5
ISSN 1911-5814 110 Prairie Perspectives: Geographical Essays 2016, 18: 110–114 Field trip: The Experimental Lakes Area Nora J. Casson Department of Geography, University of Winnipeg Morgen Burke Department of Geography, University of North Dakota Adrienne Ducharme Department of Geography, University of Winnipeg Brian McGregor Department of Geography, University of Winnipeg Jamie Paterson Department of Geography, University of Winnipeg Joseph Piwowar Department of Geography, University of Regina Kimberly Thomson Department of Geography, University of Winnipeg Nathan Wilson Department of Geography, Lakehead University Gregory Vandeberg Department of Geography, University of North Dakota This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Correspondence to: Nora J. Casson, Department of Geography, University of Winnipeg, 515 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg MB, R3B 2E9 Email: [email protected] Introduction The Experimental Lakes Area (ELA) began as a Government of Canada research station in 1968 tasked with investigating the causes of and controls on nutrient pollution in lakes. It was established largely in response to growing public awareness of nuisance algal blooms in lakes located close to cities. Through- out the 1960s, the algal blooms and fish kills in lakes such as Lake Erie became a major indicator of human influence on lake ecosystems (Schindler 2009). These changes are evidence of a process called eutrophication, whereby excess nutrients boost the productivity of plants and algae in lakes, but ultimately con- sume dissolved oxygen, leading to poor water quality and fish death. In order to understand this problem, federal scientists in the late 1960s sought out a remote site where lakes could be purposefully manipulated to assess their responses to environ- mental stressors. The ELA is located on the Precambrian shield of northwestern Ontario, 35 km southeast of Kenora, Ontario. It encompasses 58 lakes designated solely for research and monitoring (Blanchfield et al. 2009). This remote setting was chosen such that the lakes and their watersheds are distant from human-induced environmental pressures, including air pollution

Field trip: The Experimental Lakes Areapcag.uwinnipeg.ca/Prairie-Perspectives/PP-Vol18/Casson...Nora J. Casson et. al. Prairie Perspectives: Geographical Essays 2016 18 110114 110

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Field trip: The Experimental Lakes Areapcag.uwinnipeg.ca/Prairie-Perspectives/PP-Vol18/Casson...Nora J. Casson et. al. Prairie Perspectives: Geographical Essays 2016 18 110114 110

Nora J. Casson et. al.

ISSN 1911-5814110Prairie Perspectives: Geographical Essays 2016, 18: 110–114

Field Trip: The Experimental Lakes Area

Field trip: The Experimental Lakes Area

Nora J. CassonDepartment of Geography, University of Winnipeg

Morgen BurkeDepartment of Geography, University of North Dakota

Adrienne DucharmeDepartment of Geography, University of Winnipeg

Brian McGregorDepartment of Geography, University of Winnipeg

Jamie PatersonDepartment of Geography, University of Winnipeg

Joseph PiwowarDepartment of Geography, University of Regina

Kimberly ThomsonDepartment of Geography, University of Winnipeg

Nathan WilsonDepartment of Geography, Lakehead University

Gregory VandebergDepartment of Geography, University of North Dakota

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, andreproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Correspondence to: Nora J. Casson, Department of Geography, University of Winnipeg, 515 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg MB, R3B 2E9 Email: [email protected]

Introduction

The Experimental Lakes Area (ELA) began as a Government of Canada research station in 1968 tasked with investigating the causes of and controls on nutrient pollution in lakes. It was established largely in response to growing public awareness of nuisance algal blooms in lakes located close to cities. Through-out the 1960s, the algal blooms and fish kills in lakes such as Lake Erie became a major indicator of human influence on lake ecosystems (Schindler 2009). These changes are evidence of a process called eutrophication, whereby excess nutrients boost

the productivity of plants and algae in lakes, but ultimately con-sume dissolved oxygen, leading to poor water quality and fish death. In order to understand this problem, federal scientists in the late 1960s sought out a remote site where lakes could be purposefully manipulated to assess their responses to environ-mental stressors. The ELA is located on the Precambrian shield of northwestern Ontario, 35 km southeast of Kenora, Ontario. It encompasses 58 lakes designated solely for research and monitoring (Blanchfield et al. 2009). This remote setting was chosen such that the lakes and their watersheds are distant from human-induced environmental pressures, including air pollution

Page 2: Field trip: The Experimental Lakes Areapcag.uwinnipeg.ca/Prairie-Perspectives/PP-Vol18/Casson...Nora J. Casson et. al. Prairie Perspectives: Geographical Essays 2016 18 110114 110

Nora J. Casson et. al.

