18
Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation experiment by LC 1290 Infinity coupled with a 6540 UHD Accurate-Mass Q-TOF LC MS instrument with Agilent Jet Stream Technology as ESI source. m/z 359.1474 4 x10 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 -ESI Product Ion (2.799 min) Frag=160.0V [email protected] (567.2078[z=1] -> **) KF_Steffi_MSMSI_CE10_pol 419.1327 521.1997 329.1385 223.0604 133.0145 385.1472 Counts vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z) 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560 Lariciresinol glucoside (M+FA-H + ) - [M-H + ] - [M-H + +FA] - [M-Glc-H + ] - [M-Glc-CH 2 O-H + ] - [M-Glc-C 9 H 12 O- H + ] - 359.1474 - 162.0528, C 6 H 10 O 5 - 136.088, C 9 H 12 O - 30.0196, CH 2 O - 164.0825, C 10 H 12 O 2 195.0649 m/z 195.065 [C 10 H 11 O 4 ] - pporting Information Figure S1a O O-Glc O-C H 3 O H O-C H 3 O H

Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

Fig. S1a-i: MS2 spectra of infection markersThe putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS2 fragmentation experiment by LC 1290 Infinity coupled with a 6540 UHD Accurate-Mass Q-TOF LC MS instrument with Agilent Jet Stream Technology as ESI source.

O

O-Glc

O-CH3

OH

O-CH3

OH

m/z 359.1474

4x10

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

-ESI Product Ion (2.799 min) Frag=160.0V [email protected] (567.2078[z=1] -> **) KF_Steffi_MSMSI_CE10_polar_neg_110923_01.d

419.1327

521.1997

329.1385

223.0604

133.0145 385.1472

Counts vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z)120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560

Lariciresinol glucoside (M+FA-H+)-

[M-H+]-

[M-H++FA]-

[M-Glc-H+]-[M-Glc-CH2O-H+]-

[M-Glc-C9H12O-H+]- 359.1474

- 162.0528, C6H10O5

- 136.088, C9H12O

- 30.0196, CH2O

- 164.0825, C10H12O2

195.0649

m/z 195.065

[C10H11O4]-

Supporting Information Figure S1a

Page 2: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

4x10

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

-ESI Product Ion (2.284 min) Frag=150.0V [email protected] (729.2606[z=1] -> **) KF_Steffi_vl21_MSMSI_CE20_polar_neg_110919_01.d

521.2001

359.1491

329.1383

445.1137

Counts vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z)125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675 700 725

[M-Glc-Glc-H+]-

[M-Glc-Glc-CH2O-H+]-

[M-H+]-

[M-H++FA]-

Lariciresinol diglucoside (M+FA-H+)-

[M-Glc-H+]-

- 162.0528 Da, C6H10O5

- 2 x 162.0528 Da, C12H20O10

- 30.0196 Da, CH2O

Supporting Information Figure S1b

O

O-Glc

O-CH3

Glc-O

O-CH3

OH

m/z 359.1491

m/z 521.2001

Page 3: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

4x10

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1.1

1.2

-ESI Product Ion (3.169 min) Frag=160.0V [email protected] (519.1872[z=1] -> **) KF_Steffi_MSMSIV_CE10_polar_neg_110926_01.d

357.1343

419.1349

498.1601 193.0497

Counts vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z)140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 520

Pinoresinol glucoside [M+FA-H+]-

- 162.0528, C6H10O5

[M-H+]-

[M-Glc-H+]-

Supporting Information Figure S1c

O

O

OH

CH3-O

O-Glc

O-CH3

m/z 357.1343

Page 4: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

- 2 x 162.0528, 2 x C6H10O5

- 206.0942, C12H14O3 [X]

Pinoresinol diglucoside [M+FA-H+]-

4x10

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

-ESI Product Ion (2.480 min) Frag=160.0V [email protected] (681.2400[z=1] -> **) KF_Steffi_MSMSIV_CE40_polar_neg_110926_01.d

151.0398

357.1338

112.9845

Counts vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z)75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675

[M-Glc-Glc-H+]-

-ESI Product Ion (2.462 min) Frag=160.0V [email protected] (681.2400[z=1] -> **) KF_Steffi_MSMSIV_CE10_polar_neg_110926_01.d

519.1859

357.1342

681.2383

Counts vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z)350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700

