Upload
urvashi03
View
263
Download
7
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
1/101
I connect Final Report
Institute for Technology and Management Business SchoolPGDM
(Batch 2013-15)
Industry Internship Project 2014
Title of the project:
Analysis and Study of Channel satisfaction with respect to MTS data
products and benchmarking the same
Vis--vis competitors
Submitted by: Anoop IndoliaProgram: PGDM-MarketingPGDM ID: 3850
Company Guide: Faculty Guide:Vijesh Bhatnagar Prof. Arpita PandeyData Retail Area Manager Assistant Professor Marketing
Institute for Technology and Management, Navi Mumbai
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
2/101
I connect Final Report
Acknowledgements
This report is an assimilation of co-operation, support and guidance of several dignitaries. I
would like to acknowledge and extend my heartfelt gratitude to the following people whohave made the completion of this project possible.
I express my sincere gratitude to the ITM Business School for giving me the opportunity of
working in one of the most reputed telecom organisation in India as part of my Industry
internship Project. I would like to acknowledge Prof. Arpita Pandey, faculty guide at ITM
Business school under whose supervision I was able to perform a decent work.
I would like to thank my mentor, Mr. Vijesh Bhatnagar Designation Data Retail Area
Manager Dept. Sales, for guiding me right from the inception till the successful completion
of the project. I sincerely acknowledge him for extending his valuable guidance, support for
literature, critical reviews of project and the report and above all the moral support he had
provided to me with all stages of this project. Without his active support this project would
not have been a success.
I would also like to thank the whole Sales and Marketing Department also H R
Department, for their help and cooperation throughout project.
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
3/101
I connect Final Report
Certificate from Company
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
4/101
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
5/101
I connect Final Report
Executive Summary
It is no wonder that in todays aggressive business environment, the challenges of sustainingin these competitive surroundings, preoccupies the minds of many Business leaders.
Customers have many options to choose their telecom operator from competitive market.
Furthermore, they often perceive that what they are purchasing is, for all practical purposes, a
commodity that can be easily obtained from other companies, if need be. So, how does a
corporation distinguish itself in a highly commoditized and competitive market? Todays
business is more dependent, than ever before, on their top performing product which provide
services that differentiate a company from its fierce competitors. In other words, corporations
rely upon their product and human assets to survive and thrive. So here comes the need of
channel management to showcase their products better than their competitors.
Retailers are traders who buy goods from wholesalers or distributors or sometimes directly
from producers and sell them to consumers. They generally operate through a retail outlet and
sell to the end consumers. Since the retailers are the last point in the distribution channel, they
see the reaction of the consumers firsthand and know their requirement more than anyone
else knows. Because telecom retailing is not exclusive and a variety of competitive brands are
available in the same outlet hence it is important that the company is in constant mode to
satisfy the retailers through flawless support service. This will in turn make the retailers take
interest to pass positive feedbacks to the consumers and impact decision-making process of
end consumers. Recommendations from the retailers are the final step in sealing sales not
only in telecom industry but also in many other industries. Retailers have potential to affect
change in the consumption pattern of the consumers for consumers rely heavily on
recommendations made by the sales men on product quality. Customers cross check the
opinions of other customers through the retailers. Retailers can significantly affect change to
consumer decision making, as they are located in key position between suppliers and
consumers. On one hand being in direct contact with the consumers they exert influence on
consumers through their counter salesperson, and on the other hand,
They reach out to suppliers and gain advantage based on their strength and capacity to reach
out to customers. In a way, they act as gatekeepers, determining which brands are to be
offered and how they should be marketed. The volume of sales depends on the efficiency of a
retailer who assesses the psychology of consumers and takes appropriate steps to sell a
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
6/101
I connect Final Report
product. Understanding the importance of service support to execute sales at the retailers
level, this study aims to find out the sales support offered by MTS to its retailers and the
perspectives of the retailers on the same.
Most of the research in this area suggests that a channel members satisfaction increases with
long term orientation and continuity and reduces conflict. This means that organizations
which aim to do business in a profitable manner today, must not only remain focused on the
subject of customer satisfaction but also on its channel domain i.e. its channel members. This
project takes the same direction of applying most of the channel relationship satisfaction
research on the specific case of MTS, so that the organization benefits from the research in
real world.
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
7/101
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
8/101
I connect Final Report
LIST OF FIGURES
S. No. TOPIC PAGE NO.
Fig. 1 Market Share of Fixed Line Service Providers 3
Fig. 2 Market Share of Wireless Operators 3
Fig. 3 Market Share of Wireless CDMA Operators 4
Fig. 4 Market Share of GSM Operators 5
Fig. 5 Evolution of Technology 6
Fig. 6 Market Share of Telecom Service Providers 7
Fig. 7 Company Structure 12
Fig. 8 Marketing Department Verticals 13
Fig. 9 Channel Structure 24
Fig. 10 Sales Structure 24
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
9/101
I connect Final Report
1
1. Objectives
Main Objectives of training period are:
1. To study the various tariffs charged by MTS on its data products and hence to study
the schemes and services provided by MTS.
2. To analyse the retailers perception towards MTS and its competitors.
3. To understand the awareness of MTS data products among retailers in the market.
4. To create interest as well as find out the potential new retail outlets.
5. To know the satisfaction level of Retailers towards MTS products and services.
6. To Increase the customer base and improve in retailers satisfaction level.
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
10/101
I connect Final Report
2
2.Introduction to Industry
The Indian telecommunications industry is one of the fastest growing in the world.
Government policies and regulatory framework implemented by Telecom RegulatoryAuthority of India (TRAI) have provided a conducive environment for service providers.
This has made the sector more competitive, while enhancing the accessibility of
telecommunication services at affordable tariffs to the consumers. In the last two decades, the
Indian Telecom Sector and mobile telephony in particular has caught the imagination of India
by revolutionizing the way we communicate, share information; and through its staggering
growth helped millions stay connected. This growth, however, has and continues to be at the
cost of the Climate, powered by an unsustainable and inefficient model of energy generation
and usage. Simultaneously, this growth has also come at significant and growing loss to the
state exchequer, raising fundamental questions on the future business and operation model of
the Telecom sector.
The telecom industry has witnessed significant growth in subscriber base over the last
decade, with increasing network coverage and a competition-induced decline in tariffs acting
as catalysts for the growth in subscriber base. The growth story and the potential have also
served to attract newer players in the industry, with the result that the intensity of competition
has kept increasing.
The Indian Telecom Industry services are not confined to basic telephone but it also extends
to internet, broadband (both wireless and fixed), cable TV, SMS, IPTV, soft switches etc.
The bottlenecks for Indian Telecom Industry are: Slow reform Process, Low- penetration.
Service providers bears huge initial cost to make inroads and achieving break-even isdifficult .Huge initial investments, Limited spectrum availability and interconnection charges
between the private and state operators.
Evolution of Telecom Industry:
Telecommunications was first introduced in India in 1851 when the first operational land
lines were laid by the government near Kolkata, although telephone services were formally
introduced in India much later in 1881. Further, in 1883, telephone services were mergedwith the postal system. In 1947, after India attained independence, all foreign
telecommunication companies were nationalized to form the Posts, Telephone and Telegraph
(PTT), a body that was governed by the Ministry of Communication. The Indian telecom
sector was entirely under government ownership until 1984, when the private sector was
allowed in telecommunication equipment manufacturing only.
Classification of Telephony Services:
Fixed Telephony :
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
11/101
I connect Final Report
3
Until the New Telecom Policy was announced in 1999, only BSNL and MTNL were
allowed to provide land line phones, with MTNL operating in Delhi and Mumbai and
BSNL catering all others parts of country. But now many other wire line operators like
Tata, reliance, Sistema (MTS), Airtel have entered into the Indian market, with MTS
being a crucial part of the wire line sector especially in some parts of the country likeRajasthan. The market share of different land line providers are:
Figure 1: Market Share of Fixed Line Providers; Source: http://en.wikipedia.org
Mobile Telephony:
The Mobile telecommunications system in India is the second largest in the world with a
customer base of around 929 Million subscribers and it was made open to private players inthe 1990s. GSM technology had a share of 80% of the mobile subscriber market, while
CDMA stabilized its market share at 20%. The mobile market was continuing to expand at an
annual rate in excess of 40% coming into 2010.According to data provided by Minister of
State for Communications and IT Milind Deora, as of 30 November 2012, India has
7,36,654 base transceiver stations (2G GSM & CDMA, and 3G). Of those, 96,212 base
transceiver stations provide 3G mobile and data services. Out of India's 640 districts, 610
districts are covered by 3G services as of 30 November 2012.The market share of various
players in mobile services are:
Figure 2: Market Share of Wireless operators; Source: http://en.wikipedia.org
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
12/101
I connect Final Report
4
Technological Overview:
CDMA
CDMA (Code-Division Multiple Access) refers to any of several protocols used in so-
called second-generation (2G) and third-generation (3G)wireless communications.
