Upload
yliu8877
View
976
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Integrated Capstone Design Project
Hamilton West Harbour Re-development
Prepared by
Triple A Ultimate Design Group
Group Members:
Marco Morcos (0746967)
Jeffrey Nie (0755306)
Yi Liu (0847832)
Duo Huang (0864908)
Jun Xing (0744657)
Date: March 12, 2012
McMaster University
1
Letter of Transmittal
Dr. Brian Baetz
Professor and Chair, Civil Engineering
Dr. Michael Tait
Associate Professor, Civil Engineering
McMaster University
1280 Main Street West,
Hamilton, Ontario
L8S 4L8
Dear Dr. Baetz, and Dr. Tait,
Attached to this letter you will find Triple A's capstone project. Over the course of two
terms we have learned about the various aspects of creating a truly sustainable development. We
have applied a significant amount of knowledge acquired through current and past courses,
combined with new knowledge gained through research and 4X06 lectures to create this project.
Practical experience and methodology have become clearer for our group, and
sharpened our minds towards sustainability. We feel that sustainable development is critical in
the path of human development, and many of the required techniques are readily available.
In closing, we believe that sustainable development techniques used in this report
should be implemented and improved more often. The benefits of sustainable development will
become more evident as resource depletion and environmental issues increase.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey Nie Roy Xing Yi Liu Duo Huang Marco Morcos
0755306 0744657 0847832 0864908 0746967
McMaster University
2
Executive Summary
This report contains the results of a two term planning process for a sustainable
development located in Hamilton's West Harbour area. The development consists of three
sections: low-density neighbourhood, high-density condo complex, and a public buildings
division. The entire development area is designed to be environmentally sustainable and great
amount of effort is put to enhance the living quality of residents. Pedestrian friendliness and
automobiles minimization are key features to all three areas. The three storey building uses
locally available material and is designed to comply with all local codes.
The existing area consists of mostly aged industrial sites; the proposed development plan
completely transforms that into a modern, thriving, and sustainable development area. Material
chosen as building materials are selected with various aspects and constraints. Energy and
resource conservation are key features of the entire development and they are demonstrated
through the material selection process, green roof, rainwater capture system, solar panels, porous
pavement, and LEED designs.
The public buildings area, much like the entire development is focused on offering a
pedestrian friendly environment. A recreation centre, a library, a central park, and a large
shopping mall are located within walking distance of a nearby office and low/high density areas.
The low density area promotes a strong bond between neighbours with wide sidewalks and trails
that run through the entire neighbourhood area. The high density area consists of low rise condos
that offer a healthy community while providing beautiful views of the lake.
The three storey building is designed in detail with every aspect taken into deep
considerations. It is a mixed use building and is located on the southeast side of the development
area. First storey is commercial; the second and third storeys are used for office and residential
purposes respectively. The building is designed carefully while using the required building
codes.
This development will sustain a healthy population and will have the capacity to
accommodate future adaptations such as population expansion and global warming. The
development plan brings the entire community alive and is hopeful to transmit its spirit
throughout the world
McMaster University
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... 8
LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... 10
1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ....................................................................... 13
1.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 13
1.2 SCOPE AND LIMIT ......................................................................................................... 13
1.3 ADJOINING DEVELOPABLE AREAS .......................................................................... 14
1.4 VISION FOR THE PROJECT .......................................................................................... 15
1.5 DESIGN OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................... 16
1.6 PRELIMINARY PATTERN LANGUAGE ...................................................................... 16
2 MATERIAL SELECTION ................................................................................................. 18
2.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 18
2.2 PROPOSED CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY FOR SELECTION ........................... 18
2.3 STRUCTURAL MEMBERS – WOOD, STEEL OR REINFORCED CONCRETE ........ 19
2.4 EXTERIOR CLADDING AND ROOF MATERIALS ..................................................... 21
2.4.1 Exterior Cladding ............................................................................................... 21
2.4.2 Roof.................................................................................................................... 23
2.5 COVERINGS – WALL, CEILING AND FLOOR ............................................................ 25
2.6 WINDOWS AND DOORS ............................................................................................... 27
2.6.1 Windows ............................................................................................................ 27
2.6.2 Doors .................................................................................................................. 28
2.6 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................. 29
3 PUBLIC BUILDINGS COMPONENT ............................................................................. 32
3.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 32
3.2 DEFINITION OF MAJOR BUILDINGS ......................................................................... 33
3.3 DEVELOPMENT OF LAYOUT FOR PUBLIC SPACE HULLS .................................... 35
3.4 REFINEMENT OF PATTERN LANGUAGE .................................................................. 35
3.5 RINTERATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF SITE MODEL(1:500 SCALE) ........................... 36
McMaster University
4
3.6 KEY ELEMENTS FOR OUTDOOR FEATURES AND CONSIDERATION OF GREEN
ROOF ELEMENTS ................................................................................................................... 37
4 ADJOINING NEIGHBOURHOOD COMPONENT ....................................................... 40
4.1 DESIRED COMPONENT PERCENTAGES ................................................................... 40
4.2 INSIGHTS......................................................................................................................... 42
4.3 REFINEMENT OF PATTERN LANGUAGE .................................................................. 43
5 HIGHER DENSITY COMPONENT................................................................................. 45
5.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 45
5.2 PROPOSED BUILDING MASSING AND OPEN SPACE ............................................. 45
5.3 REFINEMENT OF PATTERN LANGUAGE .................................................................. 45
5.4 KEY DESIGN DETAILS .................................................................................................. 46
5.5 LAYOUT FOR DAYLIGHT ORIENTATION ................................................................ 48
5.6 LANDSCAPE ................................................................................................................... 48
5.7 GREEN ROOF .................................................................................................................. 49
6 DESIGN FOR MOBILITY................................................................................................. 51
6.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 51
6.2 PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT IN ALL THREE ZONES ................................................. 51
6.3 CYCLIST MOVEMENT IN ALL THREE ZONES ......................................................... 53
6.4 TRANSIT ACCESS FROM ALL THREE ZONES .......................................................... 54
6.5 TRAFFIC CALMING AND PARKING PROVISION ..................................................... 55
7 ECONOMICS, SAFETY, HEALTH, ACCESS, RESILIENCE ..................................... 57
7.1 SAFETY OF VISITORS AND RESIDENTS ................................................................... 57
7.2 HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE ASPECTS FOR VISITORS AND RESIDENTS .. 58
7.3 CONSIDERATIONS TO MAXIMIZE ACCESS FOR DISABLED PERSONS ............. 58
7.4 CONSIDERATIONS TO MAXIMIZE RESILIENCE TO CLIMATE CHANGE, POWER
AVAILABILITY FLUCTUATIONS, PEAK OIL EFFECTS .................................................. 61
7.5 ECONOMICS ................................................................................................................... 62
McMaster University
5
8 STRUCTURAL DESIGN ................................................................................................... 67
8.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 67
8.2 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM SELECTION ......................................................................... 68
8.2.1 Preliminary Structural Design............................................................................ 68
8.2.2 Final Structural Design ...................................................................................... 69
8.3 DESIGN CRITERIA SUMMARY ................................................................................... 71
8.4 FIRE PROTECTION ........................................................................................................ 74
8.5 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM FOR GRAVITY LOADS ...................................................... 74
8.5.1 Design Of Slab ................................................................................................... 75
8.5.2 Roof System ....................................................................................................... 76
8.5.3 Residential Floor Framing Plan ......................................................................... 78
8.5.4 Office Floor Framing Plan ................................................................................. 80
8.6 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM FOR LATERAL LOAD ........................................................ 83
8.6.1 Derivation of Wind Load ................................................................................... 84
8.6.2 Mass of each floor .............................................................................................. 86
8.6.3 Derivation of Seismic Load ............................................................................... 88
8.6.4 Lateral Bracing System Design ......................................................................... 89
8.7 CONNECTIONS DETAIL ............................................................................................... 93
8.7.1 Beam to Girder Connection ............................................................................... 93
8.7.2 Beam to Column Connection ............................................................................. 94
8.7.3 Girder to Column Connection ............................................................................ 94
8.7.4 Slab to Beam Connection................................................................................... 95
8.7.5 Column to Column Connection ......................................................................... 95
8.7.6 Connections to Braced Frame ............................................................................ 96
8.8 FOUNDATION DESIGN ................................................................................................. 96
8.8 GREEN BUILDING ELEMENTS .................................................................................... 98
8.8.1 Integrated Green Roof System ........................................................................... 98
8.8.2 Exterior Insulation And Finish Systems (EIFS) ................................................ 99
8.8.3 Double Glazed, Low Emissivity Glass Windows .............................................. 99
8.8.4 Light-Emitting Diodes (LED Lights) and Occupancy Sensors ....................... 100
McMaster University
6
8.8.5 Solar Wall ........................................................................................................ 100
8.8.6 Vestibule at the main Entrance ........................................................................ 102
8.9 BUILDING ENVELOPE ................................................................................................ 103
8.9.1 Windows .......................................................................................................... 104
8.9.2 Exterior Doors .................................................................................................. 104
8.9.3 Exterior walls ................................................................................................... 105
8.9.4 Roof.................................................................................................................. 106
8.10 PHYSICAL MODELING ............................................................................................. 107
8.10.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 107
8.10.2 Procedure ....................................................................................................... 107
8.10.3 Northridge Earthquake Results ...................................................................... 109
8.10.4 Lemo Pirate Earthquake Results .................................................................... 111
8.10.5 EI Centro Earthquake Results ........................................................................ 113
8.10.6 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 115
9 MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT DESIGN .......................................... 117
9.1 GREEN ROOF WITH SOLAR PANELS AND RAINWATER CAPTURE .................. 117
9.1.1 Green Roof ....................................................................................................... 118
9.1.2 Rainwater Capture System ............................................................................... 119
9.1.4 Solar Panel Design ........................................................................................... 122
9.1.5 Savings ............................................................................................................. 122
9.1.6 Implementations ............................................................................................... 123
9.2 POROUS PAVEMENT .................................................................................................. 123
9.2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 123
9.2.2 Definition ......................................................................................................... 123
9.2.3 Porous pavement selection ............................................................................... 124
9.2.4 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 126
9.3 LEED GREEN BUILDING RATING SYSTEM ............................................................ 126
9.3.1 Sustainable Sites .............................................................................................. 127
9.3.2 Energy And Atmosphere.................................................................................. 128
McMaster University
7
10 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................ 133
10.1 DESIGN OBJECTIVES SUMMARY .......................................................................... 133
10.2 SUMMARY OF KEY DESIGN FEATURES ............................................................... 134
10.3 DEVELOPED PATTERN LANGUAGE ..................................................................... 135
10.4 ASPECTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE NEXT DESIGN STAGE ......................... 136
10.5 LESSONS LEARNED .................................................................................................. 137
10.5.1 Jun Xing ......................................................................................................... 137
10.5.2 Jeffrey Nie ...................................................................................................... 138
10.5.3 Duo Huang ..................................................................................................... 140
10.1.4 Marco Morcos................................................................................................ 141
10.5.5 Yi Liu ............................................................................................................. 142
REFERENCE ............................................................................................................................ 144
APPENDIX A: SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX B: ARCHITECTURE DRAWINGS
APPENDIX C: STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS
McMaster University
8
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1: Development Limit..................................................................................................... 13
Figure 1.2: Existing Land Use ...................................................................................................... 14
Figure 3.1: Public Building Sector Layout ................................................................................... 32
Figure 3.2: Public Building Sector Site Model-1.......................................................................... 36
Figure 3.3: Public Building Sector Site Model-2.......................................................................... 36
Figure 3.4: Public Building Component Landuse Percentage ...................................................... 37
Figure 4.1: Neighbourhood Development Design (Google Sketchup Model-1) .......................... 42
Figure 4.2: Neighbourhood Development Design (Google Sketchup Model-2) .......................... 43
Figure 5.1: Higher Density Component (Sketchup Model-1) ...................................................... 46
Figure 5.2: Higher Density Component Section A-A view (Sketchup Model-2)......................... 47
Figure 5.3: Typical Floor Layout of Apartment in Higher Density Sector .................................. 47
Figure 6.1: Mobility design........................................................................................................... 51
Figure 6.2: Sidewalk ramp for wheelchairs .................................................................................. 52
Figure 6.3: Sidewalks for NB,PB and HD sectors ........................................................................ 52
Figure 6.4: Pedestrian walking sightlines ..................................................................................... 53
Figure 6.5: Bike racks design........................................................................................................ 54
Figure 7.1: Sidewalk elevation difference requirement ................................................................ 59
Figure 7.2: Light cut-of angle requirement for visibility .............................................................. 60
Figure 7.3: Cash Flow Diagram .................................................................................................... 63
Figure 8.1: Architecture Model of Multi-use Building ................................................................. 67
Figure 8.2: Preliminary Structural Design .................................................................................... 68
Figure 8.3: Typical Floor of Final Structural Design ................................................................... 69
Figure 8.4: Elevation View between Grid M and P (Dimensions: mm) ....................................... 71
Figure 8.5: Slab Cross Section (Dimension: mm) ........................................................................ 75
Figure 8.6: Load Distribution on Roof Slab (Dimension: mm) .................................................... 76
Figure 8.7: Load Distribution on Residential Floor Slab (Dimension: mm) ................................ 78
Figure 8.8: Load Distribution on Office Floor Slab (Dimension: mm) ........................................ 80
Figure 8.9: Lateral-Load-Resisting System Plan View (dimension: mm) .................................... 83
Figure 8.10: Seismic Weights at Each Level According to NBCC2010 ...................................... 87
McMaster University
9
Figure 8.11: BF1 and BF4 Member Sizes and Case 5 Load (SAP2000) ...................................... 90
Figure 8.12: BF1 and BF4 Axial Force Diagram (SAP2000) ...................................................... 90
Figure 8.13: BF2 and BF3 Member Sizes and Case 5 Load (SAP2000) ...................................... 91
Figure 8.14: BF2 and BF3 Axial Force Diagram ......................................................................... 91
Figure 8.15: Drift Due to Seismic Load........................................................................................ 92
Figure 8.16: Slab to Beam Connection ......................................................................................... 95
Figure 8.17: Bracing Frames Support Reactions .......................................................................... 97
Figure 8.18: Exterior Insulation and Finish System ..................................................................... 99
Figure 8.19: Low –E Glass Windows ......................................................................................... 100
Figure 8.20: The Mechanism of Solar System (Conserval Engineering,2010) .......................... 101
Figure 8.21: Floor layout of office floor ..................................................................................... 102
Figure 8.22: Acceleration Response Diagram of 1 Bar Diameter Test ...................................... 108
Figure 8.23: Excitation of Rigid Bar (Northridge) ..................................................................... 109
Figure 8.24: Excitation of Earthquake (Northridge) ................................................................... 110
Figure 8.25: Excitation of (Ss – Sg) (Northridge) ....................................................................... 110
Figure 8.26: Northridge Response Spectrum .............................................................................. 111
Figure 8.27: Excitation of Rigid Bar (Lemo Pirate Earthquake ) ............................................... 111
Figure 8.28: Excitation of Earthquake (Lemo Pirate Earthquake ) ............................................ 112
Figure 8.29: Excitation of (Ss - Sg) (Lemo Pirate Earthquake) .................................................. 112
Figure 8.30: Lome Pireta Response Spectrum ............................................................................ 113
Figure 8.31: Excitation of Rigid Bar (EI Centro Earthquake) .................................................... 113
Figure 8.32: Excitation of Earthquake (EI Centro Earthquake) ................................................. 114
Figure 8.33: Excitation of (Ss - Sg) (EI Centro Earthquake) ...................................................... 114
Figure 8.34: El Centro Earthquake Response Spectrum ............................................................. 115
Figure 9.1: Green Roof Element Design (Top View) dimension: mm ....................................... 117
Figure 9.2: Detailed Green Roof Cross Section A-A View (City Of Toronto, 2011) ................ 118
Figure 9.3: Example Of A Green Roof. (ESRI Canada Ltd, 2010) ............................................ 118
Figure 9.4: Section View of ground level between Grid F and K (Dimensions: mm) ............... 121
Figure 9.5: Typical Porous Pavement.(Drake. J, 2011) .............................................................. 124
Figure 9.6: Pervious Pavement Locations .................................................................................. 125
McMaster University
10
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1: Decision Criteria .......................................................................................................... 18
Table 2.2: Decision Matrix for Structural Members Selection ..................................................... 19
Table 2.3: Decision Matrix for Exterior Cladding Selection ........................................................ 22
Table 2.4: Decision Matrix for Roof Material Selection .............................................................. 24
Table 2.5: Decision Matrix for Wall Coverings Selection ........................................................... 26
Table 2.6: Decision Matrix for Ceiling Coverings Selection ....................................................... 26
Table 2.7: Decision Matrix for Floor Coverings Selection ........................................................... 27
Table 2.8: Decision Matrix for Window Selection ....................................................................... 28
Table 2.9: Decision Matrix for Door Selection ............................................................................ 29
Table 2.10: Summary of material selection .................................................................................. 30
Table 3.1: Landuse and building heights of major buildings in PB sector ................................... 33
Table 3.2: Key components of PB sector...................................................................................... 37
Table 4.1: Neighbourhood Area Density ...................................................................................... 40
Table 4.2: Component Summary for Neighbourhood Area.......................................................... 42
Table 7.1: Initial Costs .................................................................................................................. 62
Table 7.2: Financial Statement of Annual Revenues .................................................................... 63
Table 7.3: Cost of Development ................................................................................................... 64
Table 7.4: Revenue of Development ............................................................................................ 65
Table 8.1: Material Selection Summary ....................................................................................... 70
Table 8.2: Floor Heights Summary ............................................................................................... 71
Table 8.3: Specified Dead Loads on Roof .................................................................................... 72
Table 8.4: Specified Dead Load on Office and Residential Floor ................................................ 72
Table 8.5: Specified Live Loads Summary ................................................................................... 73
Table 8.6: Beam Sizing Summary of Roof System ...................................................................... 77
Table 8.7: Girder Sizing Summary of Roof System ..................................................................... 77
Table 8.8: Beam Sizing Summary of Residential Floor ............................................................... 79
Table 8.9: Girder Sizing Summary of Residential Floor .............................................................. 79
Table 8.10: Beam Sizing Summary of Office Floor ..................................................................... 81
Table 8.11: Girder Sizing Summary of Office Floor .................................................................... 81
McMaster University
11
Table 8.12: Column Sizing Summary ........................................................................................... 82
Table 8.13: Wind Load Summary ................................................................................................. 84
Table 8.14: Design Forces Due to Wind Torsion ......................................................................... 84
Table 8.15: South North Wind Load Distribution ........................................................................ 85
Table 8.16: West East Wind Load Distribution ............................................................................ 86
Table 8.17: Mass of Each Floor Summary ................................................................................... 87
Table 8.18: Seismic Load Summary ............................................................................................. 88
Table 8.19: Accidental Torsion Due to Seismic Load .................................................................. 88
Table 8.20: Design Forces Due to Seismic Torsion ..................................................................... 89
Table 8.21: Drift Limit Check ...................................................................................................... 92
Table 8.22: Beam to Girder Connection Detail ............................................................................ 93
Table 8.23: Beam to Column Connection Detail .......................................................................... 94
Table 8.24: Girder to Column Connection Detail ......................................................................... 94
Table 8.25: Bracing Connections Detail ....................................................................................... 96
Table 8.26: Material selection summary for building envelope ................................................. 103
Table 9.1: Annual Green Roof Rainwater Capture ..................................................................... 120
Table 9.2: Toilet/Urinal Annual Consumption ........................................................................... 121
Table 9.3: Three Storey Building Toilet/Urinal Counts ............................................................. 122
Table 9.4: Porous Pavements Comparison Chart ....................................................................... 124
Table 9.5: LEED Certification Scale .......................................................................................... 127
Table 9.6: LEED Criteria, Points, Explanation ........................................................................... 128
Table 10.1: Areas Summary For Each Section ........................................................................... 134
McMaster University Chapter 1
12
Chapter 1
Introduction and Background
McMaster University Chapter 1
13
1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
1.1 INTRODUCTION
The West Hamilton Harbour area mainly consists of remnant industrial buildings,
brownfield sites, and some stable neighbourhoods. Public access to Hamilton Harbour has been
limited due to safety and security purposes. However, the gradual increase in demand of
waterfront lands in recent years compels the City of Hamilton to redevelop the West Hamilton
Harbour waterfront area. The aim of this redevelopment plan is to improve the ecological,
environmental and the recreational activities of the West Harbour area, enhance Hamilton’s
economy and further enrich social activities in the surrounding communities. The neighbourhood
is to be carefully planned such that each area will satisfy the projected population density in
various ways.
