Upload
others
View
12
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Flue Gas Aerosol Pretreatment Technologies to Minimize Post-Combustion CO2 Capture (PCC) Solvent Losses
DOE funding award DE-FE0031592
2018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
2
Acknowledgement and Disclaimer
Acknowledgement This presentation is based on work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-FE0031592
Disclaimer ldquoThis presentation was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof nor any of their employees makes any warranty express or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy completeness or usefulness of any information apparatus product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name trademark manufacturer or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement recommendation or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereofrdquo
Objectives Scope Timeline Participants amp Funding
3
ProjectOverview
4
Overview of The Linde Group
1
Linde EngineeringTechnology-focused Air Separation
Global 1
Air Separation
Global 1
Hydrogen Syn Gas
Global 2
Hydrogen Syn Gas
Global 2
Olefins
Global 2
Olefins
Global 2
Natural Gas
Global 3
Natural Gas
Global 3
HyCO Tonnage Plants
gt70 plants
HyCO Tonnage Plants
gt70 plants
HyCO Tonnage Plants
gt70 plants
ASU Tonnage Plants
gt300 plants
ASU Tonnage Plants
gt300 plants
ECOVAR Std Plants
gt1000 plants
ECOVAR Std Plants
gt1000 plants
Linde Gas - TonnageWorld-class operations
CO2 Plants
gt100 plants
Founded
Sales (2017)
Employees
Countries
US Linde Gas HQ
US Linde Engineering Facilities
Leveraging
Synergies
1879
$20 billion
64000
gt100
Bridgewater NJ
Tulsa OK
Holly Springs GA
Houston TX
Linde has extensive experience in CO2 capture amp handling
5
Experience in design amp erection of different wash processes for CO2
removalbull Linde-Rectisol reg
bull BASF Oase technreg
bull Benfield
Long experience in operation of CO2 plants transport amp distribution
bull OCAP pipeline (Netherlands)
bull Onsite business
bull Bulk supply
CO2 Capture and Injection
LNG plant for Statoil in SnoslashhvitNorway with CO2
capture from natural gas and CO2 re-injection off-shore
CO2 Wash Units
Removal of impurities like Hydrocarbons Heavy metals O2 amp H2O for food grade CO2
CO2 Food Grade Plants CO2 Transport and Distribution
6
Overall ObjectiveDemonstrate and evaluate two innovative flue gas aerosol pretreatment technologies identified to significantly reduce high aerosol particle concentrations (gt107 particlescm3) in the 70-200 nm particle size range
(1) A high velocity water spray-based system with unique design features(2) A novel electrostatic precipitator (ESP) device with an optimized design and operating conditions
Specific Objectivesmdash Complete an aerosol mechanism literature review and develop a mechanistic model
characterizing aerosol formation and interaction with amine solvent in the absorber of a PCC plantmdash Design build install commission and operate the two technologies for flue gas aerosol
pretreatment at a coal-fired power plant host site providing the flue gas as a slipstream at a flow rate of 500-1000 scfm
mdash Complete parametric testing and analysis of each technology to demonstrate achievement of target performance
mdash Complete a benchmarking study to identify the optimal aerosol pretreatment system for commercial deployment and integration with solvent-based PCC technology
Project Objectives
Start Finish
Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Q3 2020 Q4 2020
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
Budget Period 1 612018 11302018
10 Project management 612018 11302018
21 Mechanism review 612018 6292018
22 Mechanism modeling 722018 11282018
31 Design basis dev 612018 6292018
32 Basic engineering 722018 1052018
33 Detailed engineering 1082018 11282018
34 Test planning 10292018 11282018
Budget Period 2 1232018 11292019
10 Project management 1232018 11292019
41 ESP system fabrication 1232018 8302019
42 Spray system fabrication 1232018 8302019
43 Procurement for install 1232018 8302019
51 Site installation 922019 10182019
52 Commission amp start-up 10212019 11292019
Budget Period 3 1222019 11302020
10 Project management 1222019 11302020
61 ESP system tests 1222019 2242020
62 Spray system tests 2172020 4302020
63 Test analysis 542020 8282020
70 Benchmarking analysis 8312020 11272020
80 Removal of equipment 8312020 11272020
Project Scope Timeline amp Milestones
7
BP1 Design amp Engineering
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
HIJ
BP2 Fabrication amp Installation
BP3 Testing amp Analysis
Task ID Milestone Completion Date1 A Updated PMP 629181 B Kick-Off Meeting 727182 C Mechanisms review amp modeling complete 1130183 D Design amp engineering complete 1130183 E Test plan complete 1130184 F Fabrication amp procurement complete 830195 G Installation amp commissioning complete 1129196 H Parametric testing complete 51207 I Benchmarking analysis complete 1130208 J Removal of equipment complete 113020
8
Project Participants
Partner
Organization
Lead contact(s) Key Role(s)
DOE-NETL Andy Aurelio Project Manager
-Funding amp sponsorship
Linde LLC Devin BostickPrincipal InvestigatorKrish Krishnamurthy Technology Director
-Prime contract-Overall program management-High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technology owner
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
Kevin OrsquoBrien Project Lead
-Aerosol mechanisms review-Host site liaison-Flue gas and liquid effluent composition measurement amp analysis
Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL)
Pratim BiswasProject Lead
-Aerosol mechanisms modeling lead-ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technology owner-Characterization of aerosols in flue gas
Affiliated Construction Services (ACS)
Greg LarsonProject Lead
-Procurement management for high velocity water spray-based system-Construction management for site modifications amp module installation
9
Project Budget DOE Funding and Cost Share
SourceBudget Period 1
Jun 2018 ndash Nov 2018
Budget Period 2
Dec 2018 ndash Nov 2019
Budget Period 3
Dec 2019 ndash Nov 2020Total
DOE Funding $457822 $1290725 $1078826 $2827834
Cost Share $176612 $260949 $269860 $707421
Total Project $634435 $1551674 $1348686 $3534795
Cost share commitments
Linde $234869
University of Illinois (UIUC) $231339
Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) $191213
Affiliated Construction Services (ACS) $50000
Technology Development
Rationale Background amp Previous Research
10
Rationale reducing aerosol-driven amine losses from solvent-based PCC technology enables its broader commercial deployment
11
Amine losses
Flue gas cooler
Flue gas blower
Flue gas inlet
Condensate
Major factor aerosol particles in flue gas from coal-fired power plants
Aerosol particle formation during coal combustion
S N
N
S
Inorganic oxides and metals (eg SiO2 Fe P)
Sulfur
Nitrogen
Organic volatiles
Inorganic volatiles (eg Hg)
Coal particle1st stage
devolatilization
Burning of tar
Tar
Oxidation
CO2
Partial oxidation
Metal or its Suboxide vapor (eg SiO Ca)
Absorption
Re-oxidation amp particle formation
Nano-sized inorganic aerosol particle
(eg SiO2 particle)
Inorganic aerosols shielding organics
Aerosols sent in flue gas to PCC absorber
(1) Nucleation(2) Condensation
04 nmParticle Size 04 ndash 2 nm 2 - 100 nm 0001-1000 mm
(3) Coagulation
3 main stages of aerosol formation1
Burning of char
Bottom Ash
2nd stage devolatilization
Ash formation
1 Wang Xinlei amp Williams Brent amp Tang Y amp Huang Yuhsuan amp Kong L amp Yang Xin amp Biswas Pratim (2013) Characterization of organic aerosol produced during pulverized coal combustion in a drop tube furnace Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13 105194acp-13-10919-2013
12
Theory and mechanisms for aerosol-driven amine losses from PCC plant absorbers1
13
Phase IAerosol growth and nucleation from water in absorber
Phase IIAerosol growth from amine in absorber
Phase IIIBuildup of captured CO2and amine bound to CO2in aerosols
Phase IVSalt accumulation inside particles causing further amine and CO2 diffusion into aerosols
02 microm particle
1 G Lombardo B Fostas M Shah A Morken O Hvidsten J Mertens E Hamborg Results from Aerosol Measurement in Amine Plant Treating Gas Turbine and Residue Fluidized Catalytic Cracker Flue Gases at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad GHGT-13 Energy Procedia 2017 114 Pages 1210-1230
Water condensation
Nucleation from water supersaturation
1 microm particle
Amine absorption until complete saturation
2 microm particle
CO2 and CO2+amine absorption
2-5 microm particleSalt accumulationCO2 and amine diffusion
Amine contained in aerosol particles are then emitted from PCC absorber in treated gas stream
The Kelvin equation gives the minimum particle diameter d of a liquid1 supersaturation leads to nucleation of smaller particles
14
Benefits of aerosol particle reduction
Benefits
Manageable solvent supply and transport logistics
Optimum power plant efficiency
when integrated with PCC
Reduction of particulate that can unfavorably react with amine
solvent
Improved PCC plant specific
energy performance
Environmental sustainability and
performance
Improved PCC plant business
caselower cost
Methods to reduce aerosol-driven solvent losses Flue gas aerosol pretreatment provides optimum solution1
For power plants integrated with solvent-based PCC without an existing baghouse optimized flue gas aerosol pretreatment is the only viable option to reduce aerosol concentrations from gt109 particlescm3 to manageable levels near 104-106
particlescm3 for particles with diameters in the range of 70-200 nm
Pretreatment has traditionally been performed using simple ESPs and Brownian filters
Few systematic studies have been conducted to evaluate performance of different technologies over a full range of conditions
15
BH = baghouse
1 Based on single point experience some options eg dry bed conf may handle higher particle concentrations than others
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
Abbott Power Plant (42 reheat burner w dryer) | Abbott Power Plant (0 reheat burner wo dryer) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (WashU) | Wilsonville (before baghouse) (SR) | UT Austin (NCCC) (before baghouse) | TCM (no BH no BF) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (SR) | Wilsonville Parametric Tests (Linde) | Wilsonville Long-term Tests (Linde) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anal Ins | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | kg amineMT CO2 | 04080107622 | 00095091096 | |||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 682819795644892 | 982 | 427900576923077 | 157 | 14468166666667 | 982 | 1000000 | 10 | 4000000 | 2400 | 100000 | 35 | 650000 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 735415966499163 | 102 | 532616923076924 | 163 | 160013 | 102 | 200000 | 20 | 3000000 | 2800 | 1150000 | 60 | 600000 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 667026341708543 | 106 | 642390384615385 | 168 | 14813666666667 | 106 | 200000 | 40 | 2000000 | 2800 | 10000000 | 100 | 530000 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 566092556113903 | 109 | 764663461538462 | 175 | 91535 | 109 | 1000000 | 70 | 1000000 | 3000 | 10000000 | 160 | 400000 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 60451071356784 | 113 | 993782692307693 | 181 | 21280833333333 | 113 | 6300000 | 110 | 900000 | 3200 | 1400000 | 280 | 350000 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 640447634840872 | 118 | 103840961538462 | 188 | 277361 | 118 | 8000000 | 200 | 800000 | 3200 | 120000 | 480 | 50000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 63931935678392 | 122 | 119893653846154 | 195 | 30501933333333 | 122 | 5000000 | 400 | 600000 | 3800 | 1400 | 640 | 20000 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 67781860636516 | 126 | 155467692307692 | 202 | 35493966666667 | 126 | 800000 | 700 | 500000 | 3800 | 1000 | 960 | 10000 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 678467648241207 | 131 | 173807500 | 209 | 25912033333333 | 131 | 1 | 800 | 400000 | 3800 | 1000 | 1920 | 5000 | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 736663748743719 | 136 | 198103846153846 | 217 | 20493533333333 | 136 | 1 | 1000 | 318900 | 3800 | 900 | 2560 | 100 | 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 791600921273033 | 141 | 245189807692308 | 225 | 34751733333333 | 141 | 300000 | 3800 | 750 | 5120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 776599182579565 | 146 | 27240826923077 | 233 | 43427866666667 | 146 | 200000 | 3800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 748095604690118 | 151 | 301905384615385 | 241 | 592247 | 151 | 100000 | 4000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 852265149078728 | 157 | 348734615384616 | 25 | 614018 | 157 | 90000 | 4100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 99985068676717 | 163 | 375607115384616 | 259 | 87004466666667 | 163 | 80000 | 4200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11043162479062 | 168 | 442790384615385 | 269 | 137845333333333 | 168 | 70000 | 4200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119948670016751 | 175 | 523365384615385 | 279 | 183715 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
112247051926298 | 181 | 445000384615385 | 289 | 241348 | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
126325376884422 | 188 | 591696153846154 | 30 | 299061666666667 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130470221105528 | 195 | 660759615384616 | 311 | 380613666666667 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140578994974874 | 202 | 706025000000001 | 322 | 419054666666667 | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
158666502512563 | 209 | 794851923076924 | 334 | 64940 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15709983919598 | 217 | 860896153846155 | 346 | 883372 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
146305745393635 | 225 | 847675000000001 | 359 | 130709333333333 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
175050465661642 | 233 | 943019230769232 | 372 | 182267 | 233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20586516917923 | 241 | 949319230769232 | 385 | 263912666666667 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21836616080402 | 25 | 96023076923077 | 40 | 355521333333333 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
221599480737019 | 259 | 956119230769232 | 414 | 484109 | 259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
231432663316583 | 269 | 1025750000 | 429 | 647791 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
228343541038526 | 279 | 964151923076924 | 445 | 830633 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238293788944724 | 289 | 982432692307693 | 461 | 1054740 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24027170519263 | 30 | 103288461538462 | 478 | 125545333333333 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254431427135679 | 311 | 981471153846155 | 514 | 1435950 | 311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
281640274706868 | 322 | 100416538461539 | 533 | 161942333333333 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
279502308207705 | 334 | 995501923076924 | 552 | 169811666666667 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
273149989949749 | 346 | 969944230769232 | 573 | 182475666666667 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
301086837520938 | 359 | 89473076923077 | 594 | 187437333333333 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
337571587939699 | 372 | 791292307692308 | 615 | 1885320 | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
335709822445561 | 385 | 719676923076924 | 638 | 184891666666667 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
303290958123953 | 40 | 67950576923077 | 661 | 177122333333333 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
296100891122278 | 414 | 554032692307693 | 685 | 167757333333333 | 414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305137175879397 | 429 | 441263461538462 | 71 | 1563790 | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
298671450586265 | 445 | 39593576923077 | 737 | 143831333333333 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
267825041876047 | 461 | 294517500 | 764 | 1276340 | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
268898750418761 | 478 | 235586538461539 | 791 | 111617666666667 | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
246584087102178 | 496 | 219594615384616 | 82 | 956378666666667 | 496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22753597319933 | 514 | 183537307692308 | 851 | 786719333333333 | 514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20805557118928 | 533 | 132950384615385 | 882 | 654658 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
193145899497488 | 552 | 991526923076924 | 914 | 524162333333333 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180397058626466 | 573 | 723884615384616 | 947 | 398477 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159287497487437 | 594 | 49395000 | 982 | 294095333333333 | 594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140093966499163 | 615 | 329623653846154 | 1018 | 216415 | 615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
125712003350084 | 638 | 232231346153846 | 1055 | 155941333333333 | 638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11582181239531 | 661 | 170568076923077 | 1094 | 109822 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
933554824120604 | 685 | 114283076923077 | 1134 | 811729333333333 | 685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
766995862646567 | 71 | 851232692307693 | 1176 | 533704666666667 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
625145611390285 | 737 | 558684615384616 | 1219 | 398905 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
531419574539364 | 764 | 425857115384616 | 1263 | 272716 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401304512562814 | 791 | 320039230769231 | 131 | 224988666666667 | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
302290415410386 | 82 | 224643461538462 | 1358 | 175139333333333 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
234256559463987 | 851 | 204812115384616 | 1407 | 137377666666667 | 851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
174277956448911 | 882 | 133968461538462 | 1459 | 1185743 | 882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119620948073702 | 914 | 120355384615385 | 1512 | 901657 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
860247541038527 | 947 | 1114950 | 1568 | 95869666666667 | 947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
588795608040202 | 982 | 892715384615385 | 1625 | 866524 | 982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453500100502513 | 1018 | 75693076923077 | 1685 | 79995933333333 | 1018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306104184254607 | 1055 | 734100000000001 | 1747 | 855652 | 1055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
214392951423786 | 1094 | 732648076923078 | 1811 | 82140833333333 | 1094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171584234505863 | 1134 | 530092307692308 | 1877 | 81683533333333 | 1134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129452606365159 | 1176 | 609534615384616 | 1946 | 71270166666667 | 1176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
109800234170854 | 1219 | 491257692307693 | 2017 | 67286033333333 | 1219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
875061487437187 | 1263 | 391936346153846 | 2091 | 75311933333333 | 1263 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
755701192629817 | 131 | 427556153846154 | 2167 | 71270066666667 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76907041876047 | 1358 | 528136538461539 | 2247 | 670295 | 1358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
816854716917924 | 1407 | 538875 | 2329 | 612828 | 1407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682292696817421 | 1459 | 484882692307693 | 2414 | 60685066666667 | 1459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
484327912897823 | 1512 | 523173076923077 | 2503 | 64353 | 1512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
601245688442212 | 1568 | 532400 | 2595 | 575052 | 1568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
608947306532664 | 1625 | 391983653846154 | 269 | 53995533333333 | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57423530318258 | 1685 | 39818576923077 | 2788 | 56581733333333 | 1685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
665198110552765 | 1747 | 390621538461539 | 289 | 50526966666667 | 1747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
641284469011726 | 1811 | 282454038461539 | 2996 | 52087233333333 | 1811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
551386834170855 | 1877 | 301689807692308 | 3106 | 390656 | 1877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
515487715242882 | 1946 | 392116538461539 | 322 | 40069366666667 | 1946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
557056576214406 | 2017 | 262214807692308 | 3338 | 42029366666667 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
585014763819096 | 2091 | 300040192307693 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
563217748743719 | 2167 | 327144807692308 | 3587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
516019996649917 | 2247 | 291944038461539 | 3718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
635039155778895 | 2329 | 410772307692308 | 3854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
678386860971525 | 2414 | 438539038461539 | 3995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
540607373534339 | 2503 | 810536808 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534717524288108 | 2595 | 882899298 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
624962696817421 | 269 | 884130018 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
507626351758795 | 2788 | 848442984 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
482487487437186 | 289 | 79158372 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
462233661641542 | 2996 | 628394094 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
614290241206031 | 3106 | 484154992 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549685423785595 | 322 | 3250266138 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485615936348409 | 3338 | 1930962502 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446652388609716 | 346 | 97717245 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
733651755443887 | 3587 | 451665266 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73515500837521 | 3718 | 1710666186 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
491714613065327 | 3854 | 750723816 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453128479061977 | 3995 | 3692090772 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22625785 | 542 | 08614861802 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23149945 | 583 | 11076250522 | 1596 | 89545 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2547951466667 | 626 | 1 | 1715 | 10021 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26411294 | 673 | 1 | 1843 | 11057 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2478060433333 | 723 | 1 | 1981 | 12158 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2428556433333 | 777 | 1 | 2129 | 12433 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1953912566667 | 835 | 1 | 2288 | 113975 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1421029306667 | 898 | 01230695642 | 2458 | 9234 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
797872833333 | 965 | 1 | 2642 | 70035 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430967506667 | 1037 | 1 | 2839 | 49195 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21839545 | 1114 | 1 | 3051 | 3452 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84446483333 | 1197 | 01230695642 | 3278 | 23495 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
320313357 | 1286 | 1 | 3523 | 1597 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34943302333 | 1382 | 1 | 3786 | 1089 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17471639033 | 1486 | 1 | 4068 | 781 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116477634 | 1596 | 1 | 4371 | 5965 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 1715 | 1 | 4698 | 4325 | 1596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1843 | 1 | 5048 | 3995 | 1715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1981 | 1 | 5425 | 3185 | 1843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2129 | 1 | 5829 | 2325 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2288 | 1 | 6264 | 2185 | 2129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2458 | 1 | 6732 | 194 | 2288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2642 | 1 | 7234 | 1705 | 2458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 2839 | 1 | 7774 | 1395 | 2642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 3051 | 1 | 8354 | 124 | 2839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 3278 | 1 | 8977 | 97 | 3051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 3523 | 1 | 9647 | 92 | 3278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735818 | 3786 | 1 | 10370 | 71 | 3523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23295514667 | 4068 | 1 | 11140 | 56 | 3786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4371 | 1 | 11970 | 51 | 4068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4698 | 1 | 12860 | 35 | 4371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5048 | 1 | 13820 | 31 | 4698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5425 | 1 | 14860 | 21 | 5048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5829 | 1 | 15960 | 16 | 5425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6264 | 1 | 17150 | 1 | 5829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6732 | 1 | 18430 | 055 | 6264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7234 | 1 | 19810 | 05 | 6732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7774 | 055 | 7234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8354 | 02 | 7774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8977 | 005 | 8354 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 9647 | 0 | 8977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 10370 | 01 | 9647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11140 | 005 | 10370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11970 | 005 | 11140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 12860 | 01 | 11970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 13820 | 0 | 12860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 14860 | 0 | 13820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 15960 | 0 | 14860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 17150 | 0 | 15960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 18430 | 0 | 17150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 19810 | 0 | 18430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19810 |
0009 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 |
2
Acknowledgement and Disclaimer
Acknowledgement This presentation is based on work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-FE0031592
Disclaimer ldquoThis presentation was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof nor any of their employees makes any warranty express or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy completeness or usefulness of any information apparatus product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name trademark manufacturer or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement recommendation or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereofrdquo
Objectives Scope Timeline Participants amp Funding
3
ProjectOverview
4
Overview of The Linde Group
1
Linde EngineeringTechnology-focused Air Separation
Global 1
Air Separation
Global 1
Hydrogen Syn Gas
Global 2
Hydrogen Syn Gas
Global 2
Olefins
Global 2
Olefins
Global 2
Natural Gas
Global 3
Natural Gas
Global 3
HyCO Tonnage Plants
gt70 plants
HyCO Tonnage Plants
gt70 plants
HyCO Tonnage Plants
gt70 plants
ASU Tonnage Plants
gt300 plants
ASU Tonnage Plants
gt300 plants
ECOVAR Std Plants
gt1000 plants
ECOVAR Std Plants
gt1000 plants
Linde Gas - TonnageWorld-class operations
CO2 Plants
gt100 plants
Founded
Sales (2017)
Employees
Countries
US Linde Gas HQ
US Linde Engineering Facilities
Leveraging
Synergies
1879
$20 billion
64000
gt100
Bridgewater NJ
Tulsa OK
Holly Springs GA
Houston TX
Linde has extensive experience in CO2 capture amp handling
5
Experience in design amp erection of different wash processes for CO2
removalbull Linde-Rectisol reg
bull BASF Oase technreg
bull Benfield
Long experience in operation of CO2 plants transport amp distribution
bull OCAP pipeline (Netherlands)
bull Onsite business
bull Bulk supply
CO2 Capture and Injection
LNG plant for Statoil in SnoslashhvitNorway with CO2
capture from natural gas and CO2 re-injection off-shore
CO2 Wash Units
Removal of impurities like Hydrocarbons Heavy metals O2 amp H2O for food grade CO2
CO2 Food Grade Plants CO2 Transport and Distribution
6
Overall ObjectiveDemonstrate and evaluate two innovative flue gas aerosol pretreatment technologies identified to significantly reduce high aerosol particle concentrations (gt107 particlescm3) in the 70-200 nm particle size range
(1) A high velocity water spray-based system with unique design features(2) A novel electrostatic precipitator (ESP) device with an optimized design and operating conditions
Specific Objectivesmdash Complete an aerosol mechanism literature review and develop a mechanistic model
characterizing aerosol formation and interaction with amine solvent in the absorber of a PCC plantmdash Design build install commission and operate the two technologies for flue gas aerosol
pretreatment at a coal-fired power plant host site providing the flue gas as a slipstream at a flow rate of 500-1000 scfm
mdash Complete parametric testing and analysis of each technology to demonstrate achievement of target performance
mdash Complete a benchmarking study to identify the optimal aerosol pretreatment system for commercial deployment and integration with solvent-based PCC technology
Project Objectives
Start Finish
Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Q3 2020 Q4 2020
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
Budget Period 1 612018 11302018
10 Project management 612018 11302018
21 Mechanism review 612018 6292018
22 Mechanism modeling 722018 11282018
31 Design basis dev 612018 6292018
32 Basic engineering 722018 1052018
33 Detailed engineering 1082018 11282018
34 Test planning 10292018 11282018
Budget Period 2 1232018 11292019
10 Project management 1232018 11292019
41 ESP system fabrication 1232018 8302019
42 Spray system fabrication 1232018 8302019
43 Procurement for install 1232018 8302019
51 Site installation 922019 10182019
52 Commission amp start-up 10212019 11292019
Budget Period 3 1222019 11302020
10 Project management 1222019 11302020
61 ESP system tests 1222019 2242020
62 Spray system tests 2172020 4302020
63 Test analysis 542020 8282020
70 Benchmarking analysis 8312020 11272020
80 Removal of equipment 8312020 11272020
Project Scope Timeline amp Milestones
7
BP1 Design amp Engineering
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
HIJ
BP2 Fabrication amp Installation
BP3 Testing amp Analysis
Task ID Milestone Completion Date1 A Updated PMP 629181 B Kick-Off Meeting 727182 C Mechanisms review amp modeling complete 1130183 D Design amp engineering complete 1130183 E Test plan complete 1130184 F Fabrication amp procurement complete 830195 G Installation amp commissioning complete 1129196 H Parametric testing complete 51207 I Benchmarking analysis complete 1130208 J Removal of equipment complete 113020
8
Project Participants
Partner
Organization
Lead contact(s) Key Role(s)
DOE-NETL Andy Aurelio Project Manager
-Funding amp sponsorship
Linde LLC Devin BostickPrincipal InvestigatorKrish Krishnamurthy Technology Director
-Prime contract-Overall program management-High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technology owner
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
Kevin OrsquoBrien Project Lead
-Aerosol mechanisms review-Host site liaison-Flue gas and liquid effluent composition measurement amp analysis
Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL)
Pratim BiswasProject Lead
-Aerosol mechanisms modeling lead-ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technology owner-Characterization of aerosols in flue gas
Affiliated Construction Services (ACS)
Greg LarsonProject Lead
-Procurement management for high velocity water spray-based system-Construction management for site modifications amp module installation
9
Project Budget DOE Funding and Cost Share
SourceBudget Period 1
Jun 2018 ndash Nov 2018
Budget Period 2
Dec 2018 ndash Nov 2019
Budget Period 3
Dec 2019 ndash Nov 2020Total
DOE Funding $457822 $1290725 $1078826 $2827834
Cost Share $176612 $260949 $269860 $707421
Total Project $634435 $1551674 $1348686 $3534795
Cost share commitments
Linde $234869
University of Illinois (UIUC) $231339
Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) $191213
Affiliated Construction Services (ACS) $50000
Technology Development
Rationale Background amp Previous Research
10
Rationale reducing aerosol-driven amine losses from solvent-based PCC technology enables its broader commercial deployment
11
Amine losses
Flue gas cooler
Flue gas blower
Flue gas inlet
Condensate
Major factor aerosol particles in flue gas from coal-fired power plants
Aerosol particle formation during coal combustion
S N
N
S
Inorganic oxides and metals (eg SiO2 Fe P)
Sulfur
Nitrogen
Organic volatiles
Inorganic volatiles (eg Hg)
Coal particle1st stage
devolatilization
Burning of tar
Tar
Oxidation
CO2
Partial oxidation
Metal or its Suboxide vapor (eg SiO Ca)
Absorption
Re-oxidation amp particle formation
Nano-sized inorganic aerosol particle
(eg SiO2 particle)
Inorganic aerosols shielding organics
Aerosols sent in flue gas to PCC absorber
(1) Nucleation(2) Condensation
04 nmParticle Size 04 ndash 2 nm 2 - 100 nm 0001-1000 mm
(3) Coagulation
3 main stages of aerosol formation1
Burning of char
Bottom Ash
2nd stage devolatilization
Ash formation
1 Wang Xinlei amp Williams Brent amp Tang Y amp Huang Yuhsuan amp Kong L amp Yang Xin amp Biswas Pratim (2013) Characterization of organic aerosol produced during pulverized coal combustion in a drop tube furnace Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13 105194acp-13-10919-2013
12
Theory and mechanisms for aerosol-driven amine losses from PCC plant absorbers1
13
Phase IAerosol growth and nucleation from water in absorber
Phase IIAerosol growth from amine in absorber
Phase IIIBuildup of captured CO2and amine bound to CO2in aerosols
Phase IVSalt accumulation inside particles causing further amine and CO2 diffusion into aerosols
02 microm particle
1 G Lombardo B Fostas M Shah A Morken O Hvidsten J Mertens E Hamborg Results from Aerosol Measurement in Amine Plant Treating Gas Turbine and Residue Fluidized Catalytic Cracker Flue Gases at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad GHGT-13 Energy Procedia 2017 114 Pages 1210-1230
Water condensation
Nucleation from water supersaturation
1 microm particle
Amine absorption until complete saturation
2 microm particle
CO2 and CO2+amine absorption
2-5 microm particleSalt accumulationCO2 and amine diffusion
Amine contained in aerosol particles are then emitted from PCC absorber in treated gas stream
The Kelvin equation gives the minimum particle diameter d of a liquid1 supersaturation leads to nucleation of smaller particles
14
Benefits of aerosol particle reduction
Benefits
Manageable solvent supply and transport logistics
Optimum power plant efficiency
when integrated with PCC
Reduction of particulate that can unfavorably react with amine
solvent
Improved PCC plant specific
energy performance
Environmental sustainability and
performance
Improved PCC plant business
caselower cost
Methods to reduce aerosol-driven solvent losses Flue gas aerosol pretreatment provides optimum solution1
For power plants integrated with solvent-based PCC without an existing baghouse optimized flue gas aerosol pretreatment is the only viable option to reduce aerosol concentrations from gt109 particlescm3 to manageable levels near 104-106
particlescm3 for particles with diameters in the range of 70-200 nm
Pretreatment has traditionally been performed using simple ESPs and Brownian filters
Few systematic studies have been conducted to evaluate performance of different technologies over a full range of conditions
15
BH = baghouse
1 Based on single point experience some options eg dry bed conf may handle higher particle concentrations than others
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
Abbott Power Plant (42 reheat burner w dryer) | Abbott Power Plant (0 reheat burner wo dryer) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (WashU) | Wilsonville (before baghouse) (SR) | UT Austin (NCCC) (before baghouse) | TCM (no BH no BF) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (SR) | Wilsonville Parametric Tests (Linde) | Wilsonville Long-term Tests (Linde) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anal Ins | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | kg amineMT CO2 | 04080107622 | 00095091096 | |||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 682819795644892 | 982 | 427900576923077 | 157 | 14468166666667 | 982 | 1000000 | 10 | 4000000 | 2400 | 100000 | 35 | 650000 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 735415966499163 | 102 | 532616923076924 | 163 | 160013 | 102 | 200000 | 20 | 3000000 | 2800 | 1150000 | 60 | 600000 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 667026341708543 | 106 | 642390384615385 | 168 | 14813666666667 | 106 | 200000 | 40 | 2000000 | 2800 | 10000000 | 100 | 530000 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 566092556113903 | 109 | 764663461538462 | 175 | 91535 | 109 | 1000000 | 70 | 1000000 | 3000 | 10000000 | 160 | 400000 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 60451071356784 | 113 | 993782692307693 | 181 | 21280833333333 | 113 | 6300000 | 110 | 900000 | 3200 | 1400000 | 280 | 350000 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 640447634840872 | 118 | 103840961538462 | 188 | 277361 | 118 | 8000000 | 200 | 800000 | 3200 | 120000 | 480 | 50000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 63931935678392 | 122 | 119893653846154 | 195 | 30501933333333 | 122 | 5000000 | 400 | 600000 | 3800 | 1400 | 640 | 20000 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 67781860636516 | 126 | 155467692307692 | 202 | 35493966666667 | 126 | 800000 | 700 | 500000 | 3800 | 1000 | 960 | 10000 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 678467648241207 | 131 | 173807500 | 209 | 25912033333333 | 131 | 1 | 800 | 400000 | 3800 | 1000 | 1920 | 5000 | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 736663748743719 | 136 | 198103846153846 | 217 | 20493533333333 | 136 | 1 | 1000 | 318900 | 3800 | 900 | 2560 | 100 | 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 791600921273033 | 141 | 245189807692308 | 225 | 34751733333333 | 141 | 300000 | 3800 | 750 | 5120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 776599182579565 | 146 | 27240826923077 | 233 | 43427866666667 | 146 | 200000 | 3800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 748095604690118 | 151 | 301905384615385 | 241 | 592247 | 151 | 100000 | 4000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 852265149078728 | 157 | 348734615384616 | 25 | 614018 | 157 | 90000 | 4100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 99985068676717 | 163 | 375607115384616 | 259 | 87004466666667 | 163 | 80000 | 4200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11043162479062 | 168 | 442790384615385 | 269 | 137845333333333 | 168 | 70000 | 4200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119948670016751 | 175 | 523365384615385 | 279 | 183715 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
112247051926298 | 181 | 445000384615385 | 289 | 241348 | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
126325376884422 | 188 | 591696153846154 | 30 | 299061666666667 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130470221105528 | 195 | 660759615384616 | 311 | 380613666666667 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140578994974874 | 202 | 706025000000001 | 322 | 419054666666667 | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
158666502512563 | 209 | 794851923076924 | 334 | 64940 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15709983919598 | 217 | 860896153846155 | 346 | 883372 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
146305745393635 | 225 | 847675000000001 | 359 | 130709333333333 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
175050465661642 | 233 | 943019230769232 | 372 | 182267 | 233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20586516917923 | 241 | 949319230769232 | 385 | 263912666666667 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21836616080402 | 25 | 96023076923077 | 40 | 355521333333333 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
221599480737019 | 259 | 956119230769232 | 414 | 484109 | 259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
231432663316583 | 269 | 1025750000 | 429 | 647791 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
228343541038526 | 279 | 964151923076924 | 445 | 830633 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238293788944724 | 289 | 982432692307693 | 461 | 1054740 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24027170519263 | 30 | 103288461538462 | 478 | 125545333333333 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254431427135679 | 311 | 981471153846155 | 514 | 1435950 | 311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
281640274706868 | 322 | 100416538461539 | 533 | 161942333333333 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
279502308207705 | 334 | 995501923076924 | 552 | 169811666666667 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
273149989949749 | 346 | 969944230769232 | 573 | 182475666666667 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
301086837520938 | 359 | 89473076923077 | 594 | 187437333333333 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
337571587939699 | 372 | 791292307692308 | 615 | 1885320 | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
335709822445561 | 385 | 719676923076924 | 638 | 184891666666667 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
303290958123953 | 40 | 67950576923077 | 661 | 177122333333333 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
296100891122278 | 414 | 554032692307693 | 685 | 167757333333333 | 414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305137175879397 | 429 | 441263461538462 | 71 | 1563790 | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
298671450586265 | 445 | 39593576923077 | 737 | 143831333333333 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
267825041876047 | 461 | 294517500 | 764 | 1276340 | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
268898750418761 | 478 | 235586538461539 | 791 | 111617666666667 | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
246584087102178 | 496 | 219594615384616 | 82 | 956378666666667 | 496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22753597319933 | 514 | 183537307692308 | 851 | 786719333333333 | 514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20805557118928 | 533 | 132950384615385 | 882 | 654658 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
193145899497488 | 552 | 991526923076924 | 914 | 524162333333333 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180397058626466 | 573 | 723884615384616 | 947 | 398477 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159287497487437 | 594 | 49395000 | 982 | 294095333333333 | 594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140093966499163 | 615 | 329623653846154 | 1018 | 216415 | 615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
125712003350084 | 638 | 232231346153846 | 1055 | 155941333333333 | 638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11582181239531 | 661 | 170568076923077 | 1094 | 109822 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
933554824120604 | 685 | 114283076923077 | 1134 | 811729333333333 | 685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
766995862646567 | 71 | 851232692307693 | 1176 | 533704666666667 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
625145611390285 | 737 | 558684615384616 | 1219 | 398905 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
531419574539364 | 764 | 425857115384616 | 1263 | 272716 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401304512562814 | 791 | 320039230769231 | 131 | 224988666666667 | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
302290415410386 | 82 | 224643461538462 | 1358 | 175139333333333 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
234256559463987 | 851 | 204812115384616 | 1407 | 137377666666667 | 851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
174277956448911 | 882 | 133968461538462 | 1459 | 1185743 | 882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119620948073702 | 914 | 120355384615385 | 1512 | 901657 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
860247541038527 | 947 | 1114950 | 1568 | 95869666666667 | 947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
588795608040202 | 982 | 892715384615385 | 1625 | 866524 | 982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453500100502513 | 1018 | 75693076923077 | 1685 | 79995933333333 | 1018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306104184254607 | 1055 | 734100000000001 | 1747 | 855652 | 1055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
214392951423786 | 1094 | 732648076923078 | 1811 | 82140833333333 | 1094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171584234505863 | 1134 | 530092307692308 | 1877 | 81683533333333 | 1134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129452606365159 | 1176 | 609534615384616 | 1946 | 71270166666667 | 1176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
109800234170854 | 1219 | 491257692307693 | 2017 | 67286033333333 | 1219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
875061487437187 | 1263 | 391936346153846 | 2091 | 75311933333333 | 1263 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
755701192629817 | 131 | 427556153846154 | 2167 | 71270066666667 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76907041876047 | 1358 | 528136538461539 | 2247 | 670295 | 1358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
816854716917924 | 1407 | 538875 | 2329 | 612828 | 1407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682292696817421 | 1459 | 484882692307693 | 2414 | 60685066666667 | 1459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
484327912897823 | 1512 | 523173076923077 | 2503 | 64353 | 1512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
601245688442212 | 1568 | 532400 | 2595 | 575052 | 1568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
608947306532664 | 1625 | 391983653846154 | 269 | 53995533333333 | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57423530318258 | 1685 | 39818576923077 | 2788 | 56581733333333 | 1685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
665198110552765 | 1747 | 390621538461539 | 289 | 50526966666667 | 1747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
641284469011726 | 1811 | 282454038461539 | 2996 | 52087233333333 | 1811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
551386834170855 | 1877 | 301689807692308 | 3106 | 390656 | 1877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
515487715242882 | 1946 | 392116538461539 | 322 | 40069366666667 | 1946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
557056576214406 | 2017 | 262214807692308 | 3338 | 42029366666667 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
585014763819096 | 2091 | 300040192307693 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
563217748743719 | 2167 | 327144807692308 | 3587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
516019996649917 | 2247 | 291944038461539 | 3718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
635039155778895 | 2329 | 410772307692308 | 3854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
678386860971525 | 2414 | 438539038461539 | 3995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
540607373534339 | 2503 | 810536808 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534717524288108 | 2595 | 882899298 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
624962696817421 | 269 | 884130018 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
507626351758795 | 2788 | 848442984 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
482487487437186 | 289 | 79158372 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
462233661641542 | 2996 | 628394094 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
614290241206031 | 3106 | 484154992 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549685423785595 | 322 | 3250266138 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485615936348409 | 3338 | 1930962502 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446652388609716 | 346 | 97717245 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
733651755443887 | 3587 | 451665266 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73515500837521 | 3718 | 1710666186 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
491714613065327 | 3854 | 750723816 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453128479061977 | 3995 | 3692090772 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22625785 | 542 | 08614861802 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23149945 | 583 | 11076250522 | 1596 | 89545 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2547951466667 | 626 | 1 | 1715 | 10021 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26411294 | 673 | 1 | 1843 | 11057 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2478060433333 | 723 | 1 | 1981 | 12158 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2428556433333 | 777 | 1 | 2129 | 12433 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1953912566667 | 835 | 1 | 2288 | 113975 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1421029306667 | 898 | 01230695642 | 2458 | 9234 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
797872833333 | 965 | 1 | 2642 | 70035 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430967506667 | 1037 | 1 | 2839 | 49195 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21839545 | 1114 | 1 | 3051 | 3452 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84446483333 | 1197 | 01230695642 | 3278 | 23495 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
