Upload
emediage
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/2/2019 Fenvik, 2012
1/7
New and Exotic Self-Organized Patternsfor Modulated Nanoscale Systems
Celeste Sagui,* Eliana Asciutto, and Christopher Roland
Center for High Performance Simulation and Department of Physics,
The North Carolina State UniVersity, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8202
Received October 27, 2004; Revised Manuscript Received December 16, 2004
ABSTRACT
The self-assembled domain patterns of modulated systems are the result of competing short-range attractive and long-range repulsive interactions
found in diverse physical and chemical systems. From an application point of view, there is considerable interest in these domain patterns,
as they form templates suitable for the fabrication of nanostructures. In this work we have generated a variety of new and exotic patterns,
which represent either metastable or glassy states. These patterns arise as a compromise between the required equilibrium modulation period
and the strain resulting from topologically constrained trajectories in phase space that effectively preclude the equilibrium configuration.
Introduction. A large variety of quasi-two-dimensional
physical, chemical, and even biological systems are charac-
terized by a high degree of universality, all displaying the
same kinds of structural motifs and dynamical mechanisms,
albeit on very different length and time scales.1,2 This is
irrespective of the physical origins of the underlying
microscopic interactions, which may indeed be very different.
Universal features are particularly striking in modulated
systems, which are characterized by short-range attractive
and real or effective long-range repulsive interactions (LRRI).
Here, the interactions conspire to produce patterns based on
lamellar stripe and bubble motifs. Prototypical examples
of modulated systems include such diverse examples as
magnetic garnet films,1-11 Langmuir monolayers,12-17 block-
copolymer systems,18,19 type I superconductors,20 steady-state
reaction-diffusion (Turing) patterns,21 ferrofluids,22 Swift-
Hohenberg fluid systems,23-25 liquid-crystal systems,26,27
surface science,28,29 and the primate visual cortex.2
Exploring the genesis of different configurations in these
modulated systems is a problem of fundamental importance,
which recently has been given new urgency with the advent
of nanotechnologies for molecular electronic, biomedical, and
photonic applications. Modulated systems have been usedto produce nanolithographic templates for self-assembly
applications with unprecedented characteristics,30,31 relying
on the spectacular long-range ordering and the selective
placements of defects achievable in these systems. In
particular, soft-condensed matter systems such as block
copolymers and related surface systems have proven to be
particularly versatile, because of the tunability of the size,
shape, and periodicity of the resulting patterns. Current
patterns are, for the most part, based on the self-assembly
of stripes (lamellae) and bubbles. Here, we present results
based on a successful phase field model,1,32-37 that reveal a
much larger set of unexplored patterns, so that the types of
templates that can be produced for applications is actually
more varied than what has been considered to date. These
new and exotic patterns are formed by successively taking
the system through different trajectories inside the phase
diagram. The trajectories are chosen such that the topological
constraints in the system create strained patterns that need
not evolve to the global free energy minimum. The topologi-
cal constraints can arise from a variety of physical situa-
tions: high energy barriers for the nucleation of stripes, the
bending stiffness of the stripes, packing constraints in the
initial highly geometrically ordered configurations, etc.
Model and Simulations. It is convenient to discuss the
modulated patterns in the language of two-dimensional,
uniaxial ferromagnetic thin films.1,3-11 The standard model
for this system gives a description of the order parameter
(r,) at position r as a function of time . The phenom-enological free energy functional F(suitably adimension-
alized) is expressed in terms of a Ginzburg-
Landau expan-sion based on (r) and its gradient. It consists of both a local
and a nonlocal term:
In the first term, the gradient-squared term represents the
lowest-order approximation to the cost of creating a domain* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sagui@
unity.ncsu.edu.