The main components of this redevelopment project are the development of a
higher-density residential area, an intermediate density residential neighbourhood, and a public
area as shown in Figure 1.1. Furthermore, the project will encourage investors to start small
businesses in all the different areas and will drive the city to improve public amenities.
1.2 SCOPE AND LIMIT
Figure 1.1: Development Limit
McMaster University Chapter 1
14
Figure 1.2: Existing Land Use
According to observation during site visits, the current land uses in the proposed area
consist of vacant land, green space, warehouses, residential houses and industrial facilities as
shown in Figure 1.2. Due to the changes in economy, many industrial buildings are abandoned.
Therefore, this area should no longer be used for industrial purposes. However, Hamilton Metal
works Inc which is indicated as “Existing Industrial Building” in Figure 1.2 is still in operation,
so negotiation about relocation need to be conducted in early stage of the project.
1.3 ADJOINING DEVELOPABLE AREAS
In order to redevelop a vibrant, green and sustainable community in the West Harbour
area, the City of Hamilton proposed the re-development. It is bound by the Canadian National
Railway yard, Barton Street and Bay Street. The area is split up into three sections; the sections’
areas are estimated using Google Maps and they are the following: higher density residential
development with approximate area of 6.97 hectares, neighbourhood development with
approximate area of 6.7 hectares, and the public buildings development with approximate area of
12.2 hectares.
McMaster University Chapter 1
15
After the site visit, opportunities for further development of each section were discovered.
For the public buildings area, the industrial facilities which are still serviceable or functional can
be saved and re-used, otherwise, they will be taken down. Additionally, commercial buildings,
office buildings and shopping malls will be built in this section. For the neighbourhood and high
density residential areas, large green spaces, various types of residential buildings, walk-able
commutes to the workplace and waterfront will be considered in the design. On the north side,
partial rail yard will be replaced with a modern Go station. It will not only ease the transportation
to other cities, but will also encourage visitors to come to the West Hamilton Harbour. In order
to promote a healthy and sustainable way of transportation in the proposed area, dedicated lanes
for bicycles on the main roads and larger sidewalks around residential buildings and the
neighbourhood will be added.
1.4 VISION FOR THE PROJECT
In Hamilton, most waterfronts are occupied by various industries. Public access to
Hamilton West Harbour has been limited for a long period. The vision for Hamilton West
Harbour re-development project is to have an urban area or a central park for the people to enjoy
the waterfront. The people who will live in the West Harbour will enjoy a sustainable lifestyle
and an amazing view of the waterfront. The people who will access the public buildings area in
the West Harbour will find more modern elements and attractions; a completely new style of
Hamilton will be provided. It is expected that the Hamilton West Harbour project will attract
local residents and visitors from surrounding cities. Instead of viewing Hamilton as the industry
city, Hamilton West Harbour re-development project will move Hamilton to be the sustainable
city.
McMaster University Chapter 1
16
1.5 DESIGN OBJECTIVES
The main objective of this project is to develop the area that is sustainable and green:
Environment
Environmentally Friendly (no harmful waste deposit)
Low carbon footprint
Social
Mobility Easing and Pedestrian Friendly
Safety, healthy
Comfort (view of the lake, daylight, green spaces)
Productive
Economic
Cost feasible
Energy efficiency
Visitors and investors attraction
1.6 PRELIMINARY PATTERN LANGUAGE
The following pattern language will apply to the public buildings area, neighbourhood area
and higher density area.
As the buildings get closer to the lake, their story limit will diminish to allow a good
circulation of the lake breeze in the whole area. Maximum number of stories (3) will be used at
the borders of the area and 1 story buildings will be facing the lake. These limits will be
beneficial to the new areas as well as the existing areas in terms of sunlight, lake view and
overall harmony. Some buildings will be made up of circular shapes for several reasons. Firstly,
this design will allow the sunlight to reach all rooms of the buildings. Also, it is good for air
circulation. Additionally, it is aesthetically pleasing as there are no sharp edges limiting the eye.
All main entrances should be easily seen and identified. Preferably, they should be facing the
streets. The existence of small balconies is aesthetically pleasing and it gives residents the
opportunity to enjoy the fresh air and relaxing scenery. Also, it helps in the creation of a socially
active area. Each building should have its own private garden, which will increase the growth of
plants around buildings and create a welcoming street view. Roof gardens are extremely
important and have a greater impact than private gardens. Small public parks will create a very
social environment and help keep the sustainability of the new area. The existence of a variety of
family/single dwellers will create a balance in the area in terms of social interaction.
McMaster University Chapter 2
17
Chapter 2
Material Selection
McMaster University Chapter 2
18
2 MATERIAL SELECTION
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Chapter two focuses on the selection of the materials for the three-storey building in the
public buildings component of the study area. Specific types of materials will be compared
throughout the chapter in order to find the appropriate materials for the mixed use commercial
building. Six criteria are chosen to evaluate all materials in all aspects. Initial and long term costs
are examined for the overall cost points. Aesthetics will take into account the appearance of the
material and how they integrate within the building. Local materials will be preferred then
materials that requires long distance shipping for the accessibility/availability section. Material
reuse and recycle is crucial in eliminating building waste and is evaluated. Energy efficiency of
materials will be compared for its insulation, electricity reduction, and carbon footprint
reduction.
2.2 PROPOSED CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY FOR SELECTION
The decision criteria that are used to describe what is preferred in a given material are
given below:
Table 2.1: Decision Criteria
Criteria Definition
1 Cost The price of the material
2 Aesthetics The visual appeal of the material
3 Accessibility/Availability How readily accessible a material is
4 Durability How long the material lasts and the
ease of maintenance
5 Recycle/Reuse The capability of the material to be
reused or recycled
6 Energy Efficiency Ability of the material to reduce
energy usage
7 Functionality How well does the material work in
different scenarios
McMaster University Chapter 2
19
Each criteria is given a mark from 1 to 10, 1 being the worst and 10 being the best. In each
section, the criteria are weighted differently depending on the importance of the criteria relative
to the section. After assigning a rank to each criteria for each material, a total score is calculated
concluding which material will be selected.
2.3 STRUCTURAL MEMBERS – WOOD, STEEL OR REINFORCED CONCRETE
Table 2.2: Decision Matrix for Structural Members Selection
Decision Criteria
Material Selection for Structural Members
Weight Reinforced
Concrete Steel Masonry Wood
Cost (Short and long term) 5 8 7 4 2.5
Aesthetics 7 9 8 7 0.5
Accessibility/Availability 10 7 6 9 0.5
Durability 8 9 8.5 6 2
Functionality 7 8 9.5 4 2
Recycle/Reuse 7 8.5 5 6.5 1
Energy Efficiency 6 5 6 8.5 1.5
Total Score 67 81.5 74.5 57.3 10
Reinforced Concrete
Reinforced concrete is one of the most popular modern structural material. On average, its
cost as a structural frame is slightly higher than steel frames (Nielsen, 2008). On the other hand,
the total cost per meter square of a concrete frame is less than steel. First, concrete production
requires the mixing of raw materials. Second, transportation and curing during construction
requires an extra cost. Reinforced concrete has a reliable compressive strength, and its weakness
under tensile forces can be compensated with steel reinforcement. While compressive strength is
great feature, reinforced concrete is susceptible to corrosion and reaction with sulphates,
chlorides, alkali silica, etc. Maintenance of concrete is relatively low because it has no nutrition
for fungus and other organisms that feed on organic materials, but there could be occasional
maintenance cost on sealing of cracks. At the end of the building life, concrete can be grinded to
fill trails and pavements. Steel reinforcement can be easily reused for construction again. The
McMaster University Chapter 2
20
production of cement impacts the environment as it emits large amounts of carbon dioxide; the
ratio of cement produced to carbon dioxide emitted is 1:2 (Rastra, 2007). Since concrete is such a
common material, it is very possible to find locally mixed concrete which means a reduction in
transportation costs and environmental impact. There are many concrete suppliers in the region
such as Hamilton Concrete Inc, SCP Stamped Concrete Pros Inc., etc.
Wood
Timber’s cost is very unstable as it depends on the demand and the availability of wood,
but it generally costs less than steel and reinforced concrete. Timber has a higher transportation
cost than concrete because it is not common to be produced locally; local concrete companies are
likely to waive off transportation cost as they are located in a short perimeter. In addition, the
cost of wood depends on its need to be treated to meet fire protection code and coated to disable
termites and fungus from feeding on it. Wood is easily cut and it is simple to work with; using
nails instead of screws speeds up construction time but reduces strength. Since sound insulation
is poor in between wood boards, extra sound insulation must be installed which will increase the
cost. The initial raw materials cost of wood is not large, but the accumulated cost over periods of
time due to required maintenance could be substantial. Wood also offers great opportunity for
creativity as it can be easily cut into any desired shape. It is also an abundant material in Canada.
The disadvantage is its organic material which attracts termites, moulds and rodents that can
significantly affect the durability of the structure. Another disadvantage of wood is that it has
very poor fire resistance. Wood has low ignition point and fire is easily spread to large areas in a
short amount of time. In the meantime, wood can be reused in other buildings, flooring, or
furniture. If it is not re-used, it is still biodegradable. Wood requires very insignificant amounts
of energy for production as most of the energy production comes from the sun. Finally, not all
lumber purchased is used for construction; there is always a small amount of leftover lumber
from cutting and shaping.
Steel
Steel is an expensive material requiring a high initial cost. After the steel is formed into the
desired specification and shape, it is very easily transported due to its size. Building with steel
McMaster University Chapter 2
21
leaves very minimal spare materials behind as everything is ordered in very specific dimensions
and quantities. Because of the high compressive and tensile strength offered by steel and its
ability to withstand harsh weather and temperature, it proves to be a very durable material, with
rusting as its primary problem. Due to a high melting point of steel, it has a very high fire rating.
Extra insulation is required with steel due to its high temperature conductivity. Steel is often
recycled to continue to be used in construction after demolition. The major disadvantage with a
steel frame is its ability to hold heat. Since steel has much higher heat conductivity than wood, it
requires extra insulation and energy to keep the warm air in.
Masonry
Masonry buildings are sturdy and long-lasting. Ordinary concrete blocks have very poor
insulation properties and they often require a wall of insulation to meet the building codes
standards. Construction of masonry is relatively simple but time consuming. A disadvantage of
masonry is that due to the relative heavy weight of the masonry structure, it would need a large
foundation to prevent settling and cracking. Masonry is available locally which minimizes
transportation costs. Masonry is usually crushed like concrete to be reused in paving, granular
fill, and aggregates, but it can also be reclaimed for other buildings. Masonry has very strong
weather and fire resistance, requiring very little cost on maintenance. Due to the long-lasting
feature of masonry buildings, it often has a high resale value because of the low maintenance
costs.
2.4 EXTERIOR CLADDING AND ROOF MATERIALS
2.4.1 Exterior Cladding
Exterior cladding materials form the skin of structures. The ideal wall cladding should be
inexpensive, economically maintained, aesthetically pleasing, durable and environmentally
friendly. Furthermore, the ideal wall cladding should be highly resistant to weather damage and
mechanical damage. However, since there is no perfect material for cladding, Table 2.3 gives a
comparison of several exterior-cladding materials using the criteria introduced in previous
McMaster University Chapter 2
22
sections, and the outcome of the comparison is that Exterior Insulation Finishing System (EIFS)
is the most suitable material for this project.
Table 2.3: Decision Matrix for Exterior Cladding Selection
Decision Criteria Material Selection for Exterior Cladding
Weight Glass Vinyl Siding Metal EIFS Stone Veneer
Cost 4 8 5 6 4 1.5
Aesthetics 9 7 8 8 8 3
Accessibility/Availability 5 7 8 8 6 0.5
Durability 7 8 8 7 9 2
Functionality 7 7 7 7 8 2
Recycle/Reuse 4 2 8 6 4 0.5
Energy Efficiency 8 2 7 9 7 0.5
Total Score 69.5 68.5 73 74 72.5 10
Glass Cladding
The major advantages of using glass cladding are good appearance and energy efficiency.
Glass cladding comes in a variety of different colors which can create nice patterns for the
surface of the structure. In addition, glass is good for thermal insulation, waterproof and energy
conservation. Since glass is not a good conductor of heat, it saves energy during air conditioning
of structure. However, glass is an expensive material (about $80 ~ $150 per square meter) and it
requires more maintenance costs than other materials. Finally, glass is dangerous in areas which
have higher chances of earthquakes.
Vinyl Siding
Vinyl siding is plastic exterior cladding for structures which is very durable and simple for
maintenance. The disadvantages of vinyl siding are its poor performance in protecting the
structure from extreme weather conditions (cold or heat), it is also not as recyclable as other
materials, and vinyl siding releases toxic fumes when burning which is harmful to humans,
animals, and the environment.
McMaster University Chapter 2
23
Metal Cladding
Metal cladding such as galvanized steel and aluminum provides a modern appearance of
structures. The metal cladding can protect structures well from weather changes and it requires
almost no maintenance. Another benefit of metal cladding is that it is easy to recycle and reuse,
but it will be of a lower quality. However, the metal cladding can be relatively expensive ($30 ~
$100 per square meter) and the corrosion of metal cladding may cause damage of structures.
EIFS (Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems)
EIFS is a traditional cladding system. It provides great appearance as it is carved and
moulded into a variety of different shapes. EIFS may cost more initially ($100 ~ $200 per square
meter) but it requires very low maintenance costs. Since the system is an exterior insulation, it
reduces air infiltration and hence decreases energy consumptions. However, the installation of
EIFS can be technically challenging and professional skills are required when installing good
quality EIFS cladding systems. Furthermore, moisture is difficult to escape once it gets behind
the EIFS, which might cause failure of the EIFS and it is difficult to repair.
Stone Veneer
The major benefit of stone veneer is that it is guaranteed to last long over time. It is easy to
install and it can provide great appearance of the structure. Another benefit is that manufactured
stone veneer is less expensive than the natural stone. On the other hand, it can easily break and
scrape during manufacturing and construction processes due to its light and thin material.
2.4.2 Roof
A roof primarily protects the structure against different weather conditions such as rain,
sunlight, snow and wind. A roof should be insulated and should have good drainage to protect
people from climate changes and damages that may be caused by large areas of water on the
roof. In order to provide a relatively efficient roof system, there are some roof materials
comparisons in Table 2.4 done using the criteria introduced in previous sections, and it comes
out that Vegetation Blanket (Green Roof) is the best roof material for this project.
McMaster University Chapter 2
24
Table 2.4: Decision Matrix for Roof Material Selection
Decision Criteria
Material Selection for Roof
Weight Concrete
Tile
Vegetation
Blanket
Slate Metal
Roofing
Asphalt
Shingle
Cost 4 4 2 5 7 2
Aesthetics 5 9 9 9 6 1
Accessibility/
Availability
9 7 6 7 8 1
Durability 9 7 10 9 5 2
Functionality 8 8 8 5 7 3
Recycle/Reuse 4 9 5 8 7 0.5
Energy Efficiency 5 9 7 8 5 0.5
Total Score 68.5 71 69 67 65 10
Concrete Tile
The advantages of concrete tile are its long lifespan, low maintenance cost, and good fire
protection. There is also a large selection of colours and styles of concrete tiles which will
provide good visual appearance for the structure. However, concrete is more expensive ($10 ~
$50 per square meter) than some other roofing materials. It is also relatively heavy, not good for
cold areas and generally not used in re-roofing due to repair difficulties.
Vegetation Blanket (Green Roof)
The major advantage of the vegetation blanket is that it provides substantial energy savings
and requires almost no maintenance. The vegetation blanket also provides attractive appearance
and it is simple to install. Furthermore, the vegetation blanket can uniformly drain and purify the
rainwater. However, the initial cost of a green roof is relatively high ($100 ~ $200 per square
meter). The vegetation blanket also has restrictions due to climate and weather conditions, and
the heavy weight of this kind of roof will need stronger roof supports.
Slate
Slate is a natural material which can be laid out in a variety of patterns to provide good
appearance for structures. It is very durable and has good fire resistance. It is also
environmentally friendly since it is recyclable and reusable. Slate is quite expensive compared to
McMaster University Chapter 2
25
other roof materials ($10 ~ $80 per square meter) and it can be costly if it is not installed
properly. Another disadvantage of slate is that slate is very heavy which will require a strong
roof supporting system.
Metal Roofing
Metal roofs are lightweight, durable and almost maintenance-free. They are energy
efficient since metal reflects sunlight; and they are made from 60 percent to 65 percent
recyclable materials which will offer environmental benefits. On the other hand, metal roof is
expensive ($10 ~ $30 per square meter) and may have objectionable noises caused by falling
rain. Furthermore, metal roof is not easy to install and it requires professional installation to
reduce the noise effect.
Asphalt Shingle
Asphalt shingle has a clean look at an affordable price ($1 ~ $10 per square meter), and it
can be used for a wide temperature range. Other benefits of asphalt shingle are low maintenance
and its high percentage of overlaps provides reliable waterproofing. It can also be easily recycled
and reused. On the negative side, asphalt shingle can blow off under extreme weather conditions,
such as high winds. It also may be damaged by heat. Another disadvantage of asphalt shingle is
its low durability which is relatively shorter than other materials.
2.5 COVERINGS – WALL, CEILING AND FLOOR
Coverings of wall, ceiling and floor are the skin of the internal space of a building, and
they are strongly related to the occupants’ visual sensation and emotions. Therefore, aesthetics
has the highest weight in this category, followed by material cost, durability and availability
Moreover, the primary goal of this project is to build a green and sustainable community, so
recycling, energy efficiency and carbon footprint are considered in this case. As shown inTable
2.5, masonry has the highest score among five regular alternatives because of its great
appearance as wall coating and it can be provided in various colours and textures upon
customers’ requests. Moreover, due to the varying use of the building, concrete and wood would
McMaster University Chapter 2
26
also be good choices as wall covering. Comparing both to masonry, concrete is cheaper and
easier to obtain, while wood is much more environmentally friendly and has a greater ability to
be reused. Furthermore, tiles can be used for the walls in the washroom and kitchen because tile
is less affected by ash, water, and fire.
Table 2.5: Decision Matrix for Wall Coverings Selection
Decision Criteria Material Selection for Interior Wall
Weight Concrete Masonry Tile Wood Drywall
Cost 8 7 5 8 9 2
Aesthetics 4 8 8 6 5 3
Accessibility/Availability 10 7 8 9 10 1
Durability 8 7 6 6 6 2
Functionality 8 7 7 4 4 1
Recycle/Reuse 3 3 2 5 2 0.5
Energy Efficiency 5 5 5 8 7 0.5
Total Score 66 70 64.5 65.5 63.5 10
In order to provide a clean view and visual satisfaction, ventilation ducts and pipes under
floor slab must be covered, suspended ceiling which is one of the most common construction
techniques is strongly recommended. As shown inTable 2.6, vinyl plaster has the highest score
because of its great appearance and durability. Additionally, vinyl plaster panels can be easily
installed on the suspended frames. It needs much less maintenance than wood and tile, and the
surface can be treated to allow the ceiling to project some sheen which makes the room more
bright and inviting.
Table 2.6: Decision Matrix for Ceiling Coverings Selection
Decision Criteria Alternative Material Selections for Ceiling
Weight Wood vinyl plaster Metal Tile Drywall
Cost 8 8 6 5 9 2
Aesthetics 6 7 6 7 5 3
Accessibility/Availability 9 9 7 8 10 1
Durability 6 7 8 6 6 2
Functionality 4 5 7 7 4 1
Recycle/Reuse 5 6 8 2 2 0.5
Energy Efficiency 8 6 3 5 7 0.5
Total Score 65.5 71 65.5 61.5 63.5 10
McMaster University Chapter 2
27
In general, there are hard floor coverings and soft floor coverings. Typical hard floor
coverings are shown in Table 2.7; soft floor coverings such as carpet are more dependent on the
customer’s preference and are not considered in this case. As shown in Table 2.7, bamboo
flooring has the highest score. In comparison to other hard floor coverings, bamboo flooring is as
attractive as terrazzo and as durable as concrete. Moreover, according to the healthcare report by
US Environmental Protection Agency, bamboo flooring is actually very environmentally friendly
and it is ranked to be one of the most sustainable flooring materials. (EPA Publication
909-F-07-001)
Table 2.7: Decision Matrix for Floor Coverings Selection
Decision Criteria Alternative Material Selection for Floor
Weight Concrete Bamboo Vinyl Laminate Terrazzo
Cost 8 6 8 8 5 2
Aesthetics 4 8 7 6 8 3
Accessibility/Availability 10 4 9 9 7 1
Durability 8 8 7 6 7 2
Functionality 7 7 5 4 7 1
Recycle/Reuse 4 9 6 5 3 0.5
Energy Efficiency 5 9 6 8 4 0.5
Total Score 65.5 72 71 65.5 65.5 10
2.6 WINDOWS AND DOORS
2.6.1 Windows
In the building design, windows play a significant role as they primarily maintain the
interior environment and provide residents with daylight. Additionally, two other important
aspects are added to windows’ design, energy efficiency contribution and building decoration.