As the term implies, CDMA is a form of multiplexing, which allows numerous
signals to occupy a single transmission channel, optimizing the use of
available bandwidth. The technology is used in ultra-high-frequency (UHF)cellular
telephone systems in the 800-MHz and 1.9-GHz bands. CDMA employs analog -to-
digital conversion (ADC) in combination with spread spectrum technology. Audio
input is first digitized into binary elements. The frequency of the transmitted signal is
then made to vary according to a defined pattern (code), so it can be intercepted only
by a receiver whose frequency response is programmed with the same code, so it
follows exactly along with the transmitter frequency. There are trillions of possiblefrequency-sequencing codes, which enhances privacy and makes cloning difficult.
Figure 3: Market Share of Wireless CDMA Operators; Source: http://telecomuncovered.com
GSM
GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications, originally Groupe Spcial Mobile), is a
standard set developed by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) to
describe protocols for second generation (2G) digital cellular networks used by mobile
phones. It became the de facto global standard for mobile communications with over 80%
market share. The GSM standard was developed as a replacement for first generation (1G)
analog cellular networks, and originally described a digital, circuit switched network
optimized for full duplex voice telephony. This was expanded over time to include data
communications, first by circuit switched transport, then packet data transport
via GPRS (General Packet Radio Services) and EDGE (Enhanced Data rates for GSM
Evolution or EGPRS).Further improvements were made when the 3GPP developed third
generation (3G) UMTS standards followed by fourth generation (4G) LTE Advanced
standards. In 2000, the first commercial GPRS services were launched and the first GPRScompatible handsets became available for sale. In 2001 the first UMTS (W-CDMA) network
http://searchtelecom.techtarget.com/definition/3Ghttp://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/definition/UHFhttp://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/definition/UHFhttp://searchtelecom.techtarget.com/definition/3G8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
13/101
I connect Final Report
5
was launched and worldwide GSM subscribers exceeded 500 million. In 2002 the first
multimedia messaging services (MMS) were introduced and the first GSM network in the
800 MHz frequency band became operational. EDGE services first became operational in a
network in 2003 and the number of worldwide GSM subscribers exceeded 1 billion in 2004.
By 2005, GSM networks accounted for more than 75% of the worldwide cellular networkmarket, serving 1.5 billion subscribers. In 2005, the first HSDPA capable network also
became operational. The first HSUPA network was launched in 2007 and worldwide GSM
subscribers exceeded two billion in 2008.
Figure 4: Market Share of GSM Operators; Source: http://www.nextbigwhat.com/gsm-market-share-in-india
EVOLUTION OF WIRELESS TELEPHONE TECHNOLOGY:
2G:
2G (or 2-G) is a short form for second-generation wireless telephone technology. Second
generation 2G cellular telecom networks were commercially launched on the GSM standard
in Finland. Three primary benefits of 2G networks over their predecessors were that phone
conversations were digitally encrypted; 2G systems were significantly more efficient on the
spectrum allowing for far greater mobile phone penetration levels; and 2G introduced data
services for mobile, starting with SMS text messages. 2G technologies enabled the various
mobile phone networks to provide the services such as text messages, picture messages and
MMS (multimedia messages). 2G technology is more efficient. 2G technology holds
sufficient security for both the sender and the receiver. All text messages are digitallyencrypted. This digital encryption allows for the transfer of data in such a way that only the
intended receiver can receive and read it. The radio signals on 1G networks are analog, while
the radio signals on 2G networks are digital.
2.5G (GPRS):
2.5G ("second and a half generation") is used to describe 2G-systems that have implemented
a packet-switched domain in addition to the circuit-switched domain. It does not necessarily
provide faster services because bundling of timeslots is used for circuit-switched data
services (HSCSD) as well. The first major step in the evolution of GSM networks to 3G
occurred with the introduction of General Packet Radio Service (GPRS)
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
14/101
I connect Final Report
6
2.75G (EDGE)
GPRS1 networks evolved to EDGE networks with the introduction of 8PSK encoding.
Enhanced Data rates for GSM Evolution (EDGE), Enhanced GPRS (EGPRS), or IMT Single
Carrier (IMT-SC) is a backward-compatible digital mobile phone technology that allows
improved data transmission rates, as an extension on top of standard GSM. EDGE wasdeployed on GSM networks beginning in 2003.
3G:
3G, short for third Generation, is the third generation of mobile telecommunications
technology. 3G telecommunication networks support services that provide an information
transfer rate of at least 200 Kbit/s. However, many services advertised as 3G provide higher
speed than the minimum technical requirements for a 3G service. Recent 3G releases often
denoted 3.5G and 3.75G, also provide mobile broadband access of several Mbit/s to smart
phones and mobile modems in laptop computers 3G is the latest mobile technology and is
now the fastest growing host among mobile units and handsets. 3G provides you with the
highest speed possible, compared to other technologies before it. It also gives you high
degree of connectivity and higher networking, plus resistance to noise. The technology has
enhanced the bit rate, allowing service providers to give high speed internet facilities, higher
call volumes and host of the multimedia applications that can be given to the customers.
4G:
4G, short for fourth generation, is the fourth generation of mobile telecommunications
technology, succeeding 3G. A 4G system, in addition to the usual voice and other services of
3G, provides mobile ultra-broadband Internet access, for example to laptopswith USB wireless modems, to Smartphone, and to other mobile devices. Even though 4G is
a successor technology of 3G, there can be signification issues on 3G network to upgrade to
4G as many of them were not built on forward compatibility. Conceivable applications
include amended mobile web access, IP telephony, gaming services, high-definition mobile
TV, video conferencing, 3D television, and cloud computing.
Figure 5: Evolution of technology
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
The Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of India or TRAI (established 1997) is the
independent regulator established by the Government of India to regulate the
telecommunications business in India. The mission of Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
(TRAI) is to ensure that the interests of consumers are protected and at the same time to
nurture conditions for growth of telecommunications, broadcasting and cable services in a
1G 2G2.5 G
(GPRS)
2.75 G
( EDGE)3G 4G
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
15/101
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
16/101
I connect Final Report
8
3. About Organization
SISTEMA SHYAM TELESERVICES
Sistema Shyam TeleServices Ltd (SSTL) is the fastest growing telecom company in the
competitive Indian market, with over 10 million voice subscribers and over 6 lakh mobile
broadband customers. SSTL has tied up with Mobile TeleSystems OJSC, a JSFC Sistema
company of Russia, to bring the globally acclaimed telecom brandMTS to India. MTS isthe 8th largest telecom brand in the world. Millward Brown in its yearly listing of top 100
brands, recently voted MTS as the 72nd most powerful brand globally.
SSTL is a joint venture company between Sistema {LSE-SSA} of Russia and Shyam Group
of India. Sistema is the majority share holder in this joint venture with a 73.710% equity
stake, along with the Shyam Group, holding a 23.792% stake and the remaining 2.498%
being held by the public. In a recent development, the Russian Government has picked upapproximately 17% stake in SSTL for US$ 600 million.
Key Acknowledgement & Milestones
In April 2010, Sistema JSFC has been recognized as the Best Russian Company of2009 operating in India.
MTS, the mobile telecom service brand of SSTL, has over 10 million customersinIndia.
MBlaze, the high-speed mobile broadband service, launched in November 2009 has
clocked over 600,000 satisfied mobile broadband customers in a very short span oftime.
SSTL was the FIRST telecom company in India to launch mobile broadband internet services
with speeds up to 3.1 Mbps in the state of Jharkhand in April 2010.Recently Telecom
Regulatory Authority of India (Indias APEX Telecom Regulatory Body) recognized MTSfor having one of the highest percentage of satisfied customers for Network Performance. In
May 2010, renowned industry body CMAI, Association of India awarded MTS the National
Telecom Award for being the Fastest Growing Data Operator.In February 2011, MTS India
was recognized at the World HRD Congress for
Best HR Practices Award in Reward & Recognition Strategies
Best Overall Recruiting & Staffing Organization
MTS Brand
MTS is the global telecom brand of Mobile TeleSystems (MTS) OJSC (NYSE: MBT) of
Russia. In December 2008, Sistema Shyam TeleServices Ltd, a joint venture between
Sistema (LSE-SSA) of Russia and Shyam Group of India, brought the MTS brand into Indiaunder a brand license agreement with Mobile TeleSystems (MTS) OJSC. This extended the
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
17/101
I connect Final Report
9
brand of MTS beyond the CIS. The MTS brand is one of the most recognized in the
world. The latest rankings from Millward Brown Optimor features the MTS brand as the
72nd most powerful brand globally with a value of $9.7 billion. In 2008, MTS became the
first and only Russian brand to enter BRANDZ Top 100 Most Powerful Brands, a ranking
published by the Financial Times and Millward Brown. Brand MTS was launched in 2006 inRussia and got built based on its reputation as the leading telecommunication group offering
world class telecom services in Russia, Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
In India, brand MTS offers voice & data services to over 10 million subscribers and operates
across all 9 telecom circles of India.
