Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 11/27/2018 · Representative for the Estate of PETER CUMMINGS, and DIANNE CUMMINGS, Individually UNOPPOSED SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XNOV 1 3 2013IN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

;

MY5 S U : " !'

X

GIOVANNI COLONNA and ASSUNTA COLONNA, Index No.: 102153/2003

Plaintiffs,NO-OPPOSHTON ONof 9os <!:c>SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

.1-V.-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,including, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO.,

t

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE, defendant, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing

the complaint against J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, with prejudice and after notice to

all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is••

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims - against defendant J.H. FRANCE

REFRACTORIES COMPANY, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkAJdjeM^-cr s 2018

A

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for PlaintiffsGiovanni Colonna, et al(212) 558-5500

Eva S. Wayne, Esq.MALABY& BRADLEY, LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneys for DefendantJ.H. France Refractories Company(212) 791-0285

hSO ORDERED, DATED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.

ftHM-

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ s.c NOV 27 2018

{00098348.}COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK '! |r; LD "1 ! [Lni rx

NYCALPart 13(Mendez, J.)

NOV 1 3 2018IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

PART ITNYS SUPREME COURT - CiVIL

XIndex No. 190136/2011FRANCIS G. FEE, SR. and MARY FEE, his wife,

Plaintiffs,UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

-against-A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, et al„

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, Defendant Henkel Corporation, f/k/a Henkel Loctite Corporation, as successor to

Permatex Company, Inc. requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Henkel Corporation, f/k/a Henkel

Loctite Corporation as successor to Permatex Company, Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against Defendant Henkel Corporation, f/k/a Henkel

Loctite Corporation as successor to Permatex Company, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New&

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorneys for Plaintiffs *Wilentz Goldman & Spitzer, P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038P: (212) 267-3091

een Marron Trabold, Esq.Attorneys for Defendant Henkel Corporation, f/k/aHenkel Loctite Corporation as successor toPermatex Company, Inc.Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP77 Water Street, Suite 2100, NY, NY 10005P: (212) 232-130

K

F I L ENOV 2 7 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SO ORDERED,MANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.

MANUEL J.MENDEZJ S C

4843-2780-6585.1

j I P 1 ''

' / /! Li : : ’SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK. . . j 1 ;

NOV 1 4 2018NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

1 J

j r;vs Ii i f;

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190284/2011

DIANNE CUMMINGS, as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of PETERCUMMINGS, and DIANNE CUMMINGS,Individually

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WFIEREFORE, defendant Crosby Valve, LLC (identified in the complaint as FMC

CORP., on behalf of its former subsidiary Crosby Valve Inc.) (“ Crosby” ) requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Crosby with prejudice, and after notice to all

co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Crosby are dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York/0 , of , 2018

Kate Chetta, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Crosby Valve, LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003

F I L E DSO ORDERED, NOV 2 7 }oi8

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENfcW YORK

Hon. Manuel Mendez, J. S. C.MANUELJ.MENDEZ

J.S.c3574356

j ’ L /

NOV 13 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK r 3

NYS S(J r • COURT - C!VILNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XJOSEPH FOSTER and VICTORIA FOSTER,

Index No. 190411/11Plaintiff(s),


-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendant PFIZER INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint and

cross-claims against defendant PFIZER INC.with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is,

ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant PFIZER INC. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: ?/^//y//tu

Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantPfizer Inc.

T .ipHsav TYiiionn FigWEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C

F I L E D MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.CNOV 2 7 $018


i D> !rni ;

.L.

' ! (

V Li


NOV 1 4 2018NYS su,r>. - -;


NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)


RALPH N. BORELLI and ANNE BORELLIUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Crosby Valve, LLC (“ Crosby” ) requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against Crosby with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Crosby are dismissed with


New York, New Yorkl O ( Q> ( , 2018

Dated:

7

Kafe Chetta, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Crosby Valve, LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281

o?thgfQift, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003

F S L E CSO ORDERED,

NOV 2 7 2018Hon. Manuel Mendez, J. S. C.

MANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C


3577029


NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)Index No: 190116/2011


This Document Relates to:

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

HELEN T. GORMAN, INDIVIDUALLY ANDAS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THEHEIRS AND ESTATE OF THOMAS P.GORMAN, ;! if ' \rr •

Plaintiff,vs. NOV 13 2018A.O. SMITH CORP., ET AL.,

Defendants. PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

WHEREFORE, defendant Grinnell LLC hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffscomplaint against Grinnell LLC, and its affiliate companies, with prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, all

claims and cross-claims against Grinnell LLC, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are

hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York//CA/Ptf^pc | , 2018

rDavid Chandler, Esq.Erik P. Karst, Esq.Douglas von Oiste, Esq.Karst & von Oiste, LLP576 5th Avenue, Suite 706New York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 764-3900

Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

E DFNOV 27


SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel .1. Mendez IIAID - xynoD aw3^dns SAN

n idvd

MANUEL J. MENDEZj.s r 8102 81 AON

a )3iVV.


NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez)

Index No: 111932/2003




WILLIAM R VESELY AND DIANEVESELY,

Plaintiffs,vs.A.O. SMITH CORP., et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York

Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York

International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,

without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is


claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest

to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without


Dated: New York, New York

IV<• I , 2018


Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233

j l E • :truESO ORDERED, E!Hon. Manuel J. MendezNOV 1 3 2013MANUEL J. MENDEZ

j.s.rNOV 27 2018


INYS SUPR



Index No: 103796/1999



JOSEPH WOJCIECH, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff,

vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,

Defendants.



Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant York








m< ( , 2018

bene L' ny,—Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233

SO ORDERED, .•j ; 1Lru Li: h .Hon. Manuel J. MendezF I L E D - j

NOV 1 3 2013MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.CNOV 2 7 2018 r '.rr 13

NYS SUPRE. -lr COURT - CIVIL




Index No: 102460/1999



WILBUR WRIGHT, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff,

vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et aL,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to YorkCorporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil









\ y , 2018



r; nF

•-. -u

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez NOV 1 3 2013MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.cNOV 27 2018 NYS suw:




Index No: 103584/1999




EDWARD WILSHUSEN,

Plaintiff,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,

Defendants.










Dated: New York, New York(\<N‘ IV , 2018

(khcrj.f — 6 ^



r; ! VTlCjO)L \J iL-r lL-V

NOV 1 3 2013F! Ill lii V ?

Hon. Manuel J. MendezNOV 2 7 2018 MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.CP.*\TT 13

NYS SUPRl-r COURT - CIVILCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK


NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)Index No: 190116/2011


This Document Relates to:HELEN T. GORMAN, INDIVIDUALLY ANDAS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THEHEIRS AND ESTATE OF THOMAS P.GORMAN,


Plaintiff,vs.

A.O. SMITH CORP., ET AL.,Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., now known as Goulds Pumps LLC, herebyrequests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and RulesSection 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against Goulds Pumps Inc., now known as GouldsPumps LLC, and its affiliate companies, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, itis

ORDERED that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross-claims against Goulds Pumps Inc., now known as Goulds Pumps LLC, and itsaffiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.


A/ 0 tfg <* f )gr , 2018

MtAMMBeth L. Hughes, Esq:Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

David Chandler, Esq.Erik P. Karst, Esq.Douglas von Oiste, Esq.Karst & von Oiste, LLP576 5th Avenue, Suite 706New York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 764-3900

ID) in(TOIL i I.SO ORDERED, i! \y E i LHon. Manuel J. MendezF I L E D NOV 13 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNOV 2 7 2018COUNTY CLERK*OFFICENEW YORK

f •*T‘ « i*.y

1 \t' } i!ru ^

;:: igÊD• i\ ‘».y

NOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

13— X \ :NYS ;rr - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)— X

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 116200/2002

UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

FRANK BESIGNANO,

_— Xttmum WIWMwt wmnf ww <

WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.,requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorkmmaTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLQs/h/a Rockbestos Inc.

