FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING & INTERNAL AUDITS How financial accounting and internal audits can benefit government agencies. Lydia Lafleur, CIA LSU Center for

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING & INTERNAL AUDITS How financial accounting and internal audits can benefit government agencies. Lydia Lafleur, CIA LSU Center for Internal Auditing 1
  • Slide 2
  • Agenda Accounting and Auditing Standards Internal Auditing Internal Controls Governance Fraud Management Responsibilities 2
  • Slide 3
  • Financial Accounting Business Activities Decision Makers Identifies Records Communicates External Users Investors, Creditor, Suppliers, etc. Internal Users Managers, Supervisors, Directors, etc. FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board 3
  • Slide 4
  • Stakeholders Citizens and taxpayers Legislative and oversight bodies Creditors and investors Stakeholders Citizens and taxpayers Legislative and oversight bodies Creditors and investors Governmental Accounting GASB: Governmental Accounting Standards Board GASB Concept Statement No. 1, Objectives of Financial Reporting: financial reporting should provide information to assist users in assessing the service efforts, costs, and accomplishments of the governmental entity. Accountability Fiscal Operational Accountability Fiscal Operational Characteristics of Financial Reports Understandability Reliability Relevance Timeliness Consistency Comparability Characteristics of Financial Reports Understandability Reliability Relevance Timeliness Consistency Comparability 4
  • Slide 5
  • Auditing Standards Institute of Internal Auditors Professional Practices Framework Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS) (The Yellow Book) Other Guidance Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (The Green Book) Internal Control Management and Evaluation Tool Structured approach to assessing the internal control structure 5
  • Slide 6
  • Accountability Management and officials are responsible for: Carrying out public functions Providing service to the public effectively, efficiently, economically, ethically, and equitably Providing reliable, useful, and timely information Users need to know whether: 1. Management and officials manage government resources and use their authority properly and in compliance with laws 2. Programs are achieving the objectives and desired outcomes 3. Services are provided efficiently, economically, ethically and equitably Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards Introduction 6
  • Slide 7
  • Internal Auditing Definition Internal auditing is an independent and objective assurance and consulting activity that is guided by a philosophy of adding value to improve the operations of the organization. It assists an organization in accomplishing its objectives by bringing a systematic and disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of the organizations risk management, control, and governance processes. Institute of Internal Auditors 7
  • Slide 8
  • Internal Auditing Organization Corporate Governance RisksControls Plan Triple Bottom Line - Environmental - Social - Economic Add-Value ConsultingAssurance Audit Planning Types of Audits: 1.Financial Audits 2.Attestation Engagements 3.Performance Audits 8
  • Slide 9
  • Internal Controls Plan Organize G & OR x C = rG & O Adequate Controls Reasonable Assurance R LI x C L x C I = r LI G = Goals O = Objectives R = Risk L = Likelihood I = Impact C = Controls r = Residual Risk 9
  • Slide 10
  • Internal Controls Goals & Objectives Specific Measurable Attainable Relevant Timely Goals & Objectives "Purpose" Controls Control Environment "Commitment" Management Plan Tactical Strategic Organize Staff Direct Monitor "Capability" Control Activities Segregation Access Accountability Authority Reconcile Completeness Authority Transactions Manage Accountability Safeguard Selection Alternatives Design In Place Functioning Compliance "Monitoring & Learning" Continuous Improvement Model COCO Purpose Commitment Capability Monitor & Learn Preventive Detective Directive Hard Soft 10
  • Slide 11
  • Financial Compliance Operations Systems Risk Analysis Control Environment Monitoring Control Activities Methodology used for assessing the quality of internal controls. Hard Controls: Segregation of Duties (AAA) Safeguarding of assets Transactions recorded Accountability Periodic Reconciliation Common factors used in identifying and assessing materiality of risks. Soft Controls: Corporate Culture Tone at the Top Information & Communication Management Controls: Planning To achieve goals Tactical Strategic Organizing Delegation Staffing Right People Directing Policies and Procedures Monitoring Communication and information Analytics and Analysis Change management COSO Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission 11
  • Slide 12
  • Unit B Challenge: Evolving from Control Activities to the Control Environment COSO Control (Addressing Governance) Aggregate Entity Process Unit Systemic cultural problem Mark Emmert, NCAA President Management should periodically check the batteries in their moral compass. GES Activity 2 Monitoring Information & Communication Control Activities Control Environment Unit A Activity 1 Compliance Financial Reporting Operations Risk Assessment Tone at the Top Tone at the Middle 12
  • Slide 13