MTS launched the high-speed mobile broadband service, MBlaze, in November 2009 and has
seen tremendous market acceptance with over 5 lakh satisfied mobile broadband customers.
The high speed mobile broadband service has been made available in more than 130 towns
(Including all Metros) across the country. In April 2010, MTS is also credited to havelaunched its LIVE TV and Video on demand service, aptly called MTS TV for all MBlaze
customers.
History
MTS was established in October 1993 by Moscow City Telephone Network (MGTS), T-
Mobile Deutschland GmbH (T-Mobile), an affiliate of Deutsche Telekom AG, Siemens AG
(Siemens) and several other shareholders. In late 1996, Sistema JSFC acquired a majority
stake in MTS and has remained the primary owner ever since.MTS was the first company to
launch GSM services in the Moscow region in 1994. In subsequent years, MTS has expandedrapidly in Russia largely through the acquisition of smaller independent players and became
the leading national mobile operator.MTS initiated its international expansion in 2002
through the establishment of Mobile TeleSystems LLC, a joint venture with Beltelecom, the
national fixed line operator in Belarus.
In 2003, MTS continued to expand in the CIS by acquiring the leading operator UMC in
Ukraine, the biggest CIS market outside of Russia.
MTS entered Central Asia in 2004 through the acquisition of the leading mobile phone
operator in Uzbekistan, Uzdunrobita. In June 2005, the Company acquired BarashCommunications Technologies, Inc., the number one operator in Turkmenistan.
In September 2007, MTS continued its international expansion through the acquisition of the
leading mobile operator in Armenia, K-Telecom.
In December 2008, MTS started to expose its brand outside the CIS borders. MTS and
Shyam Telelink Limited, JSFC Sistema's telecommunications subsidiary in India, announces
the agreement to allow Shyam Telelink to use MTS brand in India. The decision to introduce
the brand to India is reflective of thebrands success in the Companys markets of operationsince its launch in May 2006. In April 2008, MTS brand was recognized as one of the
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
18/101
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
19/101
I connect Final Report
11
telecom services to over 10 million wireless subscribers including more than 1million HighSpeed Mobile Broadband customers in over 450 towns across the country. MTS is wellrecognized in India and worldwide for its commitment to high quality and innovative telecomsolutions. It is focused on creating a strong portfolio of smart phones catering to customersacross various segments. The companys objective is to leverage the advancements inInformation & Communication Technologies (ICT) to contribute towards progressive socio-economic change, especially in the fields of Health and Education.
At its peak, MTS operated services in 21 out of 22 telecom circles of India. However, MTS
has shut services in 13 circles and currently operates in 9 circles.
Delhi
Gujarat
Karnataka
Kerala
Kolkata
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh (West) (includes Uttarkhand)
West Bengal (includes Sikkim and Andaman and Nicobar Islands)
Market Structure
Company has acquired three carriers in eight circles and in total continued development in
the nine most economically attractive Indian regions: Rajasthan, Delhi, Gujarat, Uttar
Pradesh (West), Kolkata, West Bengal, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka. It managed to
revive revenue growth in the last quarter of 2013, showing a 7.4% quarter-on-quarter
increase, and shifted its focus back to business expansion and development. The company's
subscriber base grew by 2.2% in the last quarter, while its data customer base increased by
10.7%. Subscribers monthly minutes of usage also increased by 39.5% to 373 minutes.Blended mobile ARPU grew by 22.8% in local currency, while non-voice revenues from data
and value-added services accounted for 34.7% of total revenue in 2013.
In October, having secured new licenses and three carriers from the nine above-mentioned
circles, it has launched the EVDO Rev.B Phase 2 high-speed data transfer services, offering
an access speed of up to 9.8 Mb/sec and the highest quality available in the market to date.
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
20/101
I connect Final Report
12
Company Structure
Figure 7: Company Structure
CEO
(Country level)
CXO
(Department
Wise)
COO (Circle)
HOD
(Finance)
HOD
(Sales)
HOD
(Marketing)
Vertical Head
(DATA)
Vertical Head
(Voice)
Operational
level
Operational
Level
Operational
Level
Vertical Head
(VAS)
Vertical head
(Wireline)
Vertical Head
(Smartphone)
HOD
(Vigilance)
HOD
(CSD)
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
21/101
I connect Final Report
13
Marketing Department MTS:
Marketing department at MTS is divided into five separate verticals which are
Figure 8: Marketing Department verticals
MTS the giant telecom company is divided into five major segments known as circles.
VOICEcircle focuses on the voice or calling facility provided by the company. Voice
can be divided into GSM and CDMA segments. MTS works on CDMA segment of
voice. Its major competitors in the field are Reliance and DoCoMo. Out of 22 circlesMTS works in 9 circles. Voice deals with two main verticals- Acquisition, which is
through retailer and another is UNR, which is focused on existing customer base.
DATA circle can be segregated into Acquisition and UNR, which can further be
divided into postpaid and prepaid. Data circle consists of various products like wifis, dongles, blazers etc. The main technologies adopted by MTS for its data centric
products are 1X, REV A and REV B. 1X is no more a part of the MTS data circle as
its speed is now enhanced in form of the other two technologies. REV B is the most
preferred one as it works both as a Wi-Fi as well as a dongle with a high speed of 9.8
Mbps. SMARTPHONE circle consists of various phones provided by the company. With
the success of the android phones all across the globe, MTS has recently launched
Canvas Blaze which is designed by Micromax with special features like additional
sim slot for the existing GSM sim with the customers, 5 inch touchscreen, Mblaze and
with a storage capacity of 32 GB. The company majorly focuses on this circle in
accordance with the market conditions and consumer needs.
WIRELINE creates a niche market in the telecom segment as the major focus
nowadays is on the smartphones. MTS stands as a market leader for the wire line
services in Rajasthan. It provides High-speed data transmission over wire line
Marketing
Department
VOICE
DATA
SMART
PHONE
WIRELINE
MARCOM
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
22/101
I connect Final Report
14
phone.MTS has an extensive fiber optic Network in Rajasthan, with only the last mile
laid in copper. This ensures practically fault free and enhanced quality of services:
-Superior voice quality-Host of value added services-Bouquet of differential services ease of payment
MARCOM deals with market communication efficacy and also various methods of
communications. Marcom is another name for branding, whose prime component is
advertisement i.e, science of arresting the human intelligence just long enough to get
money from it. Marcom is broadly classified as ATL (Above the line) and BTL
(Below the line). ATL consists of print ads, radio, creative financing, outdoor etc.,
whereas BTL consists of posters, leaflets, flanges etc.
Mission, Vision, Values and Objectives
Mission: MTS customers can actively shape their lives anytime and anywhere with therange of innovative telecom products and services. We offer people greater choice andinspiration in how they spend their valuable assets: their time and energy.
VISION:We empower people to pursue their purpose in modern networked world. MTSshares common values with people who know what they want to achieve in their lives and are
full of energy to hit their goals.
Values:
Inspiration to be a doer.
Delivering excellence
Entrepreneurial spirits
Mutuality
Objectives and strategies: Main objective of the company is to increase the Average
Revenue and decrease the loss on year on year basis. Strategy is focussing on accelerating
development of its data services and promoting smart phones, with maximised monetisationof voice services.
Major Competitors:
Telecom Industry is one of the fastest growing industries in India. Following telecom
operators are the major players in telecom Industry in India.
1. Bharti Airtel
2. Idea Cellular
3. Vodafone.
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
23/101
I connect Final Report
15
4. Tata Docomo
5. BSNL
6. Reliance
7. Aircel
Recent Trends in SSTL
1. Government priced 800 MHz spectrum at 65% of the price of 1800 MHz spectrum.
2. It uses non-contiguous CDMA spectrum in the 800 MHz band. In march 2013, DOT has
fix the reserve price of a pan India. 5 MHz block of airways in 800 MHz band at Rs 9100 cr.
3. It is observed that prepaid base is better than the postpaid base in MTS.
4. MTS has upgraded the network to Rev B phase 2 technologies by both software as well as
hardware. The speed has been optimized to the level of 9.8 Mbps.
5. The company has allocated 2 channels exclusively in all circles.
6. The company has enhanced its portfolio of smartphones and launched Rev B Mifi dongle
which connect 5 devices at a time. Till now Mifi dongle have been launched by TATA only.
7. Presently 25-30% of the voice retailers are data service enablers which have to increased to
60-70%.
8. On 3 Oct 2013, SSTL got its unified telecom license valid for 20 years. Itll providetechnology neutral telecom services for a period of 20 years in 8 circles.
