Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SCANNEDON 111812010
TMcCCCjpk) 6/15/10
THIS DOCUMENT €ELATES TO:
BERNARD SIKKAS NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORJIER
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated FAison Company of New York, Inc,, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Ne York, ew York
7 J q J o
~~~~e~~ WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
I J
Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598
F I L E D ~ u G 1 2 2oIo
SO ORDERED:
Our File No S-4523-98
JUL 2 9 2010
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:
TERRANCE J. FOLEY NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30, (Heitler, J.)
Index No. 118509/98 &
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
125 13 1/00
WilEEFORE, defendant Adience f/k/a BMI, Inc., improperly named as Premier
Refractories, Inc., flWa Adience, Inc. fMa BMI hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Adience fkla BMI, Inc., improperly named as
Premier Refractories, Inc., fMa Adience, Inc. fMa BMI, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Adience fMa BMI, Inc., improperly named as Premier Refractories,
Inc., f/k/a Adience, Inc. f/k/a BMI, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs. /
Dated: 1 L/ / 5 2010
Michael Fanelli, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500
/
Carol M. Tempe-, Esq. MARKS, O'NEILL, O'BRIEN & COURTNEY, P.C. Attorneys for Adience fMa BMI, Inc., improperly named as Premier Refractories, Inc f/Ma Adience, Inc. fMa BMI 530 Saw Mill River Road Elmsford, New York 10523 (914) 345-7301 File No.: 473.85332 /ACG
F 1 2 201Q
SO ORDERED,
-.
JUL 2 9 2010 (NY088988.1)
- TMc:CCCjpk) 7/14/10
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION,
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
TERRANCE FOLEY
INDEX NO. 1 18509/98 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, N w York
7/14
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035
RICHARD W.
York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003 Q
SO ORDERED:
Our File No S-4032-99
JUL 29 2010
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et 01.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 1009 18/08, 108708/01 , 122481/99, 118532198
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: N w ork, N w York I C ,2010 r
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
A l i C 1 2 21010
Hon. Sherry klein’keitler
324-9059
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 / (Heitler, J.)
i Index No.: 10091 8/08, 108708/01, 122481199, 118532198
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION
-against- i SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER ! A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants,
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: N w York, N w York *, 2010
Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Jay Ebinger and Shirley F. Ebin WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P,C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 e .:nm (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
454-1 1413
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I COUNTY OF NEW YORK
j NYCAL j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)
i Index No.: 10091 8/08, 108708/01, 122481/99, 118532/98
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION
: MOTION AND ORDER -against- i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: N w York, Ne York J&J q 2 0 1 0
Attorney for Plaintiffs Kentile Floors, Inc.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Jay Ebinger and Shirley F. Ebinger
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
MCGNNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
.- ~
SO ORDERED,
2082-576
TMc :CCCjpk) 6/71 10
Our File No 5-5p5-99
HENRTY R. VERREGO
INDEX NO. 103833/99 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York JhkJ !J-,2dld
Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 5
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
New York, h
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 1 (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 120328/99
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ROSEMARY KING, Individually and as Executrix ! for the Estate of HARRY A. KING,
[ NO OPPOSITION
j MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
"against-
A. C. & S., INC,, et al.
Defendants. j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
,2010
Attorney for Plaintiffs
D Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 1 2 'O''
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFX COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 120328/99
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ROSEMARY KING, Individually and as Executrix ! for the Estate of HARRY A. KING,
i NO OPPOSITION
j MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against-
A. C, & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. i ! WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules g 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: N w York, New York .L!, I C ( ,2010
Defendant Attorney for Plaintiffs Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Rosemary King and Harry A. Kin WE~TZ&LUXENBERG,P.C. F 1 I E D 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
AI$ 1 2 To'' (2 12) 509-3456 I (212) 558-5500 ~
SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
454-1460
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ROSEMARY KING, Individually and as Executrix ! for the Estate of HARRY A. KING,
j I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
i Index No,: 120328/99
i NO OPPOSITION
i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against-
A, C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishrnan Liquidating Corp,, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
e- Attorney for Defendant
Tishrnk Liquidating Corp.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
(212) 509-3456
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 AUG 1 2 2O?Q
- SO ORDERED, v
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
2383-2361 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 120328/99 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ROSEMARY KING, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of HARRY A. KING,
i NO OPPOSITION
i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: N w York, New York *, 2010
J g i e A. Bartolomeo, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
A l l v ’\ 2 Nvl (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Kleh Heitler
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ROSEMARY KING, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of HARRY A. KING,
j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)
j Index No,: 120328/99
i NO OPPOSITION
i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Plaintiffs Rosemary King and Harry A. King WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
fF\kED MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Klex Heitler
1122-215446
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 120430199
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
PATRICE G. EDGERTON, Individually and Exectrix for the Estate of RONALD G. EDGERTON, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. j ~
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 1 2 2OIa
Attorney for Plaintiffs
D 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
SO ORDERED,
JUL 2 9 2010 454-11272
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O N COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
PATRICE G. EDGERTON, Individually and Exectrix for the Estate of RONALD G. EDGERTON,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
i NYCAL j I.A.S. Part 30 1 ! (Heitler, J.)
