121
Figure 1: Support for Canadian Health Care System Model V ery im portant 88% N eutral 9% N ot im portant 3% How important is it to you to have a strong national system of publicly-funded health care? Source: Ekos, 2000

Figure 1: Support for Canadian Health Care System Model How important is it to you to have a strong national system of publicly- funded health care? Source:

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Figure 1: Support for Canadian Health Care System Model

Very important88%

Neutral9%

Not important3%

How important is it to you to have a strong national system of publicly-funded health care?

Source: Ekos, 2000

Figure 2: Support for Universality

Government should pay for all

people86%

Should pay for low income people

only11%

Individuals should pay their own

3%

Currently, Canada’s system of medicare is supported by tax dollars. Do you think governments should pay for health care for all people as they do now, just for lower income people, or should individuals and families pay their own health care costs?

Source: Environics 1999.

Figure 3: Evolution of Assessments of the Quality of the Health Care

System

6155

41 40

28 2925

29 30 31

3832

12 13 1521

41

34

30

3432

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

Excellent/ very good Good Fair/ poor/ very poor

Source: Angus Reid.

3% 4% 7%

91%

9%

84%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Canada US Don't know

1987

2001

Source: 1987, Environics; 2001, Centre for Research and Information on Canada

Figure 4: Is the American System Better?When you think about Canada and the US, which country would you say has a better health care system?

Figure 5: Preference for Care in Canada Rather than the U.S.

Agree Moderately

4%

Disagree Moderately

17%

Disagree Strongly

75%

DK/NA1%

Agree Strongly

3%

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:“If I had a serious illness or injury, I would prefer to be treated in the U.S.”

Source: Angus Reid, September 1995.

Figure 6: Health Care and National Identity

82%

14% 3% 1% Very ImportantSomewhat importantNot very importantNot at all important

How important are the following to the Canadian identity… Canada’s health care system?

Source: Environics Focus Canada Survey, March 1996

Figure 7: Health Care Should be Guaranteed by the Government

10%

4%

3%

72%

95%

96%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

1978

1985

1991

YesNo

“Should medical care be guaranteed by the government?”

Source: Environics Focus Canada Surveys

Figure 8: Support for the Canadian Health Care

Model

79

63

52

48

5

12

8

20

21

3

6

9

19

17

11

1

4

2

4

9

2

16

7

7

69

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Care should be based on need, not ability topay

Better care for rich is not right

Medicare embodies Canadian values

Medicare is right of citizenship

Prefer US system

Completely agree Agree Neither Disagree Completely disagree

Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?

Source: Earnscliffe/POLLARA, 1998.

Figure 9: Five Year Trend on Perceptions of

Quality

68

58 57

6672 71

66 64 65

2431 32

2419 22

26 26 24

7 8 8 9 8 6 8 9 10

0

20

40

60

80

Oct.'97

Apr.'98

Oct.'98

Apr.'99

Oct.'99

Apr.'00

Oct.'00

Apr.'01

Oct.'01

Deteriorated Same Improved

Has the quality of health care over the past two years improved,deteriorated, or stayed the same?

Source: Ekos Research, Rethinking Government and Health Care Surveys

Figure 10: Options for Reform

30

54

33

98

60

38

47

107

62

27

8

56

30

48

10

36

13

51

33

9

49

39

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Increase Spending Limit Services Private Services

Canada

Atlantic

Quebec

Ontario

Manitoba

Saskatchewan

Alberta

BC

Source: Centre for Research and Information on Canada, 2001.

Health care costs are expected to rise in the future because of our aging population and because of the costs of new treatments and medications. Which of the following statements comes closest to your view? Would you say (a) governments should significantly INCREASE THEIR SPENDING on health care to cover these rising costs; (b) governments should LIMIT THE AVAILABILITY of some treatments or medications; or (c) governments should allow THE PRIVATE SECTOR to provide some health care services to those people who can afford to pay for them.

Figure 11: Future Directions for the Health Care

System

It is time to move toward private

health care10%

Changes are needed, but the

principles of Medicare should be preserved.

68%

Most problems can be fixed if the

provincial government puts more money into

health10%

NR/ DK12%

Which of the following three directions do you support for the futureof Saskatchewan’s health care system?

Source: Saskatchewan Commission on Medicare, 2001

Figure 12: Is more money alone the answer?

Agree76%

Neutral10%

Disagree14%

“Money alone is not the solution to securing health care for the future.”

Source: Ekos, Ontario Health Care Funding Survey, 2000.

Figure 13: Knowledge of the Canada Health Act

59

62

67

68

70

71

74

71

65

68

31

26

23

18

21

20

19

19

24

21

19

11

7

14

10

11

7

11

13

12

8

4

9

12

11

6

9

8

8

8

7

7

3

2

1

4

3

3

4

4

Alberta

B.C.

Manitoba

Quebec

Sask.

Ontario

Atlantic

Women

Men

TOTAL

Do not know Universality AccessibilityComprehensiveness Portability

What are some of the key principles of the Canadian Health Act?

Source: Earnscliffe/POLLARA, 1998.

Figure 14: Canadians’ Highest Priorities

0 0 04 3

1215

29

40 39

51

18

8

21

3632

4045

3128

23

1310

22

42

33

21 23

1720 18

138

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1988 1990 1992 1993 1994 1996 1997 March98

Nov.98

1999 2000

Health Care Unemployment The economy Education

Source: Angus Reid

Figure 15: Images of the Future of Health Care

What will it look like 10 years from now?

87

82

81

68

39

5

6

7

11

16

7

9

10

19

40

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

More demand forhealth care services

Care outside hospitalswill be more important

It will cost more tomaintain

There will be moreout-of-pocket costs

More government role

Agree Neither Disagree

Source: Ekos, 1999.

Figure 16: Is Progress Being Made?

54

14

28

4

49

16

32

4

59

12

25

4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Losingground

Makingprogress

Staying thesame

DK/ NR

National Men Women

Is Canada making progress or losing ground on the health caresystem?

