Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Flavour-selective localization in interacting latticefermions via SU(N) symmetry breakingDaniele Tusi
LENS - European Laboratory of Non-Linear SpectroscopyLorenzo Franchi
University of FlorenceLorenzo Livi
University of FlorenceKarla Baumann
SISSA - Scuola Internazionale Studi SuperioriDaniel Benedicto-Orenes
ICFO https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-012XLorenzo Del Re
Università di RomaRafael Barfknecht
CNR-INO https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3883-8437Tianwei Zhou
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5830-6326Massimo Inguscio
LENS and Università degli Studi di FirenzeGiacomo Cappellini
LENSMassimo Capone
SISSA - Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi AvanzatiJacopo Catani
INO-CNR & LENS - University of FlorenceLeonardo Fallani ( [email protected] )
University of Florence https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5327-3254
Article
Keywords: quantum physics, superconductors, topological insulators
Posted Date: June 9th, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-543907/v1
License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License
Flavour-selective localization in interacting lattice fermions1
via SU(N) symmetry breaking2
D. Tusi1, L. Franchi2, L. F. Livi2, K. Baumann3,4, D. Benedicto Orenes5,6, L. Del Re7, R. E. Barfknecht5,3
T. Zhou2, M. Inguscio8,1,5, G. Cappellini5,1, M. Capone3,9, J. Catani5,1, L. Fallani2,1,5,104
1 LENS European Laboratory for Nonlinear Spectroscopy (Sesto Fiorentino, Italy)5
2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Florence (Sesto Fiorentino, Italy)6
3 SISSA Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (Trieste, Italy)7
4 Laboratoire de Physique et Etude des Materiaux, UMR8213 CNRS/ESPCI/UPMC (Paris, France)8
5 CNR-INO Istituto Nazionale di Ottica del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (Sesto Fiorentino, Italy)9
6 ICFO - Institut de Ciencies Fotoniques, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (Castelldefels, Spain)10
7 Department of Physics, Georgetown University, 37th and O Sts., NW, Washington, DC 20057, USA11
8 Department of Engineering, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome (Roma, Italy)12
9 CNR-IOM Istituto Officina dei Materiali, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (Trieste, Italy)13
10 INFN National Institute for Nuclear Physics (Firenze, Italy)14
15
A large repulsion between particles in a quantum system can lead to their localization, as it16
happens for the electrons in Mott insulating materials. This paradigm has recently branched out17
into a new quantum state, the orbital-selective Mott insulator, where electrons in some orbitals are18
predicted to localize, while others remain itinerant. We provide a direct experimental realization19
of this phenomenon, that we extend to a more general flavour-selective localization. By using an20
atom-based quantum simulator, we engineer SU(3) Fermi-Hubbard models breaking their symmetry21
via a tunable coupling between flavours, observing an enhancement of localization and the emergence22
of flavour-dependent correlations. Our realization of flavour-selective Mott physics opens the path to23
the quantum simulation of multicomponent materials, from superconductors to topological insulators.24
Interactions shape the collective behavior of many-25
particle quantum systems, leading to rich phase diagrams26
where conventional and novel phases can be induced by a27
controlled variation of external stimuli. The most direct28
example is perhaps the Mott insulator, where the large29
repulsion amongst particles leads to an insulating state30
despite the non-interacting system being a metal or a31
superfluid1. In solid-state physics the interest in Mott32
insulators is reinforced by the observation that the proxim-33
ity to a Mott transition is a horn of plenty where a variety34
of novel and spectacular phases can be observed, high-Tc35
superconductivity2,3 being only the tip of an iceberg4.36
In recent years it has become clear that the standard37
SU(2) Fermi-Hubbard model is only a specific example, as38
many interesting materials require a description in terms39
of “multicomponent” Hubbard models, e.g. when the40
conduction electrons have an additional orbital degree41
of freedom. These systems are not merely more compli-42
cated, rather they host new phenomena, challenging the43
standard paradigm of Mott localization5. Indeed, when44
the symmetry between orbitals is broken, by some field or45
internal coupling, electrons in specific orbitals (or some46
combinations of them) can be Mott-localized while others47
remain itinerant, leading to surprising “orbital-selective48
Mott insulators”6.4950
Orbital-selective Mott physics has become a central51
concept for the description of a new class of high-Tc52
superconductors based on iron7, as it can describe the53
anomalies of the metallic state8,10 and the orbital charac-54
ter of superconductivity11 in those systems. However, a55
clean observation of selective Mott transitions is intrinsi-56
cally hard in solid-state systems, because of the limited57
FIG. 1. Sketch of the physical system. a) We consider asystem of repulsively SU(3)-interacting fermions in a lattice.The global symmetry is broken by a coherent Rabi driving Ωbetween two internal states. b) In the absence of coupling, thesystem experiences a phase transition from an SU(3) metal to aMott insulator as the hopping is reduced. c) The Rabi drivinglifts the degeneracy between the states and, in a dressed-basis picture, causes them to acquire different energies. Thecompetition with the hopping can drive a transition from ametal to an insulator already in the noninteracting case.