\ Index No.: 120430/99
j NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT i MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
,2010
Attorney for Plaintiffs Patrice G. Edgerton and Ronald G. Edgerton
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
Courter & Company, Inc.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
F I L E D MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C, WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
AlEG 1 2 (212) 509-3456
, 4 ~ :q VQ!? Y< SO ORDERED, ,v ~ Y ~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hon. Sherry Klez Heitler
1122-5238
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 120430/99
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
PATRICE G . EDGERTON, Individually and Exectrix for the Estate of RONALD G. EDGERTON, i NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, / MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. :
WHEREFORE7 defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, KentiIe Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: N w ork N w York Ju& if ,2010
Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. S O Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Patrice G. Edgerton and Ronald G. Edgerton WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
F I L E D (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 LUG 1 2 20’0
SO ORDERED, rmjNl y ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 g s Jp
r,sEld YORK
Hon. Sherry Kleinxeitler I \Ut 2 9 2010
2082-577
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
PATRICE G. EDGERTON, Individually and Exectrix for the Estate of RONALD G. EDGERTON, i NO OPPOSITION
j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 120430/99
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: Ngw York, New York
E$*-- Attorney or Defendant
Tishmah Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 AUG 1 2 2010
Patrice G. Edgerton and Ronald G. Edgerton WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
F I L E
NEW VCAW SO ORDERED, rnI.lrnTY ~~~~~~
3!1$2 9 2010 Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
2383-22753
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O N COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YOFX COUNTY j NYCAL
i I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCIJMENT REFERS TO: Index No.: 113954/03,120450/99
JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. j KENNEDY, [ NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, \ MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. i
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated:
J
Tishman Liquidating Cop. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
James T. Kennedy WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
New York, New York 10003 ** .m$!
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway 6,UG
(212) 509-3456 :.S*s,. e %!.'% OFF *",*?,i "*&.
New York, New York 10004
~~~~ cPL""-
SO ORDERED,
2383-24 133
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK comm OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 113954/03, 120450/99 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T, j KENNEDY, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.
Defendants. j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
pment Company James T. Kennedy MCGIVNEY & KLUCER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003 AGG * ''''
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway
~ ! T- .,: , t2 J': 1"s ! .? y" bj
I 'L, I' : '1 "* (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 .,, , / , bqJ p;f:F$ TDutd-;.,' I;;,,.';,. ;,t;,,., '
SO ORDERED,
324-7718
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: i Index No.: 113954/03, 120450/99
JAMES P, KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. i KENNEDY, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summay
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: N w York, New York II( ,2010
James T. Kennedy
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 ?of,@ (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
\;Fv+J V'QRK ,,,a
"F'jf ;hi.$$, i",tZRKS OFF\@ SO ORDERED,
454-2290
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)
i Index No.: 113954/03, 120450/99 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. j KENNEDY, \ NO OPPOSITlON
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Cornp ny, Inc., hereby requests summar:
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
,2010
Attorney for fiefendant Courter & Company, Inc. MCGJVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456
James T. Kennedy WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 A\iG 1 2 2010 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
1122-18500
SUPFEME COIJRT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O U COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. j KENNEDY, / NO OPPOSITION
j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)
i Index No.: 113954103, 120450/99
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., ,meby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
4
J#e A. Bartolomeo, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
James T. Kennedy
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
2082-787
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORJS COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
PATRICE G. EDGERTON, Individually and Exectrix for the Estate of RONALD G. EDGERTON,
Plaintiffs,
Index No.: 120460199
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C . & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. 1 WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 32 12,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: N w ork, ew York J&JU ,v ,2010
Attorney w e n d a n t Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Attorney for Plaintiffs Patrice G. Edgerton and Ronald G. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 AUE 1 2 2010
Hon. Sh/erry Klein Heitler 324-2135
t I U 1 2 9 7010
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
~ ..
IN RE: NEW YOp= CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:
RONALD W. KLOPFER
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30, (Heitler, J.) Index No. 121987/99 &
106483/00
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHBXEFZIRE, defendant Adience fMa BMi, Inc., hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
32 12, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Adience fMa BMI, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Adience flWa BMI, Inc,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs. --c-
Dated: L j C/ / 3 0 1 0
fhichael Fanelli, Esq. Carol M. Tempesta, Esq- MARKS, O’NEXLL, O’BFUEN & COURTNEY, P.C. Attorneys for Adience f/k/a BMI, Inc., 530 Saw Mill River Road Elmsford, New York 10523
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500
(914) 345-7301 File No.: 473.85348
PlEW YORK ?,aurd-W CLERK‘S OFFICI?
WL 29 9”411 (NY088990.1)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 / (Heitler, J.)
i Index No.: 100918/08, 108708/01, 122481/99, 118532/98
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS Fro: JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,
Plaintiffs, : NO OPPOSITION
: MOTION AND ORDER \
-against- i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et 41.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
New York, New York 10004
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.
