Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey: Net ......4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 2 of 28 Vice-President Robredo stays “Good” at

4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey

SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 March 2020, page 1 of 28

52 Malingap St., Sikatuna Village, Quezon City

Website: www.sws.org.ph

Tel: 924-4456, 924-4465

Fax: 920-2181

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey:

Net Satisfaction “Good” for Vice-President Robredo,

“Very Good” for Senate President Sotto, “Good” for Speaker Cayetano,

and “Moderate” for Chief Justice Peralta

• “Very Good” for the Senate and House of Representatives,

“Good” for the Supreme Court and Cabinet

Social Weather Stations

The Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey, conducted from December 13-16, 2019,

found 59% satisfied and 23% dissatisfied with the performance of Vice-President Leni Robredo, 73%

satisfied and 10% dissatisfied with Senate President Vicente “Tito” Sotto III, 67% satisfied and 15%

dissatisfied with Speaker Alan Peter Cayetano, and 40% satisfied and 19% dissatisfied with Chief

Justice Diosdado Peralta [Tables 1 and 2].

The resulting net satisfaction ratings (% satisfied minus % dissatisfied) were a "good" +36 for

Vice-Pres. Robredo, a "very good" +62 (correctly rounded) for Senate President Sotto, a "very good"

+53 (correctly rounded) for Speaker Cayetano, and a "moderate" +21 first rating for Chief Justice

Peralta.

The December 2019 survey also found 73% satisfied and 11% dissatisfied with the

performance of Senate, 63% satisfied and 12% dissatisfied with the House of Representatives, 62%

satisfied and 13% dissatisfied with the Supreme Court, and 56% satisfied and 11% dissatisfied with

the Cabinet as a whole [Tables 3, 4, and 5].

The resulting net satisfaction ratings were a "very good" +62 for the Senate, a "very good"

+51 for the House of Representatives, a "good" +49 for the Supreme Court, and a "good" +45 for the

Cabinet as a whole.

[SWS terminology for Net Satisfaction Ratings: +70 and above, "excellent"; +50 to +69,

"very good"; +30 to +49, "good"; +10 to +29, "moderate", +9 to -9, "neutral"; -10 to -29, "poor";

-30 to -49, "bad"; -50 to -69, "very bad"; -70 and below, "execrable". SWS considers the movement

from one classification to another as either an "upgrade" or "downgrade".]

http://www.sws.org.ph/


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Vice-President Robredo stays “Good” at +36

Vice-President Robredo's net satisfaction rating stayed good, up from +33 in September 2019

to +36 in December 2019 [Chart 1, Tables 6 and 7].

The 3-point rise in the overall net satisfaction rating of Vice-Pres. Robredo was due to

increases in Metro Manila, Mindanao, and the Visayas, combined with a steady score in Balance

Luzon.

Vice-Pres. Robredo's net satisfaction rating stayed moderate in Metro Manila, up from +15 in

September 2019 to +25 in December 2019.

It stayed good in Mindanao, up from +32 in September to +38 in December.

It stayed good in the Visayas, up from +46 in September to +48 in December.

It also stayed good in Balance Luzon, down slightly from +34 in September to +33 in

December.

Rural net satisfaction stayed good, up from +40 in September to +45 in December.

Urban net satisfaction stayed moderate, up from +20 in September to +26 in December.

By basic demographics, Vice-Pres. Robredo’s net satisfaction rating rose from neutral to

moderate among class ABC and among high school graduates.

It stayed good among class D or the masa, among both men and women, among the 18-34

year olds, and among those 45 years old and above. It also stayed good among non-elementary

graduates, elementary graduates, and college graduates.

However, it fell from very good to good among class E, and from good to moderate among

35-44 year olds.

Senate Pres. Sotto stays “Very Good” at +62

Senate Pres. Sotto’s net satisfaction rating stayed very good, up slightly from +61 in

September 2019 to +62 in December 2019 [Chart 2, Tables 8 and 9].

The 1-point increase in the overall net satisfaction rating of Senate Pres. Sotto was due to

increases in all areas except Balance Luzon.

Senate Pres. Sotto’s net satisfaction rating rose from very good to excellent in Metro Manila,

up from +68 in September to +78 in December.

It stayed very good in the Visayas, up from +61 in September to +67 in December.

It stayed very good in Mindanao, up slightly from +51 in September to +53 in December.


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


It stayed very good in Balance Luzon, although down from +64 in September to +60 in

December.

Urban net satisfaction with Senate Pres. Sotto stayed very good, up from +64 in September to

+69 in December.

Rural net satisfaction also stayed very good, although down slightly from +59 in September

to +57 in December.

Compared to September 2019, Senate Pres. Sotto’s net satisfaction ratings stayed very good

in all basic demographics, except among class ABC where it fell from very good to good.

Speaker Cayetano up to “Very Good” +53

Speaker Cayetano’s net satisfaction rating rose from good to very good, up from +49 in

September 2019 to +53 in December 2019 [Chart 3, Tables 10 and 11].

The 4-point increase in the overall net satisfaction rating of Speaker Cayetano was due to

increases in all areas except Balance Luzon.

Speaker Cayetano’s net satisfaction rating rose from good to very good in Metro Manila, up

from +48 in September to +54 in December.

It stayed very good in Mindanao, up from +52 in September to +65 in December.

It also stayed very good in the Visayas, up from +57 in September to +67 in December.

It stayed good in Balance Luzon, although down from +45 in September to +40 in December.

Urban net satisfaction with Speaker Cayetano stayed very good, up from +51 in September to

+56 in December.

Rural net satisfaction rose from good to very good, up slightly from +49 in September to +50

in December.

Compared to September 2019, Speaker Cayetano’s net satisfaction ratings rose from good to

very good among class D, among women, among 18-24 year olds, among those 45-54 year olds and

above, and among college graduates.

However, it fell from very good to good among class E and among 25-34 year olds.

It stayed good among class ABC, among men, among 35-44 year olds, and among high school

graduates and below.


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chief Justice Peralta’s first net rating a “Moderate” +21

Chief Justice Peralta’s first net satisfaction rating was a moderate +21 [Chart 4, Tables 12

and 13].

It was moderate in all areas: highest in Metro Manila at +27, followed by Mindanao at +26,

the Visayas at +18, and Balance Luzon at +17.

It was also moderate in both rural and urban areas, at +23 and +19, respectively.

It was highest among class D at moderate +24, followed by class E at moderate +17, and class

ABC at neutral -2.

It was moderate among both men and women, at +20 and +22, respectively.

By age group, it was highest among 18-24 year olds at good +41, 35-44 year olds at moderate

+25, 55 years old and above at moderate +18, 25-34 year olds at moderate +15, and 45-54 year olds

at moderate +14.

