9
Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes N. Akchurin, Texas Tech University, USA N. Buttimore, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland A. Penzo, INFN & Dip di Fisica, Trieste, Italy

Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes N. Akchurin, Texas Tech University, USA N. Buttimore, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland A. Penzo,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes N. Akchurin, Texas Tech University, USA N. Buttimore, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland A. Penzo,

Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes

N. Akchurin, Texas Tech University, USAN. Buttimore, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland A. Penzo, INFN & Dip di Fisica, Trieste, Italy

Page 2: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes N. Akchurin, Texas Tech University, USA N. Buttimore, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland A. Penzo,

2

Introduction

• Proton proton collisions probe analyticity and spin effects

• A dispersion relation violation may suggest a new mass scale

• Hadronic spin effects appear in t = 0 fermion fermion scattering

• Seek the spin implications when evaluating transition amplitudes

• Study forward spin dependence for cross section normalisation

September 30, 2010N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Jülich

Page 3: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes N. Akchurin, Texas Tech University, USA N. Buttimore, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland A. Penzo,

3

Small Angle Collisions of Protons and Ions

The level of hadronic spin dependence is important in the context of

• Parton distribution functions and nucleon form factors

• Measuring the proton beam polarization at BNL RHIC, Makdisi, AIP Conf Proc 980

• Spin dependent couplings of the Pomeron, Trueman, Phys Rev D77

September 30, 2010N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Jülich

Page 4: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes N. Akchurin, Texas Tech University, USA N. Buttimore, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland A. Penzo,

4

Analyzing Power in CNI Region

September 30, 2010N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Jülich

• For the current analyses, we assume double-flip amplitude is zero• The Coulomb phase is 0.02• The rho parameter is 0.02

Page 5: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes N. Akchurin, Texas Tech University, USA N. Buttimore, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland A. Penzo,

N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Julich 5September 30, 2010

Page 6: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes N. Akchurin, Texas Tech University, USA N. Buttimore, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland A. Penzo,

6

Global Fit to Small –t Data

September 30, 2010N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Jülich

E704 (p=200 GeV/c) RHIC (p=100 GeV/c)☐ RHIC (√s= 200 GeV)

Page 7: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes N. Akchurin, Texas Tech University, USA N. Buttimore, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland A. Penzo,

7

Phase Angle vs |r5|

September 30, 2010N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Jülich

1s 3s2s

Page 8: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes N. Akchurin, Texas Tech University, USA N. Buttimore, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland A. Penzo,

8

Conclusions

• When all available small –t data are analyzed, the hadronic spin flip is small (value…)

• The magnitude of |r5|= 0.059 ± 0.008 and the phase angle q5= 94.1 ± 1.7 degrees

• Only statistical experimental errors are considered in this analysis. The systematic errors need to be included especially when they are comparable or larger

• pp data at 6.8 GeV suggest sizable hadronic spin flip…• pC data ….• ….

September 30, 2010N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Jülich

Page 9: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes N. Akchurin, Texas Tech University, USA N. Buttimore, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland A. Penzo,

9

Overlay Alek6.8GeV (do we need this?) maybe save it as a back up

September 30, 2010N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Julich