Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Frame Covariance in Quantum GravityFrame Covariance in Quantum Gravity
Kieran Finnwith Apostolos Pilaftsis and Sotirios Karamitsos
Wednesday 20th May 2020 arXiv:1910.06661
Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity
Outline
Motivational Example
Covariance
Frame Covariance
Frame Covariance in Gravity
Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity
Summary
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 1 / 22
Complex Scalar Field
L = ∂µφ∗∂µφ−m2 |φ|2 − λ |φ|4
, φ = 1√2
(φ1 + iφ2)
Real and Imaginary Parts
L = 12∂µφ1∂
µφ1 + 12∂µφ2∂
µφ2 − 12m
2(φ21 + φ2
2)− λ4 (φ2
1 + φ22)2
〈φ〉 = ρ0 ≡√−m2
λ , m21 = m2 + 3λρ2
0
Feynman Rules
=i
p2 −m21
, =i
p2,
= −6iλρ0, = −2iλρ0,
= −6iλ, = −6iλ, = −2iλ
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 2 / 22
Complex Scalar Field
L = ∂µφ∗∂µφ−m2 |φ|2 − λ |φ|4, φ = 1√
2(φ1 + iφ2)
Real and Imaginary Parts
L = 12∂µφ1∂
µφ1 + 12∂µφ2∂
µφ2 − 12m
2(φ21 + φ2
2)− λ4 (φ2
1 + φ22)2
〈φ〉 = ρ0 ≡√−m2
λ , m21 = m2 + 3λρ2
0
Feynman Rules
=i
p2 −m21
, =i
p2,
= −6iλρ0, = −2iλρ0,
= −6iλ, = −6iλ, = −2iλ
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 2 / 22
Complex Scalar Field
L = ∂µφ∗∂µφ−m2 |φ|2 − λ |φ|4, φ = 1√
2(φ1 + iφ2)
Real and Imaginary Parts
L = 12∂µφ1∂
µφ1 + 12∂µφ2∂
µφ2 − 12m
2(φ21 + φ2
2)− λ4 (φ2
1 + φ22)2
〈φ〉 = ρ0 ≡√−m2
λ , m21 = m2 + 3λρ2
0
Feynman Rules
=i
p2 −m21
, =i
p2,
= −6iλρ0, = −2iλρ0,
= −6iλ, = −6iλ, = −2iλ
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 2 / 22
Higgs Self-energy
iΓHH(p) =
+ + +
+ + +
ΓHH(p) =(p2 −m21) +
λm21
4π2ln
(p2
µ2
)+
λm21
(4π)2
[4CUV − 4− 9
∫ 1
0
dx ln
(x(x − 1)p2 + m2
1
µ2
)]CUV ≡
2
4− D− γE + ln(4π)
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 3 / 22
Higgs Self-energy
iΓHH(p) =
+ + +
+ + +
ΓHH(p) =(p2 −m21) +
λm21
4π2ln
(p2
µ2
)+
λm21
(4π)2
[4CUV − 4− 9
∫ 1
0
dx ln
(x(x − 1)p2 + m2
1
µ2
)]CUV ≡
2
4− D− γE + ln(4π)
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 3 / 22
Complex Scalar Field
L = ∂µφ∗∂µφ−m2 |φ|2 − λ |φ|4
, φ = 1√2ρe
i σρ0
Modulus and Argument
L = 12∂µρ∂
µρ+ 12
(ρρ0
)2
∂µσ∂µσ − 1
2m2ρ2 − λ
4 ρ4
Feynman Rules: Modulus and Argument
=i
p2 −m21
, = −6iλρ0, = −6iλ,
=i
p2,
k1
k2
= − 2i
ρ0k1 · k2,
k1
k2
= − 2i
ρ20
k1 · k2
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 4 / 22
Complex Scalar Field
L = ∂µφ∗∂µφ−m2 |φ|2 − λ |φ|4, φ = 1√
2ρe
i σρ0
Modulus and Argument
L = 12∂µρ∂
µρ+ 12
(ρρ0
)2
∂µσ∂µσ − 1
2m2ρ2 − λ
4 ρ4
Feynman Rules: Modulus and Argument
=i
p2 −m21
, = −6iλρ0, = −6iλ,
=i
p2,
k1
k2
= − 2i
ρ0k1 · k2,
k1
k2
= − 2i
ρ20
k1 · k2
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 4 / 22
