Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    1/19

    o

    _- uj 2 o

    ^ 5 o> t-

    N o K p.

    i f

    >

    Os

    w x

    H g Si

    O o m H

    T O

    D

    i

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    2'

    GRADSTEIN

    &

    MARZANO,

    P.C.

    HENRY GRADSTEIN (State Bar No

    [email protected]

    MARYANNR.

    MARZANO

    (State

    Bar

    [email protected]

    HARVEY

    W^

    GELLER

    (State

    Bar

    No

    [email protected]

    6310 San

    Vicente

    Blvd., Suite 510

    Los Angeles, California 90048

    Telephone:

    323-776-3100

    89747)

    No. 96867)

    123107)

    e n n

    -< or

    EVAN S. COHEN (State Bar No. 119^01)

    [email protected]

    1180 South Beverly Drive, Suite 510

    Los Angeles, California 90035

    Telephone: 310-556-9800 Facsimile:

    Attorneys for Plaintiff

    FLO

    &

    EDDIE,

    INC.

    310-556-9801

    *

    >oo

    Cfo->

    r-v__;x>

    I CO o

    2

    O

    I

    I

    ro

    3C

    O

    CO

    ro

    r

    m

    o

    UNITED

    S TA TE S D IS TRIC T

    COURT

    CENTRA L

    DIST

    ICT

    OF CAL IFORN IA

    FLO

    & EDDIE INC., a California ,

    corporation, individually andonbehal:

    of all others similarly situated,

    Plaintiff,

    U CV

    14

    07 64

    8-o*aKH*)

    Case No

    V .

    PANDORA

    MEDIA, INC,

    a

    Delaware

    corporation; and DOES 1 through 100

    Defendants .

    CLA S S

    ACT ION COMPLA INT

    1.

    V IOLAT ION OF CALIFORNIA

    CIVIL

    CODE

    980(a)(2);

    2. MISAPPROPRIATION;

    3. V IOLAT ION

    OF

    CAL IFORN IA

    BUS INESS

    AND

    PROFESS IONS

    CODE 8 17200; and

    4 .

    CONVER S ION

    D EM A ND FOR

    JURY

    TR IAL

    ACT ION COMPLAINT

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    2/19

    O o

    n

    U iO Tt

    _- LU S o

    O

    i-

    S o

    5 0

    business but has ignored the obligation

    Instead, Pandora has simply chosen to

    recordings to its servers and transmit

    of

    users on a daily basis without any

    handsomely from its exploitation o

    fees to its users and by selling

    , Inc. ( Pandora ) is one of the leading

    the United States, offering a personalized

    million registered users wherever and

    a wide range of smart phones, tablets,

    and a range of other internet-connected

    111

    en

    acknowledges that to secure the rights to

    [it] must obtain licenses from, and pay

    sound recordings and musical works, it

    from one large category of copyright

    ings ofmusical performances that initially

    15, 1972 ( pre-1972 recordings ),

    the historical backbone

    o f

    t he mus ic

    ig Band era to the Summer ofLove, those

    include the recordings of legendary artists

    Williams, Billie Holliday, and The

    recordin

    February

    c om p r i s e

    Bi

    and

    Hank

    the value ofpre-1972 recordings to its

    to obtain licenses to exploit those recordings

    copy tens of thousands of pre-1972

    ^nd perform them via streaming

    to

    its

    millions

    authorization whatsoever. Pandora profits

    1972 recordings by charging subscription

    fpre

    advert isements.

    CLASS

    A

    ZTION COMPLAINT

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    3/19

    O o

    Q- in ^

    O i- S o

    Z 5 ?

    ?1 - Z CO

    Of > O

    i-

    si f

    f 1

    o

    a

    < ? o1-

    SS

    j

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    5. Because Pandora has choslen

    licenses for pre-1972 recordings, Pandora

    violation

    of

    California Civil Code

    Cal i fornia Business & Professions

    unauthorized reproduction, distributior

    THE

    Flo & Eddie is a

    ^A

    98 0(.

    to operate the Music Service without

    is now liable under California law for

    a)(2), misappropriation, violation of

    17200,

    and

    conversion

    for i ts

    , and public performance of those recordings.