It was highest among high school graduates at moderate +26, non-elementary graduates at

moderate +21, elementary graduates at moderate +17, and college graduates at neutral +7.

Senate stays “Very Good” at +62

The net satisfaction rating of the Senate stayed very good, up from +56 in September 2019 to

+62 in December 2019 [Chart 5, Tables 14 and 15].

The 6-point decline in the overall net satisfaction with the Senate was due to increases in all

areas.

It rose from very good to excellent in the Visayas, up from +57 in September to +71 in

December.

It stayed very good in Mindanao, up from +56 in September to +62 in December.

It stayed very good in Metro Manila, up from +58 in September to +63 in December.

It also stayed very good in Balance Luzon, up from +55 in September to +59 in December.

It stayed very good in urban areas, up from +56 in September to +61 in December.

It also stayed very good in rural areas, up from +56 in September to +64 in December.

Compared to September 2019, net satisfaction with the Senate stayed very good in all basic

demographics except among class ABC where it fell from very good to good.

House of Representatives up to “Very Good” +51

The net satisfaction rating of the House of Representatives rose from good to very good, up

from +43 in September 2019 to +51 in December 2019 [Table 16].


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


The 8-point rise in the overall net satisfaction rating of the House of Representatives was due

to increases in Mindanao, Balance Luzon, and the Visayas, combined with a steady score in Metro

Manila.

The House of Representatives’ net satisfaction rating rose from good to very good in

Mindanao, up from +45 in September to +60 in December.

It also rose from good to very good in the Visayas, up from +48 in September to +56 in

December.

It stayed good in Balance Luzon, up from +39 in September to +47 in December.

It also stayed good in Metro Manila, at +44 from September to December.

Net satisfaction with the House of Representatives rose from good to very good in rural areas,

up from +44 in September to +55 in December.

It stayed good in urban areas, up from +40 in September to +47 in December.

Compared to September 2019, net satisfaction with the House of Representatives rose from

good to very good in all basic demographics, except among class ABC, among women, among 45-

54 year olds, and among high school graduates where it stayed good.

Supreme Court stays “Good” at +49

The Supreme Court’s net satisfaction rating stayed good, up from +41 in September 2019 to

+49 in December 2019 [Chart 6, Tables 17 and 18].

The 8-point rise in the overall net satisfaction rating of the Supreme Court was due to increases

in all areas.

The Supreme Court's net satisfaction rating rose from good to very good in Mindanao, up

from +41 in September to +54 in December.


December.

It stayed good in Metro Manila, up from +36 in September to +47 in December.

It also stayed good in Balance Luzon, up from +39 in September to +45 in December.

It rose from good to very good in rural areas, up from +42 in September to +55 in December.

It stayed good in urban areas, up from +39 in September to +43 in December.

Compared to September 2019, the Supreme Court's net satisfaction rating rose from good to

very good among class D, among women, among 25-44 year olds, and among elementary graduates

and above.


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


It stayed good among classes ABC and E, among men, among 18-24 year olds, among those

45 years old and above, and among non-elementary graduates.

The Cabinet stays “Good” at +45

The Cabinet's net satisfaction rating stayed good, up from +35 in September 2019 to +45 in

December 2019 [Chart 7, Tables 19 and 20].

The 10-point rise in the overall net satisfaction rating of the Cabinet was due to increases in

all areas except in Metro Manila.

The Cabinet’s net satisfaction rating rose from good to very good in Mindanao, up from +33

in September to +51 in December.


December.

It stayed good in Balance Luzon, up from +33 in September to +40 in December.

It also stayed good in Metro Manila, although down slightly from +41 in September to +40

in December.

It stayed good in rural areas, up from +33 in September to +47 in December.

It also stayed good in urban areas, up slightly from +40 in September to +42 in December.

Compared to September 2019, the Cabinet’s net satisfaction rating stayed good in all basic

demographics, except among 18-44 year olds where it rose from good to very good.

Survey background

The Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey was conducted from December 13-16, 2019

using face-to-face interviews of 1,200 adults (18 years old and above) nationwide: 300 each in Metro

Manila, Balance Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao (sampling error margins of ±3% for national

percentages, and ±6% each for Metro Manila, Balance Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao).

The area estimates were weighted by Philippine Statistics Authority medium-population

projections for 2019 to obtain the national estimates.

The quarterly Social Weather Surveys on public satisfaction with the Vice-President, Senate

President, Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and

the top four government institutions, are not commissioned. They are done on SWS's own initiative

and released as a public service.


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


The survey questions on public satisfaction with the top government officials next to the

President are as follows: “Maaari po bang pakisabi ninyo kung gaano kayo nasisiyahan o hindi

nasisiyahan sa pagganap ng tungkulin ni [NAME] bilang [POSITION]. Kayo ba ay lubos na

nasisiyahan, medyo nasisiyahan, hindi tiyak kung nasisiyahan o hindi, medyo hindi nasisiyahan,

lubos na hindi nasisiyahan, o wala pa kayong narinig o nabasa kahit na kailan tungkol kay

[NAME]?” [“Please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you are with the performance of [NAME]

as [POSITION]. Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied,

somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied, or you have not ever heard or read anything about

[NAME]?”].

● Leni Robredo, Bise-Presidente ng Pilipinas (Vice-President of the Philippines)

● Vicente ''Tito'' Sotto III, Pangulo ng Senado (Senate President)

● Alan Peter Cayetano, Ispiker ng Kapulungan ng mga Kinatawan (Speaker of the House of

Representatives)

● Diosdado Peralta, Punong Mahistrado ng Korte Suprema (Chief Justice of the Supreme

Court)

The survey questions on public satisfaction with the top government institutions are as

follows: “Batay sa kabuuang nagawa nila, ano po ang pakiramdam o opinyon ninyo sa mga

sumusunod na institusyon ng gobyerno? Kayo ba ay Lubos na nasisiyahan, Medyo nasisiyahan,

Hindi tiyak kung nasisiyahan o hindi, Medyo hindi nasisiyahan, lubos na hindi nasisiyahan, o wala

pa kayong narinig o nabasa kahit na kailan tungkol sa (institusyon)? Pakilagay po ang mga kard sa

naaangkop na lugar dito sa rating board.” [“Based on their overall performance, how do you feel

about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you Very satisfied, Somewhat

satisfied, Undecided if satisfied or not, Somewhat dissatisfied, Very dissatisfied or You have never

heard or read anything about (institution)? You may indicate your answer by placing each card on

the appropriate answer on this rating board.”].

• ANG SENADO (Senate)

• KAPULUNGAN NG MGA KINATAWAN (House of Representatives)

• KORTE SUPREMA (Supreme Court)

• ANG GABINETE SA KABUUAN (Cabinet as a whole)


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


SWS employs its own staff for questionnaire design, sampling, fieldwork, data-processing,

and analysis, and does not outsource any of its survey operations. This report was prepared by Leo S.