Feynman Rules: Real and Imaginary Parts
=i
p2 −m21
, = −6iλρ0, = −6iλ,
=i
p2, = −2iλρ0, = −2iλ
= −6iλ,
Feynman Rules: Modulus and Argument
=i
p2 −m21
, = −6iλρ0, = −6iλ,
=i
p2,
k1
k2
= − 2i
ρ0k1 · k2,
k1
k2
= − 2i
ρ20
k1 · k2
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 4 / 22
Higgs Self-Energy
iΓHH(p) =
+ + +
+ + +
Higgs Self-Energy: Modulus and Argument
ΓHH(p) = (p2 −m21) +
3λm21 + λ p4
m41
(4π)2ln
(p2
µ2
)+
λm21
(4π)2
(3 +
p4
m41
)CUV
+λm2
1
(4π)2
[2p4
m41
− 6− 9
∫ 1
0
dx ln
(x(x − 1)p2 + m2
1
µ2
)]
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 5 / 22
Higgs Self-Energy
iΓHH(p) =
+ + +
+ + +
Higgs Self-Energy: Modulus and Argument
ΓHH(p) = (p2 −m21) +
3λm21 + λ p4
m41
(4π)2ln
(p2
µ2
)+
λm21
(4π)2
(3 +
p4
m41
)CUV
+λm2
1
(4π)2
[2p4
m41
− 6− 9
∫ 1
0
dx ln
(x(x − 1)p2 + m2
1
µ2
)]
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 5 / 22
Higgs Self-Energy: Real and Imaginary Parts
ΓHH(p) =(p2 −m21) +
λm21
4π2ln
(p2
µ2
)+
λm21
(4π)2
[4CUV − 4− 9
∫ 1
0
dx ln
(x(x − 1)p2 + m2
1
µ2
)]
Higgs Self-Energy: Modulus and Argument
ΓHH(p) = (p2 −m21) +
3λm21 + λ p4
m41
(4π)2ln
(p2
µ2
)+
λm21
(4π)2
(3 +
p4
m41
)CUV
+λm2
1
(4π)2
[2p4
m41
− 6− 9
∫ 1
0
dx ln
(x(x − 1)p2 + m2
1
µ2
)]
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 5 / 22
On Shell p2 = m21
Higgs Self-Energy: Real and Imaginary Parts
ΓHH(p2 = m21) =
λm21
4π2ln
(m2
1
µ2
)+
λm21
(4π)2
[4CUV − 4− 9
∫ 1
0
dx ln
(x(x − 1)m2
1 + m21
µ2
)]
Higgs Self-Energy: Modulus and Argument
ΓHH(p2 = m21) =
λm21
4π2ln
(m2
1
µ2
)+
λm21
(4π)2
[4CUV − 4− 9
∫ 1
0
dx ln
(x(x − 1)m2
1 + m21
µ2
)]
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 5 / 22
Off Shell
Higgs Self-Energy: Real and Imaginary Parts
ΓHH(p) =(p2 −m21) +
λm21
4π2ln
(p2
µ2
)+
λm21
(4π)2
[4CUV − 4− 9
∫ 1
0
dx ln
(x(x − 1)p2 + m2
1
µ2
)]
Higgs Self-Energy: Modulus and Argument
ΓHH(p) = (p2 −m21) +
3λm21 + λ p4
m41
(4π)2ln
(p2
µ2
)+
λm21
(4π)2
(3 +
p4
m41
)CUV
+λm2
1
(4π)2
[2p4
m41
− 6− 9
∫ 1
0
dx ln
(x(x − 1)p2 + m2
1
µ2
)]
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 5 / 22
Off Shell
Higgs Self-Energy: Real and Imaginary Parts
ΓHH(p) =(p2 −m21) +
λm21
4π2ln
(p2
µ2
)+
λm21
(4π)2
[4CUV − 4− 9
∫ 1
0
dx ln
(x(x − 1)p2 + m2
1
µ2
)]
Higgs Self-Energy: Modulus and Argument
ΓHH(p) = (p2 −m21) +
3λm21 + λ p4
m41
(4π)2ln
(p2
µ2
)+
λm21
(4π)2
(3 +
p4
m41
)CUV
+λm2
1
(4π)2
[2p4
m41
− 6− 9
∫ 1
0
dx ln
(x(x − 1)p2 + m2
1
µ2
)]
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 5 / 22
Field Space CovarianceVilkovisky 1983
Field Theory
Fields: φA
Field Redefinitions: φA → φA(φ)
field space manifold
