Upload
watchlords-inc
View
216
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Renato Extra TTV For Saturday July 31st? Renato Watches samsonswatch 3 136 07-29-2010 11:17 AM Follow-Up Regarding The Invicta II Classique... General Invicta Watch Discussions timeman 37 626 07-28-2010 06:23 PM Thread Forum Last Poster Replies Views Last Post Diamonds In The Invicta II Women's Classique... General Invicta Watch Discussions WatchYaThink 67 1890 07-26-2010 02:15 PM Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Long Island, New York Posts: 5,069 Real Name: Jerry Senior Member True WatchGeek
Citation preview
timeman Senior Member True WatchGeek
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 5,069 Real Name: Jerry
Follow-Up Regarding The Invicta II Classique Boutique Diamonds Being Crystals
I opened a thread a few days ago regarding the Invicta II Women's Classique Boutique
Quartz Diamond Accent Stainless Steel Bracelet Watch - J179607, that I bought for my wife.
To recap, a diamond accent stone fell out of the bezel, and I brought it to a local jeweler to
replace it. Upon inspection the jeweler said the accent stones were not diamonds but
crystals. I spoke to the jeweler today, and he said he will draft an appraisal attesting to this
by the end of the week.
It was reported on my original thread that there was a mistake and two versions of this
watch were made. One being a diamond version and the other a crystal version. Each were
made for a different market, and the case backs got the same model number by mistake.
Invicta and ShopNBC are looking into the few customers who got the crystal version by
mistake, and will contact them to make matters right. As of this post I haven't heard from
either ShopNBC's or Invicta's customer service. I'm sure it's a tough job going through the
over 3200 watches that were sold, for the few customers who received the crystal version
instead of the diamond version. If I don't hear from either customer service shortly, I'll
notify them. My wife really enjoys the look of the watch, and to make matters right we'll
most likely exchange the the crystal version we received by mistake for the diamond
version.
For those geeks who wanted to be updated on this matter, the above is the most up to date
information I have.
__________________
3 Lastest Threads by timeman
Thread Forum Last Poster Replies Views Last Post
Renato Extra TTV For Saturday July 31st? Renato Watches samsonswatch 3 136 07-29-2010 11:17 AM
Follow-Up Regarding The Invicta II Classique... General Invicta Watch Discussions timeman 37 626 07-28-2010 06:23
PM
Diamonds In The Invicta II Women's Classique... General Invicta Watch Discussions WatchYaThink 67 1890 07-26-2010 02:15 PM
timeman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to timeman
Find all posts by timeman
Add timeman to Your Contacts
#2
Yesterday, 06:27 PM
QMZ Senior Member
Super Geek
Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Lake Stevens, WA
Posts: 1,282
Real Name: Ryan
2 versions, 1 model number? weird to say the least.
__________________
QMZ
View Public Profile
Send a private message to QMZ
Find all posts by QMZ
Add QMZ to Your Contacts
#3
Yesterday, 06:28 PM
jlovesseconds Senior Member
Super Geek
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: durham nc.
Posts: 2,100 Real Name: joe
as long as your satisfied is what matters
jlovesseconds
View Public Profile
Send a private message to jlovesseconds
Send email to jlovesseconds
Find all posts by jlovesseconds
Add jlovesseconds to Your Contacts
#4
Yesterday, 06:33 PM
Mr Horology WatchGeeks VIP
True WatchGeek
Join Date: May 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 15,361 Real Name: Mr Horology Aka Mehdi.
As long as they get it taken care of, that's what matters.
__________________
Watchmaker - Jewelry maker
Horology (The art of measuring time)
(Watchgeeks in house Watchmaker)
(Automatic & Mechanical Chronograph specialist)
Mr Horology
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Mr Horology
Send email to Mr Horology
Visit Mr Horology's homepage!
Find all posts by Mr Horology
Add Mr Horology to Your Contacts
#5
Yesterday, 06:37 PM
CecilG41 Member
Member Geek
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Louisiana Posts: 64
Real Name: Gary
I hope I am getting the Diamond Version that I expected. I ordered this same watch for my
Wife Sunday. Is should be here Friday.
