75
Facing the Nuclear Threat: Thyroid Blocking Revisited M. Luster, University Hospital, Marburg, Germany Chr. Reiners, R. Schneider, H. Hänscheid WHO Radiation Emergency Preparedness Assistance Network, German Collaboration Center, University Hospital, Wuerzburg, Germany

Facing the Nuclear Threat: Thyroid Blocking Revisited

  • Upload
    dillian

  • View
    31

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Facing the Nuclear Threat: Thyroid Blocking Revisited M. Luster, University Hospital, Marburg, Germany  Chr. Reiners, R. Schneider, H. Hänscheid WHO Radiation Emergency Preparedness Assistance Network, German Collaboration Center, University Hospital, Wuerzburg, Germany . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Facing the Nuclear Threat: Thyroid Blocking Revisited

M. Luster, University Hospital, Marburg, Germany 

Chr. Reiners, R. Schneider, H. HänscheidWHO Radiation Emergency Preparedness Assistance Network,

German Collaboration Center, University Hospital, Wuerzburg, Germany 

Page 2: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited
Page 3: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited
Page 4: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Daily Release of I-131, Te-132 and Cs-137 During 10 Days after the Chernobyl Reactor Accident

Graphite-Fire

I-131:T1/2 8,1d

Te-132:T1/2 2,8m

Cs-137:T1/2 30a

Page 5: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Distribution of Radioactivity Europe April/May 1986

Page 6: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

2011

25 Years After Chernobyl: Thyroid Doses in Infants

Page 7: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Thyroid Cancer in Young Girls and Females from Belarus after the Chernobyl Accident

2011

Page 8: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

'Funny' Japanese Nuclear Boy Explains Disaster

Page 9: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Dose Limits

goal dose• protection of goods 15 mSv / mission• protection of human life• avoidance of serious damage• urgent measurements

100 mSv / mission

• safe lives 250 mSv / mission and life time exposure

REAC/TS 2005

Page 10: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

External Exposition

Penetrating irradiation

1 Gy

30 Gy

5 Gy

10 Gy

Subclinical

Hematological

Cerebro-vascular

Gastrointestinal

Mucocutaneous

Page 11: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

How to react?

Page 12: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Intake ofiodine tabletsas protective measure in the event ofa severe accident in a nuclear powerplant– information leaflet

Page 13: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Age dependent Dosage

Page 14: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Suggestions for Intake

Page 15: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Bavarian Diet

Japanese Diet

Other Options?

Page 16: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Akashi M 2011

Page 17: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Iodine Kinetics of the Thyroid Follicular Epithelium

IodineBlocking

Page 18: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

The Sodium(Natrium)-Iodide-Symporter (NIS)

I

Page 19: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Radioiodine Uptake

I

I

I

Page 20: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Potassium-Iodide(KI)-Blockade (appr. 100 mg)

KII

I

I

KI

KI

KI

KI

KI

KI

KI

Page 21: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Effectivity of KI-Blockade and Time of Exposure

Ilyin 1974, modified by Verger Thyroid 2001

Page 22: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Effectivity of Iodine Blockade and Use of Powdered Milk in Poland after Chernobyl 1986

Naumann und Wolff Am J Med 1993

Page 23: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

1. Do we Have to Consider a Substantial Thyroid Cancer Risk in Adults after Exposure to Radioiodine?

Answers may be derived from:

- Modelling of age dependent thyroid doses

- Observed thyroid cancer cases after Hiroshima and Nagasaki

- Age dependent thyroid cancer risk in Russia after Chernobyl

Page 24: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Modelling: Age and Thyroid Doses after Inhalation or Ingestion

Zanzonico PB Health Phys. 2000

Page 25: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Age and Dose Related Risk-Coefficients for Thyroid Cancer

Thompson et al. Rad Res 1994

Page 26: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Thyroid Doses (Gy) and Relative Cancer Risk (RR) in Children from Russia after Chernobyl

Ivanov et al. Rad Prot Dosimetry 2012

Excess Relative Risk per Gy

Girls 0 - 17 years 6.54 P < 0.001Boys 0 - 17 years 2.24 P < 0.001

Adults > 18 years -1.47 n.s.