F[(r)] ) d2r[1
2()
2+ f() - H] +
R
2 d2rd2r(r) g(|r - r|)(r) (1)
NANO
LETTERS
2005Vol. 5, No. 2
389-395
10.1021/nl048224t CCC: $30.25 2005 American Chemical SocietyPublished on Web 01/22/2005
8/2/2019 Fenvik, 2012
2/7
wall or interface; f () is the local free energy; and -H is
the coupling between the external magnetic field H(oriented
perpendicular to the film) and the order parameter. The local
free energy has the standard temperature dependence as-
sociated with phase transitions:1,32-37 for temperatures T
greater than the critical temperature Tc, the local free energy
has a single-well structure that represents the uniform phase,
for T < Tc (the case of our simulations), f () ) -(1/2) 2
+ (1/4) ,4 so that the minima of the resulting double-well
structure identify each of two coexisting phases. These phasesare represented by either positive or negative values of -
(r): (r) > 0 corresponds to regions where the spins point
in the up direction, while (r) < 0 corresponds to spins
pointing in the down direction. H > 0 favors up spins,
which in our graphics are represented by the white phase.
The double integral represents the LRRI, with the long-range
repulsive kernel given by g(|r - r|) ) |r - r|-1 - [|r -
r|2 + L2]-1/2; L is the film thickness. In the limit of very
thin films (L f 0), the kernel g(|r - r|) f L2/(2|r - r|3)
becomes a purely repulsive, dipolar interaction. The relative
strength of the LRRI is given by the temperature-dependent
parameter R.32,34
The phase diagram as a function of R and H is sketchedin Figure 1. Here, we use R and T, somewhat loosely, as
being interchangeable because they play similar roles in
regulating the characteristic length scale of the modulated
phases (R depends on Tbut in a nontrivial, system-dependent
way3,4,8). The phase diagram is symmetric with respect to
H, with first-order transition lines separating the stripe,
bubble, and homogeneous phases. Symmetric stripe patterns
at H ) 0 (zero net magnetization) become asymmetric as H
is increased, where the stripe domains with magnetization
parallel (antiparallel) to the field become wider (thinner).
Above a critical value of H, there is a transition to a bubble
phase consisting of cylindrical domains arranged on a low-
density triangular lattice. A crucial characteristic of the
system is that at high R or high T, where the LRRI
predominate, the order parameter profile is a small-amplitude
sinusoidal (the soft-wall regime) with a short period, while
at low R or low T, where the LRRI are very weak, it has a
large-amplitude square-well profile (the hard-wall re-
gime) with a long period. Thus, quenches for high temper-
atures (shallow quenches) are mimicked in our simulations
by values of R close to Rc 0.385, while quenches for low
temperatures (deep quenches) are mimicked by values of R
that are much smaller than Rc.33-37
The time evolution of the system is obtained from the
corresponding Langevin equation
with (r,) representing the dimensionless thermal noise of
strength , which obeys the standard fluctuation-dissipationrelation (r,)(r,) ) (r - r)(- ). This equationwas discretized on grids with sizes ranging from 2562 to 5122
and numerically integrated using standard pseudospectral
methods with periodic boundary conditions.32,34
The initial patterns for the simulations consisted of highly
ordered stripe or bubble arrays that were constructed with
their proper, equilibrium wavelength characteristic of the
given point of the phase diagram. These structures were then
further equilibrated, without noise, to produce the equilibrium
patterns. These were then used as initial conditions for the
exploration of the patterns presented in this work, which were
produced by means of subsequent quenches in R and H. To
initiate the time evolution from the equilibrium patterns,
some of the configurations required the addition of initialrandom noise 0. For quenches starting in the initial hard-wall bubble configurations this initial random noise did not
seem to make a difference (here 0 as high as 10% of the
amplitude of (r,) in the initial patterns gave the sameresults as the 0 ) 0 case). On the other hand, for quenchesfrom the stripe phase, such noise was found to be essential:
without 0 the perfect lamellar patterns were too stable. Most
of the simulations were conducted without noise, but we
explicitly checked, for a number of cases, that the patterns
remained robust in the presence of noise. In general, we
observed for 2-5% of the amplitude of (r,), noise
does not effect the final configurations for the low-R and
high-R regimes. It is important to point out that a lack ofnoise does not necessarily imply zero temperature, and that
this situation is similar in spirit to the experimental realiza-
tions for ferrimagnetic films. For lamellar patterns, experi-
ments5,6,8,9 and previous theoretical40,41 considerations show
that, outside of the small critical region, temperature fluctua-
tions are irrelevant and the only role of temperature is to
modulate the characteristic period (analogously to the
parameter R). The same is true for the bubble patterns, where
the coercive friction associated with microscopic roughness
suppresses the effects of any thermal fluctuations.11 Experi-
mentally, when fluctuations are needed to initiate the time
evolution, these are simulated by adding a small ac H-field
to the system.
