Upload
votuong
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2011 Annual General Meeting
1
Perth –Thursday, 20 October 2011
Geoff Day, Managing Director & CEO
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Forward‐Looking Statements Disclaimer
Forward‐Looking Statements
• This presentation has been prepared by Kagara Ltd This document contains background information about Kagara Ltd current at the• This presentation has been prepared by Kagara Ltd. This document contains background information about Kagara Ltd current at the date of this presentation. The presentation is in summary form and does not purport to be all inclusive or complete. Recipientsshould conduct their own investigations and perform their own analysis in order to satisfy themselves as to the accuracy and completeness of the information, statements and opinions contained in this presentation.
• This presentation is for information purposes only. Neither this presentation nor the information contained in it constitutes an offer, i it ti li it ti d ti i l ti t th h l f K Ltd h i j i di tiinvitation, solicitation or recommendation in relation to the purchase or sale of Kagara Ltd shares in any jurisdiction.
• This presentation may not be distributed in any jurisdiction except in accordance with the legal requirements applicable in suchjurisdiction. Recipients should inform themselves of the restrictions that apply in their own jurisdiction. A failure to do so may result in a violation of securities laws in such jurisdiction.
• This presentation does not constitute investment advice and has been prepared without taking into account the recipient's i bj i fi i l i i l d d h i i d d i i hi iinvestment objectives, financial circumstances or particular needs and the opinions and recommendations in this presentation arenot intended to represent recommendations of particular investments to particular persons. Recipients should seek professional advice when deciding if an investment is appropriate. All securities transactions involve risks, which include (among others) the risk of adverse or unanticipated market, financial or political developments.
• To the fullest extent permitted by law, Kagara Ltd, its officers, employees, agents and advisers do not make any representation or l h l b l l f fwarranty, express or implied, as to the currency, accuracy, reliability or completeness of any information, statements, opinions,
estimates, forecasts or other representations contained in this presentation. No responsibility for any errors or omissions from this presentation arising out of negligence or otherwise is accepted.
• This presentation may include forward looking statements. Forward looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are outside the control of Kagara Ltd. Actual values, results or events may be materially different to those expressed or implied in this presentation. Given these uncertainties, recipients are cautioned not to place reliance on forward looking statements. Any forward looking statements in this presentation speak only at the date of issue of this presentation. Subject to any continuing obligations under applicable law and ASX Listing Rules, Kagara Ltd does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any information or any of the forward looking statements in this presentation or any changes in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such forward looking statement is based.
2
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Disclaimer – Competent Person’s Statement
Competent Person’s Statement
• Information in this presentation that relates to Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves is based on and accurately reflects reports• Information in this presentation that relates to Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves is based on and accurately reflects reports prepared by Peta Libby, Ingvar Kirchner, Ian Hodkinson, John Banning, Andrew Beaton, Glengarry Resources NL – ASX Release April 2, 2008*, North Queensland Metals Limited Prospectus, page 22 – released to the ASX 9 November, 2006*, Liontown Resources Limited – ASX Release 23 April 2008*, Charlie Georgees and Ian Morrison. All these persons, except Peta Libby and Ingvar Kirchner, are full‐time employees of Kagara Ltd or the relevant subsidiary. Each Competent Person consents to the inclusion of material in the f d t t i hi h it All f th C t t P d M b f Th A t l i I tit t f Mi i dform and context in which it appears. All of the Competent Persons named are Members of The Australasian Institute of Mining andMetallurgy and/or The Australian Institute of Geoscientists and possess relevant experience in relation to the mineralisation being reported on by them to qualify as Competent Persons as defined in the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results,Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (The JORC Code, 2004 Edition). * With respect to the resource statements for these projects, Kagara Ltd has relied on the veracity of the original resource statements.
