Upload
hoangkhuong
View
232
Download
6
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis1
Financial Analysis and Financial Ratio Analysis
I. Balance Sheet: assets and debts of the business. Liabilities (debts) are assets owned by creditors; net worth or equity are assets owned by the farm business.
Farm Assets (Ave.): Equals beginning total farm assets plus ending total farm assets divided by
two. Represents total capital in the farm business. (Figure 1)
1995-2004 AverageAverage Farm Assets
$8,807$8,152
$7,477
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 1: Average Farm Assets ($/cow).
Farm Liabilities (Ave.): Equals beginning total farm liabilities plus ending total farm liabilities
divided by two. Represents total capital in the farm business owned by creditors. (Figure 2)
1995-2004 AverageAverage Farm Liabilities
$3,681
$2,763
$2,308
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
Low 25% Ave. High 25%Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 2: Average Farm Liabilities ($/cow).
Net Worth Change: Equals total gain for the current year in assets owned by the farm
business. (Figure 3)
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 1
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
1995-2004 AverageNet Worth Change
$22
$462$712
($400)
$0
$400
$800
$1,200
$1,600
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 3: Net Worth Change ($/cow).
II. Liquidity: measures the ability of the farm business to meet its financial obligations as they come due.
Current Ratio: indicates the ability of the farm business to meet its current debt obligations (including current portion of intermediate and long term debts). (Figure 4)
sLiabilitieCurrentTotalFarmAssetsCurrentTotalFarmRatioCurrent =
1995-2004 AverageCurrent Ratio
1.1
1.9
2.8
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
Cur
rent
Rat
io
Figure 4: Current Ratio.
Working Capital: indicates the ability of the farm business to meet its current debt obligations (including current portion of intermediate and long term debts). (Figure 5)
LiabilitesCurrentTotalFarmAssetsCurrentTotalFarmCapitalWorking −=
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 2
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
1995-2004 AverageWorking Capital (Ending)
$88
$512
$780
($400)
$0
$400
$800
$1,200
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 5: Working Capital ($/cow, ending).
III. Profitability: is the difference between the value of goods produced and the cost of the resources used to produce them.
Net Cash Farm Income: includes all cash farm income less cash farm expenses. (Figures 6 and
7)
1995-2004 AverageNet Cash Farm Income (per cow)
$362
$655
$827
$0
$400
$800
$1,200
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 6: Net Cash Farm Income ($/cow).
1995-2004 AverageNet Cash Farm Income (per cwt)
$1.95
$3.21$3.75
$0.00
$2.00
$4.00
$6.00
Low 25% Ave. High 25%Dairy
$/cw
t
Figure 7: Net Cash Farm Income ($/cwt).
Net Farm Income: represents returns to the farm operator’s unpaid labor, management, and
owner equity. It is the reward for investing in unpaid family labor, management, and farm net
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 3
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
worth instead of investing elsewhere. Net Farm Income (NFI) is the amount the farm produced toward net worth growth during the year. To increase net worth through earnings, NFI plus nonfarm income must exceed family living expenses and income taxes. (Figures 8 and 9)
1995-2004 AverageNet Farm Income (per cow)
$104
$640
$937
($400)
$0
$400
$800
$1,200
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 8: Net Farm Income ($/cow).
1995-2004 AverageNet Farm Income (per cwt)
$0.56
$3.14
$4.25
($2.00)
$0.00
$2.00
$4.00
$6.00
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/cw
t
Figure 9: Net Farm Income ($/cwt). Return on Assets: is, in effect, the interest rate your farm earned in the past year on all money
invested in the business. (Figure 10)
InvestmentFarmAverageAssetsFarmonReturn
assetsonReturn =
Where:
.Mgmt&LaborsOperator'ofValueInterestFarmNFIAssetsFarmonReturn −+=
WorthNetFarmonInterestNFIMgmtLaborsOperatorofValue −=.&'
%6=WorthNetFarmonInterestofvalueDefault And:
( )2
AssetsFarmTotalEndingAssetsFarmTotalBeginningInvestmentFarmAverage +=
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 4
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
When assets are valued at market value, ROA represents the “opportunity cost” of investing money in the farm instead of alternative investments. When assets are valued at cost, ROA represents the actual return on the average dollar invested in the business. Goal should be to attain a ROA that is higher than your average interest rate on borrowed money. If ROA achieves this you are putting your borrowed capital to good use. However, you still must compare ROA to alternative investments with approximately the same level of risk.