CecilG41
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CecilG41
Send email to CecilG41
Find all posts by CecilG41
Add CecilG41 to Your Contacts
#6
Yesterday, 06:40 PM
reddog416 Senior Member Senior Geek
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Panama City Florida
Posts: 221
Real Name: Ray (Red)
Wow, unreal
__________________
Ray (reddog416)
reddog416
View Public Profile
Send a private message to reddog416
Send email to reddog416
Find all posts by reddog416
Add reddog416 to Your Contacts
#7
Yesterday, 06:43 PM
rbart Senior Member
Veteran Geek
Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: RI
Posts: 697
Real Name: Ron Bartone
Diamonds VS Crystals
FYI, in most cases the crystal versions look a lot better than the diamond ones when you are
deal with 1 to 5 point diamonds. It all depends on the quality of the diamonds.
I have seen the Stuhrling womens watches, same models in both and the crystals looked
much better. When you get down to diamonds that small the crystals are really not that
much less expensive either.
Ron
__________________
rbart
rbart
View Public Profile
Send a private message to rbart
Send email to rbart
Find all posts by rbart
Add rbart to Your Contacts
#8
Yesterday, 06:46 PM
JavaQueen Senior Member
Super Geek
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 1,727
Well, it is good you posted this.
JavaQueen
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JavaQueen
Find all posts by JavaQueen
Add JavaQueen to Your Contacts
#9
Yesterday, 06:54 PM
gdevine Member
Member Geek
Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Pompano Beach, FL
Posts: 75
Real Name: Geno
Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaQueen
Well, it is good you posted this.
Yes, I agree...good you posted the update Timeman. Big companies make small mistakes
(sometimes big; think BP) and it happens. God only know how many mistakes I've made in
business and I am successful (at least I think so ).
It was also GREAT to see Jim literally jump all over this situation right away as well. Says
something about him and his loyalty to his customers...seriously.
You will have a good outcome in the end.
gdevine
View Public Profile
Send a private message to gdevine
Find all posts by gdevine
Add gdevine to Your Contacts
#10
Yesterday, 07:06 PM
JoeH Senior Member Super Geek
Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Machester, Ct.
Posts: 2,207
Real Name: Joe H
Keep up in the loop, I know Jim will help you out...
__________________
Joe
JoeH
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JoeH
Send email to JoeH
Find all posts by JoeH
Add JoeH to Your Contacts
#11
Yesterday, 07:18 PM
WatchGeek4Life Senior Member
Super Geek
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,513
Real Name: Jim
Thanks for the update jerry, Kudos to shop to be all over this so quickly and trying
to get it straightend out. My daughter had her's tested at work today.....they are
diamonds, so she is cool. __________________
Breitling Bentley
WatchGeek4Life
View Public Profile
Send a private message to WatchGeek4Life
Find all posts by WatchGeek4Life
Add WatchGeek4Life to Your Contacts
#12
Yesterday, 07:27 PM
timeman Senior Member
True WatchGeek
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 5,069
Real Name: Jerry
Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchGeek4Life
Thanks for the update jerry, Kudos to shop to be all over this so quickly and
trying to get it straightend out. My daughter had her's tested at work
today.....they are diamonds, so she is cool.
Happy to hear it Jim. Even thought J179607 is listed as closed, they still had about 20
available when my original thread came out. I'm hoping they were locked down due to
SNBC's and Invicta's investigation into this matter.
I think if anyone has any doubt they should have their watch appraised also.
__________________
timeman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to timeman
Find all posts by timeman
Add timeman to Your Contacts
#13
Yesterday, 07:33 PM
curiousgeorge Senior Member
Master WatchGeek
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mpls Posts: 2,558
Real Name: George
Good to hear you are probably going to get a happy ending. I love happy endings!
curiousgeorge
View Public Profile
Send a private message to curiousgeorge
Find all posts by curiousgeorge
Add curiousgeorge to Your Contacts
#14
Yesterday, 07:36 PM
aquacleaner Senior Member
Veteran Geek
Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Buffalo N.Y.
Posts: 583
Real Name: Jerry
Man u know how women hate fake stones especially when they thik they r real
U can really get into the dog house that way
__________________
Yessss. We're in the "WEED Business". We don't smoke em, We Suck them Up !!!
aquacleaner
View Public Profile
Send a private message to aquacleaner
Send email to aquacleaner
Visit aquacleaner's homepage!
