7
Filovirus assembly and budding Bettina Hartlieb a,b , Winfried Weissenhorn b, * a Institut fu ¨r Virologie, Robert-Koch-Str. 17, 35037 Marburg, Germany b European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), 6 rue Jules Horowitz, 38042 Grenoble, France Received 31 August 2005; accepted 10 September 2005 Abstract Filoviruses belong to the order of negative-stranded non-segmented RNA viruses and are classified into two genera, Ebola and Marburg viruses. They have a characteristic filamentous shape, which is largely determined by the matrix protein VP40. Although VP40 is the main driving force for assembly and budding from the host cell, the production of infectious virus involves an intricate interplay between all viral structural proteins in addition to cellular factors, e.g., those that normally function in multi-vesicular body biogenesis. As a consequence, assembly and budding steps are defined to specific cellular compartments, and the recent progress in understanding how the different components are assembled into stable enveloped virus particles is reviewed. D 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Contents Introduction ................................................................ 64 Different conformations of the matrix protein VP40 ........................................... 65 Cellular factors implicated in enveloped virus budding .......................................... 65 VP40 interaction with cellular factors................................................... 66 Cellular transport of VP40 ........................................................ 66 The role of the glycoprotein GP in assembly and budding ........................................ 66 Assembly of the nucleocapsid ...................................................... 67 Conclusions ................................................................ 68 Acknowledgments............................................................. 68 References ................................................................ 68 Introduction Filoviruses are the causative agent of a severe, mostly fatal hemorraghic fever in humans. The route of transmission involves direct contact with body fluids from either infected patients or non-human primates or contact with a to date unknown natural host (Feldmann et al., 2003, 2004). Filo- viruses contain a single-stranded negative-sense RNA genome, which displays a genome organization similar to the other family members of the order Mononegavirales such as Paramyxoviridae, Rhabdoviridae and Bornaviridae. The 19- kb large filovirus genome encodes the structural proteins NP (major nucleoprotein), VP35 (P-like protein), VP40 (matrix protein), GP (glycoprotein) VP30 (minor nucleoprotein), VP24 and L (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase). Both VP30 and VP24 are unique to the Filoviridae (Feldmann and Kiley, 1999). Although all of the structural information to build a viral particle is encoded in the viral genome, a huge body of recent work has shown that filoviruses like other enveloped viruses such as HIV-1 hijack cellular protein machines in order to mediate assembly at and budding from cellular membranes (Morita and Sundquist, 2004; Schmitt and Lamb, 2004). 0042-6822/$ - see front matter D 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2005.09.018 * Corresponding author. Fax: +33 476 207199. E-mail address: [email protected] (W. Weissenhorn). Virology 344 (2006) 64 – 70 www.elsevier.com/locate/yviro

Filovirus Assembly and Budding

  • Upload
    mack22

  • View
    4

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Filovirus assembly and budding

Citation preview

  • bl

    in

    ch-S

    L),

    Received 31 August 2005; accepted 10 September 2005

    bola and Marburg

    is the main driving

    all viral structural

    nce, assembly and

    ents are assembled

    References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68

    unknown natural host (Feldmann et al., 2003, 2004). Filo-

    viruses contain a single-stranded negative-sense RNA genome,

    VP24 are unique to the Filoviridae (Feldmann and Kiley,

    1999). Although all of the structural information to build a viral

    uge body of recent

    enveloped viruses

    Virology 344 (2006)which displays a genome organization similar to the otherIntroduction

    Filoviruses are the causative agent of a severe, mostly fatal

    hemorraghic fever in humans. The route of transmission

    involves direct contact with body fluids from either infected

    patients or non-human primates or contact with a to date

    family members of the order Mononegavirales such as

    Paramyxoviridae, Rhabdoviridae and Bornaviridae. The 19-

    kb large filovirus genome encodes the structural proteins NP

    (major nucleoprotein), VP35 (P-like protein), VP40 (matrix

    protein), GP (glycoprotein) VP30 (minor nucleoprotein), VP24

    and L (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase). Both VP30 andD 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    Contents

    Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64

    Different conformations of the matrix protein VP40 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65

    Cellular factors implicated in enveloped virus budding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65

    VP40 interaction with cellular factors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66

    Cellular transport of VP40 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66

    The role of the glycoprotein GP in assembly and budding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66

    Assembly of the nucleocapsid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67

    Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68

    Acknowledgments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68Abstract

    Filoviruses belong to the order of negative-stranded non-segmented RNA viruses and are classified into two genera, E

    viruses. They have a characteristic filamentous shape, which is largely determined by the matrix protein VP40. Although VP40

    force for assembly and budding from the host cell, the production of infectious virus involves an intricate interplay between

    proteins in addition to cellular factors, e.g., those that normally function in multi-vesicular body biogenesis. As a conseque

    budding steps are defined to specific cellular compartments, and the recent progress in understanding how the different compon

    into stable enveloped virus particles is reviewed.Filovirus assem

    Bettina Hartlieb a,b, W

    a Institut fur Virologie, Robert-Kob European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMB0042-6822/$ - see front matter D 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    doi:10.1016/j.virol.2005.09.018

    * Corresponding author. Fax: +33 476 207199.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (W. Weissenhorn).y and budding

    fried Weissenhorn b,*

    tr. 17, 35037 Marburg, Germany

    6 rue Jules Horowitz, 38042 Grenoble, France

    64 70

    www.elsevier.com/locate/yviroparticle is encoded in the viral genome, a h

    work has shown that filoviruses like othersuch as HIV-1 hijack cellular protein machines in order to

    mediate assembly at and budding from cellular membranes

    (Morita and Sundquist, 2004; Schmitt and Lamb, 2004).

  • / VDifferent conformations of the matrix protein VP40

    The matrix protein VP40 is the major structural protein

    (Geisbert and Jahrling, 1995). Numerous studies have shown

    that expression of VP40 in mammalian cells leads to the

    production of virus-like particles (VLPs) with filamentous

    morphology suggesting that VP40 contains the necessary

    information for particle assembly and budding. However,

    VP40 containing VLPs vary in diameter (40 to 80 nm),

    compared to a strict diameter of 80 nm of infectious virus,indicating that other viral components such as the nucleocap-

    sids determine the final particle morphology (Bavari et al.,

    2002; Harty et al., 2000; Hoenen et al., 2005; Jasenosky et al.,

    2001; Kolesnikova et al., 2004a; Noda et al., 2002; Swenson et

    al., 2004; Timmins et al., 2001). Structural and functional

    studies have shown that VP40 adopts different conformations

    in vitro that have been partially linked to different functions.