• This Presentation, so far as it pertains to exploration results, ore and mineralisation, is based on information compiled by and as reported upon by Mr Joe Treacy, a full‐time employee of Kagara, who is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and has over five years experience which is relevant to the style ofmineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activities which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person
f h f h ‘ l f f l l l ’as defined in the 2004 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Treacy consents to the inclusion in the Presentation of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
JORC – Exploration Targets
• It is common practice for a company to comment on and discuss its exploration in terms of target size and type. The information in this presentation relating to exploration targets should not be misunderstood or misconstrued as an estimate of Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves. Hence the terms Resource(s) or Reserve(s) have not been used in this context. The potential quantity and grade is conceptual in nature, since there has been insufficient work completed to define them beyond exploration targets and that it is
3
uncertain if further exploration will result in the determination of a Mineral Resource.
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Presentation AgendaKZL 2011 Annual General Meeting
• Overview• Safety
KZL 2011 Annual General Meeting
Safety• 5‐Year Growth Strategy• Why Zinc• Management (Structuring for Success)• Queensland Exploration Focus:
• Targets for Resources Growth• 5‐Year Production Outlook:
• Zinc• Copper
• Progress to date and FY12 Guidance
4
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
A key turning point in KZL’s 12‐year historyOverview – 2011 in Review
• Shareholder Communication: safety, exploration, capital, margins, asset review, communications• Strategic review of all assets completed: divestment of non‐core assets underway
A key turning point in KZLs 12 year history
g p y• Focus to reposition KZL to become an ASX‐100 company• 5‐Year Growth Strategy developed and successfully articulated• Management team strengthened, accountabilities assigned, remuneration aligned• Company‐wide business improvement programs commenced – protect and enhance margins• New capital management program to support growth• New reporting timetable and improved investor and shareholder communications
d b d d b• New corporate identity, branding and website• Increased broker coverage• Last two quarters have established production records for the business
5
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
SafetyImproved safety performance a key priority for Kagara
• Improved safety performance at our Queensland Operations during the year• Reinvigorated and new programs and safety initiatives being implemented around hazard
Improved safety performance a key priority for Kagara
• Reinvigorated and new programs and safety initiatives being implemented around hazard identification and risk assessment as well as injury management and return to work programs
• Independent external audit of KZL’s HSE and Community Relations systems completed, data being used to enhance our operating systems across the business
6
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Cornerstone of our Growth StrategyA clear strategy to become a dominant ASX‐listed zinc and copper producerA clear strategy to become a dominant ASX listed zinc and copper producer
• 5‐year growth strategy based on:• Growing production to 120ktpa zinc + 30ktpa copperGrowing production to 120ktpa zinc 30ktpa copper• $50M program to build resource life• Structuring the business to become an ASX‐100 Company
• Immediate growth based on increased Zn + Cu production from North Queensland:I d d ti f lli t i d i• Increased production, falling costs, increased margins
• Strong and well managed project pipeline • Medium‐to‐longer term growth based on development of Admiral Bay (WA):
• Positioning KZL as a world‐leader in zinc, lead and silver• Preparing for future overseas expansion
• Divestment of non‐core assets to focus on growing North Queensland business• Capital management program to support production growth
Exploration and Project Optionality + Capital Flexibility + Team to Deliver
7
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Our Strategy for GrowthA clear three‐stage roadmap
