Upload
roque3r
View
9
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Very good material From Ignacio Artamendi
Citation preview
FATIGUE TESTING
Dr Ignacio Artamendi
Aggregate Industries Technical & Development Department
IAT National Training Day 24 September 2008
2Fatigue of asphalt mixtures
Fatigue cracking occurs when an asphalt layer is subjected to repeated loading under the passing traffic
Alligator pattern typical in fatigue cracking
3Severity levels
Low Moderate High
4Mechanism
compression compressiontension
Development of tensile strains at the bottom of the asphalt layer of sufficient magnitude to initiate cracking that eventually propagates up to the surface (bottom-up cracking).
5Test configurations
Trapezoidal
4-point bending
Tension/compression Indirect tension
3-point bending
Prismatic
2-point bending
6Testing modes
Controlled strain: the strain (deformation) is kept constant by decreasing the stress (load) during the test.
Applicable to thin flexible pavements.
Controlled stress: the stress (load) is maintained constant and the strain (deformation) increases during the test.
Applicable to thick pavement construction.
7Controlled strain test
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000
N (cycles)
S
t
r
a
i
n
(
m
/
m
) strain amplitude
strain mean
0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.0
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000
N (cycles)
S
t
r
e
s
s
(
M
P
a
)
stress amplitude
stress mean
StressStrain
0 0
Sinusoidal loading
8Controlled stress test
0.0
0.3
0.5
0.8
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.8
2.0
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000
N (cycles)
S
t
r
e
s
s
(
M
P
a
)
stress amplitude
stress mean
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000
N (cycles)
S
t
r
a
i
n
(
m
/
m
)
strain amplitude
strain mean
StressStrain
0 0
Sinusoidal loading
9Definition of failure
11 m
fN C =
where:Nf = number of load applications to failure
= tensile strainC1 , m = material regression coefficients
Failure in constant strain 50 % reduction in initial stiffness
Failure in constant stress 10 % reduction in initial stiffness or when the sample fractures
Arbitrary definitions of failure
10
Fatigue data: stiffness evolution
Phase I: rapid reduction of stiffness due to internal heating of the sample.
Phase II: approximate linear reduction in the stiffness (crack initiation stage)
Phase III: rapid drop in stiffness attributed to coalescence of micro-cracks to form a sharp crack (crack propagation stage).
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000
N (cycles)
E
*
(
M
P
a
)
Phase II Phase IIIP
h
a
s
e
I
11
Dissipated energy
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
800
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150
Strain (microstrain)
S
t
r
e
s
s
(
k
P
a
)
95% E
70% E
Dissipated energy (area within the hysteresis loop) is lost in the material in the form of mechanical work, heat generation or damage.
StressStrain
0 0
sini i i iw =
12
EN 12697-24 Resistance to fatigue
Two point bending test on trapezoidal specimens
Two point bending test on prismatic shaped specimens
Three point bending test on prismatic shaped specimens
Four-point bending test on prismatic shaped specimens
Indirect tensile test on cylindrical shaped specimens
13
Two-point bending trapezoidal test
14
Two-point bending trapezoidal test
Standard European fatigue test (EN 12697-24).
Specified test in France for material design (Level 4).
Large database (France).
Test is performed at low-intermediate temperature (10 0C).
Controlled strain (deflection) and stress (load) modes of testing but strain control specified.
Specimens are difficult to to fabricate.
Large number of specimens required (18).
Duration 30 days
15
Four-point bending (4PB) test
16
Four-point bending (4PB) test
Standard European fatigue test (EN 12697-24).
Preferred test in most European countries and USA (AASHTO TP9).
Good repeatability and reproducibility has been reported.
Specimens are easy to fabricate.
Test is performed at low temperatures (10 0C) where cracking occurs.
Controlled strain (deflection) and stress (load) modes of testing.
2nd Workshop on 4PB, 24-25 September, Portugal.
17
ITFT
18
ITFT
The ITFT is the most commonly used fatigue test in the UK.
The ITFT as per BS DD ABF is not a European Standard test. (The Indirect Tensile Test is , however, included in EN 12697-24).
Test is performed at 20 0C (No fatigue cracking at this temperature!).
Controlled stress test only.
No good control of the applied load (stress).
Load capacity of the equipment to test stiff materials such as EME2 is limited.
19
ITFT specimens after testing
Fatigue cracking Vertical permanent deformation
Indentation of loading strips
Failure modes for ITFT ( high stiffness materials and/or low temperatures)
20
ITFT load control
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 20000 40000 60000 80000
No of load applications
V
e
r
t
i
c
a
l
d
e
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
(
m
m
)
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
Tensile stress (kPa)
Vertical deformation (mm)Tensile stress (kPa)
Poor control of the load (stress) at high stresses (>1000 kPa) for high stiffness materials and/or low temperatures.
Temperature = 10 0C Stiffness = 13500 MPa Target stress = 1000 kPa
21
European work on fatigue (RILEM)
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
1.E+07
1.E+08
1.E+09
10 100 1000
0(m/m)
N
f
ENTPE (T/C) KTH (4PB) LCPC (2PB) CRR(SS)CRR(BS) UofL (4PB) IBDiM (4PB) DWW (4PB)DWW (3PB) VTI (ITT) CONSULPAV (4PB)
Indirect tension test ITT
Same material
11 laboratories
T = 10 0C
22
European work on fatigue (RILEM)
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
ENTP
E (T/C
)
KTH (
4PB)
LCPC
(2PB
)
CRR(S
S)
CRR(B
S)
CONS
ULPA
V (4P
B)
IBDiM
(4PB)
DWW
(4PB)
DWW
(3PB)
VTI (I
TT)
UofL
(4PB)
6
(
m
/
m
)
Indirect tension test ITT
23
Healing
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
6000
6500
7000
7500
8000
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000
Number of cycles
S
t
i
f
f
n
e
s
s
(
M
P
a
)
During a rest period the material recovers its properties (stiffness)
24
Pavement design
Horizontal tensile strain in cement bound layers
Bituminous layer
Cementitious or unbound granular layer
Subgrade
Horizontal tensile strain
Vertical compressive stress and strain
Moving wheel
Maximum tensile strain (m )
Analytical design
11 m
fN C =
Fatigue relationship
N (million standard axles)
Transfer function
LR1132
Log N= -9.38 - 4.16logm (DBM)Log N= -9.78 - 4.32logm (HRA)
25
Summary
Fatigue cracking major distress mode in asphalt pavements.
Different equipment available (2PB, 3PB, 4PB, ITT).
Different testing modes (strain / stress).
Different failure criteria
Fatigue testing is specified in EN 12697-24.
Variability between test methods.
ITT and UKs ITFT not recommended.
Data can be used to rank materials and in pavement design.
26
Thank you
Any questions?
FATIGUE TESTINGFatigue of asphalt mixturesSeverity levelsMechanismTest configurationsTesting modesControlled strain testControlled stress testDefinition of failureFatigue data: stiffness evolutionDissipated energyEN 12697-24 Resistance to fatigueTwo-point bending trapezoidal testTwo-point bending trapezoidal testFour-point bending (4PB) testFour-point bending (4PB) testITFT ITFT ITFT specimens after testingITFT load controlEuropean work on fatigue (RILEM)European work on fatigue (RILEM)HealingPavement designSummarySlide Number 26