Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Form 10
APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OR CANCELLATION OF RESOURCE CONSENT CONDITION
Section 127, Resource Management Act 1991
To Far North District Council : We, Jeff and Robby Kemp, apply for a change of condition of a resource consent. Our application relates to the following resource consent:
Resource Consent Number 2050478
Our application relates to bullet point three within the following specific condition of the resource consent being 4 d) – contained with CON 6627943.1 and more particularly applying to Lot 2 DP 353240, CFR 217962 : The proposed change is as follows: [ Insertions shown underlined , deletion shown strikethrough ]
Bullet Point 3-
A maximum of one dwelling and one accessory [ to a maximum of 100m2 gross floor area ] shall be permitted on each lot. A maximum of one dwelling . No accessory building shall exceed a gross floor area of more than 100m2.
We attach, in accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991, an assessment of environmental effects in the detail that corresponds with the scale and significance of the effects that a change to the activity may have on the environment. [see below] We attach any information required to be included in this application by the district plan, the regional plan, the Resource Management Act 1991, or any regulations made under that Act.
Planning Report, including Assessment of Environmental Effects, prepared by Bay of Islands Planning; Certificate of Title and Consent Notices ; Drawings and pictures of the structures by Versatile Limited; and Written Approvals.
............................................ Date: 20 May 2020 J. V. Kemp on behalf of Jeff and Robby Kemp.
Address for service: Bay of Islands Planning Limited, PO Box 795, Kerikeri 0245 Telephone: (09) 4075253 email: [email protected]
10. Billing Details: This identifies the person or entity that will be responsible for paying any invoices or receiving any refunds associated with processing this resource consent. Please also refer to Council’s Fees and Charges Schedule. Name/s: (please write all names in full) Jeff and Robby Kemp Postal Address: PO Box 795 Kerikeri Post Code: 0230 Phone Numbers: Work: 0274 457 136 Email: [email protected] Fees Information: An instalment fee for processing this application is payable at the time of lodgement and must accompany your application in order for it to be lodged. Please note that if the instalment fee is insufficient to cover the actual and reasonable costs of work undertaken to process the application you will be required to pay any additional costs. Invoiced amounts are payable by the 20th of the month following invoice date. You may also be required to make additional payments if your application requires notification. Declaration concerning Payment of Fees: I/we understand that the Council may charge me/us for all costs actually and reasonably incurred in processing this application. Subject to my/our rights under Sections 357B and 358 of the RMA, to object to any costs, I/we undertake to pay all and future processing costs incurred by the Council. Without limiting the Far North District Council’s legal rights if any steps (including the use of debt collection agencies) are necessary to recover unpaid processing costs I/we agree to pay all costs of recovering those processing costs. If this application is made on behalf of a trust (private or family), a society (incorporated or unincorporated) or a company in signing this application I/we are binding the trust, society or company to pay all the above costs and guaranteeing to pay all the above costs in my/our personal capacity. Name: J V Kemp (please print)
Signature: (signature of bill payer – mandatory)
Date: 21.05.20
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 1
BAY OF ISLANDS PLANNING LIMITED 2 Cochrane Drive, Kerikeri
PO Box 795 Kerikeri
Phone [ 09 ] 4075253 ; Email – [email protected]
District Services Department Far North District Council John Butler Centre Kerikeri 29 May 2020 Attention: Louise Wilson and Trish Routley. Dear Louise and Trish ,
Application for Resource Consent: Land Use and Change of Consent Notice – Proposed Storage Shed, 114 Waitotara Drive, Kerikeri. I am pleased to attach our application in respect of consenting a new three bay storage shed on our property in Waitotara Drive, Kerikeri. The application comes about by reason of an existing Consent Notice conditions limiting the number of accessory buildings to one. There is an existing accessory building on the site. Should you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours faithfully,
Jeff Kemp Bay of Islands Planning Limited on behalf of Jeff and Robby Kemp
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 2
INTRODUCTION 1.1. We seek consent to allow for the construction and use of a three bay storage shed on our
property at 114 Waitotara Drive , Kerikeri. The shed is a standard Versatile design and complies with all zone rules however the property is subject to a Consent Notice relating to the number of accessory building. This consent application follows.
