120
SCANNEDON 111812010 TMcCCCjpk) 6/15/10 THIS DOCUMENT €ELATES TO: BERNARD SIKKAS NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORJIER WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant Consolidated FAison Company of New York, Inc,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated: Ne York, ew York 7JqJo ~~~~e~~ WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. I J Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035 Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598 FILED ~uG 12 2oIo SO ORDERED: Our File No S-4523-98 JUL 2 9 2010

FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SCANNEDON 111812010

TMcCCCjpk) 6/15/10

THIS DOCUMENT €ELATES TO:

BERNARD SIKKAS NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORJIER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated FAison Company of New York, Inc,, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Ne York, ew York

7 J q J o

~~~~e~~ WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

I J

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

F I L E D ~ u G 1 2 2oIo

SO ORDERED:

Our File No S-4523-98

JUL 2 9 2010

Page 2: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

TERRANCE J. FOLEY NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30, (Heitler, J.)

Index No. 118509/98 &

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

125 13 1/00

WilEEFORE, defendant Adience f/k/a BMI, Inc., improperly named as Premier

Refractories, Inc., flWa Adience, Inc. fMa BMI hereby request summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Adience fkla BMI, Inc., improperly named as

Premier Refractories, Inc., fMa Adience, Inc. fMa BMI, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant Adience fMa BMI, Inc., improperly named as Premier Refractories,

Inc., f/k/a Adience, Inc. f/k/a BMI, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs. /

Dated: 1 L/ / 5 2010

Michael Fanelli, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

/

Carol M. Tempe-, Esq. MARKS, O'NEILL, O'BRIEN & COURTNEY, P.C. Attorneys for Adience fMa BMI, Inc., improperly named as Premier Refractories, Inc f/Ma Adience, Inc. fMa BMI 530 Saw Mill River Road Elmsford, New York 10523 (914) 345-7301 File No.: 473.85332 /ACG

F 1 2 201Q

SO ORDERED,

-.

JUL 2 9 2010 (NY088988.1)

Page 3: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

- TMc:CCCjpk) 7/14/10

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION,

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

TERRANCE FOLEY

INDEX NO. 1 18509/98 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, N w York

7/14

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

RICHARD W.

York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003 Q

SO ORDERED:

Our File No S-4032-99

JUL 29 2010

Page 4: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et 01.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 1009 18/08, 108708/01 , 122481/99, 118532198

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: N w ork, N w York I C ,2010 r

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

A l i C 1 2 21010

Hon. Sherry klein’keitler

324-9059

Page 5: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 / (Heitler, J.)

i Index No.: 10091 8/08, 108708/01, 122481199, 118532198

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,

Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION

-against- i SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER ! A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants,

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, N w York *, 2010

Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Jay Ebinger and Shirley F. Ebin WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P,C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 e .:nm (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

454-1 1413

Page 6: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I COUNTY OF NEW YORK

j NYCAL j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

i Index No.: 10091 8/08, 108708/01, 122481/99, 118532/98

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,

Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION

: MOTION AND ORDER -against- i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: N w York, Ne York J&J q 2 0 1 0

Attorney for Plaintiffs Kentile Floors, Inc.

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Jay Ebinger and Shirley F. Ebinger

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

MCGNNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

.- ~

SO ORDERED,

2082-576

Page 7: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

TMc :CCCjpk) 6/71 10

Our File No 5-5p5-99

HENRTY R. VERREGO

INDEX NO. 103833/99 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York JhkJ !J-,2dld

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 5

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

New York, h

Page 8: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 1 (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 120328/99

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

ROSEMARY KING, Individually and as Executrix ! for the Estate of HARRY A. KING,

[ NO OPPOSITION

j MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

"against-

A. C. & S., INC,, et al.

Defendants. j

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

,2010

Attorney for Plaintiffs

D Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 1 2 'O''

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Page 9: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFX COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 120328/99

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

ROSEMARY KING, Individually and as Executrix ! for the Estate of HARRY A. KING,

i NO OPPOSITION

j MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against-

A. C, & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. i ! WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules g 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, New York .L!, I C ( ,2010

Defendant Attorney for Plaintiffs Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Rosemary King and Harry A. Kin WE~TZ&LUXENBERG,P.C. F 1 I E D 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

AI$ 1 2 To'' (2 12) 509-3456 I (212) 558-5500 ~

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

454-1460

Page 10: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

ROSEMARY KING, Individually and as Executrix ! for the Estate of HARRY A. KING,

j I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

i Index No,: 120328/99

i NO OPPOSITION

i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against-

A, C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. !

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishrnan Liquidating Corp,, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

e- Attorney for Defendant

Tishrnk Liquidating Corp.

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.

(212) 509-3456

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 AUG 1 2 2O?Q

- SO ORDERED, v

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

2383-2361 1

Page 11: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 120328/99 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

ROSEMARY KING, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of HARRY A. KING,

i NO OPPOSITION

i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. i

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: N w York, New York *, 2010

J g i e A. Bartolomeo, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

A l l v ’\ 2 Nvl (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Kleh Heitler

Page 12: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

ROSEMARY KING, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of HARRY A. KING,

j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

j Index No,: 120328/99

i NO OPPOSITION

i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. !

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Attorney for Plaintiffs Rosemary King and Harry A. King WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

fF\kED MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Klex Heitler

1122-215446

Page 13: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 120430199

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

PATRICE G. EDGERTON, Individually and Exectrix for the Estate of RONALD G. EDGERTON, i NO OPPOSITION

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. j ~

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 32 12, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Attorney for Defendant Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 1 2 2OIa

Attorney for Plaintiffs

D 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

SO ORDERED,

JUL 2 9 2010 454-11272

Page 14: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O N COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

PATRICE G. EDGERTON, Individually and Exectrix for the Estate of RONALD G. EDGERTON,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

i NYCAL j I.A.S. Part 30 1 ! (Heitler, J.)

\ Index No.: 120430/99

j NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT i MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

,2010

Attorney for Plaintiffs Patrice G. Edgerton and Ronald G. Edgerton

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Courter & Company, Inc.

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

F I L E D MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C, WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

AlEG 1 2 (212) 509-3456

, 4 ~ :q VQ!? Y< SO ORDERED, ,v ~ Y ~~~~~~~~~~~~

Hon. Sherry Klez Heitler

1122-5238

Page 15: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 120430/99

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

PATRICE G . EDGERTON, Individually and Exectrix for the Estate of RONALD G. EDGERTON, i NO OPPOSITION

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, / MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. :

WHEREFORE7 defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant, KentiIe Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: N w ork N w York Ju& if ,2010

Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. S O Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Patrice G. Edgerton and Ronald G. Edgerton WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

F I L E D (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 LUG 1 2 20’0

SO ORDERED, rmjNl y ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 g s Jp

r,sEld YORK

Hon. Sherry Kleinxeitler I \Ut 2 9 2010

2082-577

Page 16: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

PATRICE G. EDGERTON, Individually and Exectrix for the Estate of RONALD G. EDGERTON, i NO OPPOSITION

j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 120430/99

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. j

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: Ngw York, New York

E$*-- Attorney or Defendant

Tishmah Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 AUG 1 2 2010

Patrice G. Edgerton and Ronald G. Edgerton WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

F I L E

NEW VCAW SO ORDERED, rnI.lrnTY ~~~~~~

3!1$2 9 2010 Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

2383-22753

Page 17: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O N COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YOFX COUNTY j NYCAL

i I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCIJMENT REFERS TO: Index No.: 113954/03,120450/99

JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. j KENNEDY, [ NO OPPOSITION

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, \ MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. i

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated:

J

Tishman Liquidating Cop. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.

James T. Kennedy WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

New York, New York 10003 ** .m$!

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway 6,UG

(212) 509-3456 :.S*s,. e %!.'% OFF *",*?,i "*&.

New York, New York 10004

