Fenvik, მარტი 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Fenvik, 2012

    1/7

    New and Exotic Self-Organized Patternsfor Modulated Nanoscale Systems

    Celeste Sagui,* Eliana Asciutto, and Christopher Roland

    Center for High Performance Simulation and Department of Physics,

    The North Carolina State UniVersity, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8202

    Received October 27, 2004; Revised Manuscript Received December 16, 2004

    ABSTRACT

    The self-assembled domain patterns of modulated systems are the result of competing short-range attractive and long-range repulsive interactions

    found in diverse physical and chemical systems. From an application point of view, there is considerable interest in these domain patterns,

    as they form templates suitable for the fabrication of nanostructures. In this work we have generated a variety of new and exotic patterns,

    which represent either metastable or glassy states. These patterns arise as a compromise between the required equilibrium modulation period

    and the strain resulting from topologically constrained trajectories in phase space that effectively preclude the equilibrium configuration.

    Introduction. A large variety of quasi-two-dimensional

    physical, chemical, and even biological systems are charac-

    terized by a high degree of universality, all displaying the

    same kinds of structural motifs and dynamical mechanisms,

    albeit on very different length and time scales.1,2 This is

    irrespective of the physical origins of the underlying

    microscopic interactions, which may indeed be very different.

    Universal features are particularly striking in modulated

    systems, which are characterized by short-range attractive

    and real or effective long-range repulsive interactions (LRRI).

    Here, the interactions conspire to produce patterns based on

    lamellar stripe and bubble motifs. Prototypical examples

    of modulated systems include such diverse examples as

    magnetic garnet films,1-11 Langmuir monolayers,12-17 block-

    copolymer systems,18,19 type I superconductors,20 steady-state

    reaction-diffusion (Turing) patterns,21 ferrofluids,22 Swift-

    Hohenberg fluid systems,23-25 liquid-crystal systems,26,27

    surface science,28,29 and the primate visual cortex.2

    Exploring the genesis of different configurations in these

    modulated systems is a problem of fundamental importance,

    which recently has been given new urgency with the advent

    of nanotechnologies for molecular electronic, biomedical, and

    photonic applications. Modulated systems have been usedto produce nanolithographic templates for self-assembly

    applications with unprecedented characteristics,30,31 relying

    on the spectacular long-range ordering and the selective

    placements of defects achievable in these systems. In

    particular, soft-condensed matter systems such as block

    copolymers and related surface systems have proven to be

    particularly versatile, because of the tunability of the size,

    shape, and periodicity of the resulting patterns. Current

    patterns are, for the most part, based on the self-assembly

    of stripes (lamellae) and bubbles. Here, we present results

    based on a successful phase field model,1,32-37 that reveal a

    much larger set of unexplored patterns, so that the types of

    templates that can be produced for applications is actually

    more varied than what has been considered to date. These

    new and exotic patterns are formed by successively taking

    the system through different trajectories inside the phase

    diagram. The trajectories are chosen such that the topological

    constraints in the system create strained patterns that need

    not evolve to the global free energy minimum. The topologi-

    cal constraints can arise from a variety of physical situa-

    tions: high energy barriers for the nucleation of stripes, the

    bending stiffness of the stripes, packing constraints in the

    initial highly geometrically ordered configurations, etc.

    Model and Simulations. It is convenient to discuss the

    modulated patterns in the language of two-dimensional,

    uniaxial ferromagnetic thin films.1,3-11 The standard model

    for this system gives a description of the order parameter

    (r,) at position r as a function of time . The phenom-enological free energy functional F(suitably adimension-

    alized) is expressed in terms of a Ginzburg-

    Landau expan-sion based on (r) and its gradient. It consists of both a local

    and a nonlocal term:

    In the first term, the gradient-squared term represents the

    lowest-order approximation to the cost of creating a domain* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sagui@

    unity.ncsu.edu.

