Father Involvement and Child Well-Being: 2006 Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) Child Well-Being Topical Module 1 By Jane Lawler Dye Fertility

Father Involvement and Child Well-Being: 2006

Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP)

Child Well-Being Topical Module

1

By Jane Lawler Dye

Fertility and Family Statistics Branch

U.S. Census Bureau

This poster is released to inform interested parties of ongoing research and to encourage discussion. Any views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the U.S. Census Bureau.

U S C E N S U S B U R E A U Helping You Make Informed Decisions

Purpose• Research suggests a positive association between father involvement

and child well being (Menestrel, 1999). However, the relationship has not been investigated in much depth.

• The well-being of children can be affected by many circumstances and parental behaviors. Research shows that for young children father involvement is associated with better cognitive development, psychological outcomes and behavior (Radin, 1994). However, the effects of father involvement may depend on factors such as whether the father is a biological or stepfather, engagement time, and father’s educational attainment (Hofferth, 2006).

2

Data Source• 2004 Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP)

• The SIPP provides a large, nationally representative sample of the civilian noninstitutionalized population age 15 and over with data on income, labor force participation, and participation in government assistance programs, as well as other characteristics.– Data in this presentation are from a sample, and therefore are subject to sampling

and nonsampling error. For more information about the source and accuracy of the data go to http://www.bls.census.gov/sipp/source.html

– All statements in this presentation have been statistically tested at the 90 percent level of confidence.

– For more information about the SIPP go to www.sipp.census.gov/sipp

3

http://www.bls.census.gov/sipp/source.html







http://www.sipp.census.gov/sipp






Child Well-Being Topical Module• The Child Well-Being Topical Module was administered to

parents of children under age 18 from June 2006 to September 2006 in wave 8 of the SIPP 2004 panel.

• A designated parent* was asked a series of questions related to father involvement. In this analysis we include the following: Did the biological, step, adopted father, or male guardian – Praise the child?– Talk or play with the child?– Eat dinner with the child?

4

*The mother was selected as the designated parent unless absent – then the father was selected. If neither parent was present a female guardian was selected. If no female guardian was present a male guardian was designated parent.

Trends in Father Involvement

• Among children 6 to 17 years old who live with a father:* – the percentage eating dinner with a father at least five

days per week declined from 76 percent in 2003 to 74 percent in 2006.

– the percentage who talked or played with a father for five minutes or more at least once a day on average rose about 4 percentage points.

– the percent who were praised by a father at least once a day increased 6 percentage points.

*Father may be biological, step, adoptive, or a male guardian.

Figure 1. Percent of Children Age 6 to 17 Who Were Involved with their Father*: 2003-2006

6

*Questions are only asked if a biological, step, or adoptive father or male guardian is in the household.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Survey of Income and Program Participation, Panels 2001 and 2004; Child Well-Being Topical Modules.

Universe: Children with a father in the household.

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

200620042003

Eat dinner with child at least five days per week

Talk or Play with child at least once per day

Praise child at least once per day

Father Involvement by Age and Sex

• In 2006, among children 6 to 17 years old with a father in the household:– Fathers were more involved with young children than

older children.• Children 6 to 11 years old were

– 7 percentage points more likely to eat dinner with a father five or more days a week,

– 8 percentage points more likely to talk or play with father, and – 15 percentage points more likely to be praised at least once a

day.

– Fathers were about equally involved with sons and daughters.

Figure 2. Percent of Children 6 to 17 Years Old by Indicators of Father Involvement, Age, and Sex: 2006

8

78

7175 74

80

7175 76

81

66

73 74

6 to 11 years 12 to 17 years Male Female

Eat dinner with Father at least 5 days per week

Talk/Play with Father at least once a day

Praised by Father at least once a day

U.S. Census Bureau, Survey of Income and Program Participation 2004 Panel Wave 8, Child Well-Being Topical Module.

Universe: Children with a father in the household

• Children in single-parent-father households had more involvement with their father through talking or playing and praise: – In one parent households, 8 out of 10 children

talked or played with a father at least once per day,– 77 percent of children in one parent households

were praised at least once per day.

Number of Parents present

• Biological fathers were more involved than step-fathers -- although the differences were small.

• There was no significant difference in father involvement based on father’s marital status among this group of children who have a father in the household.

Type of Relationship with Father and Father’s Marital Status

Figure 3. Percent of Children 6 to 17 Years Old by Indicators of Father Involvement, Number of Parents Present, Relationship with Father, and

Father's Marital Status: 2006

11

81

75 74 75

70 7274

76

65

80

75 76

7072

75 76

66

77

74 75

67

7174 74

None present One parent Two parents Biologicalchild

Step-child Adopted child Married Unmarried

Eat dinner together at least 5 days per week

Talk/Play at least once a day

Praised at least once a day

Number of parents present Relationship with father Father's marital status



Race and Hispanic Origin• Hispanic children were most likely to eat dinner

regularly with their father (81 percent) versus– 69 percent of Black children.

• Non-Hispanic White children were more likely to talk or play with their father (78 percent) versus– 69 percent of Hispanic children.

• Hispanic children were less likely to be praised every day (70 percent) versus– 75 percent of non-Hispanic White children.

Figure 4. Percent of Children 6 to 17 by Father Involvement, Race and Hispanic Origin: 2006

13

7369

72

8177

7375

69

75 74 7470

White alone, Non-Hispanic Black alone Asian alone Hispanic






Father’s Educational Attainment and Family Income

• In general, children whose father had less education and less family income tended to be more likely to eat dinner together at least five days per week.