Laroza.

#

Table 1

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather ReportDecember 13-16, 2019 National Survey

SATISFACTION WITH THE VICE-PRESIDENT

AND SENATE PRESIDENT, PHILIPPINES

Sep18 Dec18 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19

LENI

ROBREDO

Vice-

President

Satisfied 57% 53% 63% 57% 56% 59%

Undecided 20 20 16 14 19 17

Dissatisfied 23 26 21 29 23 23

Net* +34 +27 +42 +28 +33 +36

VICENTE

SOTTO III

Senate

President

Satisfied 68 72 71 72 72 73

Undecided 18 16 19 14 16 16

Dissatisfied 13 11 10 13 11 10

Net* +55 +61 +61 +60 +61 +62

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 2

Table 3


SATISFACTION WITH THE SPEAKER OF THE

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND

CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT, PHILIPPINES

Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19

ALAN PETER

CAYETANO

House

Speaker

Satisfied 64% 67%

Undecided 19 17

Dissatisfied 14 15

Net* +49 +53

DIOSDADO

PERALTA

Chief Justice

Satisfied 40

Undecided 31

Dissatisfied 19

Net* +21



Jun 18 Sep 18 Dec 18 Mar 19 Jun 19 Sep 19 Dec 19

Senate

Satisfied 57% 62% 71% 72% 74% 69% 73%

Undecided 25 23 16 17 15 17 16

Dissatisfied 17 14 13 10 11 13 11

Net* +41 +48 +58 +62 +63 +56 +62

House of

Rep.

Satisfied 45 53 57 61 62 57 63

Undecided 33 29 25 25 22 26 24

Dissatisfied 20 17 17 13 14 14 12

Net* +25 +36 +40 +47 +48 +43 +51


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE SENATE AND

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: PHILIPPINES


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 4

Table 5



Supreme

Court

Satisfied 43% 49% 54% 62% 66% 57% 62%

Undecided 31 32 27 26 22 26 24

Dissatisfied 24 18 17 12 12 16 13

Net* +19 +31 +37 +50 +54 +41 +49


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE SUPREME COURT:

PHILIPPINES



Cabinet as a

whole

Satisfied 43% 48% 52% 57% 64% 51% 56%

Undecided 37 33 29 29 23 29 30

Dissatisfied 18 16 17 12 13 16 11

Net* +25 +32 +35 +44 +51 +35 +45


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH CABINET AS A WHOLE:

PHILIPPINES


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 1

Table 6


NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF VICE-PRESIDENTS,

PHILIPPINES, OCT 1986 TO DEC 2019


-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

+

+

+

+

+

Robredo+36Estrada

ArroyoGuingona

De Castro

Binay

Laurel

C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE


LAUREL

OCT 86 +44

OCT 87 - 5

MAY 90 - 3

NOV 90 - 3

JUL 91 + 5

NOV 91 - 5

FEB 92 + 4

APR 92 -10

ESTRADA

SEP 92 +78

DEC 92 +70

MAY 93 +78

JUL 93 +87

SEP 93 +75

DEC 93 +77

APR 94 +82

AUG 94 +75

SEP 94 +75

NOV 94 +73

MAR 95 +62

JUN 95 +47

OCT 95 +46

ESTRADA (cont.)

DEC 95 +41

APR 96 +46

JUN 96 +55

SEP 96 +53

DEC 96 +47

APR 97 +54

JUN 97 +58

SEP 97 +44

DEC 97 +52

FEB 98 +38

MAR 98 +41

ARROYO

SEP 98 +73

NOV 98 +81

MAR 99 +81

JUN 99 +79

OCT 99 +72

DEC 99 +60

MAR 00 +70

APR 00 +68

SEP 00 +63

DEC 00 - 4

GUINGONA

MAR 01 +19

JUL 01 + 8

SEP 01 + 8

NOV 01 +12

MAR 02 +11

MAY 02 - 4

SEP 02 +17

NOV 02 +13

MAR 03 +16

JUN 03 +15

SEP 03 +16

NOV 03 +13

JUN 04 + 2

DE CASTRO

AUG 04 +39

DEC 04 +31

MAR 05 +19

MAY 05 +22

SEP 05 +39

DEC 05 +34

MAR 06 +29

JUN 06 +31

DE CASTRO

OCT 06 +32

DEC 06 +32

FEB 07 +36

JUN 07 +30

SEP 07 +38

DEC 07 +41

MAR 08 +47

JUN 08 +37

SEP 08 +34

DEC 08 +39

FEB 09 +36

JUN 09 +44

SEP 09 +32

DEC 09 +23

MAR 10 +14

JUN 10 +23

BINAY

SEP 10 +58

NOV 10 +57

MAR 11 +74

JUN 11 +69

SEP 11 +63

NET* NET* NET* NET*


PHILIPPINES (page 1 of 2)


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 7


BINAY

DEC 11 +70

MAR 12 +70

MAY 12 +70

AUG 12 +76

DEC 12 +70

MAR 13 +62

JUN 13 +76

SEP 13 +69

DEC 13 +62

MAR 14 +73

JUN 14 +67

SEP 14 +52

DEC 14 +44

MAR 15 +31

JUN 15 +42

SEP 15 +33

DEC 15 +24

APR 16 +25

JUN 16 +22

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. (Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys.)

ROBREDO

SEP 16 +49

DEC 16 +37

MAR 17 +26

JUN 17 +36

SEP 17 +41

DEC 17 +42

MAR 18 +34

JUN 18 +32

SEP 18 +34

DEC 18 +27

MAR 19 +42

JUN 19 +28

SEP 19 +33

DEC 19 +36

NET* NET*




PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH VICE-PRES. LENI ROBREDO:

JUN 2019 TO DEC 2019 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net*

Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19

Total PH 57% 56% 59% 14% 19% 17% 29% 23% 23% +28 +33 +36

NCR 50 47 55 12 19 15 37 32 30 +14 +15 +25

Bal. Luzon 59 56 57 16 21 19 26 22 24 +33 +34 +33

Visayas 65 65 67 14 15 14 21 19 19 +44 +46 +48

Mindanao 51 57 61 13 16 16 36 25 22 +15 +32 +38

Urban 49 49 55 14 19 16 36 29 29 +12 +20 +26

Rural 63 61 63 14 18 17 23 20 19 +41 +40 +45

ABC 53 39 50 21 27 21 25 32 29 +28 +6 +21

D 55 56 59 15 18 17 29 25 24 +25 +31 +35

E 67 65 65 7 19 14 26 14 19 +42 +51 +46


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 2


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH VICE-PRES. LENI ROBREDO:


*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses.Question. Please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in the performance of LENI ROBREDO as Vice-President ofthe Philippines. Are you very Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied,Very dissatisfied?