H i 3 B d 2015H i 2 2012 14H i 1 2011 12
A clear three stage roadmap
Horizon 3: Beyond 2015Horizon 2: 2012‐14Horizon 1: 2011‐12
Growbeyond
Delivertoth
Buildingthe
th our ownbackyard
thestrategy
growthplatform
8
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Our Strategy for GrowthA clear three‐stage roadmap
Horizon 1: 2011‐12“Building the growth platform”
A clear three stage roadmap
Building the growth platform• Get the strategy right and communicate it• Increase credibility with employees and investors• Develop the organisation to deliver results…consistentlyDevelop the organisation to deliver results…consistently• Develop and hone our skills through business improvement, technology, planning, etc• Never lose sight of safety, community or the environment in which we operate
9
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Our Strategy for GrowthA clear three‐stage roadmap
Horizon 2: 2012‐14“Deliver to the strategy”
A clear three stage roadmap
Deliver to the strategy• Identify and mine longer life assets. Our first milestone:
• An 8‐12 yr production outlook• Tightly manage the capital project pipeline from studies to profitable operationsg t y a age t e cap ta p oject p pe e o stud es to p o tab e ope at o s• Reduce site controllable costs• Become the preferred Zn & Cu producer on the ASX• Position the company for growth outside of current operations
10
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Our Strategy for GrowthA clear three‐stage roadmap
Horizon 3: Beyond 2015“Grow beyond our own backyard”
A clear three stage roadmap
Grow beyond our own backyard• Identify and mine longer life assets. Our second milestone:
• A 15+ yr production outlook• Ongoing reductions in site controllable cash costs to protect and enhance marginsO go g educt o s s te co t o ab e cas costs to p otect a d e a ce a g s• Complete assessment of Admiral Bay and its development timeframe• Develop as a regional leader in finding and developing assets throughout Australia and selected
SE Asian countries
11
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Why Zinc?A looming supply deficit…
• A metal with outstanding supply/demand fundamentals
A looming supply deficit…
• World consumption to double between 2009 and 2025 = 5.2% pa growth
• Growth driven by growing use of galvanized steel in Chinese and Indian constructionsteel in Chinese and Indian construction
• Significant market deficits likely beyond 2013• Supply‐side constraints due to anticipated
closure of several major Zn‐Pb mines, e.g. Brunswick, Century, Lisheen and Perseverance
• Brook Hunt forecasts 1,215kt will be removed from the market in 2011 and 1,189kt in 2012
1212
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Becoming One of Australia’s Largest Zinc ProducersOn a zinc equivalent basis, production to rise from 117ktpa to +200ktpaOn a zinc equivalent basis, production to rise from 117ktpa to +200ktpa
13
Source: Company filings, Broker researchNote: 1) Equivalent production calculation based on long‐term prices: US$0.86/lb for Zinc, US$0.89/lb for Lead, US$17.5/oz for Silver, US$2.5/lb for Copper, US$7.7/lb for Nickel, US$1,200/oz for Gold and US$40/lb for Uranium
2) Cash costs shown are post by product credits3) Excluding Mungana
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Becoming a Leading Global Zinc ProducerKagara will rank in the world’s top 20 within five yearsKagara will rank in the world s top 20 within five years
Leading global zinc producers by 2011 Zn production (paid metal)
Source: Company filings, AME
1414
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
A strong company structure to underpin the growth…Management and StructuresA strong company structure to underpin the growth…
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
Geoff Day
EGM* Organisation EGM Finance EGM Corporate COO EGM Minerals and gDevelopment and SustainabilityPeter Gough
EGM Finance Flavio Garofalo
EGM Corporate Dave Peterson
COO Evan Spencer Business
DevelopmentJoe Treacy
• Executive Committee (ExCo) structure introduced with several recent senior appointments• Experience and skills – more than 150 years of combined experience at ExCo • Process and systems being introduced to enable KZL to become an ASX‐100 CompanyProcess and systems being introduced to enable KZL to become an ASX 100 Company
*EGM = Executive General Manager
15