Source: Earnscliffe/POLLARA, 1998.

Figure 17: A Funding Crisis?

In crisis now76%

Will be in crisis in 5-10 years

12%

No crisis11%

NR/ DK1%

Do you think the Canadian health care system is facing a major funding crisis? (For those who say “NO”: Will the system face a major funding crisis in the new 5-10 years?)

Source: Angus Reid, 2001

Figure 18: Satisfied with Medicare?

37%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

% Agree

“Medicare in Canada works fine just the way it is.”

Sources: Angus Reid, 2000.

Figure 19: System in Crisis? International Comparisons

56

20

10

17

27

25

9

19

38

56

60

46

52

58

57

49

5

23

29

33

17

14

32

30

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Canada '88

Canada '98

US '88

US '98

UK '88

UK '98

New Zealand '98

Australia '98

Working pretty well Needs major changes Needs to be completely rebuilt

On the whole, the health care system: 1) works pretty well and only minor changes are necessary; 2) There are some good things in our health care system but fundamental changes are needed; 3) Our health care system has so much wrong that we need to completely rebuild it?

Source: Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey, 1998.

Figure 20: Federal/Provincial Satisfaction

Per cent responding “strongly approve” or “approve”Source: Environics Focus Canada Surveys

6964

70 6661

70 6963

54

41 43

2923

33 34 2953 53

6253

64

46

35 32 29

1926 29 27

0

20

40

60

80

100

'85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01

Federal Provincial

Generally speaking, do you approve or disapprove of the currentfederal /provincial government’s handling of health care?

Figure 21: Government Performance on Health Care 1988-99

56%

46%

57%62%

34%

58%

46%

56% 57%

30%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

1988 1992 1993 1994 1999

FederalProvincial

Is the federal/provincial govt doing an excellent, good, fair or poor job of ensuring that Canadians get good health care? (percent saying excellent or good).

Source: Berger Health Monitor.

Figure 22: Who is Responsible for

Deterioration?

6356

4248

58

5148 46

55

3034

4138 36

4144 45

39

710

1714

6 8 8 106

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Jan.'97

Jul.'97

Jan.'98

Jul.'98

Jan.'99

Jul.'99

Jan.'00

Jul.'00

Jan.'01

Jul.'01

Provincial Federal DK/ NR

Which level of government is most responsible for the deterioration?

Source: Ekos Research, Rethinking Government and Health Canada Surveys

Figure 23: Satisfaction With Care: Own Family versus Province

79%

59%

20%

38%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

Self and Family All residents of province

Very/ somewhat satisfied Not very/ not at all satisfied

Are you satisfied with the system’s ability to meet health care needsof you and your family? Of all residents of your province?

Sources: Merck Frost/Coalition of National Voluntary Organizations/POLLARA National Survey of HealthCare Providers and Users, 1999

Figure 24: Quality of Care: 2000-01

37%

43%

16%

4%

35%

15%

5%

45%

0%

15%

30%

45%

60%

Excellent Good Fair Poor

May 2000

March 2001

Overall, how would you rate the quality of care you personally receivedin the past twelve months (from the health care system)?

Among respondents who used health services in the previous year.Source: Berger Health Monitor, May 2000, March 2001.

Figure 25: Personal Experiences With the System

43

56

56

56

58

61

56

59

58

26

23

23

15

21

20

22

17

20

16

9

9

13

8

10

10

11

10

7

5

5

5

5

4

5

4

5

7

7

7

10

8

5

6

9

7

Sask.

Alberta

Manitoba

Quebec

B.C.

Ontario

Men

Women

TOTAL

Completely agree AgreeNeither agree nor disagree DisagreeCompletely disagree

Agree or disagree: “My experience with the system was positive.”

Source: Earnscliffe/POLLARA, 1998.

Figure 26: Confidence in Health Care Services

23%

60%

16%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

Not Confident Confident Neither

I am confident that if I or a family member were to become seriouslyill, we would be able to access the necessary health care services.

Source: Ekos Research, Rethinking Government, January 2001

Figure 27: Inability to Access Health Care: 1989-

2001

2%

12% 15%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

1989 2000 2001

Over the last twelve months, were you ever unable to obtain healthcare services when you needed them?

Among respondents who used health services in the previous year.Source: Berger Health Monitor, 1989, May 2000, March 2001.

Figure 28: Inability to Access Health Care by Province: 1989-2000

1%

1%

1%

1%

3%

1%

2%

11%

16%

14%

12%

11%

16%

12%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20%

B.C.

Alberta

Manitoba, Sask.

Ontario

Quebec

Atlantic

NATIONAL

1989 2000

For those expressing difficulty obtaining health services in the previousyear: Had difficulty or did not eventually obtain services…

1989: “Had difficulty” and “did not receive services.” 2000: “Unable to obtain health services when needed.”Source: Berger Health Monitor.

Figure 29: Difficulty Obtaining Health Care: 1989-

2000

18%

14%

14%

17%

24%

15%

18%

24%

31%

39%

25%

50%

43%

34%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

B.C.

Alberta

Manitoba, Sask.

Ontario

Quebec

Atlantic

NATIONAL

1989 2000

In the past year have you or members of your immediate family haddifficulties obtaining medical or health-related services…

“Had difficulty,” “a bit, somewhat,” or “very difficult,” for a variety of reasons.Source: Berger Health Monitor.

Figure 30: Difficulties in Seeing Specialists:

International Comparisons

16 15 1410

17

3024 21 19 18

47

57 54 55 56

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Canada UnitedStates

Australia UnitedKingdom

NewZealand

Extremely/ very difficult Somewhat difficultNot too/ Not at all difficult

Per cent who reported difficulties, 1998

Source: Commonwealth Fund 1998 International Health Policy Survey

Figure 31: Concerns About Waiting Times

18%

31%18%

30%Strongly agreeSomewhat agreeSomewhat disagreeStrongly disagree

“My local hospital emergency room provides services in a reasonable amount of time”

Source: Ipsos-Reid, 2000.

