Fish Barrier Design Evolution in Montana 1 George Austiguy PE, Pioneer Technical Services With Contributions by Dale White PE, USFS

1

Fish Barrier Design Evolution in Montana

George Austiguy PE, Pioneer Technical ServicesWith Contributions by Dale White PE, USFS

2


• Early barrier designs were based on the concept of a height barrier.• So… How high can a fish jump? Let’s try 4 ft.

• Limited data on how high a salmonid could jump => Barrier designs became based on theoretical leap estimates as a function of fish burst speed.

3


4


How fast can a fish swim? => Data old, based on laboratory measurements, not representative of field conditions = uncertainty

5


• This height based design approach led to fish barrier designs with an downstream apron on-grade with a weir crest 4 – 5 ft above the downstream design flow (typically Q50 in MT.) water surface elevation

6


• Breeching of height based designed fish barrier structures for which conservative, theoretical fish leaping calculations predicted were not breachable (i.e. the fish could not leap over) led to a focus on the downstream conditions. i.e. what’s wrong with our model?

• Analysis of the breached structures indicate downstream aprons had variable hydraulic conditions which potentially fish were able to exploit and use to breach the barrier.

7

Temporary Apron On-Grade Fish Barrier Cherry Creek, MT Breached by Rainbow Trout. Weir Height = 4.5 ft.


8


• These variable hydraulic conditions can include clinging nappes, eddys and standing waves, and micro low-energy streams associated with turbulent flow caused by non-uniform downstream geometry;

• The ability of salmonids to exploit small variations in energy within the flow stream to pass obstructions is supported by research using PIT tagged fish and 3-dimensional modeling (M.Blank, 2005“Studies of Fish Passage Through Culverts in Montana”);

9


• Research on brook trout (Kondratieff and Myrick, 2006, “How High Can Brook Trout Jump”)indicates that leaping ability by brook trout is a direct function of the water depth in the downstream region of the barrier;

• Tools available to design practitioners are typically limited to simple, 1-dimensional hydraulic models (HEC-RAS);

10

Fish Barrier Design Evolution in Montana• Collectively these observations and research results pushed our fish

barrier design concepts to focus on producing downstream hydraulically uniform, 1-dimensional flow conditions, with shallow depth and high velocities to eliminate the ability of fish to leap in the first place;

• If the flow depth is too shallow for a fish to orientate to a leaping angle, it cannot jump;

• Apron flow that is supercritical (shallow and fast) uniform flow, requires a fish to constantly be in burst mode, eliminates locations where a fish could rest or leap from.

• Wing walls adjacent to the downstream apron:– Provide geometry that produces uniform flow conditions;– Produces 1-dimensional dominated uniform flow conditions=> allows 1- dimensional

hydraulic modeling better predictive performance

• Elevated apron crest maintains supercritical apron flow;• This design concept is consistent with fish barrier design guidelines

adopted by NOAA Fisheries (BOR, 2006, Fish Protection at Water Diversions)

11


The specific structure design criteria used : •

– The downstream crest of the apron will be elevated 1 ft above the maximum design tailwater elevation;

• – The minimum apron length will be 16 feet;

• – The minimum apron slope will be 16H:1V;

• – The minimum weir height of the barrier will be 3.5 ft above the apron height;

and•

– The structure shall be designed to exclude fish passage up to the 50-year flow and to structurally withstand the 100-year flow.

12


Hydraulic Modeling Example of Elevated ApronCourtesy of Dale White USFS


Hydraulic Modeling Example of On-Grade ApronCourtesy of Dale White USFS

14


• Recent examples of this design concept are shown on the following slides

15


Temporary Fish Barrier, Casias Creek New Mexico

16Smith Creek Fish Barrier Montana


17


Cherry Creek Fish Barrier, Montana

18


Greenhorn Creek Fish Barrier, Montana

19


Muskrat Creek Fish Barrier, MontanaCourtesy of Dale White USFS

20


NF Highwood Creek Fish Barrier, Montana

Documents

Fish Barrier Design Evolution in Montana 1 George Austiguy PE, Pioneer Technical Services With Contributions by Dale White PE, USFS