Upload
ti-kenya
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Â
Citation preview
FINAL REPORT ON FACTORS INFLUENCING ETHICAL BEHAVIOUR AMONG
THE YOUTH IN KENYA
APRIL, 2012
DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH
i
APPROVAL
I do confirm that this report, prepared by members of the research team with input from
the technical team, both teams listed in the acknowledgement section, has been edited and
corrections as well as recommendations made by collaborating partners considered and
incorporated in the report.
Report received and edited by
_______________________________________________________________________ Dr. R. Muchiri Mwangi
Dean, School of Graduate Studies & Research, KCA University
Report approved by
_____________________________________________________________________ Prof. Noah O. Midamba, PhD
Vice-Chancellor & CEO, KCA University
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... iv
LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ iv
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................... v
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. vii
CHAPTER ONE ................................................................................................................ 1
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Statement of the Problem ....................................................................................................... 3
1.3 Purpose of the Study ................................................................................................................. 3
1.4 Research Objectives .................................................................................................................. 4
1.5 Research Questions................................................................................................................... 5
1.6 Scope of the Study ...................................................................................................................... 5
1.7 Significance of the Study ......................................................................................................... 5
CHAPTER TWO .............................................................................................................. 6
LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................. 6
2.1 The Youth and Ethics ................................................................................................................ 6
2.2 Theoretical and Conceptual Framework......................................................................... 15
CHAPTER THREE ........................................................................................................ 18
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .................................................................................... 18
3.1 Research Design ....................................................................................................................... 18
iii
3.2 Study Area and Target Population .................................................................................... 19
3.3 Sampling Frame and Sample Size ...................................................................................... 20
3.4 Data Collection Instruments and Procedures .......................................................... 24
3.5 Ethical Considerations ........................................................................................................... 24
CHAPTER FOUR ........................................................................................................... 26
4.1 Background Characteristics of Youths ............................................................................. 26
4.2 Meaning and Indicators of Ethical Behaviour ............................................................... 27
4.3 Sources of Influence ................................................................................................................ 30
4.4 Causes of unethical behaviour ............................................................................................ 33
4.4 Strategies for Correcting Unethical Behaviour ............................................................. 36
4.10 Dealing with ethical Dilemmas ........................................................................................ 37
CHAPTER FIVE ............................................................................................................. 41
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................... 41
5.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 41
5.2 Perception of ethics ................................................................................................................ 41
5.3 Factors promoting ethical behaviour ............................................................................... 41
5.4 Causes of Unethical Behaviour ........................................................................................... 44
ETHICS RECOMMENDATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX ............... 46
REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 53
iv
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1: Correlates of Ethical Behaviour ................................................................................ 16
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 3.1: Sample for the study by category ............................................................................ 20
TABLE 4.1: Indicators of Ethical behaviour ............................................................................... 27
TABLE 4.2: Stakeholders’ Views of Ethical Behaviour ........................................................... 28
TABLE 4.3: Views of Youth on Indicators of Unethical Behaviour ..................................... 30
TABLE 4.4: Rating of Efforts to Promote Ethics ........................................................................ 31
TABLE 4.5: Influence of Significant others and role models on ethical conduct .......... 32
TABLE 4.6: Rating of probable causes of unrest in schools .................................................. 34
TABLE 4.7: Causes of unrest behaviour among the non-school youth ............................. 35
TABLE 4.8: Major causes of school unrest as mentioned by teachers .............................. 36
TABLE 4.9: Opinions of youth in secondary schools on selected ethical dilemmas .... 38
TABLE 4.10: Opinions of Youth out of School on Moral Issues ............................................ 40
v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The technical and research teams involved in this study would wish to thank the four
collaborating institutions for funding and providing logistical support and making it possible to
realize this project. We remember fondly and are grateful for the early breakfast planning
meetings with the various directors particularly Mr J. Ogonda of TI-Kenya, Mr. D. Gathii of
NACCSC and Prof. R. Maina of KCAU when this project initially took off.
We take this opportunity to thank Prof. Midamba, the Vice-Chancellor & CEO, KCA
University, for housing the research project and taking personal responsibility to ensure that
the teams functioned properly. Special acknowledgement for Prof. Rosemary Maina, the Senior
Deputy Vice-Chancellor Academic Affairs, KCA University, for instilling focus and calmness in
the face of challenges. We want to extend a hand of gratitude to Madam Susan Abuodha for her
encouragement and facilitation of the work, especially in the initial stages of the project. Special
mention for Muchiri Mwangi, then Director of Research & Extensions, KCA University, who
continually monitored what was happening in spite of his prolonged absences due study
commitments.
The Department of Youth Development at (MOYAS) assisted this research project in
fundamental ways that deserve mention. Not only did the department provide staff to assist in
the fieldwork, but they also supported the coding and safe storage of data. We would like to
single out Mr. Kubai, the Director of Youth Development (MOYAS), for his unwavering support
throughout the study. We thank Kenyatta University for releasing Prof. Paul Achola to lead the
research team, Kenya Industrial Research and Development Institute (KIRDI) and the Teachers
Service Commission for granting permission to Mr. Kenneth Aduda and Mrs. Julie Ogoye
respectively to be part of the research team
.Members of the Technical Team Members of the Research Team Mr. Calleb Gudo – KCA University Prof. Paul Achola Mr. Micah Nguli - NACCSC Mr. Kenneth Aduda Mr. Paul Okoth – MOYAS Mrs. Julie Oguye Mr. Mwangi Kibathi – TI-Kenya
vi
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
BOGs: Board of Governors
CBOs: Community Based organizations
CIP: Centre for Public Integrity of Mozambique
CUEA: Catholic University of Eastern Africa
IDEA: International Development Ethics Association
KACC: Kenya Ant-Corruption Commission
KICC: Kenyatta International Conference Centre
KIRDI: Kenya Industrial Research and Development Institute
KNCHR: Kenya National Commission on Human rights
MOYA: Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports
NACCSC: National Anti-Corruption Campaign Steering Committee
NAYAC: Network of African Youth Against Corruption of Zambia
NCIC: National Cohesion and Integration Commission
NGOs: Non-Governmental Organizations
PATHS: Positive Adolescent Training through Holistic Social Programs
PTAs: Parents Teachers Association
PYMN: Patriotic Youth Movement of Nigeria
TI-Kenya: Transparency International-Kenya
TSC: Teachers Service Commission
TTC: Teachers Training Colleges
TTI: Technic Training Institutes
UN: United Nations
UoN: University of Nairobi
USIU: United States International University
vii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Introduction
This study on factors associated with ethical conduct among the Kenyan youth was
commissioned as a collaborative venture between KCA University, National Anti-
Corruption Campaign Steering Committee (NACCSC), Transparency International – Kenya
(TI – Kenya) and Department of Youth Affairs in the ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports
(MOYAS). The overarching purpose of the study was to discover what youth in Kenya
regarded as ethical behaviour and inquire into the factors that influenced conformity or
lack of conformity to established ethical standards. Such a discovery was deemed
significant given the increasingly anti-social behaviour witnessed in the recent past among
the Kenyan youth. Evidence of such criminal and illegal behaviourcan be seen in recent
events like the 2008 post-election violence and re-enactment of similar acts of violence in
Kenyan secondary schools.
The study, which was designed in 2010, adopted both exploratory and descriptive
research designs. The adoption of the two research designs was necessary to triangulate
results, and deepen understanding of the meaning of ethics in the perspective of the
Kenyan youth and the factors influencing ethical/unethical behaviors among them. The
study utilized qualitative data collection methods including interviews and the focus
groups to complement survey instruments used to generate quantitative data. The
research targeted school- going youths in secondary schools, out of school youths,
secondary school teachers, parents/guardians, community leaders and leaders of religious
viii
institutions. For the purpose of this study, a youth was defined to be a person aged
between 13 to 35 years. A combination of stratified and cluster sampling was used to select
samples from the target population to ensure representation of various groups and regions.
In total, a national sample of 3,449 youths was used with 45% of sample being female and
55% male. Additionally, the study sampled of a total 792 persons consisting of religious
leaders, teachers, parents/guardians and community leaders.
Findings and Results
Data collected in this exercise was analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. The
following findings stood out;
1. Majority of the youths (79%) in secondary schools considered ethical conduct to be
acceptable behaviour and morals. Their out of secondary school counterparts viewed
ethical conduct as virtuous acts such as honesty, faithfulness and generosity, and
accountability to others, like being respectful, disciplined and responsible. Teachers too
felt ethical behaviour as socially acceptable acts, a perspective congruent to the
perceptions of the secondary school youth while the community leaders viewed ethical
behaviour as virtues.
2. Both the youths in secondary schools and non-secondary school , credited schools with
promoting ethical conduct. Religious institutions were rated highly in moulding ethical
behaviour among the youths, although to a lesser extent than schools. Surprisingly, the
family as an institution received lower ranking, which is a troublesome observation,
with implication that families may not be doing enough to inculcate apposite
behaviours of their youths.
ix
3. Parents, especially mothers, were found to be most influential role models in
determining the ethical conduct of the youths. This is an interesting observation given
that the same people had rated the institution of the family as less influential to their
conduct. This paradoxical finding implies that the youths view the family unit as
different from the individuals who compose it. Within the family unit, there are other
members like siblings, and other sources of influence, for example the television, that
are worth noting. Though parents may be working hard to mould good behaviour, these
forces could blunt those efforts. Other significant sources of moulding ethical behaviour
included teachers and religious leaders, though their influence was not as that of
significant as the parents. .
4. For the non-secondary school youth, entertainment, religious activities and peer groups
were found to positively influence their ethical behaviour. In contrast, counselling
sessions by community elders and the recent government initiatives targeting school
youths were rated poorly. The poor rating could probably be ascribed to the sporadic
nature of counselling sessions, lack of proper programmatic approach in its
organization and recent controversies surrounding some of the government’s
initiatives targeting the youth.
5. Among the youths in secondary schools, our findings indicated that peer pressure,
dissatisfaction with the food served by the schools and lack of students’ involvement in
school governance structures fuelled unethical behaviours. Among the most prevalent
unethical acts mentioned by students were stealing, disregard for school rules, cheating
x
in examinations and substance abuse. It is worth noting that majority of the secondary
school going youths (55%) viewed cheating in exams as a necessary evil.
