Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda a
NOVEMBER 2018
FINANCE NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR BIODIVERSITY
CONSERVATION IN UGANDA
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Ugandab
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda c
NOVEMBER 2018
FINANCE NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR BIODIVERSITY
CONSERVATION IN UGANDA
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Ugandad
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda e
Copyright ©2018 by National Environment Management Authority (NEMA)
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY (NEMA)P.O. Box 22255 Kampala, UgandaCitation: NEMA (2018), Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda, National Environment Management Authority with the support of the Biodiversity Finance Initiative.
ISBN: 978-9970-881-15-4
Editorial Team
BIOFIN Global TeamDavid Meyers Herve Barois
National TeamEditor in Chief
Fmr. Senior Technical AdvisorSenior Technical Advisor
Sabino Francis Ogwal BIOFIN National Project CoordinatorNational Environment Management Authority
Editors Elizabeth Birabwa Aliro Economic Policy Center for ResearchEvelyn Lutalo National Environment Management AuthorityFred Onyai National Environment Management AuthorityJames Elungat National Environment Management AuthorityMary Nabatanzi ENR Africa CentreMonique Akullo BIOFIN/National Environment Management AuthorityAidan Jullian Asekenye National Environment Management AuthorityBob Nuwagira National Environment Management AuthorityPatience Nsereko National Environment Management AuthorityElizabeth Mutayanjulwa National Environment Management Authority
Consultants
Francis Mwaura BIOFIN - Private Finance /Business National ExpertFred Roland Muwanika BIOFIN - Private Finance /Business National ExpertMoses Masiga BIOFIN - Biodiversity/ Environmental Economics National Expert
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Ugandaf
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda iiFinance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda
THE BIOFIN TECHNICAL STEERING COMMITTEE
Institution Name Designation Task Email Cell phone number
National Environment Management Authority
Sabino Francis Ogwal
Natural Resource Manager- Biodiversity & Rangeland/National Project Coordinator
[email protected]/[email protected]
+256 772 517045
United Nations Development Program
Daniel Mcmondo Omodo
Program Analyst – Energy and Environment
Deputy Chairperson
+256 772 439928 / 772 289140
National Environment Management Authority
Monique Akullo
BIOFIN – Desk Officer/ Senior Internal Monitoring and Evaluation Officer
[email protected]/[email protected]
+256 772 837935 / 754837935
National Environment Management Authority
Moses Masiga
BIOFIN - Biodiversity/ Environmental Economics National Expert
Member [email protected] +256 772 563919
National Environment Management Authority
Fred Muwanika Roland
BIOFIN - Private Finance /Business National Expert
Member [email protected] +256 779 604453
National Environment Management Authority
Francis Mwaura
BIOFIN - Private Finance /Business National Expert
Member [email protected] +254 734 513259
Ministry of Water and Environment
Nathan Mununuzi
Senior Environment Officer
Member [email protected]
+256 759 644936 / 772 841 843
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development
Godfrey Ndawula
Assistant Commissioner New and Renewable Source of Energy
Member [email protected] +256 772 439144
Caroline AgutiSenior Environment Officer
Member [email protected]/ [email protected]
+256 772 619300
Ministry of Local Government
Paul Bogere (RIP)
Commissioner, Local Councils Development
Member [email protected] +256392 943390
Atim JoelSenior Environment Inspector
Member [email protected] + 256 772408873
National Planning Authority
Aaron Werikhe Research officer Member [email protected]/[email protected]
+256 774 693761
Uganda Wildlife Authority
Aggrey Rwetsiba
Senior Monitoring and Research Coordinator
Member [email protected] +256 772 499735
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Ugandaii
Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development
David Okwii Senior Economist Member david.okwii@finance.
go.ug +256 789 417282
Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries
Moses Kasigwa Principal Economist Member mkasigwa@agricultrue.
go.ug +256 773 402300
Ministry of Wildlife, Tourism and Antiquities
Dr. Akankwasah Barirega
Ag. A/Commissioner Wildlife Conservation
Member [email protected] +256 755079000
National Forestry Authority
Denis Mutaryebwa
Plant Development Specialist
Member [email protected] +256 772 544033
Uganda Bureau of Statistics
Emmanuel Menyha
Senior Statistician-Environment Statistics
Member [email protected]/[email protected]
+256 711706094/772 889554
National Environment Management Authority
Fred Onyai
Internal Monitoring and Evaluation Manager
Member [email protected] +256 772 517303
National Environment Management Authority
Allan Kasagga Director Finance and Administration
Member [email protected] +256 772 489997
National Environment Management Authority
Martin Wamwaya
Liaison Officer -ISO Member wamwayamartin@
yahoo.com +256 772 590522
National Environment Management Authority
Eunice Asinguza
Senior Legal Counsel Member
[email protected] +256 782 301142
National Environment Management Authority
Naomi Karekaho
Senior Public Relations Officer Member naomi.karekaho@
nema.go.ug +256 772 513337
National Environment Management Authority
Bob Nuwagira
Senior Information, Education & Communication officer
Member [email protected] +256 782 940384
National Environment Management Authority
George Lubega
Natural Resources Manager (Aquatics)
Member [email protected] +256 772 615222
National Environment Management Authority
James Elungat Internal Audit Manager Member james.elungat@nema.
go.ug +256 772 537494
National Environment Management Authority
Dr. Evelyn Lutalo
Senior District Support Officer Member [email protected] +256 772 652728
National Environment Management Authority
Elizabeth Mutayanjulwa
Environmental Education Materials Production officer
Member [email protected]
+256 772 411245
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda iiiiiiFinance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda
FOREWORD
I am pleased to present to you the Finance Needs Assessment (FNA) report 2018 which compares the financial needs and the expected biodiversity expenditures over a medium-to long-term planning horizon. The findings have provided an estimate of financing required to deliver national biodiversity plans, targets and results.
An insight into the Biodiversity Expenditure Review (BER) report, 2017, which provides the basis for the finance needs assessment reveals that; on average biodiversity conservation and management was allocated about UGX 91 billion in real terms per fiscal year; that translates to about 1.2% of the annual budget for Government of Uganda (GOU).
On average, Uganda requires about UGX 472.6 billion for biodiversity conservation and management per fiscal year. Furthermore, about 96.6% of the costs are to reduce and manage negative impacts while enhancing positive impacts on biodiversity (restoration of forests and wetlands). The concentration of the costs on one of the strategic objectives might be attributed to high habitat loss in terms of forests and wetlands.
In addition, the concentration of the costs on one of the strategic objectives might be attributed to high habitant lost in terms of forests and wetlands. However, the cost of habitat restoration might not be the best strategy; if the root cause of forest and wetland degradation are not addressed. Therefore, the FNA reveals that only about 0.5% of Government costs are for development while the remaining is for recurrent costs. The high proportion of the recurrent costs are attributed to restoration of forests and fragile ecosystems that are spread out till 2024/25.
Dr. Tom .O. OkurutEXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Ugandaiviv Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The Finance Needs Assessment (FNA) for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda; is a result of collaboration and support of various institutions and individuals. The National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) would like to acknowledge with profound thanks the contribution of NEMA Management, experts, advisors, consultants, members of the BIOFIN Technical Steering Committee, representatives from Government Ministries, Agencies and Local Governments (MALGs), the Private Sector and Civil Society Organisations (CSOs). NEMA is grateful to the following institutions for their contribution and active participation in developing the FNA:Aquaculture Research & Development Centre, National Agricultural Research OrganizationBuikwe District Local GovernmentBujagali Energy Limited Bwindi Impenetrable National ParkFinance Trust Bank, UgandaMakerere University, Department of Forestry, Biodiversity and Tourism, College of Geographical, Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Department of Water Resources Management International Union for the Conservation of Nature Department of Fisheries, Resources, Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and FisheriesKayunga District Local GovernmentJinja District Local GovernmentMakerere University Department of Biological SciencesMinistry of Finance, Planning and Economic DevelopmentMinistry of Energy and Mineral DevelopmentMinistry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities Ministry of Water and EnvironmentMukono district local governmentOyam district local governmentWakiso district local governmentNational Animal Genetic Resources Centre and Data Bank National Fisheries Resources Research Institute National Forestry Authority National Planning Authority Uganda Wildlife Authority Wetlands Management Department The Technical Committee on Biodiversity ConservationPlant Genetic Resource CentreUganda Bureau of Statistics Uganda Export Promotion Board Uganda National Council for Science and Technology United Nations Development Programme Uganda Wildlife Conservation Education Centre Wildlife Conservation Society World Wide Fund for the Conservation of Nature Rhino Fund UgandaTotal E&P UgandaNature Uganda
NEMA further acknowledges the support from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Uganda Country Office, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Global Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) team. Special thanks to the European Union (EU), Government of Germany, Norway, Flanders and Switzerland for the financial support. NEMA is also grateful to Mr. Sabino Francis Ogwal for effectively coordinating and guiding the BIOFIN project including the preparation of this report on behalf of Government. NEMA extends appreciation to Ms Monique Akullo for the day to day management of project activities.
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda vvFinance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Financial needs Assessment present the detailed costing of the NBSAP (2018-2025). The total cost of the implementation of the NBSAP was estimated at UGBX 2,859.9 billion on average, Uganda required about UGX 472.6 billion for biodiversity conservation and management per fiscal year. Furthermore, about 96.6% of the total cost of implementation of the NBSAP II are to implement the objective 3; these costs are related to the restoration of forests and wetlands. The main drivers of habitat loss in forest and wetlands areas are demand for biomass fuel and land for agricultural production respectively. It should be noted that cost of habitat restoration might not be the best strategies if the root cause of forest and wetland degradation are not addressed. Further analysis revealed that only about 0.5% of the total costs of implementation of the NBSAP are capital development costs while the remaining is for recurrent costs. The high proportion of the recurrent costs are attributed to restoration of forests and fragile ecosystems that are spread out till 2024/25.
The financial gap was not quantified since the NBSAP1 and the estimated biodiversity expenditure baseline review are not comparable because the NBSAP does not capture all on going biodiversity conservation activities. However, the average annual total cost of implementation of the NBSAP II was estimated at about UGX 472.6 billion per fiscal year which represent about 6.2% of the government of Uganda national budget.
The FNA indicates that the total cost of implementing strategic objective three “reduce and manage negative impacts while enhancing positive impacts on biodiversity” on average was about UGX 456.4 billion per fiscal year as indicated in the table below. Furthermore, about 81% and 17% of this annual total cost are for activities related to restoration of forest and fragile ecosystems respectively Figure 5.3. The current focus on the strategy for the restoration of forests and fragile ecosystems might not be the most effective way for the management of biodiversity in Uganda if drivers of biodiversity losses are not addressed.
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Ugandavi
Fiscal Year (UGX-billion)
Strategic objectives 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
1. Strengthen stakeholder co-ordination and frameworks for biodiversity management
3.0 3.2 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 5.9
2. To facilitate and build capacity for research, knowledge and information management and exchange on biodiversity
2.5 2.5 2.6 2.9 2.9 3.2 3.4
3. To reduce and manage negative impacts while enhancing positive impacts on biodiversity
391.9 411.7 432.5 454.4 479.3 500.3 524.9
4. To promote the sustainable use and equitable sharing of costs and benefits of biodiversity
3.1 3.4 3.9 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.3
5. To enhance awareness and education on biodiversity issues among the various stakeholders
2.7 3.2 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.9 3.4
6. To harness modern biotechnology for socio-economic development with adequate safety measures for human health and the environment
1.7 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1
7. To promote innovative and sustainable funding mechanisms to support NBSAP implementation
0.4 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5
Overall 405.3 426.2 448.2 470.7 495.6 517.6 544.5
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE BIOFIN TECHNICAL STEERING COMMITTEE .................................................................................................................. iFOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................................................................. iiiACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................................................................................... ivEXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................................ vACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................................................................................................ix
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................... 1
CHAPTER TWO: METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................................ 32.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................ 32.2: Review of National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAPII) ............................................................... 32.3: Costing of biodiversity related activities: ...................................................................................................................... 32.4: Consultative workshop ......................................................................................................................................................... 3
CHAPTER THREE: IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN ...... 43.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................... 43.2 NBSAP II strategic objectives and proposed actions .............................................................................................. 4
CHAPTER FOUR: SUMMARY RESULTS OF THE COST OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NBSAP ...................... 154.1 Overall total cost of implementing the NBSAP II ................................................................................................... 15
4.2 Analysis of total costs per NBSAP strategic objective .......................................................................................... 16
4.2.1: Costs to implement the NBSAP strategic objective 1: To strengthen stakeholder co-ordination and frameworks for biodiversity management ........................................................................ 16
4.2.2: Costs to implement the NBSAP strategic objective 2: To facilitate and build capacity for research, knowledge and information management and exchange on biodiversity ................... 18
4.2.3: Costs to implement the NBSAP objective 3: To reduce and manage negative impacts while enhancing positive impacts on biodiversity ............................................................................................... 20
4.5: Costs to implement the NBSAP Objective 4: To promote the sustainable use and equitable sharing of costs and benefits of biodiversity ...................................................................................... 22
4.6: Costs to implement NBSAP strategic objective 5: To enhance awareness and education on biodiversity issues among the various stakeholders .............................................................. 23
4.7: Costs to implement the NBSAP strategic objective 6: To harness modern biotechnology for socio-economic development with adequate safety measures for human health and the environment ........................................................................................................................... 24
4.8: Costs to implement the NBSAP strategic objective 7: To promote innovative and sustainable funding mechanisms to support NBSAP implementation ................................................................................ 25
CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................... 27
REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 28
Annex 1: Proposed cost estimates of NBSAP II .......................................................................................................................... 29
viiFinance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Ugandaviii
List of Tables
Table 3.1: NBSAP strategic objectives and proposed actions ................................................................................................... 7Table 4.1: Total Estimated Costs of implementing the NBSAP II 2018-2025 ................................................................... 17Table 4.2: Distribution of total costs by capital development and recurrent costs (UGX billion) ......................... 18Table 4.3: Summary of estimated costs to implement strategic objective one (UGX billion) ................................ 19Table 4.4: Summary of estimated costs under strategic objective two (UGX billion) ................................................. 20Table 4.5: Summary of total estimated costs to implement strategic objective three (UGX billion) .................. 22Table 4.6: Summary of estimated total cost to implement strategic objective four (UGX billion) ....................... 24Table 4.7: Summary of estimated total costs to implement strategic objective five (UGX billion) ...................... 25Table 4.8: Summary of total estimated costs to implement strategic objective six (UGX billion) ........................ 26Table 4.9: Summary of estimated total cost to implement strategic objective seven (UGX billion) ................... 27
List of figures
Figure 4.1: Share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective one .................................................................................................................19
Figure 4.1.1: Share of total costs by recurrent and capital development (UGX billion) ..............................................20
Figure 4.2: Share of total estimated cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective two.................................................................................................................21
Figure 4.3: Share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective three ..............................................................................................................21
Figure 4.4: Share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective four ................................................................................................................25
Figure 4.5: Share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective five .................................................................................................................26
Figure 4.6: Share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective six ..................................................................................................................27
Figure 4.7: Share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective seven ............................................................................................................28
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda ix
ACRONYMS
BER Biodiversity Expenditure ReviewBIOFIN Biodiversity Finance InitiativeCBD Convention on Biological Diversity CCU Climate Change UnitCDM Clean Development Mechanism CFRs Central Forest Reserves COCTU Coordinating Office for Control of Trypanosomiasis in Uganda CSOs Civil Society Organizations DAR Directorate of Animal Resources DCC Directorate of Climate ChangeDCR Directorate of Crop Resources DEA Directorate of Environmental Affairs DESS Department of Environmental Support Services DFR Directorate of Fisheries Resources DDA Dairy Development AuthorityDWRM Department of Water Resources Management ENRs Environment & Natural Resources FSSD Forestry Sector Support DepartmentFMIS Financial Management Information System FSSD Forestry Sector Support Department HTTI Hotel and Tourism Training Institute IGR Internally Generated RevenuesKP Kyoto ProtocolKRAs Key Result Areas MAAIF Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries MALGs Ministries, Agencies and Local GovernmentsMEMD Ministry of Energy and Mineral DevelopmentMoFPED Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development MTEF Medium –Term Expenditure FrameworkMTTI Ministry of Tourism, Trade and Industry MTWA Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities MWE Ministry of Water and EnvironmentNAADS National Agricultural Advisory ServicesNARO National Agricultural Research Organization NAGRC&DB National Animal Genetic Resources Center and Data BankNBSAP National Biodiversity Strategy Action PlanNDA National Designated Authority NEMA National Environment Management Authority NFA National Forestry Authority NGOs Non-Governmental Organizations NSCG Non-Sectoral Conditional Grant NTR Non-Tax Revenues ODA Official Development Assistance PMA Plan for Modernization of Agriculture RWSS Rural Water Supply and Sanitation SPRs Sector Performance Reports TCC Tourism Coordination committee
ixFinance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Ugandax
UBOS Uganda Bureau of StatisticsUCDA Uganda Coffee Development Authority UCDO Uganda Cotton Development OrganizationUCOTA Uganda Community Tourism AssociationUNDP United Nation Development ProgrammeUNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate ChangeUTA Uganda Tourism AssociationUTB Uganda Tourism Board UWA Uganda Wildlife Authority UWCEC Uganda Wildlife Conservation Education Centre UWSS Urban Water Supply and Sanitation UWTI Uganda Wildlife Training Institute WFP Water for Production WMD Wetland Management Department WRM Water Resources ManagementWSS Water Supply & Sanitation WTTC World Travel & Tourism Council WWF World Wildlife Fund
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 1
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
Available evidence and the decisions adopted by Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) indicate that a significant global financial gap for biodiversity conservation and management. A preliminary assessment recently conducted under the auspices of the High-level Panel on Global Assessment of Resources for Implementing the CBD Strategic Plan estimated that the global investment required ranges between US$150 and US$ 440 billion annually. The countries have to mobilize and drastically scale up their efforts and achieve the 20 Aichi Targets defined in the CBD’s Strategic Plan for 2011-2020.
Defining biodiversity finance needs and gaps with greater precision and to determine related challenges and opportunities for resource mobilization requires detailed national-level (bottom-up) assessments. In this context, UNDP in October 2012 launched the Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN), as a new global partnership seeking to address the biodiversity finance challenge in a comprehensive manner by building a sound business case for increased investment in the management of ecosystems and biodiversity. Uganda is among the 30 pilot countries participating in the BIOFIN project. Other countries include; 30 countries namely Belize, Brazil, Botswana, Bhutan, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, Fiji, Georgia, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Malaysia, Mexico, Mongolia, Mozambique, Peru, Philippines, Rwanda, Seychelles, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Vietnam and Zambia.
The Biodiversity Finance Initiative-BIOFIN, is a UNDP-managed global collaborative partnership to develop and implement an evidence-based methodology that improves biodiversity outcomes using finance and economics. The BIOFIN methodology provides an innovative, stepwise and adaptable approach that enables countries to:
(i) Analyse the policy and institutional context for biodiversity finance;(ii) Measure the current biodiversity expenditures;(iii) Assess future financial needs; and(iv) Identify and mobilize the resources and policies required to successfully implement the most
suitable finance solutions to achieve national biodiversity plans and targets.
The basic approach of the BIOFIN process in a country include the following three assessments that culminate in a Biodiversity Finance Plan:
1) Biodiversity Finance Policy and Institutional Review (PIR) analysis of the policy and institutional context, establishes what will be analysed within the National BIOFIN study (e.g. which biodiversity targets) and the context for the intended change in financing;
2) Biodiversity Expenditure Review (BER) analysis of public and private expenditures benefitting biodiversity, establishes, past and projected expenditures on biodiversity;
3) Financial Needs Assessment (FNA) estimates the financing required to deliver national biodiversity plans, targets and results, and then assesses the financing gap between this and the projected expenditures;
4) Biodiversity Finance Plan (BFP) Prioritizes financing solutions that will close the financing gap by optimizing current and expanding future investments (public, private, national, international, traditional and innovative) in biodiversity management, and develops the business case for the best options.
By completing the BIOFIN process, Uganda will have a clear idea of how much it will cost to implement the NBSAP and understand how to mobilize the resources required to implement the NBSAP. The goal of the BIOFIN process is to enable to transform the trajectory of biodiversity finance and development, and to chart a pathway to a sustainable future.
Uganda has already completed 2 assessments the policy and institutional review and the biodiversity expenditures review. This report is focusing on estimating finance needs for biodiversity conservation in Uganda, by calculating the costs of implementing each of the strategies within the revised NBSAP.
1Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda2
Aim and Objectives of the Financial needs Assessment.The FNA aims to make a comprehensive estimate of the financial resources needed to achieve national and sub-national biodiversity targets. It compares these financial needs to expected biodiversity expenditures over a medium- to long-term planning horizon. As described previously, national biodiversity targets are typically articulated in NBSAPs and other key national strategies such as national development plans, sectoral development plans and climate change plans.
In order to achieve the above aims, the objectives of the FNA are to:
1. Review and integrate the FNA with the national planning and budgeting process for optimal impact.
2. Clarify strategies and actions in national biodiversity plans (NBSAPs) to describe “costable actions” that link to expected biodiversity results1 in a logical framework that lends itself to costing.
3. Produce a detailed budget for each costable action by defining unit costs and quantities over the target time frame.
4. Use these detailed budgets to make a stronger case for biodiversity finance – linking the costs of achieving specific results to the National Budget processes. 2
5. Prioritize biodiversity strategies and actions based on specific biodiversity and cost criteria.
6. Link the FNA to the Biodiversity Expenditure Review (BER) through a tagging system that associates financing needs with expenditure categories, sectors and organizations.
7. Calculate the finance gap between businesses as usual biodiversity expenditure projections (from the BER) and financial needs identified in the FNA in as detailed a manner as possible.
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 3
CHAPTER TWO: METHODOLOGY
2.1 IntroductionThis section details the methods that were applied to collect, manage and analyze the data for the assessment of biodiversity financing needs. The chapter further explains how the costs of implementing National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAPII) were determined.
2.2: Review of National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAPII)To obtain information on costable actions, small groups of the TSC on each of the NBSAP strategic objectives were constituted. The members of the group were nominees from government of Uganda Ministry, Agencies and Local Government (MALGs), academia, and civil society organisations that implement or regulate biodiversity related activities. The groups reviewed the NBSAP II strategic objectives, related specific objectives outcomes, outputs, actions and activities with their related inputs.
2.3: Costing of biodiversity related activities: Activity Based Costing (ABC) was used to estimate the cost of implementing the proposed actions in Uganda. In addition to the estimated cost from the market, experts from the stakeholders were also interviewed to assess if the proposed costs and magnitude of the actions could deliver desired conservation outcomes. These consultations were conducted by visiting the MALGs. The activity-based costing involved mainly four steps namely: Identify and classify activities, (ii) Estimate the cost for whole activity, (iii) compute a cost driver rate, and (iv) apply activity costs using cost driver.
The National Biodiversity strategy and action plan (NBSAP) was costed for the whole period.
Each biodiversity strategy was costed including recurrent and capital costs. Costs were regroup using the following categories as defined below:
1) Strategies on cost of mainstreaming biodiversity: This provides summary of the one-time costs and recurring costs for 2018-2019; and 2020-2025 for strategies on mainstreaming biodiversity and sustainable use, including strategies related to the integration of biodiversity into sectoral, development and poverty alleviation and into sustainable use, production and consumption of biodiversity resources
2) sustainable use
3) Strategies on cost of protection: This is a summary of the one-time costs and recurring costs for 2018-2019; and 2020-2025 for protection strategies, including in situ and ex situ strategies.
4) Strategies on cost of restoration strategies: This is a summary of the one-time costs and recurring costs for 2018-2019; and 2020-2025 for restoration strategies, including the maintenance of essential ecosystem services, strengthening climate resilience, and promoting adaptation and mitigation.
5) Strategies on cost of access and benefits sharing strategies: This is a summary of the one-time costs and recurring costs for 2018-2019; and 2019-2025 for access and benefits-sharing strategies, including strategies related to securing prior informed consent, mutually agreed terms, benefits sharing arrangements, traditional knowledge, conservation and sustainable use of key ABS species, and legal enforcement of agreements, among others.
Strategies on cost of implementation strategies: This is a summary of the one-time costs and recurring costs for 2018-2019; and 2020-2025, for implementation strategies, including strategies related to public outreach and communication, and strategies related to knowledge, research, data and data management, among others
2.4: Consultative workshop Data validation and compilation workshop was then organized in Entebbe Lakeview hotel. The workshop involved a team of 12 stakeholders who reviewed the activities, their costs, outputs and outcomes. The costs of implementing each identified activities of the specific objectives of the NBSAPII were aggregated to establish the overall cost of implementing the strategy. Final excel sheets that detail the inputs and costs for implementation of the NBSAP II were developed. The costs were then summarised by summing up by specific actions and categorisation as capital development (one off) and recurrent costs. The aggregated costs were then projected in the future using average inflation rate obtained from Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS). The results are summarised using graphs as well as tables in the next chapters.
3Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda4
CHAPTER THREE: IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Uganda ratified CBD on 8th September 1993. The CBD has three objectives namely: the conservation of biological diversity, its sustainable use and the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources. Article 6 (a) of the CBD requires Parties to the Convention to develop national strategies, plans or programmes for the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity.
The National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) is the main instrument for implementing the Convention at country level. NBSAP provides Government with a framework for implementing its obligations under CBD as well as the setting of conservation priorities, channelling of investments and building of the necessary capacity for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in the country.
At its tenth meeting in Nagoya, Japan, the CBD Conference of the Parties (COP 10) adopted the new Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, with 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets. The Parties then committed themselves to revising their NBSAPs and to adopt them as policy instruments by 2015. They also committed themselves to developing national targets that would support the achievement of the Strategic Plan and Aichi Targets, and to report thereon at COP 11 or 12 in 2012 or 2014. The revision of the NBSAP at this time would enable Uganda to demonstrate its commitment to the achievement of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, with its Aichi Biodiversity Targets while having its own national targets. Uganda has developed national biodiversity targets in the revised NBSAP II using the Aichi targets as a flexible framework. The revised NBSAP II has seven strategic objectives:
1. To strengthen stakeholder co-ordination and frameworks for biodiversity management
2. To facilitate and enhance capacity for research, monitoring, information management and exchange on biodiversity
3. To put in place measures to reduce and manage negative impacts on biodiversity
4. To promote the sustainable use and equitable sharing of costs and benefits of biodiversity
5. To enhance awareness and education on biodiversity issues among the various stakeholders
6. To harness modern biotechnology for socio-economic development with adequate safety measures for human health and the environment
7. To promote innovative sustainable funding mechanisms to mobilize resource for implementing the Strategy
3.2 NBSAP II strategic objectives and proposed actions
We analysed the strategic objectives of the NBSAP II into specific objectives, outcomes, outputs as well as actions to achieve the objectives. The results are summarised in the Table 4.1.