320313357 | 1286 | 1 | 3523 | 1597 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34943302333 | 1382 | 1 | 3786 | 1089 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17471639033 | 1486 | 1 | 4068 | 781 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116477634 | 1596 | 1 | 4371 | 5965 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 1715 | 1 | 4698 | 4325 | 1596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1843 | 1 | 5048 | 3995 | 1715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1981 | 1 | 5425 | 3185 | 1843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2129 | 1 | 5829 | 2325 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2288 | 1 | 6264 | 2185 | 2129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2458 | 1 | 6732 | 194 | 2288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2642 | 1 | 7234 | 1705 | 2458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 2839 | 1 | 7774 | 1395 | 2642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 3051 | 1 | 8354 | 124 | 2839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 3278 | 1 | 8977 | 97 | 3051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 3523 | 1 | 9647 | 92 | 3278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735818 | 3786 | 1 | 10370 | 71 | 3523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23295514667 | 4068 | 1 | 11140 | 56 | 3786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4371 | 1 | 11970 | 51 | 4068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4698 | 1 | 12860 | 35 | 4371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5048 | 1 | 13820 | 31 | 4698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5425 | 1 | 14860 | 21 | 5048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5829 | 1 | 15960 | 16 | 5425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6264 | 1 | 17150 | 1 | 5829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6732 | 1 | 18430 | 055 | 6264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7234 | 1 | 19810 | 05 | 6732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7774 | 055 | 7234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8354 | 02 | 7774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8977 | 005 | 8354 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 9647 | 0 | 8977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 10370 | 01 | 9647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11140 | 005 | 10370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11970 | 005 | 11140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 12860 | 01 | 11970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 13820 | 0 | 12860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 14860 | 0 | 13820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 15960 | 0 | 14860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 17150 | 0 | 15960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 18430 | 0 | 17150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 19810 | 0 | 18430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19810 |
0009 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 |
Objectives Scope Timeline Participants amp Funding
3
ProjectOverview
4
Overview of The Linde Group
1
Linde EngineeringTechnology-focused Air Separation
Global 1
Air Separation
Global 1
Hydrogen Syn Gas
Global 2
Hydrogen Syn Gas
Global 2
Olefins
Global 2
Olefins
Global 2
Natural Gas
Global 3
Natural Gas
Global 3
HyCO Tonnage Plants
gt70 plants
HyCO Tonnage Plants
gt70 plants
HyCO Tonnage Plants
gt70 plants
ASU Tonnage Plants
gt300 plants
ASU Tonnage Plants
gt300 plants
ECOVAR Std Plants
gt1000 plants
ECOVAR Std Plants
gt1000 plants
Linde Gas - TonnageWorld-class operations
CO2 Plants
gt100 plants
Founded
Sales (2017)
Employees
Countries
US Linde Gas HQ
US Linde Engineering Facilities
Leveraging
Synergies
1879
$20 billion
64000
gt100
Bridgewater NJ
Tulsa OK
Holly Springs GA
Houston TX
Linde has extensive experience in CO2 capture amp handling
5
Experience in design amp erection of different wash processes for CO2
removalbull Linde-Rectisol reg
bull BASF Oase technreg
bull Benfield
Long experience in operation of CO2 plants transport amp distribution
bull OCAP pipeline (Netherlands)
bull Onsite business
bull Bulk supply
CO2 Capture and Injection
LNG plant for Statoil in SnoslashhvitNorway with CO2
capture from natural gas and CO2 re-injection off-shore
CO2 Wash Units
Removal of impurities like Hydrocarbons Heavy metals O2 amp H2O for food grade CO2
CO2 Food Grade Plants CO2 Transport and Distribution
6
Overall ObjectiveDemonstrate and evaluate two innovative flue gas aerosol pretreatment technologies identified to significantly reduce high aerosol particle concentrations (gt107 particlescm3) in the 70-200 nm particle size range
(1) A high velocity water spray-based system with unique design features(2) A novel electrostatic precipitator (ESP) device with an optimized design and operating conditions
Specific Objectivesmdash Complete an aerosol mechanism literature review and develop a mechanistic model
characterizing aerosol formation and interaction with amine solvent in the absorber of a PCC plantmdash Design build install commission and operate the two technologies for flue gas aerosol
pretreatment at a coal-fired power plant host site providing the flue gas as a slipstream at a flow rate of 500-1000 scfm
mdash Complete parametric testing and analysis of each technology to demonstrate achievement of target performance
mdash Complete a benchmarking study to identify the optimal aerosol pretreatment system for commercial deployment and integration with solvent-based PCC technology
Project Objectives
Start Finish
Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Q3 2020 Q4 2020
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
Budget Period 1 612018 11302018
10 Project management 612018 11302018
21 Mechanism review 612018 6292018
22 Mechanism modeling 722018 11282018
31 Design basis dev 612018 6292018
32 Basic engineering 722018 1052018
33 Detailed engineering 1082018 11282018
34 Test planning 10292018 11282018
Budget Period 2 1232018 11292019
10 Project management 1232018 11292019
41 ESP system fabrication 1232018 8302019
42 Spray system fabrication 1232018 8302019
43 Procurement for install 1232018 8302019
51 Site installation 922019 10182019
52 Commission amp start-up 10212019 11292019
Budget Period 3 1222019 11302020
10 Project management 1222019 11302020
61 ESP system tests 1222019 2242020
62 Spray system tests 2172020 4302020
63 Test analysis 542020 8282020
70 Benchmarking analysis 8312020 11272020
80 Removal of equipment 8312020 11272020
Project Scope Timeline amp Milestones
7
BP1 Design amp Engineering
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
HIJ
BP2 Fabrication amp Installation
BP3 Testing amp Analysis
Task ID Milestone Completion Date1 A Updated PMP 629181 B Kick-Off Meeting 727182 C Mechanisms review amp modeling complete 1130183 D Design amp engineering complete 1130183 E Test plan complete 1130184 F Fabrication amp procurement complete 830195 G Installation amp commissioning complete 1129196 H Parametric testing complete 51207 I Benchmarking analysis complete 1130208 J Removal of equipment complete 113020
8
Project Participants
Partner
Organization
Lead contact(s) Key Role(s)
DOE-NETL Andy Aurelio Project Manager
-Funding amp sponsorship
Linde LLC Devin BostickPrincipal InvestigatorKrish Krishnamurthy Technology Director
-Prime contract-Overall program management-High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technology owner
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
Kevin OrsquoBrien Project Lead
-Aerosol mechanisms review-Host site liaison-Flue gas and liquid effluent composition measurement amp analysis
Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL)
Pratim BiswasProject Lead
-Aerosol mechanisms modeling lead-ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technology owner-Characterization of aerosols in flue gas
Affiliated Construction Services (ACS)
Greg LarsonProject Lead
-Procurement management for high velocity water spray-based system-Construction management for site modifications amp module installation
9
Project Budget DOE Funding and Cost Share
SourceBudget Period 1
Jun 2018 ndash Nov 2018
Budget Period 2
Dec 2018 ndash Nov 2019
Budget Period 3
Dec 2019 ndash Nov 2020Total
DOE Funding $457822 $1290725 $1078826 $2827834
Cost Share $176612 $260949 $269860 $707421
Total Project $634435 $1551674 $1348686 $3534795
Cost share commitments
Linde $234869
University of Illinois (UIUC) $231339
Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) $191213
Affiliated Construction Services (ACS) $50000
Technology Development
Rationale Background amp Previous Research
10
Rationale reducing aerosol-driven amine losses from solvent-based PCC technology enables its broader commercial deployment
11
Amine losses
Flue gas cooler
Flue gas blower
Flue gas inlet
Condensate
Major factor aerosol particles in flue gas from coal-fired power plants
Aerosol particle formation during coal combustion
S N
N
S
Inorganic oxides and metals (eg SiO2 Fe P)
Sulfur
Nitrogen
Organic volatiles
Inorganic volatiles (eg Hg)
Coal particle1st stage
devolatilization
Burning of tar
Tar
Oxidation
CO2
Partial oxidation
Metal or its Suboxide vapor (eg SiO Ca)
Absorption
Re-oxidation amp particle formation
Nano-sized inorganic aerosol particle
(eg SiO2 particle)
Inorganic aerosols shielding organics
Aerosols sent in flue gas to PCC absorber
(1) Nucleation(2) Condensation
04 nmParticle Size 04 ndash 2 nm 2 - 100 nm 0001-1000 mm
(3) Coagulation
3 main stages of aerosol formation1
Burning of char
Bottom Ash
2nd stage devolatilization
Ash formation
1 Wang Xinlei amp Williams Brent amp Tang Y amp Huang Yuhsuan amp Kong L amp Yang Xin amp Biswas Pratim (2013) Characterization of organic aerosol produced during pulverized coal combustion in a drop tube furnace Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13 105194acp-13-10919-2013
12
Theory and mechanisms for aerosol-driven amine losses from PCC plant absorbers1
13
Phase IAerosol growth and nucleation from water in absorber
Phase IIAerosol growth from amine in absorber
Phase IIIBuildup of captured CO2and amine bound to CO2in aerosols
Phase IVSalt accumulation inside particles causing further amine and CO2 diffusion into aerosols
02 microm particle
1 G Lombardo B Fostas M Shah A Morken O Hvidsten J Mertens E Hamborg Results from Aerosol Measurement in Amine Plant Treating Gas Turbine and Residue Fluidized Catalytic Cracker Flue Gases at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad GHGT-13 Energy Procedia 2017 114 Pages 1210-1230
Water condensation
Nucleation from water supersaturation
1 microm particle
Amine absorption until complete saturation
2 microm particle
CO2 and CO2+amine absorption
2-5 microm particleSalt accumulationCO2 and amine diffusion
Amine contained in aerosol particles are then emitted from PCC absorber in treated gas stream
The Kelvin equation gives the minimum particle diameter d of a liquid1 supersaturation leads to nucleation of smaller particles
14
Benefits of aerosol particle reduction
Benefits
Manageable solvent supply and transport logistics
Optimum power plant efficiency
when integrated with PCC
Reduction of particulate that can unfavorably react with amine
solvent
Improved PCC plant specific
energy performance
Environmental sustainability and
performance
Improved PCC plant business
caselower cost
Methods to reduce aerosol-driven solvent losses Flue gas aerosol pretreatment provides optimum solution1
For power plants integrated with solvent-based PCC without an existing baghouse optimized flue gas aerosol pretreatment is the only viable option to reduce aerosol concentrations from gt109 particlescm3 to manageable levels near 104-106
particlescm3 for particles with diameters in the range of 70-200 nm
Pretreatment has traditionally been performed using simple ESPs and Brownian filters
Few systematic studies have been conducted to evaluate performance of different technologies over a full range of conditions
15
BH = baghouse
1 Based on single point experience some options eg dry bed conf may handle higher particle concentrations than others
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
Abbott Power Plant (42 reheat burner w dryer) | Abbott Power Plant (0 reheat burner wo dryer) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (WashU) | Wilsonville (before baghouse) (SR) | UT Austin (NCCC) (before baghouse) | TCM (no BH no BF) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (SR) | Wilsonville Parametric Tests (Linde) | Wilsonville Long-term Tests (Linde) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anal Ins | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | kg amineMT CO2 | 04080107622 | 00095091096 | |||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 682819795644892 | 982 | 427900576923077 | 157 | 14468166666667 | 982 | 1000000 | 10 | 4000000 | 2400 | 100000 | 35 | 650000 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 735415966499163 | 102 | 532616923076924 | 163 | 160013 | 102 | 200000 | 20 | 3000000 | 2800 | 1150000 | 60 | 600000 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 667026341708543 | 106 | 642390384615385 | 168 | 14813666666667 | 106 | 200000 | 40 | 2000000 | 2800 | 10000000 | 100 | 530000 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 566092556113903 | 109 | 764663461538462 | 175 | 91535 | 109 | 1000000 | 70 | 1000000 | 3000 | 10000000 | 160 | 400000 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 60451071356784 | 113 | 993782692307693 | 181 | 21280833333333 | 113 | 6300000 | 110 | 900000 | 3200 | 1400000 | 280 | 350000 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 640447634840872 | 118 | 103840961538462 | 188 | 277361 | 118 | 8000000 | 200 | 800000 | 3200 | 120000 | 480 | 50000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 63931935678392 | 122 | 119893653846154 | 195 | 30501933333333 | 122 | 5000000 | 400 | 600000 | 3800 | 1400 | 640 | 20000 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 67781860636516 | 126 | 155467692307692 | 202 | 35493966666667 | 126 | 800000 | 700 | 500000 | 3800 | 1000 | 960 | 10000 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 678467648241207 | 131 | 173807500 | 209 | 25912033333333 | 131 | 1 | 800 | 400000 | 3800 | 1000 | 1920 | 5000 | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 736663748743719 | 136 | 198103846153846 | 217 | 20493533333333 | 136 | 1 | 1000 | 318900 | 3800 | 900 | 2560 | 100 | 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 791600921273033 | 141 | 245189807692308 | 225 | 34751733333333 | 141 | 300000 | 3800 | 750 | 5120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 776599182579565 | 146 | 27240826923077 | 233 | 43427866666667 | 146 | 200000 | 3800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 748095604690118 | 151 | 301905384615385 | 241 | 592247 | 151 | 100000 | 4000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 852265149078728 | 157 | 348734615384616 | 25 | 614018 | 157 | 90000 | 4100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 99985068676717 | 163 | 375607115384616 | 259 | 87004466666667 | 163 | 80000 | 4200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11043162479062 | 168 | 442790384615385 | 269 | 137845333333333 | 168 | 70000 | 4200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119948670016751 | 175 | 523365384615385 | 279 | 183715 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
112247051926298 | 181 | 445000384615385 | 289 | 241348 | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
126325376884422 | 188 | 591696153846154 | 30 | 299061666666667 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130470221105528 | 195 | 660759615384616 | 311 | 380613666666667 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140578994974874 | 202 | 706025000000001 | 322 | 419054666666667 | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
158666502512563 | 209 | 794851923076924 | 334 | 64940 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15709983919598 | 217 | 860896153846155 | 346 | 883372 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
146305745393635 | 225 | 847675000000001 | 359 | 130709333333333 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
175050465661642 | 233 | 943019230769232 | 372 | 182267 | 233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20586516917923 | 241 | 949319230769232 | 385 | 263912666666667 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21836616080402 | 25 | 96023076923077 | 40 | 355521333333333 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
221599480737019 | 259 | 956119230769232 | 414 | 484109 | 259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
231432663316583 | 269 | 1025750000 | 429 | 647791 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
228343541038526 | 279 | 964151923076924 | 445 | 830633 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238293788944724 | 289 | 982432692307693 | 461 | 1054740 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24027170519263 | 30 | 103288461538462 | 478 | 125545333333333 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254431427135679 | 311 | 981471153846155 | 514 | 1435950 | 311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
281640274706868 | 322 | 100416538461539 | 533 | 161942333333333 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
279502308207705 | 334 | 995501923076924 | 552 | 169811666666667 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
273149989949749 | 346 | 969944230769232 | 573 | 182475666666667 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
301086837520938 | 359 | 89473076923077 | 594 | 187437333333333 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
337571587939699 | 372 | 791292307692308 | 615 | 1885320 | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
335709822445561 | 385 | 719676923076924 | 638 | 184891666666667 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
303290958123953 | 40 | 67950576923077 | 661 | 177122333333333 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
296100891122278 | 414 | 554032692307693 | 685 | 167757333333333 | 414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305137175879397 | 429 | 441263461538462 | 71 | 1563790 | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
298671450586265 | 445 | 39593576923077 | 737 | 143831333333333 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
267825041876047 | 461 | 294517500 | 764 | 1276340 | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
268898750418761 | 478 | 235586538461539 | 791 | 111617666666667 | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
246584087102178 | 496 | 219594615384616 | 82 | 956378666666667 | 496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22753597319933 | 514 | 183537307692308 | 851 | 786719333333333 | 514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20805557118928 | 533 | 132950384615385 | 882 | 654658 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
193145899497488 | 552 | 991526923076924 | 914 | 524162333333333 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180397058626466 | 573 | 723884615384616 | 947 | 398477 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159287497487437 | 594 | 49395000 | 982 | 294095333333333 | 594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140093966499163 | 615 | 329623653846154 | 1018 | 216415 | 615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
125712003350084 | 638 | 232231346153846 | 1055 | 155941333333333 | 638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11582181239531 | 661 | 170568076923077 | 1094 | 109822 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
933554824120604 | 685 | 114283076923077 | 1134 | 811729333333333 | 685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
766995862646567 | 71 | 851232692307693 | 1176 | 533704666666667 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
625145611390285 | 737 | 558684615384616 | 1219 | 398905 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
531419574539364 | 764 | 425857115384616 | 1263 | 272716 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401304512562814 | 791 | 320039230769231 | 131 | 224988666666667 | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
302290415410386 | 82 | 224643461538462 | 1358 | 175139333333333 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
234256559463987 | 851 | 204812115384616 | 1407 | 137377666666667 | 851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
174277956448911 | 882 | 133968461538462 | 1459 | 1185743 | 882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119620948073702 | 914 | 120355384615385 | 1512 | 901657 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
860247541038527 | 947 | 1114950 | 1568 | 95869666666667 | 947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
588795608040202 | 982 | 892715384615385 | 1625 | 866524 | 982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453500100502513 | 1018 | 75693076923077 | 1685 | 79995933333333 | 1018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306104184254607 | 1055 | 734100000000001 | 1747 | 855652 | 1055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
214392951423786 | 1094 | 732648076923078 | 1811 | 82140833333333 | 1094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171584234505863 | 1134 | 530092307692308 | 1877 | 81683533333333 | 1134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129452606365159 | 1176 | 609534615384616 | 1946 | 71270166666667 | 1176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
109800234170854 | 1219 | 491257692307693 | 2017 | 67286033333333 | 1219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
875061487437187 | 1263 | 391936346153846 | 2091 | 75311933333333 | 1263 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
755701192629817 | 131 | 427556153846154 | 2167 | 71270066666667 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76907041876047 | 1358 | 528136538461539 | 2247 | 670295 | 1358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
816854716917924 | 1407 | 538875 | 2329 | 612828 | 1407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682292696817421 | 1459 | 484882692307693 | 2414 | 60685066666667 | 1459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
484327912897823 | 1512 | 523173076923077 | 2503 | 64353 | 1512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
601245688442212 | 1568 | 532400 | 2595 | 575052 | 1568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
608947306532664 | 1625 | 391983653846154 | 269 | 53995533333333 | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57423530318258 | 1685 | 39818576923077 | 2788 | 56581733333333 | 1685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
665198110552765 | 1747 | 390621538461539 | 289 | 50526966666667 | 1747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
641284469011726 | 1811 | 282454038461539 | 2996 | 52087233333333 | 1811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
551386834170855 | 1877 | 301689807692308 | 3106 | 390656 | 1877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
515487715242882 | 1946 | 392116538461539 | 322 | 40069366666667 | 1946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
557056576214406 | 2017 | 262214807692308 | 3338 | 42029366666667 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
585014763819096 | 2091 | 300040192307693 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
563217748743719 | 2167 | 327144807692308 | 3587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
516019996649917 | 2247 | 291944038461539 | 3718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
635039155778895 | 2329 | 410772307692308 | 3854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
678386860971525 | 2414 | 438539038461539 | 3995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
540607373534339 | 2503 | 810536808 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534717524288108 | 2595 | 882899298 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
624962696817421 | 269 | 884130018 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
507626351758795 | 2788 | 848442984 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
482487487437186 | 289 | 79158372 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
462233661641542 | 2996 | 628394094 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
614290241206031 | 3106 | 484154992 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549685423785595 | 322 | 3250266138 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485615936348409 | 3338 | 1930962502 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446652388609716 | 346 | 97717245 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
733651755443887 | 3587 | 451665266 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73515500837521 | 3718 | 1710666186 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
491714613065327 | 3854 | 750723816 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453128479061977 | 3995 | 3692090772 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22625785 | 542 | 08614861802 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23149945 | 583 | 11076250522 | 1596 | 89545 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2547951466667 | 626 | 1 | 1715 | 10021 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26411294 | 673 | 1 | 1843 | 11057 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2478060433333 | 723 | 1 | 1981 | 12158 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2428556433333 | 777 | 1 | 2129 | 12433 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1953912566667 | 835 | 1 | 2288 | 113975 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1421029306667 | 898 | 01230695642 | 2458 | 9234 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
797872833333 | 965 | 1 | 2642 | 70035 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430967506667 | 1037 | 1 | 2839 | 49195 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21839545 | 1114 | 1 | 3051 | 3452 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84446483333 | 1197 | 01230695642 | 3278 | 23495 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
320313357 | 1286 | 1 | 3523 | 1597 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34943302333 | 1382 | 1 | 3786 | 1089 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17471639033 | 1486 | 1 | 4068 | 781 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116477634 | 1596 | 1 | 4371 | 5965 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 1715 | 1 | 4698 | 4325 | 1596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1843 | 1 | 5048 | 3995 | 1715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1981 | 1 | 5425 | 3185 | 1843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2129 | 1 | 5829 | 2325 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2288 | 1 | 6264 | 2185 | 2129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2458 | 1 | 6732 | 194 | 2288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2642 | 1 | 7234 | 1705 | 2458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 2839 | 1 | 7774 | 1395 | 2642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 3051 | 1 | 8354 | 124 | 2839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 3278 | 1 | 8977 | 97 | 3051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 3523 | 1 | 9647 | 92 | 3278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735818 | 3786 | 1 | 10370 | 71 | 3523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23295514667 | 4068 | 1 | 11140 | 56 | 3786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4371 | 1 | 11970 | 51 | 4068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4698 | 1 | 12860 | 35 | 4371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5048 | 1 | 13820 | 31 | 4698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5425 | 1 | 14860 | 21 | 5048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5829 | 1 | 15960 | 16 | 5425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6264 | 1 | 17150 | 1 | 5829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6732 | 1 | 18430 | 055 | 6264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7234 | 1 | 19810 | 05 | 6732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7774 | 055 | 7234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8354 | 02 | 7774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8977 | 005 | 8354 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 9647 | 0 | 8977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 10370 | 01 | 9647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11140 | 005 | 10370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11970 | 005 | 11140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 12860 | 01 | 11970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 13820 | 0 | 12860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 14860 | 0 | 13820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 15960 | 0 | 14860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 17150 | 0 | 15960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 18430 | 0 | 17150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 19810 | 0 | 18430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19810 |
0009 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 |
4
Overview of The Linde Group
1
Linde EngineeringTechnology-focused Air Separation
Global 1
Air Separation
Global 1
Hydrogen Syn Gas
Global 2
Hydrogen Syn Gas
Global 2
Olefins
Global 2
Olefins
Global 2
Natural Gas
Global 3
Natural Gas
Global 3
HyCO Tonnage Plants
gt70 plants
HyCO Tonnage Plants
gt70 plants
HyCO Tonnage Plants
gt70 plants
ASU Tonnage Plants
gt300 plants
ASU Tonnage Plants
gt300 plants
ECOVAR Std Plants
gt1000 plants
ECOVAR Std Plants
gt1000 plants
Linde Gas - TonnageWorld-class operations
CO2 Plants
gt100 plants
Founded
Sales (2017)
Employees
Countries
US Linde Gas HQ
US Linde Engineering Facilities
Leveraging
Synergies
1879
$20 billion
64000
gt100
Bridgewater NJ
Tulsa OK
Holly Springs GA
Houston TX
Linde has extensive experience in CO2 capture amp handling
5
Experience in design amp erection of different wash processes for CO2
removalbull Linde-Rectisol reg
bull BASF Oase technreg
bull Benfield
Long experience in operation of CO2 plants transport amp distribution
bull OCAP pipeline (Netherlands)
bull Onsite business
bull Bulk supply
CO2 Capture and Injection
LNG plant for Statoil in SnoslashhvitNorway with CO2
capture from natural gas and CO2 re-injection off-shore
CO2 Wash Units
Removal of impurities like Hydrocarbons Heavy metals O2 amp H2O for food grade CO2
CO2 Food Grade Plants CO2 Transport and Distribution
6
Overall ObjectiveDemonstrate and evaluate two innovative flue gas aerosol pretreatment technologies identified to significantly reduce high aerosol particle concentrations (gt107 particlescm3) in the 70-200 nm particle size range
(1) A high velocity water spray-based system with unique design features(2) A novel electrostatic precipitator (ESP) device with an optimized design and operating conditions
Specific Objectivesmdash Complete an aerosol mechanism literature review and develop a mechanistic model
characterizing aerosol formation and interaction with amine solvent in the absorber of a PCC plantmdash Design build install commission and operate the two technologies for flue gas aerosol
pretreatment at a coal-fired power plant host site providing the flue gas as a slipstream at a flow rate of 500-1000 scfm
mdash Complete parametric testing and analysis of each technology to demonstrate achievement of target performance
mdash Complete a benchmarking study to identify the optimal aerosol pretreatment system for commercial deployment and integration with solvent-based PCC technology
Project Objectives
Start Finish
Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Q3 2020 Q4 2020
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
Budget Period 1 612018 11302018
10 Project management 612018 11302018
21 Mechanism review 612018 6292018
22 Mechanism modeling 722018 11282018
31 Design basis dev 612018 6292018
32 Basic engineering 722018 1052018
33 Detailed engineering 1082018 11282018
34 Test planning 10292018 11282018
Budget Period 2 1232018 11292019
10 Project management 1232018 11292019
41 ESP system fabrication 1232018 8302019
42 Spray system fabrication 1232018 8302019
43 Procurement for install 1232018 8302019
51 Site installation 922019 10182019
52 Commission amp start-up 10212019 11292019
Budget Period 3 1222019 11302020
10 Project management 1222019 11302020
61 ESP system tests 1222019 2242020
62 Spray system tests 2172020 4302020
63 Test analysis 542020 8282020
70 Benchmarking analysis 8312020 11272020
80 Removal of equipment 8312020 11272020
Project Scope Timeline amp Milestones
7
BP1 Design amp Engineering
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
HIJ
BP2 Fabrication amp Installation
BP3 Testing amp Analysis
Task ID Milestone Completion Date1 A Updated PMP 629181 B Kick-Off Meeting 727182 C Mechanisms review amp modeling complete 1130183 D Design amp engineering complete 1130183 E Test plan complete 1130184 F Fabrication amp procurement complete 830195 G Installation amp commissioning complete 1129196 H Parametric testing complete 51207 I Benchmarking analysis complete 1130208 J Removal of equipment complete 113020
8
Project Participants
Partner
Organization
Lead contact(s) Key Role(s)
DOE-NETL Andy Aurelio Project Manager
-Funding amp sponsorship
Linde LLC Devin BostickPrincipal InvestigatorKrish Krishnamurthy Technology Director
-Prime contract-Overall program management-High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technology owner
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
Kevin OrsquoBrien Project Lead
-Aerosol mechanisms review-Host site liaison-Flue gas and liquid effluent composition measurement amp analysis
Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL)
Pratim BiswasProject Lead
-Aerosol mechanisms modeling lead-ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technology owner-Characterization of aerosols in flue gas
Affiliated Construction Services (ACS)
Greg LarsonProject Lead
-Procurement management for high velocity water spray-based system-Construction management for site modifications amp module installation
9
Project Budget DOE Funding and Cost Share
SourceBudget Period 1
Jun 2018 ndash Nov 2018
Budget Period 2
Dec 2018 ndash Nov 2019
Budget Period 3
Dec 2019 ndash Nov 2020Total
DOE Funding $457822 $1290725 $1078826 $2827834
Cost Share $176612 $260949 $269860 $707421
Total Project $634435 $1551674 $1348686 $3534795
Cost share commitments
Linde $234869
University of Illinois (UIUC) $231339
Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) $191213
Affiliated Construction Services (ACS) $50000
Technology Development
Rationale Background amp Previous Research
10
Rationale reducing aerosol-driven amine losses from solvent-based PCC technology enables its broader commercial deployment
11
Amine losses
Flue gas cooler
Flue gas blower
Flue gas inlet
Condensate
Major factor aerosol particles in flue gas from coal-fired power plants
Aerosol particle formation during coal combustion
S N
N
S
Inorganic oxides and metals (eg SiO2 Fe P)
Sulfur
Nitrogen
Organic volatiles
Inorganic volatiles (eg Hg)
Coal particle1st stage
devolatilization
Burning of tar
Tar
Oxidation
CO2
Partial oxidation
Metal or its Suboxide vapor (eg SiO Ca)
Absorption
Re-oxidation amp particle formation
Nano-sized inorganic aerosol particle
(eg SiO2 particle)
Inorganic aerosols shielding organics
Aerosols sent in flue gas to PCC absorber
(1) Nucleation(2) Condensation
04 nmParticle Size 04 ndash 2 nm 2 - 100 nm 0001-1000 mm
(3) Coagulation
3 main stages of aerosol formation1
Burning of char
Bottom Ash
2nd stage devolatilization
Ash formation
1 Wang Xinlei amp Williams Brent amp Tang Y amp Huang Yuhsuan amp Kong L amp Yang Xin amp Biswas Pratim (2013) Characterization of organic aerosol produced during pulverized coal combustion in a drop tube furnace Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13 105194acp-13-10919-2013
12
Theory and mechanisms for aerosol-driven amine losses from PCC plant absorbers1
13
Phase IAerosol growth and nucleation from water in absorber
Phase IIAerosol growth from amine in absorber
Phase IIIBuildup of captured CO2and amine bound to CO2in aerosols
Phase IVSalt accumulation inside particles causing further amine and CO2 diffusion into aerosols
02 microm particle
1 G Lombardo B Fostas M Shah A Morken O Hvidsten J Mertens E Hamborg Results from Aerosol Measurement in Amine Plant Treating Gas Turbine and Residue Fluidized Catalytic Cracker Flue Gases at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad GHGT-13 Energy Procedia 2017 114 Pages 1210-1230
Water condensation
Nucleation from water supersaturation
1 microm particle
Amine absorption until complete saturation
2 microm particle
CO2 and CO2+amine absorption
2-5 microm particleSalt accumulationCO2 and amine diffusion
Amine contained in aerosol particles are then emitted from PCC absorber in treated gas stream
The Kelvin equation gives the minimum particle diameter d of a liquid1 supersaturation leads to nucleation of smaller particles
14
Benefits of aerosol particle reduction
Benefits
Manageable solvent supply and transport logistics
Optimum power plant efficiency
when integrated with PCC
Reduction of particulate that can unfavorably react with amine
solvent
Improved PCC plant specific
energy performance
Environmental sustainability and
performance
Improved PCC plant business
caselower cost
Methods to reduce aerosol-driven solvent losses Flue gas aerosol pretreatment provides optimum solution1
For power plants integrated with solvent-based PCC without an existing baghouse optimized flue gas aerosol pretreatment is the only viable option to reduce aerosol concentrations from gt109 particlescm3 to manageable levels near 104-106
particlescm3 for particles with diameters in the range of 70-200 nm
Pretreatment has traditionally been performed using simple ESPs and Brownian filters
Few systematic studies have been conducted to evaluate performance of different technologies over a full range of conditions
15
BH = baghouse
1 Based on single point experience some options eg dry bed conf may handle higher particle concentrations than others
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
Abbott Power Plant (42 reheat burner w dryer) | Abbott Power Plant (0 reheat burner wo dryer) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (WashU) | Wilsonville (before baghouse) (SR) | UT Austin (NCCC) (before baghouse) | TCM (no BH no BF) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (SR) | Wilsonville Parametric Tests (Linde) | Wilsonville Long-term Tests (Linde) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anal Ins | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | kg amineMT CO2 | 04080107622 | 00095091096 | |||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 682819795644892 | 982 | 427900576923077 | 157 | 14468166666667 | 982 | 1000000 | 10 | 4000000 | 2400 | 100000 | 35 | 650000 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 735415966499163 | 102 | 532616923076924 | 163 | 160013 | 102 | 200000 | 20 | 3000000 | 2800 | 1150000 | 60 | 600000 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 667026341708543 | 106 | 642390384615385 | 168 | 14813666666667 | 106 | 200000 | 40 | 2000000 | 2800 | 10000000 | 100 | 530000 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 566092556113903 | 109 | 764663461538462 | 175 | 91535 | 109 | 1000000 | 70 | 1000000 | 3000 | 10000000 | 160 | 400000 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 60451071356784 | 113 | 993782692307693 | 181 | 21280833333333 | 113 | 6300000 | 110 | 900000 | 3200 | 1400000 | 280 | 350000 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 640447634840872 | 118 | 103840961538462 | 188 | 277361 | 118 | 8000000 | 200 | 800000 | 3200 | 120000 | 480 | 50000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 63931935678392 | 122 | 119893653846154 | 195 | 30501933333333 | 122 | 5000000 | 400 | 600000 | 3800 | 1400 | 640 | 20000 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 67781860636516 | 126 | 155467692307692 | 202 | 35493966666667 | 126 | 800000 | 700 | 500000 | 3800 | 1000 | 960 | 10000 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 678467648241207 | 131 | 173807500 | 209 | 25912033333333 | 131 | 1 | 800 | 400000 | 3800 | 1000 | 1920 | 5000 | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 736663748743719 | 136 | 198103846153846 | 217 | 20493533333333 | 136 | 1 | 1000 | 318900 | 3800 | 900 | 2560 | 100 | 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 791600921273033 | 141 | 245189807692308 | 225 | 34751733333333 | 141 | 300000 | 3800 | 750 | 5120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 776599182579565 | 146 | 27240826923077 | 233 | 43427866666667 | 146 | 200000 | 3800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 748095604690118 | 151 | 301905384615385 | 241 | 592247 | 151 | 100000 | 4000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 852265149078728 | 157 | 348734615384616 | 25 | 614018 | 157 | 90000 | 4100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 99985068676717 | 163 | 375607115384616 | 259 | 87004466666667 | 163 | 80000 | 4200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11043162479062 | 168 | 442790384615385 | 269 | 137845333333333 | 168 | 70000 | 4200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119948670016751 | 175 | 523365384615385 | 279 | 183715 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
112247051926298 | 181 | 445000384615385 | 289 | 241348 | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
126325376884422 | 188 | 591696153846154 | 30 | 299061666666667 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130470221105528 | 195 | 660759615384616 | 311 | 380613666666667 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140578994974874 | 202 | 706025000000001 | 322 | 419054666666667 | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
158666502512563 | 209 | 794851923076924 | 334 | 64940 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15709983919598 | 217 | 860896153846155 | 346 | 883372 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
146305745393635 | 225 | 847675000000001 | 359 | 130709333333333 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
175050465661642 | 233 | 943019230769232 | 372 | 182267 | 233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20586516917923 | 241 | 949319230769232 | 385 | 263912666666667 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21836616080402 | 25 | 96023076923077 | 40 | 355521333333333 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
221599480737019 | 259 | 956119230769232 | 414 | 484109 | 259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
231432663316583 | 269 | 1025750000 | 429 | 647791 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
228343541038526 | 279 | 964151923076924 | 445 | 830633 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238293788944724 | 289 | 982432692307693 | 461 | 1054740 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24027170519263 | 30 | 103288461538462 | 478 | 125545333333333 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254431427135679 | 311 | 981471153846155 | 514 | 1435950 | 311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
281640274706868 | 322 | 100416538461539 | 533 | 161942333333333 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
279502308207705 | 334 | 995501923076924 | 552 | 169811666666667 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
273149989949749 | 346 | 969944230769232 | 573 | 182475666666667 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
301086837520938 | 359 | 89473076923077 | 594 | 187437333333333 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
337571587939699 | 372 | 791292307692308 | 615 | 1885320 | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
335709822445561 | 385 | 719676923076924 | 638 | 184891666666667 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
303290958123953 | 40 | 67950576923077 | 661 | 177122333333333 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
296100891122278 | 414 | 554032692307693 | 685 | 167757333333333 | 414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305137175879397 | 429 | 441263461538462 | 71 | 1563790 | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
298671450586265 | 445 | 39593576923077 | 737 | 143831333333333 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
267825041876047 | 461 | 294517500 | 764 | 1276340 | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
268898750418761 | 478 | 235586538461539 | 791 | 111617666666667 | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
246584087102178 | 496 | 219594615384616 | 82 | 956378666666667 | 496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22753597319933 | 514 | 183537307692308 | 851 | 786719333333333 | 514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20805557118928 | 533 | 132950384615385 | 882 | 654658 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
193145899497488 | 552 | 991526923076924 | 914 | 524162333333333 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180397058626466 | 573 | 723884615384616 | 947 | 398477 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159287497487437 | 594 | 49395000 | 982 | 294095333333333 | 594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140093966499163 | 615 | 329623653846154 | 1018 | 216415 | 615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
125712003350084 | 638 | 232231346153846 | 1055 | 155941333333333 | 638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11582181239531 | 661 | 170568076923077 | 1094 | 109822 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
933554824120604 | 685 | 114283076923077 | 1134 | 811729333333333 | 685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
766995862646567 | 71 | 851232692307693 | 1176 | 533704666666667 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
625145611390285 | 737 | 558684615384616 | 1219 | 398905 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
531419574539364 | 764 | 425857115384616 | 1263 | 272716 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401304512562814 | 791 | 320039230769231 | 131 | 224988666666667 | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
302290415410386 | 82 | 224643461538462 | 1358 | 175139333333333 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
234256559463987 | 851 | 204812115384616 | 1407 | 137377666666667 | 851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
174277956448911 | 882 | 133968461538462 | 1459 | 1185743 | 882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119620948073702 | 914 | 120355384615385 | 1512 | 901657 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
860247541038527 | 947 | 1114950 | 1568 | 95869666666667 | 947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
588795608040202 | 982 | 892715384615385 | 1625 | 866524 | 982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453500100502513 | 1018 | 75693076923077 | 1685 | 79995933333333 | 1018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306104184254607 | 1055 | 734100000000001 | 1747 | 855652 | 1055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
214392951423786 | 1094 | 732648076923078 | 1811 | 82140833333333 | 1094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171584234505863 | 1134 | 530092307692308 | 1877 | 81683533333333 | 1134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129452606365159 | 1176 | 609534615384616 | 1946 | 71270166666667 | 1176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
109800234170854 | 1219 | 491257692307693 | 2017 | 67286033333333 | 1219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
875061487437187 | 1263 | 391936346153846 | 2091 | 75311933333333 | 1263 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
755701192629817 | 131 | 427556153846154 | 2167 | 71270066666667 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76907041876047 | 1358 | 528136538461539 | 2247 | 670295 | 1358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
816854716917924 | 1407 | 538875 | 2329 | 612828 | 1407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682292696817421 | 1459 | 484882692307693 | 2414 | 60685066666667 | 1459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
484327912897823 | 1512 | 523173076923077 | 2503 | 64353 | 1512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
601245688442212 | 1568 | 532400 | 2595 | 575052 | 1568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
608947306532664 | 1625 | 391983653846154 | 269 | 53995533333333 | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57423530318258 | 1685 | 39818576923077 | 2788 | 56581733333333 | 1685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
665198110552765 | 1747 | 390621538461539 | 289 | 50526966666667 | 1747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
641284469011726 | 1811 | 282454038461539 | 2996 | 52087233333333 | 1811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
551386834170855 | 1877 | 301689807692308 | 3106 | 390656 | 1877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
515487715242882 | 1946 | 392116538461539 | 322 | 40069366666667 | 1946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
557056576214406 | 2017 | 262214807692308 | 3338 | 42029366666667 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
585014763819096 | 2091 | 300040192307693 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
563217748743719 | 2167 | 327144807692308 | 3587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
516019996649917 | 2247 | 291944038461539 | 3718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
635039155778895 | 2329 | 410772307692308 | 3854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
678386860971525 | 2414 | 438539038461539 | 3995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
540607373534339 | 2503 | 810536808 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534717524288108 | 2595 | 882899298 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
624962696817421 | 269 | 884130018 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
507626351758795 | 2788 | 848442984 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
482487487437186 | 289 | 79158372 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
462233661641542 | 2996 | 628394094 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
614290241206031 | 3106 | 484154992 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549685423785595 | 322 | 3250266138 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485615936348409 | 3338 | 1930962502 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446652388609716 | 346 | 97717245 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
733651755443887 | 3587 | 451665266 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73515500837521 | 3718 | 1710666186 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
491714613065327 | 3854 | 750723816 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453128479061977 | 3995 | 3692090772 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22625785 | 542 | 08614861802 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23149945 | 583 | 11076250522 | 1596 | 89545 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2547951466667 | 626 | 1 | 1715 | 10021 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26411294 | 673 | 1 | 1843 | 11057 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2478060433333 | 723 | 1 | 1981 | 12158 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2428556433333 | 777 | 1 | 2129 | 12433 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1953912566667 | 835 | 1 | 2288 | 113975 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1421029306667 | 898 | 01230695642 | 2458 | 9234 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
797872833333 | 965 | 1 | 2642 | 70035 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430967506667 | 1037 | 1 | 2839 | 49195 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21839545 | 1114 | 1 | 3051 | 3452 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84446483333 | 1197 | 01230695642 | 3278 | 23495 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