Figure 32: System Performance

10

10

10

11

13

17

22

16

19

21

23

25

27

29

29

32

34

27

26

25

21

28

22

23

27

23

21

18

14

6

7

9

7

7

7

Use best available drugs

Waiting/ optional surgery

Length of hospital stay

Morale of medical staff

Waiting/ prescribed surgery

Waiting/ specialist

Waiting/ ER

Very poor Poor Average Good Very good DK/ NR

How is the health system’s performance on…

Source: Earnscliffe/POLLARA, 1998.

Figure 33: Support for Equalization

45

55

41

50 4844

34

4538

32

4237 40 41 40 39

0

80

National Atlantic Quebec Ontario Manitoba Sask. Alberta BC

Strongly Support Moderately Support

As you may know, under the federal equalization program money is transferred from the richer provinces to the poorer ones, in order to ensure that Canadians living in every province have access to similar levels of public services. Do you strongly support, moderately support, moderately oppose, or strongly oppose the equalization program?

Source: Centre for Research and Information on Canada, 2001.

Figure 34: Growing Empowerment

65%

64%

72%

69%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

I prefer when my doctor gives medifferent treatment options to choose

from rather than just writing out aprescription

I always ask my doctor questionsabout the medicine he/ she prescribes

me

20001995

Angus Reid Report.

Figure 35: Use of Health Related Internet Sites

39%43%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

2000 2001

In the past month, have you surfed or visited any Internet sites or looked up any information regarding health, health information, health organizations, medical conditions, medication, health products, alternative remedies, or anything having to do with health and well being? (percent saying “yes”)

Source: Berger Health Monitor, May 2000, March 2001.

Figure 36: Discussions with Physicians Regarding Internet

Information

17%

24%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

1999 2001

The last time you visited or consulted your doctor, did you take or referto information you had obtained over the Internet? (percent saying “yes”).

1999: Asked only of those who had visited a health related site in the previous month, or had had someone visit a site for them.2000: Asked only of those who had visited a health related site in the previous month.Source: Berger Health Monitor.

Figure 37: Communication with Physicians by E-mail and Internet

67% 63%

52%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Arrangeappointments

Get information onyour health condition

Discuss yourtreatment

Would you be interested in communicating with your doctor using e-mailand the Internet, for example… (percent saying “yes”).

Among visitors to Internet health sites in previous monthSource: Berger Health Monitor, March 2001.

Figure 38: Use of e-mail and Internet: Sociodemographic Differences

61%67%

56%64%

55%48%

28%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Visitorsto health

sites

Men Women 15-19 55-64 65-74 75+

Average "Yes" to three options

Would you be interested in communicating with your doctor using e-mailand the Internet, for example: 1. To arrange appointments. 2. To getinformation on your health condition. 3. To discuss your treatment.

Among visitors to Internet health site in previous monthSource: Berger Health Monitor, March 2001.

Figure 39: Health Related Purchases Over the

Internet

1% 1% 1% 1%0

1%

5%7%

2%3%

5%3%

2%

13%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Books,magazines

Organicfoods

Naturalhealth

products

Over thecounter,

non-prescriptionmedication

Prescriptionmedication

Medical,other healthconsultation

One or more

2000 2001

In the past month have you bought anything over the Internet that was related tohealth, for example…

Among visitors to Internet health site in previous month. Percent saying they had made such a purchase in the previous month.Source: Berger Health Monitor, March 2001.

Figure 40: Use of Natural Health Products

60

36

15 14

28

1

70

26

60

36

14 15

33

1

72

28

61

36

1916

38

15

75

31

0

20

40

60

80

Vitamins Mineralsupplements

Foodsupplements

Homeopathicremedies

Herbalremedies

Others 1+ items 3+ items

March '99 May '00 March '01

In the past six months, have you taken any of the following…

Source: Berger Health Monitor.

Figure 41: Use of Alternative Health Providers

12%10%

3% 3%1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1%

24%

3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

Source: Berger Health Monitor, 1999.

In the past six months, have you used any of the following services…

Figure 42: Use of Natural Health Products By

Region

15%

27%

33%30%

34%

41%

0%

20%

40%

60%

Atlantic Quebec Ontario Manitoba,Sask.

Alberta B.C.

Percentage reporting using three or more natural health products in the previous six months.

Source: Berger Health Monitor, March 2001.

Figure 43: Health Information on the Internet

56%

18%

8%

19%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Mainstreaminformation

Alternativeinformation

Both Notlooking/ DK

The last time you used the Internet for health-related information, wouldyou say you were looking for…

Among direct and indirect Internet users for health related purposes.Source: Berger Health Monitor.

Figure 44: Use of the Internet: Which Sites?

16%

7% 7%

33%

24%

16% 18%

28%

44%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

HealthCanada On-

line

CanadianHealth

Network

Provincialgovt, health

ministry

University Disease,condition site

May-00 Mar-01

The last time you used the Internet for health-related purposes did youvisit any of the following health-related sites:

Internet users who visited a health-related site in previous month, or had someone look for them in pastsix months.Source: Berger Health Monitor, May 2000, March 2001.

Figure 45: Support for the Principles of the Canada Health Act: 1991-99

93

8589 89

8589

7881

7976

88

73

80 8078

76

63 64

595650

60

70

80

90

100

1991 1994 1995 1999 2000

Universality AccessibilityPortability ComprehensivenessPublic Administration

The Canadian health care system is based on five principles developed some years ago. Please tell me how important you think it is to keep each of these five principles… (detailed explanation of each principle provided in question.)

Per cent answering “very important” (3 other response choices: “somewhat important,” “not very important,” and “not at all important”.Source: Berger Health Monitor.

36

60

24

74

4447

29

66

4551

39

58

41

57

0

20

40

60

80

Allow Private Entirely Public

NATIONAL

Atlantic

Quebec

Ontario

Man / Sask

Alberta

BC

Source: Centre for Research and Information on Canada, Environics/CROP, 2000.