1995-2004 AverageReturn on Assets (market)
0.9%6.8%
11.8%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
Perc
ent R
OA
Figure 10: Return on Assets (market).
Return on Equity: is, in effect, the interest rate you as the owner earned from the business (equity) in the past year. (Figure 11)
( )WorthNetFarmAverage
EquityFarmonReturnROEEquityonReturn =
Where:
.tMgm&LaborsOperator'ofValueNFIEquityFarmonReturn −=
WorthNetFarmonInterestNFIMgmtLaborsOperatorofValue −=.&'
%6=WorthNetFarmonInterestofvalueDefault
Where:
06.02
×⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ +
=WorthNetFarmEndingWorthNetFarmBeginningWorthNetFarmonInterest
And:
2WorthNetFarmEndingWorthNetFarmBeginningWorthNetFarmAverage +
=
When assets are valued at market value, ROE can be compared to returns available if the owned assets were liquidated and invested in alternative investments. When assets are valued at cost, ROE represents the actual return to equity capital in the business. Goal should be to attain a ROE that is higher than your average interest rate on borrowed money and higher
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 5
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
than ROA. Such an ROE is indicative of the “positive” use of financial leverage. If ROE is lower than your average interest rate, there is negative financial leverage.
1995-2004 AverageReturn on Equity (market)
-3.2%
7.0%
14.1%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
Perc
ent R
OE
Figure 11: Return on Equity (market).
Operating Profit Margin: is a measure of operating efficiency of your farm business. It indicates the average percentage operating profit margin per dollar of farm production. (Figure 12)
ProductionFarmofValueAssetsFarmonReturn
MarginProfitOperating =
Where:
),,,,(
livestockbreedingandincomeotherreceivableaccountslivestockmarketfeedandcropschangesinventoryfeedpurchased
purchaseslivestockfeederincomecashgrossoductionPrarmFofValue+
−−=
Operating profit margin measures how effectively you are controlling operating expenses relative to the value of output. Low prices, high operating expenses, or production problems are all possible causes of low operating profit margin.
1995-2004 AverageOperating Profit Margin Ratio
2.8%
19.5%
29.3%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
OPM
Rat
io
Figure 12: Operating Profit Margin Ratio.
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 6
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
IV. Repayment Capacity:
Term Debt Coverage Ratio: measures whether your operation generated enough cash over the past year to cover principal and interest payments on term (intermediate and long term) debt. If enough cash was generated to cover payments on term debts, the term debt coverage ratio will be greater than 100 percent. A ratio of less than 100 percent is a sign of liquidity (cash flow) problems. (Figure 13)
)).,.((
erestintprincipaleiPaymentsDebtTermTotalTaxesIncomeExpenseLivingFamilyExpenseInterestIncomeFarmCashNetRatioCoverageDebtTerm
+÷−−+=
1995-2004 AverageTerm Debt Coverage Ratio
64%
143%
231%
0%
100%
200%
300%
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
TDC
Rat
io
Figure 13: Term Debt Coverage Ratio. Capital Replacement Margin: is the amount of money remaining after all operating expenses,
taxes, family living expenses, and scheduled debt payments have been made. It is the cash generated by the farm business that is available for financing capital replacement (e.g., machinery and equipment). (Figure 14)
1995-2004 AverageCapital Replacement Margin (cash)
($161)
($400)
($200)
$153
$370
$0
$200
$400
$600
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 14: Capital Replacement Margin (cash, $/cow).
V. Solvency: is the ability of the farm business to pay all of its debts if it were liquidated. Solvency is a key measure for evaluating the farm business’s ability to bear financial risk and indicates the future borrowing capacity of the farm business.