320313357 | 1286 | 1 | 3523 | 1597 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34943302333 | 1382 | 1 | 3786 | 1089 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17471639033 | 1486 | 1 | 4068 | 781 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116477634 | 1596 | 1 | 4371 | 5965 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 1715 | 1 | 4698 | 4325 | 1596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1843 | 1 | 5048 | 3995 | 1715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1981 | 1 | 5425 | 3185 | 1843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2129 | 1 | 5829 | 2325 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2288 | 1 | 6264 | 2185 | 2129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2458 | 1 | 6732 | 194 | 2288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2642 | 1 | 7234 | 1705 | 2458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 2839 | 1 | 7774 | 1395 | 2642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 3051 | 1 | 8354 | 124 | 2839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 3278 | 1 | 8977 | 97 | 3051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 3523 | 1 | 9647 | 92 | 3278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735818 | 3786 | 1 | 10370 | 71 | 3523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23295514667 | 4068 | 1 | 11140 | 56 | 3786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4371 | 1 | 11970 | 51 | 4068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4698 | 1 | 12860 | 35 | 4371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5048 | 1 | 13820 | 31 | 4698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5425 | 1 | 14860 | 21 | 5048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5829 | 1 | 15960 | 16 | 5425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6264 | 1 | 17150 | 1 | 5829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6732 | 1 | 18430 | 055 | 6264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7234 | 1 | 19810 | 05 | 6732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7774 | 055 | 7234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8354 | 02 | 7774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8977 | 005 | 8354 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 9647 | 0 | 8977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 10370 | 01 | 9647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11140 | 005 | 10370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11970 | 005 | 11140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 12860 | 01 | 11970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 13820 | 0 | 12860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 14860 | 0 | 13820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 15960 | 0 | 14860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 17150 | 0 | 15960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 18430 | 0 | 17150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 19810 | 0 | 18430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19810 |
0009 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 |
Linde has extensive experience in CO2 capture amp handling
5
Experience in design amp erection of different wash processes for CO2
removalbull Linde-Rectisol reg
bull BASF Oase technreg
bull Benfield
Long experience in operation of CO2 plants transport amp distribution
bull OCAP pipeline (Netherlands)
bull Onsite business
bull Bulk supply
CO2 Capture and Injection
LNG plant for Statoil in SnoslashhvitNorway with CO2
capture from natural gas and CO2 re-injection off-shore
CO2 Wash Units
Removal of impurities like Hydrocarbons Heavy metals O2 amp H2O for food grade CO2
CO2 Food Grade Plants CO2 Transport and Distribution
6
Overall ObjectiveDemonstrate and evaluate two innovative flue gas aerosol pretreatment technologies identified to significantly reduce high aerosol particle concentrations (gt107 particlescm3) in the 70-200 nm particle size range
(1) A high velocity water spray-based system with unique design features(2) A novel electrostatic precipitator (ESP) device with an optimized design and operating conditions
Specific Objectivesmdash Complete an aerosol mechanism literature review and develop a mechanistic model
characterizing aerosol formation and interaction with amine solvent in the absorber of a PCC plantmdash Design build install commission and operate the two technologies for flue gas aerosol
pretreatment at a coal-fired power plant host site providing the flue gas as a slipstream at a flow rate of 500-1000 scfm
mdash Complete parametric testing and analysis of each technology to demonstrate achievement of target performance
mdash Complete a benchmarking study to identify the optimal aerosol pretreatment system for commercial deployment and integration with solvent-based PCC technology
Project Objectives
Start Finish
Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Q3 2020 Q4 2020
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
Budget Period 1 612018 11302018
10 Project management 612018 11302018
21 Mechanism review 612018 6292018
22 Mechanism modeling 722018 11282018
31 Design basis dev 612018 6292018
32 Basic engineering 722018 1052018
33 Detailed engineering 1082018 11282018
34 Test planning 10292018 11282018
Budget Period 2 1232018 11292019
10 Project management 1232018 11292019
41 ESP system fabrication 1232018 8302019
42 Spray system fabrication 1232018 8302019
43 Procurement for install 1232018 8302019
51 Site installation 922019 10182019
52 Commission amp start-up 10212019 11292019
Budget Period 3 1222019 11302020
10 Project management 1222019 11302020
61 ESP system tests 1222019 2242020
62 Spray system tests 2172020 4302020
63 Test analysis 542020 8282020
70 Benchmarking analysis 8312020 11272020
80 Removal of equipment 8312020 11272020
Project Scope Timeline amp Milestones
7
BP1 Design amp Engineering
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
HIJ
BP2 Fabrication amp Installation
BP3 Testing amp Analysis
Task ID Milestone Completion Date1 A Updated PMP 629181 B Kick-Off Meeting 727182 C Mechanisms review amp modeling complete 1130183 D Design amp engineering complete 1130183 E Test plan complete 1130184 F Fabrication amp procurement complete 830195 G Installation amp commissioning complete 1129196 H Parametric testing complete 51207 I Benchmarking analysis complete 1130208 J Removal of equipment complete 113020
8
Project Participants
Partner
Organization
Lead contact(s) Key Role(s)
DOE-NETL Andy Aurelio Project Manager
-Funding amp sponsorship
Linde LLC Devin BostickPrincipal InvestigatorKrish Krishnamurthy Technology Director
-Prime contract-Overall program management-High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technology owner
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
Kevin OrsquoBrien Project Lead
-Aerosol mechanisms review-Host site liaison-Flue gas and liquid effluent composition measurement amp analysis
Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL)
Pratim BiswasProject Lead
-Aerosol mechanisms modeling lead-ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technology owner-Characterization of aerosols in flue gas
Affiliated Construction Services (ACS)
Greg LarsonProject Lead
-Procurement management for high velocity water spray-based system-Construction management for site modifications amp module installation
9
Project Budget DOE Funding and Cost Share
SourceBudget Period 1
Jun 2018 ndash Nov 2018
Budget Period 2
Dec 2018 ndash Nov 2019
Budget Period 3
Dec 2019 ndash Nov 2020Total
DOE Funding $457822 $1290725 $1078826 $2827834
Cost Share $176612 $260949 $269860 $707421
Total Project $634435 $1551674 $1348686 $3534795
Cost share commitments
Linde $234869
University of Illinois (UIUC) $231339
Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) $191213
Affiliated Construction Services (ACS) $50000
Technology Development
Rationale Background amp Previous Research
10
Rationale reducing aerosol-driven amine losses from solvent-based PCC technology enables its broader commercial deployment
11
Amine losses
Flue gas cooler
Flue gas blower
Flue gas inlet
Condensate
Major factor aerosol particles in flue gas from coal-fired power plants
Aerosol particle formation during coal combustion
S N
N
S
Inorganic oxides and metals (eg SiO2 Fe P)
Sulfur
Nitrogen
Organic volatiles
Inorganic volatiles (eg Hg)
Coal particle1st stage
devolatilization
Burning of tar
Tar
Oxidation
CO2
Partial oxidation
Metal or its Suboxide vapor (eg SiO Ca)
Absorption
Re-oxidation amp particle formation
Nano-sized inorganic aerosol particle
(eg SiO2 particle)
Inorganic aerosols shielding organics
Aerosols sent in flue gas to PCC absorber
(1) Nucleation(2) Condensation
04 nmParticle Size 04 ndash 2 nm 2 - 100 nm 0001-1000 mm
(3) Coagulation
3 main stages of aerosol formation1
Burning of char
Bottom Ash
2nd stage devolatilization
Ash formation
1 Wang Xinlei amp Williams Brent amp Tang Y amp Huang Yuhsuan amp Kong L amp Yang Xin amp Biswas Pratim (2013) Characterization of organic aerosol produced during pulverized coal combustion in a drop tube furnace Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13 105194acp-13-10919-2013
12
Theory and mechanisms for aerosol-driven amine losses from PCC plant absorbers1
13
Phase IAerosol growth and nucleation from water in absorber
Phase IIAerosol growth from amine in absorber
Phase IIIBuildup of captured CO2and amine bound to CO2in aerosols
Phase IVSalt accumulation inside particles causing further amine and CO2 diffusion into aerosols
02 microm particle
1 G Lombardo B Fostas M Shah A Morken O Hvidsten J Mertens E Hamborg Results from Aerosol Measurement in Amine Plant Treating Gas Turbine and Residue Fluidized Catalytic Cracker Flue Gases at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad GHGT-13 Energy Procedia 2017 114 Pages 1210-1230
Water condensation
Nucleation from water supersaturation
1 microm particle
Amine absorption until complete saturation
2 microm particle
CO2 and CO2+amine absorption
2-5 microm particleSalt accumulationCO2 and amine diffusion
Amine contained in aerosol particles are then emitted from PCC absorber in treated gas stream
The Kelvin equation gives the minimum particle diameter d of a liquid1 supersaturation leads to nucleation of smaller particles
14
Benefits of aerosol particle reduction
Benefits
Manageable solvent supply and transport logistics
Optimum power plant efficiency
when integrated with PCC
Reduction of particulate that can unfavorably react with amine
solvent
Improved PCC plant specific
energy performance
Environmental sustainability and
performance
Improved PCC plant business
caselower cost
Methods to reduce aerosol-driven solvent losses Flue gas aerosol pretreatment provides optimum solution1
For power plants integrated with solvent-based PCC without an existing baghouse optimized flue gas aerosol pretreatment is the only viable option to reduce aerosol concentrations from gt109 particlescm3 to manageable levels near 104-106
particlescm3 for particles with diameters in the range of 70-200 nm
Pretreatment has traditionally been performed using simple ESPs and Brownian filters
Few systematic studies have been conducted to evaluate performance of different technologies over a full range of conditions
15
BH = baghouse
1 Based on single point experience some options eg dry bed conf may handle higher particle concentrations than others
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
Abbott Power Plant (42 reheat burner w dryer) | Abbott Power Plant (0 reheat burner wo dryer) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (WashU) | Wilsonville (before baghouse) (SR) | UT Austin (NCCC) (before baghouse) | TCM (no BH no BF) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (SR) | Wilsonville Parametric Tests (Linde) | Wilsonville Long-term Tests (Linde) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anal Ins | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | kg amineMT CO2 | 04080107622 | 00095091096 | |||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 682819795644892 | 982 | 427900576923077 | 157 | 14468166666667 | 982 | 1000000 | 10 | 4000000 | 2400 | 100000 | 35 | 650000 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 735415966499163 | 102 | 532616923076924 | 163 | 160013 | 102 | 200000 | 20 | 3000000 | 2800 | 1150000 | 60 | 600000 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 667026341708543 | 106 | 642390384615385 | 168 | 14813666666667 | 106 | 200000 | 40 | 2000000 | 2800 | 10000000 | 100 | 530000 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 566092556113903 | 109 | 764663461538462 | 175 | 91535 | 109 | 1000000 | 70 | 1000000 | 3000 | 10000000 | 160 | 400000 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 60451071356784 | 113 | 993782692307693 | 181 | 21280833333333 | 113 | 6300000 | 110 | 900000 | 3200 | 1400000 | 280 | 350000 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 640447634840872 | 118 | 103840961538462 | 188 | 277361 | 118 | 8000000 | 200 | 800000 | 3200 | 120000 | 480 | 50000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 63931935678392 | 122 | 119893653846154 | 195 | 30501933333333 | 122 | 5000000 | 400 | 600000 | 3800 | 1400 | 640 | 20000 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 67781860636516 | 126 | 155467692307692 | 202 | 35493966666667 | 126 | 800000 | 700 | 500000 | 3800 | 1000 | 960 | 10000 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 678467648241207 | 131 | 173807500 | 209 | 25912033333333 | 131 | 1 | 800 | 400000 | 3800 | 1000 | 1920 | 5000 | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 736663748743719 | 136 | 198103846153846 | 217 | 20493533333333 | 136 | 1 | 1000 | 318900 | 3800 | 900 | 2560 | 100 | 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 791600921273033 | 141 | 245189807692308 | 225 | 34751733333333 | 141 | 300000 | 3800 | 750 | 5120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 776599182579565 | 146 | 27240826923077 | 233 | 43427866666667 | 146 | 200000 | 3800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 748095604690118 | 151 | 301905384615385 | 241 | 592247 | 151 | 100000 | 4000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 852265149078728 | 157 | 348734615384616 | 25 | 614018 | 157 | 90000 | 4100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 99985068676717 | 163 | 375607115384616 | 259 | 87004466666667 | 163 | 80000 | 4200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11043162479062 | 168 | 442790384615385 | 269 | 137845333333333 | 168 | 70000 | 4200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119948670016751 | 175 | 523365384615385 | 279 | 183715 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
112247051926298 | 181 | 445000384615385 | 289 | 241348 | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
126325376884422 | 188 | 591696153846154 | 30 | 299061666666667 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130470221105528 | 195 | 660759615384616 | 311 | 380613666666667 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140578994974874 | 202 | 706025000000001 | 322 | 419054666666667 | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
158666502512563 | 209 | 794851923076924 | 334 | 64940 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15709983919598 | 217 | 860896153846155 | 346 | 883372 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
146305745393635 | 225 | 847675000000001 | 359 | 130709333333333 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
175050465661642 | 233 | 943019230769232 | 372 | 182267 | 233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20586516917923 | 241 | 949319230769232 | 385 | 263912666666667 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21836616080402 | 25 | 96023076923077 | 40 | 355521333333333 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
221599480737019 | 259 | 956119230769232 | 414 | 484109 | 259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
231432663316583 | 269 | 1025750000 | 429 | 647791 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
228343541038526 | 279 | 964151923076924 | 445 | 830633 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238293788944724 | 289 | 982432692307693 | 461 | 1054740 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24027170519263 | 30 | 103288461538462 | 478 | 125545333333333 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254431427135679 | 311 | 981471153846155 | 514 | 1435950 | 311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
281640274706868 | 322 | 100416538461539 | 533 | 161942333333333 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
279502308207705 | 334 | 995501923076924 | 552 | 169811666666667 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
273149989949749 | 346 | 969944230769232 | 573 | 182475666666667 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
301086837520938 | 359 | 89473076923077 | 594 | 187437333333333 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
337571587939699 | 372 | 791292307692308 | 615 | 1885320 | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
335709822445561 | 385 | 719676923076924 | 638 | 184891666666667 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
303290958123953 | 40 | 67950576923077 | 661 | 177122333333333 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
296100891122278 | 414 | 554032692307693 | 685 | 167757333333333 | 414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305137175879397 | 429 | 441263461538462 | 71 | 1563790 | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
298671450586265 | 445 | 39593576923077 | 737 | 143831333333333 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
267825041876047 | 461 | 294517500 | 764 | 1276340 | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
268898750418761 | 478 | 235586538461539 | 791 | 111617666666667 | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
246584087102178 | 496 | 219594615384616 | 82 | 956378666666667 | 496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22753597319933 | 514 | 183537307692308 | 851 | 786719333333333 | 514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20805557118928 | 533 | 132950384615385 | 882 | 654658 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
193145899497488 | 552 | 991526923076924 | 914 | 524162333333333 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180397058626466 | 573 | 723884615384616 | 947 | 398477 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159287497487437 | 594 | 49395000 | 982 | 294095333333333 | 594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140093966499163 | 615 | 329623653846154 | 1018 | 216415 | 615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
125712003350084 | 638 | 232231346153846 | 1055 | 155941333333333 | 638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11582181239531 | 661 | 170568076923077 | 1094 | 109822 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
933554824120604 | 685 | 114283076923077 | 1134 | 811729333333333 | 685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
766995862646567 | 71 | 851232692307693 | 1176 | 533704666666667 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
625145611390285 | 737 | 558684615384616 | 1219 | 398905 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
531419574539364 | 764 | 425857115384616 | 1263 | 272716 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401304512562814 | 791 | 320039230769231 | 131 | 224988666666667 | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
302290415410386 | 82 | 224643461538462 | 1358 | 175139333333333 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
234256559463987 | 851 | 204812115384616 | 1407 | 137377666666667 | 851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
174277956448911 | 882 | 133968461538462 | 1459 | 1185743 | 882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119620948073702 | 914 | 120355384615385 | 1512 | 901657 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
860247541038527 | 947 | 1114950 | 1568 | 95869666666667 | 947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
588795608040202 | 982 | 892715384615385 | 1625 | 866524 | 982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453500100502513 | 1018 | 75693076923077 | 1685 | 79995933333333 | 1018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306104184254607 | 1055 | 734100000000001 | 1747 | 855652 | 1055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
214392951423786 | 1094 | 732648076923078 | 1811 | 82140833333333 | 1094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171584234505863 | 1134 | 530092307692308 | 1877 | 81683533333333 | 1134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129452606365159 | 1176 | 609534615384616 | 1946 | 71270166666667 | 1176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
109800234170854 | 1219 | 491257692307693 | 2017 | 67286033333333 | 1219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
875061487437187 | 1263 | 391936346153846 | 2091 | 75311933333333 | 1263 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
755701192629817 | 131 | 427556153846154 | 2167 | 71270066666667 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76907041876047 | 1358 | 528136538461539 | 2247 | 670295 | 1358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
816854716917924 | 1407 | 538875 | 2329 | 612828 | 1407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682292696817421 | 1459 | 484882692307693 | 2414 | 60685066666667 | 1459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
484327912897823 | 1512 | 523173076923077 | 2503 | 64353 | 1512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
601245688442212 | 1568 | 532400 | 2595 | 575052 | 1568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
608947306532664 | 1625 | 391983653846154 | 269 | 53995533333333 | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57423530318258 | 1685 | 39818576923077 | 2788 | 56581733333333 | 1685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
665198110552765 | 1747 | 390621538461539 | 289 | 50526966666667 | 1747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
641284469011726 | 1811 | 282454038461539 | 2996 | 52087233333333 | 1811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
551386834170855 | 1877 | 301689807692308 | 3106 | 390656 | 1877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
515487715242882 | 1946 | 392116538461539 | 322 | 40069366666667 | 1946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
557056576214406 | 2017 | 262214807692308 | 3338 | 42029366666667 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
585014763819096 | 2091 | 300040192307693 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
563217748743719 | 2167 | 327144807692308 | 3587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
516019996649917 | 2247 | 291944038461539 | 3718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
635039155778895 | 2329 | 410772307692308 | 3854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
678386860971525 | 2414 | 438539038461539 | 3995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
540607373534339 | 2503 | 810536808 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534717524288108 | 2595 | 882899298 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
624962696817421 | 269 | 884130018 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
507626351758795 | 2788 | 848442984 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
482487487437186 | 289 | 79158372 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
462233661641542 | 2996 | 628394094 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
614290241206031 | 3106 | 484154992 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549685423785595 | 322 | 3250266138 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485615936348409 | 3338 | 1930962502 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446652388609716 | 346 | 97717245 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
733651755443887 | 3587 | 451665266 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73515500837521 | 3718 | 1710666186 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
491714613065327 | 3854 | 750723816 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453128479061977 | 3995 | 3692090772 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22625785 | 542 | 08614861802 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23149945 | 583 | 11076250522 | 1596 | 89545 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2547951466667 | 626 | 1 | 1715 | 10021 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26411294 | 673 | 1 | 1843 | 11057 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2478060433333 | 723 | 1 | 1981 | 12158 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2428556433333 | 777 | 1 | 2129 | 12433 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1953912566667 | 835 | 1 | 2288 | 113975 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1421029306667 | 898 | 01230695642 | 2458 | 9234 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
797872833333 | 965 | 1 | 2642 | 70035 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430967506667 | 1037 | 1 | 2839 | 49195 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21839545 | 1114 | 1 | 3051 | 3452 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84446483333 | 1197 | 01230695642 | 3278 | 23495 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
320313357 | 1286 | 1 | 3523 | 1597 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34943302333 | 1382 | 1 | 3786 | 1089 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17471639033 | 1486 | 1 | 4068 | 781 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116477634 | 1596 | 1 | 4371 | 5965 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 1715 | 1 | 4698 | 4325 | 1596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1843 | 1 | 5048 | 3995 | 1715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1981 | 1 | 5425 | 3185 | 1843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2129 | 1 | 5829 | 2325 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2288 | 1 | 6264 | 2185 | 2129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2458 | 1 | 6732 | 194 | 2288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2642 | 1 | 7234 | 1705 | 2458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 2839 | 1 | 7774 | 1395 | 2642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 3051 | 1 | 8354 | 124 | 2839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 3278 | 1 | 8977 | 97 | 3051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 3523 | 1 | 9647 | 92 | 3278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735818 | 3786 | 1 | 10370 | 71 | 3523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23295514667 | 4068 | 1 | 11140 | 56 | 3786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4371 | 1 | 11970 | 51 | 4068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4698 | 1 | 12860 | 35 | 4371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5048 | 1 | 13820 | 31 | 4698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5425 | 1 | 14860 | 21 | 5048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5829 | 1 | 15960 | 16 | 5425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6264 | 1 | 17150 | 1 | 5829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6732 | 1 | 18430 | 055 | 6264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7234 | 1 | 19810 | 05 | 6732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7774 | 055 | 7234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8354 | 02 | 7774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8977 | 005 | 8354 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 9647 | 0 | 8977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 10370 | 01 | 9647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11140 | 005 | 10370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11970 | 005 | 11140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 12860 | 01 | 11970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 13820 | 0 | 12860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 14860 | 0 | 13820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 15960 | 0 | 14860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 17150 | 0 | 15960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 18430 | 0 | 17150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 19810 | 0 | 18430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19810 |
0009 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 |
6
Overall ObjectiveDemonstrate and evaluate two innovative flue gas aerosol pretreatment technologies identified to significantly reduce high aerosol particle concentrations (gt107 particlescm3) in the 70-200 nm particle size range
(1) A high velocity water spray-based system with unique design features(2) A novel electrostatic precipitator (ESP) device with an optimized design and operating conditions
Specific Objectivesmdash Complete an aerosol mechanism literature review and develop a mechanistic model
characterizing aerosol formation and interaction with amine solvent in the absorber of a PCC plantmdash Design build install commission and operate the two technologies for flue gas aerosol
pretreatment at a coal-fired power plant host site providing the flue gas as a slipstream at a flow rate of 500-1000 scfm
mdash Complete parametric testing and analysis of each technology to demonstrate achievement of target performance
mdash Complete a benchmarking study to identify the optimal aerosol pretreatment system for commercial deployment and integration with solvent-based PCC technology
Project Objectives
Start Finish
Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Q3 2020 Q4 2020
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
Budget Period 1 612018 11302018
10 Project management 612018 11302018
21 Mechanism review 612018 6292018
22 Mechanism modeling 722018 11282018
31 Design basis dev 612018 6292018
32 Basic engineering 722018 1052018
33 Detailed engineering 1082018 11282018
34 Test planning 10292018 11282018
Budget Period 2 1232018 11292019
10 Project management 1232018 11292019
41 ESP system fabrication 1232018 8302019
42 Spray system fabrication 1232018 8302019
43 Procurement for install 1232018 8302019
51 Site installation 922019 10182019
52 Commission amp start-up 10212019 11292019
Budget Period 3 1222019 11302020
10 Project management 1222019 11302020
61 ESP system tests 1222019 2242020
62 Spray system tests 2172020 4302020
63 Test analysis 542020 8282020
70 Benchmarking analysis 8312020 11272020
80 Removal of equipment 8312020 11272020
Project Scope Timeline amp Milestones
7
BP1 Design amp Engineering
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
HIJ
BP2 Fabrication amp Installation
BP3 Testing amp Analysis
Task ID Milestone Completion Date1 A Updated PMP 629181 B Kick-Off Meeting 727182 C Mechanisms review amp modeling complete 1130183 D Design amp engineering complete 1130183 E Test plan complete 1130184 F Fabrication amp procurement complete 830195 G Installation amp commissioning complete 1129196 H Parametric testing complete 51207 I Benchmarking analysis complete 1130208 J Removal of equipment complete 113020
8
Project Participants
Partner
Organization
Lead contact(s) Key Role(s)
DOE-NETL Andy Aurelio Project Manager
-Funding amp sponsorship
Linde LLC Devin BostickPrincipal InvestigatorKrish Krishnamurthy Technology Director
-Prime contract-Overall program management-High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technology owner
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
Kevin OrsquoBrien Project Lead
-Aerosol mechanisms review-Host site liaison-Flue gas and liquid effluent composition measurement amp analysis
Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL)
Pratim BiswasProject Lead
-Aerosol mechanisms modeling lead-ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technology owner-Characterization of aerosols in flue gas
Affiliated Construction Services (ACS)
Greg LarsonProject Lead
-Procurement management for high velocity water spray-based system-Construction management for site modifications amp module installation
9
Project Budget DOE Funding and Cost Share
SourceBudget Period 1
Jun 2018 ndash Nov 2018
Budget Period 2
Dec 2018 ndash Nov 2019
Budget Period 3
Dec 2019 ndash Nov 2020Total
DOE Funding $457822 $1290725 $1078826 $2827834
Cost Share $176612 $260949 $269860 $707421
Total Project $634435 $1551674 $1348686 $3534795
Cost share commitments
Linde $234869
University of Illinois (UIUC) $231339
Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) $191213
Affiliated Construction Services (ACS) $50000
Technology Development
Rationale Background amp Previous Research
10
Rationale reducing aerosol-driven amine losses from solvent-based PCC technology enables its broader commercial deployment
11
Amine losses
Flue gas cooler
Flue gas blower
Flue gas inlet
Condensate
Major factor aerosol particles in flue gas from coal-fired power plants
Aerosol particle formation during coal combustion
S N
N
S
Inorganic oxides and metals (eg SiO2 Fe P)
Sulfur
Nitrogen
Organic volatiles
Inorganic volatiles (eg Hg)
Coal particle1st stage
devolatilization
Burning of tar
Tar
Oxidation
CO2
Partial oxidation
Metal or its Suboxide vapor (eg SiO Ca)
Absorption
Re-oxidation amp particle formation
Nano-sized inorganic aerosol particle
(eg SiO2 particle)
Inorganic aerosols shielding organics
Aerosols sent in flue gas to PCC absorber
(1) Nucleation(2) Condensation
04 nmParticle Size 04 ndash 2 nm 2 - 100 nm 0001-1000 mm
(3) Coagulation
3 main stages of aerosol formation1
Burning of char
Bottom Ash
2nd stage devolatilization
Ash formation
1 Wang Xinlei amp Williams Brent amp Tang Y amp Huang Yuhsuan amp Kong L amp Yang Xin amp Biswas Pratim (2013) Characterization of organic aerosol produced during pulverized coal combustion in a drop tube furnace Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13 105194acp-13-10919-2013
12
Theory and mechanisms for aerosol-driven amine losses from PCC plant absorbers1
13
Phase IAerosol growth and nucleation from water in absorber
Phase IIAerosol growth from amine in absorber
Phase IIIBuildup of captured CO2and amine bound to CO2in aerosols
Phase IVSalt accumulation inside particles causing further amine and CO2 diffusion into aerosols
02 microm particle
1 G Lombardo B Fostas M Shah A Morken O Hvidsten J Mertens E Hamborg Results from Aerosol Measurement in Amine Plant Treating Gas Turbine and Residue Fluidized Catalytic Cracker Flue Gases at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad GHGT-13 Energy Procedia 2017 114 Pages 1210-1230
Water condensation
Nucleation from water supersaturation
1 microm particle
Amine absorption until complete saturation
2 microm particle
CO2 and CO2+amine absorption
2-5 microm particleSalt accumulationCO2 and amine diffusion
Amine contained in aerosol particles are then emitted from PCC absorber in treated gas stream
The Kelvin equation gives the minimum particle diameter d of a liquid1 supersaturation leads to nucleation of smaller particles
14
Benefits of aerosol particle reduction
Benefits
Manageable solvent supply and transport logistics
Optimum power plant efficiency
when integrated with PCC
Reduction of particulate that can unfavorably react with amine
solvent
Improved PCC plant specific
energy performance
Environmental sustainability and
performance
Improved PCC plant business
caselower cost
Methods to reduce aerosol-driven solvent losses Flue gas aerosol pretreatment provides optimum solution1
For power plants integrated with solvent-based PCC without an existing baghouse optimized flue gas aerosol pretreatment is the only viable option to reduce aerosol concentrations from gt109 particlescm3 to manageable levels near 104-106
particlescm3 for particles with diameters in the range of 70-200 nm
Pretreatment has traditionally been performed using simple ESPs and Brownian filters
Few systematic studies have been conducted to evaluate performance of different technologies over a full range of conditions
15
BH = baghouse
1 Based on single point experience some options eg dry bed conf may handle higher particle concentrations than others
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
Abbott Power Plant (42 reheat burner w dryer) | Abbott Power Plant (0 reheat burner wo dryer) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (WashU) | Wilsonville (before baghouse) (SR) | UT Austin (NCCC) (before baghouse) | TCM (no BH no BF) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (SR) | Wilsonville Parametric Tests (Linde) | Wilsonville Long-term Tests (Linde) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anal Ins | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | kg amineMT CO2 | 04080107622 | 00095091096 | |||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 682819795644892 | 982 | 427900576923077 | 157 | 14468166666667 | 982 | 1000000 | 10 | 4000000 | 2400 | 100000 | 35 | 650000 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 735415966499163 | 102 | 532616923076924 | 163 | 160013 | 102 | 200000 | 20 | 3000000 | 2800 | 1150000 | 60 | 600000 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 667026341708543 | 106 | 642390384615385 | 168 | 14813666666667 | 106 | 200000 | 40 | 2000000 | 2800 | 10000000 | 100 | 530000 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 566092556113903 | 109 | 764663461538462 | 175 | 91535 | 109 | 1000000 | 70 | 1000000 | 3000 | 10000000 | 160 | 400000 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 60451071356784 | 113 | 993782692307693 | 181 | 21280833333333 | 113 | 6300000 | 110 | 900000 | 3200 | 1400000 | 280 | 350000 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 640447634840872 | 118 | 103840961538462 | 188 | 277361 | 118 | 8000000 | 200 | 800000 | 3200 | 120000 | 480 | 50000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 63931935678392 | 122 | 119893653846154 | 195 | 30501933333333 | 122 | 5000000 | 400 | 600000 | 3800 | 1400 | 640 | 20000 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 67781860636516 | 126 | 155467692307692 | 202 | 35493966666667 | 126 | 800000 | 700 | 500000 | 3800 | 1000 | 960 | 10000 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 678467648241207 | 131 | 173807500 | 209 | 25912033333333 | 131 | 1 | 800 | 400000 | 3800 | 1000 | 1920 | 5000 | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 736663748743719 | 136 | 198103846153846 | 217 | 20493533333333 | 136 | 1 | 1000 | 318900 | 3800 | 900 | 2560 | 100 | 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 791600921273033 | 141 | 245189807692308 | 225 | 34751733333333 | 141 | 300000 | 3800 | 750 | 5120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 776599182579565 | 146 | 27240826923077 | 233 | 43427866666667 | 146 | 200000 | 3800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 748095604690118 | 151 | 301905384615385 | 241 | 592247 | 151 | 100000 | 4000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 852265149078728 | 157 | 348734615384616 | 25 | 614018 | 157 | 90000 | 4100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 99985068676717 | 163 | 375607115384616 | 259 | 87004466666667 | 163 | 80000 | 4200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11043162479062 | 168 | 442790384615385 | 269 | 137845333333333 | 168 | 70000 | 4200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119948670016751 | 175 | 523365384615385 | 279 | 183715 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
112247051926298 | 181 | 445000384615385 | 289 | 241348 | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
126325376884422 | 188 | 591696153846154 | 30 | 299061666666667 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130470221105528 | 195 | 660759615384616 | 311 | 380613666666667 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140578994974874 | 202 | 706025000000001 | 322 | 419054666666667 | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
158666502512563 | 209 | 794851923076924 | 334 | 64940 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15709983919598 | 217 | 860896153846155 | 346 | 883372 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
146305745393635 | 225 | 847675000000001 | 359 | 130709333333333 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
175050465661642 | 233 | 943019230769232 | 372 | 182267 | 233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20586516917923 | 241 | 949319230769232 | 385 | 263912666666667 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21836616080402 | 25 | 96023076923077 | 40 | 355521333333333 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
221599480737019 | 259 | 956119230769232 | 414 | 484109 | 259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
231432663316583 | 269 | 1025750000 | 429 | 647791 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
228343541038526 | 279 | 964151923076924 | 445 | 830633 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238293788944724 | 289 | 982432692307693 | 461 | 1054740 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24027170519263 | 30 | 103288461538462 | 478 | 125545333333333 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254431427135679 | 311 | 981471153846155 | 514 | 1435950 | 311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
281640274706868 | 322 | 100416538461539 | 533 | 161942333333333 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
279502308207705 | 334 | 995501923076924 | 552 | 169811666666667 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
273149989949749 | 346 | 969944230769232 | 573 | 182475666666667 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
301086837520938 | 359 | 89473076923077 | 594 | 187437333333333 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
337571587939699 | 372 | 791292307692308 | 615 | 1885320 | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
335709822445561 | 385 | 719676923076924 | 638 | 184891666666667 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
303290958123953 | 40 | 67950576923077 | 661 | 177122333333333 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
296100891122278 | 414 | 554032692307693 | 685 | 167757333333333 | 414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305137175879397 | 429 | 441263461538462 | 71 | 1563790 | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
298671450586265 | 445 | 39593576923077 | 737 | 143831333333333 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
267825041876047 | 461 | 294517500 | 764 | 1276340 | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
268898750418761 | 478 | 235586538461539 | 791 | 111617666666667 | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
246584087102178 | 496 | 219594615384616 | 82 | 956378666666667 | 496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22753597319933 | 514 | 183537307692308 | 851 | 786719333333333 | 514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20805557118928 | 533 | 132950384615385 | 882 | 654658 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
193145899497488 | 552 | 991526923076924 | 914 | 524162333333333 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180397058626466 | 573 | 723884615384616 | 947 | 398477 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159287497487437 | 594 | 49395000 | 982 | 294095333333333 | 594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140093966499163 | 615 | 329623653846154 | 1018 | 216415 | 615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
125712003350084 | 638 | 232231346153846 | 1055 | 155941333333333 | 638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11582181239531 | 661 | 170568076923077 | 1094 | 109822 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
933554824120604 | 685 | 114283076923077 | 1134 | 811729333333333 | 685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
766995862646567 | 71 | 851232692307693 | 1176 | 533704666666667 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
625145611390285 | 737 | 558684615384616 | 1219 | 398905 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
531419574539364 | 764 | 425857115384616 | 1263 | 272716 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401304512562814 | 791 | 320039230769231 | 131 | 224988666666667 | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
302290415410386 | 82 | 224643461538462 | 1358 | 175139333333333 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
234256559463987 | 851 | 204812115384616 | 1407 | 137377666666667 | 851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
174277956448911 | 882 | 133968461538462 | 1459 | 1185743 | 882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119620948073702 | 914 | 120355384615385 | 1512 | 901657 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
860247541038527 | 947 | 1114950 | 1568 | 95869666666667 | 947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
588795608040202 | 982 | 892715384615385 | 1625 | 866524 | 982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453500100502513 | 1018 | 75693076923077 | 1685 | 79995933333333 | 1018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306104184254607 | 1055 | 734100000000001 | 1747 | 855652 | 1055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
214392951423786 | 1094 | 732648076923078 | 1811 | 82140833333333 | 1094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171584234505863 | 1134 | 530092307692308 | 1877 | 81683533333333 | 1134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129452606365159 | 1176 | 609534615384616 | 1946 | 71270166666667 | 1176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
109800234170854 | 1219 | 491257692307693 | 2017 | 67286033333333 | 1219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
875061487437187 | 1263 | 391936346153846 | 2091 | 75311933333333 | 1263 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
755701192629817 | 131 | 427556153846154 | 2167 | 71270066666667 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76907041876047 | 1358 | 528136538461539 | 2247 | 670295 | 1358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
816854716917924 | 1407 | 538875 | 2329 | 612828 | 1407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682292696817421 | 1459 | 484882692307693 | 2414 | 60685066666667 | 1459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
484327912897823 | 1512 | 523173076923077 | 2503 | 64353 | 1512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
601245688442212 | 1568 | 532400 | 2595 | 575052 | 1568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
608947306532664 | 1625 | 391983653846154 | 269 | 53995533333333 | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57423530318258 | 1685 | 39818576923077 | 2788 | 56581733333333 | 1685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
665198110552765 | 1747 | 390621538461539 | 289 | 50526966666667 | 1747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
641284469011726 | 1811 | 282454038461539 | 2996 | 52087233333333 | 1811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
551386834170855 | 1877 | 301689807692308 | 3106 | 390656 | 1877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
515487715242882 | 1946 | 392116538461539 | 322 | 40069366666667 | 1946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
557056576214406 | 2017 | 262214807692308 | 3338 | 42029366666667 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
585014763819096 | 2091 | 300040192307693 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
563217748743719 | 2167 | 327144807692308 | 3587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
516019996649917 | 2247 | 291944038461539 | 3718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
635039155778895 | 2329 | 410772307692308 | 3854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
678386860971525 | 2414 | 438539038461539 | 3995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
540607373534339 | 2503 | 810536808 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534717524288108 | 2595 | 882899298 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
624962696817421 | 269 | 884130018 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
507626351758795 | 2788 | 848442984 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
482487487437186 | 289 | 79158372 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
462233661641542 | 2996 | 628394094 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
614290241206031 | 3106 | 484154992 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549685423785595 | 322 | 3250266138 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485615936348409 | 3338 | 1930962502 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446652388609716 | 346 | 97717245 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
733651755443887 | 3587 | 451665266 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73515500837521 | 3718 | 1710666186 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
491714613065327 | 3854 | 750723816 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453128479061977 | 3995 | 3692090772 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22625785 | 542 | 08614861802 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23149945 | 583 | 11076250522 | 1596 | 89545 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2547951466667 | 626 | 1 | 1715 | 10021 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26411294 | 673 | 1 | 1843 | 11057 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2478060433333 | 723 | 1 | 1981 | 12158 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2428556433333 | 777 | 1 | 2129 | 12433 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1953912566667 | 835 | 1 | 2288 | 113975 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1421029306667 | 898 | 01230695642 | 2458 | 9234 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
797872833333 | 965 | 1 | 2642 | 70035 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430967506667 | 1037 | 1 | 2839 | 49195 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21839545 | 1114 | 1 | 3051 | 3452 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84446483333 | 1197 | 01230695642 | 3278 | 23495 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