1.2. Lot 2 DP 353240 is located approximately 1140m from the intersection with Waitotara Drive and Waipapa Road. It is subject to a number of Consent Notice Conditions (CONO 6627943.1) imposed as part of RC 2050478 being the consent which created the application site. Copies of the current ROT and CON documents are attached within Appendix A.
Figure 1 – Site Location Plan
SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1. The property is a large rural lifestyle site containing an area of 1.0215ha. The site is generally
rectangular and contains the existing dwelling house and garage. The boundaries are occupied with shelter belts and landscaping areas are disbursed around the site. Access to the dwelling house and garage is via a concrete drive. The site is self-reliant on a potable water source via the two water tanks collecting rainwater from the roof of the dwelling and garage. The overflow from the water tanks leads into an open drain running along the western boundary of the site. This
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 3
drain leads into the system that eventually drains into the Kerikeri River. On site wastewater is treated via an aerated wastewater system.
2.2. The application site has reticulated electricity and telecommunications.
Figure 2 - Aerial of site
SITE ZONING
3.1. In terms of the Far North District Plan the site is located within the Rural Production Zone as pictured below.
Figure 3 – District Plan Zone Map
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 4
3.2. The site is not subject to any areas of Outstanding Landscape, Outstanding Landscape Features
or Natural Features . The site is mapped as flood susceptibility in regard to Figure in light blue. The flood maps have been refined by the Northland Regional Council and this is reflected below. The property sits within an area identified as being subject to 1:100 year flood events.
Figure 4 - District Plan – Northland Regional Council Potential Flooding Maps
Northland Regional Council Potential Flooding Maps
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 5
3.3. In relation to the Proposed Regional Plan the shed is a Permitted Activity by virtue of Rule C.8.3.1 –
3.4. The location of the building area is defined as a Flood Hazard Area and the volume of earthworks
would not exceed 100m3. The only earthwork is that associated with the creation of the foundations.
APPLICATION DESCRIPTION
4.1. Consent is sought for the construction and use of a three bay shed . The shed is required to garage a motor home , boat and two vehicles. All of these are exposed to the extreme of the weather. The shed is a standard design and approximately 11.0m x 9.0m with a maximum height of 4.2m . The colour of the external walls match the existing shed being Desert Sand with the roof, trim and roller doors of the Karaka colour. The shed will be the second accessory building on the property which is more than that allowed under a CON Condition. As such, a variation of the condition to remove the number of accessory buildings is required. That condition reads as follows –
4.2. Water for the roof area will be collected into a water tank and the overflow from this water tank
being directed into the open drain.
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 6
4.3. This application is accompanied by the following supporting documents.
Appendix A – TOR and Consent Notice. Appendix B – Written Approvals. Appendix C – Shed Plans, Versatile Ltd
4.4. This snip from the Site Plan shows the location of the shed –
REASONS FOR CONSENT 5.1. Under the Far North District Plan, the site is zoned ‘Rural Production’. No resource overlays are
present on site.
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 7
5.2. The following Tables assess the new building associated with the activity against the relevant
District Plan standards.
Table 1 – Rural Production Zone Performance Standards
RURAL PRODUCTION ZONE
Rule # PERMITTED STANDARDS PERFORMANCE/COMMENTS
8.6.5.1.1 Residential Intensity – one residential unit per site or 1
residential unit per 12ha.
Restricted Discretionary Activity – one residential unit per
4.0ha.
Discretionary – one residential unit per 2.0ha.
Non-complying – If none of the above are meet.
Not applicable as the site already contains a
single dwelling house.
N/a.
8.6.5.1.2 Sunlight: no part of any building shall project beyond a 45
degree recession plane as measured inwards from any point
2m vertically above ground level on any site boundary.
The shed sits no closer than 10.m from the
boundary and complies with this rule.
Permitted
8.6.5.1.3 Stormwater Management: maximum of 15% of total site
area. 20% as a Controlled Activity.
10215m2 would enable without a resource
consent 1532.25m2 of impermeable surfaces
including buildings and paving/gravel.
The existing impermeable surfaces amounts to
around 735m2 –
The new shed has a floor area of 97 m2. In front
of the shed will be a turn in area approximately
10.0m x 7.0m = 70m2. Taking these areas into
account the following is calculated –
Existing – 735m2
Shed – 97m2
Shed turn in – 70m2
TOTAL = 902 m2.