    F[(r)] ) d2r[1

    2()

    2+ f() - H] +

    R

    2 d2rd2r(r) g(|r - r|)(r) (1)

    NANO

    LETTERS

    2005Vol. 5, No. 2

    389-395

    10.1021/nl048224t CCC: $30.25 2005 American Chemical SocietyPublished on Web 01/22/2005

  • 8/2/2019 Fenvik, 2012

    2/7

    wall or interface; f () is the local free energy; and -H is

    the coupling between the external magnetic field H(oriented

    perpendicular to the film) and the order parameter. The local

    free energy has the standard temperature dependence as-

    sociated with phase transitions:1,32-37 for temperatures T

    greater than the critical temperature Tc, the local free energy

    has a single-well structure that represents the uniform phase,

    for T < Tc (the case of our simulations), f () ) -(1/2) 2

    + (1/4) ,4 so that the minima of the resulting double-well

    structure identify each of two coexisting phases. These phasesare represented by either positive or negative values of -

    (r): (r) > 0 corresponds to regions where the spins point

    in the up direction, while (r) < 0 corresponds to spins

    pointing in the down direction. H > 0 favors up spins,

    which in our graphics are represented by the white phase.

    The double integral represents the LRRI, with the long-range

    repulsive kernel given by g(|r - r|) ) |r - r|-1 - [|r -

    r|2 + L2]-1/2; L is the film thickness. In the limit of very

    thin films (L f 0), the kernel g(|r - r|) f L2/(2|r - r|3)

    becomes a purely repulsive, dipolar interaction. The relative

    strength of the LRRI is given by the temperature-dependent

    parameter R.32,34

    The phase diagram as a function of R and H is sketchedin Figure 1. Here, we use R and T, somewhat loosely, as

    being interchangeable because they play similar roles in

    regulating the characteristic length scale of the modulated

    phases (R depends on Tbut in a nontrivial, system-dependent

    way3,4,8). The phase diagram is symmetric with respect to

    H, with first-order transition lines separating the stripe,

    bubble, and homogeneous phases. Symmetric stripe patterns

    at H ) 0 (zero net magnetization) become asymmetric as H

    is increased, where the stripe domains with magnetization

    parallel (antiparallel) to the field become wider (thinner).

    Above a critical value of H, there is a transition to a bubble

    phase consisting of cylindrical domains arranged on a low-

    density triangular lattice. A crucial characteristic of the

    system is that at high R or high T, where the LRRI

    predominate, the order parameter profile is a small-amplitude

    sinusoidal (the soft-wall regime) with a short period, while

    at low R or low T, where the LRRI are very weak, it has a

    large-amplitude square-well profile (the hard-wall re-

    gime) with a long period. Thus, quenches for high temper-

    atures (shallow quenches) are mimicked in our simulations

    by values of R close to Rc 0.385, while quenches for low

    temperatures (deep quenches) are mimicked by values of R

    that are much smaller than Rc.33-37

    The time evolution of the system is obtained from the

    corresponding Langevin equation

    with (r,) representing the dimensionless thermal noise of

    strength , which obeys the standard fluctuation-dissipationrelation (r,)(r,) ) (r - r)(- ). This equationwas discretized on grids with sizes ranging from 2562 to 5122

    and numerically integrated using standard pseudospectral

    methods with periodic boundary conditions.32,34

    The initial patterns for the simulations consisted of highly

    ordered stripe or bubble arrays that were constructed with

    their proper, equilibrium wavelength characteristic of the

    given point of the phase diagram. These structures were then

    further equilibrated, without noise, to produce the equilibrium

    patterns. These were then used as initial conditions for the

    exploration of the patterns presented in this work, which were

    produced by means of subsequent quenches in R and H. To

    initiate the time evolution from the equilibrium patterns,

    some of the configurations required the addition of initialrandom noise 0. For quenches starting in the initial hard-wall bubble configurations this initial random noise did not

    seem to make a difference (here 0 as high as 10% of the

    amplitude of (r,) in the initial patterns gave the sameresults as the 0 ) 0 case). On the other hand, for quenchesfrom the stripe phase, such noise was found to be essential:

    without 0 the perfect lamellar patterns were too stable. Most

    of the simulations were conducted without noise, but we

    explicitly checked, for a number of cases, that the patterns

    remained robust in the presence of noise. In general, we

    observed for 2-5% of the amplitude of (r,), noise

    does not effect the final configurations for the low-R and

    high-R regimes. It is important to point out that a lack ofnoise does not necessarily imply zero temperature, and that

