11
QMWG 3/2/2012 February 2012 Generation Resource Energy and Regulation Deployment Performance

February 2012 Generation Resource Energy and Regulation Deployment Performance

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

February 2012 Generation Resource Energy and Regulation Deployment Performance. QMWG 3/2/2012. NON-IRR GREDP – Energy Deployments. Resources below 85% threshold. * Resource was testing and used a resource status that caused it to be scored for GREDP. NON-IRR GREDP – Energy Deployments. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: February 2012 Generation Resource Energy and Regulation Deployment Performance

QMWG 3/2/2012

February 2012 Generation Resource Energy and Regulation Deployment Performance

Page 2: February 2012 Generation Resource Energy and Regulation Deployment Performance

2

NON-IRR GREDP – Energy Deployments

* Resource was testing and used a resource status that caused it to be scored for GREDP

Resources below 85% threshold

QSE Name Resource Name Fuel Type Total Intervals Passed Total Intervals Scored Std Dev(GREDP MW) GREDP Monthly Score<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> SCLE90 10 13 8.15 76.92<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> SCLE90 5 6 5.48 83.33<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> * SCGT90 11 15 73.80 73.33

Page 3: February 2012 Generation Resource Energy and Regulation Deployment Performance

3

NON-IRR GREDP – Energy Deployments

Interval Total Intervals Passed Total Intervals Scored Std Dev(GREDP MW) GREDP Monthly Score06:10:00 2,737 2,810 7.46 97.4006:05:00 2,998 3,069 9.28 97.6906:15:00 2,606 2,657 6.49 98.0806:00:00 3,553 3,622 6.88 98.0922:10:00 2,957 3,007 7.34 98.34

Bottom intervals by score

Bottom intervals by errorInterval Total Intervals Passed Total Intervals Scored Std Dev(GREDP MW) GREDP Monthly Score

10:45:00 3,229 3,241 10.93 99.6310:35:00 3,365 3,373 10.92 99.7606:05:00 2,998 3,069 9.28 97.6900:10:00 2,618 2,651 8.30 98.7606:10:00 2,737 2,810 7.46 97.40

Page 4: February 2012 Generation Resource Energy and Regulation Deployment Performance

4

NON-IRR GREDP – Regulation Deployments

Bottom 10 Resources during Regulation intervalsQSE Name Resource Name Fuel Type Total Intervals Passed Total Intervals Scored Std Dev(GREDP MW) GREDP Monthly Score

<QSE NAME>

<RESOURCE NAME> SCLE90 8 9 6.09 88.89

<QSE NAME>

<RESOURCE NAME> SCLE90 19 20 2.36 95.00

<QSE NAME>

<RESOURCE NAME> GSSUP 594 621 5.42 95.65

<QSE NAME>

<RESOURCE NAME> CC 1,844 1,923 6.91 95.89

<QSE NAME>

<RESOURCE NAME> CLLIG 4,870 5,057 2.85 96.30

<QSE NAME>

<RESOURCE NAME> CLLIG 4,813 4,997 2.85 96.32

<QSE NAME>

<RESOURCE NAME> CLLIG 451 464 4.56 97.20

<QSE NAME>

<RESOURCE NAME> CC 175 180 8.50 97.22

<QSE NAME>

<RESOURCE NAME> CC 2,908 2,982 3.18 97.52

<QSE NAME>

<RESOURCE NAME> CC 1,009 1,034 2.86 97.58

Bottom intervals by score

Interval Total Intervals Passed Total Intervals Scored Std Dev(GREDP MW) GREDP Monthly Score06:05:00 608 635 8.40 95.7506:10:00 574 592 7.18 96.9605:05:00 463 477 9.37 97.0605:10:00 472 484 6.02 97.5200:15:00 361 370 8.37 97.57

Bottom intervals by error

Interval Total Intervals Passed Total Intervals Scored Std Dev(GREDP MW) GREDP Monthly Score21:05:00 454 461 9.55 98.4805:05:00 463 477 9.37 97.0602:20:00 354 358 9.13 98.8808:05:00 522 527 8.59 99.0508:10:00 495 498 8.52 99.40

Page 5: February 2012 Generation Resource Energy and Regulation Deployment Performance

5

IRR GREDP

Resources below 95% thresholdDec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12

< 10 Intervals 9 2 8

>=10<100 Intervals 16 7 12

>=100<500 Intervals 13 2 5

>=500 Intervals 7 14 6

Weighted Averaged GREDP * 88.9% 92.0% 94.4%

Weighted Average Deviation * 10.8MWs 6.38MWs 5.1MWs

Total Intervals * 13,128 29,221 27,632

* Includes all WGRs (not just failures)

Interval Intervals Passed

Intervals Scored Std Dev GREDP Score

09:00:00 74 90 5.88 82.2219:05:00 45 54 14.69 83.3319:10:00 52 62 14.90 83.8722:45:00 102 119 7.32 85.7120:15:00 103 120 4.07 85.83