Permitted
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 8
RURAL PRODUCTION ZONE
Rule # PERMITTED STANDARDS PERFORMANCE/COMMENTS
8.6.5.1.4 Setback from boundaries: no building within 10m or
accessory building within 3m of any site boundary, with
various specified exceptions.
The shed sits beyond the 10.0m boundary
setback.
Transportation
- Refer
Chapter 15
below.
8.6.5.1.6 Keeping of Animals N/a.
8.6.5.1.7 Noise: noise at or within boundary of any other site in the
zone not to exceed specified limits.
The activity is not about creating any noise.
Construction noise will be present for a short
duration.
8.6.5.1.8 Building Height: maximum height 12 metres. Height is around 4.2m .
Permitted
8.6.5.1.9 Helicopter Landings N/a.
8.6.5.1.10 Building coverage: Any new building or alteration/additions to
an existing building is a permitted activity if the total Building
Coverage of a site does not exceed 12.5% of the gross site
area (10215m2)@ 12.5% = 1276m2.
The building coverage is well under the
threshold.
The existing dwelling is around 240m2 and the
garage at 54m2 = 294m2. The new shed of
97m2 makes a total of 391m2.
Permitted
8.6.5.1.11 (ii)
8.6.5.3.7
Scale of Activities: The total number of people engaged at any
one period of time in activities on a site, including employees
and persons making use of any facilities, but excluding people
who normally reside on the site or are members of the
household shall not exceed –
i. For activities ancillary to farming or forestry, 8 persons per
site or 2 person per 1 hectare of net site area, whichever is the
greater;
ii. For all other activities, 4 persons per site or 1 person per 1
hectare of net site area, whichever is the greater.
Activities on a site other than activities ancillary to farming
and forestry, that do not comply with the Rule 8.6.5.1.11(ii)
are a discretionary activity
Within the subject site, activities other than those ancillary to
farming and forestry are proposed. Up to 18 persons are
permitted.
N/a.
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 9
Table 2 – District Wide Performance Standards
PART 3 – ENVIRONMENT PROVISIONS
Rule # STANDARDS PERFORMANCE/COMMENTS
Chapter 12 – Natural and Physical Resources
12.1 Landscape &
Natural Features
12.1.6.1.1 Protection of Outstanding Landscape Features
12.1.6.1.2 Indigenous Vegetation Clearance in Outstanding
landscapes
12.1.6.1.3 Tree Planting in Outstanding Landscapes
12.1.6.1.4 Excavation and/or filling within an outstanding
landscape
12.1.6.1.5 Buildings within outstanding landscapes
12.1.6.1.6 Utility Services in Outstanding Landscapes
N/a.
12.2
Indigenous Flora
and Fauna
12.2.6.1.1 Indigenous Vegetation Clearance Permitted Throughout
the District
12.2.6.1.2 Indigenous Vegetation Clearance in the rural Production
and Minerals Zones
12.2.6.1.3 Indigenous Vegetation Clearance in the General Coastal
Zone
12.2.6.1.4 Indigenous Vegetation Clearance in Other Zones
N/a.
12.3
Earthworks
12.3.6.1.1 Excavation and/or filling, excluding mining and
quarrying, in the Rural Production Zone or Kauri Cliffs zone
Permitted – Maximum of 5000m3 within a 12-month period and
cannot be higher than 1.5m cut or fill.
RDA – Excavation and/or filling up to 20,000m3 in any 12 month
period
Earthworks only involves the
foundation preparation.
Permitted
12.4 Natural
Hazards
12.4.6.1.1 Coastal Hazard 2 Area
12.4.6.1.2 Fire Risk to Residential Units
N/a.
12.5 Heritage 12.5.6.1.1 Notable Trees
12.5.6.1.2 Alterations to/and maintenance of historic sites,
buildings and objects
12.5.6.1.3 Registered Archaeological Sites
N/a.
12.5A Heritage
Precincts
There are no Heritage Precincts that apply to the site. N/a.