Field-space tensors: S , V A, TAB
Spacetime
Coordinates: xµ
Diffeomorphisms: xµ → xµ(x)
spacetime manifold
Spacetime tensors: S , V µ, Tµν
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 6 / 22
Field Space CovarianceVilkovisky 1983
Field Theory
Fields: φA
Field Redefinitions: φA → φA(φ)
field space manifold
Field-space tensors: S , V A, TAB
Spacetime
Coordinates: xµ
Diffeomorphisms: xµ → xµ(x)
spacetime manifold
Spacetime tensors: S , V µ, Tµν
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 6 / 22
Field Space CovarianceVilkovisky 1983
Field Theory
Fields: φA
Field Redefinitions: φA → φA(φ)
field space manifold
Field-space tensors: S , V A, TAB
Spacetime
Coordinates: xµ
Diffeomorphisms: xµ → xµ(x)
spacetime manifold
Spacetime tensors: S , V µ, Tµν
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 6 / 22
Field Space CovarianceVilkovisky 1983
Field Theory
Fields: φA
Field Redefinitions: φA → φA(φ)
field space manifold
Field-space tensors: S , V A, TAB
Spacetime
Coordinates: xµ
Diffeomorphisms: xµ → xµ(x)
spacetime manifold
Spacetime tensors: S , V µ, Tµν
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 6 / 22
Are Feynman Diagrams Covariant?
Propagators
φBφA =
(∂2L
∂φA∂φB
∣∣∣〈φ〉
)−1
Vertices
φA
φB φC
φN
= ∂NL∂φA...∂φN
∣∣∣〈φ〉
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 7 / 22
Are Feynman Diagrams Covariant?
Propagators
φBφA =(∇A∇BL|〈φ〉
)−1
Vertices
φA
φB φC
φN
= ∇A . . .∇NL|〈φ〉
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 7 / 22
Field Space Covariant Derivatives
∇BXA = ∂XA
∂φB + ΓABCX
C , ∇BXA = ∂XA
∂φB − ΓCBAXC , etc.
Field-space Christoffels: ΓABC ≡ 1
2GAD[∂GBD
∂φC + ∂GDC
∂φB − ∂GBC
∂φD
]
Properties of theField Space Metric
1 Transforms as a symmetric rank 2tensor
2 Determined solely and uniquelyfrom the QFT
3 Reduces to Euclidean metric forcanonical theory
Field Space Metric
GAB ≡ gµν
D∂2L
∂(∂µφA)∂(∂νφB )
Example: Scalar field Theory
L = 12kAB∂
µφA∂µφB − V (φ)
⇓GAB = kAB
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 8 / 22
Field Space Covariant Derivatives
∇BXA = ∂XA
∂φB + ΓABCX
C , ∇BXA = ∂XA
∂φB − ΓCBAXC , etc.
Field-space Christoffels: ΓABC ≡ 1
2GAD[∂GBD
∂φC + ∂GDC
∂φB − ∂GBC
∂φD
]
Properties of theField Space Metric
1 Transforms as a symmetric rank 2tensor
2 Determined solely and uniquelyfrom the QFT
3 Reduces to Euclidean metric forcanonical theory
Field Space Metric
GAB ≡ gµν
D∂2L
∂(∂µφA)∂(∂νφB )
Example: Scalar field Theory
L = 12kAB∂
µφA∂µφB − V (φ)
⇓GAB = kAB
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 8 / 22
Field Space Covariant Derivatives
∇BXA = ∂XA
∂φB + ΓABCX
C , ∇BXA = ∂XA
∂φB − ΓCBAXC , etc.