[M-H+]-

[M-Glc-H+]-

[M-Glc-Glc-H+]-

Supporting Information Figure S1d

O

O

O

CH3-O

O

O-CH3

Glc

Glc

x

m/z 357.1338

[C8H7O3]-

[X]-

m/z 151.0398 (X-)

m/z 519.1859

Page 5: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

Supporting Information Figure S1e

3x10

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

-ESI Product Ion (3.194 min) Frag=160.0V [email protected] (579.2083[z=1] -> **) KF_Steffi_21vl_MSMSV_CE10_polar_neg_110926_02.d

417.1555

223.0591 577.1522 181.0504 361.0535 533.1669

Counts vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z)140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560 580

Syringaresinol glucoside [M-H+]-

[M-Glc-H+]-

[M-H+]-

- 162.0528, C6H10O5

- 236.1051, C13H16O4

[C9H9O4]-

[Y]-

O

O

OH

O-CH3

CH3-O

O-Glc

O-CH3

O-CH3

m/z 417.1555

Ym/z 181.0504 [Y] -

m/z 181.0504 [Y] -

Page 6: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

Supporting Information Figure S1f

4x10

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

-ESI Product Ion (3.553 min) Frag=100.0V [email protected] (551.1770[z=1] -> **) KF28_Steffi_35vl_24_MSMSV_CE10_meoh_neg_120921_01.d

389.1239

551.1760 193.0504 341.1023

492.1027 165.0566

Counts vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z)140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560

Guaiacylglycerol ferulic acid ether glucoside [M-H+]-

- 48.0216, -H2O - CH2O- 162.0528, - C6H10O5

- 196.0735, - C10H12O4

[M-Glc-H+]-

[M-H+]-

- 196.0735 -27.9938,- CO - C10H12O4

Ferulic acid[C10H9O4]-

O-CH3

O-Glc

O

OHOH

OHO-CH3

O

m/z 193.0504

m/z 389.1239

m/z 165.0566

[C9H9O3]-

Page 7: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

Supporting Information Figure S1g

3x10

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

6

-ESI Product Ion (3.207 min) Frag=160.0V [email protected] (533.1642[z=1] -> **) KF_Steffi_MSMSII_CE10_polar_neg_110923_01.d

371.1113

353.1017

533.1635

387.1414

498.1571

223.0581 419.1305

Counts vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z)180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540

[M-H+]-

[M-Glc-H+]-

[M-Glc-CH2O-H+]-

[M-Glc-H2O-H+]-

- 162.0528, C6H10O5

- 30.0103, CH2O

- 18.0096, H2O

Sesamolinol glucoside [M-H+]-

341.1010

O

O

O-CH3

O

O

O-Glc

O-CH3

m/z 371.1105

m/z 341.1010

Page 8: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

Supporting Information Figure S1h

4x10

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

-ESI Product Ion (3.757 min) Frag=160.0V [email protected] (487.1246[z=1] -> **) KF_Steffi_MSMSII_CE10_polar_neg_110923_01.d

353.1017

371.1105

133.0134 487.1219

316.9401

Counts vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z)140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500

341.1009

[M-H+]-

[M-Malyl-H+]-

[M-Malyl-CH2O-H+]-

[M-Malyl-H2O-H+]-

- 116.0114, C4H4O4

- 30.0103, CH2O

- 18.0096, H2O

Malyl sesamolinol [M-H+]-

O

O

O-CH3

O

O

O

O-CH3

O

OH

OH

O

m/z 371.1105

m/z 341.1009

Page 9: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

Supporting Information Figure S1i

3x10

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

1.25

1.5

1.75

2

2.25

2.5

2.75

3

3.25

3.5

3.75

-ESI Product Ion (2.727 min) Frag=100.0V [email protected] (399.0928[z=1] -> **) KF28_Steffi_35vl_24_MSMSV_CE10_meoh_neg_120921_01.d

191.0347

310.9121 119.0351 176.0120 243.8791 354.8957

Counts vs. Mass-to-Charge (m/z)120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400

Scopolin [M+FA-H+]-

[M-H++FA]-

[M-Glc-H+]-

[M-Glc-CH3-H+]-

- 162.0528 -44.9898, C6H10O5 -FA

- 15.0227, -CH3

O-CH3

O-GlcOO

m/z 176.0120

m/z 191.0347

Page 10: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

(a)

(b)

Supporting Information Figure S2in

tens

ityin

tens

ity

valine (cl.11) glutamine (cl.12)

arginine (cl. 14)

asparagine (cl. 11)

35dpi21 dpi10 dpi

control VL control VL control VL control VL control VL control VL

10 dpi 21 dpi 35dpi

control VL control VL control VL

10 dpi 21 dpi 35dpi

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

pyrrolidone-5-carboxylic acid (cl. 12)leucine (cl. 10)