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 10
PART 3 – ENVIRONMENT PROVISIONS
Rule # STANDARDS PERFORMANCE/COMMENTS
12.6 Air Not applicable N/a.
12.7 Lakes,
Rivers, Wetlands
and the Coastline
12.7.6.1.1 Setback from lakes, rivers and the coastal marine area
12.7.6.1.2 Setback from smaller lakes, rivers and wetlands
Permitted = for rivers minimum setback of 10 x the average width
of the river where it passes through or past the site provided that
the minimum setback is 10m and the maximum is no more than
minimum required by Rule 12.7.6.1.1
12.7.6.1.4 Land Use Activities involving the Discharges of Human
Sewage Effluent
12.7.6.1.5 Motorised Craft
12.7.6.1.6 Noise
N/a.
12.8 Hazardous
Substances
N/a.
12.9 Renewable
Energy and
Energy Efficiency
Not applicable N/a.
Chapter 15 – Traffic, Parking and Access
15.1.6A.2.1
Traffic Intensity
15.1.6A Maximum Daily One Way Traffic Movements
Appendix 3A Traffic Intensity Factors allows 60 traffic movements.
Permitted
15.1.6B
Parking
15.1.6B.1.1 On-site Car Parking Spaces:
The property already contains the
required two car parks.
Permitted
15.1.6B.1.4
Accessible
Carparks
Accessible Carparks
N/a.
15.1.6B.1.5
Carpark Space
Standards
Carpark space standards (Appendix 3D)
15.1.6B.1.6
Loading Spaces
For buildings between 500m2 and 5,000m2 two loading spaces are
required if in the Commercial or Industrial Zones
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 11
PART 3 – ENVIRONMENT PROVISIONS
Rule # STANDARDS PERFORMANCE/COMMENTS
15.1.6C.1.1
Vehicle Access Private Accessway in all zones
15.1.6C.1.5
Vehicle Crossing
Vehicle Crossing Standards in Rural and Coastal Zone
15.1.6C.1.7
General Access
Standards
General Access Standards
Chapter 16 – Signs and Lighting N/a.
5.3. The analysis in Tables 1 - 2 has shown that the application is able to meet all of the permitted Rural Production Zone standards.
5.4. A review of aerials from Retrolens did not indicate that the site was HAIL, as such no assessment of the National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health has been undertaken. The application has been considered Permitted in terms of this regulation.
5.5. No other National Environmental Standards are considered applicable to this development. 5.6. As noted in the sections above the ROT is subject to a CON . The Conditions of the CON are
reproduced below -
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 12
Table 2 - Consent Notice 6627943.1
5.7. Turning to these bullets points the first two apply to a dwelling house which is not relevant. The
third bullet point is relevant as this will be the second accessory building . The shed is less than 9.0m in height as required by bullet point four and the last bullet point is being complied with.
5.8. As detailed above the proposed shed would not comply with the following condition –
5.9. A change of a CON condition is sought under section 221.
APPLICATION DESCRIPTION - PROPOSED CHANGE OF CONDITIONS 6.1. We seek to change the following condition of the CON :
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 13
6.2. It is proposed to remove the limitation on the number of accessory buildings on the property. The conditions would be worded as follows – A maximum of one dwelling . No accessory building shall exceed a gross floor area of more than 100m2.
STATUTORY CONSIDERATIONS
7.1. The Act provides for the change of a consent condition at the request of the consent holder which is found under Section 221 (3) –
(3) At any time after the deposit of the survey plan,—
(a) the owner may apply to a territorial authority to vary or cancel any condition specified in a consent notice:
(b) the territorial authority may review any condition specified in a consent notice and vary or cancel the condition.
(3A) Sections 88 to 121 and 127(4) to 132 apply, with all necessary modifications, in relation to an application made or
review conducted under subsection (3).
7.2. The assessment of the request to change the condition is to be considered via Sections 88 – 121
and 127(4) – 132. Sections 88 – 121 outline the regulatory framework in determining resource consents and Section 127(4) specifically requires –
(4)For the purposes of determining who is adversely affected by the change or cancellation, the consent
authority must consider, in particular, every person who—
(a) made a submission on the original application; and
(b) may be affected by the change or cancellation.
In relation to Section 127(4) above the original subdivision was the subject of a submission however that was withdrawn. Consequently there is no person to be consider on the original application
7.3. Sections 88 – 121 do not specifically refer to an application made under Section 221 of the Act. As such the provisions of Section 87B apply and the application is deemed a Discretionary Activity.