~~~~ cPL""-

SO ORDERED,

2383-24 133

Page 18: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK comm OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 113954/03, 120450/99 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T, j KENNEDY, i NO OPPOSITION

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et ul.

Defendants. j

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

pment Company James T. Kennedy MCGIVNEY & KLUCER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003 AGG * ''''

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway

~ ! T- .,: , t2 J': 1"s ! .? y" bj

I 'L, I' : '1 "* (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 .,, , / , bqJ p;f:F$ TDutd-;.,' I;;,,.';,. ;,t;,,., '

SO ORDERED,

324-7718

Page 19: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: i Index No.: 113954/03, 120450/99

JAMES P, KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. i KENNEDY, i NO OPPOSITION

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summay

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, New York II( ,2010

James T. Kennedy

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 ?of,@ (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

\;Fv+J V'QRK ,,,a

"F'jf ;hi.$$, i",tZRKS OFF\@ SO ORDERED,

454-2290

Page 20: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

i Index No.: 113954/03, 120450/99 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. j KENNEDY, \ NO OPPOSITlON

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Cornp ny, Inc., hereby requests summar:

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

,2010

Attorney for fiefendant Courter & Company, Inc. MCGJVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

James T. Kennedy WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 A\iG 1 2 2010 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

1122-18500

Page 21: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPFEME COIJRT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O U COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. j KENNEDY, / NO OPPOSITION

j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

i Index No.: 113954103, 120450/99

i SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. j

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., ,meby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

4

J#e A. Bartolomeo, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc.

SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

James T. Kennedy

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

2082-787

Page 22: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORJS COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

PATRICE G. EDGERTON, Individually and Exectrix for the Estate of RONALD G. EDGERTON,

Plaintiffs,

Index No.: 120460199

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C . & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. 1 WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 32 12,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: N w ork, ew York J&JU ,v ,2010

Attorney w e n d a n t Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Attorney for Plaintiffs Patrice G. Edgerton and Ronald G. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 AUE 1 2 2010

Hon. Sh/erry Klein Heitler 324-2135

t I U 1 2 9 7010

Page 23: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

~ ..

IN RE: NEW YOp= CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

RONALD W. KLOPFER

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30, (Heitler, J.) Index No. 121987/99 &

106483/00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHBXEFZIRE, defendant Adience fMa BMi, Inc., hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

32 12, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Adience fMa BMI, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant Adience flWa BMI, Inc,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs. --c-

Dated: L j C/ / 3 0 1 0

fhichael Fanelli, Esq. Carol M. Tempesta, Esq- MARKS, O’NEXLL, O’BFUEN & COURTNEY, P.C. Attorneys for Adience f/k/a BMI, Inc., 530 Saw Mill River Road Elmsford, New York 10523

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

(914) 345-7301 File No.: 473.85348

PlEW YORK ?,aurd-W CLERK‘S OFFICI?

WL 29 9”411 (NY088990.1)

Page 24: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 / (Heitler, J.)

i Index No.: 100918/08, 108708/01, 122481/99, 118532/98

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS Fro: JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,

Plaintiffs, : NO OPPOSITION

: MOTION AND ORDER \

-against- i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et 41.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.

New York, New York 10004

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.

New York, New York 10003 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway I, ,

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 LUG 1 2 21310

I. . ’I’GRK P y y i!S2 I- ii c:,.i,”EKK‘S OFF)(-&

i,,,!” *,: i SO ORDERED,

324-9059

2UL 2 9 2010

Page 25: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 1009 1 8/08, 108708/0 1 , 12248 1 /99, 1 18532/98

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F, EBINGER,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all ca-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, N w York rq ,2010

Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Jay Ebinger and Shirley F, Ebinger WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 L (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

454-11413

Page 26: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK c o m n OF NEW YORK

! NYCAL - IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S.Part30 j (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 1009 1 8/08, 108708/0 1,

122481/99, 11 8532/98 JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,

Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION

-against- \ SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER / A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants. /

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: N w York, New York &b k ( , 2 0 1 0

Attorney for Plaintiffs Jay Ebinger and Shirley F. Ebinger WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

2082-576

Page 27: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

TMc: CCljpk) 6/10/10

SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc,

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERFD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Xnc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: NyTYr York / P

&?&\ Michael Fanelli, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

RICHARD w. Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place

Our File No S-4773-00

Jrll 292010

NEW YORK mum CLERKS OFFICE

Page 28: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to: NYCAL

I.A.S. Part 30, (Heitler, J.) Index No. 12 1987/99 &

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEilEFGRE, defendmi Adience fMa BMi, Inc., hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Adience fMa BMI, Inc., with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