Windows are available in a variety of materials including wood, aluminum, vinyl and fibreglass.
Each material has its advantages and disadvantages, and they are compared in Table 2.8.
McMaster University Chapter 2
28
Table 2.8: Decision Matrix for Window Selection
Decision Criteria Alternative Material Selections for Window
Weight Wood Aluminum Vinyl Fibreglass
Cost 2 6 10 2 2
Aesthetics 10 6 4 6 2
Accessibility/Availability 10 10 10 4 0.5
Durability/Maintenance 2 10 10 10 2
Functionality 6 10 2 8 1.5
Energy Efficiency 6 2 10 8 2
Total Score 54 68 76 66 10
Although wood needs periodical maintenance, wood windows are architecturally
appealing. Aluminum provides great strength, low maintenance cost and long term durability. In
contrast, aluminum increases heat loses. Aluminum will transfer heat when you are trying to
maintain cold in the summer and will lose heat when heat retention is needed during the winter.
Vinyl not only can it be easily made into different shapes and styles, but also it offers good
thermal protection. It requires low cost and low maintenance cost; however, the strength of vinyl
is not enough in some cases. Fibreglass is relatively new and not widely available yet, therefore,
it is more expensive. However, Fibreglass is excellent in insulation and they have an adequate
strength.
After the comparison of these materials, a combination of aluminum and vinyl windows
will be used for this three storey building. Vinyl will be applied whenever it is possible to lower
the cost, provide good quality and enhance energy efficiency. Aluminum must be used for very
large windows because of its rigidity.
2.6.2 Doors
When it comes to choosing doors for this three storey building, cost, durability and energy
efficiency will be the primary factors for selecting materials.
McMaster University Chapter 2
29
Table 2.9: Decision Matrix for Door Selection
Decision Criteria Alternative Material Selection for Windows
Weight Wood Aluminum Steel Fiberglass
Cost 2 6 10 2 2
Aesthetics 10 8 2 8 2
Accessibility/Availability 8 10 10 2 0.5
Durability/Maintenance 8 10 8 10 2
Functionality 8 10 10 10 1.5
Energy Efficiency 6 2 8 8 2
Total Score 68 72 76 72 10
According to the assessment matrix above, the total scores for the four kinds of materials
are close to each other. Although wood doors will provide the authentic beauty of nature, good
quality always comes with expensive price. Exposure to moisture and harsh weather is the
biggest problem for exterior wood doors. Steel doors are the most common type in many cases.
They are also one of the least expensive options and nearly maintenance free under normal
conditions. Fiberglass doors are costly as they are not widely produced, but they have excellent
isolation property like steel. Doors made from aluminum are popular options for exterior
entrances because of the modern and beautiful appearance. A chemical process can strengthen
and harden the surface of aluminum that is exposed to the air.
In conclusion, aluminum doors will most likely be used for exterior entrances in this three
storey mix use building. For the interior doors, the other three materials are all exceptional
choices depending on the different demands. Special mineral core will be used to help meet
certain fire ratings for each door.
2.6 CONCLUSION
In order to obtain the most appropriate material selection for the development, a
research-based approach combined with a decision analysis scoring methodology is used in this
chapter. The matrix in each selection process was to look at all of the available alternatives
numerically, and therefore assist in making decisions where dilemmas are present. The matrices
McMaster University Chapter 2
30
were used as a reference to further provide reason for the choice of an alternative. A summary
table of results from material selection is shown in Table 2.10
Table 2.10: Summary of material selection
Selection Score(/100)
Structural members Steel 81.5
Exterior cladding EIFS 74
Roof Vegetation blanket 71
Wall covering Masonry 70
Ceiling covering Vinyl plaster 71
Floor covering Hardwood(bamboo) 72
Windows Vinyl 76
Doors Steel 76
McMaster University Chapter 3
31
Chapter 3
Public Buildings Component
McMaster University Chapter 3
32
3 PUBLIC BUILDINGS COMPONENT
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Since the public buildings area is a place to be occupied by the public, open space was a
great concern in the development of the overall layout. As it is also realized that public space is
the core of any development, public space was laid out first then the buildings surrounded it. The
redevelopment of Public Building Sector is to provide a positive working space where people
can work, study, shopping, relax, and play sports. The entire area is designed with the idea that
people will be traveling throughout this area on foot and will be able to achieve all necessary
tasks without having to leave the area. Green Parking Lots1are placed in places to ease
transportation as shown in Figure 3.1.
Figure 3.1: Public Building Sector Layout
1 Porous Pavement is used for all parking lots, more information about Porous Pavement is In section 9.2.3
McMaster University Chapter 3
33
3.2 DEFINITION OF MAJOR BUILDINGS
Table 3.1: Landuse and building heights of major buildings in PB sector
Landuse
Area (m2)
Building Height
(m)(# storey)
1 Community Center 5,245 9(2)
2 Basketball Field 840 NA
3 Football Field 4,679 NA
4 Tennis court 2,400 NA
5 Total Parking Area 14,823 NA
6 Gas Station 1,351 6(1)
7 Office Building A 1,629 12(3)
8 Office Building B 3,892 8(2)
9 Office Building C 1,205 5(1)
10 3-Storey Mixed Use Building 950 12(3)
11 Mega Plaza 14,831 9(1)
12 Fountain/Central Garden 12,867 NA
13 Outdoor Walkable Space 21,798 NA
14 Major Green Space 31,534 NA
15 Tim Hartons 396 6(1)
16 Restaurant & Hotel 3,430 12(3)
Mega Plaza
The Mega plaza is a plaza that is composed of a variety of stores directed to all ages of
people. Store categories include electronic and computer stores, book stores, fashion apparel and
footwear, restaurants, photography, and many more. It is a place for people to relax and enjoy
casual shopping.
Community Centre
The community centre consists of two levels. First floor is for recreational uses such as
swimming and playing hockey, while the second floor is the library. Its main purpose is to attract
people from high density, public, and neighbourhood areas to use the facility. People who are
tired of studying at the library can conveniently go downstairs for a swim or other sports or vice
McMaster University Chapter 3
34
versa. As it is beside our theme circular garden, it would encourage the people who are visiting
the garden to use the recreational facilities.
Office Building A, B, and C
The public area will consist of three office buildings. Office buildings B and C are placed
beside an area of restaurants for the convenience of people. All three office buildings are well
within walking distance to the theme garden. Building A is conveniently located beside the
community centre that would allow people to use the recreational facilities during breaks or after
work.
Three Story building
The three story building is located adjacent to the theme garden and the mega plaza. It is
also within walking distances to nearby office buildings. The retail level will include a coffee
shop/restaurant to compensate for people working and living upstairs, and the remaining space is
to be used as a laundry shop. For design of residential floor, windows and balconies are facing
towards south of the building to absorb maximum sunshine.
Parking Lots
All parking lots are designed according to Toronto Design Guidelines for 'Greening'
Surface Parking Lots (Toronto Urban Design, 2010), and Porous Pavement is used for all
parking lots.
Parking Lot A: 164 parking spaces available for the public
Parking Lot B: 26 parking spaces available, reserved by officers of community center
Parking Lot C: 60 parking spaces available, reserved by employee in Office Building C
Parking Lot D: 90 parking spaces available, reserved by resident and officers in 3-storey building
Parking Lot E: 206 parking spaces available for the public
Bicycle Parking: 200 parking spaces are provided to promote healthy transportation
McMaster University Chapter 3
35
3.3 DEVELOPMENT OF LAYOUT FOR PUBLIC SPACE HULLS
The central area containing the fountain will be of a great attraction to the plaza and
community centre users. It is an area that is crossed by all occupants. Occupants from office
buildings, plaza, parking lots, and community centre will have to cross the central public space
hull to get from one point to the other as shown in Figure 3.1. It is expected that during pleasant
weather, this area will be a main social area as it is shared between all users. In addition to the
central hull, it was realized that there is a need for other minor hulls for specific users. Minor
public space hulls were created adjacent to all of the buildings. Office buildings in the south have
a shared public space, the community centre has a hull shared between people outdoors and
indoors and the plaza has an additional public space connecting it to the higher density area.
Furthermore, all of these minor public space hulls are connected to the central hull giving a sense
of continuity to the area. The pleasantness of the seating, scenery and the social environment will
be of an enormous attraction to the public.
3.4 REFINEMENT OF PATTERN LANGUAGE
As the user enters the public buildings area, they will be attracted to the focal points
presented by the designer. Firstly, the circular public space hull centered in the area is a focal
point existing to attract all occupants to it. Another major focal point is the plaza with its
ultramodern shape inviting people from office buildings for a lunch, community centre users for
a break and occupants of the two other components of the project for shopping and
entertainment. The diminishing story limit gives the user a feeling of a limitless horizon and
allows the central hull to intake the sunlight and the breeze of the lake. In addition, the circularity
of the buildings gives a sense of continuity and flow to the area, allowing the air to circulate the
entire component. As one continues to walk the area, the connectedness of the buildings will be
felt, it is not a physical connection, but it is a connection created by the public space hulls.
Finally, the small public parks scattered throughout the area will be filled with a social
atmosphere capturing people coming out of the small dispersed parking lots and users exiting the
buildings.
McMaster University Chapter 3
36
3.5 RINTERATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF SITE MODEL(1:500 SCALE)
Figure 3.2: Public Building Sector Site Model-1
Figure 3.3: Public Building Sector Site Model-2
McMaster University Chapter 3
37
3.6 KEY ELEMENTS FOR OUTDOOR FEATURES AND CONSIDERATION OF
GREEN ROOF ELEMENTS
The goal of the development of the public area is to enable human-environment interaction
while enhancing entertainment, working environment, and other uses of the land. To further
emphasize on sustainability, unused land will be developed into gardens, green islands, green
spaces, parks, etc. With the development of such green spaces, it will promote a healthier
community both physically and mentally. Key components of Public Building sector are shown
in Table 3.2 and Figure 3.4.
Table 3.2: Key components of PB sector
Key components
Landuse
Area(m2)
1 Outdoor Playground 7,919
2 Total Parking Area 14,823
3 Gas Station 1,351
4 Fountain/central garden 12,867
5 Outdoor walkable space 21,798
6 Major Green Space 31,534
7 Buildings 31,578
Figure 3.4: Public Building Component Landuse Percentage
McMaster University Chapter 3
38
The centre of the public area consists of a large circular green space with a fountain at its
centre. To better encourage active living, the fountain will run from spring to fall, and be served
as an outdoor skating arena during the winter. The surrounding circular garden will have a
unique theme and name to attract tourists. To give an example, the theme could be designed as
“The Pacman”, where vegetations shaped in the respective shapes for the game. To add more
flavour to the theme, an opening signifying the mouth of the “Pacman” can be created at the
circular garden to provide area for community gathering.
Green spaces are a common sight within the public area as shown in the models. To uplift
the uses of these lands, benches and picnic tables are required within the green space. It allows
proper resting for visitors while providing them with a chance to calm their minds.
Advertisements containing environment protection messages and cartoons should be used on
benches around the space. It will not only educate citizens some environmental initiatives but it
also adds a modern look to the area. Green islands should be used on major roads, it would
provide both a safety and environment feature to the public area.
Green roofs provide numerous benefits to the city such as energy reduction, aesthetics,
heat island effect, storm water retention, Carbon Dioxide reduction, and air cleaning. It will be
incorporated into the four major buildings within the public area: Community centre, office
building A, B, and C. Intensive Green Roofs will be considered against Extensive Green Roof.
To support the decision: since all buildings are new so the extra load from intensive roofs will be
incorporated in building designs. Intensive green roof supports thicker vegetation and thus more
energy efficiency and storm water interception for the building.
As the aim of the project is to turn the development land into the heart of the city, it is
essential that the public area not only provide entertainment and commercial needs for citizens,
but also environment awareness education.
McMaster University Chapter 4
39
Chapter 4
Adjoining Neighbourhood Component
McMaster University Chapter 4
40
4 ADJOINING NEIGHBOURHOOD COMPONENT
4.1 DESIRED COMPONENT PERCENTAGES
The land use of urban neighbourhoods affects quality of life significantly. The urban
neighbourhood area mainly consists of five components: structures, green spaces, pedestrian
pathways, parking spaces and roads. The total area of this neighbourhood is about 18 acres, and
Table 4.1 illustrates types and sizes of houses in this area. Semidetached houses account for half
of the total units in the residential area because they provide a comfortable living space while
reducing the extra space between houses. Building excessive detached units would reduce the
population density and hinder the full potential use of many facilities nearby. Large amount of
townhouses not only provides the eye with a compacted neighbourhood but also increases traffic
flow and congestion problems. Thus having the mixed layout of the three types of house units
would significantly enhance visual, safety, and sustainability aspects.
Table 4.1: Neighbourhood Area Density
House Type Dimension (per
unit)
Units per
Structure
Total
Units
Persons
per Unit
Total
Residents
Semidetached 13 X 10 metres 2 96 3.22 309
Detached 16 X 9 metres 1 47 3.3 155
Townhouse 12.5 X 6 metres 2 38 3.1 117.8
Total area for structures (excluding parking spaces) is approximately 5.9 Acres. It accounts
for 30% of the neighbourhood area. The structures in this area are mainly houses. There is also a
church for residents living in or near this area. The minimum residential density requirement for
a bus service in every half hour is 7 units per acre (Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and
Housing, 2010). In order to satisfy this requirement, a structure density of 10 units per acre has
been assumed so that the residents living in this area could access bus services in close
proximity.
McMaster University Chapter 4
41
The green spaces in this area are composed of gardens and backyards for houses, trails, and
over 70 percent of existing trees would remain after the development. The designed layout shows
that every detached house and semidetached house has its own green space which can provide
residents with gardens or yards to enrich the lives of people. Large backyards are desired to
enable a healthy lifestyle while providing a stress free environment. There is also a large green
area surrounding the church that would provide plentiful space for people to enjoy picnics,
exercises, and gatherings. Total green space would total up to 40% of the area because most
existing trees would be kept for trails and natural fencing.
The parking spaces are designed as individual parking lot for every semidetached or
detached house and a large shared parking lot for residents living in townhouses. The purpose of
a shared parking lot is to save space. The average parking (in cars) per unit for the
neighbourhood area is expected to be 1.8, with semi and detached houses having two cars per
unit while one car for townhouses. Therefore, parking would account for 15% of the total area.
The streets in this area are primarily designed for the comfort of residents. As can be seen
in the layout, it is not very convenient to drive in this area since the area is bisected with the trail
that prevents vehicular traffics. As a result, this would provide a more suitable environment for
residents and pedestrians since there are not many vehicles moving on the street. Furthermore,
the brown diagonal trail on the layout would promote casual walking and biking habits as it is
very close to residents. It also goes through the entire area so that the residents are able to
commute to church in a safe and easy manner. Roads do not play a big role in this area and it
accounts for only 8% of the area.
Pedestrian pathways are highly valued in this design as the main purpose of the area is to
provide a friendly and safe neighbourhood. Each road is to have sidewalks on each side along
with green curbs to add more distance between pedestrians and vehicle traffic. The diagonal trail
provides an extra walkway for pedestrians to commute in between areas. The pedestrian
walkways account for 7% of total neighbourhood area.
McMaster University Chapter 4
42
Table 4.2: Component Summary for Neighbourhood Area
Feature Percentage (%)
Buildings 30
Green Spaces (including back and front yards) 40
Parking 15
Pedestrian Pathways 7
Roads 8
4.2 INSIGHTS
A site model is shown in Figure 4.1 and Figure 4.2. The development area has a
descending slope from south to north at the south-west corner. In order to accommodate the deep
slope, the second row of townhouses from the south of the southern border would need to be
slightly higher so that the first row would not block substantial vision. The advantage of the
slope is that the forest and church located in the north part of the neighbourhood would become
more visible to the townhouses, and some of the houses. Rainwater capture tanks and its
respective system, or the potential to build them, is to be designed for every unit on the
neighbourhood property.
Figure 4.1: Neighbourhood Development Design (Google Sketchup Model-1)
McMaster University Chapter 4
43
Figure 4.2: Neighbourhood Development Design (Google Sketchup Model-2)
4.3 REFINEMENT OF PATTERN LANGUAGE
As one enters the neighbourhood area, he/she would experience the quietness and peace
offered by the unique layout of the residential properties. A layout allows cars to enter to park
only and not to drive around, encouraging residents to walk or bike in their neighbourhood. This
layout introduces safety into the neighbourhood allowing kids to use the roads for recreational
purposes. Moreover, all houses have private gardens creating a sustainable and attractive
neighbourhood, encouraging residents to spend more time outdoors socializing with their
neighbours. In addition, the existence of the small public parks in between sets of houses is a
great way to connect people together. Small balconies and main entrances facing the streets
allow residents to keep an eye on their neighbourhood increasing its safety. Also, the
connectedness of some of the residential properties gives the neighbourhood a sense of unity.
One of the most important aspects of the neighbourhood is the household mix. The types of
residential properties built into the area will allow the existence of a variety of family/single
dwellers creating a social balance in the area. Furthermore, as residents walk around their
neighbourhood, they will be fascinated by the number of trees scattered all over the area cleaning
the air and allowing different species to co-exist with the residents. Finally, the storey limit
established in the area will fill the neighbourhood with sunshine and a pleasant breeze from the
lake.
McMaster University Chapter 5
44
Chapter 5
HIGHER DENSITY COMPONENT
McMaster University Chapter 5
45
5 HIGHER DENSITY COMPONENT
5.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter is the basic design of the higher density area (6.97 acres). The layout of
structures with detailed daylight orientation, landscaping, and proposed building massing are
discussed in this chapter.
5.2 PROPOSED BUILDING MASSING AND OPEN SPACE
Building massing has a significant impact on the quality of life as well as the appearance
of the area. The structures in the higher density area are low rise buildings (2.5 stories) and
mainly apartment buildings. High-rise buildings do not exist in this area. The low-rise structures
are neatly arranged along both sides of the trails. These buildings are distributed as one next to
each other along the Stuart St., and mainly face towards East and West which will keep the
apartments receiving daylights during the day, and further save energy. Every unit will have its
own garden at the back of the buildings so that the street will have better visual effect. Although
most of parking spaces will be underground, there will still have some sidewalk parking along
both sides of the streets.
5.3 REFINEMENT OF PATTERN LANGUAGE
Entering the higher density area, the resident will sense the presence of an open united
community. People will be filling the small public parks and private gardens available in the
neighbourhood, giving it a social, safe and welcoming atmosphere. Walking around, it will be
realized that the maximum height of a building is 2.5 stories, allowing the sun to shine through
each part of the area and permitting the breeze from the lake to refresh the neighbourhood. The
low story limit will also increase the sense of safety and security as people are closer to the
ground and aware of the street activity. To further ensure a secure neighbourhood, small
balconies will be facing the streets keeping an eye on the area. Some of the dwelling units will be
McMaster University Chapter 5
46
connected to each other to increase social interaction. If a person flies over the area, they will be
amazed by the presence of roof gardens over each building in the area. In addition to all of the
green space, the non-existence of streets intersecting the neighbourhood will create a very
sustainable society. All of the roads will be surrounding the area and cars will enter only to park
in the small parking lots available by their dwelling units with no opportunity to drive around.
Finally, the presence of people walking and biking around the area demanded the existence of
connected trails in the neighbourhood.
5.4 KEY DESIGN DETAILS
Figure 5.1: Higher Density Component (Sketchup Model-1)
A site model of Higher Density Component is shown in Figure 5.1, and a section A-A
view is shown in Figure 5.2. Moreover, a detailed floor layout of apartment is shown in Figure
5.3.