6. For the non-secondary school going youths, data revealed possible causes of deviant
behaviour to include limited involvement in community leadership and governance,
tensions between and among communities, incitement by politicians, poverty and lack
of employment.
7. The community was perceived by the youth to play very little role on passing ethical
values and behaviours to youth with the singular exception of North Eastern Province.
In North Eastern, elders play a central role in the running of the communal affairs and
are often called upon by the government to mediate conflicts among various clans and
community. This phenomenon, though present in other regions, is not as pronounced as
it is in North Eastern, which could explain why the community is viewed to be
influential in imparting ethical values in that region. Generally, in other regions, the
community viewed youths as largely unethical and on the other hand, the youths rated
the community, specifically people in positions of influence, as less informed on what
constitutes ethical behaviour. This tension, which is indicative of the social gap between
the two groups, means the youth hardly consider community opinion leaders as role
models of ethical conduct. Using these community groups to mould the youths’ ethical
behaviour may be problematic as evidenced in poor rating of community counselling
initiatives.
xi
Conclusions
The study discovered that majority of the school- going youth considered ethical conduct to
be socially acceptable behaviour. This is expected given that the school environment
demands conformity to the school rules and regulations, which generally treated as basis of
judging what is acceptable and what is not acceptable. However, there may be a negative
side to the discussion, acceptability means that for behaviour to be ethical, there must be
consensus within a certain reference group such as peers, family or school that such an act
is acceptable. The perceptions of conformity offer limited assurance that such behaviour is
ethical. The strong influence of peer pressure among the school going youth attest to this.
Although certain behaviours are considered socially acceptable within a given reference
group, it is possible that such behaviours are ethically corrupt relative to wider society. For
example, within the peer groups, acts such as disobeying school authorities are viewed
heroic by the students. This then could explain why some unethical acts such as school
strikes and destroying property were common occurrences in school unrests. The view of
ethical behaviour being what is acceptable is therefore problematic. We can speculate here
that when democratic values and freedom of expression are emphasized rather than
conformity, negative peer pressure can be blunted as students have better avenues to
express themselves than sharing with their peers who might offer bad advice.
Notably, corruption was not perceived to be an indicator of unethical behaviour
among youth by parents/guardians, teachers, religious and community leaders. This was
not unexpected given the lack of emphasis on the demand side of corruption. Indeed,
evidence from secondary school going youth appeared to contradict the views of
xii
community representative, as noted in the findings, majority of the school going youth
thought cheating in exams is a necessary evil. Corruption is normally viewed as a vice
perpetrated by institutions, which means the community representative may have
difficulties associating the youth, who are not regarded to be an institution, with
corruption. This, thus, may offer explanation to the contradictory view of the community
representatives and those of the secondary school going youths. However, the utilitarian
view of cheating should raise a red flag. It may be necessary to put in place interventions to
discourage condoning such repugnant acts.
The study further observed that the youth, whether in school or not, were least involved in
running the affairs of the schools and communities. This tends to delineated the youth,
majority of whom are at a stage where they are searching for a social identity. It is
imperative, therefore, that school leadership promotes virtues of democracy and
inclusiveness within schools. A leadership posture that encourages freedom of expression
is bound to neutralize the pressure from the peers since students have legal avenues to air
their grievances rather than seeking advice elsewhere. For the out- of-school youth,
involving them in governance systems and institutions is critical. Through this
involvement, the youths can be mentored to be accountable for their conduct and
behaviour. Further, enforcement of the law to prevent incitement and creation of job
opportunities are important in blunting motivations for unethical behaviour.
1
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
In 2008, Kenya went through a harrowing experience brought about by the post-election
violence. Acts of criminality, mostly perpetrated by the youth, characterised this moment of
gloom and darkness exposing glaring weaknesses in our national values as well as a decay
of the nation’s moral fabric. Further evidence of this distressing moral condition was to
manifest in Kenyan secondary schools where, similarly, acts of violence were re-enacted by
the students. Why would the youth, the symbol of our national strength, behave so
unethically?
Ethics is an elusive concept to define. To some, ethics is about religious beliefs, for
others, it is obeying the law while to others, ethics consists of socially acceptable
behaviours, yet for some it is about personal feelings about what is right or wrong
(Velasquez et al, 1987). Ethics generally refers to standard prescriptions based on moral
principles that guide and govern human behaviour (Meyer, 1987). Ethical behaviour can
thus be defined as conduct that conforms to generally acceptable ethical standards such as
respect for human rights, benefits to society, fairness or specific virtues, and conformity to
moral beliefs and social norms.
Youth is viewed to be a specific stage between childhood and adulthood, when
people have to negotiate a complex interplay of both personal and socio-economic
challenges in order to manoeuvre the ‘transition’ from dependence to independence, take
2
effective control of their own lives and assume social responsibilities. Today’s young
generation experiences widening social gaps and faces manifold challenges: More often
than not, the youth encounter the uncertainties and risks generated by the process of
economic and cultural globalization. For instance, job opportunities are skewed and the
youth have to study longer to compete for limited vacancies hence stretching the
dependence period on parents. Some of the challenges that affect the youth include drug
abuse, HIV and AIDS, unwanted pregnancies, violence and unemployment, among others.
To grow up as useful members of the society, the youth ought to be socializedand
acculturated into ethical standards and modes of behaviour valued by their communities.
The older generation are expected to mentor the youth and socialize them into socially
acceptable modes of behaviour. Such ethical behaviour obligates them to refrain from
devious acts like stealing, violence, murder, fraud, rape, among others and to embrace
virtues of honesty, compassion, loyalty and respect for human rights. However, widening
social gaps between generations and changing lifestyles have impeded the realization of
this mentorship. Consequently, the youth have become a vulnerable lot facing difficult
challenges of social identity coupled with life uncertainties. This study, out of concern of
the increasingly anti-social behaviour among the youth, sought to uncover various factors
that shape ethical/unethical behaviour among the Kenyan youth. The overarching purpose
was to gain understanding of what the youth regarded as ethical behaviour and the factors
influential to the emergence of such ethical or unethical behaviours.
3
1.2 Statement of the Problem
There is evidence of increasing antisocial behaviour among the youth, a rather disconnect
between personal ethics and everyday behaviour. Even among the most academically
talented students in Kenya, personal interest seems to triumph over the common good. It is
argued that this culture of placing more premiums on personal interests rather than the
collective good is an outcome of Kenya’s experience and accommodation of the capitalist
mode of production that was ushered into the country through British colonization. In this
connection, youth may be simply imitating the behaviour of adults in Kenya.
It is the argument of this study that the ethical conduct of youth in Kenya merits
special attention both because this is the largest segment of the national population and the
most critical guarantee of the nation’s stability and continuity. The youth hold very distinct
positions on various moral issues, and concern must of necessity focus on those processes
that promote ethical values and conduct among the youth and, by implication, those that
may undermine the evolution of such ethical conduct.
1.3 Purpose of the Study
This nation-wide study was meant to augment the thrust of a Pilot Study undertaken in
2009 by KCA University and to correct its weaknesses. In this way, any policy formulations
and programmatic actions that may need to be undertaken on the promotion of ethical
values and conduct among youth in Kenya should be based on more sound and hopefully
representative research results. This study investigated the role various factors play in
shaping the ethical conduct of youth in Kenya. Some of these factors, as unearthed in the
4
pilot study, include the family, the school environment, religion, Guidance and Counselling
programmes in school and peer groups. These factors and others were evaluated in this
study. Efforts focused on strategies that can promote and enhance ethical conduct among
the youth in Kenya.
1.4 Research Objectives
In view of the purpose outlined in the preceding section, the following objectives guided
the study:
1. Find out what youth in Kenya regard as ethical/unethicalbehaviour
2. Explore some of the key influences on ethical conduct among youth in Kenya.
3. Identify structural and contextual factors that mediate the influences that shape
ethical perceptions and conduct of youth in Kenya.
4. Identify ways in which youth exhibit ethical/unethical behaviour conduct in their
social interactions.
5. Propose policy guidelines and programmatic strategies for inculcating and
improving ethical values and behaviour among the youth in Kenya
5
1.5 Research Questions
In view of the outlined research objectives, the study sought to answer the following
questions:
1. What do the youth perceive to constitute ethical/unethical behaviour?
2. What are the factors that influence the youth to engage in ethical/unethical
behaviour?
3. What environmental and structural factors mediate or moderate these factors’
influence on the ethical/unethical behaviour among youth in Kenya?
1.6 Scope of the Study
This study was national in scope, thus, samples drawn were representative of the country’s
regions and various subgroups in the study sample.
1.7 Significance of the Study
It is hoped that the results of this study should clarify what youth in Kenya consider to be
ethical/unethical behaviour. In addition, the youth are expected to specify factors that
promote the development of ethical behaviour and those that undermine it. In this way, the
study results should assist drawing guidelines for policies and programs designed to
enhance the development of morals and virtues among the Kenyan youths. In other words,
the study should contribute to the development of a curriculum to be anchored in various
media including school subjects, to promote, reinforce and sustain ethical values and
behaviour among youth in Kenya.
6
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 The Youth and Ethics
The youth (age 13- 35 years) constitute 38% of the Kenyan population as per the 2009
national census and are considered the greatest asset any nation can have. They are
potentially and actively the greatest investment for a country’s development. The extent of
their vitality, responsible conduct and roles in society is positively correlated with the
development of the nation. Youth is all about confidence, energy, enthusiasm, idealism and
high inspirations. The youth need strength of character, determination, sacrifice; value
systems to enable them form the critical mass that can deal with corruption eradication,
poverty, and diseases.
Besides, Youth is viewed to be a very specific stage between childhood and
adulthood, when people have to negotiate a complex interplay of both personal and socio-
economic changes in order to manoeuvre the ‘transition’ from dependence to
independence, take effective control of their own lives and assume social responsibilities.