320313357 | 1286 | 1 | 3523 | 1597 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34943302333 | 1382 | 1 | 3786 | 1089 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17471639033 | 1486 | 1 | 4068 | 781 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116477634 | 1596 | 1 | 4371 | 5965 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 1715 | 1 | 4698 | 4325 | 1596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1843 | 1 | 5048 | 3995 | 1715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1981 | 1 | 5425 | 3185 | 1843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2129 | 1 | 5829 | 2325 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2288 | 1 | 6264 | 2185 | 2129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2458 | 1 | 6732 | 194 | 2288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2642 | 1 | 7234 | 1705 | 2458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 2839 | 1 | 7774 | 1395 | 2642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 3051 | 1 | 8354 | 124 | 2839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 3278 | 1 | 8977 | 97 | 3051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 3523 | 1 | 9647 | 92 | 3278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735818 | 3786 | 1 | 10370 | 71 | 3523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23295514667 | 4068 | 1 | 11140 | 56 | 3786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4371 | 1 | 11970 | 51 | 4068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4698 | 1 | 12860 | 35 | 4371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5048 | 1 | 13820 | 31 | 4698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5425 | 1 | 14860 | 21 | 5048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5829 | 1 | 15960 | 16 | 5425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6264 | 1 | 17150 | 1 | 5829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6732 | 1 | 18430 | 055 | 6264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7234 | 1 | 19810 | 05 | 6732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7774 | 055 | 7234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8354 | 02 | 7774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8977 | 005 | 8354 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 9647 | 0 | 8977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 10370 | 01 | 9647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11140 | 005 | 10370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11970 | 005 | 11140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 12860 | 01 | 11970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 13820 | 0 | 12860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 14860 | 0 | 13820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 15960 | 0 | 14860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 17150 | 0 | 15960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 18430 | 0 | 17150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 19810 | 0 | 18430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19810 |
0009 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 |
Start Finish
Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Q3 2020 Q4 2020
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
Budget Period 1 612018 11302018
10 Project management 612018 11302018
21 Mechanism review 612018 6292018
22 Mechanism modeling 722018 11282018
31 Design basis dev 612018 6292018
32 Basic engineering 722018 1052018
33 Detailed engineering 1082018 11282018
34 Test planning 10292018 11282018
Budget Period 2 1232018 11292019
10 Project management 1232018 11292019
41 ESP system fabrication 1232018 8302019
42 Spray system fabrication 1232018 8302019
43 Procurement for install 1232018 8302019
51 Site installation 922019 10182019
52 Commission amp start-up 10212019 11292019
Budget Period 3 1222019 11302020
10 Project management 1222019 11302020
61 ESP system tests 1222019 2242020
62 Spray system tests 2172020 4302020
63 Test analysis 542020 8282020
70 Benchmarking analysis 8312020 11272020
80 Removal of equipment 8312020 11272020
Project Scope Timeline amp Milestones
7
BP1 Design amp Engineering
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
HIJ
BP2 Fabrication amp Installation
BP3 Testing amp Analysis
Task ID Milestone Completion Date1 A Updated PMP 629181 B Kick-Off Meeting 727182 C Mechanisms review amp modeling complete 1130183 D Design amp engineering complete 1130183 E Test plan complete 1130184 F Fabrication amp procurement complete 830195 G Installation amp commissioning complete 1129196 H Parametric testing complete 51207 I Benchmarking analysis complete 1130208 J Removal of equipment complete 113020
8
Project Participants
Partner
Organization
Lead contact(s) Key Role(s)
DOE-NETL Andy Aurelio Project Manager
-Funding amp sponsorship
Linde LLC Devin BostickPrincipal InvestigatorKrish Krishnamurthy Technology Director
-Prime contract-Overall program management-High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technology owner
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
Kevin OrsquoBrien Project Lead
-Aerosol mechanisms review-Host site liaison-Flue gas and liquid effluent composition measurement amp analysis
Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL)
Pratim BiswasProject Lead
-Aerosol mechanisms modeling lead-ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technology owner-Characterization of aerosols in flue gas
Affiliated Construction Services (ACS)
Greg LarsonProject Lead
-Procurement management for high velocity water spray-based system-Construction management for site modifications amp module installation
9
Project Budget DOE Funding and Cost Share
SourceBudget Period 1
Jun 2018 ndash Nov 2018
Budget Period 2
Dec 2018 ndash Nov 2019
Budget Period 3
Dec 2019 ndash Nov 2020Total
DOE Funding $457822 $1290725 $1078826 $2827834
Cost Share $176612 $260949 $269860 $707421
Total Project $634435 $1551674 $1348686 $3534795
Cost share commitments
Linde $234869
University of Illinois (UIUC) $231339
Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) $191213
Affiliated Construction Services (ACS) $50000
Technology Development
Rationale Background amp Previous Research
10
Rationale reducing aerosol-driven amine losses from solvent-based PCC technology enables its broader commercial deployment
11
Amine losses
Flue gas cooler
Flue gas blower
Flue gas inlet
Condensate
Major factor aerosol particles in flue gas from coal-fired power plants
Aerosol particle formation during coal combustion
S N
N
S
Inorganic oxides and metals (eg SiO2 Fe P)
Sulfur
Nitrogen
Organic volatiles
Inorganic volatiles (eg Hg)
Coal particle1st stage
devolatilization
Burning of tar
Tar
Oxidation
CO2
Partial oxidation
Metal or its Suboxide vapor (eg SiO Ca)
Absorption
Re-oxidation amp particle formation
Nano-sized inorganic aerosol particle
(eg SiO2 particle)
Inorganic aerosols shielding organics
Aerosols sent in flue gas to PCC absorber
(1) Nucleation(2) Condensation
04 nmParticle Size 04 ndash 2 nm 2 - 100 nm 0001-1000 mm
(3) Coagulation
3 main stages of aerosol formation1
Burning of char
Bottom Ash
2nd stage devolatilization
Ash formation
1 Wang Xinlei amp Williams Brent amp Tang Y amp Huang Yuhsuan amp Kong L amp Yang Xin amp Biswas Pratim (2013) Characterization of organic aerosol produced during pulverized coal combustion in a drop tube furnace Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13 105194acp-13-10919-2013
12
Theory and mechanisms for aerosol-driven amine losses from PCC plant absorbers1
13
Phase IAerosol growth and nucleation from water in absorber
Phase IIAerosol growth from amine in absorber
Phase IIIBuildup of captured CO2and amine bound to CO2in aerosols
Phase IVSalt accumulation inside particles causing further amine and CO2 diffusion into aerosols
02 microm particle
1 G Lombardo B Fostas M Shah A Morken O Hvidsten J Mertens E Hamborg Results from Aerosol Measurement in Amine Plant Treating Gas Turbine and Residue Fluidized Catalytic Cracker Flue Gases at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad GHGT-13 Energy Procedia 2017 114 Pages 1210-1230
Water condensation
Nucleation from water supersaturation
1 microm particle
Amine absorption until complete saturation
2 microm particle
CO2 and CO2+amine absorption
2-5 microm particleSalt accumulationCO2 and amine diffusion
Amine contained in aerosol particles are then emitted from PCC absorber in treated gas stream
The Kelvin equation gives the minimum particle diameter d of a liquid1 supersaturation leads to nucleation of smaller particles
14
Benefits of aerosol particle reduction
Benefits
Manageable solvent supply and transport logistics
Optimum power plant efficiency
when integrated with PCC
Reduction of particulate that can unfavorably react with amine
solvent
Improved PCC plant specific
energy performance
Environmental sustainability and
performance
Improved PCC plant business
caselower cost
Methods to reduce aerosol-driven solvent losses Flue gas aerosol pretreatment provides optimum solution1
For power plants integrated with solvent-based PCC without an existing baghouse optimized flue gas aerosol pretreatment is the only viable option to reduce aerosol concentrations from gt109 particlescm3 to manageable levels near 104-106
particlescm3 for particles with diameters in the range of 70-200 nm
Pretreatment has traditionally been performed using simple ESPs and Brownian filters
Few systematic studies have been conducted to evaluate performance of different technologies over a full range of conditions
15
BH = baghouse
1 Based on single point experience some options eg dry bed conf may handle higher particle concentrations than others
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
Abbott Power Plant (42 reheat burner w dryer) | Abbott Power Plant (0 reheat burner wo dryer) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (WashU) | Wilsonville (before baghouse) (SR) | UT Austin (NCCC) (before baghouse) | TCM (no BH no BF) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (SR) | Wilsonville Parametric Tests (Linde) | Wilsonville Long-term Tests (Linde) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anal Ins | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | kg amineMT CO2 | 04080107622 | 00095091096 | |||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 682819795644892 | 982 | 427900576923077 | 157 | 14468166666667 | 982 | 1000000 | 10 | 4000000 | 2400 | 100000 | 35 | 650000 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 735415966499163 | 102 | 532616923076924 | 163 | 160013 | 102 | 200000 | 20 | 3000000 | 2800 | 1150000 | 60 | 600000 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 667026341708543 | 106 | 642390384615385 | 168 | 14813666666667 | 106 | 200000 | 40 | 2000000 | 2800 | 10000000 | 100 | 530000 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 566092556113903 | 109 | 764663461538462 | 175 | 91535 | 109 | 1000000 | 70 | 1000000 | 3000 | 10000000 | 160 | 400000 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 60451071356784 | 113 | 993782692307693 | 181 | 21280833333333 | 113 | 6300000 | 110 | 900000 | 3200 | 1400000 | 280 | 350000 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 640447634840872 | 118 | 103840961538462 | 188 | 277361 | 118 | 8000000 | 200 | 800000 | 3200 | 120000 | 480 | 50000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 63931935678392 | 122 | 119893653846154 | 195 | 30501933333333 | 122 | 5000000 | 400 | 600000 | 3800 | 1400 | 640 | 20000 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 67781860636516 | 126 | 155467692307692 | 202 | 35493966666667 | 126 | 800000 | 700 | 500000 | 3800 | 1000 | 960 | 10000 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 678467648241207 | 131 | 173807500 | 209 | 25912033333333 | 131 | 1 | 800 | 400000 | 3800 | 1000 | 1920 | 5000 | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 736663748743719 | 136 | 198103846153846 | 217 | 20493533333333 | 136 | 1 | 1000 | 318900 | 3800 | 900 | 2560 | 100 | 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 791600921273033 | 141 | 245189807692308 | 225 | 34751733333333 | 141 | 300000 | 3800 | 750 | 5120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 776599182579565 | 146 | 27240826923077 | 233 | 43427866666667 | 146 | 200000 | 3800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 748095604690118 | 151 | 301905384615385 | 241 | 592247 | 151 | 100000 | 4000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 852265149078728 | 157 | 348734615384616 | 25 | 614018 | 157 | 90000 | 4100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 99985068676717 | 163 | 375607115384616 | 259 | 87004466666667 | 163 | 80000 | 4200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11043162479062 | 168 | 442790384615385 | 269 | 137845333333333 | 168 | 70000 | 4200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119948670016751 | 175 | 523365384615385 | 279 | 183715 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
112247051926298 | 181 | 445000384615385 | 289 | 241348 | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
126325376884422 | 188 | 591696153846154 | 30 | 299061666666667 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130470221105528 | 195 | 660759615384616 | 311 | 380613666666667 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140578994974874 | 202 | 706025000000001 | 322 | 419054666666667 | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
158666502512563 | 209 | 794851923076924 | 334 | 64940 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15709983919598 | 217 | 860896153846155 | 346 | 883372 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
146305745393635 | 225 | 847675000000001 | 359 | 130709333333333 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
175050465661642 | 233 | 943019230769232 | 372 | 182267 | 233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20586516917923 | 241 | 949319230769232 | 385 | 263912666666667 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21836616080402 | 25 | 96023076923077 | 40 | 355521333333333 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
221599480737019 | 259 | 956119230769232 | 414 | 484109 | 259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
231432663316583 | 269 | 1025750000 | 429 | 647791 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
228343541038526 | 279 | 964151923076924 | 445 | 830633 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238293788944724 | 289 | 982432692307693 | 461 | 1054740 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24027170519263 | 30 | 103288461538462 | 478 | 125545333333333 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254431427135679 | 311 | 981471153846155 | 514 | 1435950 | 311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
281640274706868 | 322 | 100416538461539 | 533 | 161942333333333 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
279502308207705 | 334 | 995501923076924 | 552 | 169811666666667 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
273149989949749 | 346 | 969944230769232 | 573 | 182475666666667 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
301086837520938 | 359 | 89473076923077 | 594 | 187437333333333 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
337571587939699 | 372 | 791292307692308 | 615 | 1885320 | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
335709822445561 | 385 | 719676923076924 | 638 | 184891666666667 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
303290958123953 | 40 | 67950576923077 | 661 | 177122333333333 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
296100891122278 | 414 | 554032692307693 | 685 | 167757333333333 | 414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305137175879397 | 429 | 441263461538462 | 71 | 1563790 | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
298671450586265 | 445 | 39593576923077 | 737 | 143831333333333 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
267825041876047 | 461 | 294517500 | 764 | 1276340 | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
268898750418761 | 478 | 235586538461539 | 791 | 111617666666667 | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
246584087102178 | 496 | 219594615384616 | 82 | 956378666666667 | 496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22753597319933 | 514 | 183537307692308 | 851 | 786719333333333 | 514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20805557118928 | 533 | 132950384615385 | 882 | 654658 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
193145899497488 | 552 | 991526923076924 | 914 | 524162333333333 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180397058626466 | 573 | 723884615384616 | 947 | 398477 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159287497487437 | 594 | 49395000 | 982 | 294095333333333 | 594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140093966499163 | 615 | 329623653846154 | 1018 | 216415 | 615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
125712003350084 | 638 | 232231346153846 | 1055 | 155941333333333 | 638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11582181239531 | 661 | 170568076923077 | 1094 | 109822 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
933554824120604 | 685 | 114283076923077 | 1134 | 811729333333333 | 685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
766995862646567 | 71 | 851232692307693 | 1176 | 533704666666667 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
625145611390285 | 737 | 558684615384616 | 1219 | 398905 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
531419574539364 | 764 | 425857115384616 | 1263 | 272716 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401304512562814 | 791 | 320039230769231 | 131 | 224988666666667 | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
302290415410386 | 82 | 224643461538462 | 1358 | 175139333333333 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
234256559463987 | 851 | 204812115384616 | 1407 | 137377666666667 | 851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
174277956448911 | 882 | 133968461538462 | 1459 | 1185743 | 882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119620948073702 | 914 | 120355384615385 | 1512 | 901657 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
860247541038527 | 947 | 1114950 | 1568 | 95869666666667 | 947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
588795608040202 | 982 | 892715384615385 | 1625 | 866524 | 982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453500100502513 | 1018 | 75693076923077 | 1685 | 79995933333333 | 1018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306104184254607 | 1055 | 734100000000001 | 1747 | 855652 | 1055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
214392951423786 | 1094 | 732648076923078 | 1811 | 82140833333333 | 1094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171584234505863 | 1134 | 530092307692308 | 1877 | 81683533333333 | 1134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129452606365159 | 1176 | 609534615384616 | 1946 | 71270166666667 | 1176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
109800234170854 | 1219 | 491257692307693 | 2017 | 67286033333333 | 1219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
875061487437187 | 1263 | 391936346153846 | 2091 | 75311933333333 | 1263 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
755701192629817 | 131 | 427556153846154 | 2167 | 71270066666667 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76907041876047 | 1358 | 528136538461539 | 2247 | 670295 | 1358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
816854716917924 | 1407 | 538875 | 2329 | 612828 | 1407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682292696817421 | 1459 | 484882692307693 | 2414 | 60685066666667 | 1459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
484327912897823 | 1512 | 523173076923077 | 2503 | 64353 | 1512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
601245688442212 | 1568 | 532400 | 2595 | 575052 | 1568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
608947306532664 | 1625 | 391983653846154 | 269 | 53995533333333 | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57423530318258 | 1685 | 39818576923077 | 2788 | 56581733333333 | 1685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
665198110552765 | 1747 | 390621538461539 | 289 | 50526966666667 | 1747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
641284469011726 | 1811 | 282454038461539 | 2996 | 52087233333333 | 1811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
551386834170855 | 1877 | 301689807692308 | 3106 | 390656 | 1877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
515487715242882 | 1946 | 392116538461539 | 322 | 40069366666667 | 1946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
557056576214406 | 2017 | 262214807692308 | 3338 | 42029366666667 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
585014763819096 | 2091 | 300040192307693 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
563217748743719 | 2167 | 327144807692308 | 3587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
516019996649917 | 2247 | 291944038461539 | 3718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
635039155778895 | 2329 | 410772307692308 | 3854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
678386860971525 | 2414 | 438539038461539 | 3995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
540607373534339 | 2503 | 810536808 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534717524288108 | 2595 | 882899298 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
624962696817421 | 269 | 884130018 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
507626351758795 | 2788 | 848442984 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
482487487437186 | 289 | 79158372 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
462233661641542 | 2996 | 628394094 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
614290241206031 | 3106 | 484154992 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549685423785595 | 322 | 3250266138 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485615936348409 | 3338 | 1930962502 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446652388609716 | 346 | 97717245 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
733651755443887 | 3587 | 451665266 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73515500837521 | 3718 | 1710666186 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
491714613065327 | 3854 | 750723816 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453128479061977 | 3995 | 3692090772 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22625785 | 542 | 08614861802 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23149945 | 583 | 11076250522 | 1596 | 89545 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2547951466667 | 626 | 1 | 1715 | 10021 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26411294 | 673 | 1 | 1843 | 11057 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2478060433333 | 723 | 1 | 1981 | 12158 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2428556433333 | 777 | 1 | 2129 | 12433 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1953912566667 | 835 | 1 | 2288 | 113975 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1421029306667 | 898 | 01230695642 | 2458 | 9234 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
797872833333 | 965 | 1 | 2642 | 70035 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430967506667 | 1037 | 1 | 2839 | 49195 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21839545 | 1114 | 1 | 3051 | 3452 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84446483333 | 1197 | 01230695642 | 3278 | 23495 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
320313357 | 1286 | 1 | 3523 | 1597 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34943302333 | 1382 | 1 | 3786 | 1089 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17471639033 | 1486 | 1 | 4068 | 781 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116477634 | 1596 | 1 | 4371 | 5965 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 1715 | 1 | 4698 | 4325 | 1596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1843 | 1 | 5048 | 3995 | 1715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1981 | 1 | 5425 | 3185 | 1843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2129 | 1 | 5829 | 2325 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2288 | 1 | 6264 | 2185 | 2129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2458 | 1 | 6732 | 194 | 2288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2642 | 1 | 7234 | 1705 | 2458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 2839 | 1 | 7774 | 1395 | 2642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 3051 | 1 | 8354 | 124 | 2839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 3278 | 1 | 8977 | 97 | 3051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 3523 | 1 | 9647 | 92 | 3278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735818 | 3786 | 1 | 10370 | 71 | 3523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23295514667 | 4068 | 1 | 11140 | 56 | 3786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4371 | 1 | 11970 | 51 | 4068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4698 | 1 | 12860 | 35 | 4371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5048 | 1 | 13820 | 31 | 4698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5425 | 1 | 14860 | 21 | 5048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5829 | 1 | 15960 | 16 | 5425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6264 | 1 | 17150 | 1 | 5829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6732 | 1 | 18430 | 055 | 6264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7234 | 1 | 19810 | 05 | 6732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7774 | 055 | 7234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8354 | 02 | 7774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8977 | 005 | 8354 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 9647 | 0 | 8977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 10370 | 01 | 9647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11140 | 005 | 10370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11970 | 005 | 11140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 12860 | 01 | 11970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 13820 | 0 | 12860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 14860 | 0 | 13820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 15960 | 0 | 14860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 17150 | 0 | 15960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 18430 | 0 | 17150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 19810 | 0 | 18430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19810 |
0009 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 |
8
Project Participants
Partner
Organization
Lead contact(s) Key Role(s)
DOE-NETL Andy Aurelio Project Manager
-Funding amp sponsorship
Linde LLC Devin BostickPrincipal InvestigatorKrish Krishnamurthy Technology Director
-Prime contract-Overall program management-High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technology owner
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
Kevin OrsquoBrien Project Lead
-Aerosol mechanisms review-Host site liaison-Flue gas and liquid effluent composition measurement amp analysis
Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL)
Pratim BiswasProject Lead
-Aerosol mechanisms modeling lead-ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technology owner-Characterization of aerosols in flue gas
Affiliated Construction Services (ACS)
Greg LarsonProject Lead
-Procurement management for high velocity water spray-based system-Construction management for site modifications amp module installation
9
Project Budget DOE Funding and Cost Share
SourceBudget Period 1
Jun 2018 ndash Nov 2018
Budget Period 2
Dec 2018 ndash Nov 2019
Budget Period 3
Dec 2019 ndash Nov 2020Total
DOE Funding $457822 $1290725 $1078826 $2827834
Cost Share $176612 $260949 $269860 $707421
Total Project $634435 $1551674 $1348686 $3534795
Cost share commitments
Linde $234869
University of Illinois (UIUC) $231339
Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) $191213
Affiliated Construction Services (ACS) $50000
Technology Development
Rationale Background amp Previous Research
10
Rationale reducing aerosol-driven amine losses from solvent-based PCC technology enables its broader commercial deployment
11
Amine losses
Flue gas cooler
Flue gas blower
Flue gas inlet
Condensate
Major factor aerosol particles in flue gas from coal-fired power plants
Aerosol particle formation during coal combustion
S N
N
S
Inorganic oxides and metals (eg SiO2 Fe P)
Sulfur
Nitrogen
Organic volatiles
Inorganic volatiles (eg Hg)
Coal particle1st stage
devolatilization
Burning of tar
Tar
Oxidation
CO2
Partial oxidation
Metal or its Suboxide vapor (eg SiO Ca)
Absorption
Re-oxidation amp particle formation
Nano-sized inorganic aerosol particle
(eg SiO2 particle)
Inorganic aerosols shielding organics
Aerosols sent in flue gas to PCC absorber
(1) Nucleation(2) Condensation
04 nmParticle Size 04 ndash 2 nm 2 - 100 nm 0001-1000 mm
(3) Coagulation
3 main stages of aerosol formation1
Burning of char
Bottom Ash
2nd stage devolatilization
Ash formation
1 Wang Xinlei amp Williams Brent amp Tang Y amp Huang Yuhsuan amp Kong L amp Yang Xin amp Biswas Pratim (2013) Characterization of organic aerosol produced during pulverized coal combustion in a drop tube furnace Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13 105194acp-13-10919-2013
12
Theory and mechanisms for aerosol-driven amine losses from PCC plant absorbers1
13
Phase IAerosol growth and nucleation from water in absorber
Phase IIAerosol growth from amine in absorber
Phase IIIBuildup of captured CO2and amine bound to CO2in aerosols
Phase IVSalt accumulation inside particles causing further amine and CO2 diffusion into aerosols
02 microm particle
1 G Lombardo B Fostas M Shah A Morken O Hvidsten J Mertens E Hamborg Results from Aerosol Measurement in Amine Plant Treating Gas Turbine and Residue Fluidized Catalytic Cracker Flue Gases at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad GHGT-13 Energy Procedia 2017 114 Pages 1210-1230
Water condensation
Nucleation from water supersaturation
1 microm particle
Amine absorption until complete saturation
2 microm particle
CO2 and CO2+amine absorption
2-5 microm particleSalt accumulationCO2 and amine diffusion
Amine contained in aerosol particles are then emitted from PCC absorber in treated gas stream
The Kelvin equation gives the minimum particle diameter d of a liquid1 supersaturation leads to nucleation of smaller particles
14
Benefits of aerosol particle reduction
Benefits
Manageable solvent supply and transport logistics
Optimum power plant efficiency
when integrated with PCC
Reduction of particulate that can unfavorably react with amine
solvent
Improved PCC plant specific
energy performance
Environmental sustainability and
performance
Improved PCC plant business
caselower cost
Methods to reduce aerosol-driven solvent losses Flue gas aerosol pretreatment provides optimum solution1
For power plants integrated with solvent-based PCC without an existing baghouse optimized flue gas aerosol pretreatment is the only viable option to reduce aerosol concentrations from gt109 particlescm3 to manageable levels near 104-106
particlescm3 for particles with diameters in the range of 70-200 nm
Pretreatment has traditionally been performed using simple ESPs and Brownian filters
Few systematic studies have been conducted to evaluate performance of different technologies over a full range of conditions
15
BH = baghouse
1 Based on single point experience some options eg dry bed conf may handle higher particle concentrations than others
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
Abbott Power Plant (42 reheat burner w dryer) | Abbott Power Plant (0 reheat burner wo dryer) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (WashU) | Wilsonville (before baghouse) (SR) | UT Austin (NCCC) (before baghouse) | TCM (no BH no BF) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (SR) | Wilsonville Parametric Tests (Linde) | Wilsonville Long-term Tests (Linde) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anal Ins | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | kg amineMT CO2 | 04080107622 | 00095091096 | |||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 682819795644892 | 982 | 427900576923077 | 157 | 14468166666667 | 982 | 1000000 | 10 | 4000000 | 2400 | 100000 | 35 | 650000 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 735415966499163 | 102 | 532616923076924 | 163 | 160013 | 102 | 200000 | 20 | 3000000 | 2800 | 1150000 | 60 | 600000 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 667026341708543 | 106 | 642390384615385 | 168 | 14813666666667 | 106 | 200000 | 40 | 2000000 | 2800 | 10000000 | 100 | 530000 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 566092556113903 | 109 | 764663461538462 | 175 | 91535 | 109 | 1000000 | 70 | 1000000 | 3000 | 10000000 | 160 | 400000 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 60451071356784 | 113 | 993782692307693 | 181 | 21280833333333 | 113 | 6300000 | 110 | 900000 | 3200 | 1400000 | 280 | 350000 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 640447634840872 | 118 | 103840961538462 | 188 | 277361 | 118 | 8000000 | 200 | 800000 | 3200 | 120000 | 480 | 50000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 63931935678392 | 122 | 119893653846154 | 195 | 30501933333333 | 122 | 5000000 | 400 | 600000 | 3800 | 1400 | 640 | 20000 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 67781860636516 | 126 | 155467692307692 | 202 | 35493966666667 | 126 | 800000 | 700 | 500000 | 3800 | 1000 | 960 | 10000 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 678467648241207 | 131 | 173807500 | 209 | 25912033333333 | 131 | 1 | 800 | 400000 | 3800 | 1000 | 1920 | 5000 | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 736663748743719 | 136 | 198103846153846 | 217 | 20493533333333 | 136 | 1 | 1000 | 318900 | 3800 | 900 | 2560 | 100 | 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 791600921273033 | 141 | 245189807692308 | 225 | 34751733333333 | 141 | 300000 | 3800 | 750 | 5120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 776599182579565 | 146 | 27240826923077 | 233 | 43427866666667 | 146 | 200000 | 3800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 748095604690118 | 151 | 301905384615385 | 241 | 592247 | 151 | 100000 | 4000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 852265149078728 | 157 | 348734615384616 | 25 | 614018 | 157 | 90000 | 4100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 99985068676717 | 163 | 375607115384616 | 259 | 87004466666667 | 163 | 80000 | 4200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11043162479062 | 168 | 442790384615385 | 269 | 137845333333333 | 168 | 70000 | 4200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119948670016751 | 175 | 523365384615385 | 279 | 183715 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
112247051926298 | 181 | 445000384615385 | 289 | 241348 | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
126325376884422 | 188 | 591696153846154 | 30 | 299061666666667 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130470221105528 | 195 | 660759615384616 | 311 | 380613666666667 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140578994974874 | 202 | 706025000000001 | 322 | 419054666666667 | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
158666502512563 | 209 | 794851923076924 | 334 | 64940 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15709983919598 | 217 | 860896153846155 | 346 | 883372 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
146305745393635 | 225 | 847675000000001 | 359 | 130709333333333 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
175050465661642 | 233 | 943019230769232 | 372 | 182267 | 233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20586516917923 | 241 | 949319230769232 | 385 | 263912666666667 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21836616080402 | 25 | 96023076923077 | 40 | 355521333333333 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
221599480737019 | 259 | 956119230769232 | 414 | 484109 | 259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
231432663316583 | 269 | 1025750000 | 429 | 647791 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
228343541038526 | 279 | 964151923076924 | 445 | 830633 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238293788944724 | 289 | 982432692307693 | 461 | 1054740 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24027170519263 | 30 | 103288461538462 | 478 | 125545333333333 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254431427135679 | 311 | 981471153846155 | 514 | 1435950 | 311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
281640274706868 | 322 | 100416538461539 | 533 | 161942333333333 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
279502308207705 | 334 | 995501923076924 | 552 | 169811666666667 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
273149989949749 | 346 | 969944230769232 | 573 | 182475666666667 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
301086837520938 | 359 | 89473076923077 | 594 | 187437333333333 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
337571587939699 | 372 | 791292307692308 | 615 | 1885320 | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
335709822445561 | 385 | 719676923076924 | 638 | 184891666666667 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
303290958123953 | 40 | 67950576923077 | 661 | 177122333333333 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
296100891122278 | 414 | 554032692307693 | 685 | 167757333333333 | 414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305137175879397 | 429 | 441263461538462 | 71 | 1563790 | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
298671450586265 | 445 | 39593576923077 | 737 | 143831333333333 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
267825041876047 | 461 | 294517500 | 764 | 1276340 | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
268898750418761 | 478 | 235586538461539 | 791 | 111617666666667 | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
246584087102178 | 496 | 219594615384616 | 82 | 956378666666667 | 496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22753597319933 | 514 | 183537307692308 | 851 | 786719333333333 | 514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20805557118928 | 533 | 132950384615385 | 882 | 654658 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
193145899497488 | 552 | 991526923076924 | 914 | 524162333333333 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180397058626466 | 573 | 723884615384616 | 947 | 398477 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159287497487437 | 594 | 49395000 | 982 | 294095333333333 | 594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140093966499163 | 615 | 329623653846154 | 1018 | 216415 | 615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
125712003350084 | 638 | 232231346153846 | 1055 | 155941333333333 | 638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11582181239531 | 661 | 170568076923077 | 1094 | 109822 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
933554824120604 | 685 | 114283076923077 | 1134 | 811729333333333 | 685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
766995862646567 | 71 | 851232692307693 | 1176 | 533704666666667 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
625145611390285 | 737 | 558684615384616 | 1219 | 398905 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
531419574539364 | 764 | 425857115384616 | 1263 | 272716 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401304512562814 | 791 | 320039230769231 | 131 | 224988666666667 | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
302290415410386 | 82 | 224643461538462 | 1358 | 175139333333333 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
234256559463987 | 851 | 204812115384616 | 1407 | 137377666666667 | 851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
174277956448911 | 882 | 133968461538462 | 1459 | 1185743 | 882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119620948073702 | 914 | 120355384615385 | 1512 | 901657 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
860247541038527 | 947 | 1114950 | 1568 | 95869666666667 | 947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
588795608040202 | 982 | 892715384615385 | 1625 | 866524 | 982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453500100502513 | 1018 | 75693076923077 | 1685 | 79995933333333 | 1018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306104184254607 | 1055 | 734100000000001 | 1747 | 855652 | 1055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
214392951423786 | 1094 | 732648076923078 | 1811 | 82140833333333 | 1094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171584234505863 | 1134 | 530092307692308 | 1877 | 81683533333333 | 1134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129452606365159 | 1176 | 609534615384616 | 1946 | 71270166666667 | 1176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
109800234170854 | 1219 | 491257692307693 | 2017 | 67286033333333 | 1219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
875061487437187 | 1263 | 391936346153846 | 2091 | 75311933333333 | 1263 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
755701192629817 | 131 | 427556153846154 | 2167 | 71270066666667 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76907041876047 | 1358 | 528136538461539 | 2247 | 670295 | 1358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
816854716917924 | 1407 | 538875 | 2329 | 612828 | 1407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682292696817421 | 1459 | 484882692307693 | 2414 | 60685066666667 | 1459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
484327912897823 | 1512 | 523173076923077 | 2503 | 64353 | 1512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
601245688442212 | 1568 | 532400 | 2595 | 575052 | 1568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
608947306532664 | 1625 | 391983653846154 | 269 | 53995533333333 | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57423530318258 | 1685 | 39818576923077 | 2788 | 56581733333333 | 1685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
665198110552765 | 1747 | 390621538461539 | 289 | 50526966666667 | 1747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
641284469011726 | 1811 | 282454038461539 | 2996 | 52087233333333 | 1811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
551386834170855 | 1877 | 301689807692308 | 3106 | 390656 | 1877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
515487715242882 | 1946 | 392116538461539 | 322 | 40069366666667 | 1946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
557056576214406 | 2017 | 262214807692308 | 3338 | 42029366666667 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
585014763819096 | 2091 | 300040192307693 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
563217748743719 | 2167 | 327144807692308 | 3587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
516019996649917 | 2247 | 291944038461539 | 3718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
635039155778895 | 2329 | 410772307692308 | 3854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
678386860971525 | 2414 | 438539038461539 | 3995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
540607373534339 | 2503 | 810536808 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534717524288108 | 2595 | 882899298 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
624962696817421 | 269 | 884130018 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
507626351758795 | 2788 | 848442984 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
482487487437186 | 289 | 79158372 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
462233661641542 | 2996 | 628394094 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
614290241206031 | 3106 | 484154992 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549685423785595 | 322 | 3250266138 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485615936348409 | 3338 | 1930962502 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446652388609716 | 346 | 97717245 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
733651755443887 | 3587 | 451665266 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73515500837521 | 3718 | 1710666186 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
491714613065327 | 3854 | 750723816 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453128479061977 | 3995 | 3692090772 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22625785 | 542 | 08614861802 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23149945 | 583 | 11076250522 | 1596 | 89545 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2547951466667 | 626 | 1 | 1715 | 10021 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26411294 | 673 | 1 | 1843 | 11057 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2478060433333 | 723 | 1 | 1981 | 12158 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2428556433333 | 777 | 1 | 2129 | 12433 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1953912566667 | 835 | 1 | 2288 | 113975 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1421029306667 | 898 | 01230695642 | 2458 | 9234 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
797872833333 | 965 | 1 | 2642 | 70035 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430967506667 | 1037 | 1 | 2839 | 49195 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21839545 | 1114 | 1 | 3051 | 3452 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84446483333 | 1197 | 01230695642 | 3278 | 23495 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
320313357 | 1286 | 1 | 3523 | 1597 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34943302333 | 1382 | 1 | 3786 | 1089 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17471639033 | 1486 | 1 | 4068 | 781 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116477634 | 1596 | 1 | 4371 | 5965 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 1715 | 1 | 4698 | 4325 | 1596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1843 | 1 | 5048 | 3995 | 1715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1981 | 1 | 5425 | 3185 | 1843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2129 | 1 | 5829 | 2325 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2288 | 1 | 6264 | 2185 | 2129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2458 | 1 | 6732 | 194 | 2288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2642 | 1 | 7234 | 1705 | 2458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 2839 | 1 | 7774 | 1395 | 2642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 3051 | 1 | 8354 | 124 | 2839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 3278 | 1 | 8977 | 97 | 3051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 3523 | 1 | 9647 | 92 | 3278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735818 | 3786 | 1 | 10370 | 71 | 3523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23295514667 | 4068 | 1 | 11140 | 56 | 3786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4371 | 1 | 11970 | 51 | 4068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4698 | 1 | 12860 | 35 | 4371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5048 | 1 | 13820 | 31 | 4698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5425 | 1 | 14860 | 21 | 5048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5829 | 1 | 15960 | 16 | 5425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6264 | 1 | 17150 | 1 | 5829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6732 | 1 | 18430 | 055 | 6264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7234 | 1 | 19810 | 05 | 6732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7774 | 055 | 7234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8354 | 02 | 7774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8977 | 005 | 8354 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 9647 | 0 | 8977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 10370 | 01 | 9647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11140 | 005 | 10370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11970 | 005 | 11140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 12860 | 01 | 11970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 13820 | 0 | 12860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 14860 | 0 | 13820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 15960 | 0 | 14860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 17150 | 0 | 15960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 18430 | 0 | 17150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 19810 | 0 | 18430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19810 |
0009 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 |
9
Project Budget DOE Funding and Cost Share
SourceBudget Period 1
Jun 2018 ndash Nov 2018
Budget Period 2
Dec 2018 ndash Nov 2019
Budget Period 3
Dec 2019 ndash Nov 2020Total
DOE Funding $457822 $1290725 $1078826 $2827834
Cost Share $176612 $260949 $269860 $707421
Total Project $634435 $1551674 $1348686 $3534795
Cost share commitments
Linde $234869
University of Illinois (UIUC) $231339
Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) $191213
Affiliated Construction Services (ACS) $50000
Technology Development
Rationale Background amp Previous Research
10
Rationale reducing aerosol-driven amine losses from solvent-based PCC technology enables its broader commercial deployment
11
Amine losses
Flue gas cooler
Flue gas blower
Flue gas inlet
Condensate
Major factor aerosol particles in flue gas from coal-fired power plants
Aerosol particle formation during coal combustion
S N
N
S
Inorganic oxides and metals (eg SiO2 Fe P)
Sulfur
Nitrogen
Organic volatiles
Inorganic volatiles (eg Hg)
Coal particle1st stage
devolatilization
Burning of tar
Tar
Oxidation
CO2
Partial oxidation
Metal or its Suboxide vapor (eg SiO Ca)
Absorption
Re-oxidation amp particle formation
Nano-sized inorganic aerosol particle
(eg SiO2 particle)
Inorganic aerosols shielding organics
Aerosols sent in flue gas to PCC absorber
(1) Nucleation(2) Condensation
04 nmParticle Size 04 ndash 2 nm 2 - 100 nm 0001-1000 mm
(3) Coagulation
3 main stages of aerosol formation1
Burning of char
Bottom Ash
2nd stage devolatilization
Ash formation
1 Wang Xinlei amp Williams Brent amp Tang Y amp Huang Yuhsuan amp Kong L amp Yang Xin amp Biswas Pratim (2013) Characterization of organic aerosol produced during pulverized coal combustion in a drop tube furnace Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13 105194acp-13-10919-2013
12
Theory and mechanisms for aerosol-driven amine losses from PCC plant absorbers1
13
Phase IAerosol growth and nucleation from water in absorber
Phase IIAerosol growth from amine in absorber
Phase IIIBuildup of captured CO2and amine bound to CO2in aerosols
Phase IVSalt accumulation inside particles causing further amine and CO2 diffusion into aerosols
02 microm particle
1 G Lombardo B Fostas M Shah A Morken O Hvidsten J Mertens E Hamborg Results from Aerosol Measurement in Amine Plant Treating Gas Turbine and Residue Fluidized Catalytic Cracker Flue Gases at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad GHGT-13 Energy Procedia 2017 114 Pages 1210-1230
Water condensation
Nucleation from water supersaturation
1 microm particle
Amine absorption until complete saturation
2 microm particle
CO2 and CO2+amine absorption
2-5 microm particleSalt accumulationCO2 and amine diffusion
Amine contained in aerosol particles are then emitted from PCC absorber in treated gas stream
The Kelvin equation gives the minimum particle diameter d of a liquid1 supersaturation leads to nucleation of smaller particles
14
Benefits of aerosol particle reduction
Benefits
Manageable solvent supply and transport logistics
Optimum power plant efficiency
when integrated with PCC
Reduction of particulate that can unfavorably react with amine
solvent
Improved PCC plant specific
energy performance
Environmental sustainability and
performance
Improved PCC plant business
caselower cost
Methods to reduce aerosol-driven solvent losses Flue gas aerosol pretreatment provides optimum solution1
For power plants integrated with solvent-based PCC without an existing baghouse optimized flue gas aerosol pretreatment is the only viable option to reduce aerosol concentrations from gt109 particlescm3 to manageable levels near 104-106
particlescm3 for particles with diameters in the range of 70-200 nm
Pretreatment has traditionally been performed using simple ESPs and Brownian filters