McMaster University Chapter 5
47
Figure 5.2: Higher Density Component Section A-A view (Sketchup Model-2)
Figure 5.3: Typical Floor Layout of Apartment in Higher Density Sector
McMaster University Chapter 5
48
5.5 LAYOUT FOR DAYLIGHT ORIENTATION
In the high density area, daylight orientation becomes one of the most important factors
which need to be considered carefully. Daylight consists of direct sunlight and diffuse skylight.
The diffuse skyline is almost the same from every direction, therefore, direct sunlight is the
crucial ingredient for daylight orientation. Firstly, in North America, all the sunlight comes from
south-east or south-west. This means the north side of houses barely gets any sunlight through
the year. To deal with this issue, thin houses with wide faces will be constructed in the
development area. Two wider walls facing east or west will provide the maximum sunlight
during the year. Moreover, thin house style will let sunlight go through rooms much easily.
Houses are relatively close to each other in the high density area, which might increase sunlight
obstruction. In order to avoid obstruction, there will be two houses in a row separated by
individual garden and rows are divided by streets. In this way, tremendous sunlight will be
enjoyed by the people living in this high density area.
5.6 LANDSCAPE
The high density area will enable a dense while clean and friendly living space for
residents. Increased density will not remove the "green" theme of the project. The high density
space is designed such that every household is provided with their own backyard/garden. Each of
the condos on the north side of the area will have multiple units each. Every unit has two floors,
with the balcony facing the lake and parking lot facing south. Each separate unit will be provided
with their own backyard.
Along the most north side of the area, an east west trail that runs parallel to the shoreline
will be constructed for both transportation and healthy lifestyles. It branches out in the middle
area and connects to the imposed trail in the neighbourhood area. This design greatly promotes
walking and exercising for both high density and neighbourhood areas as people can benefit
from outdoor living without having fears of vehicular traffic. The intersection of the main trail is
the heart of the high density area. It is essentially a gathering place for weddings and music
McMaster University Chapter 5
49
festivals. It will connect people together with magnificent view and style. Tall evergreen trees
will be planned along the lake trails to act as a wind shield from the lake. Shorter trees and
shrubs are more desired on the rest of the area.
5.7 GREEN ROOF
Green roofs are to be implemented on all condos in the high density area. Intensive green
roofs will reduce energy consumption and give a pleasant texture to the area. Since these condos
are one of the biggest buildings in the neighbourhood area, and placing green roofs on it would
reduce maintenance costs as it would be contracted to the same company. It would also add an
aesthetic feature to the high density area.
Note:
Detailed Integrated Green Roof System design is available in section 9.1 on page 117.
McMaster University Chapter 6
50
Chapter 6
Design for Mobility
McMaster University Chapter 6
51
6 DESIGN FOR MOBILITY
6.1 INTRODUCTION
As people’s mobility is of great importance in any neighbourhood, an overview of the
transportation system across all three areas in the development will be discussed in chapter 6. In
depth design will be presented for each mode of transportation and a general picture of the
impact of each mode on the others will be given. As Figure 6.1 shows, in order to promote a
healthy and sustainable way of transportation in the proposed area, dedicated lanes for bicycles
on the main roads and larger sidewalks around residential buildings and the neighbourhood will
be added.
Figure 6.1: Mobility design
6.2 PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT IN ALL THREE ZONES
Since sustainability is one of the top priorities in the Hamilton West Harbour
Re-development project, pedestrian movement will be encouraged through all three areas. Wide
sidewalks of width 1.7m will be implemented in all areas allowing 2 wheel chairs to pass each
other easily. Ramps as shown in Figure 6.2 will be provided to ease movement of wheel chairs,
McMaster University Chapter 6
52
disabled people, blind people with canes, kids in strollers … etc. Sufficient clearances between
sidewalks and roads will be part of all three areas as seen in Figure 6.3 for the protection of kids
playing around & pedestrians, incorporating green pavements and planting trees. In addition to
all of the details given for the ease of the pedestrian movement, a plan of the trails that connect
all three areas is given in the general layout drawing in Figure 6.1.Finally to promote healthy and
comfortable pedestrian walking sightlines will be taken into account as shown in Figure 6.4.
Figure 6.2: Sidewalk ramp for wheelchairs
Figure 6.3: Sidewalks for NB,PB and HD sectors
McMaster University Chapter 6
53
Figure 6.4: Pedestrian walking sightlines
6.3 CYCLIST MOVEMENT IN ALL THREE ZONES
In order to further encourage sustainable living, cyclist movement will be of great
significance in the design of the transportation system. Dedicated bike lanes will be implemented
on both sides of the street for collector roads as shown in the general layout given in the
appendix. Bike lanes will have a width of 1.8m in the public buildings area and 1.5m in the high
density area. No bike lanes will be provided in the neighbourhood area as roads are safe for
cyclists. In the meantime, the trail connecting all three areas will be designed to be used by
cyclists. Finally bike racks will be provided overall the development and they will be designed to
be accessed easily as shown in Figure 6.5
McMaster University Chapter 6
54
Figure 6.5: Bike racks design
6.4 TRANSIT ACCESS FROM ALL THREE ZONES
To speed transportation between all three areas and to connect the new development with
the rest of Hamilton, a transit route is given in the general layout drawing in the appendix. The
reason behind the “U” shape of the route is to compensate for the density. The route covers most
of the public buildings and high density areas and is of good proximity to the neighbourhood
area but not too close to protect its peacefulness and quietness. Transit shelters as shown in
Figure 6.5 are provided along the transit route with an incorporated bike shelter to encourage
residents to bike to bus stations and commute to their destinations.
McMaster University Chapter 6
55
6.5 TRAFFIC CALMING AND PARKING PROVISION
In order to facilitate cars’ movement in all of the three areas while keeping green
transportation a top priority, several traffic calming techniques will be implemented all around
the development. Speed humps will be minimized as it should not be placed on emergency,
transit and collector routes. All way stops will be minimized as well since drivers increase speed
in between stops. One of the main techniques that will be implemented is minor horizontal
deflection established by narrowing lanes. Also, appropriate signage will be available throughout
the development for the safety of all residents. Finally, street parking, raised medians, chicanes,
roundabouts, chockers and textured pavements will be part of the roads. They will be considered
in next stage of design.
McMaster University Chapter 7
56
Chapter 7
ECONOMICS, SAFETY, HEALTH, ACCESS,
RESILIENCE
McMaster University Chapter 7
57
7 ECONOMICS, SAFETY, HEALTH, ACCESS, RESILIENCE
7.1 SAFETY OF VISITORS AND RESIDENTS
The safety and security of all visitors and residents is the top priority in this new
development. A set of measures will be outlined in this section to address safety issues that could
arise in this diverse neighbourhood. Considering the safety and security of people on the streets
various issues could be tackled. As shown in previous chapters streets in the three areas usually
only outline the areas giving very minimal access to cars within each area. This aspect will
ensure the safety of people from any car accidents and minimize the pedestrian car interaction. In
addition, traffic calming techniques such as narrowing lanes and texturing pavements discussed
in chapter 6 will make sure that pedestrian car interaction is safe. Bike lanes provided on the
streets will ensure the safety of cyclists in addition to implementing bicycle traffic signals.
Furthermore, the existence of busy open green space facing the streets guarantees the security of
people from any acts of theft or harassment. Balconies and windows of buildings/houses, which
are facing the street, will also serve as a mean of securing people on the street. Solar paneled
light poles installed along the streets will encourage street occupancy and minimize crimes. In
terms of people’s safety on sidewalks, rough surfaced concrete sidewalks will be implemented to
prevent slippery conditions during snowfall. Moreover, most of the trails run through busy areas
to ensure the security of pedestrians. Additionally, since green space is a focal point in each of
the areas attracting pedestrians from different buildings to cross it or stay in it, the security of the
people is guaranteed through the busyness of the public space. Finally, all buildings will follow
the appropriate building and fire codes, providing sufficient fire exits and paths, installing
security cameras to ensure the safety and security of all residents and visitors.
McMaster University Chapter 7
58
7.2 HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE ASPECTS FOR VISITORS AND RESIDENTS
Since the number one attractive aspect of any community is the quality of life provided to
the residents and visitors, a variety of methods are implemented to ensure the existence of a
healthy balanced community. The major element affecting the quality of life in the development
is the existence of green space providing people with sufficient amount of oxygen. Green space
does not only affect the physical health of residents but it also affects the social health of this
community as it encourages social interaction. Green space is also very pleasing to the eye,
spreading a sense of happiness throughout the neighbourhood. In addition, the storey limit
implemented on buildings ensures sufficient sunlight will enter the development benefiting
plants and people. The existence of green roofs on many of the buildings is an additional
contributor to the physical and social health of residents. Another contributor to the elimination
of air and noise pollution is the discouragement of cars’ existence in the neighbourhood through
the layout of streets and the provided transit stops with a bike shelter. Walking and cycling will
encourage people to stop and have a talk with neighbours. Benches will also be scattered along
sidewalks to provide convenience for pedestrians who need to rest. Moreover, most of the
parking lots will include islands of green space slowing down cars and contributing to the air
quality. Finally, one of the main aspects that affect the quality of life in the development is the
layout of each area as it encourages healthy lifestyle through physical activities in the provided
facilities, walking to work and shopping using a bicycle.
7.3 CONSIDERATIONS TO MAXIMIZE ACCESS FOR DISABLED PERSONS
In order to provide a friendly and convenient neighbourhood to every person, accessibility
features are to be designed for disabled persons for maximum safety and quality of life.
Accessibility features to be considered include routes, signage and signals, texture surfaces,
waste bins, barriers, construction sites, ramps, and lighting.
Pedestrian routes are to be designed to provide safe, direct, and obstacle free access paths
for people who rely on wheel chairs and are also visually impaired. Routes to main entrances are
to be designed so they are easily accessible with wheelchairs. Ramps with smooth angle to
McMaster University Chapter 7
59
accommodate wheelchairs are to be constructed for all pedestrian crossings. Curbs are to be
constructed along the ramp to prevent wheel chair escape. As the design shown from previous
chapter, sidewalks are 1.7 metres wide to allow two wheel chairs to travel side by side in
opposite directions. To promote walking for elders and cane users, benches are to be set up along
sidewalks at spacing such that it would satisfy a 10 minutes slow-walking interval. Sidewalks
should be flat, rigid and free of large cracks. The maximum gradient should be 5% (Toronto
accessibility guidelines – 1.1.7). A maximum spacing of 6 mm (Toronto accessibility guidelines
– 1.1.7) between paving materials on sidewalks and a 13 mm grading difference should be used
according to Toronto accessibility guidelines – 1.1.7. Figure 7.1 clearly marks the requirements.
(Figure 2 of 1.1.7 of Toronto accessibility guidelines). Trees should be maintained regularly, any
obstruction branches that interfere with walking should be cut immediately. The lowest branch at
the pedestrian routes should be at least 2.1 metres from the ground.
Figure 7.1: Sidewalk elevation difference requirement
To aid visually impaired/weak persons, all pedestrian signals are to have both a flashing
and an audio signal. In order to provide a safe crossing for pedestrians, proper drainage and
maintenance should be implemented so that excessive rain and melting snow are cleared in time
to prevent accidents. Signal timing should be designed for a slow walking person. Proper signage
with appropriate colour contrast and colour such as bright yellow/orange are to be used to aid the
visually weak seniors. Signage from stores located at a close distance to the sidewalk should be
hanged above 2.1 metres to accommodate tall pedestrians.
McMaster University Chapter 7
60
Accessible parking spaces should be provided at a ratio of 1:25 (1.2 of Toronto
accessibility guidelines), with a dimension of 3660 mm by 5385 mm to allow access for a
wheelchair van.
As a warning to ramps, turns, or stairs, textured surface are to be installed in the area along
critical points listed above to assist visually impaired cane users. If sidewalk repairs and other
constructions are to occur, barriers should be placed such that it is cane detectable.
Waste and recycling bins should be secured such that it is easily accessible by physically
disabled people. Bins are to accommodate the appropriate garbage flow and should be low
enough for wheelchair and scooter users. They should be placed near benches, bus stops, and
places where people stop and rest.
Lightings are very important during night time walking, especially for seniors with weak
vision. Lighting posts should be high enough such that it would not create long shadows, which
could become a blind spot against weak vision. Lighting should also be designed to reduce glare,
and it should be placed such that it would not interfere with proper wheelchair and scooter
movement. Proper lighting should be provided at a minimum height of 2.1 metres as shown on
figure 7.2. (1.5 of Toronto accessibility guidelines.)
Figure 7.2: Light cut-of angle requirement for visibility
McMaster University Chapter 7
61
7.4 CONSIDERATIONS TO MAXIMIZE RESILIENCE TO CLIMATE CHANGE,
POWER AVAILABILITY FLUCTUATIONS, PEAK OIL EFFECTS
In order to maximize resilience to climate change, power availability fluctuations, and peak
oil effects, the strategy used by in this project is reducing dependence on cars, creating a more
vibrant city, and promoting mixing of housing and a diverse population. As global warming
becomes more visible, effects such as temperature rise, excessive rain and drought are taken into
consideration in the project.
According to U.S. Geological Survey (2000) data, U.S. buildings consume up to 40% of
total primary energy use, 72% of electricity consumption, 39% of Carbon Dioxide emissions,
and 13.6% potable water consumption. Therefore, green buildings play a very important role of
effective resilience against mentioned factors. Water usage could be reduced by installing
rain-water harvesting systems at all houses within the area. Each newly developed residential
unit should be equipped with low-flow faucet heads. All new buildings will be built with
high insulating materials as identified in chapter 2. To further decrease energy reliability, all new
buildings have been designed with the potential of using applicable green features such as solar
panels and passive solar. Large buildings will incorporate loads of intense green roofs. Modern
climate effects from global warming could lead to unexpected weather and thus proper storm
water diverting would become an issue for a fast growing area. Green roofs help reducing such
affects by intercepting rain. An energy store that sells green products such as reduced-flow
faucet/shower heads, incandescent light bulbs, rainwater harvesting systems, etc. located within
the high density neighbourhood area would greatly promote resource efficiency.
Transportation should be vibrant and not limited to cars only. All three neighbourhoods are
designed with bicycle lanes and wide sidewalks. The transit system goes through the majority of
the high density areas so there more options for travelling without driving. The neighbourhood is
designed such that walking and biking is much more convenient than driving due to the location
of roads and trails.
McMaster University Chapter 7
62
The development area is designed with a mixed use of buildings that are connected
together with convenient walk and bike paths. The main idea is to have buildings placed in such
way that ordinary necessities can be obtained without driving.
7.5 ECONOMICS
Economics is one of many important parts of a sustainable design. The primary content of
engineering economics is the evaluation of costs and benefits. In order to satisfy the revenue
neutral development for the project, cost and revenue details are introduced in this section.
Costs
There are three kinds of costs being considered in this section: fixed costs, variable costs,
and semi variable costs. Fixed costs are costs that remain the same, regardless of the volume
index. Variable costs are costs that change depending on the volume index. And semi-variable
costs are a combination of fixed costs and variable costs.
Table 7.1 is the estimation of initial costs based on Local Government Policy and
Regulatory Environment including materials, labour, and construction costs. The residential area
in this table includes all the houses, townhouses, and low-rise buildings; the commercial area is
mainly in the public building area of the project which consist of shopping malls, convenient
stores, hospital, schools, office buildings, and so on; and the institutional area includes all public
spaces such as streets, parking lots, and public green spaces. The total initial cost is calculated as
470 million dollars from this table. The initial cost will be spent only on the first year. The
annual renovation cost changes with time and assumed as increasing linearly with a rate of 0.5%.
The annual renovation is shown in Table 7.3.
Table 7.1: Initial Costs
Usage Area (ft2) Cost ($/ft
2)
Residential 765,285 100
Commercial 791,680 170
Institutional 1,335,085 195
McMaster University Chapter 7
63
Revenues
Revenues are mainly from component percentages discussed in previous chapters and the
development charges which are given in City of Hamilton Development Charge Information. The
total annual revenue is estimated as 44.5 million dollars from Table 7.2. This revenue value is
assumed increasing with a rate 0.5% annually.
Table 7.2: Financial Statement of Annual Revenues
Usage
Residential Charges ($) Non-
Residential
(per ft2) Houses
(per unit)
Apartments 2+
bedrooms
(per unit)
Apartments
Bachelor & 1
bedroom (per unit)
Town
houses
(per unit)
City 26,927 16,626 11,094 19,300 15.19
Transit 215 133 89 154
Education 610 610 610 610 0.18
Total charge
(without tax) 27,752 17,369 11,793 20,064 15.37
Tax rate (%) 1.479 1.479 1.479 1.479 3.231
Total charge
(with tax) 28,163 17,626 11,968 20,360 N.A
Final Cash Flow
From Table 7.3 and Table 7.4, the total cost of 20 years is 1.68 billion dollars while the
total revenue is 1.56 billion. This result is close to a revenue neutral development.
Figure 7.3: Cash Flow Diagram
McMaster University Chapter 7
64
Table 7.3: Cost of Development
Year (n) Initial ($) Renovation ($) N (=20-n) Convert to Future value
($)
0 471,455,675 0 20 1,033,017,440
1 0 2,357,278 19 4,966,430
2 0 4,714,557 18 9,550,827
3 0 7,071,835 17 13,775,231
4 0 9,429,114 16 17,660,553
5 0 11,786,392 15 21,226,626
6 0 14,143,670 14 24,492,261
7 0 16,500,949 13 27,475,292
8 0 18,858,227 12 30,192,629
9 0 21,215,505 11 32,660,296
10 0 23,572,784 10 34,893,478
11 0 25,930,062 9 36,906,564
12 0 28,287,341 8 38,713,179
13 0 30,644,619 7 40,326,228
14 0 33,001,897 6 41,757,928
15 0 35,359,176 5 43,019,844
16 0 37,716,454 4 44,122,917
17 0 40,073,732 3 45,077,499
18 0 42,431,011 2 45,893,381
19 0 44,788,289 1 46,579,821
20 0 47,145,568 0 47,145,568
Total (in billion dollars) 1.68
McMaster University Chapter 7
65
Table 7.4: Revenue of Development
Year
(n)
Annual Revenue ($) N (=20-n) Convert to Future
value ($)
0 46,782,621 20 102,506,484
1 47,016,534 19 99,056,746
2 47,250,447 18 95,720,736
3 47,484,360 17 92,494,809
4 47,718,273 16 89,375,431
5 47,952,186 15 86,359,179
6 48,186,099 14 83,442,734
7 48,420,012 13 80,622,880
8 48,653,925 12 77,896,503
9 48,887,838 11 75,260,582
10 49,121,752 10 72,712,193
11 49,355,665 9 70,248,501
12 49,589,578 8 67,866,762
13 49,823,491 7 65,564,316
14 50,057,404 6 63,338,586
15 50,291,317 5 61,187,077
16 50,525,230 4 59,107,374
17 50,759,143 3 57,097,134
18 50,993,056 2 55,154,090
19 51,226,970 1 53,276,049
20 51,460,883 0 51,460,883
Total (in billion dollars) 1.56
McMaster University Chapter 8
66
Chapter 8
STRUCTURAL DESIGN
McMaster University Chapter 8
67
8 STRUCTURAL DESIGN
8.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
As part of the redevelopment in the Hamilton West Harbour area, the project consists of
the structural design of a 3 storey mixed use building. Its location is chosen at the intersection of
Barton Street and Bay Street based on the LEED rating system (Canada Green Building
Council2). The ground floor will be used as retail, second floor will be offices, and third floor
will be residential apartments. Total floor area is 2850m2 and 950m
2 for each floor with
dimension N-S×E-W of 48m×19.8m. Figure 8.1 shows an architecture model of the mixed use
building. The design of the building consists of derivation of gravity loads, derivation of wind
and seismic loads, and structure member sizing for critical beams, girders, columns, braced
frames and connections according to the National Building Code of Canada 2010, CISC Steel
Handbook 10th
edition and CISC Limit States Design in Structural Steel 10th
edition. Moreover,
green building elements, building envelope, foundation design and physical modeling are also
included in this chapter.
Figure 8.1: Architecture Model of Multi-use Building
2 Score evolution and explanation available in Section 9.3.1 Sustainable Sites on page 125
McMaster University Chapter 8
68
8.2 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM SELECTION
8.2.1 Preliminary Structural Design
Figure 8.2: Preliminary Structural Design
Originally, the building and all of its elements was to be designed using reinforced
concrete. As shown in Figure 8.2, columns are spaced at 3.6m vertically, and 4m horizontally.