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Minerals Group Structure Structure consistent with Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Governance
EGMMinerals & Business
Structure consistent with Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Governance
Minerals & Business DevelopmentJoe Treacy
General Manager Exploration
General Manager Resource Development
General Manager Mine Geology
16
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Operations Group StructureA disciplined and rigorous approach: from project evaluation through operations and closure
• Establish a clear structure for delivery• A clear toll‐gate process for project management from concept through to closure
A disciplined and rigorous approach: from project evaluation through operations and closure
• A clear toll‐gate process for project management from concept through to closure
Chief Operating OfficerEvan Spencerp
S di & P jProject Implementation
Studies & Projects(Design, Schedule, Costing)
j p&
Operational ReadinessOperations
17
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Accountability and Governance: Keys for DeliveryImproved governance around Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves
• Key components:R d R G C itt t bli h d
Improved governance around Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves
• Resource and Reserve Governance Committee established• Accountability to ensure management of Company assets underpinned by:
• appropriate level of support/resources (funding, time, soft/hardware, etc)• adequately trained/skilled personneladequately trained/skilled personnel• standardised and auditable practices (develop culture)• clear and reliable reporting format – credible, timely, accurate and JORC compliant
• Clear linkage to and embedded within project planning process from discovery through to closure
18
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
A New Remuneration StructureBenchmarked against best practice for Top‐100 ASX companies
• Improved structure of risk and reward• Competitive nature of mining employment market – maintain acceptable retention / turnover ratio
Benchmarked against best practice for Top 100 ASX companies
• Two level approach to remuneration based on level within the organization• New structure designed to:
• Drive alignment between personal contribution and business objectives• Improve performance through enhanced incentives – encourage personal + team performance• Attract and retain talent• Improve visibility and management of (under)performance
For Manager Level and Above:• A 3‐tiered remuneration structure introduced:
• Base salary, reviewed annually• Short Term Incentive (STI) – Salary At Risk, agreed KPI’s based on business & personal
performance, annual cash payment, not accrued in the base salary entitlement• Long Term Incentive (LTI) – based on share price performance, incorporates retention incentive
For Superintendent Level and Below:• A ‘gain‐share’ model being developed • Paid quarterly based on company performance above budget
19
• Hurdles to entry include safety and industrial relations stability
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Three Queensland Production RegionsAn outstanding asset base to underpin the growth strategyAn outstanding asset base to underpin the growth strategy
• $50M spend over two years to rebuild KZL’s resource inventory
• Strategy has two key resource development milestones:• 8 12 ear prod ction profile (2 ears)• 8‐12 year production profile (2 years)• 15+ year production profile (within 5 years)
• Equates to ~10Mt of resources per region q p g(resources to reserve conversion of 70%)
• Aim for only 1 or 2 mining developments per region over the next decadeper region over the next decade
2020
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Zinc Deposits and ProspectsA healthy pipeline for growth
ZINC
A healthy pipeline for growth
Mungana
Balcooma
Vomacka
West 45
King Vol
DRS Balcooma Resource
Mt Garnet Resource
W l
Liontown Orient
Balcooma Extension
Montevideo
Thalanga DeepsBalcooma RegionalRed Cap / Morrison
Victoria
Waterloo
Agincourt
Balcooma ExtensionThalanga Deeps
Bald Hill
Waterloo ExtensionBalcooma DeepsPrices Dam
Nolans
Ivors
Tigertown, Cougar Town
Herberton Extension
2121
g , g
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Copper Deposits and ProspectsA healthy pipeline for growth
COPPER
A healthy pipeline for growth