Figure 46: Entirely Public or Some Private?

In your opinion, should Canada allow privately-owned companies to deliver some health care services in Canada, or should the health care system be operated entirely as a public program?

Figure 47: Support for Some Private Care: 2000-2001

4139

45

29

47

36

24

48

4042

3434

42

51

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Canada Atlantic Quebec Ontario Man /Sask

Alberta BC

2000

2001

Source: Centre for Research and Information on Canada.

In your opinion, should Canada allow privately-owned companies to deliver some health care services in Canada, or should the health care system be operated entirely as a public program?

Figure 48: Opposition to Funding Cuts

5%12%

5% 4%

78%

18%

0%

90%

1989 1995 1999 2001

Support cuttingspending/ we'respending too muchRight amount

Spending too little

Source: Environics Focus Canada Surveys

1989-1999: Some people think that the federal government should cut back its spending in some areas while other people disagree. Could you tell me whether you support the following measures… cutting back federal funds for health care.

2001: Keeping in mind that increasing services could increase taxes, do you think the federal government is spending too much, just the right amount, or is spending too little on each of the following?

Figure 49: Coverage of Public Health Care

9%

42%47%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Covers too much About right Doesn't coverenough

Does Canada’s public health care system cover enough servicesand programs?

Source: Angus Reid, The Public Domain, May 2000.

Figure 50: Restore Funding or New Programs:

1996

26.8%

70.9%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

New Programs

RestoreFunding

One of the areas for which the government may announce some new spending is health care. Now, in your view, which of the following should be the government’s first priority: 1. Restoring to the provinces the funding intended for Medicare that was cut by the federal government to help reduce the deficit; or 2. Funding new national healthcare programs such as a new pharmacare program or a new homecare program?

Source: Angus Reid, March 1996.

Figure 51: Quality vs. Equal Access

31% 33%

40%

53%

45%41% 43%

43%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

1995 1997 1998 2000

Quality Access

Which of the following aspects of health care is of greatestimportance to you?

Source: Ekos Research, Health Issues Tracking Survey.

Figure 52: Equal Access vs. Quality of Care

68

44

17

20

9

16

3

8

3

11

0% 50% 100%

We need one system with equalaccess even if it costs more

Maintain equal access even if wecan't have highest level of care

Completely agree AgreeNeither agree nor disagree DisagreeCompletely disagree DK/ NR

Do you agree/disagree with each of the following?

Source: Earnscliffe/POLLARA, 1998.

Figure 53: Where Should the Money Come From? (Saskatchewan)

Increased taxes21%

Cuts to other programs

9%

Individuals pay29%

No response41%

If more money is required for the health care system, where do youbelieve this extra money should come from?

Source: Saskatchewan Commission on Medicare, 2001.

Figure 54: Where should the money come from? (National)

71%

70%

40%

33%

22%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Take money from other non-socialprograms

Have those who can afford to pay someof their health care costs

Take money from other social programs

Increase taxes

Reduce access or quality of health care

Source: Merck Frost/Pollara, 1999.

Figure 55: Tracking Privatization

26

28

31

71

68

67

0 20 40 60 80

Mar. '99

Dec. '99

Aug. '01

Once private health care services start to become widely available, itwon't be long before quality public health care services are hard to find.

Allowing some privatization of the health care system is a good thingbecause it will relieve the pressure on public institutions like hospitalsthat are already overcrowded.

Which statement is closer to your own view?

Source: Ekos Research, Rethinking Government Surveys

Figure 56: Opposition to Privatization

31

64

40

20

40

60

80

100

Good way to dealwith funding cutsand waiting lists

Will erode thehealth care system

Don't know

Source: Environics, 2000.

In some provinces, there is talk of allowing private health clinics to charge patients a fee for using the facility and also receive the usual payment from the province for performing a particular operation. Some people say these clinics are a good way to deal with health care cutbacks and waiting lists by allowing some people to pay for a health service. Others say that this development, if it continues, will erode Canada’s universal health care system. Which of these views is closer to your own?

Figure 57: Opposition to a Mixed Public/Private

System

29%33%

55%50%

16% 17%

0%

60%

A Two-Tiered System A Mixed Public/ Private System

SupportOpposeNeither

Do you personally support or oppose moving more money towards [a two-tiered system/a mixed public-private system] where people are free to pay for faster or better health care services.”

Source: Ekos Research, Benchmark Survey, August 1999.

Figure 58: Some Support for Two-Tiered?

19%

28%

14%

38%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Acceptable if there is two-tiered

Strongly agreeSomewhat agreeSomewhat disagreeStrongly disagree

“It is alright if Canada’s health care system evolves into a two-tier system where privately owned and public health institutions offer all health services.”

Source: Angus Reid, 2000.

Figure 59: Paying for Quicker Access? 1996-2001

34%

23%

35%29%

36%

55%

67%

54%61%

52%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

Nov. '96 Nov. '97 Mar '99 Dec. '99 Jan. '01

Agree Disagree

Individuals should be allowed to pay extra to get quickeraccess to health care services.

Source: Ekos Research, Rethinking Government Surveys

Figure 60: Paying for Quicker Access?

Regional Breakdown

35

36

33

36

44

42

36

11

12

11

15

7

12

11

53

51

56

48

49

44

52

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

ATL

QC

ONT

MB/ SK

AB

BC

National

Agree Neither Disagree

Individuals should be allowed to pay extra to get quickeraccess to health care services.

Source: Ekos Research, Rethinking Government, January 2001

Figure 61: Paying for Quicker Care?

15%9%

13% 12%

49%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Completelyagree

Agree Neither agreenor disagree

Disagree Completelydisagree

Do you agree with people paying extra for quicker care?

Source: Earnscliffe/POLLARA, 1998.

Figure 62: Paying to get to the Head of the Line?