Young people continually enter the world with new perspective. They adapt quickly to
change and are early adapters of social, cultural and technological innovations. While
young people present challenges to some, they pose new wisdom and hold new solutions to
our increasingly complex global problems. Hence involving them in the promotion of ethics
and creation of awareness on corruption is cost effective and achievable.
7
The youth are a vulnerable group with peculiar unmet needs and aspirations. They
face many challenges such as limited access to sports and recreational facilities, moral
decadence in society, lack of appropriate role models, political manipulations,
unemployment and underemployment, having to study longer and longer to compete for
limited vacancies, breakdown of family values, and health and social welfare problems. In
addition, there is a growing recognition that families and religious institutions need help.
Competing with them for moral authority are peers and the mass media, which all too often
lead young people in troubling directions. Schools have become necessary partners with
parents in the race for a balancing influence. A majority of these challenges could be
resolved if the actual issues constituting unethical behaviour among the youth were
identified and addressed.
“No one is born a good citizen; no nation is born a democracy. Rather, both are
processes that continue to evolve over a lifetime. Young people must be
included from birth. A society that cuts itself off from its youth severs its
lifetime; it is condemned to bleed to death” (Kofi Annan, Secretary- General of
the United Nations, World Conference of Ministers Responsible for the Youth,
Lisbon, 1998).
This inspires the concern to ascertain the ethical challenges facing the youth with a view of
addressing the real issues rather than working on assumptions.
Shweder (1981) argues that introducing ethics or morality to children should come
rather early in life. He adds that children argue with siblings and playmates about what is
fair or unfair, and that the praise and or blame they receive from parents, teachers and
8
others encourages them to believe that they are capable of some degree of responsible
behaviour. He further states that children are both recipients and dispensers of
resentment, indignation and morally reactive attitudes. At school, educators help students
to value their own identity, learn more about their cultural heritage, and practice social and
civic responsibilities. They help students to reflect on their own learning and connect it to
their life experience. They engage students in activities that encourage diverse approaches
and solutions to issues, while providing a range of ways for students to demonstrate their
abilities and learning. They foster the development of students who can analyse,
synthesize, evaluate and communicate information effectively. This compliments the
suggestion that ethical behaviour can be integrated in the formal learning set up for the
overall wellbeing of the youth
The traditional African society education system was all-inclusive and for the
common good, relevant to everyday living, availed to all leaving no room for vices to
develop. Education was for life and laid emphasis on virtues such as integrity, honesty,
respect, responsibility, truthfulness, humility, tolerance, love, patriotism, cooperation and
hard work. Knowledge and skills were imparted through personal example, mentoring,
storytelling and other forms. Traditional education was meant to foster a noble-minded
probity of a generation with the objective of producing a purposeful well focused youth,
who internalize the virtues of the positive aspects of societal values. The learning sessions
were informal, for instance girls were taught in their grandmother’s huts when they went
to sleep. A source of property for anyone was known, and one had to respect older persons
regardless of whether they were related or not. The level of ethical conduct was high and
9
vices such stealing, dishonesty, immorality, disrespect, laziness, abortion, drug abuse,
rebellion in society and particularly among the youth were rare.
The global perspective of traditional approach of education was that teachers were
to teach virtues through example and direct communication of convictions, by giving
students an opportunity to practice these virtues, and by rewarding their expression. This
approach provided no guiding principle for defining what virtues are worthy of espousal,
and wrongly assumed a community consensus on what were considered "positive values".
In fact, teachers often ended up arbitrarily imposing certain values depending upon their
societal, cultural, and personal beliefs. In order to address this issue of ethical relativity,
some have adopted the values-clarification approach to moral education. This teaching
practice is based on the assumption that there are no single, correct answer to an ethical
dilemma, but that there is value in holding clear views and acting accordingly. In addition,
there is a value of toleration of divergent views. It follows, then, that the teacher's role is
one of discussion moderator, with the goal of teaching merely that, people hold different
values without attempting to present his/her views as the "right" views.
On the other hand, Piaget (1932/65) argues that all development emerges from
action; that is to say, individuals construct and reconstruct their knowledge of the world
because of interactions with the environment. Based on a research he conducted to prove
the theory he concluded that schools should emphasize cooperative decision-making and
problem solving, nurturing moral development by requiring students to work out common
rules based on fairness. This is a direct rejection of sociologists Emile Durkheim's view of
proper moral education (1925/1961). Durkheim, similar to Piaget, believed that morality
10
resulted from social interaction or immersion in a group. However, Durkheim believed
moral development was a natural result of attachment to the group, an attachment that
manifested itself in a respect for the symbols, rules, and authority of that group. Piaget
rejected this belief that children simply learn and internalize the norms for a group. He
believed individuals define morality individually through their struggles to arrive at fair
solutions. Given this view, Piaget suggested that a classroom teacher performed a difficult
task of providing students with opportunities for personal discovery through problem
solving, rather than indoctrinating students with norms.
The current system of education in Kenya emphasizes academic excellence at the
expense of developing a holistic person. According to Waynne and Walberg (1985), good
character ought to be the more primary focus as it is a goal in reach of more children than
is high academic achievement and can result in less alienation from school. Eztzioni (1984)
and Ginsburg and Hanson (1986) state that students who were self-disciplined or more
religious, hardworking, or valued learning, scored higher on achievement tests. These
arguments echo a blend of some of the values of the traditional education and
contemporary education. In Michael J. Meyers comment (1987), ethics could also be taken
to refer to the continuous effort of studying our morals beliefs and conduct and striving to
ensure that the institutions we shape and us live up to the standards that are reasonable
and solidly based.
The National Youth Convention III held at KICC in Nairobi in 2007, focused on
ethical and transformative leadership. The convention argued that Kenya needs a
leadership that is ethical, accountable, visionary and transformative at all levels with sound
11
principles, standards and values. These are vital ingredients in a developing nation though
they are hollow if the youth are not fully equipped with these values in preparation for the
dream they aspire to have. It would be wise to take stock of the ethical challenges facing the
youth and addressing them for before the dream is internalized and achieved.
Ireland National Youth Advisory Committee (2001) designed a youth programme
aimed at aiding and enhancing personal and social development of the youth in high
schools (an equivalent of Kenya’s secondary schools) through voluntary participation that
is complimentary to their formal, academic or vocational education and training. The youth
who signed up were obligated to carry out their work to the highest possible standards and
to be accountable for their actions. This in effect translated to youths who upheld ethical
behaviour. In Kenya, a majority of the youth loath voluntary work hence miss such valuable
opportunities. This is probably motivated by societal perverted virtues where people are
materialistic or it could be due to their upbringing where patriotism and selflessness is not
given adequate considerations in Kenya leave alone disseminating the same to the youth.
Zambia runs anti-corruption clubs in secondary schools with the aim of educating
young people who aspire to join public office, so that they can play a positive role in
Zambian development process, and help future governors to develop practical skills and an
attitude that resists corruption.
“The battle against corruption cannot be fought and won by the Anti-Corruption
Commission alone or by continuing to deal with the older leadership that we say is
corrupt. It also needs the new ideas from those who will run economies and the state in
the years to come, it needs the fresh blood of the youth who possess both the capability
12
and will to shape a prescribed path for their own future”. (Andrew Ntewewe, National
Coordinator of NAYAC-Zambia)
This promotes creation of awareness on ethical conduct and prepares a morally
upright crop of leaders. AnComm communication solutions in the United States of America
undertook a survey on key problems that affect the American youth in high schools in June
2007 and realized that stress, bullying and depression were rated the top three most
frequent problems. Others included family problems, peer pressure, drugs, cheating at
schoolwork and suicide. To some extent, this survey is reflective of the Kenyan youth in
secondary schools, as exhibited through school unrests and destruction of property in
2008. Drug abuse is an emerging issue that is accorded much attention in schools while
examination malpractices have been a problem especially in the last three years as per
media reports. The remedy is to establish the actual cause of these problems among the
Kenyan youth with a view of inculcating ethical conduct in them.
According to the survey carried out by the National Vision and the Institute of
Economic Affairs in Kenya in March 2003, the youth in secondary schools identified
creating of ethical society as the second most pressing challenge. The report indicates that
the proportion of youth envisaging ethical society was small compared to those who
recognized lack of ethics and corruption as a challenge in Kenya (25%). This is an
indication that these youth are conscious of what ethics constitute but might either be
having identity crisis because most leaders’ actions are inconsistent with their words. They
speak of values they have great deficiency in implementing.
13
In 2006, children and youth petitioned Uganda’s Parliament Speaker on their
concerns about the effect of corruption on the realization and enjoyment of children’s
rights in Uganda. Besides highlighting issues affecting them like lack of quality health care
to enable them grow and attain their full potential, they also advocated for the integration
of ethics and integrity in their curricula with a view of developing a young, anticorruption
cadre of youth. Colombia established an inter university programme on ethics whose aim is
to contribute to the ethical formation of university students as future leaders of public and
private organizations so that they can act in the interest of the public good and fight
corruption in future.
In 2007, Youth Forum on Governance and Leadership Kenya held a conference with
a highlight quote was:
“The success of an effective intervention against a social evil is greatly
determined by its trans-generational perpetuity. For the gains that have been
made against corruption to succeed, the old must pass on the baton of good
governance to the young”
The forum aimed at stimulating dialogue on governance issues among youth by
emphasizing the role they can play in demanding accountability from their government.
The Network of African Youth Against Corruption – Zambia (NAYAC – Zambia) runs
anticorruption awareness clubs in schools, closely cooperating with teachers associations.
The Youth for Good Governance project targets Zambian High School and college students.
In 2008, thousands of Croatian youth organized rallies in the cities of Zagreb, Rijeka
to protest against the arrest of a young man who created a Face book group speaking
14
against the Prime Minister. This not only highlights the power of technology and the social
media sites but also the growing unrest among the Croatian youth about the high level of
corruption. In Hong Kong, a project entitled P.A.T.H.S (Positive Adolescent Training
through Holistic Social programmes) has been established to promote holistic development
among the youth while a group of youth calling itself Patriotic Youth Movement of Nigeria
(PYMN) advocate for good governance. It is possible to restore the youths’ “mandate” as
the conscience of society as they heed the call: African Youth: Do not agonize! Organize for
change, Organize, organize and organize
A nation can only afford to neglect the growth and development of its youth at its
own peril. Youth constitute the most vital resources for national development. If correctly
guided, adequately mobilized and fully integrated into the fabric of society they bring to
national development a great reservoir of energy, resourcefulness, creativity, and
dynamics. However, if ignored, they can be a threat to national stability.