One of the main goals of this work is to provide a
comprehensive understanding of the evolution of highly
ordered equilibrium patterns under temperature-induced or
field-induced strain. For a given film thickness, the patterns
depend not only on R and H but also on the initial
configuration as given by the shape and size of the domains,
along with their geometrical arrangement. In addition,
modulated systems are strongly history dependent, so that
how a specific point in the phase diagram is reached is very
important. Many trajectories do not give the same patterns
Figure 1. Sketch of a phase diagram for a ferrimagnetic thin film.The phase diagram is symmetric with respect to the magnetic field
H. First-order transition lines separate stripe, bubble, and homo-geneous phases. The bubble phase is a low-density triangular lattice.Typical profiles of the order parameter are also sketched.
(r,)
) -
F[]
+ (r,)
390 Nano Lett., Vol. 5, No. 2, 2005
8/2/2019 Fenvik, 2012
3/7
when the quenches are reversed, and changes in R and H
often do not commute. Initial and final values of R in the
system can be linked through a direct quench (R0 f Rf)
or through a stepwise quench (R0 f R1 f R2 ... f Rf),
with intermediate equilibration (similarly for the field).
Again, this can lead to radically different configurations
because of the way the strain is accommodated. Stepwise
trajectories tend to produce smaller strain, leading to affine
shape transformations. Direct trajectories can lead to a
considerable accumulation of strain, whose fast release isaccomplished by the quick fragmentation of the domains,
or by nucleation of domains within domains. There are
innumerable ways of straining the system; in the simple cases
reported here, the patterns are either under compressive strain
(too many domains when fewer are required for equilibrium)
or under dilative strain (too few domains when more are
required). Strain generally is a result of topological con-
straints on the system arising from a variety of physical
situations: high energy barriers for the nucleation of stripes,
the bending stiffness of the stripes, packing constraints in
the initial highly geometrically ordered configurations.
Results and Discussion. To understand the origin of strain
in the quenched patterns, assume a configuration of stripes
at H ) 0. Let Llat be the lateral dimensions of the film, such
that all the stripes are perpendicular to the side of the film.
Let do represent the equilibrium stripe period and No the
number of lamellae in the initial equilibrium pattern, and let
dR and NR be the corresponding stripe period and number
for the quenched system. The dependence of d on the
parameters Hand R may be found numerically,3,4,7 although
in terms of temperature, do |T - Tc|1/4. Clearly, Nlat )
Nodo ) NRdR in equilibrium. Immediately after the quench,
when the number of stripes has not changed, the strain
produced by the quench in R is ) (dR - do)/do. When R
is decreased, the equilibrium stripe period is larger and thenumber of stripes is correspondingly smaller. Immediately
after such a quench, there is an excess number of stripes
which, therefore, are under a compressive strain ( > 0).
The reverse situation occurs when R is increased: im-
mediately after the quench, the number of stripes is lower
than what is required by the equilibrium condition and the
initial system is under dilative or extensional strain ( < 0).
To investigate the patterns produced, we have exhaustively
explored different quench trajectories. Here, we present only
the main results.