Balcooma
Baal Gammon
Maitland
Einasleigh
Kaiser Bill
Griffiths Hill
Maitland
Kaiser Bill
Victoria
Thalanga RewardZillmantonZillmanton
Harpers
Balcooma Deeps
Herberton Extension
Red Hill
Shannons
Tartana
2222
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Chillagoe Region – Key Resources & Exploration TargetsThe engine room of Kagara’s zinc and polymetallic production growthThe engine room of Kagara s zinc and polymetallic production growth
• Key deposits include:King Vol – Probable Reserve:King Vol – Probable Reserve:• 1.3Mt @ 11.2% Zn, 0.7% Pb, 0.8%
Cu, 36 g/t AgKing Vol – Inferred Resource:
80k• 1.97Mt @ 14% Zn, 1.1% Pb, 0.9% Cu, 43 g/t Ag
Montevideo – Inferred Resource:• 0 72Mt @ 7 7% Zn 7 g/t Ag
80km
• 0.72Mt @ 7.7% Zn, 7 g/t AgVictoria – Inferred Resource:• 3.4Mt @ 5.1% Zn, 1% Cu, 22g/t Ag,
0.14g/t Aug• Currently in‐fill drilling King Vol to
increase reserve and extend deposit • Currently drilling Redcap with
i l ( 14 84 @encouraging results (e.g. 14.84m @ 12.2% Zn, 1.16% Cu, 1.8% Pb, 97g/t Ag)
• Multiple targets along Red Dome Mine Corridor (Griffiths Hill, Annie, Girofla,
23
( , , ,Red Hill)
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
5‐Year Production Profile – Underpinned by ExplorationRegional resource growth targetsRegional resource growth targets
Northern Region: Polymetallic
24Note: the information on which this graph is based is provided in the Exploration Target summaries provided in slides 52-55 in the Supporting Tables at the end of this presentation. Refer to the disclaimer in the supporting tables. 24
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Central Mt Garnet Region – Resources & Exploration TargetsDriving Kagara’s copper production growth
• Key deposits include:Mt Garnet – remaining resource:
Driving Kagara s copper production growth
Mt Garnet remaining resource:• 683kt @ 6% Zn, 0.4% Cu,
13g/t AgBalcooma – copper reserve:
• 448 4kt @ 2 7% C 13 /t A• 448.4kt @ 2.7% Cu, 13g/t AgBalcooma – polymetallic reserve:
• 243kt @ 5.46% Zn, 1.5% Pb, 1% Cu, 0.1g/t Au, 25g/t Ag
Baal Gammon – current resource:• 5.5Mt @ 0.8% Cu, 0.2% Sn,
29g/t AgMaitland – current resource:Maitland current resource:
• 1.5Mt @ 1.5% Cu, 0.02% Mo• Currently drilling to re‐optimise open
pit design at Baal GammonSi ifi i l d l• Significant potential down‐plunge and along strike at Balcooma
• Maitland mineralisation open down‐plunge and down‐dip
25
p g p• Exciting exploration potential in the
Baal Gammon tenements
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
5‐Year Production Profile – Underpinned by ExplorationRegional resource growth targetsRegional resource growth targets
Central Region: Polymetallic
2626Note: the information on which this graph is based is provided in the Exploration Target summaries provided in slides 52-55 in the Supporting Tables at the end of this presentation. Refer to the disclaimer in the supporting tables.
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
5‐Year Production Profile – Underpinned by ExplorationRegional resource growth targetsRegional resource growth targets
Central Region: Copper
2727Note: the information on which this graph is based is provided in the Exploration Target summaries provided in slides 52-55 in the Supporting Tables at the end of this presentation. Refer to the disclaimer in the supporting tables.
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Southern Thalanga RegionVMS Region with potential for multiple polymetallic deposits
• Thalanga pre‐mining resource = ~7Mt @ 12% Zn, 2.5% Cu, 3.8% Pb,
VMS Region with potential for multiple polymetallic deposits
West 45 ThalangaOrient
7Mt @ 12% Zn, 2.5% Cu, 3.8% Pb, 98g/t Ag, 0.62g/t Au
• Current resource = 1.51Mt @ 7.5% Zn, 2.4% Pb, 1% Cu, 55g/t Ag, 0.3% AAu
• Large untested system with significant potential remaining (no deep drilling or exploration since p g p1999)
• Highly prospective regional landholding with large database of exploration dataexploration data
28
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
5‐Year Production Profile – Underpinned by ExplorationRegional resource growth targetsRegional resource growth targets
Southern Region: Polymetallic
2929Note: the information on which this graph is based is provided in the Exploration Target summaries provided in slides 52-55 in the Supporting Tables at the end of this presentation. Refer to the disclaimer in the supporting tables.