The fight for integrity, honesty, transparency, accountability and effective
communication has to start early among the youth so that it becomes a way of life. The
youth’s creativity, energy and enthusiasm should be harnessed to build an equitable,
sustainable and peaceful world under the umbrella of good governance.
“The work of character education in schools and homes always starts with
adults. When we talk about the moral decline of our youth, we are often just
observing our own reflection in the children who learned what we modelled. As
teachers and parents, we must demonstrate not only the right behaviour but
also the kind of thoughtfulness that makes moral education more than human
15
version of obedience school. At its best, character education cultivates an
appreciation for the power of story, reflection and the essential tools of habit
and reason in dealing with the complexities of daily life” Steve Johnson
Character Education (2005)
The idea would be perceived as vaccination of the youth against unethical behaviour and in
effect improve their immunity against bad influences from the adult world and prevent
them from growing up with the bud of corruption.
National governments fail when their citizens no longer respond to them. Engaging
people, as citizens, is a challenge all over the world. Young people are especially significant
because they constantly enter society with fresh energy and fresh perspectives. To focus
on youth is to focus on participation. To focus on participation is to transform the systems
by which citizens are formed and the ways in which they respond to their national
governments and to the rest of the world. It is worth noting that competing with parents
for moral authority with families and religious institutions are peers and the mass media,
which all too often lead young people in troubling directions. Schools have become
necessary partners with parents in the race for balancing influence.
2.2 Theoretical and Conceptual Framework
Ethical behaviour and morality are grounded in beliefs and values embedded in one's
culture defined by their respective community or and society. Each society draws a
boundary line between ethical and unethical behaviour. Unethical behaviour can take
different dimensions ranging from lying, cheating, stealing, sabotage, drug and substance
abuse, corruption, hiding or destruction of official documents and destruction of property
16
among others. Researchers in the area of ethics have argued that ethics can be taught and
thus everyone has an opportunity to embrace the set ethical behaviour in their
communities (Piper et. al., 1993). They however, recognize the fact that ethical behaviour
involves attitudes, values, thoughts, feelings, and actions, which are rooted in a sense of self
in relationship to others. According to Noddings (1984), if one feels related, connected,
responsive, responsible, and caring of significant others, s/he is likely to act in an ethical
manner. If "the other" is part of one's community, it is more difficult to inflict harm.
Figure 1 captures conceptualized correlates of ethical or unethical behaviour. In the
figure, structural variables and the cultural environment can be termed as modifiers to the
individual characteristics resulting in ethical or unethical conduct. Individual
characteristics include personal values, ego strength and locus of control. Personal values
are defined as the individual’s beliefs about right and wrong. Individual character is also
shaped by ego strengths that simply mean one’s convictions.
FIGURE 1: Correlates of Ethical Behaviour
In addition, locus of control plays an important role in moulding individual character. Locus
of control refers to an individual’s belief about the degree of control over one’s life.
Individual
Characteristics
• Personal Values • Ego Strength • Locus of Control
Structural
Variables
• Formalization (Leader Behaviour)
• Rewards • Appraisal System
Environmental
Culture
• Content • Strength
Ethical/
Unethical
Behaviour
X
17
Structural variables such as leader behaviour, rewards, appraisal system and external
pressures shape the individual characteristics. As Figure 1 illustrates, the interplay
between individual characteristics is further moulded by environmental culture that
determine the content and strength. Ultimately, the product of the interrelationship
between individual characteristics, structural variables, and environmental culture is
ethical or unethical behaviour. Based on these principles, we will try to interpret the results
of the survey.
18
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY This section describes the structure and methodology that was used in conducting this
study. Major components described are research design, study area, target population,
sample and sampling procedures, sampling techniques, data collection techniques, data
collection procedures, data management and analysis.
3.1 Research Design
This study adopted both an exploratory and descriptive survey research designs. Such an
approach was deemed necessary to triangulate results and deepen understanding of the
meaning of ethics in the perspective of the Kenyan youth and the factors influencing
ethical/ unethical behaviours among them. The study utilized qualitative data collection
methods including interviews and the focus groups to complement survey instruments
used to generate quantitative data. Emphasis was placed on interview survey design for
obtaining comprehensive information from the respondents. Questionnaire survey was
used to explore a wide range of issues regarding ethics among Kenyan youth. In addition,
focus group discussions and plenary sessions were used to generate additional qualitative
data.
It should be stressed that the two components of survey design, rely on self-
reported information, and while very useful in the study of opinions, perceptions and
attitudes, they risk some inaccuracies inherent in recall of information. The interview
survey is particularly suited to minimize inaccuracies that may arise from recall because it
allows the interviewer to probe respondents for clarity and accuracy of information given.
19
3.2 Study Area and Target Population
The Study was undertaken countrywide targeting youth and other stakeholders within
sampled secondary schools, tertiary institutions, micro and small enterprises, youth
groups, formal employment organizations and commercial centres.
Samples for youth in schools were obtained from secondary schools. Samples for
out-of-school youth were obtained from tertiary institutions namely; teachers’ training
colleges, institutes of technology, technical training institutes, national polytechnics, and
universities. In addition, some of the youth out of school were sampled from formal and
informal employment sectors. Stakeholders in youth development comprised the teachers
in secondary schools, parents and guardians, religious leaders, other community leaders
and employers.
The UN defines of a youth to include any person aged 15 to 35 years. However, for
the purposes of this study, the minimum age was lowered to 13 years in order to
incorporate the younger secondary school cohort. Therefore, the main target population
was the youth aged between 13 and 35 years. In essence, the population groups in this
study were drawn from the following:
(i) Secondary school students aged between 13-20 years
(ii) Out of School Youth aged 15-35 years
(iii) Secondary School Teachers (some within and others older than the youth age
bracket)
(iv) Parents/Guardians
(v) Religious leaders
20
(vi) Community leaders, and
(vii) Prospective employers
3.3 Sampling Frame and Sample Size
The sampling frame was designed to capture data from a cross-section of the youth from
13 years to 35 years. Also included were instruments for collecting data from samples of
the key stakeholders who are instrumental in the youth development process. The key
stakeholders considered were the parents, teachers, religious leaders and community
leaders within the environs of the schools.
Considering the size of the population of the main target group, a sample size of five
(5) per cent of the schools was considered adequate for the scope of the study and
manageable within the resources availed for the project. Table 3.1 shows the distribution
of secondary schools according to provinces in Kenya during the year 2009, the number of
teachers, parents, and community leaders sampled.
TABLE 3.1: Sample for the study by category
Province No. of Schools
Category 5% of
schools No. Of
Students Teachers Parents Religious
Leaders Community
Leaders Central 740 37 370 37 30 30 20 Coast 157 12 120 12 30 30 20 Eastern 966 48 480 48 30 30 20 Nairobi 51 12 120 12 30 30 20 North Eastern 44 12 120 12 30 30 20 Nyanza 922 46 460 46 30 30 20 Rift Valley 1006 50 500 50 30 30 20 Western 562 28 280 28 30 30 20 Totals 44481 245 2450 245 240 240 160
1 According to the Economic Survey of 2009 there were 6,566 Secondary and 26,206 Primary Schools
21
3.3.1 Secondary school students
During the period of research design, there were approximately 4,363 public and 500
private secondary schools making 4,863 secondary schools in Kenya with an enrolment of
about 1.5 million students (MoE, 2009). However, according to the Economic Survey for
2009, the number of secondary schools during the same period was 6,566. The number
provided by the Ministry of Education was used in this survey.
Samples were drawn through classification of the schools on a number of criteria.
Such criteria included national, provincial, district and private secondary schools. Further
classification of the schools took into account the following:
a) Boys only boarding
b) Boys only day
c) Girls only boarding
d) Girls only Day
e) Co-educational boarding
f) Co-educational Day
g) Religious Sponsor
Schools were sampled in proportion to the number of schools in each province, thus the
more populous provinces yielded a large number of schools while their less populous
counterparts yielded fewer schools.
In cases where sampled schools were fewer than twelve (12) in a province,
purposive sampling procedure was used to obtain additional schools using the seven
criteria indicated under (a) to (g) above. In provinces with more than 12 sampled schools,
22
simple random sampling was used to decide which schools got included in the sample. The
locations of sampled schools in terms of urban and rural settings was also taken into
account. In each province a sample of at least 5% of secondary schools was taken. In each
of the sampled schools, a sample of 10 students was randomly selected from forms 1, 2, 3
and 4. This gave a total student sample of 2,450. In total, 218 secondary schools were
sampled against the target of 245 (89%), while 2,273 students in secondary schools were
interviewed against the target of 2450 (92.8%).
3.3.2 Teachers, Parents, Religious and Community Leaders
It was also decided that at least one teacher from each of the 245 schools be interviewed.
However, as already mentioned, only 218 teachers out of the targeted 245 teachers (89%)
were surveyed. Thirty (30) parents, most of them members of School Boards of Governors,
30 religious leaders, some of them representing the sponsors of schools were purposively
sampled from each province. Finally, 20 community leaders were purposively sampled
from each province, for a total of 160. This yielded a total of 640 combined sample of
parents, religious and community leaders.
These groups were important constituencies connected to moulding of character,
and perceptions of the youth, and creating the environment in which development of
ethical behaviour takes place. Indeed this is what the results of the pilot study revealed.
The total intended sample for the people responsible for formulating or implementing
policies, rules and regulations governing the conduct of students within their schools,
including teachers, thus stood at eight hundred and eighty five (885). The study finally
23
captured 792 such respondents or 89 per cent of the intended sample that is quite
adequate.