    PART IE S

    Code

    6.

    corporation

    duly organized and existing under the

    ace of business in

    Los

    Angeles, California,

    ioward

    Kaylan and Mark Volman, two of the

    popular band The

    Turtles.

    The

    Turtles are

    influential bands

    o f

    the 1960s and

    are

    notable

    It Ain 't Me

    Babe,

    You Baby, Happy

    Elenore, and

    You

    Showed Me.

    , Flo & Eddie acquired the exclusive

    ings, the titles of which are specified on the

    herein by reference ( The Turtles'

    laws

    of

    California,

    with

    its principal pi

    7. Flo & Eddie is owned by

    founding members

    of

    the enormously

    widely recognized as one

    of

    the most i

    fortheir string of Top40 hits, including

    Together,

    She'd

    Rather Be With Me

    8. Through a series

    of

    ownership in all ofThe Turtles'

    Recor

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    4/19

    Oo

    CLE?

    uj 2 o

    O i- S o

    Z5r

    5 w , O k

    ^ _i u. i

    < 00 j O

    og

    Z . uj

    , m CO z

    HI > UJ J

    F 1 Si

    9 o co H

    r _ o

    g

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    unknown

    to Flo & Eddie who therefore sues said Defendants by such fictitious

    names. Flo & Eddie will amend this Complaint to allege their true names and

    capacities when such have been ascertained. Upon information and belief, each of

    the Doe defendants herein is responsible in some manner for the occurrences herein

    alleged, and Flo &Eddie's injuries as Ijierein alleged were proximately

    caused

    by

    such defendan t s'

    acts

    or

    omissions.

    12.

    Flo &

    Eddie

    is informed

    ajnd

    believes, and on

    that

    basis alleges,

    that

    at

    all times mentioned in this complaint, Pandora and each

    of

    the Doe Defendants was

    the agent of each other and, in doing the things alleged in this complaint, was acting

    within the course and scope

    of

    such

    agi

    jncy.

    JUR I SD ICT ION

    AND

    VENUE

    13. Jurisdiction exists pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332(d)(2) because the

    matter in controversy exceeds the sum

    and costs), is a class action in which a

    or value

    of

    $25 million (exclusive

    of

    interest

    nember of a class of plaintiffs is a citizen of a

    state different from

    Pandora,

    and

    the

    njimber ofmembers ofthe

    proposed

    class

    exceeds

    100.

    14. This Court has personal ji risdiction over Pandora because: (a) Pandora

    is located and has its principal place of business in California, (b) Pandora is

    engaged in tortious conduct in California by publicly performing, reproducing, and

    distributing pre-1972 recordings within the state, and (c) Pandora's conduct causes

    injury to Flo & Eddie and the class

    anc

    their intellectual property in California.

    15. Venue in this District exists pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and (c)

    to personal jurisdiction in this District and

    or omissions giving rise to the claims

    because Pandora resides and is subject

    because a substantial part of the events

    occu r red i n

    this

    District.

    FACTS

    COMMON

    TO

    A L L

    CLA IM S FOR

    REL IEF

    16.

    The

    Music Service is provided by

    Pandora

    to paying and non-paying

    members of the public in California and elsewhere and delivers and streams music

    CLASS ACTION COMPLA INT

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    5/19

    o

    - UJ O o

    w < ?

    - Z CD

    ct pC

    > O K

    CD -j CO

    i > uj J

    z o gj

    w< Hi

    o

    CO

    I-

    i o

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    through its website (www.pandora.con

    downloadable Android and iOS App

    publicly performs, reproduces, and

    17. According to Pandora, as

    200 million registered users and more

    top 20 stations and networks in the

    2013 alone, Pandora

    streamed 15.31 bi

    18.

