Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Fakulteit Regsgeleerdheid •
Faculty of Law
Faculty of Law, University of Oslo 4 Nov. 2013
LLM Lecture: Human Rights and the Environment
Prof. Dr. Oliver C. Ruppel
Professor of Law Faculty of Law, University of Stellenbosch
South Africa
2
Relevant Literature • Ruppel, Oliver C., (2013), Human Rights and the Environment, in:
Ruppel, Oliver C. and Ruppel-Schlichting, Katharina (Eds), Environmental Law and Policy in Namibia – Towards Making Africa the Tree of Life, Windhoek & Essen, Orumbonde Press & Welwitschia Verlag, 401–420.
• UNEP & OHCHR, (2012), Human Rights and the Environment, Rio+20: Joint Report, http : / /www.unep.org/environmenta lgovernance/Porta ls /8/JointReportOHCHRandUNEPonHumanRightsandtheEnvironment.pdf
• Ruppel, Oliver C., (2010), Environmental Rights and Justice under the Namibian Constitution, in: Bösl, Anton, Horn, Nico and Du Pisani, André, Constitutional Democracy in Namibia – A Critical Analysis After Two Decades, Windhoek, Macmillan Education Namibia, 323–360.
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
3
Contents
• Human Rights and Environmental Law: The Nexus
• The International Level • Regional Levels (Aspects from the EU and AU) • Right to Environment in National Constitutions • Human Rights and the Environment in Namibia
and in South Africa
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
4
THE LINK BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
5
2 Overlapping bodies of law
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
Environmental Law
Human Rights Law
6
Tensions?
Environmental Protection
Right to Develop
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
7
Ideally: Interaction
Environmental Law and Human Rights Law should be
applied cumulatively and
interact like gears:
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
8 8
Two objectives of Environmental Justice
Rights and responsibilities regarding the utilisation of
environmental resources are distributed with greater
fairness globally and domestically
reduce the overall amount of
environmental damage globally and domestically
© Dr. O.C. Ruppel
9
Human Rights
• basic rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled
• defined by various law making bodies: - internationally (globally and regionally) - nationally and - sometimes locally
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
10
Human Rights Categories
• First Generation Rights
• Second Generation Rights
• Third Generation Rights
• Fourth Generation Rights? à controversy human rights in the information society: “communication rights”
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
11
Categorisation Criticised
• difficulties in exact allocation
• human rights are universal and interdependent
• some rights can easily fall in more than one category
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
12
First Generation Rights
Civil and Political Rights:
Traditional rights of the individual against the state
aimed at the protection of the citizen against arbitrary actions of the state
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
13
1st Generation Rights: Examples
Rights to • Life • Liberty • Security • Privacy • Fair Trial • Equality • Dignity
Freedoms • from Torture, Slavery
and Forced Labour • of Religion, Belief and
Opinion • of Expression • of Movement • of Association
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
14
Second Generations Rights
Social, Economic, and Cultural Rights
founded on the status of the individual as a member of society
impose a positive obligation on the state to provide or at least create conditions for access to those facilities which are considered essential for modern life
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
15
2nd Generations Rights: Examples
• Work • fair remuneration • Property • housing • health
• education, • benefit from
scientific advancements
• participate in the cultural life of one’s choice
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
16
Third Generation Rights
Solidarity Rights
These rights are collective in nature and depend upon international cooperation for
their achievement
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
17
3rd Generation Rights: Examples
• Right to peace
• Right to humanitarian assistance
• Right to development
• The right to a clean and healthy environment?
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
18
The Importance of Human Rights
Human rights are a necessary prerequisite for • every democratic society
• the avoidance of social and political unrest, violence and conflict
19
Important Characteristics of Human Rights
• Universal Ø applied equally and without discrimination to all people
• Inalienable Ø no one can have his or her human rights taken away other than in
specific situations (eg, the right to liberty can be restricted if a person is found guilty of a crime by a court of law)
• I n d i v i s i b l e , i n t e r r e l a t e d a n d interdependent Ø it is insufficient to respect some human rights and not others. Ø In practice, the violation of one right will often affect the respect of
several other rights. Ø All human rights should therefore be seen as having equal importance
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
20
Poverty
• is at the centre of a number of human rights violations and
• at the same time a major obstacle to achieving sustainable development and environmental protection
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
21
1972 Stockholm Conference, Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi:
We do not want to impoverish the environment any further, but we cannot forget the grim of poverty of large numbers of people. When they themselves feel deprived how can we urge the preservation of animals? How can we speak to those who live ... in slums about keeping our oceans, rivers and the air clean when their own lives are contaminated at the source? Environment cannot be improved in conditions of poverty…
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
22
A Healthy Environment: for everyone?
