29
FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August 31, 1991 Project Title: CHARACTERIZATION OF ORGANIC NTIROGEN IN IBCSP COALS Principal Investigator: Michael A. Kruge, Dept. of Geology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901 Co-Investigators: Stephen R. Palmer, Dept. of Geology; Edwin J. Hippo, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering and Energy Processes; John C. CrelJing o Dept. of Geology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901 Project Monitor: Ken Ho, CRSC ABSTRACT When nitrogen and sulfur contents are expressed as N/C and SIC atomic ratios, it is apparent that, on a molar basis, nitrogen contents are just as high as sulfur in IBCSP coals. Removal of nitrogen from power plant effluents must be given serious consideration in any attempt to solve the acid rain problem. Unlike sulfur, there does not appear to be a relationship between maceral type and bulk nitrogen content. Nitrogen is concentrated in oxidation products of the large majority of samples. The ether-soluble fraction of the methylated oxidation products is nearly entirely GC-amenable. The ether-insoluble fractions are not. The fraction insoluble in both ether and methylene chloride has the highest proportion of nitrogen and sulfur, but only accounts for 10% of the oxidation product. A structure accounting for the nitrogen and sulfur in this insoluble fraction is proposed. The aromatic fraction of coal extracts contains GC-amenable nitrogen compounds in greater variety and abundance than do the aromatic fraction of the mild pyrolysis products of the same samples. This is in contrast to the polyaromatic hydrocarbons, which are equally complex in the aromatic fractions of both extract and pyrolyzate. Quinoline has been identified and tetraaromatic azaarenes have tentatively been identified as major nitrogen compounds in the aromatic fractions. The ether-soluble peroxyacetic acid oxidation products of the floated coals and their constituent macerals share most of the same principal nitrogen compounds, however the proportions of these compounds vary widely. The greatest variations are seen among the sporinites from the four coals and among the floated coal and macerals of IBCSP #2. Exact mass determinations indicate that the oxidation products of IBCSP #1 floated coal contain compounds with a single nitrogen atom, with two nitrogens and with both a nitrogen and a sulfur atom. The majority of single nitrogen compounds are interpreted to be oxidized derivatives of pyrrole and its benzologues. A variety of derivatives of pyridine and its benzologues are also present in lesser abundance. The majority of N2 compounds are either derivatives of pyrazole and its benzologues or dinitro compounds. Sulfur and nitrogen coexist principally in heterogeneous polyaromatic systems (e.g., pyridine/thiophene) or, to a lesser extent, as polyaromatic thiazoles. The ether-soluble fraction contained the largest population of nitrogen compounds. In future work, structure determinations would be greatly simplified if the oxidation products were stripped of their incidental oxygen functional groups by reduction procedures prior to analysis by HRMS. Using standard GCMS data collected on oxidation products, it is possible to estimate the retention times where the compounds detected by probe-HRMS may elute and cross-check those results with elution patterns observed on the nitrogen-selective GC-TSD. Major peaks on GC-TSD chromatograms of IBCSP #1 floated coal are tentatively identified as oxidized pyrrolidines. In future work, since the organic nitrogen (and sulfur) compounds are in such low abundance, we recommend the use of GC-HRMS, for greater precision in the detection and Ii identification of heterocompounds. (This project is funded by the U. S. Department of Energy as part of its cost-shared program with Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources.)

FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …

FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August 31, 1991

Project Title: CHARACTERIZATION OF ORGANIC NTIROGEN IN IBCSP COALS

Principal Investigator: Michael A. Kruge, Dept. of Geology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901

Co-Investigators: Stephen R. Palmer, Dept. of Geology; Edwin J. Hippo, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering and Energy Processes; John C. CrelJingo Dept. of Geology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901

Project Monitor: Ken Ho, CRSC

ABSTRACT

When nitrogen and sulfur contents are expressed as N/C and SIC atomic ratios, it is apparent that, on a molar basis, nitrogen contents are just as high as sulfur in IBCSP coals. Removal of nitrogen from power plant effluents must be given serious consideration in any attempt to solve the acid rain problem. Unlike sulfur, there does not appear to be a relationship between maceral type and bulk nitrogen content. Nitrogen is concentrated in CH3COOH/H2~-soluble oxidation products of the large majority of samples. The ether-soluble fraction of the methylated CH3COOH/H2~-soluble oxidation products is nearly entirely GC-amenable. The ether-insoluble fractions are not. The fraction insoluble in both ether and methylene chloride has the highest proportion of nitrogen and sulfur, but only accounts for 10% of the oxidation product. A structure accounting for the nitrogen and sulfur in this insoluble fraction is proposed. The aromatic fraction of coal extracts contains GC-amenable nitrogen compounds in greater variety and abundance than do the aromatic fraction of the mild pyrolysis products of the same samples. This is in contrast to the polyaromatic hydrocarbons, which are equally complex in the aromatic fractions of both extract and pyrolyzate. Quinoline has been identified and tetraaromatic azaarenes have tentatively been identified as major nitrogen compounds in the aromatic fractions. The ether-soluble peroxyacetic acid oxidation products of the floated coals and their constituent macerals share most of the same principal nitrogen compounds, however the proportions of these compounds vary widely. The greatest variations are seen among the sporinites from the four coals and among the floated coal and macerals of IBCSP #2. Exact mass determinations indicate that the oxidation products of IBCSP #1 floated coal contain compounds with a single nitrogen atom, with two nitrogens and with both a nitrogen and a sulfur atom. The majority of single nitrogen compounds are interpreted to be oxidized derivatives of pyrrole and its benzologues. A variety of derivatives of pyridine and its benzologues are also present in lesser abundance. The majority of N2 compounds are either derivatives of pyrazole and its benzologues or dinitro compounds. Sulfur and nitrogen coexist principally in heterogeneous polyaromatic systems (e.g., pyridine/thiophene) or, to a lesser extent, as polyaromatic thiazoles. The ether-soluble fraction contained the largest population of nitrogen compounds. In future work, structure determinations would be greatly simplified if the oxidation products were stripped of their incidental oxygen functional groups by reduction procedures prior to analysis by HRMS. Using standard GCMS data collected on oxidation products, it is possible to estimate the retention times where the compounds detected by probe-HRMS may elute and cross-check those results with elution patterns observed on the nitrogen-selective GC-TSD. Major peaks on GC-TSD chromatograms of IBCSP #1 floated coal are tentatively identified as oxidized pyrrolidines. In future work, since the organic nitrogen (and sulfur) compounds are in such low abundance, we recommend the use of GC-HRMS, for greater precision in the detection and

Ii identification of heterocompounds.

(This project is funded by the U. S. Department of Energy as part of its cost-shared program with Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources.)

9ICCITime
Typewritten Text
ICCI Project Number: 89-2/P.1.2-3
Page 2: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 3: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 4: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 5: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 6: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 7: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 8: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 9: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 10: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 11: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 12: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 13: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 14: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 15: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 16: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 17: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 18: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 19: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 20: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 21: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 22: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 23: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 24: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 25: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 26: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 27: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 28: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …
Page 29: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 1990 through August …