7.4. With respect to Discretionary Activities, a consent authority may grant or refuse an application,
and impose conditions under section 108.
7.5. The preamble in assessing a resource consent application sits within Section 104 –
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 14
7.6. The assessment of the application is limited to the potential effects arising from the change in
the condition. In this regard removing the limitation on the number of accessory buildings on the property.
APPLICATION ASSESSMENT
8.1. Whilst Section 104 details several statutory documents to be assessed the most relevant is the District Plan. Turning to that document the new shed meets all the rules of the District Plan. This turns the assessment of the application specifically to the changes in the condition sought, and the effects if any therefrom.
8.2. The consideration is therefore reflected under these subsections of Section 104 whereupon the
reference to activity it that of changing the CON condition –
(a) any actual and potential effects on the environment of allowing the activity ; and
(ab) any measure proposed or agreed to by the applicant for the purpose of ensuring
positive effects on the environment that will or may result from allowing the activity; and
(c) any other matter the consent authority considers relevant and reasonably necessary
to determine the application.”
Actual and potential effects
8.3. The development of the shed will result in an additional building on the property. The shed is
located as far back as is possible from Waitotara Drive and sits directly behind the dwelling house
and landscaping. The property has shelter belts and landscaping along the common boundaries
and specimen trees along the road frontage. The vegetation along the southern boundary is
required to be maintained under a former resource consent for a garage issued under RC 2110389.
The shed is not visible from the curtilage of the residential units on the properties to the north [ #
108 ] and south [ #120 ] of the application site.
8.4. The location renders the bulk and form subservient when viewed from the road and the adjoining
properties. Moving the shed closer to the road will increase the visual presence from that location
and will also move into the outlook of the residential unit located at 120 Waitotara Drive to the
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 15
south. In this regard the owners have a patio facing north and moving the shed closer to the road
has the potential to be seen from their courtyard area.
8.5. Despite the shed will sit within a flood area the incidence of flood water is not material by reason
it is not habital. The earthworks is less than 50m3 and would be a Permitted Activity under the
Proposed Regional Plan.
Positive effects
8.6. The shed will be of the same colour as the existing garage adjoining the dwelling house. This colour
is consistent with several accessory buildings along Waitotara Drive. In addition, the shed will
remove the “clutter ” of vehicles parked and seen in various locations around the property.
Any other matter
8.7. The limitation on the number of accessory building is seen as a means upon which the amenity
and character of an area can be attained. The original subdivider of the land had several Land
Covenant requirements including an approval process for any building or structure; the use of
specific building material; and a limitation on subdividing the land. While the property retains
some of the Land Covenant requirements these three specific requirements lapsed on 31 March
2014. The properties within the original subdivision have been progressively developed and
landscaping has been planted and sustained. The CON requirements are now some 15 years old
and their purpose has attained what was originally intended. The need to retain the limit on
accessory buildings is therefore considered unnecessary. A number of other property owners have
also sought to amend conditions within the CON which relates to the accessory building condition.
This application is therefore considered to sit within the norm of owners developing their sites
and reveals the restriction has “done its time”.
Summary
8.8. The actual and potential effects of changing the CON condition are assessed to be minimal given
the manner in which the application site is able to absorb the new shed within the property. While
there will be change within our site brought about by the presence of the shed this is internalised
an effects accepted by ourselves. These effects do not radiate beyond the property boundary and
it is considered fanciful any party would be adversely affected by this application. The factors
being managed in the Consent Notice Condition are considered to have been attained .
WRITTEN APPROVALS 9.1. We have been in touch with the two adjoining property owners and discussed our new shed.
They both support our application being reflected within the attached written approvals. The owners being –
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 16
Ernie Zane Cottle – 120 Waitotara Drive [ Lot 1 DP 353240 ] ; and Elizabeth Anne & Leo Robert Clifford - 108 Waitotara Drive [ Lot 3 DP 353240 ].
PART II CONSIDERATIONS 10.1. With regard to the purpose and principles of the Resource Management Act 1991, the
following considerations are of relevance to this application.