Few systematic studies have been conducted to evaluate performance of different technologies over a full range of conditions
15
BH = baghouse
1 Based on single point experience some options eg dry bed conf may handle higher particle concentrations than others
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
Abbott Power Plant (42 reheat burner w dryer) | Abbott Power Plant (0 reheat burner wo dryer) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (WashU) | Wilsonville (before baghouse) (SR) | UT Austin (NCCC) (before baghouse) | TCM (no BH no BF) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (SR) | Wilsonville Parametric Tests (Linde) | Wilsonville Long-term Tests (Linde) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anal Ins | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | kg amineMT CO2 | 04080107622 | 00095091096 | |||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 682819795644892 | 982 | 427900576923077 | 157 | 14468166666667 | 982 | 1000000 | 10 | 4000000 | 2400 | 100000 | 35 | 650000 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 735415966499163 | 102 | 532616923076924 | 163 | 160013 | 102 | 200000 | 20 | 3000000 | 2800 | 1150000 | 60 | 600000 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 667026341708543 | 106 | 642390384615385 | 168 | 14813666666667 | 106 | 200000 | 40 | 2000000 | 2800 | 10000000 | 100 | 530000 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 566092556113903 | 109 | 764663461538462 | 175 | 91535 | 109 | 1000000 | 70 | 1000000 | 3000 | 10000000 | 160 | 400000 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 60451071356784 | 113 | 993782692307693 | 181 | 21280833333333 | 113 | 6300000 | 110 | 900000 | 3200 | 1400000 | 280 | 350000 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 640447634840872 | 118 | 103840961538462 | 188 | 277361 | 118 | 8000000 | 200 | 800000 | 3200 | 120000 | 480 | 50000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 63931935678392 | 122 | 119893653846154 | 195 | 30501933333333 | 122 | 5000000 | 400 | 600000 | 3800 | 1400 | 640 | 20000 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 67781860636516 | 126 | 155467692307692 | 202 | 35493966666667 | 126 | 800000 | 700 | 500000 | 3800 | 1000 | 960 | 10000 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 678467648241207 | 131 | 173807500 | 209 | 25912033333333 | 131 | 1 | 800 | 400000 | 3800 | 1000 | 1920 | 5000 | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 736663748743719 | 136 | 198103846153846 | 217 | 20493533333333 | 136 | 1 | 1000 | 318900 | 3800 | 900 | 2560 | 100 | 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 791600921273033 | 141 | 245189807692308 | 225 | 34751733333333 | 141 | 300000 | 3800 | 750 | 5120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 776599182579565 | 146 | 27240826923077 | 233 | 43427866666667 | 146 | 200000 | 3800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 748095604690118 | 151 | 301905384615385 | 241 | 592247 | 151 | 100000 | 4000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 852265149078728 | 157 | 348734615384616 | 25 | 614018 | 157 | 90000 | 4100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 99985068676717 | 163 | 375607115384616 | 259 | 87004466666667 | 163 | 80000 | 4200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11043162479062 | 168 | 442790384615385 | 269 | 137845333333333 | 168 | 70000 | 4200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119948670016751 | 175 | 523365384615385 | 279 | 183715 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
112247051926298 | 181 | 445000384615385 | 289 | 241348 | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
126325376884422 | 188 | 591696153846154 | 30 | 299061666666667 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130470221105528 | 195 | 660759615384616 | 311 | 380613666666667 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140578994974874 | 202 | 706025000000001 | 322 | 419054666666667 | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
158666502512563 | 209 | 794851923076924 | 334 | 64940 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15709983919598 | 217 | 860896153846155 | 346 | 883372 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
146305745393635 | 225 | 847675000000001 | 359 | 130709333333333 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
175050465661642 | 233 | 943019230769232 | 372 | 182267 | 233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20586516917923 | 241 | 949319230769232 | 385 | 263912666666667 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21836616080402 | 25 | 96023076923077 | 40 | 355521333333333 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
221599480737019 | 259 | 956119230769232 | 414 | 484109 | 259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
231432663316583 | 269 | 1025750000 | 429 | 647791 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
228343541038526 | 279 | 964151923076924 | 445 | 830633 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238293788944724 | 289 | 982432692307693 | 461 | 1054740 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24027170519263 | 30 | 103288461538462 | 478 | 125545333333333 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254431427135679 | 311 | 981471153846155 | 514 | 1435950 | 311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
281640274706868 | 322 | 100416538461539 | 533 | 161942333333333 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
279502308207705 | 334 | 995501923076924 | 552 | 169811666666667 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
273149989949749 | 346 | 969944230769232 | 573 | 182475666666667 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
301086837520938 | 359 | 89473076923077 | 594 | 187437333333333 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
337571587939699 | 372 | 791292307692308 | 615 | 1885320 | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
335709822445561 | 385 | 719676923076924 | 638 | 184891666666667 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
303290958123953 | 40 | 67950576923077 | 661 | 177122333333333 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
296100891122278 | 414 | 554032692307693 | 685 | 167757333333333 | 414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305137175879397 | 429 | 441263461538462 | 71 | 1563790 | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
298671450586265 | 445 | 39593576923077 | 737 | 143831333333333 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
267825041876047 | 461 | 294517500 | 764 | 1276340 | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
268898750418761 | 478 | 235586538461539 | 791 | 111617666666667 | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
246584087102178 | 496 | 219594615384616 | 82 | 956378666666667 | 496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22753597319933 | 514 | 183537307692308 | 851 | 786719333333333 | 514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20805557118928 | 533 | 132950384615385 | 882 | 654658 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
193145899497488 | 552 | 991526923076924 | 914 | 524162333333333 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180397058626466 | 573 | 723884615384616 | 947 | 398477 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159287497487437 | 594 | 49395000 | 982 | 294095333333333 | 594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140093966499163 | 615 | 329623653846154 | 1018 | 216415 | 615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
125712003350084 | 638 | 232231346153846 | 1055 | 155941333333333 | 638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11582181239531 | 661 | 170568076923077 | 1094 | 109822 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
933554824120604 | 685 | 114283076923077 | 1134 | 811729333333333 | 685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
766995862646567 | 71 | 851232692307693 | 1176 | 533704666666667 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
625145611390285 | 737 | 558684615384616 | 1219 | 398905 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
531419574539364 | 764 | 425857115384616 | 1263 | 272716 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401304512562814 | 791 | 320039230769231 | 131 | 224988666666667 | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
302290415410386 | 82 | 224643461538462 | 1358 | 175139333333333 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
234256559463987 | 851 | 204812115384616 | 1407 | 137377666666667 | 851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
174277956448911 | 882 | 133968461538462 | 1459 | 1185743 | 882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119620948073702 | 914 | 120355384615385 | 1512 | 901657 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
860247541038527 | 947 | 1114950 | 1568 | 95869666666667 | 947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
588795608040202 | 982 | 892715384615385 | 1625 | 866524 | 982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453500100502513 | 1018 | 75693076923077 | 1685 | 79995933333333 | 1018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306104184254607 | 1055 | 734100000000001 | 1747 | 855652 | 1055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
214392951423786 | 1094 | 732648076923078 | 1811 | 82140833333333 | 1094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171584234505863 | 1134 | 530092307692308 | 1877 | 81683533333333 | 1134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129452606365159 | 1176 | 609534615384616 | 1946 | 71270166666667 | 1176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
109800234170854 | 1219 | 491257692307693 | 2017 | 67286033333333 | 1219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
875061487437187 | 1263 | 391936346153846 | 2091 | 75311933333333 | 1263 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
755701192629817 | 131 | 427556153846154 | 2167 | 71270066666667 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76907041876047 | 1358 | 528136538461539 | 2247 | 670295 | 1358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
816854716917924 | 1407 | 538875 | 2329 | 612828 | 1407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682292696817421 | 1459 | 484882692307693 | 2414 | 60685066666667 | 1459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
484327912897823 | 1512 | 523173076923077 | 2503 | 64353 | 1512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
601245688442212 | 1568 | 532400 | 2595 | 575052 | 1568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
608947306532664 | 1625 | 391983653846154 | 269 | 53995533333333 | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57423530318258 | 1685 | 39818576923077 | 2788 | 56581733333333 | 1685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
665198110552765 | 1747 | 390621538461539 | 289 | 50526966666667 | 1747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
641284469011726 | 1811 | 282454038461539 | 2996 | 52087233333333 | 1811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
551386834170855 | 1877 | 301689807692308 | 3106 | 390656 | 1877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
515487715242882 | 1946 | 392116538461539 | 322 | 40069366666667 | 1946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
557056576214406 | 2017 | 262214807692308 | 3338 | 42029366666667 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
585014763819096 | 2091 | 300040192307693 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
563217748743719 | 2167 | 327144807692308 | 3587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
516019996649917 | 2247 | 291944038461539 | 3718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
635039155778895 | 2329 | 410772307692308 | 3854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
678386860971525 | 2414 | 438539038461539 | 3995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
540607373534339 | 2503 | 810536808 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534717524288108 | 2595 | 882899298 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
624962696817421 | 269 | 884130018 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
507626351758795 | 2788 | 848442984 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
482487487437186 | 289 | 79158372 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
462233661641542 | 2996 | 628394094 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
614290241206031 | 3106 | 484154992 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549685423785595 | 322 | 3250266138 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485615936348409 | 3338 | 1930962502 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446652388609716 | 346 | 97717245 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
733651755443887 | 3587 | 451665266 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73515500837521 | 3718 | 1710666186 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
491714613065327 | 3854 | 750723816 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453128479061977 | 3995 | 3692090772 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22625785 | 542 | 08614861802 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23149945 | 583 | 11076250522 | 1596 | 89545 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2547951466667 | 626 | 1 | 1715 | 10021 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26411294 | 673 | 1 | 1843 | 11057 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2478060433333 | 723 | 1 | 1981 | 12158 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2428556433333 | 777 | 1 | 2129 | 12433 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1953912566667 | 835 | 1 | 2288 | 113975 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1421029306667 | 898 | 01230695642 | 2458 | 9234 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
797872833333 | 965 | 1 | 2642 | 70035 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430967506667 | 1037 | 1 | 2839 | 49195 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21839545 | 1114 | 1 | 3051 | 3452 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84446483333 | 1197 | 01230695642 | 3278 | 23495 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
320313357 | 1286 | 1 | 3523 | 1597 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34943302333 | 1382 | 1 | 3786 | 1089 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17471639033 | 1486 | 1 | 4068 | 781 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116477634 | 1596 | 1 | 4371 | 5965 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 1715 | 1 | 4698 | 4325 | 1596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1843 | 1 | 5048 | 3995 | 1715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1981 | 1 | 5425 | 3185 | 1843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2129 | 1 | 5829 | 2325 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2288 | 1 | 6264 | 2185 | 2129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2458 | 1 | 6732 | 194 | 2288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2642 | 1 | 7234 | 1705 | 2458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 2839 | 1 | 7774 | 1395 | 2642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 3051 | 1 | 8354 | 124 | 2839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 3278 | 1 | 8977 | 97 | 3051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 3523 | 1 | 9647 | 92 | 3278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735818 | 3786 | 1 | 10370 | 71 | 3523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23295514667 | 4068 | 1 | 11140 | 56 | 3786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4371 | 1 | 11970 | 51 | 4068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4698 | 1 | 12860 | 35 | 4371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5048 | 1 | 13820 | 31 | 4698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5425 | 1 | 14860 | 21 | 5048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5829 | 1 | 15960 | 16 | 5425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6264 | 1 | 17150 | 1 | 5829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6732 | 1 | 18430 | 055 | 6264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7234 | 1 | 19810 | 05 | 6732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7774 | 055 | 7234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8354 | 02 | 7774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8977 | 005 | 8354 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 9647 | 0 | 8977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 10370 | 01 | 9647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11140 | 005 | 10370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11970 | 005 | 11140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 12860 | 01 | 11970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 13820 | 0 | 12860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 14860 | 0 | 13820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 15960 | 0 | 14860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 17150 | 0 | 15960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 18430 | 0 | 17150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 19810 | 0 | 18430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19810 |
0009 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 |
Technology Development
Rationale Background amp Previous Research
10
Rationale reducing aerosol-driven amine losses from solvent-based PCC technology enables its broader commercial deployment
11
Amine losses
Flue gas cooler
Flue gas blower
Flue gas inlet
Condensate
Major factor aerosol particles in flue gas from coal-fired power plants
Aerosol particle formation during coal combustion
S N
N
S
Inorganic oxides and metals (eg SiO2 Fe P)
Sulfur
Nitrogen
Organic volatiles
Inorganic volatiles (eg Hg)
Coal particle1st stage
devolatilization
Burning of tar
Tar
Oxidation
CO2
Partial oxidation
Metal or its Suboxide vapor (eg SiO Ca)
Absorption
Re-oxidation amp particle formation
Nano-sized inorganic aerosol particle
(eg SiO2 particle)
Inorganic aerosols shielding organics
Aerosols sent in flue gas to PCC absorber
(1) Nucleation(2) Condensation
04 nmParticle Size 04 ndash 2 nm 2 - 100 nm 0001-1000 mm
(3) Coagulation
3 main stages of aerosol formation1
Burning of char
Bottom Ash
2nd stage devolatilization
Ash formation
1 Wang Xinlei amp Williams Brent amp Tang Y amp Huang Yuhsuan amp Kong L amp Yang Xin amp Biswas Pratim (2013) Characterization of organic aerosol produced during pulverized coal combustion in a drop tube furnace Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13 105194acp-13-10919-2013
12
Theory and mechanisms for aerosol-driven amine losses from PCC plant absorbers1
13
Phase IAerosol growth and nucleation from water in absorber
Phase IIAerosol growth from amine in absorber
Phase IIIBuildup of captured CO2and amine bound to CO2in aerosols
Phase IVSalt accumulation inside particles causing further amine and CO2 diffusion into aerosols
02 microm particle
1 G Lombardo B Fostas M Shah A Morken O Hvidsten J Mertens E Hamborg Results from Aerosol Measurement in Amine Plant Treating Gas Turbine and Residue Fluidized Catalytic Cracker Flue Gases at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad GHGT-13 Energy Procedia 2017 114 Pages 1210-1230
Water condensation
Nucleation from water supersaturation
1 microm particle
Amine absorption until complete saturation
2 microm particle
CO2 and CO2+amine absorption
2-5 microm particleSalt accumulationCO2 and amine diffusion
Amine contained in aerosol particles are then emitted from PCC absorber in treated gas stream
The Kelvin equation gives the minimum particle diameter d of a liquid1 supersaturation leads to nucleation of smaller particles
14
Benefits of aerosol particle reduction
Benefits
Manageable solvent supply and transport logistics
Optimum power plant efficiency
when integrated with PCC
Reduction of particulate that can unfavorably react with amine
solvent
Improved PCC plant specific
energy performance
Environmental sustainability and
performance
Improved PCC plant business
caselower cost
Methods to reduce aerosol-driven solvent losses Flue gas aerosol pretreatment provides optimum solution1
For power plants integrated with solvent-based PCC without an existing baghouse optimized flue gas aerosol pretreatment is the only viable option to reduce aerosol concentrations from gt109 particlescm3 to manageable levels near 104-106
particlescm3 for particles with diameters in the range of 70-200 nm
Pretreatment has traditionally been performed using simple ESPs and Brownian filters
Few systematic studies have been conducted to evaluate performance of different technologies over a full range of conditions
15
BH = baghouse
1 Based on single point experience some options eg dry bed conf may handle higher particle concentrations than others
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
Abbott Power Plant (42 reheat burner w dryer) | Abbott Power Plant (0 reheat burner wo dryer) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (WashU) | Wilsonville (before baghouse) (SR) | UT Austin (NCCC) (before baghouse) | TCM (no BH no BF) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (SR) | Wilsonville Parametric Tests (Linde) | Wilsonville Long-term Tests (Linde) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anal Ins | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | kg amineMT CO2 | 04080107622 | 00095091096 | |||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 682819795644892 | 982 | 427900576923077 | 157 | 14468166666667 | 982 | 1000000 | 10 | 4000000 | 2400 | 100000 | 35 | 650000 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 735415966499163 | 102 | 532616923076924 | 163 | 160013 | 102 | 200000 | 20 | 3000000 | 2800 | 1150000 | 60 | 600000 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 667026341708543 | 106 | 642390384615385 | 168 | 14813666666667 | 106 | 200000 | 40 | 2000000 | 2800 | 10000000 | 100 | 530000 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 566092556113903 | 109 | 764663461538462 | 175 | 91535 | 109 | 1000000 | 70 | 1000000 | 3000 | 10000000 | 160 | 400000 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 60451071356784 | 113 | 993782692307693 | 181 | 21280833333333 | 113 | 6300000 | 110 | 900000 | 3200 | 1400000 | 280 | 350000 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 640447634840872 | 118 | 103840961538462 | 188 | 277361 | 118 | 8000000 | 200 | 800000 | 3200 | 120000 | 480 | 50000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 63931935678392 | 122 | 119893653846154 | 195 | 30501933333333 | 122 | 5000000 | 400 | 600000 | 3800 | 1400 | 640 | 20000 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 67781860636516 | 126 | 155467692307692 | 202 | 35493966666667 | 126 | 800000 | 700 | 500000 | 3800 | 1000 | 960 | 10000 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 678467648241207 | 131 | 173807500 | 209 | 25912033333333 | 131 | 1 | 800 | 400000 | 3800 | 1000 | 1920 | 5000 | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 736663748743719 | 136 | 198103846153846 | 217 | 20493533333333 | 136 | 1 | 1000 | 318900 | 3800 | 900 | 2560 | 100 | 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 791600921273033 | 141 | 245189807692308 | 225 | 34751733333333 | 141 | 300000 | 3800 | 750 | 5120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 776599182579565 | 146 | 27240826923077 | 233 | 43427866666667 | 146 | 200000 | 3800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 748095604690118 | 151 | 301905384615385 | 241 | 592247 | 151 | 100000 | 4000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 852265149078728 | 157 | 348734615384616 | 25 | 614018 | 157 | 90000 | 4100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 99985068676717 | 163 | 375607115384616 | 259 | 87004466666667 | 163 | 80000 | 4200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11043162479062 | 168 | 442790384615385 | 269 | 137845333333333 | 168 | 70000 | 4200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119948670016751 | 175 | 523365384615385 | 279 | 183715 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
112247051926298 | 181 | 445000384615385 | 289 | 241348 | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
126325376884422 | 188 | 591696153846154 | 30 | 299061666666667 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130470221105528 | 195 | 660759615384616 | 311 | 380613666666667 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140578994974874 | 202 | 706025000000001 | 322 | 419054666666667 | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
158666502512563 | 209 | 794851923076924 | 334 | 64940 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15709983919598 | 217 | 860896153846155 | 346 | 883372 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
146305745393635 | 225 | 847675000000001 | 359 | 130709333333333 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
175050465661642 | 233 | 943019230769232 | 372 | 182267 | 233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20586516917923 | 241 | 949319230769232 | 385 | 263912666666667 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21836616080402 | 25 | 96023076923077 | 40 | 355521333333333 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
221599480737019 | 259 | 956119230769232 | 414 | 484109 | 259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
231432663316583 | 269 | 1025750000 | 429 | 647791 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
228343541038526 | 279 | 964151923076924 | 445 | 830633 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238293788944724 | 289 | 982432692307693 | 461 | 1054740 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24027170519263 | 30 | 103288461538462 | 478 | 125545333333333 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254431427135679 | 311 | 981471153846155 | 514 | 1435950 | 311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
281640274706868 | 322 | 100416538461539 | 533 | 161942333333333 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
279502308207705 | 334 | 995501923076924 | 552 | 169811666666667 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
273149989949749 | 346 | 969944230769232 | 573 | 182475666666667 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
301086837520938 | 359 | 89473076923077 | 594 | 187437333333333 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
337571587939699 | 372 | 791292307692308 | 615 | 1885320 | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
335709822445561 | 385 | 719676923076924 | 638 | 184891666666667 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
303290958123953 | 40 | 67950576923077 | 661 | 177122333333333 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
296100891122278 | 414 | 554032692307693 | 685 | 167757333333333 | 414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305137175879397 | 429 | 441263461538462 | 71 | 1563790 | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
298671450586265 | 445 | 39593576923077 | 737 | 143831333333333 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
267825041876047 | 461 | 294517500 | 764 | 1276340 | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
268898750418761 | 478 | 235586538461539 | 791 | 111617666666667 | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
246584087102178 | 496 | 219594615384616 | 82 | 956378666666667 | 496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22753597319933 | 514 | 183537307692308 | 851 | 786719333333333 | 514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20805557118928 | 533 | 132950384615385 | 882 | 654658 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
193145899497488 | 552 | 991526923076924 | 914 | 524162333333333 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180397058626466 | 573 | 723884615384616 | 947 | 398477 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159287497487437 | 594 | 49395000 | 982 | 294095333333333 | 594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140093966499163 | 615 | 329623653846154 | 1018 | 216415 | 615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
125712003350084 | 638 | 232231346153846 | 1055 | 155941333333333 | 638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11582181239531 | 661 | 170568076923077 | 1094 | 109822 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
933554824120604 | 685 | 114283076923077 | 1134 | 811729333333333 | 685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
766995862646567 | 71 | 851232692307693 | 1176 | 533704666666667 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
625145611390285 | 737 | 558684615384616 | 1219 | 398905 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
531419574539364 | 764 | 425857115384616 | 1263 | 272716 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401304512562814 | 791 | 320039230769231 | 131 | 224988666666667 | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
302290415410386 | 82 | 224643461538462 | 1358 | 175139333333333 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
234256559463987 | 851 | 204812115384616 | 1407 | 137377666666667 | 851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
174277956448911 | 882 | 133968461538462 | 1459 | 1185743 | 882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119620948073702 | 914 | 120355384615385 | 1512 | 901657 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
860247541038527 | 947 | 1114950 | 1568 | 95869666666667 | 947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
588795608040202 | 982 | 892715384615385 | 1625 | 866524 | 982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453500100502513 | 1018 | 75693076923077 | 1685 | 79995933333333 | 1018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306104184254607 | 1055 | 734100000000001 | 1747 | 855652 | 1055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
214392951423786 | 1094 | 732648076923078 | 1811 | 82140833333333 | 1094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171584234505863 | 1134 | 530092307692308 | 1877 | 81683533333333 | 1134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129452606365159 | 1176 | 609534615384616 | 1946 | 71270166666667 | 1176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
109800234170854 | 1219 | 491257692307693 | 2017 | 67286033333333 | 1219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
875061487437187 | 1263 | 391936346153846 | 2091 | 75311933333333 | 1263 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
755701192629817 | 131 | 427556153846154 | 2167 | 71270066666667 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76907041876047 | 1358 | 528136538461539 | 2247 | 670295 | 1358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
816854716917924 | 1407 | 538875 | 2329 | 612828 | 1407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682292696817421 | 1459 | 484882692307693 | 2414 | 60685066666667 | 1459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
484327912897823 | 1512 | 523173076923077 | 2503 | 64353 | 1512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
601245688442212 | 1568 | 532400 | 2595 | 575052 | 1568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
608947306532664 | 1625 | 391983653846154 | 269 | 53995533333333 | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57423530318258 | 1685 | 39818576923077 | 2788 | 56581733333333 | 1685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
665198110552765 | 1747 | 390621538461539 | 289 | 50526966666667 | 1747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
641284469011726 | 1811 | 282454038461539 | 2996 | 52087233333333 | 1811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
551386834170855 | 1877 | 301689807692308 | 3106 | 390656 | 1877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
515487715242882 | 1946 | 392116538461539 | 322 | 40069366666667 | 1946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
557056576214406 | 2017 | 262214807692308 | 3338 | 42029366666667 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
585014763819096 | 2091 | 300040192307693 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
563217748743719 | 2167 | 327144807692308 | 3587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
516019996649917 | 2247 | 291944038461539 | 3718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
635039155778895 | 2329 | 410772307692308 | 3854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
678386860971525 | 2414 | 438539038461539 | 3995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
540607373534339 | 2503 | 810536808 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534717524288108 | 2595 | 882899298 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
624962696817421 | 269 | 884130018 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
507626351758795 | 2788 | 848442984 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
482487487437186 | 289 | 79158372 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
462233661641542 | 2996 | 628394094 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
614290241206031 | 3106 | 484154992 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549685423785595 | 322 | 3250266138 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485615936348409 | 3338 | 1930962502 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446652388609716 | 346 | 97717245 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
733651755443887 | 3587 | 451665266 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73515500837521 | 3718 | 1710666186 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
491714613065327 | 3854 | 750723816 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453128479061977 | 3995 | 3692090772 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22625785 | 542 | 08614861802 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23149945 | 583 | 11076250522 | 1596 | 89545 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2547951466667 | 626 | 1 | 1715 | 10021 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26411294 | 673 | 1 | 1843 | 11057 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2478060433333 | 723 | 1 | 1981 | 12158 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2428556433333 | 777 | 1 | 2129 | 12433 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1953912566667 | 835 | 1 | 2288 | 113975 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1421029306667 | 898 | 01230695642 | 2458 | 9234 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
797872833333 | 965 | 1 | 2642 | 70035 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430967506667 | 1037 | 1 | 2839 | 49195 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21839545 | 1114 | 1 | 3051 | 3452 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84446483333 | 1197 | 01230695642 | 3278 | 23495 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
320313357 | 1286 | 1 | 3523 | 1597 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34943302333 | 1382 | 1 | 3786 | 1089 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17471639033 | 1486 | 1 | 4068 | 781 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116477634 | 1596 | 1 | 4371 | 5965 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 1715 | 1 | 4698 | 4325 | 1596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1843 | 1 | 5048 | 3995 | 1715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1981 | 1 | 5425 | 3185 | 1843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2129 | 1 | 5829 | 2325 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2288 | 1 | 6264 | 2185 | 2129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2458 | 1 | 6732 | 194 | 2288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2642 | 1 | 7234 | 1705 | 2458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 2839 | 1 | 7774 | 1395 | 2642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 3051 | 1 | 8354 | 124 | 2839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 3278 | 1 | 8977 | 97 | 3051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 3523 | 1 | 9647 | 92 | 3278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735818 | 3786 | 1 | 10370 | 71 | 3523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23295514667 | 4068 | 1 | 11140 | 56 | 3786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4371 | 1 | 11970 | 51 | 4068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4698 | 1 | 12860 | 35 | 4371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5048 | 1 | 13820 | 31 | 4698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5425 | 1 | 14860 | 21 | 5048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5829 | 1 | 15960 | 16 | 5425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6264 | 1 | 17150 | 1 | 5829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6732 | 1 | 18430 | 055 | 6264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7234 | 1 | 19810 | 05 | 6732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7774 | 055 | 7234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8354 | 02 | 7774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8977 | 005 | 8354 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 9647 | 0 | 8977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 10370 | 01 | 9647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11140 | 005 | 10370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11970 | 005 | 11140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 12860 | 01 | 11970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 13820 | 0 | 12860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 14860 | 0 | 13820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 15960 | 0 | 14860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 17150 | 0 | 15960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 18430 | 0 | 17150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 19810 | 0 | 18430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19810 |
0009 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 |
Rationale reducing aerosol-driven amine losses from solvent-based PCC technology enables its broader commercial deployment
11
Amine losses
Flue gas cooler
Flue gas blower
Flue gas inlet
Condensate
Major factor aerosol particles in flue gas from coal-fired power plants
Aerosol particle formation during coal combustion
S N
N
S
Inorganic oxides and metals (eg SiO2 Fe P)
Sulfur
Nitrogen
Organic volatiles
Inorganic volatiles (eg Hg)
Coal particle1st stage
devolatilization
Burning of tar
Tar
Oxidation
CO2
Partial oxidation
Metal or its Suboxide vapor (eg SiO Ca)
Absorption
Re-oxidation amp particle formation
Nano-sized inorganic aerosol particle
(eg SiO2 particle)
Inorganic aerosols shielding organics
Aerosols sent in flue gas to PCC absorber
(1) Nucleation(2) Condensation
04 nmParticle Size 04 ndash 2 nm 2 - 100 nm 0001-1000 mm
(3) Coagulation
3 main stages of aerosol formation1
Burning of char
Bottom Ash
2nd stage devolatilization
Ash formation
1 Wang Xinlei amp Williams Brent amp Tang Y amp Huang Yuhsuan amp Kong L amp Yang Xin amp Biswas Pratim (2013) Characterization of organic aerosol produced during pulverized coal combustion in a drop tube furnace Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13 105194acp-13-10919-2013
12
Theory and mechanisms for aerosol-driven amine losses from PCC plant absorbers1
13
Phase IAerosol growth and nucleation from water in absorber
Phase IIAerosol growth from amine in absorber
Phase IIIBuildup of captured CO2and amine bound to CO2in aerosols
Phase IVSalt accumulation inside particles causing further amine and CO2 diffusion into aerosols
02 microm particle
1 G Lombardo B Fostas M Shah A Morken O Hvidsten J Mertens E Hamborg Results from Aerosol Measurement in Amine Plant Treating Gas Turbine and Residue Fluidized Catalytic Cracker Flue Gases at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad GHGT-13 Energy Procedia 2017 114 Pages 1210-1230
Water condensation
Nucleation from water supersaturation
1 microm particle
Amine absorption until complete saturation
2 microm particle
CO2 and CO2+amine absorption
2-5 microm particleSalt accumulationCO2 and amine diffusion
Amine contained in aerosol particles are then emitted from PCC absorber in treated gas stream
The Kelvin equation gives the minimum particle diameter d of a liquid1 supersaturation leads to nucleation of smaller particles
14
Benefits of aerosol particle reduction
Benefits
Manageable solvent supply and transport logistics
Optimum power plant efficiency
when integrated with PCC
Reduction of particulate that can unfavorably react with amine
solvent
Improved PCC plant specific
energy performance
Environmental sustainability and
performance
Improved PCC plant business
caselower cost
Methods to reduce aerosol-driven solvent losses Flue gas aerosol pretreatment provides optimum solution1
For power plants integrated with solvent-based PCC without an existing baghouse optimized flue gas aerosol pretreatment is the only viable option to reduce aerosol concentrations from gt109 particlescm3 to manageable levels near 104-106
particlescm3 for particles with diameters in the range of 70-200 nm
Pretreatment has traditionally been performed using simple ESPs and Brownian filters
Few systematic studies have been conducted to evaluate performance of different technologies over a full range of conditions
15
BH = baghouse
1 Based on single point experience some options eg dry bed conf may handle higher particle concentrations than others
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
Abbott Power Plant (42 reheat burner w dryer) | Abbott Power Plant (0 reheat burner wo dryer) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (WashU) | Wilsonville (before baghouse) (SR) | UT Austin (NCCC) (before baghouse) | TCM (no BH no BF) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (SR) | Wilsonville Parametric Tests (Linde) | Wilsonville Long-term Tests (Linde) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anal Ins | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | kg amineMT CO2 | 04080107622 | 00095091096 | |||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 682819795644892 | 982 | 427900576923077 | 157 | 14468166666667 | 982 | 1000000 | 10 | 4000000 | 2400 | 100000 | 35 | 650000 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 735415966499163 | 102 | 532616923076924 | 163 | 160013 | 102 | 200000 | 20 | 3000000 | 2800 | 1150000 | 60 | 600000 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 667026341708543 | 106 | 642390384615385 | 168 | 14813666666667 | 106 | 200000 | 40 | 2000000 | 2800 | 10000000 | 100 | 530000 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 566092556113903 | 109 | 764663461538462 | 175 | 91535 | 109 | 1000000 | 70 | 1000000 | 3000 | 10000000 | 160 | 400000 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 60451071356784 | 113 | 993782692307693 | 181 | 21280833333333 | 113 | 6300000 | 110 | 900000 | 3200 | 1400000 | 280 | 350000 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 640447634840872 | 118 | 103840961538462 | 188 | 277361 | 118 | 8000000 | 200 | 800000 | 3200 | 120000 | 480 | 50000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 63931935678392 | 122 | 119893653846154 | 195 | 30501933333333 | 122 | 5000000 | 400 | 600000 | 3800 | 1400 | 640 | 20000 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 67781860636516 | 126 | 155467692307692 | 202 | 35493966666667 | 126 | 800000 | 700 | 500000 | 3800 | 1000 | 960 | 10000 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 678467648241207 | 131 | 173807500 | 209 | 25912033333333 | 131 | 1 | 800 | 400000 | 3800 | 1000 | 1920 | 5000 | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 736663748743719 | 136 | 198103846153846 | 217 | 20493533333333 | 136 | 1 | 1000 | 318900 | 3800 | 900 | 2560 | 100 | 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 791600921273033 | 141 | 245189807692308 | 225 | 34751733333333 | 141 | 300000 | 3800 | 750 | 5120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 776599182579565 | 146 | 27240826923077 | 233 | 43427866666667 | 146 | 200000 | 3800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 748095604690118 | 151 | 301905384615385 | 241 | 592247 | 151 | 100000 | 4000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 852265149078728 | 157 | 348734615384616 | 25 | 614018 | 157 | 90000 | 4100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 99985068676717 | 163 | 375607115384616 | 259 | 87004466666667 | 163 | 80000 | 4200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11043162479062 | 168 | 442790384615385 | 269 | 137845333333333 | 168 | 70000 | 4200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119948670016751 | 175 | 523365384615385 | 279 | 183715 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
112247051926298 | 181 | 445000384615385 | 289 | 241348 | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
126325376884422 | 188 | 591696153846154 | 30 | 299061666666667 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130470221105528 | 195 | 660759615384616 | 311 | 380613666666667 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140578994974874 | 202 | 706025000000001 | 322 | 419054666666667 | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
158666502512563 | 209 | 794851923076924 | 334 | 64940 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15709983919598 | 217 | 860896153846155 | 346 | 883372 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
146305745393635 | 225 | 847675000000001 | 359 | 130709333333333 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
175050465661642 | 233 | 943019230769232 | 372 | 182267 | 233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20586516917923 | 241 | 949319230769232 | 385 | 263912666666667 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21836616080402 | 25 | 96023076923077 | 40 | 355521333333333 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
221599480737019 | 259 | 956119230769232 | 414 | 484109 | 259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
231432663316583 | 269 | 1025750000 | 429 | 647791 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
228343541038526 | 279 | 964151923076924 | 445 | 830633 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238293788944724 | 289 | 982432692307693 | 461 | 1054740 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24027170519263 | 30 | 103288461538462 | 478 | 125545333333333 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254431427135679 | 311 | 981471153846155 | 514 | 1435950 | 311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
281640274706868 | 322 | 100416538461539 | 533 | 161942333333333 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
279502308207705 | 334 | 995501923076924 | 552 | 169811666666667 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
273149989949749 | 346 | 969944230769232 | 573 | 182475666666667 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
301086837520938 | 359 | 89473076923077 | 594 | 187437333333333 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
337571587939699 | 372 | 791292307692308 | 615 | 1885320 | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
335709822445561 | 385 | 719676923076924 | 638 | 184891666666667 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
303290958123953 | 40 | 67950576923077 | 661 | 177122333333333 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
296100891122278 | 414 | 554032692307693 | 685 | 167757333333333 | 414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305137175879397 | 429 | 441263461538462 | 71 | 1563790 | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
298671450586265 | 445 | 39593576923077 | 737 | 143831333333333 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
267825041876047 | 461 | 294517500 | 764 | 1276340 | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
268898750418761 | 478 | 235586538461539 | 791 | 111617666666667 | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
246584087102178 | 496 | 219594615384616 | 82 | 956378666666667 | 496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22753597319933 | 514 | 183537307692308 | 851 | 786719333333333 | 514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20805557118928 | 533 | 132950384615385 | 882 | 654658 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
193145899497488 | 552 | 991526923076924 | 914 | 524162333333333 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180397058626466 | 573 | 723884615384616 | 947 | 398477 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159287497487437 | 594 | 49395000 | 982 | 294095333333333 | 594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140093966499163 | 615 | 329623653846154 | 1018 | 216415 | 615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
125712003350084 | 638 | 232231346153846 | 1055 | 155941333333333 | 638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11582181239531 | 661 | 170568076923077 | 1094 | 109822 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
933554824120604 | 685 | 114283076923077 | 1134 | 811729333333333 | 685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
766995862646567 | 71 | 851232692307693 | 1176 | 533704666666667 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
625145611390285 | 737 | 558684615384616 | 1219 | 398905 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
531419574539364 | 764 | 425857115384616 | 1263 | 272716 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401304512562814 | 791 | 320039230769231 | 131 | 224988666666667 | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
302290415410386 | 82 | 224643461538462 | 1358 | 175139333333333 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
234256559463987 | 851 | 204812115384616 | 1407 | 137377666666667 | 851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
174277956448911 | 882 | 133968461538462 | 1459 | 1185743 | 882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119620948073702 | 914 | 120355384615385 | 1512 | 901657 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
860247541038527 | 947 | 1114950 | 1568 | 95869666666667 | 947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
588795608040202 | 982 | 892715384615385 | 1625 | 866524 | 982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453500100502513 | 1018 | 75693076923077 | 1685 | 79995933333333 | 1018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306104184254607 | 1055 | 734100000000001 | 1747 | 855652 | 1055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
214392951423786 | 1094 | 732648076923078 | 1811 | 82140833333333 | 1094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171584234505863 | 1134 | 530092307692308 | 1877 | 81683533333333 | 1134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129452606365159 | 1176 | 609534615384616 | 1946 | 71270166666667 | 1176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
109800234170854 | 1219 | 491257692307693 | 2017 | 67286033333333 | 1219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
875061487437187 | 1263 | 391936346153846 | 2091 | 75311933333333 | 1263 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
755701192629817 | 131 | 427556153846154 | 2167 | 71270066666667 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76907041876047 | 1358 | 528136538461539 | 2247 | 670295 | 1358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