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 7
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
Debt:Asset Ratio: measures the proportion of the farm’s total assets that are owned by creditors. (Figure 15)
AssetsFarmTotalAveragesLiabilitieFarmTotalAverageRatioAssetDebt =:
1995-2004 AverageDebt:Asset Ratio (Ending)
42%33% 30%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
Deb
ts:A
sset
s
Figure 15: Debt:Asset Ratio (ending).
Equity:Asset: measures the proportion of the farm’s total assets that are owned by the farm business. (Figure 16)
AssetsFarmTotalAverageWorthNetTotalAverageRatioAssetEquity =:
1995-2004 AverageEquity:Asset Ratio (Ending)
58%67% 70%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
Equi
ty:A
sset
s
Figure 16: Equity:Asset Ratio (ending).
Debt:Equity Ratio: measures the farm debt relative to farm equity. Measures the amount of borrowed capital being employed for every dollar of equity. (Figure 17)
WorthNetFarmTotalAveragesLiabilitieFarmTotalAverageRatioEquityDebt =:
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 8
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
1995-2004 AverageDebt:Equity Ratio (Ending)
73%
52%45%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Low 25% Ave. High 25%Dairy
Deb
ts:E
quity
Figure 17: Debt:Equity Ratio (ending).
VI. Efficiency:
Asset Turnover Ratio: is a measure of efficiency in using capital. It measures the amount of gross revenue produced per dollar of investment. (Figure 18)
InvestmentFarmAverageductionProFarmofValueRatioTurnoverAsset =
Where:
),,,,(
livestockbreedingandincomeotherreceivableaccountslivestockmarketfeedandcropschangesinventoryfeedpurchased
purchaseslivestockfeederincomecashgrossoductionPrarmFofValue+
−−=
If your farm business has a high level of production given your capital investment Asset Turnover Ratio will be high. If Asset Turnover Ratio is low your capital investment, or assets, are not “fully employed”, your assets are not working as hard as they should be in generating gross revenue. You should look to increase production efficiency and/or sell low returning assets.
1995-2004 AverageAsset Turnover Ratio
26.4%34.3%
40.2%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
Ass
et T
urno
ver R
atio
Figure 18: Asset Turnover Ratio (market).
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 9
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
Operating Expense Ratio: Reflects the percentage of gross accrual income to pay operating expenses. (Figure 19)
( )IncomeFarmGross
ExpenseInterestFarmExpenseOperatingFarmTotalRatioExpenseOperating −=
1995-2004 AverageOperating Expense Ratio
84.2%75.4% 71.0%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e R
atio
Figure 19: Operating Expense Ratio.
Depreciation Expense Ratio: Reflects the percentage of gross accrual income to cover
depreciation and other capital adjustments. (Figure 20)
IncomeFarmGrossonDepreciatiRatioExpenseonDepreciati =
1995-2004 AverageDepreciation Expense Ratio
12.3%
7.9%6.2%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
Dep
reci
atio
n Ex
pens
e R
atio
Figure 20: Depreciation Expense Ratio. Interest Expense Ratio: Reflects the percentage of gross accrual income to pay interest
expenses. (Figure 21)
IncomeFarmGrossExpenseInterestFarmRatioExpenseInterest =
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 10
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
1995-2004 AverageInterest Expense Ratio
7.7%
5.0%3.9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
Low 25% Ave. High 25%Dairy
Inte
rest
Exp
ense
Rat
io
Figure 21: Interest Expense Ratio.
Net Farm Income Ratio: Reflects the percentage of gross accrual income remaining after all expenses. (Figure 22)
IncomeFarmGrossIncomeFarmNetRatioIncomeFarmNet =
1995-2004 AverageNet Farm Income Ratio
-4.1%
11.7%
18.9%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
NFI
Rat
io
Figure 22: Net Farm Income Ratio.
VI. Profile Data: information concerning the size, production capacity, and other key data from surveyed dairy farms (Figures 23-27).
1995-2004 AverageNumber of Cows
156.5 188.9284.3
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
No.
Cow
s
Figure 23: Size (milk cows per farm).
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 11
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
1995-2004 AverageMilk Sold Per Cow
18,57220,407
22,060
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
Lbs.
