42
Chapter 3 Opener A leafcutter ant worker carries a leaf back to the colony while a much smaller worker rides on the leaf to protect her sister against parasitic flies

Figure 3.1 Development of worker behavior in honey bees

  • Upload
    amory

  • View
    23

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Chapter 3 Opener A leafcutter ant worker carries a leaf back to the colony while a much smaller worker rides on the leaf to protect her sister against parasitic flies. Figure 3.1 Development of worker behavior in honey bees. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Chapter 3 Opener A leafcutter ant worker carries a leaf back to the colony while a much smaller worker rides on the leaf to protect her sister against parasitic flies

Page 2: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.1 Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Page 3: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.2 Gene activity varies in the brains of nurse bees and foragers

Page 4: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.3 Social environment and task specialization by worker honey bees

Page 5: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.5 Imprinting in greylag geese

Page 6: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.6 Cross-fostering has different imprinting effects in two related songbirds

Page 7: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.7 Spatial learning by chickadees

Page 8: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.8 A Clark’s nutcracker holding a seed in its bill that the bird is about to cache underground

Page 9: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.9 Differences within a species in learned behavior

Page 10: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.12 Kin discrimination in Belding’s ground squirrels

Page 11: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.13 The ability of Belding’s ground squirrels to learn their own odor

Page 12: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.14 Different wintering sites of blackcaps

Page 13: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.15 Funnel cage for recording the migratory orientation of captive birds

Page 14: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.16 Response to artificial selection on the fall migration departure date of blackcaps

Page 15: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Hirsch Maze

Page 16: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees
Page 17: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees
Page 18: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

The evolutionary importance of heritability

Page 19: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.18 Why do people differ in their test scores?

Page 20: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.19 A coastal Californian garter snake about to consume a banana slug

Page 21: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.20 Response of newborn, naïve garter snakes to slug cubes

Page 22: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.24 Genetic differences cause behavioral differences in fruit fly larvae (Part 1)

Page 23: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.24 Genetic differences cause behavioral differences in fruit fly larvae (Part 2)

Page 24: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.25 Surrogate mothers used in social deprivation experiments

Page 25: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.27 Developmental homeostasis in humans

Page 26: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.28 Mating males of the damselfly Lestes viridis (red bars) have more symmetrical wings than unmated males (orange bars)

Page 27: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Brown et al. 2005

a, Mean dance ability of males (filled bars throughout) and females (open bars throughout) by level of bodily symmetry. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. P values for within-sex are shown. b, Mean strength of symmetry preference (that is, evaluations of asymmetrical dancers subtracted from evaluations of symmetrical dancers) by sex of dancer and sex of evaluator. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. P value at top of panel indicates significantly greater female than male evaluator preference for symmetrical male dancers.

Page 28: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.31 Developmental switch mechanisms can produce polyphenisms within the same species

Page 29: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.36 Male thynnine wasps can be deceived into “mating” with a flower

Page 30: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Peakall 1990

http://www.anu.edu.au/BoZo/orchid_pollination/

Page 31: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Peakall 1990

Males learn to avoid orchid over time (quicker decline in visits than for visits to females)

Page 32: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Peakall 1990

Male wasps revisit flowers when position is moved

Page 33: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.38 Spatial learning abilities differ among members of the crow family

Page 34: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.40 Sex differences in spatial learning ability are linked to home range size

Page 35: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.42 Sex differences in the hippocampus

Page 36: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Kroodsma and Canady 1985

http://www.bwps.org/images/Competitions/Digital/2005-2006/May06/AA_MarshWrenHanging_IDicker.jpg

Page 37: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Kroodsma and Canady 1985

Page 38: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees

Figure 3.45 Vampire bats cannot form learned taste aversions

Page 39: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees
Page 40: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees
Page 41: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees
Page 42: Figure 3.1  Development of worker behavior in honey bees