    Pandora under s tands that

    critical to the success of any music sen

    constitute a significant part

    of

    the Music

    stations dedicated to pre-1972 recordin

    Oldies, Motown, Doo-Wop, 70s

    Soul, Jam Bands,

    and Classic Rock

    to

    establish and

    increase its user base,

    19. Flo

    &

    Eddie

    is

    informed

    order to populate the Music Service's

    recordings to the public, Pandora has

    reproduce and copy pre-1972 recordings

    storage devices, and uses technology or

    recordings being distributed to its users

    20. Pandora

    is

    aware th at i t

    reproduce, perform, distribute or

    1972 recordings (including The Turtles

    of the recordings its reproduces,

    Music Service are pre-1972 recordings

    biographical information about

    each

    the pre-1972 recordings that it is

    exploiting, but Pandora analyzes each

    ) and to smart phones and tablets through its

    jjVmong the sound

    recordings

    thatPandora

    are The Turtles' Recordings.

    fyf

    December 31, 2013, it had

    more

    than

    than a 70% share of internet radio among the

    States.

    In th e

    first

    eleven months o f

    lion

    hours

    o f radio

    time,

    leaving a vast

    range and

    array ofmusic is

    ice which is why pre-1972 recordings

    Service.

    Pandora

    offers

    and

    advertises

    is, such as 50s Rock 'n ' Roll, 60s

    Folk, Early Jazz, Standards, Classic

    Pandora

    promotes these stations in order

    popularity, and revenue.

    believes, and on that basis alleges, that in

    databases and in order to stream musical

    uced

    and copied

    and

    continues to

    , including to one or more servers and

    systems that results in a copy ofpre-1972

    ' computers or storage devices.

    not have any license, right, or authority to

    exploit via the Music Service any pre-

    ' Recordings). Pandora is also aware which

    , distributes or otherwise exploits via the

    Not only does Pandora provide

    and the artwork for the albums containing

    ing, performing, distributing or otherwise

    individual songthat it streams. Pandora

    United

    reprodi

    does

    otherwise

    performs

    a r l i s t

    reproc uc i n

    CLASS ACTION COMPLA INT

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    6/19

    o

    * -

    CO

    - m *

    - uj g o

    5^

    S - z co

    CO -; CO

    is 3 3

    U > uj J

    5 uj

    ^ | ui

    CO

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    boasts of its Music Genome Project'

    uniquely analyzed songs from over

    10C

    sub-genres, which we develop one

    son^;

    song's particular attributes. As

    W e

    believe

    that each

    i

    music

    -

    no one else has

    great radio experience to

    incredibly broad and deep

    Pandora

    is

    based on

    the

    sophisticated taxonomy

    represents over ten years

    musicologists, and spans

    new releases all the way

    music .

    21.

    Pandora ' s en ti re bus ine ss

    selling the music itself. Pandora does

    adver t i sements to i ts users in between

    actually playing. In addition, for a

    service called Pandora One, which is

    CLA S S

    22. Flo & Eddie brings this ac

    tiat

    consists

    of a

    database

    of

    over 1,000,000

    ,000 artists, spanning over 500 genres and

    at a time by evaluating and cataloging each

    states

    on

    its websi te :

    individual has a uniquerelationship with

    tafctes exactly like yours. So delivering a

    and every listener requires an

    understanding of music. That's why

    Music Genome Project, the most

    of]

    musical information ever collected. It

    o|f

    analysis

    byourtrained team of

    rything from this past Tuesday's

    to

    the Renaissance

    and

    Classical

    Pandora

    behalf

    of

    all other similarly situated owners

    recordings

    were

    reproduced, performed

    Pandora

    v ia

    th e Mu sic S er vic e in

    and def ined a s fol lows:

    All owners of sound recordlin

    initially

    were fixed i.e.,

    which sound recordings were

    each

    ever

    back

    is built around selling access to music and

    lis in two ways. Pandora delivers audio

    gs

    and

    displays visual ads while music is

    moijthly feeof $4.99, Pandora offers a premium

    adver t i sement free.