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net*Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19

Total PH 57% 56% 59% 14% 19% 17% 29% 23% 23% +28 +33 +36

Men 58 55 56 13 20 17 28 24 26 +30 +30 +30

Women 56 58 63 15 17 16 29 22 21 +27 +35 +42

18-24 56 56 59 18 22 17 26 22 22 +30 +34 +37

25-34 54 56 55 17 18 22 29 24 22 +25 +31 +33

35-44 58 56 57 12 19 13 30 22 29 +29 +34 +28

45-54 57 59 63 13 16 16 31 23 20 +26 +36 +43

55 + 59 55 61 13 19 15 27 24 23 +31 +31 +38

Some Elem 60 58 63 16 18 20 23 20 16 +37 +39 +47

Some HS 62 63 65 12 17 11 25 18 23 +37 +45 +43

Some Voc/Coll 54 53 58 14 20 18 31 26 24 +23 +28 +33

Coll. Grad 48 46 45 16 20 21 35 33 32 +13 +14 +12


NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SENATE PRESIDENTS,

PHILIPPINES, APR 1990 TO DEC 2019


-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70+

+

+

+

+62Sotto

Drilon

SalongaGonzales

Angara

Gonzales

Gonzales

MacedaDrilon

Ople

N. Pimentel

Drilon

Villar

EnrileFernan

K. Pimentel



SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 8


SALONGA

MAY 90 +56

NOV 90 +47

JUL 91 +39

NOV 91 +32

GONZALES

FEB 92 +28

SEP 92 +61

DEC 92 +59

ANGARA

MAY 93 +53

JUL 93 +52

SEP 93 +51

DEC 93 +55

APR 94 +54

AUG 94 +47

NOV 94 +45

DEC 94 +48

MAR 95 +36

JUN 95 +44

GONZALES

OCT 95 +37

DEC 95 +35

NET* NET* NET* NET*

GONZALES (cont.)

APR 96 +37

JUN 96 +36

SEP 96 +43

MACEDA

DEC 96 +41

APR 97 +47

JUN 97 +49

SEP 97 +40

GONZALES

FEB 98 +31

MAR 98 +50

JUL 98 +48

FERNAN

SEP 98 +48

NOV 98 +55

MAR 99 +57

JUN 99 +49

OPLE

OCT 99 +42

DEC 99 +28

MAR 00 +33

DRILON

JUL 00 +48

SEP 00 +47

N. PIMENTEL

DEC 00 +22

DRILON

SEP 01 +30

NOV 01 +39

APR 02 +25

MAY 02 +23

SEP 02 +35

NOV 92 +36

MAR 93 +43

JUN 93 +31

SEP 93 +33

NOV 93 +28

JUN 04 +32

AUG 04 +28

DEC 04 +18

FEB 05 + 2

MAR 05 + 8

SEP 05 +22

DEC 05 +24

DRILON (cont.)

MAR 05 +23

JUN 06 +25

VILLAR

OCT 06 +42

DEC 06 +39

MAR 07 +52

JUN 07 +51

SEP 07 +47

DEC 07 +59

MAR 08 +53

JUN 08 +52

SEP 08 +43

ENRILE

DEC 08 +5

FEB 09 +8

JUN 09 +23

SEP 09 +14

DEC 09 +19

MAR 10 +19

JUN 10 +41

SEP 10 +39

NOV 10 +34




ENRILE (cont.)

MAR 11 +43

JUN 11 +39

SEP 11 +35

DEC 11 +36

MAR 12 +56

MAY 12 +48

AUG 12 +65

DEC 12 +47

MAR 13 +30

JUN 13 +38

DRILON

SEP 13 +37

DEC 13 +25

MAR 14 +17

JUN 14 +20

SEP 14 +36

DEC 14 +28

MAR 15 +35

JUN 15 +29


DRILON (cont.)SEP 15 +42DEC 15 + 7APR 16 +38JUN 16 +36

K. PIMENTELSEP 16 +37DEC 16 +30MAR 17 +29JUN 17 +33SEP 17 +46DEC 17 +49MAR 18 +41

SOTTOJUN 18 +54SEP 18 +55DEC 18 +61MAR 19 +61JUN 19 +60SEP 19 +61DEC 19 +62

NET* NET*




SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 9


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH SENATE PRESIDENT

VICENTE ''TITO'' SOTTO III: JUN 2019 TO DEC 2019 (page 1 of 2)



Total PH 72% 72% 73% 14% 16% 16% 13% 11% 10% +60 +61 +62

NCR 79 77 84 10 12 10 11 9 6 +68 +68 +78

Bal. Luzon 73 73 71 13 16 16 13 10 11 +60 +64 +60

Visayas 74 72 76 15 15 15 11 11 8 +63 +61 +67

Mindanao 65 64 66 19 21 20 15 13 12 +50 +51 +53

Urban 73 73 77 13 15 14 14 10 9 +60 +64 +69

Rural 72 70 68 16 17 18 12 11 12 +60 +59 +57

ABC 71 73 67 14 22 14 15 5 18 +56 +68 +49

D 73 72 74 14 15 16 12 11 9 +61 +61 +65

E 70 70 67 13 18 19 15 10 11 +56 +60 +55


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH SENATE PRESIDENT

VICENTE ''TITO'' SOTTO III: JUN 2019 TO DEC 2019 (page 2 of 2)

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses.Question. Please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in the performance of VICENTE ‘‘TITO’’ SOTTO III asSenate President. Are you very Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, Somewhatdissatisfied, Very dissatisfied?


Total PH 72% 72% 73% 14% 16% 16% 13% 11% 10% +60 +61 +62

Men 72 72 75 14 15 16 14 11 9 +57 +61 +67

Women 73 71 70 15 17 16 11 10 12 +62 +60 +58

18-24 73 70 76 11 19 11 16 11 13 +57 +59 +63

25-34 67 66 73 16 19 15 15 14 11 +52 +52 +63

35-44 74 73 72 13 16 16 14 10 12 +60 +63 +60

45-54 79 74 74 9 14 14 12 10 11 +67 +65 +63

55 + 71 73 70 19 15 22 9 9 7 +62 +64 +63

Some Elem 70 64 66 20 22 18 9 10 13 +62 +53 +54

Some HS 72 73 72 13 15 16 13 10 12 +59 +63 +60

Some Voc/Coll 76 73 76 12 15 15 12 11 8 +64 +63 +68

Coll. Grad 60 69 68 19 18 19 20 12 13 +40 +57 +54


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 3

Table 10


NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SPEAKERS OF THE HOUSE OF

REPRESENTATIVES, PHILIPPINES, FEB 1990 TO DEC 2019


-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70+

+

+

+

Nograles

Mitra

De VeneciaVillar

Fuentebella

Belmonte

De VeneciaAlvarez

Arroyo


Cayetano

+53


MITRA

FEB 90 +33

NOV 90 +26

JUN 91 +13

OCT 91 +20

FEB 92 +25

DE VENECIA

SEP 92 +39

NOV 92 +39

MAY 93 +40

JUL 93 +42

SEP 93 +41

DEC 93 +41

MAR 94 +33

AUG 94 +23

NOV 94 +26

DEC 94 +27

MAR 95 +13

JUN 95 +20

SEP 95 +15

DEC 95 +24

APR 96 +23

JUN 96 +27

DE VENECIA (cont.)

