Upload
louit-loic
View
388
Download
7
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2012
Basics of single leg jumping Frans Bosch
• elasticity versus power• muscle slack as influential factor for performance• using reflexes in take off• amortization in power and speed jump• p-step• preparing for p-step• regulating stride-length
BiomechanicsHJ-Boettcher
very good leg stiffness (± 5 dgr) > very good handling of speed > good use of top speed
Overall: intra-individualy there is a strong correlation between run up speed and jump height.
Is power productiona key factor in jumping??
}
}
It is not possible to add energy to the system in the take off
Performance depends greatly on how much energy can be added to system. Power production is the basis of jumping
Why is this not possible?
elasticity versus power
elasticity as main characteristic of running
± isometric contraction
Running turkeysRoberts et al (1997) Science 275: 1113.
During stance, 20mm muscle fibres lengthen and shorten by 1mm
Hopping wallabiesBiewener et al (1998) J Exp Biol 201: 1691
length length-change
during stance
gastrocnemius
muscle fibres 18mm 2mm
tendon 170mm ~7mm
plantaris
muscle fibres 16mm 0.5mm
tendon 300mm ~7mm
horse plantaris muscle fibres just 2-6mm
9
Ker, Bennett, Bibby, Kester & Alexander (1987) The spring in the arch of the human foot. Nature 325: 147-9.
Ker (1981) J. Exp. Biol. 93: 283
model Hill SEC(series linked elastic component) CE- ( contracting element)
Model� Hill
SEC
PEC
CE
model Hill SEC(series linked elastic component) CE- ( contracting element)
no length-changeoptimumlength-change
concentric power => CE behaviour“the muscle as a pump”
elastic behaviour => SEC behaviour“the muscle as a super elastic rubber band”
SEC loadlimited
CE shortening
SEC loadhigh
CE isometric
14
1 body posture erect 2 short contact time and little change in joint angles
3 pretension prior to ground contact 4 drop height not more than jumping height
Muscle trade powerfor force production
Muscle suitedfor power
model Hill SEC(series linked elastic component) CE- ( contracting element)
Model� Hill
SEC
PEC
CE
Muscle trade powerfor force production
Muscle suitedfor power
As long as there is substantial elastic load in the SEC elements. muscle fibres stay in an isometric contraction.
muscle slack as influential factor for
performance
Rate of Force Development
}
slack
slack in concentric muscle behavior
28
24
20
16
12
8
4
0
-400 -300 -200 -100 0
forc
e
stretch
time (msec)
leng
hthc
hang
e (m
m)
a b (vertical squatjump)
SEC parts
CE parts
take off
decreasing influence slack
increasing forces on bones
SEC
PEC
SEC
PEC
CE
Rate of ForceDevelopment
28
24
20
16
12
8
4
0
-400 -300 -200 -100 0
forc
e
stretch
time (msec)
leng
hthc
hang
e (m
m)
a b (vertical squatjump)
SEC parts
CE parts
take off
decreasing influence slack
increasing forces on bones
SEC
PEC
SEC
PEC
CE
Rate of ForceDevelopmentstiffness
slack
energytransport
No slack because of extra weight
Pre-stretch versus slack Kracht en snelheid 3 de counterbeweging; v Ingen, de Boer, Vergoesen 1984
trying to increase the ROM of the “pre-stretch” will only increase slack and influence performance in a negative way
± 20 degrees
F x d = M
Conclusion;
It is not possible to add energy to the system in the take off
Power production is not a key factor in single leg jumping from run up
Leg stiffness and elastic muscle work is key
Trying to increase pre-stretch is counterproductive
using reflexes in take off
Stumble reflex
Extension reflex
fixed elements in running cycle and single leg jumps
stumble reflex to overcome loss of horizontal speed
big change of direction
small change of direction
extension reflex to to increase stiffness in the take off leg
relevant position irrelevant position
emphasis on a high knee position and a vertical shin in take off is wrong
amortization in power and speed jump
little loss of speed
big loss of speed
p-step up p-step down
little loss of speed big loss of speed
Amortization in take off
sagittal plane onlyfrontal plane not measured
sagittal plane amortization
frontal plane amortization
in running
sagittal plane more in low swingleg
frontal plane more in high swingleg
in jumping
sagittal plane more in low swingleg
frontal plane more in high swingleg
in jumping
Rybakov downward hip-motion in take off and turning anklefrom 1-2 clearancefrom 1-3 miss
1! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 3
isometric conditions in highjumplook at the free hip
p-step
Criteria p-step:• short contact with knee extended• be as high as possible (do not sit on p-step)• no heel to toe action (slack)• instant reaction hip in upward direction
Do not do this
CM moving up in the P-step
upward motion in p-step
p-step and take off
criteria
CM has to travel over the foot well
CM has to travel in ± straight linegood use of extension reflexhip knee- ankle sequence and footplant from above
Conclusion;
The run up should be designed for gaining speed But also for getting the CM in the right position before the p-step
The hight of the CM is very critical for performance
From the p-step the CM should travel up as much as possible.
regulating stride-length
startrunup -6 strides
take off board
+ of - 5 cm + of - 40cm -10 of -0 cm
Non-Long Jumpers
Novice Males (Berg etal.,1994)Elite Males (Hay,1988)
Elite Females (Hay,1988)Lee et al. (1982)
Variability (Long Jump run up)
Richard ShuttleworthQU Aus.
53
startrunup
-6 strides take off board
+ of - 5 cm + of - 40cm -10 of -0 cm
run up periferalvision
centralvision
vertical displacement and abduction
arm-actionvertical GRF
positive running
sagittal plane amortization
frontal plane amortization
arm-actionvertical GRF
positive running
with rotation
without rotation
arm-action vertical GRF
positive running
controling vertical displacementby controling hipswing
conclusion;
Total pelvic movement consists of movement in 3 planes.
Frontal plane rotation helps increasing vertical displacement
Transversal plane rotation helps reducing vertical displacement
2012
thanks for listening/IFACScotland
@IFAC_SCOTLAND