    this situation is similar in spirit to the experimental realiza-

    tions for ferrimagnetic films. For lamellar patterns, experi-

    ments5,6,8,9 and previous theoretical40,41 considerations show

    that, outside of the small critical region, temperature fluctua-

    tions are irrelevant and the only role of temperature is to

    modulate the characteristic period (analogously to the

    parameter R). The same is true for the bubble patterns, where

    the coercive friction associated with microscopic roughness

    suppresses the effects of any thermal fluctuations.11 Experi-

    mentally, when fluctuations are needed to initiate the time

    evolution, these are simulated by adding a small ac H-field

    to the system.

    One of the main goals of this work is to provide a

    comprehensive understanding of the evolution of highly

    ordered equilibrium patterns under temperature-induced or

    field-induced strain. For a given film thickness, the patterns

    depend not only on R and H but also on the initial

    configuration as given by the shape and size of the domains,

    along with their geometrical arrangement. In addition,

    modulated systems are strongly history dependent, so that

    how a specific point in the phase diagram is reached is very

    important. Many trajectories do not give the same patterns

    Figure 1. Sketch of a phase diagram for a ferrimagnetic thin film.The phase diagram is symmetric with respect to the magnetic field

    H. First-order transition lines separate stripe, bubble, and homo-geneous phases. The bubble phase is a low-density triangular lattice.Typical profiles of the order parameter are also sketched.

    (r,)

    ) -

    F[]

    + (r,)

    390 Nano Lett., Vol. 5, No. 2, 2005

  • 8/2/2019 Fenvik, 2012

    3/7

    when the quenches are reversed, and changes in R and H

    often do not commute. Initial and final values of R in the

    system can be linked through a direct quench (R0 f Rf)

    or through a stepwise quench (R0 f R1 f R2 ... f Rf),

    with intermediate equilibration (similarly for the field).

    Again, this can lead to radically different configurations

    because of the way the strain is accommodated. Stepwise

    trajectories tend to produce smaller strain, leading to affine

    shape transformations. Direct trajectories can lead to a

    considerable accumulation of strain, whose fast release isaccomplished by the quick fragmentation of the domains,

    or by nucleation of domains within domains. There are

    innumerable ways of straining the system; in the simple cases

    reported here, the patterns are either under compressive strain

    (too many domains when fewer are required for equilibrium)

    or under dilative strain (too few domains when more are

    required). Strain generally is a result of topological con-

    straints on the system arising from a variety of physical

    situations: high energy barriers for the nucleation of stripes,

    the bending stiffness of the stripes, packing constraints in

    the initial highly geometrically ordered configurations.

    Results and Discussion. To understand the origin of strain

    in the quenched patterns, assume a configuration of stripes

    at H ) 0. Let Llat be the lateral dimensions of the film, such

    that all the stripes are perpendicular to the side of the film.

    Let do represent the equilibrium stripe period and No the

    number of lamellae in the initial equilibrium pattern, and let

    dR and NR be the corresponding stripe period and number

    for the quenched system. The dependence of d on the

    parameters Hand R may be found numerically,3,4,7 although

    in terms of temperature, do |T - Tc|1/4. Clearly, Nlat )

    Nodo ) NRdR in equilibrium. Immediately after the quench,

    when the number of stripes has not changed, the strain

    produced by the quench in R is ) (dR - do)/do. When R

    is decreased, the equilibrium stripe period is larger and thenumber of stripes is correspondingly smaller. Immediately

    after such a quench, there is an excess number of stripes

    which, therefore, are under a compressive strain ( > 0).

    The reverse situation occurs when R is increased: im-

    mediately after the quench, the number of stripes is lower

    than what is required by the equilibrium condition and the

    initial system is under dilative or extensional strain ( < 0).

    To investigate the patterns produced, we have exhaustively

    explored different quench trajectories. Here, we present only

    the main results.