New York, New York 10003 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway I, ,
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 LUG 1 2 21310
I. . ’I’GRK P y y i!S2 I- ii c:,.i,”EKK‘S OFF)(-&
i,,,!” *,: i SO ORDERED,
324-9059
2UL 2 9 2010
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 1009 1 8/08, 108708/0 1 , 12248 1 /99, 1 18532/98
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F, EBINGER,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all ca-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: N w York, N w York rq ,2010
Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Jay Ebinger and Shirley F, Ebinger WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 L (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
454-11413
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK c o m n OF NEW YORK
! NYCAL - IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S.Part30 j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 1009 1 8/08, 108708/0 1,
122481/99, 11 8532/98 JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION
-against- \ SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER / A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants. /
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: N w York, New York &b k ( , 2 0 1 0
Attorney for Plaintiffs Jay Ebinger and Shirley F. Ebinger WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
2082-576
TMc: CCljpk) 6/10/10
SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERFD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Xnc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: NyTYr York / P
&?&\ Michael Fanelli, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035
RICHARD w. Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place
Our File No S-4773-00
Jrll 292010
NEW YORK mum CLERKS OFFICE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to: NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30, (Heitler, J.) Index No. 12 1987/99 &
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEilEFGRE, defendmi Adience fMa BMi, Inc., hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Adience fMa BMI, Inc., with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
RONALD W. KLOPFER '
106483/00
I
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Adience f/k/a BMI, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500
MARKS, O'NEILL, O'BRIEN & COURTNEY, P.C. Attorneys for Adience f/k/a BMI, Inc., 530 Saw Mill River Road Elmsford, New York 10523
File No,: 473.85348 (914) 345-7301
{ NY088990.1}
INDEX NO. 106483/00 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc,, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Yprk, Ney York
&, Michael Fane li, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035
SO ORDERED: LS!%kz Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
on Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10 6-bL lz D
.--- ~
LUG 1 2 2O1O
Our File No S-4573-00
F3UE 29 ?Olb
TMc':CCCjpk) 6/18/10
Our File I - 3 S-4283-00
MICHAEL ZOGBY
INDEX NO. 1 14257/00 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York L Y h J I X I d \ \ = 5
700 Broadway New York, NY 100035
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc, 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598
F \ L E D SO ORDERED:
AUG 1 2 20'o
THIS DOCUMENT ELATES TO:
JOSEPH A. ZAMPELLA
NDEX NO. 119375/00 and 107791/01 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFCRE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New ork, ew York
7hf. /
f&?d, w, ' Michael Fanelli, Esq. WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035
RICHARD#ABlNECZ, ESQ. Attorney f r D fendant Consolidat dison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place
SO ORDERED:
Our File No $4940-01
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFX COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 113956/01, 123817/00
CURTIS EDWARDS,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT j MOTION AND ORDER -against -
A. C. & S., WC., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to, all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: N w Y rk, New York ~ 91,3[ / L(, 2010
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEXTZ & LUXENBERG, P:c, 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 AUI; 1 2 mfl pj,E*hy '{w 2; c v -
,"..'*,lr/ ). " (*Yt ' j l $i SO ORDERED, p&UN-p( c:", ;. i ' :
324-6265
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
11s DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
CURTIS EDWARDS,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, 3 .)
Index No,: 113956/01, 123817/00
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp,, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claim's against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Attorney for Plaint
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
Tishman Liquidating Corp. Curtis Edwards MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P C . 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 kUG 1 2 2010
2383-23662
SI JPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O N -_ -
COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
i I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 113956/01, 123817/00
CURTIS EDWARDS,
Plaintiffs, \ NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. \ WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: N w York, New York $4':i y , 2 0 1 0
Iefendant Attorney for Plaintiffs ip Company Curtis Edwards KLUGER, P.C. et-Suite 2300 700 Broadway
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
New York, New York 10003 1 2 ZOIQ puG
IYCW 1 u ~ K , lvzw York 10004 (212) 558-5500
(<\@$'
(21 2) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Klxn Heitler
j., 2 9 2010 454-1497
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)
ASBESTOS LITIGATION , ,
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: i IndexNo,: 113956/01, 123817/00
CURTIS EDWARDS,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- : MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
,2010
Curtis Edwards WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 1 2
SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry klein heitler
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 ASBESTOS LITIGATION i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 113956/01, 123817/00
CURTIS EDWARDS,
Plaintiffs, 1 NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- i MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
,2010
Ja#e A. Bartol Attorney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc. Curtis Edwards MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York
(212) 509-3456 (2 12) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry K l e z Heitler
2082-578
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION - - This Document Relates to:
TERRANCE J. FOLEY
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30, (Heitler, J.)
Index No. 118509/9& &
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
125 13 1/00
WHEREFORE, defendant Adience fMa BMI, Inc., improperly named as Premier
Refractories, Inc., fMa Adience, Inc. W a BMI hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 321 2, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Adience f/k/a BMI, Inc., improperly named as Premier Refractories, Inc., f/Wa Adience, Inc, fMa BMI, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Adience fMa BMI, Inc., improperly named as Premier Refractories,
Inc., f/k/a Adience, Inc. fNa BMI, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs. /
Dated: t / -, 2010
Michael Fanelli, Esq. WEITZ LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff(sj 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500
&.4LG&,fh - Carol M, Tempesta, Esa. MARKS, O~NEILL, O~BRIEN & CQWRTIWY, B.C. Attorneys for Adience fWa BMI, Inc., improperly named as Premier Refractories, Inc f/k/a Adience, Inc. f/k/a BMI 530 Saw Mill River Road F Elmsford, New York 10523
1 2 %DlQ (914) 345-7301 File No.: 473.85332 /l.G G
SO ORDERED,
(NY088988.1}
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
CAROL DANN and JAMES HOOKER, as Personal Representatives for the Estate of EARL HOOKER,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 106564/0 1
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: N w ork,Ne York jb+, I Cr",,o,o
Matthew D. wir;q. Attorney for D Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Attorney for Plaintiff Earl Hooker WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 LUG 1 2 20'o
p J p p j Y@BK (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
nM's om* SO ORDERED, @jNflC.LE Hon. Sherry KleiJHeitler
324-6121
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 106564/01
i
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
CAROL DANN and JAMES HOOKER, as Personal Representatives for the Estate of EARL HOOKER, i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
ook, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. Earl Hooker MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
WElTZ & LUXEMERG, P.C.