67 64 6761

68 66 67

4650

4438

4941

46

5 4 7 5 4 7 5

1813 13

2114

27

13

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

NATIONAL B.C. Alberta Man, Sask Ontario Quebec Atlantic

Strongly disapprove, '99 Strongly disapprove, '96Strongly approve, '99 Strongly approve, '96

1996: Would you approve of an arrangement where people could pay to wait a shorter time for health care services? 1999: Would you approve of a provincial health system where people could pay to go to the head of the line for health care services?

Source: Berger Health Monitor.

Figure 63: Perception of Treatment in Private System

5651

4652 51 50

8 7 9 714

10

0

40

80

B.C. Alberta Man, Sask Ontario Quebec Atlantic

Strongly agree Strongly disagree

“You and your family would be treated fairly in a system where people could pay to get to the front of the line.”

Source: Berger Health Monitor, 1999.

Figure 64: Paying for timely access?

98%

73%

2%

27%

0%

50%

100%

"All Canadians shouldreceive timely access"

"Canadians withouttimely access should have

option of using privatefacility"

AgreeDisagree

Source: Merck Frost/Pollara, 1999.

Figure 65: Attitudes toward “Bill 11” Model

15%

35%

21%26%

3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Stronglysupport

Somewhatsupport

Somewhatoppose

Stronglyoppose

Don't know

The provincial government in Alberta recently announced its intention to allow privately owned health institutions to offer services like hip replacements and they will be paid by the government with taxpayers’ dollars. From what you know, would you support or oppose the proposal put forward by Premier Klein?

Source: Angus Reid, April 2000.

Figure 66: Attitudes toward Bill 11

11%

39%

18%

27%

6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Stronglysupport

Somewhatsupport

Somewhatoppose

Stronglyoppose

Don't know

The provincial government in Alberta recently announced its intention to allow regional health authorities to contract with private health care providers to provide some surgical services. The Government of Alberta’s intent is to have these private providers operate under the jurisdiction of a regional health authority and that under this arrangement these private providers will be paid by the government and not by individual Albertans. From what you know, would you say…

Source: Angus Reid, April 1999.

Figure 67: Arguments in opposition to Bill 11

38%

40%

41%

28%

25%

30%

0% 50% 100%

Decisions like this move Canada one stepcloser to a two tier health care system

Decisions like this put Canada one step closerto having an American style health care system

This decision undermines universality and theprinciple that access to health care in Canadais based on medical need, not ability to pay

Very effective argument Somewhat effective

Source: Angus Reid, 1999.

Figure 68: Arguments in opposition to Bill 11 #2

37%

58%

71%

29%

19%

34%

0% 50% 100%

Public funds are better spent on improving thepublic system rather than creating a parallel

private health care sector

The government of Canada has a significantrole to play in ensuring the government of

Alberta's actions are consistent with the intentand spirit of the CHA

Private health institutions that receive publicfunding should have to open their financialbooks to public scrutiny the same way that

public hospitals do

Strongly agree Somewhat agree

Source: Angus Reid, 1999.

Figure 69: Arguments in support of Bill 11

25%

25%

16%

42%

37%

36%

0% 50% 100%

Paying the private system with public fundswill improve services and reduce waiting times

Decisions like this are necessary because thecurrent public system is not able to meet the

rising demand

Paying the private system with public fundswill reduce the costs to tax payers because thegovernment will not have to pay to build new

facilities. As a result more money will gotoward the provision of services

Very effective argument Somewhat effective

Source: Angus Reid, 1999.

Figure 70: Arguments in support of Bill 11 #2

41%

17%

19%

30%

31%

19%

0% 50% 100%

Anything that can be done to improve healthcare services and reduce waiting times inCanada should be done, including paying

private facilities to provide certain health careservices

It's all right if Canada's health care systemevolves into a two-tier system where privateand pubic health institutions offer all health

services

This is an Alberta issue to be solved byAlbertans and any intervention by the

Government of Canada is inappropriate

Strongly agree Somewhat agree

Source: Angus Reid, 1999.

Figure 71: Arguments in opposition to

Privatization

78%

77%

72%

0% 50% 100%

The only ones who would benefit from allowingpeople to pay for faster or better health care

services would be wealthy Canadians

Allowing people to pay for faster or betterhealth care services will not be necessary ifgovernments make the right decisions todayabout how to make the system more efficient

Universal publicly-funded health care is part ofwhat it means to be Canadian and reflects ourcore values; we would be a poorer society if we

shifted to a 2 tier health care system

Very effective argument

Source: Ekos, 1999. Arguments introduced with: “Some people talk about the need to allow Canadians to buy quicker or higher quality care than what is offered by the publicly-funded health care system.”

Figure 72: Arguments in support of Privatization

56%

41%

40%

0% 50% 100%

By having Canadians pay to use private clinics,waiting times in publicly-funded clinics and

hospitals would be reduced

It makes no sense for governments to try tokeep up with the rising cost of the public

health care system because the system is sodemanding that it will absorb any amount of

money put into it

Allowing people to pay for faster or betterhealth care services is fairer because it allowsthe freedom to choose as is the case in other

areas of the economy

Agree

Source: Ekos, 1999.Source: Ekos, 1999. Arguments introduced with: “Some people talk about the need to allow Canadians to buy quicker or higher quality care than what is offered by the publicly-funded health care system.”

Figure 73: User Fees

46%

58%

46% 44%47% 48%

44%

NATIONAL Atlantic Quebec Ontario Man/ Sask Alberta B.C.

Thinking about the hospitals and your family use, do you agree that hospitals must charge because there is not enough money anymore? (percent saying “yes”)

Source: Berger Health Monitor. 1995

Figure 74: Options for Raising Funds

42%

29%

31%

56%

Hospital user fees

Physicians extra bill

Raise taxes

User fees if people usemore than a certain

amount

Keeping in mind that right now all Canadians are entitled to necessary health services without charge, if your provincial government had to increase its health care budget, please tell me if you would strongly approve, somewhat approve, somewhat disapprove or strongly disapprove of these ways to raise money to pay for health care costs?

