Upload
others
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Science Strategy 2010-2015
FOODSTANDARDSAustralia New Zealand
Science Strategy 2010-2015
FOODSTANDARDSAustralia New Zealand
ii
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
© Food Standards Australia New Zealand 2010 ISBN 978-0-642-34571-4
This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ). Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Information Officer, FSANZ, PO Box 7186, Canberra BC, ACT 2610.
An electronic version of this work is available on the Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) website at http://www.foodstandards.gov.au. This electronic version may be downloaded, displayed, printed and reproduced in unaltered form only for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation.
Food Standards Australia New Zealand
FSANZ Australia FSANZ New ZealandPO Box 7186 PO Box 10599, The TerraceCanberra BC ACT 2610 WellingtonAustralia New Zealand
Tel +61 2 6271 2241 Tel + 64 4 978 5630Fax +61 2 6271 2278 Fax +64 4 473 9855Email [email protected] Email [email protected]
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
iii
Contents
Message from the Chief Scientist 1
Introduction, Purpose & Scope 3
FSANZ Values 7
Strategic Areas 8
Strategic Area 1: Increasing our Scientific Capacity 10
Strategic Area 2: Extending the Evidence Base 16
Strategic Area 3: Building our Collaboration and International Linkages 22
Strategic Area 4: Enhancing our Communication and Stakeholder Engagement 27
Strategic Area 5: Enhance our Capability to Identify and Respond to Emerging Issues 31
Strategic Area 6: Continue to Provide Leadership in Developing Food Regulatory
Science Capacity 35
Strategic Area 7: Measuring our Performance 40
Attachment 1 43
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
1
Message from the Chief Scientist
The scientific work of Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) forms the foundation of our
ability to continue to ensure food safety and protect the public health and safety of consumers.
FSANZ first developed its Science Strategy “Striving for Excellence in Food Regulatory Science”
to cover the period 2006-2009, describing how we intended to further enhance our scientific
resources to maintain the safety of the food supply in Australia and New Zealand in rapidly
changing times.
At the time, the then Chief Scientist of FSANZ, Dr Marion Healy, reflected that we were
witnessing changes in the nature and makeup of food and consumer expectations about what
they want from food, and alluded to the greater interest of governments, both national and
international, in using food and food regulation to achieve long-term public health outcomes
through programs such as mandatory fortification. The situation has not changed, and in fact it
could be argued that the pace of change has increased.
The Science Strategy for 2006-20091 set out to build on a number of initiatives including
enhancing our public health nutrition and social science capability, increasing collaboration with
Australian State and Territory Government agencies and the New Zealand Food Safety Authority
on our respective science programs, and strengthening external engagement with Australian
States and Territories, New Zealand Government agencies and the wider scientific and technical
community. This first Science Strategy has proven to be highly successful and significant
advancements have been achieved in relation to the goals we set. For example, FSANZ has
established a Chief Public Health Nutrition Advisor position to facilitate our current and future
work around public health nutrition. Also the areas of social science and economic research
have been strengthened to reflect their increasingly important roles within FSANZ. At the same
time, given the ever increasing demand for maintaining scientific expertise in the chemical and
biological sciences, we have established the new position of General Manager, Risk Assessment.
FSANZ also recognises that we operate within defined resources, and are putting greater
emphasis on prioritising and managing our activities to consolidate and build on the excellent
reputation we have already achieved in scientific areas.
It is now time to develop a new Science Strategy for the period 2010-2015 that will continue to
build on the good work of the previous strategy, and provide us with a platform for our future
scientific focus going forward.
1 http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/_srcfiles/Science_%20Strategy_final.pdf
2
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
Fundamental principles by which we undertake our science, espoused in the previous Science
Strategy, those of Performance, Integrity, Leadership, Collaboration, International Linkages,
Improvement and Responsiveness, will continue to underpin our future scientific work and will
remain the principles for the Science Strategy 2010-2015. Our strategic aims, as outlined in the
first Science Strategy, will also largely remain the same. However, the second Science Strategy
identifies ongoing mechanisms that we will continue to employ, and future mechanisms that we
will introduce, to maintain and further enhance our scientific capability. In this regard, the second
Science Strategy will not only set out high level principles and aspirations, but contain a second
tier that will outline yearly plans that target areas for specific work in these challenging times,
managed within available resources.
FSANZ will continue to maintain the safety of the Australian and New Zealand food supply in
partnership with Australian States and Territories and New Zealand. To do this, we need to
continue to leverage existing resources and enhance our scientific resources in the most efficient
and effective manner as described in this Science Strategy 2010-2015. I take this opportunity to
commend the document to all our stakeholders.
Dr Paul Brent
Chief Scientist
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
3
Introduction, Purpose & Scope
About FSANZ
FSANZ is an independent statutory agency with bi-national responsibilities for developing food
regulatory measures. The overarching vision of FSANZ is a safe food supply which supports the
health of people in Australia and New Zealand. In line with this vision, FSANZ has responsibility
for developing food regulatory measures including food standards and joint codes of practice
with industry covering content and labelling of food in Australia and New Zealand. FSANZ also
has responsibility for establishing primary production standards, food safety standards and in
promulgation of maximum residue limits into the Code for agricultural and veterinary chemical
residues set by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority2 (APVMA) for Australia.
Governance of the food regulatory system in Australia and New Zealand is embodied in
an intergovernmental agreement which separates the responsibility of policy development,
standards setting and the implementation and enforcement of standards set for food (Figure 1).
Policy is developed by the Australian States and Territories and the Australian and New Zealand
governments and policy agreement is ultimately made by the Australia and New Zealand Food
Regulation Ministerial Council (ANZFRMC). Food standards setting is the responsibility of FSANZ,
with the primary decision-maker being the FSANZ Board. Decisions by the FSANZ Board
are subject to review by ANZFRMC. The enforcement and implementation of food standards
for all food offered for sale is the responsibility of the States and Territories with the Australian
Quarantine and Inspection Service also responsible for imported produce in Australia; the New
Zealand government is responsible for both imported and domestic products. Collaboration and
integration across all of these areas is essential in developing effective food regulation.
2 The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) is an Australian government authority responsible for the assessment and
registration of pesticides and veterinary medicines and for their regulation up to and including the point of retail sale. Part of these responsibilities
is the setting of maximum residue limits for food commodities in Australia.
4
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
Figure 1: Food Regulatory Framework
POLICY DEVELOPMENTAustralian State & Territories and the Australian and New
Zealand Governments
STANDARDS SETTING
Food Standards Australia New Zealand
IMPLEMENTATION & ENFORCEMENT
Australian States and Territories and Australian
Quarantine and Inspection Service, New Zealand
Authorities
The process FSANZ uses to develop food regulatory measures is very open with input from
government, industry, consumers and other stakeholders. In developing, reviewing or varying food
regulatory measures, FSANZ adheres to three primary objectives3 in descending order of priority:
• protection of public health and safety;
• provision of adequate information relating to food to enable consumers to make informed
choices; and
• prevention of misleading or deceptive conduct.
In developing and varying standards, FSANZ must also have regard to:
• the need for standards to be based on risk analysis using the best available
scientific evidence;
• the promotion of consistency between domestic and international food standards;
• the desirability of an efficient and internationally competitive food industry;
3 Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
5
• the promotion of fair trading in food; and
• any written policy guidelines formulated by the Ministerial Council.