    VP40 is initially expressed as monomer, which folds into two

    structurally related beta sandwich domains forming a closed

    conformation (Dessen et al., 2000). The N-terminal domain

    constitutes the oligomerization module, which allows the

    formation of hexameric and octameric ring-like structures

    (Ruigrok et al., 2000; Timmins et al., 2003a). The C-terminal

    domain was found to be required for membrane interaction

    (Jasenosky et al., 2001; Ruigrok et al., 2000; Timmins et al.,

    2001). Oligomerization is achieved by the displacement of the

    C-terminal domain form the N-terminal domain underlining the

    metastable conformation of monomeric VP40. In vitro mem-

    brane targeting experiments suggest that lipid bilayer interac-

    tion may be the trigger for the conformational change

    (Scianimanico et al., 2000). Electron microscopy and molec-

    ular modeling indicate that hexamer formation involves the

    interface, which is otherwise occupied by the C-terminal

    domain in the closed conformation, which extends via a

    flexible linker from the ring-like structures and thus allows

    membrane interaction (Dessen et al., 2000; Nguyen et al.,

    2005; Scianimanico et al., 2000; Timmins et al., 2003a). In

    contrast to the hexameric form of VP40, the octameric ring-like

    structure depends on the interaction with single-stranded RNA.

    The octamer is formed by four anti-parallel homodimers of the

    N-terminal domain that bind two RNA triribonucleotides

    containing the sequence 5V-U-G-A-3V at the center of the pore.The bound RNA stabilizes the dimerdimer interactions, and

    biochemical studies show that RNA interaction plays a crucial

    structural role as no octamers can be formed in the absence of

    RNA (Gomis-Ruth et al., 2003; Timmins et al., 2003a). It is not

    known whether octameric VP40 binds viral or cellular RNA

    during infection. It thus remains unclear whether RNA binding

    has a sole structural role to generate octamers for a specific

    function, or this function is connected to the viral RNA

    metabolism. Mutagenesis studies have shown that RNA

    binding and thus octamer formation is absolutely essential for

    virus replication (Hoenen et al., 2005). Although VP40

    octamers are efficiently incorporated into VP40 containing

    B. Hartlieb, W. WeissenhornVLPs (Hoenen et al., 2005; Panchal et al., 2003), the inhibition

    of octamer formation still produces VP40 containing VLPs that

    are indistinguishable from VLPs containing wild type VP40(Hoenen et al., 2005). On the other hand, no VP40 octamers

    can be detected in infectious Ebola virus particles by Western

    blot analysis (Gomis-Ruth et al., 2003). Therefore, the precise

    function of VP40 octamers stays unclear. They might play a

    role in RNP formation as described for a number of matrix

    proteins (Coronel et al., 2001; Kaptur et al., 1991; Schmitt et

    al., 2002; Stricker et al., 1994). Such a function is in agreement

    with the association of VP40 with Marburg virus RNPs present

    in inclusion bodies (Kolesnikova et al., 2002). The three

    different conformations of VP40 are thus prime examples of

    how viral genomes with a limited capacity can encode for

    protein conformations that probably exert different tasks.

    However, the oligomeric or polymeric form of VP40 within

    viral particles still remains elusive.

    Cellular factors implicated in enveloped virus budding

    HIV-1 Gag deletions and mutational analyses revealed

    sequence motifs that are absolutely required for budding

    (Gottlinger et al., 1991; Huang et al., 1995; Wills et al.,

    1994). These motifs were termed late domains since they affect

    a late step in budding (Parent et al., 1995). Since then, a

    number of late domain sequences including PT/SAP, PPxY and

    YP(X)nL have been described to function in both positive - and

    negative-strand RNA virus assembly and budding (Morita and

    Sundquist, 2004; Schmitt and Lamb, 2004). Late domains can

    be functionally interchangeable, their position within the viral

    protein can vary, and they can act in trans although some

    context dependency is conserved (Martin-Serrano et al., 2004;

    Morita and Sundquist, 2004).

    Numerous recent studies show that the late domains serve as

    entry points into a network of proteins that normally functions

    in multi-vesicular body (MVB) biogenesis. The protein

    network involved in MVB formation was first identified in

    Saccharomyces cerevisiae and implicated in membrane protein

    trafficking from the Golgi and plasma membranes via the

    endosomal system to the lysosome for degradation. Receptor

    ubiquitinylation serves as a signal for the protein transport to

    endosomal membrane microdomains, which ultimately leads to

    membrane invagination and vesicle budding into endosomal

    structures (multi-vesicular bodies), thus delivering the cargo

    from the limiting membrane of the endosome into the lumen of

    the organelle. This process is mediated by non-essential

    proteins known as class E Vps proteins in S. cerevisiae

    (Gruenberg and Stenmark, 2004; Katzmann et al., 2002).

    Briefly, initial recognition of the ubiquitinylated cargo leads

    to endocytosis and interaction with class E proteins Hrs

    (Vps27p) and Stam (Katzmann et al., 2003) that in turn recruits

    the ESCRT-1 (Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for

    Transport) complex composed of Vps23p/Tsg101, Vps28p and

    Vps37p to the endosomal membrane (Bache et al., 2003;

    Katzmann et al., 2001; Lu et al., 2003). In yeast ESCRT-I cargo

    recognition then induces the formation of ESCRT-II (Babst et al.,

    2002b), which activates the assembly of the ESCRT-III multi-

    irology 344 (2006) 6470 65protein complexes that are composed of CHMP (CHarged

    Multivesicular body Protein) family proteins (Babst et al.,

    2002a). Finally, the activity of the AAA-type ATPase Vps4 is

  • / Vrequired for disassembly of ESCRT complexes from endosomal

    membranes (Babst et al., 1998, 2002a). Studies with mutant

    Vps4 and CHMP fusion proteins revealed a late budding arrest

    of fully assembled virus particles suggesting that ESCRT-III and

    Vps4 functions are crucial for enveloped virus release (Licata et

    al., 2003; Lin et al., 2005; Martin-Serrano et al., 2003; Strack et

    al., 2003; von Schwedler et al., 2003).