Milk
Figure 24: Milk Sold Per Cow (lbs/cow/year).
1995-2004 AverageAverage Milk Price
$14.15 $14.21 $14.24
$10.00
$12.00
$14.00
$16.00
$18.00
$20.00
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/cw
t
Figure 25: Average Milk Price ($/cwt).
1995-2004 AverageTotal Crop Acres
569 654891
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
Acr
es
Figure 26: Total Crop Acres.
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 12
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
1995-2004 AverageMilk Income
82.1% 83.6% 85.1%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
Perc
ent o
f Cas
h Fa
rm
Inco
me
Figure 27: Milk Income (percentage of cash farm income from milk sales).
VII. Expense Analysis: information concerning key expense items for surveyed dairy farms (Figures 28-51).
Purchased Feed:
1995-2004 AveragePurchased Feed Expense
$791 $801$865
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
Low 25% Ave. High 25%Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 28: Purchased Feed Expense ($/cow).
1995-2004 AveragePurchased Feed Expense
$4.26
$3.92 $3.92
$3.00
$3.50
$4.00
$4.50
$5.00
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/cw
t
Figure 29: Purchased Feed Expense ($/cwt).
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 13
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
Hired Labor:
1995-2004 AverageHired Labor Expense
$443$494 $526
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
Low 25% Ave. High 25%Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 30: Hired Labor Expense ($/cow).
1995-2004 AverageHired Labor Expense
$2.38 $2.42 $2.38
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
$3.50
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/cw
t
Figure 31: Hired Labor Expense ($/cwt).
Repairs:
1995-2004 AverageRepair Expense
$193 $195$185
$120
$140
$160
$180
$200
$220
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 32: Repair Expense ($/cow).
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 14
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
1995-2004 AverageRepair Expense
$1.04$0.96
$0.84
$0.50
$0.75
$1.00
$1.25
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/cw
t
Figure 33: Repair Expense ($/cwt).
Interest:
1995-2004 AverageInterest Expense
$248
$177$151
$80
$120
$160
$200
$240
$280
$320
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 34: Interest Expense ($/cow).
1995-2004 AverageInterest Expense
$1.33
$0.87$0.69
$0.40
$0.80
$1.20
$1.60
$2.00
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/cw
t
Figure 35: Interest Expense ($/cwt).
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 15
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
Livestock Marketing:
1995-2004 AverageLivestock Marketing Expense
$118$128 $131
$80
$120
$160
$200
$240
Low 25% Ave. High 25%Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 36: Livestock Marketing Expense ($/cow).
1995-2004 AverageLivestock Marketing Expense
$0.64 $0.63$0.59
$0.40
$0.50
$0.60
$0.70
$0.80
$0.90
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/cw
t
Figure 37: Livestock Marketing Expense ($/cwt).
Livestock Supplies:
1995-2004 AverageLivestock Supplies Expense
$134 $140 $145
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 38: Livestock Supplies Expense ($/cow).
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 16
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
1995-2004 AverageLivestock Supplies Expense
$0.72$0.68 $0.66
$0.20
$0.40
$0.60
$0.80
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/cw
t
Figure 39: Livestock Supplies Expense ($/cwt).
Veterinary:
1995-2004 AverageVeterinary Expense
$108 $109 $115
$80
$120
$160
$200
$240
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 40: Veterinary Expense ($/cow).
1995-2004 AverageVeterinary Expense
$0.58$0.53 $0.52
$0.20
$0.40
$0.60
$0.80
Low 25% Ave. High 25%Dairy
$/cw
t
Figure 41: Veterinary Expense ($/cwt).
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 17
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
Utilities:
1995-2004 AverageUtilities Expense
$77 $73$69
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 42: Utilities Expense ($/cow).
1995-2004 AverageUtilities Expense
$0.41
$0.36
$0.31
$0.20
$0.30
$0.40
$0.50
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/cw
t
Figure 43: Utilities Expense ($/cwt).
Fuel & Oil:
1995-2004 AverageFuel & Oil Expense$79 $76
$68
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 44: Fuel & Oil Expense ($/cow).