Find all posts by aquacleaner
Add aquacleaner to Your Contacts
#15
Yesterday, 07:38 PM
timeman Senior Member
True WatchGeek
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 5,069
Real Name: Jerry
Quote:
Originally Posted by aquacleaner
Man u know how women hate fake stones especially when they thik they r real
U can really get into the dog house that way
This incident didn't help me getting on her good side to offset my watch purchases. lol.
__________________
timeman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to timeman
Find all posts by timeman
Add timeman to Your Contacts
#16
Yesterday, 07:40 PM
kingswords Senior Member
Veteran Geek
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Nu Joisey Posts: 823
Real Name: Ken
Keep us up to date. I feel a little better as a result of your post but you're the one who has
the watch. I still think Invicta should get it together.
__________________
"Time wounds all heals." Mr Peabody
kingswords
View Public Profile
Send a private message to kingswords
Send email to kingswords
Find all posts by kingswords
Add kingswords to Your Contacts
#17
Yesterday, 07:52 PM
timeman Senior Member
True WatchGeek
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 5,069 Real Name: Jerry
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingswords
Keep us up to date. I feel a little better as a result of your post but you're the one who has
the watch. I still think Invicta should get it together.
I don't know how SNBC and Invicta will determine who got the crystal model. You would
think the watches are already in the yellow box, and just needs packaging. Furthermore, the
watches don't have serial number to know which ones are diamonds or crystal. That's why
I'm going to notify them shortly.
__________________
timeman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to timeman
Find all posts by timeman
Add timeman to Your Contacts
#18
Yesterday, 08:59 PM
sherm Senior Member True WatchGeek
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,489
I got an Android Octopuz with diamonds from the 12 to 3 on the Bezel. It came with a
certificate signed by Wing.
I don't know yet if I have the crystal or diamond Classique. I know in the scheme of things
this isn't high on the priority list; however, hearing this story and reading some of the
findings is reiterating my interest to check out the one I have.
I must clarify that I was under the impression from the sales pitch that these watches had
real diamonds on the bezel and reading the crystal/diamond mix up story; is a mystery I'd
like solved.
__________________
~ Sherm ~ ~
Like a POWDERKEG!!!
JS
sherm
View Public Profile
Send a private message to sherm
Find all posts by sherm
Add sherm to Your Contacts
#19
Today, 03:52 AM
timeman Senior Member True WatchGeek
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 5,069 Real Name: Jerry
Quote:
Originally Posted by sherm
I must clarify that I was under the impression from the sales pitch that these watches had
real diamonds on the bezel and reading the crystal/diamond mix up story; is a mystery I'd
like solved.
It was in the sales pitch during the original presentation on June 29th and subsequent ones.
It was mentioned numerous times that the watch had 42 genuine diamonds, on the bezel
and links by the case. Not only was it mentioned on air, it's listed on the web site under the
J#. There was NEVER any mention of there being a crystal version up to my original thread.
__________________
timeman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to timeman
Find all posts by timeman
Add timeman to Your Contacts
#20
Today, 08:37 AM
kdh1949 Senior Member
Veteran Geek
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 503
Real Name: Kenneth
With the same model number an no serial number on either the watch with diamonds or the
one with crystals, I think Shop is going to have some trouble determining who got which
one. I don't envy anyone THAT task.
kdh1949
View Public Profile
Send a private message to kdh1949
Send email to kdh1949
Find all posts by kdh1949
Add kdh1949 to Your Contacts
#21
Today, 09:01 AM
Onceinawhile Junior Member New Geek
Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Carrollton, GA
Posts: 11
Real Name: Sam
Thanks for the followup Timeman, but is there any new information here that wasn't in your
original thread?
EDIT: After posting this and reading it, it sounded like I was taking a shot at you Timeman,
which isn't the case at all. I was just wondering what was in this thread to make anyone
"feel better" about this debacle?
__________________
For I will not trust in my bow, neither shall my sword save me.
