Upload
jonah-pope
View
217
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Federalists and Anti-Federalists
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Adapted from We the People: The Citizen and the Constitution, Level 2, Lesson 18 and The American Journey: A History of the United States by Goldfield et al.
The Federalists were the people who supported ratifying the Constitution.
They encouraged the states to put together their ratifying conventions as soon as possible in order to ratify the Constitution.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Remember that Article VII in the Constitution said
that the Constitution would go into
effect after it had been ratified by 9
of the 13 state conventions.
James Madison
Alexander Hamilton
John Jay
The Federalists were mainly
large farmers,
merchants, and
artisans.
Also known as the Federalist Papers
Series of articles or papers written for a New York newspaper supporting ratification
One of the most important explanations of constitutional government ever written
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
“If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.” – James Madison
“Liberty is to faction what air is to fire…” – James Madison
“Give all the power to the many, they will oppress the few. Give all the power to the few, they will oppress the many.” – Alexander Hamilton
“Those who stand for nothing fall for anything.” – Alexander Hamilton
Edmund Randolf
The Anti-Federalists were the people who opposed ratifying the Constitution
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
George Mason
Elbridge Gerry
Richard Henry Lee John Hancock Samuel Adams Patrick Henry
The Anti-Federalists were
mainly small farmers, often
from rural areas. Only a few
wealthy men (like Mason and Randolf) joined
the Anti-Federalists.
While the Federalist Papers presented arguments in favor of ratifying the Constitution, the Anti-Federalist papers presented arguments against ratification
These articles were mostly written by authors with pseudonyms
They were warning the people of the dangers of tyranny that were not protected by the Constitution
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
“I had rather be a free citizen of the small republic of Massachusetts than an oppressed subject of the great American empire.”
“It is very easy to change a free government into an arbitrary one, but that it is very difficult to convert tyranny into freedom.”
“In proportion as the people lose their freedom, every gradation of distinction, between the Governors and governed obtains, until the former become masters, and the latter become slaves.”
“…every body of men, invested with power, are ever disposed to increase it.”
“It is beyond doubt that the new federal constitution, if adopted, will in great measure destroy, if not annihilate, the separate governments of the several states.”
The main thing Federalists and Anti-Federalists had conflict over was whether to throw out the Articles of Confederation or to keep the Articles of Confederation
Other areas where they disagreed:The concentration of power
Should the power be concentrated in one strong national government or divided among the separate state governments?
Inclusion of a Bill of RightsDoes the Constitution in its original composition
protect the rights of the people or should the rights of the people be clearly outlined?
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Toss the Articles of Confederation
Favored strong central government
Believed the Constitution in its original form would protect the rights of the people
Keep the Articles of Confederation
Favored power divided among state governments
People should be protected from the power of government by having clearly outlined rights
Very distrustful of government
Anti-Federalists
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
On your Fed Up: Classifying Arguments Handout, you should have written down some general information about the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
• Your job: INDIVIDUALLY decide which arguments in Part II are arguments of the Federalists (mark with an F) and which are arguments of the Anti-Federalists (mark with an A)
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Anti-Federalis
ts
We oppose a strong central government. The states will lose
their influence with the growth in the national government’s power. .
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Federalists
The necessary and proper clause (Article I, Section 8 of the
U.S. Constitution) is needed if the national government is
to do the things it is responsible for doing.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Federalists
The national government cannot become a tyranny because there are limits
placed on it through separation of powers and
checks and balances. Government will protect the rights of the people in return for their loyalty and support.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Federalists
We oppose the Articles of Confederation. It isn’t effective as a
governing document. We need a stronger central government. We
need to ratify the new government framed by the Constitution.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Anti-Federalis
ts
The Constitution’s supremacy clause makes the national
government’s laws superior to the state governments’ laws. This will destroy the state governments in favor of the national government.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Federalists
We support a strong central government. The national government needs to be
strong to function.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Anti-Federalis
ts
Republic governments only worked in small communities where the people had similar wealth and the same values. The new nation will be too large and diverse, and the
people will be unable to work toward the common good.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Federalists
A strong executive is needed if the national government is to fulfill its
responsibilities. There are checks and balances on the branches of
government so no one branch, including the executive branch, can
have too much power.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Anti-Federalis
ts
It is essential to include a Bill of Rights to protect people from the national
government. The absence of a Bill of Rights is a real threat to individual
liberties of citizens. There is no mention of freedoms like religion,
speech, press, or assembly.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Anti-Federalis
ts
The Articles of Confederation need to be amended, not abandoned. The
Constitution goes too far. A stronger national government will threaten state power. This new Constitution will create a government the people
cannot control.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Federalists
The Supremacy Clause (Article I,
Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution) is an assurance that the Constitution is the Supreme law of the land. The Constitution will protect state governments by giving
them certain powers. This will keep the national government from intruding on the powers
left to the states.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Anti-Federalist
s
The necessary and proper clause is too general and gives too much
power to the national government. All of the powers of government should be listed so appropriate limits can be placed
on them.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Anti-Federalis
ts
The Constitution gives too much power to the
executive branch. There is the threat that it will become a monarchy.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Anti-Federalis
ts
Free government requires participation of all the people. If the national government is
far from where the people live, the people will not be able to participate. This may result in
tyranny.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Federalists
A large republic where power is divided between
the national and state governments will be a
better solution than the small republics of the past
that were destroyed by self-interested citizens that did not work for the common
good. A large republic is the best protection for
individual freedoms.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Federalists
A Bill of Rights is not necessary. The Constitution gives
government only limited power. If we have a Bill of Rights, then only those rights listed may be presumed to be protected. We
cannot list every right.
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
Federalists
Anti-Federalis
ts
Citizen representation
State representation
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Federalist.jpg/220px-Federalist.jpg
http://www.acps.k12.va.us/mason/images/george_mason.jpg http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/continental/images/
photo35.jpg http://t2.gstatic.com/images?
q=tbn:ANd9GcRWmxhYQpee0T9_1fgkvrHCqK5cy9FYspP0JtCtJG3p3AWYJrjeeE4IqClkdA
http://etc.usf.edu/clipart/300/349/adams_10_lg.gif http://www.gutenberg.org/files/25093/25093-h/images/image8.jpg
© The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.