The main rationale behind this kind of building shape and position of line of symmetry is to have
the maximum daylight by maximizing south facing wall area. Moreover, the building is designed
to be narrow to allow daylight to penetrate through the building which then reduces the energy
demand once the building is in operation. Concrete is chosen because it is easy to obtain and a
variety of shapes can be formed using it. Also, steel would act as thermal bridge whereas
concrete is less thermal conductive. Therefore, concrete is better than steel regarding the heat
loss and energy efficiency of the building. However, due to the complexity of structure design
related to non-symmetric building shape, this preliminary design is further discussed among the
group and decided to be replaced by the following design.
McMaster University Chapter 8
69
8.2.2 Final Structural Design
Nowadays, structural solution for low rise buildings is often obtained by integrating two
different load resisting systems in the same structure. Both systems are connected together by
means of floor structures, which provide a rigid diaphragm at each storey level. Since the first
floor of multi-use building is used as retail, large open space is preferred. Comparing wood,
masonry, concrete and steel, steel offers more usable space because of the longer spans and
larger column spacing can be used. Most importantly, Steel is almost hundred percent recyclable
without any loss of quality, whereas concrete is not completely recyclable. As a result, steel is
chosen to be the material for the structural members. To ease construction and procurement
process, shear wall is not considered in the design. Therefore, The 3-storey mixed use building is
designed to be built with steel frame and bracing system.
Figure 8.3: Typical Floor of Final Structural Design
As shown in Figure 8.3, the cross-section of the building is designed to be symmetric about
both the East West axis and the North South axis. Beams are spaced horizontally at 3.2m; girders
McMaster University Chapter 8
70
are spaced vertically at 6.6m. For columns, horizontal spacing is 9.6m, and vertical spacing is
6.6m. Furthermore, W shaped structural steel sections are selected to be beams, girders and
columns since their shape offers efficient resistance to bending moments and as column to carry
axial loads.
Composite floor system is selected for all floor slabs. The system consists of a high
strength profiled steel deck and a structural concrete slab with welded wire fabric and additional
reinforcement when specified. Since the concrete slab acts as part of the beam to take
compression, this leads to the reduction of total floor depth; this floor system is economical and
efficient because the size of steel beams can be significantly reduced.
100mm thick hollow concrete block is selected to construct non-structural partition walls.
Comparing it to wood, concrete block is more durable and energy efficient because the block
acts as a reservoir to trap and store heat. Additionally, concrete block has good resistance to fire
and noise. According to CISC Steel handbook, 100mm thick hollow concrete block has a density
of 1.1 kPa which is less than that of solid bricks. As a result, 1.1 kPa is considered as specific
dead load on the floor in the design criteria.
Table 8.1: Material Selection Summary3
Structural members Material
Beam, girder and column W shape steel sections
Floor slab Concrete slab on profiled steel deck
Roof Conventional build up system
Non-structural partition wall 100mm thick hollow concrete block
3 For more information on material selection of covering, roofing, windows and doors please see Chapter 2:
Material Selection
McMaster University Chapter 8
71
8.3 DESIGN CRITERIA SUMMARY
Location: Hamilton, Ontario (Appendix C, NBCC2010)
Snow Load (1/50 return year): Ss=0.9, Sr =0.4
Hourly Wind Pressure (1/50 return year): 0.46 kPa
Importance Category: Normal (Table 4.1.2.1, NBCC2010)
Storey Height Restrictions: minimum ceiling height is 2.1m (Table 9.5.3.1, NBCC2010)
Table 8.2: Floor Heights Summary
Total floor height
(mm)
Floor to ceiling height
(mm)
3rd
(Residential) 3,500 2,850
2nd
(Office) 3,500 2,850
Ground(Retail) 5,000 4,350
Figure 8.4: Elevation View between Grid M and P (Dimensions: mm)
McMaster University Chapter 8
72
Figure 8.4 shows an elevation of the building, along grid line 3 and between grid lines M
and P, illustrating the floor heights. Elevations shown are top of slab.
Specified Dead Loads - Roof: (CISC Steel Handbook, pg 7-56)
Table 8.3: Specified Dead Loads on Roof
kPa
Roof finish-3ply asphalt, no gravel 0.15
Insulation 0.1
Steel deck 0.1
Ceiling 0.2
Mechanical system 0.2
Green roof 0.684
Steel concrete composite slab 1.98
Total 3.41
Specified Dead Loads - Office Floor and Residential Floor: (CISC Steel Handbook, pg 7-56)
Table 8.4: Specified Dead Load on Office and Residential Floor
kPa
Floor finish, hardwood (bamboo) 0.08
Ceiling 0.2
Ducts/pipes/wiring 0.25
Non-structural partition wall 1.1
Steel concrete composite slab 1.98
Total 3.61
4 Detailed Calculation of Green roof dead load available in Appendix A on page A-37
McMaster University Chapter 8
73
Specified Live Loads: (NBCC2010 Table 4.1.5.3)
Table 8.5: Specified Live Loads Summary
Live Load Reduction:
0.3+√ (9.8/B), where B, tributary Area, is greater than 20m2, NBCC2010 4.1.5.8(3)
Serviceability Criteria:
Max allowable deflection due to live load = L/300 (Steel Handbook Table D.1 pg 1-146)
For beams: max allowable deflection = 6600/300 = 22mm
For girders: max allowable deflection = 9600/300 = 32 mm
Drift limit:
The deflection criteria given in CISC CSA S16-09 Table D.1 states that lateral
deflection should not exceed h/400 (12000mm/400 = 30mm)
Inter storey deflections limit for seismic (NBCC 2010 Section 4.1.8.13)
2nd
(Office): 2.5% h = 0.025 x 5000 = 125 mm
3rd
(Residential):2.5% h = 0.0025 x 3500 = 87.5 mm
Roof: 2.5%h = 0.025 x 2500 = 87.5 mm
Note: All the drift limit are checked in 8.6.4 Lateral bracing design using results from
SAP2000
kPa
Roof 1
Office 2.4
Residential 1.9
Service core, corridors and balcony 4.8
McMaster University Chapter 8
74
8.4 FIRE PROTECTION
Major occupancy: (NBCC 2010 Appendix A, A-3.1.2.1.)
Group E- Retails, Shops
Group D-Offices
Group C-Residential Apartments
Type of construction: non combustible
Building height: 3 storeys (12 m)
Building area=950 m2 /each floor
Firefighting accessibility: facing 2 streets (Bay Street and Barton Street, Hamilton)
From NBCC 2010 table 3.1.3.1
Minimum Fire-Resistance Rating of Fire separation = 2 hours
8.5 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM FOR GRAVITY LOADS
The gravity loads of 3-storey steel framed building comprise a simply supported system of
vertical columns interconnected by horizontal beams, which supports the composite floors and
roofing. The loads on the lower lever columns will include the loads passed down through the
columns above in addition to the loads from the slab the column is supporting. The gravity load
combinations considered for the design are:
Case 2: 1.25DL+1.5L+0.5S
Case 3: 1.25DL+1.5S+0.5L (Table 4.1.3.2 NBCC2010)
Case 3 is used for member sizing of roof design and Case 2 is used for member sizing of
office and residential floor design. The vertical loads due to snow, dead and live loads are
distributed to the columns through tributary areas.
McMaster University Chapter 8
75
8.5.1 Design Of Slab
Assumption: One way slab is used for the entire building.
Composite Slab Selection: CD75-200(Galvanneal)5
Base steel = 0.914 mm, slab depth= 130mm, self-weight= 1.98 kPa
Fire rating = 2 hours for slab with thickness of 130mm, fire protection requirement met.
Figure 8.5: Slab Cross Section (Dimension: mm)
CD75-200 Galvanneal is used for the slab of office floor, residential floor and roof. It is
designed to carry maximum load combination according to the technical sheet and max
deflections are checked respectively.
Note:
Sample calculation of slab design is available in Appendix A page A-1
Technical sheet is available in Appendix A.
5 Retrieved from Agway Metals Inc. http://www.agwaymetals.com/products_decking.asp
McMaster University Chapter 8
76
8.5.2 Roof System
Figure 8.6: Load Distribution on Roof Slab (Dimension: mm)
Figure 8.6 shows the load distribution on the roof. Live load is 1 kPa, dead load=3.41 kPa,
snow load=1.12 kPa, wind uplift load= -0.95 kPa6, and they are all uniformly distributed on the
entire flat roof. As indicated with “*” sign Figure 6, Beam 1, Beam 2, Girder 1, Girder 2 are
designed to carry maximum shear and moment according to their tributary areas.
6 Sample calculation of Snow Load and wind uplift load available in Appendix A Page A-2
McMaster University Chapter 8
77
Location:
Beam 1(B1*): on Axis A from Axis 3 to Axis 6 on the roof
Beam 2(B2*): on Axis D from Axis 6 to Axis 8 on the roof
Girder 1(G1*): on Axis 8 from Axis G to Axis J on the roof
Girder 2(G2*): on Axis 6 from Axis G to Axis J on the roof
Table 8.6: Beam Sizing Summary of Roof System
Max V(kN) Max M(kN.m) Selection Mr(kN.m) Vr(kN) Deflection(mm)
Beam 1 34.9 57.5 W310X21 89.1 303 5.34
Beam 2 69.1 114 W310X28 126 380 7.14
Table 8.7: Girder Sizing Summary of Roof System
Max V(kN) Max M(kN.m) Selection Mr(kN.m) Vr(kN) Deflection(mm)
Girder 1 70.8 224 W410X46 275 578 12.24
Girder 2 140 445 W530X66 484 928 10.46
Table 8.6 and Table 8.7 show a summary of member sizing as well as the deflections due
to live load only. Most economical sizes are picked from CISC Steel Handbook based on their
moment capacity. Also, deflections are checked with maximum allowable deflections shown in
design criteria summary. Moreover, a detailed roof framing plan is available in Appendix C,
drawing Str-1.
Note:
Sample calculation of Beam 1 design is available in Appendix A page A-3
Sample calculation of Beam 2 design is available in Appendix A page A-4
Sample calculation of Girder 1 design is available in Appendix A page A-13
Sample calculation of Girder 2 design is available in Appendix A page A-14
McMaster University Chapter 8
78
8.5.3 Residential Floor Framing Plan
Figure 8.7: Load Distribution on Residential Floor Slab (Dimension: mm)
Figure 8.7 shows the load distribution on the 3rd
floor slab. Shadowed area are associated
with corridor and balconies, so the live load is 4.8 kPa, whereas the live load of unshadowed area
is 1.9 kPa based on its occupancies. Also, dead load of 3.61 is assumed to be uniformly
distributed on the floor. As indicated with “*” sign Figure 7, Beam 3, Beam 4, Beam 5, Beam 6,
Girder 3, Girder 4 are designed to carry maximum shear and moment according to their tributary
areas.
McMaster University Chapter 8
79
Location:
Beam 3(B3*): on Axis D from Axis 6 to Axis 8 on the 3rd
floor slab
Beam 4(B4*): on Axis G from Axis 6 to Axis 8 on the 3rd
floor slab
Beam 5(B5*): on Axis I from Axis 6 to Axis 8 on the 3rd
floor slab
Beam 6(B6*): on Axis A from Axis 3 to Axis 6 on the 3rd
floor slab
Girder 3(G3*): on Axis 6 from Axis G to Axis J on the 3rd
floor slab
Girder 4(G4*): on Axis 8 from Axis G to Axis J on the 3rd
floor slab
Table 8.8: Beam Sizing Summary of Residential Floor
Max V(kN) Max M(kN.m) Selection Mr(kN.m) Vr(kN) Deflection(mm)
Beam 3 78.5 130 W360X33 168 396 8.91
Beam 4 101 167 W360X33 168 396 15.71
Beam 5 124 204 W410X39 227 480 14.66
Beam 6 63.0 104 W310X28 126 380 17.47
Table 8.9: Girder Sizing Summary of Residential Floor
Max V(kN) Max M(kN.m) Selection Mr(kN.m) Vr(kN) Deflection(mm)
Girder 3 257 816 W610X101 900 1,300 21.56
Girder 4 105 334 W460X52 338 680 27.53
Table 8.8 and Table 8.9 show a summary of member sizing for residential floor as well as
the deflections due to live load only. Most economical sizes are picked from CISC Steel
Handbook based on their moment capacity. Also, deflections are checked with maximum
allowable deflections shown in design criteria summary. Moreover, a detailed residential floor
framing plan is available in Appendix C, drawing Str-2.
McMaster University Chapter 8
80
Note:
Sample calculation of Beam 3 design is available in Appendix A on page A-5
Sample calculation of Beam 4 design is available in Appendix A on page A-6
Sample calculation of Beam 5 design is available in Appendix A on page A-7
Sample calculation of Beam 6 design is available in Appendix A on page A-8
Sample calculation of Girder 3 design is available in Appendix A on page A-15
Sample calculation of Girder 4 design is available in Appendix A on page A-16
8.5.4 Office Floor Framing Plan
Figure 8.8: Load Distribution on Office Floor Slab (Dimension: mm)
McMaster University Chapter 8
81
Figure 8.8 shows the load distribution on the 2nd
floor slab. Shadowed area are associated
with corridor, so the live load is 4.8 kPa, whereas the live load of unshadowed area is 2.4 kPa
based on its occupancies. Also, dead load of 3.61 is assumed to be uniformly distributed on the
floor. The following members are designed to carry maximum shear and moment according to
their tributary areas.
Location:
Beam 7(B7*): on Axis D from Axis 6 to Axis 8 on the 2nd
floor slab
Beam 8(B8*): on Axis G from Axis 6 to Axis 8 on the 2nd
floor slab
Beam 9(B9*): on Axis I from Axis 6 to Axis 8 on the 2nd
floor slab
Beam 10(B10*): on Axis A from Axis 3 to Axis 6 on the 2nd
floor slab
Girder 5(G5*): on Axis 6 from Axis G to Axis J on the 2nd
floor slab
Girder 6(G6*): on Axis 8 from Axis G to Axis J on the 2nd
floor slab
Column 1: at intersection of Axis G and Axis 6
Column 2: at intersection of Axis G and Axis 8
Table 8.10: Beam Sizing Summary of Office Floor
Max V(kN) Max M(kN.m) Selection Mr(kN.m) Vr(kN) Deflection(mm)
Beam 7 86.3 142 W360X33 168 396 11.26
Beam 8 105 174 W410X39 227 480 10.99
Beam 9 124 204 W410X39 227 480 14.66
Beam 10 63.0 104 W310X28 126 380 17.47
Table 8.11: Girder Sizing Summary of Office Floor
Max V(kN) Max M(kN.m) Selection Mr(kN.m) Vr(kN) Deflection(mm)
Girder 5 257 816 W610X101 900 1,300 21.56
Girder 6 90.1 286 W460X52 338 680 20.10
McMaster University Chapter 8
82
Table 8.12: Column Sizing Summary
Cf(kN) Selection Cr(KN)
Column 1 1,571 W250X73 1,680
Column 2 813 W200X52 928
Table 8.10, Table 8.11 and Table 8.12 show a summary of member sizing for office floor.
Columns are assumed to carry axial load only, and they are the same height, which is equal to the
floor height. Note that W250X73 is used for all columns for simplicity, and overdesign is
assumed to be neglected in this project. Moreover, a detailed office floor framing plan is
available in Appendix C, drawing Str-3.
Note:
Sample calculation of Beam 7 design is available in Appendix A on page A-9
Sample calculation of Beam 8 design is available in Appendix A on page A-10
Sample calculation of Beam 9 design is available in Appendix A on page A-11
Sample calculation of Beam 10 design is available in Appendix A on page A-12
Sample calculation of Girder 5 design is available in Appendix A on page A-17
Sample calculation of Girder 6 design is available in Appendix A on page A-18
Sample calculation of Column 1 design is available in Appendix A on page A-19
Sample calculation of Column 2 design is available in Appendix A on page A-20
McMaster University Chapter 8
83
8.6 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM FOR LATERAL LOAD
The lateral loads that are considered in this design are the wind loads and seismic loads.
The building acts as a cantilever member against both types of loading. Braced frames system is
used to resist the lateral loads and to limit the drift within acceptable range which is specified in
design criteria on page 71. As shown on Figure 8.9 , there are four braced frames indicated as
BF1, BF2, BF3 and BF4, and they are designed to carry all the lateral loads. (CISC Steel
Handbook, Cl 27.5)
Figure 8.9: Lateral-Load-Resisting System Plan View (dimension: mm)
BF1: on Axis 8 from Axis M and Axis P
BF2: on Axis J from Axis 1 and Axis 3
BF3: on Axis G from Axis 6 and Axis 8
BF4: on Axis 1 from Axis A and Axis D
McMaster University Chapter 8
84
Assume that all braced frames have identical stiffness.
Centre of Rigidity: Xr = 24m , Yr = 9.9m ( Note that 10% distance will be accounted in the
design of torsional moment)
8.6.1 Derivation of Wind Load
For wind load, the force hits the outer walls of the building, and then is transferred to each
floor slab system attached perpendicular to the outer walls. Ultimately, the force is transferred to
four braced frames which in turn only resist lateral loads.
Table 8.13: Wind Load Summary
Level At (m2) Ae (m
2)
0.835At
(kN)
0.601Ae
(kN)
Eccentricity
(m)
Factored
Wind
Load (kN)
Factored
Torsion
(kN)
Roof 84.0 16.8 70.1 10.1 19.2 80.2 193.9
3rd
168.0 33.6 140.3 20.2 19.2 160.5 387.8
2nd
204.0 40.8 170.3 24.5 19.2 194.8 470.9
Table 8.14: Design Forces Due to Wind Torsion
Design Forces (kN)
Level Moment (kN.m) BF1 BF2 BF3 BF4
Roof 193.9 -8 3 -3 8
3rd 387.8 -16 6 -6 16
2nd 470.9 -20 8 -8 20
Note
Sample calculation available in Appendix A on page A-21
McMaster University Chapter 8
85
Notional Load (P-Δ Effect)
Gravity begins to act on structural members when the frame or structure is laterally
displaced by either seismic or wind loadings, which will cause a secondary effect (P-Δ effect) of
the forces and moments which in turn cause additional displacement. The P-Δ effect reduces
frame lateral resistance and stiffness which may lead to collapse. However, this three-story
building is designed to be relatively stiff so that P-Δ effects are minimal and are not very
significant (the changes in displacements and member forces are less than 10%) which can be
neglect. The drift is presented in section 8.6.4 on page 92.
Distribution of Wind Loads (NBCC 2010 Cl4.1.7.1Table 4.1.7.1)
1) Wind in South North Direction
Table 8.15: South North Wind Load Distribution
Stiffness Design Force (kN)
Frame (k) d Kd2 Kd
2/(Σkd
2) Roof 3
rd Floor 2
nd Floor
BF3 1 4.8 23.04 0.095 43.96 87.92 106.76
BF2 1 -4.8 23.04 0.095 36.27 72.54 88.09
BF4 1 -9.9 98.01 0.405 7.93 15.86 19.26
BF1 1 9.9 98.01 0.405 7.93 15.86 19.26
Sum 242.1 1
Note:
Sample calculation of Design Forces about Frame BF3, 3rd
floor is available in
Appendix A on page A-22
McMaster University Chapter 8
86
2) Wind in West East Direction
Table 8.16: West East Wind Load Distribution
Stiffness Design Force (kN)
Frame (k) d Kd2 Kd
2/(Σkd
2) Roof 3
rd Floor 2
nd Floor
BF3 1 4.8 23.04 0.095 3.84 7.69 9.34
BF2 1 -4.8 23.04 0.095 3.84 7.69 9.34
BF4 1 -9.9 98.01 0.405 32.19 64.37 78.17
BF1 1 9.9 98.01 0.405 48.04 96.09 116.68
Sum 242.1 1
Note :
Sample calculation of Design Forces about Frame BF3, 3rd
floor is available in
Appendix A on page A-22
8.6.2 Mass of each floor
Dead load of each floor is calculated based on following elements:
Dead load on the slab (refer to specified dead loads in design criteria on page 72)
Weight of beams
Weight of girders
Weight of columns (half above + half below the floor level)
Weight of interior wall (half above + half below the floor level)
Weight of exterior wall (half above + half below the floor level)
Weight of doors
Weight of windows
Live load of each floor is calculated based on specified live loads in design criteria on page
73 and associated tributary areas.
