2
A snapshot Flows for Development - Recipient and provider perspectives In detail 1 2 A A B C Provider perspective Recipient perspective + + = = 1 2 How much was allocated to a specific country for development activities? How much has a specific country provided for development activities? = implementing entity/partner (‘channel of delivery’). Funds going through the implementing partner are earmarked by the provider country - i.e. funds are allocated for specific purposes. A or can be implementing partners. Other examples of implementing partners are recipient country governments, Development Finance institutions (DFIs) and PPPs. RECIPIENT RECIPIENT RECIPIENT RECIPIENT MULTILATERAL INSTITUTION MULTILATERAL INSTITUTION MULTILATERAL INSTITUTION PROVIDER COUNTRY PROVIDER COUNTRY NGO NGO NGO RECIPIENT PERSPECTIVE. Indicates finance made available to recipient countries. Includes flows from provider countries, multilateral institutions and NGOs. PROVIDER PERSPECTIVE. Indicates bilateral provider effort. Includes flows from DAC members either to recipient countries or as core contributions to multilateral institutions and NGOs. * Core contributions relate to funds paid over to multilateral institutions and NGOs for use at their discretion. Earmarked (non-core) contributions are included in the blue arrow. core contributions * Activities in recipient countries Core contributions from provider countries (i.e. unearmarked funds) Activities in recipient countries financed from core contributions from DAC members and non-DAC countries, but also through funds raised from the private sector, including international capital markets. A B B C C + Double counting (As this would imply counting both core contributions from provider countries to multilateral institutions and NGOs, and the activities financed from these contributions) RECIPIENT RECIPIENT MULTILATERAL INSTITUTION MULTILATERAL INSTITUTION MULTILATERAL INSTITUTION PROVIDER COUNTRY NGO NGO NGO = PROVIDER COUNTRY (include earmarked contributions to and ) A (exclude earmarked contributions, as already reported in )

Flows for development infographic 10022016 · ** The OECD also produces estimates on the development co-operation programmes of the following countries: Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Flows for development infographic 10022016 · ** The OECD also produces estimates on the development co-operation programmes of the following countries: Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia,

A snapshot

Flows for Development - Recipient and provider perspectives

In detail

1

2

AA B

CProvider perspective

Recipient perspective

+

+=

=1

2

How much was allocated to a specific country for development activities?

How much has a specific country provided for development activities?

= implementing entity/partner (‘channel of delivery’). Funds going through the implementing partner are earmarked by the provider country - i.e. funds are allocated for specific purposes. A or can be implementing partners. Other examples

of implementing partners are recipient country governments, Development Finance institutions (DFIs) and PPPs.

RECIPIENT

RECIPIENTRECIPIENT

RECIPIENT

MULTILATERALINSTITUTION

MULTILATERALINSTITUTION

MULTILATERALINSTITUTION

PROVIDER COUNTRY

PROVIDER COUNTRY

NGO

NGO

NGO

RECIPIENT PERSPECTIVE. Indicates finance made available to recipient countries. Includes flows from provider countries, multilateral institutions and NGOs.

PROVIDER PERSPECTIVE. Indicates bilateral provider effort. Includes flows from DAC members either to recipient countries or as core contributions to multilateralinstitutions and NGOs.

* Core contributions relate to funds paid over to multilateral institutions and NGOs for use at their discretion. Earmarked (non-core) contributions are included in the blue arrow.

corecontributions*

Activities in recipient countries Core contributions from provider countries(i.e. unearmarked funds)

Activities in recipient countries financed from core contributions from DAC members and non-DAC countries, but also through funds raised from the private sector, including international capital markets.

A B

BC

C+ Double counting

(As this would imply counting both core contributions from provider countries to multilateral institutions and NGOs, and the activities financed from these contributions)

RECIPIENT

RECIPIENT

MULTILATERALINSTITUTION

MULTILATERALINSTITUTION

MULTILATERALINSTITUTION

PROVIDER COUNTRY

NGO

NGO

NGO

=

PROVIDER COUNTRY

(include earmarked contributions to and )

A(exclude earmarked contributions, as already reported in )

Page 2: Flows for development infographic 10022016 · ** The OECD also produces estimates on the development co-operation programmes of the following countries: Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia,

Website: www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development

Flows for Development - Collected from:

29 DAC members*

19 non-DAC countries**

35 Multilateral organisations

1 Philanthropic foundation

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Adaptation Fund, African Development BankArab Fund for Economic and Social DevelopmentAsian Development BankBADEA: Arab Bank for Economic Development in AfricaCaribbean Development BankClimate Investment FundsCouncil of Europe Development BankEuropean Bank for Reconstruction and DevelopmentFood and Agriculture Organization

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Canada, Denmark, European Union, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Estonia, Hungary, Israel, Kazakhstan, Kuwait (Kuwait Fund), Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Malta, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates

Reporting at the activity level by all DAC members, eight non-DAC members, all multilateral organisations and the Gates Foundation. For twelve non-DAC countries, data are reported at an aggregate level.

* DAC members include 28 countries and the European Union.

** The OECD also produces estimates on the development co-operation programmes of the following countries: Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Qatar and South Africa. More information at

http://www.oecd.org/development/stats/non-dac-reporting.htm.

GAVI: The Global Alliance for Vaccines and ImmunizationsGlobal Environment Facility Secretariat, Global Fund to fight Aids, Tuberculosis and MalariaGlobal Green Growth InstituteInter-American Development BankInternational Atomic Energy AgencyInternational Fund for Agricultural DevelopmentInternational Finance CorporationInternational Monetary Fund (Trust Fund)Islamic Development Bank

Montreal ProtocolNordic Development Fund OPEC Fund for International DevelopmentOrganization for Security and Co-operation in EuropeUNAIDS: United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDSUN Development PogrammeUN Economic Commission for EuropeUN Population FundUnited Nations High Commissioner for RefugeesUNICEF: United Nations Children's Fund

UN Peacebuilding FundUN Relief and Works AgencyWorld Food ProgrammeWorld Health OrganizationWorld Bank