certain groups suffer disproportionately from e n v i r o n m e n t a l h a r m s a n d / o r a r e disproportionately denied environmental benefits due to discrimination:
• Certain minority ethnic groups
• Poor people
• Least educated segments of society
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
23
Right to Environment: Why?
Environmental harm • climate change • destruction of the ozone
layer • desertification • fresh water shortages • pollution • etc.
human rights
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
affects
24
Facts and Figures (1)
• Globally, contaminated water remains the greatest single cause of human disease and death
• About 1.2 billion people still lack access to clean drinking water, 80 % of which are the rural poor
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
25
Facts and Figures (2)
• 2.4 billion people lack adequate sanitation
• in many developing countries, poor health cond i t ions preva i l a s a resu l t o f contaminated water, poor sanitation, severe air pollution, malaria and other infectious diseases, and the spread of HIV/AIDS
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
26
Facts and Figures (3)
• Two thirds of the world population will live in ‘water-stressed’ areas by 2025
• In some cases groundwater levels are falling by one to three meters each year
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
27
Facts and Figures (4)
• 75% of the world’s energy is being produced by burning fossil fuels
• 2.4 million people dying each year globally from causes directly attr ibutable to a ir pol lut ion (according to WHO)
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
28
Facts and Figures (5)
• toxic chemicals in our environment threaten our rivers and lakes, air, land, and oceans
• environmental exposure causes almost a quarter of all diseases.
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
29
Facts and Figures (6)
• There are already an estimated 25 million environmental refugees resulting from
• changing rain patterns, floods, storms and rising tides and this figure is likely to rise significantly
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
30
Environmental harm may affect (1)
Right to Life
can be linked to any environmental disruption that directly contributed to the loss of lives
e.g. air pollution causing 2.4 million deaths per year
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
31
Environmental harm may affect (2)
Right to Health
is often violated in cases of pollution of air, land or water
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
32
Environmental harm may affect (3)
Right to Water
pollution of water resources may affect the
right to (access to clean) water
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
33
Environmental harm may affect (4)
Right to Food
due to environmental disruption, the right to
physical and economic access to adequate food, is progressively under pressure
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
34
Environmental harm may affect (5)
Right to Development
Sustainable development recognises that environmentally destructive economic
progress does not produce long-term societal progress
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
35
Environmental harm may affect (6)
Right to Property
E.g. rising sea levels à more and more people living on islands and in coastal areas,
have and will be deprived of (parts of) their property
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
36
Environmental harm may affect (7)
Right to Shelter and Housing
when environmental degradation displaces
individuals and communities or compels them to live in unhealthy, hazardous conditions
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
37
Environmental harm may affect (8)
Right to Work
along with environmental disruption often comes deprivation of the right to work. An
example would be industrial overfishing putting small local fishermen out of work
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
38
Environmental harm may affect (9)
Right to Culture, Family life and Rights of Indigenous People
the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, for the first time
recognises the conservation and protection of the environment and resources as a human
right © Prof Oliver C Ruppel
39
Environmental harm may affect (10)
Rights and Equity, non-discrimination
impacts of environmental harms are expected to be bigger on the poorer parts than in the
more wealthier parts of the world
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
40
Environmental harm may affect (11)
Women and Children’s Rights
are even more impacted by environmental disruption than men
Children are particularly vulnerable to toxics, bacterial and viral contaminationand because
their immune systems have not fully been developed
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
41
Main Problems Posed By International Environmental Law (1) Conflict between economy and ecology:
Economy and ecology invariably clash when a project has environmental implications, and the state has to weigh up various justified interests when deciding whether to approve it.