    Notably, the first identified late domain motif PTAP was

    shown to bind to the cellular factor Tsg101 (ESCRT-I), which

    also binds ubiquitin (Demirov et al., 2002; Garrus et al., 2001;

    Sundquist et al., 2004; VerPlank et al., 2001). Similarly, a

    second late domain motif, YP(X)nL mediates binding to ALIX/

    AIP1 that itself interacts directly with Tsg101 via its own PTAP

    motif (Strack et al., 2003; von Schwedler et al., 2003). The

    third late domain motif PPxY mediates interactions with

    proteins that contain WW domains, such as ubiquitin ligases

    (E3 enzyme). It was long speculated that ubiquitin plays a role

    in assembly and budding since ubiquitin is incorporated into

    retroviral particles (Ott et al., 1998; Putterman et al., 1990),

    Gag proteins are monoubiquitinylated (Ott et al., 2000), and

    protease inhibitors inhibit virus budding (Patnaik et al., 2000;

    Schubert et al., 2000; Strack et al., 2000). For more detailed

    recent reviews on cellular factors implicated in virus assembly

    and budding, see Morita and Sundquist (2004) and the article

    by Bieniasz and colleagues in this issue.

    VP40 interaction with cellular factors

    Ebola virus VP40 contains two overlapping late domains 7-

    PTAPPEY-13 while Marburg virus VP40 contains only the

    putative functional, 16-PPPY-19 motif (Morita and Sundquist,

    2004; Schmitt and Lamb, 2004). Ebola virus VP40was shown to

    interact with Tsg101 via its PTAP motif in vivo (Martin-Serrano

    et al., 2001) and in vitro with both monomeric and oligomeric

    VP40 (Timmins et al., 2003b). Mammalian co-expression of

    Tsg101 and VP40 indicated that VP40 recruits Tsg101 to the

    plasma membrane and thus to the site of budding (Martin-

    Serrano et al., 2001) which includes VP40 lipid raft localization

    (Bavari et al., 2002; Panchal et al., 2003; Licata et al., 2003). In

    addition, Tsg101 is incorporated into VP40 containing VLPs

    (Licata et al., 2003). Tsg101 recruitment most likely includes

    ESCRT-I assembly at the site of budding (Martin-Serrano et al.,

    2003b; Stuchell et al., 2004; Tanzi et al., 2003) consistent with

    the finding that a C-terminal truncation of Tsg101 exerts a

    dominant negative effect on VP40 VLP formation (Yasuda et al.,

    2003). Similarly, the downstream partners, including ESCRT-

    III, are probably also recruited as a mutant Vps4 ATPase affects

    VP40 VLP formation similar as in case of retrovirus budding

    (Licata et al., 2003; Martin-Serrano et al., 2003a; Strack et al.,

    2003; von Schwedler et al., 2003).

    The importance of the second motif PPPY was first

    recognized by studies that showed VP40 binding to a WW

    domain from the yeast E3 ligase Rsp5 (Nedd4 homologue) and

    VP40 ubiquitinylation in vitro. These experiment thus revealed

    B. Hartlieb, W. Weissenhorn66a role for the late domain in VP40 release from mammalian

    cells (Harty et al., 2000). The PPEY motif was since shown to

    interact with WW domain 3 from human Nedd4 in vitro, whichrequires the oligomeric ring-like conformation of VP40

    (Timmins et al., 2003b). This indicates that ubiquitinylation

    by an E3 ligase may act on an activated conformation of VP40

    that is most likely targeted to the lipid bilayer via its C-terminal

    domain, which is in agreement with the plasma membrane

    targeting of HECT domain containing E3 ligases via their C2

    domains. Consistent with the in vitro data, dominant negative

    mutants of Nedd4 inhibit budding of VP40 containing VLPs

    (Yasuda et al., 2003). Recently, other HECT domain containing

    ubiquitin ligases were implicated in the PPPY late domain

    interaction including WWP1, WWP2 and itch (Martin-Serrano

    et al., 2005). In addition, the recruitment of HECT domain

    containing E3 ligases including Nedd4 into aberrant endosomal

    compartments induced by mutant Vps4 provides a direct link

    between the function of class E Vps factors and ubiquitinyla-

    tion (Martin-Serrano et al., 2005). Such a link is also consistent

    with the implication of yeast Rsp5 in ubiquitinylation of cargo

    for sorting into MVB and the genetic linkage of Rsp5 and

    ESCRT-III (Katzmann et al., 2004). Therefore, the presence of

    a single PPxY motif in Marburg virus VP40 may be sufficient

    to recruit the Vps machinery for assistance in assembly and

    budding.

    A number of studies have shown that the presence of intact

    late domains is required for the efficient release of VP40

    containing VLPs albeit some VP40 release takes place in the

    absence of late domains (Harty et al., 2000; Jasenosky et al.,

    2001; Timmins et al., 2001). In addition, recent work shows

    that the Ebola virus VP40 late domains are not absolutely

    required for virion production in cell culture, although titers of

    late domain mutant virions were affected by one log unit

    (Neumann et al., 2005). This thus poses the question as to

    whether yet other unknown sequences in VP40 are implicated

    in the assembly and budding process.

    Cellular transport of VP40

    Since expression of VP40 reveals mostly plasma mem-

    brane targeting (Bavari et al., 2002; Harty et al., 2000;

    Hoenen et al., 2005; Martin-Serrano et al., 2001; Timmins et

    al., 2001), which includes lipid raft microdomain localization

    (Bavari et al., 2002; Panchal et al., 2003), an active transport

    of VP40 to specific cellular sites is required. In addition,

    ultrastructural analyses of VP40 in Ebola virus and Marburg

    virus-infected cells detect VP40 in viral inclusions and in

    multi-vesicular bodies (MVBs) derived from the late endoso-

    mal compartment indicating (i) an interaction of VP40 with

    nucleocapsid structures and (ii) with endosomal membranes

    (Geisbert and Jahrling, 1995; Kolesnikova et al., 2002,

    2004a). It has been thus suggested that VP40 is transported

    through the retrograde late endosomal pathway en route from

    the endosome to the plasma membrane (Kolesnikova et al.,

    2002, 2004a, 2004b).

