Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Office of Research Information Session FRQSC Research Support for New Academics
Thursday, August 30th, 20181:00 – 3:00 pmSGW-EV 1.162
Agenda
Program Overview• Eligibility conditions• Financial support• Application components
Grantsmanship: Dr. Alexandra Panaccio, guest speaker• Evaluation• Adjudication
Technical Information and Submission Process• Internal deadlines• Contact information
Program
Overview
Agency deadline: September 27, 2018 – full proposalOOR deadline September 20, 2018 – full proposal(N.B.: Mandatory NOI deadline was August 1st )
This program is specifically designed to facilitate the development, progress or completion of an individual research project, and to foster collaborations between new and established researchers.
Program requirements:
Applicants must have held a tenure-track position for less than 5 years at a university in Québec, elsewhere in Canada or abroad;
If prospective hires, applicants must hold a tenure-track position in a Québec university by June 1st, 2019 at the latest;
Applicants can submit up to 3 times during their eligibility period.
Financial Support
Type of support Yearly TotalBase operational amount $15K $45K
Eligible expenses CommentsSalaries, with a special emphasis on student hiring
Scholarships are not permitted.
Compensation for study participants
Travel and accommodation
Materials and suppliesComputer supplies and database expensesEquipment
A maximum of $800 per year is allowed for purchasing books and reference documents.
Production, publishing and printingTranslation feesTelecommunications
Application Components
Section CommentsInscription Online – to create/open form
Candidat Online – personal/coordinates
Titre et classification
Online – French (and English) title, classification/keywords
Résumé Online – French (and English)
Ethics Online
Description(proposal)
PDF attachment, 5 pages maximum
Bibliographie PDF attachment, 2 pages maximum
Formation Online, 300 word maximum (student training)
Autres sources de financement
If applicable, enter amounts and justification (text box)
Budget Enter amounts online and upload PDF attachment (Budget justification) of 2 pages maximum
Application Components (cont’d)
Section CommentsSuggestion d’experts
Online – 5 names/contact information (no conflict of interest)
Autres documents Attestation letter of hire; parental leave, access to data, attestation of thesis defense, partners’ letter of support.
Signature et transmission
Validate all parts, save files to your hard drive, and then submit online (it comes to Advisor/OOR).
Canadian Common CV
Register on CCV website; complete the FRQSC Funding version CCV; validate your FRQ PIN, submit the application to link it to your FRQNet portfolio.
Canadian CV Contributions –fichier joint
Using template provided and following outline, format and file name conventions, upload PDF. You can only do soonce the CCV form has been linked.
Tools and resources: online lists of research discipline classification, eligible expenses (on budget page); screen shots also available from your Advisor.
Grantsmanship, Evaluation and Adjudication
with
Dr. Alexandra Panaccio
Associate ProfessorDepartment of Management
John Molson School of Business
FRQSC Committee Member
Evaluation
Three major criteria are assessed for both programs:
• Quality of the project 60%
• Applicant expertise 30%
• Student training 10%
Overall passing grade of 70%required in order to be recommended for funding
Evaluation Criteria
A passing grade of 70% on the project (42/60) is required and eliminatory.
Quality of the projectOriginality and contribution to advancement of knowledge (10 %)
Clarity of the research problem, relevance of the theoretical approach and precision of the stated objectives (20%)
Relevance, rigor and rationale of methodological approach (20%)
Soundness of the time frame and relevance of planned dissemination activities (10%)
Evaluation Criteria (cont’d)
Applicant ExpertiseQuality of scientific achievements and research activities, peer recognition and renown (communications, grants, knowledge transfer activities, publications, scholarships, seminars, student supervision – depending on the potential for supervision offered by the institution, etc.) (15%)
Relevance to the project of the applicant's scientific achievements, research activities, experience and training (15%)
Student TrainingDiversity of the activities proposed for the research training of students –beyond what is normally provided by the study program – and of the tasks and responsibilities planned for that purpose during the project
Adjudication
• Eligible applications are assessed by multidisciplinary evaluation committees. Committee members are recruited from Québec, Canada and abroad.
• Committees review all applications internally; however, they may sometimes consult external referees.
• Committees recommend funding for applications judged scientifically sound. Applications are ranked on merit; these rankings are then anonymized and reported to the FRQSC board of directors.
