Upload
mavis-cannon
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Goals
Maintain service quality 1/3 of service disruptions are due to fiber cable Fault can be a disaster
Assisting reparation Reduce lost Efficiency
Not affecting the other service
Solutions for TDM-PONs
P2P Active By-pass Passive By-pass Integrated OTDR functionality
P2MP Tunable OTDR and wavelength selective reflectors Conventional OTDR and controlled reference reflections Brillouin OTDR
Solutions for WDM-PONs
Tunable OTDR/multi-wavelength source and optical reflector
Re-using existing light sources
Commercial multi-wavelength OTDR
Measuring the Individual Attenuation Distribution of Passive
Branched Optical NetworksKuniaki Tanaka, Mitsuhiro Tateda, Senior Member, IEEE,
and Yasuyuki Inoue, Member, IEEE
IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, VOL 8, NO 7, JULY 1996
Reference Reflector
Conventional OTDR
Specially designed branched networks Transmission line lengths differ with each other
Cannot test branched fiber losses individually
Go to the subscriber terminals after branching and measure the transmission loss directly
Fiber Fault Identification for Branched Access Networks Using a Wavelength-
Sweeping Monitoring Source
Chun-Kit Chan, Frank Tong,Lian-Kuan Chen, Keang-Po Ho, Dennis Lam
Introduction
Conventional OTDR cannot differentiate Rayleigh backscattered light from different branches
Multiwavelength OTDR is expensive
Experiment
1 x 4 branched optical network
Data channels: 1548nm, 1551nm
1Gb/s 210-1 PRBS NRZ
L1=8.8km, L2=L3=6.6km, L4 is unmonitored
FBG: 1556.4nm, 1558nm, 1559.7nm
3dB passband: 0.4nm, 0.8nm, 0.9nm
Sawtoothed signal: 2kHz
Summary
Makes use of FBGs
No additional monitoring source
Both time and frequency domain
With OTDR techniques, can locate exact fiber cut position