  • Update Formalizes Fundamental Concepts Embedded in the Original Framework as Principles Control Environment 1.Demonstrates commitment to integrity and ethical values 2.Exercises oversight responsibility 3.Establishes structure, authority and responsibility 4.Demonstrates commitment to competence 5.Enforces accountability Risk Assessment 6.Specifies suitable objectives 7.Identifies and analyzes risk 8.Assesses fraud risk 9.Identifies and analyzes significant changes Control Activities 10.Selects and develops control activities 11.Selects and develops general controls over technology 12.Deploys through policies and procedures Information & Communication 13.Uses relevant information 14.Communicates internally 15.Communicates externally Monitoring Activities 16.Conducts ongoing and / or separate evaluations 17.Evaluates and communicates deficiencies Source: COSO, Internal Control Integrated Framework, September 2012 13
  • Slide 14
  • Quality Drift (Cascading Process) Control Environment Management Controls P-O-S-D-M Control Activities Objective Subjective 14
  • Slide 15
  • Controls Subjectivity Complexity Control Environment Management Controls Control Activities Parkinsons Law: Complexity leads to decay Challenges: Hard to Soft Objective to Subjective Simple to Complex Evolution to Revolution 15
  • Slide 16
  • Criteria of Control: CoCo Purpose Commitment Capability Monitoring Action 16
  • Slide 17
  • Internal Auditing: Adding Value Integration GRC External Entity Process Unit Control Environment Management Controls Control Activities Evolution of the Profession Controls Risk Board Audit Committee Charter Internal Audit Charter Governance (Mature)(Embryo)(Radar) Opportunities Threats Evaluation Check the box Reality Quality Question: Can you be in 100% compliance and go out of business? (Evaluation Audit). Does compliance equal quality? Objective Subjective Objective Subjective 17
  • Slide 18
  • Issues: Accountability Governance, Risks, and Controls King III Transparency Sustainability Board Selection Process Audit Committee CAE Risk Committee CRO Global Strategic (CRMA) Compensation Committee Stock options Bonus plans Counter- productive Salaries Up, up, up, and away The Bear Charley Mac Shareholder Input Governance Personal Opinion: The CEO and CFO should not be involved in selecting members of the Board, Audit Committee, Risk Committee, or Compensation Committee AAA COB CEO Obj. Sub. SOD The Big Risk 18
  • Slide 19
  • Organizational Governance (Roles and Responsibilities) Employees Specific Job Descriptions Control Environment Control Activities Delineation of Goals & Objectives (Integration & Linkage) Governance BOARD & SUB-COMMITTEES Plan Organize Staff Direct Monitor (P-O-S-D-M) Executive Management P-O-S-D-M Process Owner P-O-S-D-M Organizations Should Be Organized Process Owner P-O-S-D-M Process Owner P-O-S-D-M 19
  • Slide 20
  • ERM Conceptual Framework Division Business Unit Subsidiary Entity Objective Setting Event Identification Risk Assessment Risk Response Control Activities Info. & Communication Internal Environment Monitoring Strategic Operations Reporting Compliance Control Components Objectives Focus: Internal Environment Strategies Integration COSO Risk 20
  • Slide 21
  • Governance Governance Infrastructure (Integration & Linkage) Audit Committee of Board of Directors (Oversight) CEO (Responsibility) Chief Risk Officer (CRO) (Execution) Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Auditor in Charge (AIC) Micro (Engagement Planning-Risk Driven) Chief Audit Executive (CAE) Audit Plan (Risk Driven) Macro (Resource Allocation) Oversight ERM Oversight Comprehensive Report Audit Priority Feedback Input Governance Reporting 21
  • Slide 22
  • Law Specific Controls (The way it should be.) Performance Drift Criteria Agent of Change Negotiation RecommendationCriteria Plan Tactical Strategic CSA Reengineering Evolution Revolution Best Practices Benchmarking Plan Implementation Monitor Analysis Inappropriately Included Inappropriately Excluded Internal External Revenue Cost Effectiveness Efficiency Goals Effect (What difference does it make?) Condition (The way it is.) Cause (How we got to where we are?) Management Plan Organize Staff Direct Monitor Recommendation Persuasion Follow-up Issue Addressed Recommendation Implemented Management Solution Risk Accepted Meeting The Reporting Model (Risks and Controls) Risk Opportunities Proactive Preview Partially Controllable Consulting Risk Threats Reactive Review Assurance Controllable Objective Subjective Policy General 22
  • Slide 23
  • The Fraud Risk Triangle Opportunity Incentive/Pressure The Fraud Risk Triangle (FRT) consists of three key elements which are generally correlated with fraud. The FRT was developed by a criminologist, Donald R. Cressey, in 1973. Attitude/Rationalization How do you address the Fraud Triangle? 23
  • Slide 24
  • Opportunity O O O Attitude Rationalization R R R The Fraud Risk Triangle Incentive Pressure P P P Over-ride OR The Fraud Diamond Opportunity PressureRationalization Ability Kennesaw State 24
  • Slide 25
  • Management Responsibility Pre-Control Post-Control R L F I F * C L F * C l F = r L F I F PreventDetectResidual risk Risk tolerance Risk appetite Affordable risk (Analytics) Control Override Control Failure Override Control R L F I F r L F I F Management Functions Plan Tactical, Strategic Organize Delegation, Accountability Staff Competencies, Training Direct Policies, Procedure Monitor Supervision, Oversight, Change management 25
  • Slide 26
  • Management Responsibility Setting policies and strategic direction Directing employees in performance of routine activities Custody of entitys assets Reporting to those in charge of governance Implementation of audit recommendations Design, implement, and maintain internal controls Develop performance measurement system 26
  • Slide 27
  • Questions? 27