1 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, Hon. S g y Klein Heitler
2383-22885
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j 1.A.S Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 106564/01
j
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CAROL DANN and JAMES HOOKER, as Personal Representatives for the Estate of EARL HOOKER, i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. :
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: N w ork,N w York &Jf /J ,2010
rney for Defendant Attorney for Plaintiffs Kentile Floors, Inc. Earl Hooker MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
2082-698 '"Jlrl2 9 2010
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
i I.A.S. Part 30 ' (Heitler, J.) ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
CAROL DANN and JAMES HOOKER, as Personal Representatives for the Estate of EARL HOOKER,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
Index No.: 106564/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: N w York, N w York ".J( / q ,2010
Attorney for Plaintiffs Earl Hooker WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
New York, New York 10003
m MCGIVNEY & U U G E R , P.c, 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
700 Broadway R\ \I: I I .) - '1010
SO ORDERED,
1122-1 1446
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30 / (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 106564/01
i
1 SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CAROL DANN and JAMES HOOKER, as Personal Representatives for the Estate of EARL HOOKER, i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. :
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: N w York, N w York Lb (4 ,2010
Attorney for Defendant Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & JLLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456
Attorney for Plaintiffs Earl Hooker WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
!-.?$I vnR* ~ ; ;~&&*~ "Ott
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 454-10881
SO ORDERED, 8
TMc:CC(jpk) ,* 6/16/10
SUPREME! COURT : GLL COUNTIES
Our File No S-5705-01
107295/01 ASSIGNED TO: HQN. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, hc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs cornplaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. wit4 prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a l l claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, hc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs,
Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New Yirk, NY 10003-3598 cn
-- FIL.&Y AUG 1 2 2010
SO ORDERED:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ANN HARDOBY, Individually and GREGORY HARDOBY and DIANE RABIEJ, as Co- Executrices for the Estate of GEORGE HARDOBY,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A,S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 107297/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York. New York
Attorney for Defendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (21 2) 509-3456
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Ann Hardoby and George Hardoby WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 17 IO@ (212) 558-5500 hoc
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YOFX IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
i I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 107297/01
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ANN HARDOBY, Individually and GREGORY HARDOBY and DIANE RABIEJ, as Co- Executrices for the Estate of GEORGE HARDOBY, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs,
i NO OPPOSITION
[ MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A, C, & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
,2010
&A yq& J ie A. Bartolomeo, sq. Akorney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc, MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456
so
uii-
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Ann Hardoby and George Hardoby WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. \ 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
L ZQjQ .t\c 12
(212) 558-5500
ORDERED,
h" - 2082-676
' JUL 2 9 2$10 Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 / (Heitler, J.)
; Index No.: 107297/01 i
i NO OPPOSITION
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT WFERS TO:
ANN HARDOBY, Individually and GREGORY HARDOBY and DIANE RABIEJ, as Co- Executrices for the Estate of GEORGE HARDOBY, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C . & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 321 2, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
,2010
Courter & Company, Inc, MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, PC. SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456
Ann Hardoby and George WEITZ & LUXENBERG. P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 1122-1376
JUL 2 9 ZOm1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ANN HARDOBY, Individually and GREGORY HARDOBY and DIANE RABIEJ, as Co- Executrices for the Estate of GEORGE HARDOBY,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 10729710 I
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: N w York, ew York J*IJ rv ,2010
Kerre Attorn1 &iG---- or efendant
Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
Attorney for Plaintiffs Ann Hardoby and George Hardoby WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
_" .
SO ORDERED, Hon. S h e k y x i n Heitler
454-1174
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
j I.A.S, Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 107297/01 j
j NO OPPOSITION
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ANN HARDOBY, Individually and GREGORY HARDOBY and DIANE RABIEJ, as Co- Executrices for the Estate of GEORGE HARDOBY, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
A 1
Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Attorney for Plaintiffs Ne Ann Hardoby and George Har WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 AUG 1 2 zQ'o
YORK (21 2) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 nr;'s OFFIfl
WUrm cLE SO ORDERED,
324-6169
' TMc:CCQpk) 611 611 0
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION,
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
GEORGE HARDOBY
INDEX NO. 107297/01 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEEFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
$4, ( 2 p -
Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place
'mO@-?L598E D SO ORDERED:
Hon. Our File No S-5703-0 1
JUL 2 9 201O *-.. -
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
RUTH HOROWITZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of ABRAHAM HOROWITZ,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., etal.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S, Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 107298/0 1
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
, 2010
rney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 MCGIVNEY & QUGER, P.C.
Ruth Horowitz and Abraham Horow%z WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 55s-5500 1 2 2010
New York, New York 10003
SO ORDERED, Hon. She& Kl&n Heitler
2082-702
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 107298/01
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
RUTH HOROWITZ, Individually and as Executrix ! for the Estate of ABRAHAM HOROWITZ,
i NO OPPOSITION
j MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against-
A, C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. I
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
without costs.
RUG 1 2 ’’‘’ e
MCGJVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, h Hon. SheGy Klein Heitler
1122-21019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW Y O N COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
RUTH HOROWITZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of ABRAHAM HOROWITZ,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 107298/0 1
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: N w York, New York Tu$ fy ,2010
4ya Ke annM ook,Esq. - Attorney for Defendant Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456
Frank MI Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Ruth Horowitz and Abraham Horowitz WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
454-1173
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
RUTH HOROWITZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of ABRAHAM HOROWITZ,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et 01,
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 107298/0 1
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE7 defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: %w York, New York
Attorney for Plaintiffs Ruth Horowitz and Abraham Horowitz WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
324-6170
JUL 2 9 2010
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
j 1,A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)
i Index No.: 107298/01
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
RUTH HOROWITZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of ABRAHAM HOROWITZ,
[ NO OPPOSITION
i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: N w York, New York J-JJ id[, 2010
Attorney for Defendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<+ 700 Broadway
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 H,l& I2 2mQ
eitler
VU1 2 9 20 10 2383-23193
' TMc:CCljpk) 6/16/10.