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
24/101
I connect Final Report
16
4. PRODUCT/ SERVICE OFFERINGS:
MTS offers both prepaid and post paid services in all verticals. MTS offer following types of
data Products:-
I. MTS MBlaze Ultra- 9.8 MBPS
II. MTS MBlaze- 3.1 Mbps
III. MTS WIFI- 9.8 Mbps
MTS MBlaze Ultra
Features-
MTUltra High Speed Internet for broadband mobility - 3 times faster than MTSMblaze
Dual-Band 800/1900MHz
Plug and Play
Downlink speeds upto 9.8Mbps
Dual Antenna for greater receive diversity
M-ULTRA Prepaid Portfolio
M-Ultra Retail Prepaid FRC
Base Plan:Validity: 2 years, Base Tariff: Rs 1/MB
FRC Details:
MRP Bundled Usage Validity Extra Usage
Rs. 240
Unlimited access to
Facebook + Twitter + Linkedin& 6
GB
30 days Re 1/MB
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
25/101
I connect Final Report
17
New M-Ultra Retail Prepaid STVs Portfolio
STV
MRPs
(Rs.)
Bundled Usage
Validity
(in
days)
Extra
Usage
Charges
*Speeds
134 1 GB Unlimited*1 day
(24hrs.)NA
Upto 1 GB- 9.8 Mbps, 1 GB to 4
GB - 144kbps, 4 GB onwards - 64
kbps
339 2 GB Unlimited* 7 NA
Upto 2 GB- 9.8 Mbps, 2 GB to 6
GB- 144kbps, 6 GB onwards -64
kbps
303 1 GB 30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product
450 2 GB 30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product
590 3 GB 30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product
747
4 GB and Unlimited access
to
Facebook + Twitter +
Linkedin*
30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product
898 5 GB Unlimited* 30 NA
Upto 5 GB -9.8 Mbps, 5 GB to 8
GB- 144kbps, 8 GB onwards- 64
kbps
1199 10 GB Unlimited* 30 NA
Upto 10 GB-9.8 Mbps, 10 GB to
16 GB- 144kbps, 16 GB onwards-
64 kbps
1498 15 GB Unlimited* 30 NA
Upto 15 GB-9.8 Mbps, 15 GB to
20 GB- 144kbps, 20 GB onwards-
64 kbps
M-Ultra Top Ups:
Only top ups >Rs 50 will be valid.
MRP (Rs.) Talk Time (Rs.)
50 41.50
100 86.00
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
26/101
I connect Final Report
18
110 97.90
200 175.00
220 195.80
250 222.50
300 267.00
400 356.00
500 445.00
1000 890.00
MTS MBLAZE
Features:
Plug and Play Enabled Speed up to 3.1 Mbps
Fastest uploads at a speed to up to 1.8 Mbps
Micro SD Card slot for data storage
MBLAZE Prepaid Portfolio
MBlaze Retail Prepaid FRCs
Base Plan:Validity: 2 years, Base Tariff: Rs 1/MB
FRC Details:
MRP Bundled Usage Validity Extra Usage
Rs. 220
Unlimited access to
Facebook + Twitter + Linkedin&6
GB
30 days Re 1/MB
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
27/101
I connect Final Report
19
New MBlaze Retail Prepaid STVs Portfolio
SegmentsSTV
MRPs
Usage and Validity
UsageValidity
in days
Extra
Usage
*Speeds
Short
Validity
STVs
Rs.96 1 GB Unlimited*24
hoursNA
Upto 1 GB - 3.1 Mbps, 1
GB to 4GB- 144 kbps, >4
GB - 64 kbps
Rs.298 2 GB Unlimited* 7 NA
Upto2 GB - 3.1 Mbps, 2
GB to 6GB- 144 kbps, >6
GB - 64 kbps
Rs.179 2 GB Unlimited* 3 NA
Upto 2GB - 3.1 Mbps,
2GB to 4GB- 144kbps,> 4
GB - 64 kbps
Rs.225 2 GB Unlimited* 5 NA
Upto 2GB - 3.1 Mbps,
2GB to 4GB- 144kbps, >4
GB - 64 kbps
Rs.379 3 GB Unlimited* 10 NA
Upto 3GB - 3.1 Mbps,
3GB to 5GB- 144kbps,>5
GB- 64 kbps
Rs.449 4 GB Unlimited* 15 NA
Upto 4GB - 3.1
Mbps,4GB to 6GB-
144kbps,>6 GB - 64 kbps
Low
Usage
STVs
Rs.198 750 MB 30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product
Rs.248 1GB 30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product
Rs.375 2 GB 30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product
Rs.490 3GB 30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product
Social
Media
STVsRs.647
Unlimited access to
Facebook +
Twitter +
Linkedin&4 GB
30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product
High
Usage
STVs
Rs.798 5 GB Unlimited* 30 NA
Upto 5GB - 3.1 Mbps,
5GB to 10GB-
144kbps,>10 GB- 64 kbps
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
28/101
I connect Final Report
20
Rs.999 12 GB Unlimited* 30 NA
Upto 12GB - 3.1 Mbps,
12GB to15GB-
144kbps,>15 GB- 64 kbps
Rs.1298 15 GB Unlimited* 30 NA Upto 15GB - 3.1 Mbps,15GB to 20GB-
144kbps,>20 GB- 64 kbps
Long
Validity
STVs
Rs.698 4 GB 60 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product
Rs.998 6 GB 90 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product
Rs.1499 15 GB 90 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product
Rs.39906 GB
/MonthUnlimited* 180 NA
Upto 6 GB - 3.1 Mbps, 6
GB to 10 GB- 144 kbps, >10 GB - 64 kbps
Exclusive Web Recharges:
Exclusive Web
Recharges
STV
MRPs
Usage and Validity
Bundled
Usage
Validity
in days
Extra
Usage*Speed
Available on
web onlyRs.818
7 GB
Unlimited*30 Days N/A
Upto 7 GB usage @
3.1 Mbps, Above 7 GB
@ 144 kbps
Available on
web onlyRs.1010
13 GB
Unlimited*30 Days N/A
Upto 13 GB usage @
3.1 Mbps, Above 13
GB @ 144 kbps
Available on
web only Rs.133017 GB
Unlimited* 30 Days N/A
Upto 17 GB usage @
3.1 Mbps, Above 17GB @ 144 kbps
MBlaze Top Ups:
Only top ups >Rs 50 will be valid.
MRP (Rs.) Talk Time (Rs.)
50 41.50
100 86.00
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
29/101
I connect Final Report
21
110 97.90
200 175.00
220 195.80
250 222.50
300 267.00
400 356.00
500 445.00
1000 890.00
MTS WIFI
Features:
3GPlus Upto 9.8 Mbps 5 Wifi-enabled Devices - Smartphone, Laptop, Tablets, Works with Laptop USB, Car Charger and Travel Charger Plug and Play
MTS WIFI Prepaid Portfolio
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
30/101
I connect Final Report
22
MTS WIFI Postpaid Portfolio
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
31/101
I connect Final Report
23
5. Distribution Procedure and Sales Force
MTS distribution channel:
Distribution procedure and Margins:
Airtel directly supply its products to the distributors in Urban Areas through TM.
Territory Manager distributes the products as per demand TO individual distributors,
which is scheduled as per the target for the territory.
The Margin for the Distributor is 5%.
Distributor distributes the products to the FOSs. Their job is to supply those products
to the Retailers. The Retailers margin is 2%
ZBM on the basis of sales achieved above target provides spurts (schemes) to the
Distributors hence in reality margin may cross 5% sometimes.
Stock system in distribution:
The complete stock maintenance procedure is categorically divided in two parts.
1. Stock to be maintained by Distributor2. Stock to be maintained by Retailer
In the case of Distributor:
The distributor has to keep the LAPU balance for minimum 7 days; Here 35% of the value
must be in RCV.
In the case of Retailer:
The retailer has to keep LAPU balance for 3 days (minimum amount Rs.1500); Here 33% of
the value must be in RCV.
(The FOS visits each Outlet in alternative days whether there is any shortage of product or
not. The supply system of MTS is so strong that a retailer will never go with shortage of
product. It is also a compulsory task for each FOS to go and to ask Retailers whether there is
any shortage of product, once in every 2 days.)
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
32/101
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
33/101
I connect Final Report
25
MTS also control the sales force because they know the importance of control system in
organization. MTS use these four steps to decide their sales force and at each step they check
whether the process is followed within the policies of the organization. Hence we can clearly
see the difference between MTS sales growth and its competitors.TeleCompass-
TeleCompass (TC) is a system that automatically records all the stages in a sales process.
This includes a contact management system which tracks all the transactions that has been
made with a given customer, the purpose of the transaction.
What to get-
Ensures that your sales effort doesnt get duplicated thereby eliminating the risk. It eases the
work for Audit department.
