35
Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007

Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Freedom of Religion

Stephanow 2007

Page 2: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI

“…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”

Page 3: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Church-State Relationships in America 1ST AMENDMENT

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Page 4: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

The 1st Amendment has been incorporated by the 14th Amendment

“…nor shall any State deprive any person of life, Liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Incorporation means that the Supreme Court has said that the 1st Amendment also applies to state and local laws, and activities.

Page 5: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Questions about FOR Why was religion placed first of all rights

in the Bill of Rights? What did Thomas Jefferson mean when he

said, “a wall of separation between church and state?”

Why were there so few cases dealing with religion between 1791 & 1940?

Page 6: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

How has the Supreme Court interpreted religion cases?

Page 7: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

How has the Supreme Court interpreted religion cases?

Page 8: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Establishment Clause Cases:Prayer in Public Schools

Engel v. Vitale (1962) Can you have organized prayer in public schools, even if it’s voluntary and

nondenominational? Abington v. Schempp (1963)

Can you read the Bible in public school during class time? Can you say the Lord’s Prayer?

Wallace v. Jafree (1985) Can you have a “moment of silence” in public

school? The Croft Family from Texas is challenging the TX law.

Page 9: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Establishment Clause Cases:Aid to Parochial Schools

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) Set up a 3-part test

The secular purpose test—does the law have a secular purpose? What is the intent of the legislation?

The primary effect test—Does the law either advance or hinder religion?

The excessive entanglement test—does the law/program promote a high degree of interaction between religion and civil authorities?

Lemon-aid

Page 10: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Establishment Clause Cases: Aid to Parochial Schools

Page 11: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to
Page 12: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to
Page 13: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to
Page 14: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to
Page 15: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to
Page 16: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Display of other religious symbols Van Orden v. Perry (2005)

Does a 10 Commandments monument on the grounds of a state capitol building, violate the Establishment Clause, which bars the government from passing laws “respecting an establishment of religion?”

Page 17: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to
Page 18: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to
Page 19: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

More school issues… Santa Fe v. Doe (2000) Does the Santa Fe Independent School District's policy

permitting student-led, student-initiated prayer at football games violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment?

Yes. (6-3) Violates the Establishment Clause. They said that the football game prayers were public speech authorized by a government policy and taking place on government property at government-sponsored school-related events and that the District's policy involved both perceived and actual government endorsement of the delivery of prayer at important school events. Such speech is not properly characterized as "private," wrote Justice Stevens for the majority. In dissent, Justices noted the "disturbing" tone of the Court's

opinion that "bristle[d] with hostility to all things religious in public life."

Page 20: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

More school issues…

Lee v. Weisman (1992) Can you have a prayer at graduation, given by a clergyman?

Jones v. Clear Creek ISD (1995) Can students initiate and give the prayer at graduation?

“Clear Creek Prayer Policy” The senior class would take a vote to see if a majority wanted a prayer at

graduation or not. If the majority did want a prayer, the students would then select the

student(s) to say the prayer(s) from a list of volunteers. Administration was not allowed to participate in the vote other than to

“advise.” Admin. could look at prayer only to make sure that is was nonsectarian, nondenominational, and nonprothelytizing.

Page 21: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

More school issues… 5th circuit said student initiated and led is OKAY. 3rd circuit said it was NOT okay. 11the circuit said is was OKAY. Fed. Dist. Ct. in VA ruled is was NOT okay. Why won’t the SCt take a case and decide it for good? Some legal scholars believe it was decided in the Santa

Fe case. Federal Guidance Letter to Superintendents (2003)

Page 22: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

So what about prayer at graduation at CWHS? We should follow the 5th Circuit ruling. This will be our first year to deal with this

issue.

Page 23: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Religious School Clubs Westside v. Mergens (1990)

Equal Access Act allows religious groups on public school campuses, if that campus allows other clubs/organizations.

Page 24: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Evolution v. Creationism or Intelligent Design Scopes Monkey Trial (1920’s)

Schools were to teach creationism

—not Darwinism. Since—the Courts have ruled the opposite.

There cannot be state laws forbidding the teaching of evolution and requiring the teaching of creationism. Courts usually don’t even want creationism or ID taught at all.

Page 25: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Pledge Cases Elk Grove v. Newdow (2005)

Do the words “one nation under God” violate the establishment clause? Is it a government endorsement of religion?

Croft v. Perry (2007) Do the words “one state under God” added to the

Texas Pledge, violate the establishment and free exercise clause? “…the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion because

Plaintiffs have failed to show they will suffer irreparable injury if the injunction is not granted.” 8/28/07 U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Page 26: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE

You are free to exercise any religion you want; or no religion at all…

but there are limits.

Page 27: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

You cannot do anything that might harm yourself or violate the rights of others.

Cannot do anything that would violate the law.

Page 28: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Another 3-part test: Has the government imposed a burden on the free

exercise of the plaintiff’s religion? Does the religion demand the kind of behavior in

question and, Is the plaintiff engaged in good faith in that religion?

Does a compelling state interest justify the burden placed on the exercise of religion? State’s interest must be of the greatest importance to

take precedence over the plaintiff. Does the state have an alternative way of

achieving its goals rather than infringing on the free exercise of the individual’s religion?

Page 29: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

New Texas law: Religious Viewpoints Anti-Disc. Act

The bill requires that school districts adopt and implement a policy establishing a limited public forum for student speakers at school events, and ensures other protections for students expressing their religious viewpoint.

Page 30: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Saluting the Flag Cases West Virginia v. Barnette (1943)

Can the state force a student to salute the flag?

Page 31: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Other Free Exercise Issues: Polygamy Child vaccination Snake handling (picture!)

Parade permits for religious groups Military Service (conscientious objector) Ministers and public office Days off of work for religious holidays

Page 32: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Snake handling at the Pentecostal Church of God, Lejunior, Harlan County, Kentucky 09/15/1946 (National Archives and Records Administration). The ceremony also included laying on of hands. Photo by Russell Lee.

Page 33: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Other Free Exercise Issues: Deny unemployment for being fired for

smoking peyote? (next slide!)

Religious group sacrifice animals? Force Amish children to attend school

beyond the 8th grade?

Page 34: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

Peyote—Native American Church“Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the use, possession, or transportation of peyote by an Indian for bona fide traditional ceremonial purposes in connection with the practice of a traditional Indian religion is lawful, and shall not be prohibited by the United States or any State. No Indian shall be penalized or discriminated against on the basis of such use, possession or transportation, including, but not limited to, denial of otherwise applicable benefits under public assistance programs.” AMERICAN INDIAN RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT, AMENDMENTS OF 1994 http://www.nativeamericanchurch.com/law.html

Page 35: Freedom of Religion Stephanow 2007. Church-State Relationships in America ARTICLE VI “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to

THE END!