Field-space Christoffels: ΓABC ≡ 1
2GAD[∂GBD
∂φC + ∂GDC
∂φB − ∂GBC
∂φD
]
Properties of theField Space Metric
1 Transforms as a symmetric rank 2tensor
2 Determined solely and uniquelyfrom the QFT
3 Reduces to Euclidean metric forcanonical theory
Field Space Metric
GAB ≡ gµν
D∂2L
∂(∂µφA)∂(∂νφB )
Example: Scalar field Theory
L = 12kAB∂
µφA∂µφB − V (φ)
⇓GAB = kAB
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 8 / 22
Complex Scalar Field
L = ∂µφ∗∂µφ−m2 |φ|2 − λ |φ|4
, φ = 1√2
(φ1 + iφ2)
Real and Imaginary Parts
L = 12∂µφ1∂
µφ1 + 12∂µφ2∂
µφ2 − 12m
2(φ21 + φ2
2)− λ4 (φ2
1 + φ22)2
Field Space Metric
GAB =
(1 00 1
) Field Space Christoffels
ΓABC = 0
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 9 / 22
Complex Scalar Field
L = ∂µφ∗∂µφ−m2 |φ|2 − λ |φ|4, φ = 1√
2(φ1 + iφ2)
Real and Imaginary Parts
L = 12∂µφ1∂
µφ1 + 12∂µφ2∂
µφ2 − 12m
2(φ21 + φ2
2)− λ4 (φ2
1 + φ22)2
Field Space Metric
GAB =
(1 00 1
) Field Space Christoffels
ΓABC = 0
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 9 / 22
Complex Scalar Field
L = ∂µφ∗∂µφ−m2 |φ|2 − λ |φ|4, φ = 1√
2(φ1 + iφ2)
Real and Imaginary Parts
L = 12∂µφ1∂
µφ1 + 12∂µφ2∂
µφ2 − 12m
2(φ21 + φ2
2)− λ4 (φ2
1 + φ22)2
Covariant Feynman Rules: Real and Imaginary Parts
=i
p2 −m21
, =i
p2,
= −6iλρ0, = −2iλρ0,
= −6iλ, = −6iλ, = −2iλ
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 9 / 22
Complex Scalar Field
L = ∂µφ∗∂µφ−m2 |φ|2 − λ |φ|4, φ = 1√
2ρe i
σρ0
Modulus and Argument
L = 12∂µρ∂
µρ+ 12
(ρρ0
)2
∂µσ∂µσ − 1
2m2ρ2 − λ
4 ρ4
Field Space Metric
GAB =
(1 0
0(ρρ0
)2
)Field Space Christoffels
Γρσσ = − ρ
ρ20
,
Γσρσ =1
ρ
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 10 / 22
Complex Scalar Field
L = ∂µφ∗∂µφ−m2 |φ|2 − λ |φ|4, φ = 1√
2ρe i
σρ0
Modulus and Argument
L = 12∂µρ∂
µρ+ 12
(ρρ0
)2
∂µσ∂µσ − 1
2m2ρ2 − λ
4 ρ4
Covariant Feynman Rules: Modulus and Argument
=i
p2 −m21
, =i
p2,
= −6iλρ0, = −2iλρ0,
= −6iλ, = −6iλ, = −2iλ
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 10 / 22
The Quantum Effective ActionSchwinger 1951
exp(i~Γ[ϕ]
)=
∫[Dφ] exp
i~
[S [φ] +
∫d4x δΓ[ϕ]
δϕA (ϕA − φA)]
Non-invariant measureNot a field-space vector
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 11 / 22
Is the Quantum Effective ActionReparametrisation Invariant?
Schwinger 1951
exp(i~Γ[ϕ]
)=
∫[Dφ] exp
i~
[S [φ] +
∫d4x δΓ[ϕ]
δϕA (ϕA − φA)]
Non-invariant measureNot a field-space vector
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 11 / 22
Is the Quantum Effective ActionReparametrisation Invariant?
Schwinger 1951
exp(i~Γ[ϕ]
)=
∫[Dφ] exp
i~
[S [φ] +
∫d4x δΓ[ϕ]
δϕA (ϕA − φA)]
Non-invariant measure
Not a field-space vector
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 11 / 22
Is the Quantum Effective ActionReparametrisation Invariant?