Food Regulatory Science in FSANZ
To meet these objectives FSANZ ensures that food regulatory measures are based on the best
available scientific evidence, using a risk analysis framework. Risk analysis frameworks provide
a structured approach to examine and assess the risks and benefits associated with food and
food ingredients, and to formulate, implement and communicate risk management decisions.
FSANZ applies the risk analysis approach to setting standards. The risk analysis framework used
by FSANZ to make food regulatory decisions encompasses the broad spectrum of scientific
areas in which FSANZ works including nutrition, toxicology, microbiology, consumer and social
sciences and economic research. FSANZ uses the risk analysis framework4 (Figure 2) as a
decision-making tool that allows separation of the scientific aspects of risk analysis from the
broad range of factors which impact on the ultimate risk management decisions. However, it is
important to recognise that scientific approaches may also be used to inform the selection of risk
management options. Risk assessment is the evidence based analysis of all relevant scientific
information and data relating to a food health risk. Risk management is the outcome-based
analysis of the risk assessment, policy guidance and other relevant information to develop and
recommend risk management options.
4 http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/aboutfsanz/scientificcapabilities/riskanalysis.cfm
6
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
Figure 2: Risk Analysis Framework
Risk CommunicationInteractive exchange of information & opinions
Risk AssessmentEvidence based
Risk ManagementOutcome based
In its role of standards setting, FSANZ undertakes food regulatory science, defined as the use of
risk analysis, including the analysis of all available information and data, to inform food regulatory
activities including standards development. Food regulatory science recognises that food
regulatory decisions encompass a broad range of scientific areas and that other factors, such
as trade and consistency with international food standards, also need consideration in order
to ensure the best food regulatory decisions. Further information on FSANZ’s food regulatory
science is available in our document, Analysis of Food-Related Health Risks.5
Purpose and Scope of Science Strategy 2010-2015
FSANZ’s vision is a safe food supply which supports the health of people in Australia and New
Zealand. FSANZ achieves this vision through the development of effective food standards in
collaboration with Australian and New Zealand governments. The role of FSANZ scientific work in
the standards development process is critical to achieving this vision. The purpose of the FSANZ
Science Strategy 2010-15 and yearly implementation plans is to position our food regulatory
science to address current and emerging challenges through a focus on seven key strategic areas.
In developing the Science Strategy 2010-15 and yearly implementation plans, FSANZ intends to
build upon the success of its first Science Strategy, “Striving for Excellence in Food Regulatory
Science”, 2006-09.
5 http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/_srcfiles/Food%20Related%20Health%20Risks%20WEB_FA.pdf
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
7
The drivers for the first Science Strategy remain at the commencement of this second FSANZ
Science Strategy, including changes in the nature and make up of food and consumer
expectations, as well as the interest in food regulation as a way to achieve long-term public
health outcomes.
The Science Strategy 2010-2015 identifies seven strategic areas and within each area, three
to four strategic aims which FSANZ will focus on enhancing over the next five years. These
strategic areas and aims are outlined in further detail in this document. This strategy is not
intended to provide extensive details on specific areas of FSANZ scientific work, rather it
identifies some of the key areas we will focus on enhancing. The Science Strategy 2010-2015 is
targeted at FSANZ stakeholders and other interested parties in addition to providing guidance to
FSANZ staff.
The primary intention of the Science Strategy 2010-2015 is to describe how FSANZ will further
enhance its scientific capability and resources to continue to meet future food regulatory needs
and challenges. Underpinning the Science Strategy will be yearly implementation plans, which
will provide further information on the specific objectives and deliverables under each strategic
aim. These objectives and deliverables will clearly identify actions that FSANZ will take in order
to ensure the science strategy is implemented and ensure that FSANZ continues to evolve and
enhance our food regulatory science.
FSANZ Values
Professional values relate to the principles that guide our decisions and actions. In undertaking
our scientific work it is important to recognise the values of the organisation including:
• Striving for professionalism and excellence in whatever we do;
• Collaborating effectively to achieve results;
• Being inclusive in how we work;
• Being transparent in our decision making and processes;
• Being proactive and responsive in identifying and questioning of issues raised;
• Demonstrating innovation and creativity as well as consistency in the work we do; and
• Showing leadership of the highest standard.
Adherence to these values will support achievement of the strategic aims within each strategic
area that is the focus of this Science Strategy.
8
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
Strategic Areas
FSANZ has identified a number of key strategic areas covering the broad range of scientific areas
in which FSANZ works. The strategic areas are intended to be overarching, covering all areas of
food regulatory science. The Science Strategy informs and supports these areas of work and
other areas that underpin the day to day work of FSANZ. The key strategic areas identified are
closely linked to the strategic imperatives identified in the FSANZ Corporate Plan6 which shape
the overarching strategic framework for FSANZ.
The key strategic areas for the Science Strategy 2010-2015 are:
1. Increasing our Scientific Capacity
2. Extending the Evidence Base
3. Building our Collaboration and International Linkages
4. Enhancing our Communication and Stakeholder Engagement
5. Enhancing our Capability to Identify and Respond to Emerging Issues
6. Continuing to Provide Leadership in Developing Food Regulatory
Science Capacity
7. Measuring our Performance
Each of these key strategic areas is described in the subsequent sections of this Science
Strategy. For each key strategic area a number of strategic aims are identified and described.
6 http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/_srcfiles/Corporate%20Plan%20Brochure.pdf
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
9
Increasing Our Scientific Capacity• People• Information & Data• Analysis tools
Extending the Evidence Base• Data analysis• Data collection• Data management• Sharing data
Building our Collaboration & International Linkages• Jurisdictions & Government agencies• International agencies• Research & educational bodies• Industry
Enhancing our Communication & Stakeholder Engagement• Engage with stakeholders• Communicating widely• Promoting our science• Transparency
Enhancing our Capability to Identify & Respond to Emerging Issues• Identifying issues• Investigating issues• Building linkages• Predicting issues
Continuing to Provide Leadership in Developing Food Regulatory Science• Building knowledge• Harmonising food regulations• Prioritising capacity building• Building collaborative partnerships
Measuring our Performance• Peer review• Strategic imperatives
10
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
Strategic Area 1: Increasing our Scientific Capacity
Increasing our Scientific Capacity
• People
• Information and Data
• Analysis Tools
The food supply is constantly changing as a result of new technologies, expanding trade
opportunities, ethnic diversity in the population and changing individual diets. The challenge
for FSANZ is to continue to ensure the safety of the food supply by developing effective food
regulations that are based on science. FSANZ’s ability to develop effective food regulations
relies on our capability and our capacity to assess scientific data and information and manage
and communicate the conclusions of the assessment. Maintaining and enhancing our scientific
capacity in relation to our staff, resources and our tools used to undertake food regulatory
science is essential. In maintaining and enhancing our scientific capacity, it is important to
recognise that FSANZ works with limited resources. Due to these limited resources, FSANZ
relies on outside assistance, including analytical laboratories and expertise, to undertake food
regulatory science.
FSANZ also faces the new challenge of expectations that food regulation can be used to
improve long term population health outcomes. This requires careful consideration by FSANZ
and a need to ensure a high level of specialist skills and expertise in the public health area,
particularly when seeking to better understand and address population-specific issues, such as
food intolerance, which are difficult to predict and examine clinically.