3.3.3 Out of Secondary School Youths
As pointed out earlier, these are youth aged between 15 and 35 years (as per UN
definition). Some of them are to be found in post-secondary institutions, formal and
informal employment-cum income generating pursuits; while others are not in any
meaningful income generating activities. These youths were sampled from tertiary
educational institutions, informal and formal organizations, public places where
unemployed youth tend to congregate. Members of the research team relied on the
network of the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports to access the different youth groups for
sampling purposes.
Two public universities were purposively selected namely; University of Nairobi,
and Moi University. University of Nairobi (UoN) was chosen due to the diversity of its
academic programmes and as a pioneer public university in Kenya. Moi University was
selected because of its rural location. In each of the selected universities, 1% of the total
population of students was identified for sampling. The total number of sampled students
was 528 – 374 from UoN and 154 from Moi University. In the case of private universities,
two (2) universities, United States International University (USIU) and Catholic University
of Eastern Africa (CUEA) were purposively selected. A sample of 239 students from private
universities was sampled. Additional samples of youths were obtained from Kisumu and
Eldoret National Polytechnics. The student sample from the National polytechnics was 173
students, a further 63 from the technical training institutes (TTI) and 94 from teachers’
24
training college (TTC). Students from the TTI were sampled from Kaiboi TTI and North
Garrisa TTI while the college students were sampled from Mosoriot and Shanzu Teachers
Training Colleges. The total numbers of youths sampled from tertiary institutions was
1,097.
The other category of the youth was sampled from the informal sector and the public.
Some were selected from informal self-employment sector i.e. the “jua kali” sector. These
were purposively selected because of their sizes and diversity of their trades/operations.
One cluster was selected from each of the three cities of Nairobi, Kisumu and Mombasa.
Kamukunji Jua Kali Community in Nairobi, Kibuye Jua Kali Community in Kisumu, and
Shimanzi Jua Kali Community in Mombasa were chosen. In each community, 30 youths
were selected. From public places a sample of 120 unemployed youths were sampled from
Nairobi, Kajiado, Busia and Nyandarua – that is, 30 youths from each region.
3.4 Data Collection Instruments and Procedures
Data was collected using interviews, focus group discussions and survey questionnaire.
Data collection procedure entailed getting permit from relevant government agencies to
collect data. Pre-field work activities involved training of data collection staff and pre-
testing of research instruments to assure their reliability and validity.
3.5 Ethical Considerations
Consent from all study participants was obtained before collecting data. The participant
signed informed consent form confirming their consent to participate in the study. They
were all assured of confidentiality of the information disclosed. Survey questionnaires
25
were filled anonymously and no personal details that could disclose the identity of the
participants was requested. All those reached were approached with the necessary respect
and cultural sensitivity.
26
CHAPTER FOUR
RESEARCH FINDINGS AND RESULTS
4.1 Background Characteristics of Youths
Demographic Information was gathered about the respondents’ sex, age, level of education,
and religious affiliation. A total of 2,273 youth were sampled from secondary schools and
1176 non-secondary school youth which made up a total of 3,449 youth in the national
sample. For the secondary school going youth, 50.9% were male, 47.9% female and 1.2 %
failed to indicate their gender while in the non-secondary school youths 55.1% were male,
40.2 % female and 4.7% did not indicate their gender. The ages of the secondary school
youth ranged between 13 to 30 years and those of the non-secondary school youth lay
between 15 to 35 years.
Religion is one factor that is likely to shape the various values and ethical beliefs of
its adherents. Accordingly, there was interest in this study to find out the religious
membership of the youth sampled in this study. The results of the study indicated that
almost all the youth (98.8%) were either Christians (88.2%) or Muslims (10.6%). The
regional unit used to describe the distribution of sampled youth is the Province. Although
the new Kenyan Constitution has removed this unit from the country’s administrative
arrangement, it remains a point of reference in the minds of the citizens and was the unit in
existence when the study was designed. Regional representation was proportionate to the
population in the province, thus provinces with higher population had a higher
representation and vice-versa.
27
4.2 Meaning and Indicators of Ethical Behaviour
The analysis of data indicated that a majority (78.6%) of the secondary school youth
regarded ethical conduct to be acceptable behaviour and morals. A small minority (15.1%)
associated ethical conduct with respect and discipline. On the other hand, majority (85.5%)
of the non-secondary school youths viewed ethical behaviour as virtues like being
respectful, honest, responsible, generous, disciplined and obedient. Table 4.1 illustrates
some of the responses obtained from the respondents.
TABLE 4.1: Indicators of Ethical behaviour
Secondary school Youth Non-Secondary school
youth
Indicators of Ethical Conduct Number of Mentions
Percentage (%)
Number of Mentions
Percentage (%)
Acceptable behaviour or morals
1638 78.6 - -
Honesty/faithfulness - - 770 23.6 Respectful 191 9.2 686 21.0 Responsible - - 415 12.7 Discipline 123 5.9 212 6.5 Obedience 46 2.2 412 12.6 Respect for the rule of law 42 2.0 - - Having life goals 26 1.2 - - Helpful/ Generosity 9 0.4 298 9.1
The high regard for acceptability of behaviour and morals by the secondary school
youth brings to fore the role of reference groups, like peers and family, in the development
of morals among this youth category. The school and home environment are possible
sources informing this view. In school, adherence to school regulations is paramount
coupled with extant peer pressure. Furthermore, at the family level, these youths come
28
under intense pressure to conform to certain morals and behaviours. For the secondary
school youths, judgement of what is ethical or not, is dependent on its acceptability within
the reference group, which could be the family, peers or school. It appears, however, that
when the youth are out of school, acceptability of behaviour becomes a non-entity and
definition of what is ethical is based on virtues. These results triangulated well with the
views of the teachers, parents, religious and community leaders who viewed ethical
behaviour in terms of acceptability and virtues. The responses from the teachers, parents,
religious and community leaders are shown in table 4.2 below.
TABLE 4.2: Stakeholders’ Views of Ethical Behaviour
Indicators of Ethical Conduct Number of Mentions Percentage (%) Acceptable behaviour or morals 700 55.2% Respectful 179 14.1% Responsible 126 9.9% Obedience 85 6.7% Discipline 72 5.7% Honesty 57 4.5% Respect for rule of law 21 1.7% Helpful/generous 17 1.3% Patriotism 11 0.9%
The communities judgement of the prevalence of ethical behaviours among the
youth was slightly pessimistic as majority of them (55.2%) felt the occurrence such
behaviours was rare or never occurred at all. On the other hand, majority of the youth
(71.2%) felt that the community had average or no understanding of what constituted
ethical behaviour. This could be taken to be indicative of the tension between the groups
that can be ascribed to generation gaps. Although there is a consensus between the
community groups and the youth concerning what constitutes ethical behaviour, the
29
tension implies the youth view the community to be an unreliable source for modelling
ethical behaviour and morals – a harsh indictment.
The study also sought views of the participants on the type of behaviours indicative
of unethical conduct. Table 4.3 shows the responses obtained from the two groups. A
surprise finding is the low ranking of corruption as an indicator of unethical behaviour.
Either the youth do not view acts of corruption as unethical or their exposure to vices of
corruption is limiting their knowledge to what they read in popular press. The latter
appears to be a more rational explanation and is more consistent with the higher rating of
corruption as an indicator of unethical behaviour by the non-secondary school youth. It is
probable that as the youth get exposed to the life outside school, they become more aware
and exposed to vices of corruption and therefore become more sensitive to it.
30
TABLE 4.3: Views of Youth on Indicators of Unethical Behaviour
Secondary school Youth
Non-Secondary School Youth
Type of behaviour Mentions Percent Mentions Percent Drug abuse 827 19.6 518 18.5 Sexual offences (prostitution, rape, pre-marital sex, sexual immorality)
798 19.0 452 16.1
Stealing 703 16.7 358 12.8 Disobedience 593 14.1 - - Cheating 416 9.9 - - Tribalism / nepotism 248 5.9 190 6.8 Corruption 246 5.8 329 11.7 Bullying 208 4.9 - - Laziness 142 3.4 - - Burning school 29 0.7 - - Violence - - 263 9.4 Indiscipline - - 595 21.2 Indecency (Language/dress) 102 3.6
4.3 Sources of Influence
4.3.1 The family, school, community and religion
The respondents were asked to rate the efforts by schools in promoting ethical conduct.
Majority of the secondary school going youth (84.9%) and non-secondary school youth
(64.7%) rate schools’ effort as good or very good. Indeed, only religious institutions were
rated better in the promotion of ethical conduct. Some of the means schools used to
influence ethical conduct among the students include entertainment, clubs, sports, life
skills training, academic programs, and guidance and counselling. Among these, guidance
and counselling, academic programs and life skills training, in that order, were proffered as
most influential in promoting ethical conduct.
31
In the rating of family’s efforts for promoting ethical conduct, 75.7% of the
secondary school youth and 61.1% of the non-secondary school youth rated these efforts as
good to very good. As table 4.4 indicates, the family received lower ranking in promoting
ethics than the school. This is contrary to our expectations, as we would have expected the
family, being the closest community to the youth, to be in the forefront in engaging the
youth in matters pertaining to their ethical and moral behaviour. However, it is comforting
to note religious institutions such as churches and mosques are highly regarded in terms of
their efforts to promote ethical conduct. Troubling though is the very lowly rating of the
community in promotion of ethics. In the African culture, the community is expected to
play a very active role in shaping the morals of the younger generations. This perspective
appears to be misplaced as far as the current findings are concerned, and implication is that
the community’s role in moulding ethical behaviour is blunted. It was no surprise,
therefore, that community led initiatives, such as elders’ counselling sessions, were rated to
least influential in the development of ethical behaviours.