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
42
Main Problems Posed By International Environmental Law (2)
Fragmentation of environmental law:
The provisions of environmental law have their roots in many different areas of life (and law) and display strong regional differences
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
43
Main Problems Posed By International Environmental Law (3)
Non-compliance:
Even in areas where clear legal rules do exist, the hoped-for successes do not materialise because states do not respect those rules or do not respect them sufficiently.
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
44
THE INTERNATIONAL LEVEL
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
45
1972 Stockholm Declaration
Principle I:
“Man has the fundamental right to freedom, equality and adequate conditions of life, in an environment of a quality that permits a life of dignity and well-being, and he bears a solemn responsibility to protect and improve the environment for present and future generations”
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
46
Universal Declaration on Human Rights (1948) (1)
• Non-binding but
• Many provisions considered to be customary international law
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
47
Universal Declaration on Human Rights (2)
Article 25: "Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services..."
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
48
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights – ICESCR (1966) • Right to safe and healthy working
conditions (Article 7 b)
• Rights of children and young persons to be free from work harmful to their health (Article 10-3)
• The right to health (Article 12) calls on States parties to take steps for "the improvement of all aspects of environmental and industrial hygiene…”
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
49
Right to Water under the ICESCR
In 2002, the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights concluded that there was a human right to water embedded in Article 11 of the ICESCR, which defined the right to livelihood as including adequate food, clothing and housing.
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
50
Right to Water under the ICESCR
• The General Comment on the right to water was adopted by this Committee in 2002
• à 145 countries ratified the Covenant and agree that the human right to water entitles everyone to sufficient, affordable, physically accessible, safe water acceptable for personal and domestic use
• (and that they are required to develop mechanisms to ensure that this goal is realised!)
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
51
CEDAW (Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979)
Obl iges States part ies to e l iminate discrimination against women, particularly in rural areas, to ensure that women enjoy adequate living conditions , part icularly in relat ion to housing, sanitation, electricity and water supply…" (Article 14 (2)(h))
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
52 © Dr Oliver C Ruppel Human Vulnerability & Environment
52
CRC (Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) Article 24
parties shall take appropriate measures to combat disease and malnutrition through the provision of adequate nutritious foods and c lean dr ink ing water , taking into consideration the dangers and risks of environmental pollution. Article 24(2)(c).
53
United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007)
Article 29:
“1. Indigenous peoples have the right to the conservation and protection of the environment and the productive capacity of their lands or territories and resources…”
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
54
UN Environmental Constitution For The World (1)
http://www.uncsd2012.org/content/documents/IUCN%20Intl%20Covenant%20on%20Env%20and%20Dev%20EPLP-031-rev3.pdf
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
55
UN Environmental Constitution For The World (2)
Drafted by
• IUCNAEL (the Environmental Law Programme of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) in cooperation with
• ICEL (the International Council of Environmental Law)
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
56
UN Environmental Constitution For The World (3)
• Work has been going on since 1995
• The 4th edition was issued to UN member states on 22 September 2010
• The document is intended to become a permanent binding treaty intended to supersede all existing national laws…
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
57
UN Environmental Constitution For The World (4)
Objective:
to provide a comprehensive legal framework with the aim of achieving env ironmenta l conservat ion , a n indispensable foundation for sustainable development
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
Climate Change & Human Rights?
Climate Change & Interna/onal Human Rights Law
• efforts to place human rights at the centre of any future climate change dispensa5on have only recently started to become more focused
• human rights obliga5ons can provide a legal baseline for how climate change is tackled and what must be protected from its impacts
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
60
THE REGIONAL LEVEL (ASPECTS FROM AFRICA AND EU)
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
61
Treaty of the European Union
Art. 3 provides as an objective of the EU, that it shall promote inter alia harmonious, equitable and sustainable development with a high level of environmental protection and improved environmental quality.
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
62
European Convention on Human Rights (1)
So far, no explicit codification of a right to a healthy environment
(on 16 June 2010 European Ministers refused to codify the Human Right to a healthy and viable Environment into the European Convention on Human Rights)
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
63
European Convention on Human Rights (2)
But: European Court of Human Rights has laid down a number of judgements stating that:
Article 8 of the Convention on the right to private and family life imposes positive e n v i r o n m e n t a l o b l i g a t i o n s o n governments
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
64
European Convention on Human Rights (3)
Article 8: Right to respect for private and family life
“1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.