Fig. S2: UPLC-TOF-MS based metabolite fingerprinting of V. longisporum infected Arabidopsis leaves.Arabidopsis plants of different time points after inoculation with V. longisporum (10, 21 and 35 dpi) and the corresponding control plants were harvested and the aerial parts were extracted by two phase partitioning. The fingerprint of metabolites of the polar extraction phase was generated by UPLC-TOF-MS analysis. A subset of high-quality 862 metabolite marker candidates (FDR <10-4) derived from the positive as well as the negative ionization mode were used for clustering and visualization by means of one-dimensional self-organizing map (1D-SOM). (a) 1D-SOM heat map after metabolite-based clustering with 20 prototypes. Horizontal and vertical dimensions correspond to prototypes and experimental conditions, respectively. The heat map colors represent average intensity values according to the color map on the right hand side. The width of each prototype column is proportional to the number of marker candidates assigned to this prototype. (b) Box plots of prominent markers from different clusters (cl.) which accumulate in V. longisporum inoculated plants (VL). Four samples per treatment from two independent experiments were analyzed. Boxes indicate the 25th (q1) and 75th (q3) intensity percentiles and median of the data. The whiskers indicate the range between q1-1.5(q3-q1) and q3+1.5(q3-q1), respectively.

Page 11: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

control VL43

hypocotyl

petiole

Supporting Information Figure S3

Fig. S3: Lignin accumulation in V. longisporum infected vascular tissue of Arabidopsis.Cross-sections of hypocotyls and petioles of V. longisporum inoculated (VL) and control plants at 21 dpi. Material was paraffin embedded, hand sectioned and stained with phloroglucin/HCl for lignified tissue. Scale bar: 200 µm.

Page 12: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

Col 0

C4H:F

5H-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

rela

tive

units

Col 0

C4H:F

5H

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

pg m

g-1

FW

A B Crelative leaf area VL-DNAcontrol

Col 0

C4H:F5H

VL

Supporting Information Figure S4

Fig. S4: Infection of the C4H:F5H mutant with V. longisporum.Col 0 and C4H:F5H plants were infected by root dip infection and harvested at 21 dpi. (a) Pictures of infected and control plants at 21 dpi. (b) The relative leaf area was determined from pictures taken of the rosettes of the plants: The leaf area of infected plants was divided by the leaf area of control plants and the results of the mutant plants were set in relation to the value of the wild type. The data represent the mean values of five independent experiments ±SD. (c) Determination of VL-DNA in infected leaves. The mean values of ten samples of three independent experiments are shown ±SE.

Page 13: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

Supporting Information Figure S5

Fig. S5: Sinapoyl glucose, coniferin and syringin in glycosyltransferase overexpressor plants and the fah1-2 mutant. Quantification of sinapoyl glucose and monolignols by HPLC-DAD of V. longisporum-inoculated (black bars) and control (white bars) plants. Syringin could not be quantified in the UGT72E2-OE because of high coniferin peaks. Each data point represents the mean value of eight samples from two independent experiments + SD. (*, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001 )

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

0

5

10

15

µm

ol g

-1 F

W

syringinconiferin

UGT72E3-

OE

UGT72E2-

OE

UGT72E1-

OECol

0

Col 0

fah1

-20

20

40

60

80

100

nmol

g-1

FW

-1.66533453693773E-16

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2sinapoyl glucose

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

µm

ol g

-1 F

W

Col 0

fah1

-2

controlVL

UGT72E3-

OE

UGT72E2-

OE

UGT72E1-

OECol

0

UGT72E3-

OE

UGT72E2-

OE

UGT72E1-

OECol

0

coniferin sinapoyl glucose

n.d.

Page 14: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

Fig S6: Influence of ferulic and sinapic acid on V. longisporum growth.PDB plates were supplemented with ferulic acid and sinapic acid in the indicated concentrations. After inoculation the fungus was grown for 18 days on the plates. Pictures of colonies were taken under a binocular and the colony area was determined. The data represent the mean values ±SD of seven different plates of two independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences between control and supplemented plates according to student’s t-test (*, P ≤ 0.05; ***, P ≤ 0.001).

Supporting Information Figure S6

cont

rol

1 µM

10 µ

M

100µ

M1

µM

10 µ

M

100

µM

0

200colony area

mm

2

ferulic acid sinapic acid

****

Page 15: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

Supporting Information Table S1

Table S1: Primers used for the quantitative RT-PCR.