4 Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 5
Tabl
e 3.1
: NBS
AP s
trat
egic
obje
ctiv
es an
d pr
opos
ed ac
tions
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ive
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
1.0 St
rengt
hen
stake
holde
r co-
ordin
ation
and
fram
ewor
ks
for b
iodive
rsity
m
anag
emen
t
To st
rengt
hen a
genc
y pe
rform
ance
capa
bility
am
ong a
ll sta
keho
lders
in
biodiv
ersit
y man
agem
ent
in Ug
anda
Agen
cy pe
rform
ance
ca
pabil
ity
Impr
oved
per
form
ance
capa
biliti
es
amon
g sta
keho
lders
worki
ng
in bio
diver
sity m
anag
emen
t in
Ugan
da
Num
ber o
f joint
stak
ehold
ers m
eetin
g
Esta
blish
perfo
rman
ce ca
pabil
ity re
view
and
deve
lopm
ent in
to ag
ency
strat
egic
plann
ing
Biod
iversi
ty in
dicat
ors d
evelo
ped
Stak
ehold
er as
sessm
ent t
ool d
evelo
ped a
nd
distri
bute
d Nu
mbe
r of s
take
holde
rs tra
ined
To st
rengt
hen t
he
coor
dinat
ion of
biod
iversi
ty
activ
ities
amon
g all t
he
stake
holde
rs in
deliv
ering
sh
ared g
over
nmen
t pr
ioriti
es
Wor
king a
cross
gove
rnm
ent
Impr
ove t
he co
-ord
inatio
n of
activ
ity ac
ross
gove
rnm
ent t
o de
liver
share
d prio
rities
Num
ber o
f joint
stak
ehold
ers m
eetin
g De
velop
fram
ewor
k for
deliv
ering
share
d pr
ioriti
es, D
efine
all s
take
holde
rs th
at co
nser
ve,
prot
ect a
nd us
e biod
iversi
ty du
ring s
ervic
e de
liver
y
Num
ber o
f con
sulta
nt ag
encie
s eng
aged
Cons
olida
ted f
ram
ewor
k for
biod
iversi
ty
man
agem
ent
To st
rengt
hen e
valua
tion
capa
city a
cross
all
stake
holde
rs in
biodiv
ersit
y m
anag
emen
t for
polic
y and
pr
ogra
m ev
aluat
ion
Polic
y and
prog
ram
ev
aluat
ion· In
creas
ed ev
aluat
ion ca
pacit
y ac
ross
all M
ALGs
and L
Gs fo
r bio
diver
sity m
anag
emen
t
Num
ber o
f peo
ple w
orkin
g in b
iodive
rsity
train
ed
Deve
lop fo
rmal
biodiv
ersit
y eva
luatio
n poli
cy an
d gu
idelin
es th
roug
h the
Polic
y and
Insti
tutio
nal
review
at al
l leve
ls of
gove
rnm
ent (
PIR)
Num
ber o
f mee
tings
and i
ssues
discu
ssed
Prog
ram
evalu
ation
repo
rt· C
o-or
dinat
e and
mon
itor g
over
nmen
t ev
aluat
ion ac
tivity
thro
ugh t
he co
nduc
ting
biodiv
ersit
y exp
endit
ure r
eview
s and
evalu
ation
To ev
aluat
e the
efficie
ncy
and e
ffecti
vene
ss of
bio
diver
sity s
pend
ing on
res
ource
alloc
ation
and
gove
rnm
ent p
erfo
rman
ce
amon
g all s
take
holde
rs
Reso
urce
alloc
ation
Impr
oved
efficie
ncy i
n res
ource
all
ocat
ion fo
r biod
iversi
ty
man
agem
ent
Exist
ing bu
dget
revie
w rep
ort
Biod
iversi
ty bu
dget
/exp
endit
ure a
ttribu
tion
Bi
odive
rsity
Expe
nditu
re Re
views
(BER
) Ex
pend
iture
review
repo
rt
Gove
rnm
ent
perfo
rman
ce re
porti
ng
Mor
e acce
ssible
and t
rans
paren
t rep
ortin
g of G
over
nmen
t pe
rform
ance
again
st its
prior
ities
Num
ber o
f sta
keho
lders
traine
d Pr
esen
t sum
mar
y of g
over
nmen
t per
form
ance
in
the n
ew St
atem
ent o
f Ach
ievem
ent
Num
ber o
f rep
orts
ed
Biod
iversi
ty pr
ogres
s rev
iew re
port
Stren
gthe
n com
mun
ity
enga
gem
ent f
or
biodiv
ersit
y man
agem
ent
Com
mun
ity
enga
gem
ent
Impr
oved
leve
l of c
omm
unity
aw
arene
ss an
d fee
dbac
k abo
ut
gove
rnm
ent p
erfo
rman
ce fo
r bio
diver
sity m
anag
emen
t
Com
mun
ity en
gage
men
t guid
eline
s dev
elope
d
Deve
lopm
ent a
nd d
issem
inate
com
mun
ity
enga
gem
ent g
uideli
nes f
or bi
odive
rsity
m
anag
emen
t in U
gand
a
Cons
erva
tion,
prot
ectio
n and
biod
iversi
ty
guide
lines
revie
wed
Num
ber o
f prin
ted c
opies
of gu
idelin
esNu
mbe
r of g
uideli
ne co
pies d
istrib
uted
to th
e co
mm
uniti
esNu
mbe
r of c
omm
unity
mee
tings
held
Num
ber o
f con
sulta
tive m
eetin
gs co
nduc
ted
To in
creas
e acce
sses a
nd
repor
ting o
f biod
iversi
ty
man
agem
ent a
nd p
rogr
ess
Repo
rting
the
biodiv
ersit
y m
anag
emen
t pro
gres
s
Mor
e acce
ssible
and t
imely
pr
ogres
s rep
ortin
g
Num
ber o
f plan
ning m
eetin
gs co
nduc
ted
Deve
lop an
d main
tain
data
base
on bi
odive
rsity
m
anag
emen
t indic
ator
s Nu
mbe
r of c
onsu
ltativ
e mee
tings
carri
ed ou
tDa
taba
se on
biod
iversi
ty in
dicat
ors
5Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda6
Stren
gthe
n the
go
vern
men
t‘s fo
cus o
n su
staina
bility
and i
ts vis
ibilit
y in p
ublic
repo
rts
Susta
inabil
ity
Stren
gthe
n the
gove
rnm
ent‘s
focu
s on
susta
inabil
ity an
d its
visibi
lity i
n pu
blic r
epor
ts
Web
site f
or ea
sy ac
cess
and i
nfor
mat
ion sh
aring
Refle
ct th
e dim
ensio
ns of
susta
inabil
ity on
the
Mea
surin
g our
Prog
ress w
ebsit
e Nu
mbe
r of a
genc
ies an
d sta
ff tra
ined o
n the
use o
f we
bsite
Repo
rt on
scor
e card
and a
ssessm
ent d
evelo
ped
and d
istrib
uted
to st
akeh
older
s Re
port
Triple
Botto
m Li
ne In
dicat
or Sc
orec
ard in
ag
ency
Annu
al Re
ports
2.0 To
facil
itate
and
build
capa
city
for r
esea
rch,
know
ledge
and
infor
mat
ion
man
agem
ent
and e
xcha
nge
on bi
odive
rsity
Build
capa
city f
or re
searc
h on
biod
iversi
ty
Integ
ration
of re
searc
h,
Polic
y and
prac
tice
Incre
ased
capa
city o
f gov
ernm
enta
l an
d MAL
Gs to
link r
esea
rch, p
olicy
an
d pra
ctice
Num
ber o
f evid
ence
-bas
ed Po
licies
Revie
w ex
isting
polic
iesNu
mbe
r of e
viden
ce-b
ased
deve
lopm
ent
inter
vent
ions
Imple
men
tatio
n of d
evelo
pmen
t inte
rven
tions
Stan
dard
guide
lines
for
gove
rning
biod
iversi
ty
resea
rch
Impr
oved
natio
nal s
tand
ards a
nd LG
reg
ulato
ry fr
amew
orks
for r
esea
rch
gove
rnan
ce on
biod
iversi
ty
Rese
arch e
thics
stan
dard
s put
in pl
ace
Form
ulatio
n of e
thics
stan
dard
sSy
stem
of ac
credit
ation
and q
ualit
y assu
ranc
e sta
ndard
s for
rese
arch i
nstit
ution
s eva
luatio
n es
tabli
shed
De
velop
guide
lines
for q
ualit
y assu
ranc
e sta
ndard
s
Num
ber o
f insti
tutio
ns tr
ained
on bi
odive
rsity
Build
capa
city f
or in
stitu
tions
Num
ber o
f plan
s and
polic
ies to
supp
ort r
esea
rchSe
t guid
eline
s and
stan
dard
s
Gove
rnm
ent a
nd
deve
lopm
ent p
artn
ers’
com
mitm
ent t
o sup
port
and f
und b
iodive
rsity
rel
ated
rese
arch.
Incre
ased
capa
city a
nd
com
mitm
ent o
f gov
ernm
ent a
nd
deve
lopm
ent p
artn
ers t
o sup
port
and f
und r
esea
rch
Form
ation
of sc
ientifi
c res
earch
com
mitt
ee th
at ve
ts res
earch
prop
osals
in an
efficie
nt an
d tra
nspa
rent
man
ner
Esta
blish
men
t of s
cient
ific r
esea
rch co
mm
ittee
Com
petit
ive sa
laries
of re
searc
hers
set
Put in
plac
e a st
anda
rd en
umer
ation
crite
rion
Leve
l of fu
nding
of bi
odive
rsity
rese
arch b
y go
vern
men
t and
deve
lopm
ent p
artn
ers
Revie
w go
vern
men
t exp
endit
ure o
n biod
iversi
ty
resea
rch
Incre
ased
capa
city o
f M
ALGs
to m
anag
e/
cond
uct t
he re
searc
h In
creas
ed ca
pacit
y of M
ALGs
to
man
age/
cond
uct t
he re
searc
h
Leve
l of fi
nanc
ial su
staina
bility
for b
iodive
rsity
resea
rch;
Facil
itate
proc
ess o
f pro
posa
l writ
ing
Num
ber o
f app
rove
d res
earch
gran
tsPr
ovide
seed
fund
s to i
nitiat
e and
susta
in res
earch
on
biod
iversi
tyRe
giste
red re
searc
h pro
jects
(num
ber, f
undin
g lev
el, fu
nder
sprea
d);
Prior
itise
biod
iversi
ty re
searc
h pro
jects
for f
undin
g
Num
ber o
f sta
ff tra
ined f
or hi
gher
educ
ation
Facili
tate c
apac
ity bu
ilding
for h
igher
educ
ation
of st
affEs
tabli
shm
ent o
f a un
it ded
icate
d to r
esea
rch
man
agem
ent, r
esea
rcher
s tra
ined,
quali
ty of
the
orga
nizat
ion ac
cord
ing to
natio
nal s
tand
ards
Facil
itate
esta
blish
men
t of r
esea
rch un
itRe
searc
h unit
esta
blish
ed
Colla
borat
e on
biodiv
ersit
y res
earch
In
creas
ed sy
nerg
y bet
ween
MAL
Gs
on bi
odive
rsity
rese
arch
Num
ber o
f coll
abor
ation
s with
the p
ublic
/priv
ate/
NGO
secto
rFa
cilita
te fo
rmat
ion of
joint
foru
ms
Numb
er of
joint
activ
ities w
ith ot
her re
search
Insti
tution
s;Op
erat
ionali
ze pa
rtner
ships
Nu
mbe
r of fo
rmal
partn
ersh
ips w
ith ot
her r
esea
rch
instit
ution
s;
Publi
sh an
d sha
re
resea
rch fin
dings
In
creas
ed ca
pacit
y of M
ALGs
to
apply
and s
hare
result
s of r
esea
rch
Num
ber o
f joint
scien
tific P
ublic
ation
sOp
erat
ionali
ze pa
rtner
ships
Num
ber o
f con
feren
ces f
acilit
ated
by th
e MAL
Gs fo
r sta
ff to
pres
ent r
esea
rch fin
dings
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ive
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 7
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ive
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Capa
city o
f sta
ff to
do
resea
rch
Incre
ased
capa
city t
o do r
esea
rchNu
mbe
r of p
eer r
eview
ed pu
blica
tions
Op
erat
ionali
ze pa
rtner
ships
Nu
mbe
r of c
onfer
ence
pape
rs; le
vel o
f care
er
deve
lopm
ent; n
umbe
r of p
rizes
, num
ber o
f awa
rds,
type
of aw
ards
Facil
itate
rese
arch a
ctivit
ies
Capa
city t
o man
age
resea
rch
Incre
ased
capa
city t
o man
age
resea
rch
Num
ber o
f com
petit
ive gr
ants
won p
er ye
ar
indivi
duall
y or a
s tea
m qu
ality
of pl
ans a
nd re
ports
Writ
ing of
gran
t pro
posa
ls
Amou
nt o
f fund
s obt
ained
from
othe
r sou
rces;
Esta
blish
revie
w co
mm
ittee
to en
sure
quali
tyNu
mbe
r of a
ppro
ved r
esea
rch gr
ants
Capa
city t
o sha
re
resea
rch fin
dings
In
creas
ed ca
pacit
y to a
pply
and
share
resu
lts of
rese
arch
Num
ber o
f par
ticipa
tion t
imes
in po
licy p
roce
sses,
Polic
y brie
fs En
gage
men
t with
polic
y mak
ers a
nd
imple
men
ters
Num
ber o
f con
sulta
ncies
(e.g.
publi
c, pr
ivate,
NGO
se
ctor);
Nu
mbe
r of p
rofes
siona
l pub
licat
ions
To es
tabli
sh an
d exa
mine
th
e exis
ting i
nfor
mat
ion an
d kn
owled
ge pa
ckag
es on
bio
diver
sity m
anag
emen
t in
Ugan
da.
Exist
ence
and
gene
ration
of
Info
rmat
ion an
d kn
owled
ge on
bio
diver
sity
Impr
oved
gene
ration
and
man
agem
ent o
f info
rmat
ion
amon
g all s
take
holde
rs
Num
ber o
f kno
wled
ge m
aps
Revie
w of
the e
xistin
g biod
iversi
ty an
d eco
system
s da
ta, in
form
ation
and k
nowl
edge
pack
ages
amon
g the
MA
LGs im
plem
entin
g biod
iversi
ty rel
ated p
rojec
ts Kn
owled
ge an
d inf
orm
ation
revie
w rep
ort
Draft
repo
rts an
d diss
emina
te re
sults
Num
ber o
f pub
licat
ions o
n biod
iversi
ty is
sues
that
ex
ists
Deve
lop an
d aut
hor w
orkin
g pap
ers
Info
rmat
ion, d
ata a
nd kn
owled
ge co
llecti
on to
ols
deve
loped
Desig
n of d
ata c
ollec
tion t
ools
to ca
rry ou
t da
ta co
llecti
on of
biod
iversi
ty an
d eco
syste
ms,
infor
mat
ion an
d kno
wled
ge pa
ckag
es ac
ross
all
biodiv
ersit
y rela
ted p
rojec
ts Ro
w da
ta bo
th qu
antit
ative
and q
ualit
ative
co
llecte
d and
capt
ured
in da
taba
ses i
n var
ious
pack
ages
as pr
opos
ed by
the d
iffere
nt st
akeh
older
sCa
rry ou
t dat
a ent
ry an
d ana
lysis
of co
llecte
d dat
a an
d inf
orm
ation
for k
nowl
edge
map
ping
To in
creas
e org
aniza
tiona
l eff
ectiv
enes
s by e
nabli
ng
stake
holde
rs to
intu
itive
ly fin
d, sh
are an
d con
nect
to
relev
ant in
form
ation
and
know
ledge
pack
ages
abou
t bio
diver
sity a
nd ec
osys
tem
s m
anag
emen
t and
othe
r rel
ated
inte
rven
tions
.
Incre
ase i
n the
leve
l of
kn
owled
ge am
ong t
he
staff
and s
take
holde
rs an
d gen
eral
popu
lation
ab
out b
iodive
rsity
and
ecos
yste
ms
Incre
ased
leve
l of k
nowl
edge
am
ong t
he st
aff an
d sta
keho
lders
and g
ener
al po
pulat
ion ab
out
biodiv
ersit
y and
ecos
yste
ms
man
agem
ent
Num
ber o
f con
sulta
tive m
eetin
gs ca
rried
out
Carry
out C
onsu
ltativ
e mee
tings
and k
ey in
form
ant
inter
views
and f
ocus
grou
p disc
ussio
ns am
ong
proje
ct sta
ff, be
nefic
iaries
and p
olicy
mak
ers.
Data
base
with
clea
r met
adat
a rep
ort o
n bio
diver
sity i
nfor
mat
ion an
d kno
wled
ge pa
ckag
es
Crea
te da
taba
ses f
or in
form
ation
, dat
a and
kn
owled
ge pr
oduc
tsNu
mbe
r of w
orks
hops
cond
ucte
d am
ong t
he
MAL
Gs st
aff
Traini
ng of
MAL
Gs on
how
to ac
cess
and u
se
of w
ater
and e
nviro
nmen
tal in
form
ation
and
know
ledge
amon
g all s
take
holde
rsNu
mbe
r of p
eople
atte
nding
the w
orks
hops
ag
greg
ated
by se
x, dis
abilit
y, ag
e and
educ
ation
lev
el ac
ross
all pr
oject
areas
.
Info
rmat
ion an
d kn
owled
ge sh
aring
and
utiliz
ation
Impr
oved
info
rmat
ion an
d kn
owled
ge sh
aring
amon
g the
diff
erent
stak
ehold
ers
Num
ber o
f use
rs ac
cessi
ng bi
odive
rsity
relat
ed
infor
mat
ion an
d kno
wled
ge pa
ckag
es ag
greg
ated
by
sex,
disab
ility a
nd ag
e and
educ
ation
leve
l
Form
ation
of kn
owled
ge pl
atfo
rms a
s a w
ay to
im
prov
e the
shar
ing an
d upt
ake o
f kno
wled
ge an
d inf
orm
ation
prod
ucts
Num
ber a
nd m
embe
rship
to N
etwo
rk pl
atfo
rms
form
ed fo
r sha
ring o
f wat
er an
d env
ironm
enta
l kn
owled
ge an
d inf
orm
ation
acro
ss all
stak
ehold
ers
Deve
lopm
ent o
f net
work
plat
form
s for
shar
ing
of w
ater
and e
nviro
nmen
tal k
nowl
edge
and
infor
mat
ion ac
ross
all st
akeh
older
s
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda8
To ai
d the
deve
lopm
ent o
f kn
owled
ge m
anag
emen
t str
ateg
y for
biod
iversi
ty
infor
mat
ion is
sues
and
its in
itial
imple
men
tatio
n am
ong s
take
holde
rs
Info
rmat
ion
and k
nowl
edge
m
anag
emen
t stra
tegy
Impr
oved
know
ledge
man
agem
ent
syste
ms f
or bi
odive
rsity
m
anag
emen
t acro
ss all
the
stake
holde
rs
Revie
w rep
ort o
n kno
wled
ge m
anag
emen
t sy
stem
s of t
he di
fferen
t org
aniza
tions
Revie
w th
e exis
ting k
nowl
edge
man
agem
ent
syste
ms a
mon
g all M
ALGs
invo
lved i
n biod
iversi
ty
cons
erva
tion a
nd m
anag
emen
t in U
gand
aLis
t of k
nowl
edge
man
agem
ent o
ffice
rs pe
r or
ganiz
ation
Deve
lop a
data
base
Num
ber o
f peo
ple re
ache
d out
with
know
ledge
inf
orm
ation
Esta
blish
ing of
info
rmat
ion an
d kno
wled
ge
man
agem
ent c
omm
ittee
by id
entif
ying
know
ledge
man
agem
ent p
erso
ns in
the d
iffere
nt
MAL
Gs in
Uga
nda
Num
ber o
f res
earch
activ
ities
facil
itate
dCo
nduc
t cas
e stu
dies t
o exp
lore a
nd le
arn ab
out t
he
expe
rienc
es of
orga
nizati
ons in
the m
anag
emen
t of
inform
ation
and k
nowl
edge
on bi
odive
rsity
co
nser
vatio
n and
man
agem
ent in
Ugan
da
Num
ber o
f tra
ining
s, wo
rksh
ops a
nd ra
dio ta
lk sh
ows c
ondu
cted
Disse
mina
te re
sults
amon
g sta
keho
lders
thro
ugh
work
shop
s, tra
ining
s and
radio
talk
show
s
Num
ber o
f con
sulta
tive m
eetin
gs he
ldDe
velop
know
ledge
man
agem
ent s
trate
gy w
ith
clear
goals
and o
bjecti
ves i
n line
with
key r
esult
are
as of
biod
iversi
ty m
anag
emen
t
3.0 To
redu
ce
and m
anag
e ne
gativ
e im
pacts
wh
ile en
hanc
ing
posit
ive im
pacts
on
biodiv
ersit
y
Supp
ort f
ast-t
rack
ing
of es
tabli
shm
ent o
f an
integ
rated
mon
itorin
g an
d eva
luatio
n sys
tem
th
at co
llects
, sto
res,
analy
ze an
d diss
emina
te
biodiv
ersit
y im
pacts
amon
g sta
keho
lders.
Effec
tive m
onito
ring
Impr
oved
mon
itorin
g and
ev
aluat
ion of
biod
iversi
ty a
nd
ecos
yste
ms i
nter
vent
ions
Repo
rt on
the s
tatu
s of t
he cu
rrent
mon
itorin
g and
ev
aluat
ion sy
stem
sRe
view
the c
urren
t mon
itorin
g and
Evalu
ation
sy
stem
s use
d by t
he M
ALGs
Impr
oved
quali
ty of
data
and
frequ
ency
of co
llecti
onNe
eds a
ssessm
ent r
epor
t indic
ating
the e
xistin
g ga
ps in
mon
itorin
g and
evalu
ating
impa
cts on
bio
diver
sity
Cond
uct n
eeds
asse
ssmen
t am
ong t
he st
aff
of th
e MAL
Gs on
biod
iversi
ty an
d eco
syste
ms
infor
mat
ion to
effec
tively
mon
itor a
nd ev
aluat
e th
e im
pacts
Increa
sed t
rackin
g of p
rogr
ess o
f ne
gativ
e and
posit
ive bi
odive
rsity
im
pacts
Integ
rated
tool
that
could
be us
ed to
mon
itor
impa
cts on
biod
iversi
ty
Deve
lopm
ent o
f mon
itorin
g and
Evalu
ation
tools
am
ong t
he st
akeh
older
s
Incre
ased
know
ledge
on dr
ivers
of
biodiv
ersit
y los
sM
&E st
rateg
y with
set t
arget
s for
biod
iversi
ty
impa
cts de
velop
ed
Desig
n stra
tegy f
or ca
pacit
y buil
ding o
n m
onito
ring a
nd ev
aluati
on of
biod
iversi
ty im
pacts
am
ong s
take
holde
rsInc
rease
d kno
wled
ge on
setti
ng
targe
ts of
indica
tors
for ne
gativ
e and
po
sitive
impa
cts on
biod
iversi
ty
Num
ber o
f tra
ining
wor
ksho
psTra
ining
of M
ALGs
thro
ugh w
orks
hops
, on
deve
lopm
ent o
f out
put a
nd ou
tcom
e ind
icato
rs fo
r biod
iversi
ty m
anag
emen
t
Stren
gthe
n the
en
force
men
t of
envir
onm
enta
l laws
and
regula
tions
by in
creas
ing
num
ber o
f tim
es to
mon
itor
natu
ral re
sour
ces a
nd
enga
ging c
omm
uniti
es in
m
onito
ring b
iodive
rsity
and
ecos
yste
ms
Redu
ce th
e im
pact
of ac
tiviti
es in
th
e com
mun
ities
on
ecos
yste
ms
degr
adat
ion
Redu
ced n
egat
ive im
pacts
on
biodiv
ersit
y and
ecos
yste
ms
Susta
inable
mon
itorin
g mod
elAn
alyze
the e
nviro
nmen
tal d
ata c
ollec
ted a
nd
mak
e inf
orm
ed po
licy d
ecisi
on on
the s
tate
of
biodiv
ersit
y in U
gand
a and
deve
lop a
susta
inable
m
odel
for b
iodive
rsity
and e
cosy
stem
s mon
itorin
g
Upda
te rep
ort o
n stat
us of
biod
iversi
ty in
the
com
mun
ities
Incre
ased
aware
ness
of co
mm
unity
ab
out t
he ne
gativ
e im
pacts
on
biodiv
ersit
y Nu
mbe
r of c
omm
unity
mem
bers
involv
ed in
pr
otec
tion o
f biod
iversi
ty an
d eco
syste
ms
Com
mun
ity
involv
emen
t in
prot
ectin
g biod
iversi
ty
and e
cosy
stem
s
Increa
sed c
omm
unity
invo
lved i
n en
force
men
t of e
nviro
nmen
tal la
ws Nu
mbe
r of c
omm
unity
mon
itors
recru
ited a
nd
traine
d
Ident
ify an
d rec
ruit e
nviro
nmen
tal co
mm
unity
ba
sed m
onito
rs wh
o will
be ro
utine
ly m
onito
ring
and c
ollec
ting d
ata on
activ
ities in
the c
omm
unitie
s an
d sub
mit t
he da
ta in
a pred
esign
ed to
ol
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ive
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 9
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ive
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Capa
city o
f the
co
mm
unity
to m
onito
r an
d pro
tect
biodiv
ersit
y an
d eco
syste
ms
Build
capa
city o
f the
loca
l co
mm
uniti
es to
mon
itor a
nd
repo
rt hu
man
relat
ed ac
tiviti
es
that
have
pote
ntial
to ne
gativ
ely
affec
t biod
iversi
ty an
d eco
syste
ms
Num
ber o
f env
ironm
enta
l com
mun
ity ba
sed
mon
itors
traine
dTra
in en
viron
men
tal c
omm
unity
base
d mon
itors
and e
quip
then
with
tools
to be
used
for
mon
itorin
g
Emplo
ymen
t crea
tion
thro
ugh c
omm
unity
ba
sed m
onito
ring
Incre
ased
bene
fits f
or th
e co
mm
unity
from
cons
erva
tion
effor
ts Am
ount
of in
cent
ives a
lloca
ted
Facil
itate
the c
omm
unity
base
d mon
itors
to
perio
dicall
y mon
itor a
nd su
bmit t
he da
ta on
the
state
of ac
tiviti
es on
iden
tified
ecos
yste
ms i
n the
ir co
mm
uniti
es
Incre
ased
vigil
ance
and
oper
ation
alisa
tion o
f en
force
men
t laws
Redu
ced p
ollut
ion le
vels
Redu
ced i
ncide
nce o
f airb
orne
dise
ases
Facil
itate
colle
ction
and a
nalys
is of
pollu
tion d
ata
from
indu
stries
and f
acto
ries
Impr
oved
wat
er, ai
r and
soil q
ualit
y Re
duce
d inc
idenc
es of
wat
er bo
rn di
seas
esBu
ild ca
pacit
y of m
onito
rs to
colle
ct an
d ana
lyze
the d
ata t
o mak
e inf
orm
ed de
cision
s
Redu
ced i
ncide
nces
of ve
ctor b
orne
dise
ases
Build
capa
city o
f the
pollu
ters
to re
duce
the
levels
of po
llutio
n and
their
impli
catio
ns fo
r the
po
pulat
ion
To st
rengt
hen m
onito
ring,
cons
erva
tion a
nd
man
agem
ent o
f biod
iversi
ty
thro
ugh r
eward
syste
ms
Use o
f ince
ntive
s in
cons
erva
tion a
nd
man
agem
ent o
f bio
diver
sity
Incre
ased
com
mun
ity pa
rticip
ation
in
cons
erva
tion a
nd m
anag
emen
t of
biod
iversi
ty
Num
ber o
f hou
seho
lds in
volve
d in c
omm
unity
-ba
sed m
anag
emen
t of b
iodive
rsity
Facil
itate
the e
stabli
shm
ent o
f ince
ntive
s/rew
ard
syste
m an
d the
ir ope
ration
sNu
mbe
r of in
cent
ive m
echa
nism
s ope
rating
am
ong t
he co
mm
uniti
esTra
in co
mm
unity
mem
bers
on th
e rew
ard sy
stem
an
d its
impo
rtanc
e to c
onse
rvat
ion an
d live
lihoo
ds
Increa
sed k
nowl
edge
and v
alue o
f bio
divers
ity am
ong t
he co
mm
unitie
sKin
ds of
bene
fits t
o the
com
mun
ity
Supp
ort g
over
nmen
t com
mun
ity pa
rtner
ships
/en
gage
men
ts
Incre
ased
bene
fits f
rom
biod
iversi
ty
to th
e com
mun
ities
Num
ber o
f MOU
s sign
ed fo
r the
cons
erva
tion a
nd
man
agem
ent o
f com
mun
ities b
ased
on th
e rew
ard
syste
m
Facil
itate
oper
ation
aliza
tion o
f rew
ard sy
stem
s
Facil
itate
and s
uppo
rt sig
ning o
f MoU
s
To im
prov
e was
te
gene
ration
, disp
osal
and
man
agem
ent
Bette
r was
te
man
agem
ent a
t ge
nerat
ion
Impr
oved
was
te m
anag
emen
t at
point
of ge
nerat
ion
Cate
gorie
s of w
aste
gene
rated
Deve
lop an
d im
plem
ent g
uideli
nes o
n was
te
man
agem
ent a
t all l
evels
Num
ber o
f was
te co
llecti
on ba
gs fo
r the
diffe
rent
type
of w
aste
Build
capa
city o
f the
com
mun
ities
on w
aste
m
anag
emen
t, was
te se
greg
ation
hand
ling a
nd
dispo
sal
Was
te se
greg
ated
and t
rans
port
to th
e diff
erent
po
ints
Sens
itize
the c
omm
uniti
es on
was
te m
anag
emen
t pr
actic
es an
d the
ir im
plica
tions
Redu
ced v
olum
e of
waste
gene
rated
an
d disp
osed
to th
e en
viron
men
t
Increa
sed u
se of
was
te as
a raw
m
ateria
l in m
anuf
actu
re of
com
post
man
ure a
nd liq
uid fe
rtiliz
er
Volum
e of s
olid w
aste
used
for p
roduc
tion o
f man
ure
Esta
blish
chea
per c
ompo
st pla
nts
Volum
e of w
astew
ater u
sed i
n the
prod
uctio
n of
liquid
ferti
lizers
Supp
ort in
nova
tive w
ays o
f mak
ing co
mpo
st m
anur
eInc
rease
d use
of an
imal
waste
in th
e pr
oduc
tion o
f clea
n ene
rgy B
iogas
Volum
e and
mas
s of a
nnua
l was
te us
ed in
the
prod
uctio
n of b
iogas
Bu
ild ca
pacit
y of t
he co
mm
unitie
s in us
ing
waste
wate
r in m
aking
ferti
lizer
s
Raw
mat
erial
for
prod
uct d
evelo
pmen
t
Incre
ased
volum
e of c
ompo
st m
anur
e pro
duce
dM
ass o
f com
post
man
ure p
rodu
ced
Scale
up th
e con
struc
tion o
f biog
as pl
ants
espe
cially
in
rural
area
s and
arou
nd fra
gile e
cosy
stem
sIn
creas
ed us
e of c
ompo
st m
anur
e by
farm
ers
Volum
e of li
quid
fertil
izer p
rodu
ced
Facil
itate
and p
rom
ote i
nnov
ation
s to c
over
t wa
ste in
to us
eful p
rodu
cts
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda10
To in
creas
e the
fores
t cov
er
thro
ugh p
rom
otion
of ag
ro-
fores
t far
ming
syste
ms
amon
g the
com
mun
ities
in
Ugan
da
Incre
ased
fores
t cov
er
thro
ugh a
gricu
ltura
l sy
stem
s
Redu
ced a
gricu
ltura
l exp
ansio
n on
fores
t land
and
Num
ber o
f farm
ers t
hat h
ave a
dopt
ed ag
ro-fo
rest
farm
ing sy
stem
sTre
e plan
ting o
n priv
ate l
and
Incre
ase a
rea un
der f
ores
t on
priva
te la
ndAr
ea un
der f
ores
t on p
rivat
e lan
d In
creas
e area
unde
r for
est c
over
on pr
ivate
land
Incre
ase f
ores
t cov
er th
roug
h agr
o-fo
rest f
arm
ing sy
stem
Num
ber o
f farm
ers t
raine
dTra
ining
of fa
rmer
s on a
gro-
fores
try fa
rming
sy
stem
sIn
creas
ed nu
mbe
r of c
omm
unity
m
embe
rs se
nsiti
zed a
bout
bio
diver
sity
Num
ber o
f sen
sitiza
tion m
eetin
gs he
ld in
the
com
mun
ities
Sens
itiza
tion o
f the
peop
le in
the c
omm
unity
Incre
ased
area
map
ped w
here
ag
ro-fo
restry
have
been
cond
ucte
dAr
eas m
appe
d whe
re ag
ro-fo
restry
have
been
co
nduc
ted
Map
ping
of ar
eas w
here
agro
-fores
try ha
ve be
en
adop
ted
Impr
ove t
he effi
cienc
y an
d effe
ctive
ness
of th
e EIA
syste
m in
redu
cing
and m
inim
izing
nega
tive
impa
cts on
biod
iversi
ty
Effec
tive a
nd effi
cient
EIA
syste
m
Incre
ased
efficie
ncy o
f the
EIA
syste
m
Num
ber o
f day
s to r
eview
EIA r
epor
tsEs
tabli
shm
ent o
f an i
nteg
rated
EIA s
yste
mQu
ality
of th
e EIA
repo
rts
Supp
ort e
viden
ce-b
ased
EIA s
yste
mCa
pacit
y of r
eview
ers i
n ide
ntify
ing im
pacts
and
follo
w th
e miti
gatio
n hier
archy
Stren
gthe
n ins
titut
ional
linka
ges
Num
ber o
f inte
rven
tions
imple
men
ted t
hat
avoid
ed fr
agile
ecos
yste
ms
Polit
ical s
uppo
rt an
d com
mitm
ent in
the
imple
men
tatio
n of E
IA pr
oces
sNu
mbe
r of c
omm
unity
mem
bers
involv
ed in
EIA
proc
ess
Loca
l com
mun
ity in
volve
men
t in EI
A pro
cess
Incre
ased
the a
rea of
frag
ile
ecos
yste
ms a
nd nu
mbe
r of
biodiv
ersit
y spe
cies
Resto
ration
of
wetla
nds a
nd fo
rests
and f
ragil
e eco
syste
m
like r
iver b
anks
, lak
esho
res
Incre
ased
wet
land c
over
Num
ber o
f man
agem
ent p
lans d
evelo
ped
· Fac
ilitat
e the
form
ation
of m
anag
emen
t plan
s at
distr
ict, s
ub-co
unty
and c
omm
unity
Incre
ased
fores
t cov
erNu
mbe
r of p
artn
ersh
ips fo
rmed
· F
acilit
ate th
e ope
ration
alisa
tion o
f the c
omm
unity
an
d dist
rict m
anag
emen
t com
mitt
ees
Incre
ased
area
of la
kesh
ores
res
tored
Co
mm
unity
man
agem
ent p
lans d
evelo
ped
· Fac
ilitate
the d
emarc
ation
and r
esto
ration
th
rough
the c
omm
unitie
s by u
se of
tree s
eedli
ngs
in co
mm
unitie
s rath
er th
an co
ncret
e pole
sIn
creas
ed ar
ea of
river
bank
s res
tored
Di
strict
man
agem
ent p
lans d
evelo
ped a
nd
oper
ation
alise
d· F
acilit
ate t
he fo
rmat
ion an
d ope
ration
alisa
tion
of co
mm
unity
mon
itorin
g com
mitt
ees f
or th
e na
tura
l reso
urce
s with
in th
e com
mun
ities
Num
ber o
f biod
iversi
ty sp
ecies
ide
ntifi
ed an
d con
serv
ed
Num
ber o
f com
mun
ity m
anag
emen
t com
mitt
ees
form
ed
Facil
itate
the f
orm
ation
of co
mm
unity
m
anag
emen
t com
mitt
ees
Incre
ased
area
of w
etlan
d cov
er
resto
red an
d gaz
ette
d· A
rea of
wet
land c
over
resto
red an
d gaz
ette
Re
storat
ion of
wet
lands
Incre
ased
num
ber o
f tree
seed
lings
an
d var
iety p
lante
d· N
umbe
r of t
ree se
edlin
gs an
d var
iety p
lante
dPr
omot
e plan
ting v
ariet
y of t
ree se
edlin
gs
Incre
ased
prop
ortio
n of a
rea of
fo
rest c
over
plan
ted
· Area
of fo
rest c
over
plan
ted
Esta
blish
men
t of t
ree nu
rserie
s
To pr
omot
e esta
blish
men
t of
offse
ts an
d woo
dlots
amon
g con
struc
tion
com
panie
s, sch
ools,
ind
ustri
es an
d hou
seho
lds.