SEP 96 +24

NOV 96 +24

MAR 97 +41

JUN 97 +46

AUG 97 +34

NOV 97 +43

FEB 98 +25

MAR 98 +28

VILLAR

SEP 98 +22

NOV 98 +31

MAR 99 +33

JUN 99 +38

OCT 99 +31

DEC 99 +18

MAR 00 +26

JUL 00 +42

SEP 00 +39

FUENTEBELLA

DEC 00 - 4

DE VENECIA

SEP 01 +16

NOV 01 +19

MAR 02 +15

MAY 02 + 9

SEP 02 +23

NOV 02 +22

MAR 03 +18

JUN 03 + 9

SEP 03 + 9

NOV 03 + 7

JUN 04 +15

AUG 04 +14

DEC 04 + 5

MAR 05 - 8

MAY 05 - 2

SEP 05 0

DEC 05 0

MAR 06 - 1

JUN 06 + 9

OCT 06 + 4

DEC 06 + 2

MAR 07 + 5

DE VENECIA (cont.)

JUN 07 - 1

SEP 07 - 4

DEC 07 + 1

NOGRALES

MAR 08 -12

JUN 08 -15

SEP 08 -12

DEC 08 -17

FEB 09 -22

JUN 09 -15

SEP 09 -20

DEC 09 -20

MAR 10 -19

JUN 10 -10

BELMONTE

SEP 10 +9

NOV 10 +7

MAR 11 +17

JUN 11 +15

SEP 11 + 9

DEC 11 + 8

MAR 12 +18

NET* NET* NET* NET*

NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SPEAKERS OF

THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PHILIPPINES (page 1 of 2)


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 11


NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SPEAKERS OF

THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PHILIPPINES (page 2 of 2)

BELMONTE (cont.)

MAY 12 + 8

AUG 12 +20

DEC 12 +15

MAR 13 +11

JUN 13 +16

SEP 13 +18

DEC 13 +16

MAR 14 - 1

JUN 14 + 2

SEP 14 +13

DEC 14 +11

MAR 15 +12

JUN 15 + 9

SEP 15 + 5

JUN 16 +18


ALVAREZSEP 16 +22DEC 16 +10MAR 17 +12JUN 17 +16SEP 17 + 8DEC 17 +14MAR 18 + 1JUN 18 + 8

MACAPAGAL-ARROYOSEP 18 -4DEC 18 -21MAR 19 -17JUN 19 -20

CAYETANOSEP 19 +49DEC 19 +53

NET* NET*


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH SPEAKER

ALAN PETER CAYETANO: SEP AND DEC 2019 (page 1 of 2)


Sep19 Dec19 Sep19 Dec19 Sep19 Dec19 Sep19 Dec19

Total PH 64% 67% 19% 17% 14% 15% +49 +53

NCR 64 70 18 14 16 16 +48 +54

Bal. Luzon 60 59 23 21 15 19 +45 +40

Visayas 68 76 19 15 11 9 +57 +67

Mindanao 68 75 13 13 15 10 +52 +65

Urban 65 70 17 16 14 14 +51 +56

Rural 63 65 21 18 14 16 +49 +50

ABC 63 67 22 12 14 18 +49 +49

D 64 68 18 17 15 14 +49 +54

E 63 64 24 19 11 15 +52 +49


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 4


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH SPEAKER

ALAN PETER CAYETANO: SEP AND DEC 2019 (page 2 of 2)

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Dont Know and Refused to Answer responses.Question. Please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in the performance of ALAN PETER CAYETANO asSpeaker of the House of Representative. Are you very Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Undecided if satisfied ordissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Very dissatisfied?

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net*Sep19 Dec19 Sep19 Dec19 Sep19 Dec19 Sep19 Dec19

Total PH 64% 67% 19% 17% 14% 15% +49 +53

Men 65 70 19 14 15 15 +50 +55

Women 63 65 20 20 14 14 +49 +50

18-24 59 69 23 20 15 9 +43 +60

25-34 64 63 20 20 13 16 +51 +48

35-44 68 69 17 16 14 14 +55 +55

45-54 63 70 19 12 15 17 +48 +52

55 + 63 67 19 17 15 15 +48 +52

Some Elem 59 64 22 17 13 16 +46 +48

Some HS 59 65 22 16 16 17 +43 +48

Some Voc/Coll 68 69 17 17 13 13 +55 +55

Coll. Grad 66 72 15 16 18 12 +49 +61



NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF CHIEF JUSTICES OF THE

SUPREME COURT, PHILIPPINES, OCT 1986 TO DEC 2019

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

+

+

+

Carpio

Panganiban

Teehankee

Fernan Narvasa

Davide

Puno

Corona

SerenoDe Castro

Carpio

Bersamin


Peralta+21


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 12


TEEHANKEE

OCT 86 +52

FERNAN

MAY 90 +40

NOV 90 +18

JUL 91 +35

NOV 91 +31

NARVASA

APR 92 +20

MAY 93 +26

APR 96 +19

JUN 96 +17

SEP 96 +28

DEC 96 +21

APR 97 +26

JUN 97 +37

SEP 97 +26

DEC 97 +30

APR 98 +35

SEP 98 +39

NOV 98 +36

MAR 99 +40

NET*

DAVIDE

DEC 99 +18

MAR 00 +18JUL 00 +20

SEP 00 +20DEC 00 +36

MAR 01 +46

JUL 01 +26SEP 01 +31

NOV 01 +34MAR 02 +22

MAY 02 +19

SEP 02 +35NOV 02 +32

MAR 03 +34

JUN 03 +18

SEP 03 +15

NOV 03 + 5JUN 04 +18

AUG 04 +21DEC 04 + 8

MAR 05 - 5

MAY 05 +1

DAVIDE (cont.)