    The role of the glycoprotein GP in assembly and budding

    irology 344 (2006) 6470The envelope of filoviruses is decorated by the trimeric

    surface protein GP, a type I transmembrane protein (Feldmann

  • et al., 1991), which mediates cell entry (Schibli and Weissen-

    horn, 2004). GP is initially expressed as a precursor protein that

    is subsequently cleaved by the subtilisin-like proprotein

    convertase furin in the TGN into two subunits, the receptor

    binding domain GP1 and the membrane anchored fusion

    protein GP2 (Volchkov et al., 1998a, 2000). Two C-terminal

    cysteins between the transmembrane region and the short

    cytoplasmic region are acylated (Funke et al., 1995; Ito et al.,

    2001), which may play a role in a postulated interaction with

    the matrix protein VP40. GP expression alone leads to its

    transport to the plasma membrane via the secretory pathway

    and to the release of GP containing vesicles (Kolesnikova et al.,

    2004b; Sanger et al., 2001; Volchkov et al., 1998b). However,

    upon co-expression of GP and VP40 alone or in Marburg virus-

    infected cells, GP re-localizes to MVBs, which are also

    enriched in VP40. This suggests that GP and VP40 are

    transported together to the site of budding at the plasma

    membrane. In addition, such a co-localization is also consistent

    which are similar to those detected in Ebola and Marburg virus-

    infected cells (Becker et al., 1998; Modrof et al., 2002). The

    inclusion bodies contain nucleocapsid-like particles that closely

    resemble the helical core of nucleocapsids incorporated into

    mature virions indicating that NP determines the nucleocapsid

    structure (Kolesnikova et al., 2000, 2002; Noda et al., 2005).

    Although NP is the major determinant of the nucleocapsid, it

    also recruits VP30, VP35 and L into the inclusion bodies

    (Becker et al., 1998). In addition, VP24 and VP35 have been

    previously implicated in nucleocapsid formation (Huang et al.,

    2002). NP was also shown to enhance budding activity of

    VP40 suggesting an NP-VP40 interaction (Licata et al., 2004).

    Although VP40 interacts with NP containing nucleocapsids,

    VP40 and NP do not co-localize in MVBs, indicating that two

    different forms or conformations of VP40 pass by the MVB

    pathway and associate with nucleocpasids (Kolesnikova et al.,

    2004a, 2004b). Although it is currently not known how the

    assembled nucleocapsids leave the site of inclusion bodies, it

    to th

    cleo

    B. Hartlieb, W. Weissenhorn / Virology 344 (2006) 6470 67with virus budding into endosomal structures (Kolesnikova et

    al., 2004b). Like VP40, GP is targeted to lipid raft micro-

    domains in the plasma membrane, and co-expression of VP40

    and GP supports and enhances the efficiency of VP40 and GP

    containing VLP formation, which is morphologically indistin-

    guishable from infectious Ebola virus (Bavari et al., 2002;

    Noda et al., 2002). Interestingly, VLPs containing VP40 and

    GP have been shown to provide protection from filovirus

    infection upon VLP immunization (Warfield et al., 2003;

    Warfield et al., 2004).

    Assembly of the nucleocapsid

    The nucleoprotein NP encapsidates the RNA genome

    (Sanchez et al., 1992). Expression of NP in insect cells leads

    to the formation of helical NP structures that contain cellular

    RNA (Mavrakis et al., 2002). Expression of NP in mammalian

    cells leads to the formation of intracellular inclusion bodies,

    Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of distinct transport pathways of viral components

    endosomal pathway. (B) Transport of the glycoprotein GP. (C) Transport of nuparticles containing NC, VP40 and GP. Both GP and VP40 are targeted to lipid

    expression induce either the release of GP containing vesicles or VP40 containing fil

    Becker (2004).might involve the cellular cytoskeleton and VP40 interactions

    with microtubules (Ruthel et al., 2005). Furthermore, NP is

    highly phosphorylated at its C-terminus, which might play a

    role in regulating either RNAprotein or proteinprotein

    interactions (Becker et al., 1994; Elliott et al., 1985).

    Although VP24 has been previously implicated in nucleo-

    capsid assembly (Huang et al., 2002), its function is not well

    understood as nucleocapsid structures can be formed without

    VP24 (Watanabe et al., 2004). In addition, Ebola virus VP24

    interacts with membranes, oligomerizes and is released from

    VP24 expressing cells in form of trypsin-resistant vesicles (Han

    et al., 2003). Furthermore, recent studies with Marburg virus

    VP24 confirmed its lipid bilayer interaction property and its

    oligomerization into tetramers. However, it is also recruited

    into viral inclusions containing preformed nucleocapsids as

    well as into VP40 containing VLPs. Recruitment of VP24

    neither influences efficiency nor morphology of released

    particles (Bamberg et al., 2005). Silencing of VP24 by si-

    e site of assembly and budding. (A) Transport of VP40 along the retrograde late

    cpasids (NC containing NP, VP30, VP35, L and VP24) and assembly of viralraft microdomains (LR) that serve as platforms for assembly. GP and VP40

    amentous VLPs (shaded areas). The figure was modified from Kolesnikova and

  • / VRNA in Marburg virus-infected cells resulted in reduction of

    released virions, indicating a role in assembly and/or budding,

    whereas viral transcription and replication were not affected

    (Bamberg et al., 2005). Accordingly, VP24 might be either

    important for the assembly of transport competent nucleocap-

    sids or the association of nucleocapsids with the transport

    machinery or in the targeting of the nucleocapsids to the

    budding sites containing GP and VP40 (Bamberg et al., 2005;

    Kolesnikova et al., 2004b).

    Conclusions

    The matrix protein VP40 is initially expressed in a

    monomeric conformation that is targeted to cellular mem-

    branes. This may include recruitment of cellular factors such as

    Tsg101 to the membrane or vice versa and ubiquitinylation of

    membrane associated VP40 by HECT domain containing

    ubiquitin ligases. Transport to the plasma membrane occurs

    by the retrograde late endosomal pathway via MVBs. VP40

    expression alone then leads to the targeting to lipid raft

    microdomains and the release of filamentous VLPs. VP40 is

    thus sufficient to re-localize the cellular budding machinery via

    Tsg101 and HECT domain containing ubiquitin ligase interac-

    tions to the site of virus assembly and budding. VP40 is also

    found in association with viral inclusions containing assembled

    nucleocapsids, probably in a conformation different from the

    monomeric form such as the hexameric form or the octamers in

    complex with RNA (Fig. 1A).

    GP expression follows the regular secretory pathway and

    leads to lipid raft microdomain localization of GP. Surprisingly,

    this is sufficient for the release of GP containing vesicles (Fig.