Page 27: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

2. Does alimentary Iodine Supply influence Blockade with KI?

Answers may be derived from:

- Modelling of KI-blockade in relation to iodine supply

- Experiences with iodine goiter prophylaxis in Poland

- Experiments with KI-blockade in iodine-rich areas

Page 28: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Decrease of I-131 Uptake after Introduction of Goiter Prophylaxis with Iodized Salt in Poland

24h thyroid I-131 uptake

No Goiter Prophylaxis 45,7 + 6,6%

With KI 30 mg/kg Salt 27,3 + 10,4%

Huszno et al. J Endocrinol Invest 2003

Page 29: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Modelling Thyroid Uptake (%), Iodine Supply (250 vs. 50 ug/d) and Protective Effect of KI-Blockade with 100mg

Zanzonico & Becker Health Physics 2000

Protective Effect 40%

Protective Effect 17%

Page 30: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Protective Effect of 38 vs. 76 mg of KI in 8 Patients withGraves´Disease in Japan

Takamura et al. J Radiat Res 2004

Protective Effect 73.3% Protective Effect 79.5%

Page 31: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

3. Are There Drugs Interacting with KI-Blockade?

Enhancing KI-Blockade:- Other Iodine Containg Drugs, eg:

- Amiodarone

- X-Ray Contrast Media

- Antithyroid Drugs:- Carbimazole, Methimazole

- Propyl-/Methyl-Thiouracil

- Perchlorate

- Thyroid Hormones- Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitors

Leung et al. Curr.Opin.Endocrinol.2012McCruden et al. Acta Endocrol.1985Reiners et al. Nuklearmedizn 1985Manavola et al. JCEM 2007

Page 32: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

3. Are There Drugs Interacting with KI-Blockade?

Enhancing KI-Blockade:- Other Iodine Containg Drugs, eg:

- Amiodarone

- X-Ray Contrast Media

- Antithyroid Drugs:- Carbimazole, Methimazole

- Propyl-/Methyl-Thiouracil

- Perchlorate

- Thyroid Hormones- Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitors

Disturbing KI-Blockade:- Iodine Containg Drugs:

if administered to late (> 24h)

- Lithium

Leung et al. Curr.Opin.Endocrinol.2012McCruden et al. Acta Endocrol.1985Reiners et al. Nuklearmedizn 1985Manavola et al. JCEM 2007

Dietlein et al Nuklearmedizin 2007Bogazzi et al. JCEM 1999

Page 33: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Dietlein et al. Nuklearmedizin 2007

If KI is administered more

than 48h after incorporation

of radioiodine,

the dose to the thyroid is

Increased by appr. 50%

Effectivity of KI-Blockade and Time of Exposure

Page 34: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

4. How to Proceed in Emergencies with Repeated Releases of Radioiodine?

WHO KI-Guideline (update 1999)

Page 35: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

4. How to Proceed in Emergencies with Repeated Releases of Radioiodine?

Answers may be derived from:

- Experimental data by the Wuerzburg group 2011

- Experimental Data of LA Ilyin et al. 1974

Page 36: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

4. How to Proceed in Emergencies with Repeated Releases of Radioiodine?

Disappearance of the Protective Effect of a Single Dose of KI

> 40 years(n = 15)

< 25 years(n = 20)

Haenscheid et al. JCEM 2011

Page 37: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

4. How to Proceed in Emergencies with Repeated Releases of Radioiodine?

Different daily doses of KI and protective effect

Ilyin et al. Atomizdat Moscow 1972

Page 38: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

4. How to Proceed in Emergencies with Repeated Releases of Radioiodine?

- Strictly follow general recommendations:

> sheltering, evacuation, ban of contaminated

milk or food

- If recommended by the authorities, repeat taking KI-tablets

- Strictly follow recommendations for specific check-ups later on:

> especially in newborns, young children and in case of complaints

Page 39: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

5. Which Side Effects of KI-Blocking have to be Taken into Consideration?

Answers may be derived from:

- General experiences with iodine containing drugs

- Experiences with KI-Blockade after Chernobyl in Poland

- Recent literature review by L.Spallek

- Animal experiments in chimpanzees

Page 40: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

5. Which Side Effects of KI-Blocking have to be Taken into Consideration?

Systematic Review by Spallek et al. 2011:

- 14 articles relevant to the topic (mostly surveys, ecological and intervention studies)

- Only one study from Poland about KI-Blockade after Chernobyl directly addressing this question (Nauman & Wolff 1993)

- Overall :- No severe adverse reactions to KI in the general public- Evidence however is weak

Page 41: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Possible Side Effects of Potassium Iodide (KI)