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Generating Tomorrow’s GrowthMoving to longer life ore sourcesMoving to longer life ore sources
Red CapKing Vol Mungana
Polymetallic Ore300ktpa
Polymetallic Ore300ktpa
600ktpa
Polymetallic Ore250kt
Mount Garnet250ktpa
500ktpa
PolymetallicOre
CopperOre
500ktpa
EinasleighEinasleigh
Thalanga
OrientPolymetallic
Ore300ktpaBalcooma
250ktpa 250ktpa
CopperOre
500ktpa
Polymetallic Ore
Thalanga Deeps
Polymetallic
Liontown
Ore250ktpa
30
250ktpayOre
250ktpa
30
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Zinc: 5‐Year Production OutlookA well‐structured plan to reach 120ktpa productionA well structured plan to reach 120ktpa production
3131
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Copper: 5‐Year Production OutlookTargeting 30ktpa production within five yearsTargeting 30ktpa production within five years
3232
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
A Pipeline of Options and OpportunitiesSupports continued growth…
ZINC
Supports continued growth…
West 45Baal Gammon
COPPER
Balcooma North
ENGINEERING
Filter upgrade
King Vol
Mungana Plant
Einasleigh (Cu)
Dry RiverKaiser BillRed Cap
Orient
Einasleigh (Zn)
Griffiths Hill
Maitland
VictoriaLiontown
CUF fl h fl ’
Waterloo
Red Hill
Zillmanton
HarpersMontevideoOre sorting
CUF flash float’n
3333
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Summary: Key Milestones for Kagara Over Next 12 months
Delivery onThe
StrategicExecutingFundingPlan forAdmiralB
Strategicvision
Define &
BayDivest
Non‐coreassets
Define &Communicate
Strategicvision
CurrentMarketV l
3434
Value
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Quarterly Production TrendFurther incremental improvements to production and costs in September Quarter
• Continued focus on production growth and cost control• Zinc production for Q1FY12 within upper end of guidance range
Further incremental improvements to production and costs in September Quarter
• Zinc production for Q1FY12 within upper end of guidance range• Copper production 3% lower but in line with plan and guidance• FY12 zinc production guidance = 53‐59kt• FY12 copper production guidance = 17‐20ktpp p g
3535
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Performance Improvement on TrackRecord total concentrate production for last two Quarters since KZL operations startedRecord total concentrate production for last two Quarters since KZL operations started
Production – metal‐in‐concentrate (’000t)Source: Wilson HTM Investment Group
36
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
The Scorecard – FY12 Guidance
Q 1Guidance
Q 1Actuals
Q 2Guidance
Q 3Guidance
Q 4Guidance
Full Year Guidance
OPERATIONS
Copper GuidanceProductionUpper (kt) 6.0
5.7394.7 4.8 4.5 20.0
5.739Lower (kt) 5.2 3.9 4.0 3.9 17.0CostUpper (c/lb) N/A 1.61Lower (c/lb) 1.55Zinc GuidanceProduction Upper (kt) 18.3
17.79015.1 15.0 10.6 59.0
Lower (kt) 17.0 13.8 12.6 9.6 53.0CostUpper (c/lb) N/A 0.75Lower (c/lb) 0.72
EXPLORATION
Expenditure ($M) 7.5 5.42 6.0 6.0 6.5 26.0Metres Drilled (m) 39,000 26,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 134,000
RESOURCE GROWTH
Inferred (mt) N/A 3.0 N/A 3.8Indicated (mt) 5.2 5.2
FINANCE
37
EBITDA Upper ($M) N/A 72.0EBITDA Lower ($M) 54.0
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
2011 Annual General Meeting
38
Perth –Thursday, 20 October 2011
Geoff Day, Managing Director & CEO
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Resources and Reserves Tables – 2011
39
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Resources and Reserves Tables – 2011
40
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Resources and Reserves Tables – 2011
41
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Resources and Reserves Tables – 2011
42
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Resources and Reserves Tables – 2011
43
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Thalanga Regional – Exploration Target SummaryResource growth targets: Southern Thalanga Region
ProspectCurrent Resource (Mt)*
2 Year Target (Mt)
Target Zinc Grade
5 Year Target(Mt)
Target Zinc G d
Conceptual Target (Mt)
Target Zinc Grade
Resource growth targets: Southern Thalanga Region
(Mt)* Target (Mt) Grade (Mt) Grade Target (Mt) Grade
Thalanga 1.7 2.8 – 3.8 7‐10% 4.8 – 5.8 7‐10% 6.5 – 7.5 7‐10%
Liontown 1.8 2.3 – 3.3 7‐10% 3.3 – 4.3 7‐10% 4.5 – 5.5 7‐10%
Waterloo 0.7 0.7 – 1.7 7‐10% 1.2 – 2.2 7‐10% 2.5 – 3.5 7‐10%
Regional Exploration 7‐10% 7‐10% 7‐10%
TOTAL 4.2 5.8 – 8.8 7‐10% 9.3 – 12.8 7‐10% 16 – 20 7‐10%
(assuming 70% conversion of resources to reserves)
2.9 4 – 6 7‐10% 7 – 9 7‐10% 11.2 – 14.0 7‐10%
Milling life (assuming 600,000tpa milling rate)
5 7 – 10 7‐10% 11 – 15 7‐10% 19 – 23 7‐10%
JORC – Exploration TargetsIt is common practice for a company to comment on and discuss its exploration in terms of target size and type. The information in this table relating to exploration targets should not be misunderstood or misconstrued as an estimate of Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves. Hence the terms Resource(s) or R ( ) h t b d i thi t t Th t ti l tit d d i t l i t i th h b i ffi i t k l t d t
4444
Reserve(s) have not been used in this context. The potential quantity and grade is conceptual in nature, since there has been insufficient work completed to define them beyond exploration targets and that it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the determination of a Mineral Resource.