Percentage “strongly” and “somewhat” approving combined and presentedSource: Berger Health Monitor. 1995

Figure 75: Deep Support for User Fees?

15%

27%

49%

People would find a wayto pay for services they

really need

You and the communitywould help people pay

Government should pay,which may require

higher taxes

If you found that user fees discouraged sick people from getting the health services they needed, which of the following approaches would you choose for these people?

Source: Berger Health Monitor. 1995

Figure 76: How good an idea is each of the following?

41

34

32

29

24

20

51

56

60

54

52

47

7

9

7

14

22

30

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Tax breaks for the poor

Homecare

Research

Increase provincial transfers

Provide money to poor

Pharmacare

One of the best ideas A good idea but not the bestNot a good idea DK/ NR

Source: Earnscliffe/POLLARA, 1998.

Figure 77: Canadians Giving Informal Care

16%

17%

25%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

1991

1998

2000

Yes, care giving…

Are you giving care to anyone in or out of your home, a child or adult who needs care, attention, errands done for them or similar kinds of help?

Source: Berger Health Monitor, May 2000.

Figure 78: The Financial Burden of Informal

Care

33%

56%

13%

32%

42%

22%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Two or more

One or more

Borrow

Use savings

Make some cuts topersonal spending

Make major cuts topersonal spending

Among those providing informal care: Would you say that in helping out as you do, you have to…

Source: Berger Health Monitor, May 2000.

Figure 79: General Support for Pharmacare

27%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Leave situationas it is

Among all the countries with national insurance programs, Canada is theonly one that does not include prescription drugs as part of its nationalhealth care system. Do you believe Canada should leave the situation as itis or should it include prescription drugs?

Source: Berger Health Monitor, August 1998.

Figure 80: Pharmacare: What Drugs to Include?

39%

57%

0% 40% 80%

All drugsprescribed by

doctor

Only drugs forserious illness

Keeping in mind that the more drugs that are included, the more expensivethe program will be – if governments expanded the coverage for prescriptiondrugs, should this increased coverage include…

Source: Berger Health Monitor, August 1988.

Figure 81:Support for Primary Health Service

Teams

49%

14%

24%

13%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

PositiveNegativeUnsureNo Response

Source: Saskatchewan Commission on Medicare, 2001

Delivering care through Primary Health Service Teams (PHST’s) is another idea for everyday health care. These teams would include nurse practitioners, physicians, nutritionists, pharmacists, therapists and others working together. Some team members could serve more than one community. Services would be on call 24 hours a day, seven days a week. In general, do you think the PHST approach would be positive or negative for the quality of health services you receive?

Figure 82: Doctors or Specialized Professionals?

54%

25%20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Satisfied Neutral Not satisfied

If you were in need of routine health care services, such as ear or throat infections, managing diabetes, or monitoring high blood pressure, would you want to visit a doctor, or would you be satisfied with seeing a general or specialized nurse who works with a doctor?

Source: Ekos, 2000.

Figure 83: Support for Team Practices

74%

24%

3%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Part of a team On his/ her own Don't know

For the health care needs of you and your family, would you prefer a family doctor working as part of a team, or a family doctor practicing on his/her own?

Source: Ekos, 1999.

Figure 84: Importance of Keeping Hospitals

Open

51%

32%

17%

0%

20%

40%

60%

Keep Hospitals Fewer Hospitals No Response

Source: Saskatchewan Commission on Medicare, 2001.

Below are two different views about how to make sure that people get everyday health services when they need them: 1. We should keep hospitals open in as many communities as we can; 2. We could have fewer hospitals if there were more ambulances and more trained ambulance staff available, and people could get hospital care in larger centres when needed.

Figure 85: Hospitals or Community care?

32%

51%

17%

0%

20%

40%

60%

Investing more in thecurrent system of

doctors and hospitals

Investing more in newapproaches such as

home care, community-based care and earlyprevention programs

Both equally(volunteered)

Source: Ekos 1999.

If you were responsible for improving the health care system in Canada, which of the following would you put more emphasis on?

Figure 86: Options for Hospital Restructuring

35%

52%

73%

82%

Patients won't receivesame attention if

hospitals combined

Travelling 20 minutesdoesn't hurt patients

Combined service meansbetter quality

Hospitals which providesame services should be

combined

Thinking about hospitals you and your family use, please tell me whether you would strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree or strongly disagree with the following reasons for changing the way these hospitals provide services to the public?

Percent “strongly” and “somewhat” agreeing combined and presented.Source: Berger Health Monitor, 1995.

Figure 87: How important should each of the following goals be for the health care

system?

64% 62% 60%

33%

0%

25%

50%

75%

Enhance thequality of life

Promote healthand wellness

Reduce disabilityand increase

ability tofunction

Provide life-extendingtreatments

Source: Merck Frost/Pollara 1999.

Percentage saying the goal should be “very important.”

Figure 88: Physician Assisted Suicide

Agree Strongly35%

Agree Moderately

28%

Disagree Moderately

9%

Disagree Strongly

24%

DK/ NA4%

“There are some circumstances under which physicians should definitely be free to help patients commit suicide.”

Source: Angus Reid, September 1995.

Figure 89: Treating Disease or Promoting

Health?

29%

59%

11%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

focus only on the treatmentof disease, illness and injury

do more than treat disease,illness and injury, and alsopromote health through

things like improvedparenting skills, better

nutrition and helping peoplequit smoking

DK/ NA

Is it the job of the health care system to…

Source: Saskatchewan Commission on Medicare, 2001.

Figure 90: Short-Term Policy Options

60

54

48

47

45

40

31

27

31

34

27

33

33

32

8

9

13

17

12

18

17

2

3

2

4

4

3

7

2

2

2

4

4

5

12

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Guarantee on waiting

More equipment

Telemedicine

Charter of Rights for health care

ER quick response teams

Rural ambulance service

Paying doctors extra in rural areas

Completely support SupportNeither support nor oppose OpposeCompletely oppose DK/ NR

Source: Earnscliffe/POLLARA, 1998.