• Children whose father had higher educational attainment tended to be more likely to be talked to or played with and be praised by a father every day.

• Children who had a lower family income ($2,999 per month or less) tended to be talked to or played with and praised by a father less than those with an income of $6,000 per month or more.

Figure 5. Percent of Children 6 to 17 Years Old by Indicators of Father Involvement, Father's Educational Attainment and Family Income: 2006

15U.S. Census Bureau, Survey of Income and Program Participation 2004 Panel Wave 8, Child Well-Being Topical Module.

Father’s educational attainment Family income


81

76

72

81 80

75 7471

68

73

77

7269

76 76 77

65

7375

7270

75 74 75

Less thanhigh school

High schoolgraduate

Some collegeor more

Under $1,500 $1,500 to$2,999

$3,000 to$4,499

$4,500 to$5,999

$6,000 andover




Region• Children who live in the Northeast were least likely

to eat dinner with their father at least five days per week (70 percent) versus– 77 percent in the West.

• Children in the Midwest were most likely to talk or play with their father every day (80 percent) versus– 73 percent in the South.

• Children in the South were least likely to be praised every day by their father (70 percent) versus– 77 percent in the West.

Metro Status

• Children who live in nonmetropolitan areas were – more likely to eat dinner with their father at

least five days per week– Less likely to be praised at least once a day by

their father.

Figure 6. Percent of Children 6 to 17 Years Old by Indicators of Father Involvement, Region, and Metropolitan Status: 2006



7073

7577

7476

74

80

7376 75 76

7375

70

7774 73

Northeast Midw est South West In metropolitan area Nonmetropolitan area


Talk/Play at least once a dayPraised at least once a day

Bivariate Analysis

• School Attachment– Child often likes school– Child often works hard in school– Child is often interested in school work

• Academic Performance– Child is in gifted classes– Child never repeated a grade– Child was never expelled or suspended

19

School Attachment

• In the bivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in school attachment by father involvement

• Between 86 and 89 percent of children often liked school, worked hard in school or were interested in school work regardless of the degree of father involvement.

Figure 7. School Attachment by Father Involvement: 2006

21

88 88 88 88 88 8888 88 89 88 89 8887 87 87 87 86 87

Less than 5 days perweek

At least 5 days perweek

Less than once aday

At least once a day Less than once aday

At least once a day

Like school Work hard in school Are interested in schoolwork

Dinner together Talk or play together Praised



Academic Performance• Children who had dinner with their father at least five

days per week were – less likely to be in gifted classes – more likely to have never been expelled or suspended.*

• Children who talked or played with their father at least once per day were – more likely to be in gifted classes – more likely to never been expelled or suspended.*

• Children who were praised by their father at least once per day were – more likely to have never repeated a grade.– more likely to have never been expelled or suspended.*

*among 12 to 17 year olds

Figure 8. Academic Performance by Father Involvement: 2006

23

24

19 1821 20 20

94 93 93 93 92 9490

9390

9390

93

Less than 5 days perweek

At least 5 days perweek

Less than once a day At least once a day Less than once a day At least once a day

Were in gifted class

Never repeated a gradeWere never expelled/ suspended*

Dinner together Talk or Play together Praised



*for 12 to 17 year old children.

Multivariate Analysis

• Dependent variables– School attachment– Academic performance

• Independent variables– Father Involvement

• Control variables– Number of parents present, type of relationship with father,

age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, father’s educational attainment, metropolitan status, family income and region.

– For households where the mother was present, controlling for mother involvement dampened the effects of father involvement (data not shown).

24

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

Often Likes School

Often Works Hard in School

Is Often Interested in Schoolwork

In Gifted classes

Never expelled or suspended1

Never repeated a grade

Dinner together at least 5 days per week Talk/Play at least once per day Praised at least once per day


1. Restricted to 12 to 17 year old children.

"+" - 0.05<=p<0., * - Significant at 0.01<=p<0.05, ** - Significant at 0.001<=p<0.01, *** - Significant at p<0.001

Figure 9. Odds Ratios for Children 6 to 17 years by Father Involvement and Indicators of School Engagement and Academic Performance: 2006

*+

*

**

******

***

Conclusion• Father involvement was significantly related to some aspects of

child well-being:

Academic performance

– Especially with regard to the indicator that reflects disciplinary action -- Never suspended or expelled

• Children who were praised every day, who spent time talking or playing with their father every day, and/or who ate dinner with their father at least five days per week had significantly higher odds of never being suspended or expelled from school.

– Children whose father praised them every day had higher odds of being in gifted classes. Surprisingly, however, children who had dinner with their father at least five days per week had lower odds of being in gifted classes than those who ate dinner with their father less often.

Conclusion

School engagement

– Children who talked or played with their father every day had greater odds of being characterized as “often interested in school work” compared to those who spent less time with their father talking or playing.

– Children’s odds of experiencing the other measures of school engagement (often likes school, works hard in school) and of never repeating a grade showed no significant difference associated with father involvement.

Contact

Jane Lawler Dye

U.S. Census Bureau

Fertility and Family Statistics

(301) 763-6057

[email protected]

U S C E N S U S B U R E A U Helping You Make Informed Decisions

mailto:[email protected]

Documents

Father Involvement and Child Well-Being: 2006 Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) Child Well-Being Topical Module 1 By Jane Lawler Dye Fertility