It is fully integrated in all the departments that deal with customer service management.
How it benefits MTS sales team-
For the business: Sales team can approach the market in an organized and efficient manner.
For the managers: They can easily monitor the performance of your work force, solve
potential problems and make your people more proactive.
For the sales teams: Its easier to close a deal by keeping a track of your orders, proposals and
clients.
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
34/101
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
35/101
I connect Final Report
27
benchmarking the same vis--vis competitors.
Research methodology: Exploratory method.
The main purpose of exploratory research studies is that of formulating a problem for more
precise investigations or of developing the working hypotheses from an operational point of
view. The major emphasis in such studies is on the discovery of ideas and insights.
Any one of the following three methods can be used to carry out such kind of research study:
-
Survey of concerning literature.
The Experience survey.
The analysis of insight-stimulating.
Experience survey had been used to carry out such study.
Experience Survey:
It means the survey of people who have had practical experience with the problem to be
studied. The object of such a survey is to obtain insight into the relationships between
variables and new ideas relating to the research problem. An experience survey may enablethe researcher to define the problem more concisely and help in the formulation of the
research process. This survey may as well provide information about the practical
possibilities of research.
Sample Size and Method
Sample size : 209
Sample Method : Random Simple Sampling
SAMPLE
While deciding about the sample of research, it is required from the researchers point to pay
attention to these under mentioned points:
a) Sample Units:
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
36/101
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
37/101
I connect Final Report
29
Questionnaire Design:
As the questionnaire is self-administrated, the survey is kept simple and user friendly. Words
used in the questionnaire are readily understandable to all respondents.
Questionnaire was developed after studying the market conditions, awareness among the
retailers and the needs and wants of the retailers.
The parameters that are measured:
Retailer reliability
Customer and Retailers awareness
Customer satisfaction
Factor preference of the retailers to promote a particular brand.Personnel interaction:
Face to face interaction was done in order to identify grievances of the retailers.
Limitations of the Study
At most attention was taken to eliminate any kind of biasness & misinterpretation in the study
to get optimum result, even though the following limitations could have certain degree of
impact on the findings.
Data collected about may not represent the real picture as the sample size covered
only 209 retailers against 8000 retailers.
Some respondents were not willing to respond and few of them who responded were
in hurry hence the active participation was lacking.
As survey was conducted over phone so proper rationality towards the company and
its services was lacking.
Scope of the StudyBy this study, satisfaction level as well as attitude of the retailers towards MTS have been
found out, which can be used in strategy formulation in Rajasthan region.
Suggestions have been formulated keeping in mind the following points.
Factors for dissatisfaction towards the company services have been studied from
Retailer point of view which can be taken care of& improved.
Getting an opportunity to convince & interact with the Retailers.
Creating awareness & finding out potential Retailers for MTS.
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
38/101
I connect Final Report
30
Data Analysis and Interpretation
Retailer Survey
Objective 1: To know the types of Retailing Outlets.
Activating Both Recharging Grand
Total
Count of Outlet Type 2 136 71 209
2
13 6
71
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Activating Both Recharging
Outlet Type for Rajasthan region
Interpretation:
65% of the retailing outlets have activating as well as recharging facilities hence enhancingthe visibility and accessibility to the consumers.
Recharging outlets account for 34% while activating outlets are only 1%.
Objective 2: To know the most selling brand
Airce
l
Airte
l
Ide
a
MT
S
Relianc
e
TAT
A
Vodafon
e
Grand
Total
Count of Most
selling brand
14 89 10 54 9 17 16 209
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
39/101
I connect Final Report
31
13
89
10
54
917 16
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
8090
100
Aircel Airtel Idea MTS Reliance TATA Vodafone
Most Selling Brand for Rajasthan Region
Interpretation:
Airtel is the market leader with 43% followed by MTS with 26%.
While other competitors lag behind due to poor connectivity between 6% to 8%.
Row
Labels
Aircel Airtel Idea MTS Reliance TATA Vodafone Grand
TotalJaipur 4 20 3 17 4 1 2 51
4
20
17
4
1 2
0
5
10
15
20
25
Jaipur
Most selling brand for Jaipur
Zone
Aircel
Airtel
Idea
MTS
Reliance
TATA
Vodafone
Interpretation:
40% of the market is led by Airtel, while MTS covers 34%. Tata has the least market withonly 2%.
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
40/101
I connect Final Report
32
2
14
7
1 1
2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Ajmer
Most selling brand for Ajmer Zone
Aircel
Airtel
MTS
Reliance
TATA
Vodafone
Interpretation:
In Ajmer, Airtel is the market leader with 52%, while MTS has 26%. Reliance and Tata
equally compete with the lowest market of just 1%.
1
9
1
8
1
3 3
0
2
4
6
8
10
Alwar
Most selling brand for Alwar Zone
Aircel
Airtel
Idea
MTS
Reliance
TATA
Vodafone
Interpretation:
In Alwar, Airtel and MTS are close competitors with 35% and 31% respectively.
Row
Labels
Aircel Airtel MTS Reliance TATA Vodafone Grand
Total
Ajmer 2 14 7 1 1 2 27
RowLabels
Aircel Airtel Idea MTS Reliance TATA Vodafone GrandTotal
Alwar 1 9 1 8 1 3 3 26
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
41/101
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
42/101
I connect Final Report
34
Row Labels Aircel Airtel Idea MTS TATA Vodafone Grand
Total
Kota 1 9 4 7 4 1 26
1
9
4
7
4
1
0
2
4
6
8
10
Kota
Most selling brand for Kota Zone
Aircel
Airtel
Idea
MTS
TATA
Vodafone
Interpretation:
In Kota, Airtel leads the market with 35%, while MTS has 27% market presence.
Reliance has no market in this zone.
1
15
4
1
3 2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Udaipur
Most selling brand for Udaipur Zone
Aircel
Airtel
MTS
Reliance
TATA
Vodafone
Interpretation:
In Udaipur, Airtel covers 58%, MTS covers just 15% due to lack of proper communication to
the retailers. Tata has comparatively better market than other zones with 12%, while Relianceand Aircel equally compete at 4% each.
Row Labels Aircel Airtel MTS Reliance TATA Vodafone GrandTotal
Udaipur 1 15 4 1 3 2 26
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
43/101
I connect Final Report
35
Objective 3: To know the reason to associate with the most selling brand
Connectivity Dealer
Relationship
Demand Margin Promotional
Schemes
Roaming Grand
Total
Reason to
associate withthe most
selling brand
90 3 52 13 47 4 209
90
3
52
13
47
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 Reason to associate with the most selling
brand for Rajasthan region
Interpretation:
As surveyed, 43% of the retailers like to associate with the most selling brand because of
excellent connectivity.
Also due to increasing enhanced technologies, demand has increased immensely which
further pushes 25% retailers to associate with the brands with good market.
Telecom companies survive in the market majorly with the schemes they bring to the market.
Hence 22% retailers like to associate with the most selling brand due to innovative schemes.
Row
Labels
Connectivity Demand Margin Promotional
Schemes
Roaming Grand
Total
Jaipur 21 13 2 12 3 51
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
44/101
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
45/101
I connect Final Report
37
8
1
10
1
6
0
2
4
68
10
12
Connectivity Dealer Rel ations hip Demand Marg in Promotional
Schemes
Alwar
Reason to associate with the most selling brand
for Alwar region
Interpretation:
In Alwar, 38% retailers are associated with the most selling brand due to demand in the
market, while 31% retailers due to good connectivity.
Row Labels Connectivit
y
Demand Margi
n
Promotional
Schemes
Grand Total
Bikaner 11 5 3 8 27
11
5
3
8
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Connectivity Demand Margin Promotional Schemes
Bikaner
Reason to associate with the most selling brand
for Bikaner region
Interpretation:
In Bikaner, 41% retailers are associated to the most selling brand due to good connectivity
while 30% are due to good promotional schemes launched by the brands regularly.
Row Labels Connectivit
y
Demand Margi
n
Promotiona
l Schemes
Roaming Gran
d
Total
Jodhpur 10 4 2 9 1 26
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
46/101
I connect Final Report
38
10
4
2
9
1
0
2
4
68
10
12
Connectivity Demand Margin Promotional
Schemes
Roaming
Jodhpur
Reason to associate with the most selling brand
for Jodhpur region
Interpretation:
In Jodhpur, 38% retailers are associated due to good connectivity while 35% are due to good
promotional schemes. 8% of the retailers say that they have good margin in the particularbrand which triggers them to associate with the most selling brand.