TABLE 4.4: Rating of Efforts to Promote Ethics
Secondary School Youth Non-School going youth
Sources of Effort
Very good
Good Total
Positive Average
Not Good
Very good
Good Total
Positive Average
Not Good
School 43.3 41.6 84.9 11.5 3 26.7 38.0 64.7 26.4 6.5 Religious institutions
52.6 31.7 84.3 13.1 2.6 40.9 35.7 76.6 17.6 4.2
Community 10.3 25 35.3 44.8 20 8.2 23.8 32.0 43.7 22.5 Family 38.4 37.3 75.7 19.2 5.2 25.3 35.8 61.1 29.0 8.1
32
4.3.2 Significant others and role models
The study further sought to examine the influence of significant others (parents, peers and
siblings) and role models (teachers, religious leaders, politicians, sports and media
personalities) on ethical behaviour among the youth. According to the results in table 4.5
below, mothers, fathers, teachers and religious leaders, in that order, were rated to be most
influential in the development of ethical behaviours among the youth. Siblings and peers
were lowly rated in terms of their influence on the youth. However, in this particular
instance, the respondent were asked to rate the influence of these individuals on their
ethical conduct – a positive attribute. It is therefore possible that siblings and peers, though
lowly rated, do exert a greater influence but on the negative side.
TABLE 4.5: Influence of Significant others and role models on ethical conduct
Secondary School Youth Youth not in Secondary School
Sources of Influence
Very good
Good Total
positive Average
Not Good
Very good
Good Total
positive Average
Not Good
Mother 66.6 23.9 90.5 6.4 2 59.6 28.7 88.3 8.4 1.4 Father 52.1 30.5 82.6 11.4 3.7 42.6 34.6 77.2 17 4 Teachers 39.6 41.5 81.1 14.1 2.6 18 44.3 62.3 32.3 3.9 Religious Leaders
38.5 34.8 73.3 18.3 4.4 33.1 35.9 69.0 23.6 5.6
Musicians 16.1 31.8 47.9 30.6 15 6.8 13.9 20.7 36.9 40.4 Sport Personalities
16.5 30.4 46.9 33.1 13 16.5 32.9 49.4 35.9 12.8
Siblings 11.4 26.4 37.8 30.4 22.9 12.8 35 47.8 34.6 15.6 Peers 9.1 17.3 26.4 33.2 36.4 10.2 13.6 23.8 37.5 37.1 Politicians 6.3 12.8 19.1 29.5 42.7 3.2 7.4 10.6 25.1 62.5 Media Personalities
4 10.2 14.2 10.9 5.6 9.3 23 32.3 37.9 24.3
33
When the youth were asked to mention their role models, some very interesting
findings came out. Politicians received the highest number of mentions (42.1%) ahead of
parents (17.5%), siblings (18.2%) and religious leaders (4.0%). This may be explained in
two ways; first, many of the local political figures mentioned were persons either with
exemplary public record such as Prof. Wangari Maathai, Prof. Patrick Lumumba and Justice
Njoki Ndung’u or visible former presidential candidates such as Hon. Charity Ngilu, Hon.
Kalonzo Musyoka, H.E. President Mwai Kibaki, Rt.Hon. Raila Odinga and Hon. Uhuru
Kenyatta. Secondly, when asked about the reasons of their choice most of the respondents
mentioned hard work (32.5%), character (19.5%), education (12.9%) and religion (16.9%),
which means these are not the typical politicians portrayed by the popular media as
corrupt but prominent political personalities who enjoy limelight because of their
exemplary work.
4.4 Causes of unethical behaviour
Youths in secondary schools and those not in secondary school as well as teachers and
parents, religious and community leaders were asked to rate factors that were likely to
cause them compromise their ethical behaviour. As table 4.6 below reveals, students in
secondary schools reported poor diet to be a leading cause of unrests (50.0%) followed by
inadequate involvement in school governance (47.7%). This outcome implies that there us
great need for administrators and school leaders to adopt more inclusive leadership and
management styles, where students become part of the decision making organs. Nutritional
and dietary concerns ought to be given immediate attention in order to preclude unethical
behaviour. Other less prevalent factors include incitement by teachers, strained relations
34
with surrounding and conflicts among students. It worthwhile to observe that if an
inclusive leadership structure is put in place, the influence of all these other factors will
probably be attenuated.
TABLE 4.6: Rating of probable causes of unrest in schools
Unethical Factor Very Common
Common Total
Diet 24.1 25.9 50.0 Inadequate involvement in school governance 23.3 24.4 47.7 Conflict among students 15.4 20.2 35.7 Incitement by teachers 9.5 18.5 28.0 Strained relations with community 8.5 16.5 25.0
For the non-secondary school youths, limited involvement in the running of the
society was identified to the most prevalent cause of unethical behaviour. Strained
community relations and incitement from politicians were also notable causes of
unbecoming behaviour. The results of the responses are shown in the table 4.7. These
results highlight importance of adopting school and community leadership driven by
values of democracy and inclusion as a way of remediating unethical behaviour. Indeed,
when such values prevail, it becomes easier to implement mentorship programs as the
youth feel they are part of the system and can identify themselves as agents of change
required to transform their communities. On the other hand, when they are ignored and
left out on their own, they feel unrecognized and are more likely to engage in unethical
behaviours to attract attention.
35
TABLE 4.7: Causes of unrest behaviour among the non-school youth
Unethical Factor Very important
Important Total
Limited involvement in running society 43.6 29.5 73.1 Falling moral standards 35.0 25.5 60.5 Strained relationship between communities 24.3 32.6 56.9 Incitement from politicians 31.6 24.2 55.8 Internal family conflicts 18.2 26.5 44.7
To triangulate these results, teachers, parents, religious and community leaders
were asked to mention and rate causes of unethical behaviour among the youth. For
schools, teachers ascribed lack of communication as the main cause of unethical conduct,
other causes mentioned by teachers included external and internal interference, peer
pressure, authoritarian school rules, poor management and lack of parental guidance (see
table 4.8 below). These results appeared to concur with what the students had reported
earlier considering that communication, rules and management styles are constructs
closely linked to leadership. Parents, religious and community leaders on the other hand
rated limited involvement of the youth in running community affairs to be the predominant
cause (82.3%) of unrests in the community. Poverty was also rated to be a major cause of
unrests (78.6%) though to a lesser extent than limited involvement.
36
TABLE 4.8: Major causes of school unrest as mentioned by teachers
Rated Causes Number of Mentions Per cent Lack of communication 115 23.0 External influences/interference 74 14.8 Negative peer influence 74 14.8 Lack of discipline 110 22.0 Strict school rules 65 13.0 Poor school management 47 9.4 Lack of parental guidance 37 7.4
4.5 Strategies for Correcting Unethical Behaviour
The non-secondary school youths were asked to rate the appropriateness of a selected
number of activities in correcting unethical behaviour among them. The rating ranged from
“most appropriate” to “not appropriate at all”. Ratings of “most appropriate” and
“appropriate” were considered to be positive rating. Guidance and counselling (77.3%),
involvement of parents (70.8%), prosecution (62.4%), use of elders as enforcers of ethics
(53.3%) and barring culprits from holding public office (50.9%) were rated at least
appropriate by more than half of the respondents. The study also sought to identify
initiatives taken by the youth to promote ethical behaviour. The respondents were asked to
state such initiatives they were aware of. Involvement of the youth in communal activities
such as youth clubs, talents shows and cultural activities had the highest number of
mentions (mentioned 77.1% of the time).
This is important if it is recalled that one of the major causes of unethical behaviour
among the youth was lack of involvement in community and school leadership and
governance. These community activities targeting the youth can be instrumental avenues
of mentoring them, assisting them engage in productive economic activities and even
37
providing counselling sessions. Encouraging formation of youth groups whether for group
entrepreneurial activities or community social responsibility would be a positive. However,
as indicated above, law enforcement is important, especially the prosecution of criminal
elements. From experience, it is known that the political class has an affinity of such youth
groups, which they incite, and use for their own selfish ends making what is meant for good
to be evil. Such individuals, irrespective of their social status, ought to be made accountable
for their deeds through prosecution.
4.6 Dealing with ethical Dilemmas
On many occasions, the youth are faced with ethical dilemmas and how they deal with
them was a pertinent problem of this study. Specifically, the study investigated how the
youth deal with situations where values conflict or “stretching the truth’’ would lead to a
better end than otherwise. Given the different context both youth groups (school going and
non-school going) operated, analysis and presentation of the results was done separately.
For the secondary school youth, the results are shown in table 4.9 . The results
indicate that 54percent of the youth in school believed that exam cheating is a necessary
evil. This, therefore, means that, given a chance, more than half of the students would cheat
in examinations. It is indicative of the fact that students are more focused on the result
regardless of the moral implications of the process i.e. they believe that the end justifies the
means. This could be taken to explain why cases of exam cheating – in the national
examinations and in institutions of higher learning – remain a constant threat. The fact that
failing in the national exams condemns students to an abyss of neglect, unemployment and
helplessness, significantly amplifies the premiums attached to passing exams and,
38
therefore, providing powerful incentive for students to view exam cheating as necessary
though unethical.
TABLE 4.9: Opinions of youth in secondary schools on selected ethical dilemmas
Ethical Dilemmas Agree or strongly
agree Disagree or
strongly disagree Exam cheating is a necessary evil 54.0 46.0 The youth should always obey their parents even when they are wrong
53.7 46.3
Where family values contradict social values, the youth should remain loyal to their families
55.0 45.0
The youth should honour their parents even when the parents are wrong
51.9 48.1
Abortion, same sex relations, sex outside marriage should be considered a matter of choice
12.3 87.7
As may be noted in table 4.10, although opinion of non-secondary schooling youth tilts
slightly in favour of family values, there is division on where the loyalties should fall in case
family or parents values conflict with the societal values. However, the overwhelming
verdict is that, in matters of sexuality and abortion, personal choice is not favoured option.
The implication is that on sexual and women productivity matters, communal values take
precedent.
A similar response was sought from the more mature non-secondary school youth,
however separate opinions on sexual relations and abortion were sought as this group was
more exposed to such dilemmas than their younger counterparts in secondary schools. As
table 4.10 shows, the youths opinion is evenly divided on whether bribing police officers to
be a necessary evil. Unlike the youth in secondary school whose opinion was divided as to
39
whether or not to obey their parents even when they are wrong, majority of out-of-school
youth were less inclined to obey parents when they were wrong. This could be attributed
to the age and the transition stage in their lives from being teenagers to adulthood, and
thus becoming more independent. Moreover, where family values contradict social values
52.8 per cent of the out of school youth indicated they would choose social values. Thus as
the youths grow older they increasingly appreciate the societal values more than the family
values. The implication is that, as the youths grow older and more independent of their
parents, the values held by society or community become more influential in making
decisions when faced by ethical issues.