Schwinger 1951
exp(i~Γ[ϕ]
)=
∫[Dφ] exp
i~
[S [φ] +
∫d4x δΓ[ϕ]
δϕA (ϕA − φA)]
Non-invariant measureNot a field-space vector
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 11 / 22
The Configuration Space
Must integrate over all spacetime configurations of the fields
Introduce infinite-dimensional configuration space manifold withcoordinates φa ≡ φA(xA)
Configuration space metric should be ultra-local
Configuration Space Metric
Gab ≡gµνD
δ2S
δ(∂µφa)δ(∂νφb)
= GABδ(D)(xA − xB)
Configuration Space Measure
[Dφ]√
det(G)
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 12 / 22
The Configuration Space
Must integrate over all spacetime configurations of the fields
Introduce infinite-dimensional configuration space manifold withcoordinates φa ≡ φA(xA)
Configuration space metric should be ultra-local
Configuration Space Metric
Gab ≡gµνD
δ2S
δ(∂µφa)δ(∂νφb)
= GABδ(D)(xA − xB)
Configuration Space Measure
[Dφ]√
det(G)
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 12 / 22
The Configuration Space
Must integrate over all spacetime configurations of the fields
Introduce infinite-dimensional configuration space manifold withcoordinates φa ≡ φA(xA)
Configuration space metric should be ultra-local
Configuration Space Metric
Gab ≡gµνD
δ2S
δ(∂µφa)δ(∂νφb)
= GABδ(D)(xA − xB)
Configuration Space Measure
[Dφ]√
det(G)
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 12 / 22
The Configuration Space
Must integrate over all spacetime configurations of the fields
Introduce infinite-dimensional configuration space manifold withcoordinates φa ≡ φA(xA)
Configuration space metric should be ultra-local
Configuration Space Metric
Gab ≡gµνD
δ2S
δ(∂µφa)δ(∂νφb)
= GABδ(D)(xA − xB)
Configuration Space Measure
[Dφ]√
det(G)
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 12 / 22
The Configuration Space
Must integrate over all spacetime configurations of the fields
Introduce infinite-dimensional configuration space manifold withcoordinates φa ≡ φA(xA)
Configuration space metric should be ultra-local
Configuration Space Metric
Gab ≡gµνD
δ2S
δ(∂µφa)δ(∂νφb)
= GABδ(D)(xA − xB)
Configuration Space Measure
[Dφ]√
det(G)
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 12 / 22
Covariant Source Term
(ϕA − φA)
→ ΣA(ϕ,φ)
ΣA[ϕ,φ] = (C−1[ϕ])AB σB [ϕ,φ]
〈ΣA[ϕ,φ]〉 = 0
C AB [ϕ] = 〈∇Bσ
A[ϕ,φ]〉 σA[ϕ,φ]
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 13 / 22
Covariant Source Term
(ϕA − φA)→ ΣA(ϕ,φ)
ΣA[ϕ,φ] = (C−1[ϕ])AB σB [ϕ,φ]
〈ΣA[ϕ,φ]〉 = 0
C AB [ϕ] = 〈∇Bσ
A[ϕ,φ]〉 σA[ϕ,φ]
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 13 / 22
Covariant Source Term
(ϕA − φA)→ ΣA(ϕ,φ)
ΣA[ϕ,φ] = (C−1[ϕ])AB σB [ϕ,φ]
〈ΣA[ϕ,φ]〉 = 0
C AB [ϕ] = 〈∇Bσ
A[ϕ,φ]〉
σA[ϕ,φ]
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 13 / 22
Covariant Source Term
(ϕA − φA)→ ΣA(ϕ,φ)