Onceinawhile
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Onceinawhile
Find all posts by Onceinawhile
Add Onceinawhile to Your Contacts
#22
Today, 09:05 AM
timeman Senior Member True WatchGeek
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 5,069
Real Name: Jerry
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdh1949
With the same model number an no serial number on either the watch with diamonds or
the one with crystals, I think Shop is going to have some trouble determining who got
which one. I don't envy anyone THAT task.
If the stone didn't fall out which resulted going to the jeweler, my wife would still think she
had a diamond watch. I'm sure most of the people who have the crystal version have no
idea the stones are not diamonds. That's why it's imperative that SNBC and Invicta
determines who has these watches and notifies them.
__________________
timeman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to timeman
Find all posts by timeman
Add timeman to Your Contacts
#23
Today, 09:13 AM
timeman Senior Member True WatchGeek
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 5,069
Real Name: Jerry
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onceinawhile
Thanks for the followup Timeman, but is there any new information here that wasn't in
your original thread?
EDIT: After posting this and reading it, it sounded like I was taking a shot at you Timeman,
which isn't the case at all. I was just wondering what was in this thread to make anyone
"feel better" about this debacle?
The only new news is I'm still waiting to hear from either SNBC or Invicta on this matter. It
was requested that people who received the crystal version should wait and not call CS,
because it was still being worked on by management. So if you did call the CS
representative would probably have no idea what you were talking about. However, if I don't
hear something by the beginning of next week, I'll notify both CS departments. There is
really nothing to feel better about at the moment in my case. Hopefully there will be shortly.
__________________
timeman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to timeman
Find all posts by timeman
Add timeman to Your Contacts
#24
Today, 09:15 AM
Onceinawhile Junior Member
New Geek
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Carrollton, GA
Posts: 11 Real Name: Sam
Thanks for replying Time
__________________
For I will not trust in my bow, neither shall my sword save me.
Onceinawhile
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Onceinawhile
Find all posts by Onceinawhile
Add Onceinawhile to Your Contacts
#25
Today, 09:31 AM
WatchYaThink Senior Member
Master WatchGeek
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 3,028
Real Name: Larry
First, I don't think that any questions have actually yet been answered. The reply was too
vague and doesn't make any sense when you think about it. Of course, we can't blame Jim
for that because snbc has asked him not to comment, so he needs to be very careful about
whatever he says.
I don't have access to the one I purchased as it was given as a gift. I do know that the
model number on the caseback was '0132'. When I go to the Invicta website and search for
this model number, I can't locate it.
I have purchased several other Classique models that have diamond accents, it SEEMS to
me this was the first one that was produced with fake diamonds, and has a model number
that I can't locate on the Invicta website .... when it was stated that "different models were
produced for different markets" .... that's very vague, but can we imply from that then that
the crystal version was made just for ShopNBC? AND, if that is the case, then wouldn't we
expect that all of the inventory were crystal versions and not real diamond versions? That is
just an assumption of course, but given the circumstances it appeas it could be logical.
BUT, if in fact only a few were crystal versions and the rest were real diamonds, how can
ShopNBC know which customers received which versions in order to contact them? Does
ShopNBC plan to contact all purchasers? That seems to be a legitimate question. If there
were only a few with crystals, then there are a lot of cusomters out there with this watch
that have actual diamonds, and someone should be able to take it in and get them verified
and report here. If we could even hear one report from one customer that they bought this
watch and verified that it had real diamonds as advertised, then I would feel a lot better
about the whole situation.
Yes, this could just be a simple "caseback / inventory" mistake that just involves a "few"
watches ..... BUT, it could also be something much worse than that. And the point is,
without receiving some detailed answers we do not know which is the case. Given the recent
history with Invicta the inclination at this point is not to give them the benefit of the doubt,
and they should recognize that, and they should proactively be coming forth with all of the
details.
By the way, although shop no longer lists this model as available, there are some in
inventory at WOW. I have emailed the CS at WOW and asked them if they can verify for me
whether or not the models they currently have in stock feature real diamonds (as described)
or whether they are acutally made with crystals. I am waiting to hear back from them.