    ACTION

    ALLEGATIONS

    ion on

    behalf

    of itself individually and on

    of

    Pre-1972 recordings, which

    , distributed or otherwise exploited by

    California. The proposed class is comprised

    of

    gs

    of

    musical performances that

    recorded)

    prior

    to February 15, 1972,

    reproduced, performed, distributed

    6

    CLASS ACTION COMPLA INT

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    7/19

    o

    CO <

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    8/19

    uj 2 o

    co <

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    9/19

    o

    - UJ o o

    CO S ?

    i

    - z co

    o k P:

    3 T

    no 3 m

    > ui J

    z o a

    iij

    CD

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    with smaller claims, the expense and biirden

    pursuing the claims individually. And

    afford to pursue individual litigation,

    unduly burdensome to the courts in which

    would proceed. Individualized litigatioh

    varying, inconsistent, or contradictory j)ud

    expenseto all parties and to the court system

    same factual issues. By contrast, the

    presents few management difficulties,

    the court system, and protects the right:

    anticipates no difficulty in the management

    FIRST

    CLA IM

    of

    individual litigation may not justify

    ven

    if everymember of the classcould

    Court system

    could not. It

    would

    be

    individual litigation

    of

    numerous cases

    would also present the potential for

    gments and would magnify the delay and

    resulting from multiple trials of the

    maintenance

    of

    this action as

    a

    class action

    conserves the resources

    of

    the parties and of

    o f

    each

    member

    of

    the

    class.

    Flo

    &

    Eddie

    o f t hi s a cti on a s a

    class

    action.

    FOR

    REL IEF

    the

    (For

    Violation

    of

    Calif

    Drnia

    As

    Against

    ia Civil

    Code

    980(a)(2)

    All

    Defendants)

    29. Flo & Eddie hereby incorporates

    paragraphs 1 through 28 above, as though

    30. Pursuant to California Civil

    members of the class possess exclusive

    Recordings, including the artistic perfoi[mances

    31. Through its unauthorized

    otherexploitation via the

    Music

    Servic^

    Turtles' Recordings) in California, Pandiora

    interests in and to the pre-1972 recordir

    980(a)(2).

    32. As a direct and proximate

    California Civil Code 980(a)(2), Pandora

    value that rightfully belongs to Flo & Ekldie

    33. As a direct and proximate

    California Civil Code 980(a)(2),

    Flo

    the allegations set forth above in

    fully set forth herein.

    Code

    980(a)(2), Flo & Eddie

    and

    the

    ownership interests in and to the pre-1972

    embodied in those recordings,

    reproduction, performance, distribution, or

    of pre-1972 recordings (including The

    has infringed the exclusive ownership

    gs in violation ofCalifornia Civil Code

    consequence ofPandora's violation

    of

    has received and retained money and

    and the

    members o f the class.

    consequence

    ofPandora's violation of

    Edd ie and

    t he membe rs o f the

    class

    have

    9

    11

    CLASS AC ION

    COMPLA INT

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    10/19

    o

    - uj 2 o

    -~ < CO

    1 CO

    : co

    CD -j CO

    uj < ^

    z . (j

    ai co z

    o ui

    > ui f

    5 g uj

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    11/19

    o

    >- o

    5?

    co <

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    12/19

    * O i^

    j jo

    8 z . (j

    uj co z

    y y o

    > ui f

    *

    uj

    CO _J

    10

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    o

    ^m

    gs, including the artistic performances

    nterests in and to the pre-1972Recordip:

    embodied in those recordings.

    46. Pandora's conduct in reprcjdu

    exploitation via the Music Service pre

    Recordings) constitutes a misappropriation

    each

    member

    of the class in the pre-19

    Civil Code 980(a)(2).

    47. By misappropriating the

    member

    of

    the class in the pre-1972

    Code 980(a)(2), Pandora has engaged

    California

    Business & Professions

    Code

    48. As a direct and proximate

    Business & Professions Code

    17200,

    and value that rightfully belongs to Flo

    49. As a direct and proximate

    each member of the class

    are

    entitled tc

    California

    Business & Professions Cod 2

    fully ascertained but which Flo & Eddio

    mill ion.