    1B). However, upon co-expression of GP and VP40 and in

    Marburg virus-infected cells, GP localizes to the late endosome

    after proteolytic cleavage in the TGN and accumulates in

    MVBs together with VP40. Both are thus co-transported to the

    site of assembly and budding (Fig. 1C). NPRNA interactions

    are sufficient for nucleocapsid assembly that recruits VP30,

    VP35 and L. Nucleocapsids accumulate in cellular inclusions

    that co-localize with small amounts of VP40. These complexes

    are then transported to VP40 and GP containing MVBs and to

    the plasma membrane that leads to virus particle assembly and

    release (Fig. 1C).

    There are most likely a number of features common to

    assembly and budding processes of enveloped viruses since

    most enveloped viruses recruit cellular factors that normally

    act in MVB biogenesis. Based on the available data, we

    hypothesize that recruitment of cellular factors serves

    potentially two major purposes. Firstly, it needs to recruit

    factors that help to initiate the assembly process mediated by

    the matrix protein, which probably includes initiation of

    membrane curvature at the site of assembly. Such a function

    may be recruited by the ubiquitinylation of matrix proteins, a

    process which is linked to the endocytosis machinery, which

    thus may provide such functions. Secondly, recruitment of

    B. Hartlieb, W. Weissenhorn68ESCRT complexes, especially ESCRT-III and Vps4, may be

    required for the last step of the budding process, the release

    of the fully assembled virus particle from cellular mem-branes. Therefore, selective employment of cellular proteins

    by enveloped viruses via different late domains may provide

    specialized fine tuning accessories for the assembly process

    and the protein machinery required for final steps in

    budding.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank Drs. S. Becker and L. Kolesnikova for critical

    reading of the manuscript. Work in the authors laboratory and

    B. H.s trainee period at EMBL were supported by EMBL and

    Deutsche Forschunggemeinschaft SFB 593.

    References

    Babst, M., Wendland, B., Estepa, E.J., Emr, S.D., 1998. The Vps4p AAA

    ATPase regulates membrane association of a Vps protein complex required

    for normal endosome function. EMBO J. 17 (11), 29822993.

    Babst, M., Katzmann, D.J., Estepa-Sabal, E.J., Meerloo, T., Emr, S.D., 2002a.

    ESCRT-III: An endosome-associated heterooligomeric protein complex

    required for MVB sorting. Dev. Cell 3 (2), 271282.

    Babst, M., Katzmann, D.J., Snyder, W.B., Wendland, B., Emr, S.D., 2002b.

    Endosome-associated complex, ESCRT-II, recruits transport machinery for

    protein sorting at the multivesicular body. Dev. Cell 3 (2), 283289.

    Bache, K.G., Brech, A., Mehlum, A., Stenmark, H., 2003. Hrs regulates

    multivesicular body formation via ESCRT recruitment to endosomes.

    J. Cell Biol. 162 (3), 435442.

    Bamberg, S., Kolesnikova, L., Moller, P., Klenk, H.-D., Becker, S., 2005. VP24

    of Marburg virus influences the formation of infectious particles. J. Virol.

    79 (21).

    Bavari, S., Bosio, C.M., Wiegand, E., Ruthel, G., Will, A.B., Geisbert, T.W.,

    Hevey, M., Schmaljohn, C., Schmaljohn, A., Aman, M.J., 2002. Lipid raft

    microdomains: a gateway for compartmentalized trafficking of Ebola and

    Marburg viruses. J. Exp. Med. 195 (5), 593602.

    Becker, S., Huppertz, S., Klenk, H.D., Feldmann, H., 1994. The nucleoprotein

    of Marburg virus is phosphorylated. J. Gen. Virol. 75 (Pt. 4), 809818.

    Becker, S., Rinne, C., Hofsass, U., Klenk, H.-D., Muhlberger, E., 1998.

    Interactions of Marburg virus nucleocapsid proteins. Virology 249 (2),

    406417.

    Coronel, E.C., Takimoto, T., Murti, K.G., Varich, N., Portner, A., 2001.

    Nucleocapsid incorporation into parainfluenza virus is regulated by specific

    interaction with matrix protein. J. Virol. 75 (3), 11171123.

    Demirov, D.G., Ono, A., Orenstein, J.M., Freed, E.O., 2002. Overexpression of

    the N-terminal domain of TSG101 inhibits HIV-1 budding by blocking late

    domain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 (2), 955960.

    Dessen, A., Volchkov, V., Dolnik, O., Klenk, H.D., Weissenhorn, W., 2000.

    Crystal structure of the matrix protein VP40 from Ebola virus. EMBO J. 19

    (16), 42284236.

    Elliott, L.H., Kiley, M.P., McCormick, J.B., 1985. Descriptive analysis of Ebola

    virus proteins. Virology 147 (1), 169176.

    Feldmann, H., Kiley, M.P., 1999. Classification, structure, and replication of

    filoviruses. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 235, 121.

    Feldmann, H., Will, C., Schikore, M., Slenczka, W., Klenk, H.D., 1991.

    Glycosylation and oligomerization of the spike protein of Marburg virus.

    Virology 182 (1), 353356.

    Feldmann, H., Jones, S., Klenk, H.D., Schnittler, H.J., 2003. Ebola virus: from

    discovery to vaccine. Nat. Rev., Immunol. 3 (8), 677685.

    Feldmann, H., Wahl-Jensen, V., Jones, S.M., Stroher, U., 2004. Ebola virus

    ecology: a continuing mystery. Trends Microbiol. 12 (10), 433437.

    Funke, C., Becker, S., Dartsch, H., Klenk, H.D., Muhlberger, E., 1995.

    Acylation of the Marburg virus glycoprotein. Virology 208 (1), 289297.

    Garrus, J.E., von Schwedler, U.K., Pornillos, O.W., Morham, S.G., Zavitz,

    irology 344 (2006) 6470K.H., Wang, H.E., Wettstein, D.A., Stray, K.M., Cote, M., Rich, R.L., 2001.

    Tsg101 and the vacuolar protein sorting pathway are essential for HIV-1

    budding. Cell 107 (1), 5565.

  • / VGeisbert, T.W., Jahrling, P.B., 1995. Differentiation of filoviruses by electron

    microscopy. Virus Res. 39 (23), 129150.

