Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Amino Acid Balancing for the TransitionCow: Old and New Stories from a
Molecular Perspective
Johan Osorio, Assistant Professor
Dairy and Food Science Department
South Dakota State University, Brookings, USA
Amino acid balancing for the transition cow: Old and
new stories from a molecular perspective
June 10, 2020
Johan OsorioAssistant ProfessorDairy and Food Science DepartmentSouth Dakota State University, Brookings, USA
(Block et al., 2001)
Energy balance
Body condition score
Energy intake
4% Fat corrected milk
(Ingvartsen, 2006)
Peripartal or Transition periodTissue mobilization
First lactationThird lactation
Pre calving Post calving
~3 4 wk ~3 4 wkCalving
Cow in negative energy balance
NEFA
TG
NEEpi Insulin
NEFA
NEFA
CO2
Propionate
Ketonebodies
Mitochondria
Glucose
AA, Lactate andGlycerol
TG
FeedIntake
TG
VLDL
Milk Fat
Modified from Drackley, 1999
Decrease
Increase
Body fat and protein mobilization
9574 74
9574 74
143
97 83
186
125103
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2 5 12 2 5 12
Body
fata
ndprotein,
kg
Week relative to parturition
FatProtein
16% Crude protein 19% Crude protein
32.2%32.8%
22.1% 22.1%
(Komaragiri and Erdman, 1997)
Peripartal protein mobilization
97.2
88.9 89.5
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
14 60 120Day relative to parturition
Body protein (kg)
10.4
17.8
8.46.9 6.7 7.6
6.2 5.4
02468
101214161820
7 7 14 28 56 84 112 119Day relative to parturition
3 Methylhistidine (μM)
(Adapted from Phillips et al., 2003; J Dairy Sci 86:3634 47)
Proteolysis 3 Methylhistidine
Metabolizable protein and amino acids likely limiting around calving
Bell et al. (2000)
Metabolizable Protein
Needed for milk protein, glucose synthesis, synthesis of other compounds (e.g. SAM, glutathione, taurine)
1 2
3 4
1
5 6
(Larsen and Kristensen, 2013)
Net liver uptake of Methionine and Histidine increases after calving
Net uptake of Met by liver can be enhanced by supplemental RP-Met……..also prevents decrease in blood Met postpartum (Dalbach et al., 2011)
Methionine and the Peripartal Period
Dietarycomponent
Osorio et al., 2013 Zhou et al., 2016 Batistel et al., 2017
Control Met Control Met Control Met
CP, % of DM 17.4 17.4 17.2 17.3 17.7 17.7
MP supplied (g/d) 1,563 1,840 2,090 2,374 2,425 2,640
MP balance (g/d) 574 616 434 573 118 160
Lys (% of MP) 6.17 6.07 6.33 6.24 6.40 6.38
Met (% of MP) 1.81 2.15 1.79 2.30 1.70 2.24
Lys:Met 3.43:1 2.82:1 3.54:1 2.71:1 3.78:1 2.88:1
Methionine and the Peripartal Period
Day relative to parturition
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Milk
yie
ld (k
g/d)
0
10
20
30
40
50
ControlMethionine
Adapted from Osorio et al., 2013 Adapted from Zhou et al., 2016
Adapted from Batistel et al., 2017
+ 3.4 kg + 3.8 kg
+ 4.2 kg
Milk Yield
Methionine
Milk yield & Performance
Antioxidant
Liver function
DNA &Histonemethylation
Reduced immunosuppression
Liver Function
Day relative to parturition
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Milk
yie
ld (k
g/d)
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
Mild (< 5% TG)Moderate (5-10% TG)Severe (> 10%)
FL, P = 0.25DIM, P < 0.01FL X DIM, P < 0.01
Fatty liver on milk yieldn = 100 transition cows
Actual TG mean:• Mild = 3.3 ± 1.0• Moderate = 6.5 ± 1.5• Severe = 11.1 ± 0.9
Actual Milk yield:• Mild = 41.9 ± 0.84• Moderate = 41.6 ± 1.5• Severe = 36.9 ± 2.9
Correlation• r = 0.2• P = 0.06
Osorio et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2016; Bastistel et al., 2017
FL = Fatty liver level
7 8
9
11 12
10
2
Methionine plays several roles in liver
TG
VLDL, secreted from liver
TG
Phospholipid synthesis
Choline + FA +
+
Acetate
Apolipoprotein synthesis
Amino acids (Met, et al.)