__________________ "He who marches in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, for him a spinal cord would fully suffice" - Albert Einstein
sunaru Senior Member
Senior Geek
Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: THA BRONX
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by curiousgeorge
good to hear you are probably going to get a happy ending. I love happy endings!
what man doesn't?
sunaru
View Public Profile
Send a private message to sunaru
Find all posts by sunaru
Add sunaru to Your Contacts
#27
Today, 09:41 AM
samuelrz Senior Member
Super Geek
Join Date: May 2009 Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 1,374
Real Name: Sam
WTH? Crystal. Really? This reminds me of the specially made, LE, Meteorite Lupah last year
where "some" had mineral crystals instead of Flame Fusion. The SHOP needs to sends a
letter to anyone who purchased one letting them know they may not have diamonds.
A couple years ago there was another issue with the Renato Carat count and quality of some
models. From what I remember Daniel Mink was all over it since it was his reputation on the
line. I don't expect this issue will get any attention, but it wouldn't surprise me if "mix ups"
like this are more common than we know. Where models intended for different global
markets get mashed together. Just sayin this doesn't surprise me.
__________________
SAM -
samuelrz
View Public Profile
Send a private message to samuelrz
Send email to samuelrz
Find all posts by samuelrz
Add samuelrz to Your Contacts
#28
Today, 09:53 AM
morrison2951 Senior Member
Veteran Geek
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: F-V, NC
Posts: 823 Real Name: Scott
Sometimes the Invicta descriptions themselves can be in error- about 4 years ago there was
an uproar when the 3824 LE Diamond Diver description inadvertently listed the diamond
hour markers as "CZ's." The diamonds were later verified by Eyal himself and the item
correction was promptly made.
morrison2951
View Public Profile
Send a private message to morrison2951
Find all posts by morrison2951
Add morrison2951 to Your Contacts
#29
Today, 10:38 AM
X-James Senior Member
Senior Geek
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchYaThink
By the way, although shop no longer lists this model as available, there are some in
inventory at WOW. I have emailed the CS at WOW and asked them if they can verify for
me whether or not the models they currently have in stock feature real diamonds (as
described) or whether they are acutally made with crystals. I am waiting to hear back from
them.
Ya know I just have to ask but just how are they going to know? Do you think they are going
to open packages and look? Maybe randomly take 5 or 8 watches to a jeweler and ask them
to verify they are real diamonds?
Seriously why drag WoW into this by even questioning them? Why not just call Rebeca at
Invicta and ask her ... nobody has yet to make that suggestion.
In the end it will probably turn out it was all a typo in the descriptions and it should have
read diamond like accents or something like that.
I bought the quartz 3 hander Classique J179021 with the blue sandstone when it aired
months ago. The description says "20 authentic white diamond accents"? Do I think they are
diamonds? Did I buy it because of the "20 authentic white diamond accents"? No I dont
think they are authentic diamods and they glass bits on the bezel had nothing to do with the
purchase. I honestly wish they were not there at all and it was just a smooth plain bezel and
they almost kept from purchasing the watch because the look is gaudy and have no diamond
look at all to them.
Sorry about that little rant but come on people ... do we really need to make a Supreme
Court case out of this? Do we honestly believe them to be diamonds and if they are to be of
any quality? Possibly under the crystals are little time diamond dust chips and crystals are
there to protect the diamond dust chips but do we really need to make a supreme court case
out of this?
If anyone is not happy with this they should call ShopNBC, tell them they are not satisfied
with the product and they think it was improperly described and they want to return it and
have there shipping charges refunded because it is not what they said it was and then just
be done with it all.
X-James
View Public Profile
Send a private message to X-James
Find all posts by X-James
Add X-James to Your Contacts
#30
Today, 10:44 AM
nferr Senior Member
Veteran Geek
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 505
If something is advertised and promoted as having 42 diamonds don't you think the buyer
should expect diamonds? Doesn't matter if they're diamond accents. Still should be diamond
- not crystal.
nferr
View Public Profile
Send a private message to nferr
Find all posts by nferr
Add nferr to Your Contacts
#31
Today, 10:53 AM
timeman Senior Member
True WatchGeek
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Long Island, New York Posts: 5,069
Real Name: Jerry
Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchYaThink
If we could even hear one report from one customer that they bought this watch and
verified that it had real diamonds as advertised, then I would feel a lot better about the
whole situation.