RONALD W. KLOPFER '

106483/00

I

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant Adience f/k/a BMI, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated:

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

MARKS, O'NEILL, O'BRIEN & COURTNEY, P.C. Attorneys for Adience f/k/a BMI, Inc., 530 Saw Mill River Road Elmsford, New York 10523

File No,: 473.85348 (914) 345-7301

{ NY088990.1}

Page 29: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

INDEX NO. 106483/00 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc,, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Yprk, Ney York

&, Michael Fane li, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

SO ORDERED: LS!%kz Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

on Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10 6-bL lz D

.--- ~

LUG 1 2 2O1O

Our File No S-4573-00

F3UE 29 ?Olb

Page 30: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

TMc':CCCjpk) 6/18/10

Our File I - 3 S-4283-00

MICHAEL ZOGBY

INDEX NO. 1 14257/00 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York L Y h J I X I d \ \ = 5

700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc, 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

F \ L E D SO ORDERED:

AUG 1 2 20'o

Page 31: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

THIS DOCUMENT ELATES TO:

JOSEPH A. ZAMPELLA

NDEX NO. 119375/00 and 107791/01 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFCRE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New ork, ew York

7hf. /

f&?d, w, ' Michael Fanelli, Esq. WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

RICHARD#ABlNECZ, ESQ. Attorney f r D fendant Consolidat dison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place

SO ORDERED:

Our File No $4940-01

Page 32: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFX COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 113956/01, 123817/00

CURTIS EDWARDS,

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT j MOTION AND ORDER -against -

A. C. & S., WC., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to, all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: N w Y rk, New York ~ 91,3[ / L(, 2010

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEXTZ & LUXENBERG, P:c, 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 AUI; 1 2 mfl pj,E*hy '{w 2; c v -

,"..'*,lr/ ). " (*Yt ' j l $i SO ORDERED, p&UN-p( c:", ;. i ' :

324-6265

Page 33: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

11s DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

CURTIS EDWARDS,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, 3 .)

Index No,: 113956/01, 123817/00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp,, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claim's against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Attorney for Plaint

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Tishman Liquidating Corp. Curtis Edwards MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P C . 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 kUG 1 2 2010

2383-23662

Page 34: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SI JPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O N -_ -

COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

i I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 113956/01, 123817/00

CURTIS EDWARDS,

Plaintiffs, \ NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. \ WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, New York $4':i y , 2 0 1 0

Iefendant Attorney for Plaintiffs ip Company Curtis Edwards KLUGER, P.C. et-Suite 2300 700 Broadway

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

New York, New York 10003 1 2 ZOIQ puG

IYCW 1 u ~ K , lvzw York 10004 (212) 558-5500

(<\@$'

(21 2) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Klxn Heitler

j., 2 9 2010 454-1497

Page 35: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

ASBESTOS LITIGATION , ,

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: i IndexNo,: 113956/01, 123817/00

CURTIS EDWARDS,

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- : MOTION AND ORDER

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. j

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

,2010

Curtis Edwards WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 1 2

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry klein heitler

Page 36: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 ASBESTOS LITIGATION i (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 113956/01, 123817/00

CURTIS EDWARDS,

Plaintiffs, 1 NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- i MOTION AND ORDER

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

,2010

Ja#e A. Bartol Attorney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc. Curtis Edwards MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York

(212) 509-3456 (2 12) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry K l e z Heitler

2082-578

Page 37: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION - - This Document Relates to:

TERRANCE J. FOLEY

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30, (Heitler, J.)

Index No. 118509/9& &

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

125 13 1/00

WHEREFORE, defendant Adience fMa BMI, Inc., improperly named as Premier

Refractories, Inc., fMa Adience, Inc. W a BMI hereby request summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 321 2, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Adience f/k/a BMI, Inc., improperly named as Premier Refractories, Inc., f/Wa Adience, Inc, fMa BMI, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant Adience fMa BMI, Inc., improperly named as Premier Refractories,

Inc., f/k/a Adience, Inc. fNa BMI, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs. /

Dated: t / -, 2010

Michael Fanelli, Esq. WEITZ LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff(sj 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

&.4LG&,fh - Carol M, Tempesta, Esa. MARKS, O~NEILL, O~BRIEN & CQWRTIWY, B.C. Attorneys for Adience fWa BMI, Inc., improperly named as Premier Refractories, Inc f/k/a Adience, Inc. f/k/a BMI 530 Saw Mill River Road F Elmsford, New York 10523

1 2 %DlQ (914) 345-7301 File No.: 473.85332 /l.G G

SO ORDERED,

(NY088988.1}

Page 38: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

CAROL DANN and JAMES HOOKER, as Personal Representatives for the Estate of EARL HOOKER,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 106564/0 1

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: N w ork,Ne York jb+, I Cr",,o,o

Matthew D. wir;q. Attorney for D Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Attorney for Plaintiff Earl Hooker WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 LUG 1 2 20'o

p J p p j Y@BK (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

nM's om* SO ORDERED, @jNflC.LE Hon. Sherry KleiJHeitler

324-6121

Page 39: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 106564/01

i

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

CAROL DANN and JAMES HOOKER, as Personal Representatives for the Estate of EARL HOOKER, i NO OPPOSITION

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

ook, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. Earl Hooker MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

WElTZ & LUXEMERG, P.C.

