15
Reducing Risks by Setting Measurable Targets Dr. Mathis Wackernagel www.FootprintNetwork.org

Footprint Reducing Risks by Setting Measurable Targets Dr. Mathis Wackernagel

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Footprint

Reducing Risks by Setting Measurable

TargetsDr. Mathis Wackernagel

www.FootprintNetwork.org

Metabolism like a cow

Bioproductive segments

18% Biologically Productive Land

11%Deserts, Ice Caps and Barren Land

67% Low-ProductivityOcean

4%BiologicallyProductive Ocean

Bioproductive Segments

22%

Personal planetoid

Global average availability of bioproductive Land + Sea = 1.9 global hectares/person

Footprint components

Fossil Fuel Built-up Waste Food Fibres absorption

Ecological Demand (Ecological Footprint) Ecological Supply (Biocapacity)

Footprint Areas for: Biocapacity Areas:

Growing Crops 0.53 Crop land 0.53

Grazing Animals 0.12 Grazing land 0.27

Settlements & infrastructure0.10 Built-up area 0.10

Producing timber & fuelwood0.33 Forest 0.86

Absorbing excess CO2 1.07

Harvesting Fish 0.14 Fishing Grounds 0.14

Total Global Demand2.29 Total Global Supply1.90

Global Footprint Accounts

(in global hectares/person, 1999 data)

Demand

Exceeds

Supply

By

20%

>

Global Footprint

Footprint time series

Footprint time series

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

Year

# o

f E

arth

s u

sed

# of Earths available,representing the totalcapacity of the biosphere

# of Earths used by humanity

Target

Median Scenario (UN/IPCC/FAO)

0

1

2

1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100

nu

mb

er

of

pla

ne

ts

total EF

fossil EFcomponent

FAO/UNmedian EF forfuture

EF Used for Scenario Analysis

0

1

2

1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100

past Footprint

FAO/UN median EF for future

"E.O. Wilson" scenario

Mid century scenario

"Brundtland" scenario

Ecological Debt in 4 Scenarios

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

[pla

ne

t y

ea

rs]

actual debt (2000) total debt for "Wilson"scenario

total debt for "midcentury" scenario

total debt for"Brundtland" scenario

debt through 2050 forBAU scenario

“Shrink & Share” by Region

0

1

2

1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100

nu

mb

er o

f p

lan

ets

global past

ASIA-PACIFIC

NORTH AMERICA

WESTERN EUROPE

CENTRAL AND EASTERNEUROPE

LATIN AMERICA AND THECARIBBEAN

AFRICA

MIDDLE EAST ANDCENTRAL ASIA

Implications for continents?

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

160%

180%

2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100 2120

ASIA-PACIFIC

NORTH AMERICA

WESTERN EUROPE

CENTRAL AND EASTERNEUROPE

LATIN AMERICA AND THECARIBBEAN

AFRICA

MIDDLE EAST AND CENTRALASIA

WORLD OR GLOBAL OVERALL TREND

What Does this Open up?

• Accounting leads to accountability

• Targets informed by risks associated with different scenarios

• 2 simple choices: integrating climate change and biocapacity

• Performance measure

Cat on Roman foot

www.FootprintNetwork.org

[email protected]