Iodine Hypersensitivity

- True allergy against iodide: exanthema, edema,

sore throat, snuff, swelling of salivary glands, fever

- Dermatitis herpetiformis Duhring

- Iododerma tuberosum

- Hypokomplementemic vasculitis

- Myotonia congenita

very rare

Page 42: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Akuelles zur (iod)blockade der Schilddrüse

Possible Side Effects of Potassium Iodide (KI)

Iodine Hypersensitivity- True allergy against iodide: exanthema, edema,

sore throat, snuff, swelling of salivary glands, fever- Dermatitis herpetiformis Duhring- Iododerma tuberosum- Hypocomplementemic vasculitis- Myotonia congenita

Worsening of Preexisting Thyroid Disease- Elderly: thyrotoxicosis in patients with nodular goiter- Newborns and Infants: hypothyroidism if iodide is

administered in large doses

very rare

relativelyfrequent

Page 43: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Mazzaferri NEJM 1993

Detection of Thyroid Nodules

Prev

alen

ce (

%)

0 age (years)

Autopsy or ultrasound

Palpation

70

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Page 44: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Prevalence of Thyroid Nodules in Adults(n = 83.757)

18,8% presence of thyroid enlargement

Diffuse goiter

Nodular goiter

Nodules only

No pathological findings

23,1% presence of thyroid nodlues10,0%

8,8%

66,9%

14,3%

Page 45: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

3,5 %

57,4 %

39,1 %

39,1%48,4%

9%

3,5%

Diffuse goiter

Nodular goiter

Nodules only

No pathological findings

Prevalence of Thyroid Nodules in the Elderly

Page 46: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Toxic Nodular Goiter

Page 47: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Thyroidal Side Effects of KI-Blockade in Poland after Chernobyl in Adults

Naumann and Wolff Am J Med 1993

⬆?

Page 48: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Thyroidal Side Effects of KI-Blockade in Poland after Chernobyl in Newborns

Naumann and Wolff Am J Med 1993

Transient increases of TSH in 0,37% of newborns who received KI on day

Page 49: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

General Side Effects of Iodine Blockade in Poland after Chernobyl 1986

Naumann and Wolff Am J Med 1993

Page 50: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

5. Which Side Effects of KI-Blocking have to be Taken into Consideration?

Animal experiments in pregnant chimpanzees:

- 9 chimpanzees, week 19 – 21 of pregnancy

- KI 0.5, 1.95 or 6.5 mg/kg of BW (1.95 equals 130 mg in a pregnant woman)

- 1.95 mg/kg daily was effective and without side effects for mother and

fetus even if administered up to 10 days

Noteboom et al. Rad Res 1997

Page 51: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

5. Which Side Effects of KI-Blocking have to be Taken into Consideration?

Animal Experiments in Infant Chimpanzees:

- 8 chimpanzees, age 8 – 66 weeks (median 32 weeks)

- KI 0.5, 1.95 or 6.5 mg/kg of BW (1.95 appr. ½ of the recommended dose of 16 mg for

a newborn)

- 1.95 mg/kg was effective and without side effects the infants even if

administered up to 10 days

Noteboom et al. Rad Res 1997

Page 52: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

6. Do we Have Alternatives to KI for Thyroid Blocking?

The answer is yes, but:

- KI-Blockade always has to be considered in the context of other

protective measures, e.g. sheltering, evacuation, ban of

contaminated milk or food

- Perchlorate is a real alternative for thyroid blocking (but has

certain side effects and contraindications)

- For special indications, recombinant TSH may be given as a

decorporating agent

Page 53: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Iodine Kinetics of the Thyroid Follicular Epithelium

IodineBlocking

PerchlorateBlocking

Page 54: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

KI

Perchlorate

Own data:

Effectivity of Blockade and Time of Exposure

Page 55: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

So … Interim Conclusions

1. The risk for thyroid cancer in adults after exposure to irradiation is

close to zero

2. Alimentary iodine deficiency decreases the protective effect of KI

blockade

3. A number of drugs enhance and few decrease KI blockade

4. In case of repeated release, daily doses of appr. 100 mg KI are

advisable

5. Theoretical side effects of KI should not stand against necessary KI

blockade

6. Perchlorate is an alternative for thyroid blocking

Reiners C, Schneider R, Radiat. Protect. Dosimetry 2013 in press

Page 56: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Potassium-Perchlorate (ClO4) –Blockade (appr. 1g)

KClO4

Page 57: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

ClO4I

I

I

ClO4

ClO4

ClO4

ClO4

ClO4

ClO4

Potassium-Perchlorate (ClO4) –Blockade (appr. 1g)