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
11
People
Strategic Aim
Continue to build our scientific expertise in existing and new areas of food
regulatory science.
A key component of maintaining and enhancing our scientific capacity and capability is to ensure
a diverse and highly skilled workplace. FSANZ currently has a broad range of scientific expertise,
covering many disciplines including:
• Toxicology
• Nutrition
• Microbiology
• Consumer science
• Social sciences
• Molecular genetics
• Economics
• Food technology
• Epidemiology
• Chemistry
• Risk Assessment
Due to the constantly changing nature of the food supply and identification of different food-
risks, FSANZ must continually asses its internal capabilities and capacity to ensure that we can
meet current and future challenges relating to food regulatory science. Ensuring highly skilled
scientific staff across the range of scientific discipline areas is essential to ensuring that FSANZ
can assess, manage and communicate the variety of potential health risks associated with
foods. Undertaking regular skills audits of the organisation, and focussing recruitment activities
on skill gaps, will assist in identifying any skills gaps that may exist. Undertaking evaluations for
the purpose of completing a risk assessment is also a recognised and specialist skill, critical for
undertaking food regulatory science consistent with the Risk Analysis Framework.
12
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
FSANZ will aim to enhance the evaluation skills of our scientists, primarily through professional
development and in-house training opportunities.
In addition to ensuring a diverse internal skill set, it is important that FSANZ staff continue to
undertake professional development to maintain and enhance their skills and knowledge. One
of the methods for FSANZ staff to do this is by actively participating at national and international
conferences, meetings and training courses. Providing staff with the opportunity to present
at conferences that relate to food regulatory science will continue to enhance staff skills and
knowledge. Participation at these conferences also provides an opportunity for broader
discussion about FSANZ including discussions with key stakeholders. Additionally it will be
important that FSANZ identifies future food regulatory issues, including the development and
application of new technologies, and ensures that staff development and recruitment processes
provide the skills and expertise within the organisation that can address these as well as any
identified gaps in scientific capacity.
A further opportunity to enhance staff skills and knowledge is through in-house training;
mentoring; placements with other agencies; and formal training courses. Succession
opportunities are an important aspect of enhancing staff skills in both technical areas and
in leadership and senior management. Creating well planned and structured succession
opportunities within FSANZ over the next 5 year period will position the staff well for making
strong advancements in food regulatory science. Under the previous Science Strategy 2006-09,
FSANZ initiated a program of in-house training to cross skill staff in various scientific areas. This
program allows staff to develop their skills and knowledge in areas outside of their core expertise.
It is anticipated that this program will continue to be developed and cover a wide variety of
scientific areas.
Information and Data
Strategic Aim
Undertake the highest quality food regulatory science and ensure it is current
and robust.
FSANZ uses a variety of information and data to inform our food regulatory science. Ensuring
that information and data is assessed in a consistent way and is of the highest quality is essential
in ensuring our food regulatory science is robust.
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
13
As part of the risk analysis process, the risk assessment requires the examination of scientific
data on a particular physical, chemical (including nutrients) or microbiological hazard in food.
The risk assessment process is comprised of four steps namely: hazard identification; hazard
characterisation; dietary exposure assessment; and risk characterisation. The data used to
inform the risk assessment may be obtained from: laboratory investigations (toxicological
or microbiological studies); human epidemiological studies; analytical data on the levels of
substances in the food supply; and data on the level of exposure to specified food chemicals
from dietary and other sources. For some application and proposal work, FSANZ also utilises
consumer research data, which assists in providing information on consumer perceptions of food
issues and is used in the risk assessment and development of risk management options.
The data FSANZ utilises in its assessments may come from books, scientific journals, national
and international regulatory agencies, scientific opinions, unpublished raw data, and industry
generated research data. The data may be obtained from published sources and unpublished
sources and as such, FSANZ employs different levels of assessment of data to ensure it is
robust and generated according to best scientific practices. Different types of data may be given
different levels of importance based on the uncertainty that arises from the data. For example,
anecdotal evidence would normally have less weight than raw data from industry and published
journal articles. The examination and combining of the data from all relevant scientific sources,
including the identification of uncertainties, provides the risk assessment outcome which is used
to infer a level of human health risk. In order to ensure the highest quality food risk assessment,
FSANZ should continue to source and utilise the most appropriate data and information from all
sources to inform its food regulatory science decisions. To do this, FSANZ requires access to
relevant scientific journals and search databases.
It is recognised that in some cases the evidence base is insufficient to allow a decision to be
made on a food regulatory measure, due to the high level of uncertainty that is associated
with the science. In these cases, it needs to be made clear that there are insufficient data and
information to inform food regulatory science decisions. If possible, the agency will seek to
generate the required data to reduce the level of uncertainty associated with the science, which
could be undertaken by FSANZ alone or in partnership with research institutions. The agency
will actively look for opportunities to undertake joint research activities that will address gaps in
the existing evidence base. Additional data and information may become available after food
regulatory decisions are made. It is important that FSANZ continues to monitor and assess data
in relation to food regulatory decisions to ensure it remains robust and to decide when new data
are required.
14
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
Analysis Tools
Strategic Aim
Maintain the functionality and application of the Risk Analysis Framework.
To ensure the highest quality food regulatory science, FSANZ uses a risk analysis framework.
The risk analysis framework is important in providing a structured approach to considering the
diverse range of risks that may occur in food. The approach to risk analysis used by FSANZ is
based on the general framework adopted by international agencies, although the diversity of
issues FSANZ considers requires some flexibility to encompass the food regulatory environment
in which FSANZ operates. The risk analysis framework is essentially a decision-making
framework that allows separation of the scientific aspects of risk analysis from the broad range
of factors which impact on the ultimate risk management decisions. It is important to note that
there is an inherent relationship between appropriate risk management options being based on
high quality risk assessments.
The risk analysis framework applied by FSANZ incorporates risk assessment, risk management
and risk communication. Risk assessment is the evidence based analysis of all relevant scientific
information and data relating to a food health risk. Risk management is the outcome based
analysis of the risk assessment in conjunction with the consideration of policy guidance and
other relevant information to determine and select appropriate risk management options. Risk
communication involves the interactive exchange of information and opinions throughout the
risk analysis process concerning risk, risk-related factors, and risk perceptions, among risk
assessors, risk managers, consumers, industry, the academic community and other interested
parties. Risk communication also includes the explanation of risk assessment findings and the
basis of risk management decisions.
FSANZ’s internal organisation is arranged around the functional application of the risk analysis
framework, with risk assessment and risk management scientists (Attachment 1). There are
separate risk assessment and management sections for most scientific disciplines and specialist
risk communicators. In undertaking food regulatory science, FSANZ uses multidisciplinary teams
including risk assessors, risk managers (including consumer scientists and economists7) and risk
communicators for individual projects.
7 Consumer and social sciences contribute to both risk assessment and risk management activities, though they are organisationally located in
the risk management branch.
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
15
This structure ensures input from relevant areas for all stages of the project. In addition to individual
project teams, FSANZ also has over-arching cross-discipline groups including the Senior Science
Group, International Steering Group and the Food Incident Response Group which facilitate wider
staff engagement and discussion of various projects.
