Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Van der Waals - Zeeman Institute, University of Amsterdam
Fermionic Dipoles: Many-Body Physicswith Anisotropic Interactions
M.A. Baranov
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Outline:
1. BCS pairing in a dipolar Fermi gas
2. Laughlin and Wigner crystal states ina rapidly rotating 2D dipolar Fermi gas
In collaboration with:
Ł. Dobrek, H. Fehrmann, M. Lewenstein, M. Mar’enko,Klaus Osterloh, Val. Rychkov, and G. Shlyapnikov
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Dipolar Fermi gas
•Single-component gas of fermionic dipolar particles•All dipoles are oriented in the same direction (z-axis)
Hamiltonian
zr’
r−r ′
r
where is the dipole-dipole interaction
∫⎭⎬⎫
⎩⎨⎧
−+∆−= +
r trap rrVm
rH r
rrhr )()(2
)(2
ψµψ
∫ ++ −+',
)'()'()'()()(21
rr d rrrrVrrrr
rrrrrr ψψψψ
)cos31)(/()( 232rd rdrV r
r θ−=
Assumptions
Fnd ε<<2Gas: the mean dipole-dipole interaction is much less than the Fermi energy Fε
T ≈ F 2
2m 62n2/3Regime of quantum degeneracy:
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Properties of the dipole-dipole interaction
• long range• couples different angular moments l• anisotropic (partially attractive)
Attractiveinteraction
Repulsive interaction
Possibility of BCS pairing at low temperatures?
05
40,10,1 2 <−=>====< dmlVml dπ !
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Strength of the dipolar interaction
Scattering amplitude at low energies is energy independent(similar to a scattering with a short-rang potential) andcan be characterized by an effective scattering length
22
22hπ
mdad −=
Exampleso
d Aa 1450−=Polar molecules: 183 105.15.1, −×== DdND charge × cm
o
d AaDdNO 24,16.0, −==Atomic magnetic moments:
),106*(6, 2DdCr B−×== µµ
o
d Aa 5−=
a~10 1000ÅFor short-range interactions:1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
BCS pairing:
Formation of pair-correlated states - Cooper pairs,characterized by an order parameter
Δ~⟨ ≠ 0
- the critical temperatureT ≤ Tcat temperatures
Consequences:
• single-particle excitations are gapped• Fermi system exhibits collective behaviorsimilar to Bose systems: superfluidity, superconductivity
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
What to expect for pairing with dipole-dipole interactions?(simple intuitive picture)
the order parameter
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Critical temperature and the order parameter
can be found from the gap equation
The order parameter
p
Δp = Δp ′
p’
-p-p-p’
pVeff
or
∑∆=∆−lodd
ll pYpppp )ˆ()()(~)()( 0rrrr ψψ
3)2(')'(
)(22/)(tanh)',()(
h
rr
r
rrrr
πpdp
pETpEppVp eff ∆−=∆ ∫
where
cTThe gap equation has a nontrivial solution at temperatures below
the critical temperature
- excitation energy
- effective interaction
222 )2/()()( µ−+∆= mpppE rr
)',( ppVeffrr
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Effective interaction
),',()'()',( ppVppVppV deffrrrrrr δ+−=
where
( )1cos33
4)'( '22 −=− −ppd dppV rr
rr θπ- direct dipole-dipoleinteraction
=
+ +
+ - many-bodycontributions
)',( ppV rrδ
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
1/)( <<− cc TTTFor temperatures close to the critical temperature:
the order parameter is small, ,cT<<∆
and the gap equation can be expanded in its powers:
3'
'
)2(')'(
2)2/tanh(
)',()(h
rrrrr
πξξ pdp
TppVp
p
peff ∆−=∆ ∫
,4
')'()',()(8
)3(7 322 π
ενπς ndnpnppV
T FFeffF
rrrr
∆− ∫
3/12 )6( np F πh= is the Fermi momentumwhere
322/)( hπεν FF mp= the density of states
3/222
)6(2
nmF πε h
=at the Fermi energy
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Results for 1/)( <<− cc TTT PRA, 66, 013606 (2002)
The critical temperature
)12
exp(44.1 2ndT F
Fcπεε −=
Which values to expect?