&2

By: By:Andrew J. Mundo

515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

rF S L E LSO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C

NOV 2 7 3018COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

[TU V


l . ' .Vl’ 13NYS SIJPRul- i i COURT - CIVIL

- Xfwmwww wwiw— ii mi

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION


X



LIONEL L. BAIN,

Xm****** ««•»i


ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

hm/1

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC,s/h/a Rockbestos Inc

THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

5*

By:By:Andrew J. Mundo



F I L E DSO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C.

NOV 2 7 ‘2018


'V

ID)i . -• /; !

U li ;i


P.:\ Xr 13NYS SUY:3. . 3 COUKT - CIVILX



X

Index No.: 116209/2002This Document Relates to:


RONALD AMBROSIO,

X> — i — m mm tmm mm*

WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.,requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and

Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & Cable

LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & Cable

LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorkitlWA

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC,s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.


y

By:By:Andrew J. Mundo



4P iSO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ S C

m 11K'S OFF'c£

COUN^YORK

U Li


- X - CI' / IL* (Mi



XMM MW «» MW INK*» MM MM MM4*i .40


SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

ROBERT J. APERAWIC,

0MHM1— — IIMMMMM—WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & Cable

LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yotrk, New York7/3/ / o

* 9

IITHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire &pCable LLC,s/h/a Rockbestos Inc

By: _By:Andrew J. Mundo



F I L E $SO ORDERED:

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.NOV 27 tOW

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK — X> «•«>»«»*»•»«»«*« >«*«*



-X



VINCENT BONVINO,

Xmw-—WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.,

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

1/3 / / iLiTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff


By: By: — a

Andrew J. Mundo



F S L E/~\ uSO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZNOV 2 7 3018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKj.r

‘7 -v


X»*»«**•» 4



- XMWMM.HWM'nntMKliMMMOW m «MMMW « »«>" **»«"<mmim-mmummum - > mrniMMnm*»4iinmmtmm*



CARMINE ALICATA,

X


ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yorki New York


LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC,s/h/a RockbestosJm. ^

By: By:Andrew J. Mundo



F I L E CSO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J.MENDEZJ .S.C,

NOV 2 7 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEMEW YORK

!O; i r'-3

Lrii a-1. . r '1

i. ..

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NOV 1 3 2013

X [ • \ -«M»«M iWMWW^fMWNM

NYS si ;; >IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION


X

Index No.: 1$6827/2000This Document Relates to:


EUGENE CHEVALIER

— X< mmmmmumwtmmm*«mummmm>m*tmmmm m9* «••» 1

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and RulesSection 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The Goodyear Tire& Rubber Company are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, Mew York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company


By:By:Dan Gagliardi



F i L E CNOV 27 3018

SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ * r


"71 7 r, - - i ;"?•W ! L ! I.


- x p •' ~ y i 3NYS suf'R T - r v , T LIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)— X

Index No.: lJ)6827/2000This Document Relates to:


EUGENE CHEVALIER

— X«*«**»<•»tm•»«*«»«»4*1

WHEREFORE,defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

the complaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and afternotice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear CanadaInc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.


By:By:Dan Gagliardi



F 8 L E 4 ,to-SO ORDERED:

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C. NOV 2 7 *018MANUEL J.MENDEZ COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK» ^ r

’ \ 'l

Li 'Ll Liz 0 •

NOV 1 3 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK — X

NYS SUPI- 0 . • . ‘VO'JMT - C I V I LIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION


X



EMANUEL G. BELLUARDO,

— X


ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Ybrk, New York



i

By:By:Andrew J. MundoJonn Dearn



F I L E i'aca,1

SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C. NOV 2 7 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE•N'EVV YORK

MANUEL MENDEZJ.S.C

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK 2018

xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS NYCALLITIGATION

xSONIA G. DALTON as Executrix for the Estate of Index No.: 110362-08EUGENE S. DALTON,

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDERPlaintiff,

- against -A.L. Eastmond & Sons, Inc., et al.,

Defendants. — x

WHEREFORE, defendant Easco Boiler Corp., individually, and as successor to A.L.Eastmond & Sons, Inc., incorrectly named in the Amended Verified Complaint as “ ALEastmond & Sons Inc. individually and as successor to Federal Boilers” and “ Easco Boiler Corp.individually and as successor to Federal Boilers” in this action (“ Easco” ), requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Easco with prejudice, and after notice to all«

co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Easco are dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

Mayj£_, 2018

DAY PITNEY LLPWEITZ & LUXENBERi

By:By:jBenjamm E. Haglund, Esq. (yAttorneys for defendant Easco Boiler Corp.,individually, and as successor to A.LEastmond & Sons, Inc.7 Times Square, 20 FLNew York, New York 10036Tel: (212) 297-5800

Matthew Tarasoff, Esq.Attorneys for plaintiffSonia G. Dalton as Executrix for the Estateof EugeneS. Dalton700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Tel: (212) 558-5500 nD 5 «©

LU gG> CSJ

UJ|CJ oLU £

a© n

F 6 L E §5f DSO ORDERED

Manuel Mendez, J.S.C.StE U J£ £O UJ

NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C

99713977 !


N

si

.•# *V


xIN RE NEW YORK CITY


xMICHAEL YANIS, as Administrator for the Estate ofWALTER P. YANIS,

Index No.: 102373/1999

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-v.-

A.C. and S., et al.,including, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing


all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant J.H. FRANCE


Dated: New York, New YorkNovi 1

AdamWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for PlaintiffsWalter P. Yanis, et al.(212) 558-5500

Eva S. Wayne, Esq.MALABY& BRADLEY, LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneys for DefendantJ.H . France Refractories Company(212) 791-0285

ii [ i3liF S j, £NOV 2 7 m

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENHV YORK

SO ORDERED, ••,:ADATED: n

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C. bus*,"

MANUEL J.MENDEZJ S C

{00098344.}

MOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPFr- - ’£ C.OoCT ' CU1LXNEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION


IN RE:

X

Index No.: 108106/2000This Document Relates to:


CHRISTINE M. VAN GARDEREN, as Executrix for theEstate of RONALD T. RICHTMEYER,

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc., requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc., are

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

foj'zstoLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

By: By:Daniel J. Gagliardi, Esq.er, Esq.

* 137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED:

F I L E £Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J.MENDEZ

MOV 2 7 2018COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

fpjrrq’ . p'. nini n. irSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NOV 1 3 2018XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

X



EDWARD J. DONOVAN

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc., requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc., aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New.York

i5mWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

By:By:Brett Fuller, Esq. Eric M. Zisk, Esq.



SO ORDERED: F 3 L E CHon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J.MENDEZ

J.S.C. NOV 2 7 2018


~ ~3 "A n Fr;i;

•") i.

NOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ! ' \T 1 j

N Y S S U P K: - av!LNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)


XNELSON A. STRAUCH, JR. and PATRICIA STRAUCH,

Plaintiff(s),Index No. 105671/99


-against-A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL

CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it

is,

ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL

CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:

LZJoan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

Matthew Tarasoff, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)

F 0 L E C SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C

NOV 2 7 2018 MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C .


!ITU lb


NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

X p/viT i 3NYS SLf'LS'-'.i COURT • CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XRALPH N. BORELLI and ANNE BORELLI,

Index No. 108709/01; 115075/98Plaintiff(s),



Defendants.X





is,



Dated: 0(jt<J>(T ^ / <P° //

fu.Patrick Finlay, Esq. f )WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)

Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

F B L E D SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C

NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J .S.C.COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

; i \ \ n. \J I..*1:7.1Lr

_i! ... i

NOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK r. 'ivr 13

NYS SUPPSMc COURT - CIVILX NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

NELSON A. STRAUCH, JR. and PATRICIA STRAUCH,Index No. 105671/99

Plaintiffs),UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

-against-

A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al. i

Defendants.X !