ISSN 1911-5814111Prairie Perspectives: Geographical Essays 2016, 18: 110–114

Field Trip: The Experimental Lakes Area

Figure 1 The group gathers for a briefing by IISD-ELA staff at the dining hall before heading out on the tour. Although the camp was empty on the Saturday we visited, it can accommodate more than 50 people at a time. Much of the activity and interactions between research-ers, students and staff is focused around meals, eaten communally in this building. (Photo credit: N. Casson, 2015)

and impacts from industrial or urban development (Johnson and Vallentyne 1971). While there are several long-term research stations scattered across Canada, ELA is perhaps the best known for two reasons. First, its mandate to perform whole-ecosystem manipulation experiments to investigate the response of lakes and watersheds to stressors has produced striking results. These field test results have often stood in direct opposition to lab-based or smaller scale studies. Most notably, the experimental fertilization of Lake 227 in the 1970s demonstrated that algae in these systems are limited by phosphorus. This suggested that controlling phosphorus pollution to lakes would help them re-cover from eutrophication (Schindler 1974). These scientific results, accompanied by aerial photographs of emerald green, eutrophic lakes clearly altered by the addition of phosphorus, led to widespread policy changes that included banning phos-phates in detergents (Schindler 2006). Research conducted at the ELA still informs efforts to control algal blooms in water bodies across Canada today (Lake Winnipeg Stewardship Board 2006). The second reason that ELA is well-known is that in 2012, the federal government announced they intended to cut all fund-ing to the research station, prompting an outcry from scientists across North America (Orihel et al. 2013). A campaign to save the ELA was launched, consisting of petitions, newspaper ads and rallies putting the research station and its long track record of policy-relevant science in the public eye. Responsibility for the operations of ELA was transferred to the International Institute for Sustainable Development, and the station became known formally as IISD-ELA (Xenopolous and Frost 2015).

This photo essay provides an overview of a tour of the IISD-ELA camp and surrounding area given by current staff to at-tendees of the 38th annual meeting of the Prairie Division of the Canadian Association of Geographers (PCAG). The meeting and field trip were held in Kenora, Ontario in September, 2015. Participants boarded a bus in Kenora and headed east on the TransCanada Highway, taking a southward turnoff to follow a long, bumpy road to the main IISD-ELA facilities.

Figure 3 Figures 2 and 3 show scenes inside the lab facilities. Long-term monitoring of physical, chemical and biological parameters of several lakes and streams has been ongoing since the early 1970s. These records set the context for many of the manipulative experi-ments which are carried out by researchers. They are also valuable for detecting the effects of drivers like climate change, which act over years or decades. (Photo credit: Figure 2, N. Casson, 2015; Figure 3, A. Ducharme, 2015 )

Figure 2

Page 3: Field trip: The Experimental Lakes Areapcag.uwinnipeg.ca/Prairie-Perspectives/PP-Vol18/Casson...Nora J. Casson et. al. Prairie Perspectives: Geographical Essays 2016 18 110114 110

Nora J. Casson et. al.

ISSN 1911-5814112Prairie Perspectives: Geographical Essays 2016, 18: 110–114

Field Trip: The Experimental Lakes Area

Figure 6 Figures 4, 5 and 6 show views of the meteorological station located near the camp. The equipment here is operated by both IISD-ELA and Environment Canada and used to measure parameters including precipitation, temperature, windspeed and chemical deposition. As one of only a few stations in the region measuring airborne pollutants such as mercury, sulphur and nitrogen deposi-tion, the data from this station provide an important measure of these chemicals which can be carried thousands of kilometres from their sources. (Photo credit: Figure 4, K. Thomson, 2015; Figure 5, N. Casson, 2015; Figure 6, J. Piwowar, 2015)

Figure 7

Figure 5

Figure 4

Figure 8 Figures 7 and 8 show views of the landscape at ELA. The boreal forest at this site is mostly dominated by jack pine (Pinus banksiana) and black spruce (Picea mariana), with thin and discontinuous soils (<1m in depth), underlain by granite-dominated Precambrian Shield geology (Schindler et al. 1996). (Photo credit: Figure 7, G. Vandeberg, 2015; Figure 8, N. Wilson, 2015)

Page 4: Field trip: The Experimental Lakes Areapcag.uwinnipeg.ca/Prairie-Perspectives/PP-Vol18/Casson...Nora J. Casson et. al. Prairie Perspectives: Geographical Essays 2016 18 110114 110

Nora J. Casson et. al.

