Upload
curtis-dickerson
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Federal Force AccountUtilizing Sponsor Resources
Georgia Airports Association – Spring Workshop
March 13, 2014
Presented ByKatie Eleam
Aviation Project Manager, Aviation Programs
Work completed by sponsor’s employees Planning, engineering, construction Can also be performed by another public
agency with sponsor agreement
What is Force Account?
Advantages of Federal Force Account Lower cost than contract construction Allows sponsors to utilize in-kind resources
Potential Disadvantages Depending on sponsor workload, may delay project Extensive record keeping required of sponsor
Why Federal Force Account? Weak economy Need to get creative to fund projects Sponsors have qualified personnel that can complete
projects more efficiently
Case Studies Fulton County – Signage Installation Rome – Runway Safety Area Improvements and
Obstruction Removal Ellijay – Runway Safety Area Improvements and
Obstruction Removal
What Projects are Eligible? Eligible Sponsor AIP Eligible Project On the Airport Layout Plan Included in the Capital
Improvement Program Has an application Routine airport
maintenance projects are not eligible (i.e. mowing)
Notes to Keep in Mind Prior GDOT approval is required Qualified personnel must be used Appropriate NEPA document must be completed No deviation from AIP standards for construction (AC
150/5370-10) allowed Must meet federal construction standards
-Procurement of materials-Inspection and Testing-Construction reporting-Plans and Specifications
How to Apply - Sponsor’s Proposal
Preferred method under the AIP is through qualification based selection or competitive bidding
Sponsor’s proposal must:-Be submitted before work initiated-Provide sufficient justification-Include detailed cost estimates, resource information, and plans and specs
Sponsor’s Proposal - Justification
Benefits to the sponsor and the Federal Government must clearly be shown
Key Phrases that should be included:-Willing & Able-Cost Savings-Qualified Personnel and Equipment-Acknowledge and Comply with all federal requirements
Wage Rates Estimated work hours Non-Salary Expenses Indirect Costs Comparison of costs between sponsor and contract
construction-Must show that force account construction is more cost effective
Sponsor’s Proposal – Detailed Cost Estimates
Project List Material Labor Equipment Est. Item Material Extended
Item No Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Item Cost Oper Rate Hours Extended Equip Rate Hours Extended1 CONSTRUCTION EXIT 1.0 EACH $2,000 $2,000 1 $18 2 $36 Dozer $80 2 $160
1 $12 2 $24 Tandem $60 2 $120
2 TYPE C SILT FENCE 26.0 100 LF $40 $1,040 2 $15 20 $600 Trencher $5 20 $100
3 CUT 44,756.0 CU. YD. 1 $18 470 $8,460 Dozer $80 470 $37,600
44,756/12 = 3730 Loads 1 $18 470 $8,460 Excavator $115 470 $54,050
3730/80 Loads per day = 47 days 3 $12 470 $16,920 Tandem $60 470 $84,600
4 FILL 12,963.0 CU. YD. 1 $18 140 $2,520 Dozer $80 140 $11,200
12,963/12 = 1080 Loads 1 $18 140 $2,520 Excavator $115 140 $16,100
1080/80 Loads per day = 14 days 3 $12 140 $5,040 Tandem $60 140 $25,200
1 $15 140 $2,100 Compactor $25 140 $3,500
5 STORM DRAIN PIPE, 18 IN, H 1-10 128.0 LIN. FT. $18 $2,304 2 $18 160 $5,760 Gradall $40 160 $6,400
FES, 18 IN, STORM DRAIN 1.0 EACH $600 $600 2 $12 160 $3,840 6 Yard $35 160 $11,200
STORM DRAIN PIPE, 24 IN, H 1-10 462.0 LIN. FT. $20 $9,240
FES, 24 IN, STORM DRAIN 1.0 EACH $700 $700
STORM DRAIN PIPE, 30 IN, H 1-10 100.0 LIN. FT. $24 $2,400
FES, 30 IN, STORM DRAIN 1.0 EACH $800 $800
JUNCTION BOX 4.0 EACH $2,000 $8,000
6 STN DUMPED RIP RAP, TP 3, 12 IN 120.0 CU. YD. $5 $540 2 $12 10 $240 6 Yard $35 10 $700
7 PERMANENT GRASSING 13.5 ACRE $500 $6,750 1 $15 20 $300 Hyrdoseeder $60 20 $1,200
8 EROSION CONTROL MATS, SLOPES 3,333.0 SQ. YD. $1 $3,333 1 $15 20 $300
9 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN
GRASSING 2 ACRE $500 $1,000 1 $18 80 $1,440 Gradall $40 80 $3,200
18" PIPE 60.0 LIN. FT. $18 $1,080 1 $18 80 $1,440 Mini Exc $65 80 $5,200
2 $12 80 $1,920 6 yard $35 80 $5,600
1 $15 10 $150 Hydroseeder $60 10 $600
Subtotals $39,787 $61,920 $260,530
Project Totals $362,237
Example Detailed Cost Estimate – Rome RSA Project
Sponsor’s Proposal – Resources Labor – qualified for the work specified and capable Material – proper procurement Equipment -Compare rates to United States Army Corps of
Engineers “Construction Equipment Ownership and Operating Expense Schedule”
Financing Workload Schedule
Procurement Methods - Materials Competitive Sealed Bids Competitive Proposal Small Purchase
-Under $100,000-Price quotes obtained from adequate number of qualified sources
Noncompetitive Proposals-Single Source-Emergency-Competition inadequate
Shows the nature and extent of the work Makes sense for the project Does not have to be a full, complete set
-Erosion Control-Construction Safety and
Phasing Plan (7460 submittal)
Sponsor’s Proposal – Plans and Specifications
Proposal Acceptance Requirements met Proposal submitted to GDOT Reviewed by Project Manager Proposal and project accepted
What’s Next Important to maintain detailed records
-Timesheets signed off by supervisor -Direct Costs
Construction Administration-Pre-Construction Meeting-Monthly pay requests-Final Inspection
AIP Required Deliverables (if design)-Engineer’s Report-Construction Safety and Phasing Plan
What to Remember Prior GDOT approval is required Qualified personnel must be used Cost Savings Appropriate NEPA document must be completed No deviation from AIP standards for construction (AC
150/5370-10) allowed Accurate record keeping Consultants are a great asset and can assist in all
phases of the project
Resources• http://
www.faa.gov/airports/resources/publications/orders/media/aip_5100_38c.pdf
• http://www.faa.gov/airports/central/aip/sponsor_guide/media/1400.pdf
• http://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/procurement/general/