:;





is,i

ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL!

CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated:

f

i/4^Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

1

Matthew Tarasoff, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs) i

SO ORDERED, F f l L E ^ ']Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C:MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J S C NOV 2 7 £018


«

• n0=3 r=H £-2 l-.// 22





XEDWARD BENDERSKI,




Defendants.X





is,


CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.fim 2oUDated:

//

/Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

Justin Siebel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)

NON 1 ^SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C

c°on^MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C

: V'. [F- V

NOV 1 3 ,2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK T 13

: COURT - aNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)


XRICHARD A. HIDDIE and SHIRLEY HIDDIE,

Index No. 119850/98Plaintiff(s),



Defendants.X





is,



Dated:/

( /LJoan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

Justin Siebel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)

F I L E DHon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C

NOV 2 7 2018SO ORDERED,

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.


NOV 1 S 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK -rr 13N Y SNYCAL

I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

X • A * X'LiRT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XLAVINA R. SYLVIA, as Administratrix for the Estate ofCHARLES F. SYLVIA, and LAVINA R. SYLVIA,Individually,

Index No. 113092/98; 111046/98


Plaintiffs),

-against-A.C. and S„INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY)., et al.

Defendants.X





is,


CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.\Dated: /-

/

MhJoan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

Justin siebel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)

F B L E DasSO ORDERED, NOV 2 7 2018


Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.CMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.

S'; fr-J

lE l!II ' n''

*• i .:\‘J ! :

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NOV 1 S 2ojS

X NYCAL „I.A.S. Part ULJ^ SUPP^CO^T(Mendez, J.)

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

WILSON A. TERRILLION and JOYCE TERRILLION,Index No. 190271/09

Plaintiff(s),UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER


Defendants.X





is,



M 2%7- py^Dated: //I

MhJoan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

Justin Sieoel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)

F i L E cSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C

NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.


7-“.:n •-


X NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

NYSIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION j

XJAMES L. WATSON and IRENE WATSON,

Index No. 112602/00; 122200/99Plaintiffs),


-against-A.C. and S. INC., (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.

Defendants.X





is,



Dated:/

J4M.Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

Justir/Siebel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)

1mm/

SO ORDERED, NOV 2 7 2018Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C

MANUEL J. MENDEZ COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORKJ.S.C.

.~ZJ ./ ' nTE3 ' --"* • I

i _ L--| I.1;;-SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NOV 1 3 2018NYCAL


XPART 13IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX

FRANCIS GOES and SENTA GOES,Index No. 100904/03; 105028/03;

190413/11Plaintiff(s),

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants.X





is,



Dated: / H /!*¥/

^7 /

Joanuasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

Ufendsay-Beeieee pc/]WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffts)

; C;jfFF I L s» jM \II

ILSO ORDERED,

NOV 2 7 2018Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.CMANUEL J. MENDE2

J .S r COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

ojrFj.fIN EL V::j

! U-I. . I


p/'.Fv; nNYS S U P ';. ' Y "OUKT - '"UVIl•X

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

XThis Document Relates To:

DOMINICK CIPRIANI, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff,

-against- IndexNo.: 112064/1999

ACandS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendant CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION(“ CENTRAL HUDSON” ), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action,pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against

defendant CENTRAL HUDSON, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross claims against defendant, CENTRAL HUDSON, be and the same hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

njs/ itNew YorkDated:New York,

A

RGthe A. NepfÊsq.THOMPSON HINE LLPAttorneys for Defendant335 Madison Avenue, 12th FloorNew York, New York 10017(212) 344-5680

Justin Siebel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

F 3 L E L,r ~

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez

NOV 27 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.


4814-6383-1413.1

\y jib !ln

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NOV 1 3 2018IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALLA.S. Part 13(Hon.Manuel J. Mendez)

NYS SUPKui'-'c coo:- - CIVIL. \ '

This Document Relates To:!

Index No : 117992/02ROBERT G. IZYK


WHEREFORE, defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,! dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS

COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant A.O. SMITH WATER

PRODUCTS COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without cost.Dated: White Plains, New York

IL/lf , 2018

AAdam S. Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiffs)WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York NY 10003

, Esq.LauraTJ. Ho|Attorney fj/FDefendantA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANYECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank Street, Suite 700White Plains, New York 10606(914) 949-2909

& jF l LSO ORDERED,Ik*.Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C

NOV 2 7 2018


f

{V0544722.1}

Nl / ' ' / 8SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NYSSijP,



XJOSEPH F. KLEIN and DOROTHY KLEIN,




Defendants.X





is,



Dated: 9/ll/l?/

:

JoanljîotvEsq!RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

psd. —WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)

m UrvniHon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C

SO ORDERED,NOV 2 7 2018


[u L


NOV 1 3 2018PV\T 13

' P Z Z H E COURT - CIV?X NYCAL i ,,/q c

I.A.S. Part T3(Mendez, J.)


DANIEL CURCI and ROSE CURCI,

Plaintiff(s),Index No. 190294/10



Defendants.X





is,



Dated:97/7//P //

//

Joan'Cjasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

icco.Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBEF700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)

F i L PT"Kj A

LU iL^SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J- COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

; - f ,...I—

NOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK r s i

M Y S S U P? 2 . C G Y Y T • CIVILNYCAL LI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)


XLINDA MOSSOW as Administratrix for the Estate ofLYLE V. MOSSOW, Index No. 112280/02; 105718/02

Plaintiff(s), UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER-against-

A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.

Defendants.X





is,



Dated:_2'//7/7£ //

/

5WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)

Joanuasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation r ~

>3

m hr

NOV 2 7 2018SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C

COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.&C.

U'

Ll LLSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NOV 1 3 2018

NYCAL ,I.A.S. Part 13 NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL(Mendez, J.)


XVINCENT BOYLE and ELLEN BOYLE,




Defendants.X





is,



Dated: ^//1// % //

./i J

Joan uasior, EsqRENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

WEITZ & LUXENBER700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)

& iSO ORDERED, NOV 2 7 7018Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C


MANUEL J. MENDEZj.S .r

I r.j

j V ,7/r3 fd v y c 'a

' • '

'ir,'1 ;c:, lSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

N0V 1 3 20 ,SX NYCAL

I.A.S. Part(Mendez, J.)

PAST 1 3COURTEMUIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION - CIVIL

XJOYCE MCILMURRAY, as Personal Representative forthe Estate of JOHN MCILMURRAY, and JOYCEMCILMURRAY, Individually,

Index No. 119380/00; 102691/01


Plaintiff(s),


Defendants.X





is,



nu 9 23,2o\ t \Dated: /

/4

Joanuasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporatijpj|^ K.-

Jusnn Siebel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)

NOV 2 7 2018SO ORDERED,

Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

JSC

sipy !r=os ,

NOV 1 3 2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK F /' FIT i 3X MVS SUPREME COURT • crvnIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL

I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

XThis Document Relates To:

MICHAEL SOLOMON and GERTRUDE SOLOMON, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs,

Index No.: 102916/00-against-ACandS, INC., et al.