Sustainable Management [Section 5]
10.2. The purpose of the RMA as stated in section 5 of the Act is the sustainable management of
natural and physical resources through managing their use, development and protection in a way that enables people and communities to provide for their social, cultural and economic well-being while sustaining those resources for future generations, protecting the life supporting capacity of ecosystems, and avoiding, remedying or mitigating adverse effects on the environment.
10.3. The definition of natural and physical resources encompasses land, water, air, soil, minerals, energy, plants and animals and structures.
10.4. The activity is considered to attain the overall purpose described above. The change to the
CON condition continues to give effect to a subdivision approval in a manner which reflects the existing environment. Overall there will be no perception of any change on the site save the presence of a new shed. That presence being no different to the effect of ancillary building that have developed on other sites along Waitotara Drive.
Matters of National Importance [Section 6]
10.5. With respect to s.6 matters, that only applicable relates to natural hazards in terms of
flooding. The shed is not habital and any flood would only affect those items stored with the shed. There is no effect upon human life.
Other Matters [Section 7]
10.6. Items in s.7 accord include maintenance and enhancement of both amenity values and the
quality of the environment which are embodied within the proposal. It is fanciful to determine the development of the shed would destroy the amenity values and diminish the quality of environment.
Treaty of Waitangi [Section 8]
10.7. With respect to the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, the project is not considered to be in
conflict with these articles.
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 17
CONCLUSIONS 11.1. Our application seeks to change a condition contained within a CON. This would allow the
construction and use of a three-bay shed. As the CON limits the number of accessory building to no more than one a change to condition is required.
11.2. The new shed complies with all the District Plan rules and in its own account is a Permitted Activity. The change in the CON condition requires the application to be assessed as a Discretionary Activity.
11.3. The Assessment of Environmental Effects concludes that the actual and potential effects on
the environment as a result of the change in the CON would be no more than minor. 11.4. An assessment of Part II of the Act has concluded that the development is consistent with the
overall outcomes sought.
11.5. We look forward to receiving acknowledgment of the application and please advise if any additional information is required.
Jeff Kemp Director
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 18
Form 10
APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OR CANCELLATION OF RESOURCE CONSENT CONDITION
Section 127, Resource Management Act 1991
To Far North District Council : We, Jeff and Robby Kemp, apply for a change of condition of a resource consent. Our application relates to the following resource consent:
Resource Consent Number 2050478
Our application relates to bullet point three within the following specific condition of the resource consent being 4 d) – contained with CON 6627943.1 and more particularly applying to Lot 2 DP 353240, CFR 217962 :
PLANNING REPORT
FNDC Planning Report Jeff and Robby Kemp Page 19
The proposed change is as follows: [ Insertions shown underlined , deletion shown strikethrough ] Bullet Point 3-
A maximum of one dwelling and one accessory [ to a maximum of 100m2 gross floor area ] shall be permitted on each lot. A maximum of one dwelling . No accessory building shall exceed a gross floor area of more than 100m2.
We attach, in accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991, an assessment of environmental effects in the detail that corresponds with the scale and significance of the effects that a change to the activity may have on the environment. [see below] We attach any information required to be included in this application by the district plan, the regional plan, the Resource Management Act 1991, or any regulations made under that Act.
Planning Report, including Assessment of Environmental Effects, prepared by Bay of Islands Planning; Certificate of Title and Consent Notices ; Drawings and pictures of the structures by Versatile Limited; and Written Approvals.
............................................ Date: 29 May 2020 J. V. Kemp on behalf of Jeff and Robby Kemp.