experimental control over the microscopic parameters and58
the orbital degree of freedom. The paradigm of selective59
2
FIG. 2. Measurement of double occupancies. a) Number of atoms in doubly-occupied sites Nd as a function of the totalatom number N for two different values of Ω and the same U = 2.6D. b) Average doublon fraction fd as a function of U/Dand Ω/D. The actual measurements are marked by the points. c,d) Subsets of the data are shown for two different crosssections of the plot in b), i.e. for Ω = 0 (c) and for U = 2.6D (d). The measurements in b,c,d) are averages over an intervalN = (5 . . . 35)× 103. Error bars in a,c,d) are obtained with a bootstrap analysis20. Dotted lines in a) are fits with a piecewisefunction (null + straight line), while color shades in c,d) are guides to the eye representing the experimental uncertainty.
Mott physics is itself far from being fully explored and60
has the potential to become a powerful framework to un-61
derstand a variety of phenomena, from superconductivity62
to topological properties, in multicomponent quantum63
materials.64
In this work we take a broader perspective and treat65
orbital-selective Mott physics as an example of the gen-66
eral concept of “flavour-selective Mott localization”12,67
which can be realized in a variety of multi-flavour sys-68
tems, where the flavour can be the spin, the orbital or any69
other quantum number. We realize a minimal instance of70
this phenomenon by means of an atomic quantum simu-71
lator based on the optical manipulation of nuclear-spin72
mixtures of ultracold two-electron 173Yb atoms. This73
platform allows the realization of multicomponent sys-74
tems with global SU(N) interaction symmetry13,14, as in75
recent works reporting the realization of SU(N) quantum76
wires15, SU(N) Mott insulators16,17 and, more recently,77
SU(N) quantum magnetism18. Here we introduce a novel78
approach to break the symmetry of SU(3) Fermi-Hubbard79
systems in a controlled way, which allows us to go beyond80
the investigations in the solid state and to observe di-81
rectly the two key signatures of selective-Mott physics12:82
an overall enhancement of Mott localization and the onset83
of flavour-selective correlations.84
The experiment is performed with three-component85
ultracold 173Yb Fermi gases with total atom number up86
to N = 4× 104 and temperature T ≃ 0.2TF . The atoms87
are trapped in a cubic 3D optical lattice (lattice constant88
d = λ/2 = 380 nm), which realizes the multi-flavour89
Hubbard Hamiltonian90
H =− t∑
〈i,j〉,α
(
c†αicαj + h.c.)
+ U∑
i,α,β 6=α
nαinβi + VT
+Ω
2
∑
i
(
c†1ic2i + h.c.)