1 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Hon. S g y Klein Heitler

2383-22885

Page 40: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j 1.A.S Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 106564/01

j

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CAROL DANN and JAMES HOOKER, as Personal Representatives for the Estate of EARL HOOKER, i NO OPPOSITION

Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. :

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: N w ork,N w York &Jf /J ,2010

rney for Defendant Attorney for Plaintiffs Kentile Floors, Inc. Earl Hooker MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

2082-698 '"Jlrl2 9 2010

Page 41: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

i I.A.S. Part 30 ' (Heitler, J.) ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

CAROL DANN and JAMES HOOKER, as Personal Representatives for the Estate of EARL HOOKER,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

Index No.: 106564/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, N w York ".J( / q ,2010

Attorney for Plaintiffs Earl Hooker WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

New York, New York 10003

m MCGIVNEY & U U G E R , P.c, 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

700 Broadway R\ \I: I I .) - '1010

SO ORDERED,

1122-1 1446

Page 42: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30 / (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 106564/01

i

1 SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CAROL DANN and JAMES HOOKER, as Personal Representatives for the Estate of EARL HOOKER, i NO OPPOSITION

Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. :

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, N w York Lb (4 ,2010

Attorney for Defendant Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & JLLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Attorney for Plaintiffs Earl Hooker WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

!-.?$I vnR* ~ ; ;~&&*~ "Ott

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 454-10881

SO ORDERED, 8

Page 43: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

TMc:CC(jpk) ,* 6/16/10

SUPREME! COURT : GLL COUNTIES

Our File No S-5705-01

107295/01 ASSIGNED TO: HQN. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, hc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs cornplaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. wit4 prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a l l claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, hc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs,

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New Yirk, NY 10003-3598 cn

-- FIL.&Y AUG 1 2 2010

SO ORDERED:

Page 44: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

ANN HARDOBY, Individually and GREGORY HARDOBY and DIANE RABIEJ, as Co- Executrices for the Estate of GEORGE HARDOBY,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et ul.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A,S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 107297/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York. New York

Attorney for Defendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (21 2) 509-3456

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Ann Hardoby and George Hardoby WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 17 IO@ (212) 558-5500 hoc

Page 45: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YOFX IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

i I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 107297/01

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

ANN HARDOBY, Individually and GREGORY HARDOBY and DIANE RABIEJ, as Co- Executrices for the Estate of GEORGE HARDOBY, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs,

i NO OPPOSITION

[ MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A, C, & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. !

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

,2010

&A yq& J ie A. Bartolomeo, sq. Akorney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc, MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

so

uii-

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Ann Hardoby and George Hardoby WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. \ 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

L ZQjQ .t\c 12

(212) 558-5500

ORDERED,

h" - 2082-676

' JUL 2 9 2$10 Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

Page 46: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 / (Heitler, J.)

; Index No.: 107297/01 i

i NO OPPOSITION

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT WFERS TO:

ANN HARDOBY, Individually and GREGORY HARDOBY and DIANE RABIEJ, as Co- Executrices for the Estate of GEORGE HARDOBY, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

j MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C . & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. !

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 321 2, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

,2010

Courter & Company, Inc, MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, PC. SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Ann Hardoby and George WEITZ & LUXENBERG. P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 1122-1376

JUL 2 9 ZOm1

Page 47: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

ANN HARDOBY, Individually and GREGORY HARDOBY and DIANE RABIEJ, as Co- Executrices for the Estate of GEORGE HARDOBY,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 10729710 I

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, ew York J*IJ rv ,2010

Kerre Attorn1 &iG---- or efendant

Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Attorney for Plaintiffs Ann Hardoby and George Hardoby WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

_" .

SO ORDERED, Hon. S h e k y x i n Heitler

454-1174

Page 48: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

j I.A.S, Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 107297/01 j

j NO OPPOSITION

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

ANN HARDOBY, Individually and GREGORY HARDOBY and DIANE RABIEJ, as Co- Executrices for the Estate of GEORGE HARDOBY, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. !

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

A 1

Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Attorney for Plaintiffs Ne Ann Hardoby and George Har WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 AUG 1 2 zQ'o

YORK (21 2) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 nr;'s OFFIfl

WUrm cLE SO ORDERED,

324-6169

Page 49: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

' TMc:CCQpk) 611 611 0

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION,

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

GEORGE HARDOBY

INDEX NO. 107297/01 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEEFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc,

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

$4, ( 2 p -

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place

'mO@-?L598E D SO ORDERED:

Hon. Our File No S-5703-0 1

JUL 2 9 201O *-.. -

Page 50: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

RUTH HOROWITZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of ABRAHAM HOROWITZ,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., etal.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S, Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 107298/0 1

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

, 2010

rney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc.

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 MCGIVNEY & QUGER, P.C.

Ruth Horowitz and Abraham Horow%z WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway

New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 55s-5500 1 2 2010

New York, New York 10003

SO ORDERED, Hon. She& Kl&n Heitler

2082-702

Page 51: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 107298/01

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

RUTH HOROWITZ, Individually and as Executrix ! for the Estate of ABRAHAM HOROWITZ,

i NO OPPOSITION

j MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against-

A, C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. I

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 32 12, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

without costs.

RUG 1 2 ’’‘’ e

MCGJVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, h Hon. SheGy Klein Heitler

1122-21019

Page 52: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW Y O N COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

RUTH HOROWITZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of ABRAHAM HOROWITZ,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 107298/0 1

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, New York Tu$ fy ,2010

4ya Ke annM ook,Esq. - Attorney for Defendant Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Frank MI Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Ruth Horowitz and Abraham Horowitz WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

454-1173

Page 53: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

RUTH HOROWITZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of ABRAHAM HOROWITZ,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et 01,

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 107298/0 1

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE7 defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: %w York, New York

Attorney for Plaintiffs Ruth Horowitz and Abraham Horowitz WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

324-6170

JUL 2 9 2010

Page 54: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

j 1,A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

i Index No.: 107298/01

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

RUTH HOROWITZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of ABRAHAM HOROWITZ,

[ NO OPPOSITION

i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. j

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, New York J-JJ id[, 2010

Attorney for Defendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.<+ 700 Broadway

(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 H,l& I2 2mQ

eitler

VU1 2 9 20 10 2383-23193

Page 55: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

' TMc:CCljpk) 6/16/10.