ISSN 1911-5814113Prairie Perspectives: Geographical Essays 2016, 18: 110–114

Field Trip: The Experimental Lakes Area

Figure 9 Lake 240 located near the camp. This lake was originally consid-ered for eutrophication experiments, but it was decided to leave it for recreation and study by researchers, students and staff staying at the camp (Schindler 2009). (Photo credit: M. Burke, 2015)

Figure 10 A flume capturing the outflow of Lake 239 into Lake 240. The inflows and outflows of several lakes are gauged and water level is measured continuously by dataloggers. Water chemistry samples are taken weekly. These records are more than 40 years long and allow researchers to calculate water and chemical budgets for the lakes. (Photo credit: B. McGregor, 2015)

Figure 13 Plates 11, 12 and 13 show field trip participants deploying a seine net. This vertical net with floats on the top and weights on the bot-tom is spooled out from a boat in a semicircle and dragged onto shore. (Photo credit: Figure 11, B. McGregor, 2015; Figure 12, J. Paterson, 2015; Figure 13, B. McGregor, 2015)

Figure 12

Figure 11

Page 5: Field trip: The Experimental Lakes Areapcag.uwinnipeg.ca/Prairie-Perspectives/PP-Vol18/Casson...Nora J. Casson et. al. Prairie Perspectives: Geographical Essays 2016 18 110114 110

Nora J. Casson et. al.

ISSN 1911-5814114Prairie Perspectives: Geographical Essays 2016, 18: 110–114

Field Trip: The Experimental Lakes Area

Conclusion

This field trip provided students and geographers a glimpse into how field research is carried out at one of the most important long-term ecological research sites in Canada. For some, the sunny afternoon trip inspired ideas of future research questions around ecosystem processes or ways in which science informs national and international environmental policy. The partici-pants are grateful to the IISD-ELA staff and scientists, who fa-cilitated the visit, led the tour and participated in lively discus-sions.

References

Blanchfield, P. J., M. J. Paterson, J. A. Shearer, and D. W. Schindler. 2009. Johnson and Vallentyne’s legacy: 40 years of aquatic re-search at the Experimental Lakes Area. Canadian Journal of Fish-eries and Aquatic Sciences 66(11): 1831–1836.

Johnson, W. E., and J. R. Vallentyne. 1971. Rationale, background, and development of experimental lake studies in northwestern Ontario. Journal of the Fisheries Board of Canada 28(2): 123–128.

Lake Winnipeg Stewardship Board. 2006. Reducing nutrient loading to Lake Winnipeg and its watershed: Our collective responsibility and commitment to action: Report to the Minister of Water Steward-ship. Gimli, MB: Lake Winnipeg Stewardship Board.

Orihel, D. M., H. Swanson, and J. Venkiteswaran. 2013. Scientists, on saving science. Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin 22(3): 76–78.

Schindler, D. W. 1974. Eutrophication and recovery in experimental lakes: Implications for lake management. Science 184(4139): 897–899.

——. 2006. Recent advances in the understanding and management of eutrophication. Limnology and Oceanography 51(1): 356–363.

—–. 2009. A personal history of the Experimental Lakes Project. Cana-dian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 66(11): 1837–1847.

Schindler, D. W., S. E. Bayley, B. R. Parker, K. G. Beaty, D. R. Crui-kshank, E. J. Fee, E. U. Schindler, and M. P. Stainton. 1996. The effects of climatic warming on the properties of boreal lakes and streams at the Experimental Lakes Area, northwestern Ontario. Limnology and Oceanography 41(5): 1004–1017.

Xenopoulos, M. A., and P. C. Frost. 2015. The dawn of a new era for the Experimental Lakes Area. Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin 24(3): 85–87.