31210 −> cmn3ND nKTc 100>for at densities
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
The order parameter
at the Fermi surface
at arbitrary momentum
z
pθ
)(/15.2)( 0 nTTTnp ccFrr φ−=∆
)cos2
sin(2)(0 nn rr θπφ =
∫ ∆−=∆π
π4
')'()'(6
)(2 ndnpnppVp FFd
rrrrr
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Physical consequences
/21. Anisotropic order parameter with line of zeros at(similar to the polar phase of andsome heavy-fermion compounds)
3He
As a result:
2. Anisotropic gap in the spectrum of single-particle excitations
3. Anisotropic collective excitations2~ TC4. Specific heat
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Pairing in a trap (the role of a confining potential)
Hamiltonian:
∫⎭⎬⎫
⎩⎨⎧
−+∆−= +
r trap rrVm
rH r
rrhr )()(2
)(2
ψµψ
∫ ++ −+',
)'()'()'()()(21
rr d rrrrVrrrr
rrrrrr ψψψψ
])([2
)( 22222 zyxmrV ztrap ωωρ ++=rwhere
z/1/2Important parameter: - aspect ratio
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
The order parameter
),()()()(),( 212121 rRrrrrVrr drrrrrrrr ∆=−=∆ ψψ
2/)( 21 rrR rrr+= 21 rrr rrr −=andwhere
The (linearized) gap equation
with the kernel
i i − where and
).()()(2
2
rrrVm trap
rrrhννν ψεψ =
⎭⎬⎫
⎩⎨⎧
+∆−
∫ ∆−=∆',')( )','()',';,()(),(
rReffd rRrRrRKrVrR rrrrrrrrrrr
),()()()()(2
)2
tanh()2
tanh().;,( 4
*3
*21
, 21
21
4321 2121
21
rrrrTTrrrrK rrrrrrrrνννν
νν
ψψψψξξ
ξξ
∑ +
+=
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
1. The case cz T<<ρωω ,
,)6( 3/10
2npF πh=
and, as a function of
The quantity ∫ ∆−=∆ rdRrrpiRp rrrrrrr ),()exp(),(~
of on the scaleRr
,/~0 cF mTphξ
is a slow varying function
pr , it varies
0non a scale of the order of where is the gas
density in the trap center.
Ansatz for the order parameter
( ),2/)cos(sin)(~),)((~nF RRnRp r
rrrrθπ×∆=∆
where is the local Fermi momentum.))((2)( RVmRp trapF
rr−= µ
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
)(~ Rr
∆Equation on
)(~24
1)(
48)3(7
, 22
2
2 Rnd
RVf
Tv
ziF
F
trapRi
c
Fi
rr
∆⎪⎭
⎪⎬⎫
⎪⎩
⎪⎨⎧
⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ ++∇⎟⎟
⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛− ∑ =ρ
πεεπ
ζ
)(~ln RTTtrap
c
c r∆=
2
61π
+=zf2
31πρ −=fwhere and
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Results for cz T<<ρωω ,
1.1. The critical temperature in the trap:
)24
1(48
)3(722 ndTT
TT F
cc
ctrap
c πεπ
ςω+−=
−
,61312 3/42
3/22
⎭⎬⎫
⎩⎨⎧
++−× − λπ
λπ
( ) 3/12zωωω ρ= ρωωλ /z=where and
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
3/4ωλω =z
3/2−= ωλω ρFor a given number of particles in a trap
and
)(24
1 20
λπεω tdnTT
TT F
cc
ctrap
c +−=−
λ
0.694
0.384
t λ( )
2.50.2 λ0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
)(λt
The optimal aspect ratio
8.0≈optλ
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
1.2. The order parameter in the trap
has a gaussian form:
,22
exp~)( 2
2
2
2
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−−∆
z
z
lR
lR
Rρ
ρr
with 4/12203/155.0
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛≈
cF
F
Tdnvl ω
εωλρ
4/12203/268.0
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛≈ −
cF
Fz T
dnvl ωεω
λ
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Comparison of different scales
ω/FTF vR = size of the cloud
size of the pairing regionnear
cT2/1)/(~ cTF TRl ω
TFccF RTTv )/(/~0 ωξ = coherence length
TFRl <<<<0ξ
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
, z Tc , z 2. The case (but )
For a given dipolar interaction strengththere is critical aspect ratio c above which the BCS pairingdoes not take place
λ
Γ
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.60.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
−1
N=105
N=2*10
N=106
6
no BCS
BCS
PRL, 92, 250403 (2004)
Fdn πε/)0(36 2=Γ
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
The order parameter at criticality:
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0
0.5
1
∆∆ z
ρ
λ = 2.2−1
Δ R
zRz
, R
Ri - the size of the cloud in the i-th direction
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Resume:
The BCS pairing in a polarized dipolar Fermi gas is
anisotropic and very sensitive to confining potential
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Laughlin and Wigner crystal states inrapidly rotating 2D dipolar Fermi gas
Motivation:
Is it possible to model Fractional Quantum Hall and Wigner crystal states with ultracold (Fermi) gases?