Like their younger contemporaries, the out-of-school youth, there was strong
disproval of having sexual relations such sex outside marriage and same sex relations, and
abortion treated a personal choices. This is a reflection of the underlying societal values
with regard to these moral issues. Most important, and rather worrying to observe, is that
whenever the ethnic values counter national values, the loyalty of the majority of the youth
remains with their ethnic groups.
40
TABLE 4.10: Opinions of Youth out of School on Moral Issues
Ethical issue Strongly agree or agree
Strongly disagree or disagree
Female circumcision is a cultural practice that should be dropped 81.5 18.3
Bribing a policeman is a necessary evil 50.9 49.1 Where family values contradict social values, the youth should remain loyal to their families 47.2 52.8
When ethnic cultural values conflict with national values, the youth should remain loyal to national values 42.6 57.4
Sex outside marriage should be considered a matter of personal choice 35.8 64.2
The youth should always obey their parents even when these parents are wrong 33.7 66.3 Abortion should be considered a matter of personal choice 29.2 70.8 Same sex relations should be considered a matter of personal choice 27.2 72.8
41
CHAPTER FIVE
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Introduction
In this section, we highlight some of the key findings that emerged from this study on
issues linked to ethics among youth in Kenya. Recommendations made for programmatic
action in this study are based on the major conclusions specified in the sections that follow.
5.2 Perception of ethics
Youth, both in secondary schools and the more mature youth outside secondary schools
generally considered ethical behaviour to be conduct that is acceptable to their immediate
environment, for example school, peers, or church. Teachers, parents, community and
religious leaders shared this view too. However, it is important to note that what is
acceptable is determined by values held by a particular reference group. Such values may
at times be in conflict with what is for the better good of the larger community. It is very
instructive that when such conflict occurs, allegiance is pledged to the immediate group.
For example, in the case of ethnic values conflicting with national values, which is frequent
occurrence, the youth are more inclined to sacrifice national values for their ethnic values.
For Kenya to be a true Nation State, such perceptions have to be countered through
education and diversity in our institutions such as schools, higher education institutions
and workplaces.
5.3 Factors promoting ethical behaviour
a) Schools and the school environment
Schools institution were credited to be important vehicles of promoting ethical conduct,
especially for the school going youths. The study revealed that life skill lessons, guidance
and counselling were identified to be the most effective school programs that inculcated
good behaviour among the school youth. Initiatives such as peer counselling should be
42
considered as plausible avenues of influencing ethical behaviour of these youths. Equipping
the youth with life skills can also be done via matriculation programs. Given the view of the
youth on what constitutes ethical behaviour, it is essential for school leaders to ensure that
they cultivate a school culture that promotes ethical conduct. New students can then be
inducted into the school culture through mentorship programs with the help of older
students, teachers and the alumni.
There were significant differences in the views of secondary school youth regarding
the role of schools and religious institutions in imparting ethical values and conduct among
them based on province of residence. The role of schools in passing on ethical conduct
among this group of youth remained very strong, but comparatively less so among students
in Nairobi and Western Provinces. Similarly, the perceived role of religious institutions
remained strong within this cohort of youth, but comparatively less so in Central, Nairobi
and Western Provinces.
Both categories of youth did not significantly differ based on age in their views
about the role of schools, religious institutions and the family institution in promoting
ethical conduct among them. In other words, the two groups of youth irrespective of age
overwhelmingly admitted that the three institutions play an important role in shaping their
ethical conduct. Similarly, teachers rated schools and religious institutions as playing a very
important role in promoting ethics among youth. However, teachers rated the family
institution relatively poor, implying that the parents have left the role of inculcating ethics
among youth to schoolteachers and religious institutions.
b) Parents and significant others
Parents, and especially mothers, were found to be exerting the strongest influence on the
ethical behaviour of the youth. This observation applied equally to youth in secondary
schools and the non-secondary school youth. Indeed, even in correcting unethical
behaviour, involvement of the parents was found to be one of the most appropriate
methods proffered by the youth. Siblings too, were found to be influential in development
of moral behaviour, especially for the non-secondary school going youth. Parents and
significant others like elder brothers and sisters ought to be aware of their influential
43
position and should be educated on how to use such positions to inculcate positive values
among the youth. For the school-going youth, parents and guardians ought to get involved
in school activities, including counselling, life skills training, and helping out in some of the
school activities.
Essentially, there were no significant gender differences between the two groups of
youth regarding the role of parents, significant others and public personalities modelling
ethical values and morals with the exception of sports personalities. Female students rated
sports personalities as imparting ethical values more favourably than their male
counterparts impart.
Province of residence did not modify in any significant way the important role of
mothers and religious leaders in socializing their ethical values and conduct. One slight
variation was the perceived moderate role of sports personalities in socializing ethical
values among non-secondary school youth but hardly doing much in this respect among
the secondary school youth.
c) Religious organisations and community groups
Among the non-secondary school youth, religious organisations and community groups
were identified as influential determinants of their ethical behaviour. Religious
organisations were actually singled out as the most influential institutions in moulding
ethical behaviours. Much of the influence, it was discovered, was through entertainment,
peers and religious activities. In contrast, counselling sessions through community elders’
initiatives targeting out of school youth were poorly rated. Given the elevated position of
influence religious institutions enjoyed, efforts to influence ethical behaviour can thus be
channelled through them. For instance, NGOs and government agencies involved in
advocacy and campaigns such as anti-corruption initiatives, social integration and diversity
programs, could target religious institutions to be agents of their messages. Programs and
curricula developed to promote ethical practices could integrate entertainment and
religious activities. Moreover, recruiting religious organisations to be part of these
campaigns, it appears, would be a good idea.
44
Chiefs’ barazas were identified as potential forums of inculcating ethical values and
conduct among youth in society. Among non-secondary school youth, however, it is the
more educated youth with college and university education that have stronger negative
views regarding the role of barazas in promoting ethical conduct among the youth. This is a
point of concern in view of the fact that these are the more articulate groups of youth.
Interventions are needed to turn these youth around to perceive these forums in a
favourable light.
5.4 Causes of Unethical Behaviour
The main conclusions that emanated from results in this section are as listed below:
a) Among students in secondary schools, the leading factor undermining ethical
behaviour was peer pressure; this was followed by school diet and inadequate
involvement of students in school governance. Students in Rift Valley, Western,
North Eastern, Nairobi and Eastern Provinces were very particularly concerned
about the issue of school diet. There were also high levels of dissatisfaction with
exclusion of students from the management of schools espcially in Nairobi,
North Eastern, Central, Western and Eastern Provinces.
b) Among the non-secondary school youth studied, causes of unethical behaviour
within the community included limited involvement in governance, falling moral
standards, strained relations between communities and incitement by
politicians in that order. Further examination of these issues by province
confirmed incitement by politicians and strained relations between communities
to be salient in all provinces of Kenya. Youths, the study observed, were largely
excluded from leadership roles in their communities. While this was true in all
the provinces, the situation was particularly more pronounced in North Eastern,
Nyanza, Eastern and Nairobi.
c) For non-secondary school youth, additional factors that contribute to unethical
conduct included poverty, unemployment and greed in that order. Further
analysis by province revealed that poverty was a major issue in six of the
provinces namely Eastern, North Eastern Western, Nyanza, Nairobi and Rift
45
Valley in that order. Unemployment featured prominently in Coast and Central
Provinces.
d) Analysis by gender revealed significant differences between male and female
students with respect to strained relations with the community, incitement by
some teachers and conflict among students. Female students rated these factors
as more influential causes of unethical behaviour than their male counterparts
did.
46
ETHICS RECOMMENDATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX
ITEM ISSUE RECOMMENDATIONS KEY ACTORS REQUIRED
RESOURCES TIME-
FRAME 1. Educational, religious &
family institutions have strong positive influence on youth
• Strengthen programmes that promote ethical conduct e.g. Integrity Clubs, Life Skills Lessons, Guidance and Counselling Programmes
• Reward students who exemplify high standards of ethical behaviour
• Put in place strict rules and have parents endorse the rules and sign acceptance prior to admission of students
• Organise workshops and meetings to sensitise communities on Kenya’s core ethical values and norms for stakeholders in Education
MoE, TSC, MOYAS, Parents’ Associations BOGs, PTAs Educational institutions; CBOs Religious and community leaders, NGOs
Financial, Human, Seminars and Workshops / Learning materials
Immediate, Medium and long-term
2. Parents (especially mothers), teachers and religious leaders have strong influence on the ethical conduct of the youth.
• Parents, religious leaders and teachers should enhance their nurturing and mentoring roles for children and youth
Parents, religious institutions and leaders, educational leaders and CBOs
Financial, Human, Seminars and Workshops for advocacy
Immediate, Medium and long-term
3. Appreciation of extra curricula activities, religious associations, and books in youth formation
• Encourage student involvement in extra curricula activities
• Organise religious activities for youth • Establish Youth Empowerment Centres
as proposed in Kenya Vision 2030 • Provide community/ neighbourhood
libraries
MOE, Educational leaders, MOYAS, CBOs, Community and religious leaders, Kenya National Library Services
Financial, Human, Technical, Seminars and Workshops Learning materials
Immediate, Medium and long-term
47
ITEM ISSUE RECOMMENDATIONS KEY ACTORS REQUIRED RESOURCES
TIME-FRAME
4. Patriotism was strong among youth
• Guide the youth on issues of patriotism anchored in ethical values buttressed by ethical conduct.
• Design programmes that promote patriotism
• Inculcate a sense of belonging through positive provocative but constructive debates
• Provide Civic Education
MoE, MOYAS, Community leaders Parents’ Association, Mass media, Religious leaders, Provincial Administration
Financial, Human, Seminars and Workshops Learning materials
Immediate, Medium and long-term
5. Entertainment, positive peer pressure and religious activities had positive influence on youth out of secondary schools
• Promote positive entertainment programmes such as sports competitions,
• Establish the International Sports Academy as proposed in Kenyan Vision 2030.