2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.”
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
65
European Convention on Human Rights (4)
Based on Article 8, Governments are required • to employ relevant environmental
information in decision-making • to be legally responsible for preventing
serious damage to their citizen’s health caused by pollution
• to comply with domestic environmental law
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
66 © Dr Oliver C Ruppel
Aarhus Convention (1998)
= Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters
• ratified by 45 states and the European Union
• all of the ratifying states are in Europe and Central Asia
67
Aarhus Convention (2)
Preamble
Every person has the right to live in an environment adequate to his or her health and well-being, and the duty, both individually and in association with others, to protect and improve the environment for the benefit of present and future generations
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
68
The African Union (AU)
Members:
• 54 African states • Morocco left the AU's
p r e d e c e s s o r ( t h e Organization of African Unity) in 1984
• 4 members currently suspended: Madagascar (2009), Guinea Bissau (2012), Egypt (2013), Central African Republic (2012)
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
Establishment: as the OAU May 25, 1963 as the African Union July 9, 2002 Area - Total 29,757,900 km² 11,489,589 sq mi Population 2011 estimate 1,012,571,880 (2nd most populous continent)
69
The African Charter for Human and Peoples’ Rights
• explicitly incorporates a human right to environment
• Article 24: “All peoples shall have the r ight to a genera l sat is factory environment favourable to their development”
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
70
Article 24 African Charter for Human and Peoples’ Rights
• à has been addressed by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights
• (established in 1987 with a mandate to protect and promote human rights and empowered to consider complaints from individuals and States)
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
71
The Commission on Article 24:
right to a satisfactory environment puts government under the obligations to: • take reasonable measures to prevent
pollution and ecological degradation • promote conservation and ensure
ecological sustainable development and the use of natural resources
• undertake environmental and social impact assessments prior to industrial development
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
72 © Prof Oliver C Ruppel
The Case of the Ogoni People and Royal Dutch/Shell in Nigeria
73
Case: Royal Dutch/Shell in Nigeria
• The case addresses these ques5ons: • Should a foreign investor interfere in the domes5c poli5cs of a sovereign state?
• How to manage human rights aAacks?
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
74
Main environmental problems
• isolated but frequent oil spills (111 between 1975 and 1984)
• drainage of contaminated water into the waterways
• emissions from the flaring of natural gas at the pumping sites
• plant and animal life destroyed • contribution to global warming
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
75 © Prof Oliver C Ruppel
Shell claimed that…
• …the rapidly growing population in the Delta region is the principal contributor to such env i ronmen t a l p rob l ems a s deforestation, erosion, and overfarming
• Oil spills: some 77 of the 111 oil spills in the Delta were due to sabotage by local people (seeking compensation for damages, employment opportunities)
76 © Prof Oliver C Ruppel
Nigeria, Shell and the Ogoni
Since Shell began drilling oil in Ogoniland in the Niger Delta in 1958, the people of Ogoniland
• have had pipelines built across their farmlands and in front of their homes
• suffered endemic oil leaks from these very pipelines
• have been forced to live with the constant flaring of gas
77 © Prof Oliver C Ruppel
The United Nations on the Ogoni Case
• UN Special Rapporteur's report on Nigeria (released 4/15/98) accused Nigeria and Shell of abusing human rights and failing to protect the environment in oil producing regions, and called for an investigation into Shell.