McMaster University Chapter 8
87
Table 8.17: Mass of Each Floor Summary
Dead(kN) Live (kN) Snow(KN)
Seismic
weight (D +
25%S)KN
Total (1.25D +
1.5L + 0.5S)kN
2nd
Floor(Office) 4161 3193 0 4161 9992
3rd
Floor(Residential) 4299 3459 0 4299 10563
Roof 4271 950 1064 4537 7409
Figure 8.10: Seismic Weights at Each Level According to NBCC2010
Note
Sample calculations of masses of 2nd
floor are available in Appendix A on page A-23
McMaster University Chapter 8
88
8.6.3 Derivation of Seismic Load
In comparison with wind load, the seismic loading occurs just below the foundation of the
building. The building is swayed back and forth, each floor weight directly above the braced
frames will have acceleration and therefore, a lateral force is produced on the top of the braced
frames.
From NBCC 2010 - Division B Section 4.1.8
Table 8.18: Seismic Load Summary
Level Storey
Height(m) Wi(kN) hi(m)
Base
V(kN) ∑Wh
Wihi/∑
Wh
Fx
(kN)
Vi
(kN)
M
(kNm)
Roof* 3.5 4537 12 900 111788 0.487 438 438 0
3rd
3.5 4299 8.5 900 111788 0.327 294 732 1534
2nd
5 4161 5 900 111788 0.186 167 900 4097
Ground 0 0 0 900 10352
Accidental Torsion
From NBCC 4.1.8.11 (10)
Table 8.19: Accidental Torsion Due to Seismic Load
Level Fx (kN)
Design eccentricity, e (m)
ex + 0.10 Dnx ex - 0.10 Dnx
4.8 -4.8
Torsional moment, Tx = Fx*e (kN.m)
3rd
438 2,103 -2,103
2nd
294 1,412 -1,412
Ground 167 804 -804
McMaster University Chapter 8
89
Table 8.20: Design Forces Due to Seismic Torsion
Design Forces (kN)
Level Moment (kN.m) BF1 BF2 BF3 BF4
Roof* 2103 -90 33 -33 90
3rd 1412 -60 23 -23 60
2nd 804 -34 13 -13 34
Note: Sample calculations available in Appendix A on page A- 25 to page A-26
8.6.4 Lateral Bracing System Design
The load combinations used to analyze the lateral bracing system are the following:
Case 4: 1.25 D + 1.4 W + 0.5 L (NBCC2010Table 4.1.3.2)
Case 5*: 1 D + 1 E + 0.5 L + 0.25 S (NBCC2010Table 4.1.3.2)
Since factored seismic loads are much higher than factored wind loads as seen in previous
calculations, it was concluded that load case 5 will govern the design of the lateral bracing
system. The lateral bracing system was modeled in SAP2000 to find the factored axial load
applied on the brace.
*Dead, live and snow loads calculated previously were multiplied with the appropriate
factors and applied on the model. Seismic loads calculated previously were added to forces due
to torsion and applied on the model.
McMaster University Chapter 8
90
Lateral Bracing System (BF1 and BF4)
L 152 x 102 x 19 was chosen to act as a brace for all three floors since its compressive resistance
with effective length of 7 m is 539kN which is higher than the factored axial load of 521 kN
shown in Figure 8.12. (CISC CSA S16-09, P-4-126)
W460X52
W460X52
W410X46
L152X102X19-10 L152X102X19-10
L152X10
2X19-10 L152X102X19-10
L152X102X19-10 L152X102X19-10
W25
0X73
W25
0X73
X
Z0
.51
51.
85
51.
85
51.
85
51.
85
0.5
15
6.90
56.
90
56.
90
56.
90
0.4
54
4.25
44.
25
44.
25
44.
25
118.00
207.00
309.00
X
Z
Figure 8.11: BF1 and BF4 Member Sizes and Case 5 Load (SAP2000)
-308
.32
326.
04
-307
.54
206.
83
-309
.42
0.72
234.23
-402.3
5
394.35
-521.6
5
125.92
-257.9
0
33.44
-44.33
-51.80
-567.75
-270.47
-51.80
X
Z
Figure 8.12: BF1 and BF4 Axial Force Diagram (SAP2000)
McMaster University Chapter 8
91
Bracing System (BF2 and BF3)
L 152 x 102 x 19 was chosen to act as a brace for all three floors since its compressive resistance
with effective length of 6 m is 696 kN which is higher than the factored axial load of 514 kN
shown in Figure 8.14. (CISC CSA S16-09, P-4-126)
W360X33
W360X33
W310X28
L152X102X19-10 L152X102X19-10
L152
X102X19
-10 L152X102X19-10
L152X102X19-10 L152X102X19-10
W25
0X73
W25
0X73
X
Z
17.5
917
.13
13.6
6
97.00
170.00
252.00
X
Z
Figure 8.13: BF2 and BF3 Member Sizes and Case 5 Load (SAP2000)
-275
.06 244.3
5
-268
.93
151.6
5
-252
.30
0.54
258.25
-354.83
427.99
-514.94
145.60-222.97
233.76
67.63
-16.92
-480.48
-200.54
-16.92
X
Z
Figure 8.14: BF2 and BF3 Axial Force Diagram
McMaster University Chapter 8
92
Drift Limit Check:
Figure 8.15: Drift Due to Seismic Load
Table 8.21: Drift Limit Check
Storey
Deflections
obtained
from
SAP2000
Interstorey
Deflections
Δe (mm)*
Deflection x
RdRo/IE (mm)
Interstorey
Deflections
Limit (mm)
Check
2nd
3.96 3.96 15.44 125 OK
3rd
7.19 3.23 12.60 87.5 OK
Roof 10.12 2.93 11.43 87.5 OK
Sample calculation for 3rd
level drift:
Deflection obtained from SAP2000 = 7.19 mm
Interstorey deflection: Δe = 7.19 – 3.96 = 3.23 mm
Rd = 3, Ro= 1.3, IE=1 (NBCC-2010 Cl 4.1.8.13)
Δm = Δe(RdRo/IE) = 3.23 x3x1.3/1=12.60 mm < 87.5 mm ok
All deflection limits which are specific in design criteria on page 73 are met, also notice that
the drift is within 10%, so notional load is neglected as discussed on page 85.
McMaster University Chapter 8
93
8.7 CONNECTIONS DETAIL
Unlike concrete, connections in steel structures need special design. For this 3 storey
mixed use building, bolts and double angle plates are used for connections between beam to
girder, beam to column, and girder to column. Also, slab to beam connection, column to column
connection, as well as connection to braced frame will also be specified in the design. All the
connection elements are designed for the maximum shear and bearing, and detailed connections
drawings are in drawing Str-4 of Appendix C.
8.7.1 Beam to Girder Connection
Table 8.22: Beam to Girder Connection Detail
Member Section
Bearing
Resistance (Br),
kN
Shear Resistance
(Vr), kN
Tension and
Shear (Tr), kN
Beam W410×39 138.24 501 NA
Girder W610×101 226.8 1002 NA
Double Angle L89×89×7.9 NA 201 183
For this connection, the maximum shear due to factored loads is 123.8 kN. L89×89×7.9
connection angles, 150 mm long, and two M20 A325 M bolts per vertical line in both
web-framing and outstanding legs are used.
Note: Sample calculations available in Appendix A on page A-27
McMaster University Chapter 8
94
8.7.2 Beam to Column Connection
Table 8.23: Beam to Column Connection Detail
Member Section
Bearing
Resistance (Br),
kN
Shear Resistance
(Vr), kN
Tension and
Shear (Tr), kN
Beam W410×39 138.24 501 NA
Column W250×73 185.76 1002 NA
Double Angle L89×89×7.9 NA 201 183
Note that, for this connection, stiffeners used on column to prevent local buckling of flange.
Detailed drawing of this connection is in drawing Str-4 of Appendix C and sample calculations
are available in Appendix A on page A-29
For this connection, the maximum shear due to factored loads is 123.8 kN. L89×89×7.9
connection angles, 150 mm long, and two M20 A325 M bolts per vertical line in both
web-framing and outstanding legs are used.
8.7.3 Girder to Column Connection
Table 8.24: Girder to Column Connection Detail
Member Section
Bearing
Resistance (Br),
kN
Shear Resistance
(Vr), kN
Tension and
Shear (Tr), kN
Column W250×73 274 501 NA
Girder W610×101 226.8 501 NA
Double Angle L89×89×13 NA 321.5 292.8
For girder to column connection, the maximum shear due to factored loads is 256.5 kN.
L89×89×13 connection angles, 150 mm long, and two M20 A325 M bolts per vertical line in
McMaster University Chapter 8
95
both web-framing and outstanding legs are used. Sample calculations available in Appendix A
on page A- 31
8.7.4 Slab to Beam Connection
Figure 8.16: Slab to Beam Connection
This connection is designed mainly to resist the shear force due to wind load by providing
enough shear studs. Refer to sample calculation in Appendix A on page A-34, two studs per row
at spacing of 660 mm are used for the connection.
8.7.5 Column to Column Connection
This connection is designed mainly for the axial force transferred from upper column to lower
column. Max axial load between columns is 585.2 kN (Appendix A page A-19).
Two bolts per row at spacing center to center spacing of 60 mm, and edge distance of 80 mm.
Refer to sample calculation in Appendix A on page A-36,
McMaster University Chapter 8
96
8.7.6 Connections to Braced Frame
Table 8.25: Bracing Connections Detail
Member Section
Bearing
Resistance (Br),
kN
Tension (Tr), kN Tension and
Shear (Tr), kN
Double Angle L152x102x19 NA 1256 1610
Plate NA 583 NA 388
Note: Sample calculations available in Appendix A on page A- 35
8.8 FOUNDATION DESIGN
Reactions obtained through the analysis of the structure using the different load cases were
used to determine the type and size of the adequate foundation. Since the three storey building is
made up of a steel frame with columns far spread apart, a spread footing is the most economical
and logical foundation. Combined footings and mat foundations are not used since support
reactions are not too large. The following figures show some of the reactions used to design
different aspects of the foundation specifically shear and tensile forces. Axial force was obtained
from gravity load system calculations. Results are listed below:
Column Base Plate Design: use 25 mm thick plate
Anchor Rod Design: use 1 inch anchor rod with a hole diameter of 34 mm
Bearing Capacity: 361 kPa
Footing Design: use tf = 450mm (rounding it up to the next 25mm)
use: 7-20M bars BEW (bottom each way)
Note: Sample calculation in Appendix A on page A-40 to page A-42
McMaster University Chapter 8
97
235.51
590.
97
283.49
910
.25
X
Z
272.83
31
7.9
1
361.17
94
4.0
6
X
Z
Figure 8.17: Bracing Frames Support Reactions
Figure 8.17 shows the support reactions of bracing frames, and they are used in the
calculation in Appendix C on page A-40
Since the bracing system handles all the lateral loads, there are no moments experienced at
the foundation level. Detailed calculation of the foundation design and its connection to the
column is provided in appendix A. Each column will be supported with a 2m x 2m spread
footing, 0.5m thick and 1.25m below grade. A detailed foundation drawing is provided in
drawing Str-5 of Appendix C.
McMaster University Chapter 8
98
8.8 GREEN BUILDING ELEMENTS
Objective:
LEED Gold certification (70 points, Canada Green Building Council)
8.8.1 Integrated Green Roof System
Three independent green elements which are green roof, solar panels and rainwater capture are
installed on the roof of the 3 storey mixed use building.
Green Roof: vegetables are planted on the top of roof, and occupy 624 m2 of the roof area. They
are designed to reduce runoff and energy consumption, and to provide pleasing views.
Solar Panels: 36 solar panels are provided by local supplier in Hamilton and installed on the top
of roof. They are designed to reduce electricity consumption.
Rainwater Capture: water is collected by channels which are installed under soil medium and
stored in a ground storage tank. The collected water is then used to flush toilets in the 3-storey
mixed use building.
Total dead load from integrated green roof system: 0.68 kPa uniformly distributed load.
Rainwater Capture System: annual rainwater capture: up to 534,500 Litres
36 Solar Panels: provide up to 15.8 MWh per year.
Note :
A detailed green roof drawing is available in Appendix C, drawing Arc-5.
More information about integrated green roof are available in Municipal Chapter 9.1 on
page 117
Sample calculation of energy saving and green roof load calculation are are available in
Appendix A on page A-37 and A-38
McMaster University Chapter 8
99
8.8.2 Exterior Insulation And Finish Systems (EIFS)
EIFS is a traditional cladding system. It provides great appearance by carving and
moulding it into variety of shapes. EIFS may cost more initially but it requires very low
maintenance costs. Since the system is exterior insulation, it reduces air infiltration and hence
decreases energy consumptions.
Figure 8.18: Exterior Insulation and Finish System7
8.8.3 Double Glazed, Low Emissivity Glass Windows
The window is a transparent opening in a wall that allows light pass through. Although its
main function is to provide a good view of outside, heat loss has to be considered for window
selection. In this case, double glazed window with low emissivity glass is selected because the
two panes of glass and a space between them reduce heat and noise transmission through the
window while admitting sufficient solar gain. The principal mechanism here is thermal radiation
from a warm pane of glass to a cooler pane. Coating a glass surface with a low emitting material
and facing that coating into the gap between the glass layers blocks a significant amount of this
radiant heat transfer, thus lowering the total heat flow through the window (Efficient Windows
Collaborative).
7 Retrieved from Inspecting the world http://www.nachi.org/water-damage-eifs.htm
McMaster University Chapter 8
100
8.8.4 Light-Emitting Diodes (LED Lights) and Occupancy Sensors
LED lamps are known as high energy efficiency lamps, and have been applied in many
residential, commercial building in recent year although its initial cost are higher than those of
fluorescent and incandescent lamps. For the 3 storey mixed use building, LED lights will be used
as exit signs as well as indoor lights.
Occupancy sensors automatically switch lights on and off based on whether the space is
occupied. They will be installed in hallway, washroom and meeting room. Both elements are
designed to cut down building electricity consumption.
8.8.5 Solar Wall
The solar wall technology is solar air heating system that heats building ventilation air and
improves indoor air quality. A solar wall will be installed on the south wall since south facing
wall get most of sunshine during the day. Solar heated air will be ducted through a fan system for
the air supply of the mechanical unit on the roof.
Figure 8.19: Low –E Glass Windows
McMaster University Chapter 8
101
Figure 8.20: The Mechanism of Solar System (Conserval Engineering,2010)
As shown in Figure 8.20, solar walls use solar energy to preheat intake air and reduce the load on
the heating systems. Perforated metal cladding panels create air cavities that feed the intake fan
at the top of the wall. This heated air is then distributed through the building. According to
Conserval Engineering Inc., installation can save 3-10 $/ft2 of heating fuel consumption.
McMaster University Chapter 8
102
8.8.6 Vestibule at the main Entrance
Figure 8.21: Floor layout of office floor
A vestibule which consists of a set of inner doors and a set of outer doors are shown in
Figure 8.21. Since only one set of doors open at given time, the vestibule can help to reduce air
infiltration to the building, leading to the reduction of heating and air conditioning loads
McMaster University Chapter 8
103
8.9 BUILDING ENVELOPE
In order to provide a satisfactory environment needed for health and comfort as well as to
improve building energy efficiency, building envelop is deeply considered in the design. The
building envelope includes all the building components that separate the indoors from the
outdoors8. In this project, building envelopes considered are the windows, exterior doors,
exterior walls, and roof.
The following performance issues are examined for the envelope systems when applicable:
Thermal performance
Moisture protection
Fire safety
Daylights
Table 8.26: Material selection summary for building envelope
Building Envelope Material Total Area (m2)
Windows Double glazed, low emissivity glass 368
Exterior Door Insulated steel doors 22.5
Exterior wall Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems 1423
Roof Green roof covering on top of roof finishing 950
Note: Areas are estimated based on AutoCAD drawing dimensions.
8 National Institute of Building Sciences http://www.wbdg.org/design/index.php
McMaster University Chapter 8
104
8.9.1 Windows
Thermal Performance: Very high solar heat transmitted through glass (greater than 60%).
By using insulation gas within windows, it will keep homes warmer in winter and cooler in
summer.
Moisture Protection: Due to a high insulation property from double glazed, low
emissivity glass, condensation is less likely to occur on the indoor side of the window because
temperature difference is low. However, condensation is more likely to occur on the outdoor side
of the window during winter times because the air is much cooler outside than the gas/inside side
of the window.
Fire Safety: Glass, and aluminum consists of the major materials of the window and has
very high fire resistance. Gas between windows is usually argon, a non-reactive noble gas.
Day Lights: Good amount of daylight transmitted, up to 64%.
Note: More information about windows is available
2.6.1 Window selection on page 27
8.8.3 Double glazed, low emissivity glass windows on page 99
8.9.2 Exterior Doors
Thermal Performance: If spacing between door and floor or doorframe is reduced,
aluminum/steel doors have an average thermal performance.
Moisture Protection: Aluminum/Steel is coated with rust and corrosion resistance
coating.
McMaster University Chapter 8
105
Fire Safety: All aluminum/steel doors selected for the building must have a two-hour fire
rating.
Day Lights: n/a
Note: More information about doors is available
2.6.2 Door selection on page 28
8.9.3 Exterior walls
Thermal Performance: 20 mm of thermal insulation board will provide superior heat
insulation. It is crucial to the building as steel is the main material.
Moisture Protection: The EIFS is designed with a primary and secondary drain joints that
will drain any excessive moisture. Moisture penetration should be checked prior to installation
by technicians to ensure quality of EIFS walls.
Fire Safety: Core of EIFS is foam plastic, it must be completely encapsulated with the
base coat. By following building and fire codes, and using judgements of placing fire hazard
materials, EIFS could prove to be long lasting and safe.
Day Lights: n/a
Note: More information about exterior wall is available
2.4.1 Exterior cladding on page 21
8.8.2 Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems (EIFS) on page 99
8.8.5 Solar wall on page 100
McMaster University Chapter 8
106
8.9.4 Roof
Thermal Performance: Extensive green roof with a 30 cm thick soil and a blanket of
vegetation on top provides extremely good thermal resistance. Green roof will help reduce heat
loss in winter and significantly cool the building in summer.
Moisture Protection: A rainwater capture system, along with draining channel is designed
under the green roof vegetation and soil. All excessive water leaked through the soil and member
will be directed away to a storage tank to prevent any water accumulated on the rooftop.
Therefore, the roof is constantly dry and is superior with moisture protection.
Fire Safety: Vegetation in summer could be a potential fire hazard. However, with
watering of vegetation and the non-combustible soil underneath, it is unlikely that a fire will
spread if it does happen.
Day Lights: Green roof reflects light and heat back to the atmosphere, instead of
absorbing them like asphalt. It plays a role in global warming reduction.
Note: More information about roof is available
2.4.2 Roof on page 23
8.8.1 Integrated Green Roof System on page 98
9.1 Green Roof with Solar Panels and Rainwater Capture on page 117
McMaster University Chapter 8
107
8.10 PHYSICAL MODELING
8.10.1 Introduction
The goal of the physical modeling chapter is to provide students a hands on learning
experience with better demonstration for the earthquake response of designed structure. In order
to achieve this goal, the MTS Tabletop Earthquake System is used to investigate the dynamic
response of the structure to horizontal motions. Three earthquake ground motions including
Northridge earthquake, Lemo Pirate Earthquake and EI Centro Earthquake were simulated to test
the dynamic behaviors of designed structure. Instead of the real physical structure, an aluminum
rigid bar was used to represent the structure.
8.10.2 Procedure
The aluminum rigid bar was adjusted to have a free vibration period of 0.299 second
which is very close to the natural period of the designed structure 0.3 second. The damping ratio
(ζ) was calculated according to the equation below with the maximum displacement of 1 bar
diameter and 0.5 diameter.
Where:
A1 = First peak acceleration chose (g)
A2 = Tenth peak acceleration chose (g)
McMaster University Chapter 8
108
By comparing the result, dumping ratio of 1 bar diameter test (0.2956 second) was selected as
the structural dumping ratio because it is closer to the dumping ratio of designed structure.
Also, the period of the rigid bar can be calculated by following equation:
Where:
T10 = The time of tenth peak acceleration chose (s)
T1 = The time of first peak acceleration chose (s)
T is calculated to be 0.298 which is very close to 0.299 measured from the MTS Tabletop
Earthquake System.