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Fractional quantum Hall states
Cold gases analogs:Ingredients of the FQHE:
- (quasi)2D system - (quasi)2D trapped gas
- Trap rotation(critical rotation)
- Long-range dipole-dipoleinteraction
- speckle radiation from arotating diffractive mask
- Strong Magnetic field(Landau levels)
- Long-range Coulomb interaction(strongly correlated states)
- Quenched disorder(robustness - plateaus)
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
System
N dipolar fermions polarizedin the z-direction in a(quasi)2D rotating harmonic trap
Possible experimental realizations
1. Close-to-critical rotation of the harmonic trap(JILA, 2003)
2. Critical rotation + extra confining potential(LKB ENS, 2003)
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Hamiltonian (in the rotational frame)
H ∑j1N pj
2
2m Vtraprj − Lz Vdipole
rj x j,yj 0 0ezwhere
V trapr m02r2/2 - trapping potential
Vdrk − rl d2 /|rk − rl |3Vdipole ∑kl Vdrk − rl with
- dipole-dipole interaction
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Hamiltonian (continued)
H ∑j1N
HLandau
12m p j − m0rj
2
HΔ
0 − Lz Vdipole
→ 0For critical rotations
HΔ HLandau,Vdipole
and
H → H0 HLandau Vdipole
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
HLandauProperties of
HLandau describes the motion in a constant perpendicularmagnetic filed with the cyclotron frequency c 20
HLandauSpectrum of
n cn 1/2Consists of equidistant (Landau) levels
l0 /mcDegeneracy of every level g 1/2l02 , where
nfFor a given (area) density of fermions
nf/gThe filling fraction gives the number of occupied levels
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
The lowest Landau level regime
For the eigenstates of have the formHLandau 1
zj Pz1 , . . . , zNexp −∑j1N |zj|2 /4
Pz1 , . . . , zNwhere is an antisymmetric polynomial of all
zj x j iyjparticle coordinates
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
HLandau VdipoleLaughlin variational wave function for
1/3The trial wave function for the ground state at filling fraction
L Nklzk − zl3 exp −∑j1
N |zj |2 /4
Why this function?
1. Exact for short-range potentials
2. The overlap with the numerically found exact ground state forsmall number of electrons is close to 1
3. Expected also to be good for “intermediate-range” dipole-dipoleinteractions
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Excitations (quasi-holes)
Quasi-hole at 0
qh zj , 0 N 0j1
Nzj − 0 L
Excitations energy
[ ]∫ −−=∆ ),(),()( 210212122
12 zzgzzgzzVzdzd qhdε
gqhwhere and are the pair correlation functions for the groundg0
and for the quasi-hole states, respectively
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Pair correlation functions [MacDonald, Girvin, 1986]
g0z1,z2 2
221 − e−|z1−z2|2/2 − 2∑odd j
Cj
4 jj!|z1 − z2 |2je−|z1−z2|2/4
gqhz1,z2 2
22
j1,21 − e−|zj |2/2
−e−|z1 |2|z2 |2/2 ez1z2∗/2 − 1 2 2∑ oddj
Cj
4jj!∑k0 |Fj,kz1,z2 |
4 kk!
Fj,kz1 , z2 z1z2
2 ∑r,sj,k j
rks
−1rz1rsz2
jk−rs
rs1jk1−rswhere
1/3 : C1 1 C3 −1/2and for
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Results PRL, 94 (2005)
d 1Debye and 0 103Hz
30
2
)019.0927.0(ld
±=∆ε
For
02 ωε h<∆
ε∆<∆HThe requirement
put a constraint on Nand on 0 − /0
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Wigner crystal state in 2D dipolar gas
R i
Dipolar moments are polarized perpendicular to the plane
E1 d2∑Ri≠01
Ri3Classical energy per particle
a 23
n−1/2favors triangular lattice with the lattice spacing
321 /0.11 adE =and
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Dynamics of the lattice (phonons)
For the displacements uR i in the α-direction
m d2
dt2 uR i −∑j, ,ijuR j
where
,ii ∂2
∂Ri∂Ri∑Rij≠0 VdR ij
,i≠j − ∂2
∂Ri∂RiVdR ij
- components of the dynamical matrix
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Phonon dispersion curves
k xk y
k d2
ma 5
a
− a
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Existence of the dipolar crystal state
Lindemann criterion: crystal is stable if
u i−u i12
a 2 ≤ c
where cwith anharmonicity effects taken into account
should be defined from microscopic calculations
( for different 2D crystals)c 0. 03 0. 08
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Crystal in a non-rotating dipolar gas at T=0
/ma2D
D d 2
ma 5where is the characteristic (Debye) frequency
a adc2 ad~ md2
2 ≤ cStability condition requires
i.e. large densities (contrary to electron gas!)
E1 FIn this regime - strongly interacting system
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Crystal in a rotating dipolar gas at T=0
/ma2c c D( )
Stability condition
requires small densities
/2 c
n 1l0
2 c
c 0. 08(?) crystal state is stable for 1/6For
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Resume:
Interesting subject for studies:
Fractional quantum Hall states versus Wigner crystalin rotating dipolar Fermi (Bose) gas
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle
Conclusions:
Dipolar Fermi gases exhibit veryinteresting many-body physics
1-26 August 2005, University of Washington, Seattle