78 © Prof Oliver C Ruppel
The United Nations on the Ogoni Case
• The report condemned Shell for a "well armed security force which is intermittently employed against protesters"
• It was unusual both because of its frankness and its focus on Shell, instead of only on member countries
79 © Prof Oliver C Ruppel
Decision of the African Commission (I)
In 2001, the AU Commission concluded consideration of a communication which dealt with alleged violations of human rights of the Ogoni people in Nigeria…
Communication 155/96. The Social and Economic Rights Action Center and the Center for Economic and Social Rights / N i g e r i a ; a v a i l a b l e a t h t t p : / /www . a chp r . o r g / en g l i s h / _ i n f o /decision_article_24.html
80 © Prof Oliver C Ruppel
Decision of the African Commission (II)
• The African Commission found several violations of the African Charter
• It appealed to the new civil government in Nigeria to protect fully the environment, health and livelihood of the people in Ogoniland
• Government should, inter alia, - conduct an investigation into the human rights
violations - undertake a cleanup of land and rivers polluted and
damaged by the activities of the oil operations
81 © Prof Oliver C Ruppel
The Nigerian High Court on the Ogoni Case
Judgement of the Nigerian High Court on November 14, 2005 ordering Shell Nigeria and the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC)
to stop gas flaring, as gas flaring violates guaranteed constitutional rights to life and
dignity
82 © Prof Oliver C Ruppel
In 2009…
• Shell agreed to pay US$15.5m in settlement of a legal action…
• This was reached on the eve of the trial in a federal court in New York
• one of the largest payouts agreed by a multinational corporation charged with human rights violations
83 © Prof Oliver C Ruppel
In 2009…
Out of the $15.5m settlement, $5m will be used to set up a trust called Kiisi – meaning "progress" in the Ogoni Gokana language – to support educational and other initiatives in the Niger delta
84
RIGHT TO ENVIRONMENT IN NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONS
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
85
Different Pathways to Constitutional Recognition of Environmental Concerns
1. Government duty to protect the environment
2. Individual right to a healthy environment
3. I n d i v i du a l du t y t o p ro t e c t t he environment
4. Procedural environmental rights
5. No recognition
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
86
Prevalence of Environmental Protection Provisions in National Constitutions
31
84
94
142
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Procedural Environmental Rights
Individual Duty to Protect the Environment
Individual Right to a Healthy Environment
Government Duty to Protect the Environment
Number of Countries
Type
of C
onst
itutio
nal P
rovi
sion
Source: Boyd (2012)
87
Benefits of Constitutional Environmental Rights (1)
• Stronger environmental laws and policies
• Improved implementation and enforcement
• G r e a t e r c i t i z e n p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n environmental decision making
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
88
Benefits of Constitutional Environmental Rights (2)
• Increased accountability
• Reduction in environmental injustices
• A level playing field with social and economic rights
• Better environmental performance
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
89
From Constitution to Environmental Outcome
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
• Constitution
• Legislation
• Regulations
• Administrative Agencies
• Policies /Practices / Procedures
• Implementation
• Changes in Societal Behaviours
• ENVIRONMENTAL OUTCOMES
90
Potential Challenges for Constitutional Environmental Rights (1)
• too vague to be useful
• redundant because of existing human rights and environmental laws
• threat to democracy because shifting power from elected legislators to judges (judicial activism)
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
91
Potential Challenges for Constitutional Environmental Rights (2)
• difficult to enforce
• likely to cause a flood of litigation
• likely to be ineffective
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
92
Nations recognising the constitutional right to a healthy environment
• since the mid-1970s, 92 countries have granted constitutional status to this right
• recognition of environmental rights has grown rapidly over the past 50 years
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
93 © Prof Oliver C Ruppel Source: Boyd (2012)
94
Nations recognising the right to a healthy environment in constitutions, laws, or international agreements
• As of 2012, 177 of the world's 193 UN member nations recognise this right through - their constitution - environmental legislation - court decisions - or ratification of an international agreement
• The only remaining holdouts are: - United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, New
Zealand, China, Oman, Afghanistan, Kuwait, Brunei Darussalam, Lebanon, Laos, Myanmar, North Korea, Malaysia, and Cambodia…
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
95 © Prof Oliver C Ruppel Source: Boyd (2012)
96
Kenya 2010 Constitution
PREAMBLE
We the people of Kenya –
RESPECTFUL of the environment, which is our heritage, and determined to sustain it for the benefit of future generations
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
97
Kenya 2010 Constitution
Part 2: Rights and fundamental freedoms
42. Every person has the right to a clean and healthy environment, which
includes the right— (a) to have the environment protected for the
benefit of present and future generations through legislative and other measures, particularly those contemplated in Article 69; and
(b) to have obligations relating to the environment fulfilled under Article 70.
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
98
Kenya 2010 Constitution
Chapter 5: Land and Environment
Enforcement of environmental rights
70. (1) If a person alleges that a right to a clean and healthy environment
recognised and protected under Article 42 has been, is being or is likely to be, denied, violated, infringed or threatened, the person may apply to a court for redress in addition to any other legal remedies that are available in respect to the same matter…
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
99
Question
Why is Kenya so advanced?