Temperature-Induced Strain on Stripes. Consider an initial
pattern of symmetric stripes (H ) 0) at high R (soft-wall
regime, small period) quenched to a low R (hard-wall regime,large period). The system is therefore under compressive
strain. In this case, strain release takes place by means of
dislocation nucleation and climb (the topological process by
which a dislocation gradually shortens its length until it
disappears: the original stripe is ejected), as illustrated in
Figure 2a. The process is facilitated by the Peach-Koehler
force,38 which results from the strain-induced curvature of
the stripes surrounding the dislocation core. In addition, there
is a force due to the elastic interactions between the
dislocations: the force is approximately zero when the
dislocations are on the same stripe line. The longitudinal
component of this interaction force is attractive for disloca-
tions with opposite Burgers vectors, and repulsive if these
are parallel.39 This adds to the Peach-Koehler force facilitat-
ing dislocation climb, while the perpendicular component
provides a mechanism for the clustering of dislocations to
form a domain wall or grain boundary. The stripe ejection
allows the pattern to accommodate the increase in the stripe
period induced by the lowering of R while preserving the
stripe pattern (stripes do not disappear by reducing theirwidth to zero, but by shortening their length). Dislocation
interaction forces play a role when more dislocations are
nucleated. The large change in R forced onto the system by
the quench allows for the nucleation of several dislocations
in both phases. Eventually, the tips of these dislocations
separate incommensurate regions of different periods. This
is clearly seen in the last panels of Figure 2a, where two
regions of shorter period alternate with two regions of larger
period.
The reverse quench, increasing R on an initial pattern of
ordered stripes at low R, subjects the stripes to dilative strain.
Nucleation of additional stripes should release the strain, but
this is precluded by the large energetic barriers to the
nucleation of Bloch wall pairs. Rather, the excess dilative
strain is reduced by an undulation or buckling instability as
shown in Figure 2b. The free energy for the stripe phase
may be recast as an effective Hamiltonian for a lyotropic
liquid crystal:40 the undulation instability arises from the
competition between the elastic extensional energy and the
opposing elastic bending energy. As dilative strain ac-
cumulates with increasing R, a collective buckling of the
lamellae on macroscopic scales results in stable undulation
patterns, and in stable chevron or zigzag patterns at higher
R characterized by sharp cusps. Further increasing the dilative
strain, leads to a melting of the chevron pattern via thenucleation of disclination dipoles that have their origin in
the sharp tips of the zigzags. These new tethers are oriented
at 120 with respect to the original chevron walls. This
process of line branching (also known as pincement in liquid
crystals) relieves the strain by adding lamellae. For even
higher Rs, the disclinations unbind completely, and drive
the system to a glassy stripe phase. These results are in
agreement with previous experimental observations.7-9
New and unexplored patterns emerge for initial asymmetric
(H * 0) stripes undergoing temperature quenches (Figure
2c,d). There is an additional force coming from the action
of the magnetic field on the dislocation core, which
qualitatively may be understood as follows.41 Ifd+(-) is thestripe width with magnetization parallel (antiparallel) to H,
then the surface pressure due to the curvature of the
dislocation tip is pL ) 2/d+(-) (is the wall surface tension
and 2/d+(-) the dislocation curvature). This force decreases
for + dislocations pulling them in, while the ejection of (-)
dislocations is facilitated. When the lamellae are under
compression, the process of dislocation climb and ejection
is similar to that for symmetric stripes when H is small.
However, at larger (constant) fields, the process of strain
release takes place by the rupturing of stripes and subsequent
Nano Lett., Vol. 5, No. 2, 2005 391
8/2/2019 Fenvik, 2012
4/7
Figure 2. (a) Period adaptation of symmetric stripes under compressive strain through dislocation nucleation and climb and stripe ejectionfor a direct quench R ) 0.34 f 0.06 (H ) 0.0, ) 500, 1700, 2900, 9500). (b) Final frozen configurations at different values of dilativestrain for a stepwise trajectory R ) 0.08 f 0.10 f 0.16 f 0.18 f 0.28 (initial symmetric stripes not shown). (c) Time evolution of initialasymmetric stripes under compressive strain after a direct quench R ) 0.34 f 0.08 at constant field H ) 0.08 ( ) 1800, 2000, 2200,4000). (d) Time evolution for asymmetric stripes under dilative strain after a step quench R ) 0.14 f 0.16 at constant field H ) 0.10 () 0, 2500, 5500, 37000). (e) Peristaltic modes and necking instability in a stripe-bubble transition (R ) 0.34, H) 0.0f 0.25, ) 0, 600,700, 800). The system ends in a perfect triangular lattice. (f) Final frozen configurations at different values of field for a stepwise trajectory
H) 0.25 f 0.15f 0.0f -0.15f -0.22 (initial triangular lattice not shown). For visualization purposes the domains in (e) and (f) havebeen enlarged four times (i.e., one-fourth of the system is shown).