+
NEFA
Esterification
Met
Peripartum
GlutathioneTaurine(antioxidants)
Albumin Major secretory protein synthesized by liver
Liver functionCarnitine metabolism
Liver functionCarnitine metabolism
Day relative to calving
777777 21212121777 212177 217 217 217 21
Free
car
nitin
e (n
mol
es/g
of w
et ti
ssue
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180 CONMSSM
Free carnitine Met P < 0.01
Osorio et. al., 2014
ApoB
100
, ug/
mL
460
480
500
520
540
Control Methionine
ApoB
100
(ng/
mL)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Control Methionine
Liver function
Diet, P = 0.16Time, P = 0.97D × T, P = 0.75Contrast, P = 0.14
Adapted from Osorio et. al., 2013
VLDL = Very low density lipoproteins
Adapted from Sun et. al., 2016
VLD
L, m
mol
/L
0.44
0.46
0.48
0.50
0.52
0.54
0.56
0.58
Control Methionine
Adapted from Sun et. al., 2016
ApoB-100
ApoB-100VLDL
Diet, P = 0.001 Diet, P = 0.008
Inflammatory response
Local acuteInflammatory response
+ APP:Serum amyloid A (SAA)HaptoglobinCeruloplasmin
Kuby Immunology, 2007
Metritis
Mastitis - APP:AlbuminApolipoproteins
Liver
Inflammatory response
Metritis Mastitis
Liver
Potential Pathogen Infection
AcutePhaseProteins
13 14
3
15 16
17 18
Fat or Adipose Tissue
NEFA
TG
NEFA
Liver
InsulinNE, Epi
(modified from Drackley, 1999)
Cow in negativeenergy balance
InflammatoryResponseSignal
NEFA
Inflammatory response
Metritis Mastitis
Liver
Potential Pathogen Infection
AcutePhaseProteins
Albumin
Liver function
Day relative to parturition-21-21-21-21 -10-10-10 77 14-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21 -10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10 777777777777 1414141414141414141414 21212121212121212121-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21 -10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10 7777777 141414141414 2121212121-21-21-21-21 -10-10-10 77 14-21 -10 7 14 21-21 -10 7 14 21-21 -10 7 14 21
Alb
umin
(g/L
)
33
34
35
36
37
38
CONMSSM
Bertoni et. al., 2008. J Dairy Sci
Diet, P = 0.28Time, P = 0.04D × T, P = 0.20Contrast, P = 0.15
Osorio et. al., 2014
Milk yield +6.5 kg/d in Upper
MS = MetasmartSM = Smartamine M
Dietary methyl-donors in dairy cows
SAM
SAHHomocysteine
Cysteine
Diet TissuesMilkColostrum
Liver Function
DNA methylation Epigenetics
VLDLPC
Vit. B12 CH3
PE
rRNA complex Protein synthesis initiation
Choline
Betaine
Dimethylglycine
Diet
5-MTHF
Methionine
Diet
Folate+ + +
Cooke et al. 2007Zom et al. 2011
+
GlutathioneAntioxidants
Taurine+
EmbryoFetus
Day relative to parturition
777777 21212121777 212177-10 7 217 217 21
Glu
tath
ione
(mM
)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
CONMSSM
Glutathione Met P = 0.04
Liver functionGlutathione Priming Effect
Osorio et. al., 2014
Batistel et al., 2018
Zhou et al., 2016
-10.0 7.0 21.0
1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
2
3
4
5
-10.0 7.0 21.0
1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
2
3
4
5
-10.0 7.0 21.0-10.0 7.0 21.0
MethionineControl
Methionine supplementation alters the liver transcriptome2,663 genes with diet time effect
Gene expression
10 7 21 10 7 21Day relative to parturitionOsorio et al., 2012
19 20
21 22
23 24
4
Methionine and Gene RegulationCentral Dogma of Molecular Biology
Epigenetic Mechanisms
Methionine and Gene RegulationHistone
Inactive/closeInactive/close
Active/OpenActive/Open
Methionine and NutrigenomicsHistone Methylation
Tiramisu
Histone Methylation
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Relative Histone Methylation
Control 125 uM 250 uM 500 uM
Control
125 uM Met
250 uM Met
500 uM MetFernanda Rosa
Histone MethylationMethionine cycle
Enzymes
Fernanda Rosa
Histone MethylationMethionine cycle
Enzymes
Fernanda Rosa
25 26
27 28
29 30
5
Histone Methylation
Total protein
Milk protein
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Relative Histone Methylation
Control 125 uM 250 uM 500 uM
Fernanda Rosa
Histone Methylation
DietaryMethionine?
DietaryMethionine?
Bionaz et al., 2012; PLoS ONE 7:333268Day relative to parturition
Euchromatin
Heterochromatin
HistoneMethylation
ConclusionsMethionine
Performance
PostpartumPostpartumPrepartum
Gene Regulation
Performance
Metabolism
Gene expression
MethionineModel
?
31 32
33 34
6
7
www.adisseo.com
METHIONINE More Than Milk
Optimal performance, day in and day out, requires that all essential nutrient
requirements be met.
More milk,milk protein,and milkfat
Talk with your Adisseo representative today!
More relief from metabolic disorders
at transition
More timely breed backs and full-term
pregnancies