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
100
Germany (1)
• 1949 Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany (Grundgesetz) contains no fundamental subjective environmental right
• But
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
101
Germany (2)
Article 20(a) provides for state responsibility for the environment in form of an objective constitutional norm (Staatsziel Umweltschutz)
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
102
Germany (3)
Article 20a [Protection of the natural foundations of life and animals]
“Mindful also of its responsibility toward future generations, the state shall protect the natural foundations of life and animals by legislation and, in accordance with law and justice, by executive and judicial action, all within the framework of the constitutional order.” © Prof Oliver C Ruppel
103
Germany (4)
• Individuals cannot base legal claims on the non-performance of government before the courts
• But: Legislature, executive, judiciary and all bodies of government are legally bound to be directed by Article 20(a)
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
104
HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE NAMIBIAN CONSTITUTION
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
105
Chapter 3 of the Constitution
in its Chapter 3 on fundamental human rights and freedoms the Namibian Constitution does not explicitly mention a right to a clean and healthy environment
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
106
Nevertheless
the Namibian Constitution can be regarded as being progressive in
terms of environmental protection
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
107
Environmental protection
is contained in the Namibian Constitution within the Chapter on
“Principles of State Policy”
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
108
Article 95(1)
“The State shall actively promote and maintain the welfare of the people by adopting, inter alia, policies aimed at … maintenance of ecosystems, essential ecological processes and biological diversity of Namibia and the utilisation of living natural resources on a sustainable basis for the benefit of all Namibians…”
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
109
Principles of State Policy
• not legally enforceable • serve as societal goals in making and
applying laws to give effect to the fundamental objectives of the different principles
• must be employed in the interpretation of Namibian law and guide the state in its decision-making processes
(Article 101) © Prof Oliver C Ruppel
110
Article 100: Sovereign Ownership of Natural Resources
• establishes sovereign state ownership of natural resources not under the control of others
• this entails that the state should accordingly take environmentally related responsibility with a special focus on the principle of sustainability and respect for the rights of present and future generations
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
111
Article 144: International Law
• Unless otherwise provided the general rules of public international law and international agreements binding upon Namibia under this Constitution form part of the law of Namibia.
• à Public international law is ab initio part of the law of Namibia and needs no transformation or subsequent legislative act to become so
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
112
Article 25: Enforcement of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms
persons who claim that a fundamental right or freedom guaranteed by the Constitution has been infringed or threatened are entitled
- to approach a competent Court to enforce or protect such a right or freedom
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
113
Namibian Court Structure
• Community Courts (apply customary law)
• Magistrates Courts (apply common law 1st instance)
• Magistrates Courts (appeal customary law 2nd instance)
• High Court
• Supreme Court (also constitutional chamber)
____________________________________________
• SADC Tribunal
114
Article 25: Enforcement of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms
• persons who claim that a fundamental right or freedom guaranteed by the Constitution has been infringed or threatened are entitled - may approach the Ombudsman to provide them with such legal assistance or advice as they require
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
115
The Ombudsman of Namibia
has a specific environmental mandate
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
116
Mandates for the Office of the Ombudsman
• Human Rights: Article 91 (a) of the Constitution and Section 3(1)(a) of the Act
• Administrative Practices Article 91 (b) of the Constitution and Section 3(1)(b) of the Act
• Environment Article 91 (c) of the Constitution and Section 3(1)(c) of the Act
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
117
South Africa
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
118
International Law under the SA 1996 Constitution
s. 39 Interpretation of Bill of Rights
(1) When interpreting the Bill of Rights, a court, tribunal or forum - (a) must promote the values that underlie an
open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom
(b) must consider international law (c) may consider foreign law
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
119
International Law (ss 231-233)
CHAPTER 14: GENERAL PROVISIONS
s. 231 International agreements
(4) Any international agreement becomes law in the Republic when it is enacted into law by national legislation; but a self-executing provision of an agreement that has been approved by Parliament is law in the Republic unless it is inconsistent with the Constitution or an Act of Parliament.