(1)where α, β ∈ 1, 2, 3 indicate the fermionic flavours91
(corresponding to nuclear spin states m = +5/2,+1/292
and −5/2, respectively), t is the tunnelling energy be-93
tween nearest-neighboring sites 〈i, j〉, U is the onsite re-94
pulsion energy between two atoms of different flavours,95
and VT = κ∑
i,α R2i nαi describes the effects of a slowly-96
varying harmonic trapping potential (where Ri is the97
distance of site i from the trap center). In the absence98
of the 4th term of Eq. (1), H has an intrinsic global99
SU(3) symmetry, which is ensured by the invariance of100
atom-atom interactions on the spin state and by the re-101
alization of spin-independent optical potentials, i.e. U , t102
and κ do not depend on α. This symmetry is explicitly103
broken by the 4th term, which describes a coherent on-104
site coupling between flavours |1〉 and |2〉. This coupling105
is provided by a two-photon Raman process with Rabi106
frequency Ω/h20 (where h is the Planck constant). At107
the single-particle level, this coupling lifts the degeneracy108
between the flavours, creating two dressed combinations109
|±〉 = (|1〉 ± |2〉) /√2, energy-shifted from |3〉 by ±Ω/2,110
as sketched in Fig. 1c.111
We use an adiabatic preparation sequence to produce an112
equilibrium state of the atomic mixture in the optical lat-113
tice, with equal state populations N1 = N2 = N3 = N/3114
and in the presence of the coherent coupling Ω between115
states |1〉 and |2〉20. In order to characterize the degree116
3
U/t
/t
a) c)DMFT (homogeneous) 1D DMRG (trapped)
U/D
2 3 4
/D
10.0
0.2
0.4
0.8
0.6
Mott insulator
flavour-selectivephase
metal
DMFT (trapped)b)
FIG. 3. Theoretical analysis. a) DMFT phase diagram for a homogeneous system at T = 0 and 1/3 filling. The points referto different parameter runs. The boundary between the standard metal and the region of selective correlations marks a sharpcrossover where the quasiparticle weight of the coupled flavours rapidly drops to a value smaller than 0.05. b) Doublon fractionfor the trapped system at U = 2.6D and different Ω/D, obtained from a LDA analysis of the homogeneous DMFT results withthe experimental parameters. c) Doublon fraction obtained from DMRG for a 1D trapped system of N = 21 particles at T = 0.
of localization of the particles in the lattice, we measure117
the number of atoms Nd in doubly-occupied sites (called118
“doublons” in the following) with photoassociation spec-119
troscopy, as in previous experiments that demonstrated120
the onset of Mott localization for ultracold fermions16,19,20.121
In Fig. 2a we report typical measurements of Nd as a122
function of the total atom number N . In a harmonically123
trapped system, the rate of change of Nd vs N gives infor-124
mation on the core compressibility19,21. A vanishing value125
of Nd over an extended range of N signals the presence126
of an incompressible state with one atom per site in the127
center of the trap (since adding particles does not lead128
to a proportional increase of doublons), while the critical129
N above which Nd then departs from zero can be con-130
nected to the magnitude of the energy gap protecting the131
localized phase. Fig. 2a shows two datasets for U = 2.6D132
(where D = 6t is the tunnelling energy times the lattice133
coordination number), and two different Rabi couplings134
Ω = 0 and Ω = 1.6D, respectively. The range of N in the135
figure spans a range of local fillings up to ≈ 0.8 atoms/site136
per state (for the largest N) in the center of the trap in137
the noninteracting case. The comparison between the two138
datasets clearly shows that the Rabi coupling Ω results139
in an enhanced suppression of doublons, enlarging the140
region of N where the incompressible state forms.141
In the following we take the doublon fraction fd =142
〈Nd/N〉, averaged over the N interval marked by the gray143
region in Fig. 2a, as an indicator of the degree of Mott144
localization of the system. The measured values of fd145
are shown as a function of U and Ω in the diagram of146
Fig. 2b, clearly revealing the cooperative effect of Rabi147
coupling and repulsive interactions driving the system148
towards a Mott-localized state. The same data are plotted149
with error bars in Figs. 2c,d along two different line cuts150
of the diagram in Fig. 2b. Fig. 2c shows the effect151
of an increasing U in the transition towards an SU(3)152
Mott insulator for Ω = 0, while Fig. 2d shows a similar153
localization effect induced by Ω at a fixed interaction154
strength U = 2.6D.155
We now show the comparison of the experimental re-156
sults with different theoretical analysis of the model in157
Eq. (1). Fig. 3a shows a zero-temperature phase diagram158
obtained from Dynamical Mean-Field Theory (DMFT)22159
for the homogeneous system (VT = 0) with a uniform160
1/3 filling (one atom per site) and equal number of parti-161
cles for each flavour. The phase diagram clearly has the162
same shape of the experimental one, showing that the163
Hubbard U and the coupling Ω cooperate in driving the164
system from a metallic phase to a more localized state.165
Between the standard metal and the Mott phase, we find166
a region where the degree of correlations (as measured by167
the quasiparticle weight) is strongly selective, the coupled168
flavours being much more localized than the uncoupled169
one. It is evident that both selective and global Mott170
localization occur at a smaller U if Ω is included.171
In order to connect this effect to the experimentally172
measured signal, in Fig. 3b we show the doublon fraction173
fd obtained from the homogeneous DMFT results after174
a local-density approximation (LDA) analysis, to take175
into account the effect of the harmonic trapping in VT .176
The reduction of fd with increasing Ω is in agreement177
with the experimental observations reported in Fig. 2.178
The lack of a quantitative matching with Fig. 2d can be179
attributed to imperfections in the initial state preparation180
and to the finite temperature of the experiment, resulting181
in an average entropy per particle S/N ≈ 2.5kB , which is182
known21 to produce an effect on the double occupancies183
in a trapped system already at Ω = 0.184
In Fig. 3c we finally show the result of a zero-185
temperature DMRG calculation of fd for a harmonically186
trapped 1D system20. Although a quantitative agreement187
with the experimental data should not be seeked (because188
of the different dimensionality and the finite temperature189
of the experimental realization), the overall behavior, i.e.190
4
FIG. 4. Evidence of state-selective correlations. Ex-perimental values of γ(12) as a function of Ω/D for a fixedU = 2.6D. The circles are averages over an interval N =(5 . . . 35) × 103, error bars are obtained from a bootstrapanalysis20, while the color shade is a guide to the eye. Thecrosses are obtained from a LDA analysis of the DMFT re-sultes. The dashed line shows the expected value for anSU(3)-symmetric system.