ClO4

Page 58: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

58

Potassium-Perchlorate (ClO4) –Blockade (appr. 1 g)

KClO4

Page 59: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

ClO4I

I

I

ClO4

ClO4

ClO4

ClO4

ClO4

ClO4

Potassium-Perchlorate (ClO4) –Blockade (appr. 1g)

ClO4

Page 60: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Potassium-Perchlorate Study

Time of intervention

Number of volunteers

KI 100 mg - 24 7

KI 100 mg 2 7

KI 100 mg 8 7

KI 100 mg 24 7

KClO4 1 g 2 7

KClO4 1 g 8 7

KClO4 0,1 g 8 7

Hours after incorporation

Page 61: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Thyroid Dose Reduction by KI and Perchlorate

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0 5 10 15 20 25

I-123(measured)

I-131 (calculated)

Dose

Red

uctio

n %

Time of Blockade relative to Incorporation [ h p.i.]

Measured: dose reduction for I-123

100 mg KI 0,1 g KClO4 1 g KCLO4

Page 62: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Dose Reduction by KI and KClO4

0

20

40

60

80

100

Dose

Red

uctio

n %

+2h-24h

KI 100mg

+2h

KClO41 g 0,1 g

KClO41 g

Time of Medication relative to Incorporation [ h p.i.]

+8h +24h +8h

Page 63: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

KI

Own data:

Effectivity of Blockade and Time of Exposure

Page 64: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

KI

Perchlorate

Own data:

Effectivity of KI-Blockade and Time of Exposure

Page 65: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Principle of Stimulation with recombinant TSH

rhTSHstimulation

I-131

I-131

I-131

Page 66: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

020406080

100120140160180200

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time (days)

2 x i.m. 3 x i.m.

TSH

(mU

/L)

Serum TSH after 2 or 3 times 0,9 mg rhTSH i.m.

Page 67: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Whole-Body-Scan 12 d p.a.

131I-Therapy of Metastases under rhTSH

102

103

104

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

effective halflife Teff = 3 d

Whole-Body Activity

Appl. of 5200 MBq I -131

uptake 33%

Time p.a. (days)

MBq

Calculated dose to femur metastases:1000 Gy

Luster et al. JCEM 2000

Page 68: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Iodine Kinetics of the Thyroid Follicular Epithelium

rhTSHStimulation

Page 69: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

rhTSH Study

Time of intervention

Number of volunteers

KI 100 mg 8 7

KI 100 mg 24 7

rhTSH 0,9 mg 8 7

rhTSH 0,9mg 24 7

rhTSH 0,9 mg +Methimazole 8 7

rhTSH 0,9 mg +Methimazole 24 7

Hours after incorporation

Page 70: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

TSH and fT4 after rhTSH 0,9 mg i.m. in volunteers

fT4TSHmU/L pmol/L

min p.i.

Page 71: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Stable Iodine Content by X-Ray Fluorescence after rhTSH

pmol/Lmin p.i.

rhTSH 24 h after incorporation

Thyroid LT4 plasma

Time (min) after rhTSH Medication

Iodi

ne C

onte

nt b

y XF

A (m

g)

Page 72: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Stable Iodine Content by X-Ray Fluorescence after rhTSH

pmol/L

rhTSH 24 h after incorporation

Time (min) after rhTSH Medication

Iodi

ne C

onte

nt b

y XF

A (m

g)

Page 73: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Dose Reduction by KI and rhTSH

0

20

40

60

80

100Do

se R

educ

tion

%

24 h p.i.8 h p.i.24 h p.i.8 h p.i.

100 mg KI

24 h p.i.8 h p.i.

rhTSH + Methimazole0,9 mg rhTSH

*

Time of Medication relative to Incorporation [ h p.i.]

*

Page 74: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Summary

KI is effective 24 h before and up to 8 h after incorporation of radioiodine.

After 24 h, KI should not be administered because it prolongs the effective half-life of radioiodine.

Similar effects can be achieved by Potassium Perchlorate in patients with hypersensitivity against KI.

Potassium Perchlorate ist cheap and easy to administer. As an alternative i.m. injection of rhTSH together with 3 x 30 mg

of Methimazole may deplete appr. 40% of radioiodine even more than 24 h after incorporation.

However, rhTSH is expensive and not approved for this indication.

Page 75: Facing the Nuclear Threat:  Thyroid Blocking Revisited

Thank you

[email protected]