SEP 05 +13

DEC 05 +10

PANGANIBAN

MAR 06 - 3

JUN 06 + 2

OCT 06 + 4

DEC 06 + 4

PUNO

MAR 07 + 1

JUN 07 + 3

SEP 07 - 5

DEC 07 - 2

MAR 08 + 2

JUN 08 +3

SEP 08 - 3

DEC 08 - 4

FEB 09 +3

JUN 09 +4

SEP 09 +2

DEC 09 +1

MAR 10 0

CORONA

JUN 10 -18

SEP 10 -5

NOV 10 -7

MAR 11 -4

JUN 11 0

SEP 11 0

DEC 11 -14

MAR 12 -28

MAY 12 -44

CARPIO

AUG 12 + 3

SERENO

DEC 12 +14

MAR 13 + 9

JUN 13 +13

SEP 13 +17

DEC 13 +16

MAR 14 + 4

JUN 14 + 6

SEP 14 +10

DEC 14 +11

NET*NET* NET*

NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF CHIEF JUSTICES

OF THE SUPREME COURT, PHILIPPINES (page 1 of 2)


NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF CHIEF JUSTICES

OF THE SUPREME COURT, PHILIPPINES (page 2 of 2)


NET* NET*

SERENO (cont.)

MAR 15 +10

JUN 15 +11

SEP 15 + 4

DEC 15 - 1

APR 16 +13

JUN 16 +17

SEP 16 +26

DEC 16 +16

MAR 17 +14

JUN 17 +21

SEP 17 + 9

DEC 17 + 6

MAR 18 - 7

CARPIO

JUN 18 +11

DE CASTRO

SEP 18 +4

BERSAMIN

DEC 18 +11

MAR 19 +14

JUN 19 +13

SEP 19 +16

PERALTA

DEC 19 +21


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 13


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH DIOSDADO PERALTA, CHIEF

JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT: DEC 2019 (page 1 of 2)


Total PH 40% 31% 19% +21

NCR 42 30 15 +27

Bal. Luzon 38 36 20 +17

Visayas 41 24 24 +18

Mindanao 44 27 17 +26

Urban 39 31 19 +19

Rural 42 31 19 +23

ABC 21 52 23 -2

D 42 31 18 +24

E 42 24 25 +17


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH DIOSDADO PERALTA, CHIEF

JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT: DEC 2019 (page 2 of 2)

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses.Question. Please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in the performance of DIOSDADO PERALTA asChief Justice of the Supreme Court. Are you very Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Undecided if satisfied ordissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Very dissatisfied?


Total PH 40% 31% 19% +21

Men 42 29 21 +20

Women 39 33 17 +22

18-24 56 24 15 +41

25-34 36 34 21 +15

35-44 45 26 20 +25

45-54 37 29 23 +14

55 + 35 37 17 +18

Some Elem 42 27 20 +21

Some HS 40 30 23 +17

Some Voc/Coll 43 31 17 +26

Coll. Grad 28 39 21 +7


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 5

Table 14


-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF

REPRESENTATIVES: PHILIPPINES, SEP 1988 TO DEC 2019

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. (Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys).

Senate+62

+51House of Rep.

[INS-RATE.PRS]



C. AQUINO

SEP 88 +26 +22

FEB 89 +5 + 8

SEP 89 +11 +12

NOV 90 + 2 + 3

JUL 91 + 5 + 5

NOV 91 - 1 + 2

FEB 92 + 7 +11

APR 92 +13 +11

RAMOS

OCT 92 +34 +25

DEC 92 +27 +25

MAY 93 +20 +22

JUL 93 +32 +26

SEP 93 +21 +17

DEC 93 +30 +32

APR 94 +26 +21

AUG 94 +16 +13

NOV 94 +18 +14

DEC 94 +15 +10

MAR 95 +13 +12

JUN 95 +17 + 7

OCT 95 0 0

House House House HouseSenate of Rep. Senate of Rep. Senate of Rep. Senate of Rep.

NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE SENATE AND

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PHILIPPINES (page 1 of 2)

RAMOS (cont.)

DEC 95 +14 + 8

APR 96 +13 + 5

JUN 96 +18 +11

SEP 96 +15 + 8

DEC 96 +15 +11

APR 97 +29 +25

JUN 97 +34 +27

SEP 97 +18 +13

DEC 97 +27 +23

FEB 98 +19 +17

MAR 98 +19 +17

APR 98 + 9

ESTRADA

SEP 98 +22 +19

NOV 98 +31 +24

JUN 99 +30 +26

OCT 99 +16 +13

DEC 99 + 1 - 2

MAR 00 +21 +16

JUL 00 +28 +25

SEP 00 +25 +16

DEC 00 +28 +20

ARROYO

MAR 01 +24 +20

JUL 01 +28 +21

SEP 01 + 4 + 4

NOV 01 +18 +15

MAR 02 + 9 + 5

MAY 02 + 8 + 1

SEP 02 +17 +12

DEC 02 +17 +12

MAR 03 +23 +19

JUN 03 +25 +18

SEP 03 +20 +11

NOV 03 + 7 + 3

MAR 04 +25 +17

JUN 04 +19 +11

AUG 04 +17 +13

DEC 04 +12 + 7

MAR 05 + 1 - 4

MAY 05 - 3 - 9

AUG 05 +20 +12

DEC 05 +14 + 7

MAR 06 + 9 - 1

JUN 06 +17 +12

ARROYO (cont.)

OCT 06 +14 + 5

DEC 06 +18 + 7

FEB 07 +26 +11

JUN 07 +29 +20

SEP 07 +32 +18

DEC 07 +19 + 3

MAR 08 +27 + 8

JUN 08 +27 +10

SEP 08 +21 +11

DEC 08 +26 +9

FEB 09 +23 +2

JUN 09 +30 +12

SEP 09 +30 +10

DEC 09 +27 +9

MAR 10 +25 +7

B. AQUINO

SEP 10 +48 +30

NOV 10 +51 +33

MAR 11 +49 +30

JUN 11 +47 +31

SEP 11 +50 +31

DEC 11 +44 +27


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 15


NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE SENATE AND

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PHILIPPINES (page 2 of 2)

B. AQUINO (cont.)

MAR 12 +58 +40

MAY 12 +49 +30

AUG 12 +67 +42

DEC 12 +51 +31

MAR 13 +45 +29

JUN 13 +54 +37

SEP 13 +36 +27

DEC 13 +33 +26

MAR 14 +26 +18

JUN 14 +12 +13

SEP 14 +28 +21

DEC 14 +26 +20

MAR 15 +31 +20

JUN 15 +33 +20

SEP 15 +44 +26

DEC 15 +30 +16


House HouseSenate of Rep. Senate of Rep.

