Upload
vungoc
View
219
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
FINANCIAL INCLUSION SERIES 1-
MOBILE MONEY SERVICES IN THE
EBRD REGION
Presented by Governor, Central Bank of Kenya,
EBRD Headquarters
14th March 2013
• Over 2.6 billion adults in developing economies do not have any
bank account; and less than 30% have access to some form of
financial services. Banking is thus not a mass market proposition
(Mas, 2011).
• What explains such a high proportion of financial exclusion?
• Barriers to entry: these could be income levels or physical
distances to the market or a combination of both.
• The risk factor: fear of losing savings with collapse of banks.
• In African economies, presence of informal markets – barriers
to formality, costly, among other factors.
• These factors make Mobile phone Financial Services (MFS) a
great opportunity to reach scale (mass markets) cost effectively.
I. INTRODUCTION
2
I. INTRODUCTION… • The Kenyan Example:
• In 1999, there were only 15,000 mobile phone subscribers in
Kenya. This grew to 28.08 million mobile phone subscribers by
end December, 2011. Mobile penetration increased to 71.3
percent (Communications Commission of Kenya (CCK) 2nd
Quarterly Sector Statistics Report, CCK, 2011/2012).
• Kenya has the highest rate of MFS adoption globally - 68% of
adults (World Bank/Gallup Poll, 2012) since commencement of
MFS with the roll out of M-Pesa.
• MFS has a transformative impact on low-income economies,
households and individuals.
• This has forced us to refocus on financial inclusion as a poverty
reduction strategy.
3
I. INTRODUCTION…
MFS is having a transformative impact on low-income economies.
In Kenya, the M-Pesa system plays a dominant role in rural areas, with
important consequences for existing financial service providers.
The success of MFS in Kenya has led to the integration of payment
platforms with banking services resulting in a cost effective platform
for facilitating money transfers and payments and for facilitating the
operating of bank accounts, especially micro accounts.
Broad characteristics of MFS models in Kenya:
Initially the service started as a cash in/cash out money transfer
payments service, with e-value backed by funds in bank accounts.
With time, mobile payment platforms have integrated with financial
institutions to provide financial services including savings and credit.
4
Legislation Oversight
Banking Act, Cap 488. Deposit vs. Payment (Money Transfer)
• Payments - No intermediation (& no interest paid);
Funding ring fenced: not available for operations
• Banking - Integration of payments into Banking
sector.
Proceeds of Crime and Anti-
Money Laundering Act, 2009
Risk management because of traceability.
National Payment Systems
Act, 2010
Oversight over national payments systems.
Kenya Communications Act,
1998; Electronic Signature
Evidence Act Cap 80
Authentication and admissibility of electronic
signatures.
5
II. REGULATORY REGIMES THAT GOVERN MFS
IN KENYA
III. OPPORTUNITIES & CHALLENGES
Opportunities
Transactions easily
tractable
The poor can save/invest
Enhance financial inclusion
Enhance financial
development
Enhanced Monetary Policy
transmission: less cash
outside the banking system
6
Challenges
Security of the systems
Fraud and safeguards
Money laundering, little
chance, but a challenge
The normal Know Your
Customer (KYC)
requirements have to
change with the terrain
IV. ATTRIBUTES OF THE REGULATORY REGIME
Financial Institutions are increasingly embracing innovations to facilitate
financial inclusion. Test and learn approach enables innovation while
ensuring sufficient safeguards are in place.
Regulation and supervision must continuously evolve to keep pace with
innovation.
Better regulation rather than more regulation is key in building strong
institutions, that define the rules of the game to encourage prudent
market behaviour and incentivise the market.
The Regulator must be a market developer and an agent of change to:
Provide space for innovators to work.
Protect the unbanked as they enter the market.
Give confidence to drive credibility.
Balance inclusion and stability.
7
• Mobile phone financial services operations commenced in March 2007. In January 2013 they provided over 53 million transactions valued at about USD1.69 Billion (Ksh.143 billion).
• In 2012, mobile phone money transactions in Kenya were valued at USD18.19 billion, which would represent 43.5 percent of the country’s GDP (USD41.84 billion).
• Total mobile phone transactions per day now average USD 4.4 million (Ksh.4.6 billion). • The average size of the transactions per customer has been increasing (from USD45.5
(Ksh.3,067) in March 2007 to USD78.6 (Ksh.6,660.4) in January 2013) since corporates have encouraged the use of the facility in new and diverse ways of making payments.
8
V. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MOBILE PHONE FINANCIAL SERVICES: MFS TRANSACTIONS RISING
9
Customers as at January
2013
Safaricom – 16.26 Million
Airtel – 3.88 Million
Yu – 0.78 Million
Orange – 0.16 Million
Tangaza – 0.11 Million
Mobikash – 0.23 Million
Total 21.42 million
mobile phone financial
services customers.
The leveling out
experienced from
September 2011 to June
2012 has given way to
accelerated expansion.
V. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MOBILE PHONE FINANCIAL SERVICES: INCREASING NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS...
VI. TRANSITION FROM MONEY TRANSFER TO BANKING FOR THE MICRO SAVERS...
Every month, close to 20 million Kenyans have been able to use
mobile phone platforms to make payments and send remittances.
Every day USD54.4 million (Ksh.4.6 billion) is transacted through
mobile phone transfers and payments.
In 2009 mobile phone platforms began integrating with banking
platforms where customers can use their phones to
transfer/withdraw money from their bank accounts.
This set the stage for mobile phone money transfers to start
affecting financial intermediation.
Majority of commercial banks have partnered with
telecommunication companies to offer financial services on
telecommunication platforms.
10
VI. TRANSITION FROM MONEY TRANSFER TO
BANKING FOR THE MICRO SAVERS... In 2011/12, banking products leveraging on mobile phone
technology increased significantly; examples include KCB Bank
Connect, Family Bank’s Pesa Pap, KWFT’s Mobile Banking,
NationHela, Barclays Pingit, etc.
There are now micro-accounts operated through the mobile phone
platform – MKESHO. A total of 2.14 million MKESHO
transactions valued at USD169.9 million (Ksh.14.36 billion) had
been undertaken by end of December 2012.
M-Shwari, a mobile phone based facility allowing borrowing and
interest earning savings was introduced in November 2012 and
by 7th February, 2013 had netted more than USD33.1 million
(Ksh.2.8 billion) in savings while making loans of USD4.5 million
(Ksh.378 million) and had 1.6 million customers.
11
VII. THE MONETARY POLICY REGIME HAD TO CHANGE:
DECLINING VELOCITY HAS IMPLICATIONS FOR MONETARY POLICY
12
VII. THE MONETARY POLICY REGIME HAD TO CHANGE...
13
VII. THE MONETARY POLICY REGIME HAD TO CHANGE...
14
VIII. SUCCESS FACTORS
Partnerships between financial institutions and MNOs - leveraging on core
competencies - Telcos’ core competency of voice and data transmission and financial
institutions’ competencies in the provision of financial services.
Coordination and information sharing amongst regulators – CCK and CBK.
Dialogue between private sector and regulators to enable the regulators understand
business models and value propositions for the private sector; and the private sector to
understand the rationale for regulation.
Government as a partner in MFS systems to support business model.
Consumer adaption –Master Card Survey, 2012.
Beyond payments to integrated banking systems.
Interoperability is important, however imposing interoperability may curb the private
sector incentive to invest in MFS.
Market development and consensus should be the basis for considering
interoperability.
Regulators may engage in consultative dialogue with the market players to seek
readiness for implementing interoperability.
15
THANK YOU