Address for service: Bay of Islands Planning Limited, PO Box 795, Kerikeri 0245 Telephone: (09) 4075253 email: [email protected]
RECORD OF TITLEUNDER LAND TRANSFER ACT 2017
FREEHOLD
Registered OwnersJeffery Victor Kemp, Robyn Winnifred Kemp and Wayne Michael Weber
Estate Fee Simple
Area 1.0215 hectares more or less
Legal Description Lot 2 Deposited Plan 353240
Date Issued
Prior References137904
Identifier 217962Land Registration District North Auckland
31 October 2005
Guaranteed Search Copy issued under Section 60 of the LandTransfer Act 2017
Interests
Appurtenant hereto is a right of way and rights to transmit electricity and telecommunications created byTransfer D302958.13 - 18.8.1998 at 1.44 pm
The easements created by Transfer D302958.13 are subject to Section 243 (a) Resource Management Act 1991
Appurtenant hereto is a right of way and electricity and telephone rights created by Transfer D349728.2 -20.1.1999 at 2.37 pm
Land Covenant in Easement Instrument 6201889.1 - 3.11.2004 at 9:00 am
6627943.1 Consent Notice pursuant to Section 221 Resource Management Act 1991 - 31.10.2005 at 9:00 am
Subject to a right to drain water over part marked E on DP 353240 created by Easement Instrument 6627943.3 -31.10.2005 at 9:00 am
Appurtenant hereto is a right drain water created by Easement Instrument 6627943.3 - 31.10.2005 at 9:00 am
The easements created by Easement Instrument 6627943.3 are subject to Section 243 (a) Resource ManagementAct 1991
Land Covenant in Easement Instrument 6627943.3 - 31.10.2005 at 9:00 am
Fencing Covenant in Transfer 7185229.1 - 9.1.2007 at 9:00 am
Transaction Id
Client Reference Quickmap
Guaranteed Search Copy Dated 14/05/20 12:10 pm, Page 1 of 2
Register Only
Identifier 217962
Transaction Id
Client Reference Quickmap
Guaranteed Search Copy Dated 14/05/20 12:10 pm, Page 2 of 2
Register Only
Project No.: 2089-2089219J1.0 Versatile Bay of Islands311 Waipapa RoadKerikeri, Northland024609 407 [email protected]
Jeff KempWaitotara Roadkerikeri02950274 [email protected]
Stand-Tough Lean-To
Plan & Elevations
12/05/2020 Page 4 of 4
existing house
roof plan area: 246m² (est)
building coverage: 229m² (est)
PROPOSED VERSATILE BUILDING
roof plan area: 97.2m²
building coverage: 97.2m²
provide 2*80Ø downpipes
discharge to collection tank with
overflow to existing open drain
existing driveway
210m² approx
existing vehicle access
WA
ITO
TA
RA
DR
IVE
sto
rmw
ate
r e
ase
me
nt
90
.09
m1
2°
12
' 20
"
parallel
10.00 m
18
.50
m
53
.86
m
5.00 m
45
.03
m1
94
° 4
4' 3
0"
18
.66
m1
89
° 0
2' 0
0"
129.47 m 93° 47' 00"
3.63 m 93° 47' 00"
1.42 m 93° 47' 00"
1.48 m 262° 56' 40"
3.82 m 262° 56' 40"
134.63 m 262° 56' 40"
existing shed
roof plan area: 54m²
building coverage: 54m²
existing pool & paving
225m² approx
proposed manoeuvring area
70m²
existing stormwater collection tanks
existing aerated watsewater treatment plant
new stormwater collection tank
existing shelterbelt planting to all internal boundaries
existing landscape planting to road boundary
SCALE @ A3 DATE:
CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE PRIOR TO STARTING . ALL DIMENSIONS IN MM UNLESS STATED
Note: Construction to comply with NZS3604.2011 and the New Zealand Building Code
SHEET No.DRAWING TITLE:PROPOSED VERSATILE BUILDING FOR:
C.A.D. PROJECT #: OF
1 : 500
SITE PLANMAY 2020
V20505
KEMP
114 WAITOTARA DRIVE, KERIKERI01
2
Building Coverage:
Existing Building footprint: 229m²
Proposed Building footprint: 97.2m²
Total Building Coverage: 326.2m² (3.2%)
Permitted Activity maximum: 12.5%
REVISIONS:A 20.05.20 Show landscaping to boundaries
North
District Plan Zone:
Project Information:
as per NZS3604:2011 Section 5.2
Lot 2
DP353240
Val'n No. 00213-11222
Wind Zone: HIGHA/Open/Exposed/T1
Exposure Zone: C
Rural Production
Area: 1.0215ha
Earthworks: for foundations only
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Impermeable Surfaces:
Existing impermeable area: 735.0m²
Proposed building roof area: 97.2m²
Proposed manoeuvring area: 70.0m²
Total Impermeable Area: 902.2m² (8.8%)
Permitted Activity maximum: 15%