Upload
alisha-walsh
View
218
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
FOP Impasse Hearing
Board of County CommissionersApril 3, 2012
Background and Budget Environment
FY 2010-11 FOP Negotiations
Merits of Parties’ Positions
Summary
Presentation Outline
Background and Budget Environment
FY 2010-11 FOP Negotiations
Merits of Parties’ Positions
Summary
Presentation Outline
Background and Budget Environment
Since 2007:
Decreasing revenues
Major budget cuts
Record rate of foreclosures
Decline in economic activity
High unemployment
-3%-13%-11%
-27%
General Fund Ad Valorem(Budget $ in millions)
Background and Budget Environment
State’s projection for 2013 = -3.8%
Direction for FY 2010-11- No salary increases
- Reductions in operating expenses and funding for outside agencies
- Freezing most CIPs
- Reduce workforce
- Conserving cash
- No increase in tax rate
Background and Budget Environment
Background and Budget Environment
FY 2010-11 FOP Negotiations
Merits of Parties’ Positions
Summary
Presentation Outline
Approach for FY 10-11 Union Contracts
One year duration
0% salary increase
Remainder of contracts status quo
All unions agreed except FOP rank-and-file and AFSCME nurses
Consistency with other employee groups
FY 2010-11 Union Contracts
FY2010-11 FOP Negotiations
Union Final Proposal:- 4% salary increase retro to 10/1/10- Increased leave accrual- Compensatory leave time- Promotional increase language
County Final Proposal:- 0% salary increase - No increased leave accrual- No compensatory leave time- No promotional increase language
FY2010-11 FOP Negotiations
FY2010-11 FOP Negotiations
Special Magistrate RecommendationsNovember 8, 2011
-Wages-2% retro to July 1, 2011
-Increased Leave Accrual-No increased leave accrual
-Promotional Language-Memorialize language in contract
-County accepted
FY2010-11 FOP Negotiations
County Position
Union Position
BCC Decision
0% Salary Increase
No Increased Leave Accruals
4% Salary Increase retro to 10/1/10
Increased Leave Accruals
2% Salary Increase retro to 7/1/11
No Increased Leave Accruals
SMRecommendation
Background and Budget Environment
FY 2010-11 FOP Negotiations
Merits of Parties’ Positions
Summary
Presentation Outline
Merits of Parties’ Positions
Article 25
Leave
Merits of Parties’ Positions
FOP Position Increase Leave Accruals:
7 Additional days off for new employees
10 Additional days off for employees with 15+ years of service
County Position
Don’t Increase Leave Accruals
Merits of Parties’ Positions
FOP’s Position Rejected Twice Prior
June 2009 - Arbitrator ruled against FOP
April 2010 – BCC ruled against FOP
Merits of Parties’ Positions
FY 2010-11 Negotiations
FOP requested same increased leave accrual
Special Magistrate recommended against increasing FOP leave accruals
Merits of Parties’ Positions
Post-July 2007
Pre-July 2007 8 hours a day 80 hours every
two weeks 10 days every
two weeks
12 hours a day 85.4 hours every
two weeks 7 days every two
weeks
Sun Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10
Sun Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri Sat
1 2 3 4
5 6 7
Merits of Parties’ Positions
Pre-July 2007 Post-July 2007
Scheduled Work Days
260
Scheduled Work Days
182
Days Off 183
Days Off 105
Schedules
264 Hours 284.2 Hours
6.6 Weeks 6.6 Weeks
Merits of Parties’ Positions
Annual Paid Time Off
(Personal and Term)
Annual Paid Time off
(Personal and Term)
New Employee
15+ Year Employee
192 Hours 206.7 Hours
4.8 Weeks 4.9 Weeks
Current FOP 12-Hour Shift Employees
Regular/FOP Prior 8-Hour Shift Employees
Time Off Not Reduced in Schedule Change
Merits of Parties’ Positions
Current FOP Employee Proposed FOP Leave
Annual Paid Time Off
(Personal and Term)
New Employee
206.7 Hours 292.8 Hours
4.9 Weeks 6.8 Weeks
Union Wants 42% More Leave
Annual Paid Time off
(Personal and Term)
15+ Year Employee
284.2 Hours 402.6 Hours
6.6 Weeks 9.3 Weeks
Merit of Parties’ Position
Internal EquityOther 12 Hour Shift Employees
Employee Group New Employee15+ Year Employee
AFSCME 16 22
IAFF Paramedics 16 22
FOP Lieutenants 16.8 23.1
FOP Current 17 23.3
IAFF Dispatchers 24 33
Merit of Parties’ Position
Internal Equity
• Catastrophic leave donations
• Longevity
• Special risk retirement
Merit of Parties’ Position
FOP proposal for increased paid leave:
Fails on Merit
Inconsistent with long term policy strategy for employee leave
$1.9 million value
Merits of Parties’ Positions
Article 27
Wages
Merits of Parties’ Positions
FOP Position 4% increase to base pay:
Retroactive to 10/1/10
County Position
0% increase
Merits of Parties’ Positions
Cost of a 4% salary increase
$2.2 million increase to base for FOP
Not including cost of retroactivity
Every year from FY 2010-11 forward
$14.3 million to base for all BCC
Not including cost of retroactivity
Every year from FY 2010-11 forward
Merits of Parties’ Positions
Cost of a 2% salary increase
$1.1 million increase to base for FOP
Not including cost of retroactivity
Every year from FY 2010-11 forward
$8.4 million to base for all BCC
Not including cost of retroactivity
Every year from FY 2010-11 forward
Merits of Parties’ Positions
Internal Equity FY 2010-11
FOP Lts – 0% IAFF rank and file – 0% IAFF BCs – 0% LIUNA – 0% Non-union – 0% AFSCME – ?
Merits of Parties’ Positions
Recruitment and Retention
Vacancies and turnover Equal to county-wide average
Recruitment >1,000 applicants for certified
corrections officer vacancies
Merits of Parties’ Positions
External Equity
Corrections Officers
-3.64%/-0.15%
Corporals
-1.56%/-1.16%
Sergeants
-1.77%/+7.20%
Merits of Parties’ Positions
External Equity
Furloughs
Layoffs
Longevity
Shift Differential
Career Ladder
Merit of Parties’ Position
FRS Contributions• 3% contributions apply to all employees
• County savings• large percent returned to employees
• Most counties returned nothing
• County rates subject to increase
• Court has ruled unconstitutional• on appeal
• if not overturned, who will pay?
Background and Budget Environment
FY 2010-11 FOP Negotiations
Merits of Parties’ Positions
Summary
Presentation Outline
Summary
Request BCC reject FOP’s proposal for more paid leave and a 4% salary increase for FY 2010-11
Fails on merit, is inconsistent with long-term strategy and budget situation
Not in the best interest of the public including the public employees involved
FOP Impasse Hearing
Board of County CommissionersApril 3, 2012