13
6
2
5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Connectivity Demand Margin Promotional Schemes
Kota
Reason to associate with the most selling brand
for Kota region
Interpretation:
In Kota, half of the retailersi.e 50% say that because of connectivity they would like to
associate with the most selling brand, while 23% of them say that demand of the brand is
high in the market
Row
Labels
Connectivity Dealer
Relationship
Demand Margin Promotional
Schemes
Grand
Total
Udaipur 15 1 6 2 2 26
Row Labels Connectivit
y
Demand Margi
n
Promotiona
l Schemes
Grand Total
Kota 13 6 2 5 26
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
47/101
I connect Final Report
39
15
1
6
2 2
0
5
10
15
20
Connectivity Dealer Rel ations hip Dema nd Ma rg in Promot ional
Schemes
Udaipur
Reason to associate with the most selling brand
for Kota region
Interpretation:
In Udaipur as well, 58% retailers like to associate with the most selling brand due to excellent
connectivity, while 23% retailers are associated because of high market demand.
Only 4% retailers say that due to good dealer relationship they like to associate with the
brand.
Objective 4: To know the monthly recharge amount collection of the most selling brand
925
53
57
45
20
Monthly Recharge Amount for most
selling brand for Rajasthan region
>60000
10000-20000
20000-30000
30000-40000
40000-50000
50000-60000
>60000 10000-
20000
20000-
30000
30000-
40000
40000-
50000
50000-
60000
Grand
Total
Monthly Rechargeamount of the most
selling brand for
Rajasthan Region
9 25 53 57 45 20 209
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
48/101
I connect Final Report
40
Interpretation:
27% retailers have monthly recharge collection between Rs. 30,000-40,000, while 25%
retailers have monthly recharge collection between Rs. 20,000-30,000.
22% have monthly collection between 40K- 50K whereas only 4% have monthly collectionover Rs. 60,000 which is due to good connectivity and high demand.
Monthly recharge
count
>70 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 Grand Total
3 92 70 31 10 3 209
3
92
70
31
10 30
20
40
60
80
100
>70 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70
Monthly recharge count forRajasthan region
Interpretation:
44% retailers say they have monthly recharge count of 20-30, while 33% of them are able toattract 30-40 customers monthly. Only 1% retailers are able to attract 60-70 customersmonthly.
Objective 5: To know the average LAPU balance of MTS with the retailers
Row
Labels
>3000 1000-1500 1500-2000 2000-2500 2000-
3000
2500-
3000
Grand
Total
Jaipur 5 7 14 20 1 4 51
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
49/101
I connect Final Report
41
9
48
72
59
19
1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
>3000 1000-1500 1500-2000 2000-2500 2500-3000 500-1000
Average LAPU balance for Rajasthan region
Interpretation:
34% retailers have monthly LAPU balance of 1500-2000, while 28% have average LAPU
balance of 2000-2500.
Only 4% retailers have LAPU balance above 3000 which is due to good dealer relationship
and excellent chasing by the company.
Objective 6: To understand the reason behind keeping average LAPU balance less than
Rs.500
95
53
4
57
Reason for keeping LAPU balance
< Rs.500 (Rajasthan region)
Less demand
Never happened
Recharging issues due to
network congestion
Service Issues(sales
person not responding)
Less
demand
Never
happened
Recharging
issues due to
network
congestion
Service
Issues(sales
person not
responding)
Grand
Total
Reason for
LAPU Bal
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
50/101
I connect Final Report
42
Interpretation:
45% retailers say due to less demand in the area their LAPU balance sometimes fall below
500, while 27% retailers face service issues due to which LAPU balance reaches below
500.They say that due to lack of regular visits by the company executives they face such
problem. 25% retailers have never faced any problem and they always have LAPU balance
above 500, which implies good communication between the sales executive and the retailer.
Objective 7: To know the reason for not promoting MTS data products
Count of
Reason for not
promoting
MTS
Lack of
Communicatio
n
Less
demand
Less
Promotion
al schemes
Low
Margi
n
No
Reaso
n
Gran
d
Total
40 56 8 27 78 209
40
56
827
78
Reason for not promoting MTS
(Rajasthan region)
Lack of Communication
Less demand
Less Promotional schemes
Low Margin
No Reason
Interpretation:
37% retailers are satisfied with the company services and are happy to promote MTS, while
27% of them find less demand in the market hence not willing to promote MTS. 13%
retailers say they have low margin in MTS services
Row
Labels
Lack of
Communication
Less
demand
Less
Promotional
schemes
Low
Margin
No
Reaso
n
Gran
d
Total
Jaipur 11 9 2 10 19 51
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
51/101
I connect Final Report
43
119
210
19
05
1015
20
Lackof
Communicatio
n
Lessdemand
Less
Promotional
schemes
LowMargin
NoReason
Jaipur
Reason for not promoting MTS
(Jaipur Zone)
Interpretation:
In Jaipur, 22% retailers do not promote MTS due to lack of proper communication by the
company and poor response on shortage of stock.
Row
Labels
Lack of
Communication
Less
demand
Less
Promotional
schemes
Low
Margin
No
Reason
Grand
Total
Ajmer 4 8 1 1 13 27
4
8
1 1
13
02468
101214
Lackof
Com
municatio
n
Le
ssdemand
Less
P
romotional
schemes
L
owMargin
NoReason
Ajmer
Reason for not promoting MTS
(Ajmer Zone)
Interpretation:
48% retailers are happy with the service while 30% face less demand in the area and 15% are
dissatisfied with the untimely communication by the FOSs
Row
Labels
Lack of
Communication
Less demand Low Margin No Reason Grand
Total
Alwar 5 10 2 9 26
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
52/101
I connect Final Report
44
5
10
2
9
0
2
4
6
810
12
Lack of
Communication
Less demand Low Margin No Reason
Alwar
Reason for not promoting MTS
(Alwar Zone)
Interpretation:
38% retailers find less demand in the market while 19% of them complain that there is noproper communication by FOSs.
Row
Labels
Lack of
Communication
Less demand Less
Promotional
schemes
Low
Margin
No
Reason
Grand
Total
Bikaner 4 7 1 6 9 27
4
7
1
6
9
02468
10
Lackof
Communicatio
n
Lessdemand
Less
Promotional
schemes
LowMargin
NoReason
Bikaner
Reason for not promoting MTS(Bikaner Zone)
Interpretation:
22% retailers say they get fewer margins in promoting MTS while 26% retailers find less
demand in the market hence not willing to promote MTS.
Row
Labels
Lack of
Communication
Less
demand
Less
Promotional
schemes
Low
Margin
No
Reason
Grand
Total
Jodhpur 6 6 1 3 10 26
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
53/101
I connect Final Report
45
6 61
3
10
02468
1012
Lackof
Communicatio
n
Lessdemand
Less
Promotional
schemes
LowMargin
NoReason
Jodhpur
Reason for not promoting MTS
(Jodhpur Zone)
Interpretation:
23% retailers find less demand in the market and improper communication as the majorreasons for not promoting MTS.
Row Labels Lack of
Communication
Less
demand
Less
Promotional
schemes
Low
Margin
No
Reason
Grand
Total
Kota 3 7 2 3 11 26
3
7
2 3
11
02468
1012
Lackof
Communicatio
n
Lessdemand
Less
Promotional
schemes
LowMargin
NoReason
Kota
Reason for not promoting MTS
(Kota Zone)
Interpretation:
42% retailers are happy to serve and promote MTS, while 27% find less demand in the
market hence are not willing to promote MTS.
Row Labels Lack of
Communication
Less
demand
Less
Promotional
schemes
Low
Margin
No
Reason
Grand
Total
Udaipur 7 9 1 2 7 26
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
54/101
I connect Final Report
46
79
1 2
7
0246
810
Lackof
Communicatio
n
Lessdemand
Less
Promotional
schemes
LowMargin
NoReason
Udaipur
Reason for not promoting MTS
(Udaipur Zone)
Interpretation:
35% retailers say due to less demand they are not willing to promote MTS over market
leading brands, while 27% retailers say they do not get proper information from FOSs hence
lose zeal to promote MTS.
8% retailers say they get low margin in MTS as compared to other leading brands.
Objective 8: To know which MTS data product has maximum sell
Count of MTS Data
product with maxpotential
198 248 375 490 647 798 999 Grand
Total31 60 38 67 8 1 4 209
31
60
38
67
8
1 4
MTS data product with maximum
potential (Rajasthan Region)
198
248
375
490
647
798
999
Interpretation:
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
55/101
I connect Final Report
47
Low Usage STVs:
32% retailers have maximum sell of STV 490 which provides 3GB for a month, while 29%
have maximum sale of STV 248 which provides 1GB.18% retailers have maximum sale of
STV 375 which gives 2GB per month.
Social media STVs:
4% retailers say they have maximum sell of STV 647 which provides unlimited access to
Facebook + twitter+ LinkedIn and 4GB for a month.
High Usage STVs:
Only 2% retailers say they have maximum sell of STV 999 which provides 10GB unlimited
access for a month.
Objective 9: To know the time of the day when retailers get the maximum customers.
