Upload
aimee
View
41
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Finite Model Theory Lecture 10. Second Order Logic. Outline. Chapter 7 in the textbook: SO, MSO, 9 SO, 9 MSO Games for SO Reachability Buchi’s theorem. Second Order Logic. Add second order quantifiers: 9 X. f or 8 X. f - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Finite Model TheoryLecture 10
Second Order Logic
2
Outline
Chapter 7 in the textbook:
• SO, MSO, 9 SO, 9 MSO
• Games for SO
• Reachability
• Buchi’s theorem
3
Second Order Logic
• Add second order quantifiers:9 X. or 8 X.
• All 2nd order quantifiers can be done before the 1st order quantifiers [ why ?]
• Hence: Q1 X1. … Qm Xm. Q1 x1 … Qn xn. , where is quantifier free
4
Fragments
• MSO = X1, … Xm are all unary relations
• 9 SO = Q1, …, Qm are all existential quantifiers
• 9 MSO = [ what is that ? ]
• 9 MSO is also called monadic NP
5
Games for MSO
The MSO game is the following. Spoiler may choose between point move and set move:
• Point move Spoiler chooses a structure A or B and places a pebble on one of them. Duplicator has to reply in the other structure.
• Set move Spoiler chooses a structure A or B and a subset of that structure. Duplicator has to reply in the other structure.
6
Games for MSO
Theorem The duplicator has a winning strategy for k moves if A and B are indistinguishable in MSO[k]
[ What is MSO[k] ? ]
Both statement and proof are almost identical to the first order case.
7
EVEN MSO
Proposition EVEN is not expressible in MSO
Proof: • Will show that if = ; and |A|, |B| ¸ 2k then
duplicator has a winning strategy in k moves.
• We only need to show how the duplicator replies to set moves by the spoiler [why ?]
8
EVEN MSO
• So let spoiler choose U µ A.– |U| · 2k-1. Pick any V µ B s.t. |V| = |U|– |A-U| · 2k-1. Pick any V µ B s.t. |V| = |U|– |U| > 2k-1 and |A-U| > 2k-1.
We pick a V s.t. |V| > 2k-1 and |A-V| > 2k-1.
• By induction duplicator has two winning strategies:– on U, V– on A-U, A-V
• Combine the strategy to get a winning strategy on A, B. [ how ? ]
9
EVEN 2 MSO + <
• Why ?
10
MSO Games
• Very hard to prove winning strategies for duplicator
• I don’t know of any other application of bare-bones MSO games !
11
9MSO
Two problems:
• Connectivity: given a graph G, is it fully connected ?
• Reachability: given a graph G and two constants s, t, is there a path from s to t ?
• Both are expressible in 8MSO [ how ??? ]• But are they expressible in 9MSO ?
12
9 MSO
Reachability:
• Try this: = 9 X.
• Where says:– s, t 2 X– Every x 2 X has one incoming edge (except t)– Every x 2 X has one outgoing edge (except s)
13
9 MSO
• For an undirected graph G:
s, t are connected , G ²
• Hence Undirected-Reachability 2 9 MSO
14
9 MSO
• For an undirected graph G:s, t are connected , G ²
• But this fails for directed graphs:
• Which direction fails ?
s t
15
9 MSO
Theorem Reachability on directed graphs is not expressible in 9 MSO
• What if G is a DAG ?
• What if G has degree · k ?
16
Games for 9MSO
The l,k-Fagin game on two structures A, B:
• Spoiler selects l subsets U1, …, Ul of A
• Duplicator replies with L subsets V1, …, Vl of B
• Then they play an Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse game on (A, U1, …, Ul) and (B, Vl, …, Vl)
17
Games for 9MSO
Theorem If duplicator has a winning strategy for the l,k-Fagin game, then A, B are indistinguishable in MSO[l, k]
• MSO[l,k] = has l second order 9 quantifiers, followed by 2 FO[k]
• Problem: the game is still hard to play
18
Games for 9MSO
• The l, k – Ajtai-Fagin game on a property P
• Duplicator selects A 2 P• Spoiler selects U1, …, Ul µ A• Duplicator selects B P,
then selects V1, …, Vl µ B• Next they play EF on (A, U1, …, Ul) and (B,
V1, …, Vl)
19
Games for 9MSO
Theorem If spoiler has winning strategy, then P cannot be expressed by a formula in MSO[l, k]
Application: prove that reachability is not in 9MSO [ in class ? ]
20
MSO and Regular Languages
• Let = {a, b} and = (<, Pa, Pb)
• Then * ' STRUCT[]
• What can we express in FO over strings ?
• What can we express in MSO over strings ?
21
MSO on Strings
Theorem [Buchi] On strings: MSO = regular languages.
• Proof [in class; next time ?]
Corollary. On strings: MSO = 9MSO = 8MSO
22
MSO and TrCl
TheoremOn strings, MSO = TrCl1
However, TrCl2 can express an.bn [ how ? ]
Question: what is the relationship between these languages:
• MSO on arbitrary graphs and TrCl1
• MSO on arbitrary graphs and TrCl