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendant CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION

(“ CENTRAL HUDSON” ), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against

defendant CENTRAL HUDSON, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent any opposition, all

claims and cross claims against defendant, CENTRAL HUDSON, be and the same hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:New York, New York

Ruthe A. Nepf, Esq.THOMPSON HINE LLPAttorneys for Defendant335 Madison Avenue, 12th FloorNew York, New York 10017(212) 344-5680

Matthew Tarasoff, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

F i L E LSO ORDERED,

Hon. Manuel Mendez NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J. MENDE*

COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICENEW YORK

4834-3998-6293 I

r5) .'fV' • \

NOV 1 3 2013rJYs SUP;; rC:. ,ST.CF,/;LSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORKX NYCAL



SALVATORE T. CALANDRINO,Index No. 190439/10



Defendants.X





is,


CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.-''iDated: /

U.Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

WEITZ & LUXENBE700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)

"\i L E LSSI

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J . S .C COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

AS

fin n

8102 i Z d3 Sm n 51 °n 51 iyUU Li 3J GU 3J H

! UfalibLJ cU

in : fr- .i




i ' vrr 13NYS Sl.\r;33y3XCHARLES L. GRUNERT,



-against-A.C. and S„INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.

Defendants.X





is,



foyV-W\W 7\,2.( y\ ^Dated:,/'Jl 14Justin Stebel, Esq.

WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)


F i S mK -a

NOV 2 7 2018SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C

MANUEL J- MENDEZ COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEJ.S.C. NEW YORK


X NYCALI.A.S. Part(Mendez, J.)

NYS sur COURTIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

GEORGE E. MILLER,Index No. 100306/02; 120430/01



Defendants.X





is,


CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.rizilibDated: /

// Jr:LJoan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

Brett Fuller, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)

jj 1 |U \ibcM liraa bias*'SO ORDERED,

Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .* ^ COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

IU


PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - O'V!Lx NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)


THOMAS ANTHONY VALACHOVIC,Index No. 105715/02; 110318/02


-against-A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY, et al.

Defendants.X





is,



Dated: October 8, 2018


Brett Fuller, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)

f i t K,a» iLSO ORDERED,

NOV 2 7 2018COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C

mc.

NOV 1 3 20 (8SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ‘ ' r r i 3N Y S S U P R3NYCAL


X CURT - CIVILM:


WILLIAM E. JOYCE and MARIE JOYCE,Index No. 190172/09; 117843/02;

109675/99; 111069/98;113280/97; 111191/96

Plaintiff(s),

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants.X





is,



Dated:

-UPJoan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation


SO ORDERED, F il L rLUHon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C

MANUEL J. MENDEZ NOV 2 7 2018


2018SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

X NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)


THOMAS ANTHONY VALACHOVIC,Index No. 105715/02; 110318/02


-against-A.C. and S„INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY, et al.

Defendants.X





is,



Dated: October 8, 2018//

lzJoan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation


r.pmSO ORDERED,

Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICtNEW YORK



Index No: 101869/2004




JAMES CLEMENTS AND BERYL E.CLEMENTS,

Plaintiffs,vs.A.O. SMITH CORP., et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor

to Frick Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant

York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliate

companies, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is


claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, Individually and as

Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed

without prejudice and without costs.


nov . i 2- , 2018



: r>p 1 L hNOV 2 7 2018


SO ORDERED,fO) ftP , -r^ fpi r; lA „ .heye;( v/ f =

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez ii -AiUJMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C. NOV 1 3 2018NYS SUPREME'COURT‘CIVIL



Index No: 103542/1999




CORNELIUS CUNNINGHAM ANDBRIDGET CUNNINGHAM,

Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et al.,

Defendants.




International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is




prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

( ) &{ . , 2018

BrictrrEarly, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233


F i L E LNOV 2 7 2018


D) iF: ,IrOLuV'.L Ji ;

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

NOV 1 3 2018MANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C.




Index No: 121630/2001



RICHARD F. CHRISTIE AND CLARICEILENE CHRISTIE,



Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, as Successor in Interest to YorkCorporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil









nrv. ' x-Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233

, 2018

'Beth L. Hughes, fisq. ri-:ur ia L ABrady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

iHt»D

NOV 2 7 2018


0r? n \V /7ESO ORDERED, r; vyHon. Manuel J. Mendez

NOV 1 3 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL



Index No: 113859/2002




JEANNETTE DEBINSKI, ASADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OFJOHN LAWRENCE DEBINSKI ANDJEANETTE DEBINSKI, AS SPOUSE,

Plaintiff,vs.A.W. CHESTERTON CO. INC., et al.,

Defendants.



Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant







Dated: New York, New Yorkrv. \ b , 2018

BriarTEarly, Esq. ~ —'Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233


6"; ii L 1 'Hlirvn

NOV 2 7 2018


f c : "r ::‘ :

SO ORDERED, i ' i : s ..

Hon. Manuel J. MendezNOV 1 3 2018





Index No: 117270/2000



PHILLIP DILLON AND BRIDGETDILLON,



Defendants.



Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendantYork International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliate





without prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

fW - 12. , 2018

&PJPi — -Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

Brian tarty, bsq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233

F H L F:: . j

E£ Hi®*.-

NOV 2 7 2018


[33313TOIL :SO ORDERED, \. -

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez NOV 1 3 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL



Index No: 118531/2000



RUDOLPH DIMAURO AND ROSEDIMAURO,



Defendants.


Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York







M , Yt , 2018-L Wit— •

FTTE 1Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000


him*-

NOV 2 7 2018


[Q) E/R- , rrjLro E U J f


NOV 1 3 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C PART 13

NYS SUPREMc COURT - C ( VJL



Index No: 124353/2000



SAM GARELLICK, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff,


Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant York International Corporation, hereby requests summary


dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant York International Corporation, and its affiliate



claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, and its affiliate

companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.




SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez r

I..,) ' i 'V'

lroF 3 L E i MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C NOV 1 3 2018

NOV 2 7 2018 PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

COUNTY CLERK'S OFF1CNEW YORK

1-



Index No: 119670/2000



PAUL E. GROSSMAN AND KATHERINEGROSSMAN,


Plaintiffs,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et aL,

Defendants.


judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant York International Corporation, and its affiliatecompanies, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is




Dated: New York, New York(M 0- , 2018

ME -L —BrianEarly, Esq. ^ 'Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233


SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez D i f a J :: i j //' R I Pril [LifaLfa L! \J fa;LLF I L E fa MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.s r NOV 1 3 2018NOV 2 7 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICLMEW YORK




Index No: 111925/2003



JOHN J. GRECO AND MARIELLENGRECO,


Plaintiffs,vs.A.O. SMITH CORP., et aL,

Defendants.



Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendantYork International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliatecompanies, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is


claims and cross claims against defendant York International Corporation, Individually and asSuccessor to Frick Company, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.


Q(PL ? 2018


<6Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233

FlTT f LuHon. Manuel J. Mendez 1.•

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.c

NOV 1 3 2018NOV 2 7 2018PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC -NSW YORK



Index No: 102457/1999



JOHN HAWKINS, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff,


Defendants.










Dated: New York, New York(W< YL , 2018

Brian Early, Esq. — ^Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233


0,«** ' *•y-TJ


F 1 L NOV 1 3 2018u *

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S .C PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNOV 27 20«ÔUNTY CLERKS

NEW YD**-i....OfPK



Index No: 102435/1999



FRED KNECHTEL AND BARBARAKNECHTEL,



Defendants.










(Mi l x 2018aetp -k Am— -2L

Brian"Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233


! OHLT ii

NOV 1 3 2018Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZj.c rMOV 2 7 2018

COUNTY CLEW*OFFICENSW ^0RK




Index No: 121876/2002


This Document Relates to:MARIA GRYNYCHYN AND TODDKRICHMAR, AS CO-ADMINISTRATORSFOR THE ESTATE OF MYROSLAW MAC,AND MARIA GRYNYCHYN, AS SPOUSE,

Plaintiffs,


vs.A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et aL,

Defendants.





with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is



to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed with



to* I I , 2018

BriairEarly, fcsq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233


91:9f(^ (19 [ j '0, nF= rr-A'9> (S!lYj ityuLSSO ORDERED,

NOV j 3 2013F B L E L Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZj.s r

P/VVT 13^ COURT - CIVILNYS SUPP.S

NOV 2 7 2018




Index No: 104509/2002




WILLIAM W. LITTLE,

Plaintiff,vs.A.W. CHESTERTON CO. INC., et ah,

Defendants.












