4
Annika VanSandt Red Group Women should be afforded the legal protection of a minority group because, as a group, they are constantly denied the same rights as men and are sometimes though of as property. Susan Brownmiller, the author of “Against Our Will,” explained some of the situations in which women were treated differently from men in the 1970s. She specifically focused on the topic of rape and how men used their higher status to force themselves upon women. Women were reluctant to seek legal justice because “of the complex double standard that makes the female feel responsible for and act of social aggression committed against her” (Brownmiller [Page #381]). Women are not protected from men who view women as their property. They see women as merely sexual objects. This mindset allows the Court to see rape as “a women’s problem rather than a societal problem resulting from a distorted masculine philosophy of aggression” (Brownmiller [Page #400]). Not only was rape easily dismissed, but also the pornography industry was starting to rise. Porn was another topic that gave men the idea that it was acceptable to assert dominance over women. Since “90 percent of pornographic material is geared toward the male heterosexual,” (Brownmiller [Page #393]) it is

Feminism Essay

  • Upload
    annika

  • View
    26

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

FE

Citation preview

Annika VanSandtRed Group

Women should be afforded the legal protection of a minority group because, as a group, they are constantly denied the same rights as men and are sometimes though of as property. Susan Brownmiller, the author of Against Our Will, explained some of the situations in which women were treated differently from men in the 1970s. She specifically focused on the topic of rape and how men used their higher status to force themselves upon women. Women were reluctant to seek legal justice because of the complex double standard that makes the female feel responsible for and act of social aggression committed against her (Brownmiller [Page #381]). Women are not protected from men who view women as their property. They see women as merely sexual objects. This mindset allows the Court to see rape as a womens problem rather than a societal problem resulting from a distorted masculine philosophy of aggression (Brownmiller [Page #400]). Not only was rape easily dismissed, but also the pornography industry was starting to rise. Porn was another topic that gave men the idea that it was acceptable to assert dominance over women. Since 90 percent of pornographic material is geared toward the male heterosexual, (Brownmiller [Page #393]) it is very obvious that the target audience shows resemblance to the common rapists that are described by Brownmiller. Women are being objectified and their naked bodies are seen as tools to pleasure men with. Women feel dehumanized by this propaganda that promotes acts of sexual hostility against women (Brownmiller [Page 395]). Brownmillers strong, radical viewpoints on gender equality leads one to believe she would support the Equal Rights Amendment. The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) states that the equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the US or by any state on an account of sex (The ERA: A Brief). Brownmiller supported the integration of women in police department, seeing it as a revolutionary goal of the utmost importance to womens rights (Brownmiller [Page #388]). She believed that women should be able to fight as well. Since girls are taught to be prim and proper when they are growing up, men would automatically assume they are weak. Ignorant men thought a womens ultimate security lies in being accompanied by men at all times (Brownmiller [Page #399]). Women like Brownmiller pointed out that often times they were told by the same ignorant men that they should hide from men to avoid being raped. She also explained how she had learned to use her body as a weapon when she was in danger. Opposing Brownmillers views was Phyllis Schlafly. The ERA was just five states away from ratifying the amendment until Schafly stepped forward and led the Stop ERA campaign. She thought that instead of giving women more rights, the ERA would take away rights. Women would be drafted into military combat any time men were conscripted, abolish the presumption that the husband should support his wife and take away Social Security benefits of wives and widows (Schlafly). Schlafly was a hypocrite by leading a solo career of her own when she campaigned across the country to stop the ERA. Essentially Schlafly was a feminist. When questioned about this she replied the feminist movement is not about success for women but rather treating women as victims (Schlafly). Due to Schlaflys heavy influence, the ERA was not ratified because the remaining states chose not to vote in favor before the time limit ended.Compared to the 1970s, men have become more sensitive to the rights of women. Before female athletes struggled to be recognized as a star amongst male athletes, now they broadcast leagues dedicated to women on national television. The definition of rape used to be the forcible perpetration of an act of sexual intercourse on the body of a woman not ones wife, (Brownmiller [Page #380]) now rape is not tolerated under any circumstances. That being said, rape is still one of the most unreported crimes. Women today still feel scared to speak out against rapists in fear of being victim-blamed. Men are able to walk free when they have committed a rape crime. With the Internets easy accessibility, many view porn daily. On social media there are double standards presented constantly. The media shames females for wearing short shorts or tight tops while fan girls go crazy if their favorite male celebritys nudes leak. Women still need the legal protection of a minority group and, even more, they need acceptance from society. Work Cited:Brownmiller, Susan. "Chapter 12: Women Fight Back."Against Our Will. N.p.:n.p., 1975. 375-404. Print.

"The ERA: A Brief Introduction."Equal Rights Amendment. Alice Paul Institute,n.d. Web. 3 May 2015. .

Schlafly, Phyllis. "'Equal Rights' for Women: Wrong Then, Wrong Now."LA Times.LA Times, 8 Apr. 2007. Web. 3 May 2015. .

- - -. Interview by Andrea Sachs. 7 Apr. 2009.