    Temperature-Induced Strain on Stripes. Consider an initial

    pattern of symmetric stripes (H ) 0) at high R (soft-wall

    regime, small period) quenched to a low R (hard-wall regime,large period). The system is therefore under compressive

    strain. In this case, strain release takes place by means of

    dislocation nucleation and climb (the topological process by

    which a dislocation gradually shortens its length until it

    disappears: the original stripe is ejected), as illustrated in

    Figure 2a. The process is facilitated by the Peach-Koehler

    force,38 which results from the strain-induced curvature of

    the stripes surrounding the dislocation core. In addition, there

    is a force due to the elastic interactions between the

    dislocations: the force is approximately zero when the

    dislocations are on the same stripe line. The longitudinal

    component of this interaction force is attractive for disloca-

    tions with opposite Burgers vectors, and repulsive if these

    are parallel.39 This adds to the Peach-Koehler force facilitat-

    ing dislocation climb, while the perpendicular component

    provides a mechanism for the clustering of dislocations to

    form a domain wall or grain boundary. The stripe ejection

    allows the pattern to accommodate the increase in the stripe

    period induced by the lowering of R while preserving the

    stripe pattern (stripes do not disappear by reducing theirwidth to zero, but by shortening their length). Dislocation

    interaction forces play a role when more dislocations are

    nucleated. The large change in R forced onto the system by

    the quench allows for the nucleation of several dislocations

    in both phases. Eventually, the tips of these dislocations

    separate incommensurate regions of different periods. This

    is clearly seen in the last panels of Figure 2a, where two

    regions of shorter period alternate with two regions of larger

    period.

    The reverse quench, increasing R on an initial pattern of

    ordered stripes at low R, subjects the stripes to dilative strain.

    Nucleation of additional stripes should release the strain, but

    this is precluded by the large energetic barriers to the

    nucleation of Bloch wall pairs. Rather, the excess dilative

    strain is reduced by an undulation or buckling instability as

    shown in Figure 2b. The free energy for the stripe phase

    may be recast as an effective Hamiltonian for a lyotropic

    liquid crystal:40 the undulation instability arises from the

    competition between the elastic extensional energy and the

    opposing elastic bending energy. As dilative strain ac-

    cumulates with increasing R, a collective buckling of the

    lamellae on macroscopic scales results in stable undulation

    patterns, and in stable chevron or zigzag patterns at higher

    R characterized by sharp cusps. Further increasing the dilative

    strain, leads to a melting of the chevron pattern via thenucleation of disclination dipoles that have their origin in

    the sharp tips of the zigzags. These new tethers are oriented

    at 120 with respect to the original chevron walls. This

    process of line branching (also known as pincement in liquid

    crystals) relieves the strain by adding lamellae. For even

    higher Rs, the disclinations unbind completely, and drive

    the system to a glassy stripe phase. These results are in

    agreement with previous experimental observations.7-9

    New and unexplored patterns emerge for initial asymmetric

    (H * 0) stripes undergoing temperature quenches (Figure

    2c,d). There is an additional force coming from the action

    of the magnetic field on the dislocation core, which

    qualitatively may be understood as follows.41 Ifd+(-) is thestripe width with magnetization parallel (antiparallel) to H,

    then the surface pressure due to the curvature of the

    dislocation tip is pL ) 2/d+(-) (is the wall surface tension

    and 2/d+(-) the dislocation curvature). This force decreases

    for + dislocations pulling them in, while the ejection of (-)

    dislocations is facilitated. When the lamellae are under

    compression, the process of dislocation climb and ejection

    is similar to that for symmetric stripes when H is small.

    However, at larger (constant) fields, the process of strain

    release takes place by the rupturing of stripes and subsequent

    Nano Lett., Vol. 5, No. 2, 2005 391

  • 8/2/2019 Fenvik, 2012

    4/7

    Figure 2. (a) Period adaptation of symmetric stripes under compressive strain through dislocation nucleation and climb and stripe ejectionfor a direct quench R ) 0.34 f 0.06 (H ) 0.0, ) 500, 1700, 2900, 9500). (b) Final frozen configurations at different values of dilativestrain for a stepwise trajectory R ) 0.08 f 0.10 f 0.16 f 0.18 f 0.28 (initial symmetric stripes not shown). (c) Time evolution of initialasymmetric stripes under compressive strain after a direct quench R ) 0.34 f 0.08 at constant field H ) 0.08 ( ) 1800, 2000, 2200,4000). (d) Time evolution for asymmetric stripes under dilative strain after a step quench R ) 0.14 f 0.16 at constant field H ) 0.10 () 0, 2500, 5500, 37000). (e) Peristaltic modes and necking instability in a stripe-bubble transition (R ) 0.34, H) 0.0f 0.25, ) 0, 600,700, 800). The system ends in a perfect triangular lattice. (f) Final frozen configurations at different values of field for a stepwise trajectory