I'N RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, _____"___."_________--.-""--------~-------~-~-~~"---"~~-~---"~~-----~~----
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
JOSEPH A. ZAMPELLA
11 9375/00 and 107791/01 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Our File No S-4940-0 1
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company o f New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice t o all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, ew York
7 / / f / H I
/f-Z,,& #Q m, Michael Fanelli, Esq. WEXTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035
son Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place
SO ORDERED:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 108007/01
ALBERT DE ROSA, Individually and as Personal j Representative for the Estate of FRANCES DE j ROSA, \ NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC,, et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
1 -LI
U o o k , Esq. Attorney for Defendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456
Albert De Rosa and Frances De WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 AL\G 2010 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
J"L 2 9 2010 2383-23312
. . - . . . -
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK I
COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ALBERT DE ROSA, Individually and as Personal Representative for the Estate of FRANCES DE ROSA,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants,
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 108007/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: ew York, New York July \y ,2010
Attorney for Plaintiffs Albert De Rosa and Frances D WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 LUG 1 2 2010 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, I
Hon. Sherry Klein He&
2082-550
JUL 2 9 2010
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
j I.A,S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: i Index No.: 108007/01
ALBERT DE ROSA, Individually and as Personal ! Representative for the Estate of FRANCES DE j ROSA, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
Plaintiffs, : MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
,2010
Courter & Company, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456
Albert De Rosa and Frances De R o 8 WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
D FIB. AI& 1 2 20’O
(212) 558-5500
1122-1141
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION i NYCAL j I.A,S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 108007/01
ALBERT DE ROSA, Individually and as Personal ! Representative for the Estate of FRANCES DE i ROSA, i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et 01.
Defendants. i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
D a t e d x G r k i q w York ,2010
1c) AI& 1 2 2010
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
Patterson Pump Company MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C, 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O N COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ALBERT DE ROSA, Individually and as Personal Representative for the Estate of FRANCES DE ROSA,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL 1,A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 108007/0 1
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: N w York, Ne York Jug / y , 2 0 1 0
Matthed %mpar, Esq. Attorney fo efendant Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456
Attorney for Plaintiffs Albert De Rosa and Frances De R o a WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, Hon. s y Klex Heitler
JUL tl9 20m 324-5966
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O N COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30 / (Heitler, J.)
i Index No.: 100918108, 108708/01, 122481199, 11 8532/98
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAY EBlNGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,
Plaintiffs, : NO OPPOSITION
: MOTION AND ORDER -against- i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants. i
1 WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORTIERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Xnc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: NJbYsk, yeqv York ,2010
Attorney for Plaintiffs Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
Jay Ebinger and Shirley F. Ebinger WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
2082-576
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F, EBINGER,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 10@918/08, 108708/@1, 12248 1/99, 1 18532/98
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: N w York, N w York \ a, 2010
J
Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Jay Ebinger and Shirley F, Ebin WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P,C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
!w (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, Hon. Sh-leinhkeitler
454-11413
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YOFX COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)
i Index No.: 100918/08, 108708/01, 122481/99, 118532/98
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,
Plaintiffs, : NO OPPOSITION
-against- i SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER ! A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants. j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P,c. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
324-9059
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
X NYCAL _______l__"___f_X_-_---------------------------------------------------
In Re NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Heitler, J.)
I.A.S. Part 30
x ....................................................................... This document relates to: Index No.: 109480/2001
J.D. WARD (Deceased), NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
MOTION AND -against- ORDER AS TO
DEFENDANT
OLIVER BOILER
Plaintiff, JUDGMENT
KEELER-DORR OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al. KEELER-DORR-
Defendant. COMPANY x 1__1__________1_____--------------------------------------------------
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER-DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant KEELER-DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY,
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER-DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs. i
Attorneys for Plaintisf 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (2 12)558-5500
SO ORDEREI
MARIN GOODMAN, LLP. Attorneys for Defendant KEELER-DORIC-OLIVER COMPANY
*+ d
. . " 500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501
(212) 661-1151 \
'" c: I . .. Harrison, New York 10528
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 109761/01
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
IRENE HERNANDEZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of PHILIP HERNANDEZ, j
i NO OPPOSITION
i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against-
A. C. & S,, INC., et al.
Defendants. j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
; Attorney for Defendant ook, Esq.
Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
Attorney for Plaintiffs Irene Hernandez and Philip Hernandez WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 1 2 2O1O
F I L E D
2383-23293
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
IRENE HERNANDEZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of PHILIP HERNANDEZ,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C, & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 109761/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
J e e A. Bartolomeo, gsq. Attorney for Defendah Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Irene Hernandez and Philip Hem WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
2082-686
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
IRENE HERNANDEZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of PHILIP HERNANDEZ,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. !
Index No.: 109761/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: Ne York, New York J& /1/,2010
Courter & Company, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 AUG 1 2 2010
SO ORDERED,
1122-3008
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
i I.A.S. Part 30 ASBESTOS LITIGATION / (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 109761/01
IRENE HERNANDEZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of PHILIP HERNANDEZ, j
\ NO OPPOSITION Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- ; MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., NC., et al.
Defendants. j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: N w York, N w York J,!, ,9 ,2010
Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, PC, 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Irene Hernandez and Philip Hernan WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
AIJG 1 2 ZO’’ (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
454-1163
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)
i Index No.: 109761/01
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
IRENE HERNANDEZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of PHILIP HERNANDEZ, j
i NO OPPOSITION
i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: N w ork, New York Jb 5 I y ,2010
Attorney forh&ddant Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
Irene Hkrnandez and Philip Hernande? WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
324-6179
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 110739/01
MICHAEL MATTEO and FRANCES MATTEO, i
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- [ MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S,, INC., et al.
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: Ne York, N w York J& IS ,2010
Patterson Pump Company MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Michael Matteo and Frances Matteo WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 100
(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 1 2 2ola
byp,/; KPv SO ORDERED, cLEpE.&’s OFPI*-
Hon. Sherry z e i n Heitler P_X3UNV
JUL 2 9 2010 454-945
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 / (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 110739/01 i
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
MICHAEL MATTEO and FRANCES MATTEO,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: N w York, N w York Lb IS ,2010
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P,C. WEITZ&LUXENBERC,P.C. F \ E D 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Michael Matteo and Frances Matteo
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 1 2 2Q'0 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
*..
SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Krein Heitler
JU 2 9 2% 324-359
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 110943/01
JUDITH E. ACKLEY, Executrix for the Estate of j ROLAND DI ANTONIO,
; NO OPPOSITION
i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against-
A. C, & S., INC., et al.
Defendants, !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Attorney for Plaintiffs Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
Roland Di Antonio WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 . -
SO ORDERED, c ,/
Hon. Sherry K1& Heitler
AUG 1 2 2010
JUL 2 9 2010 2082-553
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JUDITH E. ACKLEY, Executrix for the Estate of RONALD DI ANTONIO,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S, Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No. : 1 1 0943/0 1
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: N w York, New York JU\ 5 1 y ,2010
. Cook, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 1000
c (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
1
SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Kleh Heitler
454-820
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YOFX COUNTY j NYCAL
i 1,A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 110943/01
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JUDITH E. ACKLEY, Executrix for the Estate of RONALD DI ANTONIO,
[ NO OPPOSITION
i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against-
A. C. & S., INC,, et al. ! Defendants, j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp,, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Attorney for Defendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P,C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Ronald Di Antonio
-
E WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway AUG 1 2 New York. New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No,: 11 1221/01, 116266/01
MORRIS COHEN and JENNIE COHEN,
Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- i MOTION AND ORDER
A, C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants, !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: N York New York JJq’uy ,2010
J
Attorney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.C. F 1 \1. E D 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Morris Cohen and Jennie Cohen
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
1 2 to’’ (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, w
Hon. Sherry K b d Heitler
‘JUL 2 9 2010 2082-440
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
i I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 11 1221/01, 116266/01
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
MORRIS COHEN and JENNIE COHEN,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- i MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.
Defendants. ~.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
WEITZ & LUXENBERC, P.C. Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 AU& 1 2 2010
(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 bjE\:d YORK
r -_ ~014~~ CLERK'S O F d SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klzn Heitler
2383-23449A JUL 2 9 TO10
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.AS. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 11 1227/01, 123440/01 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- i MOTION AND ORDER
A. C . & S., INC, et al.
Defendants. !
WHEREFOE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
,2010
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.C. F I L E D 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Shalom Levy and Malka Levy
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
AUG 1 2 2010 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
324-6204Y
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,
P 1 ai nt i ffs ,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 11 1227/01, 123440/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Shalom Levy and Malka Levy WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
F I L E D Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 AUG 1 2 2010
SO ORDERED, NEW YORK
CA)UNN CLERK'S OFn@
7rJL 2 9 2010 454-1362W
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 ASBESTOS LITIGATION i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 11 1227/01, 123440/01
SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- i MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., WC., et al.
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
,2010
m e fendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
Attorney for Plaint ShalornvLevy and Malka Lev WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 LUG 1 2 2O'O (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, 1 JUL 2 9 2010 2383-2353OX
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 : (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 11 1227/01, 123440/01
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,
Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSITION ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., NC., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York 1y ,2010
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
AUG 1 2 201' (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
1122-15690
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)
i Index No.: 11 1227/01, 123440/01
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- i MOTION AND ORDER
A, C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: N w York, New York JlA.(A 'y ,2010
Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Shalom Levy and Malka Levy WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
F \ L E D (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 LUG 1 2 2010
2082-859
SUPmME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
NICHOLAS DELFINO and LAURA DELFINO,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 11 1867/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
,2010
Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 1 (21 2) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, Won. Sherry Klein keitler
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
NICHOLAS DELFINO and LAURA DELFINO,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.
Defendants.
NYCAL 1.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 11 1867/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
,2010
Kentile Floors, Inc. MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Nicholas Delfino and Laura Delfi WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
(21 2) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 AUG 1 2 2010
NEW YORK WN 1NTY CLERK'S OFFILE
SO ORDERED, - V
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
JUL 2 9 2010 2082-539
L . .
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
NICHOLAS DELFINO and LAURA DELFINO,
Plaintiffs,
"against-
A. C . & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J .)
Index No,: 1 1 1867/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York A M , 2010
Courter & Company, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456
Nicholas Delfino and Laura Delfino
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
F I (212) 558-5500
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)
j Index No,: 1 1 1867/01 j
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
NICHOLAS DELFINO and LAURA DELFINO,
i NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs,
-against- / MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
,2010
*r?- Attorne Patterson Pump or Defendant Company
MCGXVNEY & KLUCER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
F I L E D WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
AUG 1 2 2010 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
N[{L?I YORK SO ORDERED, p a u ~ n CLERK'S O F F U
JUL 2 9 2010 454-1354
. . . .-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
NICHOLAS DELFINO and LAURA DELFINO,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., TNC,, et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 1 1 1867/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Nicholas Delfino and Laura Delfino
(21 2) 509-3456
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
New York, New York 10003 700 Broadway F I L E D (212) 558-5500
324-5923
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY \ NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)
j Index No,: 113728/01
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
LILLIAN COLLINS, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of EDWARD G. COLLINS, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT i MOTION AND ORDER P1 aint 3 ffs ,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. :
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company,
without costs.