Continuing to ensure the integrity of the risk analysis framework in FSANZ work, including its
suitability for assessing the wide variety of risks associated with food, is important in ensuring
food regulatory decisions are based on the best evidence available, are managed appropriately
and are communicated widely.
Strategic Area 1: Increasing our Scientific Capacity
FSANZ’s scientific capacity is essential to ensuring our continued ability to undertake
the highest quality food regulatory science. Ensuring diverse scientific skills, high quality
information and data assessment and utilising the best available tools will assist FSANZ
in maintaining its scientific capacity. To achieve this FSANZ will:
• Continue to build our scientific expertise in existing and new areas of food
regulatory science
• Undertake the highest quality food regulatory science and ensure it is current and
robust
• Maintain the functionality and application of the Risk Analysis Framework
• Attract and retain staff who are highly trained in technical areas and/or leadership
by offering appropriate professional development and succession opportunities
16
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
Strategic Area 2: Extending the Evidence Base
Extending the Evidence Base
• Data analysis
• Data collection
• Data management
• Sharing data
A wide range of scientific and technical data is utilised by FSANZ to inform food regulatory
decisions. FSANZ sources data from a wide variety of areas including national and international
agencies, research institutions and industry. These data assist in informing science-based
decisions on food regulatory measures.
FSANZ actively coordinates surveillance, monitoring and evaluation surveys as well as
undertaking consumer and economic surveys in partnership with Australian States and Territories
and New Zealand. In developing the data collection program, a forward plan of standards
development activities and emerging issues is considered so that data generated are relevant
and current. Currently, the program collects a wide range of data including:
• Microbiological status of foods
• Food chemical content of foods
• Food composition (nutrient content)
• Economic (cost–benefit)
• Consumer behaviour, attitudes and knowledge towards food related issues
In collaboration with other government agencies in Australia and New Zealand, FSANZ collects
data on the food supply to ensure that foods are safe and comply with standards, including
those for microbiological contaminants, chemical contaminants, residues of agricultural and
veterinary chemicals and substances added to food. Surveillance activities generate scientific
analytical data through targeted surveys relating to particular substances in particular foods, or
wider surveillance of a range of substances in a wide variety of food. These data on the food
supply enable FSANZ to undertake a robust risk analysis to assess food safety and to inform
regulatory activities, ensure confidence in a safe food supply.
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
17
A surveillance program led by FSANZ aims to collect data on the presence and concentration
of substances in foods. A significant component of the FSANZ surveillance program is the
Australian Total Diet Study (ATDS) which is Australia’s most comprehensive assessment
of consumers’ dietary exposure (intake) to pesticide residues, contaminants and other
substances. The regular survey aims to obtain a broad picture of the level and extent of chemical
contaminants in the food supply. The ATDS can also be used to obtain analytical data on a range
of other substances found in food including food additives and nutrients.
FSANZ also manages the work of the surveillance and monitoring component for the Food
Regulation Standing Committee’s Implementation Sub-Committee (ISC)8. The central element of
the ISC surveillance and monitoring component is the Coordinated Food Survey Plan (the Plan).
The Plan is developed, implemented and reviewed as a collaborative approach across Australian
States and Territories and New Zealand for surveillance and monitoring activities that develop the
evidence base used for standards development, effective implementation and interventions.
The Australian nutrient food composition database is maintained by FSANZ. Nutrient data for
foods comes from a variety of sources including: analysed values generated from analytical
programs commissioned by FSANZ; data obtained from other countries food tables; data
supplied by the food industry; data taken from food labels; imputed values from similar foods; or
values calculated using a recipe approach. FSANZ has been improving the quality and quantity
of analysed values for foods by developing analytical programs which focus on the foods
identified as being key nutrient contributors for Australians. Nutrient analysis is then targeted
towards these foods to ensure that the food composition data are accurate.
In addition to surveillance activities, FSANZ also undertakes monitoring and evaluation of the
food supply and regulatory measures. FSANZ regularly undertakes scientific and technical
evaluation of the impact, effectiveness and appropriateness of implementing key food regulatory
measures through its evaluation strategy and associated activities. Evaluation allows FSANZ to
identify and assess the impact of key changes to food regulations on our stakeholders, including
our regulatory partners in Australian States and Territories and New Zealand, the food industry,
health professionals and consumers.
FSANZ continues to build its evidence base in relation to consumer knowledge, behaviours and
attitudes towards a range of issues associated with food.
8 ISC’s primary responsibility is to develop and oversee a consistent approach across Australian States and Territories and New Zealand to the
implementation and enforcement of food regulations.
18
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
For some issues in the risk analysis process, it is important to be able to predict consumer
behaviour in order to manage the risk effectively. Food labelling, whether it is for consumer
information related to health matters, food safety and/or to enable consumers to make informed
food choices, requires that consumers will understand the information on the label and that
it assists them in choosing appropriate food. The collection of data in relation to consumer
knowledge, behaviours and attitudes in relation to food purchase and use of labels assists in
strengthening the evidence base.
Data Analysis
Strategic Aim
Improve our data collection, analysis and reporting methodologies.
The data FSANZ obtains through its surveillance, monitoring, evaluation and social science
research surveys provide significant data and information to inform food regulatory science
decisions. The data also aid in maintaining confidence that the food supply is being monitored,
ensuring the public health and safety of the food supply. As FSANZ continues to consider a wide
variety of issues, including fortification and health claims, it will become increasingly important to
continue the coordination and collection of this data.
The methods used to collect, collate and analyse data are essential to ensuring the evidence
base FSANZ utilises for its risk analysis is accurate and robust. Data collection methodologies will
vary according to the type of data being collected and where and how it is intended to be used.
As methodologies for surveys including sampling, analytical detection and analysis techniques
continue to be improved, it is important for FSANZ to continue to adapt its processes to suit
best practice. When considering undertaking survey work FSANZ should research appropriate
methodologies for collection and analysis to ensure data produced are fit for purpose.
Analysis of data collected for a particular purpose requires a good understanding of the data
including its limitations. It is important to note that all data collected and utilised by FSANZ
will contain uncertainty and variability. Reporting the data accurately, including articulating the
uncertainty and variability in data, will assist in building understanding of the data used and its
strengths and limitations.
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
19
Data Collection
Strategic Aim
Continue to increase and coordinate the systematic collection of data.
FSANZ also has an active role in coordinating the collection of data with national and
international food regulatory partners. FSANZ works closely with regulatory partners to ensure
collaboration on surveillance activities. Collaboration with regulatory partners assists in: ensuring
the efficient use of resources; reduces duplication of information; ensures consistency in
methodologies for sampling and analysis; assists in identifying and addressing data gaps; and
provides a shared understanding of data needs.
Data Management
Strategic Aim
Improve and integrate our data management and analysis systems to meet
future requirements.
In undertaking risk analysis, FSANZ utilises data from many sources within its evidence base. It
has been identified that the current data management systems which FSANZ utilises to house its
evidence base require updating and were developed using proprietary software systems which are
no longer widely used. FSANZ is currently in the process of developing a new data management
platform which will create a central system to house FSANZ data. The updating of the data
management systems will also include integration of data in order to improve our analysis. The
system will be developed considering the future needs and requirements of the organisation.
20
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
Sharing Data
Strategic Aim
Increase our collaboration with national and international food regulatory
partners, industry and research institutions to collect and share data.