a reduction of doublons for increasing U and Ω, is cor-191
rectly captured and agrees also with DMFT. This also192
indicates that the phenomena we are exploring are generic193
and qualitatively independent on the dimensionality.194
In addition to the enhancement of Mott localization,195
the DMFT phase diagram of Fig. 3a shows that Ω is196
expected to result in a flavour-dependent localization of197
the many-body system. The flavour-selective behavior198
can be experimentally detected by resolving the spin199
character of the doublons, i.e. counting how many atoms200
form doublons in each of the three pairs |12〉, |23〉, |31〉201
by means of state-selective photoassociation at a high202
magnetic field20. In Fig. 4 we plot the quantity γ(12) =203
Nd(12)/Nd, where Nd(12) is the number of atoms forming204
doublons in the |12〉 channel, as a function of Ω and fixed205
U = 2.6D. The measured value at Ω = 0 agrees with the206
expectation for an SU(3)-symmetric system, for which207
γ(12) = 1/3. As Ω is increased and the SU(3) symmetry is208
broken, γ(12) diminishes, eventually approaching zero for209
Ω ≈ D. The doublons acquire a strongly flavour-selective210
behavior.211
This suppression of |12〉 doublons is triggered by the212
polarization effect in the rotated |±〉 basis, which can213
be understood, at a qualitative level, already from the214
simplified, noninteracting case sketched in Fig. 1c: while215
|23〉 and |31〉 doublons can be formed by two fermions in216
the lowest single-particle states |+〉 and |3〉, |12〉 doublons217
can be formed only if the two fermions occupy states |+〉218
and |−〉, therefore with an additional energy cost Ω/2.219
Interactions then increase this effect12, leading to strong220
flavour-selective results even for small values of Ω.221
The crosses in Fig. 4 are the result of a DMFT cal-222
culation in which the flavour populations are kept equal223
and the harmonic trapping VT has been taken into ac-224
count in a LDA approach. The results of this numerical225
calculation are in good agreement with the experimental226
findings, with a larger degree of selectivity for the theoret-227
ical calculation. We argue that a better agreement could228
be seeked by including finite-temperature effects in the229
calculation: indeed, we expect the state-selective behavior230
to be reduced by the thermal occupation of higher-energy231
states, leading to an effective reduction of the polarization232
in the |+〉, |−〉 basis.233
We note that the experimental observation of a finite234
number of |12〉 doublons at small, but finite Ω is an235
indication of the validity of the protocol used for the236
preparation of the atomic state, which is different for Ω =237
0 and Ω > 020. We also note that, despite the polarization238
in the dressed |+〉, |−〉 basis discussed before, we have239
verified that the populations of the bare states |1〉, |2〉, |3〉240
remain always equal under all the experimental conditions241
we have considered. This is indeed an important aspect of242
our experiment. If the populations of the bare states were243
not fixed (and in particular N3 was left free to adapt), the244
dressed states would be populated according to the scheme245
in Fig. 1c, leading to N1 = N2 > N3, which favours246
flavour-selective physics already in the non-interacting247
system. The experimental state preparation procedure248
counteracts the trivial differentiation between flavours by249
forcing an even occupation. Therefore, we conclude that250
the flavour selectivity we observed is essentially due to251
quantum correlations induced by interactions.252
In the theoretical DMFT calculations, the equal pop-253
ulation constraint is enforced including an external field254
h20 that favours the occupation of |3〉 in such a way to255
match the experimental condition N1 +N2 +N3 = N/3.256
Comparing with Ref. 12, where the populations were left257