816854716917924 | 1407 | 538875 | 2329 | 612828 | 1407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682292696817421 | 1459 | 484882692307693 | 2414 | 60685066666667 | 1459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
484327912897823 | 1512 | 523173076923077 | 2503 | 64353 | 1512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
601245688442212 | 1568 | 532400 | 2595 | 575052 | 1568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
608947306532664 | 1625 | 391983653846154 | 269 | 53995533333333 | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57423530318258 | 1685 | 39818576923077 | 2788 | 56581733333333 | 1685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
665198110552765 | 1747 | 390621538461539 | 289 | 50526966666667 | 1747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
641284469011726 | 1811 | 282454038461539 | 2996 | 52087233333333 | 1811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
551386834170855 | 1877 | 301689807692308 | 3106 | 390656 | 1877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
515487715242882 | 1946 | 392116538461539 | 322 | 40069366666667 | 1946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
557056576214406 | 2017 | 262214807692308 | 3338 | 42029366666667 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
585014763819096 | 2091 | 300040192307693 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
563217748743719 | 2167 | 327144807692308 | 3587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
516019996649917 | 2247 | 291944038461539 | 3718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
635039155778895 | 2329 | 410772307692308 | 3854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
678386860971525 | 2414 | 438539038461539 | 3995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
540607373534339 | 2503 | 810536808 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534717524288108 | 2595 | 882899298 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
624962696817421 | 269 | 884130018 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
507626351758795 | 2788 | 848442984 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
482487487437186 | 289 | 79158372 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
462233661641542 | 2996 | 628394094 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
614290241206031 | 3106 | 484154992 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549685423785595 | 322 | 3250266138 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485615936348409 | 3338 | 1930962502 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446652388609716 | 346 | 97717245 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
733651755443887 | 3587 | 451665266 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73515500837521 | 3718 | 1710666186 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
491714613065327 | 3854 | 750723816 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453128479061977 | 3995 | 3692090772 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22625785 | 542 | 08614861802 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23149945 | 583 | 11076250522 | 1596 | 89545 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2547951466667 | 626 | 1 | 1715 | 10021 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26411294 | 673 | 1 | 1843 | 11057 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2478060433333 | 723 | 1 | 1981 | 12158 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2428556433333 | 777 | 1 | 2129 | 12433 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1953912566667 | 835 | 1 | 2288 | 113975 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1421029306667 | 898 | 01230695642 | 2458 | 9234 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
797872833333 | 965 | 1 | 2642 | 70035 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430967506667 | 1037 | 1 | 2839 | 49195 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21839545 | 1114 | 1 | 3051 | 3452 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84446483333 | 1197 | 01230695642 | 3278 | 23495 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
320313357 | 1286 | 1 | 3523 | 1597 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34943302333 | 1382 | 1 | 3786 | 1089 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17471639033 | 1486 | 1 | 4068 | 781 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116477634 | 1596 | 1 | 4371 | 5965 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 1715 | 1 | 4698 | 4325 | 1596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1843 | 1 | 5048 | 3995 | 1715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1981 | 1 | 5425 | 3185 | 1843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2129 | 1 | 5829 | 2325 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2288 | 1 | 6264 | 2185 | 2129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2458 | 1 | 6732 | 194 | 2288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2642 | 1 | 7234 | 1705 | 2458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 2839 | 1 | 7774 | 1395 | 2642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 3051 | 1 | 8354 | 124 | 2839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 3278 | 1 | 8977 | 97 | 3051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 3523 | 1 | 9647 | 92 | 3278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735818 | 3786 | 1 | 10370 | 71 | 3523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23295514667 | 4068 | 1 | 11140 | 56 | 3786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4371 | 1 | 11970 | 51 | 4068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4698 | 1 | 12860 | 35 | 4371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5048 | 1 | 13820 | 31 | 4698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5425 | 1 | 14860 | 21 | 5048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5829 | 1 | 15960 | 16 | 5425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6264 | 1 | 17150 | 1 | 5829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6732 | 1 | 18430 | 055 | 6264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7234 | 1 | 19810 | 05 | 6732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7774 | 055 | 7234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8354 | 02 | 7774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8977 | 005 | 8354 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 9647 | 0 | 8977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 10370 | 01 | 9647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11140 | 005 | 10370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11970 | 005 | 11140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 12860 | 01 | 11970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 13820 | 0 | 12860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 14860 | 0 | 13820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 15960 | 0 | 14860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 17150 | 0 | 15960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 18430 | 0 | 17150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 19810 | 0 | 18430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19810 |
0009 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 |
Aerosol particle formation during coal combustion
S N
N
S
Inorganic oxides and metals (eg SiO2 Fe P)
Sulfur
Nitrogen
Organic volatiles
Inorganic volatiles (eg Hg)
Coal particle1st stage
devolatilization
Burning of tar
Tar
Oxidation
CO2
Partial oxidation
Metal or its Suboxide vapor (eg SiO Ca)
Absorption
Re-oxidation amp particle formation
Nano-sized inorganic aerosol particle
(eg SiO2 particle)
Inorganic aerosols shielding organics
Aerosols sent in flue gas to PCC absorber
(1) Nucleation(2) Condensation
04 nmParticle Size 04 ndash 2 nm 2 - 100 nm 0001-1000 mm
(3) Coagulation
3 main stages of aerosol formation1
Burning of char
Bottom Ash
2nd stage devolatilization
Ash formation
1 Wang Xinlei amp Williams Brent amp Tang Y amp Huang Yuhsuan amp Kong L amp Yang Xin amp Biswas Pratim (2013) Characterization of organic aerosol produced during pulverized coal combustion in a drop tube furnace Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13 105194acp-13-10919-2013
12
Theory and mechanisms for aerosol-driven amine losses from PCC plant absorbers1
13
Phase IAerosol growth and nucleation from water in absorber
Phase IIAerosol growth from amine in absorber
Phase IIIBuildup of captured CO2and amine bound to CO2in aerosols
Phase IVSalt accumulation inside particles causing further amine and CO2 diffusion into aerosols
02 microm particle
1 G Lombardo B Fostas M Shah A Morken O Hvidsten J Mertens E Hamborg Results from Aerosol Measurement in Amine Plant Treating Gas Turbine and Residue Fluidized Catalytic Cracker Flue Gases at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad GHGT-13 Energy Procedia 2017 114 Pages 1210-1230
Water condensation
Nucleation from water supersaturation
1 microm particle
Amine absorption until complete saturation
2 microm particle
CO2 and CO2+amine absorption
2-5 microm particleSalt accumulationCO2 and amine diffusion
Amine contained in aerosol particles are then emitted from PCC absorber in treated gas stream
The Kelvin equation gives the minimum particle diameter d of a liquid1 supersaturation leads to nucleation of smaller particles
14
Benefits of aerosol particle reduction
Benefits
Manageable solvent supply and transport logistics
Optimum power plant efficiency
when integrated with PCC
Reduction of particulate that can unfavorably react with amine
solvent
Improved PCC plant specific
energy performance
Environmental sustainability and
performance
Improved PCC plant business
caselower cost
Methods to reduce aerosol-driven solvent losses Flue gas aerosol pretreatment provides optimum solution1
For power plants integrated with solvent-based PCC without an existing baghouse optimized flue gas aerosol pretreatment is the only viable option to reduce aerosol concentrations from gt109 particlescm3 to manageable levels near 104-106
particlescm3 for particles with diameters in the range of 70-200 nm
Pretreatment has traditionally been performed using simple ESPs and Brownian filters
Few systematic studies have been conducted to evaluate performance of different technologies over a full range of conditions
15
BH = baghouse
1 Based on single point experience some options eg dry bed conf may handle higher particle concentrations than others
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
Abbott Power Plant (42 reheat burner w dryer) | Abbott Power Plant (0 reheat burner wo dryer) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (WashU) | Wilsonville (before baghouse) (SR) | UT Austin (NCCC) (before baghouse) | TCM (no BH no BF) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (SR) | Wilsonville Parametric Tests (Linde) | Wilsonville Long-term Tests (Linde) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anal Ins | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | kg amineMT CO2 | 04080107622 | 00095091096 | |||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 682819795644892 | 982 | 427900576923077 | 157 | 14468166666667 | 982 | 1000000 | 10 | 4000000 | 2400 | 100000 | 35 | 650000 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 735415966499163 | 102 | 532616923076924 | 163 | 160013 | 102 | 200000 | 20 | 3000000 | 2800 | 1150000 | 60 | 600000 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 667026341708543 | 106 | 642390384615385 | 168 | 14813666666667 | 106 | 200000 | 40 | 2000000 | 2800 | 10000000 | 100 | 530000 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 566092556113903 | 109 | 764663461538462 | 175 | 91535 | 109 | 1000000 | 70 | 1000000 | 3000 | 10000000 | 160 | 400000 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 60451071356784 | 113 | 993782692307693 | 181 | 21280833333333 | 113 | 6300000 | 110 | 900000 | 3200 | 1400000 | 280 | 350000 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 640447634840872 | 118 | 103840961538462 | 188 | 277361 | 118 | 8000000 | 200 | 800000 | 3200 | 120000 | 480 | 50000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 63931935678392 | 122 | 119893653846154 | 195 | 30501933333333 | 122 | 5000000 | 400 | 600000 | 3800 | 1400 | 640 | 20000 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 67781860636516 | 126 | 155467692307692 | 202 | 35493966666667 | 126 | 800000 | 700 | 500000 | 3800 | 1000 | 960 | 10000 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 678467648241207 | 131 | 173807500 | 209 | 25912033333333 | 131 | 1 | 800 | 400000 | 3800 | 1000 | 1920 | 5000 | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 736663748743719 | 136 | 198103846153846 | 217 | 20493533333333 | 136 | 1 | 1000 | 318900 | 3800 | 900 | 2560 | 100 | 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 791600921273033 | 141 | 245189807692308 | 225 | 34751733333333 | 141 | 300000 | 3800 | 750 | 5120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 776599182579565 | 146 | 27240826923077 | 233 | 43427866666667 | 146 | 200000 | 3800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 748095604690118 | 151 | 301905384615385 | 241 | 592247 | 151 | 100000 | 4000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 852265149078728 | 157 | 348734615384616 | 25 | 614018 | 157 | 90000 | 4100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 99985068676717 | 163 | 375607115384616 | 259 | 87004466666667 | 163 | 80000 | 4200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11043162479062 | 168 | 442790384615385 | 269 | 137845333333333 | 168 | 70000 | 4200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119948670016751 | 175 | 523365384615385 | 279 | 183715 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
112247051926298 | 181 | 445000384615385 | 289 | 241348 | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
126325376884422 | 188 | 591696153846154 | 30 | 299061666666667 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130470221105528 | 195 | 660759615384616 | 311 | 380613666666667 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140578994974874 | 202 | 706025000000001 | 322 | 419054666666667 | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
158666502512563 | 209 | 794851923076924 | 334 | 64940 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15709983919598 | 217 | 860896153846155 | 346 | 883372 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
146305745393635 | 225 | 847675000000001 | 359 | 130709333333333 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
175050465661642 | 233 | 943019230769232 | 372 | 182267 | 233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20586516917923 | 241 | 949319230769232 | 385 | 263912666666667 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21836616080402 | 25 | 96023076923077 | 40 | 355521333333333 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
221599480737019 | 259 | 956119230769232 | 414 | 484109 | 259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
231432663316583 | 269 | 1025750000 | 429 | 647791 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
228343541038526 | 279 | 964151923076924 | 445 | 830633 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238293788944724 | 289 | 982432692307693 | 461 | 1054740 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24027170519263 | 30 | 103288461538462 | 478 | 125545333333333 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254431427135679 | 311 | 981471153846155 | 514 | 1435950 | 311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
281640274706868 | 322 | 100416538461539 | 533 | 161942333333333 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
279502308207705 | 334 | 995501923076924 | 552 | 169811666666667 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
273149989949749 | 346 | 969944230769232 | 573 | 182475666666667 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
301086837520938 | 359 | 89473076923077 | 594 | 187437333333333 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
337571587939699 | 372 | 791292307692308 | 615 | 1885320 | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
335709822445561 | 385 | 719676923076924 | 638 | 184891666666667 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
303290958123953 | 40 | 67950576923077 | 661 | 177122333333333 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
296100891122278 | 414 | 554032692307693 | 685 | 167757333333333 | 414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305137175879397 | 429 | 441263461538462 | 71 | 1563790 | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
298671450586265 | 445 | 39593576923077 | 737 | 143831333333333 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
267825041876047 | 461 | 294517500 | 764 | 1276340 | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
268898750418761 | 478 | 235586538461539 | 791 | 111617666666667 | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
246584087102178 | 496 | 219594615384616 | 82 | 956378666666667 | 496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22753597319933 | 514 | 183537307692308 | 851 | 786719333333333 | 514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20805557118928 | 533 | 132950384615385 | 882 | 654658 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
193145899497488 | 552 | 991526923076924 | 914 | 524162333333333 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180397058626466 | 573 | 723884615384616 | 947 | 398477 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159287497487437 | 594 | 49395000 | 982 | 294095333333333 | 594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140093966499163 | 615 | 329623653846154 | 1018 | 216415 | 615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
125712003350084 | 638 | 232231346153846 | 1055 | 155941333333333 | 638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11582181239531 | 661 | 170568076923077 | 1094 | 109822 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
933554824120604 | 685 | 114283076923077 | 1134 | 811729333333333 | 685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
766995862646567 | 71 | 851232692307693 | 1176 | 533704666666667 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
625145611390285 | 737 | 558684615384616 | 1219 | 398905 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
531419574539364 | 764 | 425857115384616 | 1263 | 272716 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401304512562814 | 791 | 320039230769231 | 131 | 224988666666667 | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
302290415410386 | 82 | 224643461538462 | 1358 | 175139333333333 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
234256559463987 | 851 | 204812115384616 | 1407 | 137377666666667 | 851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
174277956448911 | 882 | 133968461538462 | 1459 | 1185743 | 882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119620948073702 | 914 | 120355384615385 | 1512 | 901657 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
860247541038527 | 947 | 1114950 | 1568 | 95869666666667 | 947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
588795608040202 | 982 | 892715384615385 | 1625 | 866524 | 982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453500100502513 | 1018 | 75693076923077 | 1685 | 79995933333333 | 1018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306104184254607 | 1055 | 734100000000001 | 1747 | 855652 | 1055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
214392951423786 | 1094 | 732648076923078 | 1811 | 82140833333333 | 1094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171584234505863 | 1134 | 530092307692308 | 1877 | 81683533333333 | 1134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129452606365159 | 1176 | 609534615384616 | 1946 | 71270166666667 | 1176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
109800234170854 | 1219 | 491257692307693 | 2017 | 67286033333333 | 1219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
875061487437187 | 1263 | 391936346153846 | 2091 | 75311933333333 | 1263 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
755701192629817 | 131 | 427556153846154 | 2167 | 71270066666667 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76907041876047 | 1358 | 528136538461539 | 2247 | 670295 | 1358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
816854716917924 | 1407 | 538875 | 2329 | 612828 | 1407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682292696817421 | 1459 | 484882692307693 | 2414 | 60685066666667 | 1459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
484327912897823 | 1512 | 523173076923077 | 2503 | 64353 | 1512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
601245688442212 | 1568 | 532400 | 2595 | 575052 | 1568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
608947306532664 | 1625 | 391983653846154 | 269 | 53995533333333 | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57423530318258 | 1685 | 39818576923077 | 2788 | 56581733333333 | 1685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
665198110552765 | 1747 | 390621538461539 | 289 | 50526966666667 | 1747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
641284469011726 | 1811 | 282454038461539 | 2996 | 52087233333333 | 1811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
551386834170855 | 1877 | 301689807692308 | 3106 | 390656 | 1877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
515487715242882 | 1946 | 392116538461539 | 322 | 40069366666667 | 1946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
557056576214406 | 2017 | 262214807692308 | 3338 | 42029366666667 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
585014763819096 | 2091 | 300040192307693 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
563217748743719 | 2167 | 327144807692308 | 3587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
516019996649917 | 2247 | 291944038461539 | 3718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
635039155778895 | 2329 | 410772307692308 | 3854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
678386860971525 | 2414 | 438539038461539 | 3995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
540607373534339 | 2503 | 810536808 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534717524288108 | 2595 | 882899298 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
624962696817421 | 269 | 884130018 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
507626351758795 | 2788 | 848442984 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
482487487437186 | 289 | 79158372 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
462233661641542 | 2996 | 628394094 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
614290241206031 | 3106 | 484154992 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549685423785595 | 322 | 3250266138 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485615936348409 | 3338 | 1930962502 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446652388609716 | 346 | 97717245 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
733651755443887 | 3587 | 451665266 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73515500837521 | 3718 | 1710666186 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
491714613065327 | 3854 | 750723816 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453128479061977 | 3995 | 3692090772 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22625785 | 542 | 08614861802 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23149945 | 583 | 11076250522 | 1596 | 89545 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2547951466667 | 626 | 1 | 1715 | 10021 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26411294 | 673 | 1 | 1843 | 11057 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2478060433333 | 723 | 1 | 1981 | 12158 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2428556433333 | 777 | 1 | 2129 | 12433 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1953912566667 | 835 | 1 | 2288 | 113975 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1421029306667 | 898 | 01230695642 | 2458 | 9234 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
797872833333 | 965 | 1 | 2642 | 70035 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430967506667 | 1037 | 1 | 2839 | 49195 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21839545 | 1114 | 1 | 3051 | 3452 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84446483333 | 1197 | 01230695642 | 3278 | 23495 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
320313357 | 1286 | 1 | 3523 | 1597 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34943302333 | 1382 | 1 | 3786 | 1089 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17471639033 | 1486 | 1 | 4068 | 781 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116477634 | 1596 | 1 | 4371 | 5965 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 1715 | 1 | 4698 | 4325 | 1596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1843 | 1 | 5048 | 3995 | 1715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1981 | 1 | 5425 | 3185 | 1843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2129 | 1 | 5829 | 2325 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2288 | 1 | 6264 | 2185 | 2129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2458 | 1 | 6732 | 194 | 2288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2642 | 1 | 7234 | 1705 | 2458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 2839 | 1 | 7774 | 1395 | 2642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 3051 | 1 | 8354 | 124 | 2839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 3278 | 1 | 8977 | 97 | 3051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 3523 | 1 | 9647 | 92 | 3278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735818 | 3786 | 1 | 10370 | 71 | 3523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23295514667 | 4068 | 1 | 11140 | 56 | 3786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4371 | 1 | 11970 | 51 | 4068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4698 | 1 | 12860 | 35 | 4371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5048 | 1 | 13820 | 31 | 4698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5425 | 1 | 14860 | 21 | 5048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5829 | 1 | 15960 | 16 | 5425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6264 | 1 | 17150 | 1 | 5829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6732 | 1 | 18430 | 055 | 6264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7234 | 1 | 19810 | 05 | 6732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7774 | 055 | 7234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8354 | 02 | 7774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8977 | 005 | 8354 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 9647 | 0 | 8977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 10370 | 01 | 9647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11140 | 005 | 10370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11970 | 005 | 11140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 12860 | 01 | 11970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 13820 | 0 | 12860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 14860 | 0 | 13820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 15960 | 0 | 14860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 17150 | 0 | 15960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 18430 | 0 | 17150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 19810 | 0 | 18430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19810 |
0009 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 |
Theory and mechanisms for aerosol-driven amine losses from PCC plant absorbers1
13
Phase IAerosol growth and nucleation from water in absorber
Phase IIAerosol growth from amine in absorber
Phase IIIBuildup of captured CO2and amine bound to CO2in aerosols
Phase IVSalt accumulation inside particles causing further amine and CO2 diffusion into aerosols
02 microm particle
1 G Lombardo B Fostas M Shah A Morken O Hvidsten J Mertens E Hamborg Results from Aerosol Measurement in Amine Plant Treating Gas Turbine and Residue Fluidized Catalytic Cracker Flue Gases at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad GHGT-13 Energy Procedia 2017 114 Pages 1210-1230
Water condensation
Nucleation from water supersaturation
1 microm particle
Amine absorption until complete saturation
2 microm particle
CO2 and CO2+amine absorption
2-5 microm particleSalt accumulationCO2 and amine diffusion
Amine contained in aerosol particles are then emitted from PCC absorber in treated gas stream
The Kelvin equation gives the minimum particle diameter d of a liquid1 supersaturation leads to nucleation of smaller particles
14
Benefits of aerosol particle reduction
Benefits
Manageable solvent supply and transport logistics
Optimum power plant efficiency
when integrated with PCC
Reduction of particulate that can unfavorably react with amine
solvent
Improved PCC plant specific
energy performance
Environmental sustainability and
performance
Improved PCC plant business
caselower cost
Methods to reduce aerosol-driven solvent losses Flue gas aerosol pretreatment provides optimum solution1
For power plants integrated with solvent-based PCC without an existing baghouse optimized flue gas aerosol pretreatment is the only viable option to reduce aerosol concentrations from gt109 particlescm3 to manageable levels near 104-106
particlescm3 for particles with diameters in the range of 70-200 nm
Pretreatment has traditionally been performed using simple ESPs and Brownian filters
Few systematic studies have been conducted to evaluate performance of different technologies over a full range of conditions
15
BH = baghouse
1 Based on single point experience some options eg dry bed conf may handle higher particle concentrations than others
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
Abbott Power Plant (42 reheat burner w dryer) | Abbott Power Plant (0 reheat burner wo dryer) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (WashU) | Wilsonville (before baghouse) (SR) | UT Austin (NCCC) (before baghouse) | TCM (no BH no BF) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (SR) | Wilsonville Parametric Tests (Linde) | Wilsonville Long-term Tests (Linde) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anal Ins | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | kg amineMT CO2 | 04080107622 | 00095091096 | |||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 682819795644892 | 982 | 427900576923077 | 157 | 14468166666667 | 982 | 1000000 | 10 | 4000000 | 2400 | 100000 | 35 | 650000 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 735415966499163 | 102 | 532616923076924 | 163 | 160013 | 102 | 200000 | 20 | 3000000 | 2800 | 1150000 | 60 | 600000 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 667026341708543 | 106 | 642390384615385 | 168 | 14813666666667 | 106 | 200000 | 40 | 2000000 | 2800 | 10000000 | 100 | 530000 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 566092556113903 | 109 | 764663461538462 | 175 | 91535 | 109 | 1000000 | 70 | 1000000 | 3000 | 10000000 | 160 | 400000 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 60451071356784 | 113 | 993782692307693 | 181 | 21280833333333 | 113 | 6300000 | 110 | 900000 | 3200 | 1400000 | 280 | 350000 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 640447634840872 | 118 | 103840961538462 | 188 | 277361 | 118 | 8000000 | 200 | 800000 | 3200 | 120000 | 480 | 50000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 63931935678392 | 122 | 119893653846154 | 195 | 30501933333333 | 122 | 5000000 | 400 | 600000 | 3800 | 1400 | 640 | 20000 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 67781860636516 | 126 | 155467692307692 | 202 | 35493966666667 | 126 | 800000 | 700 | 500000 | 3800 | 1000 | 960 | 10000 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 678467648241207 | 131 | 173807500 | 209 | 25912033333333 | 131 | 1 | 800 | 400000 | 3800 | 1000 | 1920 | 5000 | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 736663748743719 | 136 | 198103846153846 | 217 | 20493533333333 | 136 | 1 | 1000 | 318900 | 3800 | 900 | 2560 | 100 | 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 791600921273033 | 141 | 245189807692308 | 225 | 34751733333333 | 141 | 300000 | 3800 | 750 | 5120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 776599182579565 | 146 | 27240826923077 | 233 | 43427866666667 | 146 | 200000 | 3800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 748095604690118 | 151 | 301905384615385 | 241 | 592247 | 151 | 100000 | 4000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 852265149078728 | 157 | 348734615384616 | 25 | 614018 | 157 | 90000 | 4100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 99985068676717 | 163 | 375607115384616 | 259 | 87004466666667 | 163 | 80000 | 4200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11043162479062 | 168 | 442790384615385 | 269 | 137845333333333 | 168 | 70000 | 4200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119948670016751 | 175 | 523365384615385 | 279 | 183715 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
112247051926298 | 181 | 445000384615385 | 289 | 241348 | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
126325376884422 | 188 | 591696153846154 | 30 | 299061666666667 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130470221105528 | 195 | 660759615384616 | 311 | 380613666666667 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140578994974874 | 202 | 706025000000001 | 322 | 419054666666667 | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
158666502512563 | 209 | 794851923076924 | 334 | 64940 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15709983919598 | 217 | 860896153846155 | 346 | 883372 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
146305745393635 | 225 | 847675000000001 | 359 | 130709333333333 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
175050465661642 | 233 | 943019230769232 | 372 | 182267 | 233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20586516917923 | 241 | 949319230769232 | 385 | 263912666666667 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21836616080402 | 25 | 96023076923077 | 40 | 355521333333333 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
221599480737019 | 259 | 956119230769232 | 414 | 484109 | 259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
231432663316583 | 269 | 1025750000 | 429 | 647791 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
228343541038526 | 279 | 964151923076924 | 445 | 830633 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238293788944724 | 289 | 982432692307693 | 461 | 1054740 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24027170519263 | 30 | 103288461538462 | 478 | 125545333333333 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254431427135679 | 311 | 981471153846155 | 514 | 1435950 | 311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
281640274706868 | 322 | 100416538461539 | 533 | 161942333333333 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
279502308207705 | 334 | 995501923076924 | 552 | 169811666666667 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
273149989949749 | 346 | 969944230769232 | 573 | 182475666666667 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
301086837520938 | 359 | 89473076923077 | 594 | 187437333333333 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
337571587939699 | 372 | 791292307692308 | 615 | 1885320 | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
335709822445561 | 385 | 719676923076924 | 638 | 184891666666667 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
303290958123953 | 40 | 67950576923077 | 661 | 177122333333333 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
296100891122278 | 414 | 554032692307693 | 685 | 167757333333333 | 414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305137175879397 | 429 | 441263461538462 | 71 | 1563790 | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
298671450586265 | 445 | 39593576923077 | 737 | 143831333333333 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
267825041876047 | 461 | 294517500 | 764 | 1276340 | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
268898750418761 | 478 | 235586538461539 | 791 | 111617666666667 | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
246584087102178 | 496 | 219594615384616 | 82 | 956378666666667 | 496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22753597319933 | 514 | 183537307692308 | 851 | 786719333333333 | 514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20805557118928 | 533 | 132950384615385 | 882 | 654658 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
193145899497488 | 552 | 991526923076924 | 914 | 524162333333333 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180397058626466 | 573 | 723884615384616 | 947 | 398477 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159287497487437 | 594 | 49395000 | 982 | 294095333333333 | 594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140093966499163 | 615 | 329623653846154 | 1018 | 216415 | 615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
125712003350084 | 638 | 232231346153846 | 1055 | 155941333333333 | 638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11582181239531 | 661 | 170568076923077 | 1094 | 109822 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
933554824120604 | 685 | 114283076923077 | 1134 | 811729333333333 | 685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
766995862646567 | 71 | 851232692307693 | 1176 | 533704666666667 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
625145611390285 | 737 | 558684615384616 | 1219 | 398905 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
531419574539364 | 764 | 425857115384616 | 1263 | 272716 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401304512562814 | 791 | 320039230769231 | 131 | 224988666666667 | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
302290415410386 | 82 | 224643461538462 | 1358 | 175139333333333 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
234256559463987 | 851 | 204812115384616 | 1407 | 137377666666667 | 851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
174277956448911 | 882 | 133968461538462 | 1459 | 1185743 | 882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119620948073702 | 914 | 120355384615385 | 1512 | 901657 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
860247541038527 | 947 | 1114950 | 1568 | 95869666666667 | 947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
588795608040202 | 982 | 892715384615385 | 1625 | 866524 | 982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453500100502513 | 1018 | 75693076923077 | 1685 | 79995933333333 | 1018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306104184254607 | 1055 | 734100000000001 | 1747 | 855652 | 1055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
214392951423786 | 1094 | 732648076923078 | 1811 | 82140833333333 | 1094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171584234505863 | 1134 | 530092307692308 | 1877 | 81683533333333 | 1134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129452606365159 | 1176 | 609534615384616 | 1946 | 71270166666667 | 1176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
109800234170854 | 1219 | 491257692307693 | 2017 | 67286033333333 | 1219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
875061487437187 | 1263 | 391936346153846 | 2091 | 75311933333333 | 1263 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
755701192629817 | 131 | 427556153846154 | 2167 | 71270066666667 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76907041876047 | 1358 | 528136538461539 | 2247 | 670295 | 1358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
816854716917924 | 1407 | 538875 | 2329 | 612828 | 1407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682292696817421 | 1459 | 484882692307693 | 2414 | 60685066666667 | 1459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
484327912897823 | 1512 | 523173076923077 | 2503 | 64353 | 1512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
601245688442212 | 1568 | 532400 | 2595 | 575052 | 1568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
608947306532664 | 1625 | 391983653846154 | 269 | 53995533333333 | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57423530318258 | 1685 | 39818576923077 | 2788 | 56581733333333 | 1685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
665198110552765 | 1747 | 390621538461539 | 289 | 50526966666667 | 1747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
641284469011726 | 1811 | 282454038461539 | 2996 | 52087233333333 | 1811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
551386834170855 | 1877 | 301689807692308 | 3106 | 390656 | 1877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
515487715242882 | 1946 | 392116538461539 | 322 | 40069366666667 | 1946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
557056576214406 | 2017 | 262214807692308 | 3338 | 42029366666667 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
585014763819096 | 2091 | 300040192307693 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
563217748743719 | 2167 | 327144807692308 | 3587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
516019996649917 | 2247 | 291944038461539 | 3718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
635039155778895 | 2329 | 410772307692308 | 3854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
678386860971525 | 2414 | 438539038461539 | 3995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
540607373534339 | 2503 | 810536808 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534717524288108 | 2595 | 882899298 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
624962696817421 | 269 | 884130018 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
507626351758795 | 2788 | 848442984 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
482487487437186 | 289 | 79158372 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
462233661641542 | 2996 | 628394094 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
614290241206031 | 3106 | 484154992 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549685423785595 | 322 | 3250266138 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485615936348409 | 3338 | 1930962502 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446652388609716 | 346 | 97717245 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
733651755443887 | 3587 | 451665266 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73515500837521 | 3718 | 1710666186 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
491714613065327 | 3854 | 750723816 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453128479061977 | 3995 | 3692090772 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22625785 | 542 | 08614861802 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23149945 | 583 | 11076250522 | 1596 | 89545 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2547951466667 | 626 | 1 | 1715 | 10021 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26411294 | 673 | 1 | 1843 | 11057 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2478060433333 | 723 | 1 | 1981 | 12158 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2428556433333 | 777 | 1 | 2129 | 12433 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1953912566667 | 835 | 1 | 2288 | 113975 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1421029306667 | 898 | 01230695642 | 2458 | 9234 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
797872833333 | 965 | 1 | 2642 | 70035 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430967506667 | 1037 | 1 | 2839 | 49195 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21839545 | 1114 | 1 | 3051 | 3452 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84446483333 | 1197 | 01230695642 | 3278 | 23495 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
320313357 | 1286 | 1 | 3523 | 1597 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34943302333 | 1382 | 1 | 3786 | 1089 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17471639033 | 1486 | 1 | 4068 | 781 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116477634 | 1596 | 1 | 4371 | 5965 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 1715 | 1 | 4698 | 4325 | 1596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1843 | 1 | 5048 | 3995 | 1715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1981 | 1 | 5425 | 3185 | 1843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2129 | 1 | 5829 | 2325 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2288 | 1 | 6264 | 2185 | 2129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2458 | 1 | 6732 | 194 | 2288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2642 | 1 | 7234 | 1705 | 2458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 2839 | 1 | 7774 | 1395 | 2642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 3051 | 1 | 8354 | 124 | 2839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 3278 | 1 | 8977 | 97 | 3051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 3523 | 1 | 9647 | 92 | 3278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735818 | 3786 | 1 | 10370 | 71 | 3523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23295514667 | 4068 | 1 | 11140 | 56 | 3786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4371 | 1 | 11970 | 51 | 4068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4698 | 1 | 12860 | 35 | 4371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5048 | 1 | 13820 | 31 | 4698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5425 | 1 | 14860 | 21 | 5048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5829 | 1 | 15960 | 16 | 5425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6264 | 1 | 17150 | 1 | 5829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6732 | 1 | 18430 | 055 | 6264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7234 | 1 | 19810 | 05 | 6732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7774 | 055 | 7234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8354 | 02 | 7774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8977 | 005 | 8354 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 9647 | 0 | 8977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 10370 | 01 | 9647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11140 | 005 | 10370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11970 | 005 | 11140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 12860 | 01 | 11970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 13820 | 0 | 12860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 14860 | 0 | 13820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 15960 | 0 | 14860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 17150 | 0 | 15960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 18430 | 0 | 17150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 19810 | 0 | 18430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19810 |
0009 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 |
14
Benefits of aerosol particle reduction
Benefits
Manageable solvent supply and transport logistics
Optimum power plant efficiency
when integrated with PCC
Reduction of particulate that can unfavorably react with amine
solvent
Improved PCC plant specific
energy performance
Environmental sustainability and
performance
Improved PCC plant business
caselower cost
Methods to reduce aerosol-driven solvent losses Flue gas aerosol pretreatment provides optimum solution1
For power plants integrated with solvent-based PCC without an existing baghouse optimized flue gas aerosol pretreatment is the only viable option to reduce aerosol concentrations from gt109 particlescm3 to manageable levels near 104-106
particlescm3 for particles with diameters in the range of 70-200 nm
Pretreatment has traditionally been performed using simple ESPs and Brownian filters
Few systematic studies have been conducted to evaluate performance of different technologies over a full range of conditions
15
BH = baghouse
1 Based on single point experience some options eg dry bed conf may handle higher particle concentrations than others
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
Abbott Power Plant (42 reheat burner w dryer) | Abbott Power Plant (0 reheat burner wo dryer) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (WashU) | Wilsonville (before baghouse) (SR) | UT Austin (NCCC) (before baghouse) | TCM (no BH no BF) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (SR) | Wilsonville Parametric Tests (Linde) | Wilsonville Long-term Tests (Linde) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anal Ins | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | kg amineMT CO2 | 04080107622 | 00095091096 | |||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 682819795644892 | 982 | 427900576923077 | 157 | 14468166666667 | 982 | 1000000 | 10 | 4000000 | 2400 | 100000 | 35 | 650000 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 735415966499163 | 102 | 532616923076924 | 163 | 160013 | 102 | 200000 | 20 | 3000000 | 2800 | 1150000 | 60 | 600000 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 667026341708543 | 106 | 642390384615385 | 168 | 14813666666667 | 106 | 200000 | 40 | 2000000 | 2800 | 10000000 | 100 | 530000 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 566092556113903 | 109 | 764663461538462 | 175 | 91535 | 109 | 1000000 | 70 | 1000000 | 3000 | 10000000 | 160 | 400000 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 60451071356784 | 113 | 993782692307693 | 181 | 21280833333333 | 113 | 6300000 | 110 | 900000 | 3200 | 1400000 | 280 | 350000 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 640447634840872 | 118 | 103840961538462 | 188 | 277361 | 118 | 8000000 | 200 | 800000 | 3200 | 120000 | 480 | 50000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 63931935678392 | 122 | 119893653846154 | 195 | 30501933333333 | 122 | 5000000 | 400 | 600000 | 3800 | 1400 | 640 | 20000 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 67781860636516 | 126 | 155467692307692 | 202 | 35493966666667 | 126 | 800000 | 700 | 500000 | 3800 | 1000 | 960 | 10000 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 678467648241207 | 131 | 173807500 | 209 | 25912033333333 | 131 | 1 | 800 | 400000 | 3800 | 1000 | 1920 | 5000 | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 736663748743719 | 136 | 198103846153846 | 217 | 20493533333333 | 136 | 1 | 1000 | 318900 | 3800 | 900 | 2560 | 100 | 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 791600921273033 | 141 | 245189807692308 | 225 | 34751733333333 | 141 | 300000 | 3800 | 750 | 5120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 776599182579565 | 146 | 27240826923077 | 233 | 43427866666667 | 146 | 200000 | 3800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 748095604690118 | 151 | 301905384615385 | 241 | 592247 | 151 | 100000 | 4000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 852265149078728 | 157 | 348734615384616 | 25 | 614018 | 157 | 90000 | 4100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 99985068676717 | 163 | 375607115384616 | 259 | 87004466666667 | 163 | 80000 | 4200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11043162479062 | 168 | 442790384615385 | 269 | 137845333333333 | 168 | 70000 | 4200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119948670016751 | 175 | 523365384615385 | 279 | 183715 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
112247051926298 | 181 | 445000384615385 | 289 | 241348 | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