• Establish Regional Sports Stadia as proposed in Kenyan Vision 2030.
• Organise Talent Days, Religious Crusades/ Functions, Drama, etc.
MOYAS, Community leaders, Youth groups, Educational and Religious Institutions, Provincial Administration
Financial, Human, Technical, Seminars and Workshops Learning materials
Immediate, Medium and long-term
6. Political personalities having exemplary public record or charisma or international stature were strong role models for youth
• Organise motivational talks by preferred positive role models ( e.g. . the Tom Mboya style Lectures)
• Impose a code of ethics to govern the conduct of holders of elective offices
• Develop disseminate ethics promoting messages by preferred role models.
Community, Educational/ Religious institutions, Parliament, Civil society organisations, Provincial administration, KACC, NACCSC
Financial, Human, Technical, Seminars and Workshops Learning materials
Immediate, Medium and long-term
48
ITEM ISSUE RECOMMENDATIONS KEY ACTORS REQUIRED RESOURCES
TIME-FRAME
7. Muslim youth have stronger support for institutions and significant others such as parents, teachers and religious leaders than their Christian counterparts
• Encourage Christian youth to be more vigilant in adhering to institutional regulations
• Socialise Christian youth to more strongly respect institutions, parents and other leaders
Community, Educational/ Religious institutions, Youth groups, CBOs.
Financial, Human, Technical, Seminars and Workshops Learning materials
Immediate, Medium and long-term
8. Educational, religious & Family institutions have strong positive influence on youth
• Strengthen programmes that promote ethical conduct e.g. Integrity Clubs, Life Skills Lessons, Guidance and Counselling Programmes
• Reward students who exemplify high standards of ethical behaviour
• Put in place strict rules and have parents endorse the rules and sign acceptance prior to admission of students
• Organise workshops and meetings to sensitise communities on Kenya’s core ethical values and norms for stakeholders in Education
MoE, TSC, MOYAS, Parents’ Associations BOGs, PTAs Educational institutions; CBOs Religious and community leaders, NGOs
Financial, Human, Seminars and Workshops / Learning materials
Immediate, Medium and long-term
49
MITIGATING NEGATIVE ISSUES ITEM ISSUE RECOMMENDATIONS KEY ACTORS REQUIRED
RESOURCES TIME-FRAME
1. Weak guidance to the youth by fathers
• Make attendance of open, Education, and Parents days mandatory for parents/ guardians;
• Fathers be sensitised to importance of their mentoring role for the children.
• Organize seminars/ workshops where the youth/ parents/ religious leaders and teachers participate
MoE, Educational Institutions, Civil Society, CBOs, Religious Institutions, Community Leaders,
Financial, Human, Seminars and Workshops
Immediate, Medium and long-term
2. Weak Peer/Sibling relations for secondary school youth
• Organize team-building sessions • Counselling • Organise youth clubs involving siblings
Parents, Community, Educational and Religious Institutions, MoE
Financial, Human Immediate, Medium and long-term
3. Marginal influence of Print and electronic media on ethical conduct of the youth
• Encourage Print and Electronic media to design relevant programmes, messages and publications that promote ethical behaviour.
• Print and electronic media to diversify the content of their coverage to discourage focus on negative ethnicity.
• Media to be sensitised/advised to review and present youth friendly and ethical programmes
Media Council of Kenya, , Kenya Film Censorship Board, Parents, Religious Leaders, Educational Institutions, Media Owners Association Editors’ Guild, Kenya Union of Journalists, Communication Commission of Kenya.
Financial, Human & Technical Seminars and Workshops Learning materials Media time/space
Medium and long-term
50
ITEM ISSUE RECOMMENDATIONS KEY ACTORS REQUIRED RESOURCES
TIME-FRAME
4. Negative perceptions of politicians, media personalities and artistes
• Identify politicians/media personalities & artistes that are positive role models and organize for them to give periodic motivational talk to the youth in various forums e.g. at Drama festivals, cultural events, open school days, etc.
• Sensitize the youth, parents and teachers on the value of developing talents among the youth
• Promote talent development programmes in schools and in the community
MoE, HTRs Class teachers, Career masters, Community leaders and Parents; Media, Educational and Religious institutions
Financial, Human, Seminars and Workshops Learning materials
Medium and long-term
5. Inadequate involvement of the youth in governance
• Involve students in school governance • Involve youth in governance roles in the
community • Encourage youth to attend Chiefs’ barazas and
contribute to the deliberations • Encourage youth to initiate community
development programmes
MoE, HTRs Class teachers, Career masters, Community leaders and Parents; Media, Civil Societies, Educational and Religious institutions, Youth Clubs and Associations
Financial, Human, Seminars and Workshops Learning materials
Immediate, Medium and long-term
7. Cheating, stealing, disregard for school rules were perceived as common vices among youth
• Stipulate and enforce strict penalties for those proved guilty of cheating and/or fraud
• Design lucrative reward systems for the youth who are honest
• Promote strict adherence to the rule of law and prosecute persistent offenders
• Provide anti-corruption sensitization and awareness creation programmes
MOE, TSC, Educational and religious institutions, Judiciary, Police, Civil Societies, MOYAS, NACCSC
Financial, Human, Seminars and Workshops Learning materials
Immediate, Medium and long-term
51
ITEM ISSUE RECOMMENDATIONS KEY ACTORS REQUIRED RESOURCES
TIME-FRAME
8. Strained relations between communities
• Organize exchange programmes that inspire appreciation of varied cultures
• Organize inter cultural festivals at district, county and national levels
• Enhance regional equitable distribution of resources
• Resolve historical injustices
Office of the President, Civil Society, Ministry of Culture & National Heritage, Ministry of Justice, National Cohesion and Constitutional Affairs, Ministry of Planning and Vision 2030, Ministry of Finance, NCIC, KNCHR
Financial, Human, Seminars and Workshops Learning materials
Medium and long-term
9. Minimal involvement of community members in inculcating and guiding ethical values and conduct
• Encourage council of elders to promote ethical values among youth
• Community leaders should take an active role in socialising and monitoring the youth
• Organise community based outreach programmes on ethical behaviour
Community leaders, council of elders, civil society, CBOs, religious leaders
Financial, Human, Seminars and Workshops Learning materials
Immediate, Medium and long-term
10. Negative views of government initiatives by the youths
• Involve youth in planning and implementation of interventions targeting them.
• Run youth initiatives transparently • Have effective channels of communication for
youth regarding available initiatives • Institute regular monitoring and evaluation of
these programmes
MOYAS, NACCSC, Research institutions, Development partners, Civil Society, Mass media
Financial, Human, Technical, Seminars and Workshops Learning materials
Immediate, Medium and long-term
52
ITEM ISSUE RECOMMENDATIONS KEY ACTORS REQUIRED RESOURCES
TIME-FRAME
11. Hostile school environment particularly to female learners
• Provide very secure learning environments for the girl child
• Institute programmes meant to minimise school-community conflicts, dissatisfaction by teachers and bullying by pupils/students
MoE, Teachers, Religious institutions, Community leaders, Parents, BoGs
Financial, Human, Seminars and Workshops Learning materials
Immediate, Medium and long-term
12 Poverty and unemployment lure the youth to be engaged in unethical conduct
• Develop innovative skills acquisition programmes which in the end enable the youth to utilize their talents and skills to support themselves and others
• Sensitize the youth on the link between corruption and poverty
MoE, MOYAS, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Labour, Ministry of Planning, NACCSC, TI- Kenya
Financial, Human, Seminars and Workshops Learning materials
Immediate, Medium and long-term
53
REFERENCES A Victorian Youth Sector Code of Ethical Practice Consultation Draft and Submission
Questions, March 2007 | Page 50 of 55
American camping Association (2007) Accreditations Standards Retrieved
online(www.acacamps.org/accreidation).
AnComm Communication Solutions (2007). A survey on key problems that affect the
American youth in high schools
Barwick, H. 2006. Youth work today: a review of the issues and Challenges: A literature
review of youth work in New Zealand, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Ministry of
Youth Development: Te Manatu Whakahiato Taiohi, New Zealand.
Benson P.L., Scales P.C., Hamilon S. F. & Sesma A. Jr. (2004.) Positive Youth Development:
Theory, research, and application. In W. W Darman & R. M. Lerner (Eds.) Handbook
of Child Psychology, theoretical models of human development. New York : John
Wiley
Conrad, D. (2004). Exploring Risky Youth Experiences
Turner, V. ( 1986). The anthropology of performance. New York: PAJ Publications.
Faizunnisa A. & Ikram A. (2004). Determinant of Youth Development in Pakistan. The Lahore
Journal of Economic, 9 (2).
Gambone, M. A Klem A. M. & Connell , J. P (2002) Finding out what matters for Youth:
Testing Key Links in a Community Action Framework for Youth Development. Island
Heights, NJ: Youth Development Strategies, Inc.
GOK, (2008). Kenya Vision 2030. Government Printers Nairobi, Kenya
54
Networks for Youth Developments (1998) The Handbook of Positive Youth Outcomes New
York : The Fund for the City Council
Outten, G. 1991. Key Concepts in the debates. Ethics and standards in youth work practice
Conference Report. Youth Sector Training Council of South Australia, Adelaide.
Outten, G. 1992. Key concepts for the development of a code of ethics in youth work. Youth
Issues Forum. Spring. pp 7-9
Pittman K. J (2001). Promoting Youth Development: Strengthening the role of Youth serving
and community organization. Washington, DC: Academy for Educational
Development Center for Youth Development and Policy Research
Smith, Allan T., (2002) 4-H Youth Development Facts in Brief. Washington: USDA.
Surrey County Council. (2006). Code of Conduct: Surrey County Council, Surrey, UK.
The National Youth Agency (2004) Ethical conduct in youth work: A statement of values and
principles from The National Youth Agency: Leicester, United Kingdom.
The National Student Leaders Conference held at Bomas of Kenya in April 2009
Government Printers: Kenya
The National Youth Convention 111(2007), KICC in Nairobi
Youth advisory groups (2008) “New Allies in the World Bank’s Work”, Working Paper
Series No. 6