From post #11 of this thread. Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchGeek4Life
Thanks for the update jerry, Kudos to shop to be all over this so quickly and
trying to get it straightend out. My daughter had her's tested at work
today.....they are diamonds, so she is cool.
__________________
timeman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to timeman
Find all posts by timeman
Add timeman to Your Contacts
#32
Today, 10:59 AM
WatchYaThink Senior Member Master WatchGeek
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sunnyvale, CA Posts: 3,028
Real Name: Larry
Thanks Jerry ... guess I missed that. Well, that does make me feel a little bit better, at least
there were some of these produced with real diamonds. So that means that this was not just
a mixup in the description.
By the way, is this the identical watch??:
http://www.smartbargains.com/go.sb?p...eptid=6&isrw=4
__________________ "He who marches in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, for him a spinal cord would fully suffice" - Albert Einstein
WatchYaThink
View Public Profile
Send a private message to WatchYaThink
Send email to WatchYaThink
Find all posts by WatchYaThink
Add WatchYaThink to Your Contacts
#33
Today, 11:10 AM
MamboKing Senior Member
Veteran Geek
Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Quad Cities (Moline, IL.)
Posts: 718
Real Name: Joe
This whole thing is really crazy. Same serial number for diamonds vs crystals models?
Doesn't make good sense to me.
MamboKing
View Public Profile
Send a private message to MamboKing
Find all posts by MamboKing
Add MamboKing to Your Contacts
#34
Today, 01:23 PM
timeman Senior Member
True WatchGeek
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 5,069 Real Name: Jerry
Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchYaThink
Thanks Jerry ... guess I missed that. Well, that does make me feel a little bit better, at
least there were some of these produced with real diamonds. So that means that this was
not just a mixup in the description.
By the way, is this the identical watch??:
http://www.smartbargains.com/go.sb?p...eptid=6&isrw=4
My wife's watch is the two tone, it does look very similar.
__________________
timeman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to timeman
Find all posts by timeman
Add timeman to Your Contacts
#35
Today, 02:33 PM
andrea Junior Member
Member Geek
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 29
Now, I don't want to step on anyone's shoes but think that there has been no resolution for
this situation. Yes, it's is reassuring that Jim has made statements but like he said, it's a
customer service issue. Unfortunately Jim has to wear many hats, so to speak. But, I for
one, feel a little 'unsettled' regarding this matter. This seeems to be another case of
mistaken identity. Crystal issues with the Reseve Lupah were found to not be Flame Fusion
as presented, the D.D. movement issues, and now this particular watch, found to have
crystals instead of diamonds as marketed. Obviously, this is not a Shop NBC isssue, but
come on Invicta.....Get It Together. I love Invicta's time pieces and will continue to purchase
but as Jim stated about this particular watch, "These are serious accusations." Is it that
Invicta has become so large that quality control and attention to detail is not their highest
priority? What do you guy's think?
andrea
View Public Profile
Send a private message to andrea
Find all posts by andrea
Add andrea to Your Contacts
#36
Today, 02:38 PM
tampa8 Senior Member
Super Geek
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tampa FLorida & Storrs Ct Posts: 1,199
Trying to stay within the rules set by an owner of the site, I will say this. Too many problems
over too many watches for me to consider a new Invicta, been that way for me since
January. And I agree it is not a Shop problem overall.
__________________
You mean what time is it now?
tampa8
View Public Profile
Send a private message to tampa8
Find all posts by tampa8
Add tampa8 to Your Contacts
#37
Today, 02:41 PM
Time Bandit Senior Member Veteran Geek
Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 797
Quote:
Originally Posted by timeman
My wife's watch is the two tone, it does look very similar.
Here's the two tone
http://www.overstock.com
Today: $27.49
But this one has Crystals in it, not Diamonds.
Time Bandit
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Time Bandit
Send email to Time Bandit
Find all posts by Time Bandit
Add Time Bandit to Your Contacts
#38
Today, 03:35 PM
timeman Senior Member
True WatchGeek
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Long Island, New York Posts: 5,069
Real Name: Jerry
This is a photo of the two tone from SBNC.
__________________