    50. Flo & Eddie is

    informed

    engaging in the conductdescribed herein

    and/or malice. The conduct o f Pandora

    conscious disregard

    of

    the rights of Flo

    Accordingly, Flo & Eddie and each

    punitive damages against Pandora in an

    example of it.

    51. Pandora 's

    conduct is

    this Court, will continue to cause, Flo

    cing, performing, distributing, or other

    972 recordings (including The Turtles'

    of the property rights ofFlo & Eddie and

    2 recordings and a violation ofCalifornia

    property rights ofFlo & Eddie and each

    recordings and by

    violating

    California Civil

    in unfair business practices in violation

    of

    17200.

    ;onsequence

    of

    its violation

    of

    California

    Pandora

    has

    received and retained money

    &

    Eddi e a nd

    the

    members

    o f the class,

    result

    of Pandora's

    conduct, Flo &

    Eddie

    and

    restitution and disgorgement under

    17200 in an amount that is not as yet

    is

    informed

    and

    believes exceeds $25

    ajidbelieves, and on that basis alleges, that in

    , Pandora acted with oppression, fraud

    has been despicable and undertaken in

    &

    Edd ie a nd e ac h membe r

    o f

    the

    class,

    meknber

    o f the class

    are

    entitled to an

    award of

    amount

    sufficient to punish

    and

    make an

    causing, and unless enjoined and restrainedby

    Eddie

    and each

    member of the class great

    12

    CLASS

    ACTION

    COMPLAINT

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    13/19

    - uj o o

    ? w < ?

    o o: P-

    C > O is.

    CO -ii CO

    z

    O

    LU

    g

    I > uj X

    1 g uj

    w< ui

    o

    CO

    H

    O

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    o

    and irreparable injury that cannot fully

    & Edd ie a nd e ac h

    member

    o f the

    class

    Eddie and

    each

    membe r o f the class

    are

    permanent injunctions,

    prohibiting

    furtlier

    &

    Eddie and each membe r o f t he c la ss

    FOURTH CLAIM

    ^B

    3e compensated or measured in money. Flo

    lave no adequate remedy at law. Flo &

    entitled to temporary, preliminary and

    violation

    of

    the ownership interests

    of

    Flo

    in the pre-1972 recordings.

    FOR REL IEF

    (For

    As

    Against

    Conversion)

    All

    Defendants)

    52. Flo & Eddie hereby i

    paragraphs 1 through 28 above, as

    53.

    Pursuant to

    California

    Civ

    law, Flo & Eddie and the members

    of tike

    interests in andto thepre-1972 Recordijn

    embodied in those recordings.

    54. By reproducing, performiri

    the Music Service pre-1972 recordings

    Pando ra ha s conver ted for

    its own use

    property rights inthepre-1972

    recordirj;

    property rights.

    55. As a direct and proximate

    received

    and

    retained money and value

    the

    members o f

    the class.

    56. As a direct and proximate

    Edd ie a nd th e members o f the class

    ha\

    yet fully ascertained but which Flo &

    mill ion.

    57. Flo & Eddie is informed

    engaging in the conduct described herein

    and/or malice.

    The

    conduct o f Pandora

    though

    a id

    ncorpjorates the allegations set forth above in

    fully

    set

    forth herein.

    1

    Code

    980(a)(2)

    and

    California

    common

    class possess exclusive ownership

    gs, including the artistic performances

    g, distributing or otherwise exploiting via

    (including The Turtles' Recordings),

    Flo &

    Edd ie and e ach membe r o f

    the

    class's

    gs and has dispossessed

    each

    of their of

    consequence of its conversion, Pandora has

    that rightfully belongs to

    Flo

    & Eddie

    and

    consequence of Pandora's conversion,

    Flo

    &

    e

    been

    damaged

    in an

    amount

    that is

    not

    as

    Fjddie

    is informed and believes exceeds $25

    believes, and on that basis alleges, that in

    in, Pandora acted with oppression, fraud

    has been

    despicable

    and undertaken

    in

    13

    CLAS S AC HON COMPLA INT

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    14/19

    o

    - r- 0 0

    in <

    - uj o o

    - Z CD

    Q K p.