126325376884422 | 188 | 591696153846154 | 30 | 299061666666667 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130470221105528 | 195 | 660759615384616 | 311 | 380613666666667 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140578994974874 | 202 | 706025000000001 | 322 | 419054666666667 | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
158666502512563 | 209 | 794851923076924 | 334 | 64940 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15709983919598 | 217 | 860896153846155 | 346 | 883372 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
146305745393635 | 225 | 847675000000001 | 359 | 130709333333333 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
175050465661642 | 233 | 943019230769232 | 372 | 182267 | 233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20586516917923 | 241 | 949319230769232 | 385 | 263912666666667 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21836616080402 | 25 | 96023076923077 | 40 | 355521333333333 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
221599480737019 | 259 | 956119230769232 | 414 | 484109 | 259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
231432663316583 | 269 | 1025750000 | 429 | 647791 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
228343541038526 | 279 | 964151923076924 | 445 | 830633 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238293788944724 | 289 | 982432692307693 | 461 | 1054740 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24027170519263 | 30 | 103288461538462 | 478 | 125545333333333 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254431427135679 | 311 | 981471153846155 | 514 | 1435950 | 311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
281640274706868 | 322 | 100416538461539 | 533 | 161942333333333 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
279502308207705 | 334 | 995501923076924 | 552 | 169811666666667 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
273149989949749 | 346 | 969944230769232 | 573 | 182475666666667 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
301086837520938 | 359 | 89473076923077 | 594 | 187437333333333 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
337571587939699 | 372 | 791292307692308 | 615 | 1885320 | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
335709822445561 | 385 | 719676923076924 | 638 | 184891666666667 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
303290958123953 | 40 | 67950576923077 | 661 | 177122333333333 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
296100891122278 | 414 | 554032692307693 | 685 | 167757333333333 | 414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305137175879397 | 429 | 441263461538462 | 71 | 1563790 | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
298671450586265 | 445 | 39593576923077 | 737 | 143831333333333 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
267825041876047 | 461 | 294517500 | 764 | 1276340 | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
268898750418761 | 478 | 235586538461539 | 791 | 111617666666667 | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
246584087102178 | 496 | 219594615384616 | 82 | 956378666666667 | 496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22753597319933 | 514 | 183537307692308 | 851 | 786719333333333 | 514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20805557118928 | 533 | 132950384615385 | 882 | 654658 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
193145899497488 | 552 | 991526923076924 | 914 | 524162333333333 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180397058626466 | 573 | 723884615384616 | 947 | 398477 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159287497487437 | 594 | 49395000 | 982 | 294095333333333 | 594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140093966499163 | 615 | 329623653846154 | 1018 | 216415 | 615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
125712003350084 | 638 | 232231346153846 | 1055 | 155941333333333 | 638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11582181239531 | 661 | 170568076923077 | 1094 | 109822 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
933554824120604 | 685 | 114283076923077 | 1134 | 811729333333333 | 685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
766995862646567 | 71 | 851232692307693 | 1176 | 533704666666667 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
625145611390285 | 737 | 558684615384616 | 1219 | 398905 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
531419574539364 | 764 | 425857115384616 | 1263 | 272716 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401304512562814 | 791 | 320039230769231 | 131 | 224988666666667 | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
302290415410386 | 82 | 224643461538462 | 1358 | 175139333333333 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
234256559463987 | 851 | 204812115384616 | 1407 | 137377666666667 | 851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
174277956448911 | 882 | 133968461538462 | 1459 | 1185743 | 882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119620948073702 | 914 | 120355384615385 | 1512 | 901657 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
860247541038527 | 947 | 1114950 | 1568 | 95869666666667 | 947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
588795608040202 | 982 | 892715384615385 | 1625 | 866524 | 982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453500100502513 | 1018 | 75693076923077 | 1685 | 79995933333333 | 1018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306104184254607 | 1055 | 734100000000001 | 1747 | 855652 | 1055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
214392951423786 | 1094 | 732648076923078 | 1811 | 82140833333333 | 1094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171584234505863 | 1134 | 530092307692308 | 1877 | 81683533333333 | 1134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129452606365159 | 1176 | 609534615384616 | 1946 | 71270166666667 | 1176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
109800234170854 | 1219 | 491257692307693 | 2017 | 67286033333333 | 1219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
875061487437187 | 1263 | 391936346153846 | 2091 | 75311933333333 | 1263 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
755701192629817 | 131 | 427556153846154 | 2167 | 71270066666667 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76907041876047 | 1358 | 528136538461539 | 2247 | 670295 | 1358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
816854716917924 | 1407 | 538875 | 2329 | 612828 | 1407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682292696817421 | 1459 | 484882692307693 | 2414 | 60685066666667 | 1459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
484327912897823 | 1512 | 523173076923077 | 2503 | 64353 | 1512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
601245688442212 | 1568 | 532400 | 2595 | 575052 | 1568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
608947306532664 | 1625 | 391983653846154 | 269 | 53995533333333 | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57423530318258 | 1685 | 39818576923077 | 2788 | 56581733333333 | 1685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
665198110552765 | 1747 | 390621538461539 | 289 | 50526966666667 | 1747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
641284469011726 | 1811 | 282454038461539 | 2996 | 52087233333333 | 1811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
551386834170855 | 1877 | 301689807692308 | 3106 | 390656 | 1877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
515487715242882 | 1946 | 392116538461539 | 322 | 40069366666667 | 1946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
557056576214406 | 2017 | 262214807692308 | 3338 | 42029366666667 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
585014763819096 | 2091 | 300040192307693 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
563217748743719 | 2167 | 327144807692308 | 3587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
516019996649917 | 2247 | 291944038461539 | 3718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
635039155778895 | 2329 | 410772307692308 | 3854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
678386860971525 | 2414 | 438539038461539 | 3995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
540607373534339 | 2503 | 810536808 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534717524288108 | 2595 | 882899298 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
624962696817421 | 269 | 884130018 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
507626351758795 | 2788 | 848442984 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
482487487437186 | 289 | 79158372 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
462233661641542 | 2996 | 628394094 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
614290241206031 | 3106 | 484154992 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549685423785595 | 322 | 3250266138 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485615936348409 | 3338 | 1930962502 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446652388609716 | 346 | 97717245 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
733651755443887 | 3587 | 451665266 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73515500837521 | 3718 | 1710666186 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
491714613065327 | 3854 | 750723816 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453128479061977 | 3995 | 3692090772 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22625785 | 542 | 08614861802 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23149945 | 583 | 11076250522 | 1596 | 89545 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2547951466667 | 626 | 1 | 1715 | 10021 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26411294 | 673 | 1 | 1843 | 11057 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2478060433333 | 723 | 1 | 1981 | 12158 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2428556433333 | 777 | 1 | 2129 | 12433 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1953912566667 | 835 | 1 | 2288 | 113975 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1421029306667 | 898 | 01230695642 | 2458 | 9234 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
797872833333 | 965 | 1 | 2642 | 70035 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430967506667 | 1037 | 1 | 2839 | 49195 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21839545 | 1114 | 1 | 3051 | 3452 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84446483333 | 1197 | 01230695642 | 3278 | 23495 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
320313357 | 1286 | 1 | 3523 | 1597 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34943302333 | 1382 | 1 | 3786 | 1089 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17471639033 | 1486 | 1 | 4068 | 781 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116477634 | 1596 | 1 | 4371 | 5965 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 1715 | 1 | 4698 | 4325 | 1596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1843 | 1 | 5048 | 3995 | 1715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1981 | 1 | 5425 | 3185 | 1843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2129 | 1 | 5829 | 2325 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2288 | 1 | 6264 | 2185 | 2129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2458 | 1 | 6732 | 194 | 2288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2642 | 1 | 7234 | 1705 | 2458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 2839 | 1 | 7774 | 1395 | 2642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 3051 | 1 | 8354 | 124 | 2839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 3278 | 1 | 8977 | 97 | 3051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 3523 | 1 | 9647 | 92 | 3278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735818 | 3786 | 1 | 10370 | 71 | 3523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23295514667 | 4068 | 1 | 11140 | 56 | 3786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4371 | 1 | 11970 | 51 | 4068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4698 | 1 | 12860 | 35 | 4371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5048 | 1 | 13820 | 31 | 4698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5425 | 1 | 14860 | 21 | 5048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5829 | 1 | 15960 | 16 | 5425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6264 | 1 | 17150 | 1 | 5829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6732 | 1 | 18430 | 055 | 6264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7234 | 1 | 19810 | 05 | 6732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7774 | 055 | 7234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8354 | 02 | 7774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8977 | 005 | 8354 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 9647 | 0 | 8977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 10370 | 01 | 9647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11140 | 005 | 10370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11970 | 005 | 11140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 12860 | 01 | 11970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 13820 | 0 | 12860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 14860 | 0 | 13820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 15960 | 0 | 14860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 17150 | 0 | 15960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 18430 | 0 | 17150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 19810 | 0 | 18430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19810 |
0009 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 |
Methods to reduce aerosol-driven solvent losses Flue gas aerosol pretreatment provides optimum solution1
For power plants integrated with solvent-based PCC without an existing baghouse optimized flue gas aerosol pretreatment is the only viable option to reduce aerosol concentrations from gt109 particlescm3 to manageable levels near 104-106
particlescm3 for particles with diameters in the range of 70-200 nm
Pretreatment has traditionally been performed using simple ESPs and Brownian filters
Few systematic studies have been conducted to evaluate performance of different technologies over a full range of conditions
15
BH = baghouse
1 Based on single point experience some options eg dry bed conf may handle higher particle concentrations than others
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
Abbott Power Plant (42 reheat burner w dryer) | Abbott Power Plant (0 reheat burner wo dryer) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (WashU) | Wilsonville (before baghouse) (SR) | UT Austin (NCCC) (before baghouse) | TCM (no BH no BF) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (SR) | Wilsonville Parametric Tests (Linde) | Wilsonville Long-term Tests (Linde) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anal Ins | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | kg amineMT CO2 | 04080107622 | 00095091096 | |||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 682819795644892 | 982 | 427900576923077 | 157 | 14468166666667 | 982 | 1000000 | 10 | 4000000 | 2400 | 100000 | 35 | 650000 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 735415966499163 | 102 | 532616923076924 | 163 | 160013 | 102 | 200000 | 20 | 3000000 | 2800 | 1150000 | 60 | 600000 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 667026341708543 | 106 | 642390384615385 | 168 | 14813666666667 | 106 | 200000 | 40 | 2000000 | 2800 | 10000000 | 100 | 530000 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 566092556113903 | 109 | 764663461538462 | 175 | 91535 | 109 | 1000000 | 70 | 1000000 | 3000 | 10000000 | 160 | 400000 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 60451071356784 | 113 | 993782692307693 | 181 | 21280833333333 | 113 | 6300000 | 110 | 900000 | 3200 | 1400000 | 280 | 350000 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 640447634840872 | 118 | 103840961538462 | 188 | 277361 | 118 | 8000000 | 200 | 800000 | 3200 | 120000 | 480 | 50000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 63931935678392 | 122 | 119893653846154 | 195 | 30501933333333 | 122 | 5000000 | 400 | 600000 | 3800 | 1400 | 640 | 20000 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 67781860636516 | 126 | 155467692307692 | 202 | 35493966666667 | 126 | 800000 | 700 | 500000 | 3800 | 1000 | 960 | 10000 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 678467648241207 | 131 | 173807500 | 209 | 25912033333333 | 131 | 1 | 800 | 400000 | 3800 | 1000 | 1920 | 5000 | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 736663748743719 | 136 | 198103846153846 | 217 | 20493533333333 | 136 | 1 | 1000 | 318900 | 3800 | 900 | 2560 | 100 | 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 791600921273033 | 141 | 245189807692308 | 225 | 34751733333333 | 141 | 300000 | 3800 | 750 | 5120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 776599182579565 | 146 | 27240826923077 | 233 | 43427866666667 | 146 | 200000 | 3800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 748095604690118 | 151 | 301905384615385 | 241 | 592247 | 151 | 100000 | 4000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 852265149078728 | 157 | 348734615384616 | 25 | 614018 | 157 | 90000 | 4100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 99985068676717 | 163 | 375607115384616 | 259 | 87004466666667 | 163 | 80000 | 4200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11043162479062 | 168 | 442790384615385 | 269 | 137845333333333 | 168 | 70000 | 4200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119948670016751 | 175 | 523365384615385 | 279 | 183715 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
112247051926298 | 181 | 445000384615385 | 289 | 241348 | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
126325376884422 | 188 | 591696153846154 | 30 | 299061666666667 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130470221105528 | 195 | 660759615384616 | 311 | 380613666666667 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140578994974874 | 202 | 706025000000001 | 322 | 419054666666667 | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
158666502512563 | 209 | 794851923076924 | 334 | 64940 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15709983919598 | 217 | 860896153846155 | 346 | 883372 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
146305745393635 | 225 | 847675000000001 | 359 | 130709333333333 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
175050465661642 | 233 | 943019230769232 | 372 | 182267 | 233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20586516917923 | 241 | 949319230769232 | 385 | 263912666666667 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21836616080402 | 25 | 96023076923077 | 40 | 355521333333333 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
221599480737019 | 259 | 956119230769232 | 414 | 484109 | 259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
231432663316583 | 269 | 1025750000 | 429 | 647791 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
228343541038526 | 279 | 964151923076924 | 445 | 830633 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238293788944724 | 289 | 982432692307693 | 461 | 1054740 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24027170519263 | 30 | 103288461538462 | 478 | 125545333333333 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254431427135679 | 311 | 981471153846155 | 514 | 1435950 | 311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
281640274706868 | 322 | 100416538461539 | 533 | 161942333333333 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
279502308207705 | 334 | 995501923076924 | 552 | 169811666666667 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
273149989949749 | 346 | 969944230769232 | 573 | 182475666666667 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
301086837520938 | 359 | 89473076923077 | 594 | 187437333333333 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
337571587939699 | 372 | 791292307692308 | 615 | 1885320 | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
335709822445561 | 385 | 719676923076924 | 638 | 184891666666667 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
303290958123953 | 40 | 67950576923077 | 661 | 177122333333333 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
296100891122278 | 414 | 554032692307693 | 685 | 167757333333333 | 414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305137175879397 | 429 | 441263461538462 | 71 | 1563790 | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
298671450586265 | 445 | 39593576923077 | 737 | 143831333333333 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
267825041876047 | 461 | 294517500 | 764 | 1276340 | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
268898750418761 | 478 | 235586538461539 | 791 | 111617666666667 | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
246584087102178 | 496 | 219594615384616 | 82 | 956378666666667 | 496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22753597319933 | 514 | 183537307692308 | 851 | 786719333333333 | 514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20805557118928 | 533 | 132950384615385 | 882 | 654658 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
193145899497488 | 552 | 991526923076924 | 914 | 524162333333333 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180397058626466 | 573 | 723884615384616 | 947 | 398477 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159287497487437 | 594 | 49395000 | 982 | 294095333333333 | 594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140093966499163 | 615 | 329623653846154 | 1018 | 216415 | 615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
125712003350084 | 638 | 232231346153846 | 1055 | 155941333333333 | 638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11582181239531 | 661 | 170568076923077 | 1094 | 109822 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
933554824120604 | 685 | 114283076923077 | 1134 | 811729333333333 | 685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
766995862646567 | 71 | 851232692307693 | 1176 | 533704666666667 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
625145611390285 | 737 | 558684615384616 | 1219 | 398905 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
531419574539364 | 764 | 425857115384616 | 1263 | 272716 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401304512562814 | 791 | 320039230769231 | 131 | 224988666666667 | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
302290415410386 | 82 | 224643461538462 | 1358 | 175139333333333 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
234256559463987 | 851 | 204812115384616 | 1407 | 137377666666667 | 851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
174277956448911 | 882 | 133968461538462 | 1459 | 1185743 | 882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119620948073702 | 914 | 120355384615385 | 1512 | 901657 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
860247541038527 | 947 | 1114950 | 1568 | 95869666666667 | 947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
588795608040202 | 982 | 892715384615385 | 1625 | 866524 | 982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453500100502513 | 1018 | 75693076923077 | 1685 | 79995933333333 | 1018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306104184254607 | 1055 | 734100000000001 | 1747 | 855652 | 1055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
214392951423786 | 1094 | 732648076923078 | 1811 | 82140833333333 | 1094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171584234505863 | 1134 | 530092307692308 | 1877 | 81683533333333 | 1134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129452606365159 | 1176 | 609534615384616 | 1946 | 71270166666667 | 1176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
109800234170854 | 1219 | 491257692307693 | 2017 | 67286033333333 | 1219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
875061487437187 | 1263 | 391936346153846 | 2091 | 75311933333333 | 1263 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
755701192629817 | 131 | 427556153846154 | 2167 | 71270066666667 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76907041876047 | 1358 | 528136538461539 | 2247 | 670295 | 1358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
816854716917924 | 1407 | 538875 | 2329 | 612828 | 1407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682292696817421 | 1459 | 484882692307693 | 2414 | 60685066666667 | 1459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
484327912897823 | 1512 | 523173076923077 | 2503 | 64353 | 1512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
601245688442212 | 1568 | 532400 | 2595 | 575052 | 1568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
608947306532664 | 1625 | 391983653846154 | 269 | 53995533333333 | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57423530318258 | 1685 | 39818576923077 | 2788 | 56581733333333 | 1685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
665198110552765 | 1747 | 390621538461539 | 289 | 50526966666667 | 1747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
641284469011726 | 1811 | 282454038461539 | 2996 | 52087233333333 | 1811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
551386834170855 | 1877 | 301689807692308 | 3106 | 390656 | 1877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
515487715242882 | 1946 | 392116538461539 | 322 | 40069366666667 | 1946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
557056576214406 | 2017 | 262214807692308 | 3338 | 42029366666667 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
585014763819096 | 2091 | 300040192307693 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
563217748743719 | 2167 | 327144807692308 | 3587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
516019996649917 | 2247 | 291944038461539 | 3718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
635039155778895 | 2329 | 410772307692308 | 3854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
678386860971525 | 2414 | 438539038461539 | 3995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
540607373534339 | 2503 | 810536808 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534717524288108 | 2595 | 882899298 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
624962696817421 | 269 | 884130018 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
507626351758795 | 2788 | 848442984 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
482487487437186 | 289 | 79158372 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
462233661641542 | 2996 | 628394094 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
614290241206031 | 3106 | 484154992 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549685423785595 | 322 | 3250266138 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485615936348409 | 3338 | 1930962502 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446652388609716 | 346 | 97717245 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
733651755443887 | 3587 | 451665266 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73515500837521 | 3718 | 1710666186 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
491714613065327 | 3854 | 750723816 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453128479061977 | 3995 | 3692090772 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22625785 | 542 | 08614861802 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23149945 | 583 | 11076250522 | 1596 | 89545 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2547951466667 | 626 | 1 | 1715 | 10021 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26411294 | 673 | 1 | 1843 | 11057 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2478060433333 | 723 | 1 | 1981 | 12158 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2428556433333 | 777 | 1 | 2129 | 12433 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1953912566667 | 835 | 1 | 2288 | 113975 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1421029306667 | 898 | 01230695642 | 2458 | 9234 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
797872833333 | 965 | 1 | 2642 | 70035 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430967506667 | 1037 | 1 | 2839 | 49195 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21839545 | 1114 | 1 | 3051 | 3452 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84446483333 | 1197 | 01230695642 | 3278 | 23495 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
320313357 | 1286 | 1 | 3523 | 1597 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34943302333 | 1382 | 1 | 3786 | 1089 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17471639033 | 1486 | 1 | 4068 | 781 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116477634 | 1596 | 1 | 4371 | 5965 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 1715 | 1 | 4698 | 4325 | 1596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1843 | 1 | 5048 | 3995 | 1715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1981 | 1 | 5425 | 3185 | 1843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2129 | 1 | 5829 | 2325 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2288 | 1 | 6264 | 2185 | 2129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2458 | 1 | 6732 | 194 | 2288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2642 | 1 | 7234 | 1705 | 2458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 2839 | 1 | 7774 | 1395 | 2642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 3051 | 1 | 8354 | 124 | 2839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 3278 | 1 | 8977 | 97 | 3051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 3523 | 1 | 9647 | 92 | 3278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735818 | 3786 | 1 | 10370 | 71 | 3523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23295514667 | 4068 | 1 | 11140 | 56 | 3786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4371 | 1 | 11970 | 51 | 4068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4698 | 1 | 12860 | 35 | 4371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5048 | 1 | 13820 | 31 | 4698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5425 | 1 | 14860 | 21 | 5048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5829 | 1 | 15960 | 16 | 5425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6264 | 1 | 17150 | 1 | 5829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6732 | 1 | 18430 | 055 | 6264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7234 | 1 | 19810 | 05 | 6732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7774 | 055 | 7234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8354 | 02 | 7774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8977 | 005 | 8354 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 9647 | 0 | 8977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 10370 | 01 | 9647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11140 | 005 | 10370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11970 | 005 | 11140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 12860 | 01 | 11970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 13820 | 0 | 12860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 14860 | 0 | 13820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 15960 | 0 | 14860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 17150 | 0 | 15960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 18430 | 0 | 17150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 19810 | 0 | 18430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19810 |
0009 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 |
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
Abbott Power Plant (42 reheat burner w dryer) | Abbott Power Plant (0 reheat burner wo dryer) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (WashU) | Wilsonville (before baghouse) (SR) | UT Austin (NCCC) (before baghouse) | TCM (no BH no BF) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (SR) | Wilsonville Parametric Tests (Linde) | Wilsonville Long-term Tests (Linde) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anal Ins | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | kg amineMT CO2 | 04080107622 | 00095091096 | |||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 682819795644892 | 982 | 427900576923077 | 157 | 14468166666667 | 982 | 1000000 | 10 | 4000000 | 2400 | 100000 | 35 | 650000 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 735415966499163 | 102 | 532616923076924 | 163 | 160013 | 102 | 200000 | 20 | 3000000 | 2800 | 1150000 | 60 | 600000 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 667026341708543 | 106 | 642390384615385 | 168 | 14813666666667 | 106 | 200000 | 40 | 2000000 | 2800 | 10000000 | 100 | 530000 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 566092556113903 | 109 | 764663461538462 | 175 | 91535 | 109 | 1000000 | 70 | 1000000 | 3000 | 10000000 | 160 | 400000 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 60451071356784 | 113 | 993782692307693 | 181 | 21280833333333 | 113 | 6300000 | 110 | 900000 | 3200 | 1400000 | 280 | 350000 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 640447634840872 | 118 | 103840961538462 | 188 | 277361 | 118 | 8000000 | 200 | 800000 | 3200 | 120000 | 480 | 50000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 63931935678392 | 122 | 119893653846154 | 195 | 30501933333333 | 122 | 5000000 | 400 | 600000 | 3800 | 1400 | 640 | 20000 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 67781860636516 | 126 | 155467692307692 | 202 | 35493966666667 | 126 | 800000 | 700 | 500000 | 3800 | 1000 | 960 | 10000 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 678467648241207 | 131 | 173807500 | 209 | 25912033333333 | 131 | 1 | 800 | 400000 | 3800 | 1000 | 1920 | 5000 | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 736663748743719 | 136 | 198103846153846 | 217 | 20493533333333 | 136 | 1 | 1000 | 318900 | 3800 | 900 | 2560 | 100 | 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 791600921273033 | 141 | 245189807692308 | 225 | 34751733333333 | 141 | 300000 | 3800 | 750 | 5120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 776599182579565 | 146 | 27240826923077 | 233 | 43427866666667 | 146 | 200000 | 3800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 748095604690118 | 151 | 301905384615385 | 241 | 592247 | 151 | 100000 | 4000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 852265149078728 | 157 | 348734615384616 | 25 | 614018 | 157 | 90000 | 4100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 99985068676717 | 163 | 375607115384616 | 259 | 87004466666667 | 163 | 80000 | 4200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11043162479062 | 168 | 442790384615385 | 269 | 137845333333333 | 168 | 70000 | 4200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119948670016751 | 175 | 523365384615385 | 279 | 183715 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
112247051926298 | 181 | 445000384615385 | 289 | 241348 | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
126325376884422 | 188 | 591696153846154 | 30 | 299061666666667 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130470221105528 | 195 | 660759615384616 | 311 | 380613666666667 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140578994974874 | 202 | 706025000000001 | 322 | 419054666666667 | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
158666502512563 | 209 | 794851923076924 | 334 | 64940 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15709983919598 | 217 | 860896153846155 | 346 | 883372 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
146305745393635 | 225 | 847675000000001 | 359 | 130709333333333 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
175050465661642 | 233 | 943019230769232 | 372 | 182267 | 233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20586516917923 | 241 | 949319230769232 | 385 | 263912666666667 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21836616080402 | 25 | 96023076923077 | 40 | 355521333333333 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
221599480737019 | 259 | 956119230769232 | 414 | 484109 | 259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
231432663316583 | 269 | 1025750000 | 429 | 647791 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
228343541038526 | 279 | 964151923076924 | 445 | 830633 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238293788944724 | 289 | 982432692307693 | 461 | 1054740 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24027170519263 | 30 | 103288461538462 | 478 | 125545333333333 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254431427135679 | 311 | 981471153846155 | 514 | 1435950 | 311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
281640274706868 | 322 | 100416538461539 | 533 | 161942333333333 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
279502308207705 | 334 | 995501923076924 | 552 | 169811666666667 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
273149989949749 | 346 | 969944230769232 | 573 | 182475666666667 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
301086837520938 | 359 | 89473076923077 | 594 | 187437333333333 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
337571587939699 | 372 | 791292307692308 | 615 | 1885320 | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
335709822445561 | 385 | 719676923076924 | 638 | 184891666666667 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
303290958123953 | 40 | 67950576923077 | 661 | 177122333333333 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
296100891122278 | 414 | 554032692307693 | 685 | 167757333333333 | 414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305137175879397 | 429 | 441263461538462 | 71 | 1563790 | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
298671450586265 | 445 | 39593576923077 | 737 | 143831333333333 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
267825041876047 | 461 | 294517500 | 764 | 1276340 | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
268898750418761 | 478 | 235586538461539 | 791 | 111617666666667 | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
246584087102178 | 496 | 219594615384616 | 82 | 956378666666667 | 496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22753597319933 | 514 | 183537307692308 | 851 | 786719333333333 | 514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20805557118928 | 533 | 132950384615385 | 882 | 654658 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
193145899497488 | 552 | 991526923076924 | 914 | 524162333333333 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180397058626466 | 573 | 723884615384616 | 947 | 398477 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159287497487437 | 594 | 49395000 | 982 | 294095333333333 | 594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140093966499163 | 615 | 329623653846154 | 1018 | 216415 | 615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
125712003350084 | 638 | 232231346153846 | 1055 | 155941333333333 | 638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11582181239531 | 661 | 170568076923077 | 1094 | 109822 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
933554824120604 | 685 | 114283076923077 | 1134 | 811729333333333 | 685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
766995862646567 | 71 | 851232692307693 | 1176 | 533704666666667 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
625145611390285 | 737 | 558684615384616 | 1219 | 398905 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
531419574539364 | 764 | 425857115384616 | 1263 | 272716 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401304512562814 | 791 | 320039230769231 | 131 | 224988666666667 | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
302290415410386 | 82 | 224643461538462 | 1358 | 175139333333333 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
234256559463987 | 851 | 204812115384616 | 1407 | 137377666666667 | 851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
174277956448911 | 882 | 133968461538462 | 1459 | 1185743 | 882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119620948073702 | 914 | 120355384615385 | 1512 | 901657 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
860247541038527 | 947 | 1114950 | 1568 | 95869666666667 | 947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
588795608040202 | 982 | 892715384615385 | 1625 | 866524 | 982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453500100502513 | 1018 | 75693076923077 | 1685 | 79995933333333 | 1018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306104184254607 | 1055 | 734100000000001 | 1747 | 855652 | 1055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
214392951423786 | 1094 | 732648076923078 | 1811 | 82140833333333 | 1094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171584234505863 | 1134 | 530092307692308 | 1877 | 81683533333333 | 1134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129452606365159 | 1176 | 609534615384616 | 1946 | 71270166666667 | 1176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
109800234170854 | 1219 | 491257692307693 | 2017 | 67286033333333 | 1219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
875061487437187 | 1263 | 391936346153846 | 2091 | 75311933333333 | 1263 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
755701192629817 | 131 | 427556153846154 | 2167 | 71270066666667 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76907041876047 | 1358 | 528136538461539 | 2247 | 670295 | 1358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
816854716917924 | 1407 | 538875 | 2329 | 612828 | 1407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682292696817421 | 1459 | 484882692307693 | 2414 | 60685066666667 | 1459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
484327912897823 | 1512 | 523173076923077 | 2503 | 64353 | 1512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
601245688442212 | 1568 | 532400 | 2595 | 575052 | 1568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
608947306532664 | 1625 | 391983653846154 | 269 | 53995533333333 | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57423530318258 | 1685 | 39818576923077 | 2788 | 56581733333333 | 1685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
665198110552765 | 1747 | 390621538461539 | 289 | 50526966666667 | 1747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
641284469011726 | 1811 | 282454038461539 | 2996 | 52087233333333 | 1811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
551386834170855 | 1877 | 301689807692308 | 3106 | 390656 | 1877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
515487715242882 | 1946 | 392116538461539 | 322 | 40069366666667 | 1946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
557056576214406 | 2017 | 262214807692308 | 3338 | 42029366666667 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
585014763819096 | 2091 | 300040192307693 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
563217748743719 | 2167 | 327144807692308 | 3587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
516019996649917 | 2247 | 291944038461539 | 3718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
635039155778895 | 2329 | 410772307692308 | 3854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
678386860971525 | 2414 | 438539038461539 | 3995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
540607373534339 | 2503 | 810536808 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534717524288108 | 2595 | 882899298 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
624962696817421 | 269 | 884130018 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
507626351758795 | 2788 | 848442984 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
482487487437186 | 289 | 79158372 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
462233661641542 | 2996 | 628394094 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
614290241206031 | 3106 | 484154992 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549685423785595 | 322 | 3250266138 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485615936348409 | 3338 | 1930962502 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446652388609716 | 346 | 97717245 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
733651755443887 | 3587 | 451665266 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73515500837521 | 3718 | 1710666186 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
491714613065327 | 3854 | 750723816 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453128479061977 | 3995 | 3692090772 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22625785 | 542 | 08614861802 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23149945 | 583 | 11076250522 | 1596 | 89545 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2547951466667 | 626 | 1 | 1715 | 10021 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26411294 | 673 | 1 | 1843 | 11057 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2478060433333 | 723 | 1 | 1981 | 12158 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2428556433333 | 777 | 1 | 2129 | 12433 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1953912566667 | 835 | 1 | 2288 | 113975 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1421029306667 | 898 | 01230695642 | 2458 | 9234 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
797872833333 | 965 | 1 | 2642 | 70035 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430967506667 | 1037 | 1 | 2839 | 49195 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21839545 | 1114 | 1 | 3051 | 3452 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84446483333 | 1197 | 01230695642 | 3278 | 23495 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
320313357 | 1286 | 1 | 3523 | 1597 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34943302333 | 1382 | 1 | 3786 | 1089 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17471639033 | 1486 | 1 | 4068 | 781 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116477634 | 1596 | 1 | 4371 | 5965 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 1715 | 1 | 4698 | 4325 | 1596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1843 | 1 | 5048 | 3995 | 1715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1981 | 1 | 5425 | 3185 | 1843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2129 | 1 | 5829 | 2325 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2288 | 1 | 6264 | 2185 | 2129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2458 | 1 | 6732 | 194 | 2288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2642 | 1 | 7234 | 1705 | 2458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 2839 | 1 | 7774 | 1395 | 2642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 3051 | 1 | 8354 | 124 | 2839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 3278 | 1 | 8977 | 97 | 3051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 3523 | 1 | 9647 | 92 | 3278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735818 | 3786 | 1 | 10370 | 71 | 3523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23295514667 | 4068 | 1 | 11140 | 56 | 3786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4371 | 1 | 11970 | 51 | 4068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4698 | 1 | 12860 | 35 | 4371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5048 | 1 | 13820 | 31 | 4698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5425 | 1 | 14860 | 21 | 5048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5829 | 1 | 15960 | 16 | 5425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6264 | 1 | 17150 | 1 | 5829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6732 | 1 | 18430 | 055 | 6264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7234 | 1 | 19810 | 05 | 6732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7774 | 055 | 7234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8354 | 02 | 7774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8977 | 005 | 8354 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 9647 | 0 | 8977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 10370 | 01 | 9647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11140 | 005 | 10370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11970 | 005 | 11140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 12860 | 01 | 11970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 13820 | 0 | 12860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 14860 | 0 | 13820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 15960 | 0 | 14860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 17150 | 0 | 15960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 18430 | 0 | 17150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 19810 | 0 | 18430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19810 |
0009 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 | |
lt03 |
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
Abbott Power Plant (42 reheat burner w dryer) | Abbott Power Plant (0 reheat burner wo dryer) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (WashU) | Wilsonville (before baghouse) (SR) | UT Austin (NCCC) (before baghouse) | TCM (no BH no BF) | Wilsonville (after baghouse) (SR) | Wilsonville Parametric Tests (Linde) | Wilsonville Long-term Tests (Linde) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anal Ins | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | Particle number (cm3) | Particle diameter (nm) | kg amineMT CO2 | 04080107622 | 00095091096 | |||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 682819795644892 | 982 | 427900576923077 | 157 | 14468166666667 | 982 | 1000000 | 10 | 4000000 | 2400 | 100000 | 35 | 650000 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 735415966499163 | 102 | 532616923076924 | 163 | 160013 | 102 | 200000 | 20 | 3000000 | 2800 | 1150000 | 60 | 600000 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 667026341708543 | 106 | 642390384615385 | 168 | 14813666666667 | 106 | 200000 | 40 | 2000000 | 2800 | 10000000 | 100 | 530000 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 566092556113903 | 109 | 764663461538462 | 175 | 91535 | 109 | 1000000 | 70 | 1000000 | 3000 | 10000000 | 160 | 400000 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 60451071356784 | 113 | 993782692307693 | 181 | 21280833333333 | 113 | 6300000 | 110 | 900000 | 3200 | 1400000 | 280 | 350000 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 640447634840872 | 118 | 103840961538462 | 188 | 277361 | 118 | 8000000 | 200 | 800000 | 3200 | 120000 | 480 | 50000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 63931935678392 | 122 | 119893653846154 | 195 | 30501933333333 | 122 | 5000000 | 400 | 600000 | 3800 | 1400 | 640 | 20000 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 67781860636516 | 126 | 155467692307692 | 202 | 35493966666667 | 126 | 800000 | 700 | 500000 | 3800 | 1000 | 960 | 10000 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 678467648241207 | 131 | 173807500 | 209 | 25912033333333 | 131 | 1 | 800 | 400000 | 3800 | 1000 | 1920 | 5000 | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMPS | 736663748743719 | 136 | 198103846153846 | 217 | 20493533333333 | 136 | 1 | 1000 | 318900 | 3800 | 900 | 2560 | 100 | 1000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 791600921273033 | 141 | 245189807692308 | 225 | 34751733333333 | 141 | 300000 | 3800 | 750 | 5120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 776599182579565 | 146 | 27240826923077 | 233 | 43427866666667 | 146 | 200000 | 3800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 748095604690118 | 151 | 301905384615385 | 241 | 592247 | 151 | 100000 | 4000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 852265149078728 | 157 | 348734615384616 | 25 | 614018 | 157 | 90000 | 4100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APS | 99985068676717 | 163 | 375607115384616 | 259 | 87004466666667 | 163 | 80000 | 4200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11043162479062 | 168 | 442790384615385 | 269 | 137845333333333 | 168 | 70000 | 4200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119948670016751 | 175 | 523365384615385 | 279 | 183715 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