, 2018


•- .' i !ryy !L^ [ L

F str* NOV 1 3 2018Hon. Manuel J. MendezL -

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILMANUEL J. MENDEZ

j.srNOV 2 7 2018

OUNTY CUERKSOFHO:MEW YORK



Index No: 102461/1999



ARTHUR LEISENHEIMER AND JEANLEISENHEIMER,



Defendants.









prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yorkrw. a , 2018

BriarTEarly, Esq. y

Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233

Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000“ '“ ni ; [ j -\ /7 (V :

I

li L-:.NOV 1 3 20180|£ERp,

Hon. Manuel J. MendezPART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.CNOV 2 7 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC EMEW YORK



Index No: 100919/2002




MARGARET LAROSA, ASADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OFFRANK J. LAROSA, AND MARGARETLAROSA, AS SPOUSE,

Plaintiff,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et aL,

Defendants.



dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant York International Corporation, and its affiliate





Dated: New York, New Yorkr W' ( x. , 2018



Ifii LLSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

AF 1 L E MOV 1 3 2018tv. MANUEL J. MENDEZJ S C PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNOV 2 7 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEYEW YORK



Index No: 102453/1999




JOHN LANGAN AND KATHERINELANGAN,

Plaintiffs,vs.AC&S INC., et al.,

Defendants.









13- . 2018

iBeth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233 v-A vj

NOV 1 3 2018HL. Hon. Manuel J. MendezPART 13

MYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNOV 2 7 2018 MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEX’ZW YORK



Index No: 103594/1999




CORNELIUS MCNULTY,


Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant York Industries, Inc. and York International Corporation

(Individually and as Successor to Frick Company), hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant York Industries, Inc. and York International Corporation

(Individually and as Successor to Frick Company), and its affiliate companies, without prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto, it is


claims and cross claims against defendant York Industries, Inc. and York International Corporation

(Individually and as Successor to Frick Company), and its affiliate companies, be and the same

are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.


^ , 2018

1'ksk Lr LBriarfEarly, Esq. — 'Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233


F i Hon. Manuel J. Mendez0 2018NOV 2 7 2018 MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.c ' CIVILCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEYEW YORK



Index No: 102456/1999




MARTIN MCLOUGHLIN ANDFLORENCE MCLOUGHLIN,


Defendants.










(W . q , 2018

MhJ-Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-60


i*-*Y r*y

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez 2018A* s*


NOV 2 7 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEYEW YORK



Index No: 118088/2000



JOHN MCCONNON, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff,


Defendants.










flOY- UL , 2018

i- —Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000


ir ;: iUSO ORDERED,

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

F S NOV 13 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C PART 13

- CIVILNYS SUPREME: COURTNOV 2 7 mCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEYORK



Index No: 109474/2003



THOMAS J. MARRON, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Plaintiff,

vs.A.O. SMITH CORP., et al.,

Defendants.





(Individually and as Successor to Frick Company), and its affiliate companies, with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto, it is


claims and cross claims against defendant York Industries, Inc.and York International Corporation


are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.


UKi LL , 2018'L — >


Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233 r~\, !

HOY 1 3 2018t.

NOV 2 7 2018PART 13

COURT - C/7JLNYS SUP;:;

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW vORK

4


MANUELJ.MENDEZj.s.c



Index No: 111933/2003



COLLEEN FISCHER, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF


WILLIAM D. MANNIX,Plaintiff,

vs.A.O. SMITH CORP., et al.,

Defendants.





(Individually and as Successor to Frick Company), and its affiliate companies, with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto, it is


claims and cross claims against defendant York Industries, Inc. and York International Corporation


are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.


MN- ( JL , 2018

too £Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017

P^l 86®33 DiEVFx'. r,rne4? IL Efi,• I •

J. -4'

NOV 2 7 2018 MV 1 3 2013PART 13-•' IE COURT - CIVIL


NVS SUPR-

\





Index No: 103682/1999




THOMAS J. O'REILLY AND ALICEO'REILLY,


Defendants.





with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is



to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed with


CML \±L ? 2018

i- 'VWLBeth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233 DirF^p. ii- ; ^ /;.v -MMM

SO ORDERED, NOV 1 3 2018Hon. Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S .CPART 13

MVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL



Index No: 102448/1999



FREDERICK OLSON AND AURORAOLSON,



Defendants.











POL I ?- , 2018


Brian Early, Esq. ^Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233

O Ff •r~;

\J [i j)

NOV 1 3 2018Hon. Manuel J. Mendez


NOV 2 7 20t8 PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILCOUNTY CLERKS OFFICE

NEW VQBK



Index No: 117403/2002




MARY MORAN, ADMINISTRATRIX OFTHE ESTATE OF WILLIAM MORAN,

Plaintiff,vs.A.W. CHESTERTON CO. INC., et al.,

Defendants.





companies, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is



Successor to Frick Company, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are hereby dismissedwith prejudice and without costs.



, 2018

i-Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

rP) rp$

•ma \ p j::-i|~.Nt i pHon. Manuel J. Mfendez


H0V 1 3 2018NOV 2 7 2018


- Cf'JIL



Index No: 102455/1999




PRINCIPIO RIVICCIO AND JOSEPHINERIVICCIO,


Defendants.




International Corporation,as Successor in Interest to York Corporation, and its affiliate companies,






nr' I ?- , 2018i-%UA-Beth L. Hughes, Esq.

Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233 —1 r"

< I-.-, - rtry rrr i ‘ '

MOV 1 3 3013Hon. Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.CNYS SUPRS. COURTNOV 2 7 2018




Index No: 103686/1999




FRANK RELLA AND LENA RELLA,


Defendants.



Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant








rw- \ h- , 2018

Brian"Eariy, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233


n, • ir~ \ \r/SO ORDERED, : : 1 ; !V/ i.!.F V, Hon. Manuel J. Mendezi:j£*' 1

i*KJT4;i

iJ.'HK,.' NOV 1 3 2013MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.CMOV 2 7 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFJC-NEV/ YORK

PACT 13NYS SUPP3A 3 COURT - CIVIL



Index No: 102454/1999




BARTHOLOME PIAZZA AND JULIAPIAZZA,


Defendants.










Dated: New York, New York{Mi 13- , 2018

Brian'Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233


if-:'7 1RED I !

Hon. Manuel J. MendezNOV 1 3 2013

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C

NOV 2 7 2018 PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL




Index No: 102434/1999




WILLIAM PAWLOWSKI ANDMARGARET PAWLOWSKI,


Defendants.











CW' ( L" , 2018

Brian "Early, Esq. Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233

17:J i

F frK Hon. Manuel J. MendezNOV 1 3 2013

NOV 2 7 2018






Index No: 105922/1999




DONALD PACCIONE AND DIANEPACCIONE,


Defendants.











fW. \ L , 2018

A 1Qc/pt—Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233


,0i

f U LHon. Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.CNOV 13 2013NOV 2 7 2018





Index No: 102436/1999




DONALD PACCIONE AND JOSEPHINEPACCIONE,


Defendants.











Cw. |X. , 2018

BriarfEarlyTEsq. —'Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233


SO ORDERED,

F S L E C roiwW [[,;. ! v/ L IJJHon. Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.CNOV 1 3 2018NOV 2 7 2018


COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEVE\V YORK



Index No: 102451/1999




RAYMOND OSSO AND SANDRA OSSO,Plaintiffs,


Defendants.