Incre
ased
com
mitm
ent
of th
e con
struc
tion
indus
try to
parti
cipat
e in
cons
erva
tion e
fforts
Redu
ced n
egat
ive im
pact
of co
nstru
ction
proje
cts on
bio
diver
sity a
nd en
viron
men
tal
degr
adat
ion in
Uga
nda
· Num
ber o
f offs
et sit
es es
tablish
ed fo
r sch
ools,
hotel
s, roa
d con
struc
tions
and w
oodlo
ts for
hous
ehold
s· Tr
aining
of sc
hools
teac
hers,
pupil
s’ hot
el sta
ff an
d peo
ple in
the c
onstr
uctio
n ind
ustry
Incre
ased
num
ber o
f sch
ools
and
hote
ls tra
ined a
nd se
nsiti
zed
· Num
ber o
f sch
ools
and h
otels
train
ed an
d se
nsiti
zed
· Sen
sitiza
tion w
orks
hops
for t
he pe
ople
in th
e co
nstru
ction
indu
stry
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ive
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 11
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ive
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Incre
ased
budg
et al
locat
ions f
or
offse
ts an
d oth
er co
nser
vatio
n wo
rk am
ong t
he st
akeh
older
s in
the c
onstr
uctio
n ind
ustry
· Num
ber o
f peo
ple tr
ained
·
Form
ation
/rejuv
enat
ion o
f env
ironm
enta
l club
s am
ong s
choo
l pup
ils
Incre
ased
fores
t cov
erNu
mbe
r of t
rees p
lante
d and
mon
itored
· Tree
plan
ting a
nd m
onito
ring
4.0 To
prom
ote t
he
susta
inable
use a
nd
equit
able
shar
ing of
co
sts an
d ben
efits
of bi
odive
rsity
To pr
omot
e sus
taina
ble us
e of
biod
iversi
ty
Enh
ancin
g live
lihoo
dOp
timise
bene
fits f
rom
susta
inable
bio
diver
sity
Incre
ased
efficie
nt us
e of r
esou
rces
Build
skill
thro
ugh t
raini
ngs,
inter
nship
and
volun
teer
ing an
d pilo
t acti
vities
Num
ber o
f jobs
crea
ted i
n the
diffe
rent s
ecto
rsCr
eatio
n of e
mplo
ymen
t opp
ortu
nities
Num
ber o
f peo
ple w
ho sh
ift to
diffe
rent s
ecto
rsLiv
eliho
od di
versi
ficat
ionNu
mbe
r of e
nter
prise
s crea
ted t
hat d
oesn
’t dep
end
direc
tly on
natu
ral re
sour
ces
Ente
rpris
e crea
tion
Incre
ase v
alue c
aptu
red fr
om bi
odive
rsity
use
Value
addit
ion
Efficie
nt pr
oduc
tion o
f ch
arcoa
l
Impr
oved
met
hods
of ch
arcoa
l pr
oduc
tion
Volum
e of c
harco
al Ca
pacit
y buil
ding o
n effi
cient
charc
oal p
rodu
ction
m
etho
ds
Incre
ased
volum
e of c
harco
al fro
m
the s
ame i
nput
woo
dNu
mbe
r of c
harco
al pr
oduc
ers w
ho ha
ve ad
opte
d im
prov
ed te
chno
logy
Prom
ote e
fficie
nt ch
arcoa
l pro
ducti
on
tech
nolog
ies
Incre
ased
prop
ortio
n of c
harco
al pr
oduc
ers t
raine
dNu
mbe
r of c
harco
al pr
oduc
ers t
raine
d. Co
nduc
t mee
tings
and t
raini
ngs o
n cha
rcoal
prod
uctio
n
Efficie
nt us
e of b
iomas
s en
ergy
Redu
ced w
asta
geNu
mbe
r of h
ouse
holds
that
have
adop
ted e
nerg
y sa
ving t
echn
ologie
sPr
omot
e affo
rdab
le en
ergy s
aving
tech
nolog
y
Bette
r ene
rgy s
aving
tech
nolog
ies
Num
ber o
f insti
tutio
ns th
at ha
ve ad
opte
d new
te
chno
logies
Capa
city b
uildin
g on e
nerg
y sav
ing te
chno
logies
Redu
ced d
epen
denc
y on
charc
oal a
nd
firew
ood
Alte
rnat
ive so
urce
s of c
ookin
g en
ergy
Num
ber o
f hou
seho
lds us
ing al
tern
ative
sour
ces o
f en
ergy f
or co
oking
Prom
ote a
dopt
ion of
alte
rnat
ive en
ergy f
or
cook
ing
Type
s of e
nerg
y use
dCa
pacit
y buil
ding o
n alte
rnat
ive ty
pes o
f ene
rgy
for c
ookin
gVo
lume o
f cha
rcoal
and fi
rewoo
d use
d At
titud
e cha
nge
Man
age t
he fo
rest
resou
rces
Impr
oved
Man
agem
ent o
f fores
t res
ource
sFo
rest p
rodu
ct ac
coun
ts de
velop
ed
Deve
lopm
ent o
f fores
t pro
ducts
acco
unts
Value
addit
ionCa
pacit
y buil
ding o
n res
ource
acco
untin
g
Susta
inable
utiliz
ation
of
fishe
ries r
esou
rce
Susta
inable
harv
estin
g of
fish
Impr
oved
fishin
g met
hods
Nu
mbe
r of fi
sher
ies pr
ojects
fund
edEn
cour
age fi
sh fa
rming
Num
ber o
f tra
ining
s con
ducte
dCa
pacit
y buil
ding o
n effi
cient
mon
itorin
g of
fishin
g acti
vities
Efficie
nt M
anag
emen
t of
fish s
tock
· Im
prov
ed M
anag
emen
t of fi
sh
resou
rces
· Fish
eries
acco
unts
deve
loped
· D
evelo
pmen
t of fi
sher
ies a
ccoun
ts· V
alue a
dditi
on· C
apac
ity bu
ilding
on re
sour
ce ac
coun
ting
Susta
inable
utilis
ation
of
wate
r
· Effi
cient
utilis
ation
of
wate
r res
ource
s In
creas
e in w
ater
reus
e W
ater
reus
e tec
hnolo
gies a
dopt
edAd
optin
g wat
er re
use t
echn
ologie
s Se
nsitis
ation
of m
asse
s on e
fficie
nt ut
ilisati
on of
wa
ter
Efficie
nt m
anag
emen
t of
wat
er re
sour
ceRe
duce
d was
tage
· Volu
me o
f wat
erAd
optin
g wat
er m
anag
emen
t pra
ctice
s
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda12
Efficie
nt irr
igatio
n sy
stem
s
Incre
ased
aware
ness
on th
e dr
ough
t res
istan
t cro
ps an
d bet
ter
farm
ing m
etho
ds· R
ecor
ds of
train
ings c
ondu
cted
Impr
ovem
ent o
f wat
er al
locat
ion am
ong
com
petin
g use
s
· Impr
oved
irriga
tion s
yste
ms
· Red
uced
pollu
tion
Carry
ing ou
t reg
ular W
ater
Reso
urce
s As
sessm
ents
· Num
ber o
f inno
vatio
ns ad
opte
dPr
even
tion s
trate
gies a
nd ne
w te
chno
logies
that
en
hanc
e exis
ting n
atur
al wa
ter r
esou
rces,
reduc
e de
man
d, an
d ach
ieve h
igher
efficie
ncy
Incre
ased
num
ber o
f farm
ers
traine
d on b
ette
r far
ming
met
hods
Num
ber o
f farm
ers t
raine
d on b
ette
r far
ming
m
etho
ds· E
ncou
rage
bette
r far
ming
met
hods
that
don’t
ne
ed irr
igatio
n
Efficie
nt M
anag
emen
t of
wat
er re
sour
ces
· Impr
oved
Man
agem
ent o
f wat
er
resou
rces
· Wat
er ac
coun
ts de
velop
ed
· Dev
elopm
ent o
f wat
er a
ccoun
tsVa
lue ad
dition
Capa
city b
uildin
g on r
esou
rce ac
coun
ting
Susta
inable
utilis
ation
of
clay
Efficie
nt us
e of c
lay
· Rec
ords
of tr
aining
s con
ducte
dPr
omot
e cer
tifica
tion
· Clay
guide
lines
deve
loped
· Ado
pting
of effi
cient
extra
ction
skills
· Ext
racti
on sk
ills ad
opte
d· E
ncou
rage i
nnov
ation
s whic
h req
uire l
ess m
ateria
lsNu
mbe
r of e
xtra
ctors
traine
d· C
apac
ity bu
ilding
of ex
tracto
rsCla
y ext
racti
on gu
idelin
es de
velop
ed· D
evelo
p guid
eline
s for
clay
extra
ction
.
· Im
prov
ed M
anag
emen
t of c
lay
resou
rces
· Clay
acco
unts
deve
loped
· D
evelo
pmen
t of c
lay a
ccoun
ts· V
alue a
dditi
on· C
apac
ity bu
ilding
on re
sour
ce ac
coun
ting
Susta
inable
utilis
ation
of
sand
· San
d alte
rnat
ives
· San
d alte
rnat
ives a
dopt
ed· E
ncou
rage a
dopt
ion of
othe
r alte
rnati
ves f
or sa
nd
· Impr
oved
Man
agem
ent o
f san
d res
ource
s· S
and
acco
unts
deve
loped
· D
evelo
pmen
t of s
and
acco
unts
· Valu
e add
ition
· Cap
acity
build
ing on
reso
urce
acco
untin
g
5.0 To
enha
nce
aware
ness
and
educ
ation
on
biodiv
ersit
y issu
es
amon
g the
vario
us
stake
holde
rs
Deve
lop an
d im
plem
ent
stake
holde
r awa
renes
s pr
ogra
mm
es on
biod
iversi
ty
Aware
ness
creat
ion
amon
g Po
licy m
aker
/im
plem
ente
rsIn
creas
ed aw
arene
ss
Num
ber o
f mee
tings
Polic
y eng
agem
ent
Num
ber o
f prin
t and
audio
slot
sPo
licy d
ialog
ues
Num
ber o
f mee
tings
held
Mee
tings
Biodiv
ersity
infor
mati
on pu
blish
ed in
the p
rint m
edia
Mult
imed
ia ap
proa
ch (r
adio
talk
show
s, TV
show
s, ne
wspa
pers,
docu
men
tarie
s)Nu
mbe
r of r
adio
and T
V talk
show
s con
ducte
d
Aware
ness
creat
ion
amon
g Res
earch
ers/
Acad
emia
Incre
ased
aware
ness
amon
g res
earch
er /a
cade
mia
Num
ber o
f tra
ining
wor
ksho
ps co
nduc
ted
Facil
itate
Publi
catio
nsNu
mbe
r of T
oTs r
ecru
ited
Train
ing o
f Tra
iner
sNu
mbe
r of r
etrea
ts an
d mee
tings
Retre
ats
Writ
ten r
epor
ts on
biod
iversi
tyW
riting
repo
rtsAw
arene
ss cre
ation
of
Priva
te se
ctor, c
ivil
socie
ty an
d m
edia
Incre
ased
parti
cipat
ion of
priva
te
secto
r, civi
l soc
iety a
nd m
edia
in
biodiv
ersit
y pro
gram
mes
Num
ber o
f mee
tings
cond
ucte
dPo
licy e
ngag
emen
t
Num
ber o
f prin
t and
audio
slot
sPo
licy d
ialog
ues
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ive
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 13
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ive
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Num
ber o
f fact
shee
ts de
velop
edM
eetin
gsBi
odive
rsity
info
rmat
ion pu
blish
ed in
the p
rint
med
iaM
ultim
edia
appr
oach
(rad
io ta
lk sh
ows, T
V sh
ows,
news
pape
rs, do
cum
enta
ries)
Num
ber o
f rad
io an
d TV t
alk sh
ows a
bout
bio
diver
sity c
ondu
cted
Crea
te aw
arene
ss in
Sc
hools
(all l
evels
)
Incre
ased
parti
cipat
ion of
scho
ols
in bio
diver
sity p
rogr
amm
es
Num
ber o
f TOT
wor
ksho
ps co
nduc
ted
Wor
ksho
psNu
mbe
r of e
nviro
nmen
tal c
lubs
Scho
ol clu
bsNu
mbe
r of b
rand
ed m
essa
ge m
ater
ial di
stribu
ted
Deve
lop br
andin
g mes
sage
sNu
mbe
r of c
omm
unity
enga
gem
ent p
rogr
amm
esCle
an up
prog
ram
mes
Incre
ased
aware
ness
in sch
ools
Num
ber o
f prin
t and
audi
o slo
tsM
ultim
edia
appr
oach
(rad
io ta
lk sh
ows,
TV
show
s, ne
wspa
pers,
docu
men
tarie
s)Nu
mbe
r of c
omm
unity
enga
gem
ent p
rogr
amm
esCle
an up
prog
ram
mes
Num
ber o
f prin
t and
audio
slot
sM
ultim
edia
appr
oach
(rad
io ta
lk sh
ows, T
V sh
ows,
news
pape
rs, do
cum
enta
ries
Num
ber o
f flye
rs an
d ban
ners
deve
loped
and
distri
bute
dDe
velop
bran
ding m
essa
ges
Enha
ncing
educ
ation
pr
ogra
mm
es on
biod
iversi
ty
issue
s
Educ
ation
and a
ttitu
de
chan
ge am
ong P
olicy
m
aker
/imple
men
ters
Incre
ased
parti
cipat
ion in
bio
diver
sity a
ctivit
ies
Num
ber o
f tra
ining
wor
ksho
psTra
ining
Wor
ksho
ps
Info
rmed
decis
ions o
n biod
iversi
ty
issue
s
Num
ber o
f ret
reats
Retre
ats
Polic
y brie
fs on
biod
iversi
ty de
velop
edPo
licy e
ngag
emen
tNu
mbe
r of w
orks
hops
Disse
mina
tion t
hrou
gh w
orks
hops
Educ
ation
and a
ttitu
de
chan
ge am
ong
Rese
arche
rs/Ac
adem
iaIn
creas
ed pa
rticip
ation
of
resea
rcher
s/aca
dem
ia
Num
ber o
f wor
ksho
psTra
inin
g wor
ksho
psNu
mbe
r of r
esea
rch pa
pers
Train
ing o
f tra
iner
sNu
mbe
r of r
etre
ats h
eldRe
treat
sEd
ucat
ion an
d atti
tude
ch
ange
Priva
te se
ctor,
civil s
ociet
y and
med
ia
Incre
ased
parti
cipat
ion of
Priva
te
secto
r, civi
l soc
iety a
nd m
edia
in
biodiv
ersit
y pro
gram
mes
Num
ber o
f age
ncies
that
are t
rain
edCa
pacit
y bui
ldin
g of s
take
hold
ers o
n bi
odive
rsity
prog
ram
mes
Educ
ation
and a
ttitu
de
chan
ge Sc
hools
(all
levels
)
Incre
ased
Know
ledge
on
biodiv
ersit
y issu
esNu
mbe
r of e
nviro
nmen
tal e
duca
tion p
rogr
amm
esEn
viron
men
tal e
duca
tion p
rogr
amm
es
Impr
oved
attit
ude o
n biod
iversi
ty
Num
ber o
f prin
t and
audio
slot
s(D
ebat
es, c
lean-
up, re
storat
ion)
Num
ber o
f rad
io an
d TV t
alk sh
ows c
ondu
cted
Mult
imed
ia ap
proa
ch (r
adio
talk
show
s, TV
show
s, ne
wspa
pers,
docu
men
tarie
s)Nu
mbe
r writ
ten r
epor
ts on
biod
iversi
tyW
ritin
g rep
orts
Num
ber o
f dev
elope
d and
auth
ored
wor
king
pape
rsDe
velop
wor
king p
aper
s thr
ough
Train
ing of
tra
iners
(TOTs)
Num
ber o
f mes
sage
t-sh
irts m
ade a
nd di
stribu
ted
Deve
lop br
andin
g mes
sage
sNu
mbe
r of fl
yers
and b
anne
rs de
velop
ed an
d dis
tribu
ted
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda14
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ive
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Guide
lines
to in
tegr
ate e
nviro
nmen
t edu
catio
n pr
ogra
mm
es in
to cu
rricu
lum de
velop
edDe
velop
guide
lines
to in
tegr
ate e
nviro
nmen
t ed
ucat
ion pr
ogra
mm
es in
to cu
rricu
lumM
ater
ials f
or cl
ean-
up an
d res
torat
ion pr
ovide
d an
d dist
ribut
edCle
an up
and r
esto
ration
prog
ram
mes
Educ
ation
and a
ttitu
de
chan
ge of
Indig
enou
s pe
ople
and l
ocal
com
mun
ities
Integ
ration
of in
digen
ous w
ith
mod
ern k
nowl
edge
Num
ber o
f mee
tings
Mee
tings
(bar
azas
)
Impr
oved
utilis
ation
of bi
odive
rsity
Num
ber o
f com
mun
ity en
gage
men
t pro
gram
mes
Com
mun
ity en
gage
men
t pro
gram
mes
(clea
n-up
an
d res
torat
ion)
Impr
oved
attit
ude o
f indig
enou
s pe
ople
and l
ocal
com
mun
ities
on
biodiv
ersit
y
Num
ber o
f bra
nded
mes
sage
mat
erial
distr
ibute
dM
ultim
edia
appr
oach
(rad
io ta
lk sh
ows, T
V sh
ows,
news
pape
rs, do
cum
enta
ries)
Num
ber o
f flye
rs an
d ban
ners
deve
loped
and
distri
bute
dDe
velop
flyer
sDe
velop
bann
ers
6: To
harn
ess
mod
ern
biote
chno
logy f
or
socio
-eco
nom
ic de
velop
men
t with
ad
equa
te sa
fety
mea
sures
for
hum
an he
alth a
nd
the e
nviro
nmen
t
Deve
lop an
d app
ly bio
tech
nolog
y for
socio
-ec
onom
ic de
velop
men
t
Crop
pests
cont
rol
using
biot
echn
ology
Redu
ced i
ncide
nces
of pe
sts
Num
ber o
f biol
ogica
l pes
t con
trols
tech
nolog
iesSu
ppor
t inno
vativ
e res
earch
Num
ber o
f farm
ers t
raine
dTra
ining
farm
ers in
biolo
gical
pest
cont
rol te
chno
logies
Num
ber o
f farm
ers m
aking
and u
sing b
iolog
ical
pest
cont
rol
Deve
lop pe
st res
istan
t cro
psNu
mbe
r of fa
rmer
s mak
ing an
d usin
g org
anic
pesti
cides
Prom
ote u
se of
orga
nic pe
sticid
es
Redu
ce st
orag
e grai
n/se
ed lo
sses u
sing
biotec
hnolo
gies
Redu
ced g
rain/
seed
loss
at st
orag
eNu
mbe
r of fa
rmer
s usin
g biol
ogica
l pes
t con
trol
tech
nolog
ies du
ring s
tora
ge
Supp
ort i
nnov
ative
rese
arch
Train
farm
ers on
biolo
gical
pest
cont
rol
techn
ologie
s dur
ing st
orag
ePr
omot
e use
of or
ganic
pesti
cides
Redu
ced c
rop d
iseas
es
using
biot
echn
ology
Redu
ced d
iseas
e inc
idenc
e
Num
ber o
f biol
ogica
l dise
ase c
ontro
ls te
chno
logies
Supp
ort in
nova
tive r
esea
rch fo
r biol
ogica
l dise
ase
cont
rol te
chno
logies
Num
ber o
f dem
onstr
ation
farm
s esta
blish
edEs
tabli
shm
ent o
f dem
onstr
ation
s far
ms
Num
ber o
f farm
ers u
sing b
iolog
ical d
iseas
e con
trol
tech
nolog
iesDe
velop
and r
eleas
e dise
ase r
esist
ant c
rop v
ariet
iesNu
mbe
r of fa
rmers
mak
ing an
d usin
g org
anic
herb
icide
sPr
omot
e use
of or
ganic
herb
icide
s
Was
te m
anag
emen
tRe
duce
d poll
ution
Num
ber o
f was
te tre
atmen
t tech
nolog
ies de
velop
edPr
omot
ing bi
ologic
al tre
atm
ent o
f was
tePo
pular
ise w
aste
trea
tmen
t am
ong t
he pe
ople
Man
agem
ent a
nd
cont
rol o
f Inva
sive
spec
iesCo
ntro
l and
elim
inatio
n of in
vasiv
e sp
ecies
Num
ber o
f biol
ogica
l con
trol te
chno
logies
for
invas
ive sp
ecies
deve
loped
Supp
ort d
evelo
pmen
t of b
iolog
ical c
ontro
l te
chno
logies
for in
vasiv
e spe
cies
Num
ber o
f biol
ogica
l con
trol te
chno
logies
for
invas
ive sp
ecies
adop
tedPr
omot
e the
use o
f biol
ogica
l con
trol te
chno
logies
fo
r inva
sive s
pecie
sNu
mbe
r of fa
rmers
mak
ing an
d usin
g biol
ogica
l pe
st co
ntro
lDe
velop
pest
resist
ant c
rops
7: To
prom
ote
innov
ative
and
susta
inable
fund
ing
mec
hanis
ms t
o su
ppor
t NBS
AP
imple
men
tatio
n
Mob
ilize fi
nanc
ial re
sour
ces
for b
iodive
rsity
Ident
ify po
tentia
l fun
ders
and f
undin
g pr
ioritie
sIn
creas
ed fu
nding
base
Data
base
of po
tent
ial fu
nder
s and
their
prior
ities
Facil
itate
deve
lopm
ent a
nd op
erat
ionali
satio
n of
data
base
for p
oten
tial fu
nder
s
Build
netw
orks a
nd
partn
ership
s for
fundin
gIn
creas
ed pu
blic
priva
te
partn
ersh
ips
Num
ber o
f Par
tner
ship
s dev
elope
dSt
rengt
hen P
ublic
priva
te pa
rtner
ships
Proje
ct pr
opos
al de
velop
men
tIn
creas
ed nu
mbe
r of fu
nding
pr
opos
als su
bmitt
edNu
mber
of fun
ding p
ropos
als de
velop
ed an
d sub
mitte
dFa
cilita
te de
velop
men
t of p
rojec
t pro
posa
lsNu
mbe
r of p
ropo
sals
appr
oved
Capa
city b
uildin
g on p
rojec
t pro
posa
l writ
ingDe
velop
ing a b
iodive
rsity
cons
ervati
on p
rogram
Biod
iversi
ty co
nser
vatio
n pro
gram
de
velop
edNu
mbe
r of b
iodive
rsity
cons
erva
tion p
rogr
ams
deve
loped
Capa
city b
uildin
g on b
iodive
rsity
cons
erva
tion
prog
ram
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 1515Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda
CHAPTER FOUR: SUMMARY RESULTS OF THE COST OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NBSAP
4.1 Overall total cost of implementing the NBSAP II
The financing needs for biodiversity conservation and management in Uganda were derived from the different sectors and subsectors that implement biodiversity related activities. The cost and budget for effectively implementing NBSAP II in Uganda was computed based on the intended actions expected to have an impact on biodiversity conservation and management. The activity-based costing involved mainly four steps namely: Identify and classify activities, (ii) Estimate the cost for whole activity, (iii) compute a cost driver rate, and (iv) apply activity costs using cost driver. Furthermore, consultations with different stakeholders on the possible costs for each of the suggested actions were carried out. The cost for implementing the NBSAP II for each of the strategic objective are summarised in Table 4.1 detailed costing can be found in annex 1.
Table 4.1: Total Estimated Costs of implementing the NBSAP II 2018-2025
Fiscal Year (UGX-billion) Strategic objectives 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2018/191. Strengthen stakeholder co-ordination and
frameworks for biodiversity management 3.0 3.2 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 5.9
2. To facilitate and build capacity for research, knowledge and information management and exchange on biodiversity
2.5 2.5 2.6 2.9 2.9 3.2 3.4
3. To reduce and manage negative impacts while enhancing positive impacts on biodiversity
391.9 411.7 432.5 454.4 479.3 500.3 524.9
4. To promote the sustainable use and equitable sharing of costs and benefits of biodiversity
3.1 3.4 3.9 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.3
5. To enhance awareness and education on biodiversity issues among the various stakeholders
2.7 3.2 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.9 3.4
6. To harness modern biotechnology for socio-economic development with adequate safety measures for human health and the environment
1.7 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1
7. To promote innovative and sustainable funding mechanisms to support NBSAP implementation
0.4 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5
Overall 405.3 426.2 448.2 470.7 495.6 517.6 544.5
On average, Uganda required about UGX 472.6 billion for biodiversity conservation and management per fiscal year. Furthermore, about 96.6% of the costs are to reduce and manage negative impacts while enhancing positive impacts on biodiversity (restoration of forests and wetlands). The concentration of the costs on one of the strategic objectives might be attributed to high habitat loss in terms of forests and wetlands. It should be noted that cost of habitat restoration might not be the best strategies if the root cause of forest and wetland degradation are not addressed. Further analysis revealed that only about 0.5% of the costs are for development while the remaining is for recurrent costs Table 4.2. The high proportion of the recurrent costs are attributed to restoration of forests and fragile ecosystems that are spread out till 2024/25.