* Inclusive of reserves where applicable. See full Resource and Reserves Table in Supporting Tables Appendix, slides 38‐41
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Mt Garnet Polymetallic – Exploration Target SummaryResource growth targets for Central Mt Garnet region
ProspectCurrent Resource (Mt)*
2 Year Target (Mt)
Target Zinc Grade
5 Year Target(Mt)
Target Zinc Grade
Conceptual Target (Mt)
Target Zinc Grade
Resource growth targets for Central Mt Garnet region
(Mt)* (Mt) (Mt)
Balcooma 2.2 2.7 – 3.7 7‐10% 3.7 – 4.7 7‐10% 4.5 – 5.5 7‐10%
Mt G t 0 7 0 7 1 7 7 10% 1 2 2 2 7 10% 2 5 3 5 7 10%Mt Garnet 0.7 0.7 – 1.7 7‐10% 1.2 – 2.2 7‐10% 2.5 – 3.5 7‐10%
Bald Hill 0 0 – 1 7‐10% 0.5 – 1.5 7‐10% 1.5 – 2.5 7‐10%
Regional Exploration 0.5 7‐10% 0.5 7‐10% 1.5 – 2.5 7‐10%
TOTAL 2.9 3.9 – 6.9 7‐10% 5.9 – 8.9 7‐10% 10 – 15 7‐10%
(assuming 70% conversion of resources to reserves)
2.0 3 – 59 7‐10% 4 – 6 7‐10% 7.0 – 9.8 7‐10%
Milling life 8 1 9 0% 1 2 0% 28 0 39 2 0%(assuming 250,000tpa
milling rate)8.1 11 – 19 7‐10% 17 – 25 7‐10% 28.0 – 39.2 7‐10%
JORC – Exploration TargetsIt is common practice for a company to comment on and discuss its exploration in terms of target size and type. The information in this table relating to exploration targets should not be misunderstood or misconstrued as an estimate of Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves. Hence the terms Resource(s) or R ( ) h t b d i thi t t Th t ti l tit d d i t l i t i th h b i ffi i t k l t d t
4545
Reserve(s) have not been used in this context. The potential quantity and grade is conceptual in nature, since there has been insufficient work completed to define them beyond exploration targets and that it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the determination of a Mineral Resource.