B. AQUINO (cont.)

APR 16 +41 +29

JUN 16 +52 +42

DUTERTESEP 16 +52 +38

DEC 16 +48 +36MAR 17 +52 +39

JUN 17 +49 +34

SEP 17 +46 +34DEC 17 +56 +43

MAR 18 +45 +35JUN 18 +41 +25

SEP 18 +48 +36

DEC 18 +58 +40MAR 19 +62 +47

JUN 19 +63 +48SEP 19 +56 +43

DEC 19 +62 +51


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE SENATE:




Total PH 74% 69% 73% 15% 17% 16% 11% 13% 11% +63 +56 +62

NCR 69 72 74 17 14 13 13 13 12 +56 +58 +63

Bal. Luzon 71 68 70 17 18 17 12 14 12 +59 +55 +59

Visayas 75 68 79 16 18 13 9 11 7 +65 +57 +71

Mindanao 80 68 73 11 17 16 8 12 11 +72 +56 +62

Urban 70 68 72 16 17 15 13 13 12 +57 +56 +61

Rural 76 69 74 15 17 17 9 13 10 +67 +56 +64

ABC 69 67 64 18 16 19 13 16 17 +56 +51 +48

D 75 69 73 15 17 16 10 13 10 +64 +55 +63

E 70 69 76 17 18 13 13 11 11 +58 +59 +66


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 16


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE SENATE:




Total PH 74% 69% 73% 15% 17% 16% 11% 13% 11% +63 +56 +62

Men 74 69 73 16 17 15 10 13 11 +63 +56 +63

Women 74 68 73 15 18 16 11 12 11 +62 +55 +62

18-24 73 74 77 16 16 13 11 9 10 +61 +66 +67

25-34 74 69 76 13 14 15 14 16 9 +60 +53 +67

35-44 76 71 75 13 14 13 11 13 12 +65 +58 +63

45-54 73 69 67 16 19 21 10 10 11 +63 +58 +57

55 + 72 64 72 18 21 16 9 14 11 +63 +50 +61

Some Elem 68 64 75 19 20 14 12 12 11 +56 +52 +64

Some HS 73 66 75 16 19 17 11 14 8 +63 +53 +67

Some Voc/Coll 76 71 72 15 16 15 9 12 12 +67 +59 +60

Coll. Grad 73 69 69 11 16 19 16 14 12 +56 +54 +58

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Dont Know and Refused to Answer responses.

Q. Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions?

Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, VERY

DISSATISFIED or YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OR READ ANYTHING about (THE SENATE)?


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:




Total PH 62% 57% 63% 22% 26% 24% 14% 14% 12% +48 +43 +51

NCR 53 60 60 25 22 22 20 16 16 +33 +44 +44

Bal. Luzon 64 54 59 21 28 28 14 15 12 +50 +39 +47

Visayas 63 62 66 23 21 21 14 14 10 +49 +48 +56

Mindanao 65 57 69 23 28 19 11 11 9 +54 +45 +60

Urban 54 56 62 26 26 21 18 16 15 +36 +40 +47

Rural 69 58 64 20 26 26 11 14 8 +57 +44 +55

ABC 41 62 52 34 24 24 24 14 19 +17 +48 +32

D 64 57 63 21 26 24 14 15 11 +50 +42 +52

E 60 58 65 26 25 21 14 13 11 +46 +46 +54


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 6


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:



Total PH 62% 57% 63% 22% 26% 24% 14% 14% 12% +48 +43 +51

Men 62 59 65 22 24 22 16 16 11 +46 +43 +53

Women 63 55 61 23 29 25 13 13 12 +50 +42 +49

18-24 59 58 62 26 29 27 14 11 10 +45 +48 +52

25-34 62 56 65 21 27 25 17 15 10 +45 +41 +5535-44 67 60 66 17 24 19 15 12 13 +52 +48 +54

45-54 66 58 58 24 24 27 10 15 12 +55 +43 +46

55 + 59 54 62 25 27 22 15 16 12 +45 +38 +50

Some Elem 61 50 60 28 31 27 11 11 9 +50 +39 +51Some HS 63 55 64 23 30 21 13 12 12 +50 +43 +52Some Voc/Coll 64 60 62 20 23 24 15 16 13 +50 +45 +49

Coll. Grad 54 58 67 22 22 25 22 18 8 +32 +40 +59

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses.Q. Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, VERY DISSATISFIED or YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OR READ ANYTHING about (THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES)?


* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys.

NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE SUPREME COURT:

PHILIPPINES, NOV 1990 TO DEC 2019

SupremeCourt+49

[INS-RATE.PRS]

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-



SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 17

Table 18


C. AQUINONOV 90 +14JUL 91 +15NOV 91 +11FEB 92 +18APR 92 +16

RAMOSAUG 92 +32DEC 92 +24MAY 93 +18JUL 93 +23SEP 93 +22DEC 93 +30APR 94 +26AUG 94 +29NOV 94 +19DEC 94 +17MAR 95 +18JUN 95 +15OCT 95 +17DEC 95 +25MAR 96 +16JUN 96 +14SEP 96 +16DEC 96 + 5APR 97 +26

NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE SUPREME COURT:

PHILIPPINES

RAMOS (cont.)JUN 97 +30SEP 97 +19DEC 97 +28FEB 98 +23

ESTRADASEP 98 +24NOV 98 +29MAR 99 +39JUN 99 +30OCT 99 +16DEC 99 + 6MAR 00 +31JUL 00 +31SEP 00 +18DEC 00 +41

ARROYOMAR 01 +37JUL 01 +33SEP 01 +16NOV 01 +21MAR 02 +15MAY 02 +11SEP 02 +19DEC 02 +25MAR 03 +26

ARROYOJUN 03 +21SEP 03 +16NOV 03 + 8MAR 04 +23JUN 04 +20AUG 04 +17MAR 05 + 5MAY 05 - 1AUG 05 +13DEC 05 +12MAR 06 + 6JUN 06 + 9OCT 06 + 4DEC 06 +13FEB 07 +16JUN 07 +12SEP 07 +24DEC 07 + 5MAR 08 + 9JUN 08 +6SEP 08 +9DEC 08 +8FEB 09 +4JUN 09 +17SEP 09 +14

ARROYO (cont.)DEC 09 +18MAR 10 + 9

B. AQUINOSEP 10 +33NOV 10 +36MAR 11 +26JUN 11 +26SEP 11 +29DEC 11 +21MAR 12 +27MAY 12 +13AUG 12 +35DEC 12 +36MAR 13 +34JUN 13 +37SEP 13 +41DEC 13 +36MAR 14 +35JUN 14 +30SEP 14 +32DEC 14 +26MAR 15 +34JUN 15 +32SEP 15 +27DEC 15 +22

B. AQUINO (cont.)APR 16 +36JUN 16 +44

DUTERTESEP 16 +40DEC 16 +38MAR 17 +40JUN 17 +38SEP 17 +31DEC 17 +37MAR 18 +20JUN 18 +19SEP 18 +31DEC 18 +37MAR 19 +50JUN 19 +54SEP 19 +41DEC 19 +49