Dated: N w York, New York c Llj fq ,2010
Inc., be and
Courter & Company, Inc. MCGTVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. S O Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
the same are hereby
. ZOlD
wb Attorney for Plaintiffs Lillian Collins and Edward G. Collins WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, Heitler ----~~
JUL 29 2010 1122-1894
. .. . . . . ... . __
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30 / (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 113728/01
LILLIAN COLLINS, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of EDWARD G. COLLrNS, i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
"eY defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Lillian Collins and Edward G. C o l l i x WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
w o o k , Esq. Attorney for Defendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
2383-23732
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
j 1,A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)
i Index No.: 113956/01, 123817/00
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
CURTIS EDWARDS,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- i MOTION AND ORDER
A. C . & S., INC., et nl.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: N w Y rk, New York A* L/ IL/,2010
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Curtis Edwards WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 AUG 1 2 2010 (212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry KleiG Heitler
324-6265
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
CURTIS EDWARDS,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 113956/01, 123817/00
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: N w York, New York %.':I y, 2010
r*- Attorne or Defendant
Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
554-1497
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY / NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)
i Index No.: 113956/01, 123817/00
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
CURTIS EDWARDS,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- i MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. i WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against i
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: Mew York. New York
Tishrnh Liquidating Corp.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P,c,
(212) 509-3456
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Curtis Edwards WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
F I L AUG 1 2 2010
NEW YOWK
2383-23662
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
~~ . ~~~~
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
CURTIS EDWARDS,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., N C . , et ul.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 113956/01, 123817/00
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
7 2010
Attorney for Plaintiffs Courter & Company, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
Curtis Edwards WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 ..
SO ORDERED, Won, Sherry klein Reitler
1122-2221
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)
i Index No.: 113956/01, 123817/00
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
CURTIS EDWARDS,
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Tnc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
,2010
Kentile Floors, Inc. Curtis Edwards MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York (2 12) 558-5500
JUL 2 9,2010 2082-578
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
RICHARD M. GIEGERICH, Administrator for the Estate of RICHARD GIEGERICH and CHERYLE F. GIEGERICH, Individually,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
1,A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 114379/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: Naw York. New York I(( ,2010
Kerrya k, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Richard Giegerich and Cheryle F. Gieg WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 1000
h (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 1 2 20'o
SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry KYein Heitler
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW Y O N IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION ! NYCAL j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, 3.)
j Index No.: 114379/01 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
RICHARD M. GIEGERICH, Administrator for the Estate of RICHARD GIEGERICH and CHERYLE j F. GIEGERICH, Individually, / NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, / MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
,2010
Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
WEJTZ & LUXENBERG, PC. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
454-1513
SO ORDERED,
COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW Y O N COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
MORRIS COHEN and JENNIE COHEN,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., XNC., et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
IndexNo.: 111221/01, 116266/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND OlRDER
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: yT-AYsk\Nqw York ,2010
J&ie A. Bartolomeo, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
4
Attorney for Plaintiffs Morris Cohen and Jennie Cohe WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
ACG 1 2 121110 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, Hon. Shehy Kk%h Heitler
SUL 2 9 2010 2082-440
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YOFK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler. J.)
ASBESTOS LITIGATION \ , ,
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: i Index No.: 11 1221/01,116266/01
MORRIS COHEN and JENNIE COHEN,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- i MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman L.iquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
,2010
Attorney Tishman MCGIVN 80 Broac h T a x l t V-7
JUL 2 9 2010 2383-23449A
Morris Cohen and Jennie Cohen;
700 Broadway
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. * / / 4 ") 21140
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003 A!:? I L.
i.;r:, '$ 4:'-~":.>! 1 iJ" ,,4
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
..- Pgyygy c,''\,.[:RX'S om SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Kl& Heitler
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 117155/01
MARTIN A. CONDENZIO, MICHAEL A. CONDENZIO, and LINDA KLIEBER, as Co- Administrators for the Estate of MARTIN CONDENZIO, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ NO OPPOSITION
; MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C, & S . , INC., et al.
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs,
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. F I L E D Martin Condenzio
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 1 2 2010 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Kleinkeitler
JUL 2 9 324-6260
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
MARTIN A. CONDENZIO, MICHAEL A. CONDENZIO, and LINDA KLIEBER, as Co- Administrators for the Estate of MARTIN CONDENZIO,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
j ~
NYCAL I.AS, Part 30 (Heitler, J+)
Index No.: 117155/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: ew York, ew York w, 2010
1 Ke annM ook.Esa. , 1
Atto=Defendant Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Martin Condenzio
P -T'.T--
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
AUG 1 2 2O1O 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
i1 IL 2 9 2018 Hon. S h G K l e i n Heitler a, 454-1806
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 11715Y01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
MARTIN A. CONDENZIO, MICHAEL A. CONDENZIO, and LNDA KLIEBER, as Co- Administrators for the Estate of MARTIN CONDENZIO,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C . & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York. New York
J4P=I7 *010
F I L E D AUG 1 2 2010
efendant Attorney for Plaint Tishmk Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
Martin Condenzio WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION ! NYCAL j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 117155/01 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
MARTIN A, CONDENZIO, MICHAEL A. CONDENZIO, and LINDA KLIEBER, as Co- Administrators for the Estate of MARTIN CONDENZIO, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i NO OPPOSITION
i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and wit
F \ L b costs.
Dated: N w York, N w York &\q 14 ,2010
Akomey for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P C 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456
Attorney for Plaintiffs Martin Condenzio WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
2082450
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
MARTIN A. CONDENZIO, MICHAEL A. CONDENZIO, and LINDA KLIEBER, as Co- Administrators for the Estate of MARTIN CONDENZIO,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 117155/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Courter & Company, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
Attorney for Plainti'ffs -ec Martin Condenzio wi WEITZ 700 Broadway & LUXENBERG, P,C. F I L E D New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 AUG 1 2 2010
TMc:CC(jpk) 6/16/10
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
TERRENCE CORFUGAN
I I NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Our File No S-6708-01
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the Same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Yjork, Ney York
Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035
** Timothy M. RICHARD ABDJECZ, ESQ. Attorney f o u e n d a n t Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598
@UL 2 9 2010
rMc:CC(jpk) 6/15/10
BERTRAND LINDSEY
INDEX NO, 120575/01 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York Ju\g 1TrZdW n
Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 5
Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598
LUG 1 2 2O1O
s a ~ ~ n CLERKS OFFICII;" NEW
SO ORDERED:
Our File No S-6532-01
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW Y O N IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
j J.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, 1.)
i Index No.: 1 1 1 227/0 1, 123440/0 1
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,
Plaintiffs, \ NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- / MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., NC., et al.