Figure 91: Importance of various goals

6.44

5.51

5.77

5.72

5.78

5.57

3.08

2.4

2.54

2.23

6.44

6.01

5.83

5.78

5.67

5.13

3.18

2.88

1.96

1.93

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Adequate numbers of nurses, doctors, specialists across thecountry

Expanded support for community health clinics

Expanded home and community care services

Improved access to medical specialists

Available 24-hours a day, 7 days a week

Better patient access to modern medical technology

Increased health promotion

Expanded use of health information technology

Increased performance reporting to the public

Governments cover the cost of prescription drugs

Pre dialogue Post dialogue

Source: Ekos 2000 (Respondents were asked to rank each goal in order of importance. Score of 10 indicates “most important”)

Figure 92: Preferences for Spending

25%

32%

47%

50%

58%

61%

70%

Increased health promotion activities

Making better use of information technology

Increased reporting on the performance of thehealth care system

Increase the availability of modern technology

Expanded home and community care programs

Upgrading and modernizing hospitals

Improved access to family doctors and nurses

If you were Prime Minister for a day and had an additional $1 billion to invest in health care, which would be in the best interest of the public?

Source: Ekos 2000. Responses presented in a series of random pair choices.

Figure 93: Causes of Inefficiency

39

74

63

64

54

84

69

70

71

84

55

72

65

87

52

73

0 20 40 60 80 100

People in hospital would do as well athome.

People use unnecessary services

Hospitals don't manage finances well

Doctors prescribe unnecessarily

1989 1992 1994 1995

What are the leading causes of inefficiency in Canada’s health caresystem?

Source: Canada Health Monitor.

Figure 94: Causes of Inefficiency: Do Doctors Abuse the System?

Agree Strongly35%

Agree Moderately

29%

Disagree Moderately

18%

Disagree Strongly

16%

DK/ NA2%

“I feel some doctors encourage people to come for more visits thanare strictly necessary, in order to maintain income levels.”

Source: Angus Reid, September 1995.

Figure 95: Causes of Inefficiency: Do Patients Abuse the System?

Agree66%

Neutral23%

Disagree11%

“Many Canadians misuse the health care system and this increases the costs.”

Source: Angus Reid, 2000.

Figure 96: Two Views on Ensuring Quality

13%

75%

12%

0% 50% 100%

Rely on judgement ofhealth care providers

Decisions based onbest research evidence

No response

Source: Saskatchewan Commission on Medicare, 2001

Should we rely only on the judgement and independence of health care providers, or should we ensure that decisions made by providers are supported by the best research evidence?

Figure 97: Two Views on New Drugs and

Procedures

12%50%

38%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Even if it means that some new technologies, procedures or drugs are notavailable, we should carefully examine the medical evidence and adoptonly those that offer a clear improvement over other available solutions.Even if it means we have to pay more for health care, it is important thatall new procedures, drugs and technologies are made available as soon asthey are approved.No Response

Source: Saskatchewan Commission on Medicare, 2001.

Figure 98: Willingness to Try Experimental

Therapies

7578

60

78 80 8387

0

20

40

60

80

100

National Atlantic Quebec Ontario Manit/ Sask Alberta B.C.

If you were very ill and conventional medicine did not work, should youhave the right to try a therapy which was experimental and which couldmake you even sicker than you were?

Per cent responding “yes”.Source: Berger Health Monitor, March 2001.

Figure 99: Hours of Hospital Emergency Use

23%28%

37%

12%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Between 6amand noon

Between noonand 6pm

Between 6pmand midnight

Betweenmidnight and

6am

Thinking of the last time you went to the emergency room for yourselfor somebody else, at approximately what time in the day or night didyou go?

Source: Berger Health Monitor, March 1999.

Figure 100: Alternatives to Hospital Emergency

Service

89% 86%

46%

87%

12%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Provide atelephone

service

Send peopleto walk-in

clinic

Charge aspecial fee

Familydoctors worknights andweekends

Publicawarenesscampaign

If hospitals wanted to discourage people who did not really have anemergency from using hospital emergency services, which ways would you approve of…

Source: Berger Health Monitor, March 1999.

Figure 101: Support for Community Report Cards

71%

20%

9%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Support

Oppose

DK

“The federal government should give report cards about how well each province is doing on things like health care and education.”

Source: iPoll Research Group, 2000.

Figure 102:Focus of Community Report Cards

24%

51%

17%

0% 20% 40% 60%

Both

Performance of the system on thingssuch as waiting times for treatment and

quality of treatment

Health of the population in thecommunity, on things such as people’s

health and fitness, illness in thecommunity, and nutrition.

Some people have said there should be Community Report Cards on Health so that Canadians would have more information on health issues in their community. If community health cards were established, should they concentrate on..

Source: Berger Health Monitor, August 1998.

Figure 103:Importance of Community Report

Cards

77%

19%

Providing moreservices

Reporting onhealth in thecommunity

Setting up a system of health report cards in communities would cost several million dollars. Some people say that if we spend billions on health care weshould spend at least a few million to let people know the state of health intheir communities. Others say the money would be better spent on providingmore health services . Would you prefer to spend “several million dollars” on...

Source: Berger Health Monitor, August 1998.

Figure 104: Role of the Federal Government

81%

16%

3%0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Federal government isimportant in Medicare

Federal governmentshould not have a say

DK/ NR

Which opinion reflects your view of what the federal government’srole in Medicare should be?

Source: Earnscliffe/POLLARA, 1998.

Figure 105: Should the Government Regulate Natural Health Products?

91% 93%

75%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Purity Quality Effectiveness

Regarding natural health products, do you think the government shouldregulate their: a) purity; b) quality; c) effectiveness?

Source: Berger Health Monitor, May 2000.