Adjudication:List of Committees 2019-2020
06A – Anthropologie / Archéologie06B – Communications06C – Sociologie / Démographie06D – Science politique06E – Aménagement / Environnement / Architecture / Géographie
07A – Sciences des religions et études religieuses07B – Philosophie / Éthique 07C – Histoire
08A – Psychologie / Kinanthropologie, ergonomie 08B – Service social, travail social, criminologie, criminologie clinique
09A – Administration / Gestion 09C – Droit09E – Sciences économiques
10A – Pédagogie / Formation / Systèmes d'éducation10D – Éducation spécialisée
11A – Littérature / Recherche-création en littérature11B – Linguistique / Traduction
12A – Arts visuels12B – Histoire des arts
13C – Cinéma, vidéo13D – Musique13E – Arts de la scène
Grade Rank
ExceptionalStands out from the norms of scientific rigor
90-100% A+
RemarkableHas strengths or qualities that exceed the scientific standards
85-89.9% A
ExcellentBroadly meets the norms of scientific rigor
80-84.9% A-
Very goodShows one or a few minor weaknesses
75-79.9% B+
GoodShows weaknesses (either by the accumulation of minor weaknesses or because of a significant weakness)
70-74.9% B
Major weaknesses 60-69.9% C
Insufficient 59.9% or less D
The proposal fails to meet a passing grade in one or several eliminatory criteria Z
Adjudication
Technical Information and
Submission Process
The Common CV and Other Technical Considerations
CCV login page: https://ccv-cvc.ca/ │ If you already have a Common CV, you will need to review and update. If not, you will need to create one!
You will need to validate your FRQSC “NIP” (PIN) on the CCV website before submitting your FRQSC funding CV, which will then link directly to your FRQSC account from the CCV website.
FRQSC still uses a separate attachment (“Fichier joint”) with specific format and content guidelines. This will be attached as a PDF in your FRQSC applicant portfolio.
.Authorized FRQSC fonts: All attachments: Times New Roman 12 pt Condensed fonts are not accepted
Allow extra time to get familiar with the CCV to avoid last-minute headaches!
Which CV for which competition?
CCV: https://ccv-cvc.ca/FRQ portal: https://frqnet.frq.gouv.qc.ca/researchPortal/faces/jsp/login/login.xhtml?lang=FR&site=nullNew SSHRC portal: https://portal-portail.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SSHRC CV: https://webapps.nserc.ca/SSHRC/faces/logon.jsp?lang=en_CAOld SSHRC portal: https://webapps.nserc.ca/SSHRC/faces/logon.jsp?lang=en_CA
Agency Competition Which CV? (hyperlinks below)
System
FRQSC All programs Fall 2018
CCV + Fichier joint FRQSC portal
SSHRC IG October 2018Connection and Partnership Grants
SSHRC CV + 4-page attachment for Contributions
Old SSHRC portal
SSHRC IDG February 2019 New CCV New SSHRCportal
Internal Deadlines for Submitting Applications
TWO MILESTONES: All grant applications are reviewed before their submission to external agencies. The scope of this review will vary according to the following timeline:
Up until 2 weeks prior to external deadline:Content review and consultationThis step is optional, but highly recommended. Research development advisors can assist you with their extensive knowledge of agency guidelines and requirements, and will complete a full review of the application.
5 business days prior to external deadline:Mandatory program and institutional reviewsThis allows OOR staff to verify any financial or in-kind commitments attached to a proposal, that all agency requirements have been met and that the application is complete. At this point final and complete grant applications including CVs and any other attachments must be routed through ConRAD.
Submission Process
Researcher submits complete
application on ConRAD
Advisor review;Faculty ADR
approval
Application forwarded to
OORProgram Review
by RGU
Institutional Review by Grants
Manager
Application for Signature with
AVP
Signed application returned to
Grants Manager
Application submitted to
Agency
Application finalized on
ConRAD and filed
Deadlines 2018
Content Review OOR Agency
September13
September20
September27
All supporting documentation must be submitted to the OOR at this date.
Contact Information
Sector Advisor
Business & Social Sciences
Arlene Segal x 2388 [email protected]
Engineering &Computer Science
Shoghig Mikaelian
x 3263 [email protected]
Fine Arts, Humanities & Education
Michele Kaplan
x 2071X 5632
Sciences Maya Cerda x 5001 [email protected]