    Gomis-Ruth, F.X., Dessen, A., Timmins, J., Bracher, A., Kolesnikowa, L.,

    Becker, S., Klenk, H.D., Weissenhorn, W., 2003. The matrix protein VP40

    from Ebola virus octamerizes into pore-like structures with specific RNA

    binding properties. Structure 11 (4), 423433.

    Gottlinger, H.G., Dorfman, T., Sodroski, J.G., Haseltine, W.A., 1991. Effect of

    mutations affecting the p6 gag protein on human immunodeficiency virus

    particle release. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88 (8), 31953199.

    Gruenberg, J., Stenmark, H., 2004. The biogenesis of multivesicular endo-

    somes. Nat. Rev., Mol. Cell Biol. 5 (4), 317323.

    Han, Z., Boshra, H., Sunyer, J.O., Zwiers, S.H., Paragas, J., Harty, R.N., 2003.

    Biochemical and functional characterization of the Ebola virus VP24

    protein: implications for a role in virus assembly and budding. J. Virol. 77

    (3), 17931800.

    Harty, R.N., Brown, M.E., Wang, G., Huibregtse, J., Hayes, F.P., 2000. A PPxY

    motif within the VP40 protein of Ebola virus interacts physically and

    functionally with a ubiquitin ligase: implications for filovirus budding.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97 (25), 1387113876.

    Hoenen, T., Volchkov, V., Kolesnikova, L., Mittler, E., Timmins, J., Ottmann,

    M., Reynard, O., Becker, S., Weissenhorn, W., 2005. VP40 octamers are

    essential for Ebola virus replication. J. Virol. 79 (3), 18981905.

    Huang, M., Orenstein, J., Martin, M., Freed, E., 1995. p6Gag is required for

    particle production from full-length human immunodeficiency virus type 1

    molecular clones expressing protease. J. Virol. 69, 68106818.

    Huang, Y., Xu, L., Sun, Y., Nabel, G.J., 2002. The assembly of Ebola virus

    nucleocapsid requires virion-associated proteins 35 and 24 and posttrans-

    lational modification of nucleoprotein. Mol. Cell 10 (2), 307316.

    Ito, H., Watanabe, S., Takada, A., Kawaoka, Y., 2001. Ebola virus glycoprotein:

    proteolytic processing, acylation, cell tropism, and detection of neutralizing

    antibodies. J. Virol. 75 (3), 15761580.

    Jasenosky, L.D., Neumann, G., Lukashevich, I., Kawaoka, Y., 2001. Ebola

    virus VP40-induced particle formation and association with the lipid

    bilayer. J. Virol. 75 (11), 52055214.

    Kaptur, P.E., Rhodes, R.B., Lyles, D.S., 1991. Sequences of the vesicular

    stomatitis virus matrix protein involved in binding to nucleocapsids.

    J. Virol. 65 (3), 10571065.

    Katzmann, D.J., Babst, M., Emr, S.D., 2001. Ubiquitin-dependent sorting into

    the multivesicular body pathway requires the function of a conserved

    endosomal protein sorting complex, ESCRT-I. Cell 106 (2), 145155.

    Katzmann, D.J., Odorizzi, G., Emr, S.D., 2002. Receptor downregulation and

    multivesicular-body sorting. Nat. Rev., Mol. Cell Biol. 3 (12), 893905.

    Katzmann, D.J., Stefan, C.J., Babst, M., Emr, S.D., 2003. Vps27 recruits

    ESCRT machinery to endosomes during MVB sorting. J. Cell Biol. 162 (3),

    413423.

    Katzmann, D.J., Sarkar, S., Chu, T., Audhya, A., Emr, S.D., 2004. Multi-

    vesicular body sorting: ubiquitin ligase Rsp5 is required for the modifica-

    tion and sorting of carboxypeptidase S. Mol. Biol. Cell 15 (2), 468480.

    Kolesnikova, L., Becker, S., 2004. Virus maturation. In: Klenk, H.-D.,

    Feldmann, H. (Eds.), Ebola and Marburg Viruses. Horizon Bioscience,

    Norfolk, pp. 171203.

    Kolesnikova, L., Muhlberger, E., Ryabchikova, E., Becker, S., 2000.

    Ultrastructural organization of recombinant Marburg virus nucleoprotein:

    comparison with Marburg virus inclusions. J. Virol. 74 (8), 38993904.

    Kolesnikova, L., Bugany, H., Klenk, H.D., Becker, S., 2002. VP40, the matrix

    protein of Marburg virus, is associated with membranes of the late

    endosomal compartment. J. Virol. 76 (4), 18251838.

    Kolesnikova, L., Bamberg, S., Berghofer, B., Becker, S., 2004a. The matrix

    protein of Marburg virus is transported to the plasma membrane along

    cellular membranes: exploiting the retrograde late endosomal pathway.

    J. Virol. 78 (5), 23822393.

    Kolesnikova, L., Berghofer, B., Bamberg, S., Becker, S., 2004b. Multivesicular

    bodies as a platform for formation of the Marburg virus envelope. J. Virol.

    78 (22), 1227712287.

    Licata, J.M., Simpson-Holley, M., Wright, N.T., Han, Z., Paragas, J., Harty,

    B. Hartlieb, W. WeissenhornR.N., 2003. Overlapping motifs (PTAP and PPEY) within the Ebola virus

    VP40 protein function independently as late budding domains: involvement

    of host proteins TSG101 and VPS-4. J. Virol. 77 (3), 18121819.Licata, J.M., Johnson, R.F., Han, Z., Harty, R.N., 2004. Contribution of Ebola

    virus glycoprotein, nucleoprotein, and VP24 to budding of VP40 virus-like

    particles. J. Virol. 78 (14), 73447351.

    Lin, Y., Kimpler, L.A., Naismith, T.V., Lauer, J.M., Hanson, P.I., 2005.

    Interaction of the mammalian endosomal sorting complex required for

    transport (ESCRT) III protein hSnf7-1 with itself, membranes, and the

    AAA + ATPase SKD1. J. Biol. Chem. 280 (13), 1279912809.

    Lu, Q., Hope, L.W., Brasch, M., Reinhard, C., Cohen, S.N., 2003. TSG101

    interaction with HRS mediates endosomal trafficking and receptor down-

    regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (13), 76267631.

    Martin-Serrano, J., Zang, T., Bieniasz, P., 2001. HIV-1 and Ebola virus encode

    small peptide motifs that recruit Tsg101 to sites of particle assembly to

    facilitate egress. Nat. Med. 7, 13131319.