Count of Time of the
day you get the
maximum recharges
3-6pm 6-9pm 9-11pm 9-12am Grand Total
5 87 3 114 209
5
87
3
114
Time of the day to get maximumrecharges (Rajasthan region)
3-6pm
6-9pm
9-11pm
9-12am
Interpretation:
55% retailers say they get maximum customers in the morning between 9 am to 12 am, while
42% get maximum rush in the evening between 6pm to 9pm.Only 1% retailers will get
maximum recharges during late evening hours between 9pm to 11pm.
Objective 10: To know which mode of communication is liked by the retailers most
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
56/101
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
57/101
I connect Final Report
49
20
26
14
51
98
Frequency of visits by
company executives(Rajasthan region)
Alternate Days
Fortnight
Monthly
Not regular
Weekly
Interpretation:
47% retailers say company executives visit them weekly while 10% retailers are happy with
the service as company executives visit them every alternate day.
24% retailers are not happy with the service as the company executives do not visit themregularly hence they lack proper information about the new offers and schemes.
12% retailers say CE visit them every fortnight while 7% say CE visit them monthly which
make them unsatisfied with the services.
Objective 12: To know how is the product awareness among people
Product awareness
among people about
MTS
Average Excellent Good Poor Grand
Total
47 10 149 3 209
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
58/101
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
59/101
I connect Final Report
51
7
34
168
Company representative's behaviour with retailers
(Rajasthan region)
Average
excellent
Good
Interpretation:
80% retailers say that company representatives behaviour is good, while 3% report it asaverage.
16% of the retailers perceive the company representatives behaviour to be excellent whentheir frequency of visit was on alternate days.
Objective 14: To know how is customers satisfaction of after-sales-support service
How is customer's
satisfaction of After
Sales Support
Average excellent Good Grand Total
30 15 164 209
30 15
164
Customer satisfaction of after-sales-
support service of MTS (Rajasthan
region)
Average
excellent
Good
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
60/101
I connect Final Report
52
Interpretation:
78% retailers perceive the customer satisfaction of after-sales-support service to be good,
while14% report it to be average.
7% retailers perceive it to be excellent.This percentage constitutes customers who haveexcellent awareness about the MTS products and services.
Objective15: To know if the retailers support desk helpful to retailers
Is retailer support desk
helpful to the retailers in
solving their problems
No Yes Grand Total
23 186 209
23
186
Is retailer support desk helpful
(Rajasthan region)
No
Yes
Interpretation:
89% retailers experience retailer support desk helpful, while 11% do not consider the same.
SWOT ANALYSIS
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
61/101
I connect Final Report
53
7. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Summer Internship Research project was undertaken in Marketing Department of MTS
India Rajasthan Circle to study the channel satisfaction of MTS Service In data and
benchmarking the same with its competitors. Extensive background research was done using
the secondary data provided by the company and informations available from the internet.
STRENGTHS
Execellent Connectivity
Innovative Schemes
Good service support
Reliable and qualityproduct
WEAKNESSES
Only CDMA, no GSM
Lack of propercommunication to theretailers.
Lacking efficient globaloperations.
Less brand recall incustomer's mind
THREATSTuff competition fromother companies.
Higher margin benefitsto retailers from itscompetitors.
OPPORTUNIT
YGrowing immensely indata market.
Entry into GSMtechnology.
Increasing usage ofwireless network.
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
62/101
I connect Final Report
54
Then the next stage of the research was done using the primary data collections techniques
like Survey using Questionnaire and Personal Interview with the Retailers across 7 zones of
Rajasthan. The sample chosen was random to avoid any selection and convinience bias, so
that we reflect upon the market reality.
Then careful analysis of data was done to find the following results which can be used
effectively to increase the market presence of the brand and there by holistically contributing
to development of the organization.
It was found that the customers prefer GSM technology over the CDMA network for
a plethora of reasons and thus communicating the technology per se was found to be
one of the most important requirement to increase the satisfaction of the customers
and there by the retailers.
The profit margin associated with the retailers has enough scope for improvement so
that they are motivated to increase their sale thereby increasing the overall
profitability of the retailers.
It was found that most of the retailers are not satisfied with the untimely and irregular
visits by the company executives. Thus there is a need for better communication
between the company executives and the retailers to increase sales and thus prprofit.
It was found that marketing of MTS products is not as frequent as other competitors .
Thus there is a scope of improvement in the areas of marketing communication and
brand positioning since most of the retailers wanted the brand to have a connect with
India as the other competitors like Reliance and Airtel have been trying to do.
8. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books
1. Havalder K.K. and Vasant M.C. (2007), Sales and Distribution Management, Tata
McGraw Hill, New Delhi.2. Philip Kotler and Kevin Lane Keller (12e), Marketing Management, Pearson.
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
63/101
I connect Final Report
55
3. Mamoria, C.B and Gankar, S.V (2002) Personnel Management Published byHimalaya Publishing House.
4. Virmani, B.R. And Seth Premila (1985) Evaluating Management Training andDevelopment Published By Vision Book Pvt Ltd.
5. Kulkarni M.V, Marketing Research (IV Edition), Everest Publication House, NewDelhi, 2003.
Websites:
a. http://www.mtsindia.in/
b. www.docstoc.com
c. www.citeman.com
d. www.wikipedia.org
e. www.Codeproject.com
f. www.Projectstoday.com
g. www.Freelancer.com
Journals
1. Forbes
2. Business Today
3. Business Week
APPENDIX 1
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR CHANNEL SATISFACTION STUDY
Retailer Name: Mobile Number:
LAPU Number: Area:
Region: Date:
Outlet type: Recharging/Activating/Both
http://www.mtsindia.in/http://www.mtsindia.in/8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
64/101
I connect Final Report
56
1) Which all brands are you associated with?( mark)a) Airtel b) MTS c) Aircel d) Idea
e) TATA f) Reliance g) Vodafone
2) Which is the bestselling brand?
a) Airtel b) MTS c) Aircel d) Idea
e) TATA f) Reliance g) Vodafone
3) What is the reason to associate with the brand with maximum sales?
a) Margin b) Promotional Schemes c) Dealer Relationship
d) Demand e) Credit Policy f) Connectivity g) Roaming
4) What is the monthly average recharge amount by the customers for the most selling
brand and their monthly recharge count?
a) 10000-20000b) 20000-30000c) 30000-40000 d) 40000-50000
e) 50000-60000 f) >60000
Count:a) 20-30 b) 30-40 c) 40-50 d) 50-60 e) 60-70 f) >70
5) What is the average LAPU balance? (Fig in Rs.)
a) 500-1000 b) 1000-1500 c) 1500-2000 d) 2000-2500
e) 2500-3000 f) >3000
6) What is the reason for LAPU Balance < Rs.500?
a) Less Demand b) Recharging issues due to Network Congestion
c) Service issues (sales person not reporting) d) Never Happened
7) What is the reason for not promoting MTS?
a) Low Margin b) Less Promotional Schemes c) Unfriendly Dealer
Relationship
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
65/101
I connect Final Report
57
d) Less Demand e) No Credit Policy f) Lack of communication
g) No Reasons
8) Which MTS Data Product has maximum potential? (Fig in Rs.)
a) 198 b) 248 c) 375 d) 490 e) 647
f) 798 g) 999 h) 1298
9) What time of the day you get the maximum recharges?
a) 9-12am b) 12-3pm c) 3-6pm d) 6-9pm e) 9-11pm
10)How do you like the company to communicate about the new offers to you?
a) Sales Person b) SMS c) Phone Call d) OBD e) Printing
Material
11)How frequently company executives visit and convey schemes?
a) Daily b)Alternate Days c)Weekly d) Fortnight e)
Monthly
f) Not Regular g) Never
12)How is the product awareness among people about MTS?
b) Very Poor b) Poor c) Average d) Goode) Excellent
13) How do you rate the Company Representatives behavior with retailers?b) Very Poor b) Poor c) Average d) Goode) Excellent
14)How do you rate the Customers satisfaction of After Sales Service Support of MTS?a) Very Poor b) Poor c) Average d) Goode) Excellent
15)Does the retailer support desk identifies the retailers problems effectivelyand solve them in proper time?
a) Yes b) No
16)Suggestions for MTS:
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
66/101
I connect Final Report
58
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annexure 1
FORTNIGHTLY PROJECT REPORT
Name: Anoop Indolia Program: PGDM- Marketing
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
67/101
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
68/101
I connect Final Report
60
Anoop Indolia
Signature of Student & Date Signature of Faculty Guide
5th
May, 2014
Annexure 2
FORTNIGHTLY PROJECT REPORT
Name: Anoop Indolia Program: PGDM- Marketing
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
69/101
I connect Final Report
61
Campus: Kharghar Company: Sistema Shyam Teleservices ltd. (MTS)
Fortnight Start Date: 06th May 2014 End Date: 19thMay 2014
Faculty Guide: Prof. Arpita Pandey Company Guide: Mr. Vijesh Bhatnagar
No. Of leave(s) availed, if any: No
Fortnightly Report No.: 3
Target/Task:
Survey of Retailers covering all the areas of jaipur regarding the sales of laptops/PCs,
sales of data cards and knowing major issues for drop in sales of data cards.