112247051926298 | 181 | 445000384615385 | 289 | 241348 | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
126325376884422 | 188 | 591696153846154 | 30 | 299061666666667 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130470221105528 | 195 | 660759615384616 | 311 | 380613666666667 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140578994974874 | 202 | 706025000000001 | 322 | 419054666666667 | 202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
158666502512563 | 209 | 794851923076924 | 334 | 64940 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15709983919598 | 217 | 860896153846155 | 346 | 883372 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
146305745393635 | 225 | 847675000000001 | 359 | 130709333333333 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
175050465661642 | 233 | 943019230769232 | 372 | 182267 | 233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20586516917923 | 241 | 949319230769232 | 385 | 263912666666667 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21836616080402 | 25 | 96023076923077 | 40 | 355521333333333 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
221599480737019 | 259 | 956119230769232 | 414 | 484109 | 259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
231432663316583 | 269 | 1025750000 | 429 | 647791 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
228343541038526 | 279 | 964151923076924 | 445 | 830633 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238293788944724 | 289 | 982432692307693 | 461 | 1054740 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24027170519263 | 30 | 103288461538462 | 478 | 125545333333333 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
254431427135679 | 311 | 981471153846155 | 514 | 1435950 | 311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
281640274706868 | 322 | 100416538461539 | 533 | 161942333333333 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
279502308207705 | 334 | 995501923076924 | 552 | 169811666666667 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
273149989949749 | 346 | 969944230769232 | 573 | 182475666666667 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
301086837520938 | 359 | 89473076923077 | 594 | 187437333333333 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
337571587939699 | 372 | 791292307692308 | 615 | 1885320 | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
335709822445561 | 385 | 719676923076924 | 638 | 184891666666667 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
303290958123953 | 40 | 67950576923077 | 661 | 177122333333333 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
296100891122278 | 414 | 554032692307693 | 685 | 167757333333333 | 414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
305137175879397 | 429 | 441263461538462 | 71 | 1563790 | 429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
298671450586265 | 445 | 39593576923077 | 737 | 143831333333333 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
267825041876047 | 461 | 294517500 | 764 | 1276340 | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
268898750418761 | 478 | 235586538461539 | 791 | 111617666666667 | 478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
246584087102178 | 496 | 219594615384616 | 82 | 956378666666667 | 496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22753597319933 | 514 | 183537307692308 | 851 | 786719333333333 | 514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20805557118928 | 533 | 132950384615385 | 882 | 654658 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
193145899497488 | 552 | 991526923076924 | 914 | 524162333333333 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180397058626466 | 573 | 723884615384616 | 947 | 398477 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159287497487437 | 594 | 49395000 | 982 | 294095333333333 | 594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140093966499163 | 615 | 329623653846154 | 1018 | 216415 | 615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
125712003350084 | 638 | 232231346153846 | 1055 | 155941333333333 | 638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11582181239531 | 661 | 170568076923077 | 1094 | 109822 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
933554824120604 | 685 | 114283076923077 | 1134 | 811729333333333 | 685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
766995862646567 | 71 | 851232692307693 | 1176 | 533704666666667 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
625145611390285 | 737 | 558684615384616 | 1219 | 398905 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
531419574539364 | 764 | 425857115384616 | 1263 | 272716 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401304512562814 | 791 | 320039230769231 | 131 | 224988666666667 | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
302290415410386 | 82 | 224643461538462 | 1358 | 175139333333333 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
234256559463987 | 851 | 204812115384616 | 1407 | 137377666666667 | 851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
174277956448911 | 882 | 133968461538462 | 1459 | 1185743 | 882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119620948073702 | 914 | 120355384615385 | 1512 | 901657 | 914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
860247541038527 | 947 | 1114950 | 1568 | 95869666666667 | 947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
588795608040202 | 982 | 892715384615385 | 1625 | 866524 | 982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453500100502513 | 1018 | 75693076923077 | 1685 | 79995933333333 | 1018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306104184254607 | 1055 | 734100000000001 | 1747 | 855652 | 1055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
214392951423786 | 1094 | 732648076923078 | 1811 | 82140833333333 | 1094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
171584234505863 | 1134 | 530092307692308 | 1877 | 81683533333333 | 1134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129452606365159 | 1176 | 609534615384616 | 1946 | 71270166666667 | 1176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
109800234170854 | 1219 | 491257692307693 | 2017 | 67286033333333 | 1219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
875061487437187 | 1263 | 391936346153846 | 2091 | 75311933333333 | 1263 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
755701192629817 | 131 | 427556153846154 | 2167 | 71270066666667 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76907041876047 | 1358 | 528136538461539 | 2247 | 670295 | 1358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
816854716917924 | 1407 | 538875 | 2329 | 612828 | 1407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682292696817421 | 1459 | 484882692307693 | 2414 | 60685066666667 | 1459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
484327912897823 | 1512 | 523173076923077 | 2503 | 64353 | 1512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
601245688442212 | 1568 | 532400 | 2595 | 575052 | 1568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
608947306532664 | 1625 | 391983653846154 | 269 | 53995533333333 | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57423530318258 | 1685 | 39818576923077 | 2788 | 56581733333333 | 1685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
665198110552765 | 1747 | 390621538461539 | 289 | 50526966666667 | 1747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
641284469011726 | 1811 | 282454038461539 | 2996 | 52087233333333 | 1811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
551386834170855 | 1877 | 301689807692308 | 3106 | 390656 | 1877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
515487715242882 | 1946 | 392116538461539 | 322 | 40069366666667 | 1946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
557056576214406 | 2017 | 262214807692308 | 3338 | 42029366666667 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
585014763819096 | 2091 | 300040192307693 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
563217748743719 | 2167 | 327144807692308 | 3587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
516019996649917 | 2247 | 291944038461539 | 3718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
635039155778895 | 2329 | 410772307692308 | 3854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
678386860971525 | 2414 | 438539038461539 | 3995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
540607373534339 | 2503 | 810536808 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534717524288108 | 2595 | 882899298 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
624962696817421 | 269 | 884130018 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
507626351758795 | 2788 | 848442984 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
482487487437186 | 289 | 79158372 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
462233661641542 | 2996 | 628394094 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
614290241206031 | 3106 | 484154992 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549685423785595 | 322 | 3250266138 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485615936348409 | 3338 | 1930962502 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446652388609716 | 346 | 97717245 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
733651755443887 | 3587 | 451665266 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73515500837521 | 3718 | 1710666186 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
491714613065327 | 3854 | 750723816 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
453128479061977 | 3995 | 3692090772 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22625785 | 542 | 08614861802 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23149945 | 583 | 11076250522 | 1596 | 89545 | 542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2547951466667 | 626 | 1 | 1715 | 10021 | 583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26411294 | 673 | 1 | 1843 | 11057 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2478060433333 | 723 | 1 | 1981 | 12158 | 673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2428556433333 | 777 | 1 | 2129 | 12433 | 723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1953912566667 | 835 | 1 | 2288 | 113975 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1421029306667 | 898 | 01230695642 | 2458 | 9234 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
797872833333 | 965 | 1 | 2642 | 70035 | 898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430967506667 | 1037 | 1 | 2839 | 49195 | 965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21839545 | 1114 | 1 | 3051 | 3452 | 1037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84446483333 | 1197 | 01230695642 | 3278 | 23495 | 1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
320313357 | 1286 | 1 | 3523 | 1597 | 1197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34943302333 | 1382 | 1 | 3786 | 1089 | 1286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17471639033 | 1486 | 1 | 4068 | 781 | 1382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116477634 | 1596 | 1 | 4371 | 5965 | 1486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 1715 | 1 | 4698 | 4325 | 1596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1843 | 1 | 5048 | 3995 | 1715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 1981 | 1 | 5425 | 3185 | 1843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2129 | 1 | 5829 | 2325 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2288 | 1 | 6264 | 2185 | 2129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2458 | 1 | 6732 | 194 | 2288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 2642 | 1 | 7234 | 1705 | 2458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 2839 | 1 | 7774 | 1395 | 2642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02911942367 | 3051 | 1 | 8354 | 124 | 2839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735821033 | 3278 | 1 | 8977 | 97 | 3051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 3523 | 1 | 9647 | 92 | 3278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08735818 | 3786 | 1 | 10370 | 71 | 3523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23295514667 | 4068 | 1 | 11140 | 56 | 3786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4371 | 1 | 11970 | 51 | 4068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05823884733 | 4698 | 1 | 12860 | 35 | 4371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5048 | 1 | 13820 | 31 | 4698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5425 | 1 | 14860 | 21 | 5048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 5829 | 1 | 15960 | 16 | 5425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6264 | 1 | 17150 | 1 | 5829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6732 | 1 | 18430 | 055 | 6264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7234 | 1 | 19810 | 05 | 6732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7774 | 055 | 7234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8354 | 02 | 7774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 8977 | 005 | 8354 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 9647 | 0 | 8977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 10370 | 01 | 9647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11140 | 005 | 10370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 11970 | 005 | 11140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 12860 | 01 | 11970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 13820 | 0 | 12860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 14860 | 0 | 13820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 15960 | 0 | 14860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 17150 | 0 | 15960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 18430 | 0 | 17150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 19810 | 0 | 18430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 19810 |
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
Method | Amine emissions (kg aminetonne CO2 | Aerosol particle concentration range where adequate (particlescm3) | ||||||||
Baghouse | 0009 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Dry bed operation (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+6 | 0 | 1000000 | ||||||
Absorber operating conditions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+7 | 0 | 10000000 | ||||||
Pre-treatment solutions (no BH) | lt03 | 0 to 1E+9 | 0 | 1000000000 |
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
Base case | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |||||||||||||||
DOE Case B12B Reference w baghouse | wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | wo baghouse (breakeven) | |||||||||||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | ||||||||||||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4432245 | 4516307 | 45154043379888 | |||||||||||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1698847 | 1732627 | ||||||||||||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 225385 | 229867 | 11478458479996 | |||||||||||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 644359 | 656869 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6444 | 6569 | 96690 | 9669 | 3 | |||||||||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 941 | 1072 | 9969 | |||||||||||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 551 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | ||||||||||||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3323 | 3386 | ||||||||||||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | 248 | 4405686 | |||||||||||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | 450395408921933 | 982680892193308 | 445482004460967 | |||||||||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 440778425101536 | 440864946116186 | ||||||||||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | 31725 | ||||||||||||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 489 | 482 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1061745 | 1082857 | 4415000 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4218856 | 4302745 | 443224546416968 | |||||||||||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Cost | $60366961 | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | $60429346 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Cost | $63094548 | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | $62753124 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | $12931450746 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | $2364453241 | $2364444218 | |||||||||||||
Total Plant Cost | $1939142000 | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | $1922071279 | ||||||||||||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | ||||||||||||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | ||||||||||||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $38782850 | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $38061080 | $38441426 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1814558223 | $18145582 | ||||||||||||||
Consumables Cost | $36775427 | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3687267513 | $36775427 | ||||||||||||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $550833671 | $5508337 | ||||||||||||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $59957 | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $59257 | $59691 | ||||||||||||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | $41125 | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 410280350765301 | $4159189 | ||||||||||||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Land (x1000) | $900 | $877 | $892 | $889 | $883 | $892 | ||||||||||||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $290871 | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $285458 | $288311 | ||||||||||||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $52357 | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51382 | $51896 | ||||||||||||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2384351816 | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2341063213 | $236445324106 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52378 | $53073 | ||||||||||||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $25027 | $25359 | ||||||||||||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112348 | $113838 | ||||||||||||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $401502 | $406825 | ||||||||||||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $197475 | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148954 | $150929 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $544054 | $545052 | 935327377984728 | |||||||||||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98555 | $99862 | ||||||||||||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $45107 | $45705 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178491 | $180858 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62364 | $63191 | ||||||||||||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19062 | $19314 | ||||||||||||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93749 | $94993 | ||||||||||||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31710 | $32130 | ||||||||||||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18095 | $18335 | ||||||||||||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71657 | $72608 | ||||||||||||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1307004 | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1260445 | $1277157 | ||||||||||||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $642609 | $644914 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13320 | $13686 | $13368 | $13305 | $13185 | $13279 | ||||||||||||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14280 | $14646 | $14353 | $14282 | $14149 | $14262 | ||||||||||||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3090 | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3095 | $3139 | ||||||||||||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $1470 | $2023 | $1511 | $1500 | $1478 | $1474 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1540 | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1523 | $1529 | ||||||||||||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7220 | $7062 | $7160 | $7137 | $7089 | $7136 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $5262 | $7069 | $6497 | $6472 | $6414 | $6440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $5800 | $6413 | $5894 | $5872 | $5818 | $5842 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $6901 | $7514 | $6995 | $6972 | $6919 | $6943 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46435398 | $47358727 | ||||||||||||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $960 | $985 | $977 | $963 | $984 | ||||||||||||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 480 | 492 | 488 | 481 | 491 | ||||||||||||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3379 | 3446 | ||||||||||||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1073 | 1094 | ||||||||||||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 780 | 799 | 794 | 782 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1674 | 1708 | ||||||||||||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2136 | 2178 | ||||||||||||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8372 | 8539 | ||||||||||||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | 112 | ||||||||||||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3559 | 3630 | ||||||||||||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 18682 | 30361 | 14000 | 2640 | ||||||||||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35784 | 36496 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 640 | 656 | 651 | 642 | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7770 | 7925 | ||||||||||||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | ||||||||||||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2386 | 2434 | ||||||||||||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 94148 | 107186 | ||||||||||||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10535 | 10755 | ||||||||||||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1872 | 1909 | ||||||||||||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22272 | 22715 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1521 | 1551 | ||||||||||||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 195 | 200 | 198 | 196 | 199 | ||||||||||||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 051 | 002 | -092 | -012 | |||||||||||||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 036 | -011 | -101 | -031 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 162 | 123 | 032 | 073 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 136 | 104 | 027 | 061 | |||||||||||||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -166 | -202 |
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
Concentration (cm3) | ||||||||||
Particle Size (nm) | Before | After | Removal eff () | Average removal eff () | ||||||
71 | 441263461538462 | 533704666666667 | 999879050791 | 997335936184 | ||||||
737 | 39593576923077 | 398905 | 999899250073 | |||||||
764 | 294517500 | 272716000 | 999907402446 | |||||||
791 | 235586538461539 | 224988666666667 | 999904498505 | |||||||
82 | 219594615384616 | 175139333333333 | 99992024425 | |||||||
851 | 183537307692308 | 137377666666667 | 999925150004 | |||||||
882 | 132950384615385 | 1185743 | 99991081312 | |||||||
914 | 991526923076924 | 90165700 | 999909063791 | |||||||
947 | 723884615384616 | 95869666666667 | 999867562227 | |||||||
982 | 49395000 | 866524 | 999824572528 | |||||||
1018 | 329623653846154 | 79995933333333 | 999757311308 | |||||||
1055 | 232231346153846 | 855652 | 999631551892 | |||||||
1094 | 170568076923077 | 82140833 | 999518427863 | |||||||
1134 | 114283076923077 | 81683533333333 | 999285252589 | |||||||
1176 | 851232692307693 | 71270166666667 | 999162741665 | |||||||
1219 | 558684615384616 | 67286033333333 | 998795634756 | |||||||
1263 | 425857115384616 | 75311933333333 | 998231521076 | |||||||
131 | 320039230769231 | 71270066666667 | 997773083428 | |||||||
1358 | 224643461538462 | 670295 | 997016182909 | |||||||
1407 | 204812115384616 | 612828 | 997007852788 | |||||||
1459 | 133968461538462 | 60685066666667 | 99547019754 | |||||||
1512 | 120355384615385 | 64353 | 994653085094 | |||||||
1568 | 1114950 | 575052 | 994842351675 | |||||||
1625 | 892715384615385 | 53995533333333 | 993951539957 | |||||||
1685 | 75693076923077 | 56581733333333 | 99252484697 | |||||||
1747 | 734100000000001 | 50526966666667 | 993117154793 | |||||||
1811 | 732648076923078 | 52087233333333 | 992890552098 | |||||||
1877 | 530092307692308 | 390656 | 992630415603 | |||||||
1946 | 609534615384616 | 40069366666667 | 993426236073 | |||||||
2017 | 491257692307693 | 42029366666667 | 991444537699 | |||||||
2091 | 391936346153846 | |||||||||
2167 | 427556153846154 | |||||||||
2247 | 528136538461539 | |||||||||
2329 | 538875 | |||||||||
2414 | 484882692307693 | |||||||||
2503 | 523173076923077 | |||||||||
2595 | 532400 | |||||||||
269 | 391983653846154 | |||||||||
2788 | 39818576923077 | |||||||||
289 | 390621538461539 | |||||||||
2996 | 282454038461539 | |||||||||
3106 | 301689807692308 | |||||||||
322 | 392116538461539 | |||||||||
3338 | 262214807692308 | |||||||||
346 | 300040192307693 | |||||||||
3587 | 327144807692308 | |||||||||
3718 | 291944038461539 | |||||||||
3854 | 410772307692308 | |||||||||
3995 | 438539038461539 | |||||||||
542 | 810536808 | 89545 | -104761672958 | |||||||
583 | 882899298 | 10021 | -135010529819 | |||||||
626 | 884130018 | 11057 | -25060791681 | |||||||
673 | 848442984 | 12158 | -432977846394 | |||||||
723 | 79158372 | 12433 | -570648774838 |
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
8 weeks of testing for each system 1 day testing per week at each condition 2nd part of 5th day includes data analysis and recap May vary cooling temperature depending on test results Flue gas flow and recirculation flow may vary depending on initial test results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACM 1 High-velocity water spray injection (1 or more different nozzle designs and 1 or more perforated tray designs will be tested depending on early results) | ACM 2 Novel ESP (voltage and current ranges chosen may vary depending on early test results) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | Test Week | Test Day Each Week | Test Parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flue gas flow (scfm) | Recirculation flow (gpm) | LG ratio | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | Cooling onoff | Water spray temperature (deg F) | Flue gas flow (scfm) | ESP Voltage (kV) | ESP Current (mA) | Flue gas impurities filter (SOx NOx etc) onoff (optional) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Week 1nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 2nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 1No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 2No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 3nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 4nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min gas flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 3No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filterWeek 4No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 75 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 750 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 750 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 500 | 300 | 641 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 750 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 100 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 500 | 300 | 641 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 750 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 100 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 750 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 5nozzle 1 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 6nozzle 2 perforated tray 1Effect of LG ratio at min and 50 max circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 5No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filterWeek 6No ESP dryerEffect of ESP voltage at 50 flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 500 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 500 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 500 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 200 | 214 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 500 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 500 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
Week 7nozzle 1 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filterWeek 8nozzle 2 perforated tray 2Effect of LG ratio at max and min circulation flow w and wo cooling and filter | 1 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | Week 7ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filterWeek 8ESP dryer usedEffect of ESP voltage at max flue gas flow w filter (different voltage and current range) | 1 | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | off | Determined by process | 1 | 1000 | 8 | 13 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 9 | 11 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | off | Determined by process | 2 | 1000 | 10 | 10 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 11 | 9 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | off | on | 95 | 3 | 1000 | 12 | 8 | off | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 100 | 107 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 13 | 8 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1000 | 300 | 321 | on | on | 95 | 4 | 1000 | 15 | 7 | on | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 100 | 107 | off | off | Determined by process | 5 (repeat 1st) | 1000 | 7 | 14 | off |
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||||||
wo baghouse and high solvent makeup (4x) | Varying absorber conditions and same solvent makeup | wo baghouse using water spray pretreatment system | wo baghouse using ESP pretreatment system | ||||||
Cost Basis Year | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | 2011$ | |||||
PC Boiler Steam Flow (lbhr) | 4416576 | 4530755 | 4497804 | 4416576 | |||||
Thermal input (kWt) (HHV) | 1694366 | 1736605 | 1723975 | 1692236 | |||||
Coal flowrate (kghr) | 224791 | 230395 | 228719 | 224508 | |||||
Total steam turbine power (kWe) | 642000 | 643332 | 654224 | 642000 | |||||
Gross Power (MWe) | 6420 | 6433 | 6542 | 6420 | |||||
Auxiliary Power (MWe) | 913 | 934 | 1038 | 913 | |||||
Net Power (MWe) | 551 | 550 | 550 | 551 | |||||
PCC Reboiler Duty (MW) | 3311 | 4106 | 3372 | 3310 | |||||
Specific Duty (MJkg CO2) | 248 | 300 | 248 | 248 | |||||
Fuel Type | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | Illinois No 6 Coal | |||||
Fuel Unit Cost ($ton) | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | 6854 | |||||
Power Plant Efficiency () (HHV) | 32500 | 31668 | 31930 | 32387 | |||||
Boiler Efficiency () (HHV) | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | 89100 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MThr) | 480 | 492 | 489 | 480 | |||||
CO2 Produced (lbhr) | 1058945 | 1085344 | 1077450 | 1057614 | |||||
CO2 Produced (MTyear) | 4207729 | 4312625 | 4281259 | 4202441 | |||||
CO2 Captured () | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
Capacity Factor (Fraction) | 085 | 085 | 085 | 085 | |||||
Variable Cost | $82839499 | $61871865 | $61421865 | $60526594 | |||||
Fixed Cost | $62118858 | $62746820 | $62624815 | $62372778 | |||||
Fuel Cost | $126458921 | $12961144817 | $12866877277 | $12679332619 | |||||
Total Overnight Cost | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $2356810371 | $2341063213 | |||||
Total Plant Cost | $1890358000 | $1921756120 | $1915655869 | $1903054023 | |||||
Annual Operating Labor Cost | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | $7384208 | |||||
Maintenance Labor Cost | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | $12065150 | |||||
Administrative amp Labor Support | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | $4862340 | |||||
Property Taxes and Insurance | $37807160 | $38435122 | $38313117 | $37822131 | |||||
Maintenance Material Cost | $18097725 | $1854888787 | $1841398019 | $1807497942 | |||||
Consumables Cost | $59247965 | $3769221114 | $3741807239 | $3672920691 | |||||
Waste Disposal Cost | $5493809 | $563076559 | $558981254 | $548690427 | |||||
By-Products Cost | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Preproduction Costs (x1000) | $60854 | $59820 | $59635 | $58985 | |||||
Inventory Capital (x1000) | 452270951087832 | 418250410605904 | $4155922 | 408451435817063 | |||||
Initial Cost for Catalyst and Chemicals (x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Land (x1000) | $877 | $892 | $889 | $878 | |||||
Other Owners Costs (x1000) | $283554 | $288263 | $287348 | $283666 | |||||
Financing Costs (x1000) | $51040 | $51887 | $51723 | $51060 | |||||
Total Overnight Costs (TOC) | $2331909536 | $2364444218 | $235681037146 | $2326540582 | |||||
Coal and sorbent handling ($x1000) | $52286 | $53154 | $52896 | $52242 | |||||
Coal and sorbent prep amp feed ($x1000) | $24983 | $25398 | $25274 | $24962 | |||||
Feedwater amp misc BOP systems ($x1000) | $112150 | $114013 | $113457 | $112056 | |||||
PC boiler ($x1000) | $400793 | $407450 | $405465 | $400456 | |||||
Flue gas cleanup ($x1000) | $148691 | $151161 | $150424 | $148566 | |||||
CO2 removal ($x1000) | $533757 | $542622 | $543241 | $535646 | |||||
CO2 compression amp drying ($x1000) | $98381 | $100015 | $99528 | $98298 | |||||
Heat and power integration ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
Combustion turbineaccessories ($x1000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
HRSG ducting amp stack ($x1000) | $45027 | $45775 | $45552 | $44989 | |||||
Steam turbine generaor ($x1000) | $178176 | $181135 | $180253 | $178026 | |||||
Cooling water system ($x1000) | $62254 | $63288 | $62980 | $62202 | |||||
Ashspent sorbent handling system ($x1000) | $19028 | $19344 | $19250 | $19012 | |||||
Accessory electric plant ($x1000) | $93584 | $95138 | $94675 | $93505 | |||||
Instrumentation amp control ($x1000) | $31654 | $32180 | $32023 | $31627 | |||||
Improvements to site ($x1000) | $18063 | $18363 | $18274 | $18048 | |||||
Buildings amp structures ($x1000) | $71531 | $72719 | $72365 | $71471 | |||||
TPC without PCC ($x1000) | $1258220 | $1279119 | $1272887 | $1257162 | |||||
PCC cost ($x1000) | $632138 | $642638 | $642769 | $633945 | |||||
COE ($MWh wo TampS) | $13686 | $13330 | $13279 | $11848 | |||||
COE ($MWh w TampS) | $14646 | $14316 | $14256 | $12807 | |||||
Fuel Costs ($MWh) | $3084 | $3165 | $3139 | $3048 | |||||
Variable Costs ($MWh) | $2023 | $1474 | $1474 | $1461 | |||||
Fixed Costs ($MWh) | $1517 | $1532 | $1529 | $1372 | |||||
Capital Costs ($MWh) | $7062 | $7159 | $7136 | $5967 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($ton wo TampS) | $7069 | $6450 | $6440 | $4804 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT wo TampS) | $6413 | $5851 | $5842 | $4358 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Captured ($MT w TampS) | $7514 | $6952 | $6943 | $5458 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MT) | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | $1101 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($) | $46312929 | $47467476 | $47122241 | $46254722 | |||||
CO2 TSM Cost ($MWh) | $960 | $985 | $977 | $959 | |||||
Coal handling amp conveying (kWe) | 480 | 492 | 488 | 479 | |||||
Pulverizers | 3370 | 3454 | 3429 | 3366 | |||||
Sorbent handling amp reagent preparation (kWe) | 1070 | 1097 | 1089 | 1069 | |||||
Ash handling (kWe) | 780 | 799 | 794 | 779 | |||||
Primary air fans (kWe) | 1670 | 1712 | 1699 | 1668 | |||||
Forced draft fans (kWe) | 2130 | 2183 | 2167 | 2127 | |||||
Induced draft fans (kWe) | 8350 | 8558 | 8496 | 8340 | |||||
SCR (kWe) | 60 | 61 | 61 | 60 | |||||
Activated carbon injection (kWe) | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |||||
Dry sorbent injection (kWe) | 108 | 111 | 110 | 108 | |||||
Baghouse (kWe) | 110 | 113 | 112 | 110 | |||||
Wet FGD (kWe) | 3550 | 3638 | 3612 | 3546 | |||||
PCC plant auxiliaries (kWe) | 16000 | 16399 | 27280 | 16090 | |||||
CO2 compression (kWe) | 35690 | 36580 | 36314 | 35645 | |||||
Miscellaneous balance of plant (kWe) | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | |||||
Steam turbine auxiliaries (kWe) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||||
Condensate pumps (kWe) | 640 | 656 | 651 | 639 | |||||
Circulating water pumps (kWe) | 7750 | 7943 | 7885 | 7740 | |||||
Ground water pumps (kWe) | 710 | 710 | 710 | 710 | |||||
Cooling tower fans (kWe) | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | 4010 | |||||
Transformer losses (kWe) | 2380 | 2439 | 2422 | 2377 | |||||
Total auxiliaries (kWe) | 91285 | 93383 | 103756 | 91289 | |||||
Net plant heat rate (BTUkWh) | 10498 | 10775 | 10686 | 10485 | |||||
Condenser cooling duty (GJhr) | 1867 | 1914 | 1900 | 1865 | |||||
Limestone sorbent flowrate (kghr) | 22213 | 22767 | 22601 | 22185 | |||||
Raw water withdrawal (m3min) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||
Raw water consumption (m3min) | 23 | 24 | 24 | 23 | |||||
NOx (MTyear) | 1517 | 1555 | 1544 | 1515 | |||||
Particulates (MTyear) | 195 | 200 | 198 | 195 | |||||
Hg (kgyear) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
SO2 (MTyear) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
COE Reduction (w TampS) | 256 | 025 | -017 | -1031 | |||||
COE Reduction (wo TampS) | 275 | 008 | -031 | -1105 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (wo TampS) | 1057 | 088 | 073 | -2487 | |||||
Cost of CO2 Reduction (w TampS) | 888 | 074 | 061 | -2090 | |||||
PCC Plant Cost Reduction | 000 | -166 | -168 | -029 |
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Item | Unit | Value | Results for 2 boilers at Abbott | ||||||
Temperature | deg F | 200 | |||||||
Pressure (gauge) | psig | 075 | |||||||
Gas composition | |||||||||
Moisture | vol | 192 | |||||||
CO2 | vol (dry) | 92 | |||||||
O2 | vol (dry) | 735 | |||||||
SO2 | ppmv (wet) | 177 | |||||||
NOx | ppmv (wet) | 211 |
High velocity water spray-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by RWE amp tested in Niederaussem Germany at lignite-fired coal power plant
Mechanism of actionWater circulates in loop at high velocity and contacts aerosol particles using a spray nozzle comprised of very small holes Contacting spray causes condensation and growth of particles that are then captured in loop and removed from vapor phase
PerformanceHigh velocity spray-based pretreatment reduced amine losses ~15-18 times during testing at 045 MWe PCC pilot in Niederaussum that began in 20091
16
1) P Moser G Vorberg T Stoffregen et A The wet electrostatic precipitator as a cause of mist formation ndash Results from the amine-based post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 41 (2015) 229ndash238
Typical inlet flue gas conditions ~160 degF ~1 bara~12 mol CO2 (wet)
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate new nozzle amp perforated tray designs and the impact of several operating conditions (flows temperatures etc) on performance
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Advanced ESP-based aerosol pretreatment technologyDeveloped by Washington University in St Louis (WUSTL) and tested at NCCC in Wilsonville AL on 65 slpm flue gas sample
17
Mechanism of actionESP applies high voltage between plate and wire that ionizes flue gas aerosols Ionized particles are diverted towards collecting plates for removal WUSTLrsquos system will incorporate a patented photo-ionizer technology that enhances particle capture efficiency
PerformanceBased on flue gas testing at the Linde-BASF 15 MWe pilot at NCCC in 2016 WUSTLrsquos ESP is expected to provide 98-99 removal efficiency for 1000 scfm gas flow and a specific collection area (SCA) of 95 m2(m3s) which can be increased to remove more particles in the size range of 10-500 nm1
TestsPlanned tests will evaluate voltage amp current effects and the impact of the photo-ionizer on ESP performance
1) Y Wang Z Li P Biswas Aerosol Measurements in Coal Combustor Exhaust Gas on 15 MWe Advanced Aqueous Amine-Based PCC Pilot Plant in Wilsonville AL Washington University in St Louis August 8 2016
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Economic amp technical advantages and potential challenges of each technology
18
Scenario DOE-NETL Case B12B PP w 90 CO2
capture
Case 1 PP w 90 CO2 capture high-velocity spray aerosol
pretreatment
Case 2 PP w90 CO2 capture novel ESP aerosol pretreatment
Baghouse Yes No No
Added CAPEX w aerosol pretreatment ($)
NA $3261720 $2338318
Added energy consumption w aerosol pretreatment (MW)
NA 11 132
Total Overnight Cost ($) $2384351816 $2356810371 $2328373523
PCC plant specific energy consumption (MJkg CO2)
248 248 248
Cost of electricity wo TampS (COE $MWh)
$13320 $13305 $13131
Key advantages NA Manageable footprint amp high performance low CAPEX can easily be integrated into direct
contact cooler of PCC plant
Very small footprint amp high performance
low CAPEX amp OPEX
Potential challenges NA Higher energy consumption could lead to decreased power plant
efficiency
High voltage equipment can pose a safety concern scale-up of novel components may present issues
PP 550 MWe supercritical power plant with high flue gas aerosol concentrations leading to very high amine losses for an integrated PCC plant with no aerosol mitigation usedBaghouses require significant footprint area and power plant retrofit costs including shutdown periods baghouses also produce a pressure drop so flue gas fan power must be increased the costs associated with these factors are not included
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Technical ApproachHost Site Setup Innovation Targets Success Criteria amp Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
19
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Pilot host site Abbott Power Plant at UIUC in Champaign IL
20
Abbott plant schematic and tie-in points to pilot skid
Abbott chosen as optimal host site for testing since aerosol concentrations were measured to be among the highest in scientific literature
Abbott plant aerial view
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Preliminary Pilot Skid Layout at Abbott Host Site
21
Inlet to Abbott Power Plant Stack
WUSTL ESP pretreatment
8 flue gas slipstream inlet piping
Flue gas supply conditions for
slipstreamP 075 psig
T 200degFF 500-1000 scfm
Flue gas flowmeter temperature meter pressure meter gas
composition analysis
Blower filter
Process Isolation
Valve
Linde high-velocity water
spray pretreatment
Upstream aerosol
measurement
Downstream blower pulls flue
gas due to pressure drop
Blower speed is varied to control flue gas flowrate
Optional sorbent-based SOx and NOx removal
8 flue gas slipstream
outlet piping
Process Isolation
Valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Flue gas outlet
isolation valve
Process Isolation
Valve
Downstream aerosol
measurement
Control system and gas
composition analysis
WUSL ESP control
computer
Electric Conduit Supply
Cooling Water
Supply and Return
Service Water Supply
Process condensate discharge to storage
tank
Batch condensate sampling for
analysis at UIUC
Flue gas inlet
isolation valve
Linde
WUSTL
OSBL
ISBL
COLOR KEY
Linde + WUSTL
Condensate treatment
and disposal
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Pilot Testing Innovation Targets
22
Parameter Rationale Expected target
Particle removal efficiency for 500-1000 scfm flue gas slipstream ()
Flue gas aerosol particles in size range 70-200 nm lead to amine losses in the treated gas of amine-based PCC plants
gt98
Cost competitiveness (COE = cost of electricity)
Reduced capital and operating costs are required for commercial application of enabling technologies for PCC
COE lt $13320MWh and cost of CO2 captured lt $58tonne when compared to DOE-NETL reference case B12B
Energy efficiency Low electricity consumption reduces parasitic load for enabling technologies
Energy consumption lt 14 MWe (threshold above which energy consumption greatly impacts COE and cost of CO2captured)
Environmental sustainability when integrated with PCC technology for supercritical coal-fired power plants without a baghouse
Minimal environmental impact is required to meet process safety amp regulatory requirements for customers
Process condensate adequately removed amp treated as needed ESP solids removed and treated as needed
Particle removal efficiency = (Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) - Particle concentration after aerosol pretreatment (cm3) )(Particle concentration before aerosol pretreatment (cm3) ) 100
when integrated with PCC technology for a 550 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant without a baghouse
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Decision Points and Success Criteria
23
Decision Point Date Success Criteria
Equipment procurement and fabrication of both aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation
11302018 bull Successful completion of designs HAZOPsafety reviews and engineering documents that have been accepted by host site and reviewed by NETL
bull Update of costs based on vendor quotes and cost proposal within budget
bull Preliminary parametric test matrix in accordance with FOA guidelines and agreement with NETL
Installation of aerosol pretreatment systems on site
08302019 bull Host site is prepared and ready to receive aerosol pretreatment systems for installation
Handover to testing team 11292019 bull Successful completion of commissioning activities
bull Close-out of action items related to construction and installation from HAZOPS and safety reviews
Start of testing phase 12022019 bull Finalization of a test matrix for the parametric testing campaign with minimal changes from preliminary test plan and agreement with NETL
bull Coal flue gas availability from host site Project closeout 11302020 bull Successful demonstration of test objectives
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Technical Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies
24
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Technical Risks
Material Compatibility Low Medium
bull Flue gas composition and analysis will be used as part of the design basis Material compatibility with corrosive contaminants in the flue gas can be addressed by host site and Linde Engineering experience with flue gas handling
Waste Handling Low Medium
bull Batch analysis of flue gas condensate and other liquid waste streams for regulatory compliance before disposal
bull Treated flue gas will be sent back to the Abbott power plant stack for monitoring before exhaust
bull Solid waste (flue gas particles) is expected to be low
Flue gas aerosol variability Medium Mediumbull The aerosol control methods being tested are expected to
work over wide ranges of aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions
Plugging process equipment Low Medium
bull The aerosol particle concentration in the Abbott flue gas has been measured The design and operation of all equipment components for each aerosol control module will be sufficient to prevent plugging based on these measurements and Linde Engineering experience with similar systems
Flue gas condition variability affecting aerosol measurements Low Medium
bull Online flue gas analysis (temperature composition pressure humidity etc) during testing team experience handling various flue gas qualities
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Resource amp Project Management Risks and Mitigation Strategies
25
Description of Risk Probability Impact Risk Management Mitigation and Response Strategies
Resource Risks
Flue gas and utility non-availability from power plant Medium High
bull Availability of required utilities will be confirmed with the host site and will be included as part of the design basis Power plant schedule will be confirmed prior to installation decision
Unavailability of operators and key individuals with experience and know-how Low Medium
bull Commitment from all participants to make project successful
bull Management of all team membersrsquo availability and schedule through resource planning
bull Team members have overlapping skills and knowledge and substitutions are possible
Project cost overruns Low Highbull Clear scope definition and specifications sent to vendors
and subcontractors for pricing suitable scope management and limit change orders
Equipmentmodule fabrication delay Low Medium
bull Project schedule includes contingency for delays in procurement or fabrication
bull Team will select reputable suppliers and obtain firm commitments during purchase order process
Project Management RisksPoor communication among team members Low Medium bull Maintain communication on a regular basis to align team
on decision making
Conflicts among team members Low Mediumbull Team members have existing relationships from
participation in prior projects and have worked well together in the past
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Progress and Current Project Status
Budget Period 1
26
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
27
Project Progress Status of Key Project Milestones (Budget Period 1)
Budget Period 1 (June 1 2018 ndash November 30 2018)
Completed
mdash Submit updated project management plan (06292018) radic
mdash Conduct kick-off meeting with DOE-NETL (07272018) radic
In Progress (planned completion by 11302018)
mdash Review and modeling effort of aerosol-driven amine loss mechanisms
mdash Design engineering and cost analysis for pilot skid
mdash Preliminary test plan drafted
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
Budget Period 2 (December 2018 ndash November 2019)
mdash Complete fabrication and procurement of aerosol pretreatment systems and components for installation (08302019)
mdash Complete site installation and commissioning of aerosol pretreatment systems ensure both systems are ready for testing (11292019)
Budget Period 3 (December 2019 ndash November 2020)
mdash Complete parametric testing of both aerosol pretreatment systems (05012020)
mdash Complete technology benchmarking and analysis close-out report based on test results (11302020) complete comparison against innovation targets and other state-of-the-art aerosol mitigation technologies found in literature (11302020)
mdash Dismantling and removal of test equipment and platform (11302020)
28
Key Project Milestones (Budget Periods 2 and 3) amp Future Plans
Future plans
Further scale-up of optimized aerosol pretreatment systems to be integrated with large-scale or demonstration PCC plants amp economic analysis to accurately understand cost implications when incorporated with PCC technology
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA
29
Thank you for your attention
Project DE-FE00315922018 NETL CO2 Capture Technology MeetingDevin Bostick Linde LLCAugust 16 2018Pittsburgh PA