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 18
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
1995-2004 AverageFuel & Oil Expense
$0.42$0.37
$0.31
$0.00
$0.25
$0.50
Low 25% Ave. High 25%Dairy
$/cw
t
Figure 45: Fuel & Oil Expense ($/cwt).
Breeding:
1995-2004 AverageBreeding Expense
$20
$26$31
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 46: Breeding Expense ($/cow).
1995-2004 AverageBreeding Expense
$0.11$0.13 $0.14
$0.00
$0.05
$0.10
$0.15
$0.20
$0.25
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/cw
t
Figure 47: Breeding Expense ($/cwt).
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 19
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
Total Cash Farm Expense:
1995-2004 AverageTotal Cash Farm Expenses
$2,911 $2,920 $2,968
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 48: Total Cash Farm Expense ($/cow).
1995-2004 AverageTotal Cash Farm Expenses
$15.67
$14.31$13.45
$10.00
$12.00
$14.00
$16.00
$18.00
$20.00
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/cw
t
Figure 49: Total Cash Farm Expense ($/cwt).
Total Accrual Adjusted Farm Expense:
1995-2004 AverageTotal Accrual Adjusted Farm Expenses
$3,169$2,935 $2,858
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
Low 25% Ave. High 25%
Dairy
$/co
w
Figure 50: Total Accrual Adjusted Farm Expense ($/cow).
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 20
Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis
1995-2004 AverageTotal Accrual Adjusted Farm Expenses
$17.06
$14.38
$12.96
$10.00
$12.00
$14.00
$16.00
$18.00
$20.00
Low 25% Ave. High 25%Dairy
$/cw
t
Figure 51: Total Accrual Adjusted Farm Expense ($/cwt).
1Data for all of the graphs were taken from the annual Michigan Farm Business Analysis Summaries for Dairy Farms performed by the Michigan State University Agricultural Economics Dept. These data represent financial analyses performed on, depending on the year, 69-158 Michigan dairy farms. Very importantly these data are not a random, statistically valid sample. Therefore, the data should be interpreted accordingly. Farms participate on a voluntary basis and all individual farm data is kept strictly confidential. References 1995 Nott, S. B. and R. E. Hepp. Michigan Farm Database New Directions for 1995, Mich. State.
Univ. Agr. Econ. Dept. Staff Paper #96-86, September 1996. 1996 Nott, S. B. Business Analysis Summary for Dairy Farms, Mich. State Univ. Agr. Econ. Dept. Staff
Paper #97-31, July 1997. 1997 Nott, S. B. 1997 Business Analysis Summary For Dairy Farms, Mich. State Univ. Agr. Econ.
Dept. Staff Paper #98-29, October 1998. 1998 Nott, S. B. 1998 Business Analysis Summary For Dairy Farms, Mich. State Univ. Agr. Econ.
Dept. Staff Paper #99-37, July 1999. 1999 Nott, S. B. 1999 Business Analysis Summary For Dairy Farms, Mich. State Univ. Agr. Econ.
Dept. Staff Paper #2000-24, July 2000. 2000 Nott, S. B. 2000 Business Analysis Summary For Dairy Farms, Mich. State Univ. Agr. Econ.
Dept. Staff Paper #2001-29, August 2001. 2001 Nott, S. B. 2001 Business Analysis Summary For Dairy Farms, Mich. State Univ. Agr. Econ.
Dept. Staff Paper #2002-21, August 2002. 2002 Wittenberg, E. and C. Wolf. 2002 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Mich.
State Univ. Agr. Econ. Dept. Staff Paper #03-14, November 2003. 2003 Wittenberg, E. and C. Wolf. 2003 Business Analysis Summary For Dairy Farms, Mich. State
Univ. Agr. Econ. Dept. Staff Paper #04-19, November 2004. 2004 Wittenberg, E. and C. Wolf. 2004 Business Analysis Summary For Dairy Farms, Mich. State
Univ. Agr. Econ. Dept. Staff Paper #2005-10, September 2005.
Prepared by: Dr. Craig Thomas, MSU-Extension 21