    Martin-Serrano, J., Yarovoy, A., Perez-Caballero, D., Bieniasz, P.D., 2003a.

    Divergent retroviral late-budding domains recruit vacuolar protein sorting

    factors by using alternative adaptor proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    100 (21), 1241412419.

    Martin-Serrano, J., Zang, T., Bieniasz, P.D., 2003b. Role of ESCRT-I in

    retroviral budding. J. Virol. 77 (8), 47944804.

    Martin-Serrano, J., Perez-Caballero, D., Bieniasz, P.D., 2004. Context-

    dependent effects of L domains and ubiquitination on viral budding.

    J. Virol. 78 (11), 55545563.

    Martin-Serrano, J., Eastman, S.W., Chung, W., Bieniasz, P.D., 2005. HECT

    ubiquitin ligases link viral and cellular PPXY motifs to the vacuolar

    protein-sorting pathway. J. Cell Biol. 168 (1), 89101.

    Mavrakis, M., Kolesnikova, L., Schoehn, G., Becker, S., Ruigrok, R.W., 2002.

    Morphology of Marburg virus NPRNA. Virology 296 (2), 300307.

    Modrof, J., Muhlberger, E., Klenk, H.D., Becker, S., 2002. Phosphorylation

    of VP30 impairs Ebola virus transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 277 (36),

    3309933104.

    Morita, E., Sundquist, W.I., 2004. Retrovirus budding. Ann. Rev. Cell Dev.

    Biol. 20 (1), 395425.

    Neumann, G., Ebihara, H., Takada, A., Noda, T., Kobasa, D., Jasenosky, L.D.,

    Watanabe, S., Kim, J.H., Feldmann, H., Kawaoka, Y., 2005. Ebola virus

    VP40 late domains are not essential for viral replication in cell culture.

    J. Virol. 79 (16), 1030010307.

    Nguyen, T.L., Schoehn, G., Weissenhorn, W., Hermone, A.R., Burnett, J.C.,

    Panchal, R.G., McGrath, C., Zaharevitz, D.W., Aman, M.J., Gussio, R.,

    Bavari, S., 2005. An all-atom model of the pore-like structure of hexameric

    VP40 from Ebola: structural insights into the monomerhexamer transi-

    tion. J. Struct. Biol. 151, 3040.

    Noda, T., Sagara, H., Suzuki, E., Takada, A., Kida, H., Kawaoka, Y., 2002.

    Ebola virus VP40 drives the formation of virus-like filamentous particles

    along with GP. J. Virol. 76 (10), 48554865.

    Noda, T., Aoyama, K., Sagara, H., Kida, H., Kawaoka, Y., 2005. Nucleocapsid-

    like structures of Ebola virus reconstructed using electron tomography.

    J. Vet. Med. Sci. 67 (3), 325328.

    Ott, D.E., Coren, L.V., Copeland, T.D., Kane, B.P., Johnson, D.G., Sowder II,

    R.C., Yoshinaka, Y., Oroszlan, S., Arthur, L.O., Henderson, L.E., 1998.

    Ubiquitin is covalently attached to the p6Gag proteins of human

    immunodeficiency virus type 1 and simian immunodeficiency virus and

    to the p12Gag protein of Moloney murine leukemia virus. J. Virol. 72 (4),

    29622968.

    Ott, D.E., Coren, L.V., Chertova, E.N., Gagliardi, T.D., Schubert, U.,

    2000. Ubiquitination of HIV-1 and MuLV Gag. Virology 278 (1),

    111121.

    Panchal, R.G., Ruthel, G., Kenny, T.A., Kallstrom, G.H., Lane, D., Badie, S.S.,

    Li, L., Bavari, S., Aman, M.J., 2003. In vivo oligomerization and raft

    localization of Ebola virus protein VP40 during vesicular budding. Proc.

    Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (26), 1593615941.

    Parent, L., Bennett, R., Craven, R., Nelle, T., Krishna, N., Bowzard, J., Wilson,

    C., Puffer, B., Montelaro, R., Wills, J., 1995. Positionally independent and

    exchangeable late budding functions of the Rous sarcoma virus and human

    immunodeficiency virus Gag proteins. J. Virol. 69, 54555460.

    Patnaik, A., Chau, V., Wills, J., 2000. Ubiquitin is part of the retrovirus budding

    irology 344 (2006) 6470 69machinery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 1306913074.

    Putterman, D., Pepinsky, R.B., Vogt, V.M., 1990. Ubiquitin in avian leukosis

    virus particles. Virology 176 (2), 633637.

  • Ruigrok, R.W.H., Schoehn, G., Dessen, A., Forest, E., Volchkov, V., Dolnik,

    O., Klenk, H.D., Weissenhorn, W., 2000. Structural characterization and

    membrane binding properties of the matrix protein VP40 of Ebola virus.

    J. Mol. Biol. 300 (1), 103112.

    Ruthel, G., Demmin, G.L., Kallstrom, G., Javid, M.P., Badie, S.S., Will, A.B.,

    Nelle, T., Schokman, R., Nguyen, T.L., Carra, J.H., Bavari, S., Aman, M.J.,

    2005. Association of Ebola virus matrix protein VP40 with microtubules.

    J. Virol. 79 (8), 47094719.

    Sanchez, A., Kiley, M.P., Klenk, H.D., Feldmann, H., 1992. Sequence

    analysis of the Marburg virus nucleoprotein gene: comparison to Ebola

    virus and other non-segmented negative-strand RNA viruses. J. Gen.

    Virol. 73, 347357.

    Sanger, C., Muhlberger, E., Ryabchikova, E., Kolesnikova, L., Klenk, H.D.,

    Becker, S., 2001. Sorting of Marburg virus surface protein and virus release

    take place at opposite surfaces of infected polarized epithelial cells. J. Virol.

    Swenson, D.L., Warfield, K.L., Kuehl, K., Larsen, T., Hevey, M.C.,

    Schmaljohn, A., Bavari, S., Aman, M.J., 2004. Generation of Marburg

    virus-like particles by co-expression of glycoprotein and matrix protein.

    FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 40 (1), 2731.

    Tanzi, G.O., Piefer, A.J., Bates, P., 2003. Equine infectious anemia virus

    utilizes host vesicular protein sorting machinery during particle release.

    J. Virol. 77 (15), 84408447.

    Timmins, J., Scianimanico, S., Schoehn, G., Weissenhorn, W., 2001. Vesicular

    release of Ebola virus matrix protein VP40. Virology 283 (1), 16.