    H) 0.25 f 0.15f 0.0f -0.15f -0.22 (initial triangular lattice not shown). For visualization purposes the domains in (e) and (f) havebeen enlarged four times (i.e., one-fourth of the system is shown).

    392 Nano Lett., Vol. 5, No. 2, 2005

  • 8/2/2019 Fenvik, 2012

    5/7

    coarsening of segments. This process is triggered by the

    formation of two dislocation pairs separated by a single

    stripe, which thickens in the region surrounded by the gaps

    left by the dislocations. This is a highly correlated process,

    with the thickened region of stripes inducing the pinching

    of neighboring stripes. Eventually, incommensurate domains

    of thick and thin stripes appear. Thinner domains disappear

    by shortening their length, ultimately forming regions of

    parallel stripes of the right thickness separated from each

    other by grain boundaries consisting of either bubbles or

    arrays of segment tips. New features also emerge when

    asymmetric lamellae are under dilative strain. The undulation

    patterns arise in a fashion similar to the symmetric case.

    However, the asymmetric stripes do not form a chevron

    pattern. Rather, some undulation grooves in the minority

    black phase increase their amplitude and become more

    square, while others decrease their amplitude and become

    more triangular. The square black profiles eventually frame

    Figure 3. Temperature-induced dilative strain on initial triangular lattices at different values of the field H. R is increased from left toright, either in stepwise [S] trajectories (where each configuration on the left acts as the initial configuration for the next configuration on

    the right) or direct [D] trajectories (where each configuration is obtained through a single quench starting from the configurations at R )0.08). All the configurations are effectively frozen except for those in gray, that are still evolving slowly.

    Nano Lett., Vol. 5, No. 2, 2005 393

  • 8/2/2019 Fenvik, 2012

    6/7

    short, narrow areas of the majority white phase, which

    effectively become disclination dipoles; unlike the symmetric

    case, the dipoles do not grow as tethers out of sharp chevron

    tips.

    Field-Induced Strain on Stripes and Bubbles. The effect

    of varying the field at constant R strongly depends on the

    value ofR. In the high-R, soft-wall regime, a change in field

    brings about the well-known reversible stripe-to-bubble

    transition shown in Figure 2e. Above a threshold field, the

    stripes experience inhomogeneous variations of their thick-ness, known as peristaltic modes in the lyotropic liquid

    crystal effective Hamiltonian.41 Pinching of the stripes

    follows, ending in a bubble lattice. The inverse bubble-to-

    stripe transition takes place via the stripe-out instability,

    where bubbles elongate along a given direction and touch

    each other, melting into stripes. This process, entirely

    reversible, is like reading Figure 2e from right to left. More

    interesting and unexpected results appear in the low-R, hard-

    wall regime. If a field is imposed on a lamellar pattern, the

    stripes favored by the field just grow in thickness. If,

    however, a dislocation is nucleated, period adjustment

    proceeds by irreversible dislocation climb and ejection.

    Reducing back the field creates the undulation patterns, and

    the entire dynamics is similar to that produced by temper-

    ature-induced strain. Now consider a triangular lattice. Figure

    2f shows resulting patterns under successive field quenches

    H ) 0.25 f 0.15 f 0.0 f -0.15, whose only effect is to

    increase the area of the black bubbles, which eventually

    become the majority phase. Finally, a larger field (H )

    -0.22) produces morphology changes, resulting in a hon-

    eycomb lattice of white bubbles.