In addition to undertaking surveys and data collection, FSANZ also collaborates with other
organisations, including industry, to collect data. Collaborating and sharing information and
data including methodologies, can assist in filling data gaps, or can add further evidence to
food regulatory science. There are a number of national and international organisations which
collect data of relevance to food regulatory science, including other regulatory agencies, industry
and research institutions. FSANZ will aim to continually enhance relationships with these
organisations to continue to increase our evidence base.
FSANZ shares data with a number of national and international organisations including DAFF
in the area of residues surveys, Australian States and Territories and New Zealand in relation to
surveillance and monitoring activities, and international food regulatory agencies in relation to
analytical surveys which may be relevant to Australia or New Zealand. These data are important
in informing FSANZ food regulatory science.
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
21
Strategic Area 2: Extending the Evidence Base
Continuing to build and extend the evidence base is essential to ensuring FSANZ
is utilising the best available information and data to inform food regulatory science.
Ensuring that data are collected, collated, analysed and reported in a way that is fit
for purpose and is of the highest standard and quality is essential in food regulatory
science. Coordinating, managing and sharing of data are also important to ensure data
are maintained and available for use in relevant food regulatory matters. To continue to
extend the evidence base, FSANZ will:
• Improve our data collection, analysis and reporting methodologies
• Continue to coordinate the systematic collection of data
• Improve and integrate our data management and analysis systems to meet future
requirements
• Increase our collaboration with national and international food regulatory partners
and organisations to collect and share data
22
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
Strategic Area 3: Building our Collaboration and International Linkages
Building our Collaboration & International Linkages
• Jurisdictions & Government agencies
• International agencies
• Research & educational bodies
• Industry
The range and diversity of foods available in Australia and New Zealand has greatly expanded
in recent decades as the food supply becomes increasingly global. Inherent with the expansion
of the food supply is the expectation that food is safe for all to consumers all the time. FSANZ
recognises that food-related health risks may be under consideration by a number of people,
organisations and countries at any given time. Building collaboration and linkages with national
and international agencies to share information, data and best practice, identify emerging risks
and develop clear communication on risks in the food supply is important. FSANZ regularly
engages and collaborates with external experts including national and international regulatory
agencies, government departments, industry, universities and educational institutions to enhance
our food regulatory science.
Government Agencies
Strategic Aim
Enhance relationships with relevant national and international scientists
and agencies.
National
Building and enhancing our linkages with Australian States and Territories and New Zealand
government agencies is important to ensure food regulatory science meets its objectives.
Collaboration assists in encouraging the exchange of views on scientific matters of interest to
Australia and New Zealand food agencies and to develop a national/bi-national view.
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
23
Enhancing collaboration also facilitates a greater understanding and consensus on the science
which underpins food regulations including the information and methodologies used.
FSANZ currently collaborates with many scientists from Australian States and Territories and
New Zealand government agencies in forums including:
• Science Network Forum Workshops
• Scientific Advisory Groups
• Expert Advisory Groups
• Standards Development Advisory Committees
• Risk Management advisory groups e.g. Jurisdictional Forum
• Food Incident Group
• Australian Government Food Communication Group
• Annual or bi-annual meetings with agencies including the New Zealand Food Safety
Authority (NZFSA), the National Measurement Institute (NMI), the Department of
Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF), the Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA)
and the New Zealand Ministry of Health (NZMOH).
A number of networks are established through FSANZ in various specialist areas of work
including surveillance, dietary modelling, food composition, epidemiology and evaluation.
FSANZ also participates as an observer on the Food Regulation Standing Committee (FRSC)
and is a member of the Implementation Sub Committee (ISC). FRSC is responsible for co-
ordinating policy advice to the Ministerial Council and ensuring a nationally consistent approach
to the implementation and enforcement of food standards. ISC is a subcommittee of the Food
Regulation Standing Committee. Its role is to develop and oversee a consistent approach across
Australian States and Territories to the implementation and enforcement of food regulations and
standards, regardless of whether food is sourced from domestic producers, export-registered
establishments or from imports.
International
Collaborating with international agencies involved in ensuring food safety is increasingly
important as the food supply expands and becomes more global. There are many international
scientific bodies FSANZ collaborates with to continue to develop data collection and analysis
methodologies.
24
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
While it is recognised that food-related risks around the world may vary, sharing information, data
and best practices in relation to food science regulation can promote consistent approaches
to the analysis of risks. A number of individual FSANZ staff are also engaged in international
activities including participating on expert bodies of the major food-related multilateral
organisations, which adds a further dimension to our collaboration with scientists around the
world.
FSANZ regularly collaborates with international agencies to share knowledge and
expertise including:
• The Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO)
• The World Health Organisation (WHO)
• The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA)
• The Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR)
• The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Meetings on Microbiological Risk Assessment (JEMRA)
• Codex Alimentarius Commission
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
• World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE)
In addition, FSANZ collaborates with international agencies through established networks (e.g.
the International Food Chemical Safety Liaison Group and the Food Safety Quadrilateral Group9),
participates in staff exchanges and attends relevant meetings and workshops with other agencies
Research and Educational Bodies and Industry
Strategic Aim
Maximise our access to and utilisation of experts to provide advice on issues
relating to food regulatory science.
9 The Food Safety Quadrilateral Group comprises senior officials from Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States of America
governments and convenes annually to discuss strategic issues around food safety and to collaborate on specific projects of mutual interest/
benefit.
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
25
As a small agency, it is recognised that there may be specific food regulatory issues that arise for
which FSANZ does not have the expertise. There are many research agencies and universities
nationally and internationally with expertise in specific areas of relevance to food regulatory science.
Strengthening our linkages with these research agencies, universities and other educational
institutions by teaching, collaborative projects, invitations to participate in our activities or become
part of our expert groups can assist with increasing the FSANZ knowledge base.
A number of existing mechanisms are in place to enhance FSANZ’s collaboration with research
agencies, universities and educational institutions including:
• FSANZ Fellows Program
• Student projects
• Scientific or Expert Advisory Committees
These programs and groups provide a foundation for FSANZ to seek advice and guidance
on specific areas of food regulatory science. FSANZ staff are also invited to become part of
professional institutions, including becoming fellows of universities, which assists in enhancing
collaboration.
Collaboration with industry is also valuable to FSANZ, as the food industry provides expertise
and data on a range of areas including industrial processes and practices. Industry experts
can provide valuable data and information which assists in building the FSANZ evidence base.
Continuing to build collaboration with industry including sharing knowledge and information
in relation to FSANZ methodologies and risk analysis process will aid in developing a better
understanding of food regulatory science.
FSANZ regularly collaborates with industry to share knowledge and expertise including through
the Retailers and Manufacturers Liaison Committee (RMLC)10 and other networks established for
specific food regulatory issues.
10 The RMLC is a network of major food retailers who meet regularly to discuss issues relating to the Code.
26
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
Specific Networks
Strategic Aim
Develop new and enhance existing networks, including international, to facilitate
information sharing.
The establishment of specific networks consisting of national and international government
agencies, educational institutions or industry are useful for facilitating information sharing. FSANZ
has a number of existing networks established to facilitate the sharing of expertise, information,
data and best practice in relation to food regulatory science. Increasing our utilisation of existing
networks and identifying and establishing new networks, where appropriate, will continue to
enhance FSANZ linkages and further enhance food regulatory science.