free, we observe that the quantum correlations leading to258
the selective regime survive to the inclusion of the field259
h. In general terms, single-particle effects trigger flavour260
selectivity, but the inclusion of interactions strongly en-261
hances the differentiation, turning a minor modulation262
of kinetic energy into a quantitative phenomenon which263
can also lead to a selective Mott transition24. This is a264
very general framework, underlying many investigations265
of multicomponent models.266
Exploiting an idealized quantum simulator we have ob-267
tained a clear-cut evidence for correlation-induced flavour-268
selective physics, where the SU(N) symmetry-breaking269
coupling Ω is only the trigger of a flavour-selective phe-270
nomenon which is fundamentally driven by correlation271
effects. Our first realization of multicomponent Hubbard272
physics with coherent internal couplings opens new paths273
for the quantum simulation of new classes of materials274
ranging from high-temperature superconductors to inter-275
acting topological insulators as described by the Bernevig-276
Hughes-Zhang model23. As the coupling is realized with277
5
a nonzero momentum transfer (i.e. non collinear Raman278
beams), a full range of possibilities will emerge, including279
the study of magnetic crystals25, fractional quantum Hall280
states26, and the effect of interactions of topological phase281
transitions27 and on the associated edge states28.282
Acknowledgments. We acknowledge insightful dis-283
cussions with M. Dalmonte, D. Clement, F. Scazza and284
financial support from projects TOPSIM ERC Consolida-285
tor Grant, TOPSPACE MIUR FARE project, QTFLAG286
QuantERA ERA-NET Cofund in Quantum Technologies,287
MIUR PRIN project 2017E44HRF, MIUR PRIN project288
2015C5SEJJ, MIUR PRIN project 20172H2SC4 004,289
INFN FISh project. L.D.R was supported by the U.S.290
Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy291
Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering292
under Grant No. DE-SC0019469.293
Authors contribution. L.Fa., J.C. and M.C. con-294
ceived the experiments. D.T., L.F.L., L.Fr., D.B.O.295
and G.C. carried out the measurements. L.Fa., L.F.L.,296
L.Fr. and D.T. analyzed the experimental results. K.B.,297
L.D.R. and M.C. performed DMFT calculations. R.E.B.298
performed DMRG calculations. L.F.L. and L.Fa. per-299
formed exact diagonalization calculations. All authors300
contributed extensively to the discussion of the results301
and to the writing of the manuscript.302
1 N. F. Mott, Proceedings of the Physical Society of London303
Series A 62, 416 (1949).304
2 P.W. Anderson, The resonating valence bond state in305
La2CuO4 and superconductivity, Science 235, 1196 (1987).306
3 P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Doping a Mott307
insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity,308
Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17 (2006).309
4 S. Paschen and Q. Si, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 9 (2021)310
5 A. Georges, L. de’ Medici, J. Mravlje, Strong electronic corre-311
lations from Hund’s coupling, Annual Reviews of Condensed312
Matter Physics 4, 137 (2013)313
6 M. Vojta, Orbital-selective Mott transitions: Heavy fermions314
and beyond, J. Low. Temp. Phys. 161, 203 (2010)315
7 Y. Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, Iron-316
Based Layered Superconductor La[O1−xFx]FeAs (x=0.05–317
0.12) with Tc=26 K, Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3296 (2008)318
8 L. de’ Medici, G. Giovannetti, and M. Capone, Selective319
Mott Physics as a Key to Iron Superconductors, Phys. Rev.320
Lett. 112, 177001 (2014)321
9 A. Kostin, P. O. Sprau, A. Kreisel, Yi Xue Chong, A. E.322
Bohmer, P. C. Canfield, P. J. Hirschfeld, B. M. Andersen and323
J. C. Seamus Davis, Imaging orbital-selective quasiparticles324
in the Hund’s metal state of FeSe, Nature Materials 17, 869325