I'N RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, _____"___."_________--.-""--------~-------~-~-~~"---"~~-~---"~~-----~~----

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

JOSEPH A. ZAMPELLA

11 9375/00 and 107791/01 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Our File No S-4940-0 1

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company o f New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice t o all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, ew York

7 / / f / H I

/f-Z,,& #Q m, Michael Fanelli, Esq. WEXTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

son Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place

SO ORDERED:

Page 56: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 108007/01

ALBERT DE ROSA, Individually and as Personal j Representative for the Estate of FRANCES DE j ROSA, \ NO OPPOSITION

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC,, et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

1 -LI

U o o k , Esq. Attorney for Defendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Albert De Rosa and Frances De WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 AL\G 2010 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

J"L 2 9 2010 2383-23312

. . - . . . -

Page 57: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK I

COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

ALBERT DE ROSA, Individually and as Personal Representative for the Estate of FRANCES DE ROSA,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants,

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 108007/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: ew York, New York July \y ,2010

Attorney for Plaintiffs Albert De Rosa and Frances D WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 LUG 1 2 2010 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, I

Hon. Sherry Klein He&

2082-550

JUL 2 9 2010

Page 58: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

j I.A,S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: i Index No.: 108007/01

ALBERT DE ROSA, Individually and as Personal ! Representative for the Estate of FRANCES DE j ROSA, i NO OPPOSITION

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Plaintiffs, : MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

,2010

Courter & Company, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Albert De Rosa and Frances De R o 8 WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

D FIB. AI& 1 2 20’O

(212) 558-5500

1122-1141

Page 59: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION i NYCAL j I.A,S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 108007/01

ALBERT DE ROSA, Individually and as Personal ! Representative for the Estate of FRANCES DE i ROSA, i NO OPPOSITION

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et 01.

Defendants. i

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

D a t e d x G r k i q w York ,2010

1c) AI& 1 2 2010

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

Patterson Pump Company MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C, 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Page 60: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O N COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

ALBERT DE ROSA, Individually and as Personal Representative for the Estate of FRANCES DE ROSA,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

NYCAL 1,A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 108007/0 1

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: N w York, Ne York Jug / y , 2 0 1 0

Matthed %mpar, Esq. Attorney fo efendant Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Attorney for Plaintiffs Albert De Rosa and Frances De R o a WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Hon. s y Klex Heitler

JUL tl9 20m 324-5966

Page 61: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O N COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30 / (Heitler, J.)

i Index No.: 100918108, 108708/01, 122481199, 11 8532/98

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAY EBlNGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,

Plaintiffs, : NO OPPOSITION

: MOTION AND ORDER -against- i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants. i

1 WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORTIERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Xnc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: NJbYsk, yeqv York ,2010

Attorney for Plaintiffs Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Jay Ebinger and Shirley F. Ebinger WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

2082-576

Page 62: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F, EBINGER,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 10@918/08, 108708/@1, 12248 1/99, 1 18532/98

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, N w York \ a, 2010

J

Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Jay Ebinger and Shirley F, Ebin WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P,C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

!w (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sh-leinhkeitler

454-11413

Page 63: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YOFX COUNTY j NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

i Index No.: 100918/08, 108708/01, 122481/99, 118532/98

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,

Plaintiffs, : NO OPPOSITION

-against- i SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER ! A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants. j

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P,c. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

324-9059

Page 64: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

X NYCAL _______l__"___f_X_-_---------------------------------------------------

In Re NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Heitler, J.)

I.A.S. Part 30

x ....................................................................... This document relates to: Index No.: 109480/2001

J.D. WARD (Deceased), NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

MOTION AND -against- ORDER AS TO

DEFENDANT

OLIVER BOILER

Plaintiff, JUDGMENT

KEELER-DORR OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al. KEELER-DORR-

Defendant. COMPANY x 1__1__________1_____--------------------------------------------------

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER-DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant KEELER-DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY,

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

KEELER-DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs. i

Attorneys for Plaintisf 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (2 12)558-5500

SO ORDEREI

MARIN GOODMAN, LLP. Attorneys for Defendant KEELER-DORIC-OLIVER COMPANY

*+ d

. . " 500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501

(212) 661-1151 \

'" c: I . .. Harrison, New York 10528

Page 65: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 109761/01

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

IRENE HERNANDEZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of PHILIP HERNANDEZ, j

i NO OPPOSITION

i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against-

A. C. & S,, INC., et al.

Defendants. j

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

; Attorney for Defendant ook, Esq.

Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Attorney for Plaintiffs Irene Hernandez and Philip Hernandez WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 1 2 2O1O

F I L E D

2383-23293

Page 66: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

IRENE HERNANDEZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of PHILIP HERNANDEZ,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C, & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 109761/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

J e e A. Bartolomeo, gsq. Attorney for Defendah Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Irene Hernandez and Philip Hem WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

2082-686

Page 67: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

IRENE HERNANDEZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of PHILIP HERNANDEZ,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. !

Index No.: 109761/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: Ne York, New York J& /1/,2010

Courter & Company, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 AUG 1 2 2010

SO ORDERED,

1122-3008

Page 68: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

i I.A.S. Part 30 ASBESTOS LITIGATION / (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 109761/01

IRENE HERNANDEZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of PHILIP HERNANDEZ, j

\ NO OPPOSITION Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- ; MOTION AND ORDER

A. C. & S., NC., et al.

Defendants. j

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, N w York J,!, ,9 ,2010

Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, PC, 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Irene Hernandez and Philip Hernan WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

AIJG 1 2 ZO’’ (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

454-1163

Page 69: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

i Index No.: 109761/01

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

IRENE HERNANDEZ, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of PHILIP HERNANDEZ, j

i NO OPPOSITION

i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: N w ork, New York Jb 5 I y ,2010

Attorney forh&ddant Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Irene Hkrnandez and Philip Hernande? WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

324-6179

Page 70: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 110739/01

MICHAEL MATTEO and FRANCES MATTEO, i

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- [ MOTION AND ORDER

A. C. & S,, INC., et al.

Defendants. !

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: Ne York, N w York J& IS ,2010

Patterson Pump Company MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Michael Matteo and Frances Matteo WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 100

(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 1 2 2ola

byp,/; KPv SO ORDERED, cLEpE.&’s OFPI*-

Hon. Sherry z e i n Heitler P_X3UNV

JUL 2 9 2010 454-945

Page 71: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 / (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 110739/01 i

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

MICHAEL MATTEO and FRANCES MATTEO,

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: N w York, N w York Lb IS ,2010

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P,C. WEITZ&LUXENBERC,P.C. F \ E D 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Michael Matteo and Frances Matteo

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 1 2 2Q'0 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

*..

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Krein Heitler

JU 2 9 2% 324-359

Page 72: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 110943/01

JUDITH E. ACKLEY, Executrix for the Estate of j ROLAND DI ANTONIO,

; NO OPPOSITION

i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against-

A. C, & S., INC., et al.

Defendants, !