ΣA[ϕ,φ] = (C−1[ϕ])AB σB [ϕ,φ]
〈ΣA[ϕ,φ]〉 = 0
C AB [ϕ] = 〈∇Bσ
A[ϕ,φ]〉
σA[ϕ,φ]
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 13 / 22
Covariant Source Term
(ϕA − φA)→ ΣA(ϕ,φ)
ΣA[ϕ,φ] = (C−1[ϕ])AB σB [ϕ,φ]
〈ΣA[ϕ,φ]〉 = 0
C AB [ϕ] = 〈∇Bσ
A[ϕ,φ]〉 σA[ϕ,φ]
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 13 / 22
The Vilkovisky DeWitt Effective ActionVilkovisky 1984, DeWitt 1985
exp
(i
~Γ[ϕ]
)=
∫[Dφ]
√det(G) exp
i
~
[S [φ] +
∫d4x
δΓ[ϕ]
δϕAΣA(ϕ,φ)
]
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 14 / 22
Gravity
Scalar-Tensor Gravity
S =∫d4x√−g[− f (φ)
2 R + 12g
µνkAB(φ)∂µφA∂νφ
B − V (φ)]
Field Redefinitions
gµν → gµν(gµν ,φ)
φA → φA(gµν ,φ)
Grand Field Space
ΦI =
(gµν
φA
)
GIJ =gµν
D∂2L
∂(∂µΦI )∂(∂νΦJ )
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 15 / 22
Gravity
Scalar-Tensor Gravity
S =∫d4x√−g[− f (φ)
2 R + 12g
µνkAB(φ)∂µφA∂νφ
B − V (φ)]
Frame Transformations
gµν → Ω2(φ)gµν
φA → φA(φ)
Grand Field Space
ΦI =
(gµν
φA
)
GIJ =gµν
D∂2L
∂(∂µΦI )∂(∂νΦJ )
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 15 / 22
Gravity
Scalar-Tensor Gravity
S =∫d4x√−g[− f (φ)
2 R + 12g
µνkAB(φ)∂µφA∂νφ
B − V (φ)]
Frame Transformations
gµν → Ω2(φ)gµν
φA → φA(φ)
Grand Field Space
ΦI =
(gµν
φA
)
GIJ =gµν
D∂2L
∂(∂µΦI )∂(∂νΦJ )
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 15 / 22
Gravity
Scalar-Tensor Gravity
S =∫d4x√−g[− f (φ)
2 R + 12g
µνkAB(φ)∂µφA∂νφ
B − V (φ)]
Frame Transformations
gµν → Ω2(φ)gµν
φA → φA(φ)
Grand Field Space
ΦI =
(gµν
φA
)
GIJ =gµν
D∂2L
∂(∂µΦI )∂(∂νΦJ )
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 15 / 22
Gravity
Scalar-Tensor Gravity
S =∫d4x√−g[− f (φ)
2 R + 12g
µνkAB(φ)∂µφA∂νφ
B − V (φ)]
Frame Transformations
gµν → Ω2(φ)gµν
φA → φA(φ)
Grand Field Space
ΦI =
(gµν
φA
)
(((((((((((GIJ =
gµν
D∂2L
∂(∂µΦI )∂(∂νΦJ )
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 15 / 22
Spacetime in the Grand Field Space
Spacetime Line Element
ds2 = gµνdxµdxν
Conformal Transformation
gµν → Ω2(φ)gµν ⇒ ds2 → Ω2(φ)ds2
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 16 / 22
Spacetime in the Grand Field Space
Spacetime Line Element
((((((((ds2 = gµνdx
µdxν
Conformal Transformation
gµν → Ω2(φ)gµν ⇒ ds2 → Ω2(φ)ds2
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 16 / 22
Spacetime in the Grand Field Space
Spacetime Line Element
ds2 = gµνdxµdxν
gµν = 1`2(φ)gµν
Conformal Transformation
gµν → Ω2gµν
`→ Ω`⇒ ds2 → ds2
Grand Field Space Metric
GIJ =gµν
D∂2L
∂(∂µΦI )∂(∂νΦJ )
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 17 / 22
Spacetime in the Grand Field Space
Spacetime Line Element
ds2 = gµνdxµdxν
gµν = 1`2(φ)gµν
Conformal Transformation
gµν → Ω2gµν
`→ Ω`⇒ ds2 → ds2
Grand Field Space Metric
GIJ =gµν
D∂2L
∂(∂µΦI )∂(∂νΦJ )
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 17 / 22