Strategic Area 3: Building our Collaboration and International Linkages
Building our collaboration and linkages with stakeholders assists in facilitating the sharing
of information, data and best practice in relation to food regulatory science. Collaboration
and developing networks also assists in identifying emerging risks and developing clear
communication messages on risks related to food. Developing linkages and networks
with jurisdictions, national and international scientists, academia and industry will assist
in ensuring FSANZ has access to the best available information and data to make food
regulatory decisions. To continue to build and enhance our linkages, FSANZ will:
• Enhance relationships with relevant national and international scientists and
agencies
• Maximise our access to and utilisation of experts to provide advice on issues
relating to food regulatory science
• Develop new and enhance existing networks, including international, to facilitate
information sharing
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
27
Strategic Area 4: Enhancing our Communication and Stakeholder Engagement
Enhancing our Communication & Stakeholder Engagement
• Engage with stakeholders
• Communicating widely
• Promoting our science
• Transparency
The food regulatory framework that operates in Australia and New Zealand is a collaboration
between FSANZ, the Australian and New Zealand governments, State and Territory enforcement
agencies, industry and consumers. Communicating our science, including any subsequent risk
management options, with our stakeholders is an essential and ongoing component of the risk
analysis process. The purpose of communication is to allow for the sharing of information and
opinions related to the scientific evidence and the perceived risks associated with the foods.
Communication with our stakeholders is also important in informing the planning, prioritisation
and direction of FSANZ scientific work.
It is the responsibility of all of our staff to ensure that there is effective communication of our
science, involving an interactive dialogue between risk assessors, risk managers, specialist risk
communicators and stakeholders throughout the risk analysis process. FSANZ has developed
two strategies to assist in ensuring our communication and stakeholder engagement meets the
requirements of our stakeholders.
Engage with Stakeholders
Strategic Aim
Enhance linkages with our key stakeholders.
28
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
Sound stakeholder relations form an integral part of FSANZ work, particularly in relation to the
scientific work undertaken. Stakeholders, including government, industry and consumers, play an
important role in providing opinions which can influence the strategic direction of food regulatory
science. FSANZ recognises that effective stakeholder engagement is about constantly engaging
with and listening to stakeholders throughout the risk analysis process. Stakeholder engagement
is also about reaching out and involving stakeholders in the whole process including providing
adequate time to consider the issues. FSANZ recognises that stakeholders are playing an
increasingly important role in food regulatory science by providing different perceptions and views.
Communicating Widely
Strategic Aim
Communicate our science to a range of stakeholders in an appropriate manner.
Our scientists have a role in ensuring that we communicate issues in a way that maintains the
trust and confidence of the broader community. Our scientists aim to communicate our science
throughout the risk analysis process and in a manner that is accessible to all. To do this, FSANZ
uses a variety of mechanisms including our website which provides detailed information such
as reports as well as fact sheets and webinars to explain aspects of our scientific assessments
and risk management options. We recognise that it is important to ensure that our information is
provided in a way that takes into account the knowledge base of all our stakeholders.
To ensure that we communicate our science in a way that is accessible for consumers, FSANZ
has established a Consumer Liaison Committee (CLC)11. The CLCs main role is to provide advice
and comment on a range of information and publications intended for publication including
factsheets and website information.
Promoting our science
Strategic Aim
Enhance our reputation by promoting our science.
11 The CLC is committee made up of ‘grassroots’ consumers who provide input and advice to FSANZ on various issues including the
development of factsheets for consumers.
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
29
FSANZ undertakes scientific analysis of a range of issues which relate to food regulatory science.
The nature of food regulatory science is such that often the work we undertake is unique. FSANZ
aims to publish its work through reports, peer reviewed journal articles, factsheets and brochures
so that this is available to the wider community.
All scientific reports supporting standards development activities are publicly available on our
website and we also publish our major surveillance, monitoring and evaluation activities. We
have developed a ‘Technical Series’ of reports to ensure that our scientific reports continue to
be accessible and are provided in a consistent format. Similarly, reviews of the scientific literature
commissioned by FSANZ from external experts are generally available on the FSANZ website.
Peer reviews of our approach to specific areas of food regulatory science are also made available
on the website once completed.
Transparency
Strategic Aim
Be open to the range of views and assess these with rigour, diligence and
transparency.
We recognise that it is important to be transparent in our application of science and, as such,
our scientific reports are publicly available through the FSANZ website. The FSANZ consultation
process opens our scientific analysis up to a wide range of stakeholders, who can hold differing
views. In assessing stakeholder opinions to our scientific analysis, it is important that FSANZ
considers and addresses all views and issues identified. FSANZ recognises that during the
consultation process, additional information may become available which will need to be
included in the scientific analysis. FSANZ will consider all additional information and views of
stakeholders with diligence and transparency.
30
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
Strategic Area 4: Enhancing our Communication and Stakeholder Engagement
Communicating to a wide range of stakeholders is an essential element of the FSANZ
process and assists in maintaining transparency within the food regulatory system.
FSANZ has a diverse range of stakeholders who have varying knowledge levels of food
regulatory science. In communicating widely, FSANZ needs to ensure that its uses
a wide range of mechanisms and communication media to ensure all stakeholders
have appropriate access to information on scientific issues. FSANZ also needs to
promote its science and ensure that a broad range of views are considered as part of
the risk analysis process. To continue to enhance our communication and stakeholder
engagement, FSANZ will:
• Enhance linkages with our key stakeholders
• Communicate our science to a range of stakeholders in an appropriate manner
• Enhance our reputation by promoting our science
• Be open to the range of views and assess these with rigour, diligence and
transparency
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
31
Strategic Area 5: Enhance our Capability to Identify and Respond to Emerging Issues
Enhancing our Capability to Identify & Respond to Emerging Issues
• Identifying issues
• Investigating issues
• Building linkages
• Predicting issues
Food-related issues which start locally may quickly become national issues and, in many cases,
international issues. The ability to identify and respond to existing emerging issues quickly is
critical to ensuring there is no public health and safety risk and to ensure public confidence in the
food supply. FSANZ uses information from a wide range of sources to alert us to emerging food
issues that may arise within Australia and New Zealand or worldwide. The two factors which play
a significant role here are communications and trade.
Within Australia, there are established protocols for the coordination of Australian Government
agencies responsible for food safety and food issues in the event of a national food incident.
The National Food Incident Response Protocol may be used to coordinate action at the
national, State and Territory or local levels when triggered. The Protocol provides guidance on
the response to national incidents linked to microbiological, chemical, radiological, physical
or unknown hazards. In the case of outbreaks of foodborne illness, health authorities and the
Australian Health Protection Committee are responsible for managing the outbreak investigation.
In relation to imported food issues, FSANZ works closely with the Australian Quarantine and
Inspection Service (AQIS) within the framework of the Imported Food Inspection Scheme.
FSANZ provides advice to AQIS on the level of public health risk posed by specific foods,
whereas AQIS has operational responsibility for inspection and sampling of imported food.
32
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
Identifying Issues
Strategic Aim
Continue to identify issues relating to food regulatory science.
The ease of international communication means that the reporting of food-related issues is very
rapid, alerting both food regulators and consumers, often at the same time.