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Attorney for Plaintiffs Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Roland Di Antonio WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 . -

SO ORDERED, c ,/

Hon. Sherry K1& Heitler

AUG 1 2 2010

JUL 2 9 2010 2082-553

Page 73: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JUDITH E. ACKLEY, Executrix for the Estate of RONALD DI ANTONIO,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S, Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No. : 1 1 0943/0 1

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 32 12, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, New York JU\ 5 1 y ,2010

. Cook, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 1000

c (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

1

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Kleh Heitler

454-820

Page 74: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YOFX COUNTY j NYCAL

i 1,A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 110943/01

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JUDITH E. ACKLEY, Executrix for the Estate of RONALD DI ANTONIO,

[ NO OPPOSITION

i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against-

A. C. & S., INC,, et al. ! Defendants, j

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp,, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Attorney for Defendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P,C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Ronald Di Antonio

-

E WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway AUG 1 2 New York. New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

Page 75: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No,: 11 1221/01, 116266/01

MORRIS COHEN and JENNIE COHEN,

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- i MOTION AND ORDER

A, C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants, !

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: N York New York JJq’uy ,2010

J

Attorney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.C. F 1 \1. E D 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Morris Cohen and Jennie Cohen

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

1 2 to’’ (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, w

Hon. Sherry K b d Heitler

‘JUL 2 9 2010 2082-440

Page 76: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

i I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 11 1221/01, 116266/01

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

MORRIS COHEN and JENNIE COHEN,

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- i MOTION AND ORDER

A. C. & S., INC., et ul.

Defendants. ~.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Attorney for Plaintiffs

WEITZ & LUXENBERC, P.C. Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 AU& 1 2 2010

(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 bjE\:d YORK

r -_ ~014~~ CLERK'S O F d SO ORDERED,

Hon. Sherry Klzn Heitler

2383-23449A JUL 2 9 TO10

Page 77: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.AS. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 11 1227/01, 123440/01 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- i MOTION AND ORDER

A. C . & S., INC, et al.

Defendants. !

WHEREFOE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

,2010

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.C. F I L E D 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Shalom Levy and Malka Levy

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

AUG 1 2 2010 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

324-6204Y

Page 78: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,

P 1 ai nt i ffs ,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 11 1227/01, 123440/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Attorney for Defendant Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Shalom Levy and Malka Levy WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

F I L E D Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 AUG 1 2 2010

SO ORDERED, NEW YORK

CA)UNN CLERK'S OFn@

7rJL 2 9 2010 454-1362W

Page 79: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 ASBESTOS LITIGATION i (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 11 1227/01, 123440/01

SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- i MOTION AND ORDER

A. C. & S., WC., et al.

Defendants. !

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

,2010

m e fendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Attorney for Plaint ShalornvLevy and Malka Lev WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 LUG 1 2 2O'O (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, 1 JUL 2 9 2010 2383-2353OX

Page 80: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 : (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 11 1227/01, 123440/01

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,

Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSITION ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER

A. C. & S., NC., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York 1y ,2010

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

AUG 1 2 201' (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

1122-15690

Page 81: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

i Index No.: 11 1227/01, 123440/01

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- i MOTION AND ORDER

A, C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: N w York, New York JlA.(A 'y ,2010

Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Shalom Levy and Malka Levy WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

F \ L E D (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 LUG 1 2 2010

2082-859

Page 82: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPmME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

NICHOLAS DELFINO and LAURA DELFINO,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 11 1867/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

,2010

Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 1 (21 2) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Won. Sherry Klein keitler

Page 83: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

NICHOLAS DELFINO and LAURA DELFINO,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et ul.

Defendants.

NYCAL 1.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 11 1867/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

,2010

Kentile Floors, Inc. MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Nicholas Delfino and Laura Delfi WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(21 2) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 AUG 1 2 2010

NEW YORK WN 1NTY CLERK'S OFFILE

SO ORDERED, - V

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

JUL 2 9 2010 2082-539

L . .

Page 84: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

NICHOLAS DELFINO and LAURA DELFINO,

Plaintiffs,

"against-

A. C . & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J .)

Index No,: 1 1 1867/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York A M , 2010

Courter & Company, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Nicholas Delfino and Laura Delfino

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

F I (212) 558-5500

Page 85: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

j Index No,: 1 1 1867/01 j

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

NICHOLAS DELFINO and LAURA DELFINO,

i NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs,

-against- / MOTION AND ORDER

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. j

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

,2010

*r?- Attorne Patterson Pump or Defendant Company

MCGXVNEY & KLUCER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

F I L E D WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

AUG 1 2 2010 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

N[{L?I YORK SO ORDERED, p a u ~ n CLERK'S O F F U

JUL 2 9 2010 454-1354

. . . .-

Page 86: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

NICHOLAS DELFINO and LAURA DELFINO,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., TNC,, et al.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 1 1 1867/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Nicholas Delfino and Laura Delfino

(21 2) 509-3456

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

New York, New York 10003 700 Broadway F I L E D (212) 558-5500

324-5923

Page 87: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY \ NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

j Index No,: 113728/01

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

LILLIAN COLLINS, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of EDWARD G. COLLINS, i NO OPPOSITION

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT i MOTION AND ORDER P1 aint 3 ffs ,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. :

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company,

without costs.

Dated: N w York, New York c Llj fq ,2010

Inc., be and

Courter & Company, Inc. MCGTVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. S O Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

the same are hereby

. ZOlD

wb Attorney for Plaintiffs Lillian Collins and Edward G. Collins WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Heitler ----~~

JUL 29 2010 1122-1894

. .. . . . . ... . __

Page 88: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30 / (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 113728/01

LILLIAN COLLINS, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate of EDWARD G. COLLrNS, i NO OPPOSITION

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. j

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 32 12, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

"eY defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Lillian Collins and Edward G. C o l l i x WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

w o o k , Esq. Attorney for Defendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

2383-23732

Page 89: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

j 1,A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

i Index No.: 113956/01, 123817/00

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

CURTIS EDWARDS,

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- i MOTION AND ORDER

A. C . & S., INC., et nl.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: N w Y rk, New York A* L/ IL/,2010

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Curtis Edwards WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 AUG 1 2 2010 (212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry KleiG Heitler

324-6265

Page 90: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

CURTIS EDWARDS,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 113956/01, 123817/00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, New York %.':I y, 2010

r*- Attorne or Defendant

Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

554-1497

Page 91: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY / NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

i Index No.: 113956/01, 123817/00

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

CURTIS EDWARDS,

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- i MOTION AND ORDER

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. i WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against i

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: Mew York. New York

Tishrnh Liquidating Corp.