(2018)326
10 M. Capone, Orbital-selective metals, Nature Materials 17,327
855 (2018)328
11 P. O. Sprau, A. Kostin, A. Kreisel, A. E. Bohmer, V.329
Taufour, P. C. Canfield, S. Mukherjee P. J. Hirschfeld, B.330
M. Andersen, and J. C. Seamus Davis, Discovery of orbital-331
selective Cooper pairing in FeSe, Science 357, 75 (2017)332
12 L. Del Re and M. Capone, Selective insulators and anoma-333
lous responses in three-component fermionic gases with bro-334
ken SU(3) symmetry, Phys. Rev. A 98, 063628 (2018).335
13 M. A. Cazalilla and A. M. Rey, Ultracold Fermi Gases with336
Emergent SU(N) Symmetry, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 124401337
(2014).338
14 A. V. Gorshkov, M. Hermele, V. Gurarie, C. Xu, P. S.339
Julienne, J. Ye, P. Zoller, E. Demler, M. D. Lukin, and340
A. M. Rey, Two-orbital SU(N) magnetism with ultracold341
alkaline-earth atoms, Nature Phys. 6, 289 (2010).342
15 G. Pagano, M. Mancini, G. Cappellini, P. Lombardi, F.343
Schafer, H. Hu, X.-J. Liu, J. Catani, C. Sias, M. Inguscio,344
and L. Fallani, A one-dimensional liquid of fermions with345
tunable spin, Nature Phys. 10, 198–201 (2014).346
16 S. Taie, R. Yamazaki, S. Sugawa, and Y. Takahashi, An347
SU(6) Mott insulator of an atomic Fermi gas realized by348
large-spin Pomeranchuk cooling, Nature Phys. 8, 825–830349
(2012).350
17 C. Hofrichter, L. Riegger, F. Scazza, M. Hofer, D. Rio351
Fernandes, I.Bloch, and S. Folling, Direct Probing of the352
Mott Crossover in the SU(N) Fermi-Hubbard Model, Phys.353
Rev. X 6, 021030 (2016).354
18 H. Ozawa, S. Taie, Y. Takasu, and Y. Takahashi, Anti-355
ferromagnetic Spin Correlation of SU(N) Fermi Gas in an356
Optical Superlattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 225303 (2018).357
19 R. Jordens, N. Strohmaier, K. Gunter, H. Moritz, and T.358
Esslinger, A Mott insulator of fermionic atoms in an optical359
lattice, Nature 455, 204–207 (2008).360
20 See Supplementary Materials.361
21 R. Jordens, L. Tarruell, D. Greif, T. Uehlinger, N.362
Strohmaier, H. Moritz, T. Esslinger, L. De Leo, C. Kollath,363
A. Georges, V. Scarola, L. Pollet, E. Burovski, E. Kozik,364
and M. Troyer, Quantitative Determination of Temperature365
in the Approach to Magnetic Order of Ultracold Fermions366
in an Optical Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 180401 (2010).367
22 A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg,368
Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion369
systems and the limit of infinite dimensions, Rev. Mod. Phys.370
68, 13 (1996).371
23 B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum372
Spin Hall Effect and Topological Phase Transition in HgTe373
Quantum Wells, Science 314, 5806 (2006).374
24 L. de’ Medici, S. R. Hassan, M. Capone, and X. Dai, Orbital-375
Selective Mott Transition out of Band Degeneracy Lifting,376
Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 126401 (2009).377
25 S. Barbarino, L. Taddia, D. Rossini, L. Mazza, and R.378
Fazio, Magnetic crystals and helical liquids in alkaline-earth379
fermionic gases, Nat. Comm. 6, 8134 (2015).380
26 M. Calvanese Strinati, E. Cornfeld, D. Rossini, S. Barbarino,381
M. Dalmonte, R. Fazio, E. Sela, and L. Mazza, Laughlin-like382
States in Bosonic and Fermionic Atomic Synthetic Ladders,383
Phys. Rev. X 7, 021033 (2017).384
27 A. Amaricci, J. C. Budich, M. Capone, B. Trauzettel, and385
G. Sangiovanni, First-Order Character and Observable Sig-386
natures of Topological Quantum Phase Transitions, Phys.387
Rev. Lett. 114, 185701 (2015)388
28 A. Amaricci, L. Privitera, F. Petocchi, M. Capone, G.389
Sangiovanni, and B. Trauzettel, Edge state reconstruction390
from strong correlations in quantum spin Hall insulators,391
Phys. Rev. B 95, 205120 (2017)392
Supplementary Files
This is a list of supplementary les associated with this preprint. Click to download.
supplementarymaterials.pdf