Upload
bayard
View
25
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Forward Physics Prospects using FCAL in High-Energy Collisions (pp & pA) at LHC. Bedanga Mohanty VECC, Kolkata. Two important physics issues could be addressed :. Test of pQCD predictions : p+p collisions Gluon distribution function in proton and Nuclei : p+A collisions. uds-quark. all. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Forward Physics Prospects using FCAL in High-Energy Collisions (pp & pA) at
LHC
Bedanga MohantyVECC, Kolkata
Test of pQCD predictions : p+p collisions Gluon distribution function in proton and Nuclei : p+A collisions
Two important physics issues could be addressed :
2
p+p Collisions : Test pQCD
How partons are distributed in hadrons we collide
Parton Distribution Functionsdominantly from deep-inelastic
Scattering experiments
How partons fragment into hadrons
Parton Fragmentation Functionsdetermined from e+e- annihilations
b-quark
c-quark
uds-quarkall
s=91.2 GeVOPAL
cabccbb
cbaaacba dzDxfxfdzdxdxd σσ π
π ˆ)()()( ,,
∑∫ ∫ ∫=
What is the probability that the partons will interact
Parton-Parton Cross-Section (pQCD)
3
Test of pQCD at RHIC
Jet production and high pT identified particle production well explained by NLO pQCD calculationsat midrapidity
STAR : PRL 97 (2006) 252001
Midrapidity Measurements
STAR : PLB 637 (2006) 161 PHENIX : PRL 91 (2003) 241803
4
Test of pQCD at Forward Rapidity
σdata / σpQCD depends on in addition to CM energy and pT
STAR : PRL 97 (2006) 152302
Forward rapidity Measurements
Bourrely and Soffer : hep-ph/0311110
√s=23.3 GeV √s=52.8 GeV
Ed
3 σd
p3 [b
/GeV
3 ]
√s=200 GeV
5
Test of pQCD : Role of Forward Rapidity
What are the Bjorken x dependence on
Simple Kinematics
Deep inelastic scattering
Hard scattering hadroproduction
Assumtions :
1. Initial partons are collinear2. Partonic interaction is elastic
pT, pT,2
Studying pseudorapidity, =-ln(tan/2), dependence of particle production probes parton distributions at different Bjorken x values and involves different admixtures of gg, qg and qq’ subprocesses.
6
Test of pQCD : Role of Forward Rapidity - An Example
Mid-rapidity particle detection
0 and 0
xq xg xT = 2 pT / s
Large-rapidity particle detection
>>
xq xT e xF (Feynman x)
xg xF e(
Large rapidity : different x for quarks and gluons
p+p π+X, s = 200 GeV, =0
7
Gluon Distribution : Proton
Low-x gluon density is large and continues to increase as x0
It cannot grow forever
Fundamental question - Where does saturation set in ?
Deep inelastic scattering
8
Gluon Distribution : Nuclei
World data on nuclear DIS constrains nuclear modifications to gluon density only for xgluon > 0.02
Crucial for knowing the initial conditions in Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions
M. Hirai, S. Kumano, T.-H. Nagai, Phys. Rev. C70 (2004) 044905
9
Forward Rapidity : Saturation
MidRapidity
ForwardRapidity
CTEQ6M
Saturation may set in at forward rapidity when gluons start to overlap.
yT es
px −~
Nuclear amplification: xGA(x) ~ A1/3xG(x), i.e.
gluon density is ~6x higher in Gold than the nucleon
10
Experimental Signature in p(d)+A Collisions - I
Mid Rapidity
Forward Rapidity
In CGC picture, 2 soft gluons can merge to form a harder gluon.
This will lead to a suppression of low pT hadrons in p(d)+A collisions compared to p+p collisions.
The effect should be stronger at forward rapidities where x is smaller but gluon densities are higher
yT es
px −~
11
Experimental Results : d+A Collisions at RHIC
Hadron production suppressed at forward rapidity
dAu: forward suppression & backward enhancement
PHOBOSBRAHMS
STAR
PHENIX
12
Explanation : Not Unique
Forward rapidity at RHIC ~ Mid rapidity at LHC
SATURATION (CGC)
Jalilian-Marian, NPA 748 (2005) 664.Kharzeev, Kovchegov, and Tuchin, PLB 599 (2004) 23; PRD 68 (2003) 094013.Armesto, Salgado, and Wiedemann, PRL 94 (2005) 022002.
MULTIPLE SCATTERING &Eloss IN COLD NUCLEAR MATTER
Qiu and Vitev, PRL 93 (2004) 262301; hep-ph/0410218.
BREAKDOWN OF FACTORIZATIONOr SUDAKOV SUPPRESSION
Kopeliovich, et al., hep-ph/0501260.Nikolaev and Schaefer, PRD 71 (2005) 014023.
PARTON RECOMBINATION
Hwa, Yang, and Fries, PRC 71 (2005) 024902.
SHADOWINGR. Vogt, PRC 70 (2004) 064902.Guzey, Strikman, and Vogelsang, PLB 603 (2004) 173.
Armesto & Salgado, hep-ph/0308248
Shaowing : Models differ by factor fo 3
13
Experimental Signature in p(d)+A Collisions - II
p+p: Di-jet
Experimental Signature…….
d+Au: Mono-jet
PT is balanced by many gluons
Dilute parton system
(deuteron)
Dense gluon
field (Au)
Kharzeev, Levin, McLerran NPA748, 627
14
CGC and Forward Rapidity
Taking high pT π0 in forward rapidity - allows probing high-x valence quark correlations with low -x gluons : A probe of low-x gluons
Kharzeev, Levin, McLerran NPA748, 627
pd
pAu
π
q
g EN
xqpxgp
π
π
EN
€
Q2 ~ pT2
s = 2EN
η = −ln(tan(θ
2))
xq ≈ xF / z
€
xF ≈2Eπ
s
z =Eπ
Eq
xg ≈pT
se−η g
With assumptions
STAR : PRL 97 (2006) 152302
15
Summary : Why FCAL
Allows us to test pQCD predictions
σdata / σpQCD depends on in addition to CM energy and pT
Allows us to understand the gluon distribution function in p and A Forward rapidity probes low-x regime Knowledge of initial conditions in heavy ion collisions
Motivations
Measurements
π0 transverse momentum spectra Nuclear Modification factor for π0
Forward π0 triggered correlations
Unique Opportunity
To find where Saturation sets in To map a new phase diagram ?
16
Thanks