Bottom intervals by score

Bottom intervals by errorInterval Intervals

PassedIntervals Scored Std Dev GREDP Score

05:30:00 59 61 15.58 96.7219:00:00 42 45 15.19 93.3311:15:00 42 47 15.06 89.3610:50:00 30 31 14.90 96.7719:10:00 52 62 14.90 83.87

Page 6: February 2012 Generation Resource Energy and Regulation Deployment Performance

6

IRR Failures

QSE Name Resource Name Total Intervals Passed Total Intervals Scored Std Dev (ATG-Exp MW) GREDP Monthly Score<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 1 3 2.31 33.33<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 2,273 2,402 2.20 94.63<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 73 83 18.50 87.95<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 152 162 10.55 93.83<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 49 66 8.77 74.24<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 1 13 13.73 7.69<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 0 18 8.55 0.00<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 0 19 4.99 0.00<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 30 36 8.17 83.33<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 25 27 3.92 92.59<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 0 2 0.18 0.00<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 4 5 3.55 80.00<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 31 37 1.30 83.78<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 181 191 7.67 94.76<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 0 3 4.31 0.00<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 14 57 7.84 24.56<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 423 458 5.03 92.36<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 3 8 3.91 37.50<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 6 9 0.89 66.67<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 6 10 16.03 60.00<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 509 596 1.43 85.40<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 1 2 0.17 50.00<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 856 944 12.44 90.68<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 589 881 4.17 66.86<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 890 1,044 4.74 85.25<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 3 10 8.80 30.00<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 657 756 12.10 86.90<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 15 17 5.07 88.24<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 215 232 6.78 92.67<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 7 8 1.61 87.50<QSE NAME> <RESOURCE NAME> 155 170 4.64 91.18

Page 7: February 2012 Generation Resource Energy and Regulation Deployment Performance

7

GREDP Scenario Analysis

* January performance of frequency excluded intervals for IRRs was 91.4% (2184 passed/2389 scored). The Std Dev was 5.3 MWs.

IRRs >= 95% < 95% % Passing 0% - 3 MW Band 35 32 52.2%5% - 3 MW Band 37 30 55.2%10% - 3MW Band 43 24 64.2%10% - 1 MW Band when BP = 0 (Current) 36 31 53.7%Exclusions - No Freq Dev * 35 32 52.2%

* January performance of frequency excluded intervals for NON-IRRs was 99% (74406 passed/75123 scored). The Std Dev was 2.98 MWs.

NON-IRRs >= 85% < 85% % Passing 5 MW 195 46 81.0%10 MW 197 44 81.7%15 MW 238 3 98.8%5 MW - 5% 231 10 95.9%8MW - 8% (Current) 238 3 98.8%Exclusions - No Freq Dev * 238 3 98.8%

Page 8: February 2012 Generation Resource Energy and Regulation Deployment Performance

Manual HDL/LDL Override Summary

QMWG

Page 9: February 2012 Generation Resource Energy and Regulation Deployment Performance

9

Daily Summary Graph

• For this analysis, we captured unique HDL/LDL overrides– An override is considered unique if that same Resource did not

have an override within the last 10 minutes• There were 21 total unique overrides in February

– As compared to 13 in January and 13 in December

Page 10: February 2012 Generation Resource Energy and Regulation Deployment Performance

10

Daily Summary Table

DateTotal Number of

OverridesNumber of Resources

with an OverrideNumber of Unique HDL/LDL Overrides

Feb 1, 2012 0 0 0Feb 2, 2012 256 4 4Feb 3, 2012 600 10 16Feb 4, 2012 0 0 0Feb 5, 2012 0 0 0Feb 6, 2012 0 0 0Feb 7, 2012 0 0 0Feb 8, 2012 0 0 0Feb 9, 2012 0 0 0

Feb 10, 2012 0 0 0Feb 11, 2012 0 0 0Feb 12, 2012 0 0 0Feb 13, 2012 0 0 0Feb 14, 2012 0 0 0Feb 15, 2012 0 0 0Feb 16, 2012 0 0 0Feb 17, 2012 0 0 0Feb 18, 2012 0 0 0Feb 19, 2012 0 0 0Feb 20, 2012 2 1 1Feb 21, 2012 0 0 0Feb 22, 2012 0 0 0Feb 23, 2012 0 0 0Feb 24, 2012 0 0 0Feb 25, 2012 0 0 0Feb 26, 2012 0 0 0Feb 27, 2012 0 0 0Feb 28, 2012 0 0 0Feb 29, 2012 0 0 0

              

Page 11: February 2012 Generation Resource Energy and Regulation Deployment Performance

11

Reasons for Manual HDL/LDL Overrides

• An override is considered unique if that same Resource did not have an override within the last 10 minutes

• The “Other” reason given was QSE requested testing

• Congestion concerns were a result of inaccurate Resource telemetry