Effects of `(φ)
Dirac Delta Function∫dDx√−g δ(D)(x) = 1
Functional Determinant
det(Mxy ) ≡ exp
[i
∫dDx√−g ln(M)xx
]
Functional Derivative
δF [Φ(x)]
δΦ(y)≡ limε→0
F [Φ(x) + εδ(D)(x − y)]− F [Φ(x)]
ε
Configuration Space Metric
Gij ≡gµνD
δ2S
δ(∂µΦi )δ(∂νΦj)
Configuration Space Measure
[DΦ
]=∏I ,x
DΦI (x)
= exp
[∑I
∫dDx
√−g(x) ln
(DΦI (x)
)]
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 18 / 22
Effects of `(φ)
Dirac Delta Function∫dDx√−g δ(D)(x) = 1
Functional Determinant
det(Mxy ) ≡ exp
[i
∫dDx√−g ln(M)xx
]
Functional Derivative
δF [Φ(x)]
δΦ(y)≡ limε→0
F [Φ(x) + εδ(D)(x − y)]− F [Φ(x)]
ε
Configuration Space Metric
Gij ≡gµνD
δ2S
δ(∂µΦi )δ(∂νΦj)
Configuration Space Measure
[DΦ
]=∏I ,x
DΦI (x)
= exp
[∑I
∫dDx
√−g(x) ln
(DΦI (x)
)]
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 18 / 22
Frame Covariant Quantum Gravity
Action
S =
∫d4x√−g[− f (φ)
2R +
1
2gµνkAB(φ)∂µφ
A∂νφB − V (φ)
]
Metric
Gij ≡ 14 gµν
δ2Sδ(∂µΦi )δ(∂νΦj )
= `2
(12 f Pµνρσ − 1
2 f,Bgµν− 1
2 f,Agρσ kAB
)δD(xI − xJ)
Pµνρσ = 12 (gµρgσν + gµσgρν − gµνgρσ)
Invariant Quantum Effective Action
exp
(i
~Γ[ϕ]
)=
∫ [DΦ
]√det (Gij) exp
[i
~
(S [Φ] +
δΓ
δΦiΣi [ϕ,Φ]
)]
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 19 / 22
Frame Covariant Quantum Gravity
Action
S =
∫d4x√−g[− f (φ)
2R +
1
2gµνkAB(φ)∂µφ
A∂νφB − V (φ)
]
Metric
Gij ≡ 14 gµν
δ2Sδ(∂µΦi )δ(∂νΦj )
= `2
(12 f Pµνρσ − 1
2 f,Bgµν− 1
2 f,Agρσ kAB
)δD(xI − xJ)
Pµνρσ = 12 (gµρgσν + gµσgρν − gµνgρσ)
Invariant Quantum Effective Action
exp
(i
~Γ[ϕ]
)=
∫ [DΦ
]√det (Gij) exp
[i
~
(S [Φ] +
δΓ
δΦiΣi [ϕ,Φ]
)]
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 19 / 22
Field space for Gravity
Einstein Hilbert Action
S = −1
2
∫dDx√−gR
Model Functions
` = 1 f = 1 kAB = 0 V = 0
Field Space Metric
G(µν)(ρσ) =gλτD
∂2L∂(∂λgµν)∂(∂τgρσ)
=1
2
(gµρgσν + gµσgρν −
4
Dgµνgρσ
)
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 20 / 22
Field Space Curvature Invariants for Gravity
Field Space Riemann Tensor
R(µν)(αβ)(ρσ)(γδ) =− 1
32δµρ δ
νβgσγgαδ +
1
32δµγ δ
νβgρδgσα
+1
4Dgργg
µνgσαgβδ −1
4Dgµνgρβgσγgαδ
+ permutations
Field Space Ricci Tensor
R(µν)(ρσ) =1
4gµνgρσ −
D
8gµρgνσ −
D
8gµσgνρ
Field Space Ricci Scalar
R =D
4− D2
8− D3
8
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 21 / 22
Summary
The standard approach to quantum field theory is parametrisationdependent
This can be rectified using field-space covariance
The inclusion of gravity forces us to introduce a new model function `(φ)and redefine the spacetime metric as gµν = 1
`2 gµν
We can then construct a fully reparametrisation invariant description ofquantum gravity
because gravity has a curved field space, there is no frame in which thestandard approach is valid
Kieran Finn (The University of Manchester) Frame Covariance in Quantum Gravity arXiv:1910.06661 22 / 22