FSANZ is proactive at monitoring various media, both nationally and internationally, to identify
any trends in food issues which may be relevant to Australia or New Zealand in relation to food.
FSANZ prepares and distributes information bulletins and newsletters including Food Standards
News, Food Surveillance News and the Monitoring of Emerging Issues newsletter capturing
various aspects of food regulatory science. FSANZ staff also receive electronic updates of media
clips relating to food regulatory issues.
Investigating Issues
Strategic Aim
Investigate and respond to existing and emerging issues.
FSANZ is often required to investigate and respond to existing and emerging issues by
undertaking a risk analysis. When considering existing and emerging issues, the extent and
depth of the risk analysis will depend on a number of factors, particularly the time constraints
on responding to the issue. In undertaking any investigation, FSANZ needs to ensure that
risk analyses are based on the best available scientific evidence. Ensuring adequate risk
management options and communication to stakeholders surrounding FSANZ action in
response to emerging issues is also important. FSANZ advice is delivered via regular media
releases and fact sheets to ensure our stakeholders are up-to-date and well informed of our
position on emerging issues.
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
33
Building Linkages
Strategic Aim
Continue to build linkages with national and international agencies and food
regulatory partners to share information on emerged and emerging issues.
The extensive global trade in food means that any local issue can quickly become an issue in
many parts of the world. Communicating widely with our regulatory partners internationally and
other stakeholders can assist in the early identification of emerging issues. FSANZ has a number
of networks which facilitate the discussion on issues related to food incidents. These networks
provide a sound forum for the identification of emerging issues as well as the sharing of risk
analysis processes to determining effective outcomes to these issues. It is also important that
FSANZ continues to identify and establish new networks which may assist in enhancing our
ability to identify emerging issues.
Predicting Issues
Strategic Aim
Increase our capability to predict and investigate potential emerging issues.
The ability to predict potential emerging issues can assist in being prepared for any issues which
may occur in Australia or New Zealand. Strategic foresight is the ability to develop a forward
outlook of potential food regulatory issues which may arise. Increasing FSANZ’s capability to
undertake strategic foresight activities relies on our ability to proactively put in place strategies
that allow us to monitor wider networks for re-occurring food issues and to actively investigate
these issues. In undertaking strategic foresight activities, it is important that FSANZ has capacity
and resources to investigate these further to ensure that if a food risk does occur, FSANZ can be
prepared with appropriate management strategies.
34
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
Strategic Area 5: Enhance our Capability to Identify and Respond to Emerging Issues
FSANZ needs to continue to enhance our capability to identify and respond rapidly to
emerging and existing issues via rapid risk assessments to ensure the public health and
safety of consumers. Additionally, building linkages and networks which allow the flow
of information assists in ensuring FSANZ has access to as much relevant information
regarding issues as possible. Enhancing our ability to predict issues will also assist
FSANZ in being prepared for any issues which may arise quickly. To continue to enhance
our capability to identify and respond to emerging issues FSANZ will:
• Continue to identify issues relating to food regulatory science
• Investigate and respond to existing and emerging issues
• Continue to build linkages with national and international agencies and food
regulatory partners to share information on emerged and emerging issues
• Increase our capability to predict and investigate potential emerging issues
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
35
Strategic Area 6: Continue to Provide Leadership in Developing Food Regulatory Science Capacity
Continuing to Provide Leadership in Developing Food Regulatory Science
• Building knowledge
• Harmonising food regulations
• Prioritising capacity building
• Building collaborative partnerships
The sharing of knowledge and resources relating to food regulatory science is important to
continue to enhance food safety within the global food environment. FSANZ is widely recognised
as a centre of excellence in food regulation, and a leader in food science regulation issues.
FSANZ has a significant role in providing leadership in developing regional food regulatory
science. FSANZ works with various other national and international government and non-
government organisations to assist in building technical knowledge and skills in relation to food
regulatory science within the global food community.
National
Building knowledge and capacity within Australia and New Zealand in relation to food regulatory
science is essential in ensuring a collaborative and effective food regulatory system. FSANZ’s
role within the food regulatory system is to assess the science and to provide risk management
options. Building our regulatory partners’ knowledge of the risk analysis process including risk
assessment methods for different areas and how these are used in developing risk management
options will further enhance our capacity to work collaboratively within the Australian and New
Zealand food regulatory system.
International
FSANZ is particularly active in providing leadership in developing food regulatory science
capacity in the Asia-Pacific region. FSANZ is the co-chair of the Asia Pacific Economic
Cooperation (APEC) Food Safety Cooperation Forum (FSCF), which aims to strengthen food
safety within the APEC region.
36
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
The broad goals of the FSCF are:
• to develop transparent information-sharing and communication networks that provide
accurate and timely information to consumers and producers on food safety;
• to harmonise food safety standards, to the extent possible, with international standards
and encourage food safety systems consistent with members’ rights and obligations
under the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures and the Technical Barriers to Trade
Agreements of the World Trade Organisation; and
• to enhance skills and human resource capacities to enable the development of national
food safety regulatory systems that are harmonised with international standards.
The APEC cooperative approach recognises the need to develop a more robust approach to
strengthening food and consumer product safety standards and practices in the region, using
scientific risk-based approaches and without creating unnecessary barriers to trade.
FSANZ also actively participates in the development of international food standards through the
work of the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex) and its various committees. Participation
in the work of Codex ensures that FSANZ has influence in the methods and approaches used in
food regulatory science as well as involvement in the development of individual standards.
Building Food Regulatory Science Knowledge
Strategic Aim
Contribute to building food regulatory science knowledge with regulatory
partners both nationally and internationally to increase capacity.
Increasing knowledge of issues in relation to food regulatory science is important in building
capacity both nationally and internationally. FSANZ has an active role in hosting and contributing
to activities relating to increasing knowledge and skills in relation to food regulation science. In
undertaking this work, FSANZ aims to strengthen local technical and scientific capacity and
develop effective educational tools and programs.
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
37
Harmonising Food Regulations
Strategic Aim
Assist in improving capacity to harmonise food regulations in the region to
improve health and food safety outcomes.
Many countries, particularly developing countries, are not equipped to respond to or analyse the
risks associated with food. Lack of technical knowledge and effective infrastructure significantly
hinders a country’s ability to undertake analysis of issues relating to health and food safety.
Building capacity to undertake high quality food regulatory science is important to assist in
improving health and food safety outcomes. Additionally, improving this capacity may also assist
in harmonising food regulations and facilitating trade.
Capacity building aims to develop sustainable skills, organisational structures and resources
to assist organisation in undertaking work in relation to food safety issues. FSANZ has an
active role in providing capacity building activities within the Asia-Pacific region. Food safety
capacity building activities aim to promote the strengthening of food safety control systems
at the national level by improving sustainability and international compliance. Additionally,
FSANZ works closely with APEC to build robust food safety systems amongst APEC member
economies so as to accelerate progress towards harmonisation of food standards with
international standards.
FSANZ also contributes to the work of global harmonisation of food standards through
Codex. A key role of the Codex is to ensure fair trade practices in the food trade and promote
the coordination of food standards work undertaken by international government and non-
government organisations. FSANZ plays an active role in many Codex committees, in some
cases leading the Australian Government delegation.