Dated: New York, New York(\(K ‘ [ % , 2018



r: L

IT 'LL,SO ORDERED,

F S L f f|

.» !J

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez KOV 1 3 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C PART 13!TS SUPR::« COURT - CIVILNOV 2 7 2018

-OUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEYORK



Index No: 102452/1999




WILLIAM RYAN AND KATHERINERYAN,


Defendants.











{ML , 2018



V TT .

O/lrt!RDEREDit > r»! '9

KO'J 1§&23 .,i: Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

NOV 2 7 2018 p;V.Vr 13/;cC.OUR « ‘MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.

CI'i'LNYS SUPP -

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE.

XEW YORK



Index No: 102458/1999




FRANCIS ROSZAK,


Defendants.










Dated: New York, New Yorkf\0ft 'A- , 2018



fO; fF3 /7 Y. f i

.uSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

NOV 1 3 2013MANUEL J. MENDEZJSC.

.-rte.'Jt

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNOV 2 7 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEvc'C YORK



Index No: 102449/1999




IRVING SCHWARTZ AND MARILYNSCHWARTZ,

Plaintiffs,vs.A.P, GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et aL,

Defendants.










Dated: New York, New Yorkyw . \ ^ , 2018

(kKO L ladr—Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

Brian Early, Esq.Mark Bibro, Esq.Derrell Wilson, Esq.The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Ave., 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233 r”

'-3 ! . ' h I "”

J ..ii u : - A - / L"

:_ . » 1-.«.

SO ORDERED,NOV 1 3 2013Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

F 1 L MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C


MOV 27 2018

,-OUNTY CLERKS OFFICE-N \ • V.QPK



Index No: 102438/1999




GEORGE SMOLICZ,


Defendants.










Dated: New York, New York_ PttTV. \Tr , 2018

(k& — -Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000


Til lirj V,;-:/ IT ” jj v / iiJ,SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez NOV 1 3 2013F 1 L E l1 MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.CPART 13

NYS S U P R i C O U R T - CIVIL

NOV 2 7 2018




Index No: 102459/1999




GERALD SORGENTE,Plaintiff,


Defendants.











rw- u- , 2018



SO ORDERED, If L U LF I L E Hon. Manuel J. Mendez j

NOV 1 3 2013MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.CNOV 2 7 2018 PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICECEVY YORK



Index No: 102450/1999




MATT SULLIVAN,

Plaintiff,vs.A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., et aL,

Defendants.


Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant York







Dated: New York, New York(\Qf; I 1- , 2018



SO ORDERED, NOV 1 3 2013fC1 Hon. Manuel J. MendezF I L E ! MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

p.vrr 13NYS SlJf'P - COURT - CIVILNOV 2 7 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEX’EW YORK



Index No: 102153/2003


This Document Relates to:GIOVANNI COLONNA and ASSUNTACOLONNA, UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff,

vs.A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL„

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Grinnell LLC hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Grinnell LLC without prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto.

ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants and absent any opposition, allclaims and cross claims against defendant Grinnell LLC be and the same are hereby dismissedwithout prejudice and without costs.


LO+Sh ' 2018

fkjfc LCharles Ferguson, EsqNOJames Thompson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500


I \

f * — -*LTU 1L iJ

NOV 1 3 2013F peer-Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

rvvr 13;COURT - CIVILMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J .S .CNYS SUPU-/

NOV 2 7 2018

COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICE!\,r-\ V YORK.

HM WWSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK IT:

X NOV 2 0 2018NYCALI.A.S. Part 13

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYABESTOS LITIGATION

NYS SUPREME G..,.vU

XThis document Relates to:VITO TERIC and AVELINA TERIC, Index No.: 105462/99

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGEMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Plaintiff(s),

- against -

A.C. & S. INC., et al.;Defendants.

X

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. request summary


dismissing the complaint and cross claims against FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with

prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendants FULTON BOILER

WORKS, INC. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: New York, New York— ft? k 2018

.albardier, Esq.For Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.

Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

Suzann<Attome

Erik Jacobs, Esq, jAttorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg P.C700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

F f L E DSO ORDERED,W 2 7 2O(8

COUNTY CLEF), .NEW YORK

Hon. Manuel MendezMANUEL J.MENDEZ

J.S.C. R'S OFFICE

j)


x NYS SO! COURT - CIVILIN RE NEW YORK CITY


xVITO TERIC and AVELINA TERIC, Index No.: 105462/1999

Plaintiffs, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-v.-

A.C. and S., INC., et al.,including, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissingthe complaint against J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, with prejudice, and after notice to


ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIESCOMPANY, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York,New York2018

1 L E DNOV 2 7 2018

Erik Jacobs, Esq. y Ev^S. Wayne, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, HQOUNTY CLERK'S’ OpfiifcCLABY& BRADLEY, LLC

!Vr-W YORK 150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneys for DefendantJ.H. France Refractories Company(212) 791-0285

DATED: jl

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for PlaintiffVito Teric, et al.(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .s c

{00097977.}

in ;


X

NYS Si.,1!':"IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION


X

DENNIS LUCENTI, as Executor for the Estate ofJOSEPH D. LUCENTI,

Index No.: 104390/2005

Plaintiff, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-v.-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,including, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO.,

X

WHEREFORE, defendant, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing



ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant J.H. FRANCE


Dated: New York, New York/// Z-0 2018

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for PlaintiffsJoseph Lucenti, et al.(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

Eva S. Wayne, Esq.MALABY& BRADLEY, LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneys for DefendantJ.H. France Refractories Company(212) 791-0285 ,DATED:

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZ NOV 2 7 2018


{00098343.}

p) ftLTL lc: ! iJ1 1.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK

NOV 2 0 2018X

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION r -I NYS SU; •' l l.

X

This Document Relates To: NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERVITO TERIC,

Plaintiff, Index No. 105462/99

-against-

A.C. & S„INC., et al.,

Defendantsx

WHEREFORE defendant, Morse Diesel, Inc., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-

claims against Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no

opposition, it is

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkU ( g , 2018

CLYDE & CO US LLPWEITZ & ERGtfrC."

4—By:By: Kevin W. Turbert, Esq.The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc.

Erik Jacobs, Esq. (700 Broadway,New York, New York 10003Tel: (212) 558-5500

Attorney for Plaintiff F I L E DNOV 2 7 2018SO-ORDERED:

HON. MANUEL MENDEZ, J.S.C.

MANUEL J.MENDEZJ .S.C

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENrW vOn^


f w V 2 1 mIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION


This Document Relates to:Index No.: 105935/03, 128019/02

DAVID POCHILY UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice, and after notice

to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating

Corp., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Y|ork, L(ep/ York, 2018U

1 'fv’TAjC / /_Attorney for Plaintiff(s)David PochilyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

K


JMANUEL J. MENDEZNOV 2 7 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEMHV\I VORK

2383-26078AG

" "—SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK FT/ o 1 ?* v r & A. /20:3IN RE: NEW YORK CITY




WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint

and cross-claims against Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Treadwell Corporation,

are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New (York, jNew York, 2018urns

Attorney aiiTtiff/sfDavid PochilyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

R

SO ORDERED, P U L E DHon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C NOV 2 7 2013 1235-21185

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YO i\


!r- r r.rc)

V & i JIN RE: NEW YORK CITY


!i.



WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., requests summary judgment in the


and cross-claims against Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc.,


Dated: New York, New York<11 I I , 2018

ttfiney fefpiaindfftjs)^ ( ^ . Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

K< aiADavid PochilyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

F B L E DSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

NOV 2 7 2018MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. 1122-21683


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY


NOV 2 1 ’i 20:3This Document Relates to:

Index No.: 111231/01,STEPHEN JOHN MCFADDEN

ANDDOLORES MCFADDEN




and cross-claims against Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-

defendants there is no opposition, it is



Dated: New York, New York( \ \ Qib\ , 2018

3. Cook, Esq.

Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

KAttorney fo!*Plaintiff(s)Stephen John McFadden and DoloresMcFaddenWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

F I L E DSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez


NOV 2 7 2018COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YOP

1235-417AG

\SU\

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK > < * I 20;3IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONiNYCAL| I.A.S. Part 13: (Mendez, J.)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 111231/01,

STEPHEN JOHN MCFADDENAND

DOLORES MCFADDENUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courier & Company, Inc., requests summary judgment in the


and cross-claims against Courier & Company, Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-

defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Courier & Company, Inc.,


Dated: Newv i prK, i\iew Yorrc

\ V , 2018

Ke^yamiMf Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourier & Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Stephen John McFadden and DoloresMcFaddenWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500


MANUEL J.MENDEZJSC tI22-r99AGF f l L E D

NOV H aptaCOUNTY OffICE

NEW YOU*

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NJV 2 1 20 ; 3IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY


THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 117331/01, 117339/01

VINCENT VITALE AND CATHERINE VITALE


WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation

with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendant there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating

Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

H \ , 2018

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsVincent Vitale and Catherine VitaleWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091

S5ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S.C F I L E D2383-24068V

NOV 2 7 ty)t8COUNTY OfRKt OFFICE

NEW YORK

{N0799638-1}

/

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK p y r.p.r

Li — L v i; 3IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION



CARMELA VINCELLO, INDIVIDUALLY ANDAS THE EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF

GERALD VINCELLO UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER






Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New (fork, fyew York

, 2018


Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Gerald VincelloWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091


MANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C. 2383-23694

F I L E D{N0799638-1} NOV 27 Mtt

COUNTY Plot

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK r o1\ * & i 20 =3IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY



MIRAND SUPRINA, INDIVIDUALLY ANDEXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF MARIO

SUPERINA UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER






Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New jew YorkI , 2 0 1 8l\

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsMario SuperinaWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091




2383-23917S

F S L E D{N0799638-1}

NOV 27|0t8COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE

NEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

• r 0 ? <- r. Q' » 0i:t \i t- v



GENEVA SANDERS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF

CHARLES SANDERS UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER






Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, Nfew York__\iij2y _, 2018

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Charles SandersWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091



MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. F I L E D 2383-24068U

NOV 2 7 2018COUNTY CLERICS OFFICENEW YORK

{N0799638-1}

* \


ASBESTOS LITIGATIONiNYCALi I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, J.)

IK:VI r *

& ji C- o * JiThis Document Relates to:

j r ; .\Index No.: 109983/08JOSEPH SAEVA

ANDNORMA SAEVA UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls

USA Inc., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Atwood & Morrill

Co., Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co.,

Inc. D/B/A Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New YorkINew York\ \ \ ^M , 2018

n

Nicole P. Wesselmann, Esq. ~ '

Attorney for DefendantAtwood & Morrill Co., Inc. D/B/A WeirValves & Controls USA Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attorney for£fcJaintiff(s)Joseph Saeva and Norma SaevaBELLUCK & Fox, LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575

F I L E DSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

mvnmMANUEL J. MENDEZJ S C.

963-95

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK !


IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION 13V . A L.

o r.<N.


AUDREY RUDA AS ADMINISTRATRIX !OF THE ESTATE OF JACK RUDA i UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

! JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER







Dated: New Ybrk, New York\ \ 2018

//

%Nicole P. Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for Defendant

Iqrinistratrix of the Estate of Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. D/B/A WeirValves & Controls USA Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attorney for PljaintAudrey RudaJack RudaBELLUCK & Fox, LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575

)

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez F I L E DMANUEL J.MENDEZ

J.S.C 963-85i. '

NOV 27 9018COUNTY CLERK*OFFICENEW YORK


7f? ;v i

;si -i c;



L


GARY REGELSKY







Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, Njew York

, 2018U-U

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsGary RegleskyWELENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091



MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C F I L E D 2383-236951

NOV 27 )01t{N0799638-1}

COUNTY CLERICS OFFICENEW YORK


ASBESTOS LITIGATION

2013l ; -/ ^ U

\NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.) L.


MILDRED REED, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF

GEORGE REED UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER






Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

\ Q- . 2018

UKevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of George ReedWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091



MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. F i L E D 2383-239170

NOV 27 2018COUNTY CLEFltCS OFFICE

NEW YOfiK

{N0799638-1}

' \


/ 2 i 2013r ‘




MARIE PARVIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF

JOSEPH W. PARVIS UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER







:w York_, 2018Dated: New " rork,

U..L2


Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Joseph W. ParvisWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091



2383-24068

F i L say

l£m LJ{N0799638-1}

NOV 2 7 to18COUNTY

NEW YORK

'

iir'\i f? i’ i Q- v ^ JL ilcj i 0»SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK i

jIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION


f • ••

!- . ..


LOUIS V. PAPALEO AND MARY PAPALEO







Corporation are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New|Yorkj New York

, 2018ILL2=

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsLouis V. Papaleo and Mary PapaleoWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091



MANUEL J. MENDEZj.S r F I L E D 2383-23694G

\ .

NOV 2 7 m<{N0799638-1}


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK f- V £ 1 20 iSIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY



MICHAEL OKLEVITCH, JR., AS THEADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF

MICHAEL OKEVITCH, SR. UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER







Dated: NewlYork, New York\ \ |7 , 2018


Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Michael, Sr.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091


MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.c. 383-24274

F i L E dNOV 27 1018{N0799638-1}



ASBESTOS LITIGATION

O 1L.'«/ iO



FREDERIC NIECE AND JOAN NIECE








Dated: New York, New York\ \\\Q . , 2018

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsFrederic Niece and Joan NieceWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091



MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. 3-23694FF 8 L E D

{N0799638-I}NOV 27 }018



21: ? ?? ?!?- L.^ i JIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.) !

/L...THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

Index No.: 116800/01

EDWARD NEVERMANN AND JEANNEVERMANN








Dated: New York, New YorkW , 2018

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEdward Nevermann and Joan NevermannWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091



MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. 2383-23917AF 8 L E D

NOV 87 1018{N0799638-1}


ir-


ASBESTOS LITIGATIONiNYCALj I.A.S. Part 13: (Mendez, J.) NOV 2 1 m

This Document Relates to:f J Y b L; •Index No.: 100406/08 X I

NANCY ROURKE ASADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF

HUGH MCMUNN AND DOROTHYMCMUNN








Dated: New rk. New YorkI fV , 2018li

fi

/

»Nicole P. Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for Defendant

Administratrix of the Estate Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. D/B/A WeirValves & Controls USA Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

/

Attorney for PlajnjifjlNancy Routkeof Hugh McMunmarid Dorothy McMunnBELLUCK & FbxfLLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575


NOV 2 7 ^018COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. 963-74

; iSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

- V & I


; r - C'- L;


CHARLES MCNAMARA AND THERESAMCNAMARA








N Yiork, NteDated: New rk. Nfew York, 2018

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsCharles McNamara and Theresa McNamaraWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091


SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C . 2383-23917M

F 8 L E D{N0799638-1}

NOV 27 10WCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK O g1MBIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY


3:„3.3T - C!Y'LTlYS SU:'v_:


PETER D. LISI AS ADMINISTRATOR FORTHE ESTATE OF ANTHONY LISI

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corporation, with prejudice, and after

notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is


Corporation, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkV .2018

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Anthony LisiWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091


MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. 2383-23694DF i L E D

{N0804905-1 } NOV 27 ^018


L l U


:



i . .