392 Nano Lett., Vol. 5, No. 2, 2005
8/2/2019 Fenvik, 2012
5/7
coarsening of segments. This process is triggered by the
formation of two dislocation pairs separated by a single
stripe, which thickens in the region surrounded by the gaps
left by the dislocations. This is a highly correlated process,
with the thickened region of stripes inducing the pinching
of neighboring stripes. Eventually, incommensurate domains
of thick and thin stripes appear. Thinner domains disappear
by shortening their length, ultimately forming regions of
parallel stripes of the right thickness separated from each
other by grain boundaries consisting of either bubbles or
arrays of segment tips. New features also emerge when
asymmetric lamellae are under dilative strain. The undulation
patterns arise in a fashion similar to the symmetric case.
However, the asymmetric stripes do not form a chevron
pattern. Rather, some undulation grooves in the minority
black phase increase their amplitude and become more
square, while others decrease their amplitude and become
more triangular. The square black profiles eventually frame
Figure 3. Temperature-induced dilative strain on initial triangular lattices at different values of the field H. R is increased from left toright, either in stepwise [S] trajectories (where each configuration on the left acts as the initial configuration for the next configuration on
the right) or direct [D] trajectories (where each configuration is obtained through a single quench starting from the configurations at R )0.08). All the configurations are effectively frozen except for those in gray, that are still evolving slowly.
Nano Lett., Vol. 5, No. 2, 2005 393
8/2/2019 Fenvik, 2012
6/7
short, narrow areas of the majority white phase, which
effectively become disclination dipoles; unlike the symmetric
case, the dipoles do not grow as tethers out of sharp chevron
tips.
Field-Induced Strain on Stripes and Bubbles. The effect
of varying the field at constant R strongly depends on the
value ofR. In the high-R, soft-wall regime, a change in field
brings about the well-known reversible stripe-to-bubble
transition shown in Figure 2e. Above a threshold field, the
stripes experience inhomogeneous variations of their thick-ness, known as peristaltic modes in the lyotropic liquid
crystal effective Hamiltonian.41 Pinching of the stripes
follows, ending in a bubble lattice. The inverse bubble-to-
stripe transition takes place via the stripe-out instability,
where bubbles elongate along a given direction and touch
each other, melting into stripes. This process, entirely
reversible, is like reading Figure 2e from right to left. More
interesting and unexpected results appear in the low-R, hard-
wall regime. If a field is imposed on a lamellar pattern, the
stripes favored by the field just grow in thickness. If,
however, a dislocation is nucleated, period adjustment
proceeds by irreversible dislocation climb and ejection.
Reducing back the field creates the undulation patterns, and
the entire dynamics is similar to that produced by temper-
ature-induced strain. Now consider a triangular lattice. Figure
2f shows resulting patterns under successive field quenches
H ) 0.25 f 0.15 f 0.0 f -0.15, whose only effect is to
increase the area of the black bubbles, which eventually
become the majority phase. Finally, a larger field (H )
-0.22) produces morphology changes, resulting in a hon-
eycomb lattice of white bubbles.