38
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
Prioritising Capacity Building
Strategic Aim
Continue to develop a more robust approach to strengthening, prioritising and
coordinating regional food regulatory activities.
Capacity building must start with an assessment of gaps and needs to ensure that the activities
are appropriate and will address deficiencies in knowledge, skills or infrastructure. The assessment
of gaps assists in developing regional priorities for strengthening food regulatory science. FSANZ
has an active role in undertaking needs assessments and responding to requests for assistance in
relation to identifying and responding to food regulatory science needs. FSANZ also has an active
role in the coordination of activities aimed at addressing any gaps identified.
Building Collaborative Partnerships
Strategic Aim
Maintain and enhance linkages with other countries to enable the sharing of
knowledge and resources.
In developing capacity, it is important to continue to develop and enhance linkages to facilitate
the flow of information. These linkages can assist in the sharing of knowledge and information in
response to existing and emerging issues and may also assist in identifying gaps in food science
analysis. FSANZ has an active role in establishing new international collaborative relationships in
food safety capacity building, in undertaking a range of capacity building activities in the region
and in providing training to visiting food safety officials. FSANZ also encourages linkages within
the region during training activities to continue to assist other countries in developing wider
networks and sharing information.
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
39
Strategic Area 6: Continue to Provide Leadership in Developing Food Regulatory Science Capacity
Continuing to build capacity and knowledge of food regulatory science with national
and international partners is essential in building collaboration and harmonising food
regulatory systems. FSANZ has an active role in building food regulatory knowledge,
including identifying and prioritising capacity building activities and ensuring sharing of
information with regulatory partners. To continue to provide leadership in developing food
regulatory science, FSANZ will:
• Contribute to building food regulatory science knowledge with regulatory partners
both nationally and internationally to increase capacity
• Assist in improving capacity to harmonise food regulations in the region to
improve health and food safety outcomes
• Continue to develop a more robust approach to strengthening, prioritising and
coordinating regional food regulatory activities
• Maintain and enhance linkages with other countries to enable the sharing of
knowledge and resources
40
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
Strategic Area 7: Measuring our Performance
Measuring our Performance
• Peer review
• Strategic imperatives
Ensuring our scientific output is of a high standard and meets the objectives outlined in the
FSANZ Act is critical. Measuring our performance is a key way of ensuring that we meet our
objectives. FSANZ uses two main methods of measuring performance of our scientific outputs:
1. Peer Review
2. Strategic Imperatives
Peer Review
Strategic Aim
Continue to subject our scientific outputs and processes to review.
FSANZ utilises both internal and external peer review mechanisms to review scientific outputs
related to food regulatory science. Internally, FSANZ has a number of discipline groups,
chaired by a senior FSANZ scientist from the relevant disciplines. These disciplines include:
food technology; chemical safety; nutrition; biotechnology; and microbiology. A key function of
the discipline groups is to provide an internal peer review function on our scientific analysis of
particular issues. In addition to the discipline groups, FSANZ’s Chief Scientist, Risk Assessment
Branch Manager and Chief Public Health Nutrition Advisor also act as internal peer reviewers.
In addition to internal peer review mechanisms, FSANZ also utilises external expertise to provide a
critique of our scientific outputs. Our statutory consultation procedures require us to consult on the
scientific reports associated with the development and amendment of food regulatory measures.
FSANZ utilises this process to seek expert opinions from scientists throughout Australia and
Zealand. FSANZ also seeks formal peer review of a number of our key scientific assessments and
reports from independent experts both domestically and internationally.
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
41
The review process may take several different formats, ranging from individual experts to an expert
committee. External peer review is usually sought on highly complex food regulatory science
issues.
External peer review mechanisms are also utilised for our scientific processes or specific work
areas. Under the last Science Strategy (2006-09), FSANZ subjected a number of our scientific
processes to external peer review including:
• dietary modelling procedures and processes
• genetically modified (GM) food safety assessment procedures and processes; and
• food composition procedures and processes.
These types of peer reviews provide a rigorous critique of the processes used by FSANZ in
undertaking food regulatory science, including identifying areas for improvement in the processes
used by FSANZ. Continuing to subject our scientific outputs and processes to peer review will
allow FSANZ to further develop the tools used in our food regulatory science.
Strategic Imperatives
Strategic Aim
Continue to monitor and evaluate the quality of our science.
Strategic imperatives are four key areas of strategy which shape the overarching strategic
framework of FSANZ, and are identified in the FSANZ Corporate Plan 2009-2012. One of the
primary strategic imperatives established for the development of food regulatory standards
is that they are supported by good science and are based on a strong scientific evidence
base. This imperative aims to ensure that the standards FSANZ develops are: clear and easy
to understand; soundly based on evidence; and anticipate innovation and new technologies.
FSANZ utilises both internal and external reviews of our scientific methodology, processes and
practices to facilitate the continual enhancement of our scientific analysis processes. FSANZ
also benchmarks its performance against international best practices, while having regard to the
resources available to us.
42
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND
Strategic Aim
Evaluate strategies adopted to improve our food regulatory science.
To ensure that FSANZ continues to measure our performance in relation to food regulatory
science, a number of strategies have developed to measure this. These strategies cover a
number of specific areas of FSANZ food regulatory work including:
• Reputation management
• Stakeholder engagement
• Communication
• Project Management12
In measuring performance FSANZ will utilise these strategies, including the Science Strategy
2010-2015, to evaluate its performance.
Strategic Area 7: Measuring Our Performance
To continue to maintain a high standard of food regulatory science, it is essential that
FSANZ evaluates its performance to ensure that our key objectives are met. Subjecting
FSANZ outputs and processes to peer review will assist in ensuring the highest level of
food regulatory science. To measure our performance FSANZ will:
• Continue to subject our scientific outputs to review
• Continue to monitor and evaluate the quality of our science
• Evaluate strategies adopted to improve our food regulatory science
12 FSANZ has developed a Project Management document to assist both new and experienced staff to plan, implement and complete projects
in FSANZ. This document includes a project management methodology as well as definitions, checklists, templates and tips on good
practice.
FSANZ Science Strategy 2010-2015
43
Attachment 1
FSANZ Scientific Organisational Structure*
Risk Assessment
Risk Communication
Chief Scientist Branch
Scientific Strategy, International & Surveillance
Food Composition Evaluation & Monitoring
Chief Public Health Nutrition
Advisor
Risk Assessment Chemical Safety
Risk Assessment Microbiology
Risk Assessment Production
Process
Risk Assessment Public Health
Nutrition
Food Safety
Public Health Nutrition
Standards
Consumer and Social Science
Regulatory Analysis
Labelling and Information Standards
Product Safety Standards
Community and Stakeholder Engagement
Risk Assessment Branch
Food Standards - Canberra
Food Standards - Wellington
Risk Management
* This representation of FSANZ shows only the scientific sections and is not the entire FSANZ organisational structure. Additional sections (not included in this figure) are involved in the risk management of food regulatory science including the Office of Legal Counsel and Standards Management & Parliamentary Liaison.
Australia
PO Box 7186 Canberra BCACT 2610Australia
Tel: +61 2 6271 2241 Fax: +61 2 6271 2278
New Zealand
PO Box 10559 The TerraceWellington 6036 New Zealand
Tel: +64 4 978 5630 Fax: +64 4 473 [email protected]