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P,c,

(212) 509-3456

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Curtis Edwards WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

F I L AUG 1 2 2010

NEW YOWK

2383-23662

Page 92: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

~~ . ~~~~

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

CURTIS EDWARDS,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., N C . , et ul.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 113956/01, 123817/00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

7 2010

Attorney for Plaintiffs Courter & Company, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Curtis Edwards WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 ..

SO ORDERED, Won, Sherry klein Reitler

1122-2221

Page 93: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

i Index No.: 113956/01, 123817/00

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

CURTIS EDWARDS,

Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Tnc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

,2010

Kentile Floors, Inc. Curtis Edwards MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York (2 12) 558-5500

JUL 2 9,2010 2082-578

Page 94: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

RICHARD M. GIEGERICH, Administrator for the Estate of RICHARD GIEGERICH and CHERYLE F. GIEGERICH, Individually,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

1,A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 114379/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: Naw York. New York I(( ,2010

Kerrya k, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Richard Giegerich and Cheryle F. Gieg WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 1000

h (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 1 2 20'o

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry KYein Heitler

Page 95: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW Y O N IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION ! NYCAL j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, 3.)

j Index No.: 114379/01 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

RICHARD M. GIEGERICH, Administrator for the Estate of RICHARD GIEGERICH and CHERYLE j F. GIEGERICH, Individually, / NO OPPOSITION

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, / MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

,2010

Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

WEJTZ & LUXENBERG, PC. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

454-1513

SO ORDERED,

Page 96: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW Y O N COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

MORRIS COHEN and JENNIE COHEN,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., XNC., et al.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

IndexNo.: 111221/01, 116266/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND OlRDER

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: yT-AYsk\Nqw York ,2010

J&ie A. Bartolomeo, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

4

Attorney for Plaintiffs Morris Cohen and Jennie Cohe WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

ACG 1 2 121110 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Hon. Shehy Kk%h Heitler

SUL 2 9 2010 2082-440

Page 97: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YOFK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler. J.)

ASBESTOS LITIGATION \ , ,

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: i Index No.: 11 1221/01,116266/01

MORRIS COHEN and JENNIE COHEN,

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- i MOTION AND ORDER

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman L.iquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

,2010

Attorney Tishman MCGIVN 80 Broac h T a x l t V-7

JUL 2 9 2010 2383-23449A

Morris Cohen and Jennie Cohen;

700 Broadway

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. * / / 4 ") 21140

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003 A!:? I L.

i.;r:, '$ 4:'-~":.>! 1 iJ" ,,4

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

..- Pgyygy c,''\,.[:RX'S om SO ORDERED,

Hon. Sherry Kl& Heitler

Page 98: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 117155/01

MARTIN A. CONDENZIO, MICHAEL A. CONDENZIO, and LINDA KLIEBER, as Co- Administrators for the Estate of MARTIN CONDENZIO, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[ NO OPPOSITION

; MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C, & S . , INC., et al.

Defendants. !

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs,

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. F I L E D Martin Condenzio

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 1 2 2010 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Kleinkeitler

JUL 2 9 324-6260

Page 99: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

MARTIN A. CONDENZIO, MICHAEL A. CONDENZIO, and LINDA KLIEBER, as Co- Administrators for the Estate of MARTIN CONDENZIO,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

j ~

NYCAL I.AS, Part 30 (Heitler, J+)

Index No.: 117155/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: ew York, ew York w, 2010

1 Ke annM ook.Esa. , 1

Atto=Defendant Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Martin Condenzio

P -T'.T--

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

AUG 1 2 2O1O 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

i1 IL 2 9 2018 Hon. S h G K l e i n Heitler a, 454-1806

Page 100: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 11715Y01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

MARTIN A. CONDENZIO, MICHAEL A. CONDENZIO, and LNDA KLIEBER, as Co- Administrators for the Estate of MARTIN CONDENZIO,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C . & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York. New York

J4P=I7 *010

F I L E D AUG 1 2 2010

efendant Attorney for Plaint Tishmk Liquidating Corp. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Martin Condenzio WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

Page 101: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION ! NYCAL j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 117155/01 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

MARTIN A, CONDENZIO, MICHAEL A. CONDENZIO, and LINDA KLIEBER, as Co- Administrators for the Estate of MARTIN CONDENZIO, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

i NO OPPOSITION

i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. !

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and wit

F \ L b costs.

Dated: N w York, N w York &\q 14 ,2010

Akomey for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P C 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Attorney for Plaintiffs Martin Condenzio WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

2082450

Page 102: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

MARTIN A. CONDENZIO, MICHAEL A. CONDENZIO, and LINDA KLIEBER, as Co- Administrators for the Estate of MARTIN CONDENZIO,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 117155/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Courter & Company, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Attorney for Plainti'ffs -ec Martin Condenzio wi WEITZ 700 Broadway & LUXENBERG, P,C. F I L E D New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 AUG 1 2 2010

Page 103: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

TMc:CC(jpk) 6/16/10

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

TERRENCE CORFUGAN

I I NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Our File No S-6708-01

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the Same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Yjork, Ney York

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

** Timothy M. RICHARD ABDJECZ, ESQ. Attorney f o u e n d a n t Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

@UL 2 9 2010

Page 104: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

rMc:CC(jpk) 6/15/10

BERTRAND LINDSEY

INDEX NO, 120575/01 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York Ju\g 1TrZdW n

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 5

Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

LUG 1 2 2O1O

s a ~ ~ n CLERKS OFFICII;" NEW

SO ORDERED:

Our File No S-6532-01

Page 105: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW Y O N IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

j J.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, 1.)

i Index No.: 1 1 1 227/0 1, 123440/0 1

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,

Plaintiffs, \ NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- / MOTION AND ORDER

A. C. & S., NC., et al.

Defendants. !