    Timmins, J., Schoehn, G., Kohlhaas, C., Klenk, H.D., Ruigrok, R.W.H.,

    Weissenhorn, W., 2003a. Oligomerization and polymerization of the

    filovirus matrix protein VP40. Virology 312 (2), 359368.

    Timmins, J., Schoehn, G., Ricard-Blum, S., Scianimanico, S., Vernet, T.,

    Ruigrok, R.W.H., Weissenhorn, W., 2003b. Ebola virus matrix protein

    VP40 interaction with human cellular factors Tsg101 and Nedd4. J. Mol.

    Biol. 326 (2), 493502.

    B. Hartlieb, W. Weissenhorn / Virology 344 (2006) 647070Schibli, D.J., Weissenhorn, W., 2004. Class I and class II viral fusion protein

    structures reveal similar principles in membrane fusion. Mol. Membr. Biol.

    21 (6), 361371.

    Schmitt, A.P., Lamb, R.A., 2004. Escaping from the cell: assembly and

    budding of negative-strand RNA viruses. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.

    283, 145196.

    Schmitt, A.P., Leser, G.P., Waning, D.L., Lamb, R.A., 2002. Requirements for

    budding of paramyxovirus simian virus 5 virus-like particles. J. Virol. 76

    (8), 39523964.

    Schubert, U., Ott, D.E., Chertova, E.N., Welker, R., Tessmer, U., Princiotta,

    M.F., Bennink, J.R., Krausslich, H.G., Yewdell, J.W., 2000. Proteasome

    inhibition interferes with gag polyprotein processing, release, and

    maturation of HIV-1 and HIV-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97 (24),

    1305713062.

    Scianimanico, S., Schoehn, G., Timmins, J., Ruigrok, R.H., Klenk, H.D.,

    Weissenhorn, W., 2000. Membrane association induces a conformational

    change in the Ebola virus matrix protein. EMBO J. 19 (24), 67326741.

    Strack, B., Calistri, A., Accola, M., Palu, G., Gottlinger, H., 2000. A role for

    ubiquitin ligase recruitment in retrovirus release. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    U.S.A. 97, 1306313068.

    Strack, B., Calistri, A., Craig, S., Popova, E., Gottlinger, H.G., 2003.

    AIP1/ALIX is a binding partner for HIV-1 p6 and EIAV p9 functioning in

    virus budding. Cell 114 (6), 689699.

    Stricker, R., Mottet, G., Roux, L., 1994. The Sendai virus matrix protein

    appears to be recruited in the cytoplasm by the viral nucleocapsid to

    function in viral assembly and budding. J. Gen. Virol. 75, 10311042.

    Stuchell, M.D., Garrus, J.E., Muller, B., Stray, K.M., Ghaffarian, S.,

    McKinnon, R., Krausslich, H.G., Morham, S.G., Sundquist, W.I., 2004.

    The human endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT-I)

    and its role in HIV-1 budding. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (34), 3605936071.

    Sundquist, W.I., Schubert, H.L., Kelly, B.N., Hill, G.C., Holton, J.M., Hill,

    C.P., 2004. Ubiquitin recognition by the human TSG101 protein. Mol. Cell

    13 (6), 783789.VerPlank, L., Bouamr, F., LaGrassa, T.J., Agresta, B., Kikonyogo, A., Leis, J.,

    Carter, C.A., 2001. Tsg101, a homologue of ubiquitin-conjugating (E2)

    enzymes, binds the L domain in HIV type 1 Pr55Gag. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    U.S.A. 98 (14), 77247729.

    Volchkov, V.E., Feldmann, H., Volchkova, V.A., Klenk, H.D., 1998a.

    Processing of the Ebola virus glycoprotein by the proprotein convertase

    furin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95 (10), 57625767.

    Volchkov, V.E., Volchkova, V.A., Slenczka, W., Klenk, H.D., Feldmann, H.,

    1998b. Release of viral glycoproteins during Ebola virus infection.

    Virology 245 (1), 110119.

    Volchkov, V.E., Volchkova, V.A., Stroher, U., Becker, S., Dolnik, O., Cieplik,

    M., Garten, W., Klenk, H.D., Feldmann, H., 2000. Proteolytic processing of

    Marburg virus glycoprotein. Virology 268 (1), 16.

    von Schwedler, U.K., Stuchell, M., Muller, B., Ward, D.M., Chung, H.Y.,

    Morita, E., Wang, H.E., Davis, T., He, G.P., Cimbora, D.M., Scott, A.,

    Krausslich, H.G., Kaplan, J., Morham, S.G., Sundquist, W.I., 2003. The

    protein network of HIV budding. Cell 114 (6), 701713.

    Warfield, K.L., Bosio, C.M., Welcher, B.C., Deal, E.M., Mohamadzadeh, M.,

    Schmaljohn, A., Aman, M.J., Bavari, S., 2003. Ebola virus-like particles

    protect from lethal Ebola virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100

    (26), 1588915894.

    Warfield, K.L., Swenson, D.L., Negley, D.L., Schmaljohn, A.L., Aman, M.J.,

    Bavari, S., 2004. Marburg virus-like particles protect guinea pigs from

    lethal Marburg virus infection. Vaccine 22 (2526), 34953502.

    Watanabe, S., Watanabe, T., Noda, T., Takada, A., Feldmann, H., Jasenosky,

    L.D., Kawaoka, Y., 2004. Production of novel Ebola virus-like particles

    from cDNAs: an alternative to Ebola virus generation by reverse genetics.

    J. Virol. 78 (2), 9991005.

    Wills, J., Cameron, C., Wilson, C., Xiang, Y., Bennett, R., Leis, J., 1994. An

    assembly domain of the Rous sarcoma virus Gag protein required late in

    budding. J. Virol. 68, 66056618.

    Yasuda, J., Nakao, M., Kawaoka, Y., Shida, H., 2003. Nedd4 regulates egress

    of Ebola virus-like particles from host cells. J. Virol. 77 (18), 99879992.75 (3), 12741283.

    Filovirus assembly and buddingIntroductionDifferent conformations of the matrix protein VP40Cellular factors implicated in enveloped virus buddingVP40 interaction with cellular factorsCellular transport of VP40The role of the glycoprotein GP in assembly and buddingAssembly of the nucleocapsidConclusionsAcknowledgmentsReferences