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
120
International law under the 1996 SA Constitution
s. 232 Customary international law
Customary international law is law in the Republic unless it is inconsistent with the Constitution or an Act of Parliament.
s. 233 Application of international law
When interpreting any legislation, every court must prefer any reasonable interpretation of the legislation that is consistent with international law over any alternative interpretation that is inconsistent with international law
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
121 © Prof Oliver C Ruppel
CHAPTER 2: Bill of Rights s. 24. Environment
(1) Everyone has the right: (a) to an environment that is not harmful to their health or well-
being; and (b) to have the environment protected, for the benefit of present
and future generations, through reasonable legislative and other measures that:
(i) prevent pollution and ecological degradation; (ii) promote conservation; and (iii) secure ecologically sustainable development and use of
natural resources while promoting justifiable economic and social development.
122
What is the nature of the environmental provision in the SA Constitution?
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
123
Components of Section 24
(1) Everyone has the right: (a) to an environment that is not harmful to their
health or well-being; and (b) to have the environment protected, for the
benefit of present and future generations, through reasonable legislative and other measures that:
(i) prevent pollution and ecological degradation; (ii) promote conservation; and (iii) secure ecologically sustainable development and use of natural
resources
while promoting justifiable economic and social development.
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
Fundamental right character
socio-economic right character
124
Who is “Everyone”?
• Humans
à orthodox anthropocentric approach: regards environmental rights as being primarily concerned with people
• Supported by National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) Section 2 (2): “[e]nvironmental management must place people and their needs at the forefront of its concern, and serve their physical, psychological, developmental, cultural and social interests equitably.”
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
125
“Everyone”…
à The locus standi requirement
Section 38 of the Constitution: - (c) anyone acting as a member of, or in the
interest of, a group or class of persons; - (d) anyone acting in the public interest; and - (e) an association acting in the interests of its
members
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
126
Vertical and Horizontal Application of s 24
• Everyone vs State (vertical application)? à (+)
• Everyone vs individual legal persons (horizontal application)? à generally (+) but extent is subject to debate
• Section 8 of the Constitution states that the Constitution applies to “all law” and that “[a] provision in the Bill of Rights binds natural and juristic persons to the extent that it is applicable, taking into account the nature of the right and the nature of any duty imposed by the right’
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
127
Some SA Case Law Related to s. 24 • HTF Developers (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism and Others 2006 (5) SA 512
(T)
• Hichange Investments (Pty) Ltd v Cape Produce Co (Pty) Ltd t/a Pelts Products, and Others 2004 (2) SA 393 (E)
• Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom 2001 (1) SA 46 (CC)
• Fuel Retailers Association of Southern Africa v Director-General: Environmental Management, Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Environment, Mpumalanga Province, and Others 2007 (6) SA 4 (CC)
• MEC, Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Environment and Another v HTF Developers (Pty) Ltd 2008 (2) SA 319 (CC)
• Director: Mineral Development, Gauteng Region, and Another v Save the Vaal Environment and Others 1999 (2) SA 709 (SCA)
• BP Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd v MEC for Agriculture, Conservation and Land Affairs 2004 (5) SA 124 (W)
• Minister of Public Works and Others v Kyalami Ridge Environmental Association and Others 2001 (7) BCLR 652 (CC).
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
128
Other Constitutional Provisions Relevant for the Right to Environment
• Locus standi clause s. 38
• Just administrative action clause s. 33
• Access to information clause s. 32
• Property clause s. 25
• Limitations clause s. 36
• Interpretation of the Bill of Rights clause s. 39
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
129
Summarising
• Environmental human rights cannot be seen in isolation from other human rights
• They are not only protected under various international conventions, but interlinked with many fundamental rights and freedoms
• They are not only relevant under constitutional principles of state policy but beyond
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
130
Human rights
• must be justiciable and their protection must be secured through the courts
• the judiciary is most essential in the protection and promotion of environmental human rights it leads the way in interpreting relevant legislation and settles disputes arising between citizens and/or between citizens and the state
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel
131
Unfortunately…
• the inclusion of environmental concerns into human rights jurisdiction is still in its infancy in African jurisprudence
• relevant rulings from other courts (European Court of Human Rights / Indian Supreme Court) may therefore be taken as examples when it comes to the link between human rights and environmental concerns…
© Prof Oliver C Ruppel