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda16
Table 4.2: Distribution of total costs by capital development and recurrent costs (UGX billion)
Strategic objectives Budget profile 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
1. Strengthen stakeholder co-ordination and frameworks for biodiversity management
Capital development 0.07 0.21 0.85 0.60 0.35 0.13 2.08
Recurrent 2.94 2.97 3.12 3.28 3.44 3.61 3.80
2. To facilitate and build capacity for research, knowledge and information management and exchange on biodiversity
Capital development 0.13 0.02 0.03 0.24 0.04 0.17 0.28
Recurrent 2.33 2.45 2.57 2.70 2.84 2.98 3.13
3. To reduce and manage negative impacts while enhancing positive impacts on biodiversity
Capital development 0.33 0.55 0.77 1.04 3.32 0.54 0.14
Recurrent 391.59 411.17 431.73 453.31 475.98 499.78 524.77
4. To promote the sustainable use and equitable sharing of costs and benefits of biodiversity
Capital development 0.01 0.11 0.49 0.51 0.25 0.00 0.13
Recurrent 3.14 3.29 3.46 3.63 3.81 4.00 4.20
5. To enhance awareness and education on biodiversity issues among the various stakeholders
Capital development 0.03 0.57 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.67 0.01
Recurrent 2.66 2.65 2.78 2.92 3.07 3.22 3.38
6. To harness modern biotechnology for socio-economic development with adequate safety measures for human health and the environment
Capital development 0.11 0.22 0.12 0.24 0.13 0.00 0.00
Recurrent 1.58 1.65 1.74 1.82 1.91 2.01 2.11
7. To promote innovative and sustainable funding mechanisms to support NBSAP implementation
Capital development 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Recurrent 0.34 0.36 0.55 0.39 0.41 0.43 0.45
4.2 Analysis of total costs per NBSAP strategic objective
4.2.1: Costs to implement the NBSAP strategic objective 1: To strengthen stakeholder co-ordination and frameworks for biodiversity managementThis strategic objective is divided into two main components to help in addressing the underlying causes of biodiversity loss at different levels in Uganda. The actions are directed towards mainstreaming biodiversity issues in the NDP, Sectoral, District and Local Development Plans, strengthening coordination among stakeholders and establishing and operationalisation of implementation, planning, monitoring and evaluation frameworks for the NBSAP in Uganda. The strategic objective will operate under the following specific objectives
a) To strengthen the coordination of biodiversity activities among all the stakeholders in delivering shared government priorities
b) To strengthen evaluation capacity (across all stakeholders in biodiversity management) for policy and program evaluation
c) To strengthen performance capability among all stakeholders in biodiversity management in Ugandad) To evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of biodiversity spending among all stakeholderse) Strengthen community coordination for biodiversity management among all stakeholdersf ) Improved reporting and increased access and sharing to biodiversity information among all
stakeholders
To achieve the above stated specific objectives, detailed actions and activities were developed and estimates of the cost were determined. Table 4.3 shows the estimated cost for the implementation of each specific objectives under strategic objective one.
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 17
Table 4.3: Summary of estimated costs to implement strategic objective one UGX billion
Specific objective 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
To strengthen performance capability 0.98 0.96 1.01 1.06 1.11 1.16 1.22
To strengthen the coordination of biodiversity activities 0.17 0.18 0.39 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.22
To strengthen evaluation capacity 0.33 0.34 0.36 0.86 0.40 0.42 1.00
To evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of biodiversity spending 0.90 0.94 0.99 1.04 1.09 1.14 2.72
Strengthen community engagement for biodiversity management 0.17 0.34 0.77 0.31 0.38 0.22 0.23
To increase accesses and reporting of biodiversity management and progress 0.03 0.07 0.09 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
Strengthen govt‘s focus on sustainability in public reports 0.44 0.35 0.37 0.39 0.58 0.56 0.45
Overall 3.01 3.18 3.97 3.88 3.79 3.75 5.88
On average, the total cost for implementation per year was estimated at UGX 3.92 billion
Figure 4.1 shows the summary cost share of each of the actions. For example, about 32% of the costs under this strategic objective will be allocated to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of biodiversity spending among stakeholders.
Figure 4.1: Share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective one
56 Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) Uganda
Strengthen govt‘s focus on sustainability in public reports 0.44 0.35 0.37 0.39 0.58 0.56 0.45 Overall 3.01 3.18 3.97 3.88 3.79 3.75 5.88 On average, the total cost for implementation per year was estimated at UGX 3.92 billion
Figure 4.1 shows the summary cost share of each of the actions. For example, about 32% of the costs under this strategic objective will be allocated to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of biodiversity spending among stakeholders.
Figure 4.1: share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective one
Furthermore, on average, about 13.4% of the costs are attributed to capital development while the rest will be for recurrent costs as shown in Figure 4.1.1. Detailed /costs for the suggested actions/activities are provided in Annex 1.
27%
6%
14% 32%
9% 1%
11%
To strengthen performancecapability
To strengthen the coordination ofbiodiversity activities
To strengthen evaluation capacity
To evaluate the efficiency andeffectiveness of biodiversityspending
Strengthen community engagementfor biodiversity management
To increase accesses and reportingof biodiversity management andprogress
Strengthen govt‘s focus on sustainability in public reports
Furthermore, on average, about 13.4% of the costs are attributed to capital development while the rest will be for recurrent costs as shown in Figure 4.1.1. Detailed /costs for the suggested actions/activities are provided in Annex 1.
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda18
57 Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) Uganda
Figure 4.1.1: Share of total costs by recurrent and capital development (UGX billion)
4.2.2: Costs to implement the NBSAP strategic objective 2: To facilitate and build capacity for research, knowledge and information management and exchange on biodiversity Gathering and dissemination of biodiversity information is fundamental for sustainable biodiversity management in Uganda. Building capacity for research and improving information management and exchange among stakeholders and decision makers is important for identifying and overcoming the barriers to knowledge exchange. Policies and practices that would greatly improve management of information and knowledge on biodiversity research include; Standard guidelines for governing biodiversity research, commitment to support and fund biodiversity related research, manage, facilitate and sustain research, collaborate on biodiversity research, publish and share research findings, among others. Strategic objective two was divided into four specific objectives: build capacity for research on biodiversity at both institutional and individual level, establish and examine existing information and knowledge on biodiversity, development of knowledge management strategy on biodiversity and increasing organizational effectiveness through research and publication. Table 4.4 shows the estimated total cost of each of the suggested specific objectives based on costing of actions (Annex 1).
2.94 2.97 3.12 3.28 3.44 3.61 3.80
0.07 0.21 0.85 0.60 0.35 0.13
2.08
2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
recurrent capital development
Figure 4.1.1: Share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective one
4.2.2: Costs to implement the NBSAP strategic objective 2: To facilitate and build capacity for research, knowledge and information management and exchange on biodiversity
Gathering and dissemination of biodiversity information is fundamental for sustainable biodiversity management in Uganda. Building capacity for research and improving information management and exchange among stakeholders and decision makers is important for identifying and overcoming the barriers to knowledge exchange. Policies and practices that would greatly improve management of information and knowledge on biodiversity research include; Standard guidelines for governing biodiversity research, commitment to support and fund biodiversity related research, manage, facilitate and sustain research, collaborate on biodiversity research, publish and share research findings, among others.
Strategic objective two was divided into four specific objectives: build capacity for research on biodiversity at both institutional and individual level, establish and examine existing information and knowledge on biodiversity, development of knowledge management strategy on biodiversity and increasing organizational effectiveness through research and publication. Table 4.4 shows the estimated total cost of each of the suggested specific objectives based on costing of actions (Annex 1).
Specific objective 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
Build capacity for research on biodiversity 1.22 1.18 1.23 1.36 1.35 1.42 1.61
To establish and examine the existing information and knowledge packages 0.48 0.50 0.56 0.60 0.59 0.61 0.64
To increase organizational effectiveness in sharing information and knowledge on biodiversity 0.44 0.44 0.46 0.61 0.54 0.70 0.56
To aid the development of knowledge management strategy on biodiversity 0.33 0.34 0.36 0.38 0.40 0.43 0.59
Overall 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.9 2.9 3.2 3.4
Table 4.4: Summary of estimated costs under strategic objective two (UGX billion)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 19
To achieve the specific objectives under strategic objective two, on average about UGX 2.84 billion per year are required. Figure 4.2 shows distribution of budget allocations per each of the specific objectives and actions suggested to effectively implement NBSAP II.
Figure 4.2: Share of total estimated cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective two
58 Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) Uganda
Table 4.4: Summary of estimated costs under strategic objective two (UGX billion)
Specific objective 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
Build capacity for research on biodiversity
1.22 1.18 1.23 1.36 1.35 1.42 1.61 To establish and examine the existing information and knowledge packages 0.48 0.50 0.56 0.60 0.59 0.61 0.64 To increase organizational effectiveness in sharing information and knowledge on biodiversity 0.44 0.44 0.46 0.61 0.54 0.70 0.56 To aid the development of knowledge management strategy on biodiversity 0.33 0.34 0.36 0.38 0.40 0.43 0.59 Overall 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.9 2.9 3.2 3.4 To achieve the specific objectives under strategic objective two, on average about UGX 2.84 billion per year are required. Figure 4.2 shows distribution of budget allocations per each of the specific objectives and actions suggested to effectively implement NBSAP II.
Figure 4.2: Share of total estimated cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective two
47%
20%
19%
14%
Build capacity for research onbiodiversity
To establish and examine theexisting information andknowledge packages
To increase organizationaleffectiveness in sharinginformation and knowledgeon biodiversity
To aid the development ofknowledge managementstrategy on biodiversity
Our cost analysis/ revealed that about 47% of the total costs is related to building capacity for research on biodiversity while 19% is for increasing organizational effectiveness in sharing information and knowledge on biodiversity among stakeholders. Details of proposed actions, activities and their estimated costs are provided in Annex 1.
59 Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) Uganda
Our cost analysis/ revealed that about 47% of the total costs is related to building capacity for research on biodiversity while 19% is for increasing organizational effectiveness in sharing information and knowledge on biodiversity among stakeholders. Details of proposed actions, activities and their estimated costs are provided in Annex 1.
4.2.3: Costs to implement the NBSAP objective 3: To reduce and manage negative impacts while enhancing positive impacts on biodiversity Biodiversity loss has impacts on several aspects of human well-being, such as food security, vulnerability to natural disasters, energy security, and access to clean water and raw materials. Many animal and plant populations in Uganda have declined in numbers, geographical spread, or both. Human activity is the primary cause of these declines. To protect biodiversity and ecosystem services, direct and indirect drivers of loss must be addressed. Specific objectives identified for implementation include:
a) Support fast-tracking of establishment of an integrated monitoring and evaluation systems that collects, stores, analyze and disseminate biodiversity impacts among stakeholders.
b) Strengthen the enforcement of environmental laws and regulations by engaging communities in monitoring biodiversity and ecosystems
c) Strengthen the enforcement of environmental laws and regulations by increasing monitoring frequency of the natural resources in the communities
d) To strengthen monitoring, conservation and management of biodiversity through reward systems
e) To improve waste generation, disposal and management f) To increase the forest cover through promotion of agro-forest farming systems among
the communities in Uganda g) Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the EIA system in reducing and
minimizing negative impacts on biodiversity h) Increased the area of fragile ecosystems and number of biodiversity species
2.33
2.45
2.57
2.70
2.84
2.98
3.13
0.13
0.02
0.03
0.24
0.04
0.17
0.28
2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
reccurent capital development
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda20
4.2.3: Costs to implement the NBSAP objective 3: To reduce and manage negative impacts while enhancing positive impacts on biodiversityBiodiversity loss has impacts on several aspects of human well-being, such as food security, vulnerability to natural disasters, energy security, and access to clean water and raw materials. Many animal and plant populations in Uganda have declined in numbers, geographical spread, or both. Human activity is the primary cause of these declines. To protect biodiversity and ecosystem services, direct and indirect drivers of loss must be addressed. Specific objectives identified for implementation include:
a) Support fast-tracking of establishment of an integrated monitoring and evaluation systems that collects, stores, analyze and disseminate biodiversity impacts among stakeholders.
b) Strengthen the enforcement of environmental laws and regulations by engaging communities in monitoring biodiversity and ecosystems
c) Strengthen the enforcement of environmental laws and regulations by increasing monitoring frequency of the natural resources in the communities
d) To strengthen monitoring, conservation and management of biodiversity through reward systems e) To improve waste generation, disposal and management f) To increase the forest cover through promotion of agro-forest farming systems among the
communities in Ugandag) Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the EIA system in reducing and minimizing negative
impacts on biodiversity h) Increased the area of fragile ecosystems and number of biodiversity species i) To promote establishment of offsets and woodlots among construction companies, schools,
industries and households.
The heart of biodiversity conservation and management majority depend on protection, restoration resulting in reduced negative impacts while enhancing positive impacts. Table 4.5 shows the summary total costs for implementation of the proposed specific objective under this strategic objective. Detailed costing of actions proposed can be found in Annex 1
Table 4.5: Summary of total estimated costs to implement strategic objective three (UGX billion)
Specific objective 2018/19 bn UGX
2019/20 bn UGX
2020/21 bn UGX
2021/22 bn UGX
2022/23 bn UGX
2023/24 bn UGX
2024/25 bn UGX
Support fast-tracking of establishment of an integrated monitoring and evaluation system that collects, stores, analyze and disseminate biodiversity impacts among stakeholders.
0.66 0.80 0.80 0.67 0.70 0.73 0.77
Strengthen the enforcement of environmental laws and regulations by increasing number of times to monitor natural resources and engaging communities in monitoring biodiversity and ecosystems
6.12 6.55 6.76 7.20 7.43 7.80 8.19
To strengthen monitoring, conservation and management of biodiversity through reward systems 0.63 0.82 0.64 0.67 0.70 0.73 0.77
To improve waste generation, disposal and management 0.36 0.34 0.36 1.28 2.95 0.95 0.44
To increase the forest cover through promotion of agro-forest farming systems among the communities in Uganda
315.58 331.25 348.39 365.20 383.46 402.63 422.90
Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the EIA system in reducing and minimizing negative impacts on biodiversity
0.31 0.33 0.34 0.36 0.38 0.40 0.42
Increased the area of fragile ecosystems and number of biodiversity species 68.18 71.54 75.11 78.87 83.58 86.95 91.30
To promote establishment of offsets and woodlots among construction companies, schools, industries and households.
0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12
Overall 391.92 411.72 432.50 454.35 479.30 500.31 524.91
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 21
61 Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) Uganda
Figure 4.3: Share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective three
0% 2% 0% 0%
81%
0%
17% 0%
Support fast-tracking ofestablishment of an integratedmonitoring and evaluation systemthat collects, stores, analyze anddisseminate biodiversity impactsamong stakeholders.
Strengthen the enforcement ofenvironmental laws and regulationsby increasing number of times tomonitor natural resources andengaging communities in monitoringbiodiversity and ecosystems
To strengthen monitoring,conservation and management ofbiodiversity through reward systems
To improve waste generation,disposal and management
To increase the forest cover throughpromotion of agro-forest farmingsystems among the communities inUganda
Improve the efficiency andeffectiveness of the EIA system inreducing and minimizing negativeimpacts on biodiversity
The activity-based costing exercise estimated the cost of implementing strategic objective three “reduce and manage negative impacts while enhancing positive impacts on biodiversity” on average was about UGX 456.4 billion per fiscal year. Furthermore, about 81% and 17% of the budget allocations are for restoration of forest and fragile ecosystems respectively. Figure 4.3. The high costs are associated with planting of about 120,000 hectares of forest cover at a unit cost of UGX 2,5 million and restoration of about 20,000 hectares of wetland cover at unit cost of about UGX 3.5 million per fiscal year. The current strategy for the restoration of forests and fragile ecosystems might not be the most effective way for the management of biodiversity in Uganda. Integration of biodiversity conservation and management into agricultural production and livelihood diversification might be a better option for the conservation of wetlands and forests. Furthermore, promotion of efficient technologies that reduces consumption of biomass might be more effective in reducing forestry loss rather than concentrating of tree planting.
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda22
4.5: Costs to implement the NBSAP Objective 4: To promote the sustainable use and equitable sharing of costs and benefits of biodiversity
Ecosystems generate numerous benefits which include provisioning, cultural, regulating and supporting services. Sustainable use and management of biodiversity can build bridges between biodiversity, poverty reduction and development. It involves strengthening the rights of people over resources and developing financial incentives measures through which those who are living in biodiversity rich regions receive payment from those who benefit from them. Local people can benefit financially or from training, employment, provision of infrastructure and equipment arising from development activities or projects on biodiversity conservation. Both costs as well as benefits from biodiversity conservation must be shared otherwise many stakeholders may not see any reason to support new approaches to biodiversity management in their areas.
The sustainable use and equitable sharing of costs and benefits of biodiversity can be achieved through:(i) Enhancing livelihood(ii) Efficient production of charcoal(iii) Efficient use of biomass energy(iv) Reduced dependency on charcoal and firewood (v) Manage the forest resources (vi) Sustainable harvesting of fish(vii) Efficient Management of fish stock (viii) Efficient utilisation of water resources (ix) Efficient management of water resources(x) Efficient irrigation systems (xi) Efficient Management of water resources (xii) Sustainable utilisation of clay(xiii) Sustainable utilisation of sand
Three specific objectives are proposed to implement this strategic objective of the NBSAPII:a) To promote sustainable use of biodiversityb) Sustainable utilization of fisheries resourcec) Sustainable utilisation of water
Table 4.6 shows the summarised total cost of implementing actions and activities under the NBSAP strategic objective: promotion of sustainable use and equitable sharing of costs and benefits of biodiversity among the population in Uganda. Detailed costing of actions can be found in Annex1
Specific objective 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25To promote sustainable use of biodiversity 0.90 0.95 1.19 1.18 1.08 1.14 1.20Sustainable utilization of fisheries resource 0.42 0.51 0.46 0.67 0.51 0.54 0.56Sustainable utilisation of water 1.82 1.94 2.29 2.29 2.47 2.33 2.57Overall 3.1 3.4 3.9 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.3
Table 4.6: Summary of estimated total cost to implement strategic objective four (UGX billion)
Estimates of the cost of implementing actions and activities under this strategic objective revealed that on average about UGX 3.9 billion per fiscal year. Therefore, aligning of actions/activities that promote sustainable utilization of biodiversity resources might provide better conservation outcomes. Figure 4.4 shows the distribution of the cost of implantation of each specific objective for sustainable utilization of biodiversity resources.
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 23
63 Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) Uganda
Table 4.6: Summary of estimated total cost to implement strategic objective four (UGX billion)
Specific objective 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 To promote sustainable use of biodiversity 0.90 0.95 1.19 1.18 1.08 1.14 1.20
sustainable utilization of fisheries resource 0.42 0.51 0.46 0.67 0.51 0.54 0.56
sustainable utilisation of water 1.82 1.94 2.29 2.29 2.47 2.33 2.57
Overall 3.1 3.4 3.9 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.3 Estimates of the cost of implementing actions and activities under this strategic objective revealed that on average about UGX 3.9 billion per fiscal year. Therefore, aligning of actions/activities that promote sustainable utilization of biodiversity resources might provide better conservation outcomes. Figure 4.4 shows the distribution of the cost of implantation of each specific objective for sustainable utilization of biodiversity resources.
Figure 4.4: Share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective four
Findings revealed that about 58% of the total estimated costs are related to the specific objective: promoting of sustainable utilization of water resources as compared to 28% of total costs for sustainable use of other biodiversity resources.
4.6: Costs to implement NBSAP strategic objective 5: To enhance awareness and education on biodiversity issues among the various stakeholders Raising general awareness on biodiversity and the need for conservation is absolutely necessary if significant results on biodiversity conservation are to be achieved. The more
28%
14% 58%
To promote sustainable use ofbiodiversity
sustainable utilization offisheries resources
sustainable utilisation of waterresources
Findings revealed that about 58% of the total estimated costs are related to the specific objective: promoting of sustainable utilization of water resources as compared to 28% of total costs for sustainable use of other biodiversity resources.
4.6: Costs to implement NBSAP strategic objective 5: To enhance awareness and education on biodiversity issues among the various stakeholders Raising general awareness on biodiversity and the need for conservation is absolutely necessary if significant results on biodiversity conservation are to be achieved. The more people become aware of the issues concerning biodiversity, the more general awareness and understanding of a need for actions will emerge. To achieve this objective increased participation of various stakeholders should be enhanced. These include: Policy maker/implementers, researchers/Academia, private sector, schools, indigenous people, local community’s civil society and media.
Two specific objectives are proposed for implementation:a) Develop and implement stakeholder’s awareness programmes on biodiversityb) Enhancing education programmes on biodiversity issues
Table 4.7 shows the total cost of implementing proposed for each specific objectives based on detailed costing of actions/activities (refer Annex 1) that will enhance awareness and education on biodiversity issues among the various stakeholders in Uganda. Detail costing can be found in Annex 1
Table 4.7: Summary of estimated total costs to implement strategic objective five (UGX billion)
Figure 4.4: Share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective four
Specific objective 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
Develop and implement stakeholder awareness programmes on biodiversity 1.51 2.14 1.68 1.76 1.84 1.94 2.03
Enhancing education programmes on biodiversity issues 1.17 1.08 1.11 1.21 1.23 1.95 1.36
Overall 2.7 3.2 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.9 3.4
On average about UGX 3.1 billion per year need to be spent on awareness and education on biodiversity issues among the various stakeholders in Uganda. Figure 4.5 shows the share of the total cost of each strategic objective to implement the strategic objective related to enhance awareness and education on biodiversity issues among stakeholders in Uganda.
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda24
65 Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) Uganda
Figure 4.5: Share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective five
4.7: Costs to implement the NBSAP strategic objective 6: To harness modern biotechnology for socio-economic development with adequate safety measures for human health and the environment Uganda has registered positive strides in the direction of enhancing and promoting biotechnology as compared to many countries in sub-Sahara Africa. This is reflected in the steady increment in the number of applications for research on improved crops varieties received by the Uganda national council of science and technology and consequently received and approved by the national bio-safety committee over the year. This field gives a lot of hope for the prospective development and application of modern biotechnologies in the country for the years to come. However, more effort are needed to develop and apply biotechnology to reduce incidence of pests and diseases, seed loss during storage, pollution and control the spread of invasive species. The specific objectives identified for implementation are:
a) Control crop pests using biotechnology b) Reduce storage grain/seed losses using biotechnologies c) Reduced crop diseases using biotechnology d) Management waste e) management and control of Invasive species
Table 4.8 shows the summary of total cost to implement the specific objectives based on a details costing of actions (that will contribute to harness modern biotechnology for socio-economic development with adequate safety measures for human health and the environment.
59%
41% Develop and implementstakeholder awarenessprogrammes on biodiversity
Enhancing educationprogrammes on biodiversityissues
Figure 4.5: Share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective five
4.7: Costs to implement the NBSAP strategic objective 6: To harness modern biotechnology for socio-economic development with adequate safety measures for human health and the environment
Uganda has registered positive strides in the direction of enhancing and promoting biotechnology as compared to many countries in sub-Sahara Africa. This is reflected in the steady increment in the number of applications for research on improved crops varieties received by the Uganda national council of science and technology and consequently received and approved by the national bio-safety committee over the year. This field gives a lot of hope for the prospective development and application of modern biotechnologies in the country for the years to come.
However, more effort are needed to develop and apply biotechnology to reduce incidence of pests and diseases, seed loss during storage, pollution and control the spread of invasive species. The specific objectives identified for implementation are:
a) Control crop pests using biotechnologyb) Reduce storage grain/seed losses using biotechnologiesc) Reduced crop diseases using biotechnologyd) Management of wastee) Management and control of Invasive species
Table 4.8 shows the summary of total cost to implement the specific objectives based on a details costing of actions (that will contribute to harness modern biotechnology for socio-economic development with adequate safety measures for human health and the environment.
Table 4.8: Summary of total estimated costs to implement strategic objective six (UGX billion)
Focus 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25Crop pests control using biotechnology 0.53 0.55 0.58 0.61 0.64 0.67 0.70Reduce storage grain/seed losses using biotechnologies 0.37 0.39 0.41 0.43 0.45 0.47 0.49Reduced crop diseases using biotechnology 0.37 0.50 0.29 0.30 0.32 0.34 0.35Waste management 0.16 0.17 0.29 0.43 0.19 0.20 0.21Management and control of Invasive species 0.26 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.45 0.34 0.35TOTAL 1.68 1.87 1.85 2.07 2.04 2.01 2.11
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 25
On average about UGX 1.9 billion per fiscal year are required to effectively implement the proposed actions/activities under harnessing modern biotechnology for socio-economic development with adequate safety measures for human health and the environment. Figure 4.6 shows the distribution of the budget for the proposed actions. Findings revealed that about 16% of the budget should be allocated for management and control of invasive species.
Figure 4.6: Share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective six
66 Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) Uganda
Table 4.8: Summary of total estimated costs to implement strategic objective six (UGX billion)
Focus 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 Crop pests control using biotechnology 0.53 0.55 0.58 0.61 0.64 0.67 0.70
Reduce storage grain/seed losses using biotechnologies
0.37 0.39 0.41 0.43 0.45 0.47 0.49
Reduced crop diseases using biotechnology 0.37 0.50 0.29 0.30 0.32 0.34 0.35
Waste management 0.16 0.17 0.29 0.43 0.19 0.20 0.21 management and control of Invasive species 0.26 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.45 0.34 0.35
TOTAL 1.68 1.87 1.85 2.07 2.04 2.01 2.11 On average about UGX 1.9 billion per fiscal year are required to effectively implement the proposed actions/activities under harnessing modern biotechnology for socio-economic development with adequate safety measures for human health and the environment. Figure 4.6 shows the distribution of the budget for the proposed actions. Findings revealed that about 16% of the budget should be allocated for management and control of invasive species.
Figure 4.6: Share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective six
31%
22% 18%
12%
17% Crop pests control usingbiotechnology
Reduce storage grain/seedlosses using biotechnologies
Reduced crop diseases usingbiotechnology
Waste management
management and control ofInvasive species
4.8: Costs to implement the NBSAP strategic objective 7: To promote innovative and sustainable funding mechanisms to support NBSAP implementation
Biodiversity in Uganda has a high economic value. Despite its high value, there are costs associated with management. The resources allocated to the implementing and management of biodiversity activities are usually not enough to make significant impact hence the need to increase the funding base. Mobilizing financial resources for biodiversity management aims at increasing the funding base, efficient and effective use of available resources, and increased public private partnerships, through:
i) Identify potential funders and funding prioritiesii) Cost control iii) Build networks and partnerships for funding iv) Project proposal development v) Developing a biodiversity conservation program
Table 4.9 shows the summary of the cost for the implementation of identified specific objective based on a detailed costing of proposed actions (Refer Annex 1) intended to promote innovative and sustainable funding mechanisms to support NBSAP implementation.
Table 4.9: Summary of estimated total cost to implement strategic objective seven (UGX billion)
Focus 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25Identify potential funders and funding priorities 0.037 0.017 0.191 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.007Build networks and partnerships for funding 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.014Project proposal development 0.166 0.174 0.183 0.192 0.202 0.212 0.222Developing a biodiversity conservation program 0.158 0.165 0.174 0.182 0.191 0.201 0.211Total 0.37 0.37 0.56 0.39 0.41 0.43 0.45
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda26
The costing established that on average about UGX 0.43 billion is required per fiscal year to effectively implement actions/activities to promote innovative and sustainable funding mechanisms to support NBSAP II implementation. The current investment into development of proposals for grants, projects and programs were not reflected in the expenditures of the MALGs reviewed. Furthermore, about 43% of total cost are related to the development of biodiversity conservation programme while 45% of total cost are related to project proposal development respectively as indicated in Figure 4.7.
Figure 4.7: Share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective seven
68 Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) Uganda
Figure 4.7: Share of total cost of implementation of each specific objective under strategic objective seven
9% 3%
45%
43%
Identify potential funders andfunding priorities
Build networks and partnershipsfor funding
Project proposal development
Developing a biodiversityconservation program
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 2727Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda
CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
One of the objectives of the analysis was to estimate how much more resources are required for biodiversity conservation and management in Uganda. The difference between the required resources and available resources are referred to as financial gap. In the current analysis it’s difficult to estimate the financial gap since the NBSAP and the estimated biodiversity expenditure reviews are not comparable; because the NBSAP does not include all biodiversity activities currently implemented in Uganda. Moreover, it is difficult to compare budget and real expenditures. The activity-based costing was used to estimate the cost of implementing NBSAP II. The costing of the NBSAP estimated that biodiversity conservation and management at about UGX 472.6 billion per fiscal year which is about 6.2% of the government of Uganda national budget. Furthermore, about 96.6% of the costs are to reduce and manage negative impacts while enhancing positive impacts on biodiversity.