    Temperature-Induced Strain on Bubbles. The most exotic

    patterns are formed when triangular lattices are placed under

    dilative strain, i.e., by taking the configurations that are

    formed when an initial hard-wall, low-R bubble lattice is

    subject to a field quench (the patterns shown in Figure 2f),

    and then further subjecting these to a quench to higher values

    ofR. Roughly speaking, these patterns, illustrated in Figure

    3, fall into four regimes based on the final value of R:

    (i) Low temperature 0.08 j R j 0.165 regime. Domains

    of the minority phase experience an elliptical instability and

    end up as ordered lattices of either dumb bells or rounded

    segments. Domains in the equal or majority phase experiencea higher-harmonic shape transition, and end up as Y shapes

    with trigonal symmetry. As R increases, the center of the

    Y becomes thinner and the tips more rounded. In all cases,

    the final patterns are independent of whether the quenches

    are stepwise or direct.

    (ii) Lower intermediate temperature 0.165 j R < 0.22

    regime. The final configurations depend very much on

    whether the quenches are stepwise or direct. Domains of the

    minority phase are wavy stripe segments if the trajectory is

    stepwise, or form a bubble lattice if a direct quench is

    involved. Equal or majority phase domains (under larger

    dilative strain) acquire a Y shape in the stepwise trajec-

    tories or form rings under direct quenches.

    (iii) Higher intermediate temperature 0.22 j R j 0.31

    regime. Configurations in this regime also depend strongly

    on whether the quenches are stepwise or direct. Except for

    the minority phase at high field, most configurations are

    glassy states of melted stripes/segments and bubbles in

    various proportions.

    (iv) High temperature 0.31 j R j 0.36 regime. In the

    high-R, soft-wall regime, domains have high mobilities and

    reach their equilibrium configurations. Interestingly, the

    points given by (R, H) ) (0.34, (0.15) correspond to the

    Figure 4. Time evolution for the following: (a) Direct quench R ) 0.08 f 0.34, H ) 0.25, on initial configuration (R, H) ) (0.08, 0.25)in Figure 3; ) 10, 70, 100, 900, 1400-15000. (b) Direct quench R ) 0.08 f 0.30, H ) 0.0, on initial configuration (R, H) ) (0.08, 0.0)in Figure 3; ) 10, 30, 200, 500, 3500-15000. (c) Step quench R ) 0.26 f 0.34, H ) 0.0, on initial configuration (R, H) ) (0.26, 0.0)in Figure 3; ) 50, 200, 600, 1900, 2500-15000.

    394 Nano Lett., Vol. 5, No. 2, 2005

  • 8/2/2019 Fenvik, 2012

    7/7

    stripe-bubble coexistence, and stepwise or direct trajectories

    determine the stripe or bubble nature of the final configu-

    ration.

    Finally, the time-evolution of sample systems is shown

    in Figure 4. Nonlinear instabilities in these systems trigger

    nontrivial temporal patterns, including the nucleation of

    opposite-phase bubbles inside domains, domain fragmenta-

    tion, coexistence of serpentine stripes and bubbles, etc. In

    the course of our investigations, we have obtained many more

    such exotic patterns, most of which will be presentedelsewhere.42 It may well be that these kinds of transient

    patterns will prove to be useful experimentally. The key issue

    here revolves around the long-time stabilization of these

    patterns, which presumably may be achieved by means of

    kinetic freezing.

    Summary. We have investigated the pattern formation of

    modulated systems by means of a reliable phase field model.

    This model faithfully reproduces experimental and theoretical

    results in previously explored regions of phase space.

    However, by tuning the strain that arises through the inherent

    dependence of the patterns on the temperature and the field,

    and through the topological contraints of the system, we have

    shown that new metastable or glassy patterns are formed that,to date, have been largely unexplored. These patterns are

    the result of a complex mix of ordering mechanisms and

    instabilities that will require considerable more theoretical

    and experimental study before a detailed understanding is

    achieved. Ultimately, it is hoped that these new patterns will

    find their application as templates for nanotechnology

    applications, complementing the patterns that are in current

    use.

    Acknowledgment. We gratefully acknowledge financial

    support from NSF ITR-0312105, NSF CAREER-0348039,

    and DOE DE-FG-02-98ER45t85 grants.

    References

    (1) Seul, M.; Andelman, D. Science 1995, 267, 476.(2) Bowman, C.; Newell, A. C. ReV. Mod. Phys. 1998, 70, 289.(3) Kooy, C.; Enz, U. Philips Res. Rep. 1960, 15, 7.