Figure 106: Support for National Pharmacare

63%

32%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Nationalprinciples

Provincialprinciples

If there were a national pharmacare program, should the pharmacare program be based on a set of national principles or should each province have its own pharmacare principles?

Source: Berger Health Monitor, August 1998.

Figure 107: Federal Role

59%

39%

The government of Canada's role in the healthcare system includes more than helping theprovinces pay for the system -- it should also

ensure that all Canadians, no matter where theylive, have access to similar levels of health care

services

The government of Canada's role in the healthcare system is to give money to provincial

governments to help cover the costs of provincialhealth care systems

Source: Ekos 2000.

Which of the two following statements more closely reflects your own view?

Figure 108:Federal Contribution to Health Care

2%

11%

29%

19%

8%

31%

1%

9%

32%

21%

4%

32%

0%

20%

40%

None About10%

About25%

About50%

Morethan50%

Don'tKnow

BCAlberta

How much of the money for health care in your province comes from the federal government? Would you say it is about…

Source: iPoll Research Group, 2000.

Figure 109: Under Whose Authority?

38%40%

44%

16%

24%

15%

42%

31%

39%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

1990 1994 2000

Primarily federal

Both equally (had to bevolunteered)Primarily provincial

Please tell me whether you think each of these things should be under the authorityof only the federal level of government, primarily the federal level of government, primarily the provincial level of government, only the provincial level of government… health?

Source: Environics Focus Surveys.

Figure 110: Who Should Take the Lead?

13%3%

83%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Provincial Federal Both

“Which government should be in charge of trying to fix problems with the health care system: the federal government, the provincial government, or should they have to work together on this?”

Source: iPoll Research Group, 2001.

Figure 111: Who Should Lead?

11

15

17

18

20

21

23

24

14

19

8

7

22

6

8

12

7

14

9

11

80

76

60

74

71

67

68

60

75

68

Sask.

B.C.

Quebec

Atlantic

Manitoba

Alberta

Ontario

Men

Women

TOTAL

Federal Provincial Both DK/ NR

Which level of government is the most appropriate to take thelead role on health care?

Source: Earnscliffe/POLLARA, 1998.

Figure 112: Who is to Blame?

12

15

23

23

27

28

29

19

21

31

17

22

15

15

13

23

62

45

53

47

48

48

47

50

4

6

5

7

7

7

8

6

1

3

2

1

3

2

3

2

Quebec

Ontario

Saskatchewan

Alberta

Atlantic Canada

Manitoba

British Columbia

TOTAL

Federal Provincial Both Neither DK/ NR

Who is to blame for the health care system’s problems?

Source: Earnscliffe/POLLARA, 1998.

Figure 113: The Importance of National Standards

63%

25%

7% 4%

0%

25%

50%

75%

Very Essential Somewhat Essential Not Very Essential Not At All Essential

There’s been some discussion recently about the issue of “national standardsfor health care” – that is, requiring all the provinces to provide the same basicaccessibility and quality of health care. In your view, how essential is it tohave national standards for health care across the country?

Source: Angus Reid, March 1996.

Figure 114: Who should set national standards?

47%

25%24%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

The fed and prov gov'tsshould set nationalstandards together

The fed gov't should setstandards

Each prov should set itsown standards

In Canada, different provinces often have different standards for things like health care. Which of the three following statements most closely reflects your own view:

Source: iPoll Research Group, 2000.

Figure 115: Enforcement of the Canada Health

Act

44%49%

7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Withhold transfers Not appropriate towithhold money

DK/ NR

Should the federal government enforce the Canada Health Act by withholding transfers?

Source: Earnscliffe/POLLARA, 1998.

Figure 116: Regional variations on withholding

money

56%

45%

65%

55%52%

49%

57%

0%

40%

80%

National Atlantic Quebec Ontario Manit/ Sask Alberta BC

Would you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose or strongly oppose withholding federal government funds from those provinces which do not meet the five principles (defined in previous question)?

Source: Berger Health Monitor, 1995.

Figure 117: Who Should be Involved in Policy?

62%

39%

38%

30%

23%

21%

12%

35%

31%

28%

37%

45%

34%

21%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Health care professionals

Provincial governments

Federal government

The public

Voluntary health organizations

Academics

Business leaders and employers

The lead roleA significant role

“Who should play a lead role in setting policies to protect patients and ensure the best care?”

Source: Merck Frost/Pollara, 1999.

Figure 118: Spending on Social Programmes: Socioeconomic Differences

45

48

60

71

68

49

58

37

34

21

14

18

28

23

17

18

19

14

13

23

18

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

$80K+

$60K-80K

$20K-$60K

<$20K

Females

Males

OVERALL

Investing in social programs Paying down debt Tax cut for all

In planning its budget for next year, which of the following do youthink the Government of Canada should put the most emphasis on?

Source: Ekos Research, Health Issues Tracking Survey, December 1998

Figure 119: Quality and Access Trade-off:

Socioeconomic Differences

43%

50%

30%

48%

23%

47%

58%

38%37%

43%

0%

70%

Overall Income60K +

Income<20K

Age <65 Age 65+

Quality of health careservices

Equal access to allCanadians

Which of the following aspects of health care is of greatest importance to you?

Source: Ekos, 2000.

Figure 120: Support for Pharmacare: Sociodemographic Differences

32%

36%

44%

52%

68%

49%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

$75, 000

$50-$74,999

$30-$49,999

$20-$29,999

<$20,000

National

Do you think the Canada Health Act should be extended to coverprescription drugs?

Source: Berger Report, Canada Health Monitor, May-July 1996. Percentage saying “yes”.

Figure 121: Regional Variations on Privatization

Models?

12%

33%

18%

30%

8%

19%

24%

7%

18%

32%

0%

40%

Stronglysupport

Somewhatsupport

Somewhatoppose

Stronglyoppose

DK

AlbertaRest of Canada

Do you personally strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose the proposal put forward by Premier Klein? (Bill 11 proposal defined in earlier questions).

Source: Angus Reid, 1999.