Temperature-Induced Strain on Bubbles. The most exotic
patterns are formed when triangular lattices are placed under
dilative strain, i.e., by taking the configurations that are
formed when an initial hard-wall, low-R bubble lattice is
subject to a field quench (the patterns shown in Figure 2f),
and then further subjecting these to a quench to higher values
ofR. Roughly speaking, these patterns, illustrated in Figure
3, fall into four regimes based on the final value of R:
(i) Low temperature 0.08 j R j 0.165 regime. Domains
of the minority phase experience an elliptical instability and
end up as ordered lattices of either dumb bells or rounded
segments. Domains in the equal or majority phase experiencea higher-harmonic shape transition, and end up as Y shapes
with trigonal symmetry. As R increases, the center of the
Y becomes thinner and the tips more rounded. In all cases,
the final patterns are independent of whether the quenches
are stepwise or direct.
(ii) Lower intermediate temperature 0.165 j R < 0.22
regime. The final configurations depend very much on
whether the quenches are stepwise or direct. Domains of the
minority phase are wavy stripe segments if the trajectory is
stepwise, or form a bubble lattice if a direct quench is
involved. Equal or majority phase domains (under larger
dilative strain) acquire a Y shape in the stepwise trajec-
tories or form rings under direct quenches.
(iii) Higher intermediate temperature 0.22 j R j 0.31
regime. Configurations in this regime also depend strongly
on whether the quenches are stepwise or direct. Except for
the minority phase at high field, most configurations are
glassy states of melted stripes/segments and bubbles in
various proportions.
(iv) High temperature 0.31 j R j 0.36 regime. In the
high-R, soft-wall regime, domains have high mobilities and
reach their equilibrium configurations. Interestingly, the
points given by (R, H) ) (0.34, (0.15) correspond to the
Figure 4. Time evolution for the following: (a) Direct quench R ) 0.08 f 0.34, H ) 0.25, on initial configuration (R, H) ) (0.08, 0.25)in Figure 3; ) 10, 70, 100, 900, 1400-15000. (b) Direct quench R ) 0.08 f 0.30, H ) 0.0, on initial configuration (R, H) ) (0.08, 0.0)in Figure 3; ) 10, 30, 200, 500, 3500-15000. (c) Step quench R ) 0.26 f 0.34, H ) 0.0, on initial configuration (R, H) ) (0.26, 0.0)in Figure 3; ) 50, 200, 600, 1900, 2500-15000.
394 Nano Lett., Vol. 5, No. 2, 2005
8/2/2019 Fenvik, 2012
7/7
stripe-bubble coexistence, and stepwise or direct trajectories
determine the stripe or bubble nature of the final configu-
ration.
Finally, the time-evolution of sample systems is shown
in Figure 4. Nonlinear instabilities in these systems trigger
nontrivial temporal patterns, including the nucleation of
opposite-phase bubbles inside domains, domain fragmenta-
tion, coexistence of serpentine stripes and bubbles, etc. In
the course of our investigations, we have obtained many more
such exotic patterns, most of which will be presentedelsewhere.42 It may well be that these kinds of transient
patterns will prove to be useful experimentally. The key issue
here revolves around the long-time stabilization of these
patterns, which presumably may be achieved by means of
kinetic freezing.
Summary. We have investigated the pattern formation of
modulated systems by means of a reliable phase field model.
This model faithfully reproduces experimental and theoretical
results in previously explored regions of phase space.
However, by tuning the strain that arises through the inherent
dependence of the patterns on the temperature and the field,
and through the topological contraints of the system, we have
shown that new metastable or glassy patterns are formed that,to date, have been largely unexplored. These patterns are
the result of a complex mix of ordering mechanisms and
instabilities that will require considerable more theoretical
and experimental study before a detailed understanding is
achieved. Ultimately, it is hoped that these new patterns will
find their application as templates for nanotechnology
applications, complementing the patterns that are in current
use.
Acknowledgment. We gratefully acknowledge financial
support from NSF ITR-0312105, NSF CAREER-0348039,
and DOE DE-FG-02-98ER45t85 grants.
References
(1) Seul, M.; Andelman, D. Science 1995, 267, 476.(2) Bowman, C.; Newell, A. C. ReV. Mod. Phys. 1998, 70, 289.(3) Kooy, C.; Enz, U. Philips Res. Rep. 1960, 15, 7.