Around more than 400 retailers data is given which has to be covered in one month. Knowing retailers point of view on MTS services and what can be done to improve
the market according to retailers.
Meeting with Sales head of Rajasthan circle gave broader view of the project to
increase the sales of data card.
Strategies:
By conducting Survey with Retailers regarding the sales of laptop/pc and data cards,
our market reach will come to know and which area is less covered and reason for
low sales or decrease in sales of laptop /pc. By taking details of the retailers whether
they are interested in keeping data cards and what according to them is the reason for
decrease in sales. Voice of retailers is important as they directly deal with the
customers. This will help in analyzing the decrease in sales of laptop/pc which
directly affect the sales of MTS data card.
Achievement:
Survey with retailers gave me knowledge of MTS reach in the market.
Reason for drop in sales and what all improvement is needed is known.
Communicating with retailers enhanced my market knowledge and communication
skills.
Confidence boost
Meeting with sales head gave clear and broader view of project.
Learning:
Better understanding of market.
Knowing area wise which data card is more preferred gave knowledge of
competitors.
Patience
Faculty Remark (Qualitative):
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
70/101
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
71/101
I connect Final Report
63
Campus: Kharghar Company: Sistema Shyam Teleservices ltd. (MTS)
Fortnight Start Date: 20th May 2014 End Date: 02ndJune 2014
Faculty Guide: Prof. Arpita Pandey Company Guide: Mr. Vijesh Bhatnagar
No. Of leave(s) availed, if any: No
Fortnightly Report No.: 4
Target/Task:
After covering almost all the areas of Jaipur, two major Areas Raiser Plaza and
Jayanti Bazar were left to be covered regarding the sales of data cards and number of
activations.
Knowing whether sales have fallen or risen. And finding out the reasons for the same.
Main task is to know the market demand and increase the sales and activations of data
cards.
Around 150 retailers are needed to be approached and information regarding thesales and demands of data cards are gathered.
Knowing retailers point of view on MTS services and what can be done to improve
the market according to retailers.
Strategies:
Raiser Plaza and Jayanti Bazar are the two major areas of jaipur. Most of the
electronics shops are there and major retailers of data cards.
By conducting survey in raiser plaza and jayanti bazar regarding the number of
connections sold and number of data card sold will give correct idea of main reasons
for sales and retailers voice.
To know the real market competition.
Achievement:
Survey with retailers enhanced market knowledge.
Reason for increase in sales and what all improvement is needed is known.
Communicating with retailers enhanced my market knowledge and communication
skills.
Confidence boost
Few retailers who are interested in doing business with MTS were found.
Learning:
Better understanding of market.
Recognization of major competitors in market.
Knowing area wise which data card is more preferred gave better product knowledge. Patience in dealing with Retailers.
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
72/101
I connect Final Report
64
Faculty Remark (Qualitative):
Anoop Indolia
Signature of Student & Date Signature of Faculty Guide
2nd
June, 2014
Annexure 4
FORTNIGHTLY PROJECT REPORT
Name: Anoop Indolia Program: PGDM- Marketing
Campus: Kharghar Company: Sistema Shyam Teleservices ltd. (MTS)
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
73/101
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
74/101
I connect Final Report
66
Anoop Indolia
Signature of Student & Date Signature of Faculty Guide
17th
June, 2014
Annexure 5
FORTNIGHTLY PROJECT REPORT
Name: Anoop Indolia Program: PGDM- Marketing
Campus: Kharghar Company: Sistema Shyam Teleservices ltd. (MTS)
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
75/101
I connect Final Report
67
Fortnight Start Date: 18thJune 2014 End Date: 02ndJuly 2014
Faculty Guide: Prof. Arpita Pandey Company Guide: Mr. Vijesh Bhatnagar
No. Of leave(s) availed, if any: No
Fortnightly Report No.: 6
Target/Task:
After the survey about MTS services and Competitors, area wise analysis is done and
discussed with the company guide.
Those retailers who are not in business with MTS and willing to connect with MTS
are approached.
By conducting surveys, it is find out that there are various ways by which MTS sales
can be improved. Meeting with distributors and knowing there demand for MTS Data cards and
knowing whether company person from MTS approaches to the distributors and
retailers on time or any improvement is required.
Study of various tariffs of Data card.
Strategies:
To know the real market competition.
To know MTS market reach.
To know whether proper information is being communicated to retailers and
customers
To understand MTS data card tariff and usage
To increase the retailer base of MTS.
Achievement:
Survey with retailers enhanced market knowledge.
Understanding of competition in market place.
Communicating with retailers enhanced my market knowledge and communication
skills.
Retailers who were found interested in doing business with MTS are approached.
Confidence boost
Learning:
Better understanding of market.
Recognization of major competitors in market.
Knowing area wise which data card is more preferred gave better product knowledge.
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
76/101
I connect Final Report
68
Patience in dealing with Retailers.
Faculty Remark (Qualitative):
Anoop Indolia
Signature of Student & Date Signature of Faculty Guide
02nd
July , 2014
Annexure 6
FORTNIGHTLY PROJECT REPORT
Name: Anoop Indolia Program: PGDM- Marketing
Campus: Kharghar Company: Sistema Shyam Teleservices ltd. (MTS)
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
77/101
I connect Final Report
69
Fortnight Start Date: 3rdJuly 2014 End Date: 17ndJuly 2014
Faculty Guide: Prof. Arpita Pandey Company Guide: Mr. Vijesh Bhatnagar
No. Of leave(s) availed, if any: No
Fortnightly Report No.: 7
Target/Task:
Study of various tariffs of Data card.
After the detail study, market analysis is done through various surveys.
A new Scheme for best offer in data is to be launched.
Analysis of base and best offer for data customers.
Upload of base and scheme
Work on proper communication of scheme to the retailers and customers. Competition plans are studied and analyzed.
Finding out problems which occur related to data card services and dongles.
Finding out resolution for problems.
Checking posters to be printed in for data services.
Strategies:
To know the real market competition.
To know whether proper information is being communicated to retailers and
customers
To understand MTS data card tariff and usage
To increase the usage of existing customers
Achievement:
Launch of new offer and uploading a base.
Proper communication of scheme.
Understanding of competition plan.
Understanding of planning of retention of customers.
Problem identification regarding Data cards.
Learning:
Better understanding of market.
Recognization of major competitors plan. Learned new scheme planning according to base usage to increase revenue.
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
78/101
I connect Final Report
70
Faculty Remark (Qualitative):
Anoop Indolia
Signature of Student & Date Signature of Faculty Guide
17th
July , 2014
Annexure 7
FORTNIGHTLY PROJECT REPORT
Name: Anoop Indolia Program: PGDM- Marketing
Campus: Kharghar Company: Sistema Shyam Teleservices ltd. (MTS)
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
79/101
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
80/101
I connect Final Report
72
Learned to prepare report for the new scheme launched.
Learned how to solve problem of customers at service desk.
How to increase usage and retain customers.
Faculty Remark (Qualitative):
Anoop Indolia
Signature of Student & Date Signature of Faculty Guide
01stAug , 2014
Annexure 8
FORTNIGHTLY PROJECT REPORT
Name: Anoop Indolia Program: PGDM- Marketing
Campus: Kharghar Company: Sistema Shyam Teleservices ltd. (MTS)
8/10/2019 Final Report Iip
81/101
I connect Final Report
73
Fortnight Start Date: 02ndAug 2014 End Date: 16thAug 2014
Faculty Guide: Prof. Arpita Pandey Company Guide: Mr. Vijesh Bhatnagar
No. Of leave(s) availed, if any: No
Fortnightly Report No.: 9
Target/Task:
Daily Report preparation for new scheme launched.
Keep track of retailer payout.
Study of usage pattern of data card users.
Survey of customers for customer satisfaction level with MTS services.
Communication with the call center for customer complaints.
Market Visit with Sales team.
Strategies:
To increase the average revenue.
To retain the customers and increase the usage.
Customer voice is essential to improve the services.
To know the various problem faced by customer and their solution.
Market visit to understand the market situation.
Achievement:
Successfully studied the usage pattern of data card customers.
Interaction with customers about various schemes launched by MTS.
First time ever visit to market as an company analyst and taking feedback from
retailers.
Learning:
Understanding of customers need and complaints.
Learned to prepare report for the new scheme launched.
Learned how to solve problem of customers at service desk.
How to increase usage and retain customers.
Faculty Remark (Qualitative):
8/10/201