Upload
kevin-junior-hart
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
FINANCING ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT
Peter JamesUniversity of Bradford
Higher Education Environmental Performance Improvement ( HEEPI)
www.heepi.org.uk
WHY DO MORE? Rising utilities costs Tightening regulation
- ‘Command and Control’ e.g. Part L/J Building Regs, WEEE- ‘Carrots and Sticks’
Government targets- Kyoto Protocol, EU commitments
Sustainable planning Market/student/stakeholder demands
NEW REGULATIONS EU Emission Trading Scheme Carbon Reduction Commitment
- pay for initial allowances- tradeable allowances- league table linked pot of money
Display Energy Certificates
BARRIERS Money
- Internal mechanisms- Limited external mechanisms
Financial literacy Capacity
- internal skills- right consultants
AGENDA What sources of external funding
- are available?- could be available?
What internal mechanisms can help?
How can problems be made easier in future?
THE HEEPI PROJECT University of Bradford – ‘Ecoversity’ Steered by key sectoral organisations Green Gown Awards Events and Networking- 21 June Oxford’s
Information Engineering Lab- 13 July Post Occupancy & Commissioning - Westminster- 23 August Biodiversity – Hertfordshire- Sept - Sustainable Laboratories
Information Benchmarking – Buildings; Transport
PAST Reactive
- as (after) regulations hit- as students protest- as planning applications must
Basic energy management Isolated actions ‘Worthy’ policies
PRESENT – STRUGGLING TO BE PROACTIVE
More sophisticated energy (and water) management
Embryonic environmental management systems
Cross-campus initiatives- curriculum as well as Estates
Iconic buildings/campuses
BUILDINGS Many have high operating costs Many new buildings don’t achieve
design brief and/or regulatory requirements
Design briefs often aren’t anticipating future prices and requirements
Disconnected capex/opex budgets Relatively low utilisation/productivity
HE PERFORMANCE - ENERGY
Building Type
Best(kWh m2)
Average(kWh m2)
Upper Quartile(kWh m2)
Bio-labs (15)
252 581 <436
Residences (41)
161 294 <221
FUTURE ‘Greener construction’
- energy efficient- renewable energy and materials- natural lighting and ventilation- location and orientation- materials
‘Green travel’ More efficient use of space
FUTURE – INTEGRATION INTO THE MAINSTREAM Legitimates more efficient use of space
- the most environmental building is the one not built- the greenest students and staff are those who travel least by cars and planes
Integral part of brand/reputation/credibility- index of ‘future readiness’
Synergies of key design features- natural lighting, materials and ventilation- capital £1; operating £20; salaries £100-200
Buildings/estates as the curriculum
MANY SOLUTIONS ARE GOOD CONSTRUCTION PRACTICE Integrated design teams
- integration of functions and services Thorough consideration of building function
and operation, and how this might change Good project management with clear
specification and responsibilities Effective commissioning, evaluation and
feedback Thorough whole life costing
CLEAR BENEFITS WHEN SUCCESSFUL
“minimal increases in upfront costs of about 2% to support green design would, on average, result in life cycle savings of 20% of total construction costs - more than ten times the initial investment”- The Costs and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings, A Report to California’s Sustainable Building Task Force
BARRIERS
Trade-off issues Higher capital costs Disconnected capex/opex budgets Lack of knowledge/skills Poor learning cycles