The cost of implementing strategic objective three “reduce and manage negative impacts while enhancing positive impacts on biodiversity” on average was about UGX 456.4 billion per fiscal year. Furthermore, about 81% and 17% of the budget allocations are for restoration of forest and fragile ecosystems respectively.
The concentration of the costs on one of the strategic objectives might be attributed to high habitant lost in terms of forests and wetlands. It should be noted that cost of habitat restoration might not be the best strategies if the root cause of forest and wetland degradation are not addressed. Further analysis revealed that only about 0.5% of the costs are for development while the remaining is for recurrent costs. The high proportion of the recurrent costs are attributed to restoration of forests and fragile ecosystems that are spread out till 2024/25.
Challenges The team of experts identified difficulties in enumeration of all activities under each strategic objective. To overcome the challenges, members suggested that the NBSAP should have a focus for specific period.
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda28
REFERENCES
Anderson S. W. and Young S.M (1999).The impact of contextual and process factors on the evaluation of activity based costing systems, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24, 525–559.
Berling P (2008). Holding cost determination: An activity-based cost approach, International Journal of Production Economics, 112(2), 829–840.
Carlson D.A., Young S.M (1993). Activity-based total quality management at American Express, Journal of Cost Management, 7(1), 48–58.
Charles, S.L., Hansen, D.R (2008). An evaluation of activity-based costing and functional-based costing: a game-theoretic approach, International Journal of Production Economics, 113, 480–494.
Cooper R(1990). Cost classification in unit-based and activity-based manufacturing cost systems, Journal of Cost Management, 4(3), 4–14.
Douglas T. Hicks, Activity-Based Costing, USA, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1999.
Finnie, G.R., Wittig, G.E., Desharnais, J.M., 1997. A comparison of software effort estimation techniques: using function points with neural networks, case-based reasoning and regression models. Journal of Systems and Software, 39 (3), 281-289.
Kim, G.H., An, S.H., Kang, K.I., 2004. Comparison of construction cost estimating models based on regression analysis, neural networks, and case-based reasoning. Building and Environment, 39 (10), 1235-1242.
MWE (2006). Water and Sanitation Sector Performance Report. Uganda, Ministry of Water and Environment.
MWE (2007). Water and Sanitation Sector Performance Report. Uganda, Government of Uganda, Ministry of Water and Environment.
MWE (2008). Water and Sanitation Sector Performance Report, Government of Uganda, Ministry of Water and Environment.
MWE (2009). Water and Environment Sector Performance Report, Government of Uganda, Ministry of Water and Environment.
MWE (2010). Water and Environment Sector Performance Report. Uganda, Government of Uganda, Ministry of Water and Environment.
MWE (2011). Water and Environment Sector Performance Report. Uganda, Government of Uganda, Ministry of Water and Environment.
MWE (2012). Water and Environment Sector Performance Report. Uganda, Government of Uganda, Ministry of Water and Environment.
MWE (2013). Water and Environment Sector Performance Report. Uganda, Government of Uganda, Ministry of Water and Environment.
MWE (2014). Water and Environment Sector Performance Report. Uganda, Government of Uganda, Ministry of Water and Environment.
MWE (2015). Water and Environment Sector Performance Report, Government of Uganda Ministry of Water and Environment.
Godet, M., Bourse, F., Chapuy, P. & Menant, I. (1991) Futures studies: a tool-box for problem solving, Futuribles, Paris.
Greeuw, Sandra C. H. et al. (2000): Cloudy Crystal Balls: An assessment of recent European and global Scenario studies and Models, Copenhagen: European Environment Agency (Environmental issues series 17)
Godet, Michel (1993): From Anticipation to Action: A Handbook of Strategic Prospective, Paris: United Nations Educational
Gordon, Theodore Jay (1994a): Trend Impact Analysis, in: Jerome C. Glenn / Theodore J. Gordon (eds.), Futures Research Methodology: Version 2.0, AC/UNU Millennium Project
Kahn, Herman / Anthony J. Wiener (1967): The Year 2000 –A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years, New York: Macmillan.
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 2929Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda
Anne
x 1:
Pro
pose
d co
st e
stim
ates
of N
BSAP
II
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
1.0 S
treng
then
stak
ehol
der c
o-or
dina
tion
and
fram
ewor
ks fo
r bio
dive
rsity
man
agem
ent
To st
reng
then
pe
rform
ance
ca
pabil
ity a
mon
g all
stak
ehold
ers
in bi
odive
rsity
m
anag
emen
t in
Ugan
da
Agen
cy
perfo
rman
ce
capa
bility
Impr
oved
pe
rform
ance
ca
pabil
ities
am
ong
stake
holde
rs wo
rking
in
biodiv
ersit
y m
anag
emen
t in
Ugan
da
Esta
blish
pe
rform
ance
ca
pabil
ity
revie
w an
d de
velop
men
t int
o age
ncy
strat
egic
plann
ing
Joint
stak
ehold
er m
eetin
gs (f
or Se
tting
ba
selin
es fo
r per
form
ance
indic
ator
s, Se
tting
up ac
hieva
ble pe
rform
ance
ta
rget
s tha
t are
in lin
e with
the s
trate
gic
objec
tive)
Mea
ls10
0,000
80
5
2 80
,000,0
00
Venu
e4,0
00,00
0 1
1 2
8,000
,000
Stat
ionar
y50
,000
80
1 2
8,000
,000
Perd
iem14
0,000
80
5
2 11
2,000
,000
Trans
port
refu
nd4,0
00
3,000
1
4 48
,000,0
00
Airti
me
1,000
,000
1 1
2 2,0
00,00
0 Su
b-to
tal 1
.1
258,
000,
000
Joint
stak
ehold
er w
orks
hop f
or
Revie
wing
perfo
rman
ce in
dicat
ors
Mea
ls10
0,000
80
5
2 80
,000,0
00
Venu
e4,0
00,00
0 1
1 2
8,000
,000
Stat
ionar
y50
,000
80
1 2
8,000
,000
Perd
iem14
0,000
80
5
2 11
2,000
,000
Trans
port
refu
nd4,0
00
3,000
1
4 48
,000,0
00
Airti
me
1,000
,000
1 1
2 2,0
00,00
0 Su
b-to
tal 1
.2
258,
000,
000
Deve
lop st
akeh
older
need
s asse
ssmen
t too
l Co
nsult
ancy
servic
es2,0
00,00
0 1
30
1 60
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l 1.3
60
,000
,000
Capa
city b
uildin
g/Tra
ining
of
stake
holde
rs on
biod
iversi
ty
man
agem
ent
Mea
ls10
0,000
45
0 3
1 13
5,000
,000
Venu
e2,0
00,00
0 1
1 1
2,000
,000
Stat
ionar
y10
,000
450
1 1
4,500
,000
Perd
iem14
0,000
45
0 3
1 18
9,000
,000
Trans
port
refu
nd4,0
00
5,000
1
1 20
,000,0
00
Airti
me
100,0
00
1 1
1 10
0,000
Fa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
s20
0,000
4
3 1
2,400
,000
Sub-
tota
l 1.4
35
3,00
0,00
0 To
stre
ngth
en
the c
oord
inatio
n of
biod
iversi
ty
activ
ities
amon
g all
the s
take
holde
rs in
deliv
ering
shar
ed
gove
rnm
ent p
riorit
ies W
orkin
g ac
ross
gove
rnm
ent
Impr
ove t
he
co-o
rdina
tion
of ac
tivity
ac
ross
gove
rnm
ent t
o de
liver
share
d pr
ioritie
s
Deve
lop
fram
ewor
k fo
r deli
verin
g sh
ared
pr
ioriti
es
Joint
stak
ehold
er m
eetin
gs (E
stabli
sh
a tec
hnica
l wor
king g
roup
, Rev
iew
exist
ing do
cum
entat
ion on
biod
iversi
ty &
docu
men
t age
ncy p
erfor
man
ce pr
ioriti
es)
Perd
iem14
0,000
80
2
2 44
,800,0
00
Trans
port
refu
nd4,0
00
1,000
1
2 8,0
00,00
0
Airti
me
100,0
00
1 1
2 20
0,000
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda30
Sub-
tota
l 1.5
53
,000
,000
Shar
ing dr
aft f
ram
ewor
k to t
he di
ffere
nt
stake
holde
rs fo
r inpu
tCo
ordin
ation
100,0
00
1 80
1
8,000
,000
Sub-
tota
l 1.6
8,
000,
000
Enga
ge co
nsult
ant a
genc
ies in
deve
loping
th
e fram
ewor
k
Adve
rtise
men
t1,0
00,00
0 1
1 1
1,000
,000
Inte
rview
ing2,0
00,00
0 1
1 1
2,000
,000
Selec
tion
2,000
,000
1 1
2,000
,000
Sub-
tota
l 1.7
5,
000,
000
Dev
elop a
stak
ehold
ers
data
base
that
ar
e inv
olved
in bi
odive
rsity
man
agem
ent
Stak
ehold
er m
appin
g30
,000,0
00
1 1
1 30
,000,0
00
Equip
men
t30
,000,0
00
1 1
1 30
,000,0
00
Cons
ultan
cy
servi
ces
2,000
,000
1 45
1
90,00
0,000
Data
base
pilot
ing30
,000,0
00
1 1
1 30
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l 1.8
180,
000,
000
Upda
te an
d main
tena
nce o
f dat
abas
e (d
ata c
ollec
tion,
valid
ation
, ent
ry an
d an
alysis
and r
epor
ting)
Data
colle
ction
50,00
0,000
1
1 1
50,00
0,000
Va
lidat
ion10
,000,0
00
1 1
1 10
,000,0
00
Data
entry
40,00
0,000
1
1 1
40,00
0,000
Su
b-to
tal 1
.9
100,
000,
000
To st
reng
then
ev
aluat
ion
capa
city a
cross
all st
akeh
older
s in
biodiv
ersit
y m
anag
emen
t for
po
licy a
nd pr
ogra
m
evalu
ation
Polic
y and
pr
ogra
m
evalu
ation
· Inc
rease
d ev
aluati
on
capa
city a
cross
all M
ALGs
an
d LGs
for
biodiv
ersity
m
anag
emen
t
Deve
lop fo
rmal
biodiv
ersit
y ev
aluat
ion
polic
y and
gu
idelin
es
thro
ugh t
he
Polic
y and
In
stitu
tiona
l re
view
at
all le
vels
of
gove
rnm
ent
(PIR
)
Cond
uct t
raini
ngs o
n poli
cy an
d pro
gram
ev
aluat
ion
Mea
ls10
0,000
80
5
2 80
,000,0
00
Venu
e2,0
00,00
0 1
1 2
4,000
,000
Stat
ionar
y50
,000
80
1 2
8,000
,000
Perd
iem14
0,000
80
5
2 11
2,000
,000
Trans
port
refu
nd4,0
00
3,000
1
2 24
,000,0
00
· Incre
ase t
he
scope
and
quali
ty of
ev
aluati
on
activ
ity fo
r bio
divers
ity
man
agem
ent
Airti
me
1,000
,000
1 1
2 2,0
00,00
0
Facil
itatio
n all
owan
ces
500,0
00
4 5
2 20
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l 1.1
0
250,
000,
000
Mee
tings
for T
echn
ical C
omm
ittee
on
Biod
iversi
ty Co
nser
vatio
n (TC
BC)
Mea
ls10
0,000
20
5
2 20
,000,0
00
Perd
iem14
0,000
20
5
2 28
,000,0
00
Trans
port
refu
nd4,0
00
20
75
2 12
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l 1.1
1
60,0
00,0
00
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 31
Impr
oved
co
-ord
inatio
n of
evalu
ation
ac
tivity
acro
ss go
vern
men
t
· Defi
ne al
l sta
keho
lders
that
cons
erve
, pr
otec
t and
use
biodiv
ersity
du
ring s
ervic
e de
liver
ySe
ek co
nsult
ancy
serv
ices f
or ev
aluat
ion
of pe
rform
ance
of va
rious
stak
ehold
ers
(cons
ultan
cy se
rvice
s, tra
nspo
rtatio
n,
data
colle
ction
, ent
ry, an
alysis
and
repo
rt wr
iting
, diss
emina
tion)
Cons
ultan
cy
serv
ices
2,000
,000
2 90
1
360,0
00,00
0
· Co-
ordin
ate
and m
onito
r go
vern
men
t ev
aluati
on
activ
ity th
roug
h th
e con
ducti
ng
biodiv
ersity
ex
pend
iture
review
s and
ev
aluati
on
Disse
mina
tion
40,00
0,000
1
1 1
40,00
0,000
Sub-
tota
l 1.1
2
400,
000,
000
To ev
aluate
the
efficie
ncy a
nd
effec
tiven
ess
of bio
divers
ity
spen
ding a
mon
g all
stake
holde
rs
Reso
urce
all
ocat
ion
Impr
oved
effi
cienc
y in
resou
rce
alloc
ation
for
biodiv
ersity
m
anag
emen
t
Biodiv
ersity
bu
dget
/ex
pend
iture
attrib
ution
Bio
divers
ity
Expe
nditu
re Re
views
(BER
)
Revie
w ex
isting
budg
ets
Mea
ls10
0,000
80
5
1 40
,000,0
00
Venu
e4,0
00,00
0 1
1 1
4,000
,000
Stat
ionar
y50
,000
80
1 1
4,000
,000
Perd
iem14
0,000
80
5
1 56
,000,0
00
Trans
port
refu
nd4,0
00
3,000
1
1 12
,000,0
00
· Im
prov
ed
effec
tiven
ess
of bio
divers
ity
spen
ding
amon
g all
stake
holde
rs
Airti
me
1,000
,000
1 1
2 2,0
00,00
0
Su
b-to
tal 1
.13
11
8,00
0,00
0
Surv
ey
Prep
arat
ion10
0,000
,000
1 1
1 10
0,000
,000
Mea
sure
effec
tiven
ess o
f biod
iversi
ty
spen
ding
Data
colle
ction
500,0
00,00
0 1
1 1
500,0
00,00
0 Da
ta en
try10
0,000
,000
1 1
1 10
0,000
,000
Data
clea
ning a
nd
Analy
sis20
0,000
,000
1 1
1 20
0,000
,000
Repo
rt wr
iting
80,00
0,000
1
1 1
80,00
0,000
Di
ssem
inatio
n10
0,000
,000
1 1
1 10
0,000
,000
Su
b-to
tal 1
.14
1,0
80,00
0,000
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda32
Stren
gthe
n co
mm
unity
en
gage
men
t for
biod
iversi
ty
man
agem
ent
Com
mun
ity
enga
gem
ent
Impr
oved
leve
l of
com
mun
ity
aware
ness
and f
eedb
ack
abou
t go
vern
men
t pe
rform
ance
for
biod
iversi
ty
man
agem
ent
Deve
lopm
ent
and d
issem
inate
co
mm
unity
en
gage
men
t gu
idelin
es fo
r bio
divers
ity
man
agem
ent in
Ug
anda
Deve
loping
guide
lines
on co
mm
unity
en
gage
men
tCo
nsult
ation
se
rvice
s2,0
00,00
0 1
75
1 15
0,000
,000
Revie
w gu
idelin
es on
cons
erva
tion,
prot
ectio
n and
biod
iversi
ty
Cons
ultati
on
serv
ices
2,000
,000
2 34
1
136,0
00,00
0
the g
uideli
nes
ing10
,000
50,00
0 1
1
500,0
00,00
0 4.
Distr
ibute
guide
lines
to th
e co
mm
uniti
es w
ith he
lp of
biodiv
ersity
m
anag
emen
t age
ncies
/foca
l pers
ons
Distr
ibutio
n of
guide
lines
18,00
0,000
1
1 1
18,00
0,000
5. Cre
ate aw
arene
ss to
the c
omm
uniti
es
thro
ugh c
omm
unity
mee
tings
Aware
ness
creati
on th
roug
h co
mm
unity
m
eetin
gs
144,0
00,00
0 1
1 1
144,0
00,00
0
Create
a tec
hnica
l com
mitt
ee to
co
ordin
ate th
e com
mun
ity ac
tiviti
es
Coor
dinati
on
allow
ance
960,0
00
100
1 1
9
6,000
,000
To in
creas
e acce
sses
and r
epor
ting
of bio
divers
ity
man
agem
ent a
nd
prog
ress
Repo
rting
the
biodiv
ersity
m
anag
emen
t pr
ogres
s
Mor
e ac
cessi
ble
and t
imely
pr
ogres
s rep
ortin
g De
velop
and
main
tain
data
base
on
biodiv
ersity
m
anag
emen
t ind
icato
rs
Cond
uct p
lannin
g mee
tings
Fa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
250,0
00
30
1 4
30,00
0,000
Deve
loping
sh
ared g
oals
by pr
omot
ing
broa
d en
gage
men
t to
infor
m,
mea
sure,
an
d deli
ver
prog
ress
Deve
lop st
akeh
older
need
s asse
ssmen
t to
ol Co
nsult
ation
se
rvice
s2,0
00,00
0 1
30
1 60
,000,0
00
Esta
blish
a te
chnic
al wo
rking
grou
p
Mea
ls10
0,000
40
1
1 4,0
00,00
0 Tra
nspo
rt re
fund
4,000
5,1
00
1 1
20,40
0,000
Perd
iem14
0,000
40
1
1 5,6
00,00
0
Sub-
tota
l
30,0
00,0
00
De
sign t
he da
taba
se on
biod
iversi
ty
indica
tors
Cons
ultat
ion
serv
ices
2,000
,000
1 25
1
5
0,000
,000
To ev
aluate
the
efficie
ncy a
nd
effec
tiven
ess
of bio
divers
ity
spen
ding a
mon
g all
stake
holde
rs
Gove
rnm
ent
perfo
rman
ce
repor
ting
More
acce
ssible
and
trans
paren
t rep
ortin
g of
Gove
rnm
ent
perfo
rman
ce
again
st its
pr
ioriti
es
Pres
ent
sum
mar
y of
gove
rnm
ent
perfo
rman
ce
in th
e new
Sta
temen
t of
Achie
vem
ent
Hold
disse
mina
tion m
eetin
gsM
eals
10
0,000
450
1
1
45,00
0,000
To in
creas
e ac
cessi
bility
and
trans
paren
t rep
ortin
g of
gove
rnm
ent
perfo
rman
ce a
gains
t its
prior
ities
Venu
e4,0
00,00
0 1
1 1
4,000
,000
Stat
ioner
y50
,000
450
1 1
22,50
0,000
Pe
rdiem
140,0
00
450
1 1
63,00
0,000
Tra
nspo
rt Re
fund
4,000
5,0
00
1 1
20,00
0,000
Ai
rtim
e1,0
00,00
0 1
1 1
1,000
,000
Sub-
tota
l
155,
500,
000
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 33
and d
istrib
ute r
epor
tsPr
inting
36,00
0,000
1
1 1
3
6,000
,000
Cond
uct q
uarte
rly pe
rform
ance
revie
ws
on bi
odive
rsity
man
agem
ent
34
0,000
80
5
4
544,0
00,00
0
Stren
gthe
n the
go
vern
men
t‘s fo
cus
on su
staina
bility
and
its vi
sibilit
y in p
ublic
rep
orts
Susta
inabil
ity
Stren
gthe
n the
go
vern
men
t‘s
focus
on
susta
inabil
ity
and i
ts vis
ibilit
y in
publi
c rep
orts
Refle
ct th
e dim
ensio
ns of
su
staina
bility
on
the M
easu
ring
our P
rogres
s we
bsite
Deve
lop a
webs
ite fo
r eas
y acce
ss an
d inf
orm
ation
shar
ingCo
nsult
ation
se
rvice
s2,0
00,00
0
1 50
1
10
0,000
,000
Upda
te an
d main
tenan
ce of
data
base
(d
ata co
llecti
on, v
alida
tion,
entry
and
analy
sis an
d rep
ortin
g)
Data
colle
ction
5,000
,000
12
1 1
6
0,000
,000
Valid
ation
180,0
00
12
1 1
2,1
60,00
0 En
try an
d ana
lysis
3,160
,000
12
1 1
3
7,920
,000
Su
b-to
tal
10
0,08
0,00
0
Tra
in ag
encie
s on u
sing t
he w
ebsit
eFa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
s40
0,000
4
100
2
320,0
00,00
0
Repo
rt Tri
ple
Botto
m Li
ne
Indica
tor
Scor
ecard
in
agen
cy An
nual
Repo
rts
Desig
n a sc
ore c
ard o
n the
perfo
rman
ce
of in
dicat
ors
Facil
itatio
n all
owan
ces
340,0
00
1 80
5
13
6,000
,000
2.0
To fa
cilita
te a
nd b
uild
capa
city f
or re
sear
ch, k
now
ledg
e an
d in
form
atio
n m
anag
emen
t and
exc
hang
e on
bio
dive
rsity
Build
capa
city
for re
searc
h on
biodiv
ersity
Integ
ration
of
resea
rch,
Polic
y and
pr
actic
e
Incre
ased
ca
pacit
y of
gove
rnm
enta
l an
d MAL
Gs to
lin
k res
earch
, po
licy a
nd
prac
tice
Num
ber o
f ev
idenc
e bas
ed
Polic
ies
Revie
w ex
isting
po
licies
Facil
itate
polic
y rev
iew, e
valua
tion a
nd
analy
sis
Mea
ls
10
0,000
503
115
,000,0
00Ve
nue
4,000
,000
1 1
14,0
00,00
0 St
ation
ery
50,00
0 50
1
12,5
00,00
0 Nu
mbe
r of
evide
nce-
base
d de
velop
men
t int
erve
ntion
s
Imple
men
tation
of
deve
lopm
ent
inter
vent
ions
Perd
iem14
0,000
50
3
121
,000,0
00
Trans
port
refu
nd4,0
00
3,000
1
112
,000,0
00
Airti
me
1,000
,000
1 1
11,0
00,00
0
Sub-
tota
l 2.1
55
,500
,000
Facil
itate
imple
men
tatio
n of d
evelo
p-m
ent i
nter
vent
ions
Mea
ls10
0,000
50
3
115
,000,0
00
Venu
e4,0
00,00
0 1
11
4,000
,000
Perd
iem50
,000
50
11
2,500
,000
Airti
me
140,0
00
50
31
21,00
0,000
Tra
nspo
rt re
fund
4,000
3,0
00
11
12,00
0,000
Ai
rtim
e1,0
00,00
0 1
11
1,000
,000
Sub-
tota
l 2.2
55,5
00,0
00
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda34
Stan
dard
gu
idelin
es
for g
over
ning
biodiv
ersit
y re
sear
ch
Impr
oved
na
tiona
l sta
ndar
ds a
nd
LG re
gulat
ory
fram
ewor
ks
for r
esea
rch
gove
rnan
ce on
bio
diver
sity
Rese
arch
ethic
s sta
ndar
ds pu
t in
place
Form
ulatio
n of
ethics
stan
dard
sIss
uing c
ertifi
catio
n to o
rgan
isatio
ns th
at
mee
t the
set s
tand
ards
Facil
itatio
n10
0,000
15
150
0,000
Syste
m of
ac
credit
ation
an
d qua
lity
assu
rance
sta
ndard
s for
rese
arch
instit
ution
s ev
aluati
on
esta
blish
ed
Deve
lop
guide
lines
for
quali
ty as
suran
ce
stand
ards
-
Capa
city b
uildin
g for
insti
tutio
ns
Mea
ls10
0,000
70
2
114
,000,0
00
Venu
e2,0
00,00
0 1
21
4,000
,000
Stat
ioner
y30
,000
70
11
2,100
,000
Perd
iem14
0,000
70
2
119
,600,0
00
Trans
port
refu
nd4,0
00
3,000
1
112
,000,0
00
Num
ber o
f pla
ns an
d po
licies
to
supp
ort
resea
rch
Airti
me
1,000
,000
1 1
11,0
00,00
0 Fa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
500,0
00
4 2
14,0
00,00
0
Sub-
tota
l 2.2
56
,700
,000
Fa
cilita
te de
velop
men
t of g
uideli
nes f
or
quali
ty as
sura
nce s
tand
ards
Cons
ultat
ion
serv
ices
2,000
,000
1 5
110
,000,0
00
Setti
ng gu
idelin
es an
d sta
ndar
dsFa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
500,0
00
1 10
210
,000,0
00
Gove
rnm
ent
and
deve
lopm
ent
partn
ers’
com
mitm
ent
to su
ppor
t an
d fun
d bio
divers
ity
relate
d res
earch
.
Increa
sed
capa
city a
nd
com
mitm
ent
of go
vern
men
t an
d de
velop
men
t pa
rtners
to
supp
ort a
nd
fund
rese
arch
Form
ation
of
scien
tific
resea
rch
com
mitt
ee th
at
vets
resea
rch
prop
osals
in an
effi
cient
and
trans
paren
t m
anne
r
Esta
blish
men
t of
scien
tific
resea
rch
com
mitt
ee
Scop
ing an
d sele
ction
of co
mm
ittee
m
embe
rsFa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
500,0
00
1 2
11,0
00,00
0
Com
mitt
ee m
eetin
gs
Mea
ls10
0,000
20
1
24,0
00,00
0 Ve
nue
2,000
,000
1 1
24,0
00,00
0 St
ation
ery
30,00
0 20
1
21,2
00,00
0
Facil
itatio
n all
owan
ce50
0,000
20
1
220
,000,0
00
Su
b-to
tal
29
,200
,000
Com
petit
ive
salar
ies of
re
sear
cher
s set
Put i
n plac
e a s
tand
ard
enum
erat
ion
crite
riaFo
rmula
tion o
f bud
gets
Cons
ultat
ion
serv
ices
2,000
,000
1 15
130
,000,0
00
-
Increa
sed L
evel
of fu
nding
of
biodiv
ersity
res
earch
by
gove
rnm
ent
and
deve
lopm
ent
partn
ers
Revie
w go
vern
men
t ex
pend
iture
on bi
odive
rsity
res
earch
Iden
tify f
undin
g gap
sCo
nsult
ation
se
rvice
s2,0
00,00
0 1
101
20,00
0,000
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 35
Man
age,
facilit
ate
and s
usta
in re
sear
ch
Incre
ased
ca
pacit
y of
MALG
s to
man
age/
co
nduc
t the
res
earch
Leve
l of fi
nanc
ial
susta
inabil
ity
for bi
odive
rsity
resea
rch;
Facilit
ate pr
ocess
of
propo
sal
writin
gDe
velop
ing re
sear
ch pr
opos
als fo
r fu
nding
Facil
itatio
n all
owan
ce50
0,000
10
10
150
,000,0
00
Provid
e see
d fun
ds to
initia
te an
d sus
tain
resea
rch on
bio
divers
ity
Lobb
ing to
incre
ase f
undin
g tow
ards
bio
diver
sity r
esea
rchFa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
500,0
00
10
41
20,00
0,000
Regis
tered
res
earch
proje
cts
(numb
er,
fundin
g lev
el,
funde
r sprea
d);
Priori
tise
biodiv
ersity
res
earch
proje
cts
for fu
nding
Pr
opos
al wr
iting
mee
tings
Mea
ls80
,000
10
52
8,000
,000
Venu
e2,0
00,00
0 1
12
4,000
,000
Fac
ilitate
capa
city
build
ing fo
r high
ed
ucati
on of
staff
Stat
ioner
y10
,000
10
12
200,0
00
Perd
iem14
0,000
10
5
214
,000,0
00
Trans
port
Refu
nd4,0
00
500
12
4,000
,000
Airti
me
100,0
00
1 1
220
0,000
Su
b-to
tal
30
,400
,000
Capa
city b
uildin
g for
high
er ed
ucat
ion
of st
affFa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
500,0
00
10
12
10,00
0,000
Estab
lishme
nt of
a u
nit de
dicate
d to
resea
rch
mana
geme
nt,
resea
rchers
tra
ined,
quali
ty of
the
organ
izatio
n acc
ording
to
natio
nal
stand
ards
Facil
itate
estab
lishm
ent o
f res
earch
unit
Deve
loping
resea
rch ag
enda
with
them
atic
areas
of bio
divers
ityFac
ilitati
on
allow
ance
500,0
00
2 30
130
,000,0
00
Deve
lop a l
ist of
poten
tial fu
nders
for
biodiv
ersity
Facilit
ation
all
owan
ce50
0,000
1
11
500,0
00
In se
rvice
train
ing fo
r res
earch
Facilit
ation
all
owan
ce5,0
00,00
0
1 1
15,0
00,00
0
Furth
er st
udies
Tuitio
n fee
s and
up
keep
10,00
0,000
5
15
25
0,000
,000
Colla
borat
e on
biodiv
ersity
res
earch
Increa
sed s
yn-
ergy b
etwee
n MA
LGs o
n bio
divers
ity
resea
rch
Numb
er of
colla
borat
ions
with
the pu
blic/
priva
te/NG
O sec
tor
Facil
itate
form
ation
of
joint
foru
ms
Signin
g mem
orand
ums o
f und
erstan
ding
Facili
tation
all
owan
ce50
0,000
1
11
50
0,000
Numb
er of
joint
ac
tivitie
s with
oth
er res
earch
Ins
titutio
ns ;
Oper
ation
alize
pa
rtner
ships
Jo
int st
akeh
older
mee
tings
Mea
ls10
0,000
10
0 1
110
,000,0
00
Venu
e4,0
00,00
0 1
11
4,000
,000
Stat
ioner
y50
,000
100
11
5,000
,000
Numb
er of
forma
l pa
rtners
hips w
ith
other
resea
rch
institu
tions
;
Perd
iem14
0,000
10
0 1
114
,000,0
00
Trans
port
Refu
nd4,0
00
3,000
1
112
,000,0
00
Airti
me
1,000
,000
1 1
11,0
00,00
0
46
,000
,000
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda36
Publi
sh
and s
hare
re
sear
ch
findin
gs
Incre
ased
ca
pacit
y of
MALG
s to
apply
and
shar
e res
ults
of re
sear
ch
Num
ber o
f joi
nt sc
ientifi
c Pu
blica
tions
Opera
tiona
lize
partn
ership
s
Joint
auth
orsh
ip of
scien
tific p
aper
sFa
cilita
tion t
o wr
ite pa
pers
1,500
,000
5 1
17,5
00,00
0
Num
ber o
f co
nferen
ces
facilit
ated b
y th
e MAL
Gs fo
r sta
ff to p
resen
t res
earch
fin
dings
Publi
catio
n of r
esea
rch fin
dings
Publi
catio
n fee
s3,0
00,00
0 5
11
15,00
0,000
Capa
city o
f sta
ff to
do
rese
arch
Incre
ased
ca
pacit
y to d
o re
sear
ch
Num
ber o
f pe
er rev
iewed
pu
blica
tions
Op
eratio
naliz
e pa
rtners
hips
Build
capa
city t
o con
duct
rese
arch
Mea
ls10
0,000
50
5
125
,000,0
00
Venu
e2,0
00,00
0 1
11
2,000
,000
Num
ber o
f co
nferen
ce
pape
rs; le
vel
of ca
reer
deve
lopm
ent;
num
ber o
f pr
izes, n
umbe
r of
award
s, typ
e of
award
s
Stat
ioner
y10
,000
50
11
500,0
00
Facil
itate
resea
rch
activ
ities
Perd
iem14
0,000
50
5
135
,000,0
00
Trans
port
Refu
nd4,0
00
1,000
1
14,0
00,00
0 Ai
rtim
e10
0,000
1
11
100,0
00
Facil
itatio
n all
owan
ce20
0,000
4
51
4,000
,000
Sub-
tota
l
70,6
00,0
00
Capa
city
to m
anag
e res
earch
Increa
sed
capa
city t
o m
anag
e res
earch
Num
ber o
f co
mpe
titive
gr
ants
won
per y
ear
indivi
duall
y or
as te
am qu
ality
of pla
ns an
d rep
orts
Writ
ing of
gran
t pr
opos
alsSu
bmiss
ion of
gran
t pro
posa
lsFa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
s50
0,000
20
1
220
,000,0
00
Amou
nt o
f fun
ds ob
taine
d fro
m ot
her
sourc
es;
Estab
lish r
eview
co
mm
ittee
to
ensu
re qu
ality
-
Num
ber o
f ap
prov
ed
resea
rch gr
ants
-
Capa
city t
o sh
are re
searc
h fin
dings
Increa
sed
capa
city t
o ap
ply an
d sh
are re
sults
of
resea
rch
Num
ber o
f pa
rticip
ation
tim
es in
polic
y pr
oces
ses,
Polic
y brie
fs
Enga
gem
ent
with
polic
y m
akers
and
imple
men
ters
Throu
gh w
orksh
ops t
o eng
age d
ifferen
t sta
keho
lders
abou
t biod
iversi
ty res
earch
Disse
mina
tion
works
hop
50,00
0,000
2
11
100,0
00,00
0
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 37
Num
ber o
f co
nsult
ancie
s (e
.g. pu
blic,
priva
te, N
GO
secto
r);
Thro
ugh w
riting
polic
y brie
fs Fa
cilita
tion t
o writ
e po
licy b
riefs
10,00
0,000
3
11
30,00
0,000
Num
ber o
f pr
ofessi
onal
publi
catio
ns
Writ
ing an
d aut
horin
g pap
ers
Data
colle
ction
20,00
0,000
5
11
100,0
00,00
0 Da
ta en
try &
Cle
aning
5,000
,000
5 1
125
,000,0
00
Analy
sis &
repo
rt wr
iting
10,00
0,000
5
11
50,00
0,000
Draft
ing of
pu
blica
tion p
apers
5,000
,000
51
125
0000
00
Su
b-to
tal
20
0,00
0,00
0
To es
tablis
h and
ex
amine
the e
xistin
g inf
ormati
on an
d kn
owled
ge pa
ckag
es
on bi
odive
rsity
man
agem
ent in
Ug
anda
.
