17

Forest Statistics Reloaded

  • Upload
    starr

  • View
    28

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Forest Statistics Reloaded. Eurostat at the forehead. Why YOU?. MCPFE (-RU) region FOWL is 30% 0.36 ha FOWL/ capita 0.69 m 3 Roundwood / capita North Europe (DK, EE, FI, IS, LV, LT, NO, SE) FOWL is 56 % 20% FOWL area of the region 2.33 ha FOWL/ capita - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Forest  Statistics Reloaded
Page 2: Forest  Statistics Reloaded

Eurostat at the forehead

Page 3: Forest  Statistics Reloaded

Why YOU? MCPFE (-RU) region

FOWL is 30% 0.36 ha FOWL/capita 0.69 m3 Roundwood/capita

North Europe (DK, EE, FI, IS, LV, LT, NO, SE) FOWL is 56% 20% FOWL area of the region 2.33 ha FOWL/capita 35% Roundwood production of the region 5.07 m3 Roundwood/capita

Page 4: Forest  Statistics Reloaded

Why WE (Eurostat Forestry)? Statistical Office of the EU

Neutral Confidential Empowered Harmonised platform (NACE, NA, CN, etc.)

Other data collections (SBS, STS, LFS, COMEXT, etc.)

Internal contacts (Agriculture, Climate, Energy, Industry, etc.)

International contacts Organisations (FAO, UNECE, ITTO, etc.) Representatives (AEBIOM, CEPF, CEPI, FERN, etc.)

Page 5: Forest  Statistics Reloaded

What do we do? JFSQ

Production data Trade data Publications

IEEAF Economic data Physical data Carbon balance

Various data requests Internal International

Peer-review

Page 6: Forest  Statistics Reloaded

What's news? Climate change Bio-energy Cascaded use of wood Forest strategy Sustainable Forest Management

All decisions should be based on reliable data

Page 7: Forest  Statistics Reloaded

Balance of sheets Available resources

EFDAC (NFI) FRA-SoEF JFSQ IEEAF JWEE UNFCCC

International challenges Climate-carbon (UNFCCC) Renevable energy (NRAP, Energy 2020, etc.) Resource efficiency (Cascaded use, Industry, etc.) C&I for SFM …

Page 8: Forest  Statistics Reloaded
Page 9: Forest  Statistics Reloaded

Why fail? Availability of data

Confidentiality Unreporting Legal requirements

Availability of data collection Cost-benefit Adjustments of existing collections

Page 10: Forest  Statistics Reloaded

Reloads JFSQ

Prioritisation of top items Publishing only what reported Adjust the tables (pellets, Recycled paper, etc.)

IEEAF Table 3c Tables 1 and 2 Tables 4 and 5

Page 11: Forest  Statistics Reloaded

Changes To JFSQ

Prioritisation of top items Publishing only what reported Adjust the tables (pellets, Recycled paper, etc.)

To IEEAF Table 3c Tables 1 and 2 Tables 4 and 5

Page 12: Forest  Statistics Reloaded

Changes To JFSQ

Prioritisation of top items Publishing only what reported Adjust the tables (pellets, Recycled paper, etc.)

To IEEAF Table 3c Tables 1 and 2 Tables 4 and 5

Page 13: Forest  Statistics Reloaded

Changes To JFSQ

Prioritisation of top items Publishing only what reported Adjust the tables (pellets, Recycled paper, etc.)

To IEEAF Table 3c Tables 1 and 2 Tables 4 and 5

Page 14: Forest  Statistics Reloaded

Questions ahead JFSQ

Do your country uses Eurostat data provisions? Publishing only what reported – is it enough? New emerging changes? (briquett)

IEEAF Table 1: is it more useful? Table 2: Natural losses and mortality Table 2: Logs not removed Table 2: Net or Gros increment

Page 15: Forest  Statistics Reloaded

Expected benefitsJFSQ

Reduce workload / increase utility

IEEAF Reduce workload on reporting for other

international organisations Reduce risk of misreporting Get involved/interested

Page 16: Forest  Statistics Reloaded

If not contributing one risks to miss the boat!

Page 17: Forest  Statistics Reloaded

Thank you! Thank you! Csaba MOZES

[email protected]