    (4) Cape, J. A.; Lehman, G. W. J. Appl. Phys. 1971, 42, 5732.

    (5) Molho, P.; Gouzerh, J.; Levy, J. C. S.; Porteseil, J. L. J. Magn.

    Magn. Mater. 1986, 54-57, 857.

    (6) Molho, P.; Porteseil, J. L.; Souche, Y.; Gouzerh, J.; Levy, J. C. S.

    J. Appl. Phys. 1987, 61, 4188.

    (7) Seul, M.; Monar, L. R.; OGorman, L.; Wolfe, R. Science 1991,

    254, 1616.

    (8) Seul, M.; Wolfe, R. Phys. ReV. A 1992, 46, 7519.

    (9) Seul, M.; Wolfe, R. Phys. ReV. A 1992, 46, 7534.

    (10) Garel, T.; Doniach, S. Phys. ReV. B 1982, 26, 325.

    (11) Seshadri, R.; Westervelt, R. M. Phys. ReV. B 1992, 46, 5142.

    (12) Weis, R. M.; McConnell, H. M. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 4453.

    (13) Weis, R. M.; McConnell, H. M. Nature (London) 1984, 310, 47.(14) McConnell, H. M. Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem. 1991, 42, 171.

    (15) Mohwald, H. Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem. 1990, 41, 441.

    (16) Losche, M.; Mohwald, H. Eur. Biophys. J. 1984, 11, 35.

    (17) Andelman, D.; Brochard, F.; Joanny, J.-F. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 86,

    3673.

    (18) Lopes, W. A.; Jaeger, H. M. Nature (London) 2001, 414, 735.

    (19) Kim, S. O., et al. Nature (London) 2003, 424, 411.

    (20) See for example: Huebener, R. P. Magnetic Flux Structures in

    Superconductors; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1979.

    (21) Ouyang, Q.; Swinney, H. L. Nature 1991, 352, 610.

    (22) See for example: Rosensweig, R. E. Ferrohydrodynamics; Cambridge

    University Press: Cambridge, 1985.

    (23) Elder, K. R.; Vinals, J.; Grant, M. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1992, 68, 3024.

    (24) Elder, K. R.; Vinals, J.; Grant, M. Phys. ReV. A 1992, 46, 7618.

    (25) Cross, M. C.; Meiron, D. I. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1995, 75, 2152.

    (26) Selinger, J. V.; Wang, Z. G.; Bruinsma, R. F.; Knobler, C. M. Phys.ReV. Lett. 1993, 70, 1139.

    (27) Bertoli, F., et al. Phys. ReV. E 1998, 58, 5990.

    (28) Plass, R.; Last, J. A.; Bartelt, N. C.; Kellog, G. L. Nature 2001,

    412, 875.

    (29) Ng, K. O.; Vanderbilt, D. Phys. ReV. B 1995, 52, 2177.

    (30) Park, M., et al. Science 1997, 276, 1401.

    (31) Park, C.; Yoon, J.; Thomas, E. L. Polymer 2003, 44, 6725.

    (32) Roland, C.; Desai, R. C. Phys. ReV. B 1990, 42, 6658.

    (33) Sagui, C.; Desai, R. C. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1993, 71, 3995.

    (34) Sagui, C.; Desai, R. C. Phys. ReV. E 1994, 49, 2225.

    (35) Sagui, C.; Desai, R. C. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1995, 74, 1119.

    (36) Sagui, C.; Desai, R. C. Phys. ReV. E 1995, 52, 2807.

    (37) Sagui, C.; Desai, R. C. Phys. ReV. E 1995, 52, 2822.

    (38) See, for example: Klemen, M. Points, Lines and Walls; Wiley: New

    York, 1983.

    (39) See, for example: Chandrasekhar, S. Liquid Crystals; Cambridge

    University Press: Cambridge, 1992.(40) Sornette, D. J. Phys. (Paris) 1987, 48, 1413.

    (41) Sornette, D. J. Phys. (Paris) 1987, 48, 151.

    (42) Asciutto, E.; Roland, C.; Sagui, C., unpublished.

    NL048224T

    Nano Lett., Vol. 5, No. 2, 2005 395