Total PH 66% 57% 62% 22% 25% 24% 12% 16% 13% +54 +41 +49

NCR 53 56 62 25 23 22 20 20 14 +33 +36 +47

Bal. Luzon 66 54 57 23 29 28 10 15 12 +56 +39 +45

Visayas 70 63 67 16 20 19 14 14 11 +56 +48 +56

Mindanao 69 58 66 20 20 21 10 18 13 +59 +41 +54

Urban 60 56 59 23 26 24 15 17 16 +45 +39 +43

Rural 70 58 64 20 24 24 10 15 10 +60 +42 +55

ABC 53 51 49 29 28 24 17 18 24 +36 +34 +25

D 66 57 64 21 25 23 12 16 11 +54 +41 +53

E 65 59 59 24 23 26 11 14 14 +55 +44 +45


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Chart 7






Total PH 66% 57% 62% 22% 25% 24% 12% 16% 13% +54 +41 +49

Men 65 57 61 22 23 24 13 18 13 +52 +40 +48

Women 66 57 62 22 26 23 11 15 12 +55 +42 +51

18-24 70 65 69 19 19 21 9 14 9 +60 +50 +60

25-34 67 56 66 21 25 23 12 19 11 +54 +37 +55

35-44 63 61 69 24 24 15 13 13 15 +50 +48 +54

45-54 65 54 53 26 28 34 9 15 10 +56 +39 +43

55 + 66 54 56 19 25 26 14 18 15 +52 +36 +41

Some Elem 64 53 55 27 28 31 8 11 13 +56 +41 +42

Some HS 68 58 63 18 25 21 12 15 12 +56 +43 +51

Some Voc/Coll 65 58 63 22 24 23 12 17 13 +54 +41 +50

Coll. Grad 62 55 64 20 23 24 17 21 12 +45 +34 +52

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses.Q. Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, VERY DISSATISFIED or YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OR READ ANYTHING about (THE SUPREME COURT)?


* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys.

NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE CABINET AS A WHOLE:

PHILIPPINES, NOV 1990 TO DEC 2019

Cabinet

+45

[INS-RATE.PRS]

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-



SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 19


C. AQUINO

NOV 90 -16

JUL 91 -13

NOV 91 -14

FEB 92 - 7

APR 92 - 3

RAMOS

APR 94 +17

AUG 94 + 8

NOV 94 +12

DEC 94 + 9

MAR 95 - 6

JUN 95 - 1

SEP 96 + 5

DEC 96 + 7

APR 97 +20

JUN 97 +27

SEP 97 + 8

DEC 97 +19

FEB 98 + 3

APR 98 + 1



ESTRADA

SEP 98 +18

NOV 98 +22

MAR 99 +2

JUN 99 +21

OCT 99 + 4

DEC 99 -15

MAR 00 + 6

JUL 00 +15

SEP 00 +10

DEC 00 +10

ARROYO

MAR 01 +14

JUL 01 +17

SEP 01 + 2

NOV 01 + 1

MAR 02 - 1

MAY 02 - 8

SEP 02 + 6

DEC 02 + 5

MAR 03 + 7

ARROYO (cont.)

JUN 03 +10

SEP 03 + 2

NOV 03 - 7

MAR 04 +12

AUG 05 - 6

DEC 05 - 6

MAR 06 -10

JUN 06 - 5

OCT 06 - 3

DEC 06 - 5

FEB 07 - 2

JUN 07 + 1

SEP 07 + 1

DEC 07 - 9

MAR 08 -10

JUN 08 - 9

SEP 08 - 3

DEC 08 -1

FEB 09 -7

JUN 09 +3

ARROYO (cont.)

SEP 09 -5

DEC 09 - 1

MAR 10 - 7

B. AQUINO

SEP 10 +22

NOV 10 +20

MAR 11 +24

JUN 11 +25

SEP 11 +24

DEC 11 +22

MAR 12 +26

MAY 12 +19

AUG 12 +33

DEC 12 +26

MAR 13 +23

JUN 13 +28

SEP 13 +27

DEC 13 +20

MAR 14 +20

JUN 14 + 7




B. AQUINO (cont.)

SEP 14 +18

DEC 14 + 9

MAR 15 +13

JUN 15 +12

SEP 15 +16

DEC 15 +11

APR 16 +22

JUN 16 +37

DUTERTE

SEP 16 +36

DEC 16 +32

MAR 17 +32

JUN 17 +34

SEP 17 +32

DEC 17 +38

MAR 18 +28

JUN 18 +25

DUTERTE (cont.)

SEP 18 +32

DEC 18 +35

MAR 19 +44

JUN 19 +51

SEP 19 +35

DEC 19 +45


SWS MEDIA RELEASE


Table 20


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE CABINET AS A WHOLE:


*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses.Q. Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, VERY DISSATISFIED or YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OR READ ANYTHING about (THE CABINET AS A WHOLE)?



Total PH 64% 51% 56% 23% 29% 30% 13% 16% 11% +51 +35 +45

NCR 54 57 55 25 25 28 19 16 15 +36 +41 +40

Bal. Luzon 66 49 51 23 32 36 11 16 11 +55 +33 +40

Visayas 66 55 62 23 26 22 11 15 11 +55 +40 +51

Mindanao 64 50 60 21 26 28 14 17 9 +50 +33 +51

Urban 58 55 56 25 27 28 16 15 13 +43 +40 +42

Rural 68 49 56 21 30 32 10 16 9 +58 +33 +47

ABC 57 51 53 26 26 28 17 21 17 +40 +31 +36

D 65 51 57 23 29 30 12 16 11 +53 +35 +46

E 61 52 53 24 29 32 15 14 10 +46 +38 +43


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE CABINET AS A WHOLE:




Total PH 64% 51% 56% 23% 29% 30% 13% 16% 11% +51 +35 +45

Men 64 52 55 23 27 31 13 17 12 +50 +35 +43

Women 64 51 57 23 30 29 12 15 11 +52 +36 +46

18-24 66 49 62 18 32 28 13 14 10 +53 +35 +52

25-34 67 49 62 19 30 28 13 19 8 +54 +30 +54

35-44 65 58 62 20 26 26 14 13 10 +51 +44 +53

45-54 66 50 51 26 30 31 7 15 14 +59 +35 +37

55 + 58 50 47 27 28 35 14 17 13 +43 +33 +34

Some Elem 59 43 43 27 33 41 14 15 11 +45 +28 +32

Some HS 65 48 55 21 32 26 13 15 14 +51 +33 +41

Some Voc/Coll 66 55 60 23 25 29 11 17 10 +55 +38 +50

Coll. Grad 60 55 58 23 28 33 16 16 9 +44 +38 +49

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses.Q. Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, VERY DISSATISFIED or YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OR READ ANYTHING about (THE CABINET AS A WHOLE)?

Documents

Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey: Net ......4th Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 3 March 2020, page 2 of 28 Vice-President Robredo stays “Good” at