* Inclusive of reserves where applicable. See full Resource and Reserves Table in Supporting Tables Appendix, slides 38‐41
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Mt Garnet Copper – Exploration Target SummaryResource growth targets for Central Mt Garnet region
ProspectCurrent Resource (Mt)*
2 Year Target (Mt)
Target Copper Grade
5 Year Target(Mt)
Target Copper Grade
Conceptual Target (Mt)
Target Copper Grade
Resource growth targets for Central Mt Garnet region
(Mt) (Mt) Grade (Mt) Grade Grade
Balcooma 1.1 1.9 – 2.9 2– 4% 2.9 – 3.9 2 – 4% 5.9 – 6.9 2 – 4%
Maitland 1.5 1.5 – 2.5 2 – 4% 2 – 3 2 – 4% 2.5 – 3.5 2 – 4%
Griffiths Hill Copper Zone 1.1 1.1 – 2.1 2 – 4% 1.6 – 2.6 2 – 4% 2.1 – 3.1 2 – 4%
Baal Gammon 0.5 0.6 – 1.6 2 – 4% 1 – 2 2 – 4% 1.5 – 2.5 2 – 4%
Einasleigh 0.6 – 1.6 2 – 4% 2.5 – 3.5 2 – 4% 0.5 2 – 4%
Regional Exploration 1.5 – 2.5 2 – 4% 4.5 – 5.5 2 – 4% 6.5 – 7.5 2 – 4%
TOTAL 4.2 7.2 – 13.2 2 – 4% 14.5 – 20.5 2 – 4% 24 – 29 2 – 4%
(assuming 70% conversion of resources to reserves)
2.9 5 – 9 2 – 4% 10 – 14 2 – 4% 16 – 20 2 – 4%
Milling lifeMilling life (assuming 500,000tpa milling rate)
5.9 10 – 18 2 – 4% 20 – 24 2 – 4% 33 – 40 2 – 4%
JORC – Exploration TargetsIt is common practice for a company to comment on and discuss its exploration in terms of target size and type. The information in this table relating to exploration targets should not be misunderstood or misconstrued as an estimate of Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves. Hence the terms Resource(s) or Reserve(s) have not been used in this context. The potential quantity and grade is conceptual in nature since there has been insufficient work completed to define them beyond exploration targets and that it is uncertain if
4646
The potential quantity and grade is conceptual in nature, since there has been insufficient work completed to define them beyond exploration targets and that it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the determination of a Mineral Resource.
* Inclusive of reserves where applicable. See full Resource and Reserves Table in Supporting Tables Appendix, slides 38‐411 The Einasleigh sale is subject to shareholder approval by Copper Strike at a meeting to be held on October 14th, 2011
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
Chillagoe – Exploration Target SummaryResource growth targets for Northern Chillagoe Region
ProspectCurrent Resource (Mt)*
2 Year Target (Mt)
Target Zinc Grade
5 Year Target(Mt)
Target Zinc Grade
Conceptual Target (Mt)
Target Zinc Grade
Resource growth targets for Northern Chillagoe Region
(Mt) (Mt)
Mungana 0.5 0.2 – 1.2 7‐10% 1.5 – 2.5 7‐10% 1.5 – 2.5 7‐10%
King Vol 3.3 4.5 – 5.5 7‐10% 6.5 – 7.5 7‐10% 9.5 – 10.5 7‐10%
Victoria 3.4 4.5 – 5.5 7‐10% 6.5 – 7.5 7‐10% 9.5 – 10.5 7‐10%
Red Cap / Morrisons 1 – 2 7‐10% 2.5 – 3.5 7‐10% 4.5 – 5.5 7‐10%
Montevideo 0.7 0.7 – 1.7 7‐10% 1.2 – 2.2 7‐10% 2.5 – 3.5 7‐10%
Regional Exploration 0.5 7‐10% 0.5 7‐10% 2.5 – 3.5 7‐10%
TOTAL 7.0 11.4 – 16.4 7‐10% 18.7 – 23.7 7‐10% 30 – 36 7‐10%
(assuming 70% conversion of resources to reserves)
5.5 8 – 11 7‐10% 13 – 17 7‐10% 21 – 25 7‐10%
Milling lifeMilling life (assuming 850,000tpa milling rate)
6.5 9 – 14 7‐10% 15 – 20 7‐10% 25 – 30 7‐10%
JORC – Exploration TargetsIt is common practice for a company to comment on and discuss its exploration in terms of target size and type. The information in this table relating to exploration targets should not be misunderstood or misconstrued as an estimate of Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves. Hence the terms Resource(s) or R ( ) h t b d i thi t t Th t ti l tit d d i t l i t i th h b i ffi i t k l t d t
4747
Reserve(s) have not been used in this context. The potential quantity and grade is conceptual in nature, since there has been insufficient work completed to define them beyond exploration targets and that it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the determination of a Mineral Resource.
* Inclusive of reserves where applicable. See full Resource and Reserves Table in Supporting Tables Appendix, slides 38‐41
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y