Exist
ence
and
gene
ration
of
Inform
ation
an
d kn
owled
ge on
bio
divers
ity
Impr
oved
ge
nerat
ion an
d m
anag
emen
t of
inform
ation
am
ong a
ll sta
keho
lders
Num
ber o
f kn
owled
ge
map
s
Revie
w of
the e
xistin
g bio
divers
ity an
d ec
osys
tems d
ata,
inform
ation
an
d kno
wled
ge
pack
ages
amon
g th
e MAL
Gs
imple
men
ting
biodiv
ersity
rel
ated p
rojec
ts
Estab
lishin
g a re
view
com
mitt
ee &
co
mm
ittee
mee
ting
-
Mea
ls10
0,000
20
1
24,0
00,00
0 Kn
owled
ge an
d inf
ormati
on
review
repo
rt
Venu
e4,0
00,00
0 1
12
8,000
,000
Perd
iem14
0,000
1
12
280,0
00
Num
ber o
f pu
blica
tions
on
biod
iversi
ty iss
ues t
hat
exist
s
Trans
port
Refu
nd4,0
00
500
12
4,000
,000
Sub-
tota
l
16,2
80,0
00
List o
f bio
divers
ity
know
ledge
ch
aracte
rizati
on
deve
loped
Carry
out
chara
cteriz
ation
of
know
ledge
as
sets
of th
e MA
LGs w
orking
on
biod
iversi
ty
and e
cosy
stem
s iss
ues a
mon
g th
e stak
ehold
ers
Revie
wing
exist
ing bi
odive
rsity
and
ecos
ystem
s data
, infor
mati
on an
d kn
owled
ge pa
ckag
es am
ong t
he M
ALGs
im
plem
entin
g biod
iversi
ty rel
ated p
rojec
ts
Cons
ultati
on
servi
ces
2,000
,000
2 25
110
0,000
,000
Repo
rt wr
iting a
nd di
ssem
inatio
n of re
sults
Disse
mina
tion
works
hops
130,0
00,00
0 1
11
130,0
00,00
0
Deve
lopm
ent a
nd au
thori
ng of
work
ing
pape
rsW
riting
work
ing
pape
rs20
,000,0
00
10
11
20
0,000
,000
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda38
Inform
ation
, da
ta an
d kn
owled
ge
colle
ction
tools
de
velop
ed
Desig
n of d
ata
colle
ction
tools
to
carry
out
data
colle
ction
of
biodiv
ersity
an
d eco
syste
ms,
inform
ation
an
d kno
wled
ge
pack
ages
acros
s all
biod
iversi
ty rel
ated
proje
cts
Hirin
g and
facil
itatio
n of e
xper
tCo
nsult
ancy
Fee
5,000
,000
1 1
15,0
00,00
0 De
velop
tech
nical
team
5,0
00,00
0 1
11
5,000
,000
Desig
n dat
a too
lCo
nsult
ancy
Fee
1,000
,000
1 30
130
,000,0
00
Row
data
both
qu
antit
ative
an
d qua
litativ
e co
llecte
d and
ca
pture
d in
datab
ases
in
vario
us
pack
ages
as
prop
osed
by
the d
ifferen
t sta
keho
lders
Carry
out d
ata
entry
and
analy
sis of
co
llecte
d data
an
d info
rmati
on
for kn
owled
ge
map
ping
Hirin
g and
facil
itatio
n of e
xper
tCo
nsult
ancy
Fee
5,000
,000
1 1
15,0
00,00
0
Capa
city b
uildin
g on d
ata e
ntry
Mea
ls10
0,000
10
3
13,0
00,00
0 Ve
nue
4,000
,000
1 1
14,0
00,00
0 St
ation
ery
50,00
0 10
1
150
0,000
Pe
rdiem
140,0
00
10
31
4,200
,000
Trans
port
Refu
nd4,0
00
500
31
6,000
,000
Airti
me
1,000
,000
1 1
11,0
00,00
0 Fa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
500,0
00
2 3
13,0
00,00
0
Sub-
tota
l
21,7
00,0
00
Acqu
ire so
ftwar
e and
hard
ware
40
,000,0
00
1 1
140
,000,0
00
Desig
n dat
abas
e for
data
entry
10
,000,0
00
1 1
110
,000,0
00
To in
creas
e org
aniza
tiona
l eff
ectiv
enes
s by
enab
ling s
takeh
olders
to
intuit
ively
find,
share
and
conn
ect t
o rele
vant
inf
ormati
on an
d kn
owled
ge pa
ckag
es
abou
t biod
iversi
ty an
d eco
syste
ms
man
agem
ent
and o
ther
relate
d int
erve
ntion
s.
Increa
sed l
evel
of kn
owled
ge
amon
g the
sta
ff and
sta
keho
lders
and g
enera
l po
pulat
ion
abou
t bio
divers
ity
and
ecos
ystem
s m
anag
emen
t
Num
ber o
f co
nsult
ative
m
eetin
gs
carri
ed ou
t
Carry
out
Cons
ultati
ve
mee
tings
and
key i
nform
ant
inter
views
and
focus
grou
p dis
cussi
ons
amon
g pr
oject
staff,
bene
ficiar
ies an
d po
licy m
akers
.
Crea
te te
chnic
al wo
rking
com
mitt
ee
6,0
00,00
0 1
11
6,000
,000
Facil
itate
data
colle
ction
activ
ities
10
0,000
,000
1 1
110
0,000
,000
Iden
tify s
take
holde
rs
10,00
0,000
1
11
10,00
0,000
Datab
ase w
ith
clear
meta
data
rep
ort o
n bio
divers
ity
inform
ation
an
d kno
wled
ge
pack
ages
Create
datab
ases
for
infor
mati
on,
data
and
know
ledge
pr
oduc
ts
Desig
ning a
data
base
20
,000,0
00
1 1
120
,000,0
00
Deve
loping
guide
lines
for m
anag
ing an
d up
datin
g data
base
40
,000,0
00
1 1
140
,000,0
00
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 39
Num
ber o
f wo
rksho
ps
cond
ucted
am
ong t
he
MALG
s staff
Tra
ining
of
MALG
s on h
ow
to ac
cess
and
use o
f wate
r and
en
viron
men
tal
inform
ation
an
d kno
wled
ge
amon
g all
stake
holde
rs
Cond
uct w
orksh
ops o
n the
use o
f wate
r an
d env
ironm
ent in
form
ation
and
know
ledge
man
agem
ent a
s way
to
disse
mina
te am
ong s
takeh
olders
50
0,000
10
0 1
525
0,000
,000
Num
ber
of pe
ople
atten
ding t
he
works
hops
ag
greg
ated b
y se
x, dis
abilit
y, ag
e and
ed
ucati
on
level
acros
s all
proje
ct are
as.
Inform
ation
an
d kn
owled
ge
shari
ng an
d ut
ilizati
on
Impr
oved
inf
ormati
on
and k
nowl
edge
sh
aring
amon
g th
e diffe
rent
stake
holde
rs
Num
ber o
f us
ers ac
cessi
ng
biodiv
ersity
rel
ated
inform
ation
an
d kno
wled
ge
pack
ages
ag
greg
ated b
y se
x, dis
abilit
y an
d age
and
educ
ation
leve
l
Form
ation
of
know
ledge
pla
tform
s as a
wa
y to i
mpr
ove
the s
harin
g an
d upt
ake o
f kn
owled
ge an
d inf
ormati
on
prod
ucts
Mon
itorin
g and
upda
ting o
f biod
iversi
ty
and e
cosy
stem
s inf
orm
ation
Coor
dinat
ion15
0,000
,000
1 1
115
0,000
,000
Increa
sed l
evel
of kn
owled
ge
amon
g the
sta
ff and
sta
keho
lders
and g
enera
l po
pulat
ion
abou
t bio
divers
ity
and
ecos
ystem
s m
anag
emen
t
Num
ber o
f pu
blica
tions
an
d res
earch
ori
ginati
ng
from
using
the
inform
ation
an
d kno
wled
ge
proje
cts
Deve
lopm
ent
of kn
owled
ge
man
agem
ent
plans
amon
g all
stak
ehold
ers
in bio
divers
ity
and e
cosy
stem
s m
anag
emen
t
Deve
lopm
ent o
f netw
ork pl
atform
s for
sh
aring
of w
ater a
nd en
viron
men
tal
know
ledge
and i
nform
ation
acros
s all
stake
holde
rs
Facil
itate
deve
lopm
ent o
f ne
twork
platf
orms
80,00
0,000
1
11
80,00
0,000
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda40
Num
ber a
nd
mem
bersh
ip to
Netw
ork
platfo
rms
form
ed fo
r sh
aring
of
water
and
envir
onm
ental
kn
owled
ge an
d inf
ormati
on
acros
s all
stake
holde
rs
To ai
d the
de
velop
men
t of
know
ledge
m
anag
emen
t stra
tegy
for bi
odive
rsity
inf
ormati
on iss
ues
and i
ts ini
tial
imple
men
tation
am
ong s
takeh
olders
Infor
mati
on
and
know
ledge
m
anag
emen
t str
ategy
Impr
oved
kn
owled
ge
man
agem
ent
syste
ms f
or
biodiv
ersity
m
anag
emen
t ac
ross a
ll the
sta
keho
lders
Revie
w rep
ort
on kn
owled
ge
man
agem
ent
syste
ms o
f th
e diffe
rent
organ
izatio
ns
Revie
w th
e ex
isting
kn
owled
ge
man
agem
ent
syste
ms a
mon
g all
MAL
Gs
involv
ed in
bio
divers
ity
cons
erva
tion
and
man
agem
ent in
Ug
anda
Revie
wing
exist
ing in
form
ation
syste
ms
Cons
ultat
ion
serv
ices
2,000
,000
1 50
110
0,000
,000
List o
f kn
owled
ge
man
agem
ent
office
rs pe
r org
aniza
tion
De
sign a
data
base
on kn
owled
ge
pack
ages
Co
nsult
ation
se
rvice
s2,0
00,00
0 1
51
10,00
0,000
Num
ber o
f pe
ople
reach
ed
out w
ith
know
ledge
inf
ormati
on
Estab
lishin
g of
inform
ation
an
d kno
wled
ge
man
agem
ent
com
mitt
ee
by id
entif
ying
know
ledge
m
anag
emen
t pe
rsons
in th
e diff
erent
MAL
Gs
in Ug
anda
Scop
ing an
d sele
ction
of m
anag
emen
t co
mm
ittee
Fa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
s 50
0,000
10
2
110
,000,0
00
Desig
n pilo
t pr
ojects
for
water
and
envir
onm
ental
inf
ormati
on
and K
nowl
edge
Ma
nage
men
t am
ong t
he
MALG
s
Fa
cilita
te re
sear
ch ac
tiviti
es to
enha
nce
infor
mat
ion
Data
colle
ction
an
alysis
and
repo
rt wr
iting
200,0
00,00
0 1
11
200,0
00,00
0
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 41
Cond
uct c
ase
studie
s to
explo
re an
d lea
rn ab
out t
he
expe
rienc
es of
org
aniza
tions
in
the
man
agem
ent
of inf
ormati
on
and k
nowl
edge
on
biod
iversi
ty co
nser
vatio
n an
d m
anag
emen
t in
Ugan
da
Disse
mina
te res
ults a
mon
g sta
keho
lders
throu
gh
works
hops
, tra
ining
s and
rad
io tal
k sho
ws
Facil
itate
resu
lt sh
aring
activ
ities
Disse
mina
tion
works
hop
100,0
00,00
0 1
11
100,0
00,00
0
Id
entif
y issu
es to
be ad
dres
sed
-
Deve
lop
know
ledge
m
anag
emen
t str
ategy
with
cle
ar go
als an
d ob
jectiv
es in
lin
e with
key
result
area
s of
biodiv
ersity
m
anag
emen
t
-
Se
t up a
plan
ning t
eam
to de
velop
str
ategie
sFa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
s50
0,000
10
2
110
,000,0
00
3.0
To re
duce
and
man
age
nega
tive
impa
cts w
hile
enh
ancin
g po
sitiv
e im
pact
s on
biod
iver
sity
Supp
ort f
ast-t
rackin
g of
esta
blish
men
t of a
n int
egrat
ed m
onito
ring
and e
valua
tion
syste
m th
at co
llects
, sto
res, a
nalyz
e an
d diss
emina
te
biodiv
ersity
impa
cts
amon
g sta
keho
lders.
Effec
tive
mon
itorin
g
Impr
oved
m
onito
ring
and e
valua
tion
of bi
odive
rsity
an
d ec
osys
tems
inter
vent
ions
Repo
rt on
th
e stat
us of
th
e cur
rent
mon
itorin
g an
d eva
luatio
n sy
stem
s
Revie
w th
e cur
rent
mon
itorin
g an
d Eva
luatio
n sy
stem
s use
d by
the M
ALGs
Stak
ehold
er m
eetin
gs
Mea
ls10
0,000
80
3
1 24
,000,0
00
Venu
e4,0
00,00
0 1
3 1
12,00
0,000
St
ation
ery
50,00
0 80
1
1 4,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
140,0
00
80
3 1
33,60
0,000
Trans
port
Refu
nd4,0
00
3,000
1
1 12
,000,0
00
Su
b-to
tal
85
,600
,000
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda42
Capa
city
build
ingRe
viewi
ng ex
isting
liter
atur
e
Traini
ngs
Mea
ls10
0,000
16
03
148
,000,0
00
Venu
e4,0
00,00
0 1
11
4,000
,000
Stat
ioner
y50
,000
160
11
8,000
,000
Perd
iem14
0,000
16
03
167
,200,0
00
Trans
port
Refu
nd4,0
00
4200
11
16,80
0,000
Fa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
500,0
00
43
16,0
00,00
0
Su
b-to
tal
15
0,00
0,00
0
Impr
oved
qu
ality
of da
ta
and f
requ
ency
of
colle
ction
Need
s as
sessm
ent
repo
rt ind
icatin
g the
ex
isting
gaps
in
mon
itorin
g an
d eva
luatin
g im
pacts
on
biodiv
ersit
y
Cond
uct n
eeds
as
sessm
ent
amon
g the
staff
of
the M
ALGs
on
biod
iversi
ty
and e
cosy
stem
s inf
orm
ation
to
effec
tively
m
onito
r and
ev
aluat
e the
im
pacts
Deve
loping
a da
ta co
llecti
on to
olCo
nsult
ation
se
rvice
s1,0
00,00
0 1
180
118
0,000
,000
Data
colle
ction
and a
nalys
isCo
nsult
ation
se
rvice
s1,0
00,00
0 2
201
40,00
0,000
Repo
rt wr
iting
and d
issem
inatio
n of
resu
ltsCo
nsult
ation
se
rvice
s13
0,000
,000
11
113
0,000
,000
Incre
ased
tra
cking
of
prog
ress
of
nega
tive
and p
ositi
ve
biodiv
ersit
y im
pacts
Inte
grat
ed
tool
that
co
uld be
used
to
mon
itor
impa
cts on
bio
diver
sity
Deve
lopm
ent o
f m
onito
ring a
nd
Evalu
ation
tools
am
ong t
he
stake
holde
rs
Stak
ehold
er m
eetin
gs
Mea
ls10
0,000
80
31
24,00
0,000
Ve
nue
4,000
,000
11
14,0
00,00
0 St
ation
ery
50,00
0 80
11
4,000
,000
Perd
iem14
0,000
80
31
33,60
0,000
Tra
nspo
rt Re
fund
4,000
30
001
112
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l
77,6
00,0
00
Deve
loping
the t
ool
-
Incre
ased
kn
owled
ge
on dr
ivers
of
biodiv
ersit
y los
s
M&E
stra
tegy
wi
th se
t ta
rget
s for
bio
diver
sity
impa
cts
deve
loped
Desig
n stra
tegy
fo
r cap
acity
bu
ilding
on
mon
itorin
g an
d eva
luatio
n of
biod
iversi
ty
impa
cts am
ong
stake
holde
rs
Draf
t a st
rate
gy
-
Cons
ultat
ion m
eetin
gs
Mea
ls80
,000
502
432
,000,0
00
Venu
e2,0
00,00
0 1
24
16,00
0,000
St
ation
ery
10,00
0 50
24
4,000
,000
Perd
iem14
0,000
50
24
56,00
0,000
Tra
nspo
rt Re
fund
4,000
10
002
432
,000,0
00
140,
000,
000
Revie
w of
exist
ing lit
erat
ures
-
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 43
Impr
oved
sy
stem
of
mon
itorin
g im
pacts
on
biodiv
ersit
y
Guide
lines
for
mea
surin
g diff
eren
t im
pacts
on
biodiv
ersit
y du
ring
mon
itorin
g de
velop
ed
Desig
n gu
idelin
e an
d tra
ining
m
anua
ls an
d m
odule
s on
mon
itorin
g an
d eva
luatio
n of
biod
iversi
ty
man
agem
ent
inter
vent
ions
and i
ndica
tors
Cons
ultan
cy se
rvice
s Co
nsult
ancy
Fee
-
Incre
ased
kn
owled
ge on
se
tting
targ
ets
of in
dicat
ors
for n
egat
ive
and p
ositi
ve
impa
cts on
bio
diver
sity
Num
ber
of tr
aining
wo
rksh
ops
Traini
ng of
MA
LGs t
hrou
gh
work
shop
s, on
de
velop
men
t of
outp
ut
and o
utco
me
indica
tors
for
biodiv
ersit
y m
anag
emen
t
Facil
itate
train
ings a
nd w
orks
hops
Mea
ls80
,000
502
432
,000,0
00
Venu
e2,0
00,00
0 1
24
16,00
0,000
St
ation
ery
10,00
0 50
24
4,000
,000
Perd
iem14
0,000
50
24
56,00
0,000
Num
ber o
f sta
ff tra
ined
Trans
port
Refu
nd4,0
00
1000
24
32,00
0,000
Ai
rtim
e10
0,000
2
11
200,0
00
Facil
itatio
n all
owan
ce20
0,000
4
24
6,400
,000
ing3,4
00,00
0 1
11
3,400
,000
Sub-
tota
l
150,
000,
000
Stre
ngth
en th
e en
force
men
t of
envir
onm
enta
l laws
an
d reg
ulatio
ns
by en
gagin
g co
mm
uniti
es
in m
onito
ring
biodiv
ersit
y and
ec
osys
tem
s
Redu
ce th
e im
pact
of
activ
ities
in
the
com
mun
ities
on
ec
osys
tem
s de
grad
ation
Redu
ced
nega
tive
impa
cts on
bio
diver
sity
and
ecos
yste
ms
Susta
inable
m
onito
ring
mod
elAn
alyze
the
envir
onm
enta
l da
ta co
llecte
d an
d mak
e inf
orm
ed po
licy
decis
ion on
th
e sta
te of
bio
diver
sity
in Ug
anda
an
d dev
elop
a sus
taina
ble
mod
el fo
r bio
diver
sity
and e
cosy
stem
s m
onito
ring
Awar
enes
s cre
ation
amon
g the
co
mm
uniti
esCo
ordin
ation
144,0
00,00
0 1
11
144,0
00,00
0
Upda
te re
port
on st
atus
of
biodiv
ersit
y in
the
com
mun
ities
Esta
blish
ing co
mm
unity
enga
gem
ent
platfo
rms
Cons
ultan
cy Fe
e
10
0,000
,000
11
110
0,000
,000
Incre
ased
aw
aren
ess o
f co
mm
unity
ab
out t
he
nega
tive
impa
cts on
bio
diver
sity
Num
ber o
f co
mm
unity
m
embe
rs inv
olved
in
prot
ectio
n of
biodiv
ersit
y an
d ec
osys
tem
s
Stre
ngth
ening
com
mun
ity in
volve
men
ts th
roug
h mee
tings
, wor
ksho
pCo
nsult
ancy
Fee
100,0
00,00
0 1
11
100,0
00,00
0
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda44
Com
mun
ity
involv
emen
t in
prot
ectin
g bio
diver
sity
and
ecos
yste
ms
Increa
sed
com
mun
ity
involv
ed in
en
force
men
t of
en
viron
men
tal
laws
Num
ber o
f co
mm
unity
m
onito
rs re
cruite
d and
tra
ined
Ident
ify
and r
ecru
it en
viron
men
tal
com
mun
ity-
base
d mon
itors
who w
ill be
rou
tinely
m
onito
ring a
nd
colle
cting
data
on
activ
ities in
th
e com
mun
ities
and s
ubm
it th
e data
in a
pred
esign
ed to
ol
Deve
lopm
ent o
f guid
eline
s for
re
cruitm
ent
Cons
ultat
ion
serv
ices
5,000
,000
11
15,0
00,00
0
Recru
itmen
t of e
nviro
nmen
tal c
omm
u-nit
y-ba
sed m
onito
rsAd
verti
sing,
inter
viewi
ng an
d Hi
ring
5,0
00,00
0 1
11
5,000
,000
Traini
ng
Mea
ls40
,000
1,200
3
114
4,000
,000
Venu
e2,0
00,00
0 1
11
2,000
,000
Stat
ioner
y10
,000
1200
11
12,00
0,000
Pe
rdiem
140,0
00
1200
31
504,0
00,00
0 Tra
nspo
rt Re
fund
4,000
150
001
160
,000,0
00
Facil
itatio
n all
owan
ce20
0,000
24
31
14,40
0,000
Sub-
tota
l
736,
400,
000
Deve
loping
data
colle
ction
tool
Cons
ultat
ion
serv
ices
2,000
,000
110
120
,000,0
00
Data
colle
ction
Fie
ld da
ta
colle
ction
50,00
0,000
1
11
50,00
0,000
Capa
city o
f the
com
mun
ity
to m
onito
r an
d prot
ect
biodiv
ersity
an
d ec
osys
tems
Build
capa
city
of th
e loc
al co
mm
unitie
s to
mon
itor
and r
epor
t hu
man
relat
ed
activ
ities t
hat
have
poten
tial
to ne
gativ
ely
affec
t bio
divers
ity
and
ecos
ystem
s
Num
ber o
f en
viron
men
tal
com
mun
ity-
base
d mon
itors
traine
d
Train
envir
onm
ental
co
mm
unity
-ba
sed m
onito
rs an
d equ
ip th
en
with
tools
to
be us
ed fo
r m
onito
ring
Facil
itate
train
ings
50
,000,0
00
11
150
,000,0
00
Equip
envir
onm
ental
com
mun
ity m
onito
rs wi
th da
ta co
llecti
on eq
uipm
ent
Data
colle
ction
eq
uipm
ent
120,0
00,00
0 1
11
120,0
00,00
0
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 45
Emplo
ymen
t cre
ation
th
rough
co
mm
unity
ba
sed
mon
itorin
g
Increa
sed
bene
fits f
or th
e co
mm
unity
fro
m
cons
erva
tion
effor
ts
Amou
nt of
inc
entiv
es
alloc
ated
Facil
itate
the
com
mun
ity
base
d mon
itors
to pe
riodic
ally
mon
itor a
nd
subm
it the
data
on
the s
tate
of ac
tivitie
s on
iden
tified
ec
osys
tems
in th
eir
com
mun
ities
Data
colle
ction
s Co
ordin
ation
120,0
00,00
0 1
11
120,0
00,00
0
Data
capt
ure a
nd st
orag
e
Field
Nigh
ts14
0,000
8
101
11,20
0,000
Fu
el4,0
00
1000
101
40,00
0,000
St
ation
ery
10,00
0 8
11
80,00
0
Airti
me
100,0
00
41
140
0,000
Sub-
tota
l
51,6
80,0
00
Data
analy
sis an
d diss
emina
tion
Facil
itatio
n all
owan
ce20
0,000
4
51
4,000
,000
Stren
gthe
n the
en
force
men
t of
envir
onm
ental
laws
an
d reg
ulatio
ns by
inc
reasin
g num
ber
of tim
es to
mon
itor
natu
ral re
sourc
es
Incre
ased
vig
ilanc
e and
op
erat
ion-
alisa
tion o
f en
force
men
t law
s
Redu
ced
pollu
tion l
evels
Redu
ced
incide
nce
of air
born
e dis
ease
s
Facil
itate
colle
ction
and
analy
sis of
po
llutio
n data
fro
m in
dustr
ies
and f
actor
ies
Data
colle
ction
tools
10
0,000
9,0
001
190
0,000
,000
Impr
oved
wa
ter, a
ir and
so
il qua
lity
Redu
ced
incide
nces
of
water
born
dis
ease
s
Build
capa
city
of m
onito
rs to
colle
ct an
d an
alyze
the
data
to m
ake
inform
ed
decis
ions
Traini
ng
-
1,500
20,0
001
515
0,000
,000
-
Redu
ced
incide
nces
of
vecto
r bor
ne
disea
ses
Build
capa
city
of th
e poll
uter
s to
redu
ce
the l
evels
of
pollu
tion
and t
heir
impli
catio
ns fo
r th
e pop
ulatio
n
Enga
gem
ent w
ith M
ALGs
Co
ordin
ation
-
Incre
ased
nu
mbe
r of
instit
ution
s po
llutin
g to
the s
et
stand
ards
400,0
00 1
0,000
11
4,000
,000,0
00
Ca
pacit
y buil
ding
Mea
ls40
,000
1,000
3
112
0,000
,000
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda46
Venu
e2,0
00,00
0 1
11
2,000
,000
Stat
ioner
y10
,000
1000
11
10,00
0,000
Pe
rdiem
110,0
00
1000
31
330,0
00,00
0 Tra
nspo
rt Re
fund
4,000
80
001
132
,000,0
00
To st
reng
then
mon
i-to
ring,
cons
erva
tion
and m
anag
emen
t of
biodiv
ersit
y th
roug
h re
ward
syste
ms
Use o
f inc
entiv
es in
co
nser
vatio
n an
d man
-ag
emen
t of
biodiv
ersit
y
Incre
ased
co
mm
unity
pa
rticip
ation
in co
nser
vatio
n an
d m
anag
emen
t of
biod
iversi
ty
Num
ber o
f ho
useh
olds
involv
ed in
co
mm
unity
-ba
sed
man
agem
ent
of bi
odive
rsity
Facil
itate
the
esta
blish
men
t of
ince
ntive
s/re
ward
syste
m
and t
heir
oper
ation
s
Facil
iation
all
owan
ce20
0,000
10
31
6,000
,000
500,0
00,00
0
-
Num
ber o
f inc
entiv
e m
echa
nism
s op
eratin
g am
ong t
he
com
mun
ities
Train
com
mun
ity
mem
bers
on
the r
eward
sy
stem
and i
ts im
porta
nce t
o co
nser
vatio
n an
d live
lihoo
ds
Com
mun
ity m
eetin
gs
-
1,0
00,00
0 12
14
48,00
0,000
-
-
Incre
ased
kn
owled
ge
and v
alue o
f bio
diver
sity
amon
g the
co
mm
uniti
es
Kinds
of
bene
fits t
o the
co
mm
unity
Supp
ort
gove
rnm
ent
com
mun
ity
partn
ersh
ips/
enga
gem
ents
Deve
lop gu
idelin
es fo
r ince
ntive
s
50,00
0,000
1
11
50,00
0,000
Num
ber
of MO
Us
signe
d for
the
cons
erva
tion
and
man
agem
ent
of co
mm
uniti
es
base
d on t
he
reward
syste
m
Fa
cilita
ting o
pera
tiona
lizing
of re
ward
sy
stem
s
10,00
0,000
20
11
200,0
00,00
0
Incre
ased
be
nefit
s fro
m
biodiv
ersit
y to
the c
omm
u-nit
ies
Signin
g of M
oUs
5,0
00,00
0 1
11
5,000
,000
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 47
To im
prov
e was
te
gene
ratio
n, di
spos
al an
d man
agem
ent
Bette
r was
te
man
agem
ent
at ge
nera
tion
Impr
oved
wa
ste
man
agem
ent
at po
int of
ge
nera
tion
Categ
ories
of
waste
ge
nerat
ed
Deve
lop an
d im
plem
ent
guide
lines
on
was
te m
anag
emen
t at
all le
vels
Deve
lop w
aste
man
agem
ent g
uideli
nes
30
,000,0
00
11
130
,000,0
00
Num
ber o
f wa
ste co
llecti
on
bags
for t
he
differe
nt ty
pe of
wa
ste
Build
capa
city o
f th
e com
mun
ities
on w
aste
man
agem
ent,
waste
se
greg
ation
ha
ndlin
g and
dis
posa
l
Sens
itiza
tion m
eetin
gs
500,0
00
120
11
60,00
0,000
Was
te se
greg
ated a
nd
trans
port
to th
e diff
erent
point
s
Sens
itize t
he
com
mun
ities
on w
aste
man
agem
ent
prac
tices
an
d the
ir im
plica
tions
Traini
ng on
was
te ha
ndlin
g and
disp
osal.