FRANCESCA LAPIANA, INDIVIDUALLYAND AS PROPOSED EXECUTRIX OF THE

ESTATE OF ROSARIO LAPIANA NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER






Corporation, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New ’V ork, Nfew York

\ \ ^ , 2018

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Rosario LapianaW1LENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091



F I L E DMANUEL J. MENDEZJ S C 2383-23690P

NOV 2 7 )018{N0804905-1 }




f / o ?I v - 4 & i

'! n ri r>


ELINOR JUDGEAND

GORDON JUDGE NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER






Corporation, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, fyew York

, 2018IL43

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsElinor Judge and Gordon JudgeWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SP1TZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091



F J L E DMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.sc 2383-23917J

NOV 2 7 2018COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICNEW YORK

{N0804905-1 }

F


• (. C t* - »' £ 1

*' ^ r. aIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

iNYCAL; I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, J.)


LUCIENINGRASSIAAND

CONSTANCE INGRASSIA UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Weir Valves & Controls, Individually, as successor to and

doing business as Atwood & Morrill Company, requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and

cross-claims against Weir Valves & Controls, Individually, as successor to and doing business as

Atwood & Morrill Company, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no

opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Weir Valves & Controls,

Individually, as successor to and doing business as Atwood & Morrill Company, are dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New fork, New York1L4

/

Nicole P. Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantWeir Valves & Controls, Individually, assuccessor to and doing business as Atwood &Morrill CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-34

Attorney fibr/P|amtiff(s)Lucien Ingrasslta and Constance IngrassiaBELLUCK & Fox, LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575

P I L E D/~\ NOV 27 )018SO ORDERED,

Hon. Manuel J. MendezCOUNTY CLERKS OFFICE

NEW YORKMANUEL X MENDEZJ .S .C

963-17


ASBESTOS LITIGATION

!_

V/ •J[V' Vf 9 1t \ <! jLi -

iNYCALi I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, M.)

i


THOMAS HANNAMAND

SYLVIA HANNAM NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER








]IJ3 , 2018

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsThomas Hannam and Sylvia HannamW1LENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091



MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C F S L E 0 2383-23917M

NOV 2 7 2018{N0804905-I }


!SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

?

’ '** \ »



LEROY EMERY







Corporation, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New A rork, New York

\{ ft , 2018

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsLeroy EmeryWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091



F 9 L E OMANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C. ^383-23695D

v-

NOV 2 7 2018{N0804905-1}


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK y

! i iIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION


NOV 2 1 20 - 3

This Document Relates to:C.i' - 'L

Index No.: 190019/08 t

DIANA DURAN, AS EXECUTRIX OFTHE ESTATE OF CARMELO DURAN,

DECEASED, AND SEBESBRINDAMALDONADO DURAN








Dated: New York,|New York\\ 7 - 2018

'/

INicole P. Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for Defendanty Executrix of the Estate of Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. D/B/A Weir

, deceased, and Sebesbrinda Valves & Controls USA Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attorney for PlaiDiana Durarj,Carmelo DMaldonado DuranBELLUCK & Fox, LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575

'(s

F i L E DSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez NOV 2 7 mMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S COUNIYCLEfiK*m*r<m963-107

13\ V -i. i- ôr* nSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

!


i :


MICHELE DENICHILO








Dated: New ''fork.F ew York\ l |3 .2018

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating CorporationMCGIVNEY &KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsMichele DenichiloWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091


MANUEL J.MENDEZJ .S.C.

F a L E D2383-236901

NOV 27 2018{N0804905-1 )


iSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

’ • v i 21 im\ -J 'i• NYCAL| I.A.S. Part 13: (Mendez, M.)

;

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.:117331/01, 1176521/01

ELIZABETH DINO, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASEXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF

SALVATORE DINOI NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER







Dated: New York,JiT13w York

2018


Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Salvatore DinoiWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SP1TZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez F I L E DMANUEL J- MENDEZ

J.S.C 2383-240681

NOV 47 2018

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK

{N0804905-1}

f , n * 9 f^ Qi < .. V -1- L.^ < J

!


;

L




ERNEST DONNELLY, JR.







Corporation, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.>

Dated: New ^ ork, New York1_3 . 2018

1Kevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsErnest Donnelly, Jr.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091



NOV 27

f-OUNTY CLERKS OFFICEC0U

N£W YORK

MANUEL J.MENDEZJ .S .C{N0804905-1}


ASBESTOS LITIGATION

\\ ^ V & x LJ 1 0

i NYCALj I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, M.)

i

r : •'


LEONARD DORFMANAND

JUDITH DORFMAN NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER







Dated: New York, New YorkU I S .2018

UKevin M. Berry, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsLeonard Dorfinan and Judith DorfmanWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091



MANUEL J- MENDEZ F S LJ.S.C.

NOV 27 2018COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

a3-24068K

{N0804905-1 }


ASBESTOS LITIGATIONiNYCALi I.A.S. Part 13: (Mendez, J.) £ 1 20!3

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 111767/08 i

ADELINE CHOBOT-SPITZER, iEXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF |

ARMAND DEL CIOPPO AND CARMELA i UNOPPOSED SUMMARYDEL CIOPPO, INDIVIDUALLY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER







Dated: New York, New YorkU L3 , 2018

j

/

Nicole P. Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for Defendant

(bot-Spitzer, Executrix of the Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. D/B/A Weirand Del Cioppo and Carmela Del Valves & Controls USA Inc.

MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attorney fof Pjaintiff(s)AdelineEstate ofCioppo, IndividuallyBELLUCK & Fox, LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575

F 8 LSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

NOV ii iowMANUEL J.MENDEZ

J.S.r 963-100



f-V 2 1 2m- avTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: . i

Index No.: 116800/01, 116847/01

ALBERT BREININGAND

PAULINE BREINING NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER






Corporation, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Y ork, New York

U JjM .2018


Kevin M. Berry, Esq. <

Attorney for PlaintiffsAlbert Breining and Pauline BreiningWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091


MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.c F i L E &-23917C

NOV 27 2018{N0804905-1}

COUNTY CLERK'SOFRCNfW YOLK

-


ASBESTOS LITIGATION; NYCALj I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, J.)

iF J V 2 1 r. r, '•g/ :L. vj.

I


PHYLLIS BUTCHER UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice, and after notice

to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is


Corp., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: NewjYorkjNew York, 2018U-

z

Attorney for Plaintiffts)Phyllis ButcherWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

ok, Esq.KerryAttorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. MendezMANUELJ.MENDEZ

J .S .C F I L E D 2383-25631G

NOV 2 7 2J018

COUNTY CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORK

tSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK YJV 2 1 20 i 3? •'» • :


: NYCALj I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, J.)


PHYLLIS BUTCHER UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER



and cross-claims against Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is



Dated: NewlYorkftNew YorkV l l K o l , 2018

Attorney for Plaintiffs)Phyllis ButcherWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

KerrvCnn M. Cook. Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456


MANUEL J. F f l L EJ.S.C. 1235-5153

NOV 2 7 2018COUNTY CLEWS OFFICE

NEW YORK


ASBESTOS LITIGATION! NYCAL| I.A.S. Part 13; (Mendez, J.)

~ ?.

ft J /M t

i v J 'v 21 imThis Document Relates to: /• ’ ST 13NYS SUP;;; COURT - O' / J iIndex No.: 106691/02,

<* .*U.f iPHYLLIS BUTCHER UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER jh

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., requests summary judgment in the


and cross-claims against Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc.,


Dated: Nev4 York,iNew YorkUUS(o \ , 2018

Attorney forpfamti^sfl.Phyllis ButcherWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.


s^Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Ke:


MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. 1122-5630F 3 L E D

NOV 2 7 2018COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

Documents

Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 11/27/2018 · Representative for the Estate of PETER CUMMINGS, and DIANNE CUMMINGS, Individually UNOPPOSED SUMMARY JUDGMENT