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
,2010
m e fendant Tishman Liquidating Corp, MCGIVNEY & KLWGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Frank : M.3rtiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Shalom Levy and Malka Levy WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
2383-2353OX
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OFNEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 11 1227/01, 123440/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
,2010
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WElTZ & LUXENEERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
A U G 1 2 2010 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
324-6204Y
STJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & s., IN?, et al.
Defendants.
I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No,: 11 1227/01, 123440/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, .that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: N w York, New York L-5 /y ,2010
Attorney for Plaintiffs Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P C 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
Shalom Levy and Malka Lev WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 AUG 1 2 2010
454-1362W
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 1 1 1227/01, 123440/0 1
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing I
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York &$l /y ,2010
Shalom T.evv ahd Malka T.evv MCCiIVNEY && KLUGER, Y.L. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, Y.L. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
AGG 1 2 '2m (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
1122-15690
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW Y O N IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION 1 I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, .I.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY, ; Index No.: 11 1227101, 123440/01
Plaintiffs, [ NO OPPOSlTION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- [ MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., etal.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice .to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
, 2010
1 At omey for Defendant
Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & UUGER, PC. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
Shalom Levy and Malka Levy WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 A\L)G 1 2 tQzO
2082-859
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YOFX COUNTY ! NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)
i Index No.: 100918/08, 108708/01, 122481/99, 118532/98
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION
-against- / SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 MOTION AND ORDER : A, 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: N w ork, N w York JA*& rq ,2010
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
Jay Ebinger and Shirley F. Ebinge
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P,c.
I b E D (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry kleinheitler
AUG 1 2 2010
324-9059
JUL 2 9 2010
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFX COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 100918/08, 108708/01, 122481199, 118532198
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,
Plaintiffs,
-against- ; NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT i MOTION AND ORDER : A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants. j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: N w York, N w York &+ 1 q ,2010 -*- Attorney Kerr nnM. for Defendant ok,Esq.
Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Jay Ebinger and Shirley F. Ebinge WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
D 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
454-11413
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 100918/08, 108708/01, 122481/99, 118532/98
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION
-against- i SUMMARY JUDGMENT ! MOTION AND ORDER i A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: NJbYojF y q , Y o r k 2010
Attorney for Plaintiffs Jay Ebinger and Shirley F. Ebinger WEKTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, PC.
! i I !
i i
I I I
!
1
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, Hon. SherrywKle$ Heitler
AUG 1 2 2070
2082-576
This Document Relates To:
FRANK PEZZOLA and ANN PEZZOLLA,
Plaintiff,
Index No.: 190126-09
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
AIRCO, INC., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, TRANE US TNC., flWa AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
32 13, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendants, TRANE US INC., fkla AMERICAN
STANDARD, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
TRANE US INC., flWa AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dared: ~ ~ \ L ) ~ , m o New York. New%
Charles Ferguson, Weitz & Luxenberg Attcrneys for Plaint iff( s) 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (21 2 ) 605-6200
SO ORDERED,
F I L E
Attorney for Defendant Trane US Inc., f/Wa American Standard, Inc. 2430 Route 34, Suite A-18 Manasquan, New Jersey 08736 (732) 528-8888
* t
, . . I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STAT
IndexNo.: BtFFh'W I
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, T U N E US INC. f/Wa AMERICAN STANDARD INC., hereby
requests siimmary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules I Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendants, TRANE US INC. f/Wa
AMERICAN STANDARD INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereo,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant TRANE US INC. f/Wa AMERICAN STANDARD NC., be and the same are hereb
rejudice and without costs, F l 1,
BRAATEN & PASCARELLA, LLC Attorney for Defendant TRANE US RJC f/Wa AMERICAN STANDARD INC , 2430 Route 34, Suite A-18 Manasquan, New Jersey 08736
-546 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor Nev York, New York 10036 (2J2) 681-1575
(732) 528-8888
SO ORDERED,
JUL 2 9 2010
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. KENNEDY,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 113954/03, 120450/99
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc,, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
J#e A. Bartolomeo, Ssq. Attorney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEXTZ&LUXENBERG,P.C. 1 L E D 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
James T. Kennedy
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
AUG 1 2 2010 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
2082-787
... . . . .-.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 1 13954/03, 120450/99
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. j KENNEDY, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND 0IU)ER
-against-
A, C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
,2010
Attorney for lbefendant Courter & Company, Inc, MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Attorney for Plaintiffs James T. Kennedy WEITZ & LUXENBERG. P.C. E
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
New York, New York 10003 AUG 1 2 20’o
SO ORDERED,
3UL 2 9 2010 1122-185OO
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. KENNEDY,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants.
Index No.: 113954/03, 120450/99
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Patterson Pump Company
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 p;,.J6 2 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
454-2290
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
i I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. j KENNEDY, i NO OPPOSITION
i Index No.: 113954/03, 120450/99
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
ment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
UUL 2 9 2010 324-7718
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 113954/03, 120450/99
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. j KENNEDY, i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND OIiDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.
Defendants. j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating COT*, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Attorney for Defendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. James T. Kennedy MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway 1 2 ""
(2 12) 509-3456
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003 (2 12) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
j 2383-24133 i
TMc:CC(jpk) + 6/14/10
INDEX NO. 11 8070/01 and 115706/03 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WEERJZFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests swllfnary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rdes Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the m e are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Y rk, Ne York
7/%,/,/0 'F; C r l
' WEITZ & LUXENB Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 5
L - I
Consolidated Bdison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598
S-6708-0 1