    C > O r-

    m -. co

    ^

    Z . i ll

    Vi

    ill i

    z

    O ffc

    w< ui

    gH

    co -I

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    conscious disregard

    of

    the rights of Flo

    Accordingly, Flo & Eddie and each mejnber

    punitive damages against

    Pandora

    in an

    example

    of

    it.

    58.

    Pandora's conduct

    is

    causib

    this Court,

    will

    continue to cause, Flo

    and irreparable injury that cannot fully

    &

    Eddie

    and

    each

    member

    o f

    the class

    Eddie and each membe r o f the class are

    permanent injunctions,

    prohibiting

    furtllier

    &

    Edd ie a nd e ac h m embe r o f the class

    i^S

    &

    Edd ie a nd e ac h member o f

    the

    class.

    o f the c la ss a re

    entit led

    to

    an

    award o f

    amount sufficient to punish and make an

    :

    g, and unless enjoined

    and

    restrained by

    : Eddie and each member

    of

    the class great

    3e compensated or measured in money. Flo

    lave has no adequate remedy at law. Flo &

    entitled to temporary, preliminary and

    violation

    of

    the ownership interests

    of

    Flo

    :.n the pre-1972 recordings.

    P R A Y E R

    WFIEREFORE, Flo

    &

    Eddie, on

    class, prays for Judgment against

    them,

    as follows:

    A. Determining that this is a

    Rule

    23

    o f

    t he Feder al

    Rules

    Civi l

    representative, and Flo & Eddies'

    B. On all claims except for

    Code 17200, compensatory damages

    C. On the

    claim

    fo r v iol a ti on

    17200, restitution and disgorgement

    excess

    o f

    $25 million.

    D.

    On the

    second,

    third, and

    damages according to

    proof

    at trial.

    E.

    On

    all claims, a temporary

    enjoining and restraining Pandora, and

    officers, principals, employees,

    behal f o f

    i tself and all o the r membe rs

    o f

    the

    Pandora

    and the Doe defendants, and each o f

    proper class action maintainable pursuant to

    Procedure,

    and

    certifying

    Flo

    & Eddie as class

    counkel as

    class

    counsel.

    violation

    of California Business &

    Professions

    in excess of $25 million according to proof;

    of

    California Business & Professions

    Code

    of IPandora's unlawful proceeds and revenues in

    fourth claims, punitive and exemplary

    , preliminary, and permanent injunction

    their respective agents, servants, directors,

    representatives, subsidiaries and affiliated

    14

    CLASS ACTION COMPLA INT

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    15/19

    o

    *-

    CO

    - to ^r

    i- S o

    co <

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    16/19

    O o

    t CO

    Q_ i

    o

    uj S o

    2 5 > --

    - co <

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    17/19

    UNITEDSTATES DISTRICTCOURT, CENTRAL DISTRICTOFCALIFORNIA

    CIVIL COVEF

    SHEET

    I.

    a) PLAINTIFFS

    (

    Check box if you

    are

    representing yourself

    Q )

    FLO

    &

    EDDIE, INC.,

    a

    California

    corporation, individually and on behalfofallothers

    similarly

    situated

    (b)County ofResidenceof

    First

    Listed Plaintiff Los Angeles

    EXCEPT

    INU.S.

    PLAINTIFF

    CASES

    (c)

    Attorneys irm

    Name,

    Address

    and

    Telephone

    Number If

    you are

    representing yourself, provide the same information.

    GRADSTEIN

    &

    MARZANO,

    P.C;HenryGradstein,

    SBN

    89747

    Maryann

    R.