Figure 8.22: Acceleration Response Diagram of 1 Bar Diameter Test
McMaster University Chapter 8
109
In order to record the excitation of the bar and the table, two sensors were touched on the
top of the bar and the table respectively. After that, the response spectrums for each earthquake
were obtained using Matlab code provided. However the response spectrum diagrams for 0
second to 0.1 second were eliminated because the sensors are sensitive to the high frequency
noise which could make errors for diagram during that period.
There were four inputs for Matlab code program:
1. Period of the rigid bar
2. Damping ratio (0%, 2%, 5% and actual damping ratio ζ)
3. Earthquake excitation for each case
4. Gamma (Adjusting factor, obtained 1.477 by sample excel file)
8.10.3 Northridge Earthquake Results
Figure 8.23: Excitation of Rigid Bar (Northridge)
McMaster University Chapter 8
110
Figure 8.24: Excitation of Earthquake (Northridge)
Figure 8.25: Excitation of (Ss – Sg) (Northridge)
McMaster University Chapter 8
111
Figure 8.26: Northridge Response Spectrum
8.10.4 Lemo Pirate Earthquake Results
Figure 8.27: Excitation of Rigid Bar (Lemo Pirate Earthquake )
McMaster University Chapter 8
112
Figure 8.28: Excitation of Earthquake (Lemo Pirate Earthquake )
Figure 8.29: Excitation of (Ss - Sg) (Lemo Pirate Earthquake)
McMaster University Chapter 8
113
Figure 8.30: Lome Pireta Response Spectrum
8.10.5 EI Centro Earthquake Results
Figure 8.31: Excitation of Rigid Bar (EI Centro Earthquake)
McMaster University Chapter 8
114
Figure 8.32: Excitation of Earthquake (EI Centro Earthquake)
Figure 8.33: Excitation of (Ss - Sg) (EI Centro Earthquake)
McMaster University Chapter 8
115
Figure 8.34: El Centro Earthquake Response Spectrum
8.10.6 Conclusion
The rigid bar used in the experiment is used to represent the structure when it was calibrated with
the same free vibration period of 0.299 seconds. The model damping ratio is 3.48. Northridge
Response Spectrum produced a 0.538 g peak response, while Lome Pireta and El Centro
produced peak responses of 0.367 g and 0.263 g. All three response spectrums had a spike in the
beginning, and is suspected to be caused by equipment errors from sensitivity from sounds. The
spectrum should have a general shape that would start at low acceleration, and then increase to a
peak, and stays constant at that peak for a short period then decreases. Such accelerations are not
likely to cause serious damage to the three storey building in the development area.
McMaster University Chapter 9
116
Chapter 9
Municipal Infrastructure Element Design
McMaster University Chapter 9
117
9 MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT DESIGN
9.1 GREEN ROOF WITH SOLAR PANELS AND RAINWATER CAPTURE
The three storey building’s roof is to incorporate three main green elements: green roof,
solar panels, and rainwater capture system. The green roof and the rainwater capture system
work together as one. As shown in the green roof design calculations, the roof’s total area is
811.1 m2. Vegetation, pervious walk path, and solar panels areas and their respective rainfall
storage to the storage tank are listed in Table 9.1. The green roof with the inclusion of soil,
vegetation, solar panels, structural supports and membranes would exert a uniform
(approximately) load of 0.68 kPa. 9
Figure 9.1: Green Roof Element Design (Top View) dimension: mm
9 calculations are shown in Appendix A on page A-37
McMaster University Chapter 9
118
Figure 9.2: Detailed Green Roof Cross Section A-A View (City Of Toronto, 2011)
9.1.1 Green Roof
The green roof will take up 623.5 m2 of the roof or about 77% of the total roof area. The
main intentions of the green roof are to reduce surface runoff and energy consumption, and
increase environmental initiatives in Hamilton by planting vegetables. As the three storey
building is located at the south boundary of Hamilton West Harbour, having a green roof on the
building would not only provide a nice view but will also constantly remind residents of
sustainability. The objective of this design is to create zero runoff from the building area,
increase energy efficiency and promote a healthy city.
Figure 9.3: Example Of A Green Roof. (ESRI Canada Ltd, 2010)
McMaster University Chapter 9
119
The roof is to be covered with 30 cm of soil, allowing the growth of almost any kind of
roof vegetation. Bell peppers require up to 30 cm of soil for healthy roof development (National
Garden Association, 2012). The green roof will have fresh produce such as peppers, tomatoes,
and cucumbers grown on top, they will supply nutritious local vegetables and are easy to grow.
Sidewalks are to be constructed along the borders of the roof to allow resident visitation and
watering. The green roof is also synthesized with the rain capture system and the solar panel
system.
9.1.2 Rainwater Capture System
Green roof is constructed such that excess rainwater would infiltrate through the 30 cm
thick soil content, then through the filter membrane into a semi-hollow space that is supported by
very small columns as shown in Figure 9.2 on page 118. Water seepage into the hollow space
would be directed into channels as presented in the design. All channels are led to the final exit
point at the north-east corner of the building by gravity. Water travelling down the roof through
pipes would enter a cylindrical storage tank that has dimensions of 3m diameter and 5m length.
The tank would have a maximum capacity of 35.3 m3, large enough to contain a 60 mm rain.
From weather history of Hamilton, the average annual rainfall is 764.8 mm (The Weather
Network, 2011), and the total amount of rainfall fallen on the roof is calculated to be 620 m3.
The total amount of rainwater captured takes account of soil absorption and pervious walkway
runoff, summing up to 534,500 litres per year. All rainwater captured is to be used for toilet and
urinal flushing. Water is to be drawn from the tank only, with water level kept constant by either
filling with water from distribution system or rainwater. This is to be done with a monitoring
gage to maximize rainwater usage and cover any intermittent rain events.
McMaster University Chapter 9
120
Table 9.1: Annual Green Roof Rainwater Capture
Rooftop Material Area
(m2)
Rainfall Retaining
Percentage
Annual Rainfall to Storage
Tank (m3)
Vegetation 623.5 15% 405.3
Pervious walk path 137.1 10% 94.4
Solar Panels 50.5 0% 34.8
Total: 534,500 Litres
Note: Sample calculations available in Appendix A on page A- 37
Toilet Water Consumption:
The number of urinals and toilets within the building is summed up in Figure 9.2. Toilet
water consumption is 6 litres per flush (Davis G, 2011) while urinals are 3.8 litres per flush
(Davis G, 2011). By using Table 9.3, the total annual water usage is calculated to be 1,611,840
litres, while the annual rainwater captured rain is 534,500 litres. The rainwater capture system
would save water usage from toilets/urinals by 22%.
McMaster University Chapter 9
121
Figure 9.4: Section View of ground level between Grid F and K (Dimensions: mm)
As Figure 9.4 shows, there are 4 urinals and 8 toilets on the ground level, and same for the
second level.
Table 9.2: Toilet/Urinal Annual Consumption
Floor Urinals
(Numbers)
Toilets
(Numbers)
Total Toilets
Annual Usage
(Litres)
Total Urinal
Annual Usage
(Litres)
Ground( Retail) 4 8 525,600 1,109,600
2nd
(Office) 4 8 262,800 166440
3rd
(Residential) 0 9 394200 0
Total: 515,480 Litres
Note: Sample calculations available in Appendix A on page A- 38
McMaster University Chapter 9
122
Table 9.3: Three Storey Building Toilet/Urinal Counts
Floor Toilet daily usage (Flush/day) Urinal daily usage (Flush/day)
Commercial 30 200
Office 15 30
Residential 20 n/a
9.1.4 Solar Panel Design
Due to rising energy prices and demand, renewable energy such as solar energy would
provide a long-life pollution free energy source for the three storey building. Solar Panels will
use 50.5 m2 of the roof area.
A Hamilton solar panel provider (SolarUpEnergy) supplies solar panels with dimensions of
159 cm by 82 cm, and peak power of 175W. There are 36 solar panels designed to be placed on
the roof as shown in Figure 9.1. The maximum possible power output is 6.3 kW, enough to run 6
laundry dryers at the same time during peak hours. Solar panels do not affect rainwater capture
as it would not have an interception effect.
9.1.5 Savings
With Hamilton's water/wastewater charge being around $2.45 (City of Hamilton) per m3,
the rainwater capture system would save $1308 annually. Placing the initial cost of solar panels
aside, and assuming that each solar panel provides approximately 120 W for 10 hours per day, it
would provide 15768 kWh per year. According to horizon utilities Hamilton, the cost of
electricity per kWh during peak hour is 10.8 cents. The panels provide savings up to $1703 per
year. For more calculation please refer to green roof and water calculations in appendix A.
McMaster University Chapter 9
123
9.1.6 Implementations
This green roof system (green roof, solar panels, and rainwater capture) is to be widely
built in other structures within the development area. The entire system or individual component
could be selected for the roofing system depending on the scenario. A common house is most
likely to use the rainwater capture system while an office building benefits from all three systems
due to a flat and large roof surface.
9.2 POROUS PAVEMENT
9.2.1 Introduction
Traditionally, in order to collect rain water from hard surfaces such as roads and parking
lots, we direct them into pipes and pump them out of suburbs. However, base flows in streams
are decreased as infiltration decrease, which often dries up small streams or increases overall
runoff in a local area. Apparently, the old storm water management practices are no longer to
satisfy our environmental and sustainable needs. Therefore, porous pavement is introduced and
studied based on its economical, social and environmental impacts.
9.2.2 Definition
Permeable pavement is also known as permeable pavement. Basically, as Figure 9.5 show,
the structure of the pavement allows water to move through void spaces and infiltrate into
underlying soils, which enhance the pavement's ability to absorb runoff. Therefore, it is applied
in many places for our project, particularly for parking lots in the Public Building Area.
McMaster University Chapter 9
124
Figure 9.5: Typical Porous Pavement.(Drake. J, 2011)
9.2.3 Porous pavement selection
There are many types of permeable pavements that serve different purposes. The three
main permeable pavements are interlocking concrete, pervious concrete and porous asphalt
pavement. The deciding factors for the three are listed in the following table:
Table 9.4: Porous Pavements Comparison Chart
Interlocking Concrete Pervious Concrete
Porous Asphalt
Pavement
Aesthetics
Wide range of colours
Can form architectural
designs.
Limited colors
Limited
appearances.
Very limited design.
Construction
Aspects
Easily installed
no need for drying.
Instant usage after
installation
Requires formwork.
Seven day curing
period.
No formwork.
24 hour curing
period.
Cost
Highest initial cost.
Could have lower
lifespan cost
Competitive with
interlocking
concrete.
Cheaper than both
pervious and
interlocking
concrete.
McMaster University Chapter 9
125
Winter
Durability
Freeze-thaw and salt
resistant.
Water does not freeze
in base.
Snowmelt drains
immediately.
Frozen saturation no
effect on concrete.
Frozen saturation
may damage
concrete.
Snowmelt drains
immediately
Less Freeze-thaw
resistant
Freeze-thaw
resistant.
Frozen saturation
may damage asphalt.
Snowmelts drains
immediately
Porous pavements are mainly going to be used for outdoor public parking spaces.
Interlocking concrete will be the main choice of porous pavements due to its winter durability
and the high initial cost would be balanced out in the long run by low maintenance cost
compared to the other candidates.
Figure 9.6 shows the location of the interlocking concrete parking spaces denoted by two
circles with a red centre. (Also the right side of the HD area, circles without the red centre.)
Figure 9.6: Pervious Pavement Locations
McMaster University Chapter 9
126
9.2.4 Conclusion
As stated before, the main objective behind introducing porous pavements to the
development is to reduce the overall runoff and to enhance the storm water management process.
Considering the various factors that affect the performance of the different types of porous
pavements, it was decided that interlocking concrete will be the pavement of choice due to the
reasons stated in the previous comparison chart. Installing interlocking concrete will improve the
local potable ground water’s quality. It enhances the social atmosphere by minimizing the urban
heat island effect with its permeable properties and decreasing local temperatures. Finally,
although it will have a high initial cost, new paving materials will not be continuously purchased
as with asphalt and concrete with their maintenance issues. Depth of base/subbase is calculated
to be 0.625 m and dmax is 1.8 m.
9.3 LEED GREEN BUILDING RATING SYSTEM
The LEED Green Building Rating System was formulated by the U.S. Green Building
Council in 1993. It measures all aspects of sustainable buildings and uses different criteria to
define buildings as “green.” Prerequisites and credits in the LEED rating system address 7
topics:
Sustainable Sites
Water Efficiency
Energy and Atmosphere
Materials Resources
Indoor Environmental Quality
Innovation in Design
Regional Priority
McMaster University Chapter 9
127
Certifications are awarded according to the following scale:
Table 9.5: LEED Certification Scale
Certified 40-49 Points
Silver 50-59 Points
Gold 60-79 Points
Platinum 80 Points and above
All criteria are reviewed individually and points are given according to the entire
development area. Some criteria were given hypothetical ratings because it is not incorporated in
the building design such as: paint and gas monitoring. The total rating of the three storey
building scored an impressive 70 points, which is equivalent to a gold rating. Each criterion is
given with an explanation. The LEED rating scored near perfect in most high point criteria,
covering important features of a sustainable development. The development area is to have new
buildings as existing land is to be taken down. This will incorporate newer technologies and
materials and the use of recyclable materials promoted a high LEED rating.
9.3.1 Sustainable Sites
The development area scored a near perfect mark at the sustainable sites section.
Development density and community connectivity is heavily focused in previous chapters. Basic
services are conveniently located within 800 metres to residential areas. Safe and sustainable
pedestrian walkways and access are designed in chapter 7. Bus line runs around and through the
entire development area, providing easy access to public transportation while limiting
disturbance. Bike paths, racks, and trails are located throughout the entire area. Green features
such as pervious parking space and green roof are designed and are commonly found in most
units.
McMaster University Chapter 9
128
9.3.2 Energy And Atmosphere
Almost all buildings within the development area are new and materials are chosen
carefully in chapter 2. Energy efficiency of the new materials significantly reduces energy usage.
Solar panels are to be promoted within all large buildings with appropriate roof, cutting
electricity needs from power plants. No CFC containing refrigerants are to be used for the
development area. The superb energy standard designed for the development area scored large
amount of points for the energy and atmosphere section.
Table 9.6: LEED Criteria, Points, Explanation
Criteria Point Explanation
Sustainable Sites
Site Selection 1/1 Building is not near any sensitive land such as
water bodies, habitats and wetlands.
Development Density and
Community Connectivity 5/5
Located on previously developed site.
Within 800 m of residential area.
Within 800 m to more than 10 basic services.
Has pedestrian access.
Brownfield Redevelopment 1/1 Site is located on brownfield.
Alternative Transportation 5/6
Building is located within 400 m of bus stop.
Nearby bike paths available.
Only bus, there is not another public rideshare
options for 4 or more passengers.
Alternative Transportation
– Bicycle Storage and
Changing Rooms
1/1
Bicycle racks are provided within 200 m of the
building entrance at more than 5% of all building
users.
Alternative
Transportation-Low
emitting and fuel-efficient
vehicles
0/3
No low-emitting fuel vehicles, parking and gas
stations are planned for this development.
Alternative
Transportation-Parking
Capacity
1/2
No parking for carpools designed.
McMaster University Chapter 9
129
Site Development – Protect
or Restore Habitat 0/1
Not all roadways/walkways, meet the distance
requirements.
Site Development – Max
Open space 0/1
Not enough open space such that it exceeds local
zoning requirements by 25%.
Storm water
Design-Quantity Control 1/1
Pervious parking space designed to reduce runoff
by over 50%.
Storm water
Design–Quality Control 1/1
Pervious parking space and green roof will reduce
total suspended solids and runoff by over 80%.
Heat Island-nonroof 1/1 Shades are provided.
Heat Island –Roof 1/1 Low-sloped roof with green roof will give a very
high SRI.
Light Pollution Reduction 0/1 No design for this criterion.
Water Efficiency
Water Efficient
Landscaping 2/4
Captured rainwater is used.
No graywater or recycled wastewater used.
Innovative Wastewater
Technologies 1/2
Rainwater capture system will reduce water
consumption, but not by 50%.
Water Use Reduction 4/4
Toilets, urinals, faucets and showerheads will be
designed with high efficient – low usage materials.
Projected percent reduction of water: 40%.
Energy and Atmosphere
Optimize Energy
Performance 18/19
Over 48% of buildings are new. New materials for
energy efficiency. Design meets all regulatory
requirements.
On-Site Renewable Energy 4/7 Approximately 7% of total energy is renewable
from solar panels.
Enhanced Commissioning 0/2 n/a
Enhanced Refrigerant
Management 2/2
No refrigerants will be used to reduce GHG.
Measurement and
Verification 0/3
No work done on this aspect.
Green Power 1 Solar panels, but they will not generate 35% of
building’s total electricity consumption.
Materials and Resources
Building Reuse-Maintain
Existing Walls, Floors and
Roof
0/3
No existing building is reused.
Building Reuse-Maintain 0/3 No existing interior elements are reused.
McMaster University Chapter 9
130
Interior Non-structural
Elements
Construction Waste
Management 2/2
Construction and demolition debris are carefully
examined in chapter 2 for reusability.
Materials Reuse 0/2 No plan for existing building material reuse.
Recycled Content 2/2 Over 20% of materials of the building considered
are reusable.
Regional Materials 2/2 Over 20% of materials are to come from local
factories – Stelco for steel.
Rapidly Renewable
Materials 0/1
n/a
Certified Wood 0/1 n/a
Indoor Environmental Quality
Outdoor Air Delivery
Monitoring 1/1
Will be designed – monitoring for exiting air.
Increased Ventilation 1/1 Ventilation is to meet regulatory codes.
Construction Indoor Air
Quality Management Plan –
During Construction
0/1
Not proposed.
Construction Indoor Air
Quality Management Plan –
Before Occupancy
0/1
Not proposed.
Low-Emitting Materials –
Adhesive and Sealants 0/1
Not proposed.
Low-Emitting
Materials-Paints and
Coatings
1/1
Anti-corrosive and anti-rust are designed to apply
to all building elements to prolong lifetime.
Low-Emitting
Materials-Flooring Systems 0/1
Not proposed.
Low-Emitting
Materials-Composite Wood
and Agrifiber Products
0/1
Not proposed.
Indoor Chemical and
Pollutant Source Control 1/1
Mechanical ventilation and gas monitoring devices
are to be provided to meet standards.
Controllability of
Systems-Lighting 1/1
Over 90% of lightings are individually adjustable
for personal needs.
Controllability of
Systems-Thermal Comfort 1/1
Over 50% of building occupants are enable to
adjust heat controls.
McMaster University Chapter 9
131
Thermal
Comfort-Verification 0/1
n/a
Daylight and Views-Views 1/1 Over 75% of the building area has direct line of
sight to perimeter vision glazing.
Innovation in Design
Innovation in Design 4/5
Proposed design is to comply all building codes,
and the intent of the design is to maximize to
reduce environmental impact.
LEED Accredited
Professional 0/1
N/a
Regional Priority
Regional Priority 3/4 A high priority land as It is very close to light rail
and other services.
TOTAL 70 Gold
McMaster University Chapter 10
132
Chapter 10
Summary and Conclusions
McMaster University Chapter 10
133
10 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
10.1 DESIGN OBJECTIVES SUMMARY
The Main objective of the project is to redevelop West Habour area in Hamilton in a
sustainable and green way while remaining aesthetically pleasing and economical. Additionally,
the project also consists of structural design of a 3 storey mixed use building.
In general, sustainable design provides a way of life that has low environmental impacts
while people still enjoy their life through vibrant activities. As for the redevelopment, sustainable
design is chosen to be the main theme because it can avoid the increasing costs for waste
management as well as resource depletion of energy and water. Moreover, productivity of people
living in the community can be increased because they would have great passion to work if they
feel good about the environment they work in. Therefore, the design objectives related to
sustainability are further explored and listed below in three categories which are environment,
social and economic:
Environment
Environmentally Friendly (no harmful waste deposit)
Low carbon footprint
Social
Mobility Easing and Pedestrian Friendly
Safety, healthy
Comfort (view of the lake, daylight, green spaces)
Productive
Economic
Cost feasible
Energy efficiency
Visitors and investors attraction
McMaster University Chapter 10
134
On the other hand, living design philosophies and practices of Christopher Alexander will
are incorporated into the development in terms of architecture patterns, floor heights, and views.
