20
•FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project –Hydroelectric Power Generation •Drought •Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

•FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project–Hydroelectric Power Generation

•Drought

•Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply

Sabine River Authority Issues

Page 2: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

– Current license issued Oct.1963 – Expires Sept. 2013– Filed NOI/PAD September 22, 2008– Preparing license application 2008 – 2011 – File license application September, 2011– Re-licensing could affect all levels of Operations

• Lake levels• Downstream releases• Water supply yield• Water releases for instream flows and bays & estuaries• Hydroelectric power production• Construction/Permitting within Project Boundary

Re-Licensing the Toledo Bend Project

Page 3: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

FERC Relicensing Challenges

• In the early 1960’s, the Clean Water Act, the National Environmental Protection Act, and the National Historic Properties Act had not been enacted.

• Before FERC will issue a new license for Toledo Bend, all those Acts must be complied with.

• It is the responsibility of the licensee’s (SRA-TX and SRA-LA) to prove the project is in compliance.

Page 4: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues
Page 5: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

• Length – 560 miles

• Drainage Area – 9,952 sq. mi.25% in Louisiana75% in Texas

• Boundary reach covered by Sabine River Compact.

• Available water from the boundary reach down is split equally between States.

• Toledo Bend Dam is located 147 miles from top of Sabine Lake.

• Average Inflow into Sabine Lake – 5,982,000 Ac-ft/yr

Sabine River Basin Facts

Page 6: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

Toledo Bend Project

• Water Supply

• Hydroelectric Power

• Recreation

Page 7: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

Toledo Bend Reservoir

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission– Project No. 2305; license issued 1963 (LA & TX)

185,000 surface acres Max Power Pool Elev 172.0 ft MSL Storage Capacity 4,477,000 acre-feet Average Inflow 4,200,000 acre-feet/year Shoreline 1,200+ miles Drainage Area 7,190 sq. miles

Page 8: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

Water Volumes

• 1 Acre-foot = 325,848 gallons• Toledo Bend Reservoir

• 4,476,951 Acre-feet @ 172 ft. msl• 4,200,000 Acre-feet annual average inflow

• Hydro Power Generation – 2 Units• 28,000 acre-feet per 24 hours

• Haynesville Shale Hydrofracking• 6.5 million gallons/ 20 acre-feet

• Evaporation Loss (Monthly)• August – 40,000 acre-feet

Page 9: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

“Firm Yield”

• “The amount of water that can be supplied from a reservoir on an annual basis during the most critical drought period of record.”

• Forest & Cotton, 1959 2,074,500 ac-ft• Brown & Root, 1991 2,086,600 ac-ft• TCB, 2005 1,908,000 ac-ft• Louisiana’s Portion 954,000 ac-ft

Page 10: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

172 msl 4,476,951 ac-ft

Elevation and VolumeToledo Bend Reservoir

168 msl 3,788,901 ac-ft

169 msl 3,953,801 ac-ft

170 msl 4,123,426 ac-ft 171 msl 4,297,776 ac-ft

Page 11: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

Elevation and VolumeToledo Bend Reservoir

172 ft-msl

168 ft-msl

688,000 Acre-Feet

15% of Total Volume

16% of Average Annual Inflow

Page 12: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

LA SRA Water Sales(Toledo Bend Reservoir)

• Existing ContractsAnnual withdrawals: 27,589 ac-ft/yrAdditional options: 37,940 ac-ft/yrContracts total: 65,529 ac-ft/yr

Haynesville Shale (projected) 36,500 ac-ft/yr

• Non-Allocated Water 851,971 ac-ft/yr

Page 13: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

Power Generation vs. Water Supply

• Power Sales Agreement– Expires 2018– Notice of Termination due 2015– Power Sales Revenue accounts for 40% of total

SRA Revenue

• Water Supply– Toledo Bend:

• Accounts for 12% of SRA Revenue– Diversion Canal

• Accounts for 34% of SRA Revenue

Page 14: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

Water TB12%

Power40%

SRD34%

Other14%

SRA RevenueFY 06 -FY 10

Page 15: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

Future Utilization of Toledo Bend Reservoir

• SRA’s Board of Commissioners has adopted the strategy of developing water sales as an alternative source of revenue in lieu of hydroelectric power generation.

• “Run of the River” for Power Generation– Environmental Flows– Controlled excess capacity releases

Page 16: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

Water Supply Proposal

• Out-of-State Sale– Requires Governor’s Consent

• 600,000 Acre-Feet Per Year• Maximum Monthly Withdrawal

– 75,000 Acre-Feet/month– Equivalent to running 2-generators 2.67

days/month• Drought Contingency Plan

Page 17: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

January February March April May June July August September October November December

(100,000)

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

800,000

Average InflowAcre-Feet

1969 - 2010

75,000 Ac-ft Max

Power Sales Agreement1,000,000 Acre-feet

May - September

600,000 Acre-Feet Maximum Annual Water Supply

Power Sales vs Water Supply

Page 18: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

Relative Value of Water for Hydropower vs. Water Supply

(Based on one million acre-feet)

$48,877,650

$2,606,808

$0

$10,000,000

$20,000,000

$30,000,000

$40,000,000

$50,000,000

$60,000,000

Water Supply

HydroApprox. $.008 / 1000 Gallon

$.15 / 1000 Gallon

Page 19: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

Balancing Water Supply/Lake LevelSRA-LA & SRA-TX

• Inter-Basin Transfers– Present Law prohibits SRA-TX from transferring water outside

the Sabine River Basin– Highly probable SRA-TX will be granted a permit to transfer

300,000 acre-feet per year outside the Sabine River Basin of Texas

• SRA-LA will reduce its allocation to 300,000 acre-feet per year

• Proposed Cooperative Agreement– In the event SRA-TX does not receive an Interbasin Transfer

Permit, SRA-LA may enter into agreement with SRA-TX to purchase up to 300,000 acre-feet per year for lake-level mitigation and to balance operational budgets

Page 20: FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues

Water Supply vs. Hydroelectric CONCLUSION

• Extensive Financial and Environmental Analysis have been conducted

• Minimal Environmental Impact and Substantial Economic and Social Benefits

• Consistent with purposes for which Toledo Bend was constructed

• Consistent with the public trust mandate of Article IX, 1 of the Louisiana Constitution