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating C o p , be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

,2010

m e fendant Tishman Liquidating Corp, MCGIVNEY & KLWGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

Frank : M.3rtiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Shalom Levy and Malka Levy WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

2383-2353OX

Page 106: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OFNEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 11 1227/01, 123440/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

,2010

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WElTZ & LUXENEERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

A U G 1 2 2010 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

324-6204Y

Page 107: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

STJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & s., IN?, et al.

Defendants.

I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No,: 11 1227/01, 123440/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, .that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, New York L-5 /y ,2010

Attorney for Plaintiffs Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P C 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Shalom Levy and Malka Lev WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 AUG 1 2 2010

454-1362W

Page 108: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 1 1 1227/01, 123440/0 1

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing I

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York &$l /y ,2010

Shalom T.evv ahd Malka T.evv MCCiIVNEY && KLUGER, Y.L. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, Y.L. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

AGG 1 2 '2m (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

1122-15690

Page 109: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW Y O N IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION 1 I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, .I.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

SHALOM LEVY and MALKA LEVY, ; Index No.: 11 1227101, 123440/01

Plaintiffs, [ NO OPPOSlTION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- [ MOTION AND ORDER

A. C. & S., INC., etal.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice .to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

, 2010

1 At omey for Defendant

Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & UUGER, PC. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Shalom Levy and Malka Levy WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 A\L)G 1 2 tQzO

2082-859

Page 110: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YOFX COUNTY ! NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

i Index No.: 100918/08, 108708/01, 122481/99, 118532/98

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,

Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION

-against- / SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 MOTION AND ORDER : A, 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: N w ork, N w York JA*& rq ,2010

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Jay Ebinger and Shirley F. Ebinge

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P,c.

I b E D (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry kleinheitler

AUG 1 2 2010

324-9059

JUL 2 9 2010

Page 111: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFX COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 100918/08, 108708/01, 122481199, 118532198

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,

Plaintiffs,

-against- ; NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT i MOTION AND ORDER : A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants. j

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, N w York &+ 1 q ,2010 -*- Attorney Kerr nnM. for Defendant ok,Esq.

Patterson Pump Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.

Jay Ebinger and Shirley F. Ebinge WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

D 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

454-11413

Page 112: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 100918/08, 108708/01, 122481/99, 118532/98

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAY EBINGER and SHIRLEY F. EBINGER,

Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION

-against- i SUMMARY JUDGMENT ! MOTION AND ORDER i A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants. !

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: NJbYojF y q , Y o r k 2010

Attorney for Plaintiffs Jay Ebinger and Shirley F. Ebinger WEKTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, PC.

! i I !

i i

I I I

!

1

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Hon. SherrywKle$ Heitler

AUG 1 2 2070

2082-576

Page 113: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

This Document Relates To:

FRANK PEZZOLA and ANN PEZZOLLA,

Plaintiff,

Index No.: 190126-09

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

AIRCO, INC., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, TRANE US TNC., flWa AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

32 13, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendants, TRANE US INC., fkla AMERICAN

STANDARD, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

TRANE US INC., flWa AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dared: ~ ~ \ L ) ~ , m o New York. New%

Charles Ferguson, Weitz & Luxenberg Attcrneys for Plaint iff( s) 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (21 2 ) 605-6200

SO ORDERED,

F I L E

Attorney for Defendant Trane US Inc., f/Wa American Standard, Inc. 2430 Route 34, Suite A-18 Manasquan, New Jersey 08736 (732) 528-8888

Page 114: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

* t

, . . I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STAT

IndexNo.: BtFFh'W I

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, T U N E US INC. f/Wa AMERICAN STANDARD INC., hereby

requests siimmary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules I Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendants, TRANE US INC. f/Wa

AMERICAN STANDARD INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereo,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant TRANE US INC. f/Wa AMERICAN STANDARD NC., be and the same are hereb

rejudice and without costs, F l 1,

BRAATEN & PASCARELLA, LLC Attorney for Defendant TRANE US RJC f/Wa AMERICAN STANDARD INC , 2430 Route 34, Suite A-18 Manasquan, New Jersey 08736

-546 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor Nev York, New York 10036 (2J2) 681-1575

(732) 528-8888

SO ORDERED,

JUL 2 9 2010

Page 115: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. KENNEDY,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 113954/03, 120450/99

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc,, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

J#e A. Bartolomeo, Ssq. Attorney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEXTZ&LUXENBERG,P.C. 1 L E D 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

James T. Kennedy

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

AUG 1 2 2010 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

2082-787

... . . . .-.

Page 116: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 1 13954/03, 120450/99

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. j KENNEDY, i NO OPPOSITION

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND 0IU)ER

-against-

A, C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. j

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

,2010

Attorney for lbefendant Courter & Company, Inc, MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.

Attorney for Plaintiffs James T. Kennedy WEITZ & LUXENBERG. P.C. E

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

New York, New York 10003 AUG 1 2 20’o

SO ORDERED,

3UL 2 9 2010 1122-185OO

Page 117: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. KENNEDY,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.

Index No.: 113954/03, 120450/99

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Patterson Pump Company

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 p;,.J6 2 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

454-2290

Page 118: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

i I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. j KENNEDY, i NO OPPOSITION

i Index No.: 113954/03, 120450/99

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. j

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

ment Company MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

UUL 2 9 2010 324-7718

Page 119: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 113954/03, 120450/99

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JAMES P. KENNEDY and THERESA E. DIVINE, Co-Executors for the Estate of JAMES T. j KENNEDY, i NO OPPOSITION

! SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND OIiDER

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. j

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating COT*, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Attorney for Defendant Tishman Liquidating Corp. James T. Kennedy MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway 1 2 ""

(2 12) 509-3456

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003 (2 12) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

j 2383-24133 i

Page 120: FILED - Judiciary of New York...WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

TMc:CC(jpk) + 6/14/10

INDEX NO. 11 8070/01 and 115706/03 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WEERJZFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests swllfnary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rdes Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the m e are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Y rk, Ne York

7/%,/,/0 'F; C r l

' WEITZ & LUXENB Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 5

L - I

Consolidated Bdison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

S-6708-0 1