15
0,000
,000
11
115
0,000
,000
Incre
ased
use
of wa
ste as
a raw
mate
rial in
m
anufa
cture
of co
mpo
st m
anure
and
liquid
ferti
lizer
Volum
e of s
olid
waste
used
for
prod
uctio
n of
man
ure
Estab
lish
chea
per
com
post
plant
s Fa
cilita
te in
nova
tions
3,000
,000
121
414
4,000
,000
Redu
ced
volum
e of
was
te
gene
rate
d an
d disp
osed
to
the
envir
onm
ent
Volum
e of
waste
water
us
ed in
the
prod
uctio
n of
liquid
ferti
lizers
Supp
ort
innov
ative
wa
ys of
mak
ing
com
post
man
ure
Traini
ngs c
omm
uniti
es in
recy
cling
of
waste
50,00
0 1,0
001
210
0,000
,000
Increa
sed
use o
f anim
al wa
ste in
the
prod
uctio
n of
clean
energ
y Bio
gas
Volum
e and
m
ass o
f ann
ual
waste
used
in
the p
roduc
tion
of bio
gas
Build
capa
city o
f th
e com
mun
ities
in us
ing
waste
water
in
mak
ing
fertili
zers
Facil
itate
cons
tructi
on of
biog
as pl
ants
2,0
00,00
0 10
01
240
0,000
,000
Raw
mate
rial
for pr
oduc
t de
velop
men
t
Mas
s of
com
post
man
ure
prod
uced
Scale
up th
e co
nstru
ction
of
bioga
s plan
ts es
pecia
lly in
ru
ral ar
eas a
nd
aroun
d frag
ile
ecos
ystem
s
- do
-
2,000
,000
1,000
11
2,000
,000,0
00
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda48
In
creas
ed us
e of
com
post
man
ure by
far
mers
Volum
e of
liquid
ferti
lizer
prod
uced
Facil
itate
an
d pro
mot
e inn
ovat
ions t
o co
vert
waste
int
o use
ful
prod
ucts
Facil
itate
inno
vatio
ns
5,000
,000
120
11
60
0,000
,000
To in
creas
e the
for
est c
over
throu
gh
prom
otion
of
agro-
fores
t farm
ing
syste
ms a
mon
g th
e com
mun
ities in
Ug
anda
Incre
ased
for
est c
over
throu
gh
agric
ultur
al sy
stem
s
Redu
ced
agric
ultur
al ex
pans
ion on
for
est la
nd an
d
Num
ber o
f far
mer
s tha
t ha
ve ad
opte
d ag
ro-fo
rest
farm
ing
syste
ms
Tree p
lantin
g on
priva
te la
ndSe
nsiti
zatio
n mee
ting
Com
mun
ity
enga
gem
ent
mee
tings
18
,750,0
00
81
115
0,000
,000
Ar
ea un
der
fores
t on p
rivate
lan
d
Esta
blish
men
t of
seed
ling
nurse
ries w
ithin
the d
istric
tsar
ea of
fore
st pla
nted
ar
ea of
fore
st pla
nted
2,5
00,00
0 120
,000
11
300,0
00,00
0,000
Incre
ase f
orest
cove
r thr
ough
ag
ro-for
est
farm
ing sy
stem
Num
ber o
f far
mers
train
ed
Traini
ng of
far
mers
on ag
ro-for
estry
farm
ing
syste
ms
Facil
itate
nurse
ry be
d esta
blish
men
tsCo
ordin
ation
500,0
00
500
12
50
0,000
,000
Num
ber o
f se
nsitiz
ation
m
eetin
gs
held
in th
e co
mm
unitie
s
Sens
itizati
on of
th
e peo
ple in
the
com
mun
ityFa
cilita
te tr
aining
s of f
arm
ers
Facil
itatio
n all
owan
ce50
,000
6000
11
30
0,000
,000
Map
ping
of are
as w
here
agro-
fores
try
have
been
ad
opted
Unde
rtake
biom
ass s
urve
yDa
ta co
llecti
on
entry
ana
lysis
& re
port
writi
ng
100,0
00,00
0 1
11
100,0
00,00
0
Impr
ove t
he effi
cienc
y an
d effe
ctive
ness
of th
e EIA
syste
m
in red
ucing
and
mini
mizi
ng ne
gativ
e im
pacts
on bi
odive
rsity
Effec
tive a
nd
efficie
nt EI
A sy
stem
Incre
ased
effi
cienc
y of
the E
IA sy
stem
Num
ber o
f day
s to
review
EIA
repor
ts
Estab
lishm
ent
of an
integ
rated
EIA
syste
mCa
pacit
y buil
ding o
f pra
ctitio
ners
Mea
ls80
,000
238
11
19,04
0,000
Venu
e2,0
00,00
0 1
11
2,000
,000
Sub-
tota
l
21,0
40,0
00
Qu
ality
of th
e EIA
repo
rts
Supp
ort
evide
nce b
ased
EIA
syste
mEm
powe
ring l
ocal
com
mun
ity to
be
involv
ed in
the E
IAs
15
,000,0
00
11
115
,000,0
00
Incre
ased
eff
ectiv
enes
s of
the E
IA
syste
m
Capa
city o
f re
viewe
rs in
ident
ifying
im
pacts
and
follo
w th
e m
itiga
tion
hiera
rchy
Stre
ngth
en
instit
ution
al lin
kage
s
Capa
city b
uildin
g on c
ondu
cting
envi-
ronm
enta
l aud
its an
d enf
orce
men
t
Mea
ls 80
,000
802
112
,800,0
00
Venu
e 2,0
00,00
0 1
11
2,000
,000
Perd
iem
140,0
00
802
122
,400,0
00
Tran
spor
t Refu
nd
4,000
10
001
14,0
00,00
0
Su
b-to
tal
41
,200
,000
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 49
Num
ber o
f int
erve
ntion
s im
plem
ente
d th
at av
oided
fra
gile
ecos
yste
ms
Polit
ical
supp
ort a
nd
com
mitm
ent
in th
e im
plem
entat
ion
of EIA
proc
ess
Empo
werin
g loc
al co
mm
unity
to be
inv
olved
in th
e EIA
s
Facil
itatio
n of
polit
ical le
ader
s to
atte
nd
enga
gem
ent
mee
ting
500,0
00
120
21
120,0
00,00
0
Lo
cal
com
mun
ity
involv
emen
t in
EIA pr
oces
s
Enco
urag
emen
t of lo
cal c
omm
uniti
es in
EIA
proc
esse
sFa
cilita
tion o
f loc
al lea
ders
to
atte
nd m
eetin
g50
,000
500
41
100,0
00,00
0
Incre
ased
the a
rea o
f fra
gile e
cosy
stem
s an
d num
ber o
f bio
diver
sity s
pecie
s
Resto
ratio
n of
wet
lands
an
d for
ests
and f
ragil
e ec
osys
tem
lik
e rive
r ba
nks,
lakes
hore
s
Incre
ased
we
tland
cove
r
Num
ber o
f m
anag
emen
t pla
ns
deve
loped
· Fac
ilitat
e the
fo
rmat
ion of
m
anag
emen
t pla
ns at
distr
ict,
sub-
coun
ty an
d co
mm
unity
Area
of w
etlan
d res
tore
dRe
stora
tion o
f we
tland
s9,0
00,00
0 72
001
164
,800,0
00,00
0
Incre
ased
fo
rest
cove
rNu
mbe
r of
partn
ersh
ips
form
ed
· Fac
ilitate
the
opera
tiona
l-isa
tion o
f the
com
mun
ity
and d
istric
t m
anag
emen
t co
mm
ittee
s
Deve
lop gu
idelin
es fo
r for
mat
ion of
m
anag
emen
t plan
s, ar
ea
Facil
itatio
n of
com
mun
ity
mem
bers
in th
e de
velop
men
t of
guide
lines
25,00
0 1,8
001
145
,000,0
00
Incre
ased
area
of
lake
shor
es
resto
red
Com
mun
ity
man
agem
ent
plans
de
velop
ed
· Fac
ilitat
e the
de
mar
catio
n an
d res
tora
tion
thro
ugh t
he
com
mun
ities
by
use o
f tre
e se
edlin
gs in
co
mm
uniti
es
rath
er th
an
conc
rete
poles
Form
ation
of pa
rtner
ships
, are
a/len
gth
Facil
itatio
n of
partn
ers i
n th
e res
tora
tion
activ
ities
250,0
00
200
11
50,00
0,000
Incre
ased
area
of
river
bank
s re
store
d
Distr
ict
man
agem
ent
plans
de
velop
ed an
d op
eratio
nalis
ed
· Fac
ilitate
the
form
ation
and
opera
tiona
lisa-
tion o
f com
mu-
nity m
onito
ring
com
mitt
ees
for th
e natu
ral
resou
rces w
ithin
the c
omm
unitie
s
Deve
loping
by-la
ws an
d ord
inanc
esFa
cilita
tion f
or
Com
mun
ity
mee
tings
to
deve
lop by
-laws
5,000
,000
120
11
600,0
00,00
0
Num
ber o
f bio
diver
sity
spec
ies
inden
tified
an
d con
serv
ed Nu
mbe
r of
com
mun
ity
man
agem
ent
com
mitt
ees
form
ed
Form
ation
of co
mm
unity
man
agem
ent
com
mitt
ees
10
0,000
20
12
4,000
,000
· A
rea o
f we
tland
cove
r re
store
d and
ga
zette
Facil
itate
esta
blish
men
t of t
ree n
urse
ries
10
,000,0
00
11
110
,000,0
00
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda50
· Num
ber o
f tre
e see
dling
s an
d var
iety
plant
ed
Facil
itate
plan
ting d
iffer
ent v
ariet
ies of
tre
es
15,00
0,000
1
11
15,00
0,000
· Are
a of f
ores
t co
ver p
lante
dFa
cilita
te es
tabli
shm
ent o
f tre
e nur
serie
s
10,00
0,000
1
11
10,00
0,000
To pr
omot
e es
tabli
shm
ent o
f off
sets
and w
oodlo
ts am
ong c
onstr
uctio
n co
mpa
nies,
schoo
ls,
indus
tries
and
hous
ehold
s.
Incre
ased
co
mm
itmen
t of
the
cons
tructi
on
indus
try to
pa
rticip
ate i
n co
nser
vatio
n eff
orts
Redu
ced n
eg-
ative
impa
ct of
cons
truc-
tion p
rojec
ts on
biod
iver-
sity a
nd en
-vir
onm
enta
l de
grad
ation
in
Ugan
da
· Num
ber o
f off
set s
ites
esta
blish
ed
for s
choo
ls,
hote
ls, ro
ad
cons
tructi
ons
and w
oodlo
ts fo
r hou
seho
lds
·Train
ing
of sc
hool’
s te
ache
rs, pu
pils’
hote
l sta
ff an
d pe
ople
in th
e co
nstru
ction
ind
ustry
Sens
itiza
tion w
orks
hops
2,0
00,00
0 5
12
20,00
0,000
· N
umbe
r of
schoo
ls an
d ho
tels
traine
d an
d sen
sitize
d
· Sen
sitiza
tion
works
hops
for
the p
eople
in
the c
onstr
uctio
n ind
ustry
Facil
itatin
g env
ironm
enta
l club
s
500,0
00
201
110
,000,0
00
Incre
ased
bu
dget
all
ocat
ions
for o
ffset
s an
d oth
er
cons
erva
tion
work
am
ong t
he
stake
holde
rs in
the
cons
tructi
on
indus
try
· Num
ber o
f pe
ople
traine
d
· For
mat
ion/
rejuv
enat
ion of
en
viron
men
tal
clubs
amon
g sch
ool p
upils
Capa
city b
uildin
g of s
take
holde
rs
100,0
00
500
11
50,00
0,000
· Tre
e plan
ting
and m
onito
ring
50,00
0 10
01
15,0
00,00
0
4.0
To p
rom
ote
the
sust
aina
ble
use
and
equi
tabl
e sh
arin
g of
cost
s and
ben
efits
of b
iodi
vers
ity
To pr
omot
e su
staina
ble us
e of
biodiv
ersit
y
Enh
ancin
g liv
eliho
od
Optim
ise
bene
fits f
rom
su
staina
ble
biodiv
ersit
y
Incre
ased
effi
cient
use o
f re
sour
ces
Build
skill
thro
ugh
traini
ngs,
inter
nship
and
volun
teer
ing
and p
ilot
activ
ities
Traini
ng on
quali
ty im
prov
emen
t/max
i-m
izatio
n of r
esou
rces
Mea
ls40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
140,0
00
140
51
98,00
0,000
Fa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l
150,
000,
000
Num
ber o
f job
s cre
ated
in
the d
iffer
ent
secto
rs
Crea
tion o
f em
ploym
ent
oppo
rtunit
iesCa
pacit
y buil
ding
on re
cycli
ng/
reus
abilit
yM
eals
40,00
0 14
05
128
,000,0
00
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 51
Venu
e2,0
00,00
0 2
11
4,000
,000
Perd
iem14
0,000
14
05
198
,000,0
00
Facil
itatio
n all
owan
ce50
0,000
8
51
20,00
0,000
Sub-
tota
l
150,
000,
000
Num
ber o
f pe
ople
who
shift
to di
ffer-
ent s
ecto
rs
Liveli
hood
div
ersifi
catio
nFa
cilita
te de
velop
men
t of a
rtisa
n skil
lsCo
nsult
ation
se
rvice
s2,0
00,00
0 1
51
10,00
0,000
Num
ber o
f en
terpr
ises
create
d tha
t do
esn’t
depe
nd
direc
tly on
nat-
ural
resou
rces
Ente
rpris
e cre
ation
Prom
otion
of co
oper
ative
s Co
nsult
ation
se
rvice
s2,0
00,00
0 1
101
20,00
0,000
Incre
ase v
alue
capt
ured
from
bio
divers
ity us
eVa
lue ad
dition
Facil
itate
prov
ision
of im
prov
ed te
chno
l-og
iesFa
cilita
tion f
or
com
mun
ity
mee
tings
5,000
,000
21
110
,000,0
00
In
dustr
ialisa
tion
-
Efficie
nt
prod
uctio
n of
char
coal
Impr
oved
m
etho
ds
of ch
arco
al pr
oduc
tion
Volum
e of
char
coal
Capa
city
build
ing on
effi
cient
char-
coal
prod
uctio
n m
etho
ds
Facil
itate
traini
ng on
efficie
nt ch
arcoa
l pr
oduc
tion
Mea
ls40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
140,0
00
140
51
98,00
0,000
Fa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Su
b-to
tal
15
0,00
0,00
0 Inc
rease
d vo
lume o
f ch
arcoa
l from
th
e sam
e inp
ut
wood
Num
ber o
f cha
r-co
al pro
duce
rs wh
o hav
e ad-
opted
impro
ved
techn
ology
Prom
ote e
ffi-
cient
charc
oal
prod
uctio
n tec
hnolo
gies
Form
ation
of Ch
arco
al pr
oduc
er’s
asso
ciatio
ns
Com
mun
ity
mob
ilizati
on5,0
00,00
0 1
11
5,00
0,000
Nu
mbe
r of
charc
oal p
ro-
duce
rs tra
ined.
M
eetin
gsFa
cilita
tion o
f co
mm
unity
m
eetin
g5,0
00,00
0 1
11
5,00
0,000
Efficie
nt us
e of
biom
ass
energ
y
Redu
ced
wasta
ge
Num
ber o
f ho
useh
olds
that
have
ad
opted
en
ergy s
aving
tec
hnolo
gies
Prom
ote
affor
dable
en
ergy s
aving
tec
hnolo
gy
Scree
ning e
nerg
y opt
ions f
or bi
odive
rsity
be
nefit
sRe
searc
h Asst
. Cos
t20
0,000
16
51
16,00
0,000
Bette
r ene
rgy
savin
g tec
h-no
logies
Num
ber o
f ins
titut
ions
that
have
ad
opted
new
tec
hnolo
gies
Capa
city
build
ing on
en
ergy s
aving
tec
hnolo
gies
Dem
onstr
ation
s on e
nerg
y sav
ing
techn
ologie
sFa
cilita
tion
100,0
00
100
11
10,00
0,000
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda52
Redu
ced
depe
nden
cy
on ch
arcoa
l an
d firew
ood
Alter
nativ
e so
urces
of
cook
ing en
ergy
Num
ber o
f ho
useh
olds
using
alt
ernati
ve
sourc
es of
en
ergy f
or
cook
ing
Prom
ote
adop
tion o
f alt
ernati
ve
energ
y for
co
oking
Dem
onstr
ation
s
5,000
,000
31
115
,000,0
00
Type
s of
ener
gy us
ed
Capa
city
build
ing on
alt
ernati
ve ty
pes
of en
ergy f
or
cook
ing
Com
mun
ity en
gage
men
ts M
obiliz
ation
an
d fac
ilitati
on
of co
mm
unity
m
embe
rs10
,000,0
00
61
160
,000,0
00
Volum
e of
charc
oal a
nd
firew
ood u
sed
At
titud
e cha
nge
Capa
city b
uildin
g/tra
ining
for
com
mun
ities
Mea
ls40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
140,0
00
140
51
98,00
0,000
Fa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l 15
0,00
0,00
0 Ch
ange
in
attitu
de an
d pe
rcept
ion on
alt
ernati
ve
sourc
es of
en
ergy
Man
age
the f
orest
resou
rces
Impro
ved
Mana
gem
ent
of fo
rest
resou
rces
Fore
st pr
oduc
t ac
coun
ts de
velop
ed
Deve
lopm
ent o
f for
est p
roduc
ts
acco
unts
Facil
itate
the d
evelo
pmen
t of th
e fore
st pro
duct
acco
unts
Cons
ultan
cy Fe
e1,0
00,00
0 2
901
180,0
00,00
0
Value
addit
ionIn
tegr
ating
the i
nfor
mat
ion of
the f
ores
t pr
oduc
t acco
unts
into p
olicy
Co
nsult
ancy
Fee
2,000
,000
230
12
0,000
,000
Capa
city
build
ing on
res
ource
ac
coun
ting
Fa
cilita
tion f
or th
e tra
ining
30,00
0,000
2
12
120,0
00,00
0
Susta
inable
utiliz
ation
of
fishe
ries r
esou
rceSu
staina
ble
harve
sting
of
fish
Impro
ved
fishin
g m
ethod
s
Num
ber
of fis
herie
s pro
jects
funde
dEn
coura
ge fis
h far
ming
Rese
arch
2,0
00,00
0 1
651
130,0
00,00
0
Num
ber o
f tra
ining
s co
nduc
ted fo
r fis
h farm
ing
Capa
city
build
ing
on effi
cient
m
onito
ring o
f fis
hing a
ctivit
ies
Traini
ng an
d sen
sitiza
tion
Mea
ls40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
140,0
00
140
51
98,00
0,000
Fa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l
150,
000,
000
· Fun
ding f
or st
art-u
p pro
jects
-
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 53
Effi
cient
M
anag
emen
t of
fish s
tock
· Impr
oved
M
anag
emen
t of
fish
re
sour
ces
· Fish
eries
ac
coun
ts de
velop
ed
· Dev
elopm
ent
of fis
herie
s ac
coun
ts· F
acilit
ate t
he de
velop
men
t of t
he fis
h ac
coun
t. Co
nsult
ancy
Fee
1,000
,000
230
160
,000,0
00
· Valu
e add
ition
· Inte
grat
ing th
e inf
orm
ation
of th
e fish
ac
coun
t int
o poli
cy
Cons
ultat
ion
serv
ices
2,000
,000
160
112
0,000
,000
· Cap
acity
bu
ilding
on
reso
urce
ac
coun
ting
Mea
ls40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
140,0
00
140
51
98,00
0,000
Fa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Su
b-to
tal
15
0,00
0,00
0
Susta
inable
ut
ilisat
ion of
wat
er
· Effi
cient
ut
ilisat
ion
of w
ater
re
sour
ces
Incre
ase i
n wa
ter r
euse
Wat
er re
use
tech
nolog
ies
adop
ted
Adop
ting
wate
r reu
se
tech
nolog
ies
Traini
ng on
diffe
rent
way
s of r
eusin
g wa
ter
Mea
ls40
,000
705
114
,000,0
00
Venu
e2,0
00,00
0 1
11
2,000
,000
Perd
iem14
0,000
70
51
17,50
0,000
Ca
pacit
y bu
ilding
Trans
port
Refu
nd50
,000
705
170
,000,0
00
Sens
itisa
tion
of m
asse
s on
efficie
nt
utilis
ation
of
wate
r
Facil
itatio
n all
owan
ce20
0,000
16
51
16,00
0,000
Su
b-to
tal
11
9,50
0,00
0
Efficie
nt
man
agem
ent
of w
ater
re
sour
ce
Redu
ced
wasta
ge· V
olum
e of
wate
rAd
optin
g wat
er
man
agem
ent
prac
tices
Tra
ining
on w
ater
man
agem
ent
prac
tices
-
Efficie
nt
irriga
tion
syste
ms
· R
ecor
ds of
tra
ining
s co
nduc
ted
Iimpr
ovem
ent
of w
ater
all
ocat
ion
amon
g co
mpe
ting u
ses
Crea
te aw
aren
ess o
n the
drou
ght
resis
tant
crop
s and
bette
r far
ming
m
etho
ds.
Done
durin
g aw
aren
ess
cam
paign
s50
,000,0
00
31
115
0,000
,000
· Im
prov
ed
irriga
tion
syste
ms
· Red
uced
po
llutio
n
Carry
ing ou
t re
gular
Wat
er
Reso
urce
s As
sessm
ents
Traini
ng in
wat
er ha
rves
ting t
echn
olo-
gies.
Mea
ls40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
140,0
00
140
51
98,00
0,000
Fa
ciliat
ion
allow
ance
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Su
b-to
tal
15
0,00
0,00
0
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda54
· Num
ber o
f inn
ovat
ions
adop
ted
Prev
entio
n str
ateg
ies
and n
ew
tech
nolog
ies
that
enha
nce
exist
ing na
tura
l wa
ter r
esou
rc-es
, redu
ce
dem
and,
and
achie
ve hi
gher
effi
cienc
y
Crea
te aw
aren
ess o
n the
drou
ght r
esis-
tant
crop
s and
bette
r far
ming
met
hods
.M
obiliz
ation
and
sens
iteza
tion o
f co
mm
uniti
es50
,000,0
00
41
1
200,0
00,00
0
· Impr
oved
qu
ality
of
wate
r· E
ncou
rage
wa
ter r
euse
· Fac
ilitat
e esta
blish
men
t of w
ater
re
serv
oirs
Mea
ls40
,000
705
114
,000,0
00
·
· Dro
ught
re
sista
nt cr
ops
· Fac
ilitat
e the
esta
blish
men
t of c
lean
wate
r sou
rces.
Venu
e2,0
00,00
0 1
11
2,000
,000
· Enc
oura
ge
bette
r far
ming
m
etho
ds th
at
don’t
need
irr
igatio
n
Perd
iem14
0,000
70
51
17,50
0,000
· Red
uce w
ater
po
llutio
n Tra
nspo
rt Re
fund
50,00
0 70
51
70,00
0,000
· Cap
acity
bu
ilding
on
wate
r har
vest-
ing te
chno
lo-gie
s
Facil
iation
allow
-an
ce20
0,000
16
51
16,00
0,000
Su
b-to
tal
11
9,50
0,00
0 · R
ewar
ding
syste
m fo
r wa
ter s
ource
pr
otec
tion.
Prev
entio
n stra
tegie
s and
new
tech
nolo-
gies t
hat e
nhan
ce ex
isting
natu
ral w
ater
re
sour
ces,
redu
ce de
man
d, an
d ach
ieve
highe
r effi
cienc
y
Cons
ultat
ion
serv
ices
2,000
,000
160
112
0,000
,000
Efficie
nt
Man
agem
ent
of w
ater
re
sour
ces
· Impr
oved
M
anag
emen
t of
wat
er
reso
urce
s
· Wat
er
acco
unts
deve
loped
· Dev
elopm
ent
of w
ater
ac
coun
ts· F
acilit
ate t
he de
velop
men
t of t
he w
ater
ac
coun
t. Co
nsult
ation
se
rvice
s2,0
00,00
0 1
401
80,00
0,000
Value
addit
ion· In
tegr
ating
the i
nfor
mat
ion of
the
wate
r acco
unt i
nto p
olicy
Co
nsult
ation
se
rvice
s2,0
00,00
0 1
501
100,0
00,00
0
Ca
pacit
y buil
d-ing
on re
sour
ce
acco
untin
g
Mea
ls40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
140,0
00
140
51
98,00
0,000
Fa
ciliat
ion
allow
ance
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l
150,
000,
000
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 55
Susta
inable
ut
ilisat
ion of
cla
yEffi
cient
use
of cl
ay· R
ecor
ds
of tr
aining
s co
nduc
ted
Prom
ote
certi
ficat
ionTra
ining
s
Mea
ls40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
140,0
00
140
51
98,00
0,000
Fa
ciliat
ion
allow
ance
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Su
b-to
tal
15
0,00
0,00
0
·
· C
lay
guide
lines
de
velop
ed
· Ado
pting
of
efficie
nt
extra
ction
skills
· Cre
ating
awar
enes
s on o
ther
alte
rnat
ive
mat
erial
sCo
mm
unity
m
obiliz
ation
and
facilit
ation
50,00
0,000
2
11
100,0
00,00
0
· E
xtra
ction
sk
ills ad
opte
d
· Enc
oura
ge
innov
ation
s wh
ich re
quire
les
s mat
erial
s·
Capa
city b
uildin
g 2,0
00,00
0 1
51
10,00
0,000
· Exp
lore
alter
nativ
es
-
· Cap
acity
bu
ilding
of
extra
ctors
Fa
cilita
tion
allow
ance
s1,0
00,00
0 1
151
15,00
0,000
· Dev
elop
guide
lines
for
clay
extra
ction
.