10.2 SUMMARY OF KEY DESIGN FEATURES
The main components of this redevelopment project are the development of a higher
density residential area, an intermediate density residential neighborhood, and a public building
area. Areas of each section are estimated using Google Maps and they are shown in
Table 10.1: Areas Summary For Each Section
Section Estimated Area(hectares)
Public Building Area: 12.2
Neighborhood 6.70
HD Area 6.97
For the development of public area, key sustainable design features are
1. Central Garden: located at the centre of the public area and consists of a large circular
green space with a fountain
2. Green spaces : 27 % of total public building area
3. Outdoor playground: recreational purpose and community gathering
4. Community Center: recreational facility on the ground level and library on second floor
5. Mega Plaza: place for people to purchase daily need as well as enjoy casual shopping.
6. Green Parking Lot Design (porous pavement)
7. Green Roof with solar panels and rainwater capture
For the development of neighborhood, key sustainable design features are
1. Green spaces : 40 % of total public building area
2. Mixed layout of house units: semi-detached, single-detached and townhouse
3. Church
4. Pedestrian Pathways
5. Green Parking Lot Design ( porous pavement )
McMaster University Chapter 10
135
For the development of higher density residential area, key sustainable design features are
1. Daylight orientation: maximum south facing wall
2. Green spaces
3. Green Roof with solar panels and rainwater capture
4. Low rise condo with private garden
5. Trails and Central park: connect people together with magnificent view and style
6. Natural Ventilation and Operable Windows: Natural ventilation eliminates the need for
air conditioning. People are healthier and work more effectively with access to fresh
air.10
For the 3-storey mixed use building, key sustainable design features are
1. Material selection(bamboo flooring, steel etc)
2. Daylight orientation: maximum south facing wall
3. Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems (EIFS)
4. Double glazed, low emissivity glass Windows
5. Light-emitting diodes (LED lights)
6. Green Roof with solar panels and rainwater capture
7. Solar Wall
8. Vestibule at the main entrance
10.3 DEVELOPED PATTERN LANGUAGE
The experiences the residents and visitors of Hamilton west harbour development go
through can only be felt in a sustainable community which is our number one priority. The
public space provided and centered in all areas is a tool to attract users to it, increasing social
activity. The three storey limit allows the sun to shine through each area and permits the breeze
from the lake to refresh all the divisions. The layout of roads, buildings and open space allows
10http://www.cityofpuyallup.org/visitors/puyallup-city-hall/sustainable-design-features/
McMaster University Chapter 10
136
cars to enter to park only and not to drive around, encouraging residents to walk or bike in this
sustainable community. Balconies and main entrances facing the streets scattered throughout all
the divisions allow residents to keep an eye on their neighbourhood increasing its safety and
security. The existence of well developed and maintained trails connecting all three areas is an
irresistible way of moving around in our community. The circularity of some of the buildings
gives a sense of continuity and flow to the area, allowing the air to circulate all the divisions.
Small private gardens dispersed throughout each division are tools to involve all residents in
participating in keeping their community environmentally friendly. Finally, the properties built
into the different areas will allow the existence of a variety of dwellers and visitors creating a
social balance in this new development.
10.4 ASPECTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE NEXT DESIGN STAGE
Legislation approvals for land development (municipal government)
Environmental assessment :study the environment impact of the land development
More detailed life cost analysis:
- materials, labour, construction and operations costs;
- funding and investment
Traffic impact study : study the traffic impact of the development on surrounding roads
Constructed detailed physical model for the development and conduct necessary tests on
the model ( wind, earthquake etc)
Advanced project management ( procurement, biding document preparation, etc )
Fire protection and utility service design
Detailed structural, architectural and electrical design of houses, apartment, and office
buildings
McMaster University Chapter 10
137
10.5 LESSONS LEARNED
10.5.1 Jun Xing
The final year capstone project which is to redevelop a range of vacant land near west
Habour area in Hamilton, through it we had the opportunity to get to know about land
development, we did lots of site visiting, and we had lots of discussion about economical,
environmental and social impact of the development. Moreover, this project involved structural
design of a 3 storey mixed use building, and as group leader, I am responsible for all the
structural and architecture drawings. We design everything in detail, beam, girder, column, as
well as connections as well as lateral bracing system. I truly learned a lot from the project in
terms of building stability design and project management. Moreover, it is very beneficial for me
to be aware that a group leader should not only make critical decisions, but also coordinate one’s
group members. Overall, I feel grateful for taking this project although some improvement may
be needed in the future.
List of tasks completed by Jun Xing
Structural (Chapter 8):
Architecture drawing Arc1-Arc 4
Structural drawing Str 1- Str3
All AutoCAD drawings editing and revision
Architecture modeling in Sketchup
Preliminary structural design layout and revision
Floor system design
Design of Slab
Beam 1-Beam 10 design and sample calculation
Girder 1- Girder 6 design and sample calculation
Column 1 - Column 2 design and sample calculation
Design criteria summary and fire protection
McMaster University Chapter 10
138
Mass of each floor calculation
Green building elements
Appendix A formatting
Report formatting and put everything together(for 1-3revision)
report printing and submit (for 1-3 revision)
Environmental:
Chapter 1: Adjoining Developable Areas
Chapter 2: Proposed Criteria
Chapter 2: Coverings-Wall, Ceiling and Floors
Chapter 3:Interactive Development of Site Mode
Chapter 3: AutoCAD drawing of PB area
Chapter 5:Key Design Details, and Landscaping
Chapter 9: AutoCAD drawing of Green roof editing
Chapter 11: Porous Pavement Introduction and Definition
Chapter 12: Summary of key design features
10.5.2 Jeffrey Nie
4X06 is a great course that incorporates many aspects of Civil Engineering. I have learned
so much from all chapters, particularly the huge amount of consideration in all aspects need to be
studied for a design. I feel like sustainable designs and infrastructures are the must take
procedures in order for a health advance of our footage in time. The most valuable thing I took
away from this project is that development should be focused on the health of a community
rather than economic growth. I knew very little about design and amount of regulations and
guidelines prior to the project, but this project has taught me that it is crucial to follow proper
guidelines.
McMaster University Chapter 10
139
My opinion for the course and improvement
I feel like this project is heavily focused on structural components, and limited in the
water/environment stream (Except green building/sustainability). Amount of expectations from
the structural side far exceeds the environmental part. I understand that design of structures are
critical to a graduating structural engineer, but I feel environmental designs are limited to the
development. Instead of the development area in Hamilton, even though we can visit the site, it
is still very conceptual. I suggest set the development area in another place, perhaps in
developing countries with water resource problems. Students can learn how to allocate water
resources, and sustainable solutions in all aspects covered in the present course materials. In that
way, realistic problems could be defined and reduced/solved, and some of the best projects could
also be implemented. After all, we are really moving into a globalized community, and the
present of some countries that lack resources could be the future of us.
List of tasks completed by Jeffrey Nie
Chapter 1: Design Objective.
Chapter 2: Structural Members
Chapter 3: Definition of Major buildings.
Chapter 4: Google Sketchup and hand sketch design.
Chapter 5: Landscape, Green Roof design, AutoCAD drawing of Green Roof
Chapter 6: All.
Chapter 7: Design to enhance health, disabled persons, resilience to climate change.
(7.2-7.4)
Chapter 8: Green Roof Load calculations and design.
Chapter 9: All
Chapter 10: All
Chapter 11: Porous Pavement Selection.
Editing of Chapter 4, 9, 10, 11.
Putting Google sketchup together for all three areas, and modifying the high density
sketchup.
McMaster University Chapter 10
140
10.5.3 Duo Huang
After being through this year, capstone course 4X06 provides me a lot of interesting
information and experiences which I cannot learn from textbooks. I really appreciate this
opportunity to be the involved in this course. Through the capstone project my teamwork skills,
communication skills have improved significantly. Project scheduling and planning skills have
been utilized throughout this year as well. In addition to the soft skills improved, I feel very
fortunate to have a chance to conduct this real world fashion capstone project before I start my
career in Civil Engineering. The reason I appreciate this project is almost every aspects of Civil
Engineering have been introduced to us. Layout of land use, material selection, transportation,
sustainability, municipal infrastructure as well as structural design, we all have a chance to touch
on it no matter what stream you are in.
Considering the course load of the capstone course, I really want to have more time to
work on it. Known that most students still have 5 or 6 course in their final year for each term, if
some of those courses in the final year would be moved to previous year, it will be much more
grateful for final year students to be involved more and learn more from this project.
List of tasks completed by Duo Huang
Chapter 1 – Vision for the project
Chapter 2 – Windows and doors
Chapter 3 – Google Sketchup
Chapter 5 – High Density Component Google Sketchup
Chapter 8 – Structure Design
- Structural system for gravity load
- Mass for each floor
- Beam, Column, Girder design
- Derivation of seismic load
McMaster University Chapter 10
141
- Connections design
- Sap model
- Physical modeling chapter
- AutoCAD drawings
Final format
10.1.4 Marco Morcos
Although I have learned a lot of lessons though this project, I will mainly focus on the
content aspect of the project. It has been made clear to me that environmental design does not
mean an expensive design. Environmental, economical and social aspects of a design can
coexist. Also, the inter and intra connectivity of a new development is vital for its survival.
Defining and redefining a pattern language throughout the project helps sustain a picture in mind
of the development. Moreover, a sustainable design is concerned with large scale aspects of a
project as well as tiny details unseen by the user. The layout provided by the designer will define
how the area will be used by residents and visitors. Finally, although properties are the products
of the real estate market, without free open space they are worth nothing.
List of tasks completed byMarco Morcos
Chapter 1 - Preliminary pattern language for the project, and editing of the chapter.
Chapter 2 - Introduction, and editing of the chapter.
Chapter 3 - Refinement of pattern language and identification of focal points, and
editing of the chapter.
Chapter 4 - Refinement of pattern language and identification of focal points, and
editing of the chapter.
Chapter 5 - Refinement of pattern language and identification of focal points, and
editing of the chapter.
Chapter 6 - Involved in all sections of the chapter.
Chapter 7 -Design and operational aspects to enhance safety, health and quality of life,
and editing of the chapter.
McMaster University Chapter 10
142
Chapter 8
- Lateral bracing system design
- Bracing Sap model
- Bracing connections
- Foundation design
- Foundation AutoCAD drawing
- Bracing connections AutoCAD drawing
Chapter 9 - Editing of the chapter.
Chapter 10 - Editing of the chapter.
Chapter 11 - Editing of the chapter.
Chapter 12 - Developed pattern language, lessons learned and tasks completed.
Overall editing of the final report in term of grammar.
10.5.5 Yi Liu
Different characteristics of different exterior cladding materials and of different roof
materials that affect the selection of materials for structures with various decision criteria.
Green space of an area significantly affects residents’ lifestyle and living quality. The
layout of living area, green spaces, and streets are very important, since better layout will provide
more convenience and better quality for people who are living or working in the area.
One of the important parts of a sustainable design is the economical aspect. I have learned
methods of calculating benefits and costs by using engineering economic fundamentals.
For the structure design part, I have learned basic steps of designing wind load for a
low-rise building and also became familiar with the national design code. Moreover, I have
learned basic procedure of designing connections between the different members.
List of tasks completed byYi Liu
Chapter 1 – Introduction
Chapter 2 – Selection of exterior cladding materials and roof materials.
Chapter 3 – Helping with physical model
McMaster University Chapter 10
143
Chapter 4 – Desired component percentages
Chapter 5 – Proposed building massing and open spaces
Chapter 7 – Economic part; re-editing of the chapter
Chapter 8 – Snow load, Wind uplift; Wind load; Connections design
Chapter 12 – Lessons learned and tasks completed
Final formatting of citations and references.
McMaster University
144
REFERENCE
McMaster University
145
1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (2004). Public Works Technical Bulletin 200-1-27, Reuse
of Concrete Material From Building Demolition. A19-A28.
2. Claus V. Nielsen. (2008). Proceedings NRMCA 2008 Concrete Technology Forum,
Carbon Footprint of Concrete Buildings seen in the Life Cycle Perspective. Page 1-14.
3. Mark D. Webster, Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, Inc.1 Daniel T. Costello, Costello
Dismantling Co., Inc.2. (2005). Green build Conference, Designing Structural Systems for
Deconstruction: How to Extend a New Building’s Useful Life and Prevent it from Going
to Waste When the End Finally Comes. Pages 1-14.
4. Rastra. (1987). Rastra document. CO2 Impact: Wood vs Concrete. Pages 1-5.
5. Author Unknown. (2010). BIBM Communication Commission,
COUNTER-ARGUMENTS PRECAST CONCRETEVS TIMBER AND STEEL. Pages 1-4.
6. S. Abdol Chini and Kavita Gupta. (1997). Journal of Construction Education. A
Comparison Between Steel and Wood Residential Framing Systems. Pages 1-13.
7. Clive Fewins. (1987). Home Building & Renovating. The Pros and Cons of Different
Construction Systems. Pages 1-11.
8. BCIS. (2003). RICS CONSTRUCTION FACULTY INFORMATION PAPER. The Pros
and Cons of Different Construction Systems. Pages 2-10.
9. U.S. Department of Energy. (2007, June 28). Insulation & Air Sealing. Retrieved october 2,
2011, from U.S. Department of Energy:
http://www.energy.gov/insulationairsealing.htm
10. U.S Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Sustainable Flooring, HEALTHCARE -
TOP 5 GREEN BUILDING STRATEGIES. Retrieved october 2, 2011 from:
http://www.epa.gov/region9/waste/p2/pdf/flooring-final-071126.pdf
McMaster University
146
11. Litherland,A. (2010, December 8). Glass Cladding Advantages. Retrieved October 3,
2011 from: http://www.ehow.com/list_7466986_glass-cladding-advantages.html
12. Gromicko,N&Ward,E. 1987.). Vinyl Siding Inspection. Retrieved October 3, 2011 from:
http://www.nachi.org/vinyl-siding-inspection.htm
13. Beach,E.(1987.). Types of Building Cladding. Retrieved October 3, 2011 from:
http://www.ehow.com/about_5059366_types-building-cladding.html
14. Gilani,N. (2011, January 18). Advantages of Cladding. Retrieved October 3, 2011 from:
http://www.ehow.co.uk/list_6128983_advantages-cladding.html
15. Kumar,S. (2001, December 21). EIFS. Retrieved October 3, 2011 from:
http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/building_construction/86681
16. Surina,E. (2001). How Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems Work. Retrieved October 3,
2011 from:
http://home.howstuffworks.com/home-improvement/heating-and-cooling/exterior-insulati
on2.htm
17. Rodgers,S. (2011, June 9). To Find Out About the Advantages and Disadvantages of Slate
Roofs, Read On. Retrieved October 3, 2011 from:
http://mmoadmin.com/to-find-out-about-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-slate-roofs-
read-on/
18. Jarquio,E. (1998.). Metal Roofing Materials - Advantages and Disadvantages. Retrieved
October 3, 2011 from:
http://ezinearticles.com/?Metal-Roofing-Materials---Advantages-And-Disadvantages&id=
726906
McMaster University
147
19. Sobczuk,L. (2009, November 11). Advantages and Disadvantages of Metal Roofing.
Retrieved October 3, 2011 from:
http://lgcroofingnj.com/roofingblog/metal/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-metal-roofing
20. City of Toronto, (April, 2010), Using Green Roofs, Using Green roofs to enhance
Biodiversity in the City of Toronto. Pages 1-47.
21. Steven Peck, Monica Kuhn. (2005), Ontario Association of Architects, Design Guidelines
For Green Roofs. Pages 1-22.
22. Baetz, B. (2011). Urban Neighbourhoods. Civ Eng 4X06 Course Notes. Retrieved October
20th, from McMaster Avenue.
23. Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. (2010). Community Planning and
Development Portal. Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing Planning Tools.
Retrieved October 20th, from: http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/Page160.aspx
24. Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. (2007). Land Use Planning. Ontario
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing Planning Tools. Retrieved October 20th
2011
from: http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/Page161.aspx
25. Pyke, Chris; Johnson, Thomas. (2007). CTG Energetics, Inc. – Adapting to Climate
Change Through Neighbourhood Design. Retrieved from:
http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CMSPageID=124
26. Shipley, Robert; Parsons, Michael; Utz, Stephen. (2006). The Lazarus Effect - An
Exploration of the Economics of Heritage Development in Ontario. Waterloo, Canada:
The Heritage Resources Centre, University of Waterloo from:
http://www.fes.uwaterloo.ca/research/hrc/lazarus-jan20-verA.pdf
McMaster University
148
27. Warne, Christine. (2002) Local Government Policy and Regulatory Environment . British
Columbia, Canada: Capital Region District (CRD) - Planning & Protective Services from:
http://www.crd.bc.ca/regionalplanning/growth/reports/strategic/documents/hasOviewSept
18.ppt
28. City of Hamilton – Corporate Services: Tax Rates (2011). Retrieved from:
http://www.hamilton.ca/CityDepartments/CorporateServices/FinanceBudgetTaxes/Proper
tyInformationTaxes/TaxRates.htm
29. Centre for Science and Environment, (2009), Rainwater Harvesting, Design of storage
tanks. Retrieved from: http://www.rainwaterharvesting.org/urban/Design_Storage.htm
30. Peck, S., Kuhn, M., (2008), Ontario Association of Architects, Design Guidelines for
Green Roofs. Retrieved from:
http://www.cmhc.ca/en/inpr/bude/himu/coedar/loader.cfm?url=/commonspotsecurity/getfi
le.cfm&PageID=70146
31. City of Toronto, (2009), City of Toronto website, Green Roof Bylaw. Retrieved from:
http://www.toronto.ca/greenroofs/overview.htm
32. Westinghouse Solar Inc. (2010), Westinghouse Solar, Solar Panel AC-175w. Retrieved
from:
http://www.solarupenergy.com/HS%20Westinghouse%20Solar%20PowerSystems%20-%
20Solar%20Panel%20AC%20175%20Spec%20sheet%20Aug%202010.pdf
33. The Engineering Toolbox. (2011), Earth of Soil – Weight and Composition, Typical
weight and composition of soil or earth. Retrieved from:
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/earth-soil-weight-d_1349.html
McMaster University
149
34. Motes, J., Criswell, J. Damicone, J., (2009), Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service,
Pepper Production. Retrieved from:
http://pods.dasnr.okstate.edu/docushare/dsweb/Get /Document-1041/F-6030web.pdf
35. Horizon Utilities, (2011), Electricity, Horizon Utilities Current Residential Rates
November 1, 2011.Retrieved from:
http://www.horizonutilities.com/HHSC/html/residential/res_rates.jsp
36. M.I.T.,(2009), Sixty State Street (Boston). The structural system. Retrieved from:
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/sixty-state-street/construction.htm)
37. City of Toronto, (April, 2010), Using Green Roofs, Using Green roofs to enhance
Biodiversity in the City of Toronto. Pages 1-47.
38. Steven Peck, Monica Kuhn. (2005), Ontario Association of Architects, Design Guidelines
For Green Roofs. Pages 1-22.
39. Horizon Utilities (2011). Residential, Electricity and Water rates. Retrieved January 8th,
2012 from: http://www.horizonutilities.com/HHSC/html/residential/residential.jsp
40. The Weather Network (2011). Historical, Historical Weather (Hamilton). Retrieved
January 8th, 2012 from:
http://www.theweathernetwork.com/index.php?product=historical&placecode=caon0
289&HisMM=01&HisDD=18&HisYY=2012&stnCode=XHM&cityname=Hamilton&pro
vince=
41. The U.S. Green Building Council, Inc. (2009). LEED 2009 FOR NEW
CONSTRUCTIONS AND MAJOR RENOVATIONS. WITH ALTERNATIVE
COMPLIANCE PATHS FOR PROJECTS OUTISDE THE U.S.
McMaster University
150
42. Drake, J. (2011). Design of Infiltration Methods. Retrieved from McMaster Avenue.
43. ICPI. (2008). Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavement. Retrieved from:
http://www.icpi.org/node/1234
44. City of Puyallup. Sustainable Design Features (2005 – 2012). Retrieved from:
http://www.cityofpuyallup.org/visitors/puyallup-city-hall/sustainable-design-features/
45. A. Rutenberg, Simplified P-Delta Analysis for Asymmetric Structures, ASCE Journal of
the Structural Division, Vol. 108, No.9, Sept. 1982.
46. E.L. Wilson and A. Habibullah, Static and Dynamic Analysis of Multi-story Buildings
Including P-Delta Effects, Earthquake Spectra, Earthquake Engineering Research
Institute, Vol. 3, No. 3, May 1987.