QuantPrime: Samuel Arvidsson, Miroslaw Kwasniewski, Diego M. Riano-Pachon and Bernd Mueller-Roeber: QuantPrime - a flexible tool for reliable high-throughput primer design for quantitative PCR. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:465

name ATG Primer referencePhenylalanine ammonia lyase 1 (PAL1)

At2g37040PAL1neuF: AGAAGTGGAAGCAGCAAGAGCAG

PAL1neuR: ATCCTGTTCGGGATAGCCGATG

QuantPrime

Phenylalanine ammonia lyase 2 (PAL2)

At3g53260PAL2R: TGCTACTTCTCACCGGAGA

PAL2F: TATTCCGGCGTTCAAAAATC 

Huang et al. 2010

Ferulate-5-hydroxylase (F5H)

At4g36220F5H_F: ATGATGGGGATGTTGTCGAT

F5H_R: CGTCCATGATGATTGCTTTG 

Vanholme et al. 2010

Cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase 5 (CAD5)

At4g34230CAD5F: CCTGCGAGAGAGATCTGGAA

CAD5R:CAAAGTGGCTCAGTGGACTGT 

Tronchet et al. 2010

Cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase 8 (CAD8)

At4g37990CAD8F: GCTGCACCGAAGGTATGGAA

CAD8R: CGTCCAAGGGGAGATTGTCT 

Tronchet et al. 2010

UGT72E1 At3g5074072E1F: AAAGAGACCGCTGCCGAAT

72E1R: CCTGACACGCTCCAAAAGATG 

Lanot et al. 2006

UGT72E2 At5g6669072E2neuF: TGGTGGTTGTCTATCGGCGAAAC

72E2neuR: ATACGAACCGTTGCTGGCTCTG

QuantPrime

UGT72E3 At5g2631072E3neuF: AGGGTTCGTGACTCGTACTTGC

72E3neuR: TGGGCTAGGATTTCAGCTTGCG

QuantPrime

UGT84A3 At4g1549084A3F: AGCCAACTTGAAGCAAGAGCAG

84A3R: ACCACCCATAAGACCGACAAGC 

QuantPrime

Dirigent protein 6 (DIR6)

At4g23690DIR6F: ACCCTGCAAACACTTCTCGTTC

DIR6R: CGGAGGTTGCGTTTGCTACATTG

QuantPrime

Page 16: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

Supporting Information Table S2

Table S2: Data matrix of 826 high quality marker candidates (false discovery rate<10 -4) obtained by metabolite fingerprinting (UPLC-ESI-TOF-MS analysis) of mock treated (control) or V. longisporum infected (VL) leaves of Arabidopsis (10, 21, 35 dpi) (see separate file).

Page 17: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

Supporting Information Table S3

Table S3: Infection markers identified by metabolite fingerprinting (UPLC-ESI-TOF-MS analysis) and verified by UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS2 analysis or co-elution (see separate file).

Page 18: Fig. S1a-i: MS 2 spectra of infection markers The putative identity of infection markers obtained by metabolite fingerprinting was confirmed by MS 2 fragmentation

Linie Atg plant line literature effected gene susceptibility

fah1-2 At4g36220 CS6172 (Chapple et al. 1992) ferulate-5-hydroxylase defect

++

ref 1_SALK At3g24503 SALK_027911 aldehyde-dehydrogenase defect

(+)

sng1-1 At3g24503 N3737 (Lorenzen et al. 1996) sinapoylglucose-malate O-sinapoyltransferase defect

(+)

UGT72E1-OE At3g50740 (Lanot et al. 2008) glycosyltransferase overexpressed

+/-

UGT72E2 -OE At5g66690 (Lanot et al. 2006) glycosyltransferase overexpressed

--

UGT72E3 -OE At5g26310 (Lanot et al. 2008) glycosyltransferase overexpressed

+/-

C4H::F5H At4g36220 (Meyer et al. 1998) ferulate-5-hydroxylase overexpressed

(- )

Atprr1-1atprr2 At1g32100At4g13660

SALK_058467SALK_123621

(Nakatsobu et al. 2008)

pinoresinol-reductase defect

+/-

nac42 At2g43000 N536474 transcription factor defect

+/-

NAC42_20-OE At2g43000 transkription factor overexpressed

+/-

NAC42_6 -OE At2g43000 transcription factor overexpressed

+/-

cad4 At4g39330 SAIL_1265_A06 cinnamyl-alcohol-dehydrogenase defect

+/-

cad5 At4g34230 SALK_040062 cinnamyl-alcohol-dehydrogenase defect

+/-

Supporting Information Table S4

Table S4: Mutants and transgenic lines tested for their susceptibility against V. longisporum.