(4) Cape, J. A.; Lehman, G. W. J. Appl. Phys. 1971, 42, 5732.
(5) Molho, P.; Gouzerh, J.; Levy, J. C. S.; Porteseil, J. L. J. Magn.
Magn. Mater. 1986, 54-57, 857.
(6) Molho, P.; Porteseil, J. L.; Souche, Y.; Gouzerh, J.; Levy, J. C. S.
J. Appl. Phys. 1987, 61, 4188.
(7) Seul, M.; Monar, L. R.; OGorman, L.; Wolfe, R. Science 1991,
254, 1616.
(8) Seul, M.; Wolfe, R. Phys. ReV. A 1992, 46, 7519.
(9) Seul, M.; Wolfe, R. Phys. ReV. A 1992, 46, 7534.
(10) Garel, T.; Doniach, S. Phys. ReV. B 1982, 26, 325.
(11) Seshadri, R.; Westervelt, R. M. Phys. ReV. B 1992, 46, 5142.
(12) Weis, R. M.; McConnell, H. M. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 4453.
(13) Weis, R. M.; McConnell, H. M. Nature (London) 1984, 310, 47.(14) McConnell, H. M. Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem. 1991, 42, 171.
(15) Mohwald, H. Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem. 1990, 41, 441.
(16) Losche, M.; Mohwald, H. Eur. Biophys. J. 1984, 11, 35.
(17) Andelman, D.; Brochard, F.; Joanny, J.-F. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 86,
3673.
(18) Lopes, W. A.; Jaeger, H. M. Nature (London) 2001, 414, 735.
(19) Kim, S. O., et al. Nature (London) 2003, 424, 411.
(20) See for example: Huebener, R. P. Magnetic Flux Structures in
Superconductors; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1979.
(21) Ouyang, Q.; Swinney, H. L. Nature 1991, 352, 610.
(22) See for example: Rosensweig, R. E. Ferrohydrodynamics; Cambridge
University Press: Cambridge, 1985.
(23) Elder, K. R.; Vinals, J.; Grant, M. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1992, 68, 3024.
(24) Elder, K. R.; Vinals, J.; Grant, M. Phys. ReV. A 1992, 46, 7618.
(25) Cross, M. C.; Meiron, D. I. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1995, 75, 2152.
(26) Selinger, J. V.; Wang, Z. G.; Bruinsma, R. F.; Knobler, C. M. Phys.ReV. Lett. 1993, 70, 1139.
(27) Bertoli, F., et al. Phys. ReV. E 1998, 58, 5990.
(28) Plass, R.; Last, J. A.; Bartelt, N. C.; Kellog, G. L. Nature 2001,
412, 875.
(29) Ng, K. O.; Vanderbilt, D. Phys. ReV. B 1995, 52, 2177.
(30) Park, M., et al. Science 1997, 276, 1401.
(31) Park, C.; Yoon, J.; Thomas, E. L. Polymer 2003, 44, 6725.
(32) Roland, C.; Desai, R. C. Phys. ReV. B 1990, 42, 6658.
(33) Sagui, C.; Desai, R. C. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1993, 71, 3995.
(34) Sagui, C.; Desai, R. C. Phys. ReV. E 1994, 49, 2225.
(35) Sagui, C.; Desai, R. C. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1995, 74, 1119.
(36) Sagui, C.; Desai, R. C. Phys. ReV. E 1995, 52, 2807.
(37) Sagui, C.; Desai, R. C. Phys. ReV. E 1995, 52, 2822.
(38) See, for example: Klemen, M. Points, Lines and Walls; Wiley: New
York, 1983.
(39) See, for example: Chandrasekhar, S. Liquid Crystals; Cambridge
University Press: Cambridge, 1992.(40) Sornette, D. J. Phys. (Paris) 1987, 48, 1413.
(41) Sornette, D. J. Phys. (Paris) 1987, 48, 151.
(42) Asciutto, E.; Roland, C.; Sagui, C., unpublished.
NL048224T
Nano Lett., Vol. 5, No. 2, 2005 395