    Marzano,

    SBN

    96867;HarveyGeller,

    SBN

    123107

    6310San Vicente

    Blvd.,

    Suite 510, LosAngeles,California90048; (323)776-3100

    Dl

    FENDANTS (

    Check box if you

    are representing

    yourself

    Q]

    PAiNDORA

    MEDIA,

    INC., a

    Delaware corporation;

    and

    DOES

    1through100

    County of Residence of First Listed Defendant

    IN

    U.S.

    PLAINTIFF

    CASESONLY

    At orneys { irm Name, Address and Telephone Number Ifyou are

    representing yourself, provide

    the

    same information.

    II. BASISOFJURISDICTION

    (Place anXinone boxonly.) III.

    CITIZENSHIP

    (Place

    Citizen o f

    Citizen

    of Ahothei

    OF PRINCIPAL

    PARTIES-For Diversity Cases Only

    an Xin one box for plaintiff

    and

    one for

    defendant)

    PTF

    DEF . . . . . .

    Incorporated

    or Principal Place

    of Business in this

    State

    I 11 . U.S. Government

    Plaintiff

    | | 2.

    U.S. Government

    Defendant

    Q 3.

    Federal Question

    U.S.

    Government Not a Party)

    [x]4.Diversity

    (Indicate Citizenship

    of

    Parties

    in

    Item

    III) qa pa

    f Tit is Sta te

    r

    Sta te

    Subject

    ofa

    itizen

    or

    Foreign

    Coikntry

    2

    3

    H 1

    2

    Incorporated

    and

    Principal Place

    of Business

    in

    Another State

    | | 3 ForeignNation

    IV.ORIGIN (Placean X in one

    box

    only.)

    rrri 1.

    Original

    2.

    Removed

    from |,

    ^ Proceeding

    I

    State Court II

    3.

    Remanded

    f rom

    Appellate Court

    4 . Re in s ta

    :e d

    or

    Reopen

    sd

    5.

    Transferred from

    Another

    District (Specify)

    6. Multi-

    I I

    District

    Litigation

    V. REQUESTED

    IN

    COMPLAINT: JURY

    DEMAND:

    [x] Yes No

    CLASS

    ACTION

    under F.R.Cv.P.

    23: [x]Yes

    No

    [x

    (Check Yes only if demanded in complaint.)

    MONEY

    DEMANDED

    IN COMPLAINT: $ 25 Million

    PTF

    4

    5

    6

    OE F

    4

    5

    6

    VI. CAUSE OFACTION (Cite

    the

    U.S.

    Civil Statute under

    which you

    arefiling and

    writ

    Class actioncomplaintbased on diversityarisingunder 28

    U.S.C.

    1332(d)(2) - damages in

    recordings fixed priorto February15,1972, under California statutory and common law.

    ; a briefstatement ofcause. Donot citejurisdictional statutes unlessdiversity.)

    excess of$5million andover 100classmembers --forviolation of rightsinsound

    VII. NATUREOFSUIT (Placean X in

    one

    box only).

  • 8/11/2019 Flo & Eddie v. Pandora - CD Ca.pdf

    18/19

    UNITED

    STATES DISTRICT

    COURT,

    CENTRAL DISTRICT OFCALIFORNIA

    CIVIL COVER SHEET

    VIII. VENUE:

    Your answers tothequestions

    below

    will

    determine

    thedivision ofthe

    to change, in accordance with the

    Court's

    General

    Orders,

    upon review by the

    Court

    ofyoi

    ility insurance benefits underTitle 2oftheSocial Security

    Act,

    as

    amended;

    plus

    based on disability. (42U.S.C. 405(g))

    All claims filed for widows or

    widowers

    in

    amended. (42

    U.S.C.

    405 (g))

    urance

    benefits

    basedon

    disability

    under

    Title

    2ofthe

    Social Security Act,

    as

    All claimsforsupplemental security i

    amended .

    neone payments basedupon

    disability

    filed underTitle 16ofthe Social Security Act, as

    All claimsfor retirement (oldage) and sun

    (42

    U.S.C.

    405(g))

    ivorsbenefitsunder Title2 of the Social SecurityAct,as amended.