14
Financing Infrastructure Financing Infrastructure Over Time Over Time David Levinson David Levinson University of Minnesota University of Minnesota Levinson, David (2001) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. Journal of Urban Planning and Development American Society of Civil Engineers 127(4) 146-157 (Dec). http://nexus.umn.edu/Papers/FinancingInfrastructure.pdf

Financing Infrastructure Over Time David Levinson University of Minnesota Levinson, David (2001) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. Journal of Urban Planning

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Financing Infrastructure Over Time David Levinson University of Minnesota Levinson, David (2001) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. Journal of Urban Planning

Financing Infrastructure Financing Infrastructure Over TimeOver Time

David LevinsonDavid Levinson

University of MinnesotaUniversity of Minnesota

Levinson, David (2001) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. Journal of Urban Planning and Development American Society of Civil Engineers 127(4) 146-157 (Dec).http://nexus.umn.edu/Papers/FinancingInfrastructure.pdf

Page 2: Financing Infrastructure Over Time David Levinson University of Minnesota Levinson, David (2001) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. Journal of Urban Planning

Temporal Free Rider ProblemTemporal Free Rider Problem

One Group Pays for Infrastructure, a One Group Pays for Infrastructure, a Different Group Uses ItDifferent Group Uses It• When a fixed piece of infrastructure is funded

and built by one group, and then a new group comes in and uses it without paying, there is a free rider problem.

• When one group comes in and borrows money to build infrastructure, and another group is held liable, there is also a free rider problem.

Page 3: Financing Infrastructure Over Time David Levinson University of Minnesota Levinson, David (2001) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. Journal of Urban Planning

Alternative Financing SchemesAlternative Financing Schemes

Development Exactions (on-site) Impact Fees to finance off-site infrastructure

(roads, sewers, schools, and parks). Value capture districts Growth management regulations Capital Recovery Fees Pay as you go

Page 4: Financing Infrastructure Over Time David Levinson University of Minnesota Levinson, David (2001) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. Journal of Urban Planning

Capital Recovery FeesCapital Recovery Fees

Cities with capital recovery fees for water and sewer:• Austin TX, Chelmsford, MA Chesterfield County

VA, Concord NC, Conway SC, Dunedin FL, Gurnee, IL, Houston TX, Loveland CO, Montecito CA, Pooler GA, Round Rock TX, San Jose CA, Santa Clara, CA and Calgary Canada.

Capital recovery issue in electricity deregulation; "stranded" costs

Page 5: Financing Infrastructure Over Time David Levinson University of Minnesota Levinson, David (2001) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. Journal of Urban Planning

What Are Expectations?What Are Expectations?

Does the existing community have an expectation (a law) of being reimbursed when it decides to expand a capital facility?

Does it lack that expectation until after the facility is constructed?

Does the facility come before or after new residents?

Page 6: Financing Infrastructure Over Time David Levinson University of Minnesota Levinson, David (2001) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. Journal of Urban Planning

Timeline of Recovery PoliciesTimeline of Recovery Policies

InfrastructureLeadsDevelopment

Community -> [A] -> Infrastructure -> [B] -> Development -> [C]

DevelopmentLeadsInfrastructure

Community -> [A] -> Development -> [D] -> Infrastructure -> [E]

Page 7: Financing Infrastructure Over Time David Levinson University of Minnesota Levinson, David (2001) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. Journal of Urban Planning

Three Financing SchemesThree Financing Schemes

Pay-As-You-Go (Traditional) Pay-As-You-Use (Bonds, Continuous

Recovery) Pay-When-You-Enter (Impact Fees)

Page 8: Financing Infrastructure Over Time David Levinson University of Minnesota Levinson, David (2001) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. Journal of Urban Planning

Cost IncidenceCost Incidence

NewInfrastructure

Pay-Go Bond Impact FeeOld Pay-

Go[F/Q + f/(Q+q), f/(Q+q)]

[F/Q + r/(Q+q),r/(Q+q)]

[F/Q,f/q]

Infrastruc-ture

Bond [(R+f)/(Q+q),(R+f)/(Q+q)]

[(R+r)/(Q+q),(R+r)/(Q+q)]

[R/(Q+q),R/(Q+q)+ f/q]

note: [existing residents payment, new development payment], for simplicity, assume that newdevelopment follows immediately after infrastructure (re-) financing, so that bond payments for oldinfrastructure are borne proportionally by old residents and new developmentwhere: R, r = net present value of future bond payment for old (R) and new (r) infrastructure

F, f = fixed cost for old (F) and new (f) infrastructureQ, q = existing population (Q), new population (q)

Page 9: Financing Infrastructure Over Time David Levinson University of Minnesota Levinson, David (2001) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. Journal of Urban Planning

Illustration of Continuous Illustration of Continuous RecoveryRecovery

Average Fixed Cost

Q Q+q

C

c

Excess Payment by Q

Welfare Loss

D

q

Page 10: Financing Infrastructure Over Time David Levinson University of Minnesota Levinson, David (2001) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. Journal of Urban Planning

Continuous Recovery EquationsContinuous Recovery Equations

(Q + q )* c = Q * C (1) C = T / Q (2) c =T / (Q + q ) (3)

where:

T = Total Fixed Cost

C, c = average fixed cost of infrastructure before (C), and after (c) development

Q, q = existing population (Q), new population (q)

Page 11: Financing Infrastructure Over Time David Levinson University of Minnesota Levinson, David (2001) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. Journal of Urban Planning

Loveland ExampleLoveland Example

Category LovelandA. Total Capital Cost $3,354,000B. Replacement and Betterment Cost = A * Q/ ( Q+ q)

$1,571,300

C. Future Capacity in Units 14,700D. CEF Fee = (A - B)/C $121

Page 12: Financing Infrastructure Over Time David Levinson University of Minnesota Levinson, David (2001) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. Journal of Urban Planning

Continuous Recovery ExampleContinuous Recovery ExampleCategory Continuous

RecoveryA. Total Capital Cost $3,354,000B. Initial Cost per Household = A /Q

$260.00

C. Fee for First New Household =A/(Q+1)

$259.98

D. Fee for 5,000th New Household= A/ (Q+5000)

$187.37

E. Fee for Last New Household =A / (Q + q)

$121.52

F. Total Amount Paid (beforeReturns)

$2,550,944

G. Total Amount Returned to q $764,575H. Total Amount Returned to Q =Net Total Amount Paid by q

$1,786,370

I. Amount Recovered by Q perhousehold = H/Q

$138.47

J. Net Payment by Q = B - I $121.52

Page 13: Financing Infrastructure Over Time David Levinson University of Minnesota Levinson, David (2001) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. Journal of Urban Planning

BargainingBargaining

DeveloperDo Not Pay Pay if

RequiredCommunity No Payment

Required[0 - X,Π] [0 - X,Π]

Payment Required [0 , 0] [Payment - X,Π - payment]

X = net negative externalityΠ = economic profit to new development < < if X PaymentΠ then development

will occur with payment

Page 14: Financing Infrastructure Over Time David Levinson University of Minnesota Levinson, David (2001) Financing Infrastructure Over Time. Journal of Urban Planning

ConclusionsConclusions

Temporal Free Riding is a Problem Leading to Infrastructure Under-investment

Bonds and Continuous Recovery Offer Solutions to the Problem

Such schemes reduce risk to existing residents, by eliminating subsidies to new development.