Cons
ultat
ion
serv
ices
2,000
,000
110
120
,000,0
00
· Valu
e add
ition
· Im
prov
ed
Man
agem
ent
of c
lay
reso
urce
s
· Clay
acco
unts
deve
loped
· D
evelo
p-m
ent o
f clay
ac
coun
ts· F
acilit
ate t
he de
velop
men
t of t
he cl
ay
acco
unt.
Cons
ultan
cy Fe
e1,0
00,00
0 1
901
90,00
0,000
· Valu
e add
ition
· Inte
grat
ing th
e inf
orm
ation
of th
e clay
ac
coun
t int
o poli
cy
Cons
ultat
ion
serv
ices
2,000
,000
160
112
0,000
,000
· Cap
acity
bu
ilding
on
reso
urce
ac
coun
ting
Mea
ls40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
140,0
00
140
51
98,00
0,000
Fa
ciliat
ion
allow
ance
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Su
b-to
tal
15
0,00
0,00
0
Su
staina
ble
utilis
ation
of
sand
· San
d alt
erna
tives
· San
d alt
erna
tives
ad
opte
d
· Enc
ourag
e ad
optio
n of o
ther
altern
ative
s for
sand
· Tra
ining
s on u
se of
othe
r alte
rnat
ives t
o sa
nd th
roug
h dem
onstr
ation
s
Mea
ls40
,000
705
114
,000,0
00
Venu
e2,0
00,00
0 1
11
2,000
,000
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda56
Perd
iem14
0,000
70
51
49,00
0,000
· E
fficie
nt
met
hods
of
extra
ction
of
sand
· Num
ber o
f pe
ople
traine
d · C
apac
ity
build
ing
· Wor
ksho
psFa
ciliat
ion
allow
ance
200,0
00
165
116
,000,0
00
Su
b-to
tal
81
,000
,000
·
Num
ber o
f wo
rksh
ops
cond
ucte
d
· Im
prov
ed
Man
agem
ent
of s
and
reso
urce
s
· San
d
acco
unts
deve
loped
·
De
velop
men
t of
sand
ac
coun
ts
· Fac
ilitat
e the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
sand
ac
coun
t. Co
nsult
ancy
Fee
1,000
,000
190
190
,000,0
00
· Valu
e add
ition
· Int
egra
ting t
he in
form
ation
of th
e san
d ac
coun
t int
o poli
cy
Cons
ultan
cy Fe
e2,0
00,00
0 1
601
120,0
00,00
0
· Cap
acity
bu
ilding
on
reso
urce
ac
coun
ting
Mea
ls40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
140,0
00
140
51
98,00
0,000
Facil
iation
all
owan
ce50
0,000
8
51
20,00
0,000
Sub-
tota
l
150,
000,
000
5.0
To e
nhan
ce a
war
enes
s and
edu
catio
n on
bio
dive
rsity
issu
es a
mon
g th
e va
rious
stak
ehol
ders
Deve
lop an
d im
plem
ent
stake
holde
r aw
aren
ess
prog
ram
mes
on
biodiv
ersit
y
Aware
ness
creati
on
amon
g Po
licy
mak
er/im
plem
enter
s
Incre
ased
aw
aren
ess
Num
ber o
f m
eetin
gsPo
licy
enga
gem
ent
Deve
lop Po
licy b
riefs
Proc
urem
ent o
f pr
inting
firm
10,00
0 5,0
00
11
50,00
0,000
Num
ber o
f pr
int an
d au
dio sl
ots
Polic
y dial
ogue
sFa
cilita
te pr
inting
of de
velop
men
t Br
ochu
res
Proc
urem
ent o
f pr
inting
firm
2,000
5,0
00
11
10,00
0,000
M
eetin
gsFa
ct sh
eets
Proc
urem
ent o
f pr
inting
firm
2,000
5,0
00
11
10,00
0,000
News
pape
rAd
verti
sing
10,00
0,000
2
14
80,00
0,000
Ra
dio &
TVAd
verti
sing
100,0
00,00
0 1
11
100,0
00,00
0
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 57
Aware
ness
creati
on
amon
g Re
searc
hers/
Acad
emia
Incre
ased
aw
arene
ss am
ong
resea
rcher
/ac
adem
ia
Num
ber
of tra
ining
wo
rksho
ps
cond
ucted
Facil
itate
Pu
blica
tions
Traini
ng w
orks
hops
Mea
ls 40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
14
0,000
14
05
198
,000,0
00
Facil
iation
all
owan
ce
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l
150,
000,
000
Num
ber o
f ToT
s rec
ruite
d
Traini
ng of
Tra
iners
Mea
ls 40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
14
0,000
14
05
198
,000,0
00
Facil
iation
all
owan
ce
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l
150,
000,
000
Num
ber o
f ret
reats
and
mee
tings
Retre
ats
Hold
retre
at
Mea
ls15
0,000
10
0 3
145
,000,0
00
Venu
e2,
000,
000
1 1
12,
000,
000
Trans
port
Refu
nd4,0
00
2,000
1
18,0
00,00
0
Su
b-to
tal
55
,000
,000
Repo
rtsPr
ocur
emen
t of
ing fir
m10
,000
500
11
5,00
0,000
Aware
ness
creati
on of
Pr
ivate
secto
r, civ
il soc
iety
and
med
ia
Incre
ased
pa
rticip
ation
of
priva
te
secto
r, civi
l so
ciety
and
med
ia in
biodiv
ersity
pr
ogram
mes
Num
ber o
f m
eetin
gs
cond
ucte
dPo
licy
enga
gem
ent
Polic
y brie
fsPr
ocur
emen
t of
ing fir
m10
,000
5,000
1
150
,000,0
00
Num
ber o
f pr
int an
d aud
io slo
tsPo
licy d
ialog
ues
Facil
itate
prod
uctio
n of B
roch
ures
Proc
urem
ent o
f pr
inting
firm
2,000
5,0
00
11
10,00
0,000
Mee
tings
Fact
shee
tsPr
ocur
emen
t of
ing fir
m2,0
00
5,000
1
110
,000,0
00
Mult
imed
ia ap
proa
ch (r
adio
talk
show
s, TV
show
s, ne
wspa
pers,
do
cum
enta
ries)
News
pape
rAd
verti
sing
10,00
0,000
2
14
80,00
0,000
Radio
& TV
Adve
rtisin
g10
0,000
,000
1 1
110
0,000
,000
Cre
ate
aware
ness
in Sc
hools
(all
levels
)
Increa
sed
parti
cipati
on
of sch
ools
in bio
divers
ity
prog
ramm
es
Num
ber o
f TOT
wo
rksho
ps
cond
ucted
Wor
ksho
psCo
nduc
t wor
ksho
p
Mea
ls80
,000
200
31
48,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
2 1
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
140,0
00
200
31
84,00
0,000
Fa
ciliat
ion
allow
ance
500,0
00
4 3
16,0
00,00
0
Sub-
tota
l
142,
000,
000
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda58
Num
ber o
f en
viron
men
tal
clubs
Scho
ol clu
bsBo
oks
Proc
urem
ent o
f pr
inting
firm
2,000
10,0
00
11
20,00
0,000
Num
ber o
f br
ande
d m
essa
ge
mate
rial
distri
buted
Deve
lop
bran
ding
mes
sage
sBr
andin
g ite
ms
Proc
urem
ent o
f pr
inting
firm
5,000
100,
000
11
50
0,000
,000
Cle
an up
pr
ogram
mes
Clean
ing of
targ
eted
com
mun
ity ar
eas
Acce
ssorie
s20
0,000
,000
1 1
1
200,0
00,00
0
de
mos
tratio
n sit
es
Resto
ratio
n of f
ragil
e eco
syste
ms
Acce
ssorie
s
-
Num
ber o
f pr
int an
d aud
io slo
ts
Mult
imed
ia ap
proa
ch (r
adio
talk
show
s, TV
show
s, ne
wspa
pers,
do
cum
enta
ries)
Supp
ort o
ut re
ach p
rogr
amm
es
100,0
00,00
0 1
11
100,0
00,00
0
Aware
ness
creati
on
amon
g ind
igeno
us
peop
le an
d loc
al co
mm
uniti
es
Incre
ased
co
mm
unity
en
gage
men
t in
biodiv
ersity
pr
ogram
mes
Num
ber o
f m
eetin
gs
(bara
zas)
Com
mun
ity
Meet
ings
(bara
zas)
Facil
itate
Tran
slatio
n of:
Coor
dinat
ion
-
Num
ber o
f co
mm
unity
en
gage
men
t pr
ogram
mes
Clean
up
prog
ramm
esCle
aning
of ta
rget
ed co
mm
unity
area
sAc
cesso
ries
1000
0000
01
11
100,0
00,00
0
Num
ber o
f prin
t an
d aud
io slo
ts
Mult
imed
ia ap
proa
ch (r
adio
talk
show
s, TV
show
s, ne
wspa
pers,
do
cum
enta
ries
TV do
cum
enta
ries
Adve
rtisin
g50
,000,0
00
1 1
150
,000,0
00
Flyer
sPr
ocur
emen
t of
ing fir
m1,0
00
5,000
1
1
5,
000,0
00
Bann
ers
Proc
urem
ent o
f pr
inting
firm
1,000
5,0
00
11
5,00
0,000
Enha
ncing
educ
ation
pr
ogra
mm
es o
n bio
diver
sity i
ssues
Educ
ation
an
d atti
tude
ch
ange
am
ong
Polic
y m
aker/
imple
men
ters
Increa
sed
parti
cipati
on
in bio
divers
ity
activ
ities
Num
ber
of tra
ining
wo
rksho
psTra
ining
W
orks
hops
Facil
itate
prod
uctio
n of Tr
aining
mate
rials
Traini
ng m
ateria
ls pr
inting
10,00
0 2,5
00
11
25,00
0,000
Info
rmed
de
cision
s on
biodiv
ersity
iss
ues
Num
ber o
f ret
reats
Retre
ats
Guide
lines
Mea
ls15
0,000
10
0 3
145
,000,0
00
Venu
e2,0
00,00
0 1
11
2,000
,000
Trans
port
Refu
nd4,0
00
2,000
1
18,0
00,00
0
Sub-
tota
l
55,0
00,0
00
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 59
Polic
y en
gage
men
t
Polic
y brie
fs M
eals
150,0
00
90
31
40,50
0,000
Ve
nue
1,900
,000
1 1
11,9
00,00
0 Tra
nspo
rt Re
fund
4,000
1,9
00
11
7,600
,000
Su
b-to
tal
50
,000
,000
Disse
mina
tion
works
hops
Wor
king p
aper
s
Mea
ls 10
0,000
14
75
173
,500,0
00
Venu
e 1,8
00,00
0 2
11
3,600
,000
Perd
iem
140,0
00
147
51
102,9
00,00
0 Fa
ciliat
ion
allow
ance
50
0,000
8
51
20,00
0,000
Su
b-to
tal
20
0,00
0,00
0
Educ
ation
an
d atti
tude
ch
ange
am
ong
Rese
arche
rs/Ac
adem
ia
Incre
ased
pa
rticip
ation
of
rese
arche
rs/ac
adem
ia
Num
ber o
f wo
rksho
psTra
ining
wo
rksho
psPu
blica
tions
Mea
ls 40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
14
0,000
14
05
198
,000,0
00
Facil
iation
all
owan
ce
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l
150,
000,
000
Num
ber o
f res
earch
pape
rs
Traini
ng of
tra
iners
Facil
itatin
g TOT
sPa
mph
lets
Book
sRe
ports
Facil
itatin
g TOT
s to
cond
uct t
rainin
gs10
,000,0
00
11
11
110,0
00,00
0
Retre
ats
Mea
ls15
0,000
10
0 3
145
,000,0
00
Venu
e2,0
00,00
0 1
11
2,000
,000
Trans
port
Refu
nd4,0
00
2,000
1
18,0
00,00
0
Sub-
tota
l
55,0
00,0
00
Gu
idelin
es to
disse
mina
te re
sear
ch
findin
gs
-
Educ
ation
an
d atti
tude
ch
ange
Pr
ivate
secto
r, civ
il soc
iety
and
med
ia
Increa
sed
parti
cipati
on
of Pr
ivate
se
ctor, c
ivil
socie
ty an
d m
edia
in bio
divers
ity
prog
ramm
es
Num
ber o
f ag
encie
s tha
t are
train
edTra
ining
W
orks
hops
Facil
itate
Publi
catio
ns M
eals
40,00
0 14
05
128
,000,0
00
Traini
ng of
tra
iners
Wor
king p
aper
s Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0
Disse
mina
tion
works
hops
Pam
phlet
s, bo
oks,
repo
rts Pe
rdiem
14
0,000
14
05
198
,000,0
00
Bo
oks
Facil
iation
all
owan
ce
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Su
b-to
tal
15
0,00
0,00
0
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda60
Educ
ation
an
d atti
tude
ch
ange
Sc
hools
(all
levels
)
Increa
sed
Know
ledge
on
biodiv
ersity
iss
ues
Num
ber o
f en
viron
men
tal
educ
ation
pr
ogram
mes
Envir
onm
ental
ed
ucati
on
prog
ramm
esBr
ochu
res
Prod
uctio
n of
broc
hures
1,000
10,0
00
11
10,00
0,000
Impr
oved
att
itude
on
biodiv
ersity
Num
ber o
f prin
t an
d aud
io slo
ts(D
ebate
s, clea
n-up
, resto
ration
)Bo
oks
Prod
uctio
n of
simple
book
s abo
ut
biodiv
ersity
2,000
10,0
00
11
20,00
0,000
Multim
edia
appro
ach (
radio
talk s
hows
, TV
show
s, ne
wspa
pers,
do
cum
entar
ies)
Pam
phlet
sRa
dio &
TV ta
lk sh
ows a
bout
bio
divers
ity20
,000,0
00
5 1
110
0,000
,000
Pa
pers
Prod
uctio
n of
pape
rs ab
out
biodiv
ersity
500,0
00
10
11
5,000
,000
Deve
lop
worki
ng pa
pers
throu
ghTra
ining
of
traine
rs (TO
Ts)
Publi
catio
ns M
eals
100,0
00
147
51
73,50
0,000
Venu
e 1,8
00,00
0 2
11
3,600
,000
Pe
rdiem
14
0,000
14
75
110
2,900
,000
Fa
ciliat
ion
allow
ance
50
0,000
8
51
20,00
0,000
Su
b-to
tal
20
0,00
0,00
0
Mes
sage
t-sh
irts
25
,000
240
11
6,000
,000
Flyer
s
2,000
2,5
00
11
5,000
,000
Bann
ers
50
0,000
10
1
15,0
00,00
0Gu
idelin
es to
inte
grat
e env
ironm
ent
educ
ation
prog
ram
mes
into
curri
culum
Cons
ultan
cy
serv
ices
2,000
,000
5 1
110
,000,0
00
Mat
erial
s for
clea
n-up
and r
esto
ratio
nFa
cilita
tion
500,0
00
8 1
1
4,
000,0
00
Educ
ation
an
d atti
tude
ch
ange
In
digen
ous
peop
le an
d loc
al co
mm
uniti
es
Inte
grati
on
of ind
igeno
us
with
mod
ern
know
ledge
Num
ber o
f m
eetin
gsM
eetin
gs
(bara
zas)
Facil
itate
Tran
slate
d:Fa
cilita
tion
500,0
00
10
11
5,000
,000
Impr
oved
ut
ilisat
ion of
bio
diver
sity
Num
ber o
f co
mm
unity
en
gage
men
t pr
ogra
mm
es
Com
mun
ity
enga
gem
ent
prog
ram
mes
(cl
ean-
up an
d re
stora
tion)
Broc
hure
sFa
cilita
te th
e pr
oduc
tion
and p
rintin
g of
mat
erial
s1,0
00 1
0,000
1
110
,000,0
00
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 61
Impr
oved
at
titud
e
Num
ber o
f br
ande
d m
essa
ge
mat
erial
dis
tribu
ted
Mult
imed
ia ap
proa
ch (r
adio
talk
show
s, TV
show
s, ne
wspa
pers,
do
cum
enta
ries)
Bran
ded m
essa
ge m
ater
ials (
t-shir
ts,
caps
)Fa
cilita
te TV
&
Radio
talk
show
s
20,00
0,000
25
11
50
0,000
,000
Nu
mbe
r of
and
audio
slot
s
Flyer
sFa
cilita
te
prod
uctio
n of
flyer
s on
biodiv
ersit
y2,0
00
2,500
1
1
5,
000,0
00
Ba
nner
sFa
cilita
te
prod
uctio
n of
bann
ers a
bout
bio
diver
sity
500,0
00
10
11
5,00
0,000
STRA
TEGI
C OB
JECT
IVE 6
: To
harn
ess m
oder
n bi
otec
hnol
ogy f
or so
cio-e
cono
mic
deve
lopm
ent w
ith a
dequ
ate
safe
ty m
easu
res f
or h
uman
hea
lth a
nd th
e en
viro
nmen
t
Deve
lop an
d app
ly bio
tech
nolog
y for
so
cio-e
cono
mic
deve
lopm
ent
Crop p
ests
cont
rol us
ing
biotec
hnolo
gy
Redu
ced
incide
nces
of
pests
Num
ber o
f bio
logica
l pe
st co
ntro
ls te
chno
logies
Supp
ort
innov
ative
re
sear
chCo
nduc
t res
earch
on b
iolog
ical p
est
cont
rol t
echn
ologie
sRe
sear
ch
prep
arat
ions
5,000
,000
21
110
,000,0
00
Data
colle
ction
10,00
0,000
21
120
,000,0
00
Data
entry
&
Analy
sis10
,000,0
002
11
20,00
0,000
Repo
rting
&
shar
ing25
,000,0
002
11
50,00
0,000
Sub-
tota
l
100,
000,
000
Num
ber
of fa
rmer
s tra
ined
Estab
lishme
nt o
f de
mons
tratio
ns
farms
Traini
ng
farme
rs in
biolog
ical
pest
cont
rol
techn
ologie
s
Traini
ng fa
rmer
s in b
iolog
ical p
est
cont
rol t
echn
ologie
s
Mea
ls 40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
14
0,000
14
05
198
,000,0
00
Facil
iation
all
owan
ce
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l
150,
000,
000
Num
ber o
f far
mer
s mak
-ing
and u
sing
biolog
ical p
est
cont
rol
Deve
lop pe
st re
sista
nt cr
ops
Awar
enes
s cre
ation
on bi
ologic
al pe
st co
ntro
l tec
hnolo
gies
Facil
itate
aw
aren
ess
cam
paign
s20
,000,0
005
11
100,0
00,00
0
Num
ber
of fa
rmer
s m
aking
and
using
orga
nic
pesti
cides
Prom
ote u
se
of or
ganic
pe
sticid
es
Traing
farm
ers o
n use
of or
ganic
pe
sticid
es
Mea
ls 40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
14
0,000
14
05
198
,000,0
00
Facil
iation
all
owan
ce
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Su
b-to
tal
15
0,00
0,00
0
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda62
Redu
ce
stora
ge
grain
/seed
los
ses u
sing
biote
chno
l-og
ies
Redu
ced
grain
/seed
los
s at
sto
rage
Num
ber o
f far
mer
s usin
g bio
logica
l pe
st co
ntro
l te
chno
logies
du
ring s
tora
ge
Supp
ort i
nno-
vativ
e res
earch
Cond
uct r
esea
rch on
biolo
gical
pest
cont
rol t
echn
ologie
s for
stor
age.
Rese
arch
pr
epar
ation
s5,0
00,00
02
11
10,00
0,000
Data
colle
ction
10,00
0,000
21
120
,000,0
00
Data
entry
&
Analy
sis10
,000,0
002
11
20,00
0,000
Repo
rting
&
shar
ing25
,000,0
002
11
50,00
0,000
Su
b-to
tal
10
0,00
0,00
0
Train
farm
ers
on bi
ologic
al pe
st co
ntro
l te
chno
logies
du
ring s
tora
ge
Traini
ng fa
rmer
s
Mea
ls 40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
14
0,000
14
05
198
,000,0
00
Facil
iation
all
owan
ce
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l
150,
000,
000
Prom
ote u
se
of or
ganic
pe
sticid
esAw
aren
ess c
reat
ion on
biolo
gical
pest
cont
rol t
echn
ologie
s at s
tora
geFa
cilita
te
awar
enes
s ca
mpa
igns
20,00
0,000
51
110
0,000
,000
Redu
ced
crop d
iseas
es
using
bio-
tech
nolog
y
Redu
ced
disea
se
incide
nce
Num
ber o
f bio
logica
l dis
ease
co
ntro
ls te
chno
logies
Supp
ort
innov
ative
re
sear
ch fo
r bio
logica
l dis
ease
cont
rol
tech
nolog
ies
Cond
uct r
esea
rch on
biolo
gical
disea
se
cont
rol t
echn
ologie
s
Rese
arch
pr
epar
ation
s5,0
00,00
02
11
10,00
0,000
Data
colle
ction
10,00
0,000
21
120
,000,0
00
Data
entry
&
Analy
sis10
,000,0
002
11
20,00
0,000
Repo
rting
&
shar
ing25
,000,0
002
11
50,00
0,000
Sub-
tota
l
100,
000,
000
Num
ber
of di
seas
e re
sista
nt
varie
ties
deve
loped
and
relea
sed
Es
tabli
shm
ent o
f dem
onstr
ation
s far
ms
Facil
itate
es
tabli
shm
ent o
f de
mon
strat
ions
farm
s20
,000,0
0010
11
20
0,000
,000
Num
ber o
f far
mer
s usin
g bio
logica
l dis
ease
cont
rol
tech
nolog
ies
Deve
lop an
d re
lease
dise
ase
resis
tant
crop
va
rietie
sAw
aren
ess c
reat
ion on
biolo
gical
disea
se
cont
rol t
echn
ologie
sFa
cilita
te
awar
enes
s ca
mpa
igns
20,00
0,000
51
1
100,0
00,00
0
Num
ber
of fa
rmer
s m
aking
and
using
orga
nic
herb
icide
s
Prom
ote u
se
of or
ganic
he
rbici
des
Traini
ng on
use o
f org
anic
herb
icide
s
Mea
ls 40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
14
0,000
14
05
198
,000,0
00
Facil
iation
all
owan
ce
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Su
b-to
tal
15
0,00
0,00
0
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 63
W
aste
man
-ag
emen
tRe
duce
d po
llutio
n
Num
ber
of w
aste
tre
atm
ent
tech
nolog
ies
deve
loped
Prom
oting
bio
logica
l tre
atm
ent o
f wa
ste
Cond
uct r
esea
rch on
was
te tr
eatm
ent
tech
nolog
ies
Rese
arch
pr
epar
ation
s5,0
00,00
02
11
10,00
0,000
Data
colle
ction
10,00
0,000
21
120
,000,0
00
Data
entry
&
Analy
sis10
,000,0
002
11
20,00
0,000
Repo
rting
&
shar
ing25
,000,0
002
11
50,00
0,000
Su
b-to
tal
10
0,00
0,00
0
Popu
larise
wa
ste
treat
men
t am
ong t
he
peop
le
Traini
ngs
Mea
ls 40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
14
0,000
14
05
198
,000,0
00
Facil
iation
all
owan
ce
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l
150,
000,
000
Cond
uct d
emon
strat
ions
Facil
itate
es
tabli
shm
ent o
f de
mon
strat
ions
for w
aste
m
anag
emen
t
10,00
0,000
201
1
200,0
00,00
0
M
anag
emen
t an
d con
trol
of In
vasiv
e sp
ecies
Cont
rol a
nd
elim
inatio
n of
inva
sive
spec
ies
Num
ber o
f bio
logica
l co
ntro
l te
chno
logies
fo
r inva
sive
spec
ies
deve
loped
Supp
ort
deve
lopm
ent
of bi
ologic
al co
ntro
l te
chno
logies
fo
r inva
sive
spec
ies
Cond
uct r
esea
rch on
biolo
gical
cont
rol
agen
ts
Rese
arch
pr
epar
ation
s5,0
00,00
02
11
10,00
0,000
Data
colle
ction
10,00
0,000
21
120
,000,0
00
Data
entry
&
Analy
sis10
,000,0
002
11
20,00
0,000
Repo
rting
&
shar
ing25
,000,0
002
11
50,00
0,000
Sub-
tota
l
100,
000,
000
Num
ber o
f bio-
logica
l con
trol
tech
nolog
ies
for in
vasiv
e sp
ecies
ad
opte
d
Prom
ote t
he
use o
f biol
og-
ical c
ontro
l te
chno
logies
fo
r inva
sive
spec
ies
Traini
ngs
Mea
ls 40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
14
0,000
14
05
198
,000,0
00
Facil
iation
all
owan
ce
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l
150,
000,
000
Awar
enes
s cre
ation
on bi
ologic
al co
ntro
l ag
ents
Facil
itate
aw
aren
ess
cam
paign
s10
,000,0
0010
11
10
0,000
,000
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment forBiodiversity Conservation in Uganda64
STRA
TEGI
C OBJ
ECTI
VE 7:
To p
rom
ote i
nnov
ative
and
sust
aina
ble f
undi
ng m
echa
nism
s to s
uppo
rt N
BSAP
impl
emen
tatio
n
Mob
ilize fi
nanc
ial
reso
urce
s for
bio
diver
sity
Iden
tify
pote
ntial
fu
nder
s and
fu
nding
pr
ioriti
es
Incre
ased
fu
nding
base
Data
base
of
pote
ntial
fu
nder
s and
th
eir pr
ioriti
es
Facil
itate
de
velop
men
t an
d ope
ra-
tiona
lizat
ion
of da
taba
se
for p
oten
tial
fund
ers
Cond
uct R
esea
rch on
the f
unde
rs &
upda
ting o
f the
list
Stak
ehold
er
ident
ifica
tion
500,0
00
1 10
1
5,
000,0
00
Iden
tify t
he fu
nder
s prio
rities
Map
ping a
nd
analy
sis
500,0
00
1 60
1
30,0
00,00
0
Desig
n the
data
base
Facil
iation
all
owan
ce50
0,000
1
201
1
0,000
,000
Popu
late t
he da
taba
se
-
Traini
ng on
how
to us
e the
data
base
Mea
ls40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
140,0
00
140
51
98,00
0,000
Fa
ciliat
ion
allow
ance
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l
150,
000,
000
Deve
lop gu
idelin
es on
how
to us
e the
da
taba
seCo
nsult
ation
se
rvice
s50
0,000
1
201
1
0,000
,000
Build
ne
twor
ks an
d pa
rtner
ships
fo
r fun
ding
Incre
ased
pu
blic p
rivat
e pa
rtner
ships
Num
ber o
f Pa
rtner
ships
de
velop
ed
Stren
gthe
n Pu
blic p
rivate
pa
rtners
hips
Cond
uct a
ware
ness
cam
paign
sFa
ciliat
ion
allow
ance
500,0
00
1 20
1
10,0
00,00
0
Stre
ngth
en
Inte
rnat
ional
relat
ions
-
Proje
ct pr
opos
al de
velop
men
t
Incre
ased
nu
mbe
r of
fund
ing
prop
osals
su
bmitt
ed
Num
ber
of fu
nding
pr
opos
als
deve
loped
and
subm
itted
Facil
itate
de
velop
men
t of
proje
ct pr
opos
als
Proje
ct pr
opos
al wr
iting
Prop
osal
writi
ng
work
shop
8,000
,000
1 1
1
8,
000,0
00
Num
ber o
f pr
opos
als
appr
oved
Capa
city
build
ing
on pr
oject
prop
osal
writi
ng
Traini
ng on
proje
ct pr
opos
al wr
iting
Mea
ls 40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
14
0,000
14
05
198
,000,0
00
Facil
iation
all
owan
ce
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Sub-
tota
l
150,
000,
000
Num
ber
of gr
ants
appr
oved
Su
bmiss
ion of
the p
rojec
t pro
posa
l
-
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
Finance Needs Assessment for Biodiversity Conservation in Uganda 65
Deve
loping
a bio
divers
ity
cons
erva
tion
prog
ram
Biod
iversi
ty
cons
erva
tion
prog
ram
deve
loped
Num
ber o
f bio
divers
ity
cons
erva
tion
prog
rams
deve
loped
Supp
ort a
nd
deve
lop a
biodiv
ersity
co
nser
vatio
n pr
ogram
Facil
itate
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
biod
iversi
ty
cons
erva
tion
prog
ram
-
Capa
city
build
ing on
bio
divers
ity
cons
erva
tion
prog
ram
Cond
uct R
eview
of th
e biod
iversi
ty
cons
erva
tion p
rogr
am
-
Supp
ort a
pplic
ation
of th
e biod
iversi
ty
cons
erva
tion
prog
ram
-
Traini
ng on
biod
iversi
ty co
nser
vatio
n pr
ogram
Mea
ls 40
,000
140
51
28,00
0,000
Ve
nue
2,000
,000
21
14,0
00,00
0 Pe
rdiem
14
0,000
14
05
198
,000,0
00
Facil
iation
all
owan
ce
500,0
00
85
120
,000,0
00
Su
b-to
tal
15
0,00
0,00
0
Spec
ific o
bjec
tive
Focu
sOu
tcom
e Ou
tput
s Ac
tions
Ac
tiviti
es
ITEM
UNI
T COS
T UN
ITS
DAYS
FRE
Q TO
TAL(
UGX)
National Environment Management AuthorityPlot, 17/19/21 Jinja Road, Kampala, UgandaP.O Box 22255 www.nemaug.org
United Nations Development ProgrammePlot 11 Yusuf Lule, Kampala, UgandaP. O Box 7184www.undp.org